UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☑
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☑ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |
(5) |
Total fee paid: | |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: | |
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |
(3) |
Filing Party: | |
(4) |
Date Filed: | |
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
To All Stockholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, a Delaware corporation, will be held on Thursday, May 6, 2021, commencing at 8:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time. Due to ongoing concerns about the coronavirus (COVID-19), this year the annual meeting will once again be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. You may attend the online meeting, submit questions, and vote your shares electronically during the meeting via the internet by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2021. To enter the annual meeting you will need the 16-digit control number that is printed in the box marked by the arrow on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. We recommend that you log in at least 15 minutes before the meeting to ensure that you are logged in when the meeting starts. Online check-in will start shortly before the meeting on May 6, 2021. At the annual meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on the following matters:
(1) | To elect directors to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; |
(2) | To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the accounts of our company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021; |
(3) | To consider an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; |
(4) | To consider and act upon the Stockholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Aggregation for Proxy Access set forth in the accompanying proxy statement; and |
(5) | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
By Order of the Board of Directors |
![]() |
D. C. FINDLAY, SECRETARY |
March 26, 2021
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 6, 2021: THE 2021 LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS, PROXY STATEMENT, AND 2020 FORM 10-K ARE AVAILABLE AT www.proxyvote.com |
1 | |||||
5 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 | |||||
Director Experiences, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills; Board Diversity |
11 | ||||
11 | |||||
12 | |||||
12 | |||||
13 | |||||
14 | |||||
17 | |||||
18 | |||||
18 | |||||
19 | |||||
20 | |||||
20 | |||||
21 | |||||
21 | |||||
22 | |||||
Board Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
22 | ||||
22 | |||||
23 | |||||
24 | |||||
24 | |||||
24 | |||||
25 | |||||
25 | |||||
25 | |||||
26 | |||||
26 | |||||
27 | |||||
28 | |||||
28 |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | i |
Table of Contents
29 | |||||
30 | |||||
33 | |||||
34 | |||||
36 | |||||
45 | |||||
46 | |||||
47 | |||||
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits |
48 | ||||
49 | |||||
Compensation/Succession Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
49 | ||||
50 | |||||
50 | |||||
51 | |||||
53 | |||||
54 | |||||
55 | |||||
55 | |||||
56 | |||||
57 | |||||
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements |
58 | ||||
61 | |||||
62 | |||||
62 | |||||
Review and Approval of Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
62 | ||||
62 | |||||
63 | |||||
PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
65 | ||||
65 | |||||
65 | |||||
66 | |||||
PROPOSAL NO. 4 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SHAREHOLDER AGGREGATION FOR PROXY ACCESS |
67 | ||||
69 | |||||
69 | |||||
69 | |||||
A-1 |
ii | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
The following is a summary of certain key disclosures in this proxy statement. This is only a summary, and it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For more complete information, please review this proxy statement in its entirety as well as our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As used in this proxy statement, ADM or the Company refers to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. The information contained on adm.com or any other website referred to in this proxy statement is provided for reference only and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 1 |
Proxy Summary
Governance Highlights
Governance Highlights
The Board of Directors views itself as the long-term stewards of ADM. The Board is committed to enhancing the success and value of our company for its stockholders, as well as for other stakeholders such as employees, business partners, and communities. The Board recognizes the importance of good corporate governance and understands that transparent disclosure of its governance practices helps stockholders assess the quality of our company and its management and the value of their investment decisions.
ADMs corporate governance practices are intended to ensure independence, transparency, management accountability, effective decision making, and appropriate monitoring of compliance and performance. We believe that these strong corporate governance practices, together with our enduring corporate values and ethics, are critical to providing lasting value to the stockholders of our company.
We use majority voting for uncontested director elections.
|
11 of 12 of our director nominees are independent and only independent directors serve on the Audit, Compensation/
| |||
We have an independent Lead Director, selected by the independent directors. The Lead Director provides the Board with independent leadership, facilitates the Boards independence from management, and has broad powers as described on page 12.
|
Our independent directors meet in executive session at each regular in-person board meeting.
| |||
We have policies prohibiting directors and officers from trading in derivative securities of our company and from pledging any company stock.
|
Significant stock ownership requirements are in place for directors and executive officers.
| |||
The Board and each standing committee annually conduct evaluations of their performance. Directors annually evaluate each other, and these evaluations are used to assess future re-nominations to the Board.
|
Individuals cannot stand for election as a director once they reach age 75, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines set limits on the number of public company boards on which a director can serve.
| |||
Holders of 10% or more of our common stock have the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders.
|
Our bylaws include a proxy access provision under which a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that has owned at least 3% of our common stock for at least 3 years may submit nominees for up to 20% of the board seats for inclusion in our proxy statement.
|
2 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Proxy Summary
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Proposal |
Board Voting Recommendation |
Page Reference | ||
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |
FOR | 7 | ||
Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
FOR | 65 | ||
Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation |
FOR | 66 | ||
Proposal No. 4 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Aggregation for Proxy Access |
AGAINST | 67 |
Director Nominee Qualifications and Experience
The following chart provides summary information about each of our director nominees qualifications and experiences. More detailed information is provided in each director nominees biography beginning on page 8.
Current or Prior CEO |
Non-U.S. Business |
Risk Management |
M&A | Government/ Public Policy |
Agriculture, Food, or Retail Consumer Business |
Corporate Governance |
Sustainability/ Environmental |
Operations, Supply Chain, or Logistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. Burke |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. Colbert |
🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. Crews |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. Dufour |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. Felsinger |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. Harrison |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. Moore |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. Sanchez |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. Sandler |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. Schlitz |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. Westbrook |
🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 | 🌑 |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 3 |
Proxy Summary
Director Nominee Diversity, Age, Tenure, and Independence
Director Nominee Diversity, Age, Tenure, and Independence
The following charts provide summary information about our director nominees personal characteristics, including race/ethnicity, gender, and age, as well as tenure and independence, to illustrate the diversity of perspectives of our director nominees. More detailed information is provided in each director nominees biography beginning on page 8.
4 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting
Proxy Statement
GENERAL MATTERS
The Board of Directors asks that you complete the accompanying proxy for the annual stockholders meeting. Due to ongoing concerns about the coronavirus (COVID-19), the meeting will once again be completely virtual and will be held at the time and web address mentioned in the Notice of Annual Meeting included in these materials. We will be using the notice and access method of providing proxy materials to stockholders via the internet. We will mail to our stockholders (other than those described below) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and the 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K and how to vote electronically via the internet. This notice will also contain instructions on how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials. Stockholders holding shares through the ADM 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Salaried Employees (the 401(k) and ESOP) and those stockholders who previously have opted out of participation in notice and access procedures will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail or an electronic copy of the proxy materials by email. We are first providing our stockholders with notice and access to, or first mailing or emailing, this proxy statement and a proxy form around March 26, 2021.
We pay the costs of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. We have retained Georgeson LLC to help us solicit proxies. We will pay Georgeson LLC a base shareholder meeting services fee of approximately $15,000 plus reasonable project management fees and expenses for its services. Our employees or employees of Georgeson LLC may also solicit proxies in person or by telephone, mail, or the internet at a cost which we expect will be nominal. We will reimburse brokerage firms and other securities custodians for their reasonable fees and expenses in forwarding proxy materials to their principals.
We have a policy of keeping confidential all proxies, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders. Such documents are available for examination only by the inspectors of election, our transfer agent, and certain employees associated with processing proxy cards and tabulating the vote. We will not disclose any stockholders vote except in a contested proxy solicitation or as may be necessary to meet legal requirements.
Our common stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2021, are the only people entitled to notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on March 15, 2021, we had 558,500,563 outstanding shares of common stock, each share being entitled to one vote on each of the director nominees and on each of the other matters to be voted on at the meeting.
Our stockholders and advisors to our company are the only people entitled to attend the annual meeting. The annual meeting this year will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. Hosting a virtual meeting provides expanded access, improved communication, and cost savings for our stockholders and us and enables participation from any location around the world. Stockholders may submit questions during the annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2021, and management will respond to questions in the same way as it would if the company held an in-person meeting. If you have questions during the meeting, you may type them in the dialog box provided at any point during the meeting until the floor is closed to questions.
If you properly execute the enclosed proxy form, your shares will be voted at the meeting. You may revoke your proxy form at any time prior to voting by:
(1) | delivering written notice of revocation to our Secretary; |
(2) | delivering to our Secretary a new proxy form bearing a date later than your previous proxy; or |
(3) | attending the annual meeting online and voting again (attendance at the online meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). |
Under our bylaws, stockholders elect our directors by a majority vote in an uncontested election (one in which the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected) and by a plurality vote in a contested election (one in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected). Because this years election is an uncontested election, each director nominee receiving a majority of votes cast will be elected (the number of shares voted for a director nominee must exceed the
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 5 |
General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting
Principal Holders of Voting Securities
number of shares voted against that nominee). Approval of each other proposal presented in the proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present, online or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on that matter. Shares not present at the meeting and shares voting abstain have no effect on the election of directors. For the other proposals to be voted on at the meeting, abstentions are treated as shares present or represented and voting, and therefore have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes (shares held by brokers who do not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter and have not received voting instructions from their clients) are counted toward a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether a matter has been approved.
Principal Holders of Voting Securities
Based upon filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we believe that the following stockholders are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock shares:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Amount | Percent Of Class | ||
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
|
52,451,107(1)
|
9.39
| ||
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and related entities One State Farm Plaza, Bloomington, IL 61710
|
51,460,463(2)
|
9.21
| ||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
|
37,675,225(3)
|
6.75
| ||
State Street Corporation One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111
|
31,852,864 (4)
|
5.70
|
(1) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021, The Vanguard Group has sole dispositive power with respect to 50,012,908 shares, shared voting power with respect to 897,820 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,438,199 shares.
(2) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2021, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and related entities have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 51,214,613 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 245,850 shares.
(3) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 29, 2021, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 32,316,377 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 37,675,225 shares.
(4) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2021, State Street Corporation has shared voting power with respect to 28,771,783 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 31,816,235 shares.
6 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
The Board of Directors currently consists of eleven members. The Board of Directors, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated each of the current directors for re-election at the annual meeting, and has also nominated a new nominee for election at the annual meeting. The new nominee for election is Theodore Colbert. Mr. Colbert was identified by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee as a potential nominee following his referral by one of our current independent directors, and was recommended by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee after it completed its interview and vetting process. Unless you provide different directions, we intend for board-solicited proxies (like this one) to be voted for the nominees named below.
The Board of Directors, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating/Governance Committee, has approved an increase in the size of the Board of Directors from eleven members to twelve members, to be effective as of the election of directors at the annual meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than twelve, which is the number of nominees named in this proxy statement.
If elected, the nominees would hold office until the next annual stockholders meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. If any nominee for director becomes unable to serve as a director, the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute who will be designated by the Board of Directors. Alternatively, the Board of Directors could reduce the size of the board. The Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve as a director.
Our bylaws require that each director be elected by a majority of votes cast with respect to that director in an uncontested election (where the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected). In a contested election (where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the plurality voting standard governs the election of directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of nominees equal to the number of directors to be elected who receive more votes than the other nominees are elected to the Board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of the votes cast. Whether an election is contested or not is determined as of the day before we first mail our meeting notice to stockholders.
This years election was determined to be an uncontested election, and the majority vote standard will apply. If a nominee who is serving as a director is not elected at the annual meeting, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a holdover director. However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director annually submits an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if the director fails to be elected through a majority vote in an uncontested election. In that situation, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board will act on the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days after the date that the election results are certified. The Board will nominate for election or re-election as director, and will elect as directors to fill vacancies and new directorships, only candidates who agree to tender the form of resignation described above. If a nominee who was not already serving as a director fails to receive a majority of votes cast at the annual meeting, Delaware law provides that the nominee does not serve on the Board as a holdover director.
The information below describes the nominees, their ages, positions with our company, principal occupations, current directorships of other publicly owned companies, directorships of other publicly owned companies held within the past five years, the year in which each first was elected as a director, and the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 15, 2021, directly or indirectly. Unless otherwise indicated, and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each nominee named in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the nominees have been executive officers of their respective companies or employed as otherwise specified below for at least the last five years.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the twelve nominees named below as directors. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 7 |
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Nominees
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 9 |
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Nominees
10 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Experiences, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills; Board Diversity
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 11 |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Our companys Board of Directors does not have a current requirement that the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board be either combined or separated, because the Board believes it is in the best interest of our company to make this determination based on the position and direction of the company and the constitution of the Board and management team. The Board regularly evaluates whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be combined or separated. The Boards implementation of a careful and seamless succession plan over the past years demonstrates that the Board takes seriously its responsibilities under the Corporate Governance Guidelines to determine who should serve as Chairman at any point in time in light of the specific circumstances facing our company. After careful consideration, the Board has determined that having Mr. Luciano, our companys Chief Executive Officer, continue to serve as Chairman is in the best interest of our stockholders at this time. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the day-to-day management of our company and the development and implementation of our companys strategy, and has access to the people, information, and resources necessary to facilitate board function. Therefore, the Board believes at this time that combining the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman contributes to an efficient and effective board.
The independent directors elect a Lead Director at the Boards annual meeting. Mr. Felsinger is currently serving as Lead Director. The Board believes that having an independent Lead Director provides the Board with independent leadership and facilitates the independence of the Board from management. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee regularly evaluates the responsibilities of the Lead Director and considers current trends regarding independent board leadership.
In prior years, the Board has enhanced the Lead Directors responsibilities, as set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, in connection with determining performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer, evaluating the Board, committees, and individual directors, and planning for management succession. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Lead Director:
(1) presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and regularly meets with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for discussion of appropriate matters arising from these sessions;
(2) coordinates the activities of the other independent directors and serves as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors;
(3) consults with the Chairman and approves all meeting agendas, schedules, and information provided to the Board, and may, from time to time, invite corporate officers, other employees, and advisors to attend Board or committee meetings whenever deemed appropriate;
(4) interviews, along with the Chairman and the Chair and members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, all director candidates and makes recommendations to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee;
(5) advises the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee on the selection of members of the board committees;
(6) advises the board committees on the selection of committee chairs;
(7) works with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to propose a schedule of major discussion items for the Board;
(8) guides the Boards governance processes;
(9) provides leadership to the Board if circumstances arise in which the role of the Chairman or Chief Executive Officer may be, or may be perceived to be, in conflict;
(10) has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;
(11) if requested by major stockholders, ensures that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication;
(12) leads the non-management directors in determining performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer and coordinates the annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer;
(13) works with the Chair of the Compensation/Succession Committee to guide the Boards discussion of management succession plans;
12 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Board Role in Risk Oversight
(14) works with the Chair and members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to facilitate the evaluation of the performance of the Board, committees, and individual directors;
(15) works with the Chair and members of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee to set sustainability and corporate responsibility objectives; and
(16) performs such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine.
In addition to electing a Lead Director, our independent directors facilitate the Boards independence by meeting frequently as a group and fostering a climate of transparent communication. The high level of contact between our Lead Director and our Chairman between board meetings and the specificity contained in the Boards delegation of authority parameters also serve to foster effective board leadership.
Management is responsible for day-to-day risk assessment and mitigation activities, and our companys Board of Directors is responsible for risk oversight, focusing on our companys overall risk management strategy, our companys degree of tolerance for risk, and the steps management is taking to manage our companys risks. While the Board as a whole maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, the committees of the Board can be assigned responsibility for risk management oversight of specific areas. The Audit Committee currently maintains responsibility for overseeing our companys enterprise risk management process and regularly discusses our companys major risk exposures, the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, and guidelines and policies to govern our companys risk assessment and risk management processes. The Audit Committee periodically reports to the Board of Directors regarding significant matters identified with respect to the foregoing.
