def14a
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT
CORP.
|
|
|
1055 West Hastings Street, Suite 2200
Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2E9
|
|
2700 Colorado Avenue, Suite 200
Santa Monica, California 90404
|
NOTICE OF SPECIAL
MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 4,
2010
To Our Shareholders:
You are invited to attend the Special Meeting of Shareholders
(the Special Meeting) of Lions Gate
Entertainment Corp. (Lionsgate), which will
be held at the Four Seasons Hotel, Tudor Stuart Orange Room, 21
Avenue Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 2G1, on Tuesday,
May 4, 2010, beginning at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time).
At the Special Meeting, shareholders will act on the following
matters:
1. To consider and, if thought advisable, approve, ratify
and confirm the adoption of the shareholder rights plan adopted
by the board of directors of Lionsgate pursuant to the
Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated as of March 12,
2010 between Lionsgate and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, as
rights agent; and
2. To consider and act upon any other matters that may
properly be brought before the Special Meeting.
Any action may be taken on the foregoing matters at the Special
Meeting on the date specified above, or on any date or dates to
which, by original or later adjournment, the Special Meeting may
be adjourned or to which the Special Meeting may be postponed.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on
March 23, 2010 are entitled to vote at the meeting or any
continuations, adjournments or postponements thereof. It is
expected that these materials first will be mailed to
shareholders on or about March 26, 2010.
Registered shareholders unable to attend the Special Meeting in
person are requested to read the enclosed proxy statement and
the proxy card that accompany this notice and to complete, sign,
date and deliver the proxy card, together with the power of
attorney or other authority, if any, under which it was signed
(or a notarially certified copy thereof) to IVS Associates, Inc.
(IVS Associates), Attn: Lionsgate Proxy
Tabulation, 1925 Lovering Avenue, Wilmington, Delaware, 19806,
via facsimile at
302-369-8486,
or via the Internet at www.ivselection.com/lionsgate. Subject to
the discretion of the Chair of the Special Meeting, to be
effective, proxies must be received by IVS Associates not later
than 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on Friday, April 30,
2010 or, if the Special Meeting is adjourned, not later than
48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before
the time of the adjourned Special Meeting, or any further
adjournment thereof.
If you are not a registered shareholder, please refer to the
accompanying proxy statement for information on how to vote your
shares.
By Order of Our Board of Directors,
Jon Feltheimer
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of the Board
Vancouver, British Columbia
March 26, 2010
IMPORTANT: WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE
SPECIAL MEETING, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO COMPLETE AND PROMPTLY
RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
In accordance with our security procedures, all persons
attending the Special Meeting will be required to present
picture identification.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
OF
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT
CORP.
PROXY
STATEMENT
This proxy statement is part of a solicitation of proxies by the
board of directors (the Board) and management
of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. (Lionsgate
or the Company) and contains information
relating to our special meeting of shareholders (the
Special Meeting) to be held on Tuesday,
May 4, 2010, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time, at
the Four Seasons Hotel, Tudor Stuart Orange Room, 21 Avenue
Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 2G1, and to any
continuations, adjournments or postponements thereof. All dollar
figures contained in this proxy statement are U.S. dollars,
unless otherwise indicated. The notice of the Special Meeting,
this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card first will be
mailed to shareholders on or about March 26, 2010.
ABOUT THE
MEETING
What is
the purpose of the Special Meeting?
The purpose of the Special Meeting is to seek shareholder
approval of the shareholder rights plan (the Rights
Plan) adopted by the Board pursuant to the shareholder
rights plan agreement, dated as of March 12, 2010, between
Lionsgate and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, as rights agent
(the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement).
Why was
the Rights Plan approved by the Board?
On March 1, 2010, an unsolicited offer to purchase up to
13,164,420 of the issued and outstanding common shares of
Lionsgate (the Shares) at a price of $6.00
per Share in cash was commenced. On March 11, 2010, after
careful consideration, including consideration of the unanimous
recommendation of the Special Committee of the Board (the
Special Committee) and consultation with
their financial and legal advisors, the Board, by unanimous vote
of the directors present, determined that it was in the best
interests of Lionsgate, its shareholders and other stakeholders
to adopt a shareholder rights plan, and authorized the execution
of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement.
In response to the Initial Offer (as defined below), the Special
Committee considered, with the benefit of advice from its legal
and financial advisors, whether it was in the best interests of
the Company, its shareholders and other stakeholders to adopt a
shareholders rights plan. The Special Committee unanimously
determined that it was in the best interests of the Company, its
shareholders and other stakeholders to do so to limit the
potential adverse impact of an accumulation of a significant
interest in the Shares that was effected through a creeping bid,
a partial bid or other means that resulted in coercive or unfair
attempts to take over the Company without affording all
shareholders the opportunity to sell all of their Shares for
fair value. After careful consideration, including the unanimous
recommendation of the Special Committee and consultation with
their financial and legal advisors, the Board, by unanimous
recommendation of the directors present, made a similar
determination and authorized the execution of the Shareholder
Rights Plan Agreement and the issuance of the Rights (as defined
below). Those recommendations of the Special Committee and the
Board have not changed as a result of the amendment of the offer
by the Icahn Group. The Rights Plan that has been adopted by the
Company does not prevent control transactions but rather
encourages potential acquirors of effective control to make
take-over bids by means of a Permitted Bid (as defined below) or
to approach the Board to negotiate another form of transaction
that treats shareholders equally and fairly and is in the best
interests of the Company, its shareholders and other
stakeholders.
Please see Matters to be Acted Upon Background
to the Rights Plan for a detailed description of the
reasons the Board considered in connection with the adoption of
the Rights Plan.
Who is
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting?
Only shareholders of record of the Companys common shares
(NYSE: LGF) at the close of business on March 23, 2010 (the
Record Date) are entitled to receive notice
of the Special Meeting and to vote the Shares that they held on
that date at the Special Meeting, or any continuations,
adjournments or postponements of the Special Meeting. Each
outstanding Share entitles its holder to cast one vote on each
matter to be voted upon. As of the Record Date,
117,951,193 Shares were outstanding and entitled to vote
and held by approximately 858 shareholders of record.
Each shareholder has the right to appoint a person or company
to represent the shareholder other than the persons designated
in the form of proxy.
Who can
attend and vote at the Special Meeting?
Only registered shareholders of the Company or the persons they
appoint as their proxies are permitted to attend and vote at the
Special Meeting. Most shareholders of the Company are
non-registered shareholders (Non-Registered
Shareholders) because the Shares they own are not
registered in their names but are, instead, registered in the
name of the brokerage firm, bank or trust company through which
they purchased the shares. Shares beneficially owned by a
Non-Registered Shareholder are registered either: (i) in
the name of an intermediary (an Intermediary)
that the Non-Registered Shareholder deals with in respect of the
shares of the Company (Intermediaries include, among others,
banks, trust companies, securities dealers or brokers and
trustees or administrators of self-administered Registered
Retirement Savings Plans, Registered Retirement Income Funds,
Registered Education Savings Plans and similar plans); or
(ii) in the name of a clearing agency (such as The Canadian
Depository for Securities Limited or The Depository
Trust & Clearing Corporation) of which the
Intermediary is a participant. In accordance with applicable
securities law requirements, the Company will have distributed
copies of the notice of Special Meeting, this proxy statement
and the proxy card (collectively, the Meeting
Materials) to the clearing agencies and Intermediaries
for distribution to Non-Registered Shareholders.
Intermediaries are required to forward the Meeting Materials to
Non-Registered Shareholders unless a Non-Registered Shareholder
has waived the right to receive them. Intermediaries often use
service companies to forward the Meeting Materials to
Non-Registered Shareholders. Generally, Non-Registered
Shareholders who have not waived the right to receive Meeting
Materials will either:
(i) be given a voting instruction form which is not
signed by the Intermediary and which, when properly
completed and signed by the Non-Registered Shareholder and
returned to the Intermediary or its service company, will
constitute voting instructions (often called a voting
instruction form) which the Intermediary must follow.
Typically, the voting instruction form will consist of a
one-page printed form. Sometimes, instead of the one-page
pre-printed form, the voting instruction form will consist of a
regular printed proxy form accompanied by a page of instructions
which contains a removable label with a bar code and other
information. In order for the form of proxy to validly
constitute a voting instruction form, the Non-Registered
Shareholder must remove the label from the instructions and
affix it to the form of proxy, properly complete and sign the
form of proxy and submit it to the Intermediary or its service
company in accordance with the instructions of the Intermediary
or its service company; or
(ii) be given a form of proxy which has already been
signed by the Intermediary (typically by a facsimile,
stamped signature), which is restricted to the number of shares
beneficially owned by the Non-Registered Shareholder but which
is otherwise not completed by the Intermediary. Because the
Intermediary has already signed the form of proxy, this form of
proxy is not required to be signed by the Non-Registered
Shareholder when submitting the proxy. In this case, the
Non-Registered Shareholder who wishes to submit a proxy should
properly complete the form of proxy and deposit it with the
Company,
c/o IVS
Associates, Inc., Attn: Lionsgate Proxy Tabulation, 1925
Lovering Avenue, Wilmington, Delaware, 19806, via facsimile at
302-369-8486.
2
In either case, the purpose of these procedures is to permit
Non-Registered Shareholders to direct the voting of the Shares
of the Company they beneficially own. Should a Non-Registered
Shareholder who receives one of the above forms wish to vote at
the Special Meeting in person (or have another person attend and
vote on behalf of the Non-Registered Shareholder), the
Non-Registered Shareholder should request a legal proxy from
their Intermediary. Instructions for obtaining legal proxies
may be found on the voting instruction form. If you have any
questions about voting your Shares, please call MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. at
1-800-322-2885
(Toll-Free) or
212-929-5500
(Collect) or
e-mail
lionsgate@mackenziepartners.com.
A Non-Registered Shareholder may revoke a voting instruction
form or a waiver of the right to receive Meeting Materials and
to vote which has been given to an Intermediary at any time by
written notice to the Intermediary, provided that an
Intermediary is not required to act on a revocation of a voting
instruction form or of a waiver of the right to receive the
Meeting Materials and to vote which is not received by the
Intermediary in a timely manner in advance of the Special
Meeting.
What
constitutes a quorum?
A quorum is necessary to hold a valid meeting of shareholders.
The presence at the Special Meeting, in person or by proxy, of
two holders of the Shares outstanding on the Record Date who, in
the aggregate, hold at least 10% of the issued Shares, will
constitute a quorum.
How do I
vote at the Special Meeting?
If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy card
and return it to us, it will be voted as you direct. Registered
shareholders that are unable to attend the Special Meeting in
person are requested to read this proxy statement and
accompanying proxy card and to complete, sign and date the proxy
card, and to return it, together with the power of attorney or
other authority, if any, under which it was signed or a
notarially certified copy thereof, to IVS Associates, Inc.,
Attn: Lionsgate Proxy Tabulation, 1925 Lovering Avenue,
Wilmington, Delaware, 19806, via facsimile at
302-369-8486,
or via the Internet at www.ivselection.com/lionsgate. Subject to
the discretion of the Chair of the Special Meeting, to be
effective, proxies must be received by IVS Associates not later
than 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on Friday, April 30,
2010 or, if the Special Meeting is adjourned, not later than
48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before
the time of the adjourned Special Meeting, or any further
adjournment thereof.
Street name shareholders who wish to vote at the
Special Meeting will need to obtain a proxy or voting
instruction form from the institution that holds their shares,
see Who can attend and vote at the Special Meeting? above.
At the Special Meeting, one or more representatives from IVS
Associates, an independent, third-party company, shall be
appointed to act as scrutineers. These scrutineers will
determine the number of Shares represented at the Special
Meeting, the existence of a quorum and the validity of proxies,
will count the votes and ballots, if required, and will
determine and report the results to us.
If you are a registered shareholder but do not wish to, or
cannot, attend the Special Meeting in person, you can appoint
someone who will attend the Special Meeting and act as your
proxy holder to vote in accordance with your instructions by
striking out the printed names of the proposed management
nominees on the accompanying proxy card and inserting the name
of such other person in the blank space provided therein for
that purpose. To vote your Shares, your proxy must attend the
Special Meeting. If you do not fill a name in the blank space in
the enclosed form of proxy, the persons named in the form of
proxy are appointed to act as your proxy holder. Those persons
are directors
and/or
officers of the Company.
Can I
change my vote after I return my proxy card?
Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change
your vote by depositing a duly executed proxy bearing a later
date in the manner and within the time described above, see
How do I vote at the Special Meeting. You may also revoke
a previously deposited proxy (i) by an instrument in
writing that is received at the registered office of the Company
at any time up to and including May 3, 2010 or, if the
Special Meeting is adjourned, the last business day before the
day set for the adjourned meeting, or any further adjournment
thereof, (ii) by an instrument
3
in writing provided to the Chair of the Special Meeting at the
Special Meeting or any adjournment thereof, or (iii) in any
other manner permitted by law. The powers of the proxy holders
will be suspended if you attend the Special Meeting in person
and so request, although attendance at the Special Meeting will
not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
What is
the Boards recommendation?
The Board recommends you vote FOR the resolution approving
the Rights Plan. The enclosed proxy is solicited
on behalf of the Board and management. Unless you give other
instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxy
holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the
recommendations of the Board set forth with the description of
each item in this proxy statement.
The Board does not know of any other matters that may be brought
before the Special Meeting. If any other matter should properly
come before the Special Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as
recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in
accordance with their best judgment.
What vote
is required to approve each item?
The Rights Plan Resolution (as defined below) must be approved
by a majority of the votes cast by Independent Shareholders (as
defined in the Rights Plan) present or represented by proxy at
the Special Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not
be counted in determining the number of Shares necessary for
approval of any item.
To the Companys knowledge, as of the date of this proxy
statement, all shareholders of the Company are considered
Independent Shareholders except those affiliated, associated or
acting jointly or in concert with Carl Icahn.
Who pays
for the preparation of this proxy statement?
We will pay the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing this
proxy statement, notice of the Special Meeting and enclosed
proxy card. In addition to the use of mail, our employees and
advisors may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. Our
employees will receive no compensation for soliciting proxies
other than their regular salaries. We may request banks, brokers
and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward copies
of the proxy materials to their principals and to request
authority for the execution of proxies and we may reimburse
those persons for their expenses incurred in connection with
these activities. We will compensate only independent
third-party agents that are not affiliated with us but who
solicit proxies. We have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., a
third-party solicitation firm, to solicit proxies on our behalf
and we will pay all costs and expenses associated with retaining
MacKenzie Partners, Inc., which are estimated to be up to
approximately $250,000.
May I
propose actions for consideration at next years annual
general meeting of shareholders?
Yes. Under U.S. laws, for your proposal to be considered
for inclusion in our proxy statement for next years annual
meeting, we must receive your written proposal no later than
April 19, 2010. You should also be aware that your proposal
must comply with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) regulations regarding inclusion of
shareholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials.
Shareholder proposals submitted as per the Business
Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the BC
Act) to be presented at the next annual general
meeting of shareholders must be received by our Corporate
Secretary at our registered office no later than June 12,
2010, and must comply with the requirements of the BC Act.
If the date of the 2010 annual meeting is advanced or delayed by
more than 30 days from the date of the 2009 annual meeting,
under U.S. laws, shareholder proposals intended to be
included in the proxy statement for the 2010 annual meeting must
be received by us within a reasonable time before we begin to
print and mail the proxy statement for the 2010 annual meeting.
Upon any determination that the date of the 2010 annual meeting
will be advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the
date of the 2009 annual meeting, we will disclose the change in
the earliest practicable Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
SEC rules also govern a companys ability to use
discretionary proxy authority with respect to shareholder
proposals that were not submitted by the shareholders in time to
be included in the proxy statement. In the event a
4
shareholder proposal is not submitted to us prior to
July 28, 2010, the proxies solicited by our Board for the
2010 annual meeting of shareholders will confer authority on the
proxyholders to vote the shares in accordance with the
recommendations of our Board if the proposal is presented at the
2010 annual meeting of shareholders without any discussion of
the proposal in the proxy statement for such meeting. If the
date of the 2010 annual meeting is advanced or delayed more than
30 days from the date of the 2009 annual meeting, then the
shareholder proposal must have been submitted to us within a
reasonable time before we mail the proxy statement for the 2010
annual meeting.
Who can I
contact if I have questions?
Shareholders who have questions about deciding how to vote
should contact their financial, legal or professional advisors.
For any queries referencing information in this proxy statement
or in respect of voting your Shares, please call MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. at
1-800-322-2885
(Toll-Free) or
212-929-5500
(Collect) or
e-mail
lionsgate@mackenziepartners.com.
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Special Meeting to Be Held on May 4, 2010
The notice of the Special Meeting, this proxy statement and the
enclosed proxy card will be mailed to shareholders on or about
March 26, 2010. The proxy statement will also available in
the Investors/Governance Documents section on our website
at www.lionsgate.com.
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, OTHER THAN
THE INFORMATION AND REPRESENTATIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY
STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION AND/OR
REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN
AUTHORIZED, AND THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL,
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS
BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE
HEREOF.
Our registered and head office is located at 1055 West
Hastings Street, Suite 2200, Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 2E9, and our telephone number there is
(877) 848-3866.
Our principal executive offices are located at our head office
and at 2700 Colorado Avenue, Suite 200, Santa Monica,
California 90404, and our telephone number there is
(310) 449-9200.
Our website is located at www.lionsgate.com. Website
addresses referred to in this proxy statement are not intended
to function as hyperlinks, and the information contained on our
website is not a part of this proxy statement. As used in this
proxy statement, unless the context requires otherwise, the
terms we, us, our and the
Company refer to Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. and
its subsidiaries.
The date of this proxy statement is March 26, 2010
5
PRINCIPAL
HOLDERS OF SHARES
The following table presents certain information about
beneficial ownership of our Shares as of March 23, 2010 by
each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known by us
to own beneficially more than 5% of our Shares. Except as
indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in
the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to
all Shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to
community property laws, where applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial
Owner(1)
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percent of
Total(2)
|
|
Capital Research Global
Investors(3)
|
|
|
12,250,000
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
Carl C.
Icahn(4)
|
|
|
22,107,571
|
|
|
|
18.64
|
%
|
Kornitzer Capital Management,
Inc.(5)
|
|
|
9,321,966
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Mark H.
Rachesky, M.D.(6)
|
|
|
23,165,278
|
|
|
|
19.64
|
%
|
Steinberg Asset Management,
LLC(7)
|
|
|
7,944,950
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The addresses for the listed
beneficial owners are as follows: Capital Research Global
Investors, 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles,
California 90071; Carl C. Icahn,
c/o Icahn
Associates Corp., 767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700,
New York, New York 10153; Kornitzer Capital Management, Inc.,
5420 West 61st Place, Shawnee Mission, Kansas
66205; Mark A. Rachesky, M.D. c/o MHR Fund Management LLC,
40 West 57th Street, 24th Floor, New York, NY 10019; and
Steinberg Asset Management, LLC,
12 East 49th Street, Suite 1202, New York,
New York 10017.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The percentage of total Shares
owned by each person (or group of affiliated persons) is
calculated by dividing: (1) the number of Shares deemed to
be beneficially held by such person (or group of affiliated
persons) as of March 23, 2010, as determined in accordance
with
Rule 13d-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act); by (2) the sum of
(A) 117,945,360 which is the number of Shares outstanding
as of March 23 2010; plus (B) the number of Shares issuable
upon the exercise of options and other derivative securities, if
any, exercisable as of March 23, 2010 or within
60 days thereafter, held by such person (or group of
affiliated persons).
|
|
(3)
|
|
The information is based solely on
a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2010 with the
SEC by Capital Research Global Investors.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The number of Shares is based
solely on an amended Schedule 13D/A filed on March 19,
2010 with the SEC by Carl C. Icahn. The Shares are held for the
account of High River Limited Partnership (High
River), which directly beneficially owns 4,421,515 Shares,
Icahn Partners LP (Icahn Partners), which directly
beneficially owns 6,536,231 Shares, Icahn Partners Master
Fund LP (Icahn Master), which directly
beneficially owns 7,359,605 Shares, Icahn Partners Master
Fund II LP (Icahn Master II), which
directly beneficially owns 2,749,372 Shares, and Icahn Partners
Master Fund III LP (Icahn Master III),
which directly beneficially owns 1,040,848 Shares. Barberry
Corp. (Barberry) is the sole member of Hopper
Investments LLC (Hopper), which is the general
partner of High River. Beckton Corp. (Beckton) is
the sole stockholder of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc. (Icahn
Enterprises GP), which is the general partner of Icahn
Enterprises Holdings L.P. (Icahn Enterprises
Holdings). Icahn Enterprises Holdings is the sole member
of IPH GP LLC (IPH), which is the general partner of
Icahn Capital LP (Icahn Capital). Icahn Capital is
the general partner of each of Icahn Onshore LP (Icahn
Onshore) and Icahn Offshore LP (Icahn
Offshore). Icahn Onshore is the general partner of Icahn
Partners. Icahn Offshore is the general partner of each of Icahn
Master, Icahn Master II and Icahn Master III. Each of
Barberry and Beckton is 100% owned by Mr. Icahn. As such,
Mr. Icahn is in a position indirectly to determine the
investment and voting decisions made by each of High River,
Icahn Partners, Icahn Master, Icahn Master II and Icahn
Master III. Each of Icahn Offshore, Icahn Capital, IPH, Icahn
Enterprises Holdings, Icahn Enterprises GP, Beckton and
Mr. Icahn may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own the
Shares which each of Icahn Partners, Icahn Master, Icahn
Master II and Icahn Master III owns.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The information is based solely on
a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 22, 2010 with the
SEC by Kornitzer Capital Management, Inc. According to the
Schedule 13G/A, Kornitzer Capital Management, Inc. has sole
dispositive power over 2,932,918 Shares and shared dispositive
power over 9,321,966 Shares.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The information is based solely on
a Form 4 file on September 15, 2009 with the SEC by
Mark H. Rachesky, M.D. The Shares are held for the account
of MHR Capital Partners Master Account LP (Master
Account), MHR Capital Partners (100) LP
(Capital Partners (100)), MHR Institutional
Partners II LP (Institutional Partners II), MHR
Institutional Partners IIA LP (Institutional Partners
IIA) and MHR Institutional Partners III LP
(Institutional Partners III). MHR Advisors LLC
(Advisors) is the general partner of each of Master
Account and Capital Partners (100), and, in such capacity, may
be deemed to beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate
of 2,686,673 Shares) for the accounts of each of Master Account
(2,370,023 Shares) and Capital Partners (100) (316,650 Shares).
MHR Institutional
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Advisors II LLC
(Institutional Advisors II) is the general partner
of each of Institutional Partners II and Institutional
Partners IIA, and, in such capacity, may be deemed to
beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate of 8,278,176
Shares) for the accounts of each of Institutional
Partners II (2,352,223 Shares) and Institutional Partners
IIA (5,925,953 Shares). MHR Institutional Advisors III LLC
(Institutional Advisors III) is the general partner
of Institutional Partners III, and, in such capacity, may be
deemed to beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate of
12,200,429 Shares) for the account of Institutional Partners
III. MHR Fund Management LLC
(Fund Management) is an affiliate of and has an
investment management agreement with Master Account, Capital
Partners (100), Institutional Partners II, Institutional
Partners IIA and Institutional Partners III, and other
affiliated entities, pursuant to which it has the power to vote
or direct the vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition
of the common shares and, accordingly, Fund Management may
be deemed to beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate
of 23,165,278 Shares) for the account of each of Master Account
(2,370,023 Shares), Capital Partners (100) (316,650 Shares),
Institutional Partners II (2,352,223 Shares), Institutional
Partners IIA (5,925,953 Shares) and Institutional
Partners III (12,200,429 Shares). Dr. Rachesky is the
managing member of Advisors, Institutional Advisors II,
Institutional Advisors III and Fund Management, and,
in such capacity, may be deemed to beneficially own the
securities held (an aggregate of 23,165,278 Shares) for the
account of each of Master Account (2,370,023 Shares), Capital
Partners (100) (316,650 Shares), Institutional Partners II
(2,352,223 Shares), Institutional Partners IIA (5,925,953
Shares) and Institutional Partners III (12,200,429 Shares).
|
|
(7)
|
|
The information is based solely on
a Schedule 13G/A, filed on February 16, 2010 with the
SEC by Steinberg Asset Management, LLC.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table presents certain information about
beneficial ownership of our Shares as of March 23, 2010 by
(i) each director and executive officer, and (ii) all
current directors and executive officers as a group. Except as
indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in
the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to
all Shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to
community property laws, where applicable. Except for Shares in
brokerage accounts, which may, from time to time (and up to a
maximum of 10,000 Shares), together with other securities in the
account, serve as collateral for margin loans made in such
accounts, no shares reported as beneficially owned have been
pledged as security for any loan or indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial
Owner(1)
|
|
Number of
Shares(1)
|
|
Percent of
Total(2)
|
|
Norman
Bacal(3)
|
|
|
73,854
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Steven
Beeks(4)
|
|
|
340,227
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Michael
Burns(5)
|
|
|
1,346,280
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Joseph
Drake(6)
|
|
|
540,614
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Arthur Evrensel
|
|
|
27,512
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Jon
Feltheimer(7)
|
|
|
1,868,532
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
James Keegan
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Morley Koffman
|
|
|
44,245
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Wayne
Levin(8)
|
|
|
91,786
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Harald Ludwig
|
|
|
81,332
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
G. Scott Paterson
|
|
|
239,807
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mark H.
Rachesky, M.D.(9)
|
|
|
23,165,278
|
|
|
|
19.64
|
%
|
Daryl Simm
|
|
|
32,908
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Hardwick Simmons
|
|
|
54,300
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Brian V. Tobin
|
|
|
24,584
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Phyllis Yaffe
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All executive officers and current directors as a group
(16 persons)
|
|
|
27,962,959
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
7
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pursuant to
Rule 13d-3(d)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, amount
includes vested restricted share units and restricted share
units vesting and options exercisable within 60 days of
March 23, 2010 (i.e., May 23, 2010).
|
|
(2)
|
|
The percentage of total Shares
owned by each person (or group of affiliated persons) is
calculated by dividing: (1) the number of Shares deemed to
be beneficially held by such person (or group of affiliated
persons) as of March 23, 2010, as determined in accordance
with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act; by (2) the sum of
(A) 117,945,360 which is the number of Shares outstanding
as of March 23 2010; plus (B) the number of Shares issuable
upon the exercise of options and other derivative securities, if
any, exercisable as of March 23, 2010 or within
60 days thereafter, held by such person (or group of
affiliated persons).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 50,000 Shares subject to
options that are fully exercisable on or before May 23,
2010.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 212,500 Shares subject to
options that are fully exercisable on or before May 23,
2010. Excludes 850,000 cash-based share appreciation rights with
an exercise price of $5.45.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 787,500 Shares subject to
options that are fully exercisable on or before May 23,
2010.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 200,000 Shares subject to
options that are fully exercisable on or before May 23,
2010.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 787,500 Shares subject to
options that are fully exercisable on or before May 23,
2010.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 50,000 restricted share
units that will vest on or before May 24, 2010. Excludes
700,000 cash-based share appreciation rights with an exercise
price of $5.17.
|
|
(9)
|
|
The information is based solely on
a Form 4 file on September 15, 2009 with the SEC by
Mark H. Rachesky, M.D. The Shares are held for the account
of Master Account, Capital Partners (100), Institutional
Partners II, Institutional Partners IIA and Institutional
Partners III. Advisors is the general partner of each of Master
Account and Capital Partners (100), and, in such capacity, may
be deemed to beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate
of 2,686,673 Shares) for the accounts of each of Master Account
(2,370,023 Shares) and Capital Partners (100) (316,650 Shares).
Institutional Advisors II is the general partner of each of
Institutional Partners II and Institutional Partners IIA,
and, in such capacity, may be deemed to beneficially own the
securities held (an aggregate of 8,278,176 Shares) for the
accounts of each of Institutional Partners II (2,352,223
Shares) and Institutional Partners IIA (5,925,953 Shares).
Institutional Advisors III is the general partner of
Institutional Partners III, and, in such capacity, may be deemed
to beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate of
12,200,429 Shares) for the account of Institutional
Partners III. Fund Management is an affiliate of and has an
investment management agreement with Master Account, Capital
Partners (100), Institutional Partners II, Institutional
Partners IIA and Institutional Partners III, and other
affiliated entities, pursuant to which it has the power to vote
or direct the vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition
of the Shares and, accordingly, Fund Management may be
deemed to beneficially own the securities held (an aggregate of
23,165,278 Shares) for the account of each of Master Account
(2,370,023 Shares), Capital Partners
(100) (316,650 Shares), Institutional Partners II
(2,352,223 Shares), Institutional Partners IIA (5,925,953
Shares) and Institutional Partners III
(12,200,429 Shares). Dr. Rachesky is the managing
member of Advisors, Institutional Advisors II, Institutional
Advisors III and Fund Management, and, in such
capacity, may be deemed to beneficially own the securities held
(an aggregate of 23,165,278 Shares) for the account of each
of Master Account (2,370,023 Shares), Capital Partners
(100) (316,650 Shares), Institutional Partners II
(2,352,223 Shares), Institutional Partners IIA
(5,925,953 Shares) and Institutional Partners III
(12,200,429 Shares).
|
MATTERS
TO BE ACTED ON
Approval
of Rights Plan Resolution
Shareholders will be asked at the Special Meeting to consider
and, if thought advisable, pass a resolution (the
Rights Plan Resolution) to approve, ratify
and confirm the adoption of the Shareholder Rights Plan
Agreement dated as of March 12, 2010 between the Company
and CIBC Mellon Trust Company.
Background
to the Rights Plan
On March 1, 2010, Icahn Partners, a limited partnership
governed by the laws of Delaware, Icahn Master, a limited
partnership governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands, Icahn
Master II, a limited partnership governed by the laws of the
Cayman Islands, Icahn Master III, a limited partnership governed
by the laws of the Cayman Islands, High River, a limited
partnership governed by the laws of Delaware, Icahn
Fund S.à.r.l., a limited liability company governed by
the laws of Luxembourg, and Daazi Holding B.V., a limited
liability company governed by the laws of the Netherlands
(together, the Offeror), each of which is
indirectly controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, commenced an
unsolicited offer to purchase up to 13,164,420 Shares for
$6.00 per Share in cash (the Offer Price) on
the
8
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to
Purchase and Circular, dated March 1, 2010 and the related
Letter of Acceptance and Transmittal (the Initial
Offer).
As a result of Carl C. Icahns relationship with the
Offeror, Hopper, Barberry, Icahn Onshore, Icahn Offshore, Icahn
Capital, IPH, Icahn Enterprises Holdings, Icahn Enterprises GP
and Beckton, each of Mr. Icahn, Hopper, Barberry, Icahn
Onshore, Icahn Offshore, Icahn Capital LP, IPH, Icahn
Enterprises Holdings, Icahn Enterprises GP and Beckton are
deemed to be co-bidders with the Offeror (Mr. Icahn and
such entities, together with the Offeror, as applicable, the
Icahn Group).
In connection with the Initial Offer, the Board determined that
the Special Committee (originally formed in February
2009) would continue to be constituted to consider,
evaluate, negotiate (if necessary) and make recommendations to
the Board in connection with initiatives by the Icahn Group,
including the formulation of the Companys recommendation
to be filed on
Schedule 14d-9
with respect to the Initial Offer and the corresponding
directors circular to be delivered to shareholders in
Canada (the Directors Circular), and
any other transactions, proposals, expressions of interest or
strategic alternatives that may be available to the Company. The
Special Committee of independent directors was delegated with
authority to engage in negotiations with the Icahn Group. The
members of the Special Committee initially consisted of Harald
Ludwig and Brian V. Tobin, who were later joined by Morley
Koffman and Hardwick Simmons, all independent members of the
Board. The Special Committee also engaged independent legal and
financial advisors in connection with its consideration of the
Initial Offer.
On March 10, 2010, the Special Committee met with its
financial and legal advisors as well as the Companys
management and financial and legal advisors. During the meeting,
the Special Committee considered and discussed, among other
things, presentations from Messrs. Michael Burns, the
Companys Vice Chairman, Jon Feltheimer, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman and Wayne Levin, the
Companys Executive Vice President Corporate Operations and
General Counsel, regarding their views on the potential
implications of the Initial Offer, the adoption of a shareholder
rights plan, and other responses and courses of action that
might be taken in the context of the Initial Offer. The Special
Committee and its advisors also considered and discussed a
presentation by Morgan Stanley, the Companys financial
advisor, with respect to, among other things: the potential
impact of the Initial Offer on effective control of the Company;
factors currently affecting the market price of the Shares and
shares of the Companys peers; the value implications of
the current business plan and outlook and strategic initiatives
of the Company, (including with respect to the Companys
theatrical segment, television segment, TV Guide Network and
EPIX, the Companys joint venture creating a premium
television channel and subscription
video-on-demand
service); the adequacy of the consideration in the Initial Offer
when assessed against a range of relevant metrics, and
considerations relevant to the potential adoption of a
shareholder rights plan. The Special Committee also considered
and discussed a presentation by the Companys legal advisor
with respect to the potential adoption of a shareholder rights
plan and the calling of a special meeting of shareholders to
confirm such shareholder rights plan. The Special Committee then
excused Companys management and the Companys
advisors and considered and discussed, among other things, a
presentation from Perella Weinberg Partners LP (Perella
Weinberg), the financial advisor to the Special
Committee, and focused particularly on Perella Weinbergs
financial analysis of the Offer Price when assessed against a
range of relevant metrics. At the conclusion of its
presentation, Perella Weinberg orally delivered its opinion to
the effect that as of March 10, 2010 and based upon and
subject to the matters stated in its opinion, the consideration
to be paid in the Initial Offer is inadequate, from a financial
point of view, to the shareholders of the Company (other than
the Icahn Group and its affiliates). The Special Committee also
discussed with its financial and legal advisors the
Companys current business strategy to maximize shareholder
value, including with respect to the Companys theatrical
segment, television segment, TV Guide Network and EPIX, as well
as the responses and courses of action that might be taken in
the context of the Initial Offer, including the adoption of a
shareholder rights plan, and its fiduciary duties and the
interests of the Company, its shareholders and other
stakeholders. Following this discussion, the Special Committee
unanimously determined to recommend to the Board that the Board
recommend that shareholders reject the Initial Offer and not
tender any Shares pursuant to the Initial Offer, and that the
Board implement a shareholder rights plan, which would be
subject to confirmation by the shareholders at a special meeting
of shareholders.
On March 11, 2010, the Board met with its financial and
legal advisors as well as the Companys management and the
Special Committees financial and legal advisors. The Board
considered and discussed, among other things,
9
presentations from Messrs. Burns, Feltheimer and Levin
regarding their views on the potential implications of the
Initial Offer, the adoption of a shareholder rights plan, and
other responses and courses of action that might be taken in the
context of the Initial Offer. The Board discussed with
management the Companys business plan and its strategy to
maximize shareholder value, including with respect to the
Companys theatrical segment, television segment, TV Guide
Network and EPIX. The Board also considered and discussed a
presentation by Morgan Stanley, the Companys financial
advisor, with respect to, among other things: the potential
impact of the Initial Offer on effective control of the Company;
factors currently affecting the market price of the Shares and
shares of the Companys peers; the value implications of
the Companys business plan and outlook and strategic
initiatives of the Company; the adequacy of the consideration in
the Initial Offer when assessed against a range of relevant
metrics; and considerations relevant to the potential adoption
of a shareholder rights plan. The Board considered and discussed
a presentation from Perella Weinberg, including Perella
Weinbergs financial analysis of the Offer Price when
assessed against a range of relevant metrics. Perella Weinberg
advised the Board that on March 10, 2010, it had delivered
its opinion to the Special Committee, to the effect that, as of
March 10, 2010 and based upon and subject to the matters
stated in its opinion, the consideration to be paid in the
Initial Offer is inadequate, from a financial point of view, to
the shareholders (other than the Icahn Group and its
affiliates). The Chairman of the Special Committee advised the
Board of the determinations and recommendations of the Special
Committee with respect to the Initial Offer and the adoption of
a shareholder rights plan. The Board considered and discussed
with its advisors matters relevant to the adoption of a rights
plan, including the mechanics of a plan, events that could
trigger a plan, the possible effect of such plan on future
transactions and the material terms of the plan that was
proposed to be implemented. The Board also considered and
discussed with its advisors the calling of a special meeting of
shareholders to confirm such shareholder rights plan.
After careful consideration, including a thorough review of the
terms and conditions of the Initial Offer by the Special
Committee and by the Board, in consultation with their financial
and legal advisors, the Board, by unanimous vote of the
directors present at a meeting held on March 11, 2010, and
upon the unanimous recommendation of the Special Committee,
determined that the Initial Offer was financially inadequate and
coercive and was not in the best interests of Lionsgate, its
shareholders and other stakeholders, and to recommend that
shareholders REJECT the Initial Offer and
NOT tender their Shares to the Initial Offer. At
the March 11, 2010 meeting, the Board, by unanimous vote of
the directors present at a meeting, and upon the unanimous
recommendation of the Special Committee, also approved the
execution of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement, the issuance
of one share purchase right (a Right) per
Share payable to shareholders of record at the close of business
on March 22, 2010, in accordance with the Rights Plan, and
approved convening the Special Meeting to confirm such
shareholder rights plan as soon as reasonable practicable after
its adoption, on May 4, 2010.
On March 12, 2009 the Board formally announced its
recommendation that shareholders REJECT the
Initial Offer and NOT tender their Shares, and it
set forth detailed reasons for this recommendation in its
Schedule 14D-9
and in its Directors Circular, each dated March 12,
2009. The reasons for the Boards recommendation that
shareholders REJECT the Initial Offer and
NOT tender their Shares included, among other
reasons, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Initial Offer did not reflect the full value of the Shares.
|
|
|
|
The Initial Offer was financially inadequate.
|
|
|
|
As the owner of 29.9% of the Companys outstanding Shares,
the Icahn Group would likely have had the power to effectively
veto certain significant transactions and other matters
requiring approval by a special resolution of shareholders.
|
|
|
|
The purchase price offered by the Icahn Group represented an
effort by the Icahn Group to acquire control of Lionsgate
without paying a control premium.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition by the Icahn Group of 29.9% of the outstanding
Shares would have constituted an event of default under the
Companys credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with the Icahn Groups relative lack of
industry experience.
|
|
|
|
The Initial Offer was structurally coercive.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
The Initial Offer was highly conditional.
|
|
|
|
All of Lionsgates directors and executive officers had
informed Lionsgate that they did not currently intend to tender
their Shares into the Initial Offer.
|
A complete summary of the reasons for the Boards
recommendation can be found in the recommendation filed on
Schedule 14D-9
and the Directors Circular, each dated March 12, 2010.
Subsequent to the adoption of the Rights Plan and the
Boards recommendation to reject the Initial Offer, the
Offeror amended the Offer to, among other things, purchase up to
all of the issued and outstanding Shares, though at the same
price of $6.00 per Share in cash (the Amended
Offer).
On March 22, 2010, the Special Committee met with its
financial and legal advisors as well as the Companys
management and financial and legal advisors. During the meeting,
the Special Committee considered and discussed, among other
things, presentations from Messrs. Burns, Feltheimer and
Levin regarding managements views on the Amended Offer,
the likely reaction of shareholders to the Amended Offer, and
the other business and strategic initiatives that are being
pursued by the Company. The Special Committee also discussed
with its legal advisors the terms of the Amended Offer,
including the absence of a subsequent offering period and the
Icahn Groups ability to waive the minimum tender
condition, the applicability of the Rights Plan to the Amended
Offer, and further proceedings regarding the Rights Plan,
including the upcoming Special Meeting. The Special Committee
discussed with its and the Companys advisors potential
responses to the Amended Offer. The Special Committee and its
advisors also considered and discussed a presentation by Morgan
Stanley with respect to, among other things: the absence of any
change to the per share Offer Price; market perspectives on the
Amended Offer, including the inadequacy of the Offer Price;
factors currently affecting the market price of the Shares,
including the current business plan and strategic initiatives of
the Company, and the industry generally. After excusing the
Companys management and the Companys advisors, the
Special Committee considered and discussed, among other things,
a presentation from Perella Weinberg regarding the Amended Offer
and Perella Weinbergs financial analysis of the Amended
Offer. The Special Committee also took note of the opinion that
it had received from Perella Weinberg on March 10, 2010
regarding the inadequacy, from a financial point of view, of the
Initial Offer and the fact that the Icahn Group had not
increased the Offer Price from the per share price in the
Initial Offer. Following discussion, the Special Committee
unanimously determined that the Amended Offer remained
inadequate, from a financial point of view, and to recommend to
the Board that the Board recommend that shareholders reject the
Amended Offer and not tender any Shares pursuant to the Amended
Offer.
Later on March 22, 2010, the Board met with its financial
and legal advisors as well as the Companys management and
the Special Committees financial and legal advisors. The
Board discussed with its and the Special Committees legal
advisors the terms of the Amended Offer, including the absence
of a subsequent offering period and the Icahn Groups
ability to waive the minimum tender condition, the applicability
of the Rights Plan to the Amended Offer, and further proceedings
regarding the Rights Plan, including the upcoming Special
Meeting. The Board also considered and discussed, among other
things, presentations from Messrs. Burns, Feltheimer and
Levin regarding managements views on the Amended Offer,
the likely reaction of shareholders to the Amended Offer, and
the other business and strategic initiatives that are being
pursued by the Company. The Board also considered and discussed
a presentation by Morgan Stanley with respect to, among other
things: the absence of any change to the per share Offer Price;
market perspectives on the Amended Offer, including the
inadequacy of the Offer Price; factors currently affecting the
market price of the Shares, including the current business plan
and strategic initiatives of the Company, and the industry
generally. The Board considered and discussed a presentation
from Perella Weinberg regarding the Amended Offer, including
Perella Weinbergs financial analysis of the Amended Offer.
The Chairman of the Special Committee also advised the Board of
the determinations and recommendations of the Special Committee
with respect to the Amended Offer. After completion of these
presentations, the Board engaged in a broad discussion of
potential responses to the Amended Offer, the Companys
current business and strategic initiatives and other strategic
alternatives.
After careful consideration, including a thorough review of the
terms and conditions of the Amended Offer by the Special
Committee and by the Board, in consultation with their financial
and legal advisors, the Board, by unanimous vote of the
directors present at a meeting held on March 22, 2010, and
upon the unanimous recommendation of the Special Committee,
determined that the Amended Offer remained financially
inadequate
11
and coercive and was not in the best interests of Lionsgate, its
shareholders and other stakeholders, and to recommend that
shareholders REJECT the Amended Offer and
NOT tender their Shares to the Amended Offer.
The Board formally announced its recommendation that
shareholders REJECT the Amended Offer and
NOT tender their Shares, and it set forth detailed
reasons for this recommendation in its
Schedule 14D-9
Amendment No. 1 and in notice of change to its
Directors Circular, each dated March 22, 2010. The
reasons for the Boards recommendation that shareholders
REJECT the Amended Offer and NOT
tender their Shares included many of the same reasons that
had been the basis for its recommendation to reject the Initial
Offer, including:
|
|
|
|
|
The Amended Offer does not reflect the full value of the
Shares. The $6.00 per Share price offered by the
Offeror does not reflect significant value that senior
management, under the direction of the Board, has built over the
past 10 years and the significant additional value that the
Board and senior management believe would result from the
continued implementation of Lionsgates business plan.
Among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lionsgate has created one of the only motion picture businesses
with a significant presence in the action, horror,
African-American,
independent and prestige segments of the market.
Lionsgates theatrical business acquires, produces and
releases approximately 12 to 15 films per year under a
disciplined financial model. In addition, Lionsgate has been
successful in releasing highly regarded hits such as the Academy
Award®
winning films Crash and Precious, and in creating
long-term, valuable franchises such as the Tyler Perry
and Saw franchises. Lionsgates film business
has achieved profitability of approximately 70% of its
theatrical releases over the past 10 years, one of the
highest success rates in the industry.
|
|
|
|
Through a series of successful acquisitions and additions from
recent television and theatrical productions, Lionsgate has
built a premier 12,000-title library that has generated an
average of $267 million in annual revenue over the past
three years.
|
|
|
|
Lionsgate has diversified its business through a combination of
organic growth and acquisitions, including acquisitions in
television programming. The television programming business has
achieved an approximately 40% compounded annual growth rate over
the past 11 years. Lionsgate has been focused on financial
discipline in developing new television product. The television
programming business has been led by such hit shows as Mad
Men, Weeds and Nurse Jackie, which
have achieved critical acclaim, dedicated fan bases and economic
success.
|
The Board and senior management believe that the significant
additional value that would result from the continued
implementation of Lionsgates business plan, and the
inadequacy of the Offer, is supported by the views of analysts.
The average price target of Wall Street analysts for the Shares
as of March 22, 2010, is at a 46.3% premium to the $6.00
per share offer price (as indicated in the chart below).
12
ANALYST
TARGETS
AS OF
MARCH 22, 2010
Source Bloomberg
|
|
(1)
|
Long-term price target
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Amended Offer is financially
inadequate. In connection with its review of the
Offerors original Offer made on March 1, 2010, the
Special Committee received, and the Board considered the
analysis of, a written opinion dated March 10, 2010 from
Perella Weinberg to the effect that as of such date and based
upon and subject to the matters stated in its opinion, the
consideration to be paid in the Initial Offer is inadequate,
from a financial point of view, to the shareholders (other than
the Icahn Group and its affiliates). A copy of the opinion dated
March 10, 2010 of Perella Weinberg to the Special Committee
with respect to the original Offer was previously attached as
Appendix B to the
Schedule 14D-9
and Directors Circular dated March 12, 2010.
Shareholders are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its
entirety for a description of the procedures followed, matters
considered and limitations on the use thereof and the review
undertaken in connection therewith. The opinion does not
constitute a recommendation to Lionsgate shareholders as to
whether they should tender their Shares pursuant to the Amended
Offer. The Special Committee and the Board noted, among other
things, that the per-share Offer Price in the Amended Offer is
the same as it was for the Initial Offer and, based in part on
presentations by Perella Weinberg and Morgan Stanley as to the
Amended Offer and the March 10, 2010 Perella Weinberg
opinion, determined that the Offer Price continues to be
inadequate, from a financial point of view, to the shareholders
(other than the Icahn Group and its affiliates).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Icahn Group is seeking complete control over the
Company. In the Offer, Mr. Icahn, on behalf
of the Offeror, stated that it is making the Amended Offer in
part because Lions Gates latest actions convince me
that the current management and board will never allow
shareholders to make their own determination on this extremely
important decision, referring to the decision to purchase
a film library. In connection with the Amended Offer,
Mr. Icahn stated on March 19, 2010, on behalf of the
Offeror, that Due to managements recent actions, I
am now convinced that Lions Gates shareholders will never
have the right to make important decisions. However,
despite this rhetoric of shareholder choice, if the Icahn Group
gains control, it would be able to impose its views on the other
shareholders by, among other things fundamentally
changing Lionsgates strategy to reflect that of the Icahn
Group, replacing the Board, and potentially replacing top
management with individuals sharing the Icahn Groups
views thus minimizing, not enhancing, the potential
for choice and influence by Lionsgates other shareholders
relating to the Company and its future. Even if the Icahn Group
waives its minimum condition and has less than a majority
interest in Lionsgate, its increased ownership would still
result in the Icahn Group exerting considerable influence over
Lionsgates affairs and, in some circumstances, exerting
negative control over Lionsgate. As noted in a news
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
release issued by Moodys Investor Services on
March 16, 2010, the potential ownership of 29.9% of the
Shares outstanding by the Icahn Group would also provide
Mr. Icahn with effective control given the size of the
stake and the largest shareholder position, and therefore
significant influence to either move the company in a direction
that may be harmful to debt investors or potential veto
capability over certain significant transactions and other
matters requiring approval by a special resolution of
shareholders.
|
By setting the expiration date of the Amended Offer four days
before the scheduled date for the Special Meeting, the Icahn
Group also is attempting to pre-empt the right of shareholders
to choose to confirm the Rights Plan in order to protect
themselves against coercive acquisition strategies.
Furthermore, the Icahn Group has not articulated a clear
strategy or vision for Lionsgate, other than the general
statement that it would prefer to pursue a strategy aimed
more at the consolidation of film and television distributors,
as opposed to the acquisition of library assets. The Board
and management of Lionsgate, on the other hand, have continued
to pursue its growth strategy to build Lionsgate, including by
actively exploring several strategic acquisitions in both the
distributor and library spaces for an extended period of time
(which pre-dates the Initial Offer) that they believe could
create significant value for shareholders. Based on
Mr. Icahns statements, the Board believes that the
Icahn Group will seek to undermine Lionsgates growth
strategy by impeding its ability to pursue strategic
acquisitions and other significant transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price offered by the Icahn Group represents an
effort by the Icahn Group to acquire control of Lionsgate
without paying a control premium. As noted above,
if the Amended Offer is successfully completed, the Icahn Group
would acquire control over the decisions of the Company,
including the ability to elect all of the directors of the
Company. However, the Icahn Group is not offering shareholders
an appropriate premium for such control.
|
The Board believes that the premium represented by the Amended
Offer is insufficient for the acquisition of control of
Lionsgate. The Offer Price of $6.00 per Share represents a
premium of only 14.7% to the previous days closing price,
15.4% over the unaffected
20-day
value-weighted average price of the Shares
(VWAP) of $5.20, and a premium of only 8.7%
to the one-year VWAP of $5.52 per Share, in each case,
calculated based on a price or VWAP of the Shares prior to the
announcement of the Icahn Groups intention to make the
Initial Offer on February 16, 2010.
A comparison of the Offer Price of $6.00 per Share to average
takeover bid premiums in the U.S. market illustrates that
the Amended Offer provides for a substantially below-market
premium for control of Lionsgate. For example, The Walt Disney
Companys acquisition of Marvel Entertainment, Inc., a
transaction involving a change of control in late 2009, had a
one-day
announced premium of 29.4%, significantly higher than the 14.7%
premium being offered by the Offeror (based on the $6.00 per
Share price). As shown in the chart below, the average
1-day
announced premium in transactions from January 1, 2008 to
February 16, 2010 (the date the Offeror commenced the
Initial Offer) involving a change of control was 39.8%, compared
to the premium being offered by the Offeror. Moreover, the
premium offered by the Offeror is also less than the 41.7%
average
one-day
announced premium in transactions from January 1, 2009 to
February 16, 2010 involving a change of control. Further,
the Offer Price of $6.00 per Share represents a premium of only
0.5% to Lionsgates closing price on March 18, 2010 of
$5.97, the last trading date immediately preceding the Icahn
Groups announcement of the Amended Offer, which date, the
Board believes, reflects the updated trading price of the Shares
following Lionsgates rejection of the Icahn Groups
original Offer and the Boards adoption of the Rights Plan.
14
ANNOUNCED
ONE-DAY PREMIUMS IN U.S.
(1)
Source Thomson
|
|
(1)
|
Premiums based on all cash deals
with consideration greater than $500 million
|
|
(2)
|
Premium to unaffected share price
as of February 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition by the Icahn Group of a majority or all of
the outstanding Shares would constitute an event of default
under the Credit Facilities and could trigger financial
obligations under the 10.25% Notes and the
Notes. As the Icahn Group has repeatedly noted,
the Companys Second Amended and Restated Credit, Security,
Guaranty and Pledge Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008
(the Senior Revolving Facility) and Credit,
Security, Guaranty and Pledge Agreement, dated as of
October 6, 2009 (the 2009 Facility and,
together with the Senior Revolving Facility, the Credit
Facilities) both define a change in
control to include, subject to certain limited exceptions,
any person or group who acquires ownership or control in excess
of 20% of Lionsgates equity securities having voting power
to vote in the election of the Board. The Credit Facilities
provide that a change in control would be an event
of default that permits the lenders to accelerate the maturity
of borrowings thereunder and to enforce security interests in
the collateral securing such debt. As of March 19, 2010,
Lionsgate had no borrowings outstanding under the Senior
Revolving Facility and borrowings of approximately
$35.6 million outstanding under the 2009 Facility.
|
In addition, if the Credit Facilities were accelerated following
an event of default that is not waived or cured, holders of the
Companys 2.9375% Convertible Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2024 (the 2024 Notes) issued by
Lions Gate Entertainment Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Lionsgate (LGEI) in October 2004, the
3.625% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2025 (the
2025 Notes) issued by LGEI in February 2005,
the 3.625% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2025
issued by LGEI in April 2009 (the New 2025
Notes and, together with the 2024 Notes and the 2025
Notes, the Notes), and the 10.25% Senior
Secured Second-Priority Notes due 2016 (the
10.25% Notes) would have the right to
accelerate the debts thereunder. As of March 19, 2010,
$236.0 million principal amount of the 10.25% Notes
and $236.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes
were outstanding.
As of March 19, 2010, Lionsgates consolidated total
indebtedness was approximately $816.8 million (includes
principal values for the 10.25% Notes and the Notes).
If Lionsgate is unable to negotiate an amendment to the Credit
Facilities to increase the 20% change in control threshold or
obtain a forbearance or waiver for any default resulting from
the Offerors acquisition of outstanding Shares, Lionsgate
would be required to repay all amounts then outstanding and
would lose its primary source of liquidity to fund operations.
15
The 10.25% Notes and the Notes define a change of
control to include the acquisition of beneficial
ownership, directly or indirectly, by any person or group of in
excess of 50% of the voting stock of Lionsgate. Upon a
change of control, the holders of the
10.25% Notes and the Notes would have the right to require
LGEI, to repurchase the principal amount of the
10.25% Notes and the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, and in certain circumstances for the Notes, a
make-whole premium. A change of control of the
10.25% Notes and the Notes would also result in a default
under the Credit Facilities.
Lionsgate cannot assure shareholders that it would be able to
obtain an amendment, forbearance or waiver of the default
provisions of the Credit Facilities on reasonable terms. In
addition, although Lionsgate had approximately
$128.5 million in cash and cash equivalents available as of
March 19, 2010 to fund the repayment and termination of the
outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facilities, it would
need to immediately seek a replacement source of funding in
order to continue to operate its business in the ordinary
course. Lionsgate cannot assure shareholders that a replacement
credit facility would be available on reasonable terms, if at
all. Additionally, certain other Lionsgate indebtedness may be
accelerated in the event that there is a change of
control under the Credit Facilities or as set forth in the
applicable documentation.
In short, if the Amended Offer were successfully completed and
the Icahn Group acquired outstanding Shares, Lionsgates
liquidity and ability to operate its business could be
materially and adversely impacted.
|
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with the Icahn Groups relative lack of
industry experience. As noted above, the Icahn
Group is seeking control of Lionsgate. To the knowledge of
Lionsgate, the Icahn Group is comprised primarily of financial
investors and has limited experience in operating a business in
Lionsgates industry. Notwithstanding this lack of
demonstrated experience, the Icahn Group has stated that if its
Amended Offer is successful, it would replace the Board and top
management of the Company, effectively taking over all of the
business decisions of Lionsgate, including developing and
green-lighting film and television projects, film and television
acquisitions and marketing, including any decisions regarding
any of the strategic acquisitions and opportunities that
Lionsgate is currently considering. The Icahn Group even warns
of a potentially volatile period of transition
resulting from its actions.
|
|
|
|
The Amended Offer is structurally
coercive. While the Amended Offer is no longer a
partial bid for less than all of the Shares, it is
still structured to be coercive in its effect. The Icahn Group
has set a single deadline for tenders at April 30, 2010. It
has also reserved to itself the right to waive the minimum
tender condition that there shall have been properly and validly
deposited under the Amended Offer and not withdrawn at least
40,492,682 Shares. It is under no obligation to announce
the amount of any tenders prior to that deadline or to provide a
subsequent offering period, in which shareholders who did not
tender their shares initially could tender after learning the
results of the initial offering period or whether the minimum
tender condition has been waived, and has stated that it does
not currently intend to provide shareholders with such a period.
As a result, each shareholder is forced to decide whether to
accept the Amended Offer (and in respect of how many Shares),
reject such Amended Offer, sell into the market or maintain
their position without knowing whether and to what extent other
shareholders would accept the Amended Offer and whether
Lionsgate will be under the control of the Icahn Group and
forced to implement the Icahn Groups strategy (including
fundamentally changing Lionsgates business strategy,
replacing Lionsgates board of directors, potentially
replacing top management with several individuals who more
closely share our vision for the future of the company,
and thrusting Lionsgate into a potentially volatile period
of transition). In addition, the terms of the Amended
Offer are different in the U.S. and Canada in important
respects, including that while a waiver of the minimum condition
would require an extension of the Amended Offer under
U.S. law, the Offeror has no such obligation under Canadian
law. The Offeror has therefore retained the option to take up
Shares in Canada immediately after waiving the minimum
condition, which has the effect of achieving the same result as
its original partial bid.
|
A shareholder may, therefore, feel compelled to tender Shares
into the Amended Offer, even if the shareholder considers the
bid price to be inadequate, out of concern that in failing to do
so, if the Icahn
16
Group acquires Shares under the Amended Offer, the shareholder
may suffer adverse consequences including:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduced price reflective of a minority discount resulting from
the extent of the Icahn Groups ownership, control and
ability to frustrate other potential offers to acquire all of
the Shares;
|
|
|
|
a potential default by Lionsgate under the Credit Facilities and
its other indebtedness, including the 10.25% Notes and the
Notes, or the need to secure alternate financing arrangements
that may be less advantageous to Lionsgate;
|
|
|
|
a potential default by Lionsgate under certain contracts that
may be important to the business and continued growth of
Lionsgate;
|
|
|
|
the loss of or limitation on Lionsgates ability to use net
operating loss carry forwards for U.S. federal income tax
purposes;
|
|
|
|
the loss of certain benefits as a result of Lionsgate ceasing to
be Canadian-controlled; and
|
|
|
|
holding an investment in a company that is under the influence
of a shareholder with control that has little related industry
experience, has articulated vague plans or direction for
Lionsgate, has contemplated the replacement of the Board and top
management, and has contemplated a potentially volatile
period of transition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Amended Offer is highly conditional. The
Amended Offer is highly conditional for the benefit of the
Offeror, resulting in substantial uncertainty for shareholders
as to whether the Amended Offer would be completed. Each of the
numerous conditions to the Amended Offer, including the
elimination of the Rights Plan that now provides shareholders
with protections against coercive and unfair attempts to take
over the Company and the approval of certain government
authorities, including under the Investment Canada Act,
must be satisfied or waived before the Offeror would be
obligated to take up any Shares deposited under the Amended
Offer. Several of the conditions provide the Offeror with broad
discretion to determine whether the conditions have or have not
been satisfied. For example, the Offeror can decide not to
proceed with the Amended Offer if there is any change or
development that has occurred or been threatened in the
business, properties, assets, liabilities, financial condition,
operations, results of operations, or the prospects for the
business of Lionsgate which is outside the ordinary course of
business.
|
|
|
|
All of Lionsgates directors and executive officers have
informed Lionsgate that they do not currently intend to tender
their Shares into the Amended Offer. As of
March 26, 2010, Lionsgates directors and executive
officers beneficially owned an aggregate of
27,962,959 Shares (excluding any Shares issuable to
Lionsgates directors and executive officers pursuant to
the vesting of any Lionsgate restricted stock or performance
share awards). 23,165,278 of these Shares were beneficially
owned by Mark H. Rachesky, M.D., a Lionsgate director.
|
Purpose
of the Rights Plan
The purpose of the Rights Plan is to ensure, to the extent
possible, that all shareholders of the Company are treated
equally and fairly in connection with any initiative to acquire
effective control of the Company. Control transactions (such as
the one launched by the Icahn Group) may be structured by the
acquiror to be coercive and to permit effective control to be
acquired in circumstances that are not in the best interests of
a company, its shareholders or other stakeholders. Those
transactions may be structured so as to, among other things,
result in shareholders being subject to undue pressure in
choosing whether to sell their shares for a price that does not
represent the fair value of those shares or to retain their
shares with a view to realizing greater value for their
investment.
The Rights Plan that has been adopted by the Company does not
prevent control transactions but rather encourages potential
acquirors of effective control to make take-over bids by means
of a Permitted Bid (as defined below) or to approach the Board
to negotiate another form of transaction that treats
shareholders equally and fairly and is in the best interests of
the Company, its shareholders and other stakeholders.
17
Under current Canadian and U.S. securities legislation, it is
possible for effective control of a company to be acquired
through a transaction that may be coercive or otherwise unfair
to shareholders and not in the best interests of the company,
its shareholders and other stakeholders. For example, effective
control can be acquired through private agreement purchases from
select shareholders that are not available to all shareholders
and purchases from time to time on a stock exchange or other
market where the shares are traded. Those acquisitions may
result in an acquisition of effective control that does not
afford all shareholders, and may preclude shareholders from
receiving, a control premium for their shares.
Take-over bids also can be structured so that they are coercive
and effectively limit shareholder choice. Partial take-over bids
(like the original offer by the Icahn Group), for example, may
pressure shareholders to accept a take-over bid even in
circumstances where they do not believe that it provides
appropriate value because of a concern that, if others do and
they do not tender , they will be left holding shares the value
of which may be impaired as a result of the change of control.
This pressure is exacerbated where, for example, a shareholder
has concerns about the effect of the change of control under
legislation applicable to the company or contracts to which the
company is a party or the way in which the acquiror might
exercise control. That coercive effect can similarly be created
in take-over bids that are not partial where, for example, a
minimum tender condition can be satisfied or waived without
there being a subsequent tender period (as is the case with the
amended offer by the Icahn Group).
In this context, and in response to the Initial Offer, the
Special Committee considered, with the benefit of advice from
its legal and financial advisors, whether it was in the best
interests of the Company, its shareholders and other
stakeholders to adopt a shareholders rights plan. The Special
Committee unanimously determined that it was in the best
interests of the Company, its shareholders and other
stakeholders to do so to limit the potential adverse impact of
an accumulation of a significant interest in the Shares that was
effected through a creeping bid, a partial bid or other means
that resulted in coercive or unfair attempts to take over the
Company without affording all shareholders the opportunity to
sell all of their Shares for fair value. After careful
consideration, including the unanimous recommendation of the
Special Committee and consultation with its financial and legal
advisors, the Board, by unanimous recommendation of the
directors present, made a similar determination and authorized
the execution of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement and the
issuance of the Rights. Those recommendations of the Special
Committee and the Board have not changed as a result of the
amendment of the offer by the Icahn Group.
The Rights Plan discourages coercive or unfair acquisition of
effective control by creating the potential that any Shares that
may be acquired or held by an acquiror will be significantly
diluted if not acquired in a manner permitted by the Rights
Plan. Such potential dilution results because the Rights Plan
provides that all holders of Shares who are not related to the
acquiror will be entitled to exercise Rights issued to them
under the Rights Plan and to acquire additional Shares at a
substantial discount to prevailing market prices (with the
acquiror and the persons related to the acquiror not entitled to
exercise any such Rights). However, the Rights Plan that has
been adopted by the Company does not prevent control
transactions. The Rights Plan does not apply to bids that are
structured as a Permitted Bid, which is a take-over
bid that is:
|
|
|
|
|
made by way of a take-over bid circular to all holders of
Shares, other than the acquiror, for all outstanding
Shares; and
|
|
|
|
subject to irrevocable and unqualified conditions that
(A) no Shares shall be taken up or paid for prior to a date
which is not less than 60 days after the date of the bid
and then only if more than 50% of the outstanding Shares held by
Independent Shareholders have been tendered to the bid and not
withdrawn, (B) Shares may be deposited pursuant to the bid
(unless the bid is withdrawn) at any time prior to the close of
business on the date Voting Shares are first taken up and paid
for under the bid, (C) any Shares deposited pursuant to the
bid may be withdrawn until taken up and paid for, and
(D) if the 50% tender condition is satisfied, that fact
will be publicly announced and the bid will be extended for at
least 10 business days following such announcement.
|
These criteria are intended to ensure that the Permitted Bid is
evenhanded and free of coercive effect. In a Permitted Bid, a
shareholder who is not inclined to keep shares in a company
controlled by the acquiror may, for example, wait to see if the
acquiror achieves the 50% tender level at the time shares are
first taken up, and then
18
subsequently tender their shares to exit their investment with
assurance that their tender will be accepted and that they will
receive the same consideration as other shareholders. Thus, in a
Permitted Bid, shareholders are given a free choice to decide
whether the consideration offered is adequate and properly
reflective of a control premium. The Rights Plan is designed to
discourage only those potential acquirors, such as the Icahn
Group here, who refuse to eliminate the unfair and coercive
elements of their takeover bids that would interfere with this
shareholder franchise by potentially causing some shareholders
to tender their Shares out of fear of the consequences of not
tendering rather than because they believe in the value and
adequacy of the offer.
General
Description of the Rights Plan
The following is a summary of the principal terms of the Rights
Plan, which summary is qualified by and is subject to the full
terms and conditions of the Rights Plan, a copy of which is
available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov and on SEDAR
at www.sedar.com. The Rights Plan is also available for
inspection by shareholders during business hours on any day
prior to May 4, 2010 at the Companys records office
located at Suite 2200, 1055 West Hastings Street,
Vancouver, British Columbia. Except as otherwise defined herein,
defined terms used below have the meanings ascribed thereto in
the Rights Plan.
Issue of Rights. Under the Rights Plan, which
became effective on March 12, 2010, one Right will be
issued to shareholders of record on March 22, 2010 and will
be attached to each outstanding Share. One Right will also be
issued and attach to each Share issued thereafter, subject to
the limitations set forth in the Rights Plan.
Acquiring Person. An Acquiring
Person is a person that Beneficially Owns 20% or more of
the outstanding Voting Shares or, if the Company has completed
an offering of its securities after March 12, 2010 and in
connection with that offering the Board has so determined, 24.9%
of the outstanding Voting Shares. However, an Acquiring Person
does not include the Company or any subsidiary of the Company,
or any person that would otherwise become an Acquiring Person as
a result of certain exempt transactions. These exempt
transactions include, among others: (i) specified
acquisitions of securities of the Company,
(ii) acquisitions pursuant to a Permitted Bid or Competing
Permitted Bid (as described below), (iii) specified
distributions of securities of the Company, (iv) certain
other specified exempt acquisitions, and (v) transactions
to which the application of the Rights Plan has been waived by
the Board.
Rights Exercise Privilege. The Rights will
separate from the Shares to which they are attached and will
become exercisable at the later of (a) the close of
business on the tenth Business Day after the earliest of:
(i) the first date of public announcement that an Acquiring
Person has become an Acquiring Person; (ii) the date of
commencement of, or first public announcement of the intent of
any person to commence, a take-over bid, other than a Permitted
Bid or a Competing Permitted Bid, (iii) the date upon which
a Permitted Bid or a Competing Permitted Bid ceases to be such,
or (b) in the event that any of the circumstances in
(a) occurred more than ten Business Days prior to the
issuance of the Rights, the close of business on March 22,
2010, or in each case such later date as the Board may determine
(the Separation Time). As a result of the
public announcement by the Offeror on February 16, 2010 of
its intention to make the Initial Offer, the Separation Time
would have occurred at the close of business on March 22,
2010. However, the Board has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company, its shareholders and other
stakeholders to defer the Separation Time. Subject to adjustment
as provided in the Rights Plan, following the Separation Time,
each Right will entitle the holder to purchase one Share for an
exercise price (the Exercise Price) equal to
four times the prevailing market price of a Share as at the
Separation Time.
A transaction in which a person becomes an Acquiring Person is
referred to as a Flip-in Event. Any Rights
Beneficially Owned by an Acquiring Person (or any transferee of
such Rights) on or after the earlier of the Separation Time or
the first date of public announcement by the Company or an
Acquiring Person that an Acquiring Person has become such, will
become void upon the occurrence of a Flip-in Event. After the
close of business on the tenth business day after the first date
of public announcement by the Company or an Acquiring Person
that an Acquiring Person has become such, the Rights (other than
those Beneficially Owned by the Acquiring Person or any
transferee of such Rights) will entitle the holder to purchase,
for the Exercise Price, that number of Shares having an
aggregate market price (based on the prevailing market price at
the time of the consummation or occurrence of the Flip-in Event)
equal to twice the Exercise Price, subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances.
19
Impact Once Rights Plan is Triggered. Upon the
occurrence of a Flip-in Event and the Rights separating from the
attached Shares, reported earnings per Share on a fully diluted
or non-diluted basis may be affected. Holders of Rights who do
not exercise their Rights upon the occurrence of a Flip-in Event
may suffer substantial dilution.
By permitting holders of Rights other than Rights Beneficially
Owned by an Acquiring Person (or any transferee of such Rights)
to acquire Shares of the Company at a discount to market value,
the Rights may cause substantial dilution to a person or group
that becomes an Acquiring Person other than by way of a
Permitted Bid or a Competing Permitted Bid or other than in
circumstances where the Rights are redeemed or the Board waives
the application of the Rights Plan.
Certificates and Transferability. Prior to the
Separation Time, certificates for Shares will also evidence one
Right for each Share represented by the certificate.
Certificates evidencing Shares issued after March 22, 2010
will bear a legend to this effect. Rights are also attached to
Shares outstanding on March 22, 2010, although share
certificates already outstanding on that date will not bear such
a legend. Prior to the Separation Time, Rights will not be
transferable separately from the attached Shares. From and after
the Separation Time, the Rights will be evidenced by Rights
certificates which will be transferable and traded separately
from the Shares.
Permitted Bids and Competing Permitted
Bids. The Rights Plan is not triggered if an
offer would, among other things, allow sufficient time for the
shareholders to consider and react to the offer and would allow
shareholders to decide to tender or not tender without the
concern that they will be left with illiquid Voting Shares
should they not tender.
A Permitted Bid is a take-over bid where the bid is
made by way of a take-over bid circular to all holders of Voting
Shares, other than the offeror, for all outstanding Voting
Shares and the bid is subject to irrevocable and unqualified
conditions that (A) no Voting Shares shall be taken up or
paid for prior to a date which is not less than 60 days
after the date of the bid and then only if more than 50% of the
outstanding Voting Shares held by Independent Shareholders have
been tendered to the bid and not withdrawn, (B) Voting
Shares may be deposited pursuant to the bid (unless the bid is
withdrawn) at any time prior to the close of business on the
date Voting Shares are first taken up and paid for under the
bid, (C) any Voting Shares deposited pursuant to the bid
may be withdrawn until taken up and paid for, and (D) if
the 50% condition set forth in (A) above is satisfied, that
fact will be publicly announced and the bid will be extended for
at least 10 Business Days following such announcement.
A Competing Permitted Bid is a take-over bid made
after a Permitted Bid or another Competing Bid has been made and
prior to the expiry of that Permitted Bid or Competing Permitted
Bid and that satisfies all the criteria of a Permitted Bid
except that since it is made after a Permitted Bid has been
made, the minimum deposit period and the time period for the
take-up of
and payment for shares tendered under a Competing Permitted Bid
is not 60 days, but is instead the later of (i) the
last day on which a take-over bid must be open for acceptance
after the date of such bid under applicable securities
legislation, and (ii) the earliest date for
take-up and
payment of shares under any other Permitted Bid or Competing
Permitted Bid then in existence. Neither a Permitted Bid nor a
Competing Permitted Bid is required to be approved by the Board
and such bids may be made directly to shareholders. Acquisitions
of Voting Shares made pursuant to a Permitted Bid or a Competing
Permitted Bid do not give rise to a Flip-in Event.
Waiver, Redemption and Amendment. With the
prior consent of the holders of Voting Shares, the Board may, at
any time prior to the occurrence of a Flip-in Event that would
occur by reason of an acquisition of Voting Shares otherwise
than pursuant to a take-over bid made by means of a take-over
bid circular to all holders of record of Voting Shares (or
otherwise as outlined in the paragraph below), waive the
application of the Rights Plan to such Flip-in Event. In such
event, the Board shall extend the Separation Time to a date at
least 10 Business Days subsequent to the meeting of shareholders
called to approve such waiver.
The Board may waive the application of the Rights Plan to a
Flip-in Event provided that the Board has determined that the
Acquiring Person became an Acquiring Person by inadvertence
without any intention to become or knowledge that it would
become, an Acquiring Person and such Acquiring Person has
reduced its beneficial ownership of Voting Shares such that at
the time of the waiver it is no longer an Acquiring Person.
Similarly, the Board may waive the application of the Rights
Plan to a Flip-in Event provided that the Acquiring
20
Person has reduced or has contractually agreed to reduce its
beneficial ownership of Shares such that it would no longer be
an Acquiring Person. The Board may also, prior to the occurrence
of a Flip-In Event, waive the application of the Rights Plan to
a particular Flip-In Event which would occur as a result of a
take-over bid made under a circular prepared in accordance with
applicable securities laws to all holders of Voting Shares. In
such event, the Board shall be deemed also to have waived the
application of the Rights Plan to any other Flip-In Event
occurring as a result of any other takeover bid made under a
circular prepared in accordance with applicable securities laws
to all holders of Voting Shares prior to the expiry of any
take-over bid for which the Rights Plan has been waived or
deemed to have been waived.
Until the occurrence of a Flip-in Event, the Board may, at any
time prior to the Separation Time, with the approval of holders
of the Voting Shares (or with the approval of holders of Rights
if the Separation Time has occurred), elect to redeem all but
not less than all of the then outstanding Rights at $0.001 per
Right. In the event that, prior to the occurrence of a Flip-In
Event, a person acquires Voting Shares pursuant to a Permitted
Bid, a Competing Permitted Bid or pursuant to a transaction for
which the Board has waived the application of the Rights Plan,
then the Board of Directors shall, immediately upon the
consummation of such acquisition, without further formality, be
deemed to have elected to redeem the Rights at the redemption
price.
Effective Time. The Rights Plan is effective
and in full force and effect from the date of adoption
(March 12, 2010). If the Rights Plan is not confirmed by a
majority of the votes cast by Independent
Shareholders who vote in respect of confirmation of the
Rights Plan at the Special Meeting, then the Rights Plan and all
outstanding Rights will terminate and be void and of no further
force and effect on and from the close of business on the date
of termination of the Special Meeting. Independent
Shareholders is defined in the Rights Plan to mean holders
of Shares other than Shares beneficially owned by (i) an
Acquiring Person, (ii) any Offeror that has announced an
intention to make a takeover bid, (iii) any affiliate or
associate of an Acquiring Person or and Offeror, (iv) any
person acting jointly or in concert with any Acquiring Person or
Offeror or any of their respective affiliates or associates, and
(v) any employee benefit plan, deferred profit sharing
plan, stock participation plan and any similar plan or trust for
the benefit of employees of the Company or a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, unless the beneficiaries of such plan
or trust direct the manner in which such Shares are to be voted
or withheld from voting or direct whether the Shares are to be
tendered to a take-over bid.
To the Companys knowledge, as of the date of this proxy
statement all shareholders of the Company are considered
Independent Shareholders except those affiliated, associated, or
acting jointly or in concert with Carl Icahn.
Term. If approved at the Special Meeting, the
Rights Plan shall expire at the close of the third annual
meeting of shareholders following the Special Meeting, unless
the term is otherwise extended in accordance with the terms of
the Rights Plan.
Approval
of the Rights Plan Resolution
The Rights Plan Resolution must be approved by a majority of the
votes cast by Independent Shareholders (as defined in the Rights
Plan) present or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in
determining the number of Shares necessary for approval of any
item. The Board believes that the Rights Plan is in the
best interests of the Company, its shareholders and other
stakeholders and recommends that our shareholders vote FOR the
Rights Plan Resolution.
The Rights Plan Resolution must be approved by a majority of the
votes cast by Independent Shareholders (as defined in the Rights
Plan) present or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting. To
the Companys knowledge, as of the date of this proxy
statement all shareholders of the Company are considered
Independent Shareholders except those affiliated, associated, or
acting jointly or in concert with Carl Icahn.
In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the Shares
represented by a properly executed form of proxy in favour of
the persons designated by management of the Company will be
voted FOR the Rights Plan Resolution approving, ratifying and
confirming the adoption of the Rights Plan.
21
Text of
the Rights Plan Resolution
BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
(a) The Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated
March 12, 2010 between Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. and
CIBC Mellon Trust Company as submitted to this Special
Meeting is hereby approved, ratified and confirmed.
(b) Any director or officer of Lions Gate Entertainment
Corp. is authorized to do all such acts and things and to
execute and deliver all such instruments, agreements and other
documents as in such persons opinion may be necessary or
desirable in connection with the foregoing.
OTHER
INFORMATION
Information regarding the Company is contained in its Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
and other periodic reports required by Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act. The Company makes available, free of
charge through its website (www.lionsgate.com), its Annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically
filed with or furnished to the SEC. This proxy statement
incorporates by reference the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009. These reports can be
found under SEC Filings through the
Investors section of the Companys website.
The exhibits to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are available to any shareholder who (a) submits a written
request to us at 2700 Colorado Ave., Suite 200, Santa
Monica, California 90404, Attn: Investor Relations and
(b) provides payment of charges that approximate our cost
of reproduction. The exhibits to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are also available at no charge on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
OTHER
BUSINESS
The Board knows of no other business to be brought before the
Special Meeting. If, however, any other business should properly
come before the Special Meeting, the persons named in the
accompanying proxy will vote proxies as in their discretion they
may deem appropriate, unless they are directed by a proxy to do
otherwise.
AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP are the auditors of the Company.
DIRECTORS
APPROVAL
The contents of this proxy statement and the sending of it to
shareholders of the Company has been approved by the Board.
By Order of Our Board of Directors,
Jon Feltheimer
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of the Board
Vancouver, British Columbia
March 26, 2010
22
|
|
|
PROXY |
|
|
|
|
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORP. |
|
1055 West Hastings Street, Suite 2200 Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2E9 |
|
|
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMMON SHARES
|
The undersigned holder of Common Shares of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., a corporation existing under the laws of British
Columbia (the Company), hereby appoints Michael Burns, Jon Feltheimer, James Keegan and
Wayne Levin, and each of them, or in the place of the foregoing,
(print name), as proxies for the undersigned, each with full power of
substitution, for and in the name of the undersigned to act for the undersigned and to vote, as
designated on the reverse, all of the Common Shares of the Company that the undersigned is entitled
to vote at the Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, to be held at the Four Seasons
Hotel, Tudor Stuart Orange Room, 21 Avenue Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 2G1, on Tuesday, May
4, 2010, beginning at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time), or at any continuations, adjournments or
postponements thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
The securities represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the holder, however, if
such a direction is not made in respect of the shareholder rights plan resolution, this proxy will
be voted FOR the shareholder rights plan resolution. The securities represented by this proxy will
be voted in favour of or voted against the matter described herein in accordance with the
instructions of the holder on any ballot that may be called for and, if the holder has specified a
choice with respect to any matter to be acted on, the securities will be voted accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
|
If the shareholder does not want to appoint the persons named in the instrument of proxy,
he/she should strike out his/her name and insert in the blank space provided the name of the person
he/she wishes to act as his/her proxy. Such other person need not be a shareholder of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This form of proxy must be completed, dated and signed and returned by mail in the envelope
provided for that purpose, by fax to (302) 369-8486 or by Internet to:
http://www.ivselection.com/lionsgate prior to 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on Friday, April
30, 2010. If completing by fax, please ensure you fax both sides of this form of proxy. |
|
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to
Be Held on May 4, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notice of the Special Meeting, the proxy statement and this proxy card first will be mailed to
shareholders on or about March 26, 2010. The Companys proxy statement is also available in the
Investors/Governance Documents section on our website at www.lionsgate.com. |
|
|
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed on reverse side)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Here for Address Change or Comments |
o |
|
|
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
1. |
|
Resolution approving, ratifying and confirming the shareholder rights plan adopted by the
board of directors of the Company pursuant to the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated as
of March 12, 2010 between the Company and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, as rights agent, pursuant
to the resolution included in the proxy statement. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may
properly come before the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of (i) the Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders,
and (ii) the Proxy Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER
DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS
MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL OF THE PROPOSALS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
|
|
, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon and mail it promptly even though you
may plan to attend the meeting. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
|
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORP. OFFERS SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD
THREE WAYS TO VOTE YOUR PROXY
YOUR INTERNET VOTE AUTHORIZES THE NAMED PROXIES TO VOTE YOUR SHARES
IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF YOU HAD RETURNED YOUR PROXY CARD. WE ENCOURAGE YOU
TO USE THIS COST EFFECTIVE AND CONVENIENT WAY OF VOTING, 24 HOURS A DAY,
7 DAYS A WEEK.
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET VOTING |
|
|
Visit the Internet voting website at
http://www.ivselection.com/lionsgate.
Have this proxy card ready and follow
the instructions on your screen. You
will incur only your usual Internet
charges. Available 24 hours a day, 7
days a week until 10:00 a.m. (Eastern
Standard Time) on April 30, 2010. If you are
voting by Internet, please do not mail
your proxy card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTING BY MAIL |
|
|
Simply sign and date your proxy card
and return it in the postage-paid
envelope to IVS Associates Inc., Attn:
Lionsgate Proxy Tabulation, 1925
Lovering Ave, Wilmington, Delaware 19806
prior to 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard
Time) on April 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTING BY FAX |
|
|
Simply sign and date your proxy card
and Fax it to IVS Associates Inc., Attn:
Lionsgate Proxy Tabulation at Fax Number
302-369-8486 prior to 10:00 a.m. (Eastern
Standard Time) on April 30, 2010. If completing by fax, please
ensure you fax both sides of this form of proxy.
|
|
|