UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

UMH Properties, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all the boxes that apply):

UMH PROPERTIES, INC.

Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C

Freehold, New Jersey 07728

NOTICE OF 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 29, 2024

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of UMH Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), will be held on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of the Company at Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, to consider and vote on the following matters, each as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

1. The election of four Class III directors, each to hold office until the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2027 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

2. The ratification of the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024;

3. An advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2023;

4. Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on March 8, 2024, as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON, YOU SHOULD AUTHORIZE A PROXY TO VOTE YOUR SHARES PRIOR TO THE MEETING USING THE METHODS DETAILED ON PAGES 10 AND 11 OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE.

	BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
	CRAIG KOSTER
	EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY
April 5, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UMH PROPERTIES, INC.

Juniper Business Plaza

3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C

Freehold, New Jersey 07728

PROXY STATEMENT

2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 29, 2024

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of UMH Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of the Company at Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes listed in the preceding Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Notice”).

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying Proxy Card are being distributed on or about April 5, 2024, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on Friday, March 8, 2024. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Proxy Statement to “UMH”, “we”, “our”, “us” and the “Company” refer to UMH Properties, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. A copy of the Company’s 2023 Annual Report, including financial statements, is being mailed herewith, and is available on the Company’s website at www.umh.reit.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 29, 2024

Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), you are able to obtain proxy materials via the Internet, instead of being mailed printed copies of those materials. This will expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the annual meeting, and help conserve natural resources. Please visit the website www.proxyvote.com to view electronic versions of proxy materials and the Company’s 2023 Annual Report, and to request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Have your Proxy Card or Notice of Internet Availability in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions. You will need your 12-digit Control Number which is located on your Proxy Card or Notice of Internet Availability. Shareholders also may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

UMH CONTACT INFORMATION

The mailing address of our principal executive office is Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, and our main telephone number is (732) 577-9997. We maintain an Internet website at www.umh.reit. Information at or connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and is not and should not be considered part of this Proxy Statement.

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

During 2023, UMH made substantial progress on multiple fronts – generating solid operating results, achieving strong growth and improving our financial position. We believe that this past year represented continued progress in building long-term value for our shareholders. The following are some of our many financial performance, strategic growth and capital markets accomplishments achieved during fiscal 2023:

¹ For a reconciliation of Community NOI, Same Property NOI and Normalized FFO to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and additional information regarding such Non-GAAP measures, see the section entitled “Financial Information” on page 59 of this Proxy Statement.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

We are committed to good corporate governance to serve the interests of our shareholders and better align the interests of our directors and management with those of our shareholders. We also believe that good corporate governance fosters trust by our shareholders and accountability of management. Our Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee and its ESG Subcommittee help oversee and implement our corporate governance initiatives. Below are some highlights of our corporate governance policies:

Environmental and Social Practices

UMH is committed to incorporating environmental and social considerations into its business practices to create value for its shareholders and enhance the communities where our residents live. UMH recognizes its obligation to reduce its impact on the environment and to conserve natural resources. As such, we have invested in technology and other sustainable practices. We also believe in enriching the lives of the people impacted by our Company. These include not only our employees and our residents, but also our neighbors and the rest of society. Some of our recent highlights are as follows:

The Company’s commitment to Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance practices is demonstrated in its Environmental, Social & Governance Report as well as its corporate governance guidelines and policies that can be found under the “ESG” and “Governance” tabs, respectively, of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement?

You are receiving these materials because you owned shares of our Company’s common stock (hereinafter sometimes referred to herein as “Common Shares”) as a “registered” shareholder or you held Common Shares in “street name” at the close of business on March 8, 2024, the record date for the Annual Meeting, and that entitles you to vote at our Annual Meeting to be held at 4:00 p.m., local time, on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, at the offices of the Company at Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, or any postponements or adjournments of such meeting, for the purposes set forth in the Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement contains information related to the solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of our Board of Directors. We will pay the costs of soliciting proxies, which will consist primarily of the cost of printing, postage and handling. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our officers, directors and other employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by other appropriate means. It is anticipated that banks, brokers, fiduciaries, custodians and nominees will forward proxy soliciting materials to their principals, and that we will reimburse these persons’ out-of-pocket expenses.

We have also retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, to assist in the distribution of proxy materials and the solicitation of proxies from brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, and other similar organizations representing beneficial owners of Common Shares for the Annual Meeting. We have agreed to pay MacKenzie Partners a fee of approximately $12,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses. You may contact MacKenzie Partners at (800) 322-2885.

What is the difference between a “registered” shareholder and a shareholder holding shares in “street name?”

If your Common Shares are registered directly in your name with EQ, our transfer agent, you are a “registered” shareholder. If you own Common Shares through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee rather than in your own name, you are the beneficial owner of the Common Shares, but considered to be holding the Common Shares in “street name.”

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

All of our common shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 8, 2024, the record date for the Annual Meeting, or individuals holding their duly authorized proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance. Appointing a proxy in response to this solicitation will not affect a shareholder’s right to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote in person. Please note that if you hold your common stock in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the close of business on March 8, 2024, the record date for the Annual Meeting, to gain admittance to the Annual Meeting.

Who may vote?

You may vote if you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on March 8, 2024, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting. For each share of common stock you owned as of the record date, you are entitled to cast one vote for as many individuals as there are directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting and to cast one vote on each other matter presented at the Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting is not permitted in the election of directors.

What is a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

As of the close of business on March 8, 2024, we had 69,357,605 shares of common stock outstanding. In order to conduct a meeting, shareholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or by proxy. No business may be conducted at the Annual Meeting if a quorum is not present. If you submit a properly executed Proxy Card or authorize a proxy by telephone or via the Internet, you will be considered part of the quorum. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker “non-vote” results when a bank, broker or other nominee who holds shares for another person has not received voting instructions from the owner of the shares and, under the applicable rules, does not have discretionary authority to vote on a matter.

What am I voting on?

At the Annual Meeting, you may consider and vote on:

We are not aware of any other business, other than procedural matters relating to the Annual Meeting or the proposals listed above, that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting. Once the business of the Annual Meeting is concluded, members of management will respond to questions raised by shareholders, as time permits.

