SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant /x/ |
||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / / | ||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
/ / | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
/ / | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
/x/ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
/ / | Definitive Additional Materials | |
/ / | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
AAR CORP. |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
/x/ | No fee required | |||
/ / | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11 | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
/ / | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
/ / | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
One AAR Place
1100 N. Wood Dale Road
Wood Dale, Illinois 60191
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2001
To the Stockholders of AAR CORP.:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AAR CORP. for the year 2001 will be held at AAR CORP.'s headquarters, One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois, on Wednesday, October 10, 2001, at 10:00 A.M. (Chicago time). At the meeting, stockholders will act on the following matters:
By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
HOWARD A. PULSIFER Secretary |
August 27, 2001
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
PLEASE DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED STAMPED, ADDRESSED ENVELOPE, OR SUBMIT YOUR PROXY ELECTRONICALLY BY TELEPHONE OR VIA THE INTERNET SO THAT IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOUR SHARES MAY NEVERTHELESS BE VOTED. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED FOR MAILING IN THE UNITED STATES.
One AAR Place
1100 N. Wood Dale Road
Wood Dale, Illinois 60191
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
October 10, 2001
SOLICITATION
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card were mailed to stockholders on or about August 27, 2001, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company to be used at the 2001 Annual Meeting ("Annual Meeting").
If you are a stockholder of record (i.e., you hold your shares in your own name other than through a broker, bank or other nominee), you are encouraged to submit your proxy vote electronically either by telephone or via the internet. This will eliminate the need to sign, date and return your proxy card. To submit your proxy by telephone or over the internet you will be required to enter the control number assigned to you and imprinted on your proxy card accompanying this Proxy Statement. The vote by telephone and vote by internet can be accessed 24 hours a day, seven days a week until the day prior to the Annual Meeting.
- using a touch-tone phone, call 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683) toll-free and follow the voice prompts
- Log onto internet website at http://www.eproxyvote.com/air and enter your voter control number on your proxy card and mark the appropriate boxes to enter voting instructions
If you are a street-name stockholder (i.e., you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee describing how you may vote your shares.
You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is exercised, but only by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, or by submitting another proxy by telephone, over the internet, or delivering a later dated, signed proxy to the Secretary of the Company.
Proxies will be voted in accordance with instructions on the proxy. If no instructions are specified, the named proxy holders will vote FOR the election of the nominees for Class II director designated by the Board, FOR approval of the amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan, and FOR approval of the restricted stock performance goals under the Long-Term Incentive Plan for the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and upon any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting in their discretion and best judgment. The Board may nominate another person if any nominee becomes unavailable for election for any reason prior to the Annual Meeting vote. In that event, the named proxy holders will vote for that other person.
1
The cost of the solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company. The Company has engaged D. F. King & Co., 77 Water Street, New York, New York, to aid in the solicitation of proxies at a total estimated cost of $8,000, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. D. F. King & Co. may solicit proxies by mail, by telephone, by facsimile, by e-mail, or in person. Certain officers, directors and employees of the Company may also solicit proxies.
RECORD DATE AND VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholders owning Common Stock of the Company ("Common Stock") outstanding at the close of business on the record date, August 15, 2001, may vote at the 2001 Annual Meeting. On that date, 26,945,685 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. Stockholders will have one vote on each matter to be voted on for each share held on the record date. Shares cannot be voted unless the owner is present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy. A majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum. Votes cast in person or by proxy will be tabulated by the inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting. The inspectors of election will treat directions to withhold authority, abstentions and broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Directions to withhold authority will have no effect on the election of directors, because directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be disregarded for purposes of determining whether a matter has been approved, because they are not considered votes cast.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Company provide that the Board shall consist of between three and fifteen directors. The exact number of directors is set from time to time by the Board. The number of directors is presently set at 10 and is set at eight effective October 10, 2001 when two current directors, Lee B. Stern and Richard D. Tabery, will retire. The members of the Board are divided into three classes: Class I (3 directors), Class II (presently 4 directors, reduced to 2 on October 10, 2001) and Class III (3 directors). One class is elected each year for a three-year term.
During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 ("Fiscal 2001"), the Board held seven meetings. All of the incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate meetings of the Board and of the Committees on which they served during Fiscal 2001.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, an Executive Committee, and a Nominating Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors. Its members are Joel D. Spungin (Chairman), A. Robert Abboud, Howard B. Bernick, and James G. Brocksmith, Jr. This committee acts pursuant to its written charter adopted by the Board of Directors (a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit 1) which was reviewed by the Committee at its April, 2001 meeting and determined to adequately describe the Committee's role and responsibilities. Among other things, the Audit Committee recommends to the Board the independent auditors who audit the Company's consolidated financial statements, maintains communication between the Board and its independent auditors, monitors performance of the independent auditors, has oversight of and reviews the financial reporting process and practices, has oversight of and reviews the adequacy of financial accounting controls and the organization and performance of the Company's internal systems of audit, reviews the scope and results of audits, and meets with the independent auditors and internal auditors without members of management present. The Audit Committee held three meetings during Fiscal 2001.
2
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors. Its members are James G. Brocksmith, Jr. (Chairman), A. Robert Abboud, Howard B. Bernick, Edgar D. Jannotta, and Lee B. Stern. This committee reviews and approves compensation policies and practices for all elected corporate officers, fixes the compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer, and administers the Chief Executive Officer's long-term incentive program, the annual incentive compensation programs for other officers, and the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during Fiscal 2001.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee is comprised of Ira A. Eichner (Chairman), David P. Storch and Edgar D. Jannotta. The Executive Committee is authorized to meet between meetings of the Board of Directors and exercise the powers of the Board, subject to limitations imposed by law and by the Board. The Executive Committee did not hold any meetings during Fiscal 2001.
Nominating Committee
The Nominating Committee is comprised of David P. Storch (Chairman), Ira A. Eichner, Lee B. Stern, and Richard D. Tabery. This committee reviews and recommends to the Board qualified candidates for election as directors and considers the performance of incumbent directors to determine whether they should be recommended to the Board for nomination for reelection. The Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders may submit a recommendation to the Nominating Committee for consideration with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the year 2002 by writing to the Secretary, AAR CORP., One AAR Place, 1100 N. Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191. To be considered, recommendations must be received prior to April 9, 2002, must state the reasons for the recommendation and contain the full name and address of each proposed nominee, as well as a brief biographical history setting forth past and present directorships, employment and occupations, and any other qualifications. Recommendations must also include a statement indicating that the proposed nominees have consented to being named in the proxy statement and to serve if elected. The Nominating Committee held three meetings during Fiscal 2001.
DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION
Each director who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any subsidiary ("Eligible Director") receives an annual retainer of $28,000 payable in Common Stock, a fee of $1,750 for attendance at each meeting of the Board or of any Board committee and reimbursement of expenses. The Chairman of the Board and the chairman of each committee receive an additional $2,000 annual retainer. Each director may elect to defer receipt of the annual retainer and meeting fees pursuant to the Company's Nonemployee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan.
In addition, each non-employee director receives term life insurance coverage of $200,000 and a one-time grant upon becoming a director of stock options for 10,000 shares of Common Stock under the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan. These options can be exercised in 25% increments on each anniversary grant date at the closing New York Stock Exchange price on the date of grant.
The AAR CORP. Directors' Retirement Plan was terminated effective April 10, 2001. Any eligible non-employee director who was a director on the plan's effective date of termination or retired director currently receiving benefits under the plan will continue to receive benefits pursuant to the terms of the plan as the plan was in effect on the date of termination or date of retirement and applicable to such participant. Benefits are paid upon retirement from the Board on or after age 65 if such director has completed at least five years of service as a director. Benefits are paid quarterly in cash in an amount equal to 25% of the annual retainer payable to an active eligible director and are paid for a period equal to the total number of years of service as a director to a maximum of ten years or until death. The AAR CORP. Directors' Retirement Plan is unfunded. As of May 31, 2001, three former directors were receiving retirement benefits under the plan.
Directors who are officers or employees of the Company or any subsidiary receive no additional compensation for service on the Board or any of its committees.
3
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Jannotta, a director of the Company, is Chairman of William Blair & Company, L.L.C. ("William Blair"). William Blair, from time to time, has rendered investment banking services to the Company and received customary compensation for those services. During Fiscal Year 2001, William Blair received $50,000 from the Company for investment banking services rendered to the Company. The Company may engage William Blair for additional services in the future.
Mr. Eichner, a director of the Company and Chairman of the Board, provides consulting services to the Company pursuant to a four year consulting agreement ending June 1, 2003 under which he receives a quarterly consulting fee in the amount of $25,000; in Fiscal 2001 he received $100,000 in consulting fees.
Mr. Abboud, a director of the Company, has a son, Robert G. Abboud, who is the President of RGA Labs, Inc. ("RGA Labs"). AAR Allen Services, Inc. ("AAR Services"), a subsidiary of the Company, has engaged RGA Labs to provide engineering consulting services in connection with development of a product line at a cost of approximately $100,000. AAR Services may also engage RGA Labs for additional services in the future.
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
|
Director Since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
NOMINEES FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2004 | ||||
Class II Directors whose terms expire at the 2001 Annual Meeting: | ||||
EDGAR D. JANNOTTA, 70: Since March, 2001, Chairman of William Blair, an investment banking firm. From 1996 to March, 2001, Senior Director of William Blair. From 1995 to 1996, Senior Partner of William Blair. From 1977 to 1995, Managing Partner of William Blair. | 1964 | |||
Other directorships: Aon Corporation; Bandag, Incorporated; Exelon Corporation; Inforte Corp.; and Molex Incorporated. | ||||
A. ROBERT ABBOUD, 72: Since 1984, President of A. Robert Abboud & Co., a private investment business. | 1987 | |||
Other directorship: Alberto-Culver Company. | ||||
CONTINUING DIRECTORS: | ||||
Class III Directors whose terms expire at the 2002 Annual Meeting: | ||||
HOWARD B. BERNICK, 49: Since 1994, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alberto-Culver Company, a manufacturer, marketer and distributor of personal care and household products. From 1988 to 1994, President and Chief Operating Officer of Alberto-Culver Company. | 1994 | |||
Other directorship: Alberto-Culver Company. | ||||
IRA A. EICHNER, 70: Since 1973, Chairman of the Board of AAR. Mr. Eichner founded the Company in 1955 and was its Chief Executive Officer until October, 1996. From 1996 until his retirement as an active executive officer on May 31, 1999, he was executive Chairman of the Board and Founder of the Company. Mr. Eichner is Mr. Storch's father-in-law. | 1955 |
4
RONALD R. FOGLEMAN, 59: Since 1997, President and Chief Operating Officer of B Bar J Cattle Company and President and Chief Operating Officer of Durango Aerospace Incorporated, an international aviation consulting firm, and member of NASA Advisory Council. From 1994 to 1997, General, Chief of Staff, Headquarters United States Air Force, Washington, D.C. | 2001 | |||
Other directorships: DERCO Aerospace; East, Inc.; International Airline Support Group; Mesa Air Group; MITRE Corporation; North American Airlines; Rolls-Royce North America; and World Airways. | ||||
Class I Directors whose terms expire at the 2003 Annual Meeting: | ||||
JOEL D. SPUNGIN, 63: Since 1995, Managing Partner, DMS Enterprises, L.P., a consulting and management advisory partnership. From 1994 to 1999, Chairman Emeritus, and from 1988 to 1995, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Stationers Inc. | 1992 | |||
Other directorships: Home Products International, Inc.; and Vita Foods, Inc. | ||||
JAMES G. BROCKSMITH, JR., 60: Since 1996, an independent business consultant. From 1990 to 1996, Deputy Chairman, and Chief Operating Officer of KPMG Peat Marwick, where he retired after 31 years. | 2001 | |||
Other directorships: Nationwide Financial Services; and Ciber Inc. | ||||
DAVID P. STORCH, 48: Since 1996, President and Chief Executive Officer of AAR. From 1989 to 1996, President and Chief Operating Officer of AAR. From 1988 to 1989, Vice President of AAR. Mr. Storch is Mr. Eichner's son-in-law. | 1989 |
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors is currently divided into three classes, each having three-year terms that expire in successive years. At this year's Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors has nominated two directors to be elected in Class II, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting in the year 2004 or until the individual is succeeded by another qualified director who has been duly elected.
The nominees for Director in Class II this year are Edgar D. Jannotta and A. Robert Abboud.
The Board expects both nominees to serve if elected as directors. If either of them should become unavailable to serve as a director for any reason prior to the Annual Meeting, the Board may substitute another person as nominee. Under Delaware law and the Company's By-Laws, the two nominees for director who individually receive the greatest number of votes shall be elected directors of the Company.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR BOTH NOMINEES
5
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
TABLES
The following tables show the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, as of July 31, 2001, by (i) each director and nominee for election to the Board, (ii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and (iv) each beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Except as noted, the nature of beneficial ownership for shares shown in the Tables is sole voting and/or investment power.
