Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Table of Contents

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

1275 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94103

(415) 558-0200

December 17, 2021

Dear Stockholder:

We cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Due to the continuing public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the health and well-being of our stockholders and employees, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. Stockholders will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. The Annual Meeting will be accessible at www.meetnow.global/MW6XWLS. Please see “Additional Meeting Matters—Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting” in the Proxy Statement accompanying this letter for information on how to attend, submit questions and vote at the Annual Meeting.

We are making available to you the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and form of proxy card or voting instruction form on or about December 17, 2021.

We are pleased to furnish proxy materials to stockholders primarily over the internet. We believe that this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lowers the costs of our Annual Meeting, and conserves natural resources. On or about December 17, 2021, we mailed to our stockholders a notice that includes instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report and how to vote online. The notice also includes instructions on how you can receive a paper copy of your Annual Meeting materials, including the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and proxy card or voting instruction form. If you elected to receive your Annual Meeting materials by mail, the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and proxy card or voting instruction form were enclosed. If you elected to receive your Annual Meeting materials via e-mail, the e-mail contains voting instructions and links to the 2021 Annual Report and the Proxy Statement, both of which are available at https://investor.dolby.com/financials/annual-reports/default.aspx.

Additional details regarding admission to, and the business to be conducted at, the Annual Meeting are described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. A copy of our 2021 Annual Report is included with the Proxy Statement for those stockholders who are receiving paper copies of the proxy materials.

Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope that you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote over the internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card or voting instruction form. Please review the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction form regarding each of these voting options. Voting will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend the Annual Meeting.

Thank you for your ongoing support of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Sincerely yours,

Kevin Yeaman

President and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on February 8, 2022

To the Stockholders of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

Due to the continuing public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the health and well-being of our stockholders and employees, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Dolby Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held virtually via live webcast on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, for the following purposes:

These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. We are not aware of any other business to come before the Annual Meeting.

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 10, 2021 and their proxies are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any postponement, adjournment or continuation thereof.

All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting virtually and no stockholder will be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. The Annual Meeting will be accessible at www.meetnow.global/MW6XWLS. Please see “Additional Meeting Matters—Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting” in the Proxy Statement accompanying this letter for information on how to attend, submit questions and vote at the Annual Meeting.

Stockholders may also vote over the internet, by telephone, or by mail in advance of the Annual Meeting. Voting your shares in advance will not prevent you from attending the Annual Meeting, revoking your earlier submitted proxy, or voting your shares at the Annual Meeting. See “Additional Meeting Matters—How to Vote” in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice for more information.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Andy Sherman

Secretary

December 17, 2021

Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice and submit your proxy or voting instructions as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. You may submit your proxy or voting instructions for the Annual Meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card or voting instruction form in the pre-addressed envelope provided, or, in most cases, by using the telephone or the internet. Even if you have given your proxy, you may still vote at the meeting if you attend the Annual Meeting. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled “Additional Meeting Matters—How to Vote” in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice and the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction form.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting as this summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider.

2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Due to the continuing public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the health and well-being of our stockholders and employees, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast. Stockholders will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

 

Date and Time:		Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time
Place:		Live webcast accessible at www.meetnow.global/MW6XWLS. Please see “Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting” beginning on page 74 for information on how to attend, submit questions and vote at the Annual Meeting.
Record Date:		December 10, 2021

Proposals to Be Voted on at 2022 Annual Meeting

 

Proposal		Board Recommendation		Page Number for Additional Information
1. Election of Directors		FOR			8
2. Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation		FOR			69
3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		FOR			71

Director Nominees

The nominees for election to our Board at the 2022 Annual Meeting are listed below. N. William Jasper, Jr., who had served on our Board since 2003, retired from our Board upon the expiration of his term as a director that ended in February 2021. Emily Rollins and Tony Prophet were appointed to our Board effective February 24, 2021 and December 6, 2021, respectively, and are standing for election by our stockholders for the first time.

 

Committee Memberships

Name

Age

Director Since

Principal Occupation

Indep.

AC

CC

NGC

SPC

TSC

Kevin Yeaman

55

2009

President and CEO

No

Peter Gotcher

62

2003

Chairman of the Board

Yes

Micheline Chau

68

2013

Director

Yes

David Dolby

44

2011

Chief Executive Officer, Dolby Family Ventures

No

Tony Prophet

62

2021

Director

Yes

Emily Rollins

51

2021

Director

Yes

Simon Segars

54

2015

CEO, Arm Ltd

Yes

Roger Siboni

67

2004

Director

Yes

Anjali Sud

38

2019

CEO, Vimeo, Inc.

Yes

Avadis Tevanian, Jr.

60

2009

Managing Director, NextEquity Partners

Yes

1

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

3

Table of Contents

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation and Fiscal 2021 Executive Compensation Highlights

 

 

Element of Compensation		Fiscal 2021 Highlights
Base Salary   Comprised 9% of the target total direct compensation opportunity of our CEO, and 16% for our other NEOs (on average), in fiscal 2021.		•  For calendar 2021, the Compensation Committee of our Board increased the base salary of each of our NEOs by 3%.
Annual Incentive Compensation (Cash)   Comprised 9% of the target total direct compensation opportunity of our CEO, and 10% for our other NEOs (on average), in fiscal 2021.		•  NEO annual incentive compensation targets—stated as a percentage of base salary for calendar 2021—were maintained at fiscal 2020 levels (100% for our CEO and 65% for each of our other NEOs).   •  Due to the continued economic uncertainty and lack of forward visibility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic in fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee established two semi-annual performance periods under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan (rather than a single twelve-month performance period), based on achievement of a combination of revenue and non-GAAP operating income goals for each such period.   •  The fiscal 2021 Executive Bonus Plan funded at 115% of target, representing the blended average of the funding multipliers for the two semi-annual performance periods.   •  Based on these results and team and individual performance, our NEOs received annual incentive compensation payments equal to 115% of their annual incentive compensation targets.

4

Table of Contents

5

Table of Contents

6

Table of Contents

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

1275 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94103

(415) 558-0200

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors (our “Board”) of Dolby Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is soliciting proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually via live webcast on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time and any postponement, adjournment or continuation thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). Stockholders will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. The Annual Meeting will be accessible at www.meetnow.global/MW6XWLS. Please see “Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting” beginning on page 74 for information on how to attend, submit questions and vote at the Annual Meeting.

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying notice and form of proxy are first being made available to stockholders on or about December 17, 2021.

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the internet. On or about December 17, 2021, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also provides information on how to access your voting instructions to be able to vote through the internet or by telephone. Other stockholders, in accordance with their prior requests, have received e-mail notification of how to access our proxy materials and vote via the internet, or have been mailed paper copies of our proxy materials and a proxy card or voting instruction form.

Internet distribution of our proxy materials helps to expedite receipt by stockholders, lowers the cost of the Annual Meeting and conserves natural resources. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials via e-mail unless you elect otherwise.

7

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

Our Board currently consists of ten members. Our Bylaws permit our Board to establish by resolution the authorized number of directors, and ten directors are currently authorized. N. William Jasper, Jr. served as a member of our Board during fiscal 2021 until his retirement from our Board upon the expiration of his term that ended in February 2021, at which time he received the honorary title of Director Emeritus, as described below.

Our Board proposes the election of ten directors, each to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Emily Rollins and Tony Prophet were appointed to our Board effective February 24, 2021 and December 6, 2021, respectively. Ms. Rollins and Mr. Prophet were recommended as a director to our Nominating and Governance Committee by a third-party search firm, which assisted the committee in identifying and evaluating potential director nominees. Ms. Rollins and Mr. Prophet are standing for election to the Board by our stockholders for the first time. All other incumbent directors are nominees for re-election to our Board. All of the nominees have been recommended for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and all of them are currently serving as directors. All nominees other than Ms. Rollins and Mr. Prophet were elected by the stockholders at last year’s annual meeting. Your proxy cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected, and management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unavailable to serve. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as director at the time of the Annual Meeting, an event that we do not currently anticipate, proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our Board to fill the vacancy. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them “FOR” the nominees named below.

Information Regarding the Director Nominees and our Director Emeritus

Director Nominees

Names of the nominees and certain biographical information about them as of December 10, 2021, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are set forth below:

8

Table of Contents

Kevin Yeaman became our President and CEO in March 2009 and has been a member of our Board since he assumed the role of CEO. He joined Dolby as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President in October 2005, was appointed Senior Vice President in November 2006 and Executive Vice President in July 2007. Prior to joining Dolby, he worked for seven years at Epiphany, Inc., a publicly traded enterprise software company, most recently as Chief Financial Officer from August 1999 to October 2005. Previously, Mr. Yeaman also served as Worldwide Vice President of Field Finance Operations for Informix Software, Inc., a provider of relational database software, from February 1998 to August 1998. From September 1988 to February 1998, Mr. Yeaman served in Silicon Valley and London in various positions at KPMG LLP, an accounting firm, serving most recently as a senior manager. Mr. Yeaman is a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. He also sits on the Board of Trustees of the Academy Museum Foundation. He holds a B.S. degree in commerce from Santa Clara University.

As Dolby’s Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Yeaman has extensive experience in Dolby’s markets and brings to our Board a deep understanding of Dolby, its finances, operations and strategy.

Peter Gotcher has served as a director since June 2003 and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 2011. Mr. Gotcher served as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors from March 2009 until March 2011. Mr. Gotcher is an independent investor. Mr. Gotcher was a venture partner with Redpoint Ventures, a private investment firm, from September 1999 to January 2003. Prior to joining Redpoint Ventures, Mr. Gotcher was a venture partner with Institutional Venture Partners, a private investment firm, from 1997 to September 1999. Prior to joining Institutional Venture Partners, Mr. Gotcher founded and served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Digidesign from 1984 to 1995. Digidesign was acquired by Avid Technology, a media software company, in 1995 and Mr. Gotcher served as the General Manager of Digidesign and Executive Vice President of Avid Technology from January 1995 to May 1996. Mr. Gotcher serves on the board of directors of GoPro, Inc., and served on the board of directors of Pandora Media, Inc. from September 2005 to May 2017. Mr. Gotcher also serves on the boards of directors of several private companies. Mr. Gotcher holds a B.A. degree in English literature from the University of California at Berkeley.

As the founder, former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Digidesign and a former venture capitalist, Mr. Gotcher has a broad understanding of the operational, financial and strategic issues facing public companies. In addition, his service on other boards and committees, including as a member of the Audit Committee and Compensation and Leadership Committee of GoPro, Inc., as a former member of the Compensation Committee and member and chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Pandora Media, Inc., and his extensive experience in Dolby’s markets, provide valuable perspective for our Board and give him significant operating experience, as well as financial, accounting and corporate governance experience.

9

Table of Contents

Micheline Chau has served as a director since February 2013. Ms. Chau served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Lucasfilm Ltd., a film and entertainment company, from April 2003 to September 2012. Prior to assuming her role as President and Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Chau served as Lucasfilm’s Chief Financial Officer, from 1991 to March 2003. Before that, Ms. Chau was Chief Financial/Administrative Officer for Bell Atlantic Healthcare Systems and held other executive-level positions within various industries, including retail, restaurant, venture capital and financial services. Ms. Chau is a member of the board of directors of Las Vegas Sands Corp., a developer, owner and operator of integrated resorts in Asia and the United States, and serves on Las Vegas Sands’ Compensation and Audit Committees. Ms. Chau also sat on the board of directors of Red Hat, Inc., an open source enterprise software provider (acquired by International Business Machines Corporation in July 2019), from November 2008 to August 2012, and also served as a member of Red Hat’s Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. In addition, Ms. Chau currently sits on the boards of directors of several private and non-profit entities. Ms. Chau holds an undergraduate degree in English and Asian Studies from Wellesley College and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

As the former President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Lucasfilm, Ms. Chau brings to our Board senior leadership and significant operating experience, as well as financial and entertainment industry expertise. In addition, as a member of the Compensation and Audit Committees of Las Vegas Sands and a former member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of Red Hat, Ms. Chau brings to our Board corporate governance experience.

David Dolby has served as a director since February 2011. Mr. Dolby is founder and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Dolby Family Ventures, an early stage venture firm unrelated to Dolby Laboratories that launched in June 2014 to invest in companies and technologies with the potential for significant social impact. Previously, Mr. Dolby served as a consultant to our Board on technology strategy matters from February 2011 until February 2015. Mr. Dolby also served as Manager, Strategic Partnerships of Dolby Laboratories from May 2008 until February 2011. In this role, Mr. Dolby was responsible for managing the company’s strategic partnerships and technology standards for internet media encoding, delivery and playback. He represented the company in technical and business working groups at a variety of international standards groups, including Universal Serial Bus, Digital Living Network Alliance, Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem Ultraviolet, and Blu-ray Disc Association. Mr. Dolby has attended industry events with the company for a significant number of years, including Audio Engineering Society, National Association of Broadcasters, International Consumer Electronics Show, ShoWest, Cine Expo International, IFA, and Custom Electronic Design and Installation Association. From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Dolby was a self-employed entrepreneur and investor. Mr. Dolby attended Stanford Business School between 2004 and 2006. During that time, he served as product manager at Kaleidescape, Inc., a Silicon Valley technology firm focused on high-performance music and movie server systems. From 2003 to 2006, he owned and operated Charter Flight LLC, a private aircraft leasing business. In addition, during 2004, Mr. Dolby was an investment banking analyst focused on technology at Perseus Group (now GCA Savvian). From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Dolby was an employee of NetVMG, a company developing route control software for optimizing multi-homed IP network routing. Before joining NetVMG, Mr. Dolby worked for engineering firms Bechtel and Poe & Associates. Mr. Dolby serves on the board of directors of Cogstate Limited, a cognitive assessment and training company focused on the development and commercialization of computerized tests of cognition. Mr. Dolby serves on Cogstate’s Remuneration and Nomination Committee. Mr. Dolby also serves on the governing boards of various not-for-profit entities, including the Boards of Trustees of the Salk Institute for Biological Sciences and the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, as well as the board of directors of Tipping Point Community. Mr. Dolby received a B.S.E. in Civil Engineering from Duke University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

10

Table of Contents

Mr. Dolby brings experience to our Board in home theater system technology and software technology productization, and offers a long-term perspective on the growth of the company and its commitment to excellence in audio and video.

Tony Prophet is standing for election by our stockholders for the first time. Mr. Prophet was formerly the Chief Equality and Recruiting Officer at salesforce.com, inc. (“Salesforce”), which he joined in September 2016 until July 2021. Before Salesforce, Mr. Prophet served as Corporate Vice President, Education Marketing, of Microsoft Corporation, from June 2015 to September 2016, as Corporate Vice President, Windows and Search Marketing, from February 2015 to June 2015, and as Corporate Vice President, Windows Marketing, from May 2014 to February 2015. Prior to Microsoft, Mr. Prophet held leadership roles at HP Inc. since 2006, including leading worldwide PC and printing operations. Before that, Mr. Prophet served in positions of increasing responsibility at multiple organizations, including leading worldwide operations for the Carrier Business unit of United Technologies and rising to Partner at Booz Allen Hamilton. In addition to his operating roles, Mr. Prophet served on the board of directors of Gannett Co., Inc., a subscription-led and digitally focused media and marketing solutions company, from 2013 to May 2019. Mr. Prophet is also a Board Advisor to Aviso AI, a provider of a predictive revenue intelligence platform, since September 2021. He holds a BS in industrial engineering from General Motors Institute (now Kettering University) and an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

As a long-time, accomplished technology business executive, Mr. Prophet brings to our Board substantial leadership experience in industrial, consumer electronic, hardware, and software spaces.

Emily Rollins has served as a director since February 2021 and is standing for election by our stockholders for the first time. She served in various positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP since 1992, including as an Audit and Assurance Partner from 2006 until her retirement in September 2020. At Deloitte, Ms. Rollins served technology and media companies and guided hundreds of clients through complex audit and reporting processes. Ms. Rollins also served in positions of increasing responsibility, including leadership roles in Deloitte’s US Technology, Media, and Telecommunications industry group, Audit Innovation and Transformation, and Diversity and Inclusion. She led firmwide initiatives to recruit, develop, and retain women and diverse professionals as well as transform and modernize Deloitte’s audit platform. Ms. Rollins currently serves on the board of directors of Xometry, Inc. (since March 2021), an AI-enabled marketplace for on-demand manufacturing enabling buyers to efficiently source on-demand manufactured parts and assemblies, and serves as chair of Xometry’s Audit Committee. Ms. Rollins is also a member of the board of directors of McAfee Corp. (since October 2021), a global provider of online protection, and serves on McAfee’s Audit Committee. She also sits on the board of directors of Science 37 Holdings, Inc. (since October 2021), a research company that specializes in decentralized clinical trials to enable universal access to clinical research, and is chair of Science 37’s Audit Committee. Ms. Rollins also serves on the boards of Dwolla, a private company specializing in electronic payment technology, and several non-profit entities and associations. Ms. Rollins is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.A. degree in Accounting and International Relations from Claremont McKenna College.

After nearly 30 years in public accounting, Ms. Rollins brings to our Board considerable experience as an advisor to boards and executive teams and extensive financial and public accounting expertise as an audit expert in the technology and media spaces.

11

Table of Contents

Simon Segars has served as a director since February 2015. Since 1991, Mr. Segars has worked for Arm Ltd (known as Arm Holdings Plc prior to 2017), a designer and provider of microprocessors, software development tools and related technologies that was publicly held until its acquisition by SoftBank Group Corp. in September 2016. Mr. Segars has served as Arm’s Chief Executive Officer since July 2013 and as a member of its board of directors since 2005. Mr. Segars also served as a member of SoftBank Group Corp.’s board of directors between June 2017 and June 2021. He served as President of Arm in 2013 before being promoted to Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Segars held the position of Executive Vice President and General Manager, Physical IP Division, from 2007 to 2012. Prior senior roles at Arm include Executive Vice President, Engineering; Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales; and Executive Vice President, Business Development. Mr. Segars worked on many of the early Arm CPU products and led the development of the ARM7 and ARM9 Thumb^® families. He holds a number of patents in the field of embedded CPU architectures. Mr. Segars received his Bachelors in Electronic Engineering from the University of Sussex, and obtained a Masters of Computer Science from the University of Manchester. In recognition of his extraordinary lifetime accomplishments and his impact on the global technology industry, Mr. Segars was conferred an Honorary Doctor of Science from the University of Sussex in 2019. Mr. Segars currently serves on the boards of directors of the Global Semiconductor Alliance (where he currently serves as Chairman) and the UK’s TechWorks.

As a trained and former engineer, Mr. Segars has extensive experience in the technological elements of Dolby’s business operations. In addition, with his significant experience as an executive officer of Arm, and his service on the boards of both public and private companies, Mr. Segars brings to our Board a valuable understanding of the operational and strategic issues facing companies.

Roger Siboni has served as a director since July 2004. Mr. Siboni served as the Chairman of the Board of Epiphany, Inc., a provider of data analytics for customer personalization, from December 1999 until Epiphany, Inc. was acquired by SSA Global Technologies, Inc. in September 2005. Mr. Siboni also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Epiphany from August 1998 to July 2003. From July 1996 to August 1998, Mr. Siboni was Deputy Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, a member firm of KPMG International, an accounting and consulting firm. From July 1993 to June 1996, Mr. Siboni was Managing Partner of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP’s information, communication and entertainment practice. Mr. Siboni also serves on the boards of directors of Coupa Software Incorporated, a cloud-based provider of spend management solutions, and a number of private companies. Previously, Mr. Siboni served on the board of FileNet Corporation, from December 1998 until it was acquired by IBM in October 2006; the board of infoGROUP Inc., from January 2009 until it was acquired by CCMP Capital Advisors in July 2010; the board of ArcSight, Inc., from June 2009 until it was acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company in October 2010; the board of Classmates Media Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Online, from 2007 to 2010; the board of Marketo, Inc., from October 2011 until it was acquired by Milestone Holdco, LLC in August 2016; and the board of Cadence Design Systems from January 1999 to April 2020. Mr. Siboni holds a B.S. degree in business administration from the University of California at Berkeley.

As a former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Epiphany, Inc., a former Chief Operating Officer and Managing Partner of the information, communication and entertainment practice at KPMG LLP and a director of a number of companies, including as a former member of the Audit (where he served as Chairman), Finance and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees of Cadence Design Systems, and as a current member of the Audit (where he also serves as Chairman) and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and Lead Independent Director of Coupa Software Incorporated, Mr. Siboni has significant operating experience, as well as financial, accounting and corporate governance experience.