What are the Board’s recommendations?

The Board recommends a vote:

FOR the election of each nominee named in this Proxy Statement for election as a Class III director (Proposal 1);

FOR the ratification of the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 2) and

FOR the approval of the Say-on-Pay proposal (Proposal 3).

Unless you give other instructions on your Proxy Card, the persons named as proxy holders on the Proxy Card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

How many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals assuming that a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting?

Proposal 1: Election of Directors: The election of a director nominee must be approved by a plurality of the votes cast.

Proposal 2: Approval of the ratification of the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast.

Proposal 3: Approval of the Say-on-Pay proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal.

If you are a shareholder of record as of the record date for the Annual Meeting and you authorize a proxy (whether by Internet, telephone or mail) without specifying voting instructions on any matter to be considered at this Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares according to the Board’s recommendation on that matter and in their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

If you are a shareholder of record as of the record date for the Annual Meeting and you fail to authorize a proxy or attend the meeting and vote in person, assuming that a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, it will have no effect on the result of the vote on any of the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), your broker or other nominee may not vote with respect to certain proposals unless you have provided voting instructions with respect to that proposal. As noted above, this is referred to as a broker “non-vote.” A broker non-vote is not considered a vote cast on a proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote on any of the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account, then, under NYSE rules and Maryland law, your broker is entitled to vote your shares on Proposal 2 (Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm) if no instructions are received from you, but your broker is not entitled to vote on Proposal 1 (Election of Directors), and Proposal 3 (Say-on-Pay) without specific instructions from you.

How do I vote?

Shareholders who hold common stock in their name, other than those who hold shares through a Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”) member, have three ways to authorize a proxy:

If you mail us your properly completed and signed Proxy Card or authorize a proxy to vote your shares by telephone or Internet, your votes will be cast according to the choices that you specify. Unless you indicate otherwise on your Proxy Card, the persons named as your proxies will cast your votes: FOR all of the nominees for election as directors named in this Proxy Statement; FOR the ratification of the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm; FOR the advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers and in their discretion on any additional matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

If your common stock is held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you should receive separate instructions from the holder of your common stock describing how to provide voting instructions.

Shares of Common Stock held by or through a TASE member cannot be voted during the Annual Meeting. If your shares of Common Stock are held by or through a TASE member and you wish to vote your shares, you must complete, sign and date the form of proxy card that we filed via MAGNA and attach to it an ownership certificate from the TASE member through which your shares are registered (i.e., your broker, bank or other nominee) indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the Record Date, the record date for voting, and return the proxy card along with the ownership certificate, to the Company’s Israeli counsel, Goldfarb Seligman & Co. (“Goldfarb”), c/o Hod Mimun, 98 Yigal Alon Street, 44th Floor, Tel Aviv 6789141, Israel (email: hod.mimun@goldfarb.com). The proxy card and ownership certificate must be received no later than May 23, 2024, to be included in the tally of shares voted.

Can I revoke my proxy?

Yes, if your common stock is held in your name, you can revoke your proxy by:

Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a properly-executed proxy. If your common stock is held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the voting instructions provided by the holder of your common stock regarding how to revoke your instructions.

What if I return my proxy but abstain?

Abstentions are counted as present for determining a quorum. However, abstentions will have no effect on any of the items to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

Why did I receive more than one Notice, proxy card, voting instruction form and/or email?

You will receive more than one Notice of Availability, proxy card, voting instruction form or email, or any combination of these, if you hold your common stock in different ways (i.e., joint tenancy, trusts and custodial accounts) or in multiple accounts. You should provide voting instructions for all Notices of Availability proxy cards, voting instruction forms and email links you receive.

What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

If you and other residents at your mailing address who have the same last name own our common stock in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one Annual Report to Shareholders (the “Annual Report”) and Proxy Statement. This practice of sending only one copy of proxy materials is known as “householding.” If you did not respond that you did not want to participate in householding, you were deemed to have consented to the process. If the foregoing procedures apply to you, your broker has sent one copy of each of our Notice of Availability or Annual Report, Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement to your address. However, even if your broker has sent only one copy of these proxy materials, each stockholder in your household should receive a proxy card or should be able to vote individually via telephone or internet. You may revoke your consent to householding at any time by contacting your broker or bank, if you hold your shares in a “street name,” or by calling EQ at (800) 937-5449 if you are a “registered” stockholder. The revocation of your consent to householding will be effective 30 days following its receipt. In any event, if you did not receive an individual copy of our annual report or Proxy Statement, we will promptly send a separate copy of the Annual Report, the Proxy Statement or the Notice of Availability to you upon oral or written request. Such request can be made by contacting us at 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, NJ 07728, attention: Secretary (telephone number: (732) 577-9997). Any shareholders sharing the same address and currently receiving multiple copies of the Annual Report and the Proxy Statement who wish to receive only one copy of these materials per household in the future may also contact your broker or bank or us to participate in the householding program.

What if I have questions about the Notice of Availability, voting or email delivery?

Questions regarding the Notice of Availability, voting or email delivery should be directed to our Secretary at UMH Properties, Inc., 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, NJ 07728.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s charter and bylaws provide for a classified board of directors comprised of Class I, II, and III directors. Four Class III directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting, to serve until the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2027 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. The four nominees for election as Class III directors are set forth below. Unless instructed otherwise, the proxy holders will vote all proxies received by them for the nominees listed below or, if any such nominee is unwilling or unable to serve, for any other nominee designated by the Company’s Board of Directors. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s Board of Directors is not aware of any other individual who may properly be nominated for election as a Class III director at the Annual Meeting or of any nominee who is unable or unwilling to serve as director, if elected. The nominees listed below are currently each serving as a director of the Company and each has consented, if elected as a director, to serve until his or her term expires.

The Company’s Board of Directors currently consists of twelve directors, four of whom have terms expiring at the Annual Meeting and when their successors are duly elected and qualified.