Security Ownership of Management
Name |
Number of Shares1 |
Percent of Shares Outstanding if greater than 1% |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Robert Abboud | 41,092 | |||||
Howard B. Bernick | 27,500 | |||||
James G. Brocksmith, Jr. | 0 | |||||
Ira A. Eichner | 767,900 | 2 | 2.9 | |||
Ronald R. Fogleman | 0 | |||||
Edgar D. Jannotta | 37,500 | |||||
Howard A. Pulsifer | 89,588 | |||||
Timothy J. Romenesko | 113,931 | |||||
Michael J. Sharp | 14,400 | |||||
Philip C. Slapke | 199,833 | |||||
Joel D. Spungin | 20,250 | |||||
Lee B. Stern3 | 103,973 | 4 | ||||
David P. Storch | 1,381,163 | 5 | 5.1 | |||
Richard D. Tabery3 | 60,962 | |||||
All directors and executive officers as a group |
2,858,092 |
1,2,3,4 |
10.6 |
6
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Name and Address of Stockholder |
Number of Shares |
Percent of Shares Outstanding |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. 1299 Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
2,077,700 | 1 | 7.7 | % | |||
Neuberger & Berman, LLC 605 Third Avenue New York, NY 10158-3698 |
2,458,545 |
2 |
9.15 |
% |
|||
Putnam Investments One Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 |
2,166,918 |
3 |
8.1 |
% |
|||
The TCW Group, Inc. 865 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 |
1,705,513 |
4 |
6.4 |
% |
|||
Westport Asset Management, Inc. 253 Riverside Avenue Westport, CT 06880-4816 |
2,587,850 |
5 |
9.6 |
% |
(i) | sole voting power: | 2,077,700 | ||||
(ii) | shared voting power: | 0 | ||||
(iii) | sole dispositive power: | 2,077,700 | ||||
(iv) | shared dispositive power: | 0 |
(i) | sole voting power: | 990,695 | ||||
(ii) | shared voting power: | 1,458,350 | ||||
(iii) | sole dispositive power: | 0 | ||||
(iv) | shared dispositive power: | 2,458,545 |
(i) | sole voting power: | 0 | ||||
(ii) | shared voting power: | 534,200 | ||||
(iii) | sole dispositive power: | 0 | ||||
(iv) | shared dispositive power: | 2,166,918 |
(i) | sole voting power: | 0 | ||||
(ii) | shared voting power: | 1,705,513 | ||||
(iii) | sole dispositive power: | 0 | ||||
(iv) | shared dispositive power: | 1,705,513 |
(i) | sole voting power: | 271,250 | ||||
(ii) | shared voting power: | 1,697,450 | ||||
(iii) | sole dispositive power: | 271,250 | ||||
(iv) | shared dispositive power: | 2,316,600 |
7
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Based solely upon a review of Securities and Exchange Commission Forms 3, 4 and 5 and upon related written representations furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, no person who, at any time during the fiscal year, was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE'S REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
General
The Company's executive compensation program is structured and administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Committee is comprised of the five individuals listed below, all of whom are independent directors of the Company.
The executive compensation program is designed to enable the Company to attract, motivate and retain talented executives capable of achieving strategic business initiatives and to reward them for their achievement. It is designed to complement the Company's short-term and long-term business objectives and to focus executives' efforts on fulfilling these objectives. The program consists of three elements: (i) base salaries which are generally set between the median and third quartile salary level of comparable positions in similar companies, adjusted up or down to reflect individual responsibilities, performance and other relevant factors; (ii) annual variable incentive opportunities paid in cash and stock based on individual contribution and performance; and (iii) long-term incentive opportunities, in the form of stock option/restricted stock awards.
Total compensation opportunities for each executive are intended to be competitive with those offered by other companies competing for talent in the Company's employment market. In designing and administering the individual elements of the executive compensation program for each executive, the Committee strives to balance short- and long-term incentive objectives and employ prudent judgment in establishing base salary levels and performance criteria, evaluating performance and determining actual incentive payments. To ensure competitiveness and reasonableness of the Committee's compensation decisions, independent compensation consulting firms are retained periodically to advise the Committee in connection with both the design and implementation of the various elements of the program and the level of individual executive participation. The Company uses competitive compensation analyses by independent consultants to ensure that the President and Chief Executive Officer's and other executive officers' base salaries and total compensation are at an appropriate competitive level relative to compensation for such positions at other companies in the relevant employment market. Generally, as an executive's level of responsibility increases, a greater percentage of total compensation is based on performance, and the mix of total compensation shifts toward stock, thereby aligning the long-term interest of senior executives with those of stockholders.
8
Base salary levels of all elected corporate officers, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, are reviewed annually by the Committee and may be adjusted depending upon the executive's qualifications, responsibilities, assessed performance contribution, tenure in the Company and in the position held, and competitive salary considerations relative to similar positions at other companies competing for talent in the Company's employment market. Adjustments in Fiscal 2001 to the base salaries of the President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table reflect the factors referred to above.
Annual Incentive Opportunities
The President and Chief Executive Officer has an annual performance-based incentive bonus opportunity of up to 150% of his base salary. Twenty percent of his incentive bonus is payable in restricted stock that vests ratably in equal amounts over a three year period. The percentage incentive bonus opportunity for other executive positions varies depending on their responsibility level.
Each fiscal year the Compensation Committee establishes specific annual cash bonus performance goals, within guidelines approved by stockholders in 1997 and intended to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"), for certain executive officers of the Company. These goals focus on two categories: income and balance sheet management. The importance and weighting of these two categories is established each year by the Compensation Committee. Under the category of balance sheet management, the goals include one or several of the following criteria: shareholder equity, long-term debt to capital ratio, investment rating, debt coverage, cash flow and return on invested capital. Under the category of income, the goals include one or several of the following: pre-tax income, earnings per share and net income. A participant may be eligible to earn up to 100% of such participant's salary for meeting target goals and up to an additional 50% of salary for exceeding target goals. The amount actually earned depends on each participant's position, bonus opportunity and actual performance versus the pre-established goals.
Long-Term Incentive Opportunities
The long-term incentive program consists of stock option and/or restricted stock awards granted under the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan.
Stock option awards typically expire ten (10) years from the date of grant or earlier upon termination of employment, become exercisable in equal increments over a period of three to five years on successive grant anniversary dates at the NYSE closing stock price on the date of grant, and are accompanied by reload features. Restrictions imposed on restricted stock awards vary and are designed, among other things, to encourage executives to stay with the Company and to maintain a focus on long-term objectives of the Company. Restricted stock grants vest over three (3) to ten (10) years, depending on the grant; restrictions on restricted stock used in lieu of cash to pay earned bonuses vests ratably over a three (3) year period. Typically, awards are subject to forfeiture if the employee terminates employment for any reason other than death, retirement or disability or the Company terminates employment for cause, during the award cycle. During the award cycle the participant receives dividends on the restricted shares and also has the right to vote the restricted shares.
In determining stock option and restricted stock awards, the Committee considers the recipient's position and responsibilities in the Company, performance and contributions made during the preceding year, capabilities and potential for future contribution to the Company, the number of options and awards previously granted to the recipient and, for senior management, their progress toward achieving the Company's guidelines for stock ownership by senior management.
The Board believes that Mr. Storch, as the President and Chief Executive Officer, should have the opportunity, based on performance, to become a significant shareholder and that the performance
9
measures that govern his opportunities should be both economic and shareholder value related. Such measures should also be related to the Company's industry and investor communities and reflect business objectives of the Company over the coming years. On October 10, 2000, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Storch options for 600,000 shares in two separate grants of 300,000 shares each. The second grant is subject to stockholder approval of an amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan adopted by the Company on October 10, 2000 which is being presented as Proposal 2 in this Proxy Statement. The amendment increases the number of shares that may be granted to any individual during a specified period in order to qualify the options as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the IRC.
Under a long-term incentive plan approved by the Board, commencing on June 1, 2001 and ending on May 31, 2005, Mr. Storch has the opportunity to receive annually under the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, (i) options in an amount determined by a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to 1.25 times his then current base salary and the denominator of which is equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant divided by three, and (ii) upon stockholder approval of the restricted stock performance goals described in Proposal 3, up to .9375 times his then current base salary in performance restricted stock based on the Company's average Return on Capital during the performance period as compared to each of (i) the Company's Peer Group Index and (ii) the S&P 500 Index, during the performance period.
Mr. Storch and other named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table below received the stock options and restricted stock awards reflected in the tables below. The number of shares covered by each grant reflects individual contributions and performance, as well as competitive industry practices, in the view of the Committee. The grant levels also continue the Board's emphasis on executive share ownership and further the Company's objectives of tying incentive compensation to performance and aligning executive's interests with the interests of the Company's stockholders.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
In Fiscal 2001, Mr. Storch's annual base salary was increased to $676,000 and he received an annual incentive bonus award equal to 40% of base salary. Twenty percent of Mr. Storch's annual incentive bonus was paid in restricted stock.
The tables which follow this report and accompanying footnotes and narrative reflect the decisions covered by the above discussion.
Federal Income Tax Considerations
IRC Section 162(m) generally prevents any public company from claiming a deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million for the Chief Executive Officer or any of the four highest compensated executive officers. This deduction limitation, however, does not apply to performance-based compensation that satisfies certain requirements under Section 162(m). The Committee has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to structure compensation of executive officers so that compensation will not be subject to the deduction limit to the extent that it can reasonably do so in a manner that provides adequate incentives and allows the Company to attract and retain qualified executives. However, the Committee has previously and may in the future structure compensation arrangements that under certain circumstances may be subject to the deduction limit. None of the compensation paid by the Company in Fiscal 2001 was subject to the deduction limit.
Compensation Committee
James
G. Brocksmith, Jr., Chairman
A. Robert Abboud
Howard B. Bernick
Edgar D. Jannotta
Lee B. Stern
10
STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total stockholder return (including reinvestment of dividends) of the Company, the S&P (Standard & Poor's) 500 Index, and a peer group index selected by the Company.
The S&P 500 Index is comprised of domestic industry leaders in four major sectors: Industrials, Financials, Utilities and Transportation, and serves as a broad indicator of the performance of the U.S. equity market. The peer group index selected by the Company is comprised of companies engaged in engine, airframe and/or manufacturing activities in support of the aerospace/aviation aftermarket similar to those conducted by the Company. The peer group selected by the Company is comprised of the following companies: Aviall, Inc., Aviation Sales Company, BFGoodrich Aerospace, Kellstrom Industries, Inc., Sequa Corp., SPS Technologies Inc., and Willis Lease Finance Corp.
These indices relate only to stock prices and dividends; they do not purport to provide a direct comparison of the business or financial performance of the companies comprising such indices with the Company or with each other.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Stockholder Total Return1
11
COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the total compensation earned by or paid for fiscal years 1999 through 2001 to the President and Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly paid executive officers in Fiscal 2001.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
Annual Compensation |
Long-Term Compensation |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Other Annual Compensation ($) |
Restricted Stock Award(s) ($)1 |
Securities Underlying Options (#) |
All Other Compensation ($)2 |
|||||||
DAVID P. STORCH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
2001 2000 1999 |
676,000 650,000 610,000 |
270,000 97,500 800,000 |
4 4 4 |
89,400 |
0 523,125 615,313 |
668,040 0 195,000 |
3 |
139,000 115,200 97,600 |
|||||
PHILIP C. SLAPKE5 VICE PRESIDENT |
2001 2000 1999 |
410,000 410,000 350,000 |
60,000 61,500 491,900 |
4 |
|
134,375 226,250 155,756 |
40,000 40,000 42,500 |
49,500 33,400 34,600 |
||||||
TIMOTHY J. ROMENESKO VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
2001 2000 1999 |
300,000 265,000 220,000 |
90,000 39,250 143,500 |
4 4 |
|
100,781 113,125 83,870 |
40,000 25,000 26,750 |
34,600 28,500 21,000 |
||||||
HOWARD A. PULSIFER VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY |
2001 2000 1999 |
260,000 241,800 215,000 |
65,000 36,270 125,000 |
4 4 |
|
40,313 45,250 47,925 |
27,000 13,000 16,350 |
44,000 40,500 34,200 |
||||||
MICHAEL J. SHARP VICE PRESIDENT, CONTROLLER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER |
2001 2000 1999 |
170,000 145,000 132,500 |
34,000 21,750 50,000 |
4 |
|
26,875 0 13,313 |
10,000 7,000 4,750 |
14,400 4,200 3,300 |
12
STOCK OPTIONS
Options generally become exercisable 20% each year over a five-year period. Unexercised options expire ten years after the date of grant. The stock option exercise price is equal to the fair market value (NYSE closing price) of a share of stock on the date of grant. The options have no value unless the stock price appreciates and the holder satisfies the applicable vesting requirements.
The following table shows certain information with respect to stock options granted in Fiscal 2001 to the named executive officers. It also shows how much the named executive officers potentially may realize under two hypothetical situations: if the stock gains 5% or 10% in value per year compounded over the ten-year life of the options. These are assumed hypothetical rates of appreciation required to be shown by Securities Exchange Commission regulations as an example and are not a forecast of future stock price appreciation.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
|
Individual Grants |
|
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term of 10 Years |
|||||||||||
|
Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#) |
% of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year |
|
|
||||||||
Name |
Exercise Price ($/Sh) |
Expiration Date |
||||||||||
5% ($) |
10% ($) |
|||||||||||
David P. Storch | 600,000 | 1,2 | 48.53 | % | $11.13 | 10/11/2010 | $4,199,758 | $10,643,012 | ||||
68,040 | 3 | 5.50 | % | $14.50 | Various | $184,659 | $394,660 | |||||
Philip C. Slapke | 40,000 | 2 | 3.24 | % | $13.4375 | 7/11/2010 | $338,031 | $856,637 | ||||
Timothy J. Romenesko | 40,000 | 2 | 3.24 | % | $13.4375 | 7/11/2010 | $338,031 | $856,637 | ||||
Howard A. Pulsifer | 27,000 | 2 | 2.18 | % | $13.4375 | 7/11/2010 | $228,171 | $578,230 | ||||
Michael J. Sharp | 10,000 | 2 | .81 | % | $13.4375 | 7/11/2010 | $84,508 | $214,159 |
The following table shows stock options exercised by named executive officers during Fiscal 2001 and the aggregate gain in value realized over the period between the date of grant and the date exercised. This table also shows the number of shares of common stock covered by both exercisable and non-exercisable stock options as of May 31, 2001, and the value of "in-the-money" unexercised options.
13
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option Values
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End (#) |
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End ($)1 |
||||||||||||
Name |
Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized ($) |
|||||||||||||
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
||||||||||||
David P. Storch | 108,150 | $ | 581,589 | 1,061,632 | 600,000 | $ | 409,977 | $ | 1,722,000 | ||||||
Philip C. Slapke | 0 | 0 | 97,423 | 111,750 | $ | 101,037 | $ | 22,500 | |||||||
Timothy J. Romenesko | 0 | 0 | 44,465 | 84,300 | $ | 33,600 | $ | 22,500 | |||||||
Howard A. Pulsifer | 0 | 0 | 36,388 | 54,260 | $ | 34,800 | $ | 15,188 | |||||||
Michael J. Sharp | 0 | 0 | 7,500 | 20,250 | $ | 0 | $ | 5,625 |
PENSION BENEFITS
Qualified Plan Benefits
The Company provides benefits to all domestic employees including the named executive officers under a qualified retirement program that includes defined benefits (The AAR CORP. Retirement Plana cash balance type plan) and 401(k)/profit sharing plan (The AAR CORP. Retirement Savings Plan). The defined benefits are based upon the present value of a participant's benefit as of 12/31/99 and a formula for benefits earned from and after 1/1/00 which takes into consideration the participant's age, years of credited service, a percentage of the participant's compensation for the year and certain interest credits. Compensation includes cash compensation shown as income on an employee's Form W-2, reduced by certain items specified in the plans, plus amounts voluntarily contributed to the AAR CORP. Retirement Savings Plan. Compensation for purposes of the plans cannot exceed an annual compensation limitation of $170,000 as adjusted from time to time by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in accordance with applicable provisions of the IRC.
The aggregate salary and bonus compensation shown for the named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table above is the compensation currently included for purposes of determining benefits under qualified plans as well as the Supplemental Key Employee Retirement Benefit Plan ("SKERP") described below (subject to applicable IRC compensation limits for qualified plans). Profit sharing and 401(k) benefits are based on voluntary contributions by employees with a Company match of up to 2 percentage points of the first 5 percentage points voluntarily contributed under the plan, and a profit sharing contribution by the Company based on the individual employee's voluntary contributions and the economic performance of the individual employee's operating unit. The Company's profit sharing contribution can be up to 3% of cash compensation.
Non-Qualified Plan Benefits
The Company provides supplemental retirement benefits to certain executives and key employees under the SKERP. All of the named executive officers are participants in the SKERP. The SKERP is designed to restore the approximate amount of employer-provided benefits under the Company's qualified retirement plans lost as a result of Code limitations, including those limiting compensation for purposes of benefit calculations. The SKERP also provides for aggregate retirement benefits (including qualified plan benefits) at 60% and 50% of final average compensation (as defined in plan documents), respectively, for the President and CEO and for certain other executive officers designated by the Board, including four of the named executive officers, reduced by certain items specified in plan documents. SKERP benefits are unfunded and are forfeited if the participant violates a covenant not to compete set forth in the plan document or if employment is terminated
14
for cause (except that a forfeiture will not occur under certain circumstances in the event of a Change in Control as defined in the plan document).
Table of Pension Benefits
The following table shows the estimated aggregate annual benefits payable upon retirement at normal retirement age (65) and years of service for each of the named executive officers under the AAR CORP. Retirement Plan and SKERP.
Pension Benefit Table1
Name |
Projected Annual Benefit |
Years of Service |
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David P. Storch | $ | 973,400 | 22 | ||||
Philip C. Slapke | $ | 405,900 | 20 | ||||
Timothy J. Romenesko | $ | 297,000 | 20 | ||||
Howard A. Pulsifer | $ | 240,000 | 14 | ||||
Michael J. Sharp | $ | 88,400 | 5 |
EMPLOYMENT AND OTHER AGREEMENTS
David P. Storch
The Company has an employment agreement with Mr. Storch designed to assure his continued services with the Company at a base compensation of $676,000 per year or such increased amount as the Board may determine. Mr. Storch's term of employment is continuously extended so as to have a remaining term of three years, but shall expire upon death, disability, retirement or other termination of employment.
Mr. Storch's employment agreement also includes: confidentiality and non-compete provisions; participation in the Company's benefit plans; a severance payment upon termination of employment by the Company for other than cause prior to a change in control of the Company equal to two times base salary then in effect; a severance payment equal to three (3) times his average cash compensation (base salary plus cash bonus) for the last two fiscal years of employment upon termination of employment under certain circumstances in the event of a change in control of the Company; an incentive bonus opportunity of up to 150% of base salary subject to annual financial targets approved by the Compensation Committee (20% of any bonus is payable in three year restricted stock); an annual long-term incentive stock compensation plan consisting of (i) an annual option grant opportunity of an amount determined by a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to 1.25 times his base salary and the denominator of which is equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date divided by three, and (ii) upon stockholder approval of restricted stock performance goals (see Proposal 3 in this Proxy Statement), up to .9375 times his salary in performance restricted stock based on the Company's Return on Capital as compared to each of the S&P 500 Index and the Company's Peer Group Index Return on Capital; a supplemental cash payment to the extent necessary to preserve the level of benefits provided for in the employment agreement in the event of imposition of excise taxes in respect of "excess parachute payments" under the IRC and, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the employment agreement), accelerated vesting of awards outstanding under the Company's Stock Benefit Plan and continuation of certain other benefits for a period of three years.
Other Agreements
The Company has entered into severance agreements with certain key employees, including the named executive officers other than Mr. Storch. The severance agreements are substantially identical, include confidentiality and non-compete covenants, and provide for payment of compensation and certain benefits in the event of termination of employment for other than cause, including a
15
Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the severance agreements). Severance equal to base salary plus any earned incentive cash bonus will be paid upon termination of employment by the Company for other than Cause (as defined in the severance agreements) prior to a Change in Control of the Company. Under certain circumstances, upon termination of employment following a Change in Control, the employee will receive severance equal to three times total compensation (base salary plus annual cash bonus) for the most recently ended fiscal year or the preceding fiscal year, whichever is greater, accelerated vesting of awards outstanding under the Company's Stock Benefit Plan, special supplemental retirement benefits determined as if the employee had three additional years of service under the Company's retirement plans, continuation of certain other benefits for a period of three years, and a supplemental cash payment to the extent necessary to preserve the level of benefits provided for in the severance agreement in the event of imposition on such employee of excise taxes payable in respect of "excess parachute payments" under the IRC.
The Company has also entered into split dollar life insurance agreements with certain key employees, including all of the named executive officers. Under the agreements, the Company will fund the annual insurance premiums for the policies subject to reimbursement from the cash value or death benefit proceeds of the policies.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee is comprised of four independent directors and carries out its responsibilities pursuant to a written charter (a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit 1) adopted by the Board of Directors. Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process. The Company's management is primarily responsible for the Company's financial statements and the quality and integrity of the reporting process and systems of internal control. The Company's independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company's financial statements and for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2001, with the Company's management and representatives of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors their independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, and considered the compatability of nonaudit services with the auditors' independence.
In reliance on its review of the audited financial statements and the discussions referred to above and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the Committee referred to above and in the charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2001, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee
Joel
D. Spungin, Chairman
A. Robert Abboud
Howard B. Bernick
James G. Brocksmith, Jr.
16
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AAR CORP. STOCK BENEFIT PLAN TO PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK THAT MAY BE GRANTED UNDER THE PLAN TO ANY GRANTEE DURING ANY CALENDAR YEAR
Proposed Amendment to the Plan
IRC Section 162(m) generally precludes a publicly traded company from taking a federal income tax deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the company's chief executive officer or any of the four next highest paid executive officers, subject to several exceptions, including an exception for compensation paid under a stockholder-approved plan that is "performance-based" within the meaning of Section 162(m). Compensation attributable to a stock option or stock appreciation right is deemed to be performance-based if, among other things, the underlying plan, as approved by the stockholders, includes a limit on the number of shares for which stock options or stock appreciation rights may be granted to any one person during a specified period.
The Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company to ensure, to the extent possible, the full deductibility of compensation attributable to stock options ("Options") granted under the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan (the "Plan"). Accordingly, the Board unanimously adopted on October 10, 2000, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment to the Plan, effective October 10, 2000, which provides that "the total number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which options may be granted to any Grantee under the Plan within any calendar year shall not exceed the number of shares available for issue under the Plan at the time of grant." Prior to this amendment, the Section 162(m) Plan limit was 300,000 shares in any 12-month period.
If this proposal is not approved by the stockholders, the Company's named executive officers will receive compensation pursuant to the terms of applicable employment agreements or under alternative compensation arrangements approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion.
Summary of the Plan
The Plan was approved by the Company's stockholders in 1992, and an amendment to the Plan was approved by the stockholders in 1996. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the Plan and has the authority to determine the key employees to whom awards are to be granted under the Plan, the term and other terms and conditions of each award, the applicable vesting schedule, and the number of shares of Common Stock covered by an award. As of May 31, 2001, approximately 170 employees were eligible to receive awards under the Plan. In Fiscal 2001, 157 employees received such awards.
As of June 30, 2001, a total of 1,079,780 shares were available for issuance under the Plan. On January 1 of each calendar year that the Plan is in effect through December 31, 2001, an additional number of shares equal to 2% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of such date becomes available for issuance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no more than 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock may be subject to incentive stock options granted under the Plan.
Under the Plan, the Company may grant the following types of awards:
Options. Options may be either non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options. Incentive stock options may not be granted under the Plan after July 15, 2002. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the exercise price must equal the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Payment of the exercise price may be made in cash, in shares of Common Stock, or as otherwise authorized by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Subject to certain limited exceptions, including a Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan), Options may not be exercised before the first anniversary date of grant. Each Option will expire on the date fixed by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant but in no event later than the tenth
17
anniversary of the date of grant. In its discretion, the Compensation Committee, may grant an additional Option (a "Reload Option") for the number of shares used by the grantee to pay the exercise price of the original Option, provided that such Reload Option must be subject to the same terms as the original Option except that the exercise price of a Reload Option must be equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time that the original Option is exercised. The Plan also provides for an automatic grant of a non-qualified stock option to acquire 10,000 shares of Common Stock, exercisable over four years, to each non-employee director on the date such person becomes a director of the Company.
Restricted Stock. The Compensation Committee may also grant awards of restricted stock to key employees, either separately from or in tandem with, the grant of an Option. Subject to certain limited exceptions (including a Change in Control of the Company), such restrictions may not lapse sooner than the first or later than the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.
Information relating to awards made in Fiscal 2001 under the Plan to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table is presented in the various tables under the caption "Executive Compensation and Other Information." In addition, 450,000 Options at an average exercise price of $13.30 per share were granted to all non-officer employee participants as a group in Fiscal 2001. Awards to be made in the future under the Plan are not yet determinable since they are discretionary (other than the automatic grants to non-employee directors). On July 31, 2001, the last reported sales price for the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $16.52 per share.
The Board of Directors may terminate, suspend or modify the Plan, without the authorization of the stockholders, to the extent allowed by law. No termination, suspension or modification of the Plan may adversely affect any rights of a holder of an award granted under the Plan before the date of such termination, suspension or modification without the consent of such holder.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
Neither non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, nor restricted stock awards require the holder to recognize income, or entitle the Company to a deduction, at the time of grant.
Upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the holder will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the option stock as of the date of exercise over the exercise price. Upon the vesting of a restricted stock award, the holder will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at such time. A holder may elect to recognize ordinary income on the fair market value of the restricted stock at the date of the award, and thus recognize capital gain on the subsequent sale of the stock in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock at the date of vesting over the fair market value at the date of the award.
Incentive stock options are not ordinarily subject to taxation until the holder sells the option stock, although the excess of the fair market value of the option stock over the exercise price is a tax preference item subject to alternative minimum taxation at the time of exercise. When stock acquired through exercise of an incentive stock option is sold at least two years after grant and at least one year after exercise, the holder recognizes as capital gain or loss the difference between the sale proceeds of the option stock and the exercise price. If these holding periods are not met, the holder will recognize ordinary income on the excess of the sale proceeds over the exercise price.
Subject to IRC Section 162(m), the Company is entitled to a deduction when and to the extent the holder recognizes ordinary income upon the vesting of a restricted stock award or the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, provided the Company complied with certain withholding requirements. In the case of an incentive stock option, the Company is not entitled to a deduction where the holder recognizes capital gain; the Company is, however, entitled to a deduction when and to the extent the holder recognizes ordinary income upon sale of the option stock within either of the two previously mentioned holding periods.
18
Vote Required for Approval
The proposed amendment to the Plan must be approved by a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the 2001 Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE AAR CORP. STOCK BENEFIT PLAN.
PROPOSAL 3
APPROVAL OF RESTRICTED STOCK PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER
THE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Background
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has unanimously adopted a Long-Term Incentive Plan for David P. Storch, the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("LTI Plan"). The LTI Plan will use stock available under the stockholder-approved AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan. The LTI Plan is designed to (i) tie a significant portion of the total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer to the creation of stockholder value on the basis of stock price appreciation, (ii) provide incentive compensation opportunities contingent upon achieving better than average economic performance as compared with peers and the general market, (iii) provide an incentive opportunity in the form of stock options and performance-based restricted stock that results in significant stock ownership, the value of which is contingent upon sustained performance of the Company; and (iv) to the extent possible, consistent with the Company's performance and compensation objectives, qualify such compensation as "performance-based" for purposes of IRC Section 162(m) so that the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction on the payment of such awards.
Mr. Storch's LTI Plan consists of two parts: (i) an annual stock option grant opportunity (with options vesting ratably over four years) up to an amount (not to exceed the maximum amount permitted under the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan) determined by a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to 1.25 times his base salary and the denominator of which is equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant divided by three, and (ii) subject to stockholder approval of restricted stock performance goals, an annual performance restricted stock opportunity.
The restricted stock opportunities under the LTI Plan are based on achievement of restricted stock performance goals. Mr. Storch may earn up to .9375 times his then current base salary ("Performance Dollars") each year in restricted stock based on the Company's average Return on Capital during the performance period as compared to each of (i) the S&P 500 Index average Return on Capital, and (ii) the Company's Peer Group Index average Return on Capital during the performance period. Performance Dollars will be earned in accordance with the following performance matrix:
% of Target Achieved1 |
% of Salary |
||
---|---|---|---|
0 to 80 | 0 | ||
80 to 100 | 31.25 | % | |
100 to 120 | 62.5 | % | |
120+ | 93.75 | % |
19
The number of shares to be awarded, if any, will be determined at the end of each performance period based on achievement of the goals during the period and Performance Dollars earned. Any restricted shares awarded under the LTI Plan will be restricted for three years after the award date with one-third (33.33%) of the award vesting (i.e. restrictions will lapse) on the first, second and third anniversary date(s) of the award.
The first performance period begins June 1, 2001 and ends May 31, 2002. The second performance period begins June 1, 2001 and ends May 31, 2003. The third performance period begins June 1, 2002 and ends May 31, 2004. The fourth performance period begins June 1, 2003 and ends May 31, 2005.
For purposes of the LTI Plan, "Peer Group Index" means the index selected by the Company from time to time for performance comparisons in the Company's annual proxy statement pursuant to applicable Securities and Exchange Commission regulations; and "Return on Capital" means earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) divided by Total Capital (debt plus equity minus cash).
If this proposal is approved by the stockholders, Mr. Storch's Employment Agreement will be amended to reflect the approved restricted stock performance goals and long-term restricted stock incentive award opportunity described in this proposal. If this proposal is not approved by the stockholders, Mr. Storch may receive compensation pursuant to other alternative compensation arrangements approved by the Board and acceptable to Mr. Storch.
Plan Administration
Mr. Storch's LTI Plan will be administered by the Board's Compensation Committee (the committee that also administers the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan), consisting of at least two non-employee directors, each of whom is intended to qualify as an "outside director" within the meaning of IRC Section 162(m).
Federal Income Tax Consequences
Under present federal income tax law, Mr. Storch will realize ordinary income in the year the restrictions on the shares lapse in an amount equal to the fair market value of the vested restricted shares. The Company will receive a deduction for the amount constituting ordinary income to the participant, provided that the requirements of IRC Section 162(m) which limit the deductibility of non-performance related compensation paid to certain corporate executives are satisfied.
Vote Required for Approval
The proposed restricted stock performance goals must be approved by a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the 2001 Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED RESTRICTED STOCK PERFORMANCE GOALS.
OTHER MATTERS TO BE VOTED UPON
Management knows of no other matters which are to be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the named proxy holders will vote all proxies in their discretion and best judgment on such other matters.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
During the year ended May 31, 2001, the Company engaged KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors principally to perform the annual audit and to render other services.
The Company's Board of Directors, upon recommendation of its Audit Committee after consideration and determination of the independent auditors' independence in light of all services rendered to the Company, has selected KPMG LLP as its independent auditors for the Fiscal Year ending
20
May 31, 2002. Representatives of that firm are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by KPMG for audit of the Company's financial statements for Fiscal 2001 and for reviews of financial statements included in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q were $514,000.
All Other Fees
The aggregate Fiscal 2001 fees billed by KPMG for services rendered to the Company, other than the services described above under "Audit Fees", were $402,724.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE YEAR 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Any stockholder who wishes to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2002 must submit such proposal in accordance with the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the Company's by-laws, in order for a proposal to be eligible for action by the shareholders at and inclusion in the Company's Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to the 2002 Annual Meeting, the stockholder must submit such proposal to the Company, in writing, to be received by the Secretary of the Company, AAR CORP., One AAR Place, 1100 N. Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191, no later than April 9, 2002.
A stockholder proposal submitted outside the Rule 14a-8 process for presentation at the 2002 Annual Meeting will be considered untimely for purposes of Rules 14a-4 and 14a-5 if notice of the stockholder proposal is received by the Company after April 9, 2002.
By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
Howard A. Pulsifer Secretary |
August 27, 2001
UPON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF ANY RECORD HOLDER OR BENEFICIAL OWNER OF COMMON STOCK OF AAR CORP., THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE, WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2001. REQUESTS SHOULD BE MADE TO MR. HOWARD A. PULSIFER, SECRETARY, AAR CORP., ONE AAR PLACE, 1100 N. WOOD DALE ROAD, WOOD DALE, ILLINOIS 60191, (630) 227-2000.
21
AAR CORP.
Board of Directors
Audit Committee Charter
Purpose
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to (i) corporate accounting, disclosure and reporting practices and legal compliance of the Company, (ii) the quality and integrity of the Company's financial reports and (iii) the independence and performance of the Company's internal and independent auditors.
Organization
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of not less than three directors of the Company who shall meet the independence and experience requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. The members of the Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board on the recommendation of the Nominating Committee.
Policy and Procedure
The Audit Committee will maintain flexible policies and procedures and meeting schedules to enable the Audit Committee to best react to changing circumstances and provide that the Company's accounting, disclosure and reporting practices are in accordance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Chairman of the Audit Committee may call meetings during the year as necessary.
The Committee will provide for free and open communication between the Committee and the Company's directors, independent auditors, internal auditors and management.
Both the Company's internal auditors and independent auditor are ultimately accountable to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee as representatives of the Company's shareholders.
The Audit Committee has authority to retain special legal, accounting or other consultants to advise the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may request any officer or employee of the Company or the Company's legal counsel or independent auditor to attend committee meetings or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee shall make regular reports to the Board.
Responsibilities
E1
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company's financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This is the responsibility of management and the independent auditor. Nor is it the duty of the Audit Committee to conduct investigations, to resolve disagreements, if any, between management and the independent auditor or to assure compliance with laws and regulations and the Company's Code of Conduct.
E2
AAR CORP. | PROXY | |
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the October 10, 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at AAR CORP.'s headquarters, One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois, on Wednesday, October 10, 2001, at 10:00 A.M. (CST). |
The undersigned hereby appoints DAVID P. STORCH and HOWARD A. PULSIFER, or either of them, with full power of substitution, as Proxies, and hereby authorizes them to represent the undersigned at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AAR CORP. to be held on October 10, 2001, or any adjournment thereof, and to vote all shares of AAR CORP. Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present.
AS TO EACH ITEM SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1, 2, AND 3.
(Continued and to be dated and signed on reverse side.)
^ FOLD AND DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR VOTED PROXY BY MAIL ^ |
Dear Stockholder:
We encourage you to submit your proxy for the voting of your shares electronically this year either by telephone or via the Internet. This will eliminate the need to return your proxy card. You will need your proxy card and Social Security Number (where applicable) when voting your shares electronically. The Voter Control Number that appears above, just below the perforation, must be used in order to submit your proxy vote by telephone or via the Internet.
The EquiServe Vote by Telephone and Vote by Internet systems can be accessed 24 hours a day, seven days a week up until the day prior to the meeting.
To submit your proxy vote by Telephone: | |||
Using a touch-tone phone call toll-free | 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683) | ||
To submit your proxy vote by Internet: |
|||
Log onto the Internet and go to the website: | http://www.eproxyvote.com/air | ||
Note: If you submit your proxy over the Internet, you may incur costs such as telecommunication and Internet access charges for which you will be responsible. |
THANK YOU FOR VOTING YOUR SHARES
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
Do not return this Proxy Card if you are submitting your proxy by telephone or the Internet
/x/ | Please mark your votes as in this example. |
6019 |
As to any other business that may come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, this Proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies. | PLEASE MARK VOTE CLEARLY | |||
The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" items 1, 2, and 3 described in the proxy statement: |
1. | Election of two Class II directors | FOR all nominees* / / |
Withhold Authority to vote for all nominees / / |
Nominees: 01 Edgar D. Jannotta 02 A. Robert Abboud |
2. | Approval of an amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan ("Plan") to provide a maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted under the Plan to any grantee during any calendar year. | FOR / / |
AGAINST / / |
ABSTAIN / / |
||||||||
*(Instructions: to withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write that nominee's name(s) in the space below) | |||||||||||||||||
3. |
Approval of restricted stock performance goals established under the Long-Term Incentive Plan for the Company's Chief Executive Officer. |
/ / |
/ / |
/ / |
|||||||||||||
(Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should all sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, etc. should so indicate when signing. If signer is a corporation, sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer who adds his or her name and title.) |
|||||||||||||||||
SIGNATURE(S) | DATE | ||||||||||||||||
^ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ^ |
AAR...
...meeting the needs of the aviation/aerospace industry around the world
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Harrisburg, Pennsylvania | Petropolis, Brazil | ||
Atlanta, Georgia | Holtsville, New York | Port Jervis, New York | ||
Brussels, Belgium | Livonia, Michigan | Prestwick, Scotland | ||
Cadillac, Michigan | London, England | Ra'anana, Israel | ||
Clearwater, Florida | Los Angeles, CA | Roswell, NM | ||
Columbus, Ohio | Madrid, Spain | Singapore | ||
Costa Mesa, CA | Memphis, Tennessee | South Glamorgan, Wales | ||
Dallas, Texas | Miami, Florida | Tampa, Florida | ||
Elk Grove Village, Illinois | Miami Lakes, Florida | Teterboro, New Jersey | ||
Frankfort, New York | Mitcham, England | Toronto, Canada | ||
Garden City, New York | Montreal, Canada | Windsor, Connecticut | ||
Hamburg, Germany | Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | Winston-Salem, NC | ||
Hannover, Germany | Paris, France | Wood Dale, Illinois |