12

Table of Contents

Anjali Sud has served as a director since May 2019. Ms. Sud currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer, and on the board of directors, of Vimeo, Inc., a provider of cloud-based software tools that enable creative professionals, marketers and enterprises to stream, host, distribute and monetize videos online and across devices. Ms. Sud held various positions at Vimeo since July 2014, before being promoted to CEO in July 2017. Prior to Vimeo, Ms. Sud served in various positions at Amazon.com, Inc. from 2010 to 2014, most recently as Director of Marketing. Ms. Sud holds a B.S. degree from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

As the Chief Executive Officer of Vimeo, Ms. Sud brings extensive knowledge of the technology industry and operational experience to the boardroom, including an understanding of the operational, financial and strategic issues facing audio-visual content creators. In addition, through her prior role as Director of Marketing at Amazon, Ms. Sud brings valuable business and marketing insight and experience to our Board.

Avadis Tevanian, Jr. has served as a director since February 2009. Dr. Tevanian serves as a Managing Director of NextEquity Partners, a firm he co-founded in July 2015, making venture capital investments. Previously, Dr. Tevanian served as the Software Chief Technology Officer of Apple Inc. from 2003 to 2006. As Software CTO, Dr. Tevanian focused on setting the company-wide software technology direction for Apple. Prior to his tenure as Software CTO, Dr. Tevanian was Senior Vice President of Software at Apple, a role he took on when Apple acquired NeXT, Inc. in 1997. As Senior Vice President of Software, Dr. Tevanian led the software engineering team responsible for the creation of macOS and worked as part of Apple’s executive team. Before joining Apple, he was Vice President of Engineering at NeXT, Inc. and was responsible for managing NeXT’s engineering department. Dr. Tevanian started his professional career at Carnegie Mellon University, where he was a principal designer and engineer of the Mach operating system upon which Nextstep, and now macOS and iOS, are based. Dr. Tevanian is a former board member of Tellme Networks, Inc., an internet telecom company acquired by Microsoft. He holds a B.A. degree in mathematics from the University of Rochester and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in computer science from Carnegie Mellon University.

With more than 30 years of operational and software expertise, including as Apple’s Chief Software Technology Officer, Dr. Tevanian brings to our Board extensive experience in consumer technology businesses and a deep understanding of the operational and strategic issues facing companies.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers.

See “Corporate Governance Matters” and “Compensation of Directors” for additional information regarding our Board.

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees set forth above.

Director Emeritus

N. William Jasper, Jr. served as a director from June 2003 until his retirement from our Board in February 2021, at which time he received the honorary title of Director Emeritus, in an uncompensated, non-voting capacity. Mr. Jasper joined Dolby in February 1979 as Chief Financial Officer and retired as President and Chief Executive Officer in March 2009. He served in a variety of positions prior to becoming President in May 1983, including as our Vice President, Finance and Administration and as our Executive Vice President. Mr. Jasper is an at-large member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. He holds a B.S. degree in industrial engineering from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley.

13

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The following table provides information concerning the compensation paid by us to each of our non-employee directors for fiscal 2021. Our CEO did not receive additional compensation for his service as a director, and his compensation as an employee is presented in the Fiscal 2021 Summary Compensation Table.

In fiscal 2021, our non-employee directors received the following restricted stock unit awards (which are also reflected in the above table):

14

Table of Contents

As of September 24, 2021, the aggregate number of shares of our Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock unit awards held by each of our non-employee directors is listed in the table below. As of such date, no stock options to purchase shares of our Class A Common Stock were held by any of our non-employee directors.

Standard Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements

We use a combination of cash and equity compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for conducting periodic reviews of our non-employee director compensation and, if appropriate, recommending to our Board any changes in the type or amount of compensation.

Cash Compensation

During fiscal 2021, the annual cash retainers for serving as a non-employee director on our Board or committees of our Board were as follows:

Members of the Stock Plan Committee receive no annual cash retainer for serving on this committee.

Equity Compensation

During fiscal 2021, a newly appointed non-employee director was eligible to receive an initial restricted stock unit award, and all incumbent/continuing non-employee directors were eligible to receive an annual ongoing restricted stock unit award, in each case covering that number of shares of our Class A Common Stock

15

Table of Contents

as determined by dividing $250,000 (pro-rated for complete months of service in the case of an initial restricted stock unit award for a newly-appointed director) by the average closing price of our Class A Common Stock for the 30 trading days ending on (and including) the trading day immediately preceding the grant date, rounded down to the nearest whole share. Both initial and ongoing restricted stock unit awards vest in full on the day preceding the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders following the grant date of the award (or if earlier, the first anniversary of the award’s grant date), subject to continued service on our Board. All shares covered by initial or ongoing restricted stock unit awards will become fully vested immediately prior to a change in control of Dolby, so long as the director is then on our Board.

Director Compensation Review

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews our non-employee director compensation on an annual basis, and if appropriate, recommends changes to our Board. For fiscal 2021, the Nominating and Governance Committee engaged Compensia, Inc., the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consulting firm, for purposes of advising the Nominating and Governance Committee on its non-employee director compensation review. The Nominating and Governance Committee provided Compensia with instructions regarding the goals of our non-employee director compensation program. The committee also directed Compensia to evaluate our director compensation relative to director compensation at companies included in our compensation peer group that we use as a market check for our fiscal 2021 executive officer compensation. Following such review, Compensia concluded that our non-employee director compensation program remains aligned with peer practice, and the Nominating and Governance Committee concluded that no changes to director compensation were advisable for fiscal 2021.

In addition to assisting the Nominating and Governance Committee on its non-employee director compensation review, Compensia has advised the Compensation Committee on executive officer compensation matters and has provided other services to Dolby in designing employee compensation programs. The Compensation Committee took into account the provision of these services and the compensation to Compensia for such services in determining that its relationship with Compensia and the work of Compensia on behalf of the Compensation Committee has not raised any conflict of interest, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Roles of the Compensation Committee, Management and Compensation Consultant—Role of Compensation Consultant.”

Other Arrangements

We reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel, lodging, and related expenses in connection with attendance at our Board and committee meetings and company-related activities. Eligible non-employee directors may elect to participate in our company-wide healthcare program (which is a program that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation, in favor of executive officers or directors), provided that they pay the premiums associated with their (and their eligible dependents’) healthcare coverage.

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Board has approved stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors based on our belief that stock ownership further aligns the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our stockholders. These guidelines provide that each non-employee director is expected to accumulate and hold an amount of qualifying Dolby equity securities equal to the value of five times his or her annual retainer for service on our Board (subject to a “floor” to protect against significant decreases in stock price, consisting of a fixed number of shares having a value equal to five times the annual Board retainer on September 22, 2015, representing the date of the most recent amendment of the stock ownership guidelines; or in the case of directors who joined our Board after such date, a value equal to five times the annual Board retainer in effect when he or she joined the Board). Compliance is measured as of the last day of each fiscal year. For purposes of our non-employee director stock ownership guidelines, a director’s “annual retainer” excludes any retainer for serving as a member or chairman of

16

Table of Contents

any Board committees, or for serving as the Chairman of the Board. New directors have a compliance period of five years from the date they first become a non-employee director to achieve the requisite level of ownership.

As of the end of fiscal 2021, all of our non-employee directors were in compliance with, or within the new director compliance period specified in, our non-employee director stock ownership guidelines.

17

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Board Meetings and Committees

Our Board held seven meetings during fiscal 2021 and acted by unanimous written consent on one occasion. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings held by our Board and the committees on which he or she served during fiscal 2021.

The standing committees of our Board consist of an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee, and a Stock Plan Committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below. Our Board also has convened an ad hoc Technology Strategy Committee, which has the composition and responsibilities described below. Our Board may in the future convene additional ad hoc committees of our Board as it deems necessary or advisable.

Each of the committees of our Board described below acts pursuant to a written charter approved by our Board, each of which is available on the Corporate Governance section of the Investors page of our website at https://investor.dolby.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.

The non-employee members of our Board regularly meet in executive session without management present. In addition, the independent members of our Board also meet regularly in executive session. Peter Gotcher, our independent Chairman of the Board, serves as the Presiding Director of these executive sessions.

Audit Committee

The current members of the Audit Committee are Micheline Chau, Emily Rollins, Roger Siboni, and Simon Segars, each of whom is a non-employee member of our Board. Our Board appointed Ms. Rollins to the Audit Committee, effective February 24, 2021. No other members of our Board served on the Audit Committee during fiscal 2021. Mr. Siboni is the chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held seven meetings during fiscal 2021 and acted by unanimous written consent on one occasion. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the requirements for independence under the current requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, our Board also has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE and SEC, and is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC rules. Our Board has also determined that Ms. Rollins’s simultaneous service on the audit committees of three other public companies does not impair her ability to effectively serve on our Audit Committee. In arriving at this determination, our Board considered, among other factors, Ms. Rollins’s nearly 30 years of experience in public accounting and finance, which included leading multiple audits and reviews simultaneously, as well as her retired working status.

The Audit Committee has established a telephone and internet whistleblower hotline for the anonymous submission of suspected violations, including accounting, internal controls or auditing matters, harassment, fraud and policy violations.

The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

18

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Micheline Chau, Roger Siboni, Anjali Sud, and Avadis Tevanian, Jr., each of whom is a non-employee member of our Board. No other members of our Board served on the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2021. Mr. Tevanian is the chairman of the Compensation Committee. In fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee held six meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on two occasions. Our Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Nominating and Governance Committee

The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Peter Gotcher, Simon Segars, and Avadis Tevanian, Jr., each of whom is a non-employee member of our Board. No other members of our Board served on the Nominating and Governance Committee during fiscal 2021. Mr. Gotcher is the chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee held 22 meetings during fiscal 2021. Our Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets

19

Table of Contents

the requirements for independence under current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Stock Plan Committee

The current members of the Stock Plan Committee are Avadis Tevanian, Jr. and Kevin Yeaman. No other members of our Board served on the Stock Plan Committee during fiscal 2021. In fiscal 2021, the Stock Plan Committee held one meeting and granted equity awards by written consent on 12 occasions. The Stock Plan Committee has the authority to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock unit awards to newly hired employees and consultants who will not be executive officers or directors of Dolby on the date of grant, and to make performance, promotion or retention grants of equity awards to employees and consultants who are not executive officers or directors of Dolby on the date of grant. Equity awards granted by the Stock Plan Committee are subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity-Based Award Grant and Vesting Policy described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.

Technology Strategy Committee

The current members of the Technology Strategy Committee are David Dolby and Avadis Tevanian, Jr. No other members of our Board served on the Technology Strategy Committee during fiscal 2021. Mr. Tevanian is the chairman of the Technology Strategy Committee. The Technology Strategy Committee held one meeting during fiscal 2021. The Technology Strategy Committee is responsible for exploring the opportunities and issues associated with Dolby’s technology strategies and intellectual property.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board is responsible for overseeing Dolby’s risk management structure. Management is responsible for establishing our business and operational strategies, identifying and assessing the related risks and implementing appropriate risk management practices on a day-to-day basis. Our Board reviews our business and operational strategies and management’s assessment of the related risk, and discusses with management the appropriate level of risk for the company. Our Board meets with management at least quarterly to review, advise and direct management with respect to strategic business risks, operational risks, legal risks and risks related to Dolby’s acquisition strategies, among others. In addition, in fiscal 2021 our Board used these meetings to receive updates and confer with management on company performance and the company’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including management’s strategies for minimizing and mitigating pandemic-related risks. Our Board also delegates oversight to Board committees to oversee selected elements of risk.

The Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring our financial condition and investments, the integrity of our financial statements, accounting matters, internal control over financial reporting, the independence of Dolby’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, plans regarding business continuity and cybersecurity, and guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk

20

Table of Contents

management. The Audit Committee receives periodic internal controls and related assessments from Dolby’s finance department and an annual attestation report on internal control over financial reporting from KPMG. The Audit Committee oversees Dolby’s annual enterprise business risk assessment, which is conducted by our Internal Audit Department. The annual enterprise business risk assessment reviews the primary risks facing the company and Dolby’s associated risk mitigation measures. In addition, the Audit Committee discusses other risk assessment and risk management policies of the company periodically with management.

The Compensation Committee oversees the design of executive compensation structures that create incentives that encourage behaviors and decisions consistent with our business strategy, including a review of an annual risk assessment with respect to our compensation programs and policies generally.

The Nominating and Governance Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with Board organization, membership, structure and compensation, succession planning for our directors and executive officers and corporate governance policies.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and CEO and that our Board is free to choose the Chairman of the Board in any way that it deems best for the company at any given point in time. Our Board believes that these issues should be considered as part of our Board’s broader governance responsibilities.

Our Board has determined that having two different individuals serve in the roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO is in the best interest of the company’s stockholders at this time. Mr. Yeaman currently serves as our CEO and Mr. Gotcher currently serves as our independent Chairman of the Board. The CEO is responsible for the strategic direction, day-to-day leadership, and performance of the company, while the Chairman of the Board provides overall leadership to our Board. The Chairman of the Board also works with the CEO and General Counsel to prepare Board meeting agendas and chairs meetings of our Board. The leadership structure allows the CEO to focus on his operational responsibilities, while keeping a measure of independence between the oversight function of our Board and those operating decisions. Our Board believes that this leadership structure provides an appropriate allocation of roles and responsibilities at this time.

Board Independence

Our Board has determined that Mses. Chau, Rollins and Sud, and Messrs. Gotcher, Jasper (who served on our Board for a portion of fiscal 2021), Prophet, Segars, Siboni and Dr. Tevanian do not have any material relationship with Dolby and are independent within the meaning of the standards established by the NYSE. In making this determination, our Board considered all relevant facts and circumstances known to us, including the director’s commercial, accounting, legal, banking, consulting, charitable and familial relationships. With respect to Mr. Jasper, our Board also specifically considered that Mr. Jasper retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of Dolby in March 2009 and has not held a management position with the company for more than ten years.

Succession Planning

As reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a key responsibility of our Board is to work with the Nominating and Governance Committee on succession planning for our CEO. As part of this process, our Board works with the Nominating and Governance Committee to identify potential successors to our CEO and the committee makes an annual report to our Board. Our Board also has adopted an emergency succession plan in the event of the death, disability, incapacity or unanticipated departure or leave of our CEO.

21

Table of Contents

Policy for Director Recommendations

It is the policy of the Nominating and Governance Committee to consider recommendations for candidates to our Board from stockholders holding at least 250,000 shares of our Common Stock continuously for at least 12 months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation.

A stockholder that wishes to recommend a candidate for election to our Board should send the recommendation by letter to Dolby Laboratories, Inc., 1275 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94103, Attn: General Counsel. The recommendation must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and Dolby, and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of Dolby Common Stock. Such recommendations must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for Board membership, addressing issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, diversity of perspective, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments, and personal references.

The committee will use the following procedures to identify and evaluate any individual recommended or offered for nomination to our Board:

We do not maintain a separate policy regarding the diversity of our Board, but during the director nomination process, as described above, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers diversity of experience and diversity of perspective.

For stockholders who wish to nominate a candidate for election to our Board (as opposed to only recommending a candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee as described above), see the procedures discussed in “Additional Meeting Matters” below.

22

Table of Contents

Policies and Procedures for Communications to Non-Employee or Independent Directors

In cases where stockholders or interested parties wish to communicate directly with our non-employee or independent directors, messages may be sent to our General Counsel, at generalcounsel@dolby.com, or to Dolby Laboratories, Inc., 1275 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94103, Attn: General Counsel. The office of our General Counsel monitors these communications and our General Counsel will provide a summary of all received messages to our Board at each regularly scheduled meeting of our Board, or if appropriate, solely to the non-employee or independent directors at each regularly scheduled executive session of non-employee or independent directors. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our General Counsel may obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of our Board, of non-employee or independent directors, of independent advisors or of Dolby management, as our General Counsel considers appropriate. Our General Counsel may decide in the exercise of his judgment whether a response to any stockholder or interested party communication is necessary.

Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders

We encourage our directors to attend our Annual Meetings of Stockholders, and all of the members of our Board attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all of our directors and our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations page of our website at https://investor.dolby.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx. We will post any amendments or waivers to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC or NYSE on this website.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that contain the general framework for the governance of the company. Among other things, our Corporate Governance Guidelines address:

The Nominating and Governance Committee will periodically review the guidelines and report any recommended changes to our Board. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporate Governance section of the Investors page of our website at https://investor.dolby.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.

23

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Micheline Chau, Roger Siboni, Anjali Sud, and Avadis Tevanian, Jr. None of the members of our Compensation Committee during the last fiscal year is or has been an officer or employee of our company or had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933. None of our executive officers has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

Certain of our directors and executive officers have adopted, and in the future may adopt, written trading plans that meet the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Rule 10b5-1 allows persons who may be considered insiders of an issuer to adopt pre-arranged written plans for trading specified amounts of stock. Rule 10b5-1 trading plans establish predetermined trading parameters that, among other things, do not permit the person adopting the trading plan to exercise subsequent influence over how, when or whether to effect trades. Once a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan has been properly adopted, trades may be executed pursuant to the terms of the trading plan at times when the person would otherwise be restricted from trading (e.g., during a closed trading window). Rule 10b5-1 trading plans are designed to allow individuals to purchase or sell shares in an orderly fashion for asset diversification, liquidity, tax planning and other purposes when they might otherwise be restricted from doing so due to material, non-public information that they might possess at the time of the purchase or sale.

Under our policies, directors and executive officers may enter into a new Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or amend an existing trading plan only during an open trading window and only if they are not in possession of any material non-public information concerning Dolby at the time. In addition, trades pursuant to a new or amended Rule 10b5-1 trading plan are subject to a “cooling off” period and may not be made until the date of the opening of the next quarterly trading window following the date of entry into, or amendment of, such trading plan. Each Rule 10b5-1 trading plan generally must remain in effect for at least one year following its adoption and must automatically terminate within two years from the adoption date. Rule 10b5-1 trading plan terms do not generally restrict directors or executive officers from making trades outside of the trading plans, provided that any such trades occur during open trading windows and are otherwise subject to our insider trading policy requirements.

Sale transactions by our directors and executive officers under Rule 10b5-1 trading plans will be disclosed publicly through filings with the SEC to the extent required. We do not undertake any obligation to report Rule 10b5-1 trading plans that may be adopted by any of our directors or executive officers, or to report any modifications or terminations of any publicly announced plan, except to the extent required by law.

24

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the number of shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by:

Applicable percentage ownership is based on 65,199,068 shares of our Class A Common Stock and 36,086,779 shares of our Class B Common Stock outstanding as of November 18, 2021. In computing the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding: (i) shares of Common Stock subject to stock options held by that person that were exercisable on or are exercisable within 60 days after November 18, 2021 (excluding performance stock options that may vest, if at all, within such 60-day period based on the achievement of performance criteria); and (ii) shares of Common Stock subject to restricted stock unit awards held by that person that are subject to vest within 60 days after November 18, 2021.

Unless otherwise indicated below, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table is c/o Dolby Laboratories, Inc., 1275 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94103.

25

Table of Contents

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information available or furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.

26

Table of Contents

27

Table of Contents

28

Table of Contents

29

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions

Our Board has adopted a written Related Person Transactions Policy. Pursuant to this policy, any related person transaction proposed or entered into by Dolby must be reviewed, approved or ratified by the Audit Committee in accordance with the terms of the policy. A “related person transaction” is a transaction between Dolby and a related person in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of the policy, a “related person” is any person who is or was an executive officer, director or nominee for director at any time since the beginning of the last fiscal year and such person’s immediate family members, or a greater than 5% beneficial owner of any class of our voting securities at the time of the occurrence or existence of the transaction and such owner’s immediate family members.

Any related person transaction proposed or entered into by Dolby that does not fall into a specified exclusion under the policy must be reported to Dolby’s General Counsel, and the Audit Committee will review, approve or ratify such transactions in accordance with the terms of the policy. In the course of its review and approval or ratification of a related person transaction, the Audit Committee considers:

In addition, the use of certain theatres of the company by the immediate family members of Ray Dolby, to the extent that it may constitute a related person transaction, is deemed to be pre-approved under the terms of the policy.

Since September 26, 2020, we have not been a party to any related person transactions, other than the transactions described below.

Real Estate Transactions

Lease for 100 Potrero Avenue Premises

Since 1980, we have leased approximately 70,000 square feet of office space located at 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California from several Dolby family entities pursuant to a master lease (the “Master Lease”). The Master Lease expires on October 31, 2024 and provides us an option to renew for two additional five-year terms at a rate equal to the rent that the landlord could obtain for the applicable option term from a third party desiring to lease the premises for the option term, as determined by the landlord and agreed to by us.

In connection with the Master Lease, we also leased additional parking and warehouse space adjacent to 100 Potrero from the Dolby entities. As previously disclosed, we early-terminated these additional leases (which otherwise would have terminated on October 31, 2024) in fiscal 2020. To satisfy our surrender obligations under the leases for these facilities, we undertook certain maintenance and repair projects within the premises, at a cost of approximately $471,000.

30

Table of Contents

We are generally responsible for operating expenses, taxes, and the condition, operation, repair, maintenance, security and management of the premises. We also agreed to indemnify and hold the Dolby family entities, as landlord, harmless from and against certain liabilities, damages, claims, costs, penalties and expenses arising from our conduct related to the premises.

Dolby Family Sub-lease of 100 Potrero Avenue Premises

Under the terms of the Master Lease, a Dolby family entity acting as landlord or a member of the Dolby family, as assignee, retains the right to sublease office space at 100 Potrero with prior notice to us, at a rental rate equal to the then-current base rent per square foot paid by us plus $14 per square foot per year (reflecting estimated costs payable by us for the operation and maintenance of the premises, subject to an annual increase of 1.5% per year during each year of the sublease term), which we refer to as the rent and related expenses below. In fiscal 2021, a member of the Dolby family, as assignee, exercised its right to sublease this space, comprising approximately 1,617 rentable square feet. The amount of rent and related expenses paid to us for this space by the member of the Dolby family in fiscal 2021 was $90,715 and the aggregate amount of rent and related expenses over the remaining life of this sublease arrangement is $294,075, as of September 24, 2021.

Our Ceased Occupation of 100 Potrero Avenue Premises

As previously disclosed, in fiscal 2019, we ceased occupying the 100 Potrero premises and executed a sublease with a third-party tenant for our remaining lease term (through October 31, 2024) at a rental rate that is higher than what we are paying to the Dolby family entity under our Master Lease. Under the sublease, the subtenant is required to reimburse us for our costs related to operating expenses, taxes, and the condition, operation, repair, maintenance, security, and management of the subleased premises and to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to the subleased premises in substantially the same manner as provided in the Master Lease and described above. As a result of our ceased occupancy, in fiscal 2019 we incurred $33.5 million in restructuring charges recorded as operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations, as described in Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fiscal 2021 Rent Expense for 100 Potrero Avenue Premises

The rent expense under the 100 Potrero Master Lease was $3.3 million in fiscal 2021. As described above, we ceased occupying the 100 Potrero Avenue premises in fiscal 2019 and entered into a sublease with a third party for the remainder of our term, at a rental rate that is higher than what we are paying to the Dolby family under our Master Lease. However, Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K requires us to disclose our estimated rent expense over the remaining life of the Master Lease for these premises, which is $43.7 million as of September 24, 2021. This figure includes $33.4 million in rent payable for the option—which we do not intend to exercise—to renew the 100 Potrero Avenue lease for two additional five year terms beyond its October 31, 2024 expiration, assuming a rental rate equal to the rate applicable to the month in which the lease is to expire (the actual rental rate during any option term is not known at this time and may be materially different from the rate used in our assumptions).

Jointly-Owned Real Estate Entities

As of the end of fiscal 2021, the Dagmar Dolby Trust or Dolby Wootton Bassett, LLC (“DWB”), of which the Dagmar Dolby Trust is the sole member, own a majority financial interest in two real estate entities that owned and leased commercial real property to us in fiscal 2021. We own the remaining financial interests in these real estate entities. The following table sets forth, as of the end of fiscal 2021, for each of these real estate

31

Table of Contents

entities, the entity that owns the majority financial interest in the real estate entity, the percentage interest owned, and the location of the property.

The expense attributable to Dolby and recorded for rents payable to such entities was $381,468 in fiscal 2021 and the estimated rent expense attributable to Dolby over the remaining life of the 3601 W. Alameda Avenue, Burbank, California lease is approximately $4.0 million as of September 24, 2021, assuming the exercise of our two five-year renewal options under that lease (for these purposes, assuming a rental rate equal to the rate applicable to the month in which the lease is scheduled to expire; the actual rental rate during any option term is not known at this time and may be materially different from the rate used in our assumptions). The amounts for fiscal 2021 include rent payable by us under our lease of approximately 18,500 square feet of office space in Wootton Bassett, England. This lease expired on March 31, 2020, and we continued to occupy the premises pursuant to a statutory continuation of the lease under the UK Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 on substantially the same terms, including a monthly rental rate of approximately £13,679 through March 31, 2021. In addition, as required by the Wootton Bassett lease, in fiscal 2021 the landlord conducted work to replace the heating and air conditioning systems for the premises, at a cost of approximately £752,000, approximately half of which was covered through a sinking fund to which tenants of the premises contributed over time. The balance of the repair costs not covered by the sinking fund was paid by Dolby and the Dolby family in proportion to their respective ownership interests in the landlord entity (10% and 90%, respectively).

When we negotiate new terms for any lease agreement with the Dolby family or any of the jointly-owned real estate entities, we engage real estate brokers to provide fair market rent and lease terms based on a summary of comparable properties located in the area of the subject property. The brokers are instructed that the transaction is intended to be completed on an arm’s-length basis. We believe that all of our leases were entered into on a reasonable fair market basis.

Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC

As previously disclosed, our lease for manufacturing and office space in Brisbane, California with Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC (a limited liability company jointly owned by the Dagmar Dolby Trust and us, which we will refer to as the “LLC”) expired on March 31, 2019. We did not renew our lease for these premises and the LLC subsequently marketed the property for sale. In October 2019, the LLC concurrently entered into a five-year lease agreement and a purchase and sale agreement with an unrelated third party (“Buyer”) for sale of the property for $16.5 million in cash (the “Sale”). The lease agreement allowed Buyer to exclusively occupy the premises through the closing date of the Sale, which occurred on December 17, 2020. Under the terms of the lease agreement, rent commenced on January 1, 2020 at a rate of $60,000 per month, for a total of $690,000 in rent collected through the December 17, 2020 closing date of the Sale. Proceeds from the Sale and rent paid under the lease agreement inured 51% to the Dagmar Dolby Trust and 49% to us.

Academy Museum Donations

In June 2014, we agreed to donate cinema products and related services to the Museum of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the “Academy Museum”) having a retail value of approximately $7 million, in exchange for promotional benefits over a 15 year period, including our exclusive appointment as the audio/video sponsor of the Academy Museum theaters, public recognition of our donation, access to Academy Museum space for events, invitations to certain events, board membership at the Academy Foundation, Academy Museum membership rights, and other benefits. Contemporaneously, the Dolby family agreed to donate $5 million in cash and/or marketable securities to the Academy Museum over time based on achievement of certain key project

32

Table of Contents

milestones, in exchange for certain naming rights, public recognition of the Dolby family’s donation, an installation at the Academy Museum dedicated to portraying Ray Dolby’s story, invitations to certain events, board membership at the Academy Foundation, Academy Museum membership rights, and other benefits.

Smithsonian Institution Donations

In September 2018, we agreed to make an in-kind donation to the Smithsonian Institution (the “Smithsonian”), for use in the National Museum of American History (the “Museum”), of certain audio/visual equipment and related services together having a retail value of up to approximately $2 million, including equipment for and refurbishment of an exhibition theatre in the Museum. In exchange for the donation, we are entitled to promotional benefits for a certain period of time, including our exclusive audio/video sponsorship of the Smithsonian, public recognition of our donation, access to the Museum space for events, and invitations to certain events. Contemporaneously, a charitable entity associated with the Dolby family agreed to donate $5 million in cash and/or marketable securities to the Smithsonian over time based on achievement of certain milestones, in exchange for certain benefits, including naming rights and public recognition of the Dolby family’s donation.

BAFTA Donations

In January 2020, we agreed to make an in-kind donation to the British Academy of Film and Television Arts (the “BAFTA”), for use in the redevelopment of the Princess Anne Theater at 195 Piccadilly in London (the “Theater”), of certain audio/visual equipment and related services together having a retail value of up to $930,000, including equipment and services following the Theater’s redevelopment. In exchange for this donation, we are entitled to receive certain benefits from BAFTA, including branding rights, exclusive audio/video sponsorship of the Theater, private use of the Theater under certain circumstances, and event tickets. Contemporaneously, the Dolby family agreed to make a donation to a BAFTA-affiliated organization of cash and/or marketable securities in the amount of $3.5 million, payable in installments based on the achievement of certain milestones, in exchange for certain benefits, including certain naming rights and event tickets.

Other Arrangements with the Dolby Family

In the past, we have allowed members of the Dolby family to use our office facilities for their personal purposes on a limited basis, and we expect this use to continue in the future. For example, members of the Dolby family are allowed to use our conference and screening rooms for personal purposes up to ten times per year. Our Board has approved of these arrangements.

33

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) below is intended to:

Named Executive Officers

Our Named Executive Officers are the individuals whose compensation is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and accompanying tables. For fiscal 2021, our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) were:

Earlier this year, we announced that Lewis Chew will be retiring from Dolby by the end of calendar year 2021. We would like to thank Mr. Chew for his nearly decade-long service and contributions to Dolby and wish him the best in his retirement. On October 15, 2021, Robert Park joined us as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and, on that date, Mr. Chew transitioned to a part-time advisor role to enable a smooth transition. See the “CFO Transition” section of this CD&A for a description of Mr. Park’s compensation and Mr. Chew’s advisory arrangements.

In addition, shortly after the end of fiscal 2021, we announced that Giles Baker transitioned from his role as Senior Vice President, Consumer Entertainment, to Senior Vice President, Cloud Media Solutions, and no longer serves as an executive officer or a Section 16 officer for purposes of the federal securities laws.

Fiscal 2021 Financial and Operational Highlights

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This CD&A includes forward-looking statements concerning our current expectations and business opportunities. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current assumptions and expectations, and actual results could differ materially. Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Business Overview

We create audio and imaging technologies that transform entertainment and communications for content playback in movies, TV, music and gaming. Founded in 1965, our strengths stem from expertise in analog and digital signal processing and digital compression technologies that have transformed the ability of artists to convey entertainment experiences to their audiences through recorded media. Such technologies led to the development of our noise-reduction systems for analog tape recordings, and have since evolved into multiple offerings that enable more immersive sound for cinema, digital TV transmissions and devices, mobile devices, streaming and subscription video and music services, and home entertainment devices. Today, we derive the majority of our revenue from licensing our audio technologies. We also derive revenue from licensing our consumer imaging and communication technologies, as well as audio and imaging technologies for premium

34

Table of Contents

cinema offerings in collaboration with exhibitors. In addition, we provide products and services for a variety of applications in the cinema, broadcast, and communications markets, and offer media processing and interactivity APIs through our developer platform, Dolby.io ^TM.

Key Financial Highlights

We achieved year-over-year revenue growth of 10% in fiscal 2021. Our key financial highlights for fiscal 2021 and a comparison to fiscal 2020 were as follows:

Return of Capital to Stockholders

In fiscal 2021, we returned capital to our stockholders in the form of stock repurchases and dividends as indicated below.

In addition, shortly after the end of fiscal 2021, in November 2021, we announced a 14% increase in the per share dividend amount under our quarterly dividend program, from $0.22 to $0.25.

Key Business Highlights

In fiscal 2021, we continued our focus on expanding our leadership in audio and imaging solutions for premium entertainment content by increasing the number of Dolby experiences that people can enjoy, which we believe will drive revenue growth across the markets we serve. We can increase our value proposition and create opportunities by broadening Dolby technologies into new types of content, such as music and gaming. We are also beginning to leverage our audio and imaging expertise to expand the reach of our technologies to address content beyond premium entertainment that can create new revenue generating opportunities. For example, with

35

Table of Contents

the launch of our developer platform, Dolby.io, we are expanding our addressable market to enhance a broader range of content, by enabling developers to build high-quality, interactive, and media-centric applications. Below we discuss select key business highlights for fiscal 2021, including the increased availability of content in Dolby formats as well as key markets that we address and the various Dolby technologies and solutions that serve these markets. For additional details on our business and fiscal 2021 highlights, please see the “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Content

Licensing

We also continued to see engagement with partners supporting our newer technologies in set-top-boxes. In fiscal 2021, Comcast announced the launch of XiOne, a new wireless streaming set-top-box that supports Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos, for its global customers including Sky in Europe.

36

Table of Contents

The breadth of mobile devices supporting Dolby technologies continues to increase globally. In fiscal 2021, Apple continued to deepen its adoption of the combined Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos experience across Apple mobile devices. In addition, mobile devices from Samsung, Sony, OPPO, and Lenovo support Dolby Atmos. Also in fiscal 2021, Xiaomi launched its first smartphones supporting Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos.

We also generate revenue from the automotive industry primarily through disc playback devices as well as other elements of the entertainment system, including in the future, enabling the playback of Dolby Atmos music. In fiscal 2021, Lucid Motors announced that its Lucid Air model is the first vehicle that features Dolby Atmos in its entertainment system. Shortly after fiscal 2021, Mercedes-Benz announced that it expects to adopt the Dolby Atmos Car Experience in two of its luxury car models, the Mercedes-Maybach and Mercedes-Benz S-Class.

Products and Services

The Committee took these accomplishments into consideration in making its executive compensation determinations for fiscal 2021.

37

Table of Contents

Fiscal 2021 Executive Compensation Highlights

In fiscal 2021, the Committee took the following actions with respect to the compensation of our NEOs:

Reinforcing our Business Strategy through an Emphasis on Incentive Compensation

The principal elements of the target total direct compensation opportunity of our executive officers are:

These principal elements are further described below.

The Committee allocated a substantial portion of the target total direct compensation opportunity of our NEOs to incentive compensation in fiscal 2021, the vast majority of which consists of long-term incentive compensation. The graphs below illustrate this emphasis on long-term incentive compensation in the target total direct compensation opportunities of our NEOs. Much of this long-term incentive compensation is tied to equity vehicles, the value of which is driven wholly by stock price appreciation. In addition, the realization of this long-term incentive compensation is conditioned upon the satisfaction of multi-year vesting requirements or the achievement of pre-established performance conditions. Because the value our NEOs could realize from their equity awards depends on the performance of our stock price, changes in our stock price will impact the value of their equity awards, and correspondingly, the total compensation realizable by our NEOs. This design aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders and focuses their efforts on the successful execution of our business strategy.

38

Table of Contents

Consideration of Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation; Stockholder Engagement

At our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we conducted an advisory (non-binding) vote of our stockholders to approve the compensation of our NEOs (a “Say-on-Pay” vote). At that meeting, approximately 99% of the voting power of the shares present and entitled to vote on the proposal voted to approve the compensation of our NEOs.

On an annual basis, members of our senior management contact our largest stockholders in advance of our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to solicit their views on a variety of topics. In fiscal 2021 we conducted outreach to our top 22 stockholders, who collectively held approximately 60% of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock. We engaged with about half of those investors and discussed a broad range of governance matters, including our executive compensation policies and practices. These engagement efforts provided us with a valuable understanding of investors’ perspectives and an opportunity to exchange views. Management reports this feedback to the Committee, which then considers it, as well as the results of our most recent Say-on-Pay votes and other factors, in assessing its overall approach to executive compensation. Consistent with this feedback and as a result of the Committee’s ongoing efforts to enhance the effectiveness of our executive compensation program, in prior fiscal years, for example, the Committee added performance-based equity to our long-term incentive compensation program and adopted a compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy for our executive officers.

The Committee will continue to carefully consider the results of our Say-on-Pay votes as well as stockholder feedback in overseeing our executive compensation program.

Roles of the Compensation Committee, Management and Compensation Consultant

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Committee approves and oversees the compensation program for our executive officers, including base salaries and annual and long-term incentive compensation opportunities. In discharging these duties, the Committee determines these elements of compensation for our CEO, and, with the input of our CEO, determines these elements for our other executive officers. In addition, the Committee oversees the equity incentive plans for our broad-based employee population and reviews equity grant guidelines for these employees on an annual basis.

39

Table of Contents

The Committee routinely meets throughout the fiscal year in the ordinary discharge of its duties, including to determine the compensation for our executive officers. The Committee also regularly meets in executive session without management present.

Role of Management

Our CEO and members of our People & Places, Legal and Finance Departments (collectively, “Management”) assist and support the Committee. At least annually, Management reviews our executive compensation philosophy with the Committee and, at the Committee’s direction, develops compensation proposals for Committee consideration. The Committee considers and approves any proposed changes with the intent to continue aligning our compensation philosophy and policies with our business objectives and to support our efforts to attract and retain key talent in a highly competitive environment. In this regard, Management assesses a market review and analysis of peer company executive compensation levels and practices prepared by the Committee’s compensation consultant Compensia, Inc. as well as executive compensation data drawn from industry-specific compensation surveys (collectively, the “Market Comparables”) and provides the Committee with executive compensation information informed by the Market Comparables, including: historical base salary and annual incentive compensation payments; fiscal year-end levels of equity ownership; equity award holdings; unrealized value calculations of vested and unvested equity awards at various stock prices; grant date fair values of equity award holdings (as computed for financial reporting purposes); and other relevant information.

At least annually, our CEO reviews with the Committee the performance of our other executive officers and recommends to the Committee base salary adjustments, annual incentive compensation targets, and long-term incentive compensation awards for each of these individuals. He also uses these individual performance assessments to make recommendations for annual incentive compensation payouts under the fiscal year’s annual incentive compensation plan. The Committee considers our CEO’s input, but the Committee makes the final determinations regarding executive officer compensation. The Committee makes decisions with respect to our CEO’s compensation without him present and after considering input from our Chairman of the Board, the Chairman of the Committee, other members of our Board, and our CEO’s direct reports.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Committee engages independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. During fiscal 2021, the Committee engaged Compensia, Inc. for the purpose of advising the Committee on executive compensation matters. Compensia also advised the Committee on certain matters related to our compensation programs for broad-based employees, including our equity utilization, participation, and grant guidelines relative to competitive market practices.

The Committee provided Compensia with instructions regarding the goals of our executive compensation program and the parameters of the competitive analysis of executive officer compensation packages that it was to conduct. In particular, the Committee instructed Compensia to analyze whether the compensation packages of our executive officers were consistent with our compensation philosophy and competitive relative to the Market Comparables. The Committee further instructed Compensia to evaluate the following elements to assist the Committee in establishing fiscal 2021 compensation:

40

Table of Contents

Accordingly, Compensia performed an analysis of the compensation for each of our executive officers against the compensation of executives with similar positions within the Market Comparables and presented its report to the Committee. In December 2020, the Committee used the analysis in the course of its deliberations and determinations of executive compensation for fiscal 2021.

Representatives from Compensia attend most meetings of the Committee and periodically communicate with members of the Committee and Management outside the formal Committee meetings.

During fiscal 2021, Compensia also performed services for us at the direction of the Committee relating to equity utilization, proxy statement support, executive new-hire arrangements, and general Committee meeting support. In addition, Compensia assisted the Nominating and Governance Committee with its review of the compensation of our non-employee directors. Compensia received compensation for these services. Based on an assessment of the factors set forth in the NYSE listing standards and the SEC’s rules and regulations, and taking into account the provision of these services, the Committee does not believe that its relationship with Compensia and the work of Compensia on behalf of the Committee has raised any conflict of interest.

Use of Market Data for Competitive Positioning

The Committee does not benchmark compensation of our executive officers against the Market Comparables or pay practices of our compensation peer group. Rather, the Committee uses the Market Comparables and the pay practices of our compensation peer group only as a point of reference when setting compensation levels for each of our executive officers.

To assist it in analyzing our executive compensation program for fiscal 2021, the Committee directed Compensia to review and recommend potential changes to our compensation peer group and, thereafter, compile and analyze the executive compensation data for the companies in the peer group. Compensia also compiled and analyzed executive compensation data drawn from published industry-specific compensation surveys and prepared a report for the Committee on the competitive positioning of our executive compensation program.

As part of this process, and based on advice from Compensia, the Committee instructed Compensia that, for a company to be considered as a potential compensation peer group candidate, the company must operate in one of several designated industries (consumer electronics, technology IP licensing, entertainment technology, electronic equipment, or software) and have a market capitalization within the range of approximately 0.25 times to four times our mid-calendar year market capitalization. Once an initial group of companies that met these industry and market capitalization thresholds had been identified, with Compensia’s input, the Committee evaluated them using the following additional selection criteria relative to the same criteria for Dolby:

The Committee generally considered potential new additions only if they met at least three of the five selection criteria above. In its evaluation, the Committee also considered whether the potential compensation peer group candidates were direct competitors for executive talent, either because of their geographic proximity to us, prior recruitment history, or employment of individuals with unique skills or expertise that are comparable to the unique skills or expertise that are either required or desirable in our business.

Using these selection criteria, the Committee determined to add Nuance Communications, Inc. and Xperi Holding Corporation and to remove IMAX Corporation (due to a significant decrease in market capitalization causing it to fall outside of the Committee’s selection criteria) and Tableau Software, Inc. (due to its acquisition)

41

Table of Contents

from our compensation peer group for fiscal 2021. Accordingly, our compensation peer group in fiscal 2021 comprised the following 17 companies:

As discussed above, while the Committee uses the Market Comparables as a point of reference when setting compensation levels for each of our executive officers, the Committee does not benchmark compensation of our executive officers against the Market Comparables or pay practices of our compensation peer group. Instead, the Committee uses the Market Comparables as a market check to identify situations where an executive officer’s compensation may be an outlier—substantially below the 50^th percentile or substantially above the 75^th percentile.

The Committee has carefully considered its compensation peer group selection methodology and has consistently applied this methodology over time. However, given the unique nature of our business, selection of our peer group requires the Committee to use its judgment, in addition to the objective criteria contained in our peer group selection methodology. The Committee from time to time considers alternative peer group selection methodologies and has determined that our current peer group selection methodology continues to be the most appropriate methodology for us.

Overview of Executive Compensation Program

Objectives

The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

42

Table of Contents

Consistent with these objectives, our pay positioning strategy emphasizes the total direct compensation opportunity provided to our executive officers and places less weight on the discrete positioning of individual compensation elements. In addition, when evaluating total direct compensation, the Committee considers, as a point of reference only, compensation trends reflected by the companies in our compensation peer group (as described above) and companies with which we compete for talent. Individual elements of compensation are designed to create incentives that are consistent with our business needs and strategic objectives.

Executive Compensation Policies

In discharging its responsibilities relating to executive compensation, the Committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, monitors trends and developments in compensation policies and practices and seeks to enhance the effectiveness of our executive compensation program on an ongoing basis. As a result, our executive compensation program includes:

43

Table of Contents

Fiscal 2021 Compensation Determinations

Committee Considerations

The Committee considered a variety of factors in determining the compensation for our executive officers for fiscal 2021. These factors included:

Our CEO applied a similar list of factors when formulating compensation recommendations for his direct reports (he did not participate in recommending or setting his own compensation). The Committee members and our CEO may have weighed these factors differently depending on the compensation element.

Base Salary

The Committee makes base salary adjustments, if any, on a calendar year (as opposed to a fiscal year) basis. Consequently, the fiscal 2021 base salary information reported in the Summary Compensation Table reflects a blend of calendar 2020 and calendar 2021 base salaries.

In December 2020, following its review of our executive compensation program objectives for fiscal 2021, the Committee assessed the base salaries of our executive officers in light of the factors described in “—Committee Considerations” above. As a result of this assessment, for calendar 2021 the Committee approved an increase of approximately 3% for each of our NEOs. These base salary increases were consistent with the merit-based increases for our general U.S. workforce, which members of our People & Places Department established based on competitive market data for technology companies.

The annualized base salaries of our NEOs for calendar 2020 and 2021 are set forth below:

44

Table of Contents

Annual Incentive Compensation—2021 Executive Bonus Plan

Our annual incentive compensation plan consists of performance-based compensation, which is paid in cash. Payouts under the plan are contingent on Dolby’s financial performance so that our executive officers are rewarded based on the achievement of financial objectives.

Fiscal 2021 Executive Bonus Plan—Structure

The purpose of our 2021 Executive Bonus Plan was to motivate our executive officers to achieve pre-established financial goals and to maintain a high level of team and individual performance.

Due to the continued uncertainty and lack of forward visibility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee established two semi-annual performance periods under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan (rather than a single twelve-month performance period), one comprising the first and second fiscal quarters, and the other comprising the third and fourth fiscal quarters. Funding for each semi-annual performance period was determined based on achievement of revenue and non-GAAP operating income goals set by the Committee for each performance period, as described further below.

We calculated the potential payouts under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan for our NEOs using the following formula, the terms of which are described further below:

Annual Incentive Compensation Targets

For fiscal 2021, the Committee maintained the NEOs’ fiscal 2021 annual incentive compensation targets (stated as a percentage of base salary for calendar 2021) at the same levels that were used for our fiscal 2020 annual incentive compensation plan.

An executive officer may receive an actual award payout that is larger or smaller than his annual incentive compensation target, or may receive no award payout at all, depending on the extent to which the applicable corporate performance goals were met and subject to any discretionary adjustments based on individual performance as described further below.

45

Table of Contents

Performance Multipliers—Revenue and Non-GAAP Operating Income Goals

Funding for the two performance periods under our 2021 Executive Bonus Plan was based on revenue and non-GAAP operating income goals, which were consistent with our fiscal 2021 financial performance objectives and operating plan. The Committee used these metrics to incentivize our executive officers to achieve strong financial, team, and individual performance and to continue their focus on revenue and non-GAAP operating income achievement. The Committee also believed that solid performance in these areas would contribute to long-term stockholder value creation.

For purposes of the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan, “non-GAAP operating income” was calculated by excluding expenses related to stock based compensation, the amortization of intangibles from business combinations, and restructuring charges.

—First Performance Period Multiplier

The first performance period under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan comprised the first and second quarters of fiscal 2021. In September 2020, the Committee approved a sliding scale corporate financial performance formula for determining payout levels for the first performance period based on our achievement of a combination of non-GAAP operating income and revenue goals. No payouts would be made with respect to the first performance period under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan unless we achieved both a non-GAAP operating income “gate” and threshold revenue as set forth in the table below, which represented 75% and 90% of the non-GAAP operating income and revenue target objectives for the first and second fiscal quarters under our fiscal 2021 operating plan. The maximum multiplier for the first performance period was 200%.

For the first performance period, we achieved non-GAAP operating income of $300.6 million against a “gate” requirement for the first performance period of $137.3 million. We also achieved revenue for the first performance period of $709.4 million against a threshold requirement of $558.0 million and a target of $620.0 million, resulting in a multiplier of 171%. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP to GAAP financial results is set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

—Second Performance Period Multiplier

The second performance period under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan comprised the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2021. In May 2021, the Committee approved a sliding scale corporate financial performance formula for determining payout levels for the second performance period based on our achievement of a

46

Table of Contents

combination of non-GAAP operating income and revenue goals. No payouts would be made with respect to the second performance period under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan unless we achieved both a non-GAAP operating income “gate” and threshold revenue as set forth in the table below, which represented 75% and approximately 103.6% of the non-GAAP operating income and revenue target objectives for the third and fourth fiscal quarters under our fiscal 2021 operating plan. The Committee set the revenue target for the second performance period at 103.6% (instead of 90%) of the revenue target under our fiscal 2021 operating plan to account for timing of revenue. Specifically, certain transactions originally forecasted to occur in the second half of fiscal 2021 occurred in the first half of the fiscal year instead. The maximum multiplier for the second performance period was 200%.

For the second performance period, we achieved non-GAAP operating income of $150.1 million against a “gate” requirement for the second performance period of $99.0 million. We also achieved revenue for the second performance period of $571.8 million against a threshold requirement of $545.4 million and a target of $606.0 million, resulting in a multiplier of 58%. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP to GAAP financial results is set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

—Blended Multiplier

For fiscal 2021, the blended multiplier used to determine individual payouts under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan, which was calculated as the average of the two performance period multipliers (171% and 58% respectively), was 115%.

Potential Adjustments for Individual Performance and Actual 2021 Executive Bonus Plan Payouts

For fiscal 2021, our CEO received 115% of his annual incentive compensation target, based on a blended multiplier of 115%. The Committee had the discretion to adjust the calculated award payout amount for our CEO under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan to take into account additional factors that the Committee deemed relevant to the assessment of individual or corporate performance. In November 2021, the Committee, based on its evaluation of our CEO’s performance and his contributions during the fiscal year, determined not to make any such adjustment. In making this determination, the Committee considered our successful completion of several operational and strategic objectives for the fiscal year, including those described in “Fiscal 2021 Financial and Operational Highlights—Key Business Highlights” above.

For each of our other NEOs, our CEO had the discretion under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan to recommend, subject to Committee approval and the limitations set forth in the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan, increases or decreases of up to 25% of each such NEO’s calculated award payout amount for the entire fiscal year. In November 2021, the Committee, after consultation with our CEO, determined not to make any

47

Table of Contents

adjustments to the calculated award payout amounts of our NEOs, resulting in payments at 115% of their annual incentive compensation targets, based on blended multiplier of 115% for fiscal 2021. In making these determinations, our CEO and the Committee evaluated our NEOs’ team and individual performance and their contributions during the fiscal year. Our CEO and the Committee also considered our successful completion of several operational and strategic objectives for the fiscal year, including those described in “Fiscal 2021 Financial and Operational Highlights—Key Business Highlights” above. All final determinations were made by the Committee alone.

Accordingly, the Committee awarded the following annual incentive compensation payouts to our NEOs under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan:

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The objectives of our long-term incentive compensation program are to: encourage our executive officers to focus on our long-term strategic objectives; further align the interests of our executive officers and our stockholders; provide compensation that is market competitive; recruit, motivate, and retain top talent; and make efficient use of compensation resources.

Performance Stock Unit Awards

The Committee periodically reviews the design of our long-term incentive compensation program to ensure that it continues to further the objectives described above. In fiscal 2020, the Committee introduced performance stock unit awards into our long-term incentive compensation program for our executive officers.

The shares of our Class A Common Stock subject to performance stock unit awards may be earned contingent on our achievement of annualized total stockholder return levels for Dolby over a three-year performance period beginning on the date of grant, measured against a comparator index, the S&P Midcap 400 Index (^MID). From 0% to 200% of the target number of shares subject to the performance stock unit awards may be earned, depending on our level of achievement of these performance conditions, as follows:

The Committee determined that granting a portion of long-term incentive compensation in the form of awards that are earned only upon the achievement of specific performance conditions further aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders.

48

Table of Contents

Equity Mix of Awards

We use a “portfolio” approach that mixes different types of equity awards for the long-term incentive compensation granted to our executive officers, consisting in fiscal 2021 of a combination of performance stock unit awards, stock options, and restricted stock unit awards. The graph below illustrates how the Committee allocated the long-term incentive compensation granted to our NEOs among these equity vehicles in fiscal 2021, based on the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted to our NEOs.

In determining the mix of equity for our executives, the Committee considered the following:

Stock Options. This vehicle directly ties a sizable portion of our executive officers’ target total direct compensation opportunity to increases in the market price of our Class A Common Stock and presents an effective incentive for them to make long-term decisions that sustain stock price growth and to maximize performance over the term of the award, which is generally a maximum of ten years. Because stock options provide real economic value only if the price of the underlying stock increases, our executive officers realize no economic benefit from their outstanding stock options if our stock price declines or stays flat.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards. This vehicle aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders by rewarding them for increases in our stock price. Unlike stock options, however, restricted stock unit awards have real economic value when they vest even if the stock price declines or stays flat, thus delivering more predictable value to our executive officers and furthering our retention objectives over the vesting term of the awards. In addition, because of their “full value” nature, restricted stock unit awards deliver the desired grant date fair value using a lesser number of shares than we would otherwise use for stock option grants, enabling us to use our equity compensation resources more efficiently and manage the overall number of shares granted and potential resulting dilution.

Performance Stock Unit Awards. This vehicle requires us to generally track the return of the S&P Midcap 400 Index (^MID) over a three-year period, with payouts above target requiring us to exceed the index’s performance over that period. If the market price of our Class A Common Stock lags significantly behind the price of the S&P Midcap 400 Index over the term of the performance period, no shares will be earned under the performance stock unit awards and our executive officers will not realize any value from these awards.

We believe that providing a portfolio of performance stock unit awards, stock options, and restricted stock unit awards supports the objectives of our long-term incentive compensation program by further aligning the interests of our executive officers and stockholders, balancing performance and retention considerations, and enabling us to use our equity compensation resources more efficiently.

Award Terms

Generally, we make an initial equity award to an executive officer when he or she joins us. Thereafter, our executive officers are eligible for additional equity awards on an annual basis. The Committee determines the size of each executive officer’s equity award based on the factors described in “—Committee Considerations” above.

49

Table of Contents

One of the objectives of our long-term incentive compensation program is to encourage executive officer retention by requiring that the awards be earned over a multi-year period. Accordingly, in fiscal 2021, we granted stock options and restricted stock unit awards that vest over a period of four years, as well as performance stock unit awards that are subject to a three-year performance period, as follows:

In fiscal 2021, after considering the factors described in “—Committee Considerations” above, the Committee approved the following stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and performance stock unit awards for our NEOs:

All stock options were granted with a per-share exercise price equal to the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock on the grant date.

Equity-Based Award Grant and Vesting Policy

The Committee has adopted an Equity-Based Award Grant and Vesting Policy (the “Equity Policy”), which applies to all equity awards granted to any of our employees, including our executive officers. The Equity Policy provides that:

50

Table of Contents

Restrictions on Trading Securities (Including Hedging and Pledging)

We maintain an insider trading policy that is applicable to all of our directors, officers, and employees, all contractors of the company and all members of their immediate families and households, and that prohibits, among other things, short sales, hedging or similar transactions designed to decrease the risks associated with holding Dolby securities, and transactions involving derivative securities relating to Dolby securities. Our insider trading policy also generally prohibits pledging of Dolby securities.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, based on our belief that stock ownership further aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. These guidelines provide that:

Compliance is measured as of the last day of each fiscal year, and our executive officers are expected to achieve the applicable level of ownership by the fifth anniversary of the adoption date of the guidelines (or with respect to future executive officers, within five years of becoming an executive officer). As of the end of fiscal 2021, all of our executive officers were in compliance with our executive stock ownership guidelines.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

We maintain a policy on the recovery of incentive compensation. The policy allows us to recover certain cash or equity-based incentive compensation payments or awards made or granted to an executive officer in the event he or she is involved in fraud or misconduct that results in the need for Dolby to prepare a material financial restatement. The policy covers cash or equity-based compensation based on the attainment of company financial reporting measures (excluding stock price or total stockholder return). Recovery under the policy applies to incentive compensation subject to the policy that is paid, awarded or granted during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on which we are required to prepare the restatement. In addition, no recovery can be made unless the executive officer would have received a lower payment based upon the restated financial results.

51

Table of Contents

Generally Available Benefits

In fiscal 2021, our executive officers were eligible to participate in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the health and welfare programs that are generally available to our other full-time employees, including medical, dental and vision plans; flexible spending accounts for healthcare and dependent care; life, accidental death and dismemberment, and disability insurance; and paid time off.

We also maintain a tax-qualified Section 401(k) Plan, which is broadly available to our U.S. general employee population. Under the Section 401(k) Plan, U.S. employees are eligible to receive matching contributions and profit-sharing contributions from Dolby, which together were capped at a maximum of up to $30,560 per participating employee in calendar 2021.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

General

Our employee stock plans contain “double-trigger” vesting acceleration provisions for outstanding and unvested equity awards that may be triggered by a termination of employment by Dolby without “cause” or an employee resignation with “good reason” within 12 months following a change in control of Dolby. The vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards also accelerates if an equity award is not assumed by the successor entity in connection with such a change in control. These vesting acceleration provisions are intended to secure the continued dedication of our employees, including our executive officers, notwithstanding the possibility or occurrence of a change in control of Dolby.

We do not provide “golden parachute” excise tax gross-ups for our executive officers.

Severance Arrangement with Mr. Yeaman

We have entered into a severance arrangement with our CEO as described under the section entitled “Executive Compensation Tables and Related Matters—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” We negotiated this arrangement to induce him to resign from his former position and accept the position of CEO in fiscal 2009. This arrangement is intended to provide him with certain payments and benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of his employment without cause or his resignation for good reason, including following a change in control of Dolby.

No Other Severance or Change in Control Arrangements

Apart from the arrangement with Mr. Yeaman and the “double-trigger” vesting acceleration provisions in our 2020 Stock Plan as described above, none of our executive officers has any severance, change in control, or similar agreements or arrangements with Dolby.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We provide our executive officers with only limited perquisites or other personal benefits that are both customary in the industry in which we operate and are in furtherance of accomplishing our business objectives. For example, given our role in the entertainment industry, our executive officers may be asked to attend industry events, including film festivals, film premieres, award shows, or other similar events, where the attendance of a spouse or significant other may be expected or customary. In those cases, we may pay for or reimburse the business travel and dining expenses of an executive officer’s spouse or significant other (not to exceed $8,000 per executive officer in any single fiscal year). We believe that payment or reimbursement of these expenses serves a legitimate business purpose in, among other things, advancing our brand and business relationships within the entertainment industry.

52

Table of Contents

Employment Agreement with Mr. Yeaman

In connection with the appointment of Mr. Yeaman as our President and CEO in fiscal 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with him, which provides that, among other things, his target annual incentive compensation will be at least equal to a specified minimum percentage of his annual base salary. The agreement also provides Mr. Yeaman with certain payments and benefits in the event of his termination of employment under specified circumstances, including following a change in control of Dolby. For a summary of the material terms and conditions of these provisions, see “Executive Compensation Tables and Related Matters—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

CFO Transition

Compensation Arrangements with Mr. Park

On October 15, 2021, our Board appointed Robert Park as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In connection with his appointment, we entered into an offer letter with Mr. Park that provides for, among other things,

Advisory Agreement with Mr. Chew

On October 15, 2021, we entered into an advisory agreement with Lewis Chew, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement, which amended his offer letter with the company, Mr. Chew ceased to serve as Chief Financial Officer effective October 15, 2021 and agreed to provide transitional and advisory services to us until December 20, 2021. Under the agreement, Mr. Chew will receive an annual base salary of $342,000 through December 20, 2021 and remained eligible for his preestablished annual bonus under the 2021 Dolby Executive Bonus Plan, contingent upon his continued employment through the date the bonus was paid. The bonus payment received by Mr. Chew is reflected in the Fiscal 2021 Summary Compensation Table contained in this Proxy Statement. For the duration of his services to the company, Mr. Chew receives standard company-sponsored benefits and his outstanding equity awards continue to vest in accordance with their terms. A copy of the advisory agreement is expected to be filed as an exhibit to the company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2021.

Accounting and Tax Considerations

The Committee generally takes into consideration the accounting and tax treatment of each element of compensation when establishing the compensation programs, practices, and packages for our executive officers.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We examine the accounting cost associated with equity compensation in light of the requirements under ASC Topic 718. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based

53

Table of Contents

payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, restricted stock unit awards and performance stock unit awards, based on the grant date “fair value” of the awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes, even though recipients may never realize any value from their awards. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements (net of estimated forfeitures, which are determined based on historical experience) over the period that a recipient is required to render service in exchange for the award.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) imposes limitations on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of compensation over $1 million paid to certain executive officers in a taxable year. Under Section 162(m), the affected executive officers are our CEO, CFO, next three most highly compensated executive officers, and certain of our other current and former executive officers who have been subject to the Section 162(m) deduction limit while at Dolby. This change in Section 162(m) was contained in the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was signed into law in December 2017 (the “Act”).

The Committee generally has considered the deductibility of executive compensation in structuring our executive compensation program but, in light of the Act’s changes to Section 162(m), expects to pay non-deductible compensation to one or more executive officers in furtherance of the goals and purposes of our executive compensation program as the Committee determines appropriate from time to time.

54

Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

This report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Dolby specifically incorporates this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee

Avadis Tevanian, Jr., Chairman

Micheline Chau

Roger Siboni

Anjali Sud

55

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES AND RELATED MATTERS

Fiscal 2021 Summary Compensation Table

The Summary Compensation Table and accompanying footnotes below describe the “total compensation” of our NEOs for the past three fiscal years, calculated in accordance with SEC rules. The total compensation presented below does not reflect the actual compensation received by, or the target compensation of, our NEOs in each fiscal year. The actual value realized by our NEOs in fiscal 2021 from their long-term incentive compensation awards is presented in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested at 2021 Fiscal Year-End table below.

The individual elements of the total compensation amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table are as follows:

Base Salary.  For each of fiscal 2019, fiscal 2020, and fiscal 2021, the amounts reported represent 52 weeks of base salary. Base salary adjustments are set on a calendar year (as opposed to a fiscal year) basis. Consequently, the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table represent a blend of calendar year base salaries.

Bonus.  The figure reported in the “Bonus” column for Messrs. Sherman and Baker in fiscal 2019 represents the amount of the Committee’s upward discretionary adjustment to each respective calculated award payout under the fiscal 2019 Executive Bonus Plan (the amount of the payout based solely on meeting the applicable performance measures under the fiscal 2019 Executive Bonus Plan is reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column).

Stock Awards and Option Awards.  Stock Awards consist of restricted stock unit and performance stock unit awards, and Option Awards consist of stock options and performance stock options, as indicated. Amounts reported in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding estimated forfeitures. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of such awards.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.  The amount of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation consists of the Executive Bonus Plan awards earned for the fiscal year. Such awards are based on our financial performance during the fiscal year and are paid in the following fiscal year.

56

Table of Contents

57

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021 Table

During fiscal 2021, we granted the following plan-based awards to our NEOs:

58

Table of Contents

Information with respect to each of these awards on a grant-by-grant basis is set forth in the table below.