DEF 14A
1
tgscfproxy04f.txt
TGSCF PROXY SPECIAL MEETING 3/19/04
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Sec. 240.14a-12
TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLER COMPANIES FUND, INC.
----------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11(s)(2).
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
[LOGO]
FRANKLIN(R) TEMPLETON(R)
INVESTMENTS
TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLER COMPANIES FUND, INC.
IMPORTANT SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
These materials are for a Special Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for
March 19, 2004 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern time. The enclosed materials discuss four
proposals (the "Proposals" or, each, a "Proposal") to be voted on at the
meeting, and contain the Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card. A
proxy card is, in essence, a ballot. When you vote your proxy by signing and
returning your proxy card, it tells us how you wish to vote on important issues
relating to Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"). If you
specify a vote for all Proposal(s), your proxy will be voted as you indicate.
If you specify a vote for one or more Proposals, but not all, your proxy will
be voted as specified on such Proposals and, on the Proposal(s) for which no
vote is specified, your proxy will be voted FOR such Proposal(s). If you simply
sign and date the proxy card, but do not specify a vote for any Proposal, your
proxy will be voted FOR all Proposals.
We urge you to spend a few minutes reviewing the Proposals in the proxy
statement. Then, please fill out and sign the proxy card and return it to us so
that we know how you would like to vote. When shareholders return their proxies
promptly, the Fund may be able to save money by not having to conduct
additional mailings.
We welcome your comments. If you have any questions, call Fund Information
at 1-800/DIAL BEN(R) (1-800-342-5236).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TELEPHONE AND INTERNET VOTING
For your convenience, you may be able to vote by telephone or through the
Internet, 24 hours a day. If your account is eligible, separate instructions
are enclosed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[LOGO]
FRANKLIN(R) TEMPLETON(R)
INVESTMENTS
TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLER COMPANIES FUND, INC.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
A Special Meeting of Shareholders (the "Meeting") of Templeton Global
Smaller Companies Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"), will be held at the Fund's offices,
500 East Broward Boulevard, 12th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394-3091 on
March 19, 2004 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern time.
During the Meeting, shareholders of the Fund will vote on the following
Proposals and Sub-Proposals:
1. To elect a Board of Directors of the Fund.
2. To approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that provides for the
reorganization of the Fund from a Maryland corporation to a Delaware
statutory trust.
3. To approve amendments to certain of the Fund's fundamental investment
restrictions (includes eight (8) Sub-Proposals):
(a) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
diversification of investments;
(b) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
investments in real estate;
(c) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
investments in commodities;
(d) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
underwriting;
(e) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
issuing senior securities;
(f) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
lending;
(g) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
borrowing; and
(h) To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
industry concentration.
4. To approve the elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental
investment restrictions.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Barbara J. Green
Secretary
January 27, 2004
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
Information About Voting............................................................... 1
Proposal 1: To Elect a Board of Directors of the Fund................................. 3
Proposal 2: To Approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that provides for the
Reorganization of the Fund from a Maryland Corporation to a Delaware
Statutory Trust........................................................... 16
Introduction to Proposals 3 and 4...................................................... 23
Proposal 3: To Approve Amendments to Certain of the Fund's Fundamental Investment
Restrictions (this Proposal involves separate votes on Sub-Proposals
3a-3h).................................................................... 24
Sub-Proposal 3a: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
diversification of investments..................................... 24
Sub-Proposal 3b: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
investments in real estate......................................... 26
Sub-Proposal 3c: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
investments in commodities......................................... 27
Sub-Proposal 3d: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
underwriting....................................................... 28
Sub-Proposal 3e: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
issuing senior securities.......................................... 29
Sub-Proposal 3f: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
lending............................................................ 30
Sub-Proposal 3g: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
borrowing.......................................................... 32
Sub-Proposal 3h: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding
industry concentration............................................. 34
Proposal 4: To Approve the Elimination of Certain of the Fund's Fundamental Investment
Restrictions.............................................................. 35
Additional Information About the Fund.................................................. 40
Audit Committee........................................................................ 43
Further Information About Voting and the Meeting....................................... 45
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A--Nominating Committee Charter................................................ A-1
Exhibit B--Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Templeton Global Smaller
Companies Fund, Inc. (a Maryland corporation) and Templeton Global Smaller
Companies Fund (a Delaware statutory trust)................................. B-1
Exhibit C--A Comparison of Governing Documents and State Law........................... C-1
Exhibit D--Fundamental Investment Restrictions Proposed to be Amended or Eliminated.... D-1
TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLER COMPANIES FUND, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
. INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING
Who is asking for my vote?
The Directors of Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"),
in connection with the Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund to be held
on March 19, 2004 (the "Meeting"), have requested your vote on several matters.
Who is eligible to vote?
Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 20, 2004 are
entitled to be present and to vote at the Meeting or any adjourned Meeting.
Each share of record is entitled to one vote (and a proportionate fractional
vote for each fractional share) on each matter presented at the Meeting. The
Notice of Meeting, the proxy card, and proxy statement were first mailed to
shareholders of record on or about January 27, 2004.
On what issues am I being asked to vote?
You are being asked to vote on four Proposals:
1. To elect a Board of Directors of the Fund;
2. To approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that provides for the
reorganization of the Fund from a Maryland corporation to a Delaware
statutory trust;
3. To approve amendments to certain of the Fund's fundamental investment
restrictions (includes eight (8) Sub-Proposals); and
4. To approve the elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental
investment restrictions.
How do the Directors recommend that I vote?
The Directors unanimously recommend that you vote:
1. FOR the election of all nominees as Directors of the Fund;
2. FOR the approval of an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that
provides for the reorganization of the Fund from a Maryland corporation
to a Delaware statutory trust;
3. FOR the approval of each of the proposed amendments to certain of the
Fund's fundamental investment restrictions; and
4. FOR the approval of the elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental
investment restrictions.
How do I ensure that my vote is accurately recorded?
You may attend the Meeting and vote in person or you may complete and return
the enclosed proxy card. If you are eligible to vote by telephone or through
the Internet, separate instructions are enclosed.
Proxy cards that are properly signed, dated and received at or prior to the
Meeting will be voted as specified. If you specify a vote on any of the
Proposals 1 through 4, your proxy will be voted as you indicate, and any
Proposal for which no vote is specified will be voted FOR that Proposal. If you
simply sign, date and return the proxy card, but do not specify a vote on any
of the Proposals 1 through 4, your shares will be voted FOR the election of all
nominees as Directors (Proposal 1); FOR the approval of an Agreement and Plan
of Reorganization that provides for the reorganization of the Fund from a
Maryland corporation to a Delaware statutory trust (Proposal 2); FOR the
approval of each of the proposed amendments to certain of the Fund's
fundamental investment restrictions (Sub-Proposals 3a-3h); and FOR the approval
of the elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental investment restrictions
(Proposal 4).
May I revoke my proxy?
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by forwarding a
written revocation or a later-dated proxy to the Fund that is received by the
Fund at or prior to the Meeting, or by attending the Meeting and voting in
person.
What if my shares are held in a brokerage account?
If your shares are held by your broker, then in order to vote in person at
the Meeting, you will need to obtain a "Legal Proxy" from your broker and
present it to the Inspector of Election at the Meeting.
2
. THE PROPOSALS
PROPOSAL 1: TO ELECT A BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FUND
How are nominees selected?
The Board of Directors of the Fund (the "Board" or the "Directors") has a
Nominating Committee (the "Committee") which, during 2003, consisted of Andrew
H. Hines, Jr. (Chairman) and Gordon S. Macklin, neither of whom is an
"interested person" of the Fund as defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). Directors who are not interested persons of
the Fund are referred to as the "Independent Directors," and Directors who are
interested persons of the Fund are referred to as the "Interested Directors."
Mr. Hines retired from the Board and the Committee effective December 31, 2003.
It is expected that the Board will appoint three new members to the Committee,
each of whom will be an Independent Director, promptly after the Meeting.
The Committee is responsible for selecting candidates to serve as Directors
and recommending such candidates (a) for selection and nomination as
Independent Directors by the incumbent Independent Directors and the full
Board; and (b) for selection and nomination as Interested Directors by the full
Board. In considering a candidate's qualifications, the Committee generally
considers the potential candidate's educational background, business or
professional experience, and reputation. In addition, the Committee has
established as minimum qualifications for Board membership as an Independent
Director: (1) that such candidate be independent from relationships with the
Fund's investment manager and other principal service providers both within the
terms and the spirit of the statutory independence requirements specified under
the 1940 Act, (2) that such candidate demonstrate an ability and willingness to
make the considerable time commitment, including personal attendance at Board
meetings, believed necessary to his or her function as an effective Board
member, and (3) that such candidate have no continuing relationship as a
director, officer or board member of any mutual fund other than those within
the Franklin Templeton Investments fund complex.
When the Board has or expects to have a vacancy, the Committee receives and
reviews information on individuals qualified to be recommended to the full
Board as nominees for election as Directors, including any recommendations by
shareholders. Such individuals are evaluated based upon the criteria described
above. To date, the Committee has been able to identify, and expects to
continue to be able to identify, from its own resources an ample number of
qualified candidates. The Committee, however, will review shareholders'
recommendations to fill vacancies on the Board if these recommendations are
submitted in writing and addressed to the Committee at the Fund's offices.
3
The Board has adopted and approved a formal written charter for the
Committee. A copy of the charter is attached as Exhibit A to this proxy
statement.
Who are the nominees?
All of the nominees, except Frank J. Crothers, Edith E. Holiday, Frank A.
Olson and Constantine D. Tseretopoulos, are currently members of the Board. An
incumbent Independent Director recommended Messrs. Crothers, Olson and
Tseretopoulos and Ms. Holiday for consideration by the Committee as nominees
for Director. If elected, each nominee shall hold office until the next meeting
of shareholders at which Directors are elected and until his or her successor
shall be elected and shall qualify, or until his or her earlier death,
resignation or removal. In addition, all of the current nominees are also
directors or trustees of other Franklin(R) funds and/or Templeton(R) funds.
Among these nominees, Nicholas F. Brady, Harmon E. Burns and Charles B. Johnson
are deemed to be "interested persons" for purposes of the 1940 Act.
Certain Directors of the Fund hold director and/or officer positions with
Franklin Resources, Inc. ("Resources") and its affiliates. Resources is a
publicly owned holding company, the principal shareholders of which are Charles
B. Johnson and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr., who owned 18.25% and 15.26%,
respectively, of its outstanding shares as of December 1, 2003. Resources, a
global investment organization operating as Franklin Templeton Investments, is
primarily engaged, through various subsidiaries, in providing investment
management, share distribution, transfer agent and administrative services to a
family of investment companies. Resources is a New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
("NYSE") listed holding company (NYSE: BEN). Charles B. Johnson, Chairman of
the Board, Director and Vice President of the Fund, and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.,
Vice President of the Fund, are brothers. There are no family relationships
among any of the nominees for Director.
Each nominee currently is available and has consented to serve if elected.
If any of the nominees should become unavailable, the designated proxy holders
will vote in their discretion for another person or persons who may be
nominated as Directors.
4
Listed below, for each nominee, are their names, ages and addresses, as well
as their positions and length of service with the Fund, principal occupations
during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Franklin Templeton
Investments fund complex that they oversee, and any other directorships held by
the nominee.
Nominees for Independent Director:
Number of
Portfolios in
Franklin
Templeton
Investments
Fund Complex
Length of Overseen by
Name, Age and Address Position Time Served Director* Other Directorships Held
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harris J. Ashton (71) Director Since 1992 142 Director, Bar-S Foods
500 East Broward Blvd. (meat packing company).
Suite 2100
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Director of various companies; and formerly, Director, RBC Holdings, Inc. (bank holding company) (until
2002); and President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, General Host Corporation (nursery
and craft centers) (until 1998).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank J. Crothers (59) Nominee Not Applicable 21 None
500 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 2100
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Chairman, Ventures Resources Corporation (Vice Chairman 1996-2003); Vice Chairman, Caribbean Utilities
Co. Ltd.; Director and President, Provo Power Company Ltd.; Director, Caribbean Electric Utility Services
Corporation (Chairman until 2002); director of various other business and nonprofit organizations; and
formerly, Chairman, Atlantic Equipment & Power Ltd. (1977-2003).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S. Joseph Fortunato (71) Director Since 1992 143 None
500 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 2100
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Attorney; and formerly, member of the law firm of Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5
Number of
Portfolios in
Franklin
Templeton
Investments
Fund Complex
Length of Overseen by
Name, Age and Address Position Time Served Director* Other Directorships Held
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edith E. Holiday (51) Nominee Not Applicable 97 Director, Amerada Hess
500 East Broward Blvd. Corporation (exploration and
Suite 2100 refining of oil and gas);
Fort Lauderdale, FL Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
33394-3091 (health care); H.J. Heinz
Company (processed foods
and allied products); RTI
International Metals, Inc.
(manufacture and
distribution of titanium); and
Canadian National Railway
(railroad).
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Director or Trustee of various companies and trusts; and formerly, Assistant to the President of the United
States and Secretary of the Cabinet (1990-1993); General Counsel to the United States Treasury Department
(1989-1990); and Counselor to the Secretary and Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and Public Liaison--
United States Treasury Department (1988-1989).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon S. Macklin (75) Director Since 1993 142 Director, White Mountains
500 East Broward Blvd. Insurance Group, Ltd.
Suite 2100 (holding company); Martek
Fort Lauderdale, FL Biosciences Corporation;
33394-3091 MedImmune, Inc.
(biotechnology); and
Overstock.com (Internet
services); and formerly,
Director, MCI
Communication Corporation
(subsequently known as MCI
WorldCom, Inc. and
WorldCom, Inc.)
(communications services)
(1988-2002) and Spacehab,
Inc. (aerospace services)
(1994-2003).
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Deputy Chairman, White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (holding company); and formerly, Chairman,
White River Corporation (financial services) (1993-1998) and Hambrecht & Quist Group (investment banking)
(1987-1992); and President, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (1970-1987).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
Number of
Portfolios in
Franklin
Templeton
Investments
Fund Complex
Length of Overseen by
Name, Age and Address Position Time Served Director* Other Directorships Held
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred R. Millsaps (74) Director Since 1990 28 None
500 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 2100
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Director of various business and nonprofit organizations; manager of personal investments (1978-present); and
formerly, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Landmark Banking Corporation (1969-1978); Financial Vice
President, Florida Power and Light (1965-1969); and Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (1958-1965).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank A. Olson (71) Nominee Not Applicable 21 Director, Becton, Dickinson
500 East Broward Blvd. and Co. (medical
Suite 2100 technology); White
Fort Lauderdale, FL Mountains Insurance Group
33394-3091 Ltd. (holding company); and
Amerada Hess Corporation
(exploration and refining of
oil and gas).
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Chairman of the Board, The Hertz Corporation (car rental) (since 1980) (Chief Executive Officer 1977-1999);
and formerly, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, UAL Corporation (airlines).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Constantine D. Tseretopoulos (49) Nominee Not Applicable 21 None
500 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 2100
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Physician, Lyford Cay Hospital (1987-present); director of various nonprofit organizations; and formerly,
Cardiology Fellow, University of Maryland (1985-1987) and Internal Medicine Resident, Greater Baltimore
Medical Center (1982-1985).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
Nominees for Interested Director:
Number of
Portfolios in
Franklin
Templeton
Investments
Fund Complex
Length of Overseen by
Name, Age and Address Position Time Served Director* Other Directorships Held
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Nicholas F. Brady (73) Director Since 1993 21 Director, Amerada Hess
500 East Broward Blvd. Corporation (exploration and
Suite 2100 refining of oil and gas); and
Fort Lauderdale, FL C2, Inc. (operating and
33394-3091 investment business); and
formerly, Director, H.J.
Heinz Company (processed
foods and allied products)
(1987-1988; 1993-2003).
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Chairman, Darby Overseas Investments, Ltd., Darby Emerging Markets Investments LDC and Darby Technology
Ventures Group, LLC (investment firms) (1994-present); Director, Templeton Capital Advisors Ltd. and Franklin
Templeton Investment Fund; and formerly, Chairman, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust PLC (until
2003); Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (1988-1993); Chairman of the Board, Dillon,
Read & Co., Inc. (investment banking) (until 1988); and U.S. Senator, New Jersey (April 1982-December 1982).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Harmon E. Burns (58) Director Director 38 None
One Franklin Parkway and Vice since 1992
San Mateo, CA President and Vice
94403-1906 President
since 1996
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Vice Chairman, Member--Office of the Chairman and Director, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Vice President and
Director, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; Director,
Franklin Investment Advisory Services, Inc.; and officer and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of some
of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 49 of the investment companies in Franklin
Templeton Investments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Charles B. Johnson (71) Chairman Chairman of 142 None
One Franklin Parkway of the the Board
San Mateo, CA Board, and Director
94403-1906 Director since 1995
and Vice and Vice
President President
since 1992
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Chairman of the Board, Member--Office of the Chairman and Director, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Vice
President, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc.; Director, Fiduciary Trust Company International; and officer
and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and
of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8
* We base the number of portfolios on each separate series of the U.S.
registered investment companies within the Franklin Templeton Investments
fund complex that a nominee for election as director would oversee if
elected. These portfolios have a common investment adviser or affiliated
investment advisers, and also may share a common underwriter.
** Nicholas F. Brady, Harmon E. Burns and Charles B. Johnson are "interested
persons" of the Fund as defined by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act limits the
percentage of interested persons that can comprise a fund's board of
directors. Mr. Johnson is considered an interested person of the Fund due to
his position as an officer and director and major shareholder of Resources,
which is the parent company of the Fund's investment manager, and his
position with the Fund. Mr. Burns is considered an interested person of the
Fund under the federal securities laws due to his position as an officer and
director of Resources and his position with the Fund. Mr. Brady's status as
an interested person results from his business affiliations with Resources
and Templeton Global Advisors Limited. On October 1, 2003, Resources
acquired all of the shares of Darby Overseas Investments, Ltd. ("Darby
Investments") and the remaining portion of the limited partner interests not
currently owned by Resources of Darby Overseas Partners, L.P. ("Darby
Partners"). Mr. Brady, formerly a shareholder of Darby Investments and a
partner of Darby Partners, will continue as Chairman of Darby Investments,
which is the corporate general partner of Darby Partners. In addition, Darby
Partners and Templeton Global Advisors Limited are limited partners of Darby
Emerging Markets Fund, L.P. ("DEMF"). Mr. Brady will also continue to serve
as Chairman of the corporate general partner of DEMF, and Darby Partners and
Darby Investments own 100% of the stock of the general partner of DEMF.
Resources also is an investor in Darby Technology Ventures Group, LLC
("DTV") in which Darby Partners is a significant investor and for which
Darby Partners has the right to appoint a majority of the directors.
Templeton Global Advisors Limited also is a limited partner in Darby--BBVA
Latin America Private Equity Fund, L.P. ("DBVA"), a private equity fund in
which Darby Partners is a significant investor, and the general partner of
which Darby Partners controls jointly with an unaffiliated third party. Mr.
Brady is also a director of Templeton Capital Advisors Ltd. ("TCAL"), which
serves as investment manager to certain unregistered funds. TCAL and
Templeton Global Advisors Limited are both indirect subsidiaries of
Resources. The remaining nominees are Independent Directors.
9
The tables below provide the dollar range of the equity securities of the
Fund and of all funds overseen by the Directors in the Franklin Templeton
Investments fund complex beneficially owned by the nominees as of December 31,
2003.
Independent Nominees:
Aggregate Dollar Range of
Equity Securities in all Funds Overseen by
Dollar Range of Equity the Director in the Franklin Templeton
Name of Director Securities in the Fund Investments Fund Complex
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harris J. Ashton... $50,001--$100,000 Over $100,000
Frank J. Crothers.. None Over $100,000
S. Joseph Fortunato None Over $100,000
Edith E. Holiday... None Over $100,000
Gordon S. Macklin.. None Over $100,000
Fred R. Millsaps... None Over $100,000
Frank A. Olson..... None Over $100,000
Constantine D.
Tseretopoulos.... None Over $100,000
Interested Nominees:
Aggregate Dollar Range of
Equity Securities in all Funds Overseen by
Dollar Range of Equity the Director in the Franklin Templeton
Name of Director Securities in the Fund Investments Fund Complex
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicholas F. Brady. None Over $100,000
Harmon E. Burns... None Over $100,000
Charles B. Johnson $10,001--$50,000 Over $100,000
How often do the Directors meet and what are they paid?
The role of the Directors is to provide general oversight of the Fund's
business and to ensure that the Fund is operated for the benefit of all
shareholders. The Directors anticipate meeting at least five times during the
current fiscal year to review the operations of the Fund and the Fund's
investment performance. The Directors also oversee the services furnished to
the Fund by Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC, the Fund's investment manager
(the "Investment Manager"), Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited, the
Fund's sub-advisor ("FTIA"), and various other service providers. The Fund
currently pays the Independent Directors and Mr. Brady an annual retainer of
$8,000 and a fee of $400 per Board meeting attended. Directors serving on the
Audit Committee of the Fund and other investment companies in Franklin
Templeton Investments receive a flat fee of $2,000 per Audit Committee meeting
attended, a portion of which is allocated to the Fund. Members of a committee
are not compensated for any committee meeting held on the day of a Board
meeting.
