DEF 14A
1
a2042273zdef14a.txt
DEF 14A
`
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant /X/
Filed by a party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/ / Preliminary Proxy Statement
/ / Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
/X/ Definitive Proxy Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
HON INDUSTRIES INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ No fee required.
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HON INDUSTRIES INC.
414 EAST THIRD STREET - P.O. BOX 1109
MUSCATINE, IA 52761-0071
319/264-7400
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of HON INDUSTRIES Inc. (the "Company")
will be held at the Holiday Inn, Highways 61 and 38 North, Muscatine, Iowa, on
Monday, May 7, 2001, beginning at 10:30 a.m. (local time), in order:
1. To elect three Directors, each for a term of three years or
until their successors are elected and qualify; and
2. To transact any other business that may properly be brought
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The holders of record as of the close of business on March 1, 2001 of the
Company's Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, are entitled to vote at the
meeting.
You are encouraged to attend the meeting. We want to keep you informed of the
Company's activities and progress.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
/s/ James I. Johnson
James I. Johnson
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
March 27, 2001
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE PREPAID ENVELOPE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL
MEETING.
HON INDUSTRIES INC.
414 EAST THIRD STREET
MUSCATINE, IOWA 52761
March 27, 2001
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 7, 2001
This Proxy Statement is furnished by and on behalf of the Board of Directors of
HON INDUSTRIES Inc. (the "Company" or "HON INDUSTRIES") in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for use at the annual meeting of shareholders of the
Company to be held on May 7, 2001 at the Holiday Inn in Muscatine, Iowa, and at
any adjournment or postponement thereof (the "Annual Meeting").
There were 59,426,775 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $1.00 per
share (the "Common Stock"), outstanding (the "Outstanding Shares") as of the
close of business on March 1, 2001 ("Record Date"). Shareholders are entitled to
cast one vote per share for election of Directors and one vote per share on all
other matters.
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card will be first mailed on or
about March 27, 2001 to the holders of shares on the Record Date (the
"Shareholders" or, individually, a "Shareholder").
A Shareholder who gives a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to its exercise
by filing with the Secretary a written revocation or a duly executed proxy
bearing a later date. The proxy will be suspended if the Shareholder attends the
meeting and elects to vote in person. Proxies that are signed but unmarked will
be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.
The Company will treat abstentions and broker non-votes as present at the Annual
Meeting solely for purposes of determining whether or not a quorum exists. These
non-votes will not be considered to be voting on the matters to which they
pertain and, thus, will not be counted in determining whether the election of
Directors has been approved by the requisite vote of Shareholders.
Except as described below, the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of
the total Outstanding Shares entitled to vote is required to adopt any motion or
resolution or to take any action at any meeting of shareholders. The affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the total Outstanding Shares entitled to
vote is required and will be sufficient to take any of the following actions
submitted to a vote of shareholders: (1) any amendment to the Company's Articles
of Incorporation that has been approved or recommended by the Board of
Directors, other than certain amendments that would amend, limit or conflict
with certain provisions governing shareholder voting requirements and the
Company's Board of Directors (including removal and election); (2) the election
of a class of Directors at any annual meeting of shareholders if (a) at the
annual meeting of shareholders in the third preceding year, an election of such
class was held but no Director of such class was elected because no candidate
received the requisite two-thirds vote, and (b) the term of such class of
Directors was extended for an additional term of three years; and (3) any other
motion, resolution or action which has been approved or recommended by the Board
of Directors of the Company (other than any such motion, resolution or action
regarding (a) the election or removal of Directors, (b) amendment of certain
portions of the Articles of Incorporation, (c) any Corporate Combination (as
defined in the Company's Articles of Incorporation), (d) any partial or complete
liquidation of the Company, (e) any liquidating dividend or distribution or (f)
any dissolution of the Company).
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, three Directors are to be elected to hold
office each for a term of three years and until their successors are elected and
shall qualify. The Board of Directors recommends the election of the three
nominees listed below. The named proxies intend to vote for the election of the
three nominees. If, at the time of the meeting, any of the nominees should be
unable or decline to serve, the discretionary authority provided in the proxy
will be exercised to vote for a substitute or substitutes, unless otherwise
directed. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any substitute
nominee or nominees will be required.
Set forth below is certain information furnished to the Company by each nominee
and each Director continuing in office after the Annual Meeting.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION
COMMON STOCK
AS OF MARCH 1, 2001
------------------------
NOMINATED AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENT
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS DIRECTOR FOR TERM OF BENEFICIAL OF
NOMINEES EXPERIENCE DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS AGE SINCE EXPIRING OWNERSHIP CLASS
Dennis J. Martin Executive Vice President since 1996, 50 2000 2004 335(1) *
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (developer and
marketer of highly engineered products
and systems); President, The Miller Group
since 1994, President, ITW Hobart
Brothers Company since 1996 (Illinois
Tool Works Inc.).
Jack D Chairman of the Board since 1996, Chief 63 1990 2004 233,012(3) *
Michaels (2) Executive Officer since 1991, President
since 1990, HON INDUSTRIES Inc.
Abbie J. Smith (4) Chaired Professor, Graduate School of 47 2000 2004 911(1) *
Business since 1999, Full Professor,
Graduate School of Business, 1989-1999, The
University of Chicago (national leader
in higher education and research).
2
INCUMBENT DIRECTORS
COMMON STOCK
AS OF MARCH 1, 2001
-----------------------
AMOUNT AND
NATURE PERCENT
CONTINUING PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS DIRECTOR TERM OF BENEFICIAL OF
DIRECTORS EXPERIENCE DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS AGE SINCE EXPIRES OWNERSHIP CLASS
Cheryl A. Francis Advisor/Consultant since 2000; Executive 47 1999 2002 2,775 *
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
1995-2000, RR Donnelley & Sons Company
(provider of printing and related services to
the merchandising, magazine, book, directory
and financial markets).
Robert L. Katz (5) President since 1953, Robert L. Katz and 75 1995 2002 13,514(1) *
Associates (consultants on corporate
strategy); President since 1975, CalTex
Investment Management Co. (venture capital
firm).
Richard H Vice Chairman, Board of Directors since 68 1964 2002 3,240,589(7)(8) 5.5%
Stanley (6) 1979, HON INDUSTRIES Inc.; Chairman since
1998, and President, 1986-1998, SC
Companies, Inc. (private holding company
with subsidiaries offering engineering,
environmental, and design-build services);
Chairman since 1984, Stanley Consultants,
Inc. (international consultants
engineering, architecture, planning and
management).
Brian E. Stern (9) President, Xerox Technology Enterprises 53 1998 2002 7,632(7) *
since 1999, Senior Vice President of Xerox
Corporation 1996-1999, President, Office
Document Products Group, 1996-1999, and
Corporate Vice President of Xerox Corporation
and President, Personal Document Products
Division, 1994-1996, Xerox Corporation
(developer, marketer, manufacturer, financier
and servicer of document processing products
and services).
Gary M President and Chief Executive Officer, 57 2000 2003 1,134(1) *
Christensen (10) since 1996, Pella Corporation (marketer
and manufacturer of windows and doors).
Robert W Chairman Emeritus since 1999, Counsel 63 1994 2003 5,470(1) *
Cox (11) 1994-1999, Baker & McKenzie (an
international law firm). Director of
various corporations.
3
COMMON STOCK
AS OF MARCH 1, 2001
------------------------
AMOUNT AND
NATURE PERCENT
CONTINUING PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS DIRECTOR TERM OF BENEFICIAL OF
DIRECTORS EXPERIENCE DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS AGE SINCE EXPIRES OWNERSHIP CLASS
Lorne R Executive Vice President, 1985-1993, The 67 1994 2003 16,755(1) *
Waxlax (12) Gillette Company (marketer and
manufacturer of personal care and use
products). Director of various
corporations.
W August Director since 1972, President and Chief 60 1998 2001 4,468(1) *
Hillenbrand Executive Officer, 1989-2000, Hillenbrand
(13)(14) Industries, Inc. (marketer and
manufacturer of health care, funeral service
and high security products, services and
support programs).
--------------------
* Less than 1 percent.
NOTES
(1) Includes deferred fees and/or compensation in the form of deferred
shares of Common Stock held on the books and records of the Company in
the following amounts: Mr. Christensen, 1,134 shares; Mr. Cox, 1,093
shares; Mr. Hillenbrand, 1,743 shares; Dr. Katz, 1,499 shares; Mr.
Martin, 335 shares; Dr. Smith, 911 shares; and Mr. Waxlax, 1,905
shares.
(2) Mr. Michaels is also a director of IPSCO Inc. and Snap-On Incorporated,
each of which has a class of securities registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
(3) Includes 136,000 shares owned by Jachris L.L.C. Mr. Michaels is
co-manager of Jachris L.L.C., and, as such, shares voting and
dispositive powers as to the shares it owns. Mr. Michaels disclaims
"beneficial ownership" of those shares.
(4) Dr. Smith is also a director of DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc.
and Dimensional Investment Group Inc., each of which has a class of
securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(5) Dr. Katz is also a director of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., which has a
class of securities registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
(6) Mr. Stanley also serves as a Director of Dover Resources, Inc., a
subsidiary of Dover Corporation, a diversified manufacturer of
industrial products.
(7) Figures include shares held by or for the benefit of certain family
members of Mr. Stanley, 185,472, and Mr. Stern, 3,000. Each Director
disclaims "beneficial ownership" of such respective shares.
(8) Includes 16,144 shares beneficially and indirectly owned by Mr. Stanley
as co-trustee of the C. Maxwell Stanley and Elizabeth M. Stanley Real
Estate Trust. Also includes 2,173,104 shares owned by The Stanley
Foundation and 632,500 shares owned by The Holthues Trust. Mr. Stanley
is Chairman, President and a director of The Stanley Foundation and
President and a director of The Holthues Trust and, as such, shares
voting and dispositive powers as to shares held by such entities, of
which he disclaims "beneficial ownership."
(9) Mr. Stern is also a director of New England Business Service, Inc. and
Esselte Corporation, each of which has a class of securities registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4
(10) Mr. Christensen is also a director of Butler Manufacturing Company,
which has a class of securities registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
(11) Mr. Cox is also a director of Carey International, Inc. and Homebase,
Inc., each of which has a class of securities registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
(12) Mr. Waxlax is also a director of Clean Harbors, Inc., Pennzoil-Quaker
State Company, BJ's Wholesale Club Inc. and Homebase, Inc., each of
which has a class of securities registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
(13) Mr. Hillenbrand is also a director of DPL Inc., which is the parent
company of The Dayton Power and Light Company, and has a class of
securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(14) Mr. Hillenbrand is not standing for re-election as a Director of the
Company.
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth information known as of March 1, 2001, with
respect to any person who is known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of
more than 5 percent of the Company's Common Stock. The table also includes any
non-Director executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table. For
information regarding Director stock ownership, see "Election of Directors."
NAME AND ADDRESS OF AMOUNT AND NATURE OF PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
State Farm Insurance Companies 7,374,200 12.4%
One State Farm Plaza
Bloomington, Illinois 61701
Terrence L. and Loretta B. Mealy 3,435,008 5.8%
301 East Second Street
Muscatine, Iowa 52761
David C. Stuebe 11,205 *
Jerald K. Dittmer 4,507 *
James I. Johnson 4,077 *
Thomas K. Miller 15,317 *
All Directors and Officers as a Group (1) 3,666,997 6.2%
___________________
* Less than 1 percent.
NOTES
(1) Includes shares held by or for the benefit of certain family members of
Mr. Michaels (136,000), Mr. Stanley (185,472) and Mr. Stern (3,000), as
to which they disclaim "beneficial ownership." See Note (3) and Note
(7) of "Election of Directors."
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
Directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered
class of the Company's equity securities, to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of Common Stock, and to furnish the Company with copies of all
5
such reports they file. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on a review of
the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations
that no other Forms 5 were required, during the fiscal year ended December 30,
2000, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers,
Directors, and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners were complied with,
except Mr. Stuebe inadvertently failed to timely file one report on Form 4 for
May 1998 covering one transaction in Company securities.
BOARD MEETINGS, COMMITTEES AND FEES
The Board of Directors held four regular meetings and one special meeting during
the last fiscal year. The Board has three standing committees that deal with
audit matters, compensation and corporate governance, including nominations to
the Board. Each Director has attended 100 percent of all committee and Board
meetings during the last fiscal year.
The Audit Committee consists of Cheryl A. Francis, W August Hillenbrand, Dennis
J. Martin and Abbie J. Smith. It met four times during the last fiscal year. The
Committee recommends selection of the independent auditor and reviews the
auditor's performance, fees and audit plans. The Committee also reviews the
annual financial statements; the auditor's management letter with both the
outside auditor and management; internal audit staffing, budget, plans and
reports; nonaudit services provided by outside auditor; the Company's insurance
coverage and any other financial matters as directed by the Board.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is comprised of Lorne R. Waxlax,
Gary M. Christensen and Robert L. Katz. It met five times during the last fiscal
year. The Committee reviews executive compensation, benefit programs for all
employees, management's recommendations on election of officers and human
resources development.
The Public Policy and Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of Richard H.
Stanley, Robert W. Cox and Brian E. Stern. It met four times during the last
fiscal year. The Committee monitors social accountability, recommends changes in
Board size, oversees committee jurisdiction and assignments and proposes
nominees for election to the Board of Directors. The Committee will consider
candidates for Board membership recommended in writing by shareholders by the
deadline for shareholder proposals. See "Deadline For Shareholder Proposals For
2002 Annual Meeting."
Each Non-employee Director receives an annual retainer of $22,000. Non-employee
Directors are required to receive one-half of their annual retainer in the form
of shares of Common Stock of the Company to be issued under the terms of the
Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HON
INDUSTRIES Inc. (the "Director Plan") or (to the extent the Director
participates in the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferred Plan"))
in the form of shares to be credited to the Director's Share Sub-Account under
the Deferred Plan. However, this provision does not apply to any Director owning
Common Stock with a market value of five times the annual retainer, or more.
Non-employee Directors can also acquire Common Stock in several other ways.
Under the Director Plan, Directors are entitled to receive up to 100 percent of
their retainers and other fees in the form of shares of Common Stock. Under the
Deferred Plan, each Director is provided with the opportunity to defer cash
compensation earned as a Director, including retainer and committee fees, in
accordance with the provisions of such plan. Deferred compensation may be
deferred in cash or in the form of shares of Common Stock (determined by
dividing the amount of the compensation deferred by the fair market value per
share of Common Stock on the date such compensation would have otherwise been
paid). In addition, each Non-employee Director is eligible to receive awards of
options to purchase Common Stock of the Company, restricted stock or common
stock grants, or any combination thereof, in such amounts as the Board of
Directors may authorize under the Director Plan. In 2000, each Non-employee
Director was issued 600 shares of Common Stock of the Company under the Director
Plan. All shares of Common Stock issued in lieu of cash retainer amounts or
other Director fees (as described below) have heretofore been issued pursuant to
the Company's amended and restated 1995 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the
"Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan") or the Director Plan. Each Director
also receives $1,000 for each regular or special Board meeting, $1,000 for each
special committee meeting, and $500 for each regular meeting of a committee of
which the Director is a member. Directors also receive an additional $1,000 for
each meeting attended if they are required to travel six hours or more on a
round-trip basis. Each Director receives a $500 fee for each Board or committee
meeting held by telephone conference or meetings attended at the request of the
Chairman of the Board. Directors are also paid travel and related expenses for
meetings attended. Directors who are employees of the Corporation do not receive
additional compensation for service on the Board of Directors.
6
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Company's Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee Charter is set forth in Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement. The primary functions of the Audit Committee are set forth in its
Charter and under "Board Meetings, Committees and Fees" on the preceding page.
All members of the Audit Committee are independent as defined in Sections 303.01
and 303.02 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Arthur Andersen
LLP, the Company's independent auditor, the Company's audited financial
statements for the year ended December 30, 2000.
The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent auditor the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
COMMUNICATION WITH AUDIT COMMITTEES, as amended.
The Audit Committee received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter
from the independent auditor required by Independence Standard No. 1,
INDEPENDENCE DISCUSSIONS WITH AUDIT COMMITTEES, as amended, and discussed with
the auditor the auditor's independence. The Audit Committee also considered
whether the provision of tax assistance, ERISA audits of employee benefit and
welfare plans and supplemental internal audit services are compatible with
maintaining the independence of the Company's independent auditor.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to
above be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2000, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Cheryl A. Francis, Chairperson
W August Hillenbrand
Dennis J. Martin
Abbie J. Smith
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
On November 15, 1995, Robert L. Katz and Associates, of which Dr. Katz is
President, entered into a one-year agreement with the Company to provide certain
consulting services for $5,000 per month. The agreement also provides for
reimbursement of travel expenses and other reasonable out-of-pocket costs
incurred on the Company's behalf and is automatically renewed each year unless
notice of cancellation is given no later than 90 days prior to the end of the
one-year term. The agreement has been renewed for 2001. In 2000, the Company
paid Robert L. Katz and Associates a total consulting fee of $60,000, plus
$9,563.35 of expense reimbursement, for services rendered.
REQUIRED VOTE
Approval of the election of the above nominees as Directors requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the total Outstanding Shares
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE
ABOVE NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS. PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE
SO VOTED UNLESS SHAREHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY CHOICE IN THEIR PROXIES.
7
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid
to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the other four most highly
compensated executive officers of the Company (determined by reference to fiscal
year 2000) for the years indicated:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
ANNUAL LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION COMPENSATION
------------- ---------------
VESTED
AWARDS BENEFITS
-----------------------------------------
Other Securities
Annual Restricted Underlying All Other
Name and Compen- Stock Options/ LTIP Compen-
Principal Fiscal Salary(1) Bonus(2) sation(3) Awards(4) SARs(5) Vested(6) sation(7)
Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) (#) ($) ($)
Jack D. Michaels 2000 593,333 525,943 53,008 431,000 240,000 182,354
Chairman, President and 1999 527,500 483,834 49,274 75,000 259,479 158,268
Chief Executive Officer 1998 493,000 490,442 30,030 809,965 203,138
David C. Stuebe 2000 273,333 165,438 11,968 42,500 58,744
Vice President and 1999 255,000 125,083 14,511 30,000 129,739 58,878
Chief Financial Officer 1998 240,333 173,974 9,848 72,551
Jerald K. Dittmer 2000 187,655 95,338 9,383 15,000 24,399
Vice President, Finance 1999 140,707 64,751 7,938 11,250 20,922
and Controller 1998 129,907 55,044 28,220 7,000 25,982
James I. Johnson 2000 179,500 68,424 11,202 17,500 30,587
Vice President, General 1999 169,767 70,419 11,804 15,000 26,070
Counsel and Secretary 1998 161,200 73,672 26,548 576
Thomas K. Miller 2000 166,083 64,879 15,312 15,000 29,822
Vice President, 1999 161,083 62,029 15,986 11,250 64,869 28,474
International 1998 156,083 71,296 12,305 17,160 35,234
-----------------
NOTES
(1) These figures and others on this Table include amounts deferred, if any, in
respect of fiscal years 2000, 1999 and 1998 compensation but do not include any
interest that may have accrued on any deferred compensation under the Company's
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferral Plan"). The Deferral Plan
permits a participant to elect to defer any combination of salary, bonus, cash
profit-sharing, ERISA supplemental retirement, long-term performance or LTIP
income. The deferrals under this Deferral Plan may be made into a cash account
or a HON INDUSTRIES stock account. The Deferral Plan provides for interest to be
paid on any amounts deferred to the cash account at an annual rate, compounded
monthly, equal to one percent above the prime rate of The Northern Trust
Company, Chicago, Illinois, effective as of the first business day of the year.
(2) The figures for bonuses reflect the awards of executive bonuses for the
relevant fiscal years under the Company's Executive Bonus Plan. The executive
bonuses are payable in February following the fiscal year for which they are
earned, subject generally to a participant's continued employment with the
Company at the time of payment.
8
(3) The figures in this column reflect cash profit-sharing payments, interest
on vested LTIP benefits, above market interest payable on deferred
compensation, and relocation expenses. In the 2000, 1999 and 1998 fiscal
years, the Company made the following payments under the Cash Profit-Sharing
Plan: Mr. Michaels -$11,968; $12,782; $9,848; Mr. Stuebe - $11,968; $12,782;
$9,848; Mr. Dittmer -$9,383; $7,938; $7,788; Mr. Johnson - $11,202; $11,804;
$-0-; and Mr. Miller -$10,657; $11,156; $9,848. The Company's Cash
Profit-Sharing Plan is generally applicable to all members after completing
one year of service. Cash profit-sharing is earned on a non-fiscal year
cycle. Interest payments for LTIP benefits vested in fiscal year 1999 were as
follows: Mr. Michaels - $3,459; Mr. Stuebe - $1,729; and Mr. Miller - $865.
The above market interest payments on deferred compensation paid for the
2000, 1999, and 1998 fiscal years were as follows: Mr. Michaels - $41,040;
$33,033; $20,182 and Mr. Miller - $4,655; $3,965; $2,457. In the 1998 fiscal
year, the Company made taxable relocation expense reimbursements of $20,432
for Mr. Dittmer and $26,548 for Mr. Johnson.
(4) The amounts for 1998 shown in this column are based upon the closing
price of the Company's unrestricted Common Stock on February 11, 1998, the
date the restricted stock was granted. These shares were granted to make up
for a short fall in retirement benefits due to the absence of an ERISA
Supplemental Retirement Plan at the Company prior to 1995. The amount for
2000 shown in this column is based upon the closing price of the Company's
unrestricted Common Stock on August 7, 2000, the date the 16,000 shares of
restricted stock was granted. These shares were awarded to recognize Mr.
Michaels' past performance and to provide him with an additional incentive to
achieve the Company's long-range strategic goals. These restricted shares
will vest in 2006, after the anticipated date on which Mr. Michaels'
successor will have been selected, to ensure a successful CEO succession and
transition. This grant further provides for accelerated vesting when certain
price targets for the Company's unrestricted Common Stock are achieved to
further align his interests with those of the shareholders. As of the end of
fiscal year 2000, Mr. Michaels held an aggregate of 40,922 shares of
restricted stock valued at $1,043,511; and Mr. Miller held an aggregate of
528 shares of restricted stock valued at $13,464. These restricted shares
cannot be sold or otherwise transferred while the participant is employed by
the Company. Dividends are paid on the restricted stock reported in this
column.
(5) These numbers represent options for shares of the Common Stock of the
Company granted pursuant to the Company's Restated Stock-Based Compensation
Plan. Out of the total option grant to Mr. Michaels in 2000, a grant of
140,000 options was made as part of the annual long-term incentive grant to
senior executives. A grant of 100,000 options was based upon the Committee's
belief that stock options represent an appropriate means to provide an
additional incentive to retain Mr. Michaels and ensure a smooth leadership
transition during the CEO succession process. These 100,000 options vest in
2008, after Mr. Michaels' projected retirement, with accelerated vesting when
certain price targets for the Company's Common Stock are achieved consistent
with the accelerated vesting noted in Note 4 above.
(6) These benefits vested in the designated fiscal periods. The 1999 LTIP
benefits for Mr. Michaels, Mr. Stuebe, and Mr. Miller represent cumulative
appreciation over a five-year period starting January 1, 1995 on 200,000,
100,000, and 50,000 units, respectively, of permanent capital of HON
INDUSTRIES Inc. and, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, have been
wholly paid or deferred in fiscal year 2000. The appreciation for Mr.
Michaels consisted of $32,860 in 1995, $50,857 in 1996, $58,446 in 1997,
$62,308 in 1998, and $55,008 in 1999. The appreciation for Mr. Stuebe
consisted of $16,430 in 1995, $25,428 in 1996, $29,223 in 1997, $31,154 in
1998 and $27,504 in 1999. The appreciation for Mr. Miller consisted of $8,215
in 1995, $12,714 in 1996, $14,611 in 1997, $15,577 in 1998 and $13,752 in
1999. See discussion of Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan in
the "Report of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company on Executive Compensation."
(7) Included are Company contributions to the HON Members Company Ownership Plan
and the HON INDUSTRIES Inc. Profit-Sharing Retirement Plan, as well as the
dollar value of Company-paid life insurance under the HON INDUSTRIES Inc. Group
Term Life Insurance Plan, all of which are generally applicable to all members.
The amounts paid under the HON Members Company Ownership Plan for the 1998
fiscal year were as follows: Mr. Michaels - $838; Mr. Stuebe - $660; Mr. Dittmer
- $275; and Mr. Miller - $458. Amounts paid under the HON Members Company
Ownership Plan in 1998 were lower than in prior years because the shares of
Common Stock reserved for issuance under this plan were exhausted prior to the
end of the year and the Company determined not to make additional contributions.
This plan was merged into the HON INDUSTRIES Inc. Profit-Sharing Retirement Plan
and that plan was amended to add substitute benefits. The amounts paid under the
HON INDUSTRIES Inc. Profit-Sharing Retirement Plan for the 2000, 1999 and 1998
fiscal years were as follows: Mr. Michaels - $17,018; $16,010; $15,056; Mr.
Stuebe - $17,018; $16,010; $15,396; Mr. Dittmer - $14,299; $13,610; $15,047; Mr.
Johnson - $17,018; $16,010; $-0-; and Mr. Miller - $17,018; $16,010; $15,781.
The dollar value of Company-paid life insurance under the HON INDUSTRIES Inc.
Group Term Life Insurance Plan in the 2000, 1999 and 1998 fiscal years were as
follows: Mr. Michaels - $847; $1,184; $1,404; Mr. Stuebe - $249; $772; $900; Mr.
Dittmer - $87; $133; $155; Mr. Johnson - $-0-; $309; $576; and Mr. Miller -
$158; $731; $1,404. This column also includes amounts equal to the value of
Company Common Stock paid in respect of the 2000, 1999 and 1998 fiscal years
under the Company's ERISA Supplemental Retirement Plan ("ESRP"), as follows: Mr.
Michaels - $164,489; $141,074; $185,840; Mr. Stuebe - $41,477; $42,096; $55,595;
Mr. Dittmer - $10,013; $7,179; $10,505; Mr. Johnson - $13,569; $9,751; $-0-; and
Mr. Miller - $12,646; $11,733; $17,591. Under this Plan, certain executives
receive certain benefits in the form of Company Common Stock equal in value to
benefits they would have received under certain Company ERISA plans and the
Company's Cash Profit-Sharing Plan but for a $170,000 earnings cap for 2000. The
number of shares of Company Common Stock to be paid is determined by dividing
the value of such benefits by the average of the closing prices of a share of
the Company's Common Stock for each trading day of the last calendar quarter of
the most recent calendar year immediately preceding the date of payment, with
cash payable in lieu of any fractional share. The amount included in this column
as compensation under the ESRP is equal to the closing price of the shares on
the date they are paid. The shares for 2000 were
9
issued as of February 23, 2001. The Common Stock is issued under the Company's
Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan and may not be transferred while the
recipient remains employed by the Company.
STOCK OPTIONS
The following table contains information concerning the grant of stock options
under the Company's Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan to the Named
Executive Officers for the year ended December 30, 2000, all of which are
reflected in the Company's Summary Compensation Table.
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
---------------------------------------------------------
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE
AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF OF STOCK PRICE APPRECIATION
SECURITIES TOTAL OPTIONS/ FOR OPTION TERM(3)
UNDERLYING SARS GRANTED ---------------------------
OPTION/SARS TO EMPLOYEES EXERCISE OR BASE 5% 10%
NAME GRANTED(1)(#) IN FISCAL YEAR PRICE ($/SHARE)(2) EXPIRATION DATE ($) ($)
---- ------------ -------------- ------------------- --------------- --- ---
Jack D. Michaels 140,000 $18.31 February 16, 2010 1,612,329 4,085,957
100,000 45.1% $26.69 January 1, 2012 2,124,141 5,707,465
David C. Stuebe 42,500 8.0% $18.31 February 16, 2010 489,457 1,240,380
Jerald K. Dittmer 15,000 2.8% $18.31 February 16, 2010 172,749 437,781
James I. Johnson 17,500 3.3% $18.31 February 16, 2010 201,541 510,745
Thomas K. Miller 15,000 2.8% $18.31 February 16, 2010 172,749 437,781
-----------------
(1) The options were granted pursuant to the Company's Restated Stock-Based
Compensation Plan, which was approved by the shareholders. All options
granted under the Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan in 2000 are
non-qualified stock options. No stock appreciation rights were granted under
the Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan in 2000.
(2) The average of the high and low transaction prices of a share of Common
Stock on February 16, 2000, the date of grant, was $18.31 per share. The
average of the high and low transaction prices of a share of Common Stock on
August 7, 2000, the date of grant, was $26.69 per share. The exercise price
may be paid (a) in cash, or (b) in shares of Common Stock valued at fair
market value on the date of delivery, or (c) by authorizing the Company to
withhold shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered upon
exercise of the option, having a fair market value equal to the purchase
price payable by reason of the exercise, or by a combination of (a), (b) or
(c). The options become exercisable at the end of four years after the grant
date. The 100,000 options granted to Mr. Michaels become exercisable as set
out in Notes 4 and 5 to the Executive Summary Compensation Table on page 9.
Upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Restated Stock-Based Compensation
Plan), all options then outstanding become immediately exercisable in full
and remain exercisable for the remaining term of the option. Those
participants who terminate employment due to disability may exercise options,
which shall become fully vested as of the date of disability until the
earlier of the expiration date of the option or the first anniversary of the
date of disability. The representative of participants whose employment is
terminated due to death may exercise options, which shall become fully vested
as of the date of death until the earlier of the expiration date of the
option or the first anniversary of the date of death. Those participants who
terminate employment due to retirement may exercise options which shall
become fully vested as of the date of retirement until the earlier of the
expiration of the option, or, the third anniversary of the date of
retirement. Those participants who terminate employment for any other reason
(except termination "for cause" in which case no additional exercise period
is provided) may exercise options which are vested as the date of termination
until the earlier of the expiration of the option or the end of the 30th day
following the date of termination. Except as set forth above, all options
terminate upon termination of employment.
(3) Calculated on option terms of ten years beginning February 16, 2000
through February 16, 2010, with annual compounding. The 100,000 stock option
award to Mr. Michaels is calculated on option terms of 11-1/2 years beginning
August 7, 2000 through January 1, 2012, with
10
annual compounding. The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of
calculations at the 5 percent and 10 percent rates set by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and therefore are not intended to forecast possible
future appreciation of the Common Stock of the Company. The Company did not
use an alternative formula for a grant date valuation, as the Company is not
aware of any formula, which will determine with reasonable accuracy a present
value based on future unknown or volatile factors.
OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Named Executive
Officers concerning the exercise of options and the unexercised options held as
of December 30, 2000. None of the Named Executive Officers exercised any stock
options.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUES
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS/SARS VALUE OF UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
AT FISCAL YEAR-END(1) OPTIONS/SARS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
(#) ($)
--------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
Jack D. Michaels -0- 360,000 N/A $1,203,850
David C. Stuebe -0- 87,500 N/A $381,475
Jerald K. Dittmer -0- 33,250 N/A $130,688
James I. Johnson -0- 42,500 N/A $156,275
Thomas K. Miller -0- 33,250 N/A $137,688
----------------
(1) The number of unexercised options consists of non-qualified stock options
granted under the Company's Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan. No SARs were
issued or outstanding as of December 30, 2000 under the Restated Stock-Based
Compensation Plan.
11
NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY SET FORTH IN ANY OF THE COMPANY'S
PREVIOUS FILINGS UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, THAT MIGHT INCORPORATE FUTURE FILINGS,
INCLUDING THIS PROXY STATEMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, THE PRECEDING AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT AND THE FOLLOWING PERFORMANCE GRAPH AND THE REPORT OF THE HUMAN
RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY ON
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SHALL NOT BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH
FILINGS.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN AMONG
S & P 500 INDEX, OFFICE FURNITURE INDUSTRY GROUP, AND THE COMPANY
TOTAL RETURN
STOCK PRICE PLUS REINVESTED DIVIDENDS
ANNUAL RETURN 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------
HON INDUSTRIES $100.00 $142.01 $253.53 $214.57 $200.00 $236.93
S & P 500 $100.00 $122.89 $163.83 $210.58 $254.81 $231.60
OFIG* $100.00 $182.07 $279.93 $212.76 $187.49 $231.74
*The Office Furniture Industry Group is a composite peer index constructed by
the Company and weighted by market capitalization that includes the following
companies, but from which the Company has been excluded: Herman Miller, Inc.;
Kimball International, Inc.; Teknion Corporation; and Steelcase Inc.
The total return assumes $100.00 invested in each of the Company's Common Stock,
the S & P 500 Index, and the Office Furniture Industry Group Stocks on December
31, 1995. It includes reinvestment of dividends and is based on the closing
stock price on the last trading day of the Company's fiscal quarter. Information
for Steelcase Inc. is not available prior to its Initial Public Offering on
February 18, 1998, and returns for the Office Furniture Industry Group do not
include Steelcase Inc. prior to the second quarter of 1998. Information for
Teknion Corporation is not available prior to its Initial Public Offering on
July 17, 1998, and returns for the Office Furniture Industry Group do not
include Teknion Corporation prior to the third quarter of 1998.
The comparative performance of the Company's Common Stock against the indexes as
depicted in this graph is dependent on the price of the stocks at a particular
measurement point in time. Since individual stocks are more volatile than
broader stock indexes, the perceived comparative performance of the Company's
Common Stock may vary based on the strength or weakness of the stock price at
the new measurement point used in each future proxy statement graph. For this
reason, the Company does not believe that this graph should be considered as the
sole indicator of Company performance.
12
REPORT OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
OVERALL POLICY. The Company's executive compensation program is designed to be
linked to Company performance. To this end, the Company has developed an overall
compensation strategy and specific compensation plans that tie executive
compensation to the Company's success in meeting its business goals and
objectives.
The executive compensation strategy is designed to: (i) ensure the total program
will assist the Company to attract, motivate, and retain executives of the
highest quality; (ii) relate total compensation to individual executive
performance and the performance of the business unit he or she manages; and
(iii) provide incentives for high levels of performance that reward strong
Company performance and recognize individual initiative and achievement.
The Company also believes executive compensation should be subject to
independent review. Relative matters pertaining to executive compensation are
submitted to the non-employee Directors of the Board for approval following
review and recommendation by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the
"Committee"). The Committee is comprised of three non-employee Directors and met
five times during fiscal year 2000.
Operating within the framework of a statement of duties and responsibilities
established by the Board of Directors, the Committee's role is to assure the
Company's: (1) compensation strategy is aligned with the long-term interest of
the shareholders and members; (2) compensation structure is fair and reasonable;
and (3) compensation reflects both Company and individual performance. In
discharging its responsibilities, the Committee utilizes broad-based,
comparative compensation surveys developed by independent professional
organizations.
Approximately every three to five years, the Board of Directors requests a more
extensive competitive assessment of the Company's executive compensation
programs. During fiscal year 2000, the Company retained Towers Perrin, a
national compensation consulting firm, to conduct this executive compensation
review under the oversight of the Committee. The competitive assessment included
a review of the Company's executive pay philosophy and analysis of the elements
of pay and long-term incentives compared to broad-based survey data and a
selected peer group of similarly sized companies. The companies comprising the
peer group included Herman Miller and Steelcase, as well as other companies,
which provided competitive data, based upon sales that ranged from $700 million
to $3 billion. The Company was closely aligned in the median of that range.
The federal corporate income tax law (IRS Code Section 162(m)) limits the
ability of public companies to deduct compensation in excess of $1 million paid
annually to the chief executive officer or the other four most highly
compensated executive officers. There are exceptions to this limit, including
exceptions for compensation that qualifies as "performance based." The Company
has structured the performance-based portion of the compensation of its
executive officers in a manner that complies with the exception to Section
162(m) to permit the Company to deduct the related expenses.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM. The Company's executive compensation program
consists of the following components:
BASE SALARY. Base salaries are determined by evaluating the duties and level of
responsibilities of a position, the experience of a candidate, prior
compensation, compensation for positions having similar scope and accountability
within the Company, and market survey data. In general, the Company uses as a
guide, for setting base salary levels, 90% of the mid-point of base salary
ranges from compensation surveys. The Company participates annually in the
Towers Perrin Compensation Survey, which is widely used and gives relevant
compensation information on executive positions. While some of the companies in
the peer group chosen for comparison of shareholder returns in the Performance
Graph on page 12 may be included in the surveys considered by the Committee in
setting executives' salaries, there is no set peer group against which those
salaries are measured. Base salaries are determined for executive officers by
considering an executive's individual performance and level of experience,
changes in responsibilities and by reference to salary surveys for comparably
situated executives with companies of similar size.
13
EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN. The purpose of the Company's Executive Bonus Plan ("Bonus
Plan") is to motivate and reward executive management to achieve specific
financial and non-financial objectives. These objectives include, for example,
achievement of annual profitability and return on asset goals by operating units
and meeting personal achievement objectives established for each participant
based upon the participant's position and responsibilities. A target bonus
level, stated as a percent of annual base salary, is established for each
participant and approved by the Committee and the Board annually. For the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Committee determines the
annual bonus opportunity and performance objectives. The annual target bonus
percentage for the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer is equal to
100% of base salary. The other named executives in the Summary Compensation
Table have annual target bonus percentages that range from 50% to 75% of their
base salary. The Bonus Plan objectives are reviewed and approved annually by the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Committee and the Board.
Bonuses are normally awarded annually based upon achievement of predetermined
financial performance targets and personal objectives, measured over the
Company's fiscal year. The bonus awards for each fiscal year are approved by the
Committee and the Board of Directors.
EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN. There are currently 4
participants in the Company's Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
("LTIP"), including operating company presidents and certain key corporate
officers. Its purpose is to focus the attention of senior executives on the
long-term financial performance of the Company and to strengthen the ability of
the Company to attract, motivate and retain senior executives of high caliber.
Awards made under the LTIP are in the form of rights to the appreciation, over a
five-year period (unless otherwise designated by the Board of Directors), in the
value of units of permanent capital of the Company and/or one of its operating
companies. Appreciation is measured on a net cumulative basis over the award
period. Under the LTIP, permanent capital may be defined by the Board of
Directors and generally means total assets less current liabilities (excluding
current portions of long-term debt and capital lease obligations). Appreciation
is defined as after-tax net income exclusive of non-operating items such as
gains and losses from sales of assets and sales, transfers, or redemption of
permanent capital, and certain other extraordinary and non-operating items. Each
unit of permanent capital is equal to one dollar. The size of an award is
dependent upon the impact the participant has on the long-term realization of
Company or business unit, or both, sales and profits. Maximum amounts are not
specified, but are dependent upon the net cumulative appreciation or net growth
in the permanent capital of the relevant business unit during the period, which
is itself based on such business unit's financial and business performance and
is governed by such practical limitations as the size of the market, the rigors
of competition and the business unit's manufacturing capacity. The ultimate
value of an award payment, which is equal to the net cumulative appreciation, if
any, on units of permanent capital, is dependent on the financial performance of
the Company or the applicable business unit, or both.
Rights to award payments become vested, unless participant's employment has been
terminated previously, at the end of the award period or on death, disability,
retirement at age 62 or change in corporate control. Award payments are made in
cash in three equal installments over three fiscal years unless the Board of
Directors approves a different payment schedule. In lieu of payments,
participants may elect to receive shares of the Company's Common Stock pursuant
to the terms of the Restated Stock-Based Compensation Plan.
No LTIP awards were made in fiscal year 2000.
LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE PLAN. In fiscal year 2000, the Board approved the addition
of the Long-Term Performance Plan (the "Performance Plan"). The purpose of this
Performance Plan is to promote the attainment of the Company's performance
goals. The Performance Plan is designed to reward increasing long-term
shareholder value and is tied to individual business unit's three-year strategic
plan. The Performance Plan provides target awards of performance "units" to each
participant at the beginning of a three-year performance period. Actual
performance units earned are based upon growth in profitability and average
return on capital. Performance unit valuation, in turn, is based upon business
unit valuation determined by profitability, use of capital and free cash flow.
RESTATED STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN. The Restated Stock-Based Compensation
Plan authorizes, among other things, the grant of stock options and SARs to
participants, including the Company's executives. The grant of stock options and
SARs is intended to further the growth, development, and financial success of
the Company by providing additional incentives to key employees and assist them
to become owners of Common Stock of the Company. As owners, they will benefit
directly from its growth, development and financial success of the Company with
other shareholders. Stock option grants will also enable the
14
Company to attract and retain the services of executives considered essential to
the long-range success of the Company by providing them with a competitive
compensation package and an opportunity to become owners of Common Stock of the
Company.
Awards were based on market survey data of long-term incentive compensation for
executives in similar positions and individual performance of each participant.
Stock option grants are generally made to those individuals who have the ability
through their leadership, strategic planning and actions to impact the long-term
performance of the Company and, consequently, its stock price.
EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP POLICY. The Company has adopted an Executive Stock
Ownership Policy based upon the belief that key executives who can impact
shareholder value through their achievements should own significant amounts of
the Company Common Stock. Under this Policy, guidelines are provided for
participants to acquire and hold a recommended amount of Common Stock of the
Company based on their position, responsibilities, length of service and
compensation level. Such Common Stock ownership will align the interests of key
executives with shareholder interests and provide a personal benefit for the
success of the Company. Exercise of vested stock options provides one of several
means by which key executives can satisfy this Policy.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. In determining Jack D. Michaels'
compensation, the Committee and the Board of Directors consider, in a manner
consistent with the base salary guidelines applied to executive officers of the
Company as described above, the Company's success in implementing strategies for
long-term growth, profitability and shareholder value creation. The Committee
also reviews the Company's performance goals in the areas of revenue,
profitability, return on equity, growth, financial soundness, member relations
and corporate citizenship. The Committee also considers the compensation levels
of chief executive officers as shown by reputable independent surveys for
organizations of similar size. Overall, profitable sales growth, return on
equity, return on capital and achievement of long-term initiatives related to
strategic business objectives are the primary measures of the Chief Executive
Officer's performance.
Mr. Michaels was paid a base salary of $593,333 with respect to fiscal year
2000. The Committee reviewed survey data for comparable positions within the
manufacturing industry and considered recommendations from Towers Perrin as part
of an overall executive competitive compensation assessment performed in fiscal
year 2000 at the direction of the Committee. The Committee also considered
performance against certain financial goals. In the 2000 fiscal year, the
Company's net sales increased to $2.05 billion, compared to $1.80 billion in
1999. Net income and earnings per share were $106.2 million and $1.77 per share,
respectively, compared to $99.9 million and $1.64 in 1999. The Company's return
on average shareholders' equity was 19.8% in fiscal year 2000. 1999 net sales
are restated from prior reports to reflect accounting regulations enacted since
1999.
Under the Bonus Plan, Mr. Michaels received an award of $525,943 in respect of
fiscal year 2000 compared to an award of $483,834 for fiscal year 1999. This
award reflected the performance of the Company against financial goals
established by the Committee under the Bonus Plan and the Committee's judgment
regarding the level of achievement by Mr. Michaels of non-financial, personal
goals established for him by the Board for fiscal year 2000. It further
reflected the successful attainment of other strategically important initiatives
and long-term objectives, which the Committee believes will be of significant
benefit in positioning the Company for profitable growth in the future.
Mr. Michaels received a grant of 240,000 stock options, and a grant of 16,000
shares of restricted stock in fiscal year 2000 (see Notes 4 and 5 in the Summary
Compensation Table).
HUMAN RESOURCES AND
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Lorne R. Waxlax, Chairperson
Gary M. Christensen
Robert L. Katz
15
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During fiscal year 2000, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee was
comprised of Mr. Waxlax and, for part of the year, Dr. Katz and Messrs.
Christensen, Cox, Hillenbrand and Stanley, none of whom is a current or
former officer of the Company. There are no interlocking board memberships
between officers of the Company and any member of the Committee.
CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
The Company has entered into change in control employment agreements with
corporate officers and certain other key employees. According to the agreements,
a change in control occurs when a third person or entity becomes the beneficial
owner of 20 percent or more of the Company's Common Stock or more than one-third
of the Company's Board of Directors is composed of persons not recommended by at
least three-fourths of the incumbent Board of Directors, or upon the occurrence
of certain business combinations involving the Company. Upon a change in
control, a two-year employment contract between the Company and each such
executive becomes effective, and all his or her benefits become vested under
Company plans. In addition, the executive becomes entitled to certain benefits
if, at any time within two years of the change in control, any of the following
occurs: (i) employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than
cause or disability of the executive, or (ii) employment is terminated by the
executive for good reason, as such terms are defined in the agreement. In such
circumstances, the executive is entitled to receive his or her annual salary
through the date of termination, a bonus equal to the average of the executive's
annual bonuses for the prior two years prorated based on the length of
employment during the year in which termination occurs, and a severance payment
equal to two times the sum of (i) the executive's annual base salary and (ii)
the average of the executive's annual bonuses for the prior two years. The
executive will also be entitled to a continuation of certain employee benefits
for two years, or longer if comparable benefits are not otherwise available to
the executive. The executive will be entitled to receive reimbursement for any
legal fees and expenses, plus interest thereon, that may be incurred in
enforcing or defending his or her employment agreement. All of the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table have executed such agreements.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
Representatives of Arthur Andersen LLP, the Company's independent auditor, are
expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to
make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
AUDIT FEES
The aggregate fees billed by the Company's independent auditor for professional
services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company's financial
statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year
2000, as well as for the review of the Company's financial statements included
in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during the 2000 fiscal year,
totaled $450,500.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES
No fees other than those described above, see "Audit Fees," and those described
below, see "All Other Fees," were billed to the Company by the Company's
independent auditor for professional services as described in Paragraph
(c)(4)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X in fiscal year 2000.
ALL OTHER FEES
The aggregate fees billed by the Company's independent auditor for professional
services during fiscal year 2000, other than those described above, totaled
$992,985. These services were provided for various miscellaneous matters
including tax assistance, acquisition assistance, ERISA audits of employee
benefit and welfare plans, and supplemental internal auditor services.
16
DEADLINE FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Proposals by shareholders intended to be presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting
must be received at the Company's executive offices no later than November 20,
2001 to be included in the proxy statement and proxy form. All shareholder
notice of proposals submitted outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 of the General
Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
must be received by March 8, 2002 to be considered for presentation at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2002. In addition, any shareholder proposals
must comply with the informational requirements contained in the Company's
By-laws in order to be presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be brought before the
Annual Meeting, but, if other matters properly come before the meeting, it is
intended that the persons named in the proxy will vote the proxy according to
their best judgment.
The entire cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting is paid by the
Company. No solicitation other than by mail is contemplated.
ON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE UNDERSIGNED AT 414 EAST THIRD STREET, P.O. BOX 1109,
MUSCATINE, IA 52761-0071, THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE, WITHOUT CHARGE TO ANY
SHAREHOLDER, A COPY OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES, FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR
THE COMPANY'S MOST RECENT FISCAL YEAR.
Information set forth in this proxy statement is as of March 1, 2001, unless
otherwise noted.
James I. Johnson
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
March 27, 2001
THE ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 30, 2000, WHICH INCLUDES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, IS BEING MAILED TO
SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY TOGETHER WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT. THE ANNUAL
REPORT DOES NOT FORM ANY PART OF THE MATERIAL FOR THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES.
17
EXHIBIT A
HON INDUSTRIES INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
(REVISED FEBRUARY 14, 2001)
ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist it in
fulfilling the Board's oversight responsibilities relating to (1) the Company's
financial reporting and accounting processes for the Company's financial
position and results of operations, and (2) the independence of the Company's
independent auditor.
The independent auditor for the Company is ultimately accountable to the Board
of Directors and Audit Committee of the Company. The Board of Directors and
Audit Committee have the ultimate authority and responsibility to select,
evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the independent auditor (or to nominate
the independent auditor to be proposed for shareholder approval in any proxy
statement).
The Committee shall meet at least four times per year or more frequently as
circumstances require. The Audit Committee shall have the authority to retain
special legal, accounting or other consultants to advise the Committee. The
Audit Committee may request any officer or employee of the Company or the
Company's outside counsel or independent auditor to attend a meeting of the
Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the Committee.
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in the
Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or
to determine that the Company's financial statements are complete and accurate
or are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This is the
responsibility of management and the independent auditor. Nor is it the duty of
the Audit Committee to conduct investigations, to resolve disagreements, if any,
between management and the independent auditor or to assure compliance with laws
and regulations and the Company's Code of Conduct.
The Audit Committee shall make regular reports to the Board.
COMPOSITION/EXPERTISE REQUIREMENT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS
The Audit Committee shall consist of at least three Directors, all of whom have
no relationship to the Company that may interfere with the exercise of their
independence from management and the Company.
In determining independence, the Board will observe the requirements of Rules
303.01 and 303.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
The members of the Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board on the
recommendation of the Public Policy and Corporate Governance Committee.
Each Audit Committee member shall be financially literate, as the Company's
Board interprets such qualifications in its business judgment, or attain such
status within a reasonable period after appointment. At least one Audit
Committee member shall have accounting or related financial management
expertise, as the Company's Board interprets such qualifications in its business
judgment.
A-1
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
1. Review the Committee's Charter annually, and recommend changes, if any, to
the Public Policy and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors.
2. Recommend to the Board of Directors the independent auditor to be
nominated.
3. Ensure that the independent auditor submits on a periodic basis a formal
written report delineating all relationships between the independent
auditor and the Company, to actively engage in a dialogue with the
independent auditor with respect to any disclosed relationships or services
that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent
auditor, and to recommend that the Board of Directors take appropriate
action in response to the independent auditor's report to satisfy itself of
the independent auditor's independence. The independence review will also
encompass a review of all management consulting services provided by the
independent auditor to the Company and their related fees.
4. Inquire of management, including general counsel, the manager of risk
management, the senior internal audit executive, and the independent
auditor about significant risks or exposures, and assess the steps
management has taken to minimize such risks to the Company.
5. Review with the independent auditor the plan, scope, and fees for the
annual audit and other examinations.
6. CONDUCT OF AUDIT. Discuss with the independent auditor the matters required
to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 90 relating to the
conduct of the audit.
7. REVIEW OF AUDIT RESULTS. Review with the independent auditor the report of
their annual audit, or proposed report of their annual audit, the
accompanying management letter, if any, the reports of their review of the
Company's interim financial statements conducted in accordance with
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 71, and the reports of the results of
such other examinations outside of the course of the independent auditor's
normal audit procedures that the independent auditor may from time to time
undertake.
8. REVIEW FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Review with appropriate officers of the
Company and the independent auditor the annual and quarterly financial
statements of the Company prior to public release thereof.
9. REVIEW INTERNAL AUDIT PROGRAM. Review with the senior internal auditing
executive and appropriate members of the staff of the internal auditing
department and plans for and the scope of their ongoing audit activities.
10. REVIEW INTERNAL AUDIT REPORTS. Review with the senior internal auditing
executive and appropriate members of the staff of the internal auditing
department reports of audit activities, examinations and results thereof of
the internal auditing department.
11. REVIEW SYSTEMS OF INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS. Review with the independent
auditor, the senior internal auditing executive, the General Counsel and,
if and to the extent deemed appropriate by the Chairman of the Committee,
members of their respective staffs the adequacy of the Company's internal
accounting controls, the Company's financial, auditing and accounting
organizations and personnel and the Company's policies and compliance
procedures with respect to business practices.
12. REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. Review with the senior
internal auditing executive and the appropriate members of the staff of the
internal auditing department recommendations made by the independent
auditor and the senior internal auditing executive, as well as such other
matters, if any, as such persons or other officers of the Company may
desire to bring to the attention of the Committee.
13. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT. Obtain assurance from the independent auditor that
Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act has not been implicated.
A-2
14. REVIEW OTHER MATTERS. Review such other matters in relation to the
accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices and procedures of
the Company as the Committee may, in its own discretion, deem desirable in
connection with the review functions described above.
15. BOARD REPORTS. Report its activities to the Board in such manner and at
such times as it deems appropriate.
16. Approve (a) the Audit Committee Report required by the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in the Company's annual
proxy statement, and (b) the annual Audit Committee affirmation letter
required by the New York Stock Exchange and recommend its approval by the
Board of Directors.
A-3
HON INDUSTRIES INC.
COMMON STOCK PROXY SOLICITED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ON MAY 7, 2001
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of a Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy
Statement dated March 27, 2001, and appoints Jack D. Michaels and James I.
Johnson, or either of them, with full power of substitution, as the proxies and
attorneys of the undersigned, to vote all shares of common stock, par value
$1.00 per share, of HON INDUSTRIES Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to
vote at the annual meeting of shareholders of HON INDUSTRIES Inc. to be held at
Muscatine, Iowa, on May 7, 2001, at 10:30 a.m. and any adjournment thereof. The
proxies are directed to vote as checked on the reverse side on the proposed
matter or otherwise in their discretion.
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that may properly be, or that
are likely to be, brought before the meeting. However, if any other matters are
properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, the proxies will
vote on such matters in their discretion.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES, SEE
REVERSE SIDE. THE PROXIES CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN
THIS CARD.
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side.)
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED
HEREIN. IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES
LISTED.
FOR WITHHELD FOR ALL
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR THREE-YEAR TERMS: ALL ALL EXCEPT
NOMINEES: DENNIS J. MARTIN, JACK D. MICHAELS / / / / / /
AND ABBIE J. SMITH.
TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE(S),
WRITE THE NAME(S) ON THE LINE BELOW.
_______________________________________________________
PLEASE DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL IN ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE.
CONSENT:
/ / DO NOT MAIL FUTURE ANNUAL REPORTS/PROXY STATEMENTS/
INFORMATION STATEMENTS TO THIS ACCOUNT. MORE THAN
ONE IS RECEIVED AT THIS HOUSEHOLD (SEE BACK FOR
DETAILS).
Dated ______________, 2001.
________________________________________
________________________________________
Signature(s) of Shareholder(s)
/ / Individual / / Corporation / / Partnership
/ / Other ______________________________
(Please date this proxy and sign exactly as your
name or names appear hereon. If you sign as
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee,
guardian, custodian, or corporate official,
please give your full title in such capacity.)