UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

George P. Schwartz

Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

Schwartz Value Focused Fund

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

The Schwartz Value Focused Fund (the “Fund”) had a strong start to the year with a total return of 6.09% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to 2.91% for the S&P 1500 Index (the “Index”). The Fund also performed well for the one-year period ended June 30, 2018, with a total return of 18.74% compared to 14.50% for the Index. The Fund’s performance for that period ranked in the top 4th percentile out of 456 funds in Morningstar’s Mid-Cap Blend category based on total return. The Fund’s recent outperformance is notable, given our value-laden portfolio and considering the ongoing underperformance of value stocks compared to growth stocks. For the first 6 months of 2018, the S&P 500 Value component returned -2.22% compared to 7.28% for the Growth component.

The Fund’s best performing security this year is Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust” or TPL), which is also the Fund’s largest holding. You may recall that we initiated our position just over two years ago at $170. Today, the share price is over $700 and we believe considerable upside remains. The Trust owns nearly 900,000 acres of land in West Texas – in the heart of the Permian Basin – which has become the epicenter of the U.S. oil fracking boom. The Trust generates revenue primarily from oil & gas mineral rights, a rapidly expanding water rights business, and periodic land sales. Remarkably, TPL produces a 91% pre-tax profit margin and a 160% return on equity, with a zero-debt balance sheet. In 2017, revenue and earnings grew 121% and 109%, respectively. Last year’s growth is clearly unsustainable long term, but TPL has the potential to achieve out-sized revenue and earnings growth for many years to come.

The stock price of Madison Square Garden Company (MSG) has appreciated more than 45% this year, after initiating our position near the end of 2017. MSG owns and operates professional sports teams (New York Knicks, New York Rangers), various athletic and entertainment venues (Madison Square Garden, The Forum in L.A., Radio City Music Hall), and other entertainment productions (the Rockettes). Based on its diverse portfolio of iconic and irreplaceable assets, we believe the shares still represent a significant discount to our intrinsic value estimation. MSG is a top-10 holding in the Fund.

The Fund’s five best performing securities in the first half of this year were:

The main detractors from performance were consumer-oriented companies in the airline, retail, and consumer products sectors. The share prices of American Airlines Group, Inc. and Delta Air Lines, Inc. have been weak in recent months. The fear of rising energy

1

prices has dampened investor enthusiasm in the airline sector. We believe American and Delta are strong franchises and attractively priced, as both stocks trade for 9x 2018 estimated earnings. Qurate Retail, Inc. (formerly known as Liberty Interactive QVC), is the leading TV, video, and Internet commerce retailer that owns QVC and the Home Shopping Network. Qurate’s stock price was down 23% in the first half of the year, as it transitions from a complicated tracking stock structure to a traditional asset-backed stock. The company is growing modestly and generates strong free cash flow, which is primarily used to repurchase shares. We believe Chairman John Malone to be a good capital allocator and expect Qurate to generate above-average shareholder returns over time.

The Fund’s five worst performing securities in the first half of 2018 were:

During the past six months, we liquidated 3 stocks from the portfolio: Goldcorp, Inc. – due deteriorating fundamentals, QUALCOMM, Inc. – better risk/reward opportunities, and Service Master Global Holdings, Inc. – stock price reached our estimate of intrinsic value. New positions were established in five companies that meet our criteria of owning shares of high-quality businesses, in strong financial condition, that are selling at discount to our estimate of intrinsic value:

2

to run Formula One. Under his capable leadership, we believe the company has several growth opportunities ahead, including higher broadcast rights, expanded advertising and sponsorships, and recently launched digital products and services aimed at die-hard Formula One fans.

As always, we’re working tirelessly to find opportunities that meet our stringent, value-oriented investment criteria. We continue to believe the Fund contains several under-valued and under-appreciated stocks. As such, we remain enthused about the Fund’s future investment prospects.

Thank you for being a shareholder in the Fund.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The Fund received the following percentile rankings for the 5 and 10 year periods ending 6/30/18, respectively: 96 out of 329 funds and 90 out of 232 funds in the Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend category. Rankings are based on total return.

3

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
TEN LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS *
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

ASSET ALLOCATION (Unaudited)

4

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

5

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

6

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

7

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

8

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

9

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

10

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period

11

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Schwartz Value Focused Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of Schwartz Investment Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end, non-diversified management investment company established as an Ohio business trust under a Declaration of Trust dated August 31, 1992. Other series of the Trust are not incorporated in this report. The Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital appreciation. See the Prospectus for information regarding the principal investment strategies of the Fund.

Shares of the Fund are sold at net asset value (“NAV”). To calculate the NAV, the Fund’s assets are valued and totaled, liabilities are subtracted, and the balance is divided by the number of shares outstanding. The offering price and redemption price per share are equal to the NAV per share.

The Fund follows accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies.” The following is a summary of the Fund’s significant accounting policies used in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

(a) Valuation of investments — Securities which are traded on stock exchanges, other than NASDAQ, are valued at the closing sales price as of the close of the regular session of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the day the securities are being valued, or, if not traded on a particular day, at the closing bid price. Securities which are quoted by NASDAQ are valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price or, if an Official Closing Price is not available, at the most recently quoted bid price. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the last reported sales price or, if there is no reported sale on the valuation date, at the most recently quoted bid price. Securities which are traded both in the over-the-counter market and on a stock exchange are valued according to the broadest and most representative market. Investments representing shares of other open-end investment companies are valued at their NAV as reported by such companies. When using quoted prices and when the market for the securities are considered active, the securities will be classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy (see below). Securities (and other assets) for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with consistently applied procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees, and will be classified as Level 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy, depending on the inputs used. Fair value pricing may be used, for example, in situations where (i) a portfolio security is so thinly traded that there have been no transactions for that stock over an extended period of time; (ii) the exchange on which the portfolio security is principally traded closes early; or (iii) trading of the portfolio security is halted during the day and does not resume prior to the Fund’s NAV calculation. A portfolio security’s “fair value” price may differ from the price next available for that portfolio security using the Fund’s normal pricing procedures.

12

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

GAAP establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Fund’s investments, by security type, as of June 30, 2018:

Refer to the Fund’s Schedule of Investments for a listing of the common stocks by industry type. There were no Level 3 securities or derivative instruments held by the Fund as of June 30, 2018. It is the Fund’s policy to recognize transfers into or out of any Level at the end of the reporting period. Transfers that occurred between Level 2 and 1 on June 30, 2018 due to the availability of pricing was as follows:

(b) Income taxes — The Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Qualification generally will relieve the Fund of liability for federal income taxes to the extent 100% of its net investment income and net realized capital gains are distributed in accordance with the Code.

In order to avoid imposition of the excise tax applicable to regulated investment companies, it is also the Fund’s intention to declare as dividends in each calendar year at least 98% of its net investment income and 98.2% of its net realized capital gains plus undistributed amounts from prior years.

13

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

The following information is computed on a tax basis for each item as of June 30, 2018:

The Fund recognizes the tax benefits or expenses of uncertain tax positions only when the position is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has reviewed the tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for the current and all open tax years (tax years ended December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2017) and has concluded that no provision for unrecognized tax benefits or expenses is required in these financial statements.

(c) Investment transactions and investment income — Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis. Realized capital gains and losses on investment transactions are determined on the identified cost basis. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been recorded in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable country’s rules and tax rates.

(d) Dividends and distributions — Dividends from net investment income and distributions of net realized capital gains, if any, are declared and paid annually in December. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The tax character of the distributions paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2017 was long-term capital gains. There were no distributions paid to shareholders during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

(e) Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(f) Common expenses — Common expenses of the Trust are allocated among the Fund and the other series of the Trust based on relative net assets of each series or the nature of the services performed and the relative applicability to each series.

2. Investment Advisory Agreement and Transactions with Related Parties

The Chairman and President of the Trust is also the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Schwartz Investment Counsel, Inc. (the “Adviser”). Certain other officers of the Trust are officers of the Adviser, or of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (“Ultimus”), the administrative, accounting and transfer agent for the Fund, or of Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (the “Distributor”), the Fund’s principal underwriter.

14

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and the Adviser, the Adviser is responsible for the management of the Fund and provides investment advice along with the necessary personnel, facilities, equipment and certain other services necessary to the operations of the Fund. The Adviser receives from the Fund a quarterly fee at the annual rate of 0.95% per annum of the Fund’s average daily net assets.

The Adviser has contractually agreed to reduce its advisory fees or reimburse a portion of the Fund’s expenses until at least May 1, 2019 so that the ordinary operating expenses of the Fund do not exceed 1.25% per annum of average daily net assets. Accordingly, during the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Adviser reduced its investment advisory fees by $66,870.

Any fee reductions or expense reimbursements by the Adviser are subject to repayment by the Fund for a period of three years after such fees and expenses were incurred, provided repayment to the Adviser does not cause the ordinary operating expenses of the Fund to exceed 1.25% per annum of average daily net assets. As of June 30, 2018, the Advisor may seek recoupment of investment advisory fee reductions totaling $331,083 no later than the dates stated below:

The Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust (the “CCO”) is an employee of the Adviser. The Trust pays the Adviser a fee for providing CCO services, of which the Fund pays its proportionate share along with the other series of the Trust. In addition, the Trust reimburses the Adviser for out-of-pocket expenses incurred, if any, for providing these services.

Pursuant to a Mutual Fund Services Agreement between the Trust and Ultimus, Ultimus supplies regulatory and compliance services, calculates the daily NAV per share, maintains the financial books and records of the Fund, maintains the records of each shareholder’s account, and processes purchases and redemptions of the Fund’s shares. For these services Ultimus receives fees computed as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the Fund, subject to a minimum monthly fee.

Pursuant to a Distribution Agreement between the Trust and the Distributor, the Distributor serves as the Fund’s exclusive agent for the distribution of its shares. The Distributor is an affiliate of Ultimus.

Trustees and officers affiliated with the Adviser or Ultimus are not compensated by the Trust for their services. Each Trustee who is not an affiliated person of the Adviser or Ultimus (“Independent Trustee”) receives from the Trust an annual retainer of $46,000 (except that such fee is $56,000 for the Lead Independent Trustee/Chairman of the Governance Committee and $50,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee), payable quarterly; a fee of $6,000 for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Trustees; plus reimbursement of travel and other expenses incurred in attending meetings. The Fund

15

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

pays its proportionate share of the Independent Trustees’ fees and expenses along with the other series of the Trust.

3. Investment Transactions

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities, excluding short-term investments and U.S. government securities, amounted to $3,969,611 and $4,281,580, respectively.

4. Contingencies and Commitments

The Fund indemnifies the Trust’s officers and Trustees for certain liabilities that might arise from their performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.

5. Subsequent Events

The Fund is required to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed as of the date of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, the Fund is required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of these financial statements and has noted no such events.

16

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
(Unaudited)

We believe it is important for you to understand the impact of costs on your investment. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses. The following examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

A mutual fund’s ongoing costs are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The ongoing costs reflected in the table below are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the most recent semi-annual period (January 1, 2018) and held until the end of the period (June 30, 2018).

The table below illustrates the Fund’s ongoing costs in two ways:

Actual fund return – This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount of operating expenses that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.

To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for the Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”

Hypothetical 5% return – This section is intended to help you compare the Fund’s ongoing costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the Fund had an annual return of 5% before expenses during the period shown, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case, because the return used is not the Fund’s actual return, the result does not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess the Fund’s ongoing costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.

Note that expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only. The Fund does not charge sales loads or redemption fees.

The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.

More information about the Fund’s expenses, including historical annual expense ratios, can be found in this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to the Fund’s Prospectus.

17

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENT
(Unaudited)

At an in-person meeting held on February 9, 2018, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees voting separately, approved the continuance of the Advisory Agreement with Schwartz Investment Counsel, Inc. (the “Adviser”) on behalf of the Fund.

The Independent Trustees were advised and assisted throughout their evaluation by independent legal counsel experienced in matters relating to the investment management industry. The Independent Trustees received advice from their independent legal counsel, including a legal memorandum, on the standards and obligations in connection with their consideration of the continuance of the Advisory Agreement. The Independent Trustees also received and reviewed relevant information provided by the Adviser in response to requests of the Independent Trustees and their legal counsel to assist in their evaluation of the terms of the Advisory Agreement, including whether the Advisory Agreement continues to be in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. The Independent Trustees also retained an independent consultant (Strategic Insight) to prepare an expense and performance analysis for the Fund. The Strategic Insight materials included information regarding advisory fee rates, other operating expenses, expense ratios, and performance comparisons to the Fund’s peer group and to a broad-based securities index. Prior to the Board meeting, the Independent Trustees discussed separately with Strategic Insight the methodologies that it used to construct its report and the Morningstar, Inc. (“Morningstar”) categories that it identified to base its peer group comparisons for the Fund and other aspects of its report. The Independent Trustees met separately with independent counsel to discuss the continuance of the Advisory Agreements, during which time no representatives of the Adviser were present.

The Independent Trustees considered that they meet with the portfolio managers of the Fund at regularly scheduled meetings over the course of the year to discuss the investment results, portfolio composition, and developments affecting the performance of the Fund and the investment management industry in general. They also considered that the Adviser had discussed the overall condition of the economy and the markets, including an analysis of the factors that have influenced the markets, investor preferences and market sentiment.

The Trustees reviewed, among other things: (1) industry data comparing the advisory fee and expense ratio of the Fund with those of comparable investment companies and any model portfolios under the management of the Adviser; (2) comparative performance information; (3) the Adviser’s revenues and profitability for providing services to the Fund; and (4) information about the Adviser’s portfolio managers, research analysts, investment process, compliance program and risk management processes.

As part of this process, the Trustees considered various factors, among them:

18

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENT
(Unaudited) (Continued)

In their consideration of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund, the Trustees discussed the responsibilities of the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement and the investment management process applied to the Fund. The Trustees reviewed the background and experience of the Adviser’s key investment and research personnel, the co-portfolio management structure for the Fund, and the research process and brokerage practices that are applied in the management of the Fund. The Trustees discussed the background and experience of the Adviser’s operational and compliance personnel, the Adviser’s ongoing responsibilities with regards to the compliance program of the Trust and the Trust’s overall compliance record. The Trustees considered the strength and stability of the Adviser, its investment approach and the quality of its risk management program, technology capabilities, shareholder support services and shareholder communications. The Trustees also considered the significant risks assumed by the Adviser in connection with the services provided to the Fund, including investment, operational, enterprise, regulatory and compliance risks. The Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services to the Fund was acceptable.

The Trustees reviewed information provided by Strategic Insight on the advisory fees paid by the Fund and compared such fees to the advisory fees paid by similar mutual funds, as compiled by Morningstar. The Trustees compared the Fund’s net advisory fee with the net advisory fees of representative funds within its Morningstar peer group. The Trustees noted that the Morningstar information showed that the net advisory fee of the Fund is lower than the median net advisory fees of its Morningstar peers. The Independent Trustees took into account that the Adviser’s fee reductions during the 2017 calendar year with respect to the Fund had the effect of reducing the net management fee and net operating expenses of the Fund. The Trustees also compared the Fund’s net total expense ratio with the net total expense ratios of representative funds within its Morningstar peer group. The Trustees noted that the Morningstar information showed that the net total expense ratio of the Fund is lower than the median net total expense ratio of its Morningstar peers. The Trustees concluded that, based upon the investment strategies of the Fund and the quality of services provided by the Adviser, the advisory fees paid by the Fund are acceptable.

The Trustees reviewed the Adviser’s analysis of its profitability in managing the Fund during the 2017 calendar year, including the methodology by which that profitability analysis was calculated. The Trustees considered that the Adviser may receive, in addition to the advisory fee, certain indirect benefits from serving as the Fund’s investment adviser, including various research services as a result of the placement of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage. The Trustees considered the Adviser’s investments in its business and the costs to the Adviser of providing ongoing services to the Fund, including staffing costs and costs to maintain systems and resources that support portfolio trading, research and other portfolio management functions. They also considered, in a broader context of the Adviser’s overall business, that the Adviser bears the shareholder recordkeeping costs charged by third party financial intermediaries investing in the Fund. Based upon their

19

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AGREEMENT
(Unaudited) (Continued)

review of the Adviser’s profitability analysis, the Board concluded that the Adviser’s profitability is reasonable.

The Trustees considered both the short-term and long-term investment performance of the Fund in light of its investment objective of seeking long-term capital appreciation. The Trustees considered the Funds’ historical performance over the nine-month period ended November 30, 2017 as compared to the returns of the Fund’s benchmark index and observed that the Fund placed below the returns of its benchmark index over the period. The Trustees further considered the investment performance of the Fund compared to similarly managed mutual funds as compiled by Morningstar for selected periods ended November 30, 2017 and observed that the Fund placed in the fourth quartile of its Morningstar peers for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ending November 30, 2017. The Trustees considered that the performance of the Fund is the result of a value-oriented investment approach and noted that growth momentum stocks have been favored over value stocks during 2017 and many of the years before. The Trustees were mindful of the tendency of a value style of investing to be in and out of favor during certain periods. In view of all the factors considered, the Trustees concluded that the Adviser’s commitment to the Fund and its fundamental value investment process supports their view that the Adviser’s continued management should benefit the Fund and its shareholders.

The Trustees also considered the existence of any economies of scale and whether those would be passed along to the Fund’s shareholders. The Trustees observed that the Adviser has a history of reducing the advisory fees paid by the Fund in order to maintain a lower operating expense ratio for the Fund. The Trustees concluded that it is not necessary or appropriate at this time to consider adding fee breakpoints to the advisory fee schedule for the Fund.

No single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision of the Trustees to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement and each Trustee may have attributed different weights to certain factors. Rather, the Trustees concluded, in light of a weighing and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for an additional annual period.

20

SCHWARTZ VALUE FOCUSED FUND
RESULTS OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
(Unaudited)

On March 15, 2018, a Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Trust was held for the purpose of considering the election of seven trustees for the Trust. The number of shares of the Trust present by proxy and voting at the Special Meeting represented 68.45% of the total shares entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the seven nominees was elected by the shareholders of the Trust.

The results of the voting with respect to the election of the seven Trustees were as follows:

OTHER INFORMATION
(Unaudited)

A description of the policies and procedures the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free (888) 726-0753, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is also available without charge upon request by calling toll-free (888) 726-0753, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

The Trust files a complete listing of portfolio holdings for the Fund with the SEC as of the end of the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The filings are available free of charge, upon request, by calling (888) 726-0753. Furthermore, you may obtain a copy of the filings on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Trust’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC, and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.

21

Shareholder Services c/o Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC P.O. Box 46707 Cincinnati, OH 45246 (888) 726-9331

Corporate Offices 801 W. Ann Arbor Trail Suite 244 Plymouth, MI 48170 (734) 455-7777 Fax (734) 455-7720

Dear Fellow Shareholders of:

Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX)
Ave Maria Growth Fund (AVEGX)
Ave Maria Rising Dividend Fund (AVEDX)
Ave Maria World Equity Fund (AVEWX)
Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX)
Ave Maria Money Market Account

People can debate the reasons for the 2018 U.S. economic expansion — but however you view it, it’s a welcome relief. After several years of 2% or less annual GDP growth, the once unthinkable 3% rate is being achieved, and now some forecasters are saying 4% real growth is achievable.

Tax rate cuts in late 2017 and deregulation have certainly helped corporate profits, which are growing at a 15-20% annual rate, while consumer optimism has surged. One has to hope potential trade wars and other foreign policy disputes don’t derail these exceptional developments. With the unemployment rate below 4% and headed lower, there is a shortage of workers with some 6 million jobs now going unfilled. These statistics lead us to believe that the strong economy has sustainability.

The capital markets have obviously taken notice of the spreading prosperity, as asset prices have appreciated smartly. The Ave Maria Mutual Funds have participated, as outlined herein by each of the Funds’ portfolio managers.

As always, we seek to meet each Fund’s investment objective, as expressed in the prospectus, and do it in a morally responsible way.

Thank you for investing in these pro-life, pro-family mutual funds.

Sincerely,

George P. Schwartz, CFA
Chairman & CEO

June 30, 2018

AVE MARIA MUTUAL FUNDS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AVE MARIA MUTUAL FUNDS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)

This report is for the information of the shareholders of the Ave Maria Mutual Funds. To obtain a copy of the prospectus, please visit our website at www.avemariafunds.com or call 1-888-726-9331 and a copy will be sent to you free of charge. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest. The Ave Maria Mutual Funds are distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC.

Past performance is not predictive of future performance. Investment results and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. Performance data, current to the most recent month end, is available at the Ave Maria Mutual Funds website at www.avemariafunds.com or by calling 1-888-726-9331.

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited)

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

The Ave Maria Value Fund (the “Fund”) had a total return of 3.54% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to 3.49% for the S&P MidCap 400 Index (the “Index”). The Fund performed well for the one-year period ended June 30, 2018, with a total return of 15.90% compared to 13.50% for the Index. That performance placed the Fund in the 11th percentile out of 456 funds in Morningstar’s Mid-Cap Blend category based on total return. The Fund’s recent outperformance is notable, given our value-laden portfolio and considering the ongoing underperformance of value stocks compared to growth stocks. For the first 6 months of 2018, the S&P 500 Value component returned -2.22% compared to 7.28% for the Growth component.

The Fund’s best performing security this year is Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust” or TPL), which is also the Fund’s largest holding. You may recall that we initiated our position just over two years ago at $170. Today, the share price is over $700, and we believe considerable upside remains. The Trust owns nearly 900,000 acres of land in West Texas – in the heart of the Permian Basin – which has become the epicenter of the U.S. oil fracking boom. The Trust generates revenue primarily from oil & gas mineral rights, a rapidly expanding water rights business, and periodic land sales. Remarkably, TPL produces a 91% pre-tax profit margin and a 160% return on equity, with a zero-debt balance sheet. In 2017, revenue and earnings grew 121% and 109%, respectively. TPL has the potential to achieve out-sized revenue and earnings growth for many years to come.

We initiated a position in Madison Square Garden Company (MSG) late last year and thus far the results have been favorable, as the stock price has increased more than 48% this year. MSG owns and operates professional sports teams (New York Knicks, New York Rangers), various athletic and entertainment venues (Madison Square Garden, The Forum in L.A., Radio City Music Hall), and other entertainment productions (the Rockettes). MSG recently announced plans to separate the company’s sports businesses from the entertainment businesses. Based upon its diverse portfolio of iconic and irreplaceable assets, the shares are still trading at a significant discount to our intrinsic value estimation.

2

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited) (Continued)

The Fund’s five best performing securities in the first half of this year were:

The main detractors from performance were consumer-oriented companies in the airline, retail, and consumer products sectors. American Airlines Group, Inc. and Delta Air Lines, Inc. have been weak performers in recent months. The fear of rising energy prices has dampened investor enthusiasm in the airline sector. We believe American and Delta are strong franchises and attractively priced, as both stocks trade for 9x 2018 estimated earnings, and those earnings should grow next year. Qurate Retail, Inc. (formerly known as Liberty Interactive QVC), is the leading TV, video, and Internet commerce retailer that owns QVC and the Home Shopping Network. Qurate’s stock price was down 23% in the first half of the year, as it transitions from a complicated tracking stock structure to a traditional asset-backed stock. The company is growing modestly and generates strong free cash flow, which is primarily used to repurchase shares. We believe Chairman John Malone to be a good capital allocator and expect Qurate to generate above-average shareholder returns over time.

The Fund’s five worst performing securities in the first half of this year were:

During the past six months, we liquidated 6 stocks from the portfolio due to their share prices having reached our estimate of intrinsic value: ANSYS, Inc., Colfax Corporation, Eaton Corporation plc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, VF Corporation, and Waters Corporation. We also sold Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings due to the company violating one of our moral screens. New positions were established in seven companies that meet our criteria of owning shares of high-quality businesses, in strong financial condition, that are selling at discount to our estimate of intrinsic value:

3

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited) (Continued)

4

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited) (Continued)

As always, we’re working tirelessly to find companies that meet our stringent, value-oriented investment criteria. We continue to believe the Fund contains many under-valued and under-appreciated stocks. As such, we remain enthused about the Fund’s future investment prospects.

Thank you for being a shareholder in the Fund.

Timothy S. Schwartz, CFA	Joseph W. Skornicka, CFA
Lead Portfolio Manager	Co-Portfolio Manager

Chadd M. Garcia

Co-Portfolio Manager

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The Fund received the following percentile rankings for the 5 and 10 year periods ending 6/30/18, respectively: 94 out of 329 funds and 83 out of 232 funds in the Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend category. Rankings are based on total return.

5

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
TEN LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS*
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

ASSET ALLOCATION (Unaudited)

6

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

7

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

8

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

9

AVE MARIA VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

10

AVE MARIA GROWTH FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited)

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Ave Maria Growth Fund (the “Fund”) had a total return of 6.14%, compared with the benchmark S&P 500 Index total return of 2.65%. For the three-year, five-year and ten-year periods through June 30, 2018, the Fund had a total return of 12.88%, 13.68% and 11.13%, compared with the benchmark total return of 11.93, 13.42% and 10.17%, respectively.

For the first six months, four of the top five return contributors were also among the Fund’s largest holdings. Unfortunately, Madison Square Garden Company (MSG) – a position started early in the first quarter of 2018 – was not among the Fund’s top holdings during this period, when its stock price was up by more than 45%. MSG recently announced its intent to divide its professional sports teams and entertainment segments into two distinct entities. MSG owns the New York Knicks (NBA) and New York Rangers (NHL), plus various entertainment assets, including Madison Square Garden, which some call the “The World’s Most Famous Arena.” Professional sports teams are unique assets capable of strong intrinsic value growth over many years. MSG’s stock price is starting to reflect this value.

The industrials sector was among the worst performing S&P 500 sectors during the first half of 2018, and some of our industrials holdings suffered. The Fund remains invested in four of the top five return detractors listed below. The exception is Colfax Corporation, which the Fund exited during the second quarter. Colfax was founded by brothers Mitchell Rales and Steven Rales, who also founded Danaher, a company that has rewarded investors with strong returns over many years. Our investment thesis was that Colfax could replicate Danaher’s success as the company followed the same playbook of acquiring companies and making them more efficient through the Colfax Business System (copied from the Danaher Business System). What we didn’t fully appreciate at the outset of our investment was the amount of time it is going to take for Colfax to transform its business portfolio – primarily through acquisitions -

11

AVE MARIA GROWTH FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited) (Continued)

to more attractive end-markets. Seller price expectations remain high, helped by the flood of private equity money competing with Colfax for acquisitions. Colfax’s current business portfolio is over-indexed to commodity-related end markets and the Chinese power generation market, which is in steep decline as the country addresses pollution concerns.

Our goal remains to purchase shares of exceptional companies at attractive prices to produce favorable returns over the long run. Our team continues to spend considerable time searching for companies that fit our quality and price requirements. We appreciate your participation in the Fund.

With best regards,

Brian D. Milligan, CFA	Richard L. Platte, Jr., CFA
Lead Portfolio Manager	Co-Portfolio Manager

12

AVE MARIA GROWTH FUND
TEN LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS*
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

ASSET ALLOCATION (Unaudited)

13

AVE MARIA GROWTH FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

14

AVE MARIA GROWTH FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

15

AVE MARIA GROWTH FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)

16

AVE MARIA RISING DIVIDEND FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited)

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

Stock prices continued to roll higher during the first half of 2018 with the shares of the Ave Maria Rising Dividend Fund (the “Fund”) returning 1.69% versus 2.65% on the S&P 500 Index. As in recent quarters, growth stocks significantly outperformed value stocks.

Year to date, strong contributions to the Ave Maria Rising Dividend Fund returns came from TJX Companies, Inc. (retail), Moody’s Corporation (credit rating and other investment services), RPM International, Inc. (building products), and Cisco Systems, Inc. (technology). Industrial stocks contributed disproportionately to the weakest performers in the portfolio. Specifically, 3M Company (diversified manufacturer), Illinois Tool Works, Inc. (diversified manufacturer), MSC Industrial Direct Company (distributor of industrial products) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (package delivery). How any stock behaves in a six-month period is more the product of changing investor preferences and headline news, than it is any reflection of the underlying fundamentals of the companies represented by those stocks. As long-term investors, we remain focused on the underlying realities of the companies held in the portfolio.

Of significance during the first six months of the year, was the reporting of individual companies on the impact the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 had on their year-end 2017 reported earnings and their probable new tax rate on a go forward basis. Because intelligent allocation of capital is one of the criterion that we use in evaluating managements, this major change in tax law offered a useful insight into how individual managements prioritize their use of capital. A number of our companies used the windfall to increase dividends, some to increase share repurchases, while others “invested” in their employees. Others announced accelerated capital expenditures, and a few contributed cash to community foundations.

As our goal is capital appreciation from companies generating a rising stream of dividends, we are particularly interested in those companies that are using lower tax rates to meaningfully increase their dividends. Of the 39 companies held in the Rising Dividend Fund as of June 30th, 20 raised their dividend during the first six months of the year, 13 by 10 percent or more and 7 by 15 percent or more. Many of those same companies are also stepping up their share repurchases, which can also have positive implications for shareholder returns.

While there are always reasons for concern (today’s seem focused primarily upon rising prices and fears of trade wars), most consumers and corporate managers remain optimistic in their outlooks and that bodes well for sustained

17

AVE MARIA RISING DIVIDEND FUND
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY
(Unaudited) (Continued)

economic growth. In that environment, we expect the companies in the Ave Maria Rising Dividend Fund to continue generating increased earnings and dividends.

We appreciate your interest and investment in the Fund.

With best regards,

Richard L. Platte, Jr., CFA	George P. Schwartz, CFA
Lead Portfolio Manager	Co-Portfolio Manager

18

AVE MARIA RISING DIVIDEND FUND
TEN LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS*
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

ASSET ALLOCATION (Unaudited)

19

AVE MARIA RISING DIVIDEND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)

20

AVE MARIA RISING DIVIDEND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(Continued)