Management has established an Enterprise Risk Management Committee consisting of a Chief Risk Officer and other personnel that represent multiple functional and regional areas within our company, with broad oversight of the risk management process.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Audit Committee
assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to the stockholders relating to the companys major risk exposures
oversees the companys enterprise risk management process
regularly discusses the steps management has taken to monitor and control risk exposure
regularly reports to the Board regarding significant matters identified |
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
assigns oversight of specific areas of risk to other committees
recommends director nominees who it believes will capably assess and monitor risk |
Compensation/ Succession Committee
assesses potential risks associated with compensation decisions
engages an independent outside consultant every other year to review the companys compensation programs and evaluate the risks in such programs; the consultant attends all committee meetings to advise the committee |
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee
has oversight responsibility for the companys objectives, goals, strategies, and activities relating to sustainability and corporate responsibility matters, including workplace safety, process safety, environmental, social well-being, diversity and inclusion, corporate giving, and community relations
oversees the companys compliance with sustainability and corporate responsibility laws and regulations
assesses the companys performance relating to sustainability and corporate responsibility goals and industry benchmarks
|
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 13 |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
| ||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Risk Management Committee | ||||||||||||||||||
ensures implementation and maintenance of a process to identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks to our companys objectives
ensures congruence of risk decisions with our companys values, policies, procedures, measurements, and incentives or disincentives
supports the integration of risk assessment and controls into mainstream business processes, planning, and decision-making |
identifies roles and responsibilities across our company in regard to risk assessment and control functions
promotes consistency and standardization in risk identification, reporting, and controls across our company
ensures sufficient information capabilities and information flow to support risk identification and controls and alignment of technology assets |
regularly evaluates the overall design and operation of the risk assessment and control process, including development of relevant metrics and indicators
reports regularly to senior management and the Board regarding the above-described processes and the most significant risks to our companys objectives |
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Our commitment to change and growth goes beyond our products and services. At ADM, sustainable practices and a focus on environmental responsibility are not separate from our primary business: they are integral to the work we do every day to serve customers and create value for stockholders.
Our disclosure for sustainability topics, including climate change, follow the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics & KPIs.
Governance: Our sustainability efforts are overseen by our Board of Directors, in particular a dedicated Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee, and led by our Chief Sustainability Officer, who is supported by regional sustainability teams.
Strategy: In 2019, ADM assembled a Carbon Reduction Task Force to identify and assess technologies and process changes to enable meaningful Scope 1 and Scope 2 reductions. We engaged WSP Global to review the findings of the Task Force and to conduct an in-depth feasibility study to help shape an ambitious new set of goals to further reduce our environmental footprint.
We address climate change through three main pathways:
| renewable product and process innovations, such as our carbon sequestration project in Decatur, Illinois, |
| supply chain commitments, such as our Commitment to No-Deforestation, and |
| a strategic approach to operational excellence which emphasizes enhancing the efficiency of our production plants throughout our global operations, including through a centralized energy management team that enables us to identify and share successful programs across business or geographic regions. |
Our No-Deforestation program is focused on four key pillars:
| Supply chain traceability |
| Supplier engagement |
| Monitoring & verification |
| Reporting |
Risk Management: Sustainability risk management, including climate change and deforestation, is integrated into the multi-disciplinary company-wide enterprise risk management (ERM) process.
Each quarter, the ERM Sustainability subgroup reviews the risk matrix. Previously identified risks are discussed to ensure proper focus and time is spent discussing and assessing emerging risks. The risk matrix includes quantitative review of impact, mitigation, and residual risk as well as qualitative information about risk categories, warning periods, mitigation strategies and effectiveness.
14 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Various risk types are included in the analysis including current and emerging regulation, technology, legal, market, reputation, acute physical and chronic physical risks.
Relevance & |
Explanation | |||
Current regulation |
Relevant, sometimes included |
Risks associated with current regulation have typically already been assessed and mitigated where possible. Current regulation risks are relevant when assessing facility expansions or acquisitions, or when assessing new product streams. For example, as more entities establish carbon taxes or trading schemes, we must analyze the applicability to our facilities and assess the financial risks. | ||
Emerging regulation |
Relevant, always included |
Emerging regulation, such as carbon taxes or emissions limitations, could have a direct impact on our operations, and are therefore relevant and always included in our assessments. | ||
Technology |
Relevant, always included |
As technology changes, demand for existing products could be affected or more efficient processing techniques may be discovered. Technology also represents a significant mitigation strategy - for example, digital satellite monitoring is evolving and making it easier to detect deforestation to ensure we do not source from farmers violating our policies. Emerging technology is always relevant and included in risk assessments. | ||
Legal |
Relevant, always included |
Legal impacts pose a relevant risk to the company and are always assessed. For example, palm from Indonesia/Malaysia and soy from Brazil are at risk of being sourced from growers who are in violation of labor laws or deforestation regulations. | ||
Market |
Relevant, always included |
Market demand has a direct effect on production as well as directing sustainable sourcing initiatives. Staying informed on market changes is a necessary part of risk assessment and always included. | ||
Reputation |
Relevant, always included |
Reputational damage could pose a risk to the company. For example, deforestation linked to our supply chain could cause brand or company reputation damage. Monitoring our reputation, as well as the reputations of suppliers, competitors, and customers is an important and relevant part of our risk assessments and always included. | ||
Acute physical |
Relevant, always included |
Acute physical risks, such as droughts, cyclones, floods, and fires pose risks and are always included in our risk assessments. | ||
Chronic physical |
Relevant, sometimes included |
Chronic physical risks, such as the shifting of growing zones, are included in our risk assessments; however, because these tend to be longer-term risks, they are not always assessed quarterly. |
Risk 1: Direct Operations Acute physical risk, increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods could lead to increased direct costs in the short term.
The Companys operations rely on dependable and efficient transportation services, the disruption of which could result in difficulties supplying materials to the Companys facilities and impairment of the Companys ability to deliver products to its customers in a timely manner. The Company relies on access to navigable rivers and waterways in order to fulfill its transportation obligations more effectively. Any major lack of available water for use in certain of the Companys processing operations could have a material adverse impact on operating results.
The availability and prices of the agricultural commodities and agricultural commodity products the Company procures, transports, stores, processes, and merchandises can be affected by climate change, weather conditions, disease, government programs, competition, and various other factors beyond the Companys control and could adversely affect the Companys operating results. Reduced supply of agricultural commodities could adversely affect the Companys profitability by increasing the cost of raw materials and/or limiting the Companys ability to procure, transport, store, process, and merchandise agricultural commodities in an efficient manner.
Risk 2: Upstream supply chain - Acute physical risk, increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods could lead to increased sourcing costs in the short term. A reduction in agricultural commodities would directly impact ADMs ability to produce goods which would directly affect sales and revenue. The ERM team estimates a potential financial risk of $10-70M based on increased price of commodities, increased transportation costs, loss in revenue if facilities are unable to acquire enough raw material to operate.
The availability and prices of agricultural commodities are subject to wide fluctuations, including impacts from factors outside the Companys control such as changes in weather and climate. Reduced supply of agricultural commodities could adversely affect the Companys profitability by increasing the cost of raw materials and/or limiting the Companys ability to procure, transport, store, process, and merchandise agricultural commodities in an efficient manner.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 15 |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Risk 3: Direct operations Emerging regulation and carbon pricing mechanisms could result in increased operational costs in the short to medium term. Financial implications are dependent upon the environmental regulations but vary from increased operating costs (additional monitoring and testing requirements) to capital costs (equipment upgrades/installation). A carbon tax could also potentially increase direct costs.
The Companys business could be affected in the future by additional global, regional, national, and local regulation, pricing of greenhouse gas emissions or other climate change legislation, regulation or agreements. It is difficult at this time to estimate the likelihood of passage, or predict the potential impact, of any additional legislation, regulations or agreements. Potential consequences of new obligations could include increased energy, transportation, raw material, and administrative costs, and may require the Company to make additional investments in its facilities and equipment.
After a carbon reduction feasibility study, ADM has set a new, ambitious GHG reduction target. As we reduce absolute emissions, the total potential cost of a carbon tax or trading scheme goes down.
Opportunity 1: Direct operations Development and expansion of low emissions goods and services could lead to increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services. As various renewable fuel standards are implemented around the world, ADM has an opportunity to capitalize through the production and sale of ethanol and biodiesel.
ADMs strategy to realize this opportunity is to remain active in trade associations and in public policy activities related to renewable fuels standards. The cost of this strategy is included in day-to-day business operational costs.
Opportunity 2: Direct operations Development of new products or services through R&D and innovations could lead to increased revenues through access to new and emerging markets. More businesses and consumers are looking to renewable products.
The Company is continuing to invest in research to develop a broad range of sustainable materials with an objective to produce key intermediate materials that serve as a platform for producing a variety of sustainable packaging products. Conversion technologies include utilizing expertise in both fermentation and catalysis.
Metrics & KPIs:
We have aligned our sustainability efforts with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which serve as a road map to achieve a better future for all. Specifically, we are focusing our efforts toward Zero Hunger, Clean Water and Sanitation, Climate Action, and Life On Land.
Below are highlights of some of our activities that support our commitment to these SDGs, as well as some of our other company goals, metrics, and KPIs.
After meeting our 15x20 environmental goals ahead of schedule, and based on the results of a carbon reduction feasibility study, we have announced an ambitious new set of goals we call Strive35 to further reduce our environmental footprint.
16 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Board Role in Overseeing Political Activities
We disclose key performance indicators aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Framework. Below are key metrics from calendar years 2018 and 2019.
GRI 305-1, 305-2, 305-5 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
GHG Emissions, million metric tons* |
2018 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Global Scope 1 GHG Emissions |
14.52 | 14.80 | ||||||||||||
Global Scope 2 GHG Emissions |
2.84 | 3.01 | ||||||||||||
GHG Intensity Reduction over 2010 baseline |
15.1 | % | 15.1% |
GRI 303-1 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||
Water Withdrawal (locations >100,000 m3/year) in million m3* |
2018 | 2019 | ||||||||
Groundwater |
42.2 | 43.1 | ||||||||
Municipal |
41.5 | 41.1 | ||||||||
Rain |
1.1 | 0.9 | ||||||||
Surface |
31.0 | 31.0 |
GRI 302-1 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||
Energy consumption within the organization in million MWh* |
2018 | 2019 | ||||||||
Total non-renewable fuel consumption |
57.3 | 59.9 | ||||||||
Total renewable fuel consumption |
5.2 | 4.7 |
* Data provided in these tables have been assessed by a third-party which has issued limited assurance statements.
Board Role in Overseeing Political Activities
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 17 |
Board, Committee, and Director Evaluations
The Board believes that a robust annual evaluation process is a critical part of its governance practices. Accordingly, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluation of the performance of the Board of Directors, each committee of the Board, and each individual director. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee approves written evaluation questionnaires which are distributed to each director. The results of each written evaluation are provided to, and compiled by, an outside firm. Individual directors are evaluated by their peers in a confidential process. Our Lead Director works with the Chair and members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to facilitate the evaluation of the performance of the Board, committees, and individual directors, and delivers and discusses individual evaluation results with each director. The Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee delivers and discusses the Lead Directors individual evaluation with him or her. Results of the performance evaluations of the committees and the Board are discussed at appropriate committee meetings and with the full board.
The Board utilizes the results of these evaluations in making decisions on board agendas, board structure, committee responsibilities and agendas, and continued service of individual directors on the board.
18 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Independence of Directors
The Board of Directors has reviewed business, familial, and charitable relationships between our company and each non-employee director and director nominee to determine compliance with the NYSE standards and our bylaw standards, each described below, and to evaluate whether there are any other facts or circumstances that might impair a directors or nominees independence. Based on that review, the Board has determined that ten of its eleven current members, Messrs. Burke, Crews, Dufour, Felsinger, Moore, Sanchez, and Westbrook, Ms. Harrison, Ms. Sandler, and Dr. Schlitz are independent, and that Mr. Colbert, the director nominee, is also independent. Mr. Luciano is not independent under the NYSE or bylaw standards because of his employment with us.
In determining that each director and nominee is independent (other than Mr. Luciano), the Board reviewed the following transactions, relationships, or arrangements. The Board of Directors determined that any amounts or relationships involved in all of the following matters fall below applicable thresholds or outside the NYSE or bylaw independence standards, that none of the directors or nominee had a direct or material interest in the matters described below, and that such matters do not impair the independence of any director or nominee.
Name | Matters Considered | |
M. Burke | Ordinary course business with AECOM (sales to ADM of certain services on an arms length basis). | |
T. Crews | Ordinary course business with WestRock Company (purchases from ADM of various products and sales to ADM of various products, all on an arms length basis).
Ordinary course business with Hormel Foods Corporation (purchases from ADM of various products and sales to ADM of various products, all on an arms length basis). | |
P. Dufour | Ordinary course business with Air Liquide Group (sales to ADM of certain products on an arms length basis). | |
D. Felsinger | Stepson-in-law is employed by ADM as Director, New Product Development, which is not an executive officer or senior management position, at a compensation level and on terms determined on a basis consistent with the Companys policies for non-executive officers. | |
S. Harrison | Ordinary course business with WestRock Company (purchases from ADM of various products and sales to ADM of various products, all on an arms length basis). | |
D. Sandler | Ordinary course business with Pharmavite (purchases from ADM of certain products on an arms length basis).
Ordinary course business with Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (purchases from ADM of certain products on an arms length basis). | |
L. Schlitz | Ordinary course business with Illinois Tool Works Inc. (sales to ADM of certain equipment and services on an arms length basis). | |
K. Westbrook | Ordinary course business with Mosaic Company (sales to ADM of certain products and purchases from ADM of certain services, all on an arms length basis).
Ordinary course business with T-Mobile US, Inc. (sales to ADM of various products and purchases from ADM of certain products, all on an arms length basis). |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 19 |
Independence of Directors
Independence of Directors
|
The listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, require companies listed on the NYSE to have a majority of independent directors. Subject to certain exceptions and transition provisions, the NYSE standards generally provide that a director will qualify as independent if the Board affirmatively determines that he or she has no material relationship with our company other than as a director, and will not be considered independent if:
1. | the director or a member of the directors immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, one of our executive officers or, in the case of the director, one of our employees; |
2. | the director or a member of the directors immediate family has received during any 12-month period within the last three years more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from us other than for service as a director, provided that compensation received by an immediate family member for service as a non-executive officer employee is not considered in determining independence; |
3. | the director or an immediate family member is a current partner of one of our independent auditors, the director is employed by one of our independent auditors, a member of the directors immediate family is employed by one of our independent auditors and personally works on our audits, or the director or a member of the directors immediate family was within the last three years an employee of one of our independent auditors and personally worked on one of our audits; |
4. | the director or a member of the directors immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, employed as an executive officer of a company where one of our executive officers at the same time serves or served on the compensation committee; or |
5. | the director is a current employee of, or a member of the directors immediate family is an executive officer of, a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, us in an amount which, in any of the of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other companys consolidated gross revenues. |
|
Section 2.8 of our bylaws also provides that a majority of the Board of Directors be comprised of independent directors. Under our bylaws, an independent director means a director who:
1. | is not a current employee or a former member of our senior management or the senior management of one of our affiliates; |
2. | is not employed by one of our professional services providers; |
3. | does not have any business relationship with us, either personally or through a company of which the director is an officer or a controlling stockholder, that is material to us or to the director; |
4. | does not have a close family relationship, by blood, marriage, or otherwise, with any member of our senior management or the senior management of one of our affiliates; |
5. | is not an officer of a company of which our Chairman or Chief Executive Officer is also a board member; |
6. | is not personally receiving compensation from us in any capacity other than as a director; and |
7. | does not personally receive or is not an employee of a foundation, university, or other institution that receives grants or endowments from us, that are material to us, the recipient, or the foundation, university, or institution. |
20 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Independence of Directors
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that govern the structure and functioning of the Board and set forth the Boards policies on governance issues. The guidelines, along with the written charters of each of the committees of the Board and our bylaws, are posted on our website, https://www.adm.com/investors/corporate-governance, and are available free of charge upon written request to ADM, Attention: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
Independent Executive Sessions
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the non-management directors meet in executive session at least quarterly. If the non-management directors include any directors who are not independent pursuant to the Boards determination of independence, at least one executive session each year includes only independent directors. The Lead Director, or in his or her absence, the chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, presides at such meetings of independent directors. The non-management directors met in independent executive session four times during fiscal year 2020.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 21 |
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Board Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
During the last fiscal year, the Board of Directors held eight meetings. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the combined total meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served during such period. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that all directors standing for election are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All director nominees standing for election at our last annual stockholders meeting held on May 7, 2020, virtually attended that meeting.
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
The Boards standing committees for the year ended December 31, 2020, consisted of the Audit, Compensation/Succession, Nominating/Corporate Governance, Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility, and Executive Committees. Each committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, available on our website, www.adm.com.
Audit Committee |
The Audit Committee consists of Mr. Crews (Chair), Mr. Dufour, Mr. Moore, Mr. Sanchez, and Ms. Sandler. The Audit Committee met nine times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Audit Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws, in the NYSE listing standards, and in Section 10A of the Exchange Act. No director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such director serves on the audit committees of more than two other public companies unless the Board determines that such service would not impair such directors ability to serve effectively on the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews:
1. the overall plan of the annual independent audit;
2. financial statements;
3. the scope of audit procedures;
4. the performance of our independent auditors and internal auditors;
5. the auditors evaluation of internal controls;
6. the companys oversight of risk and the enterprise risk management program; |
7. matters of legal and regulatory compliance;
8. the performance of our companys compliance function;
9. business and charitable relationships and transactions between us and each non-employee director, director nominee, and executive officer to assess potential conflicts of interest and impairment of independence; and
10. the companys earnings press releases and information provided to analysts and investors. |
For additional information with respect to the Audit Committee, see the sections of this proxy statement entitled Report of the Audit Committee and Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies.
22 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Compensation/Succession Committee |
The Compensation/Succession Committee consists of Mr. Westbrook (Chair), Mr. Burke, Ms. Harrison, and Ms. Schlitz. The Compensation/Succession Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Compensation/Succession Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards, including the NYSE listing standards specifically applicable to compensation committee members.
The Compensation/Succession Committee:
1. establishes and administers a compensation policy for senior management;
2. reviews and approves the compensation policy for all of our employees and our subsidiaries other than senior management;
3. approves all compensation elements with respect to our directors, executive officers, and all employees with a base salary of $500,000 or more;
4. reviews and monitors our financial performance as it affects our compensation policies or the administration of those policies;
5. establishes and reviews a compensation policy for non-employee directors; |
6. reviews and monitors our succession plans;
7. approves awards to employees pursuant to our incentive compensation plans;
8. approves major modifications in the employee benefit plans with respect to the benefits that salaried employees receive under such plans; and
9. ensures succession processes are in place to aid business |
The Compensation/Succession Committee provides reports to the Board of Directors and, where appropriate, submits actions to the Board of Directors for ratification. Members of management attend meetings of the committee and make recommendations to the committee regarding compensation for officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. In determining the Chief Executive Officers compensation, the committee considers the evaluation prepared by the non-management directors.
In accordance with the General Corporation Law of Delaware, the committee may delegate to one or more officers the authority to grant stock options to other officers and employees who are not directors or executive officers, provided that the resolution authorizing this delegation specifies the total number of options that the officer or officers can award. The charter for the Compensation/Succession Committee also provides that the committee may form subcommittees and delegate tasks to them.
For additional information on the responsibilities and activities of the Compensation/Succession Committee, including the committees processes for determining executive compensation, see the section of this proxy statement entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 23 |
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee |
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee consists of Mr. Moore (Chair), Mr. Burke, Ms. Sandler, and Mr. Westbrook. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee met five times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee:
1. identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board, including evaluating individuals appropriately suggested by stockholders in accordance with our bylaws;
2. recommends individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board and board committees;
3. develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the company; |
4. assigns oversight of particular risk areas to other committees of the board;
5. leads the evaluation of the directors, the Board, and board committees; and
6. has oversight responsibility for certain of the companys corporate objectives and policies. |
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee |
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee consists of Ms. Harrison (Chair), Mr. Crews, Mr. Dufour, Mr. Sanchez, and Ms. Schlitz. The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards. For more information on the companys sustainability and corporate responsibility efforts, see the section of this proxy statement entitled Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility.
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee:
1. oversees objectives, goals, strategies, and activities relating to sustainability and corporate responsibility;
2. receives and reviews reports from management regarding strategies, activities, compliance, and regulations regarding sustainability and corporate responsibility; |
3. has authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external advisors; and
4. leads the evaluation of the companys performance related to sustainability and corporate responsibility. |
Executive Committee |
The Executive Committee consists of Mr. Luciano (Chairman), Mr. Felsinger (Lead Director), Mr. Crews (Chair of the Audit Committee), Ms. Harrison (Chair of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee), Mr. Moore (Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee), and Mr. Westbrook (Chair of the Compensation/Succession Committee). The Executive Committee did not meet during the most recent fiscal year. The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board to determine matters which, in the judgment of the Chairman of the Board, do not warrant convening a special board meeting but should not be postponed until the next scheduled board meeting. The Executive Committee exercises all the power and authority of the Board in the management and direction of our business and affairs except for matters which are expressly delegated to another board committee and matters that cannot be delegated by the Board under applicable law, our certificate of incorporation, or our bylaws.
24 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Stockholder Outreach and Engagement; Code of Conduct
Stockholder Outreach and Engagement
As part of our commitment to effective corporate governance practices, in 2020-21 we reached out to many of our largest institutional stockholders to hold formal discussions with them to help us better understand the views of our investors on key topics. Our Lead Director (who, as provided in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, ensures that he is available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders) and senior management participated in these meetings to discuss and obtain feedback on corporate governance, executive compensation, and other related issues important to our stockholders.
We share stockholder feedback with the Board and its committees to enhance both our governance practices and transparency of these practices to our stockholders. We review the voting results of our most recent annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholder feedback received through our engagement process, the governance practices of our peers and other large companies, and current trends in governance as we consider enhancements to our governance practices and disclosure. We value our dialogue with our stockholders and believe our outreach efforts, which are in addition to our other communication channels available to our stockholders and interested parties, help ensure our corporate governance, compensation, and other related practices continue to evolve and reflect the insights and perspectives of our many stakeholders. We welcome suggestions from our stockholders on how the Board and management can enhance this dialogue in the future.
We have approved procedures for stockholders and other interested parties to send communications to individual directors or the non-employee directors as a group. You should send any such communications in writing addressed to the applicable director or directors in care of the Secretary, ADM, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All correspondence will be forwarded to the intended recipients.
The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct that sets forth standards regarding matters such as honest and ethical conduct, compliance with law, and full, fair, accurate, and timely disclosure in reports and documents that we file with the SEC and in other public communications. The Code of Conduct applies to all of our directors, employees, and officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The Code of Conduct is available at our website, https://www.adm.com/our-company/the-adm-way/code-of-conduct , and is available free of charge upon written request to ADM, Attention: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601. Any amendments to certain provisions of the Code of Conduct or waivers of such provisions granted to certain executive officers will be disclosed promptly on our website.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 25 |
For fiscal year 2020, our standard compensation for non-employee directors consists of an annual retainer in the amount of $300,000. With respect to the $300,000 annual retainer, $175,000 must be paid in stock units pursuant to our Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The remaining portion of the annual retainer may be paid in cash, stock units, or a combination of both, at the election of each non-employee director. Each stock unit is deemed for valuation and bookkeeping purposes to be the equivalent of a share of our common stock. In addition to the annual retainer, our Lead Director received a stipend in the amount of $30,000, the Chair of the Audit Committee received a stipend in the amount of $25,000, the Chair of the Compensation/Succession Committee received a stipend in the amount of $20,000, the Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee received a stipend in the amount of $15,000, and the Chair of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee received a stipend in the amount of $10,000. All such stipends were paid in cash in 2020, but will be paid in stock units in 2021. We do not pay fees for attendance at board and committee meetings. Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket traveling expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings. Directors may also be provided with certain perquisites from time to time.
Stock units are credited to the account of each non-employee director on a quarterly basis in an amount determined by dividing the quarterly amount of the retainer or stipend to be paid in stock units by the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the last business day of that quarter, and are fully-vested at all times. As of any date on which cash dividends are paid on our common stock, each directors stock unit account is also credited with stock units in an amount determined by dividing the dollar value of the dividends that would have been paid on the stock units in that directors account had those units been actual shares by the fair market value of a share of our stock on the dividend payment date. For purposes of this plan, the fair market value of a share of our common stock on any date is the average of the high and low reported sales prices for our stock on the NYSE on that date. Each stock unit is paid out in cash on the first business day following the earlier of (i) five years after the end of the calendar year that includes the quarter for which that stock unit was credited to the directors account, and (ii) when the director ceases to be a member of the Board. The amount to be paid will equal the number of stock units credited to a directors account multiplied by the fair market value of a share of our stock on the payout date. A director may elect to defer the receipt of these payments in accordance with the plan.
The following table summarizes compensation provided to each non-employee director for services provided during fiscal year 2020.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) |
Stock Awards ($)(2) |
All Other ($)(3) |
Total ($) | ||||
M. S. BURKE |
125,000 | 175,000 | | 300,000 | ||||
T. K. CREWS |
150,000 | 175,000 | | 325,000 | ||||
P. DUFOUR |
125,000 | 175,000 | | 300,000 | ||||
D. E. FELSINGER |
30,000 | 300,000 | | 330,000 | ||||
S. F. HARRISON |
135,000 | 175,000 | | 310,000 | ||||
P. J. MOORE |
140,000 | 175,000 | 5,000 | 320,000 | ||||
F. J. SANCHEZ |
125,000 | 175,000 | | 300,000 | ||||
D. A. SANDLER |
125,000 | 175,000 | | 300,000 | ||||
L. Z. SCHLITZ |
125,000 | 175,000 | | 300,000 | ||||
K. R. WESTBROOK |
145,000 | 175,000 | 320,000 |
26 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Director Compensation
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our company has guidelines regarding ownership of shares of our common stock by our non-employee directors. These guidelines call for non-employee directors to own shares of common stock (including stock units issued pursuant to the Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors) over time with a fair market value of not less than five times the amount of the maximum cash portion of the annual retainer. Application of these guidelines will consider the time each director has served on the Board of Directors, as well as stock price fluctuations that may impact the achievement of the five times cash retainer ownership guidelines.
We prohibit directors from hedging or pledging company securities.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 27 |
Executive Officer Stock Ownership
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of March 15, 2021, directly or indirectly, by each of the named executive officers.
Executive |
Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1) |
Options Exercisable Within 60 Days |
Percent of Class | |||
J. R. LUCIANO |
3,001,703(2) | 1,758,700 | * | |||
R. G. YOUNG |
1,376,319(3) | 901,641 | * | |||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
294,102 |
93,110 | * | |||
G. A. MORRIS |
334,127(4) | 117,839 | * | |||
J. D. TAETS |
499,405(5) | 261,154 | * |
* Less than 1% of outstanding shares
(1) Includes for each named executive officer stock options exercisable within 60 days and the following:
Unvested RSUs |
RSUs that vest within 60 days | |||
J. R. Luciano |
483,994 |
0 | ||
R. G. Young |
164,367 |
0 | ||
V. F. Macciocchi |
110,956 |
0 | ||
G. A. Morris |
110,956 |
0 | ||
J. D. Taets |
104,927 |
0 |
(2) Includes 758,771 shares held in trust, 238 shares held by a family-owned limited liability company.
(3) Includes 4,430 shares held in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
(4) Includes 635 shares held in the 401(k) and ESOP.
(5) Includes 962 shares held in the 401(k) and ESOP.
Common stock beneficially owned as of March 15, 2021, by all directors, director nominees, and executive officers as a group, numbering 20 persons including those listed above, is 7,132,019 shares representing 1.3% of the outstanding shares, of which 334,732 shares represent stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan for Nonemployee Directors, 4,659 shares are held in the 401(k) and ESOP, 4,430 shares are held in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan, 3,784,269 shares are unissued but are subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days, and no shares are subject to pledge.
28 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation of the following named executive officers, or NEOs:
Name |
Title | Time with ADM (as of March 2021) | ||
Juan R. Luciano |
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President | 9 years, 11 mos. | ||
Ray G. Young |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 10 years, 4 mos. | ||
Vincent F. Macciocchi |
Senior Vice President and President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer | 8 years, 9 mos.* | ||
Greg A. Morris |
Senior Vice President and President, Agricultural Services and Oilseeds | 26 years, 2 mos. | ||
Joseph D. Taets |
Senior Vice President and President, Global Business Readiness and Procurement | 32 years, 10 mos. |
* includes tenure at a predecessor company that ADM acquired in 2014.
Table of Contents
Section |
Page | |
30 | ||
33 | ||
34 | ||
36 | ||
45 | ||
46 | ||
47 | ||
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits |
48 |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 29 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
1 Revenue on a constant currency basis (revenue adjusted for the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates), adjusted earnings per share (earnings per share, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items), Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. In 2019, the Compensation/Succession Committee chose to recognize $27 million in Adjusted EBITDA due to our anticipated collection of reimbursement for our losses caused by a third party shipping accident at our Reserve, Louisiana facility. While we expected to collect this reimbursement in 2020 and deduct this amount from any calculation performed in connection with our 2020 annual cash incentive, the collection did not occur in 2020. We expect to collect this reimbursement in 2021. This amount will be deducted from any calculation performed in connection with the 2021 annual cash incentive awards so as not to double-count the effects of such adjustment.
30 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
The charts below present the mix of total target direct compensation awarded to the NEOs in 2020.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 31 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES
We annually evaluate all elements of NEO pay to ensure alignment with performance objectives, market best practices and stockholder interests. In addition, ADMs lead director, our CEO, and other members of management annually engage with the companys largest institutional stockholders to receive their feedback on the structure and performance focus of our executive compensation programs. The following table summarizes our current practices.
What We Do | What We Dont Do | |
✓ Pay-for-performance: We tie compensation to performance by setting clear and challenging company financial goals and individual goals, and having a majority of target total direct compensation consist of performance-based components.
|
X No guaranteed base salary increases: Base salary levels are reviewed every year and periodically adjusted based on market competitiveness and internal equity.
| |
✓ Multiple performance metrics: Payouts of our annual cash incentives and long-term incentives are determined based on the weighted results for several financial performance measures and structured to balance accountability for driving annual results with sustainable long-term performance.
|
X No dividends paid on unvested performance awards: We do not pay dividends or credit dividend-equivalents on unvested performance-based awards.
| |
✓ Aggressive stock ownership and retention requirements: Our NEOs and directors must comply with rigorous stock ownership requirements, and they may not sell any company securities until these guidelines are satisfied.
|
X No hedging: We prohibit executives from engaging in hedging transactions with ADM securities.
| |
✓ Compensation-related risk review: The Compensation/Succession Committee regularly reviews compensation-related risks, with the assistance of independent consultants, to confirm that any such risks are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.
|
X No gross up of excise tax payments: We do not assist executives with taxes owed as a result of their compensation.
| |
✓ Clawback policy: The company has a policy to enable us to recover previously paid cash and equity-based incentive compensation from executives in the event of a financial restatement, ethical misconduct, or other specified circumstances.
|
X No excessive executive perks: With the exception of certain benefits provided under our expatriate program, executive perquisites are restricted to executive physicals, company-provided life insurance, and (for the Chairman and CEO) limited personal use of Company chartered aircraft.
| |
✓ Regular review of proxy advisor policies, stockholder feedback and corporate governance best practices: The Compensation/Succession Committee regularly considers the perspectives of outside authorities as they relate to our executive compensation programs.
|
X No pledging: We prohibit executives from pledging ADM securities.
| |
✓ Performance-based equity awards: Half of the NEOs annual LTI award opportunity is delivered in PSUs that may be earned only if the company achieves prescribed financial goals over a prospective three-year measurement period.
|
X No employment contracts: We do not have an employment contract with any executive officer.
| |
✓ Double-trigger requirement: Equity awards do not automatically vest in the event of a change in control. Instead, we impose a double-trigger requirement to accelerate vesting.
|
||
✓ Peer group: We use the S&P 100 Industrials as a peer group to recognize that ADM has no direct competitor (in terms of size or focus) in the U.S. public markets and we recruit talent from a wide spectrum of organizations and industries.
|
32 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Components of Executive Compensation
Components of Executive Compensation
Element and Form | Link to Stockholder Value | Key Characteristics | ||||||
FIXED | Annual | Base Salary | Recognize an individuals role and responsibilities |
Reviewed annually and set based on competitiveness versus the external market, individual performance, and internal equity
| ||||
ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS | Annual | Annual Cash Incentive |
Achieve annual goals measured in terms of financial, strategic, and individual performance linked to creation of stockholder value
|
Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted ROIC, Individual Performance Factor, Nutrition Adjusted Operating Profit Growth, Capital Efficiency, Portfolio Optimization, 1ADM Performance, Readiness Performance
| ||||
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS |
Long-Term
|
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 50%
|
Align NEOs interests with stockholders interests, retain executive talent, and promote stock ownership | RSUs are granted pursuant to the companys long-term equity plan and cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date
| ||||
Performance Share Units (PSUs) 50% |
Align long-term performance with interests of stockholders and retain executive talent | Achievement of key drivers of company performance and stockholder value as evidenced by average Adjusted ROIC, average Nutrition Adjusted Operating Profit Growth, and relative total stockholder return (TSR)
|
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 35 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
INDIVIDUAL COMPENSATION DECISIONS
The following tables summarize compensation decisions made by the Compensation/Succession Committee with respect to each of the NEOs for 2020. Details regarding the specific compensation elements and related payouts follow the individual summaries.
The award values shown below for LTI grants represent the dollar amount of such awards, at target, as approved by the Compensation/Succession Committee. These amounts differ from the grant date fair values of such awards as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the Summary Compensation Table due to the valuation methodology the Compensation/Succession Committee uses in making its decisions differing from the valuation methodology required by the SEC for the compensation tables.
MR. LUCIANO Chairman, CEO and President | ||||
|
Base salary |
Unchanged at $1,400,004 | ||
Target annual cash incentive |
200% of base salary, or $2,800,000 | |||
Actual annual cash incentive |
$4,507,300 or approximately 322% of base salary | |||
Long-term incentives |
$15,000,000, divided equally between PSUs and RSUs | |||
Significant accomplishments:
Executed key elements of our strategy, including Readiness efforts focused on continued process improvements across the organization, including significant progress with 1ADM.
Optimized the organizational structure to drive effectiveness, customer experience, and operational excellence.
Delivered strong financial results in the face of extraordinary challenges, all while maintaining a safe working environment with strong business continuity.
Advanced our Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability efforts, including the launch of Strive 35, an ambitious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, energy, water, and waste by 2035. |
MR. YOUNG Executive Vice President and CFO | ||||
|
Base salary |
Unchanged at $850,008 | ||
Target annual cash incentive |
132% of base salary, or $1,125,000 | |||
Actual annual cash incentive |
$1,754,719 or approximately 206% of base salary | |||
Long-term incentives |
$5,500,000, divided equally between PSUs and RSUs | |||
Significant accomplishments:
Drove enterprise earnings algorithm and performance reviews to help deliver strong financial results.
Fortified liquidity and balance sheet in environment of credit market disruptions in the first half of the year and rising commodity prices in the back half of the year.
Managed controllable corporate costs effectively, including reductions in net interest expense and subsidiary capital structure net funding costs.
Exceeded the targets for Corporate Enterprise and G&A Readiness workstreams, and helped advance key enabling Readiness projects that improve business processes. |
36 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
MR. MACCIOCCHI Senior Vice President, President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer | ||||
|
Base salary |
Unchanged at $675,000 | ||
Target annual cash incentive |
100% of base salary, or $675,000 | |||
Actual annual cash incentive |
$1,086,581 or approximately 161% of base salary | |||
Long-term incentives |
$4,000,000, divided equally between PSUs and RSUs | |||
Significant accomplishments:
Grew full-year Nutrition operating profits by 37% over 2019, while growing Nutrition revenue 5 percent on a constant currency basis2 and continuing to expand EBITDA margins.
Exceeded synergy targets related to our Neovia acquisition and delivered them ahead of schedule.
Continued to harvest recent investments to deliver accretion and returns, to lead in consumer growth trend areas, and to partner with customers to bring innovative new products and solutions to market in 2020.
Enhanced our specialty protein capabilities with the launch of PlantPlus Foods joint venture. |
MR. MORRIS Senior Vice President and President, Agricultural Services and Oilseeds | ||||
|
Base salary |
Unchanged at $675,000 | ||
Target annual cash incentive |
100% of base salary, or $675,000 | |||
Actual annual cash incentive |
$1,086,581 or approximately 161% of base salary | |||
Long-term incentives |
$4,000,000, divided equally between PSUs and RSUs | |||
Significant accomplishments:
Achieved highest operating profit for the new combined segment in 12 years, second best ever recorded in ADM history.
Achieved record volumes of Oilseeds processed.
Delivered exceptional risk management in a year of significant market volatility.
Advanced progress in strategic initiatives including Precision EVA, which delivered more than $300 million in capital reduction benefits. |
MR. TAETS Senior Vice President and President, Global Business Readiness and Procurement | ||||
|
Base salary |
Unchanged at $700,008 | ||
Target annual cash incentive |
100% of base salary, or $700,000 | |||
Actual annual cash incentive |
$1,091,825 or approximately 156% of base salary | |||
Long-term incentives |
$3,650,000, divided equally between PSUs and RSUs | |||
Significant accomplishments:
Continued to drive companys Readiness transformation, spearheading cost, improvement and enabling projects.
Surpassed our 2020 Readiness stretch goal of more than $1.3 billion of net run rate benefits.
Continued global realignment and centralization of Procurement function, leading the group to its best overall savings results.
As executive Quality Champion, drove strategy and actions that resulted in overall global quality improvements. |
2 Revenue on a constant currency basis is a financial measure that has not been calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers a more detailed definition of this term, a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosure about the use of this non-GAAP financial measure.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 37 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
CHANGES TO 2020 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS
The Compensation/Succession Committee made changes to the short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans for performance periods beginning in 2020. Some of these changes were designed to emphasize our focus to significantly grow the Nutrition segment of our business. Other changes were made to simplify our incentive plans.
Changes to the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus included eliminating the separate calculation for bonus pool funding and providing that the company portion of the payout is based on results for adjusted EBITDA, five strategic goals, and adjusted ROIC. Payout opportunities mirror the past three years with slightly lower rewards for strategic goals.
Changes to the 2020 PSU awards included increasing the adjusted ROIC metric to 50%, introducing a new 50% metric of adjusted operating profit growth in the Nutrition segment, and using relative TSR modifier as a +/- 10%.
The Committee may consider the effects of a global pandemic and other economic and environmental pressures negatively impacting results.
2020 ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVES
The annual cash incentive program aligns rewards with business results measured against specific strategic goals. At the start of each fiscal year, the Compensation/Succession Committee approves target annual cash incentive levels, expressed as a percentage of salary, for each NEO. Actual awards paid are based on both company performance (75% weight) and individual performance (25% weight).
COMPANY PERFORMANCE COMPONENTS
Company performance payout is determined by ADMs adjusted EBITDA, our results on a set of strategic initiatives, and our adjusted return on invested capital (ROIC).3
Adjusted EBITDA
As a threshold matter, adjusted EBITDA must exceed $2.0 billion for payout to occur. If adjusted EBITDA for 2020 had been less than $2.0 billion, ADM would not have paid any annual incentives to the NEOs. If adjusted EBITDA for 2020 had been between $2.0 billion and $3.013 billion, the Compensation/Succession Committee would have had discretion to determine whether any payouts under the annual incentive plan would occur, and if so, the amounts of such payouts.
If adjusted EBITDA for 2020 was above $3.013 billion, then an initial payout opportunity amount would be determined based on actual adjusted EBITDA results. The adjusted EBITDA goals and associated payout opportunity levels are shown below. Payout opportunity levels are interpolated for results that fall between specific goal amounts.
Adjusted EBITDA Achieved |
Payout Opportunity | |
$4.078B & Above (+15% Above Plan) |
200% | |
$3.901B (+10% Above Plan) |
165% | |
$3.723B (+5% Above Plan) |
130% | |
$3.546B (Plan Adjusted EBITDA) |
100% | |
$3.369B (-5% Below Plan) |
75% | |
$3.191B (-10% Below Plan) |
55% | |
$3.014B (-15% Below Plan) |
40% |
3 Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Annex A to this Proxy Statement provides more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures.
38 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
Strategic Initiatives
Under the company performance component of our 2020 annual cash incentive program, the initial payout amount determined by actual adjusted EBITDA results as described above could be adjusted upward based on the companys achievements of five equally-weighted strategic goals, each adding 7% to the initial payout amount if achieved:
Nutrition Adjusted Operating Profit Growth. ADM must realize an increase of 20% in year-on-year adjusted operating profit of the Nutrition reporting segment.
Capital Efficiency. ADM must unlock $300 million of capital through monetization.
Portfolio Optimization. 50% of this goal is focused on achieving Neovia business synergies of 50 million and the other 50% of this goal is focused on the successful sale or spin-off of our ethanol dry mills.
1ADM. ADM must achieve successful deployment of four applications.
Readiness. Readiness, which is a program that helps drive continuous improvement in our company particularly in execution, must achieve its bankable plan of $1.8 billion of gross benefits.
Adjusted ROIC Multiplier
ROIC measures how effectively we are using invested capital.
As the last step in the company performance payout component of our 2020 annual cash incentive program, actual adjusted ROIC for 2020 is compared against the 7.0% adjusted ROIC target that was set for 2020, which represents the Companys long term weighted average cost of capital. The result of that comparison leads to a multiplier of +/- 10%. In essence, the multiplier boosts the payout potential in years that our adjusted ROIC exceeds our target, and reduces the payout potential if adjusted ROIC falls below target expectations.
The adjusted ROIC multiplier is determined as follows:
Adjusted ROIC Achieved |
Multiplier* | Effect of multiplier on payout | ||||||||
8.0% |
1.1 | 10% increase | ||||||||
7.0% (Target) |
1.0 | No change | ||||||||
6.0% |
.9 | 10% decrease |
* For Adjusted ROIC results between specific goals, the multiplier will be determined by linear interpolation.
2020 Company Performance Payout Component Calculation
The committee did not exercise its discretion to adjust any of the company performance results for the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. For 2020, ADM attained the results shown below, leading to a company performance payout of 161.3% of target.
Our 2020 Adjusted EBITDA of $3.660 billion represented 119.3% of our goal.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 39 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
In addition, 31.5% was added to the company performance portion of the payout as a result of the achievement of the strategic goals at the following levels:
1. | Achieving a >20% year-over-year increase in Nutrition adjusted operating profit. (+7%) |
2. | Unlocking more than $300 million of capital. (+7%) |
3. | Capturing more than 50 million in Neovia business synergies. (+3.5%). The other 50% of this goal involved monetizing of our ethanol dry mills as part of our portfolio optimization efforts through the sale or spin-off of our ethanol dry mills. As this effort was not completed in 2020, the remaining +3.5% potential credit for this goal was not achieved. |
4. | Deploying four 1ADM applications during the calendar year. (+7%) |
5. | Surpassing our Readiness bankable plan of $1.8 billion in gross run-rate benefits. (+7%) |
Further, Adjusted ROIC for 2020 was 7.7%, resulting in a multiplier of 1.07.
Total company portion of annual cash bonus payout: |
|
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMPONENTS
Individual performance determines 25% of the annual cash bonus.
Our leaders are responsible for driving performance company-wide; their respective individual performance ratings are a result of their performance against goals for the year, including goals for the business units they run. The target individual performance percentage is 25%. For any NEO, however, the Compensation/Succession Committee has discretion to adjust this target percentage by +/- 5% increments based on the committees assessment of the NEOs performance and contribution to the companys success. As a result, individual payouts can range from 0% to 50%.
Based on business results in 2020, and the individual achievements summarized above under Individual Compensation Decisions, the Compensation/Succession Committee elected to award the following individual performance percentages to the NEOs:
Mr. Luciano |
40% | |
Mr. Young |
35% | |
Mr. Macciocchi |
40% | |
Mr. Morris |
40% | |
Mr. Taets |
35% |
The Compensation/Succession Committee considered the full boards assessment of the Chairman and CEOs performance and full company performance when approving Mr. Lucianos individual performance percentage.
40 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
CALCULATION OF AWARD AMOUNTS
The formula used to calculate an annual cash incentive payout for the NEOs can be expressed as follows:
THE RESULTING ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE FOR EACH NEO
Based on the determination of the company and individual performance factors as described above, the NEOs received the payouts set forth below.
Executive |
Target Cash Incentive Opportunity (% of Salary) |
Target Cash Incentive Opportunity ($) |
Cash Bonus Payout Percentage |
Actual FY2020 Cash Award | ||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano |
200% | $2,800,000 | 160.975% | $4,507,300 | ||||||||||||||||
R. G. Young |
132% | $1,125,000 | 155.975% | $1,754,719 | ||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi |
100% | $675,000 | 160.975% | $1,086,581 | ||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris |
100% | $675,000 | 160.975% | $1,086,581 | ||||||||||||||||
J. D. Taets |
100% | $700,000 | 155.975% | $1,091,825 |
EQUITY-BASED LONG-TERM INCENTIVES
ADMs LTI program aligns the interests of executives with those of our stockholders by rewarding the creation of long-term stockholder value, supporting stock ownership, and motivating retention of our senior executives. Our performance-based LTI awards are based on the results of forward-looking metrics measured over a three-year performance period. In 2020, we divided LTI awards equally between performance share units (PSUs) and restricted stock units (RSUs) with three-year cliff vesting. We believe this forward-looking LTI program aligns our equity compensation with market practice and strengthens our executives focus on growth and future value creation for stockholders.
The February 2020 grants in the target amounts approved by the Compensation/Succession Committee are shown below. The 2020 grants reflect the Compensation/Succession Committees decision to provide a one-time increase in the target award amounts for retention purposes, which will be re-evaluated each year.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 41 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
The listed values represent the dollar amount of such awards, at target, as approved by the Compensation/Succession Committee. These amounts differ from the grant date fair values of such awards as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the Summary Compensation Table due to the valuation methodology the Compensation/Succession Committee uses in making its decisions differing from the valuation methodology required by the SEC for the compensation tables.
Executive |
Target Equity Award | |
J. R. Luciano |
$15,000,000 | |
R. G. Young |
$5,500,000 | |
V. F. Macciocchi |
$4,000,000 | |
G. A. Morris |
$4,000,000 | |
J. D. Taets |
$3,650,000 |
The terms of these equity awards are described below.
PSU VESTING
The 2020 PSUs will vest in three years upon the Compensation/Succession Committees determination of the companys achievements, if any, against certain performance goals over a three-year performance period (20202022). Payouts can range from 0% to 200%, and the value of those payouts will depend upon the price of ADMs common stock at the end of the performance period. Vested PSUs will be settled in shares of ADM common stock.
PSU PERFORMANCE METRICS
The performance metrics for the 2020 PSU awards are:
| Average adjusted ROIC over the three-year performance period,4 |
| Average Nutrition adjusted Operating Profit (OP) Growth over the three-year performance period, and |
| Relative TSR as compared to a defined peer group over the three-year performance period. |
ROIC appears as a metric in both our short- and long-term incentive compensation plans, but it serves different purposes and has different weights in the two plans. One-year adjusted ROIC in our annual cash incentive plan demonstrates our short-term performance, while three-year average adjusted ROIC in the PSU award better reflects long-term results with an emphasis on growth and consistent return of our capital investments over time.
The defined peer group against which TSR is compared is more focused for the 2020 PSU awards than it was in prior years. This more focused peer group includes: Symrise AG, International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., Olam International Limited, Bunge Limited, Ingredion Incorporated, The Andersons, Inc., and Green Plains Inc.
4 Adjusted ROIC for the performance period means the average of the annual percentage obtained by dividing the Adjusted ROIC Earnings for each fiscal year during the Performance Period by Adjusted Invested Capital for the same fiscal year. For this purpose, Adjusted Invested Capital is the average of quarter-end amounts for the trailing four quarters, with each such quarter-end amount being equal to the sum of ADMs stockholders equity (excluding non-controlling interests), interest-bearing liabilities, the after-tax effect of the LIFO reserve, and other specified adjustments as determined by the Compensation/Succession Committee to be appropriate.
42 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
The goals and associated payouts for these metrics are shown below. If results for average adjusted ROIC and average Nutrition adjusted OP Growth fall between specific goals, the associated payout will be determined by linear interpolation.
Performance metric
|
Weighting
|
No payout
|
50% payout
|
100% payout
|
150% payout
|
175% payout
|
200% payout
| |||||||
Average Adjusted ROIC |
50% | Below 5.75% |
6.5% |
7.0% |
7.5% |
8.0% | 9.0% or above | |||||||
Average Nutrition Adjusted OP Growth |
50% | Below 6% Growth |
8% Growth |
10% Growth |
15% Growth |
n/a | 20% Growth | |||||||
Relative TSR Modifier |
+/- 10% | Based on ranking that compares ADMs 3-year TSR against defined peer group
1st Rank 1.1 Modifier 2nd Rank 1.067 Modifier 3rd Rank 1.033 Modifier 4th & 5th Rank 1.0 Modifier 6th Rank 0.967 Modifier 7th Rank 0.933 Modifier 8th Rank 0.9 Modifier |
In establishing and measuring achievements against the goals shown above, the Compensation/Succession Committee retains discretion to make changes to reflect material portfolio adjustments, which are events that are unusual and infrequent, like significant acquisitions and divestitures. Absolute negative stock price will cap the modifier at 1.0, which equals to no change in payout.
RSU VESTING
Except in cases that trigger accelerated vesting (described below), RSUs vest three years after the grant date so long as the recipient is still employed by the company. During the vesting period, participants are paid dividend equivalents on their unvested RSUs. Vested RSUs will be settled in shares of ADM common stock.
CONDITIONS LEADING TO ACCELERATED VESTING
RSUs and PSUs will continue to vest as scheduled if an executive leaves the company because of disability or retirement (at age 55 or older with 10 or more years of service, or 65 years of age). Upon the death of an executive, the executives RSUs will vest immediately and the executives PSUs will vest immediately at the target level. A detailed description of change in control provisions that may lead to accelerated vesting appears under the header Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits below.
EQUITY AWARDS GRANTED IN 2018 WITH A PERFORMANCE PERIOD THAT ENDED IN 2020
In 2018, ADM granted PSUs to our then-NEOs with a three-year performance period (2018-2020). The 2018 PSUs provided that if our cumulative adjusted EBITDA for the performance period was less than $7.0 billion, no PSUs would be earned or vest. ADMs cumulative adjusted EBITDA for 2018-2020 was $10.680 billion, and therefore, the threshold requirement was met.
The performance metrics for the 2018 PSU awards were:
| Relative TSR performance as compared to the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index over the three-year performance period, |
| Average adjusted ROIC over the three-year performance period, and |
| Cumulative adjusted EBITDA over the three-year performance period. |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 43 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
The weighting, goals, and associated payout factors for these metrics are shown below. For average adjusted ROIC and cumulative adjusted EBITDA, if results were to fall between specific goals, the associated payout would be determined by linear interpolation.
Performance metric
|
Weighting
|
No payout
|
50%
|
75%
|
100%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
| ||||||||
Relative TSR | 25% | Below 30th percentile |
30th percentile |
Between 30th percentile and median |
Median | Between median and top quartile |
n/a | Top quartile | ||||||||
Adjusted ROIC | 25% | Below 6.5% |
6.5% | n/a | 7.0% | 7.5% | 8.0% | 8.5% and above | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 50% | Below $8.0 billion |
$8.0 billion | n/a | $9.45 billion | $9.925 billion | n/a | $10.5 billion |
On February 3, 2021, the Compensation/Succession Committee determined the degree to which the performance metrics under the 2018 PSUs were attained, and the resulting payout level relative to the target amount for each metric. For the performance period of 2018-2020:
| Relative TSR was at the 62nd percentile, falling between median and top quartile, and therefore the resulting payout factor relative to the target amount for that metric was 150%, |
| Average adjusted ROIC was 7.7%, and therefore the resulting payout factor was 160%, and |
| Cumulative adjusted EBITDA was $10.680 billion, and therefore the resulting payout factor relative to the target amount for that metric was 200%.5 |
The weightings applicable to each of the metrics were then applied to the percentage payout level for each metric, resulting in a weighted payout percentage of 177.5% of the target number of PSUs. Based on these determinations, the Compensation/Succession Committee approved the following number of PSUs earned for each NEO pursuant to the 2018 PSUs:
Executive |
Target Number of 2018 PSUs |
Actual Number of 2018 PSUs Earned | ||
J. R. Luciano |
152,440 | 270,581 | ||
R. G. Young |
51,449 | 91,322 | ||
V. F. Macciocchi |
33,029 | 58,627 | ||
G. A. Morris |
35,570 | 63,137 | ||
J. D. Taets |
35,570 | 63,137 |
All of the earned PSUs shown in the table above vested on February 15, 2021.
5 Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Annex A to this Proxy Statement provides more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures.
44 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Peer Group
The Compensation/Succession Committee utilizes the S&P 100 Industrial Index as a peer group to evaluate whether executive officer pay levels are aligned with performance on a relative basis and to assess relative total stockholder return for the PSUs granted prior to 2020. We believe the large peer group is relevant for ADM because we compete for talent and investments across a wide range of industries. Moreover, our diverse business encompasses aspects of several industries; we do not have a direct competitor in terms of size, focus or business mix in the public markets. As a result, the Compensation/Succession Committee believes it is appropriate to consider a broad spectrum of compensation levels and investment returns to arrive at our NEO compensation.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 45 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Benefits
In addition to the direct elements of pay described above, ADM offers benefits to our NEOs to provide for basic health, welfare, and income security needs and to ensure that our compensation packages are competitive. With few exceptions, such as supplemental benefits provided to employees whose benefits under broad-based plans are limited under applicable tax laws, our policy is to offer the same benefits to all U.S. salaried employees as are offered to the NEOs.
Retirement Program | Eligibility | Description | ||
401(k) and ESOP |
All salaried employees |
Qualified defined contribution plan where employees may defer up to 75% of eligible pay, or up to $19,500 for 2020. The company provides a 1% non-elective employer contribution and a match of 4% on the first 6% contributed by an employee. The employee contribution can be made pre-tax (401(k)) or after-tax (Roth 401(k)). Employees also may defer traditional after-tax contributions into the plan for a total $57,000 savings opportunity including all contribution types (pre-tax, Roth, and after tax) plus any ADM matching and 1% non-elective contributions. Employees who are 50 years of age or older can elect to make additional contributions of up to $6,500 for 2020.
| ||
ADM Retirement Plan |
All salaried employees |
Newly-hired eligible employees and those who had less than 5 years of service as of January 1, 2009, participate in a qualified cash balance pension formula where the benefit is based on an accrual of benefit at a stated percentage of the participants base compensation each year. Those employees who had 5 or more years of service as of January 1, 2009, participate in a qualified traditional defined benefit formula where the benefit is based on number of years of service and final average earnings. (Final average earnings is the average of monthly compensation over a 60 consecutive month period within the employees last 180-month period of employment that produces the highest average.) Effective January 1, 2022, participants in the traditional defined benefit pension will begin to accrue benefits under the cash balance pension formula.
| ||
Deferred Compensation Plan |
Employees with salaries above $175,000 |
Eligible participants may defer up to 75% of their annual base salary and up to 100% of their annual cash incentive until designated future dates. Earning credits are added to the deferred compensation account balances based upon hypothetical investment elections available under these plans and chosen by the participant. These hypothetical investment options correspond with the investment options (other than company common stock) available under the 401(k) and ESOP.
| ||
Supplemental Retirement Plan |
Employees whose retirement benefit is limited by applicable IRS limits |
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan that ensures participants in the Retirement Plan receive the same retirement benefit they would have received if not for certain limitations under applicable tax law.
|
Healthcare and Other Benefits. NEOs receive the same healthcare benefits as other employees, except that we provide executive physicals and related services to our senior executives who serve on the Executive Council. We provide a benefits package for employees (including NEOs) and their dependents, portions of which may be paid for by the employee. Benefits include life, accidental death and dismemberment, health (including prescription drug), dental, vision, and disability insurance; dependent and healthcare reimbursement accounts; tuition reimbursement; paid time off; holidays; and a matching gifts program for charitable contributions.
Perquisites. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, we limit executive perquisites. Any NEO who receives a perquisite is individually responsible for any associated taxes.
The Compensation/Succession Committee allows our Chairman and CEO to have access to Company chartered aircraft for personal use for security and efficiency reasons. See the notes to the Summary Compensation Table for a description of other perquisites provided to the NEOs.
46 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Policies and Governance
Compensation Policies and Governance
EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP
The Board of Directors believes it is important for each member of senior management to maintain a significant ownership position in shares of ADMs common stock to further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. Accordingly, we require each member of senior management to own shares of common stock with a fair market value ranging from one to six times the individuals base salary. Executives may not sell any company securities until the applicable guideline is met. As shown below, each of our NEOs exceeds the applicable ownership guideline by a significant margin.
Executive |
Ownership Guideline as a Multiple of Salary |
Actual Ownership as of March 15, 2021 | ||
J. R. Luciano |
6.0x | 51.7x | ||
R. G. Young |
3.0x | 32.5x | ||
V. F. Macciocchi |
3.0x | 16.7x | ||
G. A. Morris |
3.0x | 18.0x | ||
J. D. Taets |
3.0x | 19.8x |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 47 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 49 |
The following table summarizes the compensation for the fiscal years noted in the table of our named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Option Awards ($)(2) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(4) |
All Other Compensation ($)(5) |
Total ($) | |||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO Chairman, CEO and
|
2020 | 1,400,004 | | 15,940,148 | | 4,507,300 | 112,853 | 34,128 | 21,994,433 | |||||||||
2019 | 1,383,338 | | 13,641,916 | | 2,898,000 | 93,298 | 123,869 | 18,140,421 | ||||||||||
2018 | 1,300,008 | | 13,204,353 | | 5,020,600 | 33,918 | 78,655 | 19,637,534 | ||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG Executive Vice President and CFO |
2020 | 850,008 | | 5,844,739 | | 1,754,719 | 74,554 | 24,734 | 8,548,754 | |||||||||
2019 | 845,848 | | 4,722,182 | | 1,164,375 | 61,783 | 30,879 | 6,825,067 | ||||||||||
2018 | 825,048 | 4,456,512 | | 2,172,375 | 19,233 | 24,204 | 7,497,372 | |||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI Senior Vice President, |
2020 | 675,000 | | 4,250,761 | | 1,086,581 | 43,181 | 78,051 | 6,133,574 | |||||||||
President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer(6) |
2019 | 669,168 | | 2,938,269 | | 664,875 | 29,335 | 23,071 | 4,324,718 | |||||||||
G. A. MORRIS Senior Vice President and President, Ag Services and Oilseeds |
2020 | 675,000 | | 4,250,761 | | 1,086,581 | 730,151 | 21,840 | 6,764,333 | |||||||||
2019 | 670,834 | | 2,938,269 | | 664,875 | 818,206 | 26,145 | 5,118,329 | ||||||||||
2018 | 650,004 | | 3,081,073 | | 1,255,150 | 27,574 | 21,082 | 5,034,883 | ||||||||||
J. D. TAETS Senior Vice President and President, Global Business Readiness and Procurement |
2020
|
700,008 | | 3,878,766 | | 1,091,825 | 746,347 | 23,258 | 6,440,204 | |||||||||
2019
|
700,008 |
| 2,938,269 | | 794,500 | 857,911 | 25,274 | 5,315,962 | ||||||||||
2018
|
700,008 | | 3,081,073 | | 1,351,700 | (194,918) | 1,654,244 | 6,592,107 |
(1) Stock awards in 2020 consisted of RSU awards and PSU awards. The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards for fiscal years 2020, 2019, and 2018 and of the target level of the PSU awards for fiscal years 2019 and 2020. We calculated these amounts in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 utilizing the assumptions discussed in Note 11 to our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018. The grant date fair value of the 2020 RSUs and the grant date fair value of the 2020 PSUs if target performance and maximum performance is achieved are as follows:
PSUs | ||||||
Name |
RSUs |
Target |
Maximum | |||
J. R. Luciano |
$7,970,074 |
$7,970,074 |
$15,940,148 | |||
R. G. Young |
$2,922,370 |
$2,922,370 |
$5,844,739 | |||
V. F. Macciocchi |
$2,125,380 |
$2,125,380 |
$4,250,761 | |||
G. A. Morris |
$2,125,380 |
$2,125,380 |
$4,250,761 | |||
J. D. Taets |
$1,939,383 |
$1,939,383 |
$3,878,766 |
(2) No options were issued in 2018, 2019 or 2020.
(3) The amounts reported in this column represent amounts earned under our annual incentive plan during each of the respective fiscal periods shown. In each case, the amounts were paid shortly after the close of the applicable fiscal period.
(4) The amounts reported in this column for 2020 represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of each NEOs accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020, using the same assumptions used for financial reporting purposes except that retirement age is assumed to be the normal retirement age (65) specified in the plans. No NEO received above market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. To derive the change in pension value for financial reporting purposes, the assumptions used to value pension liabilities on December 31, 2020 were an interest rate of 2.84% for the ADM Retirement Plan, an interest rate of 2.47% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, and mortality was determined using the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using Scale MP-2020. The assumptions used to value pension liabilities on December 31, 2019 were an interest rate of 3.44% for the ADM Retirement Plan, an interest rate of 3.19% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, and mortality was determined using the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using Scale MP-2019.
(5) The amounts reported in this column for 2020 include costs for use of company-leased aircraft, relocation expenses, value of company-provided life insurance, imputed value of company-provided life insurance, costs for executive healthcare services, spousal travel and lodging, company contributions under the 401(k) and ESOP and charitable gifts pursuant to the companys matching charitable gift program which is available to substantially all full-time employees and non-employee directors, and, for Mr. Taets, expenses related to certain expatriate tax services and tax gross ups related thereto. Specific perquisites and other items applicable to each NEO listed are identified below by an X. Where a perquisite or benefit exceeded $10,000 for an individual, the dollar amount is given.
50 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2020
NEO |
Personal Aircraft Use |
Relocation Expenses |
Expatriate Expenses |
Imputed Income |
Life Company |
Executive Services |
Spousal Travel & Lodging |
Matching Charitable Gifts | ||||||||
J. R. Luciano |
X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
R. G. Young |
X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi(6) |
$58,639 | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
G. A. Morris |
X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
J. D. Taets |
X | X | X | X | X |
Mr. Macciocchis relocation expenses included moving expenses ($38,639), a relocation allowance ($10,000) and an amount related to the sale of his home ($10,000).
(6) Mr. Macciocchi first became an NEO in 2019.
Aggregate incremental cost to our company of perquisites and personal benefits is determined as follows. In the case of payment of expenses related to items such as executive healthcare services and relocation expenses, incremental cost is determined by the amounts paid to third-party providers. In the case of personal use of company-leased aircraft, incremental cost is based solely on variable costs under the agreements with the lessor of the aircraft, and does not include fixed or other costs.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS DURING FISCAL YEAR 2020
The following table summarizes the grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
All
Other Stock or |
Grant Awards | |||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Date of Committee Action |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO |
||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
0 | 2,800,000 | 5,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 0 | 174,744 | 349,488 | 7,970,074 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 174,744 | 7,970,074 | ||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG |
||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
0 | 1,125,000 | 2,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 0 | 64,073 | 128,146 | 2,922,370 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 64,073 | 2,922,370 | ||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
0 | 675,000 | 1,350,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 0 | 46,599 | 93,198 | 2,125,380 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 46,599 | 2,125,380 | ||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
0 | 675,000 | 1,350,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 0 | 46,599 | 93,198 | 2,125,380 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 46,599 | 2,125,380 | ||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
0 | 700,000 | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 0 | 42,521 | 85,042 | 1,939,383 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
2/13/20 | 2/5/20 | 42,521 | 1,939,383 |
(1) The grant date fair value is generally the amount the company would expense in its financial statements over the awards service period under FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to the PSUs the value represents the probable outcome of the performance condition using target payout levels. See Footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table for additional detail.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 51 |
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2020
All of the awards in the table above were granted under our 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan. The awards shown in the columns designated Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards were made pursuant to our annual cash incentive plan. The amounts actually paid with respect to these awards are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions 2020 Annual Cash Incentives for more information about our annual cash incentive plan.
The awards shown in the column designated Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards in the table above are PSU awards and vest in three years if the company achieves certain performance goals over a three-year performance period (2020 2022). The 2020 PSU metrics are: (i) the degree to which the company achieves specified average Adjusted ROIC goals over the 2020 2022 performance period (50% weighting), and (ii) the degree to which the companys Nutrition segment achieves adjusted operating profit growth rate goals over the 2020 2022 performance period (50% weighting). The number of 2020 PSUs that may be earned following the application of such performance goals against actual performance will be subject to a relative TSR modifier of up to +/- 10%. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives for more information about the 2020 PSUs.
All of the awards shown in the All Other Stock Awards column in the table above are RSUs awards and vest in full three years after the date of the grant. Under the terms of the RSU award agreements, the recipient of the award may receive cash dividend equivalents on RSUs prior to their vesting date, but may not transfer or pledge the units in any manner prior to vesting. Dividend equivalents on RSUs are paid at the same rate as dividends to our stockholders generally.
The 2020 RSU and PSU awards are subject to double-trigger accelerated vesting and payout upon a change in control only if the award recipients employment is terminated without cause or if the award recipient resigns for good reason, in each case, within 24 months after the change in control, or if the surviving entity in the change in control transaction refuses to continue, assume, or replace the awards. In such instance the 2020 RSU awards will vest in full immediately, and the number of 2020 PSU awards that vest will be equal to the greater of the target number of PSUs and the number of PSUs earned based on actual performance during the truncated performance period. Upon the death of an award recipient, vesting of the RSU awards will accelerate in full and the PSU awards will vest at target. If an award recipients employment ends as a result of disability or retirement, both the RSU and PSU awards will continue to vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule. If an award recipients employment ends for any other reason, unvested RSU and PSU awards will be forfeited. With respect to each of the RSU and PSU awards described above, if an award recipients employment is terminated for cause, or if the recipient breaches a non-competition, non-solicitation, or confidentiality restriction or participates in an activity deemed by us to be detrimental to our company, the recipients unvested units will be forfeited, and any shares issued in settlement of units that have already vested must be returned to us or the recipient must pay us the amount of the shares fair market value as of the date they were issued.
The impact of a termination of employment or change in control of our company on RSU and PSU awards held by our named executive officers is quantified in the Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements section below.
.
52 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2020 Year-End
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR 2020 YEAR-END
The following table summarizes information regarding unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards for the named executive officers as of December 31, 2020.
OPTION AWARDS |
STOCK AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO |
2-11-2016 | 744,879 | 186,220 | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-12-2015 | 324,821 | | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-13-2014 | 234,531 | | 40.65 | 2-13-2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-21-2013 | 51,664 | | 32.50 | 2-21-2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8-16-2012 | 216,585 | | 26.25 | 8-16-2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
490,092 | 24,705,538 | 337,652 | 17,021,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG |
2-11-2016 | 277,526 | 69,382 | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-12-2015 | 214,836 | | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-13-2014 | 184,631 | | 40.65 | 2-13-2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-21-2013 | 31,503 | | 32.50 | 2-21-2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8-16-2012 | 123,763 | | 26.25 | 8-16-2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171,913 | 8,666,134 | 120,464 | 6,072,590 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
2-11-2016 | 74,488 | 18,622 | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | 114,716 | 5,782,834 | 81,687 | 4,117,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS |
2-11-2016 | 67,446 | 22,347 | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-12-2015 | 28,046 | | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
117,257 | 5,910,925 | 81,687 | 4,117,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS |
2-11-2016 | 111,732 | 27,933 | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-12-2015 | 75,743 | | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-13-2014 | 70,285 | | 40.65 | 2-13-2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-21-2013 | 13,861 | | 32.50 | 2-21-2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8-16-2012 | 5,311 | | 26.25 | 8-16-2022 | 113,179 | 5,705,353 | 77,609 | 3,912,270 |
(1) Stock option awards vest at a rate of 20% of the subject shares per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date.
(2) The RSUs reported in this column vest on the dates and in the amounts set forth below.
Restricted Stock Units Vesting On: | |||||||||||||||
Name |
2/15/21 | 2/14/22 | 2/13/23 | ||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano |
152,440 | 162,908 | 174,744 | ||||||||||||
R. G. Young |
51,449 | 56,391 | 64,073 | ||||||||||||
V.F. Macciocchi |
33,029 | 35,088 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
G. A. Morris |
35,570 | 35,088 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
J. D. Taets |
35,570 | 35,088 | 42,521 |
(3) Based on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2020, which was $50.41.
(4) The PSUs reported in this column represent 2019 PSU and 2020 PSU awards that each will vest at the end of the three-year performance period. The number of PSUs that the executive officer will receive is dependent upon the achievement of certain financial metrics approved by the Compensation/Succession Committee measuring, in the case of the 2019 PSUs, relative TSR, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted ROIC, and in the case of the 2020 PSUs, Adjusted ROIC, Nutrition segment adjusted operating profit growth and a relative TSR modifier. The amount of PSU units shown is the target number of units that could be earned and paid out in shares. The company did not assign a threshold unit amount to the 2019 or 2020 PSU awards. This table
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 53 |
Executive Compensation
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2020
does not include the 2018 PSU awards that were earned for the 2018-2020 performance period, because those earned PSUs were not subject to an additional service-based vesting period and instead vested upon the Compensation/Succession Committees determination of the number of PSUs earned. The earned 2018 PSUs are reported in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2020 table.
Performance Stock Units: | ||||||||||
Name |
Performance Period 1/1/19 to 12/31/21 |
Performance Period 1/1/20 to 12/31/22 | ||||||||
J. R. Luciano |
162,908 | 174,744 | ||||||||
R. G. Young |
56,391 | 64,073 | ||||||||
V.F. Macciocchi |
35,088 | 46,599 | ||||||||
G. A. Morris |
35,088 | 46,599 | ||||||||
J. D. Taets |
35,088 | 42,521 |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2020
The following table summarizes information regarding stock options exercised by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and RSU and PSU awards to the named executive officers that vested during that same period.
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) |
Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting (#)(2) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO(4) |
194,014 | 4,539,085 | 407,977 | 21,227,992 | ||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG(5) |
80,377 | 1,863,012 | 138,226 | 7,188,354 | ||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
| | 78,938 | 4,176,020 | ||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS(6) |
34,807 | 554,948 | 89,422 | 4,694,773 | ||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS(7) |
42,181 | 983,762 | 96,590 | 5,015,684 |
(1) Represents the difference between the market value of the shares acquired upon exercise (calculated using the sale price of the shares on the NYSE on the date preceding the exercise date) and the aggregate exercise price of the shares acquired.
(2) Reflects vesting of the 2017 RSUs during 2020, and the number of 2018 PSUs that were earned for the 2018-2020 performance period and vested upon the Compensation/Succession Committees determination of the number of PSUs earned.
(3) Represents the market value of the shares issued in settlement of 2017 RSU and 2018 PSU awards on the date the awards vested, calculated using the closing sale price reported on the NYSE on the trading date immediately prior to the vesting date, before shares were withheld for taxes.
(4) Mr. Luciano exercised: (a) 57,424 options at a strike price of $26.17 on October 12, 2020; (b) 23,745 options at a strike price of $26.17 on October 16, 2020; and (c) 112,845 options at a strike price of $26.17 on October 19, 2020.
(5) Mr. Young exercised: (a) 49,020 options at a strike price of $26.17 on October 12, 2020; and (b) 31,357 options at a strike price of $26.17 on October 16, 2020.
(6) Mr. Morris exercised: (a) 3,114 options at a strike price of $30.71 on June 3, 2020; (b) 4,491 options at a strike price of $26.17 on August 7, 2020; (c) 5,263 options at a strike price of $26.25 on September 3, 2020; and (d) 21,939 options at a strike price of $33.18 on October 12, 2020.
(7) Mr. Taets exercised:(a) 21,979 options at a strike price of $26.25 on October 9, 2020; (b) 5,260 options at a strike price of $26.25 on October 19, 2020; (c) 8,135 options at a strike price of $26.25 on October 20, 2020; (d) 5,146 options at a strike price of $26.25 on October 21, 2020; and (e) 1,661 options at a strike price of $26.25 on October 22, 2020.
54 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Executive Compensation
Pension Benefits
The following table summarizes information regarding the participation of each of the named executive officers in our defined benefit retirement plans as of the pension plan measurement date for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Name |
Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | |||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO |
ADM Retirement Plan | 10 | 113,605 | 0 | |||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 10 | 396,499 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG |
ADM Retirement Plan | 10 | 118,396 | 0 | |||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 10 | 246,059 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
ADM Retirement Plan | 9 | 60,015 | 0 | |||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 9 | 84,831 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS |
ADM Retirement Plan | 26 | 1,053,063 | 0 | |||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 26 | 1,941,273 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS |
ADM Retirement Plan | 33 | 1,510,978 | 0 | |||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 33 | 2,959,117 | 0 |
(1) The number of years of credited service was calculated as of the pension plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes, which was December 31, 2020. For each of the named executive officers, the number of years of credited service is equal to the number of actual years of service with our company.
(2) The assumptions used to value pension liabilities as of December 31, 2020 were an interest rate of 2.84% for the ADM Retirement Plan and 2,47% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan and mortality was determined under the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using scale MP-2020. Mr. Morris and Mr. Taets participate in the final average pay formula under the ADM Retirement Plan and the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, while Mr. Luciano, Mr. Young and Mr. Macciocchi participate in the cash balance formula under those plans. The amounts reported for Mr. Luciano, Mr. Young and Mr. Macciocchi are the present value of their respective projected normal retirement benefit under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans at December 31, 2020. The amounts reported are calculated by projecting the balance in the accounts forward to age 65 by applying a 1.95% interest rate, converting to a single-life annuity as of age 65, and then discounting back to December 31, 2020 using the assumptions specified above. The total account balance for Mr. Luciano at December 31, 2020 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $353,455.07 , the total account balance for Mr. Young at December 31, 2020 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $254,773.88 and the total account balance for Mr. Macciocchi at December 31, 2020 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $104,601.58 , which are the amounts that would have been distributable if such individuals had terminated employment on that date.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 55 |
Executive Compensation
Supplemental Retirement Plan
56 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Executive Compensation
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes information with respect to the participation of the named executive officers in the ADM Deferred Compensation Plan for Selected Management Employees I and II, which are non-qualified deferred compensation plans, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Name |
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last |
Aggregate Balance at 12/31/20 ($)(2) | ||||
J. R. LUCIANO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||
R. G. YOUNG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||
G. A. MORRIS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||
J. D. TAETS |
0 |
7,977 |
286,898 |
45,445 |
(1) The amount reported in this column was not reported in the Summary Compensation Table as part of Mr. Taets compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 because none of the earnings is considered to be above market.
(2) Of the amount shown in this column, $709,977 was previously reported as compensation to Mr. Taets in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years, not all of which is reflected in this column due in part to previous distributions to Mr. Taets, including $286,898 in 2020.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 57 |
Executive Compensation
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
In fiscal year 2020, the investment options available under Deferred Comp Plans I and II and their respective notional rates of return were as follows:
Deemed Investment Option |
Fiscal Year 2020 Cumulative Return (1/1/20 to 12/31/20) | |
Dodge & Cox Stock |
7.16% | |
Aristotle Small Cap Equity Collective Trust Class B |
8.81% | |
PIMCO Total Return Instl Class |
8.88% | |
T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid-Cap Equity Growth |
23.87% | |
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large-Cap Growth |
39.56% | |
Vanguard Wellington Admiral Shares |
10.68% | |
Vanguard International Growth Admiral Shares |
59.74% | |
Vanguard Institutional 500 Index Trust |
18.40% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2015 Trust I |
10.43% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Trust I |
12.12% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Trust I |
13.41% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Trust I |
14.19% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Trust I |
14.93% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 Trust I |
15.59% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Trust I |
16.26% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Trust I |
16.45% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Trust I |
16.42% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Trust I |
16.49% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Trust I |
16.48% | |
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Trust I |
10.10% |
58 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Executive Compensation
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 59 |
Executive Compensation
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
The amount of compensation payable to each named executive officer in various termination and change in control scenarios is listed in the table below. These payments and benefits are provided under the terms of agreements involving equity compensation awards. Unless otherwise indicated, the amounts listed are calculated based on the assumption that the named executive officers employment was terminated or that a change in control occurred on December 31, 2020.
Name |
Voluntary Termination ($) |
Involuntary Termination without Cause ($) |
Termination for Cause ($) |
Death ($)(1) |
Disability ($) |
Change in Control ($)(3) |
Change in Control (Non- Assumption of |
Retirement ($) | ||||||||||
J. R. Luciano |
Vesting of nonvested stock options |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,208,571 |
(2) |
3,208,571 |
3,208,571 |
(5) | |||||||||
Vesting of nonvested RSU awards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24,705,538 |
(2) |
0 |
24,705,538 |
(5) | ||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32,447,304 |
(2) |
0 |
32,447,304 |
(5) | ||||||||||
R. G. Young |
Vesting of nonvested stock options |
(6) |
(6) |
0 |
1,195,452 |
(2) |
1,195,452 |
1,195,452 |
(6) | |||||||||
Vesting of nonvested RSU awards |
(6) |
(6) |
0 |
8,666,134 |
(2) |
0 |
8,666,134 |
(6) | ||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards |
(6) |
(6) |
0 |
11,294,512 |
(2) |
0 |
11,294,512 |
(6) | ||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi |
Vesting of nonvested stock options |
0 |
0 |
0 |
320,857 |
(2) |
320,857 |
320,857 |
(5) | |||||||||
Vesting of nonvested RSU awards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,782,834 |
(2) |
0 |
5,782,834 |
(5) | ||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7,458,008 |
(2) |
0 |
7,458,008 |
(5) | ||||||||||
G. A. Morris |
Vesting of nonvested stock options |
0 |
0 |
0 |
385,039 |
(2) |
385,039 |
385,039 |
(5) | |||||||||
Vesting of nonvested RSU awards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,910,925 |
(2) |
0 |
5,910,925 |
(5) | ||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7,685,357 |
(2) |
0 |
7,685,357 |
(5) | ||||||||||
J. D. Taets |
Vesting of nonvested stock options |
(6) |
(6) |
0 |
481,286 |
(2) |
481,286 |
481,286 |
(6) | |||||||||
Vesting of nonvested RSU awards |
(6) |
(6) |
0 |
5,705,353 |
(2) |
0 |
5,705,353 |
(6) | ||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards |
(6) |
(6) |
0 |
7,479,785 |
(2) |
0 |
7,479,785 |
(6) |
60 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Executive Compensation
CEO Pay Ratio
For our fiscal year 2020 pay ratio analysis, we determined that we could use the same median employee that we identified last year, as permitted by SEC rules. There has been no change in either our employee population or our employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact our fiscal year 2020 pay ratio disclosure. Similarly, there has been no change in our median employees circumstances that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change to our fiscal year 2020 pay ratio disclosure.
Our median employees annual total compensation for fiscal year 2020 was $65,133. The annual total compensation of our Chairman and CEO for fiscal year 2020 was $22,012,509. The ratio between the Chairman and CEOs annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee is 338:1.
With respect to our median employee, we identified and calculated the elements of the employees annual total compensation for 2020 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and also included $18,077 as the estimated value of the median employees 2020 employer-paid health care and short-term disability insurance premiums. With respect to the annual total compensation of our Chairman and CEO, we used the amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table and also included $18,077 as the estimated value of our Chairman and CEOs 2020 employer-paid health care and short-term disability insurance premiums.
Supplemental Pay Ratio
Our global footprint drives the median pay level at ADM. 60% of our workforce is employed outside the United States. We aim to provide competitive pay and benefits for each employees role in every business segment and geography. To be consistent with our compensation philosophy, all global colleagues are paid based upon their local market as reviewed on an annual basis to ensure they are paid competitively. We believe this information is useful to put the SEC-required pay ratio provided above into context.
In addition, we are also providing a supplemental pay ratio that includes our domestic employees only. We identified the median employee for purposes of the supplemental pay ratio using the same methodology as the required pay ratio. Applying this methodology to our employees located in the United States only (other than our Chairman and CEO), we determined that our median employee in fiscal year 2020 had annual total compensation in the amount of $92,411.
As a result, the fiscal year 2020 ratio of the total annual compensation of our Chairman and CEO to the total annual compensation of our median employee in the United States, each as calculated above to include 2020 employer-paid health care and basic life and short-term disability insurance premiums, is 239:1. This supplemental pay ratio is not a substitute for the required CEO pay ratio, but we believe it is helpful in fully evaluating the ratio of our Chairman and CEOs annual total compensation to that of our median employee.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 61 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information; Related Transactions
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION AT DECEMBER 31, 2020
Plan Category |
Number of to be Issued of Outstanding Warrants, and |
Weighted- Warrants and |
Number of | ||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
13,640,224(1) |
$40.73(2) |
19,400,252(3) | ||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total |
13,640,224(1) |
$40.73(2) |
19,400,252(3) |
As of March 15, 2021, our company does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our stockholders.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Various policies and procedures of our company, including our Code of Conduct, our bylaws, the charter of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and annual questionnaires completed by all of our directors and executive officers, require the directors and executive officers to disclose and otherwise identify to the company the transactions or relationships that may constitute conflicts of interest or otherwise require disclosure under applicable SEC rules as related person transactions between our company or its subsidiaries and related persons. For these purposes, a related person is a director, executive officer, nominee for director, or 5% stockholder of the company since the beginning of the last fiscal year and their immediate family members.
Although the companys processes vary with the particular transaction or relationship, in accordance with our Code of Conduct, directors, executive officers, and other company employees are directed to inform appropriate supervisory personnel as to the existence or potential existence of such a transaction or relationship. To the extent a related person is involved in the relationship or has a material interest in the transaction, the companys practice, although not part of a written policy, is to refer consideration of the matter to the Board or the Audit Committee. The transaction or relationship will be evaluated by the Board or the Audit Committee, which will approve or ratify it if it is determined that the transaction or relationship is fair and in the best interests of the company. Generally, transactions and series of related transactions of less than $120,000 are approved or ratified by appropriate company supervisory personnel and are not approved or ratified by the Board or a committee thereof.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the brother of Christopher Cuddy, one of our executive officers, was employed by our company as a vice president of our Golden Peanut and Tree Nut business. Such relationship was considered by the Audit Committee and found to be fair and in the best interests of our company.
62 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to the stockholders relating to the Companys (i) financial statements and the financial reporting process, (ii) preparation of the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to any governmental or regulatory body, (iii) systems of internal accounting and financial controls, (iv) internal audit functions, (v) annual independent audit of the Companys financial statements, (vi) major risk exposures, (vii) legal compliance and ethics programs as established by management and the Board, (viii) related-party transactions, and (ix) performance of the compliance function.
The Audit Committee assures that the corporate information gathering, analysis and reporting systems developed by management represent a good faith attempt to provide senior management and the Board of Directors with information regarding material acts, events, and conditions within the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee ensures that the Company establishes, resources, and maintains a professional internal auditing function and that there are no unjustified restrictions or limitations imposed on such function. The Audit Committee reviews the effectiveness of the internal audit function and reviews and approves the actions relating to the General Auditor, including performance appraisals and related base and incentive compensation. The Audit Committee is comprised of five independent directors, all of whom are financially literate and one of whom (T. K. Crews, the Chair) has been determined by the Board of Directors to be an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the annual report with management, including a discussion of the quality not just the acceptability of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. Also, the Audit Committee discussed with management education regarding compliance with the policies and procedures of the Company as well as federal and state laws.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent auditor, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, and the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the SEC, including their judgment as to the quality not just the acceptability of the Companys accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditor required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditor the auditors independence from management and the Company. The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the independent auditors independence. The Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors approved) a hiring policy related to current and former employees of the independent auditor.
The Committee discussed the Companys major risk exposures, the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, and guidelines and policies to govern the Companys risk assessment and risk management processes.
The meetings of the Audit Committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, the Company, the Companys internal audit function and the Companys independent auditor. The Audit Committee discussed with the internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the accounting and financial controls, and the overall quality of the Companys financial reporting. The Audit Committee met individually with members of management in executive session. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal year 2020.
The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Companys independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance, tenure and independence of the Companys independent auditor and determines whether to re-engage the current independent auditor. In doing so, the Audit
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 63 |
Report of the Audit Committee
Report of the Audit Committee
Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the auditors, the auditors global capabilities and the auditors technical expertise and knowledge of the Companys operations and industry. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that, due to Ernst & Young LLPs knowledge of the Company and of the industries in which the Company operates, it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to continue retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Companys independent auditor. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent auditors, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for filing with the SEC.
T. K. Crews, Chair
P. Dufour
P. J. Moore
F. J. Sanchez
D. A. Sandler
64 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the companys financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Ernst & Young LLP, or its predecessor firms, has served as our independent registered public accounting firm for more than 85 years.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with our companys retention of Ernst & Young LLP. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. In conjunction with the required rotation of Ernst & Young LLPs lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Young LLPs new lead engagement partner.
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. The members of the Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors, believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the companys independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our company and its stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the virtual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The following table shows the aggregate fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP by us for the services it rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019.
Description of Fees |
2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
Audit Fees(1) |
$17,391,000 |
$17,153,000 | ||||||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) |
2,710,000 |
2,567,000 | ||||||||
Tax Fees(3) |
2,198,000 |
2,447,000 | ||||||||
All Other Fees(4) |
|
318,000 | ||||||||
Total |
$22,299,000 |
$22,485,000 |
(1) Includes fees for audit of annual financial statements, reviews of the related quarterly financial statements, audit of the effectiveness of our companys internal control over financial reporting, and certain statutory audits.
(2) Includes fees for accounting and reporting assistance, due diligence for mergers and acquisitions, and audit-related work in connection with employee benefit plans of our company.
(3) Includes fees related to tax planning advice and tax compliance.
(4) Includes fees for advisory services related to strategic transactions or divestitures.
AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES
The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy. This policy provides that audit services engagement terms and fees, and any changes in such terms or fees, are subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The policy further provides that all other audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and permitted non-audit services are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. All of the services Ernst & Young LLP performed for us during fiscal years 2020 and 2019 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 65 |
Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the following proposal provides our stockholders with an opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. In considering your vote, you may wish to review the Compensation Discussion and Analysis discussion herein, which provides details as to our compensation policies, procedures, and decisions regarding the named executive officers, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes, and narrative disclosures in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific element of our executive compensation program, but rather the overall compensation program for our named executive officers.
The Compensation/Succession Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, and the Board of Directors believe that the executive compensation policies, procedures, and decisions made with respect to our named executive officers are competitive, are based on our pay-for-performance philosophy, and are focused on achieving our companys goals and enhancing stockholder value.
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above and in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the Board asks our stockholders to vote FOR the adoption of the following resolution to be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2021:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Companys named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.
Although this advisory vote is not binding on the Board of Directors, the Board and the Compensation/Succession Committee will review and expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution on the compensation of our companys named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
66 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Proposal No. 4 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Aggregation for Proxy Access
John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, owner of 100 shares, has given notice that he intends to present for action at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
Proposal 4 Improve Our Catch-22 Proxy Access
Shareholders request that our board of directors take the steps necessary to enable as many shareholders as may be needed to aggregate their shares to equal 3% of our stock owned continuously for 3-years in order to enable shareholder proxy access.
The current arbitrary maximum quota of 20 shareholders to initiate shareholder proxy access can be called Catch-22 Proxy Access. In order to assemble a group of 20 shareholders, who have owned 3% of the stock for an unbroken 3-years, one would reasonably need to start with about 60 shareholders who own 9% of company stock for an unbroken 3-years because initiating proxy access is a complicated process that is easily susceptible to errors.
The 60 shareholders could then be whittled down to 40 shareholders because some shareholders would be unable to meet all the paper chase requirements. After the 40 shareholders submit their paperwork to management then management might arbitrarily claim that 10 shareholders do not meet the requirements (figuring that shareholders do not want a court battle) and management might convince another 10 shareholders to withdraw leaving 20 shareholders. But the current rule does not allow 40 shareholders to submit their paperwork to management to end up with 20 qualified shareholders.
And 60 shareholders who own 9% of company for an unbroken 3-years might determine that they own 60% of company stock when length of unbroken stock ownership is factored out. Plus, it would be easier to simply call for a special meeting because 10% of shares can call for a special meeting and there is no 3-year unbroken stock ownership needed to qualify.
But how does one begin to assemble a group of 60 potential participants if potential participants cannot be guaranteed participant status after following the tedious rules of 4000-words of dense legalese in our bylaws because they could be voted off the island after a substantial investment of time by the arbitrary quota of 20 shareholders.
Who would be voted off the island? Would one favor shareholders who own the most stock or shareholders who have the best access to expert advice on the complicated workings of shareholder proxy access or shareholders who could attract the best proxy access candidates or the shareholders who can attract the most votes to the proxy access candidate?
The current arbitrary limit of 20 shareholders to initiate shareholder proxy access means that shareholders of the same class of stock are treated unequally. This could be in violation of state law. At least one court concluded that a company cannot provide for different voting rights as among the holders of the same class of stock.
As an analogy such an arbitrary maximum limit of 20 shareholders does not apply to shareholders acting by written consent or to shareholders calling for a special shareholder meeting.
Please vote yes: Improve Our Catch-22 Proxy Access Proposal 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGAINST THE PROPOSAL
The Board has carefully considered the above proposal, believes the proposal is not in the best interests of ADM and its stockholders for the reasons set forth below, and recommends that stockholders vote against the proposal.
ADMs Proxy Access Bylaw Reflects Extensive Board Consideration and Current Best Practices
The company has consistently demonstrated its responsiveness to stockholders and a commitment to strong corporate governance. In November 2015, the Board adopted a proxy access bylaw following extensive discussion by the Board and engagement with a number of ADMs largest stockholders. ADMs proxy access bylaw provides that an eligible stockholder or group of up to 20 eligible stockholders, owning at least 3% of ADMs outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years, has the right to nominate candidates representing 20% of the Board, and include those nominees in ADMs proxy materials, provided that the stockholders and the nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws.
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 67 |
Proposal No. 4
Proposal No. 4 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Aggregation for Proxy Access
Prior to adopting our proxy access bylaw, the Board carefully evaluated various terms including ownership thresholds, potential length of holding periods, caps on board seats and aggregation limits, among other factors. In addition, the Board considered existing stockholder rights, investors views, other companies proxy access bylaws, and ADMs institutional investor profile. As a result of careful and thorough consideration, our proxy access bylaw is consistent with current market standards and best practices. The 20-stockholder aggregation limit has been widely adopted by companies that have adopted proxy access and has been broadly endorsed by institutional investors. According to Shearman & Sterlings 2019 Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey, approximately 92% of public companies that have adopted proxy access have a 20-stockholder aggregation limit.
ADMs Current Proxy Access Bylaw Provides Meaningful Opportunity for Stockholder Involvement in Director Elections
The proposal is unnecessary because ADM has already implemented an appropriate proxy access framework for our stockholders that gives our stockholders a significant voice in director elections. The stockholder proposal would not significantly enhance proxy access at ADM because the current aggregation limit does not prevent stockholders from participating in the director nomination process. The 20-stockholder aggregation limit does not unduly restrict any stockholder from forming a group to submit a proxy access nomination, and provides ample opportunities for all stockholders to combine with other stockholders to reach the 3% threshold. In fact, any stockholder, regardless of how small their holdings, could achieve the 3% minimum by combining with as little as just one other stockholder. We believe that our proxy access bylaw strikes the appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting the interests of all our stockholders.
ADMs 20-Stockholder Aggregation Limit Is Vital to Appropriately Balance the Benefits and Risks of Proxy Access
The stockholder proposal is not in the best interests of ADM stockholders. The companys 20-stockholder aggregation limit is critical to appropriately balance the benefits and risks to stockholders of proxy access. When a stockholder or stockholder group submits a nominee under our proxy access bylaw, ADM must review and confirm that the eligibility and procedural requirements have been satisfied (and remain satisfied through the date of the annual meeting) by the stockholder or each stockholder in a stockholder group. The 20-stockholder aggregation limit is a reasonable and market standard that ensures ADM is not forced to incur time-consuming and potentially expensive inquiries into the nature and duration of the share ownership of a large number of stockholders. Undertaking this administrative burden for a large group of stockholders would likely cost significant time and resources for ADM and could impede the exercise of proxy rights by other stockholders.
Further, the reasonable limit on the number of stockholders permitted to act as a group helps to ensure that the interests of the group are aligned with the general interests of our long-term stockholders by ensuring that the members of the group have a meaningful financial interest in our company. Based on the Boards assessment of stockholder interests and our ongoing investor engagements, we continue to believe that our current 20-stockholder aggregation limit reflects best practice and strikes the appropriate balance between providing stockholders the right to nominate director candidates and mitigating the risks that some stockholders may use proxy access to pursue special interests or objectives that are not aligned with the interests of a majority of long-term stockholders.
ADM Is Committed to Board Refreshment and Diversity
The stockholder proposal is not necessary to ensure, and instead may hinder, the governance goal that our Board possesses the appropriate mix of skills, expertise, and diverse viewpoints. When assessing an individuals qualifications to become a member of the Board, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of the Board considers various factors including education, experience, judgment, independence, integrity, availability, diversity, and other factors that the Committee deems appropriate. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee strives to recommend candidates that complement the current members of the Board and any other proposed nominees so as to further the objective of having a board that reflects a diversity of background and experience with the necessary skills to effectively perform the functions of the Board and its committees. In addition, the Committee considers personal characteristics of nominees and current board members, including race, gender, and geographic origin, in an effort to obtain a diversity of backgrounds and perspectives on the Board.
Advancing its commitment to board refreshment and diversity, ADM has added four new independent directors in the last five years, three of whom are women, one of whom is racially diverse, and all of whom are accomplished leaders with varied relevant skills and experience. Together, the current directors constitute a Board that has the diversity of expertise and perspectives to effectively represent the long-term interests of all stockholders.
In summary, the Board believes that ADM already has a progressive proxy access bylaw that offers meaningful opportunity for stockholder involvement while protecting the interests of all stockholders, and the Board is committed to board refreshment and diversity to ensure a strong and effective governing body. The proposal is unnecessary and is not in the best interests of ADM and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this stockholder proposal. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SHAREHOLDER AGGREGATION FOR PROXY ACCESS.
68 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Submission of Stockholder Proposals and Other Matters
Deadline for Submission of Stockholder Proposals
Proposals of stockholders, including nominations for director, intended to be presented at the next annual meeting and desired to be included in our proxy statement for that meeting must be received by the companys Secretary, addressed to ADM, Attn: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601, no later than November 26, 2021, and, in the case of nominations for director, no earlier than October 27, 2021, in order to be included in such proxy statement. These proposals and nominations must also meet all the relevant requirements of our bylaws in order to be included in our proxy statement. Generally, if written notice of any stockholder proposal intended to be presented at the next annual meeting, and not included in our proxy statement for that meeting, is not delivered to the Secretary at the above address between February 5, 2022 and March 7, 2022 (or, if the next annual meeting is called for a date that is not within the period from April 6, 2022 to June 5, 2022, if such notice is not so delivered by the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the date on which notice of the date of such annual meeting is mailed or public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting is made), or if such notice does not contain the information required by Section 1.4(c) of our bylaws, the chair of the annual meeting may declare that such stockholder proposal be disregarded.
STOCKHOLDERS WITH THE SAME ADDRESS
Individual stockholders sharing an address with one or more other stockholders may elect to household the mailing of the proxy statement and our annual report. This means that only one annual report and proxy statement will be sent to that address unless one or more stockholders at that address specifically elect to receive separate mailings. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Also, householding will not affect dividend check mailings. We will promptly send a separate annual report and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address on request. Stockholders with a shared address may also request us to send separate annual reports and proxy statements in the future, or to send a single copy in the future if we are currently sending multiple copies to the same address.
Requests related to householding should be made in writing and addressed to Investor Relations, ADM, 4666 Faries Parkway, Decatur, Illinois 62526-5666, or by calling our Investor Relations at 217-424-5656. If you are a stockholder whose shares are held by a bank, broker, or other nominee, you can request information about householding from your bank, broker, or other nominee.
It is not contemplated or expected that any business other than that pertaining to the subjects referred to in this proxy statement will be brought up for action at the meeting, but in the event that other business does properly come before the meeting calling for a stockholders vote, the named proxies will vote thereon according to their best judgment in the interest of our company.
By Order of the Board of Directors
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
D. C. Findlay, Secretary
March 26, 2021
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | 69 |
Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
DEFINITION AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
We use Adjusted ROIC to mean Adjusted ROIC Earnings divided by Adjusted Invested Capital. Adjusted ROIC Earnings is the Companys net earnings attributable to controlling interests adjusted for the after-tax effects of interest expense, changes in the LIFO reserve, and other specified items. Adjusted Invested Capital is the average of quarter-end amounts for the trailing four quarters, with each such quarter-end amount being equal to the sum of the Companys equity (excluding noncontrolling interests), interest-bearing liabilities, the after-tax effect of the LIFO reserve, and other specified items. Management uses Adjusted ROIC to measure the Companys performance by comparing Adjusted ROIC to the Companys weighted average cost of capital, or WACC.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, adjusted for specified items. Adjusted EPS is defined as diluted Earnings Per Share adjusted for the effects on reported diluted EPS of certain specified items. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS are useful measures of the Companys performance because they provide investors additional information about the Companys operations allowing better evaluation of underlying business performance and better period-to-period comparability.
Adjusted economic value added (EVA) is the Companys economic value added adjusted for LIFO and other specified items. The Company calculates economic value added by comparing ADMs adjusted ROIC to its Annual WACC multiplied by adjusted invested capital.
Revenue on a constant currency basis, referred to as FX adjusted revenue in this Annex A, is the Companys GAAP revenue adjusted for the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company calculates FX adjusted revenue by converting its current period non-USD revenue to USD using the prior period exchange rates. Management believes providing FX adjusted revenue provides valuable supplemental information regarding its revenue and facilitates period-to-period comparison. FX adjusted revenue is a non-GAAP measure and is not intended to replace or be an alternative to GAAP revenue, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Adjusted ROIC, Adjusted ROIC Earnings, Adjusted Invested Capital, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EPS, adjusted EVA, and FX adjusted revenue are non-GAAP financial measures and are not intended to replace or be alternatives to GAAP financial measures. The following tables present reconciliations of Adjusted ROIC Earnings to net earnings attributable to controlling interests, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; of Adjusted Invested Capital to Total Shareholders Equity, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; of Adjusted EBITDA to earnings before income taxes, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; of Adjusted EPS to diluted EPS, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP, of FX adjusted revenue to GAAP revenues, and the calculations of Adjusted EVA and Adjusted ROIC for the period ended December 31, 2020.
ADJUSTED EVA(1) CALCULATION (TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020) |
Adjusted ROIC 7.7% less Annual WACC 5.75% x Adjusted Invested Capital $29,410* = $573* |
ADJUSTED ROIC(1) CALCULATION (TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020) |
Adjusted ROIC Earnings $2,260* ÷ Adjusted Invested Capital $29,410* = 7.7% |
*in millions
A-1 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
Annex A
Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
ADJUSTED ROIC EARNINGS(1) (IN MILLIONS) |
Quarter Ended | Four Quarters Ended | ||||||||
Mar 31, 2020 |
Jun 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM |
$391 | $469 | $225 | $687 | $1,772 | |||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||
Interest expense |
83 | 87 | 100 | 69 | 339 | |||||
LIFO |
(91) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (91) | |||||
Specified items |
48 | 8 | 355 | 1 | 412 | |||||
Total adjustments |
40 | 95 | 455 | 70 | 660 | |||||
Tax on adjustments |
(7) | (23) | (120) | (22) | (172) | |||||
Net adjustments |
33 | 72 | 335 | 48 | 488 | |||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings |
$424 | $541 | $560 | $735 | $2,260 |
ADJUSTED INVESTED CAPITAL(1) (IN MILLIONS) |
Quarter Ended | Trailing Four- Quarter Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 31, 2020 |
Jun 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders Equity(2) |
$18,952 | $19,293 | $19,322 | $20,000 | $19,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||
+ Interest-bearing liabilities(3) |
12,512 | 9,181 | 8,141 | 9,937 | 9,943 | ||||||||||||||||||||
+ Specified items |
39 | 6 | 259 | (5) | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted Invested Capital |
$31,503 | $28,480 | $27,722 | $29,932 | $29,410 |
ADJUSTED EBITDA(1) (IN MILLIONS) |
Twelve Months Ended Dec 31, 2020 | |
Earnings before income taxes |
$1,883 | |
Interest expense |
339 | |
Depreciation and amortization |
976 | |
EBITDA |
3,198 | |
Adjustments: |
||
LIFO credit |
(91) | |
Gains on sales of assets and businesses |
(90) | |
Asset impairment, restructuring, and settlement charges |
92 | |
Railroad maintenance expense |
138 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment |
409 | |
Acquisition-related expenses |
4 | |
Adjusted EBITDA |
$3,660 |
ADM Proxy Statement 2021 | A-2 |
Annex A
Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
ADJUSTED EPS(1) |
Twelve Months Ended Dec 31, 2020 | |
EPS (fully diluted) as reported |
$3.15 | |
Adjustments: |
||
LIFO credit |
(0.12) | |
Gains on sales of assets and businesses |
(0.14) | |
Asset impairment, restructuring, and settlement charges |
0.12 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment |
0.55 | |
Loss on debt conversion option |
0.03 | |
Acquisition-related expenses |
0.01 | |
Tax adjustments |
(0.01) | |
Adjusted EPS |
$3.59 |
NUTRITION REVENUE
(AMOUNTS IN |
||||
FY 2020 | Growth vs. FY 2019 | |||
GAAP Revenue |
||||
Nutrition |
$5,800 | 2.2% | ||
Human Nutrition |
2.812 | 2.4% | ||
Animal Nutrition |
2,988 | 1.9% | ||
FX Adjusted Revenue(1) |
||||
Nutrition |
5,962 | 5.0% | ||
Human Nutrition |
2,822 | 2.8% | ||
Animal Nutrition |
3,140 | 7.1% |
(1) Non-GAAP measure: The Company uses certain Non-GAAP financial measures as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. These are measures of performance not defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and should be considered in addition to, not in lieu of, GAAP reported measure.
(a) | Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is Adjusted ROIC Earnings divided by Adjusted Invested Capital. Adjusted ROIC Earnings is ADMs net earnings adjusted for the after tax effects of interest expense, changes in the LIFO reserve, and other specified items. Adjusted Invested Capital is the sum of ADMs equity (excluding noncontrolling interests), interest-bearing liabilities, and the after tax effect of other specified items. |
(b) | Specified items are comprised of charges of $41 million ($32 million, after tax; $0.06 per share) related to the impairment of certain assets and restructuring and a tax expense adjustment of $7 million ($0.01 per share) related to certain discrete items for the quarter ended March 31, 2020; charges of $16 million ($12 million, after tax; $0.02 per share) related to the impairment of certain assets and restructuring, gains of $23 million ($18 million, after tax; $0.03 per share) related to the sale of certain assets, a loss of $14 million ($11 million, after tax; $0.02 per share) related to the early repayment of certain debt, and a tax expense adjustment of $1 million ($0.00 per share) related to certain discrete items for the quarter ended June 30, 2020; charges of $8 million ($5 million, after tax; $0.01 per share) related to the impairment of certain assets, restructuring, and settlement, gains of $57 million ($54 million, after tax; $0.10 per share) related to the sale of Wilmar shares and other certain assets, a loss of $396 million ($300 million, after tax; $0.53 per share) related to the early repurchase of certain of the Companys debentures, and a tax expense adjustment of $8 million ($0.02 per share) related to certain discrete items for the quarter ended September 30, 2020; and charges of $27 million ($20 million, after tax; $0.03 per share) related to the impairment of certain assets, restructuring, and settlement, gains of $10 million ($8 million, after tax; $0.01 per share) related to the sale of certain assets, expenses of $4 million ($3 million, after tax; $0.01 per share) related to a target acquisition, a gain of $1 million (1 million, after tax; $0.00 per share) related to the early repayment of certain debt, and a tax benefit adjustment of $19 million ($0.04 per share) related to certain discrete items for the quarter ended December 31, 2020. |
(c) | Loss on debt conversion of $17 million ($17 million, after tax; $0.03 per share) related to the mark-to-market adjustment of the conversion option of the exchangeable bonds issued in August 2020. |
(d) | Adjusted EVA is Adjusted ROIC less the Companys Annual WACC multiplied by Adjusted Invested Capital. |
(e) | Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted for certain specified items as described above and railroad maintenance expense. |
(f) | Adjusted EPS is diluted EPS adjusted for certain specified items as described above. |
(g) | FX adjusted revenue is GAAP revenue adjusted for the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. |
(2) Excludes noncontrolling interests.
(3) Includes short-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt.
A-3 | ADM Proxy Statement 2021 |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | ||||
D43054-Z79754 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | |||
| ||||
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY | ||||||||||||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE |
||||||||||||||||
FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3 AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 4. |
||||||||||||||||
1. Election of Directors: |
For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||
Nominees: |
For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||
1a. M.S. Burke |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1b. T. Colbert |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 2. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2021. |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1c. T.K. Crews |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
3. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1d. P. Dufour |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 4. Stockholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Aggregation for Proxy Access. |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1e. D.E. Felsinger |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
In their discretion, upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting. |
||||||||||||
1f. S.F. Harrison |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1g. J.R. Luciano |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1h. P.J. Moore |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1i. F.J. Sanchez |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1j. D.A. Sandler |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1k. L.Z. Schlitz |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
1l. K.R. Westbrook |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||
Note: Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on this Proxy Card, and date it. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, guardian, administrator, trustee, officer of corporation or other entity or in another representative capacity, please give the full title under the signature. |
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 6, 2021.
The 2021 Letter to Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2020 Form 10-K for this meeting are
available at:
www.proxyvote.com
D43055-Z79754
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 6, 2021
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY.
The undersigned holder of Common Stock of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, revoking all proxies heretofore given, hereby appoints J.R. Luciano, D.E. Felsinger and P.J. Moore as Proxies, with the full power of substitution, to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of the undersigned held of record on March 15, 2021, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2021, on Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 8:30 a.m., Central Daylight Time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.
This card also provides your instructions for voting any shares that you may hold in the Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan. This card provides instructions to the savings plan trustee for voting those shares. To allow sufficient time for the savings plan trustee to tabulate the vote of the savings plan shares, you must vote by telephone, internet or return this card in the enclosed envelope so that your vote is received by May 3, 2021.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse side. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 and AGAINST Proposal 4. The votes entitled to be cast by the Proxy holder will be cast in the discretion of the Proxy holder on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.