10
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, there were five meetings of
the Board, three meetings of the Audit Committee, and five meetings of the
Nominating Committee. Each Director then in office attended at least 75% of the
aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of
meetings held by all committees of the Board on which the Director served.
Certain Directors and officers of the Fund are shareholders of Resources and
may receive indirect remuneration due to their participation in management fees
and other fees received by the Investment Manager and its affiliates from the
investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. The Investment Manager
or its affiliates pay the salaries and expenses of the officers. No pension or
retirement benefits are accrued as part of Fund expenses.
Number of Boards
Total Compensation within Franklin
Aggregate from Franklin Templeton
Compensation Templeton Investments Fund
from the Investments Complex on which
Name of Director Fund* Fund Complex** Director Serves***
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harris J. Ashton........ $10,000 $369,700 46
Nicholas F. Brady....... 10,000 82,300 15
S. Joseph Fortunato..... 10,000 369,700 47
Andrew H. Hines, Jr.**** 10,084 202,225 0
Betty P. Krahmer*****... 10,000 136,100 15
Gordon S. Macklin....... 10,000 369,700 46
Fred R. Millsaps........ 10,084 204,225 17
--------
*Compensation received for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003.
**Compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2003.
***We base the number of boards on the number of U.S. registered investment
companies in the Franklin Templeton Investments fund complex. This number
does not include the total number of series or funds within each
investment company for which the Board members are responsible. Franklin
Templeton Investments currently includes 51 registered investment
companies, with approximately 154 U.S. based funds or series.
****Mr. Hines retired from the Board effective December 31, 2003.
*****Ms. Krahmer is not seeking re-election on this Board.
The table above indicates the total fees paid to Directors by the Fund
individually and by all of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton
Investments. These Directors also serve as directors or trustees of other
investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments, many of which hold
meetings at different dates and times. The Directors and the Fund's management
believe that having the same individuals serving on the boards of many of the
investment
11
companies in Franklin Templeton Investments enhances the ability of each fund
to obtain, at a relatively modest cost to each separate fund, the services of
high caliber, experienced and knowledgeable Independent Directors who can more
effectively oversee the management of the funds.
Board members historically have followed a policy of having substantial
investments in one or more of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton
Investments, as is consistent with their individual financial goals. In
February 1998, this policy was formalized through adoption of a requirement
that each board member invest one-third of the fees received for serving as a
director or trustee of a Templeton fund in shares of one or more Templeton
funds and one-third of the fees received for serving as a director or trustee
of a Franklin fund in shares of one or more Franklin funds until the value of
such investments equals or exceeds five times the annual fees paid to such
board member. Investments in the name of family members or entities controlled
by a board member constitute fund holdings of such board member for purposes of
this policy, and a three-year phase-in period applies to such investment
requirements for newly elected board members. In implementing this policy, a
board member's fund holdings existing on February 27, 1998 were valued as of
such date, with subsequent investments valued at cost.
Who are the Executive Officers of the Fund?
Officers of the Fund are appointed by the Directors and serve at the
pleasure of the Board. Listed below, for each Executive Officer, are their
names, ages and addresses, as well as their positions and length of service
with the Fund, and principal occupations during the past five years.
Name, Age and Address Position Length of Time Served
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles B. Johnson Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the
Director and Vice President Board and Director
since 1995 and Vice
President since 1992
Please refer to the table "Nominees for Interested Director" for additional information
about Mr. Charles B. Johnson.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harmon E. Burns Director and Vice President Director since 1992
and Vice President
since 1996
Please refer to the table "Nominees for Interested Director" for additional information
about Mr. Harmon E. Burns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12
Name, Age and Address Position Length of Time Served
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Everett (39) President and Chief Since 2002
P.O. Box N-7759 Executive Officer--
Lyford Cay Investment Management
Nassau, Bahamas
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
President and Director, Templeton Global Advisors Limited; officer of 15 of the
investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments; and formerly, Investment
Officer, First Pennsylvania Investment Research (until 1989).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy D. Gambill (56) Senior Vice President and Since 2002
500 East Broward Blvd. Chief Executive Officer--
Suite 2100 Finance and
Fort Lauderdale, FL Administration
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
President, Franklin Templeton Services, LLC; Senior Vice President, Templeton
Worldwide, Inc.; and officer of 51 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton
Investments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. (63) Vice President Since 1996
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Vice Chairman, Member--Office of the Chairman and Director, Franklin Resources,
Inc.; Vice President and Director, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc.; Director,
Franklin Advisers, Inc. and Franklin Investment Advisory Services, Inc.; Senior Vice
President, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC; and officer and/or director or trustee, as
the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 49
of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13
Name, Age and Address Position Length of Time Served
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin L. Flanagan (43) Vice President Since 1990
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Co-President and Chief Executive Officer, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC; Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director, Templeton Worldwide, Inc.; Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC;
President and Director, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Franklin
Investment Advisory Services, Inc. and Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC;
Chief Financial Officer, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC; Chairman, Franklin
Templeton Services, LLC; and officer and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of
some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 49 of the investment
companies in Franklin Templeton Investments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John R. Kay (63) Vice President Since 1994
500 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 2100
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33394-3091
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Vice President, Templeton Worldwide, Inc.; Assistant Vice President, Franklin
Templeton Distributors, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Franklin Templeton Services,
LLC; and officer of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 35
of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments; and formerly, Vice
President and Controller, Keystone Group, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murray L. Simpson (66) Vice President and Since 2000
One Franklin Parkway Assistant Secretary
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Franklin Resources, Inc.; officer and/or
director, as the case may be, of some of the subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and
of 51 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments; and formerly,
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Templeton Franklin Investment
Services (Asia) Limited (until 2000); and Director, Templeton Asset Management Ltd.
(until 1999).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14
Name, Age and Address Position Length of Time Served
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barbara J. Green (56) Vice President and Vice President since
One Franklin Parkway Secretary 2000 and Secretary
San Mateo, CA since 1996
94403-1906
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc.;
Secretary and Senior Vice President, Templeton Worldwide, Inc.; Secretary, Franklin
Advisers, Inc., Franklin Advisory Services, LLC, Franklin Investment Advisory
Services, Inc., Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, Franklin Templeton Alternative
Strategies, Inc., Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC, Franklin Templeton
Services, LLC, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., Templeton Investment Counsel,
LLC, and Templeton/Franklin Investment Services, Inc.; and officer of some of the
other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 51 of the investment companies in
Franklin Templeton Investments; and formerly, Deputy Director, Division of
Investment Management, Executive Assistant and Senior Advisor to the Chairman,
Counselor to the Chairman, Special Counsel and Attorney Fellow, U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (1986-1995); Attorney, Rogers & Wells (until 1986); and
Judicial Clerk, U.S. District Court (District of Massachusetts) (until 1979).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David P. Goss (56) Vice President and Since 2000
One Franklin Parkway Assistant Secretary
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Associate General Counsel, Franklin Resources, Inc.; officer and director of one of the
subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc.; officer of 51 of the investment companies in
Franklin Templeton Investments; and formerly, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director, Property Resources Equity Trust (until 1999) and Franklin Select Realty Trust
(until 2000).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael O. Magdol (66) Vice President--AML Since 2002
600 Fifth Avenue Compliance
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY
10048-0772
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Vice Chairman, Chief Banking Officer and Director, Fiduciary Trust Company
International; Director, FTI Banque, Arch Chemicals, Inc. and Lingnan Foundation; and
officer and/or director, as the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin
Resources, Inc. and of 48 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton
Investments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15
Name, Age and Address Position Length of Time Served
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kimberley H. Monasterio (40) Treasurer and Chief Since 2003
One Franklin Parkway Financial Officer
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
Senior Vice President, Franklin Templeton Services, LLC; and officer of 51 of the
investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSAL 2: TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION THAT PROVIDES
FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF THE FUND FROM A MARYLAND CORPORATION TO
A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST
The Directors unanimously recommend that you approve an Agreement and Plan
of Reorganization (the "Plan"), substantially in the form attached to this
proxy statement as Exhibit B, that would change the state of organization of
the Fund. This proposed change calls for the reorganization of the Fund from a
Maryland corporation to a newly formed Delaware statutory trust. This proposed
reorganization will be referred to throughout this proxy statement as the
"Reorganization." To implement the Reorganization, the Directors have approved
the Plan, which contemplates the continuation of the current business of the
Fund in the form of a new Delaware statutory trust, named "Templeton Global
Smaller Companies Fund" (the "DE Fund").
What will the Reorganization mean for the Fund and its shareholders?
If the Plan is approved by shareholders and the Reorganization is
implemented, the DE Fund would have the same investment goal, policies and
restrictions as the Fund (including, if approved by shareholders at the
Meeting, the same fundamental investment restrictions amended or eliminated by
Proposals 3 and 4 in this proxy statement). The Board, including any persons
elected under Proposal 1, and officers of the DE Fund would be the same as
those of the Fund, and would operate the DE Fund in essentially the same manner
as they previously operated the Fund. Thus, on the effective date of the
Reorganization, you would hold an interest in the DE Fund that is equivalent to
your then interest in the Fund. For all practical purposes, a shareholder's
investment in the Fund would not change.
16
Why are the Directors recommending approval of the Plan and the
Reorganization?
The Directors have determined that investment companies formed as Delaware
statutory trusts have certain advantages over investment companies organized as
Maryland corporations. Under Delaware law, investment companies are able to
simplify their operations by reducing administrative burdens. For example,
Delaware law allows greater flexibility in drafting and amending an investment
company's governing documents, which can result in greater efficiencies of
operation and savings for an investment company and its shareholders. Delaware
law also provides favorable state tax treatment. Most significantly, an
investment company formed as a Delaware statutory trust, unlike one formed as a
Maryland corporation, need not pay an organization and capitalization tax on
the aggregate par value of shares it issues to shareholders. Furthermore, as
described below, in Delaware there is a well-established body of legal
precedent in the area of corporate law that may be relevant in deciding issues
pertaining to the DE Fund. This could benefit the DE Fund and its shareholders
by, for example, making litigation involving the interpretation of provisions
in the DE Fund's governing documents less likely or, if litigation should be
initiated, less burdensome or expensive. Accordingly, the Directors believe
that it is in the best interests of the shareholders to approve the Plan.
How do the Maryland corporate law and the Fund's governing documents compare
to the Delaware statutory trust law and the DE Fund's governing documents?
The following summary compares certain rights and characteristics of the
shares of the Fund to the shares of the DE Fund. The summary is qualified in
its entirety by the more complete comparison of Maryland corporate law and
Delaware statutory trust law, and a comparison of the relevant provisions of
the governing documents of the Fund and the DE Fund, attached as Exhibit C to
this proxy statement, which is entitled "A Comparison of Governing Documents
and State Law."
Reorganizing the Fund from a Maryland corporation to a Delaware statutory
trust is expected to provide many benefits to the Fund and its shareholders.
Funds formed as Delaware statutory trusts under the Delaware Statutory Trust
Act (the "Delaware Act") are granted a significant amount of operational
flexibility, resulting in efficiencies of operation that translate into savings
for a fund, such as the DE Fund, and its shareholders. For example, the
Delaware Act authorizes management to take various actions without requiring
shareholder approval if permitted by the governing instrument. Additionally,
unlike Maryland corporate
17
law, the Delaware Act permits any amendment to the statutory trust's governing
instrument without the need for a state filing, which can reduce administrative
burdens and costs.
The operations of a Delaware statutory trust formed under the Delaware Act
are governed by a declaration of trust and by-laws. The DE Fund's Agreement and
Declaration of Trust ("Declaration of Trust") and By-Laws streamline many of
the provisions in the Fund's Charter and By-Laws, and should thus lead to
enhanced flexibility in management and administration as compared to its
current operation as a Maryland corporation. As a Delaware statutory trust, the
DE Fund should also be able to adapt more quickly and cost effectively to new
developments in the mutual fund industry and the financial markets.
Moreover, to the extent provisions in the DE Fund's Declaration of Trust and
By-Laws are addressed by rules and principles established under Delaware
corporate law and the laws governing other Delaware business entities (such as
limited partnerships and limited liability companies), the Delaware courts may
look to such other laws to help interpret provisions of the DE Fund's
Declaration of Trust and By-Laws. Applying this body of law to the operation of
the DE Fund should prove beneficial because these laws are extensively
developed and business-oriented. In addition, Delaware's Chancery Court is
dedicated to business law matters, which means that the judges tend to be more
specialized and better versed in the nuances of the law that will be applied to
the DE Fund. These legal advantages tend to make more certain the resolution of
legal controversies and help to reduce legal costs resulting from uncertainty
in the law.
Shares of the DE Fund and the Fund each have one vote per full share and a
proportionate fractional vote for each fractional share. Both the DE Fund and
the Fund provide for noncumulative voting in the election of their
Trustees/Directors. Like the Fund, the DE Fund is not required by its governing
instrument to hold annual shareholder meetings. Shareholder meetings may be
called at any time by the DE Fund Board, by the chairperson of the DE Fund
Board or by the president of the DE Fund for the purpose of taking action upon
any matter deemed by the DE Fund Board to be necessary or desirable. To the
extent permitted by the 1940 Act, a meeting of the shareholders for the purpose
of electing trustees may also be called by the chairperson of the DE Fund
Board, or shall be called by the president or any vice-president of the DE Fund
at the request of shareholders holding not less than 10% of the DE Fund's
shares, provided that the shareholders requesting such meeting shall have paid
the DE Fund the reasonably estimated cost of preparing and mailing the notice
of the meeting. With respect to shareholder inspection rights of a fund's books
and records, the Fund and the DE Fund each provide certain inspection rights to
its shareholders at least to the extent required by applicable law.
18
While shareholders of the DE Fund will have similar distribution and voting
rights as they currently have as shareholders of the Fund, there are certain
differences. The organizational structures differ in record date parameters for
determining shareholders entitled to notice, to vote and to a distribution, and
differ in the proportion of shares required to vote on certain matters, such as
mergers, dissolution and amendments to charter documents.
Under Maryland corporate law, the shareholders of the Fund are not subject
to any personal liability for any claims against, or liabilities of, the Fund
solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder of the Fund. Under the
Delaware Act, shareholders of the DE Fund will be entitled to the same
limitation of personal liability as is extended to shareholders of a private
corporation organized for profit under the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.
What are the procedures and consequences of the Reorganization?
Upon completion of the Reorganization, the DE Fund will continue the
business of the Fund and will have the same investment goal, policies and
investment restrictions as those of the Fund existing on the date of the
Reorganization, and will hold the same portfolio of securities then held by the
Fund. The DE Fund will be operated under substantially identical overall
management, investment management, distribution and administrative arrangements
as those of the Fund. As the successor to the Fund's operations, the DE Fund
will adopt the Fund's registration statement under the federal securities laws
with amendments to show the new Delaware statutory trust structure.
The DE Fund was created solely for the purpose of becoming the successor
organization to, and carrying on the business of, the Fund. To accomplish the
Reorganization, the Plan provides that the Fund will transfer all of its
portfolio securities and any other assets, subject to its liabilities, to the
DE Fund. In exchange for these assets and liabilities, the DE Fund will issue
shares of the DE Fund to the Fund, which will then distribute those shares pro
rata to you as a shareholder of the Fund. Through this procedure, you will
receive exactly the same number and dollar amount of shares of the DE Fund as
you held in the Fund immediately prior to the Reorganization. You will retain
the right to any declared but undistributed dividends or other distributions
payable on the shares of the Fund that you may have had as of the effective
date of the Reorganization. As soon as practicable after the date of the
Reorganization, the Fund will be dissolved and will cease its existence.
The Directors may terminate the Plan and abandon the Reorganization at any
time prior to the effective date of the Reorganization if they determine that
19
proceeding with the Reorganization is inadvisable. If the Reorganization is not
approved by shareholders of the Fund, or if the Directors abandon the
Reorganization, the Fund will continue to operate as a Maryland corporation. If
the Reorganization is approved by shareholders, it is expected to be completed
during 2004.
What effect will the Reorganization have on the current investment management
agreement?
As a result of the Reorganization, the DE Fund will be subject to a new
investment management agreement between the DE Fund and the Investment Manager
and a new sub-advisory agreement between the Investment Manager and FTIA. The
new investment management agreement and the new sub-advisory agreement will be
substantially identical to the current investment management agreement between
the Investment Manager and the Fund and the current sub-advisory agreement
between the Investment Manager and FTIA, respectively.
What effect will the Reorganization have on the current shareholder servicing
agreements and distribution plans?
The DE Fund will enter into an agreement with Franklin Templeton Investor
Services, LLC for transfer agency, dividend disbursing and shareholder services
that is substantially identical to the agreement currently in place for the
Fund. Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. will serve as the distributor for
the shares of the DE Fund under a separate distribution agreement that is
substantially identical to the distribution agreement currently in effect for
the Fund.
As of the effective date of the Reorganization, the DE Fund will have
distribution plans under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act relating to the
distribution of the classes of shares that are substantially identical to the
distribution plans currently in place for the corresponding classes of shares
of the Fund. It is anticipated that there will be no material change to the
distribution plans as a result of the Reorganization.
What is the effect of shareholder approval of the Plan?
Under the 1940 Act, the shareholders of a mutual fund must elect trustees
and approve the initial investment management agreement and any sub-advisory
agreements for the fund. Theoretically, if the Plan is approved and the Fund is
reorganized to a Delaware statutory trust, the shareholders would need to vote
on these three items for the DE Fund. In fact, the DE Fund must obtain
shareholder approval of these items or it will not comply with the 1940 Act.
However, the
20
Directors have determined that it is in the best interests of the shareholders
to avoid the considerable expense of another shareholder meeting to obtain
these approvals after the Reorganization. Therefore, the Directors have
determined that approval of the Plan also will constitute, for purposes of the
1940 Act, shareholder approval of (1) the election of the Directors of the Fund
who are in office at the time of the Reorganization as Trustees of the DE Fund;
(2) a new investment management agreement between the DE Fund and the
Investment Manager, which is substantially identical to the investment
management agreement currently in place for the Fund; and (3) a new
sub-advisory agreement between the Investment Manager and FTIA, which is
substantially identical to the sub-advisory agreement currently in place for
the Fund.
Prior to the Reorganization, if the Plan is approved by shareholders, the
officers will cause the Fund, as the sole shareholder of the DE Fund, to vote
its shares FOR the matters specified above. This action will enable the DE Fund
to satisfy the requirements of the 1940 Act without involving the time and
expense of another shareholder meeting.
What is the capitalization and structure of the DE Fund?
The DE Fund was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on December 2, 2003
pursuant to the Delaware Act. The DE Fund has an unlimited number of shares of
beneficial interest without par value authorized. The shares of the DE Fund
will be allocated into four classes to correspond to the current four classes
of shares of the Fund.
As of the effective date of the Reorganization, outstanding shares of the
DE Fund will be fully paid, nonassessable, freely transferable, and will have
no preemptive or subscription rights. The DE Fund also has the same fiscal year
as the Fund.
Who will bear the expenses of the Reorganization?
The expenses incurred in the Reorganization, including the costs of
soliciting proxies, will be paid by the Fund, whether or not the Reorganization
is approved by shareholders.
Are there any tax consequences for shareholders?
The Reorganization is designed to be tax-free for federal income tax
purposes so that you will not experience a taxable gain or loss when the
Reorganization is completed. Generally, the basis and holding period of your
shares in the DE Fund
21
will be the same as the basis and holding period of your shares in the Fund.
Consummation of the Reorganization is subject to receipt of a legal opinion
from the law firm of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, counsel to the DE
Fund and the Fund, that, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
the Reorganization will not give rise to the recognition of income, gain or
loss for federal income tax purposes to the Fund, the DE Fund or their
shareholders.
As a result of the Reorganization, there may be adverse tax consequences in
a foreign jurisdiction, including possible taxes on capital gains and
forfeiture of capital loss carry forwards. If a foreign jurisdiction treats the
Reorganization as a "sale" and "purchase" of portfolio securities that are
registered in that jurisdiction, the Fund may be required to pay taxes on any
capital gains arising from the "sale" of those portfolio securities. Similarly,
such treatment by a foreign jurisdiction may prevent the Fund from retaining
the capital losses it previously incurred on securities registered in that
jurisdiction to offset future capital gains, if any, incurred on securities
registered in that jurisdiction. However, the Fund does not believe that it
will experience a materially adverse impact as a result of a foreign
jurisdiction's tax treatment of the Reorganization.
What if I choose to sell my shares at any time?
A request to sell Fund shares that is received and processed prior to the
effective date of the Reorganization will be treated as a redemption of shares
of the Fund. A request to sell shares that is received and processed after the
effective date of the Reorganization will be treated as a request for the
redemption of the same number of shares of the DE Fund.
What is the effect of my voting "FOR" the Plan?
By voting "FOR" the Plan, you will be agreeing to become a shareholder of a
mutual fund organized as a Delaware statutory trust, with trustees, an
investment management agreement, a sub-advisory agreement, distribution plans
and other service arrangements that are substantially identical to those in
place for the Fund.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL 2.
22
INTRODUCTION TO PROPOSALS 3 AND 4
The Fund is subject to a number of fundamental investment restrictions that
(1) are more restrictive than those required under present law; (2) are no
longer required; or (3) were adopted in response to regulatory, business or
industry conditions that no longer exist. Under the 1940 Act, "fundamental"
investment restrictions may be changed or eliminated only if shareholders
approve such action. The Board is recommending that shareholders approve the
amendment or elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental investment
restrictions principally to (1) update those current investment restrictions
that are more restrictive than is required under the federal securities laws;
and (2) conform the Fund's fundamental investment restrictions to those of the
majority of the funds in Franklin Templeton Investments. In general, the
proposed restrictions would (1) simplify, modernize and standardize the
fundamental investment restrictions that are required to be stated by a fund
under the 1940 Act; and (2) eliminate those fundamental investment restrictions
that are no longer required by the federal securities laws, interpretations of
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") or state securities law, as
preempted by the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 ("NSMIA").
After the Fund was organized as a Maryland corporation in 1981, certain
legal and regulatory requirements applicable to investment companies changed.
For example, certain restrictions imposed by state securities laws and
regulations were preempted by NSMIA and, therefore, are no longer applicable to
investment companies. As a result, the Fund currently is subject to certain
fundamental investment restrictions that are either more restrictive than is
required under current law, or which are no longer required at all.
The Board believes there are several distinct advantages to revising the
Fund's fundamental investment restrictions at this time. First, by reducing the
total number of investment restrictions that can be changed only by a
shareholder vote, the Board and the Investment Manager believe that the Fund
will be able to minimize the costs and delays associated with holding future
shareholders' meetings to revise fundamental investment restrictions that have
become outdated or inappropriate. Second, the Board and the Investment Manager
also believe that the Investment Manager's ability to manage the Fund's assets
in a changing investment environment will be enhanced because the Fund will
have greater investment management flexibility to respond to market, industry,
regulatory or technical changes by seeking Board approval only when necessary
to revise certain investment restrictions. Finally, the standardized
fundamental investment restrictions are expected to enable the Fund to more
efficiently and more easily monitor portfolio compliance.
23
The proposed standardized fundamental investment restrictions cover those
areas for which the 1940 Act requires the Fund to have fundamental restrictions
and are substantially similar to the fundamental investment restrictions of
other funds in Franklin Templeton Investments that have recently amended their
investment restrictions. The proposed standardized restrictions will not affect
the Fund's investment goal or its current principal investment strategies.
Although the proposed amendments will give the Fund greater flexibility to
respond to possible future investment opportunities, the Board does not
anticipate that the changes, individually or in the aggregate, will result in a
material change in the current level of investment risk associated with an
investment in the Fund, nor does the Board anticipate that the proposed changes
in fundamental investment restrictions will materially change the manner in
which the Fund is currently managed and operated. However, the Board may change
or modify the way the Fund is managed in the future, as contemplated by the
proposed amendments to, or elimination of, the applicable investment
restrictions. Should the Board in the future modify materially the way the Fund
is managed to take advantage of such increased flexibility, the Fund will make
the necessary disclosures to shareholders, including amending its prospectus
and statement of additional information ("SAI"), as appropriate.
PROPOSAL 3: TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN OF THE FUND'S FUNDAMENTAL
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS (this Proposal involves separate votes on
Sub-Proposals 3a-3h)
The Fund's existing fundamental investment restrictions, together with the
recommended changes to the investment restrictions, are detailed in Exhibit D,
which is entitled "Fundamental Investment Restrictions Proposed to be Amended
or Eliminated." Shareholders are requested to vote separately on each
Sub-Proposal in Proposal 3. Any Sub-Proposal that is approved by shareholders
will be effective for the Fund as of the date of the supplement to the Fund's
SAI reflecting such changes to certain of the Fund's fundamental investment
restrictions, which is anticipated to be shortly after the date of shareholder
approval. The Board of Directors recommends unanimously a vote "FOR" each
Sub-Proposal.
Sub-Proposal 3a: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding diversification of investments.
The 1940 Act prohibits "diversified" investment companies, like the Fund,
from purchasing securities of any one issuer if, at the time of purchase, with
respect to 75% of a fund's total assets, more than 5% of total assets would be
invested in the securities of that issuer, or the fund would own or hold more
than 10% of the
24
outstanding voting securities of that issuer. Up to 25% of a fund's total
assets may be invested without regard to these limitations. Under the 1940 Act,
these limitations do not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S.
government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or to the securities of other
investment companies.
What effect will amending the current diversification restriction have on the
Fund?
The Fund has a fundamental investment restriction prohibiting investments of
more than 5% of the Fund's total assets in securities of any one issuer (other
than U.S. government securities) (the "5% limitation").
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction regarding
diversification of investments is more restrictive in several respects than the
requirements of the 1940 Act. First, the Fund's current diversification
restriction applies the 5% limitation to 100% of the Fund's total assets,
rather than to 75% of total assets as permitted by the 1940 Act. Second, the
Fund's current 5% limitation does not exclude securities of other investment
companies, as permitted by the 1940 Act.
The proposed fundamental investment restriction regarding diversification
follows the 5% and 10% limitations set forth in the 1940 Act. In addition, the
proposed fundamental investment restriction would exclude from such 5% and 10%
limitations securities issued by other investment companies (whether registered
or unregistered pursuant to certain SEC rules or orders). Under the amended
investment restriction, the Fund would be able to invest cash held at the end
of the day in money market funds or other short-term investments (such as
unregistered money market funds) without regard to the 5% and 10% limitations.
The Fund, together with the other investment companies in Franklin Templeton
Investments, obtained an exemptive order from the SEC (the "Cash Sweep Order")
that permits the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments to
invest their uninvested cash in one or more registered Franklin Templeton money
market funds and in unregistered money market funds sponsored by Franklin
Templeton Investments. Amending the Fund's current investment restriction
regarding diversification would enable the Fund to take advantage of the
investment opportunities presented by the Cash Sweep Order.
The proposed fundamental investment restriction regarding diversification of
investments is consistent with the definition of a diversified investment
company under the 1940 Act and the Cash Sweep Order issued by the SEC. In
addition, the proposed investment restriction would provide the Fund with
greater investment flexibility consistent with the provisions of the 1940 Act
and future rules or SEC interpretations. However, it is not currently
anticipated that the adoption of the proposed restriction would materially
change the way the Fund is managed.
25
Sub-Proposal 3b: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding investments in real estate.
Under the 1940 Act, a fund's restriction regarding investments in real
estate must be fundamental. The 1940 Act does not prohibit an investment
company from investing in real estate, either directly or indirectly. The
Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to real estate
prohibits the Fund from investing in real estate or mortgages on real estate,
although the Fund may invest in marketable securities secured by real estate or
interests therein.
What effect will amending the current real estate restriction have on the
Fund?
The proposed restriction would permit the Fund to continue to invest in
marketable securities secured by real estate or interests therein, and would
also permit the Fund to invest in such securities that are not "marketable." In
addition, under the proposed restriction, the Fund would be permitted to invest
in securities of issuers that invest, deal or otherwise engage in transactions
in real estate or interests therein, including real estate limited partnership
interests. The proposed restriction would also permit the Fund to hold and sell
real estate acquired by the Fund as a result of owning a security or other
instrument.
Modifying the Fund's real estate restriction may increase the Fund's
exposure to certain risks inherent to investments in real estate, such as
relative illiquidity, difficulties in valuation, and greater price volatility.
In addition, to the extent the Fund invests in developing or emerging market
countries, these investments are subject to risk of forfeiture due to
governmental action. Under the proposed real estate restriction, the Fund will
not be limited to investments in "marketable" securities secured by real estate
or interests therein, which would increase the Fund's ability to invest in
illiquid securities. However, the Board has adopted a non-fundamental
investment restriction, consistent with the SEC Staff's current position on
illiquid securities, which prohibits the Fund from investing more than 15% of
its net assets in illiquid securities (the "Illiquid Securities Restriction").
As a result, it is not currently intended that the Fund would materially change
its investment strategies as they relate to real estate or interests therein.
Thus, it is not currently anticipated that the proposed amendments to the
investment restriction relating to real estate would involve additional
material risk at this time.
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to real
estate is combined with fundamental investment restrictions relating to
investments in commodities, investments in other investment companies, and
investments in oil, gas, and other mineral development programs. The adoption
of this Sub-Proposal would result in separating the Fund's restriction
regarding investments in real
26
estate from these other fundamental investment restrictions, including the
Fund's fundamental investment restriction on investments in commodities. (See
Sub-Proposal 3c below.) The Fund is proposing to eliminate the restrictions on
investing in other investment companies and on investing in oil, gas, and
mineral development programs. (See Proposal 4 below.)
Sub-Proposal 3c: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding investments in commodities.
Under the 1940 Act, a fund's investment policy relating to the purchase and
sale of commodities must be fundamental. The most common types of commodities
are physical commodities such as wheat, cotton, rice and corn. Under the
federal securities and commodities laws, certain financial instruments such as
futures contracts and options thereon, including currency futures, stock index
futures or interest rate futures, may, under limited circumstances, also be
considered to be commodities. Funds typically invest in futures contracts and
related options on these and other types of commodity contracts for hedging
purposes, to implement a tax or cash management strategy, or to enhance returns.
What effect will amending the current commodities restriction have on the
Fund?
The current fundamental investment restriction on commodities states that
the Fund may not purchase or sell commodity contracts.
The proposed investment restriction relating to commodities clarifies the
ability of the Fund to engage in currency and financial futures contracts and
related options and to invest in securities or other instruments that are
secured by physical commodities but not to invest directly in physical
commodities. Notwithstanding the flexibility provided by the proposed
fundamental investment restriction, the Fund is subject to guidelines
established by the Board regarding the use of derivatives. Under these
guidelines, currently no more than 5% of the Fund's assets may be invested in,
or exposed to, options and swap agreements (as measured at the time of
investment). The use of futures contracts can involve substantial risks and,
therefore, the Fund would only invest in such futures contracts where the
Investment Manager believes such investments are advisable and then only to the
extent permitted by the guidelines established by the Board. It is not
currently intended that the Fund would materially change these guidelines or
its use of futures contracts, forward currency contracts and related options.
Thus, it is not currently anticipated that the proposed amendments to the
investment restriction relating to commodities would involve additional
material risk at this time.
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to
commodities is combined with fundamental investment restrictions relating to
27
investments in real estate, investments in other investment companies, and
investments in oil, gas, and other mineral development programs. The adoption
of this Sub-Proposal would result in separating the Fund's restriction
regarding commodity contracts from these other fundamental investment
restrictions, including the Fund's fundamental investment restriction relating
to real estate. (See Sub-Proposal 3b above.) The Fund is proposing to eliminate
the restrictions on investing in other investment companies and on investing in
oil, gas, and mineral development programs. (See Proposal 4 below.)
Sub-Proposal 3d: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding underwriting.
Under the 1940 Act, the Fund's policy concerning underwriting is required to
be fundamental. Under the federal securities laws, a person or company
generally is considered to be an underwriter if the person or company
participates in the public distribution of securities of other issuers, which
involves purchasing the securities from another issuer with the intention of
re-selling the securities to the public. From time to time, a mutual fund may
purchase securities in a private transaction for investment purposes and later
sell or redistribute the securities to institutional investors. Under these or
other circumstances, the Fund could possibly be considered to be within the
technical definition of an underwriter under the federal securities laws. SEC
Staff interpretations have clarified, however, that re-sales of privately
placed securities by institutional investors, such as the Fund, do not make the
institutional investor an underwriter in these circumstances. In addition,
under certain circumstances, the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter of its
own securities. The proposed restriction incorporates these SEC interpretations
and would make clear that the Fund has the ability to sell its own shares.
What effect will amending the current underwriting restriction have on the
Fund?
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to
underwriting prohibits the Fund from acting as an underwriter. The current
investment restriction does not provide any clarification regarding whether the
Fund may sell securities that the Fund owns or whether the Fund may sell its
own shares in those limited circumstances where the Fund might be deemed to be
an underwriter.
The proposed restriction relating to underwriting is substantially similar
to the Fund's current investment restriction by prohibiting the Fund from
engaging in underwriting. The proposed investment restriction, however,
clarifies that the Fund may re-sell securities that the Fund owns and that it
may also sell its own shares. It is not anticipated that the adoption of the
proposed restriction would involve
28
additional material risk to the Fund or affect the way the Fund is currently
managed or operated.
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to
underwriting is combined with restrictions relating to issuing senior
securities, purchasing securities on margin, engaging in short sales and
writing, purchasing or selling options. The adoption of this Sub-Proposal would
result in the separation of the Fund's underwriting restriction from these
other fundamental investment restrictions, including the Fund's investment
restriction relating to issuing senior securities. (See Sub-Proposal 3e below.)
The Fund is proposing to eliminate the restrictions on purchasing securities on
margin, engaging in short sales and writing, purchasing or selling options.
(See Proposal 4 below.)
Sub-Proposal 3e: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding issuing senior securities.
The 1940 Act requires the Fund to have an investment policy describing its
ability to issue senior securities. A "senior security" is an obligation of a
fund, with respect to its earnings or assets, that takes precedence over the
claims of the fund's shareholders with respect to the same earnings or assets.
The 1940 Act generally prohibits an open-end fund from issuing senior
securities in order to limit the fund's ability to use leverage. In general,
leverage occurs when a fund borrows money to enter into securities transactions
or acquires an asset without being required to make payment until a later time.
SEC Staff interpretations allow an open-end fund under certain conditions to
engage in a number of types of transactions that might otherwise be considered
to create "senior securities," for example, short sales, certain options and
futures transactions, reverse repurchase agreements and securities transactions
that obligate the fund to pay money at a future date (such as when-issued,
forward commitment or delayed delivery transactions). According to SEC Staff
interpretations, when engaging in these types of transactions, an open-end fund
must mark on its books, or segregate with its custodian bank, cash or other
liquid securities to cover its future obligations, in order to avoid the
creation of a senior security. This procedure limits the amount of a fund's
assets that may be invested in these types of transactions and the fund's
exposure to the risks associated with senior securities.
What effect will amending the current senior securities restriction have on
the Fund?
The current fundamental investment restriction relating to issuing senior
securities prohibits the Fund from issuing senior securities.
29
The proposed restriction would permit the Fund to issue senior securities as
permitted under the 1940 Act or any relevant rule, exemption, or interpretation
issued by the SEC. The proposed restriction also would clarify that the Fund
may, provided that certain conditions are met, engage in those types of
transactions that have been interpreted by the SEC Staff as not constituting
senior securities, such as covered reverse repurchase transactions.
The Fund has no present intention of changing its current investment
strategies regarding transactions that may be interpreted as resulting in the
issuance of senior securities. Therefore, the Board does not anticipate that
amending the current restriction will result in additional material risk to the
Fund. However, the Fund may initiate the use of these strategies in the future
to the extent described in the proposed new restriction. To the extent the Fund
does engage in such strategies in the future, it would be subject to the risks
associated with leveraging, including reduced total returns and increased
volatility. The additional risks to which the Fund may be exposed are limited,
however, by the limitations on issuing senior securities imposed by the 1940
Act and any rule, exemption or interpretation thereof that may be applicable.
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to issuing
senior securities is combined with restrictions relating to underwriting,
purchasing securities on margin, engaging in short sales, and writing,
purchasing and selling options. The adoption of this Sub-Proposal would result
in the separation of the Fund's senior securities restriction from these other
fundamental investment restrictions, including the Fund's investment
restriction relating to underwriting. (See Sub-Proposal 3d above.) The Fund is
proposing to eliminate the restrictions on purchasing securities on margin,
engaging in short sales, and writing, purchasing and selling options. (See
Proposal 4 below.)
Sub-Proposal 3f: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding lending.
Under the 1940 Act, a fund must describe, and designate as fundamental, its
policy with respect to making loans. In addition to a loan of cash, the term
"loans" may, under certain circumstances, be deemed to include certain
transactions and investment-related practices. Among those transactions and
practices are lending of portfolio securities, entering into repurchase
agreements and the purchase of certain debt instruments. If a fund adopts a
fundamental policy that prohibits lending, the fund may still invest in debt
securities, enter into securities lending transactions, and enter into
repurchase agreements if it provides an exception from the general prohibition.
30
Under SEC Staff interpretations, lending by an investment company, under
certain circumstances, may also give rise to issues relating to the issuance of
senior securities. To the extent that the Fund enters into lending transactions
under these limited circumstances, the Fund will continue to be subject to the
limitations imposed under the 1940 Act regarding the issuance of senior
securities. (See Sub-Proposal 3e above.)
What effect will amending the current lending restriction have on the Fund?
The Fund's current investment restriction regarding lending prohibits the
Fund from loaning money, except that the Fund may purchase a portion of an
issue of publicly distributed bonds, debentures, notes and other evidences of
indebtedness. In addition, the Fund may buy U.S. government obligations with a
simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase them within no more than
seven days at the original purchase price plus accrued interest (such
transactions are commonly known as "repurchase agreements"). Although the
Fund's current investment restriction permits the purchase of certain debt
securities, the Fund is only permitted to purchase publicly distributed debt
securities and may not invest in certain types of private placement debt
securities or engage in direct corporate loans, even if such investments would
otherwise be consistent with the Fund's investment goal and policies.
The proposed fundamental investment restriction provides that the Fund may
not make loans to other persons except (1) through the lending of its portfolio
securities; (2) through the purchase of debt securities, loan participations
and/or engaging in direct corporate loans in accordance with its investment
goals and policies; and (3) to the extent the entry into a repurchase agreement
is deemed to be a loan. The proposed investment restriction provides the Fund
with greater lending flexibility by permitting the Fund to invest in
non-publicly distributed debt securities, loan participations, and direct
corporate loans. To the extent that these instruments are illiquid, they will
be subject to the Illiquid Securities Restriction.
The proposed investment restriction also provides the Fund with greater
flexibility by permitting the Fund to enter into repurchase agreements with
terms of more than seven days. To the extent that repurchase agreements with
terms of more than seven days are illiquid, they will be subject to the
Illiquid Securities Restriction. In addition, the proposed investment
restriction will not limit the Fund to only collateralizing repurchase
agreements with U.S. government obligations. To the extent the Fund uses other
forms of collateral for its repurchase agreements, however, it will still
generally be subject to regulations under the 1940 Act regarding eligible
collateral.
31
The proposed fundamental investment restriction also provides the Fund with
additional flexibility to make loans to affiliated investment companies or
other affiliated entities. In September 1999, the SEC granted an exemptive
order to the Fund, together with other funds in Franklin Templeton Investments,
permitting the Fund to loan money to other funds in Franklin Templeton
Investments (the "Inter-Fund Lending and Borrowing Order"). These lending
transactions may include terms that are more favorable than those which would
otherwise be available from lending institutions. The proposed investment
restriction would permit the Fund, under certain conditions, to lend cash to
other funds in Franklin Templeton Investments at rates higher than those that
the Fund would receive if the Fund loaned cash to banks through short-term
lending transactions, such as repurchase agreements. Management anticipates
that this additional flexibility to lend cash to affiliated investment
companies would allow additional investment opportunities, and could enhance
the Fund's ability to respond to changes in market, industry or regulatory
conditions.
Because the proposed lending restriction would provide the Fund with greater
flexibility to invest in non-publicly distributed debt securities, loan
participations, and other direct corporate loans, the Fund may be exposed to
additional risks associated with such securities, including general
illiquidity, greater price volatility and the possible lack of publicly
available information about issuers of privately placed debt obligations and
loan counterparties. However, these risks will be somewhat offset by the Fund's
adoption of the non-fundamental Illiquid Securities Restriction. Thus, the
Investment Manager believes that the risks posed by these investments should be
relatively modest.
Sub-Proposal 3g: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding borrowing.
The 1940 Act requires investment companies to impose certain limitations on
borrowing activities, and a fund's borrowing limitations must be fundamental.
The 1940 Act limitations on borrowing are generally designed to protect
shareholders and their investment by restricting a fund's ability to subject
its assets to the claims of creditors who, under certain circumstances, might
have a claim to the fund's assets that would take precedence over the claims of
shareholders.
Under the 1940 Act, an open-end fund may borrow up to 33 1/3% of its total
assets (including the amount borrowed) from banks and may borrow up to 5% of
its total assets for temporary purposes from any other person. Generally, a
loan is considered temporary if it is repaid within sixty days. Funds typically
borrow money to meet redemptions or for other short-term cash needs in order to
avoid forced, unplanned sales of portfolio securities. This technique allows a
fund greater
32
flexibility by allowing its manager to buy and sell portfolio securities
primarily for investment or tax considerations, rather than for cash flow
considerations.
What effect will amending the current borrowing restriction have on the Fund?
The Fund's current investment restriction relating to borrowing prohibits
the Fund from borrowing money for any purpose other than redeeming its shares
for cancellation, and then only as a temporary measure up to an amount not
exceeding 5% of the value of its total assets. The Fund's current fundamental
investment restriction further prohibits the Fund from pledging, mortgaging or
hypothecating its assets for any purpose other than to secure such borrowings,
and only in amounts not exceeding 10% of the value of the Fund's total assets
as the Board may approve. In addition, the Fund will not pledge, mortgage or
hypothecate its assets if the percentage of pledged assets plus the sales
commission will exceed 10% of the offering price of the shares of the Fund.
The proposed investment restriction would prohibit borrowing money, except
to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act or any rule, exemption or
interpretation thereunder issued by the SEC. Unlike the current fundamental
investment restriction on borrowing, the proposed restriction does not limit
the purposes for which the Fund can borrow. In addition, the Fund's investment
restriction on pledging, mortgaging or hypothecating its assets would be
eliminated because the 1940 Act does not require this type of fundamental
investment restriction. By so amending the investment restriction, the Fund
would not unnecessarily limit the Investment Manager if the Investment Manager
determines that borrowing is in the best interests of that Fund and its
shareholders. As a general matter, however, Section 18 of the 1940 Act limits a
fund's borrowings to not more than 33 1/3% of the fund's total assets
(including the amount borrowed), which is greater than the Fund's current
investment restriction of up to 5% of the value of the Fund's total assets.
The proposed restriction would also permit the Fund to borrow money from
affiliated investment companies or other affiliated entities. In September
1999, the SEC granted the Inter-Fund Lending and Borrowing Order, permitting
the Fund to borrow money from other funds in Franklin Templeton Investments.
The proposed borrowing restriction would permit the Fund, under certain
circumstances and in accordance with the Inter-Fund Lending and Borrowing
Order, to borrow money from other funds in Franklin Templeton Investments at
rates that are more favorable than the rates that the Fund would receive if it
borrowed from banks or other lenders. The proposed borrowing restriction would
also permit the Fund to borrow from other affiliated entities, such as the
Investment Manager, under emergency market conditions should the SEC permit
investment companies to engage in such borrowing in the future, such as it did
in response to the emergency market conditions that existed immediately after
the events of September 11, 2001.
33
Because the proposed borrowing restriction would provide the Fund with
additional borrowing flexibility, to the extent that the Fund uses such
flexibility, the Fund may be subject to additional costs and risks inherent to
borrowing, such as reduced total return and increased volatility. The
additional costs and risks to which the Fund may be exposed are limited,
however, by the borrowing limitations imposed by the 1940 Act and any rule,
exemption or interpretation thereof that may be applicable.
Sub-Proposal 3h: To amend the Fund's fundamental investment restriction
regarding industry concentration.
Under the 1940 Act, a fund's policy regarding concentration of investments
in the securities of companies in any particular industry must be fundamental.
The SEC Staff takes the position that a fund "concentrates" its investments if
it invests more than 25% of its "net" assets (exclusive of certain items such
as cash, U.S. government securities, securities of other investment companies,
and certain tax-exempt securities) in any particular industry or group of
industries. An investment company is not permitted to concentrate its
investments in any particular industry or group of industries unless it
discloses its intention to do so.
What effect will amending the current industry concentration restriction have
on the Fund?
The proposed concentration restriction is substantially the same as the
Fund's current restriction, except that (1) it modifies the Fund's asset
measure (from "total assets" to "net assets") by which concentration is
assessed; and (2) it expressly references, in a manner consistent with current
SEC Staff policy, the categories of investments that are excepted from coverage
of the restriction. The proposed restriction reflects a more modernized
approach to industry concentration, and provides the Fund with investment
flexibility that ultimately is expected to help the Fund respond to future
legal, regulatory, market or technical changes. In addition, the Board may from
time to time establish guidelines regarding industry classifications.
The proposed restriction would expressly exempt from the 25% limitation
those securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its
agencies or instrumentalities, and the securities of other investment
companies, consistent with SEC Staff policy. The proposed restriction thus
clarifies the types of U.S. government securities in which the Fund may invest.
In addition, if Proposal 4 is approved, then the Fund's current fundamental
investment restriction against investments in other investment companies will
be eliminated. The proposed restriction on industry concentration will make
explicit that such investments in
34
other investment companies are exempt from the Fund's concentration
restriction. Even with this modified restriction, however, the Fund would
continue to remain subject to the limitations on a fund's investments in other
investment companies as set forth in the 1940 Act, its Prospectus and any
exemptive orders issued by the SEC. In general, absent such rules or orders
from the SEC, the 1940 Act would prohibit the Fund from investing more than 5%
of its total assets in any one investment company and investing more than 10%
of its total assets in other investment companies overall.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" SUB-PROPOSALS 3a-3h.
PROPOSAL 4: TO APPROVE THE ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN OF THE FUND'S FUNDAMENTAL
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS.
The Fund's current fundamental investment restrictions, together with those
recommended to be eliminated, are detailed in Exhibit D, which is entitled
"Fundamental Investment Restrictions Proposed to be Amended or Eliminated." If
the Fund's shareholders approve Proposal 4, the elimination of such investment
restrictions of the Fund will be effective as of the date of the supplement to
the Fund's SAI reflecting elimination of such fundamental investment
restrictions, which is anticipated to be shortly after the date of shareholder
approval.
Why is the Board recommending that certain fundamental investment
restrictions be eliminated, and what effect will their elimination have on
the Fund?
Certain of the Fund's fundamental investment restrictions are either
restatements of restrictions that are already included within the 1940 Act or
are more restrictive than current SEC Staff interpretations. These restrictions
include those relating to (1) investments in other investment companies; (2)
purchasing securities on margin, engaging in short sales and purchasing and
writing options; and (3) participation in joint trading accounts. The Fund's
fundamental investment restrictions relating to illiquid and restricted
securities and "letter" stocks do not represent current SEC Staff positions and
are effectively limited by the Fund's non-fundamental Illiquid Securities
Restriction.
The other fundamental investment restrictions of the Fund were originally
adopted to comply with state securities laws and regulations. Due to the
passage of NSMIA, these fundamental restrictions are no longer required by law.
As a result, the Fund is no longer legally required to adopt or maintain
investment restrictions
35
relating to (1) investments in oil and gas programs; (2) management ownership
of portfolio securities; (3) investing for purposes of exercising control; (4)
investments in companies with less than three years of continuous operation;
and (5) warrants.
Accordingly, the Investment Manager has recommended, and the Board has
determined, that these ten restrictions (referred to in this Proposal 4 as the
"Restrictions") be eliminated and that their elimination is consistent with the
federal securities laws. By reducing the total number of investment
restrictions that can be changed only by a shareholder vote, the Board believes
that the Fund will be able to reduce the costs and delays associated with
holding future shareholder meetings for the purpose of revising fundamental
investment restrictions that become outdated or inappropriate. Elimination of
the Restrictions would also enable the Fund to be managed in accordance with
the current requirements of the 1940 Act, without being constrained by
additional and unnecessary limitations. The Board believes that the elimination
of the Restrictions is in the best interest of the Fund's shareholders as it
will provide the Fund with increased flexibility to pursue its investment goal
and will enhance the Investment Manager's ability to manage the Fund's assets
in a changing investment environment.
Which ten (10) Restrictions is the Board recommending that the Fund eliminate?
The Fund currently is subject to ten Restrictions that are no longer
required by law and were adopted primarily in response to regulatory, business
or industry conditions that no longer exist. The exact language of the
Restrictions has been included in Exhibit D, which is entitled "Fundamental
Investment Restrictions Proposed to be Amended or Eliminated."
Investment in Other Investment Companies
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction prohibits the Fund
from investing in other open-end investment companies (except in connection
with a merger, consolidation, acquisition or reorganization) and closed-end
investment companies. This fundamental investment restriction is more
restrictive than the 1940 Act and current SEC Staff interpretations, which do
not require a fund to adopt such a provision as a fundamental investment
restriction.
Upon elimination of this restriction, the Fund would remain subject to the
restrictions under Section 12(d) of the 1940 Act relating to the Fund's ability
to invest in other investment companies, including open-end and closed-end
investment companies, except where the Fund has received an exemption from such
restrictions. The 1940 Act restrictions generally specify that the Fund may not
purchase more than 3% of another fund's total outstanding voting stock, invest
36
more than 5% of its total assets in another fund's securities, or have more
than 10% of its total assets invested in securities of all other funds. In
addition, eliminating the Fund's current restriction on investments in other
investment companies would enable the Fund to take advantage of the investment
opportunities presented by the Cash Sweep Order (discussed in Sub-Proposal 3a
above), since it contemplates relief from the 1940 Act restrictions relating to
investments in other registered and unregistered investment companies in
certain limited circumstances. Therefore, the Board is recommending that the
restriction be eliminated.
Oil and Gas Programs
The Fund has a fundamental investment restriction that prohibits the Fund
from investing in interests (other than publicly issued debentures or equity
stock interests) in oil, gas or other mineral exploration or development
programs. The Fund's fundamental investment restriction regarding oil and gas
programs was based on state securities laws that had been adopted by a few
jurisdictions, but have since been pre-empted by NSMIA. Accordingly, the Board
proposes that the restriction be eliminated.
Management Ownership of Securities
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction prohibits the Fund
from investing in companies in which certain affiliated persons of the Fund
have an ownership interest. This restriction was based on state law provisions
that have been pre-empted by NSMIA. In addition, the 1940 Act provisions
addressing conflicts of interest would continue to apply to the Fund.
Therefore, the Board is recommending that the restriction be eliminated.
Investing for Purposes of Exercising Control
The 1940 Act does not require, and applicable state law no longer requires,
that the Fund adopt a fundamental investment restriction prohibiting it from
investing in any company for the purpose of exercising control or management.
Because the Fund, as a diversified investment company, is already subject to
certain limitations with respect to how much of a single issuer's voting
securities it may acquire (and, if approved by shareholders, would be subject
to the amended fundamental investment restriction regarding diversification of
investments described in Sub-Proposal 3a above), the Board is recommending that
this restriction be eliminated.
37
Purchasing Securities on Margin, Engaging in Short Sales and Writing, Buying
or Selling Options
The 1940 Act does not require the Fund to adopt a fundamental investment
restriction regarding purchasing securities on margin, engaging in short sales,
or writing, buying or selling options, except to the extent that these
transactions may result in the creation of senior securities (as described more
fully in Sub-Proposal 3e above). The Fund's current fundamental investment
restrictions prohibits the Fund from (1) purchasing securities on margin; (2)
engaging in short sales of securities; and (3) writing, buying or selling puts,
calls, straddles or spreads.
Current 1940 Act provisions on issuing senior securities, engaging in short
sales and purchasing on margin, together with the proposed fundamental
investment restriction on senior securities, will limit the ability of the Fund
to purchase securities on margin, engage in short sales and write, buy or sell
puts, calls, straddles or spreads. Therefore, the Investment Manager does not
anticipate that deleting the current restrictions will result in additional
material risk to the Fund at this time.
Three Years of Continuous Operation
The Fund's current fundamental investment restriction relating to
investments in newer companies limits the Fund's ability to invest more than 5%
of the value of its total assets in securities of issuers which have been in
continuous operation less than three years. This restriction was based upon
state securities laws, which have been pre-empted by NSMIA. Therefore, the
Board proposes that the restriction be eliminated.
Warrants
The Fund's fundamental investment restriction relating to warrants limits
the Fund's investments in warrants to 5% of its total assets whether or not the
warrant is listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock
Exchange, including no more than 2% of the Fund's total assets, which may be
invested in warrants that are not listed on those exchanges. A warrant entitles
an investor to purchase a specified amount of stock at a specified price and is
effective for a period of time normally ranging from a number of years to
perpetuity. The Fund's fundamental investment restriction on warrants was based
on state securities laws that have since been pre-empted by NSMIA. Accordingly,
the Board proposes that the restriction be eliminated.
38
Illiquid and Restricted Securities
The fundamental investment restriction on illiquid and restricted securities
limits the Fund from investing more than 10% of its total assets in restricted
securities, securities with a limited trading market (which the Fund may not be
able to dispose of at the current market price) or those which are not
otherwise readily marketable with readily available current market quotations.
With some exceptions, such securities generally include securities that have
not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and therefore
may only be resold to certain institutional investors under certain
circumstances, and securities that are subject to other contractual
restrictions on resale (often referred to as "restricted securities"). To the
extent that a restricted security is not readily marketable at a price that is
approximately equal to the value placed on such assets by the Fund, these types
of securities may be considered illiquid. The Fund's current fundamental
investment restriction on investments in securities with a limited trading
market was based upon state law restrictions on the purchase of unregistered
securities, as well as an SEC Staff position relating to illiquid securities.
The state law provision has been pre-empted by NSMIA and the SEC Staff, which
does not require investment companies to adopt the position as a fundamental
restriction, has subsequently amended its position to permit investment
companies to invest up to 15% of their net assets in illiquid securities.
The Fund remains subject to the limitations imposed by the SEC Staff on an
open-end fund's ability to invest in illiquid securities. As a result of the
proposed elimination of the Fund's current investment restrictions that relate
to illiquid and restricted securities (including "letter" stocks described
below), the Board has adopted the non-fundamental Illiquid Securities
Restriction. Thus, the Fund is already prohibited from investing more than 15%
of its net assets in illiquid securities, including securities that are not
readily marketable. The Board is therefore recommending that the current
fundamental investment restrictions on illiquid and restricted securities be
eliminated. However, because the Illiquid Securities Restriction increases
slightly, from 10% to 15%, the amount of the Fund's assets that may be invested
in illiquid securities, to the extent the Fund were to take advantage of such
increase, the Fund would be subject to a greater degree to the risks associated
with illiquid securities. Such risks include limited ability to sell such
securities and to sell at a price acceptable to the Fund, and difficulty in
valuation.
"Letter" Stocks
The Fund's fundamental investment restriction relating to "letter" stocks
prohibits the Fund from investing in "letter" stocks or securities on which
there are
39
any sales restrictions under a purchase agreement. As with other illiquid and
restricted securities, discussed above, these types of securities may be
illiquid to the extent that they are not readily marketable.
This fundamental investment restriction is not required by the 1940 Act.
Moreover, as described above, the Board has adopted the non-fundamental
Illiquid Securities Restriction in recognition of the SEC Staff position on
illiquid securities. Accordingly, the Board is recommending that the current
fundamental investment restriction on "letter" stocks be eliminated. However,
to the extent the Fund does invest in "letter" stocks as permitted by the
Illiquid Securities Restriction, the Fund will be subject to the risks
described above under "Illiquid and Restricted Securities."
Joint Trading Accounts
The Fund's fundamental investment restriction relating to joint trading
accounts prohibits the Fund's participation on a joint or a joint and several
basis in such an account. Because Section 12(a)(2) of the 1940 Act prohibits a
mutual fund from participating in a joint trading account unless allowed by
rule or exemptive order, the current fundamental restriction is unnecessary.
Therefore, the Board is recommending that the restriction be eliminated.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL 4.
. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUND
The Investment Manager. The Investment Manager of the Fund is Templeton
Investment Counsel, LLC, 500 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 2100, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33394-3091. Pursuant to an investment management agreement,
the Investment Manager manages the investment and reinvestment of Fund assets.
The Investment Manager is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Resources.
Under an agreement with the Investment Manager, FTIA, 2701 Shui On Centre,
6-8 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong, is the Fund's sub-advisor. FTIA provides
the Investment Manager with investment management advice and assistance.
The Administrator. The administrator of the Fund is Franklin Templeton
Services, LLC ("FT Services"), with offices at 500 East Broward Boulevard,
Suite 2100, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394-3091. FT Services is an indirect,
40
wholly owned subsidiary of Resources and an affiliate of the Investment
Manager, sub-advisor, and principal underwriter. Pursuant to an administration
agreement, FT Services provides certain administrative functions for the Fund.
The Underwriter. The underwriter for the Fund is Franklin Templeton
Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906.
The Transfer Agent. The transfer agent and dividend-paying agent for the
Fund is Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC, 100 Fountain Parkway,
St. Petersburg, Florida 33716-1205.
The Custodian. The custodian for the Fund is JPMorgan Chase Bank, MetroTech
Center, Brooklyn, New York 11245.
Pending Litigation. Woodbury v. Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund,
Inc. and Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC, Case 2003 L 001362, was filed on
October 3, 2003 in the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit, Madison
County, Illinois. The lawsuit alleges various breaches of duty with respect to
the valuation of the Fund's portfolio securities. On November 14, 2003, the
case was removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Illinois. Management strongly believes that the claims made in this action
are without merit and intends vigorously to defend against this action.
Other Matters. The Fund's last audited financial statements and annual
report for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 are available free of charge.
To obtain a copy of this report, please call 1-800/DIAL BEN(R) (1-800-342-5236)
or forward a written request to Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC, P.O.
Box 33030, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733-8030.
Shareholders Sharing the Same Address. If two or more shareholders share
the same address, only one copy of this proxy statement is being delivered to
that address, unless the Fund has received contrary instructions from one or
more of the shareholders at that shared address. Upon written or oral request,
the Fund will deliver promptly a separate copy of this proxy statement to a
shareholder at a shared address. Please call 1-800/DIAL BEN(R) (1-800-342-5236)
or forward a written request to Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC, P.O.
Box 33030, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733-8030 if you would like to (1) receive
a separate copy of this proxy statement; (2) receive your annual reports or
proxy statements separately in the future; or (3) request delivery of a single
copy of annual reports or proxy statements if you are currently receiving
multiple copies at a shared address.
41
Principal Shareholders. As of January 20, 2004, the Fund had total net
assets of $870,939,494.19 and a total of 100,454,059.715 shares of common
stock, $1.00 par value ("shares"), outstanding divided among four separate
classes of shares as follows: 95,722,730.266 Class A shares, 708,832.346 Class
B shares, 3,093,808.312 Class C shares and 928,688.791 Advisor Class shares.
From time to time, the number of shares held in "street name" accounts of
various securities dealers for the benefit of their clients may exceed 5% of
the total shares outstanding. To the knowledge of the Fund's management, as of
January 20, 2004, the only other entities owning beneficially more than 5% of
the outstanding shares of any class of the Fund were:
Percentage of
Amount and Nature Outstanding
of Beneficial Shares of the
Name and Address Share Class Ownership Class (%)
---------------- ------------- ----------------- -------------
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Class C 177,710.078 5.74
333 W. 34th Street, 3rd Fl.
New York, NY
10001-2402
Louis E. Woodworth & Advisor Class 125,865.833 13.55
Heidi Charleson JT TEN
c/o Franklin Resources, Inc.
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906
Franklin Templeton Bank & Advisor Class 610,656.386 65.75
Trust
TTEE for Defined Contribution
SVCS Franklin Templeton
401(k)
PO Box 2438
Rancho Cordova, CA
95741-2438
42
Note: Charles B. Johnson and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr., who are officers and/or
directors of the Fund, serve on the administrative committee of the Franklin
Templeton Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan, which owns shares of the Fund. In that
capacity, they participate in the voting of such shares. Charles B. Johnson and
Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. disclaim beneficial ownership of any shares of the Fund
owned by the Franklin Templeton Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan.
In addition, to the knowledge of the Fund management, as of January 20,
2004, the Directors and officers of the Fund, as a group, owned of record and
beneficially less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the Fund in the
aggregate and of each class of the Fund.
Contacting the Board of Directors. If a shareholder wishes to send a
communication to the Board of Directors, such correspondence should be in
writing and addressed to the Board of Directors at the Fund's offices, 500 East
Broward Boulevard, Suite 2100, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394-3091, Attention:
Secretary. The correspondence will then be given to the Board for their review
and consideration.
. AUDIT COMMITTEE
Audit Committee and Independent Auditors. The Fund's Audit Committee is
responsible for the selection of the Fund's independent auditors, including
evaluating their independence, and meeting with such auditors to consider and
review matters relating to the Fund's financial reports and internal
accounting. The Audit Committee also reviews the maintenance of the Fund's
records and the safekeeping arrangements of the Fund's custodian. The Audit
Committee consists of Independent Directors, and, during 2003, Andrew H. Hines,
Jr. and Fred R. Millsaps (Chairman) were the members of the Audit Committee.
Mr. Hines retired from the Board and the Audit Committee effective December 31,
2003. It is expected that the Board will appoint three new members to the Audit
Committee, each of whom will be an Independent Director, promptly after the
Meeting.
Selection of Independent Auditors. The Audit Committee and the Board
selected the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") as independent auditors
of the Fund for the current fiscal year. Representatives of PwC are not
expected to be present at the Meeting, but will have the opportunity to make a
statement if they wish, and will be available should any matter arise requiring
their presence.
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees paid to PwC for professional services
rendered by PwC for the audit of the Fund's annual financial statements or for
services that are normally provided by PwC in connection with statutory and
43
regulatory filings or engagements were $27,934 for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2003 and $28,909 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees paid to PwC for assurance and
related services by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of the Fund's financial statements and are not reported under
"Audit Fees" above were $4,840 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 and
$3,981 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002. The services for which these
fees were paid included the review of semi-annual reports to shareholders,
internal control testing and evaluation and services in connection with the
Fund's contract renewal.
In addition, the Audit Committee pre-approves PwC's engagement for
audit-related services with the Investment Manager and certain entities
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Investment Manager
that provide ongoing services to the Fund, which engagements relate directly to
the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The fees for these services
were $426,460 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 and $284,400 for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
Tax Fees. PwC did not render any tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning
services to the Fund for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 or for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
PwC did not render any such tax services to the Investment Manager or
certain entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
Investment Manager that provide ongoing services to the Fund, which engagements
relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 or for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
All Other Fees. PwC did not bill for other products and services, other
than the services reported above, for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 or
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
PwC did not render other services to the Investment Manager or entities
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Investment Manager
that provide ongoing services to the Fund, which engagements relate directly to
the operations and financial reporting of the Fund for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2003 or for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. As of the date of
this proxy statement, the Audit Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies
and procedures. As a result, all services provided by PwC must be directly
pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
44
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees. PwC did not render any non-audit services to the
Fund, to the Investment Manager or to any entity controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with the Investment Manager that provides ongoing services
to the Fund for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 or for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2002.
. FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING AND THE MEETING
Solicitation of Proxies. Your vote is being solicited by the Board of
Directors of the Fund. The cost of soliciting proxies, including the fees of a
proxy soliciting agent, is borne by the Fund. The Fund reimburses brokerage
firms and others for their expenses in forwarding proxy material to the
beneficial owners and soliciting them to execute proxies. The Fund has engaged
D.F. King & Co., Inc. ("D.F. King"), a professional proxy solicitation firm, to
solicit proxies from brokers, banks, other institutional holders and individual
shareholders at an estimated cost of approximately $60,000, including
out-of-pocket expenses. The Fund expects that the solicitation will be
primarily by mail, but also may include telephone, facsimile, electronic or
other means of communications. If the Fund does not receive your proxy by a
certain time, you may receive a telephone call from D.F. King asking you to
vote. The Fund does not reimburse Directors and officers of the Fund or regular
employees and agents of the Investment Manager involved in the solicitation of
proxies.
Voting by Broker Dealers. The Fund expects that, before the Meeting,
broker-dealer firms holding shares of the Fund in "street name" for their
customers and beneficial owners will request voting instructions from their
customers and beneficial owners. If these instructions are not received by the
date specified in the broker-dealer firms' or such depositories' proxy
solicitation materials, the Fund understands that the broker-dealers may vote
on Proposal 1 on behalf of their customers and beneficial owners. Certain
broker-dealers may exercise discretion over shares held in their name for which
no instructions are received by voting these shares in the same proportion as
they vote shares for which they received instructions.
Quorum. A majority of the shares entitled to vote - present in person or
represented by proxy - constitutes a quorum at the Meeting. The shares over
which broker-dealers have discretionary voting power, the shares that represent
"broker non-votes" (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees as to which (i)
instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons
entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary
voting power on a particular matter), and the shares whose proxies reflect an
abstention on any item will all be counted as shares present and entitled to
vote for purposes of determining whether the required quorum of shares exists.
45
Methods of Tabulation. Proposal 1, the election of Directors, requires the
affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast at the Meeting. Proposal 2,
to approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that provides for the
reorganization of the Fund from a Maryland corporation to a Delaware statutory
trust, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Fund's outstanding
shares. Proposal 3, to approve amendments to certain of the Fund's fundamental
investment restrictions (including eight (8) Sub-Proposals), and Proposal 4, to
approve the elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental investment
restrictions, each require the affirmative vote of the lesser of (i) more than
50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund; or (ii) 67% or more of the
outstanding shares of the Fund present at the Meeting, if the holders of more
than 50% of the outstanding shares are present or represented by proxy.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as votes present at the
Meeting but will not be treated as votes cast. Abstentions and broker
non-votes, therefore, will have no effect on Proposal 1, which requires a
majority of the Fund's shares present and voting, but will have the same effect
as a vote "against" Proposal 2, Sub-Proposals 3a-3h, and Proposal 4.
Adjournment. In the event that a quorum is not present at the Meeting or,
in the event that a quorum is present but sufficient votes have not been
received to approve a Proposal or Sub-Proposal, the Meeting may be adjourned to
permit further solicitation of proxies. The holders of a majority of shares
entitled to vote at the Meeting and present in person or by proxy, whether or
not sufficient to constitute a quorum, or any officer present entitled to
preside or act as Secretary of the Meeting, may adjourn the Meeting without
determining the date of the new Meeting or from time to time, without further
notice, to a date not more than 120 days after the original record date to
permit further solicitation of proxies or for other reasons consistent with
Maryland law and the Fund's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and By-Laws,
as amended and restated. Any business that might have been transacted at the
Meeting originally called may be transacted at such adjourned Meeting at which
a quorum is present. Unless otherwise instructed by a shareholder granting a
proxy, the persons designated as proxies may use their discretionary authority
to vote on questions of adjournment.
Shareholder Proposals. Neither the Fund nor the DE Fund is required, and
they do not intend, to hold regular annual shareholders' meetings. A
shareholder wishing to submit a proposal for consideration for inclusion in a
proxy statement for the next shareholders' meeting should send his or her
written proposal to the offices of the Fund or the DE Fund, as applicable, 500
East Broward Boulevard, Suite 2100, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394-3091,
Attention: Secretary, so that it is received within a reasonable time before
any such meeting. A shareholder proposal
46
may be presented at a meeting of shareholders only if such proposal concerns a
matter that may be properly brought before the meeting under applicable federal
proxy rules, state law, and other governing instruments.
Submission of a proposal by a shareholder does not guarantee that the
proposal will be included in the Fund's or the DE Fund's, as applicable, proxy
statement or presented at the meeting.
No business other than the matters described above is expected to come
before the Meeting, but should any other matter requiring a vote of
shareholders arise, including any question as to an adjournment or postponement
of the Meeting, the persons designated as proxies named on the enclosed proxy
card will vote on such matters in accordance with the views of management.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Barbara J. Green
Secretary
January 27, 2004
47
EXHIBIT A
NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER
I. The Committee.
The Nominating Committee (the "Committee") is a committee of, and
established by, the Board of Directors/Trustees of the Fund (the "Board"). The
Committee consists of such number of members as set by the Board from time to
time and its members shall be selected by the Board. The Committee shall be
comprised entirely of "independent members." For purposes of this Charter,
independent members shall mean members who are not interested persons of the
Fund ("Disinterested Board members") as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act").
II. Board Nominations and Functions.
1. The Committee shall make recommendations for nominations for
Disinterested Board members on the Board to the incumbent Disinterested Board
members and to the full Board. The Committee shall evaluate candidates'
qualifications for Board membership and the independence of such candidates
from the Fund's investment manager and other principal service providers.
Persons selected must be independent in terms of both the letter and the spirit
of the 1940 Act. The Committee shall also consider the effect of any
relationships beyond those delineated in the 1940 Act that might impair
independence, e.g., business, financial or family relationships with investment
managers or service providers.
2. The Committee also shall evaluate candidates' qualifications and make
recommendations for "interested" members on the Board to the full Board.
3. The Committee may adopt from time to time specific, minimum
qualifications that the Committee believes a candidate must meet before being
considered as a candidate for Board membership and shall comply with any rules
adopted from time to time by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
regarding investment company nominating committees and the nomination of
persons to be considered as candidates for Board membership.
4. The Committee shall review shareholder recommendations for nominations to
fill vacancies on the Board if such recommendations are submitted in writing
and addressed to the Committee at the Fund's offices. The Committee shall
adopt, by resolution, a policy regarding its procedures for considering
candidates for the Board, including any recommended by shareholders.
A-1
III. Committee Nominations and Functions.
1. The Committee shall make recommendations to the full Board for nomination
for membership on all committees of the Board.
2. The Committee shall review as necessary the responsibilities of any
committees of the Board, whether there is a continuing need for each committee,
whether there is a need for additional committees of the Board, and whether
committees should be combined or reorganized. The Committee shall make
recommendations for any such action to the full Board.
3. The Committee shall, on an annual basis, review the performance of the
Disinterested Board members.
IV. Other Powers and Responsibilities.
1. The Committee shall meet at least twice each year or more frequently in
open or executive sessions. The Committee may invite members of management,
counsel, advisers and others to attend its meetings as it deems appropriate.
The Committee shall have separate sessions with management and others, as and
when it deems appropriate.
2. The Committee shall have the resources and authority appropriate to
discharge its responsibilities, including authority to retain special counsel
and other experts or consultants at the expense of the Fund.
3. The Committee shall report its activities to the Board and make such
recommendations as the Committee may deem necessary or appropriate.
4. A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum for
the transaction of business at any meeting of the Committee. The action of a
majority of the members of the Committee present at a meeting at which a quorum
is present shall be the action of the Committee. The Committee may meet in
person or by telephone, and the Committee may act by written consent, to the
extent permitted by law and by the Fund's by-laws. In the event of any
inconsistency between this Charter and the Fund's organizational documents, the
provisions of the Fund's organizational documents shall be given precedence.
5. The Committee shall review this Charter at least annually and recommend
any changes to the full Board.
A-2
EXHIBIT B
FORM OF
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION
BETWEEN TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLER COMPANIES FUND, INC. AND TEMPLETON GLOBAL
SMALLER COMPANIES FUND
This Agreement and Plan of Reorganization ("Agreement") is made as of this
day of , 2004 by and between Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund,
Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund"), and Templeton Global Smaller
Companies Fund, a Delaware statutory trust (the "Trust") (the Fund and the
Trust are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "parties").
In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and intending to
be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Plan of Reorganization.
(a) Upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent described in Section 3
hereof, the Fund will convey, transfer and deliver to the Trust at the closing
provided for in Section 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Closing") all of the
Fund's then-existing assets (the "Assets"). In consideration thereof, the Trust
agrees at the Closing (i) to assume and pay when due all obligations and
liabilities of the Fund, existing on or after the Effective Date of the
Reorganization (as defined in Section 2 hereof), whether absolute, accrued,
contingent or otherwise, including all fees and expenses in connection with
this Agreement, which fees and expenses shall, in turn, include, without
limitation, costs of legal advice, accounting, printing, mailing, proxy
solicitation and transfer taxes, if any (collectively, the "Liabilities"), such
Liabilities to become the obligations and liabilities of the Trust; and (ii) to
deliver to the Fund in accordance with paragraph (b) of this Section 1, full
and fractional shares of each class of shares of beneficial interest, without
par value, of the Trust, equal in number to the number of full and fractional
shares of the corresponding class of shares of common stock, $0.20 par value
per share, of the Fund outstanding at the close of regular trading on the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE") on the business day immediately preceding
the Effective Date of the Reorganization. The reorganization contemplated
hereby is intended to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section
368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Fund
shall distribute to the Fund's shareholders the shares of the Trust in
accordance with this Agreement and the resolutions of the Board of Directors of
the Fund (the "Board of Directors") authorizing the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement.
B-1
(b) In order to effect the delivery of shares described in Section 1(a)(ii)
hereof, the Trust will establish an open account for each shareholder of the
Fund and, on the Effective Date of the Reorganization, will credit to such
account full and fractional shares of beneficial interest, without par value,
of the appropriate class of the Trust equal to the number of full and
fractional shares of common stock such shareholder holds in the corresponding
class of the Fund at the close of regular trading on the NYSE on the business
day immediately preceding the Effective Date of the Reorganization. Fractional
shares of the Trust will be carried to the third decimal place. At the close of
regular trading on the NYSE on the business day immediately preceding the
Effective Date of the Reorganization, the net asset value per share of each
class of shares of the Trust shall be deemed to be the same as the net asset
value per share of each corresponding class of shares of the Fund. On the
Effective Date of the Reorganization, each certificate representing shares of a
class of the Fund will be deemed to represent the same number of shares of the
corresponding class of the Trust. Simultaneously with the crediting of the
shares of the Trust to the shareholders of record of the Fund, the shares of
the Fund held by such shareholders shall be cancelled. Shareholders of the Fund
will have the right to deliver their share certificates of the Fund to the
Trust in exchange for share certificates of the Trust. However, a shareholder
need not deliver such certificates to the Trust unless the shareholder so
desires.
(c) As soon as practicable after the Effective Date of the Reorganization,
the Fund shall take all necessary steps under Maryland law to effect a complete
dissolution of the Fund.
(d) The expenses of entering into and carrying out this Agreement will be
borne by the Fund to the extent not paid by its investment manager.
2. Closing and Effective Date of the Reorganization.
The Closing shall consist of (i) the conveyance, transfer and delivery of
the Assets to the Trust in exchange for the assumption and payment, when due,
by the Trust, of the Liabilities of the Fund; and (ii) the issuance and
delivery of the Trust's shares in accordance with Section 1(b), together with
related acts necessary to consummate such transactions. The Closing shall occur
either on (a) the business day immediately following the later of the receipt
of all necessary regulatory approvals and the final adjournment of the meeting
of shareholders of the Fund at which this Agreement is considered and approved,
or (b) such later date as the parties may mutually agree ("Effective Date of
the Reorganization"). Solely for purposes of subsection (a) above, the
effectiveness of one or more post-effective amendments to the Fund's
Registration Statement as described below in Section 3(b)(i) shall not be
deemed to be a necessary regulatory approval.
B-2
3. Conditions Precedent.
The obligations of the Fund and the Trust to effectuate the transactions
hereunder shall be subject to the satisfaction of each of the following
conditions:
(a) Such authority and orders from the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") and state securities commissions as may be
necessary to permit the parties to carry out the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement shall have been received;
(b) (i) One or more post-effective amendments to the Fund's Registration
Statement on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
("1940 Act"), containing such amendments to such Registration Statement as
are determined under the supervision of the Board of Directors to be
necessary and appropriate as a result of this Agreement, shall have been
filed with the Commission; (ii) the Trust shall have adopted as its own such
Registration Statement, as so amended; (iii) the most recent post-effective
amendment or amendments to the Fund's Registration Statement shall have
become effective, and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the
Registration Statement shall have been issued, and no proceeding for that
purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by the Commission (other
than any such stop order, proceeding or threatened proceeding which shall
have been withdrawn or terminated); and (iv) an amendment of the Form N-8A
Notification of Registration filed pursuant to Section 8(a) of the 1940 Act
("Form N-8A") reflecting the change in legal form of the Fund to a Delaware
statutory trust shall have been filed with the Commission and the Trust
shall have expressly adopted such amended Form N-8A as its own for purposes
of the 1940 Act;
(c) Each party shall have received an opinion of Stradley, Ronon,
Stevens & Young, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to the effect that,
assuming the reorganization contemplated hereby is carried out in accordance
with this Agreement, the laws of the State of Maryland and the State of
Delaware, and in accordance with customary representations provided by the
parties in a certificate(s) delivered to Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young,
LLP, the reorganization contemplated by this Agreement qualifies as a
"reorganization" under Section 368 of the Code, and thus will not give rise
to the recognition of income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes
to the Fund, the Trust or the shareholders of the Fund or the Trust;
(d) The Fund shall have received an opinion of Stradley, Ronon, Stevens &
Young, LLP, dated the Effective Date of the Reorganization, addressed to and
in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Fund, to the effect
that (i) the Trust is a statutory trust duly formed, validly existing,
B-3
and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware; (ii) this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the execution and
delivery of this Agreement have been duly authorized and approved by all
requisite statutory trust action of the Trust and this Agreement has been
duly executed and delivered by the Trust and is a legal, valid and binding
agreement of the Trust in accordance with its terms; and (iii) the shares of
the Trust to be issued in the reorganization have been duly authorized and,
upon issuance thereof in accordance with this Agreement, will have been
validly issued and fully paid and will be nonassessable by the Trust;
(e) The Trust shall have received the opinion of Stradley, Ronon,
Stevens & Young, LLP, dated the Effective Date of the Reorganization,
addressed to and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Trust,
to the effect that: (i) the Fund is duly incorporated, validly existing, and
in good standing under the laws of the State of Maryland; (ii) the Fund is
an open-end investment company of the management type registered under the
1940 Act; and (iii) this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby
and the execution and delivery of this Agreement have been duly authorized
and approved by all requisite corporate action of the Fund and this
Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Fund and is a legal,
valid and binding agreement of the Fund in accordance with its terms;
(f) The shares of the Trust are eligible for offering to the public in
those states of the United States and jurisdictions in which the shares of
the Fund are currently eligible for offering to the public so as to permit
the issuance and delivery by the Trust of the shares contemplated by this
Agreement to be consummated;
(g) This Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall have
been duly adopted and approved by the appropriate action of the Board of
Directors and the shareholders of the Fund;
(h) The shareholders of the Fund shall have voted to direct the Fund to
vote, and the Fund shall have voted, as sole shareholder of each class of
the Trust, to:
(1) Elect as Trustees of the Trust the following individuals: Harris
J. Ashton, Nicholas F. Brady, Harmon E. Burns, Frank J. Crothers, S.
Joseph Fortunato, Edith E. Holiday, Charles B. Johnson, Gordon S.
Macklin, Fred R. Millsaps, Frank A. Olson, and Constantine D.
Tseretopoulos;
(2) Approve an Investment Management Agreement between Templeton
Investment Counsel, LLC ("TICL") and the Trust which is
B-4
substantially identical to the then-current Investment Management
Agreement, as amended and restated to date, between TICL and the Fund;
and
(3) Approve a Sub-Advisory Agreement between TICL and Franklin
Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited ("FTIA") which is substantially
identical to the then-current Sub-Advisory Agreement between TICL and
FTIA;
(i) The Trustees of the Trust shall have duly adopted and approved this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and shall have taken the
following actions at a meeting duly called for such purposes:
(1) Approval of the Investment Management Agreement described in
paragraph (h)(2) of this Section 3 between TICL and the Trust;
(2) Approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement described in paragraph
(h)(3) of this Section 3 hereof between TICL and FTIA;
(3) Approval of the assignment to the Trust of the Restated Custody
Agreement, dated June 1, 1984, as amended and restated to date, between
The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (now JPMorgan Chase Bank), and the Fund;
(4) Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Trust's
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2004;
(5) Approval of a Fund Administration Agreement between the Trust and
Franklin Templeton Services, LLC;
(6) Approval of a Distribution Agreement between the Trust and
Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc.;
(7) Approval of a Form of Dealer Agreement between the Trust and
Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. and securities dealers dated
March 1, 1998, including the Amendment to the Form of Dealer Agreement
dated May 15, 1998;
(8) Approval of the following Distribution Plans by the Trust
pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act: (a) Class A Distribution Plan
pursuant to Rule 12b-1; (b) Class B Distribution Plan pursuant to
Rule 12b-1; (c) Class C Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1; and
(d) Multiple Class Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3;
(9) Approval of a Transfer Agent and Shareholder Services Agreement
between the Trust and Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC;
B-5
(10) Approval of the assignment to the Trust of the Sub-Transfer
Agent Services Agreement among Franklin Templeton Investor Services,
LLC, The Shareholder Services Group, Inc. and the Fund;
(11) Approval of the assignment to the Trust of the Sub-Accounting
Services Agreement among Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC,
Financial Data Services, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith
Inc. and the Fund;
(12) Authorization of the issuance by the Trust, prior to the
Effective Date of the Reorganization, of one share of each class of
shares of beneficial interest of the Trust to the Fund in consideration
for the payment of $1.00 for each such share for the purpose of enabling
the Fund to vote on the matters referred to in paragraph (h) of this
Section 3;
(13) Submission of the matters referred to in paragraph (h) of this
Section 3 to the Fund as sole shareholder of each class of the Trust; and
(14) Authorization of the issuance and delivery by the Trust of
shares of the Trust on the Effective Date of the Reorganization and the
assumption by the Trust of the Liabilities of the Fund in exchange for
the Assets of the Fund pursuant to the terms and provisions of this
Agreement.
At any time prior to the Closing, any of the foregoing conditions may be
waived or amended, or any additional terms and conditions may be fixed by the
Board of Directors if, in the judgment of such Board, such waiver, amendment,
term or condition will not affect in a materially adverse way the benefits
intended to be accorded the shareholders of the Fund under this Agreement.
4. Dissolution of the Company.
Promptly following the consummation of the distribution of each class of
shares of the Trust to holders of the corresponding class of shares of the Fund
under this Agreement, the officers of the Fund shall take all steps necessary
under Maryland law to dissolve its corporate status, including publication of
any necessary notices to creditors, receipt of any necessary pre-dissolution
clearances from the State of Maryland, and filing for record with the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland of Articles of Dissolution.
5. Termination.
The Board of Directors may terminate this Agreement and abandon the
reorganization contemplated hereby, notwithstanding approval thereof by the
B-6
shareholders of the Fund, at any time prior to the Effective Date of the
Reorganization if, in the judgment of such Board, the facts and circumstances
make proceeding with this Agreement inadvisable.
6. Entire Agreement.
This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties hereto and
there are no agreements, understandings, restrictions or warranties among the
parties hereto other than those set forth herein or herein provided for.
7. Further Assurances.
The Fund and the Trust shall take such further action as may be necessary or
desirable and proper to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
8. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
9. Governing Law.
This Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be governed
by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of
Delaware.
B-7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Fund and the Trust have each caused this Agreement
and Plan of Reorganization to be executed on its behalf by its Chairman,
President or a Vice President and attested by its Secretary or an Assistant
Secretary, all as of the day and year first-above written.
Attest: TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLERCOMPANIES
FUND, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)
By By
------------------------------------ -----------------------------------
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLERCOMPANIES FUND
Attest: (a Delaware statutory trust)
By By
------------------------------------ -----------------------------------
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
B-8
EXHIBIT C
A COMPARISON OF GOVERNING DOCUMENTS AND STATE LAW
A Comparison of:
The Law Governing Delaware Statutory Trusts and
The Charter Documents of Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund
Under Such Law
With
The Law Governing Maryland Corporations and
The Charter Documents of Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund, Inc.
Under Such Law
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Governing A Delaware statutory trust (a A Maryland corporation is created
Documents/ "DST") is formed by a governing by filing articles of incorporation
Governing instrument and the filing of a with the Maryland State
Body certificate of trust with the Department of Assessments and
Delaware Secretary of State Taxation ("MSDAT"). The
("Secretary of State"). The Maryland law governing
Delaware law governing a DST is corporations is referred to in this
referred to in this analysis as analysis as "Maryland Law."
the "Delaware Act."
A DST is an unincorporated A corporation is incorporated
association organized under the under Maryland Law. A
Delaware Act whose operations corporation's operations are
are governed by its governing governed by its charter and by-
instrument (which may consist of laws, and its business and affairs
one or more instruments). Its are managed by or under the
business and affairs are managed direction of a board of directors
by or under the direction of one (the "board" or "board of
or more trustees. directors" or collectively, the
"directors"). No public filing of
the by-laws is required.
If a DST is, becomes, or will
become prior to or within 180
days following its first issuance of
beneficial interests, a registered
investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended (the "1940 Act"), such
DST is not required to have a
C-1
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
trustee who is a resident of
Delaware or who has a principal
place of business in Delaware
provided that notice that the DST
is or will become an investment
company is set forth in the DST's
certificate of trust and the DST has
a registered office and a registered
agent for service of process in
Delaware.
The governing instrument for the Templeton Global Smaller
DST, Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund, Inc., a Maryland
Companies Fund (the "Trust"), is corporation, is referred to in this
comprised of an agreement and analysis as the "Corporation." The
declaration of trust ("Declaration") Corporation is governed by its
and by-laws ("By-Laws"). The Articles of Incorporation, as
Trust's governing body is a board amended and supplemented
of trustees (the "board" or "board ("Charter"), and by-laws ("By-
of trustees" or collectively, the Laws") and the Corporation's
"trustees"). governing body is a board of
directors.
Each trustee of the Trust shall hold Directors of the Corporation are
office for the lifetime of the Trust elected at an annual meeting of the
or until such trustee's earlier stockholders, if held, and each
death, resignation, removal or director is elected to serve for one
inability otherwise to serve, or, if year and until his or her successor
sooner than any such events, until shall be elected and shall qualify
the next meeting of shareholders or until his or her earlier death,
called for the purpose of electing resignation or removal.
trustees or consent of shareholders
in lieu thereof for the election of
trustees, and until the election and
qualification of his or her
successor.
Designation of Under the Delaware Act, the Equity securities of a corporation
Ownership Shares ownership interests in a DST are are generally denominated as
or Interests denominated as "beneficial shares of stock. Record owners of
interests" and are held by shares of stock are stockholders.
"beneficial owners." However, Generally, equity securities that
there is flexibility as to how a have voting rights and are entitled
governing instrument refers to to the residual assets of the
"beneficial interests" and corporation, after payment of
"beneficial owners" and the liabilities, are referred to as
governing instrument may identify "common stock."
"beneficial interests" and
"beneficial owners" as "shares"
and "shareholders," respectively.
C-2
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
The Trust's beneficial interests, The Corporation's equity
without par value, are designated securities are shares of common
as "shares" and its beneficial stock, par value $0.20 per share,
owners are designated as and the owners of such stock are
"shareholders." This analysis will "stockholders."
use the "share" and "shareholder"
terminology.
Series and Under the Delaware Act, the The Maryland Law permits a
Classes governing instrument may provide corporation to issue one or more
for classes, groups or series of series and classes of stock. If the
shares, shareholders or trustees, stock is to be divided into series or
having such relative rights, powers classes, the charter must describe
and duties as set forth in the each series and class, including
governing instrument. Such series, any preferences, conversion or
classes or groups may be other rights, voting powers,
described in the DST's governing restrictions, limitations as to
instrument or in resolutions dividends, qualifications and terms
adopted by its trustees. No state or conditions of redemption
filing is necessary and, unless among such classes and series. To
required by the governing change the terms of an existing
instrument, shareholder approval series or class or create a new
is not needed. Except to the extent series or class, the charter must be
otherwise provided in the amended. Generally, amendments
governing instrument of a DST, to the charter must receive board
where the DST is a registered and stockholder approval.
investment company under the
1940 Act, any class, group or Under Maryland Law, the charter
series of shares established by the may also authorize the board to
governing instrument shall be a classify or reclassify any unissued
class, group or series preferred as stock from time to time, without
to distributions or dividends over stockholder approval, by setting or
all other classes, groups or series changing the preferences,
with respect to assets specifically conversion or other rights, voting
allocated to such class, group or powers, restrictions, limitations as
series as contemplated by Section to dividends, qualifications, or
18 (or any amendment or terms and conditions of
successor provision) of the 1940 redemption, by filing articles
Act and any regulations issued supplementary to the charter with
thereunder. the MSDAT.
The Declaration authorizes the The Charter authorizes the board,
board of trustees to divide the subject to any applicable
Trust's shares into separate and provisions of the 1940 Act, to
distinct series and to divide a classify or to reclassify, from time
series into separate classes of to time, any unissued shares of
shares as permitted by the stock of the Corporation, by
Delaware Act. Such series and setting, changing or eliminating
classes will have the rights, the preference, conversion or
C-3
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
powers and duties set forth in the rights, voting powers, restrictions
Declaration unless otherwise or limitations as to dividends, and
provided in resolutions of the qualifications or terms and
board with respect to such series conditions of or rights to require
or class. The board of trustees may redemption of the stock and
classify or reclassify any unissued pursuant to such classification, or
shares or any shares of the Trust or reclassification, to increase or
any series or class, that were decrease the number of authorized
previously issued and are shares but the number of shares of
reacquired, into one or more series any class shall not be reduced by
or classes that may be established the board below the number of
and designated from time to time. shares outstanding.
The Declaration provides that the The Charter provides that, at such
establishment and designation of times as may be determined by the
any series or class shall be board (or with the authorization of
effective, without the requirement the board, the officers of the
of shareholder approval, upon the Corporation) in accordance with
adoption of a resolution by not the 1940 Act, including Rule 18f-3
less than a majority of the then thereunder, and applicable rules
board of trustees, which resolution and regulations of the National
shall set forth such establishment Association of Securities Dealers,
and designation and may provide, Inc., and reflected in the
to the extent permitted by the Corporation's registration
Delaware Act, for rights, powers statement, Class B shares may be
and duties of such series or class converted automatically into Class
(including variations in the A shares based on the relative net
relative rights and preferences as asset values of such classes at the
between the different series and time of conversion, subject,
classes) otherwise than as however, to any conditions of
provided in the Declaration. The conversion that may be imposed
board of trustees has approved by the board (or with the
resolutions that provide the authorization of the board, the
shareholders of each series and officers of the Corporation) and
class of the Trust with the same reflected in the registration
conversion rights, and subject to statement.
the same conditions of conversion,
as the shareholders of the
corresponding series and class of
the Corporation.
Assets and Liabilities Assets and Liabilities
The Declaration also provides that The Charter also provides that the
each series of the Trust shall be allocation of investment income,
separate and distinct from any realized and unrealized capital
other series of the Trust, shall gains and losses, and expenses and
maintain separate and distinct liabilities of the Corporation
records on the books of the Trust, among the classes of the
and shall hold and account for the Corporation's shares and the
C-4
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
assets and liabilities belonging to determination of their respective
any such series separately from the net asset values and rights upon
assets and liabilities of the Trust or liquidation or dissolution of the
any other series. Each class of a Corporation shall be determined
series shall be separate and distinct conclusively by the board in a
from any other class of the series. manner that is consistent with
If any assets or liabilities which Rule 18f-3 of the 1940 Act and
are not readily identifiable as any existing or future amendment
assets or liabilities of a particular to that rule or any rule or
series, then the board of trustees, interpretation under the 1940 Act
or an appropriate officer as that modifies, is an authorized
determined by the board of alternative to, or supersedes that
trustees, shall allocate such assets rule.
or liabilities to, between or among
any one or more of the series in
such manner and on such basis as
the board of trustees, in its sole
discretion, deems fair and
equitable. Each such allocation by
or under the direction of the board
of trustees shall be conclusive and
binding upon the shareholders of
all series for all purposes.
Liabilities, debts, obligations,
costs, charges, reserves and
expenses related to the distribution
of, and other identified expenses
that should properly be allocated
to, the shares of a particular class
may be charged to and borne
solely by such class. The bearing
of expenses solely by a particular
class of shares may be
appropriately reflected in (in a
manner determined by the board
of trustees), and may affect the net
asset value attributable to, and the
dividend, redemption and
liquidation rights of, such class.
Each allocation of liabilities,
debts, obligations, costs, charges,
reserves and expenses by or under
the direction of the board of
trustees shall be conclusive and
binding upon the shareholders of
all classes for all purposes.
C-5
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Dividends and Distributions Dividends and Distributions
The Declaration provides that no The Charter provides that the
dividend or distribution including, dividends and distributions of
without limitation, any distribution investment income and capital
paid upon dissolution of the Trust gains with respect to each class of
or of any series, nor any the stock of the Corporation shall
redemption of, the shares of any be in such amount as may be
series or class of such series shall declared from time to time by the
be effected by the Trust other than board, and such dividends and
from the assets held with respect distributions may vary from class
to such series, nor, except as to class to reflect differing
specifically provided in the allocations of the expenses of the
Declaration, shall any shareholder Corporation among the classes,
of any particular series otherwise and any resultant difference
have any right or claim against the among the net asset value per
assets held with respect to any share of the classes, to such extent
other series or the Trust generally and for such purposes as the board
except, in the case of a right or may deem appropriate.
claim against the assets held with
respect to any other series, to the The By-Laws provide that
extent that such shareholder has dividends upon the capital stock of
such a right or claim under the the Corporation, subject to the
Declaration as a shareholder of provisions of the Charter, may be
such other series. The shareholders declared by the board at any
of the Trust or any series or class, regular or special meeting,
if any, shall be entitled to receive pursuant to law. Before payment
dividends and distributions when, of any dividend, there may be set
if and as declared by the board of aside out of the net profits of the
trustees, provided that with respect Corporation available for
to classes, such dividends and dividends such sum or sums as the
distributions shall comply with the board from time to time in its
1940 Act. The right of absolute discretion thinks proper
shareholders to receive dividends as a reserve fund to meet
or other distributions on shares of contingencies, or for equalizing
any class may be set forth in a dividends, or for repairing or
plan adopted by the board of maintaining any property of the
trustees and amended from time to Corporation, or for such other
time pursuant to the 1940 Act. purpose as the board shall think
conducive to the interests of the
No share shall have any priority or Corporation, and the board may
preference over any other share of modify or abolish any such reserve
the same series with respect to in the manner in which it was
dividends or distributions paid in created.
the ordinary course of business or
distributions upon dissolution of
the Trust or of such series made
pursuant to the provisions of the
Declaration; provided however,
that if the shares of a series are
C-6
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
divided into classes, no share of a
particular class shall have any
priority or preference over any
other share of the same class with
respect to dividends or
distributions paid in the ordinary
course of business or distributions
upon dissolution of the Trust or of
such series made pursuant to the
provisions of the Declaration. All
dividends and distributions shall
be made ratably among all
shareholders of the Trust or a
particular series from the property
of the Trust held with respect to
the Trust or such series; provided
however, that if the shares of a
series are divided into classes, all
dividends and distributions from
the property of the Trust held with
respect to such series shall be
distributed to each class of such
series according to the net asset
value computed for such class and
within such particular class, shall
be distributed ratably to the
shareholders of such class.
Dividends may be paid in cash or
in kind. Before payment of any
dividend there may be set aside
out of any funds of the Trust, or
the applicable series, available for
dividends such sum or sums as the
board of trustees may from time to
time, in its absolute discretion,
think proper as a reserve fund to
meet contingencies, or for
equalizing dividends, or for
repairing or maintaining any
property of the Trust, or any
series, or for such other lawful
purpose as the board of trustees
shall deem to be in the best
interests of the Trust, or the
applicable series, as the case may
be, and the board of trustees may
abolish any such reserve in the
manner in which it was created.
C-7
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Amendments to The Delaware Act provides broad Under Maryland Law,
Governing flexibility as to the manner of amendments to the charter must
Documents amending and/or restating the generally be approved by the
governing instrument of a DST. board and by the affirmative vote
Amendments to the Declaration of two-thirds of all votes entitled
that do not change the information to be cast (unless the charter
in the DST's certificate of trust are permits amendment by a higher or
not required to be filed with the lesser proportion of the voting
Secretary of State. stock, but not less than a majority
of the shares outstanding).
Declaration of Trust Charter
The Declaration may be restated The Charter provides that the
and/or amended at any time by a Charter may be amended, altered,
written instrument signed by a repealed, or added to (including
majority of the board of trustees any amendment which changes the
and, if required by the Declaration, terms of any of the outstanding
the 1940 Act or any securities stock by classification,
exchange on which outstanding reclassification or otherwise) upon
shares are listed for trading, by the vote of the holders of a
approval of such amendment by majority of the shares outstanding
the shareholders, by the and entitled to vote thereon.
affirmative "vote of a majority of
the outstanding voting securities"
(as defined in the 1940 Act) of the
Trust entitled to vote at a
shareholders' meeting at which a
quorum is present, subject to
Article III, Section 6 of the
Declaration relating to voting by
series and classes.
By-Laws By-Laws
The By-Laws may be amended, Under Maryland Law, after the
restated or repealed or new By- organizational meeting, the power
Laws may be adopted by the to adopt, alter or repeal the by-
affirmative vote of a majority of laws is vested in the stockholders,
the outstanding shares entitled to except to the extent that the
vote. The By-Laws may also be charter or by-laws vest such power
amended, restated or repealed or in the board.
new By-Laws may be adopted by
the board of trustees, by a vote of The By-Laws may be adopted,
a majority of the trustees present amended or repealed by "vote of
at a meeting at which a quorum is the holders of a majority of the
present. [Corporation's] stock" (as defined
in the 1940 Act) at any annual or
Certificate of Trust special meeting of the
Pursuant to the Declaration, stockholders at which a quorum is
amendments and/or restatements present or represented, provided
of the certificate of trust shall be notice of the proposed amendment
made at any time by the board of shall have been contained in the
C-8
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
trustees, without approval of the notice of the meeting. Directors
shareholders, to correct any may adopt, amend or repeal any
inaccuracy contained therein. Any By-Law (which is not inconsistent
such amendments/restatements of with any By-Law adopted,
the certificate of trust must be amended or repealed by
executed by at least one (1) trustee stockholders) by majority vote of
and filed with the Secretary of all of the directors in office at any
State in order to become effective. regular meeting, or at any special
meeting, in accordance with
applicable law.
Preemptive Under the Delaware Act, a Under Maryland Law, a
Rights and governing instrument may contain stockholder does not have
Redemption any provision relating to the preemptive rights unless the
of Shares rights, duties and obligations of charter expressly grants such
the shareholders. Unless otherwise rights.
provided in the governing
instrument, a shareholder shall
have no preemptive right to
subscribe to any additional issue
of shares or another interest in a
DST.
The Declaration provides that no The Corporation does not provide
shareholder shall have the stockholders with preemptive
preemptive or other right to rights.
subscribe for new or additional
shares or other securities issued by
the Trust or any series thereof.
Unless otherwise provided in the The Charter provides stockholders
Trust's prospectus relating to the the right to require the Corporation
outstanding shares, as such to redeem outstanding shares
prospectus may be amended from offered by the stockholder upon
time to time, the Trust shall the stockholder's compliance with
purchase the outstanding shares procedures set forth in the Charter.
offered by any shareholder for The Corporation shall pay the net
redemption upon such asset value of such shares, less any
shareholder's compliance with the redemption fee fixed by the board
procedures set forth in the and payable to the Corporation not
Declaration and/or such other exceeding 1% of the net asset
procedures as the board may value of the shares redeemed.
authorize. The Trust shall pay the However, the board may suspend
net asset value for such stockholders' redemption rights
outstanding shares, subject to when permitted or required to do
certain reductions for fees and so by the 1940 Act. The
sales charges, in accordance with Corporation may pay a redeeming
the Declaration, the By-Laws, the stockholder in portfolio securities
1940 Act and other applicable law. of the Corporation and/or cash, as
The Trust's payments for such the board deems advisable, but
outstanding shares shall be made stockholders do not have the right
C-9
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
in cash, but may, at the option of to require that the shares be
the board of trustees or an redeemed in kind. In addition, the
authorized officer, be made in board may cause the Corporation
kind or partially in cash and to redeem the shares held in any
partially in kind. In addition, at the account if the aggregate net asset
option of the board of trustees, the value of such shares (taken at cost
Trust may, from time to time, or value, as determined by the
without the vote of the board) is less than such amount as
shareholders, but subject to the the board may fix and, upon
1940 Act, redeem outstanding notice, the stockholder does not
shares or authorize the closing of comply with such other terms and
any shareholder account, subject conditions as may be fixed by the
to such conditions as may be board, subject to the 1940 Act.
established by the board of
trustees.
Dissolution and The Trust shall be dissolved upon See Voting Rights, Meetings,
Termination the first to occur of the following: Notice, Quorum, Record Dates
Events (i) upon the vote of the holders of and Proxies--Stockholder Vote
a majority of the outstanding for the Maryland Law as to the
shares of the Trust entitled to vote; stockholder vote required to
(ii) at the discretion of the board of voluntarily dissolve a corporation.
trustees at any time there are no
shares outstanding of the Trust; Depending on the grounds for
(iii) upon the sale, conveyance and involuntary dissolution, under
transfer of all of the assets of the Maryland Law (i) stockholders
Trust to another entity; or entitled to cast at least 25% of all
(iv) upon the occurrence of a the votes entitled to be cast in the
dissolution or termination event election of directors; (ii) any
pursuant to any provision of the stockholder entitled to vote in the
Delaware Act. election of directors; or (iii) any
stockholder or creditor of the
A particular series shall be corporation, may petition a court
dissolved upon the first to occur of of equity to dissolve the
the following: (i) upon the vote of corporation.
the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of that series
entitled to vote; (ii) at the
discretion of the board of trustees
at any time there are no shares
outstanding of that series; or
(iii) upon any event that causes the
dissolution of the Trust.
A particular class shall be
terminated upon the first to occur
of the following: (i) upon the vote
of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of that class
entitled to vote; (ii) at the
discretion of the board of trustees
C-10
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
at any time there are no shares
outstanding of that class; or (iii)
upon the dissolution of the series
of which the class is a part.
Liquidation Under the Delaware Act, a DST Under Maryland Law, a
upon that has dissolved shall first pay corporation that has voluntarily
Dissolution or make reasonable provision to pay dissolved shall pay, satisfy and
or all known claims and obligations, discharge the existing debts and
Termination including those that are obligations of the corporation,
contingent, conditional and including necessary expenses of
unmatured, and all known claims liquidation, before distributing the
and obligations for which the remaining assets to the
claimant is unknown. Any stockholders.
remaining assets shall be
distributed to the shareholders or
as otherwise provided in the
governing instrument.
Under the Delaware Act, a series
that has dissolved shall first pay or
make reasonable provision to pay
all known claims and obligations
of the series, including those that
are contingent, conditional and
unmatured, and all known claims
and obligations of the series for
which the claimant is unknown.
Any remaining assets of the series
shall be distributed to the
shareholders of such series or as
otherwise provided in the
governing instrument.
The Declaration provides that any
remaining assets of the dissolved
Trust and/or each series thereof (or
the particular dissolved series, as
the case may be) shall be
distributed to the shareholders of
the Trust and/or each series
thereof (or the particular dissolved
series, as the case may be) ratably
according to the number of
outstanding shares of the Trust
and/or such series thereof (or the
particular dissolved series, as the
case may be) held of record by the
several shareholders on the date
for such dissolution distribution;
C-11
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
provided, however, that if the
outstanding shares of a series are
divided into classes, any
remaining assets held with respect
to such series shall be distributed
to each class of such series
according to the net asset value
computed for such class and
within such particular class, shall
be distributed ratably to the
shareholders of such class
according to the number of
outstanding shares of such class
held of record by the several
shareholders on the date for such
dissolution distribution.
Voting Rights, Under the Delaware Act, the
Meetings, governing instrument may set
Notice, Quorum, forth any provision relating to
Record Dates trustee and shareholder voting
and Proxies rights, including the withholding
of such rights from certain trustees
or shareholders. If voting rights
are granted, the governing
instrument may contain any
provision relating to meetings,
notice requirements, written
consents, record dates, quorum
requirements, voting by proxy and
any other matter pertaining to the
exercise of voting rights. The
governing instrument may also
provide for the establishment of
record dates for allocations and
distributions by the DST.
One Vote Per Share One Vote Per Share
Subject to Article III, Section 6 of Under Maryland Law, unless a
the Declaration relating to voting corporation's charter provides for
by series and classes, the a greater or lesser number of votes
Declaration provides that each per share, or limits or denies
outstanding share is entitled to one voting rights, each outstanding
vote and each outstanding share of stock is entitled to one
fractional share is entitled to a vote on each matter submitted to a
fractional vote. vote at a meeting of stockholders.
A corporation may issue fractional
shares of stock.
C-12
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Voting by Series or Class The Charter provides that each
In addition, the Declaration outstanding share of stock is
provides that all outstanding entitled to one vote and each
shares of the Trust entitled to vote outstanding fractional share of
on a matter shall vote on the stock is entitled to a fractional
matter, separately by series and, if vote, subject to Maryland Law and
applicable, by class, provided that: 1940 Act requirements regarding
(1) where the 1940 Act requires all voting by class.
outstanding shares of the Trust to
be voted in the aggregate without
differentiation between the
separate series or classes, then all
of the Trust's outstanding shares
shall vote in the aggregate; and
(2) if any matter affects only the
interests of some but not all series
or classes, then only the
shareholders of such affected
series or classes shall be entitled to
vote on the matter.
Shareholders' Meetings Stockholders' Meetings
The Delaware Act does not Under Maryland Law, every
mandate annual shareholders' corporation must hold an annual
meetings. stockholders' meeting to elect
directors and transact other
business, except that the charter or
by-laws of a corporation registered
under the 1940 Act may provide
that an annual meeting is not
required in any year in which the
election of directors is not required
by the 1940 Act. Maryland Law
authorizes, and permits the charter
and by-laws to authorize, certain
persons to call special meetings of
stockholders.
The By-Laws authorize the calling The By-Laws do not require the
of a shareholders' meeting: Corporation to hold an annual
(i) when deemed necessary or meeting of stockholders in any
desirable by the board of trustees; year in which the election of
or (ii) to the extent permitted by directors is not required by the
the 1940 Act, by the chairperson 1940 Act. Otherwise, the board is
of the board, or at the request of authorized to hold annual
holders of 10% of the outstanding meetings of stockholders for the
shares if such shareholders pay the election of directors and the
reasonably estimated cost of transaction of other business as it
preparing and mailing the notice may determine. The By-Laws also
thereof, for the purpose of electing authorize the calling of a special
C-13
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
trustees. However, no meeting meeting for any purpose or
may be called at the request of purposes, unless otherwise
shareholders to consider any "prescribed" by statute or the
matter that is substantially the Charter, by resolution of the board
same as a matter voted upon at a or the president, and shall be
shareholders' meeting held during called by the president or the
the preceding twelve (12) months, secretary upon the written request
unless requested by holders of a of a majority of the directors or at
majority of all outstanding shares the written request of stockholders
entitled to vote at such meeting. owning 10% "in amount of the
entire capital stock" of the
Corporation then issued and
outstanding, if (1) the request
states the purpose of such meeting
and the matters proposed to be
acted on and (2) the stockholders
requesting such meeting pay the
reasonably estimated cost of
preparing and mailing the notice
thereof. However, no special
meeting will be called at the
request of stockholders to consider
any matter that is substantially the
same as a matter voted upon at a
stockholders' special meeting held
during the preceding 12 months,
unless requested by holders of a
majority of all outstanding shares
entitled to vote at such meeting.
Record Dates Record Dates
As set forth above, the Delaware Under Maryland Law, unless the
Act authorizes the governing by-laws otherwise provide, the
instrument of a DST to set forth board may set a record date, which
any provision relating to record date must be set within the
dates. parameters outlined by the
Maryland statute, for determining
stockholders entitled to notice of a
meeting, vote at a meeting, receive
dividends or be allotted other
rights.
In order to determine the In order to determine the
shareholders entitled to notice of, stockholders entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, a shareholders' and to vote at, a stockholders'
meeting, the Declaration meeting, the By-Laws authorize
authorizes the board of trustees to the board of directors to fix a
fix a record date. The record date record date not less than ten (10)
may not precede the date on which nor more than ninety (90) days
it is fixed by the board and it may prior to the date of the meeting or
not be more than one hundred and prior to the last day on which the
C-14
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
twenty (120) days nor less than ten consent or dissent of stockholders
(10) days before the date of the may be effectively expressed for
shareholders' meeting. The By- any purpose without a meeting.
Laws provide that notice of a
shareholders' meeting shall be
given to shareholders entitled to
vote at such meeting not less than
ten (10) nor more than one
hundred and twenty (120) days
before the date of the meeting.
To determine the shareholders If the board does not fix a record
entitled to vote on any action date, the record date shall be the
without a meeting, the Declaration later of the close of business on
authorizes the board of trustees to the day on which notice of the
fix a record date. The record date meeting is mailed or the 30th day
may not precede the date on which before the meeting, except if all
it is fixed by the board nor may it stockholders waive notice, the
be more than thirty (30) days after record date is the close of business
the date on which it is fixed by the on the 10th day next preceding the
board. day the meeting is held.
Pursuant to the Declaration, if the
board of trustees does not fix a
record date: (a) the record date for
determining shareholders entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, a
meeting will be the day before the
date on which notice is given or, if
notice is waived, on the day before
the date of the meeting; (b) the
record date for determining
shareholders entitled to vote on
any action by consent in writing
without a meeting, (i) when no
prior action by the board of
trustees has been taken, shall be
the day on which the first signed
written consent is delivered to the
Trust, or (ii) when prior action of
the board of trustees has been
taken, shall be the day on which
the board of trustees adopts the
resolution taking such prior action.
To determine the shareholders of To determine the stockholders
the Trust or any series or class entitled to a dividend, any other
thereof entitled to a dividend or distribution, or delivery of
any other distribution of assets of evidences of rights or other
the Trust or any series or class interests from the Corporation, the
thereof, the Declaration authorizes By-Laws authorize the board to
C-15
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
the board of trustees to fix a record fix a record date not exceeding
date. The record date may not ninety (90) days preceding the
precede the date on which it is date fixed for the payment of the
fixed by the board nor may it be dividend or distribution or
more than sixty (60) days before delivery of the evidences.
the date such dividend or
distribution is to be paid. The
board may set different record
dates for different series or
classes.
Quorum for Shareholders' Quorum for Stockholders'
Meeting Meeting
To transact business at a Under Maryland Law, unless the
shareholders' meeting, the charter or Maryland Law provides
Declaration provides that forty otherwise, in order to constitute a
percent (40%) of the outstanding quorum for a meeting, there must
shares entitled to vote at the be present in person or by proxy,
meeting, which are present in stockholders entitled to cast a
person or represented by proxy, majority of all the votes entitled to
shall constitute a quorum at such be cast at the meeting.
meeting, except when a larger
quorum is required by the To transact business at a meeting,
Declaration, the By-Laws, the By-Laws provide that a
applicable law or any securities majority of the outstanding shares
exchange on which such shares entitled to vote, which are present
are listed for trading, in which in person or represented by proxy,
case such quorum shall comply shall constitute a quorum at a
with such requirements. When a stockholders' meeting.
separate vote by one or more
series or classes is required, forty
percent (40%) of the outstanding
shares of each such series or class
entitled to vote at a shareholders'
meeting of such series or class,
which are present in person or
represented by proxy, shall
constitute a quorum at such series
or class meeting, except when a
larger quorum is required by the
Declaration, the By-Laws,
applicable law or the requirements
of any securities exchange on
which outstanding shares of such
series or class are listed for
trading, in which case such
quorum shall comply with such
requirements.
C-16
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Shareholder Vote Stockholder Vote
The Declaration provides that, Under Maryland Law, for most
subject to any provision of the stockholder actions, unless the
Declaration, the By-Laws, the charter or Maryland Law provides
1940 Act or other applicable law otherwise, a majority of all votes
that requires a different vote: (i) in cast at a meeting at which a
all matters other than the election quorum is present is required to
of trustees, the affirmative "vote approve any matter. Actions such
of a majority of the outstanding as (i) amendments to the
voting securities" (as defined in corporation's charter, (ii) mergers,
the 1940 Act) of the Trust entitled (iii) consolidations, (iv) statutory
to vote at a shareholders' meeting share exchanges, (v) transfers of
at which a quorum is present, shall assets and (vi) dissolutions require
be the act of the shareholders; and the affirmative vote of two-thirds
(ii) trustees shall be elected by a of all votes entitled to be cast on
plurality of the votes cast of the the matter unless the charter
holders of outstanding shares provides for a lesser proportion
entitled to vote present in person which may not be less than a
or represented by proxy at a majority of all votes entitled to be
shareholders' meeting at which a cast on the matter. Unless the
quorum is present. Pursuant to the charter or by-laws require a
Declaration, where a separate vote greater vote, a plurality of all votes
by series and, if applicable, by cast at a meeting at which a
classes is required, the preceding quorum is present is required to
sentence shall apply to such elect a director.
separate votes by series and
classes.
Election of Directors. Under the
By-Laws, at a stockholders'
meeting at which a quorum is
present, a majority of the votes
cast shall be required to fill any
vacancy on the board, unless
express provisions of applicable
statutes, of the Charter or of the
By-Laws require a different vote.
As described in Vacancies on
Board of Trustees/Directors
below, the By-Laws provide for a
different vote to fill vacancies
after shareholders have voted to
increase the number of directors or
to remove a director.
C-17
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Other matters for which the vote is
not expressly designated
otherwise. For all other matters,
other than any specific matter for
which the Charter or By-Laws
expressly provides for a different
vote, the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the shares
cast, at a stockholders' meeting at
which a quorum is present, shall
be the act of the stockholders.
Shareholder Vote on Certain
Transactions
Pursuant to the Declaration, the
board of trustees, by vote of a
majority of the trustees, may cause
the merger, consolidation,
conversion, share exchange or
reorganization of the Trust, or the
conversion, share exchange or
reorganization of any series of the
Trust, without the vote of the
shareholders of the Trust or such
series, as applicable, unless such
vote is required by the 1940 Act;
provided however, that the board
of trustees shall provide 30 days'
prior written notice to the
shareholders of the Trust or such
series, as applicable, of such
merger, consolidation, conversion,
share exchange or reorganization.
If permitted by the 1940 Act, the
board of trustees, by vote of a
majority of the trustees, and
without a shareholder vote, may
cause the Trust to convert to a
master feeder structure and thereby
cause series of the Trust to either
become feeders into a master fund,
or to become master funds into
which other funds are feeders.
Cumulative Voting Cumulative Voting
The Declaration provides that Maryland Law provides that the
shareholders are not entitled to charter may authorize cumulative
cumulate their votes on any voting for the election of the
matter. directors and if the charter does
not so provide, then the
stockholders are not entitled to
cumulative voting rights.
C-18
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
The Charter and By-Laws do not
have any provisions as to whether
stockholders are entitled to
cumulate their votes on any matter
and consequently, the stockholders
are not entitled to cumulate their
votes on any matter.
Proxies Proxies
Under the Delaware Act, unless Under Maryland Law, a
otherwise provided in the stockholder may sign a writing
governing instrument of a DST, on authorizing another person to act
any matter that is to be voted on as a proxy or may transmit such
by the trustees or the shareholders, authorization by telegram,
the trustees or shareholders (as cablegram, datagram, electronic
applicable) may vote in person or mail, or any other electronic or
by proxy and such proxy may be telephonic means.
granted in writing, by means of
"electronic transmission" (as
defined in the Delaware Act) or as
otherwise permitted by applicable
law. Under the Delaware Act, the
term "electronic transmission" is
defined as any form of
communication not directly
involving the physical
transmission of paper that creates
a record that may be retained,
retrieved and reviewed by a
recipient thereof and that may be
directly reproduced in paper form
by such a recipient through an
automated process.
The By-Laws permit a shareholder The By-Laws require a proxy to
to authorize another person to act be executed in writing by the
as proxy by the following stockholder or by a duly
methods: execution of a written authorized attorney-in-fact. Unless
instrument or by "electronic a proxy provides otherwise, it is
transmission" (as defined in the not valid more than 11 months
Delaware Act), telephonic, after its date. A proxy is revocable
computerized, telecommunications by the person executing it or by
or another reasonable alternative his or her personal representatives
to the execution of a written or assigns. Proxies shall be
instrument. Unless a proxy delivered prior to the meeting to
provides otherwise, it is not valid the Secretary of the Corporation or
more than 11 months after its date. to the person acting as Secretary
In addition, the By-Laws provide of the meeting before being voted.
that the revocability of a proxy A proxy with respect to stock held
that states on its face that it is in the name of two or more
irrevocable shall be governed by persons will be valid if executed
the provisions of the general by one of them, unless at or prior
C-19
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
corporation law of the State of to its exercise, the Corporation
Delaware. receives specific written notice to
the contrary from any one of them.
A proxy purporting to be executed
by or on behalf of a stockholder
shall be deemed valid unless it is
challenged at or prior to its
exercise.
Action by Written Consent Action by Written Consent
Under the Delaware Act, unless Maryland Law provides that any
otherwise provided in the action required or permitted to be
governing instrument of a DST, on taken at a stockholders' meeting
any matter that is to be voted on may be taken without a meeting, if
by the trustees or the shareholders, a unanimous written consent is
such action may be taken without signed by each stockholder
a meeting, without prior notice entitled to vote on the matter.
and without a vote if a written
consent(s), setting forth the action
taken, is signed by the trustees or
shareholders (as applicable)
having the minimum number of
votes that would be necessary to
take such action at a meeting at
which all trustees or interests in
the DST (as applicable) entitled to
vote on such action were present
and voted. Unless otherwise
provided in the governing
instrument, a consent transmitted
by "electronic transmission" (as
defined in the Delaware Act) by a
trustee or shareholder (as
applicable) or by a person
authorized to act for a trustee or
shareholder (as applicable) will be
deemed to be written and signed
for this purpose.
Shareholders. The Declaration Stockholders. The By-Laws
authorizes shareholders to take provide that any action to be taken
action without a meeting and by stockholders may be taken
without prior notice if written without a meeting if: (1) all
consents setting forth the action stockholders entitled to vote on the
taken are signed by the holders of matter consent to the action in
all outstanding shares entitled to writing; (2) all stockholders
vote on that action. A consent entitled to notice of the meeting
transmitted by "electronic but not entitled to vote at it sign a
transmission" (as defined in the written waiver of any right to
Delaware Act) by a shareholder or dissent; and (3) the consents and
by a person(s) authorized to act for waivers are filed with the record
a shareholder shall be deemed to of the meetings of stockholders.
C-20
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
be written and signed for purposes Such consent shall be treated for
of this provision. all purposes as a vote of the
meeting.
Board of Trustees. The Board of Directors. The By-Laws
Declaration also authorizes the also provide that, except as
board of trustees or any committee otherwise required by statute, the
of the board of trustees to take board or any committee of the
action without a meeting and board may act by written consent
without prior written notice if signed by all the members of the
written consents setting forth the board or committee, respectively,
action taken are executed by if the consent is filed with the
trustees having the number of minutes of the proceedings of the
votes necessary to take that action board or committee.
at a meeting at which the entire
board of trustees or any committee
thereof, as applicable, is present
and voting. A consent transmitted
by "electronic transmission" (as
defined in the Delaware Act) by a
trustee shall be deemed to be
written and signed for purposes of
this provision.
Removal of Trustees/ The governing instrument of a Under Maryland Law, unless
Directors DST may contain any provision otherwise provided in the charter,
relating to the removal of trustees; a director may generally be
provided however, that there shall removed with or without cause by
at all times be at least one trustee the vote of a majority of all the
of the DST. votes entitled to be cast generally
for the election of directors unless
(i) such director is elected by a
certain class or series, (ii) the
charter provides for cumulative
voting or (iii) the board is
classified.
Under the Declaration, any trustee Under the By-Laws, stockholders
may be removed, with or without may remove any director or
cause, by the board of trustees, by directors with or without cause at
action of a majority of the trustees. a meeting of stockholders duly
Shareholders shall have the power called and at which a quorum is
to remove a trustee only to the present, by the affirmative vote of
extent provided by the 1940 Act. the holders of a majority of the
votes entitled to be cast thereon,
remove any director or directors
from office, and may elect a
successor or successors to fill any
resulting vacancies for the
unexpired terms of the removed
directors. A stockholders' meeting
shall be called for such purpose by
C-21
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
board if requested in writing by
holders of not less than 10% of the
outstanding shares of the
Corporation.
Vacancies on Board Subject to the 1940 Act, vacancies Under Maryland Law,
of Trustees/ on the board of trustees may be stockholders may elect persons to
Directors filled by not less than a majority fill vacancies that result from the
vote of the trustee(s) then in removal of directors. Unless the
office, regardless of the number charter or by-laws provide
and even if less than a quorum. otherwise, a majority of the
However, a shareholders' meeting directors in office, whether or not
shall be called to elect trustees if comprising a quorum, may fill
required by the 1940 Act. vacancies that result from any
cause except an increase in the
number of directors. A majority of
the entire board of directors may
fill vacancies that result from an
increase in the number of
directors.
In the event all trustee offices Under the By-Laws, directors may
become vacant, the investment increase or decrease their number;
adviser shall serve as the sole if the number is increased, the
remaining trustee, subject to the added directors may be elected by
provisions of the 1940 Act, and a majority of directors in office at
shall, as soon as practicable, fill all the time of the increase. For other
of the vacancies on the board. vacancies, the directors then in
Thereupon, the investment adviser office (although less than a
shall resign as trustee and a quorum) shall continue to act and
shareholders' meeting shall be may by a majority vote fill any
called to elect trustees. vacancy until the next meeting of
stockholders, subject to the 1940
Act.
The number of directors may also
be increased or decreased by vote
of stockholders at any meeting
called for that purpose and if the
vote is to increase the number,
stockholders will vote by plurality
to elect the directors to fill the new
vacancies as well as any then
existing vacancies. The By-Laws
further provide that "[a]ny
vacancy may be filled by the
[s]tockholders at any meeting
thereof."
C-22
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Shareholder Under the Delaware Act, except to The stockholders of a corporation
Liability the extent otherwise provided in are not liable for the obligations of
the governing instrument of a the corporation.
DST, shareholders of a DST are
entitled to the same limitation of
personal liability extended to
shareholders of a private
corporation organized for profit
under the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware
(such shareholders are generally
not liable for the obligations of the
corporation).
Under the Declaration,
shareholders are entitled to the
same limitation of personal
liability as that extended to
shareholders of a private
corporation organized for profit
under the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.
However, the board of trustees
may cause any shareholder to pay
for charges of the trust's custodian
or transfer, dividend disbursing,
shareholder servicing or similar
agent for services provided to such
shareholder.
Trustee/Director/ Subject to the provisions in the Maryland Law requires a director
Agent Liability governing instrument, the to perform his or her duties in
Delaware Act provides that a good faith, in a manner he or she
trustee or any other person reasonably believes to be in the
managing the DST, when acting in best interests of the corporation
such capacity, will not be and with the care that an ordinarily
personally liable to any person prudent person in a like position
other than the DST or a would use under similar
shareholder of the DST for any circumstances. A director who
act, omission or obligation of the performs his or her duties in
DST or any trustee. To the extent accordance with this standard has
that at law or in equity, a trustee no liability to the corporation, its
has duties (including fiduciary stockholders or to third persons by
duties) and liabilities to the DST reason of being or having been a
and its shareholders, such duties director. A corporation may
and liabilities may be expanded or include in its charter a provision
restricted by the governing expanding or limiting the liability
instrument. of its directors and officers for
money damages to the corporation
or its stockholders, provided
C-23
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
however, that liability may not be
limited to the extent the person has
received an improper benefit or
profit in money, property or
services or where such person has
been actively and deliberately
dishonest.
The Declaration provides that any The Charter provides that no
person who is or was a trustee, director or officer shall be
officer, employee or other agent of personally liable to the
the Trust or is or was serving at Corporation or its stockholders for
the request of the Trust as a monetary damages except: (i) a
trustee, director, officer, employee director or officer is liable for the
or other agent of another amount of any improper benefit or
corporation, partnership, joint profit in money, property or
venture, trust or other enterprise services actually received; and
(an "Agent") will be liable to the (ii) where a judgment or other
Trust and to any shareholder final adjudication adverse to the
solely for such Agent's own director or officer is entered in a
willful misfeasance, bad faith, proceeding based on a finding that
gross negligence or reckless such person's action, or failure to
disregard of the duties involved in act, was the result of active and
the conduct of such Agent (such deliberate dishonesty and was
conduct referred to as material to the cause of action
"Disqualifying Conduct"). Subject adjudicated in the proceeding. The
to the preceding sentence, Agents Charter further provides that no
will not be liable for any act or director or officer will be
omission of any other Agent or protected from liability to the
any investment adviser or Corporation or its stockholders
principal underwriter of the Trust. arising from such director's or
No Agent, when acting in such officer's Disqualifying Conduct.
capacity, shall be personally liable
to any person (other than the Trust
or its shareholders as described
above) for any act, omission or
obligation of the Trust or any
trustee.
Indemnification Subject to such standards and Unless limited by its charter,
restrictions contained in the Maryland Law requires a
governing instrument of a DST, corporation to indemnify a
the Delaware Act authorizes a director who has successfully
DST to indemnify and hold defended a proceeding to which
harmless any trustee, shareholder such person was a party because
or other person from and against of such person's service in such
any and all claims and demands. capacity, against reasonable
expenses incurred in connection
with the proceeding.
C-24
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Maryland Law permits a
corporation to indemnify a
director, officer, employee or
agent who is a party or threatened
to be a party, by reason of service
in that capacity, to any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit
or proceeding, against judgments,
penalties, fines, settlements and
reasonable expenses unless it is
established that: (i) the act or
omission of such person was
material to the matter giving rise
to the proceeding, and was
committed in bad faith or was the
result of active and deliberate
dishonesty; (ii) such person
actually received an improper
personal benefit; or (iii) such
person had reasonable cause to
believe that the act or omission
was unlawful. This permissible
indemnification obligation may be
provided for, or may be
prohibited, through a corporation's
charter, by-laws, a board
resolution or another agreement.
However, if the proceeding is a
derivative suit or was brought by
the corporation, the corporation
may not indemnify a person who
has been adjudged to be liable to
the corporation. Corporations are
authorized to advance payment of
reasonable expenses upon
compliance with certain
requirements.
Pursuant to the Declaration, the The By-Laws provide that the
Trust will indemnify any Agent Corporation will indemnify its:
who was or is a party or is (i) directors to the fullest extent
threatened to be made a party to that indemnification of directors is
any proceeding by reason of such permitted by Maryland Law;
Agent's capacity, against (ii) officers to the same extent as
attorneys' fees and other certain its directors and to such further
expenses, judgments, fines, extent as is consistent with law;
settlements and other amounts and (iii) directors and officers
incurred in connection with such who, while serving as directors or
proceeding if such Agent acted in officers, also serve at the request
C-25
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
good faith or in the case of a of the Corporation as a director,
criminal proceeding, had no officer, partner, trustee, employee,
reasonable cause to believe such agent or fiduciary of another
Agent's conduct was unlawful. corporation, partnership, joint
However, there is no right to venture, trust, other enterprise or
indemnification for any liability employee benefit plan to the
arising from the Agent's fullest extent consistent with law.
Disqualifying Conduct. As to any This indemnification (and other
matter for which such Agent is rights) provided by the By-Laws
found to be liable in the will continue as to persons who
performance of such Agent's duty have ceased to be a director or
to the Trust or its shareholders, officer, includes the advance of
indemnification will be made only reasonable expenses subject to
to the extent that the court in certain conditions, and will inure
which that action was brought to the benefit of the heirs,
determines that in view of all the executors and administrators of
circumstances of the case, the such persons, but such persons
Agent was not liable by reason of will not be protected against any
such Agent's Disqualifying liability to the Corporation or its
Conduct. Note that the Securities stockholders arising from his or
Act of 1933, as amended (the her Disqualifying Conduct. The
"1933 Act"), in the opinion of the Corporation may indemnify, and
U.S. Securities and Exchange advance reasonable expenses to,
Commission ("SEC"), and the its employees and agents who are
1940 Act also limit the ability of not officers or directors of the
the Trust to indemnify an Agent. Corporation as may be provided
by the board of directors or by
Expenses incurred by an Agent in contract, subject to any limitations
defending any proceeding may be imposed by the 1940 Act. The By-
advanced by the Trust before the Laws permit the board of directors
final disposition of the proceeding to make such additional provisions
on receipt of an undertaking by or for the indemnification and
on behalf of the Agent to repay the advancement of expenses to
amount of the advance if it is directors, officers, employees and
ultimately determined that the agents, as are consistent with the
Agent is not entitled to law. The indemnification provided
indemnification by the Trust. by the By-Laws is not exclusive of
any other right, with respect to
indemnification or otherwise, to
which those seeking
indemnification may be entitled
under any insurance or other
agreement or resolution of
stockholders or disinterested
directors or otherwise.
Insurance The Delaware Act is silent as to Under Maryland Law, a
the right of a DST to purchase corporation may purchase
insurance on behalf of its trustees insurance on behalf of any person
C-26
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
or other persons. However, as the who is or was a director, officer,
policy of the Delaware Act is to employee or agent against any
give maximum effect to the liability asserted against and
principle of freedom of contract incurred by such person in any
and to the enforceability of such capacity whether or not the
governing instruments, the corporation would have the power
Declaration authorizes the board to indemnify such person against
of trustees, to the fullest extent such liability.
permitted by applicable law, to
purchase with Trust assets, The By-Laws authorize the
insurance for liability and for all Corporation to purchase and
expenses of an Agent in maintain insurance on behalf of
connection with any proceeding in any person who is or was a
which such Agent becomes director, officer, employee or
involved by virtue of such Agent's agent of the Corporation or who,
actions, or omissions to act, in its while a director, officer,
capacity or former capacity with employee, or agent of the
the Trust, whether or not the Trust Corporation, is or was serving at
would have the power to the request of the Corporation as a
indemnify such Agent against director, officer, partner, trustee,
such liability. employee, or agent of another
foreign or domestic corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust,
other enterprise, or employee
benefit plan against any liability
asserted against and incurred by
such person in any such capacity
or arising out of such person's
position. However, no insurance
may be purchased which would
indemnify any director or officer
against any liability to the
Corporation or its stockholders
arising from such person's
Disqualifying Conduct.
Shareholder Under the Delaware Act, except to Under Maryland Law, a
Right of the extent otherwise provided in stockholder may inspect, during
Inspection the governing instrument and usual business hours, the
subject to reasonable standards corporation's by-laws, stockholder
established by the trustees, each proceeding minutes, annual
shareholder has the right, upon statements of affairs and voting
reasonable demand for any trust agreements. In addition,
purpose reasonably related to the stockholders who have
shareholder's interest as a individually or together been
shareholder, to obtain from the holders of at least 5% of the
DST certain information regarding outstanding stock of any class for
the governance and affairs of the at least 6 months, may inspect and
DST. copy the corporation's books of
account, its stock ledger and its
statement of affairs.
C-27
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
To the extent permitted by The Charter grants stockholders
Delaware law and the By-Laws, a inspection rights only to the extent
shareholder, upon reasonable provided by Maryland Law. Such
written demand to the Trust for rights are subject to reasonable
any purpose reasonably related to regulations of the board of
such shareholder's interest as a directors not contrary to Maryland
shareholder, may inspect certain Law.
information as to the governance
and affairs of the Trust during
regular business hours. However,
reasonable standards governing,
without limitation, the information
and documents to be furnished and
the time and location of furnishing
the same, will be established by
the board or any officer to whom
such power is delegated in the By-
Laws. In addition, as permitted by
the Delaware Act, the By-Laws
also authorize the board or an
officer to whom the board
delegates such powers to keep
confidential from shareholders for
such period of time as deemed
reasonable any information that
the board or such officer in good
faith believes would not be in the
best interest of the Trust to
disclose or that could damage the
Trust or that the Trust is required
by law or by agreement with a
third party to keep confidential.
Derivative Under the Delaware Act, a Under Maryland Law, in order to
Actions shareholder may bring a derivative bring a derivative action, a
action if trustees with authority to stockholder (or his or her
do so have refused to bring the predecessor if he or she became a
action or if a demand upon the stockholder by operation of law)
trustees to bring the action is not must be a stockholder (a) at the
likely to succeed. A shareholder time of the acts or omissions
may bring a derivative action only complained about, (b) at the time
if the shareholder is a shareholder the action is brought, and (c) until
at the time the action is brought the completion of the litigation. A
and: (i) was a shareholder at the derivative action may be brought
time of the transaction complained by a stockholder if (i) a demand
about or (ii) acquired the status of upon the board of directors to
shareholder by operation of law or bring the action is improperly
pursuant to the governing refused or (ii) a request upon the
instrument from a person who was board of directors would be futile.
a shareholder at the time of the
C-28
Delaware Statutory Trust Maryland Corporation
------------------------ --------------------
Derivative transaction. A shareholder's right Under Maryland Law, a director
Actions to bring a derivative action may be of an investment company who "is
subject to such additional not an interested person, as
standards and restrictions, if any, defined by the 1940 Act, shall be
as are set forth in the governing deemed to be independent and
instrument. disinterested when making any
determination or taking any action
The Declaration provides that, as a director."
subject to the requirements set
forth in the Delaware Act, a
shareholder may bring a derivative
action on behalf of the Trust only
if the shareholder first makes a
pre-suit demand upon the board of
trustees to bring the subject action
unless an effort to cause the board
of trustees to bring such action is
excused. A demand on the board
of trustees shall only be excused if
a majority of the board of trustees,
or a majority of any committee
established to consider the merits
of such action, has a material
personal financial interest in the
action at issue. A trustee shall not
be deemed to have a material
personal financial interest in an
action or otherwise be disqualified
from ruling on a shareholder
demand by virtue of the fact that
such trustee receives remuneration
from his service on the board of
trustees of the Trust or on the
boards of one or more investment
companies with the same or an
affiliated investment advisor or
underwriter.
Management The Trust is an open-end The Corporation is an open-end
Investment management investment company management investment company
Company under the 1940 Act (i.e., a under the 1940 Act (i.e., a
Classification management investment company management investment company
whose securities are redeemable). whose securities are redeemable).
C-29
EXHIBIT D
FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED OR ELIMINATED
CURRENT
INVESTMENT CURRENT PROPOSED
RESTRICTION FUNDAMENTAL FUNDAMENTAL
PROPOSAL OR NUMBER & RESTRICTION RESTRICTION
SUB-PROPOSAL SUBJECT The Fund may not: The Fund may not:
------------ ------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------
3a 1. (Diversification Invest more than 5% of its Purchase the securities of any
of investments) total assets in the securities of one issuer (other than the U.S.
any one issuer (exclusive of government or any of its
U.S. government securities). agencies or instrumentalities
or securities of other
investment companies,
whether registered or excluded
from registration under
Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act)
if immediately after such
investment (a) more than 5%
of the value of the Fund's total
assets would be invested in
such issuer or (b) more than
10% of the outstanding voting
securities of such issuer would
be owned by the Fund, except
that up to 25% of the value of
the Fund's total assets may be
invested without regard to
such 5% and 10% limitations.
3b 2. (Real Estate) Invest in real estate or Purchase or sell real estate
mortgages on real estate unless acquired as a result of
(although the Fund may ownership of securities or
invest in marketable other instruments and
securities secured by real provided that this restriction
estate or interests therein). does not prevent the Fund
from purchasing or selling
securities secured by real
estate or interests therein or
securities of issuers that
invest, deal or otherwise
engage in transactions in real
estate or interests therein.
4 2. (Investment in Invest in other open-end Proposed to be Eliminated.
Other Investment investment companies
Companies) (except in connection with a Note: The Fund will still be
merger, consolidation, subject to the restrictions of
acquisition or reorganization) (S) 12(d) of the 1940 Act, or
or, as an operating policy any rules or exemptions or
D-1
CURRENT
INVESTMENT CURRENT PROPOSED
RESTRICTION FUNDAMENTAL FUNDAMENTAL
PROPOSAL OR NUMBER & RESTRICTION RESTRICTION
SUB-PROPOSAL SUBJECT The Fund may not: The Fund may not:
------------ ---------------- ------------------------------- --------------------------------
approved by the board, invest interpretations thereunder that
in closed-end investment may be adopted, granted or
companies. issued by the SEC, which
restrict an investment
company's investments in
other investment companies.
4 2. (Oil and Gas Invest in interests (other than Proposed to be Eliminated.
Programs) publicly issued debentures or
equity stock interests) in oil,
gas or other mineral
exploration or development
programs.
3c 2. (Commodities) Purchase or sell commodity Purchase or sell physical
contracts. commodities, unless acquired
as a result of ownership of
securities or other instruments
and provided that this
restriction does not prevent the
Fund from engaging in
transactions involving
currencies and futures
contracts and options thereon
or investing in securities or
other instruments that are
secured by physical
commodities.
4 3. (Management Purchase or retain securities Proposed to be Eliminated.
Ownership of of any company in which
Securities) directors or officers of the
Fund or of the manager,
individually owning more
than 1/2 of 1% of the
securities of such company,
in the aggregate own more
than 5% of the securities of
such company.
4 4. (Control) Purchase more than 10% of Proposed to be Eliminated.
any class of securities of any Note: The Fund will be
one company, including more subject to the fundamental
than 10% of its outstanding investment restriction on
voting securities, or invest in diversification described in
any company for the purpose Sub-Proposal 3a above.
of exercising control or
management.
D-2
CURRENT
INVESTMENT CURRENT PROPOSED
RESTRICTION FUNDAMENTAL FUNDAMENTAL
PROPOSAL OR NUMBER & RESTRICTION RESTRICTION
SUB-PROPOSAL SUBJECT The Fund may not: The Fund may not:
------------ ----------------- ------------------------------- --------------------------------
3d 5. (Underwriting) Act as an underwriter. Act as an underwriter except
to the extent the Fund may be
deemed to be an underwriter
when disposing of securities it
owns or when selling its own
shares.
3e 5. (Senior Issue senior securities. Issue senior securities, except
Securities) to the extent permitted by the
1940 Act and any rules,
exemptions or interpretations
thereunder that may be
adopted, granted or issued by
the SEC.
4 5. (Purchase Purchase on margin or sell Proposed to be Eliminated.
Securities on short; write, buy or sell puts,
Margin, Short calls, straddles or spreads. Note: The Fund will still be
Sales and Write, subject to the fundamental
Buy or Sell investment restriction on
Options) issuing senior securities
described in Sub-Proposal 3e
above.
3f 6. (Lending) Loan money, apart from the Make loans to other persons
purchase of a portion of an except (a) through the lending
issue of publicly distributed of its portfolio securities,
bonds, debentures, notes and (b) through the purchase of
other evidences of debt securities, loan
indebtedness, although the participations and/or engaging
Fund may buy U.S. in direct corporate loans in
government obligations with accordance with its investment
a simultaneous agreement objectives and policies, and
with the seller to repurchase (c) to the extent the entry into
them within no more than a repurchase agreement is
seven days at the original deemed to be a loan. The Fund
repurchase price plus accrued may also make loans to other
interest. investment companies to the
extent permitted by the
1940 Act or any rules or
exemptions or interpretations
thereunder that may be
adopted, granted or issued by
the SEC.
3g 7. (Borrowing) Borrow money for any Borrow money, except to the
purpose other than redeeming extent permitted by the
its shares for cancellation, 1940 Act or any rules,
D-3
CURRENT
INVESTMENT CURRENT PROPOSED
RESTRICTION FUNDAMENTAL FUNDAMENTAL
PROPOSAL OR NUMBER & RESTRICTION RESTRICTION
SUB-PROPOSAL SUBJECT The Fund may not: The Fund may not:
------------ ------------------ ------------------------------- -------------------------------
and then only as a temporary exemptions or interpretations
measure up to an amount not thereunder that may be
exceeding 5% of the value of adopted, granted or issued by
its total assets; or pledge, the SEC.
mortgage, or hypothecate its
assets for any purpose other
than to secure such
borrowings, and then only to
such extent not exceeding
10% of the value of its total
assets as the board of
directors may by resolution
approve. The Fund will not
pledge, mortgage or
hypothecate its assets to the
extent that at any time the
percentage of pledged assets
plus the sales commission
will exceed 10% of the
offering price of its shares.
4 8. (Three Years of Invest more than 5% of the Proposed to be Eliminated.
Company value of its total assets in
Operation) securities of issuers which
have been in continuous
operation less than three
years.
4 9. (Warrants) Invest more than 5% of its Proposed to be Eliminated.
total assets in warrants
whether or not listed on the
New York Stock Exchange or
American Stock Exchange,
and more than 2% of its total
assets in warrants that are not
listed on those exchanges.
Warrants acquired by the
Fund in units or attached to
securities are not included in
this restriction.
4 10. (Illiquid and Invest more than 10% of its Proposed to be Eliminated.
Restricted total assets in restricted
Securities) securities, securities with a Note: The Board has adopted
limited trading market (which the non-fundamental Illiquid
the Fund may not be able to Securities Restriction,
dispose of at the current consistent with the SEC staff's
D-4
CURRENT
INVESTMENT CURRENT PROPOSED
RESTRICTION FUNDAMENTAL FUNDAMENTAL
PROPOSAL OR NUMBER & RESTRICTION RESTRICTION
SUB-PROPOSAL SUBJECT The Fund may not: The Fund may not:
------------ -------------- ------------------------------- --------------------------------
market price) or those which current position on illiquid
are not otherwise readily securities, which prohibits the
marketable with readily Fund from investing more
available current market than 15% of its net assets in
quotations. illiquid securities.
3h 11. (Industry Invest more than 25% of its Invest more than 25% of its
Concentration) total assets in a single net assets in securities of
industry. issuers in any one industry
(other than securities issued or
guaranteed by the U.S.
government or any of its
agencies or instrumentalities
or securities of other
investment companies).
4 12. ("Letter" Invest in "letter" stocks or Proposed to be Eliminated.
Stocks) securities on which there are
any sales restrictions under a Note: The Board has adopted
purchase agreement. the non-fundamental Illiquid
Securities Restriction,
consistent with the SEC staff's
current position on illiquid
securities, which prohibits the
Fund from investing more
than 15% of its net assets in
illiquid securities.
4 13. (Joint Participate on a joint or a Proposed to be Eliminated.
Accounts) joint and several basis in any
trading account in securities.
(See "Portfolio Transactions"
[in the SAI] as to transactions
in the same securities for the
Fund, other clients and/or
other mutual funds within
Franklin Templeton
Investments.)*
--------
* This disclosure states that if purchases or sales of securities of the Fund
and one or more other investment companies or clients supervised by the
[Investment Manager] are considered at or about the same time, transactions
in these securities will be allocated among the several investment companies
and clients in a manner deemed equitable to all by the [Investment Manager],
taking into account the respective sizes of the funds and the amount of
securities to be purchased or sold.
D-5
103 PROXY 01/04
PROXY PROXY
TEMPLETON GLOBAL SMALLER COMPANIES FUND, INC.
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS - MARCH 19, 2004
The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies for his/her shares and
appoints BARBARA J. GREEN, ROBERT C. ROSSELOT and LORI A. WEBER, and each
of them, proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution to vote all
shares of Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"), that the
undersigned is entitled to vote at the Fund's Special Meeting of Shareholders
(the "Meeting") to be held at 500 East Broward Blvd., 12th Floor, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33394 at 2:00 p.m., Eastern time, on the 19th day of
March 2004, including any postponements or adjournments thereof, upon the
matters set forth below and instructs them to vote upon any matters that may
properly be acted upon at the Meeting.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. IT WILL BE VOTED AS
SPECIFIED. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS
1 (INCLUDING ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR), 2, 3 (INCLUDING EIGHT (8)
SUB-PROPOSALS) AND 4. IF ANY OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING TO
BE VOTED ON, THE PROXY HOLDERS WILL VOTE, ACT AND CONSENT ON THOSE MATTERS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE VIEWS OF MANAGEMENT.
VOTE VIA THE INTERNET: WWW.FRANKLINTEMPLETON.COM
VOTE VIA THE TELEPHONE: 1-866-241-6192
999 9999 9999 999
PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME APPEARS ON THIS PROXY.
IF SIGNING FOR ESTATES, TRUSTS OR CORPORATIONS, TITLE OR
CAPACITY SHOULD BE STATED. IF SHARES ARE HELD JOINTLY,
EACH HOLDER SHOULD SIGN.
------------------------------------------------------
Signature
------------------------------------------------------
Signature
------------------------------------------------, 2004
Dated TGSCF_13893
I PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING. YES NO
[ ] [ ]
(CONTINUED ON THE OTHER SIDE)
PLEASE MARK YOURS VOTES AS INDICATED IN THIS EXAMPLE: [X]
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1 THROUGH 4.
PROPOSAL 1 - To elect a Board of Directors of the Fund:
01 Harris J. Ashton 05 Gordon S. Macklin 09 Nicholas F. Brady FOR all nominees WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
02 Frank J. Crothers 06 Fred R. Millsaps 10 Harmon E. Burns listed (except as to vote for all
03 S. Joseph Fortunato 07 Frank A. Olson 11 Charles B. Johnson marked to the left) nominees listed.
04 Edith E. Holiday 08 Constantine D. Tseretopoulos [ ] [ ]
TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE, WRITE THAT NOMINEE'S
NAME ON THE LINE BELOW.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSAL 2 - To approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that provides
for the Reorganization of the Fund from a Maryland corporation
to a Delaware statutory trust.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
PROPOSAL 3 - To approve amendments to certain of the Fund's fundamental
investment restrictions (includes eight (8) Sub-Proposals):
Sub-Proposal 3a. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding diversification of investments.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3b. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding investments in real estate.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3c. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding investments in commodities.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3d. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding underwriting.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3e. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding issuing senior securities.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3f. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding lending.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3g. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding borrowing.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
Sub-Proposal 3h. To amend the Fund's fundamental investment
restriction regarding industry concentration.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
PROPOSAL 4 - To approve the elimination of certain of the Fund's fundamental
investment restrictions.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
IMPORTANT: PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY...TODAY