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The following information concerning the principal occupation, other affiliations and business experience of each of the four Class III Director nominees during the last five years has been furnished to the Company by such nominee:

Class III Directors with Terms Expiring in 2024

Vote Required:

At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be requested to elect four Class III Directors. A plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum is present, is required to elect a nominee.

Board Recommendation:

THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS YOU
VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE FOUR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE

INFORMATION CONCERNING CONTINUING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Class I Directors with Terms Expiring in 2025

Class II Directors with Terms Expiring in 2026

Other Named Executive Officers of the Company

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

UMH Properties, Inc. was incorporated in 1968. We have a 56-year history of providing quality, affordable housing for our Nation’s workforce while creating value for our shareholders. We believe that good corporate governance and robust Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (“ESG”) policies are essential elements of the Company’s successful history. The Company’s commitment to maintaining sound ESG practices is demonstrated in its Environmental, Social & Governance Report as well as its corporate governance guidelines and policies which can be found under the “ESG” and “Governance” tabs, respectively, of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

Substantial Insider Ownership

The aggregate stock ownership of Company directors and executive officers represents approximately 8.63% of the Company’s outstanding shares, as of March 8, 2024, which currently represents the second largest block of shareholders. This substantial ownership clearly aligns management’s interests with those of our shareholders.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Eugene W. Landy is the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Samuel A. Landy, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Anna T. Chew, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (“CFO”), are also members of the Board of Directors. The Company believes that this structure helps ensure critical and independent thinking with respect to the Company’s strategy and performance, while ensuring that management’s insight is directly available to the directors in their deliberations. The Board of Directors has selected an independent Director, Matthew I. Hirsch, to serve as Presiding Director, in which capacity Mr. Hirsch presides at executive sessions of the independent non-management directors. The Board reviews the structure of the Board and Company leadership regularly as part of the succession planning process. At present, our Board believes that this structure is appropriate and that it facilitates independent oversight of management.

The Board of Directors oversees the Company’s enterprise-wide approach to the major risks facing the Company and oversees the Company’s policies for assessing and managing its exposure to risk. The Board periodically reviews these risks and the Company’s risk management processes. The Board also considers risk in evaluating the Company’s strategy. The Board’s responsibilities include reviewing the Company’s practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management and reviewing contingent liabilities and risks that may be material to the Company. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial and compliance risks and major legislative and regulatory developments which could materially impact the Company. The Audit Committee also oversees a Cybersecurity Subcommittee. The Compensation Committee oversees management’s assessment of whether the Company’s compensation structure, policies and programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee (formerly the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) oversees management’s assessment of whether our governance structure, policies and programs create risks that may be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee also oversees the Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (“ESG”) Subcommittee which was established to assist the Committee with respect to the Company’s ESG initiatives.

Board Independence

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines include specific Director Independence Standards that comply with applicable rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Board requires that at least a majority of its directors satisfy this definition of independence. The Board of Directors has considered business and other relationships, arrangements and other transactions between the Company and each of its Directors, including information provided to the Company by the directors. Based upon its review, the Board of Directors has determined that all of its Directors, other than Ms. Anna T. Chew and Messrs. Eugene W. Landy, Michael P. Landy and Samuel A. Landy, are independent, consistent with the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, which incorporate the NYSE Director Independence Standards, are available at the Company’s website located at www.umh.reit and in print upon request.

Board Diversity

The Company seeks diversity as to the makeup of its Board of Directors in terms of education, skills and experience, gender, race and ethnicity because of the value of bringing varied backgrounds, viewpoints, and perspectives to the boardroom. Three members of our Board of Directors are female and two members are minorities in terms of race. The average age of our directors is 61 years. Our average director tenure is approximately 16 years and our average independent director tenure is approximately 7 years. Our directors have expertise in a variety of fields, including real estate, cybersecurity, finance, legal and education.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance

The Board of Directors had four meetings during the last year. Each director attended all of the meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of the Committees on which he or she served. The Company does not have a policy concerning directors’ attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Five directors attended the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, of which there is a Cybersecurity Subcommittee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee, of which there is an ESG Subcommittee. Each of these committees and subcommittees is composed exclusively of independent directors.

The following table shows the composition of the Company’s Board committees:

Name		Age as of Record Date		Director Since		Audit Committee		Compensation Committee		Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee
Amy L. Butewicz (1)(2)		40		2020
Jeffrey A. Carus		61		2011
Anna T. Chew Chief Financial and Accounting Officer		65		1995
Kiernan Conway (2)		61		2022
Matthew I. Hirsch Presiding Director		64		2013
Eugene W. Landy Chairman of the Board		90		1968
Michael P. Landy		62		2011
Samuel A. Landy Chief Executive Officer		63		1992
Stuart D. Levy (1)		54		2011
William E. Mitchell (1)		57		2019
Angela D. Pruitt-Marriott (1)(2)		52		2021
Kenneth K. Quigley, Jr.		66		2016

Chair

Member

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing and overseeing financial reporting, policies and procedures and internal controls, retaining the independent registered public accounting firm, approving the audit fees, and monitoring the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. It also oversees the internal audit function, legal and regulatory compliance, establishing procedures for complaints received regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters. In addition, the Audit Committee prepares the Audit Committee Report which is included in the Company’s annual proxy statements. The Audit Committee had eight meetings during the year ended December 31, 2023, including an executive session with the independent registered public accounting firm, which management did not attend. The Audit Committee operates under the Audit Committee Charter which can be found under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

The current members of the Company’s Audit Committee are Jeffrey A. Carus, Kiernan Conway, Stuart D. Levy, and Kenneth K. Quigley, Jr. (who serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee). The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE, is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, is “financially literate” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.

The Cybersecurity Subcommittee (the “Subcommittee”) of the Audit Committee assists the Audit Committee in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Company’s cybersecurity risks. The Subcommittee is comprised of four independent directors: Amy L. Butewicz, Stuart D. Levy and William E. Mitchell (who serves as the Chairman of the Cybersecurity Subcommittee) and Angela D. Pruitt-Marriott. The Subcommittee met at least once during the year ended December 31, 2023. The Subcommittee reviews and provides high level guidance on cybersecurity-related issues of importance to the Company. The Cybersecurity Subcommittee operates under the Cybersecurity Subcommittee Charter which can be found under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include (1) evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s and other Named Executive Officers’ performance in light of the Company’s goals and objectives and determining the Chief Executive Officer’s and other Named Executive Officers’ compensation, which includes base salary and bonus; and (2) administering the Company’s 2023 Equity Incentive Award Plan. The Compensation Committee had at least one meeting during the year ended December 31, 2023. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Jeffrey A. Carus, William E. Mitchell (who serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee), Angela D. Pruitt-Marriott and Kenneth K. Quigley, Jr. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee operates under the Compensation Committee Charter which can be found under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee (formerly the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) identifies, considers and recommends candidates to serve as members of the Board of Directors and makes recommendations regarding the structure and composition of the Board of Directors and Committees. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee also develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance guidelines and, consistent with such guidelines, oversees the evaluation of Board and management. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee had at least one meeting during the year ended December 31, 2023. The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Amy L. Butewicz, Matthew I. Hirsch, Stuart D. Levy (who serves as the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee) and William E. Mitchell. The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee is “independent” as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee operates under its charter which can be found under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

The principal function of the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee is to review and select candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee will consider for recommendation as nominees appropriate individuals whose names are submitted in writing by a shareholder and will evaluate them using the same criteria as that used for other candidates. See “Shareholder Communications” below for more information.

The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee has established a process for identifying and evaluating prospective nominees for director. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee will annually assess the qualifications, expertise, performance and willingness to serve of existing directors. If at this time or at any other time during the year the Board of Directors determines a need to add a new director with specific qualifications or to fill a vacancy on the Board, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee will then initiate the search, seeking input from other directors and senior management, considering nominees previously submitted by shareholders, and, if the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee deems necessary or appropriate, hiring a search firm. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee considers diversity of background and personal experience in identifying director candidates. Specifically, the Committee will examine the following minimum attributes and qualifications of candidates:

An initial slate of candidates satisfying the specific qualifications, if any, and otherwise qualifying for membership on the Board, will be identified and presented to the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee by the Committee Chairman. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee will then prioritize the candidates and determine if the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee members, other directors or senior management have relationships with the preferred candidates and can initiate contact with the candidate. To the extent feasible, all of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board will interview the prospective candidate(s). Evaluations and recommendations of the interviewers are submitted to the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee for final evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee will then meet to consider such recommendations and to select the final candidate(s) to recommend to the Board of Directors as nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee will evaluate all potential nominees for director, including nominees recommended by a shareholder, on the same basis.

To date, there are no third parties being compensated for identifying and evaluating candidates.

The ESG Subcommittee of the Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee was created to assist the Committee in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Company’s environmental, social and corporate governance initiatives. The ESG Subcommittee is comprised of three independent directors: Amy L. Butewicz, Kiernan Conway and Angela D. Pruitt-Marriott (who serves as the Chairperson of the ESG Subcommittee). The ESG Subcommittee was formed at the September 2023 board meeting and started convening meetings in 2024. The ESG Subcommittee operates under the ESG Subcommittee Charter which can be found under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

Independent Director Meetings

The Company’s independent directors, as defined under the listing standards of the NYSE, have established a policy to meet separately from the other directors in a regularly scheduled executive session at least annually and at such additional times as may be deemed appropriate by the Company’s independent directors. The independent directors had at least one meeting during the year ended December 31, 2023. The Board of Directors has selected an independent director, Matthew I. Hirsch, to serve as Presiding Director, in which capacity Mr. Hirsch presides at executive session(s) of the independent directors.

Shareholder Communications

The Company believes that effective corporate governance should include regular constructive discussions with our shareholders. We have a proactive engagement process that encourages feedback from our shareholders. This feedback helps shape our governance practices. Shareholders and other interested parties who desire to contact the Company’s Board of Directors may do so by writing to: Board of Directors, c/o Secretary, UMH Properties, Inc., 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, NJ 07728. Communications received will be distributed to the Chairperson of the appropriate committee of the Board depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Shareholders and other interested parties also may direct communications solely to the Independent Directors of the Company by addressing such communications to the Independent Directors, c/o Secretary, at the address set forth above. In addition, the Board of Directors maintains special procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints that may be received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and for the submission by employees of the Company, on a confidential and anonymous basis, of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Such communications may be made by writing to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, c/o Secretary, at the address set forth above. Any such communication marked “Confidential” will be forwarded by the Secretary, unopened, to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which apply to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. These guidelines are posted under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit. Included in the guidelines is the requirement for the Board of Directors to conduct, at least annually, a self-evaluation to determine whether it and its Committees are functioning effectively. The Audit Committee also performs annual reviews of its performance and compliance with its charter.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer. This code is posted under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit. During 2023 and through the date of this proxy, no violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics were reported nor were any waivers granted.

Vendor Code of Conduct

The Company has adopted a Vendor Code of Conduct that applies to individuals and firms that provide services to the Company. This code is posted under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit. In addition to requiring all vendors to comply with all applicable laws and professional standards, the code sets forth a procedure for reporting misconduct to the Company’s General Counsel.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company considers it inappropriate for any director, officer or employee to enter into speculative transactions in Company securities. Such transactions, while allowing the holder to own Company securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separate the holder’s interests from those of other Company shareholders. Therefore, the Company prohibits the purchase or sale of puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities by directors, officers or employees. Our policy also prohibits hedging or monetization transactions, such as forward sale contracts, in which the holder continues to own the underlying Company security without all the risks or rewards of ownership. The Anti-Hedging Policy is posted under the “Governance” tab of the Company’s investor website: www.umh.reit.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, no director, officer or employee has entered into speculative transactions in Company securities.

CEO Stock Ownership Requirement Policy

Our Chief Executive Officer is required by Company policy to own shares of the Company’s common stock having a value equal to at least six times his base salary. The Chief Executive Officer’s stock ownership level is evaluated on an annual basis. The value of stock holdings is calculated based on the closing price of a share of common stock of the Company on the last trading day of the year, which was $15.32 on December 29, 2023. Shares owned by the Chief Executive Officer include: a) shares owned outright by the Chief Executive Officer or his immediate family members residing in the same household; b) shares held in trust or under a similar arrangement for the economic benefit of the Chief Executive Officer; c) restricted or unrestricted stock issued as part of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, whether or not vested; d) shares acquired upon option exercise that the Chief Executive Officer continues to own; and e) shares held for the Chief Executive Officer’s account in a 401(k) or other retirement plan.

If the Chief Executive Officer meets the ownership requirement at the time of the annual review, he will be in compliance with these requirements until the next annual review. Changes in the Company’s stock price or changes to base salary will not affect compliance status for the remainder of that year. The Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee has authority to administer and interpret these requirements.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Samuel A. Landy, owned shares of the Company’s common stock valued at approximately 24 times his base salary, which is approximately quadruple the Company’s ownership requirement.

Named Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company recommends that each individual serving as a Named Executive Officer of the Company (“NEO”), other than the CEO, own shares of the Company’s common stock having a value equal to at least two times the NEO’s annual base salary. As stated in the foregoing section, the CEO, in accordance with a separate policy on CEO Stock Ownership Requirements, is required to own shares of the Company’s common stock having a value equal to at least six times his base salary. These Named Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines are intended to be a guide; the Company recognizes that each NEO has different personal financial circumstances. Therefore, each NEO is advised to own shares of the Company’s common stock in an amount commensurate with each NEO’s circumstances. Each NEO’s stock ownership level is evaluated by or at the direction of the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in connection with the preparation of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K or the Company’s proxy statement each year. The value of stock holdings is calculated based on the closing price of a share of common stock of the Company on the last trading day of the Company’s fiscal year ending prior to the annual review. Stock that counts towards satisfaction of the Company’s Named Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines includes: a) shares owned outright by the NEO or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; b) shares held in trust or under a similar arrangement for the economic benefit of the NEO; c) restricted or unrestricted stock issued as part of an NEO’s compensation, whether or not vested; d) shares acquired upon option exercise that the NEO continues to own; and e) shares that are held for the NEO under a 401(k) or other retirement plan. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has authority to administer and interpret these guidelines and include these guidelines as part of its annual review of each NEO. As of the proxy record date, all NEOs met or exceeded the ownership guidelines.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company recommends that each non-employee serving as a director on the Board of the Company own shares of the Company’s common stock having a value equal to at least three times the director’s annual cash retainer from the Company. The value of stock holdings is calculated based on the closing price of a share of common stock of the Company on the last trading day of the Company’s fiscal year ending prior to the annual review. Stock that counts towards satisfaction of the Company’s Director Stock Ownership Guidelines includes: a) shares owned outright by the director or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; b) shares held in trust or under a similar arrangement for the economic benefit of the director; c) restricted or unrestricted stock issued as part of a director’s compensation, whether or not vested; and d) shares acquired upon option exercise that the participant continues to own. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has authority to administer and interpret these guidelines and include these guidelines as part of its annual review of directors. As of the proxy record date, seven out of the nine non-employee directors met or exceeded the ownership guidelines.

Clawback Policy

The Board has adopted a clawback policy that provides for the recovery of short-term and long-term incentive compensation received by current and former executive officers and certain other employees in the event of a financial restatement due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities law or to correct a material error. This policy has a three-year lookback period and applies even if there was no misconduct or failure of oversight on the part of an individual executive officer or employee subject to the policy. The Board of the Company shall not have any discretion as to whether to pursue recovery of incentive compensation paid to its employees, except if (i) the Board determines, after reasonable and documented attempts by the Company to recover, that the cost to enforce the Policy in any particular instance would exceed the amount to be recovered, or (ii) recovery would likely cause an otherwise tax-qualified retirement plan to fail to be so qualified.

Human Rights Policy

The Board has adopted a Human Rights Policy to address its responsibility across all business levels, subsidiaries and joint ventures to respect human rights and labor standards, both within the Company and across its value and supply chains. This policy addresses, among other things, non-discrimination, payment of fair compensation, promoting employee health and safety, preventing harassment, providing employees with the support needed to perform their jobs in a responsible manner, and ensuring that the Company’s offices and facilities are accessible for persons with disabilities.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table lists information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Shares as of March 8, 2024, by:

Unless otherwise indicated, the person or persons named below have sole voting and investment power over the Common Shares indicated and that person’s address is c/o UMH Properties, Inc., Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728.

In determining the number and percentage of Common Shares beneficially owned by each person, Common Shares that may be acquired by that person under options exercisable within 60 days of March 8, 2024, are deemed beneficially owned by that person and are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding Common Shares for that person and are not deemed outstanding for that purpose for all other shareholders.

*Less than 1%

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

At the Annual Meeting, the Company’s common shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP (“PKF”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024. The Company’s charter and bylaws do not require that its shareholders ratify the appointment of PKF as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Company is asking its common shareholders to ratify this appointment as a matter of good corporate practice. If the Company’s common shareholders do not ratify the appointment of PKF, the Company’s Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain PKF as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, but may determine to retain PKF. Even if the appointment of PKF is ratified by the Company’s common shareholders, the Audit Committee may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that a change would be in the best interests of the Company. PKF has advised us that neither it nor any member thereof has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in the Company or any of its subsidiaries in any capacity. There have been no disagreements between the Company and PKF relating to accounting procedures, financial statement disclosures or related items. The Company expects a representative of PKF to be present at the Annual Meeting to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

Vote Required:

Approval of the ratification of the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal.

Board Recommendation:

THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS YOU
VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PKF
O’CONNOR DAVIES, LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of UMH operates under a written charter which was amended in January 2020. The amended charter is available on the Company’s website at www.umh.reit.

The Audit Committee consists of four “independent” Directors, as defined by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee’s role is to act on behalf of the Board of Directors in the oversight of all material aspects of the Company’s reporting, internal control and audit functions.

We have reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023.

We have discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), rules of the SEC and other applicable regulations.

We have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, “Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”, and we have discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm, the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee:

Jeffrey A. Carus

Kiernan Conway

Stuart D. Levy

Kenneth K. Quigley, Jr. (Chairman)

FEES BILLED BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. The following are fees billed by and accrued to PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP in connection with services rendered for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:

Audit fees include professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, management’s assessment of internal controls, and reviews of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Audit-related fees include services that are normally provided by the Company’s independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Tax fees include professional services rendered for the preparation of the Company’s federal and state corporate tax returns and supporting schedules as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service and applicable state taxing authorities. Tax fees also include other work directly affecting or supporting the payment of taxes, including planning and research of various tax issues.

All other fees include fees for all other services provided by PKF, other than the services reported above as Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees or Tax Fees.

All of the services performed by PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP for the Company during 2023, including audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and all other fees described above, were either expressly pre-approved by the Audit Committee or were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, and the Audit Committee was provided with regular updates as to the nature of such services and fees paid for such services.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires that all services provided by our principal independent registered public accounting firm to the Company, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, and all have been so pre-approved. The pre-approval requirements do not prohibit day-to-day normal tax consulting services, which matters will not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate.

The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP’s independence.

PROPOSAL 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (as set forth in Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to cast a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation that was paid to our named executive officers in 2023 as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth in this proxy statement, including the compensation tables and the narrative disclosures that accompany those tables.

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 31, 2023, the Company’s shareholders approved by their advisory vote the compensation of the named executive officers. The shareholders also expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year. Accordingly, a shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation will be held at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders. The results of this advisory vote are not binding on the Compensation Committee, the Company or our Board of Directors. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors values input from our shareholders and will consider carefully the results of this vote when making future decisions concerning executive compensation.

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain talented individuals who possess the skills and expertise necessary to lead the Company. The following table highlights important aspects of our executive compensation program, which promotes good corporate governance and serves the interests of our shareholders:

Peer Group

In order to help our shareholders fairly evaluate our executive compensation in light of our relative economic performance, we have selected a peer group of REITs with whom we compete for executive employees, based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors including, but not limited to, total market capitalization, industry, enterprise value and total shareholder return history. We have also taken into consideration the peer decisions made by other companies. This peer group has also been approved by our compensation consultants, Ferguson Partners (“FP”).

The peer group of comparable REITs (“Comparable REITs”) is as follows:

We have removed Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. from our peer group since it was acquired by Regency Centers Corporation in August 2023. We have replaced it with American Assets Trust, Inc. due to it having a similar size market capitalization to UMH and it being listed in 2023 as a member of the Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) peer group for UMH.

Pay for Performance: Total Shareholder Return

From 1968 through 2023, UMH has delivered consistent and reliable returns for its shareholders. The Company has been one of the top 25% performing REITS based upon total shareholder return over the past 5 and 10-year periods and in the top half of all performing REITS over the past 3-year period.¹ Over the past five years, UMH has generated total returns to its shareholders of approximately 64% (approximately 12.8% per annum) which is greater than the 43% return of the MSCI REIT index (RMS) over that same period.²

¹ Source: KeyBanc “The Leaderboard” publication dated December 29, 2023.

² Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence.

³ REIT index represents RMS, a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is comprised of equity REITs and is calculated with dividends reinvested on a daily basis.

Over the same five-year period, and as depicted in the following graphs, the Company has grown its Community Net Operating Income by 78%, total revenue by 60% and increased its total market capitalization by 71%.

The following graph demonstrates our strong total return performance over the 3, 5 and 10-year periods, as of December 31, 2023, compared to that of the Comparable REITs and over the 5 and 10-year periods compared to the MSCI US REIT Index (RMS). Total Return Performance reflects stock price appreciation and dividend reinvestment.

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence

Lesser Pay for Greater Performance

While the Company has outperformed its peers and rewarded its shareholders with its substantial total returns, our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation in 2023 was below the median and average total executive compensation of the CEOs for the Comparable REITs. It was also less than half of the median and average total compensation of CEOs for REITs in the residential property sector and REITs with similar numbers of full-time employees, based upon the 2023 National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) Compensation Survey. Although our operating results over the past year were impacted by our investments to grow the company through value-add acquisitions, developments, inflation and rising interest rates as well as backlogs to obtain rental homes and inventory for sale, which have now been resolved, the Company has consistently outperformed the Comparable REITs (RMS) over the past 1, 3, 5 and 10-year periods and the RMS over the past 5 and 10-year periods.

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews all elements of the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers. The Committee believes that the Company’s present compensation programs, as presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the accompanying tables and related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement, promote in the best manner possible, our business objectives while aligning the interests of the Named Executive Officers with our shareholders to ensure continued positive financial results. Our results support this conclusion. By adhering to a business plan that has emphasized manufactured home communities, coupled with a strong balance sheet, the Company has continued to grow and deliver positive results to its shareholders. The Company is proud of its long-term record of dividends and profitability. The compensation programs for our named executives are a key ingredient in motivating these executives to continue to deliver such results.

Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as set forth in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”

Vote Required:

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, assuming a quorum is present, is required to approve the advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers.

Board Recommendation:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Overview of Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee (for purposes of this analysis, the “Committee”) of the Board has been appointed to implement the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Committee has the overall responsibility for approving and evaluating the executive officer compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company. The Committee’s primary objectives include serving as an independent and objective party to review such compensation plans, policies and programs.

The five individuals who served during 2023 as the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer are included in the Summary Compensation Table presented below in this Proxy Statement. These individuals, who are the Company’s five most highly compensated executive officers, are sometimes referred to in this Proxy Statement as the “Named Executive Officers.” In connection with the preparation of new employment agreements for the Named Executive Officers, which were entered into during 2023 and took effect as of January 1, 2023, the Committee retained the advice of a compensation consultant, Ferguson Partners (“FP”), to conduct an overview of peer companies’ employment arrangements and compensation practices for senior executives and to consult with the Committee with respect to the amount of compensation for our Named Executive Officers and other terms and conditions, including the short and long-term incentive programs, for the new employment agreements. The Committee determined that the amount of compensation that FP was paid for their services was reasonable and customary.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Committee believes that a well-designed compensation program should align the goals of the Named Executive Officers with the goals of the shareholders, and that a significant part of each executive’s compensation, over the long term, should be dependent upon the value created for shareholders. In addition, all executives should be held accountable through their compensation for the performance of the Company, and compensation levels should also reflect the executive’s individual performance to encourage increased individual contributions to the Company’s performance. The compensation philosophy, as reflected in the Company’s employment agreements with its executives and the overall compensation program, is designed to motivate executives to focus on operating results and create long-term shareholder value by:

The salaries and bonuses provided for in the Company’s executed executive employment agreements are consistent with the Committee’s philosophy and objectives.

The Committee believes that each of the above factors is important when determining compensation levels for Named Executive Officers. The Committee reviews and approves the employment contracts for the Named Executive Officers and reviews and approves the performance goals and objectives applicable to their performance-based compensation. The Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Named Executive Officers in light of those goals and objectives. The Committee considers the Company’s performance, relative stockholder return, the total compensation provided to comparable officers at similarly-situated companies, including the Comparable REITs (defined above), and compensation given to Named Executive Officers in prior years.

In addition to obtaining advice from the Company’s compensation consultant, FP, the Committee uses the annual Compensation Survey published by Nareit (the “Survey”) as a guide to setting compensation levels. Participant company data is not presented in a manner that specifically identifies any named individual or company. The Survey details compensation by position type and company size with statistical salary and bonus information for each position. The sub-sets presented in the Survey used by the Committee for comparison are the residential property sector, entities with less than $1.5 billion in equity market capitalization and entities with more than 300 but less than 750 full-time employees. The Company’s salaries, bonus amounts and long-term compensation awards are compared to the ranges presented for reasonableness. The Committee believes executive compensation packages provided by the Company to its executive officers should include base salaries, annual bonuses and long-term compensation awards that reward corporate and individual performance, as well as give incentives to executives to meet or exceed established goals. As a result, an important portion of the Company’s compensation program is comprised of discretionary bonuses and equity awards as determined by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements, as well as overall Company performance.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

The Committee makes all final compensation decisions for the Company’s Named Executive Officers.

Role of Grants of Stock Options and Restricted Stock in Compensation Analysis

The Committee views the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards as a form of long-term compensation. The Committee believes that such grants promote the Company’s goal of retaining key employees and align the key employee’s interests with those of the Company’s shareholders from a long-term perspective. The number of options or shares of restricted stock granted to each employee is determined by consideration of various factors including, but not limited to, the employee’s contribution, title, responsibilities and years of service. The Committee takes outstanding awards of stock options and restricted stock into account in making its compensation determinations.

Role of Employment Agreements in Determining Executive Compensation

All of the Company’s currently employed Named Executive Officers are parties to employment agreements. These agreements provide for base salaries, bonuses and customary fringe benefits. The employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, by the employee for good reason or due to the employee’s death or disability. Such severance benefits are designed to alleviate the financial impact of termination of employment, with the intent of providing for a stable work environment. Other key elements of the Company’s compensation program for the Named Executive Officers are stock options, restricted stock awards and other benefits. Each of these is addressed separately below. In determining initial compensation, the Committee considers all elements of a named executive officer’s total compensation package in comparison to current market practices and other benefits. In reviewing and setting compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee takes the terms of the employment agreements into consideration.

Shareholder Advisory Vote

The Committee believes that one way to determine if the Company’s compensation program reflects the interests of shareholders is through their nonbinding vote. At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 31, 2023, over 94% of votes cast (excluding broker non-votes) were voted in favor of our Say-On-Pay proposal, which we believe affirms our shareholders’ support of our approach to our executive compensation program.

Base Salaries

Base salaries are paid for ongoing performance throughout the year. In order to compete for and retain talented executives who are critical to the Company’s long-term success, the Committee has determined that the base salaries of Named Executive Officers should approximate those of executives of other equity REITs that compete with the Company for employees, investors and business, while also taking into account the Named Executive Officers’ performance and tenure and the Company’s performance relative to its peer companies within the REIT industry using the Survey described above.

Bonuses

Short-Term Incentive Program (STIP)

In addition to the provisions for base salaries under the terms of their employment agreements and discretionary cash bonuses awarded by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer are entitled to receive annual cash bonuses for each year during the terms of each respective agreement. Bonuses, as approved by management, are measured from the appropriate prior and current year-end audited financial statements. 75% of the cash bonus for these executive officers are based on the increase in Normalized Funds from Operations (“Normalized FFO”) per share, which does not include any gains or losses from the stock portfolio. The remaining 25% of the cash bonuses for these executive officers is at the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on but not limited to Normalized FFO growth; TSR; occupancy growth; same property NOI growth; sales growth; general and administrative expense management; growth of rental homes; acquisition targets; expansions and development of sites (including by the Company’s Joint Venture with Nuveen Real Estate); capital raising/refinancing; and ESG.

The Company considers FFO and Normalized FFO to be an important measure of an equity REIT’s operating performance. We define FFO as net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders, as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”), excluding extraordinary items, as defined under U.S. GAAP, gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, impairment charges related to depreciable real estate assets, the change in the fair value of marketable securities and the gain or loss on the sale of marketable securities plus certain non-cash items such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization. We define Normalized FFO as FFO excluding one-time charges. FFO and Normalized FFO exclude historical cost depreciation as an expense and may facilitate the comparison of REITs which have a different cost basis. However, other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate FFO and Normalized FFO and, accordingly, our FFO and Normalized FFO may not be comparable to all other REITs. The Company considers FFO and Normalized FFO to be meaningful, additional measures of operating performance primarily because they exclude the assumption that the value of its real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and because industry analysts have accepted these as performance measures.

In setting discretionary bonuses for 2023, the Committee also considered management’s report on the Company’s 2023 achievements in financial performance, strategic growth and financial position, and the role of each named executive officer in delivering these achievements. The factors that were considered included the progress that was made by the Company during 2023 due to the efforts of management, described in the Business Highlights section on page 5 of this proxy statement. After considering the Company’s 2023 achievements in financial performance, strategic growth and financial position, as outlined above, as well as the individual performance of the Named Executive Officers, the Committee established the individual discretionary cash bonuses for the Named Executive Officers based on the Company’s overall performance and the Named Executive Officers’ individual contributions to these accomplishments.

Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP)

Stock options and restricted stock awards granted to employees typically vest over five years, 20% per year, to encourage employee retention and ensure that their interests are aligned with those of the shareholders. As subsequently described in greater detail, the employment agreements for the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer have three, equally-weighted components that comprise the LTIP: time-based, performance-based strategic milestones and performance-based total shareholder return.

Annual stock option awards of up to 50,000 shares shall also be granted to Named Executive Officers for the achievement of any of the bonus categories and/or in combination with the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on, but not limited to, Normalized FFO growth; TSR; occupancy growth; same property NOI growth; sales growth; general and administrative expense management; growth of rental homes; acquisition targets; expansions and development of sites (including the Joint Venture); capital raising/refinancing; and ESG. The Committee determines the size of the restricted stock grants and option awards based upon the Committee’s decision as to the degree to which that the relevant performance metrics have been achieved and, in the case of executives other than the CEO, taking into consideration the recommendations of the CEO.

Other Personal Benefits

The Company’s Named Executive Officers are provided with other personal benefits that the Company and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program to better enable the Company to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Committee periodically reviews the levels of other personal benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

The Named Executive Officers who are subject to employment agreements are provided the following benefits under the terms of their employment agreements: an allotted number of paid vacation weeks; eligibility for the executives, spouses and dependents in all Company sponsored employee benefits plans, including 401(k) plan, group health insurance, on such terms no less favorable than applicable to any other executive. Attributed costs of the personal benefits described above for the Named Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2023, are included in “All Other Compensation” of the Summary Compensation Table provided below in this Proxy Statement.

Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

In addition, the Named Executive Officers’ employment agreements each contain provisions relating to change in control events and severance upon termination. These change in control and severance terms are designed to promote stability and continuity of senior management. Information regarding these provisions is included in “Employment Agreements” provided below in this Proxy Statement. There are no other agreements or arrangements governing change in control payments.

Evaluation

Mr. Eugene W. Landy is employed under an amended employment agreement with the Company. His base compensation under his amended contract has remained at $250,000 per year since 2014. Mr. Landy also received a bonus for 2023 of $119,615 and stock options to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s stock, primarily based on performance, including growth of the Company. This stock option has a grant date fair value of $3.10 per share, for a total grant date fair value of approximately $233,000. Additionally, during 2023, Mr. Landy was awarded $50,000 in lieu of a $50,000 retirement benefit to which he is entitled under his employment agreement. Due to the fact that he has continued to serve the Company, the Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to pay him an amount equivalent to the retirement benefit that he would have been entitled to had he retired.

Mr. Samuel Landy is employed under an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with the Company. His base compensation under this contract was $766,000 for 2023. Ms. Anna Chew is employed under an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with the Company. Her base compensation under this contract was $591,000 for 2023. Mr. Craig Koster is employed under an employment agreement with the Company. His base compensation under this contract was $425,000 for 2023. Mr. Brett Taft is employed under an employment agreement with the Company. His base compensation under this contract was $390,000 for 2023. In evaluating Mr. Landy’s, Ms. Chew’s, Mr. Koster’s and Mr. Taft’s eligibility for a short-term cash bonus, long-term equity compensation and discretionary bonuses, as set forth in the below Summary Compensation Table, the Compensation Committee used a combination of corporate and financial metrics as well as time-based vesting requirements. The performance-based metrics include, but are not limited to, normalized FFO per share growth, total shareholder return, same property occupancy increase, NOI growth, sale increase, acquisitions, development of sites (including through any joint ventures), capital raising and ESG. Awarded equity compensation is also based in part upon the performance-based relative shareholder return of the Company as compared to the MSCI US REIT Index.

All Named Executive Officers were awarded their respective compensation based on their respective employment agreements and the many contributions that they have made towards the Company’s achievements. In addition to its determination of the executive’s individual performance levels for 2023, the Committee compared the executive’s total compensation for 2023 to that of similarly-situated personnel in the REIT industry using the 2023 Nareit Compensation Survey as well as the total compensation of executives of the Comparable REITs. The Company’s salary and bonus amounts were compared to the ranges presented for reasonableness.

Risk Management

The Committee has assessed our compensation program for the purpose of viewing and considering any risks presented by our compensation policies and practices that are likely to have a material adverse effect on us. As part of that assessment, management reviewed the primary elements of our compensation program, including base salary, annual cash bonus opportunities, long-term equity compensation and severance arrangements. Management’s risk assessment included a review of the overall design of each primary element of our compensation program, and an analysis of the various design features, controls and approval rights in place with respect to compensation paid to management and other employees that mitigate potential risks to us that could arise from our compensation program. Following the assessment, management determined that our compensation policies and practices did not create risks that were reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us and reported the results of the assessment to the Committee.

Clawback Policy

As described above on page 25, compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers is subject to our Compensation Clawback policy, which provides for the recovery of short-term and long-term incentive compensation received by executive officers and certain other employees in the event of a financial restatement due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities law or to correct a material error. During 2023, there were no events that triggered a right to a clawback of compensation from any of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee:

William E. Mitchell (Chairman)

Jeffrey A. Carus

Angela D. Pruitt-Marriott

Kenneth K. Quigley, Jr.

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table shows compensation paid by the Company for services rendered during 2023, 2022 and 2021 to the five Named Executive Officers.

Pay Versus Performance Table

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. The following table discloses information on compensation actually paid (“CAP”) to our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and (on average) to our other NEOs (“non-PEO NEOs”) during the specified years alongside TSR and net income metrics, as well as a Company-selected measure of Normalized Funds from Operations (“Normalized FFO”). The Company selected this measure as the most important in linking compensation actually paid to our NEOs for 2023 to Company performance, as Normalized FFO was the predominant metric used in our 2020-2023 performance awards as described in more detail beginning on page 41.

Pay versus Performance

PEO Reconciliation of SCT to CAP

PEO CAP Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation