DEF 14A
1
a2058814zdef14a.txt
DEF 14A
VALUE LINE, INC.
220 EAST 42ND STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
--------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
-------------
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Value
Line, Inc. (the "Company") will be held on October 11, 2001, at 9:30 a.m. at the
New York Helmsley Hotel, Turtle Bay Room, 212 East 42nd Street, 3rd Floor, New
York, NY 10017 for the following purposes:
1. To elect seven directors of Value Line, Inc.; and
2. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on September 14, 2001 will
be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournments
thereof.
We urge you to vote on the business to come before the meeting by promptly
executing and returning the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided or by
casting your vote in person at the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors
HOWARD A. BRECHER,
VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY
New York, New York
September 20, 2001
VALUE LINE, INC.
220 EAST 42ND STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
--------------
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS--OCTOBER 11, 2001
--------------
PROXY STATEMENT
The following information is furnished to each shareholder in connection
with the foregoing Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Value Line, Inc.
(the "Company") to be held on October 11, 2001. The enclosed proxy is for use at
the meeting and any adjournments thereof. This Proxy Statement and the form of
proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about September 20, 2001.
The enclosed proxy is being solicited by and on behalf of the Board of
Directors of the Company. A proxy executed on the enclosed form may be revoked
by the shareholder at any time before the shares are voted by delivering written
notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company, by executing a later dated
proxy or by attending the meeting and voting in person. The shares represented
by all proxies which are received by the Company in proper form will be voted as
specified. If no specification is made in a proxy, the shares represented
thereby will be voted for the election of the Board's nominees as Directors.
The expense in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be borne by
the Company.
Only holders of Common Stock of record at the close of business on
September 14, 2001 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. On that date, there
were 9,979,325 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, the holders of
which are entitled to one vote per share.
Under the New York Business Corporation Law (the "BCL") and the Company's
By-Laws, the presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on a particular matter
is necessary to constitute a quorum of shareholders to take action at the Annual
Meeting with respect to such matter. For these purposes, shares which are
present, or represented by a proxy, at the Annual Meeting will be counted for
quorum purposes regardless of whether the holder of the shares or proxy fails to
vote on any particular matter or whether a broker with discretionary authority
fails to exercise its discretionary voting authority with respect to any
particular matter. Once a quorum of the shareholders is established, under the
BCL and the Company's By-Laws, the nominees standing for election as directors
will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast and each other matter will be
decided by a majority of the votes cast on the matter, except as otherwise
provided by law or the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or By-Laws. For
voting purposes (as opposed to for purposes of establishing a quorum)
abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining whether the
nominees standing for election as directors have been elected and whether each
other matter has been approved.
1
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information as of September 14, 2001 as to
shares of the Company's Common Stock held by persons known to the Company to be
the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock.
Name and Address Number of Shares Percentage of Shares
of Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned Beneficially Owned(1)
------------------- ------------------ ---------------------
Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc.(1) 8,609,403 86.27%
220 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
---------
(1) Jean Bernhard Buttner, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, owns all of the outstanding voting stock of Arnold
Bernhard & Co., Inc.
The following table sets forth information as of July 31, 2001 with respect
to shares of the Company's Common Stock owned by each nominee for director of
the Company, by each executive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table
and by all executive officers and directors as a group.
Name of Number of Shares Percentage of Shares
Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned Beneficially Owned
---------------- ------------------ --------------------
Jean Bernhard Buttner 100(1) *
Harold Bernard, Jr. 432 *
Howard A. Brecher 2,800(2) *
Samuel Eisenstadt 100 *
David T. Henigson 150 *
Herbert Pardes 100 *
Marion N. Ruth 200 *
All directors and executive officers
as a group (7 persons) 3,882(1)(2) *
---------
* Less than one percent
(1) Excludes 8,609,403 shares (86.27% of the outstanding shares) owned by Arnold
Bernhard & Co., Inc.
(2) Includes 2,275 shares purchasable within 60 days of July 31, 2001 upon the
exercise of stock options by Mr. Brecher.
2
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the meeting, seven directors are to be elected. If no contrary indication
is made, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote for the election of
the nominees listed below. If any nominee shall become unavailable for reasons
presently unknown, the proxy will be voted for the election of the other
nominees named herein and may be voted for the election of a substitute nominee.
During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001, there were four meetings of the
Board of Directors. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings held
during the year of the Board of Directors and of each committee on which he or
she served.
The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee which consists of
Harold Bernard, Jr., Herbert Pardes, M.D. and Marion N. Ruth. The Committee held
two meetings during the year ended April 30, 2001 to discuss audit and financial
reporting matters with both management and the Company's independent public
accountants. The Board of Directors has also established a Compensation
Committee consisting of Marion N. Ruth, Howard A. Brecher and David T. Henigson.
The Committee held two meetings following the close of the 2001 fiscal year to
discuss the compensation of the chief executive officer. The Company does not
have a standing nominating committee.
A director who is also an employee of the Company receives no compensation
for his service on the Board in addition to that compensation which he receives
as an employee. For fiscal 2001, a director who was not an employee of the
Company was paid a director's fee of $3,000 per year plus $1,750 for each Board
meeting attended and $2,500 for each Audit Committee meeting attended.
Information concerning the nominees for directors appears in the following
table. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the following has held an
executive position with the companies indicated for at least five years.
NOMINEE, AGE AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 DIRECTOR
AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION SINCE
------------------------------------- --------
Jean Bernhard Buttner* (66). Chairman of the Board, 1982
President, and Chief Executive and Operating Officer of the
Company and Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc.; Chairman of the
Board and President and Director or Trustee of each of the
Value Line Funds; Trustee, Skidmore College.
Harold Bernard, Jr. (70). Attorney-at-law. Retired 1982
Administrative Law Judge, National Labor Relations Board.
Director of Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc. Judge Bernard is a
cousin of Jean Bernhard Buttner.
Samuel Eisenstadt (79). Senior Vice President and Research 1982
Chairman of the Company.
Howard A. Brecher* (47). Vice President of the Company since 1992
1996 and Secretary since 1992; Secretary, Treasurer and
General Counsel of Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc. since 1991,
Director since 1992 and Vice President since 1994.
David T. Henigson* (44). Vice President of the Company since 1992
1992 and Treasurer since 1994; Director of Compliance and
Internal Audit of the Company since 1988; Vice President of
each of the Value Line Funds since 1992 and Secretary and
Treasurer since 1994; Vice President and Director of Arnold
Bernhard & Co., Inc. since 1992.
Herbert Pardes, M.D. (67). President and CEO of 2000
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital since 2000; Vice President for
Health Sciences and Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at the
College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University
(1989-2000).
Marion N. Ruth (66). Real Estate Executive. President, Ruth 2000
Realty (real estate broker). Director or Trustee of each of
the Value Line Funds.
---------
* Member of the Executive Committee.
3
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for
services in all capacities to the Company for the fiscal years ended April 30,
2001, 2000 and 1999 of the chief executive officer of the Company and each of
the other executive officers of the Company who were serving at April 30, 2001.
The Company has four executive officers.
Long-Term
Compensation
--------------------
Awards
--------------------
Restricted
Annual Compensation Stock Options All Other
Name and Fiscal --------------------------- Award(s) Granted Compensation (b)
Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus (a)($) ($) (#) ($)
------------------------- ------ ----------- ------------- ---------- ------- -----------------
Jean B. Buttner 2001 853,092 900,000 -- -- 18,311
Chairman of the Board and 2000 826,807 900,000 -- -- 20,944
Chief Executive Officer 1999 807,611 800,000 -- -- 19,777
Samuel Eisenstadt 2001 128,750 120,000 -- -- 15,450
Senior Vice President and 2000 125,000 120,000 -- -- 17,500
Research Chairman 1999 125,000 110,000 -- -- 16,625
David T. Henigson 2001 100,000 375,000 -- -- 12,000
Vice President 2000 100,000 300,000 -- -- 14,000
1999 100,000 242,500 -- -- 14,000
Howard A. Brecher 2001 50,000 295,000 -- -- 6,000
Vice President 2000 50,000 250,000 -- -- 7,000
1999 50,000 210,000 -- -- 7,000
----------
(a) A portion of the bonuses are contingent upon future employment.
(b) Employees of the Company are members of the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan
(the "Plan"). The Plan provides for a discretionary annual contribution out
of net operating income which is (subject to legal limitations)
proportionate to the salaries of eligible employees. The Company's
contribution expense was $1,180,000 for the year ended April 30, 2001. Each
employee's interest in the Plan is invested in such proportions as the
employee may elect in shares of one or more of the mutual funds available
under the Plan for which the Company acts as investment adviser.
Distributions under the Plan vest in accordance with a schedule based upon
the employee's length of service and are payable upon request at the time of
the employee's retirement, death, total disability, or termination of
employment.
4
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION
VALUES
The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired by any of the
named persons upon exercise of stock options in fiscal 2001, the value realized
through the exercise of such options, and the number of unexercised options held
by such person, including both those which are presently exercisable, and those
which are not presently exercisable.
Number of Value of Unexercised
Unexercised Options In-the-Money Options at
at April 30, 2001 April 30, 2001 (1)
Shares Acquired ------------------------- -----------------------------
Upon Option Value Not Not
Name Exercise Realized (1) Exercisable Exercisable Exercisable Exercisable
---- --------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------------
Howard A. Brecher 300 $2,925 2,675 -- $27,419 --
---------
(1) Market value of underlying securities at exercise date or year-end, as the
case may be, minus the exercise price.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc. utilizes the services of officers and employees
of the Company to the extent necessary to conduct its business. The Company and
Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc. allocate costs for office space, equipment and
supplies and staff pursuant to a servicing and reimbursement arrangement. During
the year ended April 30, 2001, the Company was reimbursed $549,000 for such
expenses. In addition, a tax-sharing arrangement allocates the tax liabilities
of the two companies between them. The Company pays to Arnold Bernhard &
Co., Inc. an amount equal to the Company's liability as if it filed separate tax
returns.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised of the three
independent directors named below. The Committee has adopted a written charter
which has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and which is
set forth in Appendix A of this Proxy Statement. The Committee has reviewed and
discussed Value Line's audited financial statements with management. The
Committee has discussed with Horowitz & Ullmann, P.C., the Company's outside
auditing firm, the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Communication
with Audit Committee). The Committee has received the written disclosures and
the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence
Discussions with Audit Committees) and has discussed with Horowitz & Ullmann,
P.C. its independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements
certified by Horowitz & Ullmann, P.C. be included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Harold Bernard, Jr.
Herbert Pardes, M.D.
Marion N. Ruth
5
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001, fees for services provided by
Horowitz & Ullmann, P.C., were as follows:
Audit services $111,595
Financial information systems design and implementation 0
All other (including tax consulting) 149,960
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Company's executive compensation program is intended to enable the
Company to attract and retain able and experienced executives, to promote
successful corporate performance and to compensate appropriately executives who
contribute to the management and long-term profitability of the Company. The
following guidelines have been established to carry out this policy:
(a) Base salaries and bonuses should be maintained at levels consistent with
competitive market compensation practices; and
(b) A portion of the executive compensation should reflect the performance
of the Company and the individual.
The Company's compensation program is comprised of two main components: Base
Salary and Incentive Compensation (Bonus).
BASE SALARY
Base salaries for the Company's executives take into account the amounts
paid by companies of comparable size engaged in the business of publishing or
investment management, as applicable. The Committee believes that the base
salary levels as established are reasonable and competitive and necessary to
attract and retain key employees.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
Bonus payments are awarded to executives based upon competitive conditions,
individual performance and the success of the Company. The performance of the
Company and attainment of individual goals and objectives are given
approximately equal weighting in determining bonuses paid to all executive
officers.
The Internal Revenue Code limits to one million dollars the allowable tax
deduction that may be taken by the Company for compensation paid to each
executive officer included in the Summary Compensation Table. Compensation in
excess of the one million dollar level is deductible only if a series of
requirements including fixed numerical performance goals are met. The Company's
compensation program does not attempt to meet all the applicable Internal
Revenue Service requirements for such a deduction because the Company considers
it essential to retain flexibility in establishing performance standards which
recognize a full range of the criteria important to the Company's long-run
success, such as appropriate investments in product and service development and
other strategic decisions, even where some portion of executive compensation may
not be deductible. These strategic investments could decrease earnings (and
executive bonuses) in the short run while yielding returns to the Company in the
future. In addition, performance goals
6
for the Company would be difficult to set appropriately because the Company has
several important lines of business, the financial results for which depend to
varying but substantial degrees on equity market conditions beyond its control.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2001
Jean B. Buttner's base salary in fiscal 2001 was increased from that paid in
fiscal 2000 on the basis of the general cost-of-living percentage increase
awarded to Company personnel. Mrs. Buttner was awarded a bonus under the
Company's annual incentive compensation plan for fiscal 2001 of $900,000. In
establishing this bonus, consideration was given to several important individual
and Company achievements during the fiscal year, including restructuring of
investment advisory related fees to enhance marketing capabilities while
increasing revenues. Mrs. Buttner was also responsible for major strategic
initiatives including strategic outsourcing alliances.
At the request of the Compensation Committee, Pearl Meyer & Partners, Inc.,
executive compensation consultants, provided a study and recommendation in
regard to Mrs. Buttner's fiscal 2001 compensation. The study included a
comparative analysis of both Mrs. Buttner's compensation and the financial
performance of the Company in relation to a peer group developed by the
consultants which is set forth on page 9.
The Company has two substantial lines of business, whereas most of its
competitors have a single line of business. As a result, the Committee
considered CEO compensation in both the investment management and publishing
industries. Compensation in investment management was deemed more relevant in
determining compensation for the CEO position, pursuant to analysis provided by
Pearl Meyer & Partners, Inc.
Pearl Meyer & Partners, Inc. observed in its report for 2001, that the
Company attained excellent results for operating income, revenue and growth in
shareholder return. Performance was strong relative to a peer group of asset
managers, financial services firms and specialty publishers. Overall, the report
noted, the Company continued to deliver strong net income and impressive
shareholder returns, provide high quality products and position itself for
growth in long-term value reflecting, in large measure, Mrs. Buttner's strategic
leadership. Her leadership contributions included, among others, the decision to
restructure the Company's investment portfolio, which yielded income tax savings
of nearly $4 million.
The report indicated that based on Pearl Meyer's surveyed compensation data,
Mrs. Buttner's total compensation for fiscal 2001 would rank her near the median
among those in the peer group. It concluded that given the Company's financial
performance and shareholder returns in the difficult equity market environment
of 2000-2001, Mrs. Buttner's total direct compensation for fiscal 2001 is
reasonable in terms of that offered by comparable companies. The report added
that when stock options granted by peer companies to their chief executives--but
not granted to Mrs. Buttner-- are taken into account, the Value Line chief
executive's total remuneration falls below the median. Mrs. Buttner, through her
ownership of stock of Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc., holds a very significant
economic interest in the Company. Although normally stock options would almost
certainly be a part of her compensation package, the Committee believed that her
existing significant ownership interest made stock option grants redundant.
7
The report recommended a moderate increase in fiscal 2001 compensation for
Mrs. Buttner. Based on Mrs. Buttner's request that her annual incentive
compensation not be increased in light of the difficult environment in which the
Company operated in fiscal 2001, the Committee determined that the 2001
compensation package described above was reasonable and appropriate.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Marion N. Ruth
Howard A. Brecher
David T. Henigson
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS
AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The names of the members of the Compensation Committee during the fiscal
year ended April 30, 2001 are set forth above. During such fiscal year, each of
Howard A. Brecher and David T. Henigson served as an officer and director of the
Company and each of its subsidiaries. Each of such individuals also served as an
officer and director of Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc. Marion N. Ruth served as a
director of the Company and as a director or trustee of each of the Value Line
Mutual Funds. Certain relationships between the Company and Arnold Bernhard &
Co., Inc. are described above under "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
8
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Value Line, Inc., Russell 2000 Index And Peer Group
(Performance Results Through 4/30/00)
EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC
VALUE LINE, INC. RUSSELL 2000 INDEX PEER GROUP
1996 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
1997 $150.51 $100.01 $116.43
1998 $208.61 $142.03 $174.83
1999 $176.43 $128.38 $164.95
2000 $170.86 $150.16 $233.28
2001 $200.65 $142.08 $332.61
Value Line, Inc. $100.00 $150.51 $208.61 $176.43 $170.86 $200.65
Russell 2000
Index $100.00 $100.01 $142.03 $128.38 $150.16 $142.08
Peer Group $100.00 $116.43 $174.83 $164.95 $233.28 $332.61
Assumes $100 invested at the close of trading 4/30/96 in Value Line, Inc. common
stock, Russell 2000 Index, and Peer Group.
*Cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.
(1) The Peer Group is comprised of the following companies:
Atalanta Sosnoff Capital Corp.
Courier Corp.
Eaton Vance Corp.
Federated Investors Inc PA
Hoenig Group, Inc.
Hungary Minds, Inc.
John Nuveen Co.
Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Thomas Nelson Inc.
Waddell & Reed Financial Inc.
(2) The Company believes that its total return is impaired by the relatively
small float of public shares outstanding and the resulting general illiquidity
in trading and lack of analyst coverage for its stock.
9
The Compensation Committee Report, the Report of the Audit Committee and the
Comparative Five-Year Total Returns graph shall not be deemed to be "soliciting
material" or to be "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission or
subject to Regulation 14A or 14C of the Regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The independent certified public accountants selected by the Board of
Directors to audit the Company's books and records for the 2002 fiscal year are
the firm of Horowitz & Ullmann, P.C., which firm also audited the Company's
books and records for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001. It is expected that
a representative of Horowitz & Ullmann, P.C. will be present at the Annual
Meeting. The representative of Horowitz & Ullmann, P.C. will have an opportunity
to make a statement if he desires to do so and will be available to respond to
appropriate shareholder questions.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholder proposals intended for presentation at the next Annual Meeting
of Shareholders must be received by the Company for inclusion in its proxy
statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting no later than May 13, 2002.
The Company's By-Laws contain other procedures for proposals to be properly
brought before an annual meeting of shareholders. To be timely, a shareholder
must have given written notice of a proposal to the Chairman of the Board of
Directors with a copy to the Secretary and such notice must be received at the
principal executive offices of the Company not less than thirty nor more than
sixty days prior to the scheduled annual meeting; provided, however, that if
less than forty days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the
scheduled annual meeting is given or made, notice by the shareholder to be
timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth day
following the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the
scheduled annual meeting was mailed or the day on which such public disclosure
was made. Such shareholder's notice shall set forth as to each matter the
shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting (i) a brief description
of the proposal desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons
for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and address,
as they appear on the Company's books, of the shareholder proposing such
business, (iii) the class and number of shares which are beneficially owned by
the shareholder on the date of such shareholder notice and (iv) any material
interest of the shareholder in such proposal.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
ANY SHAREHOLDER WHO DESIRES A COPY OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2001 FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION MAY OBTAIN A COPY (EXCLUDING EXHIBITS) WITHOUT CHARGE BY
ADDRESSING A REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY AT 220 EAST 42ND STREET,
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017. EXHIBITS MAY ALSO BE REQUESTED, AT A CHARGE EQUAL TO
THE REPRODUCTION AND MAILING COSTS.
GENERAL
The Board of Directors is not aware of any business to come before the
meeting other than that set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. However, if any other business is properly brought before the
meeting, it is the intention of the persons directed to vote the shareholders'
stock to vote such stock in accordance with their best judgment.
The Company is mailing its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2001 to shareholders together with this Proxy Statement.
10
Appendix A
VALUE LINE, INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Value Line, Inc. (the "Company")
shall appoint the Audit Committee (the "Audit Committee") which should be
constituted and have the responsibility and authority as described herein.
COMPOSITION
The Audit Committee shall meet the size, independence and experience
requirements of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
RESPONSIBILITY
The Audit Committee's primary responsibility shall be to assist the Board in
monitoring the financial statements of the Company and the independence of the
Company's external auditors.
In carrying out its responsibility, the Audit Committee shall undertake the
following activities:
1. Recommend to the Board, in advance of the annual meeting of the
shareholders, the appointment of the independent auditor to audit the books,
records and accounts of the Company. Such independent auditor is ultimately
accountable to the Board and the Audit Committee, as representatives of the
shareholders.
2. Meet with the independent auditor prior to the audit to review the planning
and staffing of the audit and approve the proposed fee for the audit.
3. Receive written periodic reports from the independent auditor delineating
all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company. This
report shall be consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1
regarding the auditor's independence. The Audit Committee shall actively
engage in dialogue with the independent auditor with respect to any
disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and
independence of the auditor, and if determined by the Audit Committee,
recommend that the Board take appropriate action to insure the independence
of the auditor.
4. Discuss with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 relating to the conduct of the audit,
including:
(a) Any difficulties encountered in the course of the audit work, including
any restrictions on the scope of activities or access to required
information.
(b) Significant financial reporting issues and judgments.
(c) Any major changes to the Company's auditing and accounting principles
and practices.
5. Obtain from the independent auditor assurance that Section 10A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 has not been implicated.
6. Review the Company's annual audited financial statements and the report
thereon with the independent auditor and management prior to the publication
of such statements.
7. Adopt the report (to be prepared by the Company's legal counsel) required by
the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in the
Company's annual proxy statement, which shall include a statement of whether
the Audit Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K.
8. Review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually and submit it to
the Board for approval.
The Audit Committee shall meet at least two times a year and make an oral
report to the Board following each meeting.
While the Audit Committee has the responsibility and authority set forth in
this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct
audits or to determine that the Company's financial statements are complete and
accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
This is the responsibility of management and the independent auditor. Nor is it
the duty of the Audit Committee to conduct investigations, to resolve
disagreements, if any, between management and the independent auditor or to
assure compliance with laws and regulations.
P
R VALUE LINE, INC.
O 220 EAST 42ND STREET
X NEW YORK, NY 10017
Y THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby authorizes and directs Howard A. Brecher and
David T. Henigson and each of them, with full power of substitution, to vote
the stock of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of VALUE
LINE, INC. on Thursday, October 11, 2001, or at any adjournments thereof as
hereinafter specified and, in their discretion, to vote according to their
best judgment upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournments thereof.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
PLEASE MARK
YOUR VOTES AS /X/
INDICATED IN
THIS EXAMPLE
ELECTION OF NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS: 01 H. BERNARD, JR., 02 H.A. Director, 03 J. BUTTNER, 04 S. EISENSTADT,
05 D.T. HENIGSON, 06 H.PARDES AND 07 M.N. RUTH
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD (INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee,
listed above AUTHORITY write that nominee's name on the space provided below.)
(except as marked to to vote for all
the contrary.) nominees listed above. _______________________________________________________________________
/ / / /
Please sign exactly as your name appears to
the left. When signing as Trustee,
Executor, Administrator, or Officer of a
corporation give title as such.
Dated: _______________________________, 2001
____________________________________________
Signature
____________________________________________
Signature, if owned jointly
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -