DEF 14A
1
ddef14a.txt
DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A
===============================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [_]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE
COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY
RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S) 240.14a-12
Targeted Genetics
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
Reg. (S) 240.14a-101.
SEC 1913 (3-99)
[LOGO OF TARGETED GENETICS]
April 5, 2001
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend Targeted Genetics Corporation's 2001
Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The annual meeting will be held on May 8, 2001,
at 8:00 a.m. local time, at the Washington Athletic Club, 1325 Sixth Avenue,
Seattle, Washington.
At the annual meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal
to adopt our 2000 Genovo, Inc. Roll-Over Stock Option Plan and a proposal to
amend our 1999 Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares issuable
under the plan. In addition, you will be asked to elect three directors to
Targeted Genetics' board of directors.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ADOPTION OF THE
GENOVO, INC. ROLL-OVER STOCK OPTION PLAN, "FOR" THE AMENDMENT OF THE 1999 STOCK
OPTION PLAN AND "FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
You should read carefully the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and the proxy statement for additional information.
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please complete, sign
and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed
postage-prepaid envelope. Your stock will be voted in accordance with the
instructions you give in your proxy. If you attend the annual meeting, you may
vote in person if you wish, even if you previously returned your proxy card.
Your prompt cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
/s/ Stewart Parker
H. Stewart Parker
President and Chief Executive
Officer
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
TARGETED GENETICS CORPORATION
1100 Olive Way, Suite 100
Seattle, Washington 98101
NOTICE OF THE 2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 8, 2001
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF TARGETED GENETICS CORPORATION:
We will hold the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Targeted Genetics
Corporation on May 8, 2001, at 8:00 a.m. local time, at the Washington Athletic
Club, 1325 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington, for the following purposes:
. to consider a proposal to adopt the Targeted Genetics Corporation 2000
Genovo, Inc. Roll-Over Stock Option Plan;
. to consider a proposal to amend the Targeted Genetics Corporation 1999
Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock
issuable under the plan;
. to elect two Class I directors to Targeted Genetics' board of directors,
to hold office until the third annual meeting of shareholders following
their election or until their successors are elected and qualified, and
one Class II director, to hold office until the 2002 annual meeting of
shareholders or until his successor is elected and qualified; and
. to transact such other business as may properly come before the annual
meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting.
These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement
accompanying this notice. The board of directors has fixed the close of
business on March 9, 2001 as the record date for the annual meeting. Only
shareholders of record on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote
at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the annual
meeting.
The approval of the holders of shares representing a majority of the shares
of our common stock cast, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting is
required to adopt the Genovo, Inc. Roll-Over Stock Option Plan and amend the
1999 Stock Option Plan. The directors elected will be the three candidates
receiving the greatest number of votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the
annual meeting.
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. To ensure your
representation at the annual meeting, however, you should complete, sign, date
and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed
postage-prepaid envelope. Your shares will be voted in accordance with the
instructions you give in your proxy. You may revoke your proxy at any time
before it is voted by signing and returning a proxy for the same shares bearing
a later date, by filing with the Assistant Secretary of Targeted Genetics a
written revocation or by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ David J. Poston
David J. Poston
Assistant Secretary
Seattle, Washington
April 5, 2001
TARGETED GENETICS CORPORATION
----------------
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is being furnished to holders of shares of common stock
of Targeted Genetics Corporation, a Washington corporation, in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at our 2001
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournments or postponements of the
annual meeting. We will hold the annual meeting on May 8, 2001 at the
Washington Athletic Club, 1325 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington, at 8:00 a.m.
local time. The approximate date of mailing this proxy statement and the
accompanying proxy is April 12, 2001.
Matters to Be Considered at the Annual Meeting
At the annual meeting, shareholders of record of Targeted Genetics as of the
close of business on March 9, 2001 will consider and vote on:
. a proposal to adopt the Targeted Genetics Corporation 2000 Genovo, Inc.
Roll-Over Stock Option Plan (the "Roll-Over Plan");
. a proposal to amend the Targeted Genetics Corporation 1999 Stock Option
Plan (the "Option Plan") to increase the number of shares of common
stock issuable under the plan;
. the election of two Class I directors to the board, to hold office until
the third annual meeting of shareholders following their election or
until their successors are elected and qualified, and one Class II
director, to hold office until the 2002 annual meeting of shareholders
or until his successor is elected and qualified; and
. such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or
any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT OUR SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE
ADOPTION OF THE ROLL-OVER PLAN, "FOR" THE AMENDMENT OF THE OPTION PLAN AND
"FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
Record Date; Shares Entitled to Vote; Vote Required
Only our shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date,
March 9, 2001, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. We
have one class of voting securities outstanding, which is designated as common
stock, and each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. As of the record
date, 43,757,050 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. The
presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of
common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at the annual meeting.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast at the meeting, in
person or by proxy, is necessary to adopt the Roll-Over Plan and to amend the
Option Plan. Only shares affirmatively voted for approval of adoption of the
Roll-Over Plan and for amendment of the Option Plan, including shares
represented by properly executed proxies that do not contain voting
instructions, will be counted as votes "for" those proposals.
The directors elected at the annual meeting will be the three candidates
receiving the greatest number of votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the
annual meeting. Holders of common stock are not entitled to cumulate votes in
the election of directors.
Brokers who hold shares of our common stock in street name for a customer who
is the beneficial owner of those shares may not give a proxy to vote the
customer's shares without specific instructions from the customer. These
nonvoted shares are referred to as "broker nonvotes." If your broker holds your
Targeted
Genetics stock in street name, your broker will vote your shares only if you
provide instructions on how to vote by filling out the voter instruction form
sent to you by your broker with this proxy statement. Abstentions and broker
nonvotes will have no effect on any of the proposals to be considered at the
annual meeting because they will not represent votes cast for the purpose of
voting for that proposal.
As of the record date, our directors and executive officers and their
affiliates may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of approximately 7% of the
outstanding shares of our common stock. Each of our directors and executive
officers plans to vote or direct the vote of all shares of common stock over
which he or she has voting control in favor of the election of the nominees for
director, in favor of the adoption of the Roll-Over Plan and in favor of the
amendment of the Option Plan.
Proxies
Shares of common stock represented by properly executed proxies that we
receive at or before the annual meeting that have not been revoked will be
voted at the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions contained in
the proxy. Shares of common stock represented by properly executed proxies for
which no instruction is given will be voted "for" the election of the nominees
for director, "for" the approval of the Roll-Over Plan and "for" the amendment
of the Option Plan. To ensure that your shares are voted, please complete,
sign, date and return promptly the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid
envelope we have provided. You may revoke a proxy by
. submitting a later-dated proxy for the same shares at any time before
the vote on the proposal;
. delivering written notice of revocation to the Assistant Secretary of
Targeted Genetics at any time before the vote; or
. attending the annual meeting and voting in person. Merely attending the
annual meeting will not in and of itself revoke a proxy.
If the annual meeting is postponed or adjourned for any reason, at any
subsequent reconvening of the annual meeting all proxies will be voted in the
same manner as the proxies would have been voted at the original convening of
the annual meeting (except for any proxies that have at that time effectively
been revoked or withdrawn), even if the proxies had been effectively voted on
the same or any other matter at a previous meeting.
Proxy Solicitation
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of our board of directors. We will
bear the cost of soliciting proxies from our shareholders. In addition to
solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies
by telephone, facsimile, in person or otherwise. We will not additionally
compensate our directors, officers and employees for this solicitation but will
reimburse them for the out-of-pocket expenses that they incur. We will
reimburse persons who hold our common stock of record but not beneficially,
such as brokerage firms, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians, for the
reasonable expenses they incur in forwarding solicitation materials to, and
requesting authority for the exercise of proxies from, the persons for whom
they hold the shares.
2
PROPOSAL ONE
ADOPTION OF THE 2000 GENOVO, INC. ROLL-OVER STOCK OPTION PLAN
Proposed Amendment
On October 19, 2000, in connection with our acquisition of Genovo, Inc., our
board of directors unanimously approved the adoption of the Targeted Genetics
Corporation 2000 Genovo, Inc. Roll-Over Stock Option Plan (the "Roll-Over
Plan"), subject to approval by our shareholders at the annual meeting. The
purpose of the Roll-Over Plan is to give employees of Genovo who continue to be
employed after the closing of the acquisition the opportunity to convert their
vested Genovo options into vested Targeted Genetics options. The board believes
that adopting the Roll-Over Plan is in the best interests of Targeted Genetics
and our shareholders, and recommends that you vote "for" the adoption of the
Roll-Over Plan.
The following summary of the Roll-Over Plan and its federal income tax
consequences is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of
the Roll-Over Plan, which is available to shareholders upon written request to
the Assistant Secretary of Targeted Genetics.
Description of the Roll-Over Plan
Eligibility to Receive Options. Options were granted under the Roll-Over Plan
to employees of Genovo who held unexercised Genovo options before the closing
of our acquisition of Genovo. All options granted under the Roll-Over Plan
replace options that were originally granted by Genovo under the Genovo, Inc.
1998 Stock Option Plan, which was terminated at the closing of the acquisition.
We have granted options to 19 individuals under the Roll-Over Plan.
Shares Subject to the Roll-Over Plan. Subject to adjustment as provided in
the Roll-Over Plan, we have granted options to purchase 679,444 shares of
Targeted Genetics common stock under the Roll-Over Plan. We do not intend to
grant any additional options under the Roll-Over Plan.
Subject to adjustment as provided in the Roll-Over Plan and to the extent
required for compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1984 (the "Code"), no more than 300,000 shares of our common stock were awarded
in the aggregate to any one optionee. Section 162(m) precludes us from taking a
tax deduction for compensation payments to certain executives in excess of $1
million, unless those payments qualify for the "performance-based" exemption
from the $1 million limitation.
Administration. The board or a committee appointed by the board and
consisting of at least two members of the board will administer the Roll-Over
Plan and will have the authority to determine all matters relating to options
granted under the Roll-Over Plan, including all terms, conditions, restrictions
and limitations of options. The plan administrator also has the exclusive
authority to interpret the Roll-Over Plan and may from time to time adopt, or
change, rules and regulations of general application for administering the
Roll-Over Plan.
Options. Options granted under the Roll-Over Plan are either incentive stock
options ("ISOs") or nonqualified stock options ("NSOs"). The exercise price for
all ISOs granted under the Roll-Over Plan is not less than 100% of the fair
market value of the Genovo common stock on the date the original Genovo option
was granted. The exercise price for all NSOs granted under the Roll-Over Plan
is not less than 85% of the fair market value of the Genovo common stock on the
original date of grant.
The plan administrator has broad discretion to determine the terms and
conditions under which options are exercisable, but under no circumstances may
an option granted under the Roll-Over Plan have a term exceeding the term
remaining with respect to the original Genovo option. For ISOs, the maximum
term also shall not exceed ten years from the date the option was originally
granted by Genovo.
The exercise price for shares purchased when an optionee exercises options
may be paid in cash or by check, or, unless the plan administrator determines
otherwise at any time, by a combination of cash, check, shares of our common
stock that have been held for at least six months, or delivery of a properly
executed exercise notice, together with irrevocable instructions to a broker.
The plan administrator may also permit
3
payment by a full-recourse promissory note or other forms of consideration and
specify the terms of any loans, installment payments or loan guarantees,
including the interest rate and terms of and security for repayment.
With limited exceptions, each option granted under the Roll-Over Plan is 100%
vested and exercisable. Unless the plan administrator determines otherwise, if
an optionee ceases to provide services to us or one of our subsidiaries,
options generally will be exercisable for one year after termination of
services as a result of retirement, disability or death and for three months
after all other terminations, but in no event later than the remaining term of
the option. An option will terminate automatically if the optionee's services
are terminated for "cause," as that term is defined in the Roll-Over Plan.
Transferability. Unless the plan administrator determines otherwise in its
sole discretion, and except to the extent permitted by Section 422 of the Code,
no option is assignable or otherwise transferable by the optionee other than by
will or the laws of descent and distribution and, during the optionee's
lifetime, the option may be exercised only by the optionee.
Change in Control. In the event of a "change in control," unless an option
agreement provides otherwise, options issued under the Roll-Over Plan will
terminate immediately following the change in control unless they are assumed
by the successor corporation. A "change in control" is defined in the Roll-Over
Plan to include specified changes in the composition of our board, certain
significant acquisitions of outstanding shares of our common stock or approval
by our shareholders of (a) a complete liquidation or dissolution of Targeted
Genetics, (b) specified mergers or other reorganizations involving significant
changes in ownership of Targeted Genetics or (c) specified sales or other
dispositions of all or substantially all of our assets.
Further Adjustment of Options. If we split or consolidate our shares or make
any other similar capital adjustment of our common stock, we will
proportionately adjust the number and kind of shares subject to the Roll-Over
Plan, the outstanding options under the Roll-Over Plan and the option exercise
prices.
Withholding. We may require an optionee to pay any applicable withholding
taxes that we are required to withhold with respect to the grant or exercise of
any option. The withholding tax may be paid in cash or, subject to applicable
law, the plan administrator may permit the optionee to satisfy such obligations
by the withholding or delivery of shares of our common stock.
Amendment and Termination. The Roll-Over Plan may be amended or terminated at
any time by our board of directors. To the extent required by Section 422 of
the Code or any applicable law or regulation, however, any amendment that would
increase the number of shares issuable under the Roll-Over Plan, modify the
class of persons eligible to receive options or otherwise require shareholder
approval must be approved by our shareholders.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following paragraphs briefly describe the federal income tax consequences
of the Roll-Over Plan to the optionee and to Targeted Genetics, based on
current provisions of the Code. This summary does not address all possible tax
aspects of transactions that may arise under the Roll-Over Plan, including
foreign, state or local tax consequences. The tax laws and regulations are
complex and are subject to legislative changes that could be applied
retroactively, and circumstances peculiar to certain individuals may change the
usual income tax results.
Option Grants. Under present law and regulations, the optionee will not
recognize income when the option is granted.
Exercise of NSOs. When exercising an NSO, the optionee will recognize taxable
ordinary income equal to the difference between the fair market value of the
shares on the date of exercise and the option exercise price. When the optionee
sells the shares, he or she will have short-term or long-term capital gain or
loss, as the case may be, equal to the difference between the amount the
optionee receives from the sale and the tax basis of the shares sold. If the
optionee pays the option exercise price entirely in cash, the tax basis of the
4
shares will be equal to their fair market value on the exercise date (but not
less than the option exercise price), and the shares' holding period will begin
on the day after the exercise date.
If the optionee uses already-owned shares of Targeted Genetics common stock
to pay the option exercise price, in whole or in part, the Internal Revenue
Service ("IRS") will not treat the sale as a taxable disposition of the
already-owned shares, except under certain circumstances relating to already-
owned shares received upon the exercise of ISOs, as described below. The
optionee may carry over his or her tax basis and holding period for the
already-owned shares to the equivalent number of shares he or she receives upon
exercise. The tax basis of the additional shares the optionee receives upon
exercise will be their fair market value on the exercise date (but not less
than the amount of cash, if any, used to pay for the shares), and the holding
period for the additional shares will begin on the day after the exercise date.
The NSO tax consequences described above also apply to an ISO that the
optionee exercises more than three months after his or her termination of
employment with Targeted Genetics or one of our subsidiaries (or more than 12
months after termination in the case of permanent and total disability, as
defined in the Code).
Exercise of ISOs. If the optionee exercises an ISO while he or she is
employed with Targeted Genetics or our subsidiaries or within three months
after his or her employment ends (12 months in the case of permanent and total
disability), the optionee will recognize no income at the time of exercise
(although he or she will have income for alternative minimum income tax
purposes at that time, as if the option were an NSO). If the optionee sells or
exchanges the shares after the later of (a) one year from the date the optionee
exercised the option and (b) two years from the grant date of the option
(which, for this purpose, would be the grant date of the original Genovo
option), the transaction will be taxed as a long-term capital gain or loss on
the difference between the amount the optionee received in the sale or exchange
and the option exercise price. If the optionee disposes of the shares before
these holding period requirements are satisfied (a "Disqualifying
Disposition"), then the optionee will recognize taxable ordinary income in the
year of disposition equal to the excess, on the date of exercise of the option,
of the fair market value of the shares received over the option exercise price
(or generally, if less, the excess of the amount realized on the sale of the
shares over the option exercise price), and the optionee will have capital gain
or loss (long-term or short-term, as the case may be) equal to the difference
between (i) the amount the optionee received when he or she sold the shares and
(ii) the option exercise price increased by the amount of ordinary income, if
any, the optionee recognized.
We cannot be sure of the tax consequences of exercising an ISO by delivering
already-owned shares of common stock. In proposed regulations, the IRS has
taken the position that (a) except as described below, the optionee will
recognize no income at the time of a stock-for-stock exercise, (b) to the
extent the optionee acquires an equivalent number of shares, the optionee's
basis in the shares he or she acquires upon exercise is equal to his or her
basis in the surrendered shares increased by any compensation income he or she
recognized, (c) the optionee's basis in any additional shares acquired upon
such exercise is zero, and (d) it will view a Disqualifying Disposition of the
acquired shares within the one- or two-year period described above first as a
Disqualifying Disposition of the shares with the lowest basis. Furthermore, if
the optionee exercises an ISO by tendering already-owned shares for which the
ISO holding period described above has not been satisfied at the time of
exercise, the IRS will treat the transaction as a Disqualifying Disposition.
The optionee will recognize compensation income and will be subject to other
basis allocation and holding period requirements if the optionee makes a
Disqualifying Disposition.
Tax Consequences to Targeted Genetics. In the foregoing cases, we will be
entitled to a deduction in the same amount as the optionee recognizes in
ordinary income, subject to limitations on deductions for compensation
contained in the Code.
Additional Information Regarding the Roll-Over Plan
The SEC's proxy rules require us to provide information regarding future
participation in plans subject to shareholder action. There will be no grants
under the Roll-Over Plan in 2001.
5
PROPOSAL TWO
AMENDMENT OF THE 1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN
Proposed Amendment
On January 23, 2001, the board unanimously approved an amendment to the
Targeted Genetics Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan"),
subject to approval by our shareholders at the annual meeting, that increases
the number of shares of common stock issuable under the Option Plan by
2,000,000 shares, from 1,500,000 to 3,500,000 shares. The board recommends that
you vote "for" the amendment of the Option Plan.
The board believes that the amendment to the Option Plan is necessary to
provide sufficient stock options to attract and retain the services of
experienced and knowledgeable employees in a competitive biotechnology
industry. In the two years since the Option Plan was originally approved, our
employee base has grown from approximately 64 to 132. This increase in the
number of shares issuable under the Option Plan is necessary given our growth
and should afford us the ability to continue to provide our employees with
stock option incentives at levels the board determines to be appropriate. The
board believes that the amendment to the Option Plan will allow us to better
retain our current employees as well as attract new ones.
As of March 1, 2001, we had issued options to purchase 4,508,108 shares of
common stock from three stock option plans, the Option Plan and two
discontinued plans. As of March 1, 2001 options to purchase 895,846 shares had
been exercised, options to purchase 3,455,577 shares were outstanding, with a
weighted average exercise price of $4.06 per share, and options to purchase
156,685 shares remained available for future grant under the Option Plan.
The principal features of the Option Plan are described below. We will
furnish a copy of the amended Option Plan to any shareholder upon written
request to the Assistant Secretary of Targeted Genetics.
Description of the Option Plan
Eligibility to Receive Options. Options may be granted under the Option Plan
to those employees, directors and officers of Targeted Genetics and our
subsidiaries that the plan administrator from time to time selects. Options may
also be issued to consultants, agents, advisors and independent contractors who
provide services to us or our subsidiaries. Approximately 139 individuals are
currently eligible to participate in the Option Plan.
Shares Subject to the Option Plan. Subject to adjustment as provided in the
Option Plan, if the amendment is approved a maximum of 3,500,000 shares of our
common stock will be available for issuance under the Option Plan. Shares
issued under the Option Plan will be drawn from authorized but unissued shares
or shares that we now hold or subsequently acquire.
Subject to adjustment as provided in the Option Plan and to the extent
required for compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code, no more than 200,000
shares of our common stock may be awarded in the aggregate to any one optionee
in a single fiscal year. Section 162(m) precludes us from taking a tax
deduction for compensation payments to certain executives in excess of $1
million, unless those payments qualify for the "performance-based" exemption
from the $1 million limitation.
Any shares of our common stock that subsequently cease to be subject to an
option granted under the Option Plan (other than because of exercise of the
option) will again be available for issuance in connection with future grants
of options under the Option Plan.
Administration. The board or a committee appointed by the board and
consisting of at least two members of the board will administer the Option
Plan. The plan administrator will have the authority to determine all matters
relating to options under the Option Plan, including the persons to whom
options are granted, the type of options, the number of shares of common stock
subject to an option and all terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations of
options. The plan administrator also has the exclusive authority to interpret
the Option Plan and may from time to time adopt, or change, rules and
regulations of general application for administering the Option Plan.
6
Options. Options granted under the Option Plan may be either ISOs or NSOs.
The exercise price for all ISOs granted under the Option Plan will not be less
than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
The exercise price for all NSOs granted under the Option Plan will not be less
than 85% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
"Fair market value," for purposes of the Option Plan, means the closing price
for our common stock on the date of grant, as reported by the Nasdaq National
Market. On March 1, 2001, the closing price for our common stock was $4.09 per
share.
The plan administrator has broad discretion to determine the terms and
conditions under which options are exercisable, but under no circumstances may
an option have a term exceeding ten years from the date it is granted.
The exercise price may be paid in cash or by check, or, unless the plan
administrator determines otherwise at any time, by a combination of cash,
check, shares of our common stock that have been held for at least six months,
or delivery of a properly executed exercise notice, together with irrevocable
instructions to a broker. The plan administrator may also permit payment by a
full-recourse promissory note or other forms of consideration and specify the
terms of any loans, installment payments or loan guarantees, including the
interest rate and terms of and security for repayment.
Each option will be exercisable according to a vesting schedule determined by
the plan administrator. If no vesting schedule is contained in the instrument
evidencing the option, the option will become exercisable over four years, in
16 equal quarterly installments beginning three months after the date of grant.
The plan administrator will also determine the circumstances under which an
option will be exercisable in the event the optionee ceases to provide services
to us or one of our subsidiaries. If these circumstances are not established,
options generally will be exercisable for one year after termination of
services as a result of retirement, disability or death and for three months
after all other terminations, but in no event later than the remaining term of
the option. An option will terminate automatically if the optionee's services
are terminated for "cause," as that term is defined in the Option Plan.
Transferability. Unless the plan administrator determines otherwise in its
sole discretion, and except to the extent permitted by Section 422 of the Code,
no option will be assignable or otherwise transferable by the optionee other
than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and, during the optionee's
lifetime, the option may be exercised only by the optionee.
Change in Control. In the event of a "change in control," as that term is
defined in the Option Plan, unless the option agreement provides otherwise,
each option that is outstanding at that time shall automatically accelerate so
that the option becomes 100% vested immediately before the effective date for
the change in control, except that the acceleration will not occur if, in the
opinion of our accountants, it would render unavailable "pooling of interest"
accounting for a change in control that would otherwise qualify for that
accounting treatment. In addition, the option will not accelerate if and to the
extent that the option is either (a) to be assumed by the successor corporation
or its parent or replaced with a comparable award for the purchase of shares of
the capital stock of the successor corporation or (b) to be replaced with a
cash incentive program of the successor corporation that preserves the spread
between the fair market value and the exercise price existing at the time of
the change in control and provides for subsequent payout according to the same
vesting schedule applicable to the option. The determination of comparability
under clause (a) above will be made by the plan administrator, whose
determination will be conclusive and binding. All options will terminate and
cease to remain outstanding immediately following the consummation of the
change in control, except to the extent they are assumed by the successor
corporation. Any options that are assumed or replaced in the change in control
and do not otherwise accelerate at that time will be accelerated in the event
the optionee's employment or services with the successor corporation
subsequently terminates within two years following the change in control,
unless his or her employment or services are terminated by the successor
corporation for "cause" or by the optionee voluntarily without "good reason"
(as those terms are defined in the Option Plan). A "change in control" is
defined in the Option Plan to include specified changes in the composition of
our board of directors, significant acquisitions of outstanding shares of our
common stock, or approval by our
7
shareholders of (i) a complete liquidation or dissolution of Targeted Genetics,
(ii) mergers or other reorganizations involving significant changes in
ownership, or (iii) sales or other dispositions of all or substantially all of
our assets.
Further Adjustment of Options. If we split or consolidate our shares or make
any other similar capital adjustment of our common stock, we will
proportionately adjust the number and kind of shares subject to the Option
Plan, any outstanding options under the Option Plan and the option exercise
prices.
Withholding. We may require an optionee to pay to us any applicable
withholding taxes that we are required to withhold with respect to the grant or
exercise of any option. The withholding tax may be paid in cash or, subject to
applicable law, the plan administrator may permit the optionee to satisfy such
obligations by the withholding or delivery of shares of our common stock.
Amendment and Termination. The Option Plan may be amended or terminated at
any time by our board of directors. To the extent required by Section 422 of
the Code or any applicable law or regulation, however, any amendment that would
increase the number of shares available under the Option Plan, modify the class
of persons eligible to receive options or otherwise require shareholder
approval must be approved by our shareholders.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
Except as described below, the summary of the federal income tax consequences
of the Option Plan to the optionee and Targeted Genetics, based on current
provisions of the Code, is substantially identical to the summary of the
federal income tax consequences of the Roll-Over Plan, which begins on page 4
of this proxy statement. The summary does not address all possible tax aspects
of transactions that may arise under the Option Plan, including foreign, state
or local tax consequences. The tax laws and regulations are complex and are
subject to legislative changes that could be applied retroactively, and
circumstances peculiar to certain individuals may change the usual income tax
results.
Exercise of ISOs. The one- and two-year holding periods required to avoid a
Disqualifying Disposition commence on the actual date Targeted Genetics grants
the option.
Additional Information Regarding the Option Plan
The SEC's proxy rules require us to provide information regarding future
participation in plans subject to shareholder action. Because awards under the
Option Plan are discretionary, the size and recipients of grants to be made
under the Option Plan in 2001 are not currently determinable. The following
chart therefore lists, for purposes of comparison, the options granted in 2000
under the Option Plan:
OPTION PLAN BENEFITS
Name and Position Dollar Value Number of Shares
----------------- ------------ ----------------
H. Stewart Parker.......................... $ 331,152 38,686
President and Chief Executive Officer
Barrie J. Carter........................... 184,947 21,606
Executive Vice President and Director of
Research and Development
James A. Johnson........................... 180,445 21,080
Senior Vice President, Finance
and Administration, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Executive officers, as a group............. 696,544 81,372
Directors who are not executive officers,
as a group................................ 765,550 85,000
Employees who are not executive officers,
as a group................................ 5,435,592 527,900
8
PROPOSAL THREE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our bylaws provide that our board of directors shall be composed of not less
than one nor more than nine directors. At present, we have eight directors,
each of whom is placed into one of three classes such that, to the extent
possible, there is an equal number of directors in each class. Every director
subsequently elected to the board generally holds office for a three-year term
and until his or her successor is elected and qualified. However, if a director
resigns from the board before his or her term expires, the director elected or
appointed to fill the resulting vacancy may be designated to a class such that
he or she initially must be elected to a shorter term.
At the annual meeting, two Class I directors are to be elected, each to hold
office for a three-year term or until his successor is elected and qualified,
and one Class II director is to be elected, to hold office until the 2002
annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor is elected and qualified.
Jack L. Bowman and Jeremy L. Curnock Cook have been nominated for election to
the board as Class I directors and Joseph M. Davie has been nominated for
election to the board as a Class II director. We intend to cast votes in
accordance with the accompanying proxy for the election of these nominees
unless we receive contrary instructions. If any nominee should become
unavailable for any reason, we intend to cast votes for a substitute nominee
designated by the board. The board of directors has no reason to believe that
any of the nominees named will be unable to serve if elected.
Nominees Terms Will Expire in 2004
Jack L. Bowman (age 68) has served as a director of Targeted Genetics since
March 1997. From 1987 until his retirement in January 1994, Mr. Bowman was a
company group chairman at Johnson & Johnson, with primary responsibility for a
group of companies in the diagnostic, blood glucose monitoring and
pharmaceutical businesses. From 1980 to 1987, he held various positions at
American Cyanamid Company, a pharmaceutical company, most recently as executive
vice president. Mr. Bowman served as a member of the board of trustees of The
Johns Hopkins University and currently serves on the board of directors of Cell
Therapeutics, Inc., Celgene Corporation, Cellegy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., NeoRx
Corporation and Osiris Therapeutics Inc.
Jeremy L. Curnock Cook (age 52) has served as a director of Targeted Genetics
since July 1995 and chairman of the board since February 1998. Mr. Curnock Cook
founded the International Biochemicals Group in 1975, which was sold to Royal
Dutch Shell in 1985, serving as managing director until 1987. From 1987 until
2000, he was a director of Rothschild Asset Management Limited and was
responsible for the Rothschild Bioscience Unit. He currently serves as chairman
of the board of International Bioscience Managers Ltd. and serves on the board
of directors of Cell Therapeutics, Inc., Creative BioMolecules Inc. and
Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals Inc., as well as several public and privately held
companies outside the United States. Mr. Curnock Cook received his M.A. in
Natural Sciences from Trinity College, Dublin.
Joseph M. Davie (age 61) has served as a director of Targeted Genetics since
October 2000. Dr. Davie was employed by Biogen, Inc., a biopharmaceutical
company, from 1993 to 2000, most recently serving as senior vice president,
research. From 1987 to 1993, Dr. Davie held several positions at G.D. Searle &
Co., including president of research and development and senior vice president
of science and technology. He has been an adjunct professor of microbiology and
immunology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis since 1987
and an adjunct professor of microbiology and immunology at Northwestern
University School of Medicine in Chicago since 1998. He previously served as
director of graduate studies in experimental pathology and as a professor and
head of the department of microbiology and immunology at Washington University
School of Medicine. Dr. Davie received his A.B., M.A. and Ph.D. in bacteriology
from Indiana University and his M.D. from Washington University School of
Medicine.
Continuing Directors--Terms Expire 2002
James D. Grant (age 68) has served as a director of Targeted Genetics since
February 1993. Mr. Grant served as chief executive officer of T Cell Sciences,
Inc., a biotechnology company, from 1986 to 1992 and as
9
chairman of the board from 1986 until his retirement in 1997. He was vice
president of CPC International, Inc., a multinational food and industrial
products company, from 1972 to 1986. He served as deputy commissioner of the
Food and Drug Administration from 1969 to 1972 and was vice chairman of the
advisory committee of the FDA from 1990 to 1991. Mr. Grant currently serves on
the board of directors of Blue Planet Biotech Fund, a U.K.-based unit trust,
and Zynergy Group Limited, a U.K-based medical device company, and previously
served on the boards of several biotechnology companies.
Louis P. Lacasse (age 44) has served as a director of Targeted Genetics since
May 1998. Mr. Lacasse has served as president of GeneChem Management, Inc., the
manager of GeneChem Technologies Venture Fund L.P., a venture capital fund,
since May 1997. He served as vice president (Healthcare and Biotechnology) of
SOFINOV, an investment subsidiary of Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec,
from July 1987 to May 1997. Mr. Lacasse currently serves on the board of
directors of several privately held biotechnology companies, and previously
served as a director of several private and public companies, including Biochem
Pharma Inc.
Continuing Directors--Terms Expire 2003
Nelson L. Levy (age 59) has been a director of Targeted Genetics since May
1999. Since 1993, Dr. Levy has served as chairman of the board and chief
executive officer of the CoreTechs Corporation, a private firm that focuses on
the development and marketing of early-stage technologies. He was the president
of Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company, the U.S. subsidiary of Japan's third-
largest pharmaceutical company, from 1992 to 1993, as chief executive officer
of CoreTechs Corporation from 1984 to 1992 and as vice president for
pharmaceutical research at Abbott Laboratories from 1981 to 1984, Dr. Levy was
a tenured professor of microbiology and immunology at Duke University. He
currently serves on the board of directors of several privately held companies
and on the scientific advisory boards of several public and privately held
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Levy received his B.A. from
Yale University, his M.D. from Columbia University and his Ph.D. from Duke
University.
H. Stewart Parker (age 45) managed the formation of Targeted Genetics as a
wholly owned subsidiary of Immunex Corporation and has served as president,
chief executive officer and a director of Targeted Genetics since our inception
in 1989. She served in various capacities at Immunex from August 1981 through
December 1991, most recently as vice president, corporate development. Ms.
Parker also served as president and a director of Receptech Corporation, a
company formed by Immunex in 1989 to accelerate the development of soluble
cytokine receptor products, from February 1991 to January 1993. Ms. Parker
currently serves as chairman of the board of CellExSys, Inc., our majority-
owned subsidiary, serves on the board of directors and the executive committee
of BIO, the primary trade organization for the biotechnology industry, and
serves on the board of directors of several privately held companies. She
received her B.A. and M.B.A. from the University of Washington.
Mark P. Richmond (age 70) has been a director of Targeted Genetics since July
1996. He is a business consultant and a research fellow of the School of Public
Policy, University College London. From January 1993 until his retirement in
February 1996, Dr. Richmond served as director of research at Glaxo Wellcome
plc (previously Glaxo plc), a pharmaceutical company. From October 1990 to
December 1993, he served as chairman of the Science and Engineering Research
Council in London. Dr. Richmond currently serves on the board of directors of
Genentech, Inc., OSI Pharmaceuticals and several privately held biotechnology
companies. He received his Ph.D. and D.Sc. from Cambridge University, England.
Director Compensation
Directors who are employees of Targeted Genetics do not receive any fees for
their services as directors. We pay directors who are not employees of Targeted
Genetics meeting attendance fees of $1,000 for each board meeting attended in
person, $500 for each telephonic board meeting and $500 for each committee
meeting held separately from a board meeting, whether in-person or telephonic.
We also grant our nonemployee directors stock options under the nonemployee
director stock option grant program in our 1999 Stock Option Plan and reimburse
them for travel expenses that they incur in attending meetings.
10
Committees of the Board of Directors and Meetings
We have established standing committees of our board of directors, including
audit, compensation and nominating committees. Each of these committees is
responsible to the full board of directors, and its activities are therefore
subject to approval of the board. The functions performed by these committees
can be summarized as follows.
Audit Committee. The audit committee oversees our corporate accounting and
reporting practices, internal accounting controls, audit plans and results,
investment policies and financial reports to ensure that our assets are
appropriately safeguarded and to ensure the quality and integrity of our
financial records. In addition, the audit committee recommends to the board the
independent auditors to be retained by Targeted Genetics. The members of this
committee are Jeremy L. Curnock Cook, Louis P. Lacasse and Nelson L. Levy, each
of whom is independent of management as defined by Rule 4200(a)(14) of the NASD
Marketplace Rules. The audit committee met four times during 2000, of which two
meetings were held telephonically. The report of the audit committee is set
forth below.
Compensation Committee. The compensation committee establishes salaries,
incentives and other forms of compensation for our directors and executive
officers. This committee also administers our various incentive compensation
and benefit plans, including stock option plans, and recommends the
establishment of policies relating to our incentive compensation and benefit
plans. The members of this committee are Jack L. Bowman, James D. Grant and
Mark P. Richmond. This committee met once during 2000. The report of the
compensation committee is set forth below.
Nominating Committee. The nominating committee makes recommendations to the
board concerning the desired qualifications of prospective candidates to fill
vacancies on the board. The members of this committee are H. Stewart Parker and
James D. Grant. This committee did not meet during 2000. Joseph M. Davie was
appointed to the board in connection with our September 2000 acquisition of
Genovo. The nominating committee also considers any shareholder recommendations
for director-nominees that are submitted in accordance with the procedures
established in our bylaws. Any shareholder wishing to submit a nomination for
consideration at an annual meeting must provide notice of the nomination to the
Secretary of Targeted Genetics no fewer than 60 days and no more than 90 days
before the date of that annual meeting.
During 2000, there were seven meetings of our board of directors, three of
which were held by telephone. Each of our directors was in attendance at 75% or
more of the total number of board meetings held during that director's service
on the board. Each of our directors was in attendance at all of the committee
meetings held during the director's service on the applicable committee.
Executive Officers
The following table lists the executive officers of Targeted Genetics, who
will serve in the capacities noted until their successors are duly appointed
and qualified.
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
H. Stewart Parker....... 45 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Barrie J. Carter, Ph.D.. 56 Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer
H. Stewart Parker's biography is contained in the section of this proxy
statement entitled "Continuing Directors--Terms Expire 2003."
Barrie J. Carter has been an executive vice president of Targeted Genetics
since August 1992. He was appointed chief scientific officer in January 2001
and served as director of research and development from August 1992 until
December 2000. Before joining Targeted Genetics he was employed for 22 years by
the National Institutes of Health and served as chief of the laboratory of
molecular and cellular biology in the
11
National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases from 1982 to
1992. From 1995 to 2000, he was an affiliate professor of medicine at the
University of Washington Medical School. Dr. Carter received his B.Sc. (Honors)
from the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and his Ph.D. in
biochemistry from the University of Otago Medical School. He then spent a
period of postdoctoral training at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund
Laboratories in London before joining the NIH. His long-term research interests
are in the molecular biology of viruses, development of AAV vectors and gene
therapy. Dr. Carter serves on the editorial boards of Human Gene Therapy, as a
section editor of Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics and as an associate
editor of Virology. He also serves as a member of the advisory committee to the
director of the NIH and as a director of the American Society for Gene Therapy.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Summary
The following table lists all compensation earned during 2000, 1999 and 1998
by our chief executive officer and our other executive officers whose salary
and bonus exceeded $100,000 for 2000 (collectively, the "Named Executive
Officers").
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term
Annual Compensation
Compensation Awards
----------------- ------------
Securities
Underlying All Other
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Options Compensation
--------------------------- ---- -------- -------- ------------ ------------
H. Stewart Parker......................... 2000 $278,250 $203,123 38,686 $2,841(1)
President and Chief Executive Officer 1999 265,000 104,675 133,079 2,716
1998 229,000 57,250 95,875 593
Barrie J. Carter, Ph.D(2)................. 2000 194,250 102,953 21,606 3,177(3)
Executive Vice President and Director of 1999 185,000 58,460 67,411 3,052
Research and Development 1998 174,000 34,800 59,300 1,365
James A. Johnson(4)....................... 2000 189,525 100,448 21,080 2,841(5)
Senior Vice President, Finance and 1999 180,500 57,038 61,600 2,716
Administration, Chief Financial Officer, 1998 159,000 23,850 54,152 640
Treasurer and Secretary
--------
(1) All Other Compensation consists of matching contributions to a 401(k)
savings plan of $2,625 in 2000, $2,500 in 1999 and $185 in 1998 and excess
life insurance premiums of $216 in 2000, $216 in 1999 and $408 in 1998.
(2) Dr. Carter was named executive vice president and chief scientific officer
in January 2001.
(3) All Other Compensation consists of matching contributions to a 401(k)
savings plan of $2,625 in 2000, $2,500 in 1999 and $213 in 1998 and excess
life insurance premiums of $552 in 2000, $552 in 1999 and $1,152 in 1998.
(4) Mr. Johnson terminated his employment with Targeted Genetics on January 31,
2001.
(5) All Other Compensation consists of matching contributions to a 401(k)
savings plan of $2,625 in 2000, $2,500 in 1999 and $232 in 1998 and excess
life insurance premiums of $216 in 2000, $216 in 1999 and $408 in 1998.
12
Option Grants in 2000
The following table provides information regarding options granted to the
Named Executive Officers during 2000.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Potential
Individual Grants Realizable Value
---------------------------------------------------- at Assumed Annual
Percent of Rates of Stock
Total Options Price
Number of Granted to Appreciation for
Shares Underlying Employees in Exercise Option Term(3)
Options Last Fiscal Price Expiration -----------------
Name Granted(1) Year(2) ($/Share) Date 5%($) 10%($)
---- ----------------- ------------- --------- ---------- -------- --------
H. Stewart Parker......... 38,686 5.6% $8.56 1/20/2010 $208,260 $527,771
Barrie J. Carter, Ph.D. .. 21,606 3.1 8.56 1/20/2010 116,312 294,758
James A. Johnson.......... 21,080 3.0 8.56 1/20/2010 113,481 287,583
--------
(1) Options are granted at the fair market value on the date of grant and vest
over four years, with 6.25% of each grant becoming exercisable quarterly,
beginning three months after the date of grant. Specified changes in
control of Targeted Genetics can trigger accelerated vesting of stock
options and rights to related payments.
(2) We granted options to purchase 694,272 shares of common stock to our
employees during 2000.
(3) The dollar amounts under these columns are calculated based on assumed
rates of appreciation of 5% and 10% and are not intended to forecast future
appreciation. The Named Executive Officers will realize no value if our
stock price does not exceed the exercise price of the options.
Option Exercises in 2000 and 2000 Option Values
The following table provides information regarding options exercised in 2000
by the named executive officers and unexercised options held as of December 31,
2000.
Option Exercises in 2000 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Total Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options at
Options at Fiscal Year-End(#) Fiscal Year-End ($)(1)
Shares Acquired Value -------------------------------- -------------------------
Name on Exercise Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---- --------------- -------- -------------- --------------- ----------- -------------
H. Stewart Parker......... 0 $ 0 297,294 194,997 $996,625 $664,326
Barrie J. Carter, Ph.D. .. 0 0 165,784 110,708 461,178 374,289
James A. Johnson.......... 8,000 77,000 167,608 102,257 528,610 341,970
--------
(1) The value of unexercised options is calculated based on the closing share
price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on December 29,
2000, which was $6.6875 per share.
Change in Control Arrangements
Senior Management Employment Agreements. In October 1996, we entered into
Senior Management Employment Agreements with each of Ms. Parker and Dr. Carter.
Mr. Johnson's Employment Agreement terminated on January 31, 2001, when he
terminated his employment with Targeted Genetics. These agreements provide that
upon a "change in control" (as that term is defined in the agreements), each of
these executives will be entitled to receive an annual base salary that is not
less than his or her salary in effect before the change in control and an
annual bonus at least equal to the average of his or her annual bonuses for the
three prior years. In addition, each of these executives will be entitled to
insurance coverage and other employee benefits no less favorable than our
benefits in effect before the change in control. If during the two-
13
year period after a change in control we terminate the employment of any of
these executives for any reason other than death, disability or "cause" or the
executive terminates his or her employment for "good reason" (as these terms
are defined in the agreements), the terminated executive will be entitled to
specified additional benefits, including a lump-sum payment equal to one and
one-half (or, in the case of Ms. Parker, two times) of the sum of (1) that
executive's annual salary before the change in control (or on the date of
termination, if the executive's salary is higher on that date) and (2) a
percentage of that salary equal to the executive's percentage bonus for the
year before the change in control. If no such bonus was paid or if the bonus
cannot be determined, the applicable percentage will be 10%. In addition, the
terminated executive will be entitled to be paid an amount sufficient to
compensate the executive for any excise tax, including interest and penalties,
imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code and will be entitled
to continuation of life insurance, disability, health, dental and other
similar employee benefits for one year after termination. The Senior
Management Employment Agreements may be terminated with 30 days' prior written
notice, but we will remain liable for any obligations arising before the
termination.
Option Plans. Our Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan, which has been suspended,
our 1999 Stock Option Plan and our 2000 Genovo, Inc. Roll-Over Stock Option
Plan each contain provisions that could result in the accelerated vesting of
options granted under those plans in the event of a "change in control," as
that term is defined in each of the option plans.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
following report of the compensation committee of our board of directors shall
not be incorporated by reference into any such filing and shall not otherwise
be deemed filed under either act.
The compensation committee of our board of directors currently consists of
Jack L. Bowman, James D. Grant and Mark P. Richmond, all of whom are
nonemployee directors. The compensation committee is responsible for our
executive compensation program and for administering our option plans. On an
annual basis, the compensation committee evaluates the performance and
compensation of our executive officers.
Our executive compensation philosophy is to pay competitively to attract
qualified executive personnel capable of leading Targeted Genetics to
achieving our business objectives, retain and motivate these executives to
achieve superior performance, link individual compensation to individual and
company performance, and align executives' financial interests with those of
our shareholders.
Our executive compensation program includes the following components:
. competitive base salaries that target base salaries paid by other
biotechnology companies of comparable size and mission with which we
compete for qualified executives, taking into account incumbent
qualifications, behaviors and performance;
. annual bonuses that are structured to encourage executives to focus on
achieving important short-term corporate objectives; and
. long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants, which provide
financial rewards on the same basis as those realized by our
shareholders.
Base Salaries and Bonuses. In late 2000, we engaged the services of a
benefits consulting firm to review our management compensation structure and
programs. This consulting firm interviewed our executives and board members to
gather their perspectives on company compensation, reviewed background
information on Targeted Genetics, including our financial statements and
compensation, reviewed and analyzed competitive
14
practices and analyzed information from proxy statements of selected comparable
organizations. In the course of their review, the consultants reviewed:
. Radford Associates' 2000 Biotechnology Compensation Survey Report, a
published survey of salaries paid by 171 companies within the
biotechnology industry, in this case using an average of data from two
subsets, for companies with 50 to 149 employees and with 150 to 499
employees;
. Top Five Data Services' 2000 Report on Executive Compensation in the
Biopharmaceutical Industry, a survey of 398 publicly traded companies
engaged in researching, developing, manufacturing or distributing drugs,
therapies or diagnostic products; and
. the salary levels of executives at the following publicly traded "peer
group" companies: Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Avigen, Inc., Cell
Genesys, Inc., Collateral Therapeutics, Inc., Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Transkaryotic Therapies Inc., Valentis,
Inc. and Vical Incorporated.
On January 22, 2001, the compensation committee met with the consultants to
review their recommendations and to consider the compensation levels of our
executive officers.
After reviewing and analyzing the consulting firm's report and reviewing
management's 2000 performance and achievement of goals important to Targeted
Genetics, the compensation committee recommended that Ms. Parker's base salary
be increased by 26%, to $350,000 (or 106% of the average market base salary),
and that Dr. Carter's base salary be increased by 20%, to $233,000 (or 109% of
the average market base salary).
Short-term incentive bonuses. The compensation committee discussed the
performance of our executive officers with respect to our corporate objectives
that were set in early 2000. The primary objectives covered completion of
transactions to strengthen Targeted Genetics financially and strategically;
progress in the development of tgAAV-CF according to plan; development of
product pipeline opportunities; and conservation of cash reserves. The first
objective, related to strategic and financial transactions, was weighted
significantly more than the other three objectives. Performance relative to
these objectives was the basis for payout of the executive officers' target
bonus. In addition, the target bonus could be increased by up to 100%, at the
discretion of the board. The committee concluded that the executive officers
had performed extremely well in 2000 and that all of the identified corporate
objectives had been substantially achieved. Therefore, the committee
recommended that bonuses for the year 2000 be paid to our executive officers at
180% of the target amounts, which are 35% of the 2000 base salary for Ms.
Parker, 25% for Dr. Carter and 25% for James A. Johnson, who left Targeted
Genetics in January 2001.
In addition, at mid-year 2000, the compensation committee revisited the
target bonuses for 1999 cash inflows, in accordance with the compensation plan
established for 1999. The committee concluded that the cash inflows goals set
for 1999-2000 had been reached and awarded the remaining 21% of the 1999 target
bonuses to Ms. Parker, Dr. Carter and Mr. Johnson.
Stock Option Grants. We grant stock options to provide a long-term incentive
opportunity that is directly linked to an increase in shareholder value.
Options generally have been granted with an exercise price equal to the market
value of our common stock on the date of the grant, have a term of ten years
and become exercisable over a four-year period in 16 equal installments
beginning three months after the date of grant. To encourage stock retention,
we grant all options as ISOs to the maximum extent possible under the Code.
In past years, the compensation committee has used a formula to establish the
number of stock option grants to be awarded annually to our executives, as
follows: the number of shares on which options are to be awarded equals the
executive's base salary (multiplied by 125% in the case of Ms. Parker),
adjusted upward or downward depending on company performance, divided by the
closing price of our common stock on the award date or an average of the
closing prices of our stock over the 20-day period ending on the award date.
For 2000, the formula was adjusted to account for the consulting firm data, to
a "range of shares" approach
15
that determines potential award values based on current competitive grant
guidelines. These share guidelines will stay in place for three years and then
be revised based on then-current competitive data. The resulting share amounts
awarded in January 2001 were an option to purchase 160,000 shares granted to
Ms. Parker and an option to purchase 63,000 shares granted to Dr. Carter.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deductibility by a
corporation of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its chief executive
officer and any other of its four most highly compensated executive officers.
Compensation that qualifies as "performance-based," however, is excluded from
the $1 million limit. The compensation committee does not presently expect
total cash compensation payable as salaries to our Named Executive Officers to
exceed the $1 million limit for any individual executive. In addition, our
stock option plans are designed to qualify as performance-based compensation
that is fully deductible by us for income tax purposes. The compensation
committee will continue to monitor the compensation levels potentially payable
under our other compensation programs but intends to retain the flexibility
necessary to provide total compensation in line with competitive practice, our
compensation philosophy and the best interests of Targeted Genetics.
On January 23, 2001, the compensation committee met with the full board of
directors to discuss the committee's recommendations. These recommendations
were accepted and approved by the board of directors.
Compensation Committee
Jack L. Bowman
James D. Grant
Mark P. Richmond
16
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
following report of the audit committee of our board of directors shall not be
incorporated by reference into any such filing and shall not otherwise be
deemed filed under either act.
The audit committee of our board of directors is composed of three
independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the board
(attached as Appendix A). The members of the audit committee are Louis P.
Lacasse (chairman), Jeremy L. Curnock Cook and Nelson L. Levy.
Our management is responsible for our internal controls and the financial
reporting process. Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, are responsible
for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report on
its audit. The audit committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these
processes. In addition, the audit committee recommends to the full board of
directors the selection of our independent auditors.
In 2000, the audit committee met and held discussions with management and the
independent auditors. In addition, the members of the audit committee
individually reviewed our consolidated financial statements before we filed
them with the SEC in our periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K. Management
represented to the audit committee that our consolidated financial statements
were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
the audit committee reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial
statements with management and the independent auditors. The audit committee
also discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees.
Our independent auditors also provided to the audit committee the written
disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board's Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, and discussed with the audit
committee Ernst & Young's independence.
Based on the audit committee's discussion with management and the independent
auditors and its review of the representation of management and the report of
the independent auditors to the audit committee, the audit committee
recommended that the board include the audited consolidated financial
statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000, to be filed with the SEC.
Louis P. Lacasse (chairman)
Jeremy L. Curnock Cook
Nelson L. Levy
17
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return
for Targeted Genetics, the Nasdaq Stock Market Total Return Index and a peer
group composed of Avigen, Inc., Cell Genesys, Inc., Collateral Therapeutics,
Inc., GeneMedicine, Inc., GenVec, Inc., Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., Onyx
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somatix Therapy Corporation, Transgene SA, Valentis,
Inc. and Vical, Incorporated (the "Gene Therapy Peer Group"). Since there is no
widely recognized standard industry group comprised of Targeted Genetics and
peer companies, this peer group is composed of companies that are or were in
the gene therapy business and that we believe to be companies that analysts
have frequently used to compare with an investment in Targeted Genetics. The
graph shows the value, as of December 31, 2000, of $100 invested on December
29, 1995 in our common stock, the Gene Therapy Peer Group and the Nasdaq Stock
Market Total Return Index.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return Among Targeted Genetics Corporation, Gene
Therapy Peer Group and the Nasdaq Stock Market Total Return Index
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH]
Dec. 29, 1995 Dec. 31, 1996 Dec. 31, 1997 Dec. 31, 1998 Dec. 31, 1999 Dec. 29, 2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Targeted Genetics....... $100.00 $ 80.00 $ 46.67 $ 23.33 $ 70.00 $118.89
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gene Therapy Peer Group. $100.00 $ 83.49 $ 60.66 $ 36.64 $ 86.08 $ 74.98
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq Stock Market..... $100.00 $123.04 $150.69 $212.51 $394.92 $237.62
18
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table provides information with respect to the beneficial
ownership of shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2001 by
. each person that we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common
stock;
. each of our directors;
. each of the Named Executive Officers; and
. all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
The percentage ownership data is based on 43,757,050 shares of our common
stock outstanding as of March 1, 2001. Under the rules of the SEC, beneficial
ownership includes shares over which the indicated beneficial owner exercises
voting and/or investment power. Shares of common stock subject to options or
warrants that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60
days are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the
person holding the option or warrant, but are not deemed outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as
otherwise noted, we believe that the beneficial owners of the shares of common
stock listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares beneficially owned, subject to applicable community property laws.
Percent of
Name and Address of Amount and Nature of Common Stock
Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership Outstanding
------------------- -------------------- ------------
5% Owners:
International Biotechnology Trust plc...... 4,210,000(1) 9.4%
c/o Schroder Ventures
20 Southhampton Street
London, England WC2E7QG
Biogen, Inc. .............................. 4,008,868 9.2%
14 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
SOFINOV, Societe Financiere d'Innovation,
Inc. ..................................... 3,800,000(2) 8.4%
1981, avenue McGill College
Montreal, Quebec H3A 3C7
The Equitable Life Assurance Company....... 2,692,200 6.2%
City Place House
55 Basinghall Street
London, England EC2V 5DR
Immunex Corporation........................ 2,548,814 5.8%
51 University Street
Seattle, WA 98101
Elan International Services, Ltd. ......... 2,531,638 5.8%
102 St. James Court
Flatts
Smiths FL 04
Bermuda
GeneChem Technologies Venture Fund L.P. ... 2,450,185(1) 5.5%
c/o GeneChem Management Inc.
1001 De Maisonneuve Boulevard West
Suite 920
Montreal, Quebec H3A 3C8
19
Percent of
Name and Address of Amount and Nature of Common Stock
Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership Outstanding
------------------- -------------------- ------------
Directors and Executive Officers:
H. Stewart Parker............................ 534,090(3) 1.2%
Barrie J. Carter............................. 331,610(4) *
Jack L. Bowman............................... 28,333(5) *
Jeremy L. Curnock Cook....................... 48,333(6) *
Joseph M. Davie.............................. 10,000 *
James D. Grant............................... 33,333(7) *
Louis P. Lacasse............................. 2,465,185(8) 5.5%
Nelson L. Levy............................... 8,333(6) *
Mark P. Richmond............................. 10,001(9) *
All directors and executive officers as a
group (9 persons)........................... 3,469,218(10) 7.3%
--------
* Less than 1%
(1) Includes warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock that are
exercisable immediately.
(2) Includes warrants to purchase 1,333,333 shares of common stock that are
exercisable immediately.
(3) Includes 327,335 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60
days of March 1, 2001.
(4) Includes 204,945 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60
days of March 1, 2001.
(5) Includes 23,333 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60
days of March 1, 2001.
(6) Represents shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days
of March 1, 2001.
(7) Includes 21,333 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60
days of March 1, 2001.
(8) Includes 15,000 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60
days of March 1, 2001. Also includes 1,450,185 shares of common stock
owned by GeneChem Technologies Venture Fund L.P. ("GeneChem") and warrants
held by GeneChem to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock that are
exercisable immediately. Mr. Lacasse is president of GeneChem Management,
Inc., the manager of GeneChem, and thereby has power to vote the
securities held by GeneChem. Mr. Lacasse disclaims beneficial ownership of
the securities owned by GeneChem.
(9) Includes 8,333 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60
days of March 1, 2001.
(10) Includes 1,450,185 shares of common stock owned by GeneChem, warrants held
by GeneChem to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock and 656,945
shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 1,
2001.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers
and directors and holders of 10% or more of our equity securities to file
reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC regulations
require our executive officers, directors and 10%-or-greater shareholders to
give us copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file with the SEC.
Based solely on our review of these forms, or written representations from
reporting persons that no such forms were required for those persons, we
believe that our executive officers, directors and 10%-or-greater shareholders
complied with all applicable filing requirements for the calendar year 2000.
20
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditors, are expected
to attend the annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions from shareholders.
The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for its audit of our
consolidated financial statements for the year 2000 and for its reviews of our
interim consolidated financial statements was $175,000. Ernst & Young billed no
fees in 2000 for information technology consulting. The aggregate fees billed
by Ernst & Young in 2000 for professional services other than audit and
information technology consulting fees was $80,000. During 2000, none of the
hours Ernst & Young expended on our financial audit were provided by persons
other than Ernst & Young's full-time permanent employees.
Our audit committee has determined that Ernst & Young's rendering of all
other non-audit services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.
OTHER BUSINESS
We do not intend to present any business at the annual meeting other than the
adoption of the Roll-Over Plan, the amendment of the Option Plan and the
election of directors described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, and we have no present knowledge that any other person intends to
present business at the annual meeting. If, however, other matters requiring
the vote of the shareholders properly come before the annual meeting or any
adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting, the persons named in the
accompanying form of proxy will have discretionary authority to vote the
proxies held by them in accordance with their judgment as to those matters.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Under the SEC's proxy rules and the applicable provisions of our bylaws,
shareholder proposals that meet specified conditions may be included in our
proxy materials for, and may be presented at, the 2002 annual meeting.
Shareholders who intend to present a proposal at our 2002 annual meeting must
give us notice of the proposal not later than December 6, 2001 for the proposal
to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for that meeting.
Shareholders that intend to present a proposal that will not be included in the
proxy materials must give us notice of the proposal at least 60 days but not
more than 90 days before the date of the 2002 annual meeting. Because there are
other requirements in the proxy rules, however, our timely receipt of any such
proposal by a qualified shareholder will guarantee neither the proposal's
inclusion in our proxy materials for, nor presentation of the proposal at, the
2002 annual meeting.
ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10-K
Copies of our 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders and Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 are being mailed with this proxy
statement to each shareholder of record. If you did not receive a copy of the
Annual Report or Form 10-K, you may obtain a copy (without exhibits) without
charge by writing or calling Investor Relations, Targeted Genetics Corporation,
1100 Olive Way, Suite 100, Seattle, Washington 98101, (206) 623-7612. Copies of
the exhibits to the Form 10-K are available for a nominal fee.
21
Appendix A
TARGETED GENETICS CORPORATION
Audit Committee Charter
Adopted on May 12, 2000 by the TGC Board of Directors
Organization
This charter governs the operations of the Targeted Genetics Corporation (the
"Company") audit committee. The committee shall review and reassess the charter
at least annually and obtain the approval of the board of directors. The
committee shall be appointed by the board of directors and shall comprise at
least three directors, each of whom are independent of management and the
Company. Members of the committee shall be considered independent if they have
no relationship that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from
management and the Company. All committee members shall be financially
literate, or shall become financially literate within a reasonable period of
time after appointment to the committee, and at least one member shall have
accounting or related financial management expertise.
Statement of Policy
The audit committee shall provide assistance to the board of directors in
fulfilling their oversight responsibility to the shareholders, potential
shareholders, the investment community, and others relating to the Company's
financial statements and the financial reporting process, the systems of
internal accounting and financial controls, the internal audit function, the
annual independent audit of the Company's financial statements, and the legal
compliance and ethics programs as established by management and the board. In
so doing, it is the responsibility of the committee to maintain free and open
communication between the committee, independent auditors and management of the
Company. In discharging its oversight role, the committee is empowered to
investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to all books,
records, facilities, and personnel of the Company and the power to retain
outside counsel, or other experts for this purpose.
Responsibilities and Processes
The primary responsibility of the audit committee is to oversee the Company's
financial reporting process on behalf of the board and report the results of
their activities to the board. Management is responsible for preparing the
Company's financial statements, and the independent auditors are responsible
for auditing those financial statements. The committee in carrying out its
responsibilities believes its policies and procedures should remain flexible,
in order to best react to changing conditions and circumstances. The committee
should take the appropriate actions to set the overall corporate "tone" for
quality financial reporting, sound business risk practices, and ethical
behavior.
The following shall be the principal recurring processes of the audit
committee in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The processes are set
forth as a guide with the understanding that the committee may supplement them
as appropriate.
. The committee shall have a clear understanding with management and the
independent auditors that the independent auditors are ultimately
accountable to the board and the audit committee, as representatives of
the Company's shareholders. The committee shall have the ultimate
authority and responsibility to evaluate and, where appropriate,
recommend the replacement of the independent auditors. The committee
shall discuss with the auditors their independence from management and
the Company and the matters included in the written disclosures required
by the Independence Standards Board. Annually, the committee shall
review and recommend to the board the selection of the Company's
independent auditors, subject to shareholders' approval.
A-1
. The committee shall discuss with the independent auditors the overall
scope and plans for their respective audits including the adequacy of
staffing and compensation. Also, the committee shall discuss with
management and the independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness
of the accounting and financial controls, including the Company's system
to monitor and manage business risk, and legal and ethical compliance
programs. Further, the committee shall meet separately with the
independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss
the results of their examinations.
. The committee shall review the interim financial statements with
management and the independent auditors prior to the filing of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Also, the committee shall
discuss the results of the quarterly review and any other matters
required to be communicated to the committee by the independent auditors
under generally accepted auditing standards. The chair of the committee
may represent the entire committee for the purposes of this review.
. The committee shall review with management and the independent auditors
the financial statements to be included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K (or the annual report to shareholders if distributed prior
to the filing of Form 10-K), including their judgment about the quality,
not just acceptability, of accounting principles, the reasonableness of
significant judgments, and the clarity of the disclosures in the
financial statements. Also, the committee shall discuss the results of
the annual audit and any other matters required to be communicated to
the committee by the independent auditors under generally accepted
auditing standards.
A-2
TARGETED GENETICS CORPORATION
This Proxy is solicited by Targeted Genetics' board of directors for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 8, 2001
The undersigned hereby appoint(s) H. Stewart Parker and Jeremy L. Curnock
Cook, and each of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to
represent and vote as designated all shares of common stock of Targeted Genetics
Corporation held of record by the undersigned on March 9, 2001 at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of Targeted Genetics to be held at the Washington
Athletic Club, 1325 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington, at 8:00 a.m. local time
on Tuesday, May 8, 2001, with authority to vote upon the matters listed below
and with discretionary authority as to any other matters that may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
IMPORTANT--PLEASE DATE AND SIGN ON THE OTHER SIDE
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
Please mark [X]
your votes
as indicated
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" Proposals 1 and 2 and "FOR" the
Nominees in Proposal 3.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
(1) Proposal to adopt the Targeted Genetics [ ] [ ] [ ]
Corporation 2000 Genovo, Inc. Roll-Over
Stock Option Plan
(2) Proposal to amend the Targeted [ ] [ ] [ ]
Genetics Corporation 1999 Stock Option
Plan to increase the number of shares of
common stock issuable under the plan
from 1,500,000 to 3,500,000 shares
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
FOR the to vote for the
Nominees Nominees
(3) ELECTION OF TWO CLASS I DIRECTORS [ ] [ ]
(Terms will expire 2004) Nominees:
Jack L. Bowman and Jeremy L. Curnock
Cook and ONE CLASS II DIRECTOR (Term
will expire in 2002) Nominee: Joseph M.
Davie
WITHHOLD for the following only: (write the name of the nominee in the space
below)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDER IN
THE SPACE PROVIDED.
IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2 AND FOR
THE NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 3.
I plan to attend the Annual Meeting [ ]
Please sign exactly as your name appears on your stock certificate. Attorneys,
trustees, executors and other fiduciaries acting in a representative capacity
should sign their names and give their titles. An authorized person should sign
on behalf of corporations, partnership, associations, etc. and give his or her
title. If your shares are held by two or more persons, each person must sign.
Receipt of the notice of meeting and proxy statement is hereby acknowledged.
Date Signature(s)
--------------------- -----------------------------------------
Date Signature(s)
--------------------- -----------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE .