rrrr

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C., 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

OR

For the transition period from ____ to _____

Commission File No. 001-34600

TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

101 Glen Lennox Drive, Suite 300, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: (919) 855-2100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by checkmark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $5,887,711.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s class of $0.0001 par value common stock as of March 21, 2025 was 3,970,385.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, and/or which include words such as “believes,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “will” or similar expressions. In addition, any statements concerning future financial performance, ongoing strategies or prospects, and possible future actions, including any potential strategic transaction involving us, which may be provided by our management, are also forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events, actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed in under the heading “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, could affect our stock price or future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:

The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K represent our views as of the date such statements are made. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date such statements are made.

NOTES

All references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the “Company,” “Tenax”, “we”, “our” and “us” means Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains references to our trademarks and to trademarks belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including logos, artwork and other visual displays, may appear without the ® or TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other company.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Our business is subject to significant risks and uncertainties that make an investment in us speculative and risky. Below we summarize what we believe are the principal risk factors, but these are not the only risks we face, and you should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors in the section titled “Risk Factors”, together with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the following risks materializes (or if any of those listed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K materialize), our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects could be seriously harmed. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

Risks Relating to Our Industry

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock

ITEM 1—BUSINESS

Overview

Tenax Therapeutics is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company using clinical insights to develop novel cardiopulmonary therapies. We employ a clinician-focused drug development approach, led by key opinion leaders and heart failure experts and informed by their clinical insights to precisely target disease pathophysiology. We are currently actively conducting the LEVEL clinical trial to evaluate levosimendan as our prioritized product candidate and have deprioritized a Phase 3 clinical trial of imatinib, two drugs supported by promising evidence that they may significantly improve the lives of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Importantly, both levosimendan and imatinib have already been approved in other indications and prescribed around the world for more than 20 years, and we believe their mechanisms of action are uniquely suitable to target and treat pulmonary hypertension. We believe this derisked approach of using already-approved drugs that provide well-established safety profiles from millions of patients, combined with a development path led by preeminent cardiology and pulmonary hypertension experts, puts us in a strong position to deliver breakthrough cardiopulmonary therapies designed to improve patients’ function and quality of life.

In August 2024, we closed a private placement financing (the “August 2024 Offering”) raising gross proceeds of approximately $100.0 million and in March 2025 we closed a private placement financing (the "March 2025 Offering”) raising gross proceeds of $25.0 million. We intend to use the net proceeds from the August 2024 and March 2025 Offerings to advance our Phase 3 oral levosimendan program, by completing our ongoing Phase 3 LEVEL study and initiating a second planned global Phase 3 study, LEVEL-2. We intend to submit marketing authorization applications following completion of the two Phase 3 trials of levosimendan and, when appropriate, a single Phase 3 trial of imatinib.

Our Strategy

The key elements of our business strategy are outlined below.

Efficiently conduct clinical development to establish clinical proof of principle in new indications, refine dosage levels and dosing strategies, conduct other required clinical and nonclinical testing as FDA and other regulators may require, and continue Phase 3 testing of oral levosimendan, as our prioritized product candidate.

Levosimendan and imatinib have already been approved and prescribed in other indications in many countries around the world. We are conducting clinical development with the intent to establish proof of beneficial activity in cardiopulmonary diseases in which these therapeutics would be expected to have benefit for patients with diseases for which either no pharmaceutical therapies are approved at all, or in the case of pulmonary arterial hypertension, where numerous, expensive therapies generally offer a modest reduction of symptoms. Our focus is primarily on designing and executing formulation improvements, protecting these innovations with patents and other forms of exclusivity, and employing innovative clinical trial science to establish a robust foundation for subsequent development, product approval, and commercialization. We intend to submit marketing authorization applications following two Phase 3 trials of levosimendan, as our prioritized drug candidate. Our trials are designed to incorporate and reflect advanced clinical trial design science and the regulatory and advisory experience of our team. We intend to continue partnering with innovative companies, renowned biostatisticians and trialists, medical leaders, formulation and regulatory experts, and premier preclinical and clinical testing organizations to help expedite development, and continue expanding into complementary areas when opportunities arise through our development, research, and discoveries. We also intend to continue outsourcing to clinical research organizations, and seeking and acting upon the advice of preeminent scientists focused on cardiovascular and pulmonary drug development, when designing and executing our research.

Efficiently explore new high-potential therapeutic applications, in particular where expedited regulatory pathways are available, leveraging third-party research collaborations and our results from related areas.

Levosimendan has shown promise in multiple disease areas during its development and in the more than two decades following its approval. Our own Phase 2 study and open-label extension has demonstrated that levosimendan’s property of relaxing the venous circulation, a formerly under-appreciated mechanism of action of levosimendan, brings durable improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life, as well as other clinical assessments, in patients with PH-HFpEF. The FDA has not approved a therapy for this disease. We are committed to exploring potential clinical indications where our therapies may achieve best-in-class profile, and where we can address significant unmet medical needs.

We believe these factors will support approval by the FDA of this product candidate based on positive Phase 3 data. Through our agreement with our licensor, Orion Corporation, we have access to a library of ongoing and completed trials and research projects, including certain documentation, which we believe, in combination with positive Phase 3 data we hope to generate in at least one indication, will support FDA approval of levosimendan. In order to achieve our objective of developing this medicine for new groups of patients, we have established collaborative research relationships with investigators from leading research and clinical institutions, and our strategic partners. These collaborative relationships have enabled us to explore where our product candidate may have therapeutic relevance, gain the advice and support of key opinion leaders in medicine and clinical trial science, and invest in development efforts to exploit opportunities to advance beyond current clinical care.

Continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio.

Our intellectual property, as more fully described below, and the confidentiality of all our Company information is important to our business and we take significant steps to help protect its value. Our research and development efforts, both through internal activities and through collaborative research activities with others, aim to develop new intellectual property and enable us to file patent applications that cover new uses of our existing technologies, alone or in combination with existing therapies, as well as other product candidates.

Enter into licensing or product co-development arrangements.

In addition to our internal development efforts, an important part of our product development strategy is to work with collaborators and partners to accelerate product development, maintain our low development and business operations costs, and broaden our commercialization capabilities globally. We believe this strategy will help us develop a portfolio of high-quality product development opportunities, enhance our clinical development and commercialization capabilities, and increase our ability to generate value from our proprietary technologies.

We also continue to position ourselves to execute upon licensing and other partnering opportunities. To do so, we need to continue to maintain our strategic direction, manage and deploy our available cash efficiently, and strengthen our collaborative research development and partner relationships.

Our Pipeline and Drug Candidates

PH-HFpEF

Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (“PH-HFpEF”) is the most common form of pulmonary hypertension in the world, according to the World Health Organization. Prevalence in the United States is currently estimated to be 1.5 million, although PH-HFpEF may be significantly underdiagnosed because diagnosis typically requires catheterization. Currently, there are no therapies approved for treatment of PH-HFpEF. Even though many therapies have been studied in this indication in the past, none have proven to be effective in treating patients with the disease.

Levosimendan

Levosimendan is a novel, first-in-class K-ATP activator and calcium sensitizer developed for intravenous use in hospitalized patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. It has been granted market authorization in 60 countries

for use in this indication, although it is not available in the United States or Canada. It is estimated that over 2.2 million patients have been treated worldwide with levosimendan to date.

In the countries where it is marketed, intravenous levosimendan is indicated for the short-term treatment of acutely decompensated heart failure in situations where conventional therapy is not sufficient, and in cases where inotropic support is considered appropriate. In acute decompensated heart failure patients, levosimendan has been shown to significantly improve patient symptoms as well as acute hemodynamic measurements such as increased cardiac output, reduced preload and reduced afterload.

The therapeutic effects of levosimendan are mediated through:

Several studies have demonstrated that levosimendan protects the heart and improves tissue perfusion while minimizing tissue damage during cardiac surgery.

Importantly, several published studies provide evidence that levosimendan may improve right ventricular dysfunction, a common comorbidity in patients with pulmonary hypertension. While none of these studies focused specifically on PH-HFpEF patients, the general hemodynamic improvements in these published studies of various types of pulmonary hypertension provide a basis for further evaluation of potential clinical benefit in PH-HFpEF.

Phase 2 HELP Study

Insights from published studies led us to initiate the HELP Study ("Hemodynamic Evaluation of Levosimendan in PH-HFpEF), a Phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan (“TNX-101”) in patients with PH-HFpEF. The primary endpoint of the HELP Study was change from baseline in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (“PCWP”) during exercise, along with various other secondary endpoints. The first patient was enrolled in the study in March 2019, and the enrollment and dosing of 44 patients was completed in March 2020.

The HELP Study design was novel in several respects. To date, no other multi-center study has evaluated levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients. Instead, all previous levosimendan heart failure studies have enrolled patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (“HFrEF”), thereby excluding HFpEF patients from the study. Also, the HELP Study utilized a unique 24-hour weekly infusion regimen of 0.075- 0.1µm/kg/min. Finally, the HELP Study employed a unique home-based intravenous infusion administration via an ambulatory infusion pump. This home-based weekly intravenous administration is unlike all other chronic dosing studies of levosimendan that have typically employed a shorter duration and less frequent infusion regimen administered in a hospital setting.

In June 2020, we announced preliminary, top-line data from the HELP study. Hemodynamic measurements were made at rest (supine), after leg raise on a supine bicycle (a test of rapid increase in ventricular filling) and during exercise (25 watts for three minutes or until the patient tired). In the initial open-label phase, 84% of the patients responded to the degree required by the protocol in order to be randomized (including reduction of PCWP of at least 4mm Hg at exercise). In the randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded 6-week trial, levosimendan did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction from baseline in PCWP during exercise, the primary endpoint. However, patients receiving levosimendan had statistically significant reductions from baseline at Week 6 in PCWP and PAP at rest or after leg raise (p<0.05). Furthermore, the study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PCWP compared to baseline (p=<0.0017) and placebo (p=<0.0475) when the three patient measurements (i.e., at rest, with legs up, and during exercise) were combined.

Levosimendan also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the change in 6-minute walk distance (“6MWD”), a secondary end-point commonly used in many pulmonary hypertension registration trials. Clinical efficacy was confirmed by a statistically significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance of 29 meters (p=0.0329).

The incidence rate of adverse events or serious adverse events between the treatment and placebo groups was similar. In addition, there were no arrhythmias observed, atrial or ventricular, when comparing baseline electrocardiographic monitoring with 72-hour monitoring after five weeks of treatment.

Detailed results from HELP Study were presented at the Heart Failure Society of America Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting in October 2020, at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions in November 2020, and more recent scientific congresses.

Open-Label Extension Study of Oral Levosimendan (TNX-103)

Following completion of the randomized treatment phase of the HELP Study, patients were able to enter an open-label extension study (“OLE”) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an oral formulation of levosimendan (“TNX-103”). Patients who agreed to participate in the OLE were safely transitioned from intravenous to oral formulation in late 2021, and the study was continued by the Company and our HELP investigators for over two years, concluding in the first half of 2023. Positive signs of efficacy were observed across all measured parameters during the OLE, which provided us with sufficient data to discuss further development of oral levosimendan with the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (the "FDA").

The transition of patients in the OLE from intravenous to oral formulation occurred safely. Improvements in all measures of efficacy taken in the transition from intravenous to 3mg daily oral levosimendan were observed.

We believe these findings from the HELP Study and the OLE represent important discoveries related to the use of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients. Not only is it the first study to evaluate levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients, but to our knowledge it is also the first study conducted of any therapy in PH-HFpEF patients to show such positive improvements in hemodynamics and 6MWT. Taken together, the encouraging data to date demonstrate that levosimendan’s property of relaxing the venous circulation, a formerly under-appreciated mechanism of action of levosimendan, brings durable improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life, as well as other clinical assessments, in patients with PH-HFpEF.

Phase 3 LEVEL Study

In October 2020, we met with the FDA for an End-of-Phase 2 Meeting to discuss the Phase 2 clinical data and further development of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF. Subsequently, a path to registration was agreed upon involving two confirmatory Phase 3 studies, as well as a plan to replace weekly intravenous levosimendan dosing with daily oral levosimendan doses in the upcoming clinical trials. In February 2022, the FDA provided a written response advising that the safety database required for filing a New Drug Application (“NDA”) only needs to meet two of the three minimum International Clinical Harmonization (“ICH”) standards for a chronic medication in treating a non-life-threatening condition: 300 patients treated for 6 months, and 100 patients treated for 12 months. Tenax plans to continue to discuss with the FDA and other global regulators this requirement and other requirements that will determine the size and timing of its completed Phase 3 program, throughout the execution of its Phase 3 program.

On November 13, 2023, the Company announced that the FDA had reviewed and cleared the Company’s Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application for oral levosimendan for the treatment PH-HFpEF, enabling Tenax to proceed with the first of two Phase 3 studies.

In the fourth quarter of 2023, we initiated the LEVEL Study (LEVosimendan to Improve Exercise Limitation in PH-HFpEF Patients), a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate TNX-103 in patients with PH-HFpEF. The primary endpoint is change in 6MWT from baseline to Week 12. A second global Phase 3 study, LEVEL-2, is expected to initiate in 2025, with the primary endpoint being change in 6MWT from baseline to Week 26.

With the net proceeds from the August 2024 Offering and the March 2025 Offering, we plan to accelerate the Phase 3 program. Site activation and the enrollment of participants are ongoing in the Phase 3 LEVEL study. We also expect

to initiate a second Phase 3 study, LEVEL-2, in 2025. In addition, we are planning an OLE phase following the completion of the randomized phase to treat patients under protocol on open label levosimendan, allowing for additional weeks of safety observation that will contribute to the safety data on TNX-103.

PAH

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a type of pulmonary hypertension and a rare, progressive, and serious disease. Although several therapies are now available, none are cures for the disease and patients remain symptomatic with high morbidity and mortality. Importantly, all currently approved PAH therapies are pulmonary vasodilators, and there is no data supporting that these types of treatments halt progression or induce regression of the disease.

Imatinib

Imatinib (marketed in the United States as Gleevec®) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It is the first curative treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (“CML”) and has significantly impacted patients since receiving FDA approval in 2001.

Separately, imatinib has been shown in animal models of pulmonary hypertension to induce disease reversal by affecting platelet derived growth factor, which may be causal in the disease. Several case reports and small case series of patients with advanced PAH failing combination pulmonary vasodilator therapy that were treated with imatinib were subsequently published, showing dramatic effects on disease stabilization and improvements in symptom and function.

These results led Novartis to develop imatinib as a treatment of PAH. Novartis sponsored a Phase 2 proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of imatinib as an adjunct to PAH-specific therapy in patients with PAH. Novartis then sponsored a Phase 3 trial (IMPRES) which met its primary endpoint of significant increase in 6MWT (32 meters, p=0.002), an effect maintained in an extension study in patients remaining on imatinib. However, the data were confounded by a high rate of dropouts in the patients randomized to imatinib, attributed largely to gastric intolerance during the first eight weeks in the study. Consequently, Novartis chose to withdraw the IND application.

On May 30, 2019, PHPrecisionMed Inc. (“PHPM”) met with the FDA to discuss a proposal for a Phase 3 trial of imatinib in PAH using change in 6MWT as the primary endpoint. PHPM received agreement for submission under the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway, and thereafter received orphan designation. In July 2020, PHPM received agreement from the FDA for the development of a modified release formulation that would require only a small comparative pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study.

In January 2021, Tenax acquired PHPM and renamed the modified release formulation of imatinib TNX-201. Given our prioritization of the LEVEL trials, we have suspended plans to launch an imatinib Phase 3 trial.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of patent applications, patents, trade secrets, proprietary know-how, trademarks, and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We believe that to have a competitive advantage, we must develop and maintain the proprietary aspects of our technologies. Currently, we require our officers, employees, consultants, contractors, manufacturers, outside scientific collaborators and sponsored researchers, and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their employment, consulting, or advisory relationships with us, where appropriate. We also require employees, consultants, and advisors whom we expect to work on our products to agree to disclose and assign to us all inventions conceived during the workday, developed using our property, or which relate to our business.

As of the date of this filing, the Company has been granted four patents, all related to product candidates and proprietary process, method and technology. Our issued levosimendan patents expire in 2039 and late 2040.

On January 4, 2022, we received a patent for the subcutaneous administration of levosimendan (TNX-102), whether through the prototype formulation we have developed in collaboration with a formulation development partner, or other subcutaneous formulations meeting certain broad characteristics defined in the patent. This patent expires in 2039. On March 21, 2023, we were granted a patent for the use of IV levosimendan in the treatment of PH-HFpEF patients. This patent expires in 2040. On July 19, 2023, the Company announced the USPTO issuance of another

patent, this one including claims covering the use of oral levosimendan in patients with PH-HFpEF. This issued patent provides exclusivity through December 2040. On February 6, 2024, the Company announced the fourth levosimendan USPTO patent broadening IP protection for oral, I.V., and subcutaneous use of levosimendan and its active metabolites in PH-HFpEF, at all therapeutic doses and in combination with various cardiovascular drugs. The Company also has multiple patent applications pending in Europe and other countries the for the treatment of PH-HFpEF, for oral and combination products.

The U.S. trademark registration for Simdax® is owned by Orion Corporation ("Orion") and is licensed to us for sales and marketing purposes for any intravenous pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan that are commercialized in the United States and Canada.

Our success will in part depend on the ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary rights in commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business, the validity and enforceability of our patents, the continued confidentiality of our trade secrets and our ability to operate without infringing the valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties. We also rely on continuing technological innovation and in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position.

We cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications we may own or license in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents we may own or license in the future will be useful in protecting our technology and products. Comprehensive risks related to our intellectual property are described under the heading “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Simdax License Agreement

On November 13, 2013, we acquired, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Life NewCo, Inc., a license agreement between Phyxius and Orion, which was later amended on October 9, 2020, January 25, 2022, and February 19, 2024 (as amended, the “License”). The License grants us an exclusive, sublicensable right to develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan worldwide (the “Territory”) and, pursuant to the October 9, 2020 and January 25, 2022 amendments to the License, also includes two product dose forms containing levosimendan, in capsule and solid dosage form, and a subcutaneously administered product containing levosimendan, subject to specified limitations (together, the “Product”). Pursuant to the License, Tenax and Orion will agree to a new trademark when commercializing the Product in either of these forms.

Pursuant to the License, we have a right of first refusal to commercialize new developments of the Product, including developments as to the formulation, presentation, means of delivery, route of administration, dosage or indication but pursuant to the February 2024 amendment, excluding new applications of levosimendan developed by Orion for neurological diseases and disorders.

Orion’s ongoing role under the License includes sublicense approval, serving as the sole source of manufacture of oral formulations of levosimendan, holding a first right to enforce Orion's intellectual property rights outside the United States and Canada, and certain regulatory participation rights. Orion can notify the Company if it chooses not to exercise its right to supply oral formulations of levosimendan to the Company for commercialization in the Territory. Additionally, the Company must grant back to Orion a broad non-exclusive license to any patents or clinical trial data related to levosimendan developed by the Company under the License.

As consideration for the License, we agreed to pay Orion (i) a one-time up-front payment in the amount of $1.0 million, (ii) development milestones consisting of (a) $10.0 million upon the grant of FDA approval of a levosimendan-based product and (b) $1.0 million upon the grant of regulatory approval for the Product in Canada, (c) $5.0 million due upon the grant of regulatory approval for a levosimendan-based product in Japan, (iii) non-refundable commercialization milestones aggregating to up to $45.0 million, upon achievement of certain cumulative worldwide sales of the Product by the Company, and (iv) tiered royalties based on worldwide net sales of the Product. After the end of the License term, the Company must pay Orion a royalty based on net sales of the Product in the Territory for as long as the Company sells the Product in the Territory.

The term of the License extends until 10 years after the launch of the Product in the Territory, provided that the License will continue after the end of the term in each country in the Territory until the expiration of Orion’s patent rights in

the Product in such country. In the event that no regulatory approval for the Product has been granted in the United States on or before September 20, 2030, however, either party will have the right to terminate the License with immediate effect.

Manufacturing and Supply

We contract with third parties for the manufacturing of all of our product candidates and for pre-clinical and clinical studies and intend to continue to do so in the future. We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities and we have no plans to build any owned clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities. We believe that the use of third-party manufacturers and contract drug manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) eliminates the need to directly invest in manufacturing facilities, equipment and additional employees.

Pursuant to the terms of the License, Orion is contractually our sole manufacturing source for TNX-103. We may engage other third-party suppliers and CMOs for the supply and manufacture of TNX-102, or other formulations we may develop.

We have engaged various third-party suppliers and CMOs for the supply and manufacture of imatinib for potential future clinical trials and relied on such contractors for material contributing to TNX-201, for testing in our two completed Phase 1 trials.

As we further develop our product pipeline, we expect to consider secondary or back-up manufacturers for both active pharmaceutical ingredient and drug product manufacturing. To date, our third-party manufacturers have met the manufacturing requirements for our product candidates. We expect third-party manufacturers to be capable of providing sufficient quantities of our product candidates to meet anticipated full-scale commercial demands, but we have not assessed these capabilities beyond the supply of clinical materials to date.

We believe alternate sources of manufacturing will be available to satisfy our clinical and future commercial requirements however, we cannot guarantee that identifying and establishing alternative relationships with such sources will be successful, cost effective, or completed on a timely basis without significant delay in the development or commercialization of our product candidates. All of the vendors we use are required to conduct their operations under current Good Manufacturing Practices, a regulatory standard for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals.

Competition

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are intensely competitive. Many companies, including biotechnology, chemical, and pharmaceutical companies, are actively engaged in activities similar to ours, including research and development of drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and related medical conditions, both rare and common. Many of these companies have substantially greater financial and other resources, larger research and development staff and more extensive marketing and manufacturing organizations than we do. In addition, some of them have considerable experience in preclinical testing, clinical trials and other regulatory approval procedures. There are also academic institutions, governmental agencies and other research organizations that are conducting research in areas in which we are working. Our success will be based in part on our ability to identify, develop and manage a portfolio of product candidates that are safer and more effective than any competing products.

We believe the concept of using TNX-101/102/103 (levosimendan) to treat patients with PH-HFpEF is novel, and the patent granted for this use in March 2023 demonstrates the USPTO’s concurrence. Because no therapies are approved to treat PH-HFpEF, we believe our ability to succeed in the market is primarily dependent on our ability to change the established practice paradigm, which could be difficult. Key factors on which we will compete with regards to the development and marketing of levosimendan for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in these patients include, among others, the ability to obtain adequate efficacy data, safety data, cost effectiveness data and hospital formulary approval, marketing exclusivity, as well as sufficient distribution and handling. Furthermore, while we believe the mechanism of action of levosimendan is novel, other low-priced, generically available products possess some similar qualities, which could present competition in the form of therapeutic substitution. Other companies, including for example Astra Zeneca, Tectonic, and Merck, are currently conducting Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials of potential new therapies to great PH-HFpEF. Merck’s sotatercept is approved for PAH and is being tested in a subset of PH patients with HFpEF, with a data readout predicted in 2025. These companies may be successful in their efforts to gain market approval for a product in the same patients we aim to treat with levosimendan, whether before or after we

could do so. Some classes of medical therapy such as SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists are or may be approved for use in patients with heart failure, and may or may not be developed specifically for PH-HFpEF, creating competition in the future. Some approved products to treat common conditions such as diabetes and obesity are theorized, or proven, to provide benefit in patients with heart failure, and are sometimes used in these patients, including off-label. Products approved for PAH, including endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, even though trials have not shown benefit and have sometimes demonstrated harm, and manufacturers of which have not sought approval in patients with PH-HFpEF by filing an NDA or BLA, are nevertheless prescribed off-label by some physician who care for patients with PH associated with HFpEF, and who state in our own market research that they wish to provide something for patients with this disease.

TNX-201 (imatinib) has the potential to be the first disease-modifying treatment of PAH, a fatal orphan disease. Pulmonary vasodilators, the only approved medications for PAH, do not have disease modifying properties. We do not expect these products, other than one which is not widely used today, to be contraindicated in patients taking TNX-201, and our intended protocol design tests TNX-201 as an additional therapy to one or more of these vasodilators.

In order to compete successfully, we must develop proprietary positions in patented drugs for therapeutic markets that have not been satisfactorily addressed by conventional research strategies. Our product candidates, even if successfully tested and developed, may not be adopted by physicians over other products and may not offer economically feasible alternatives to other therapies.

Government Regulation

The manufacture and distribution of levosimendan will require the approval of U.S. government authorities as well as those of foreign countries. In the United States, the FDA regulates medical products. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act govern the testing, manufacture, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, advertising and promotion of our medical products. In addition to FDA regulations, we are also subject to other federal and state regulations, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Environmental Protection Act. Product development and approval within this regulatory framework requires a number of years and involves the expenditure of substantial funds.

Preclinical tests include evaluation of product chemistry and studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product and its formulation. The results of the preclinical tests are submitted to the FDA as part of the application. The goal of clinical testing is the demonstration in adequate and well-controlled studies of substantial evidence of the safety and effectiveness of the product in the setting of its intended use. The results of preclinical and clinical testing are submitted to the FDA from time to time throughout the trial process. In addition, before approval for the commercial sale of a product can be obtained, results of the preclinical and clinical studies must be submitted to the FDA. The testing and approval process requires substantial time and effort and there can be no assurance that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. The approval process is affected by a number of factors, including the severity of the condition being treated, the availability of alternative treatments and the risks and benefits demonstrated in clinical trials. Additional preclinical studies or clinical trials may be requested during the FDA review process and may delay product approval. After FDA approval for its initial indications, further clinical trials may be necessary to gain approval for the use of a product for additional indications. The FDA may also require post-marketing testing to monitor for adverse effects, which can involve significant expense.

The effects of government regulations on our business are discussed under the heading “Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Industry” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Employees and Human Capital

We have assembled a high-quality team of clinical development managers and executives with significant experience in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.

As of December 31, 2024, we had four full-time employees and two part-time employees. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we had five full-time employees and two part-time employees. In addition to our employees, we also rely on the service and support of outside consultants and advisors. None of our employees is represented by a union, and we believe relationships with our employees are good.

Available Information

Our website address is www.tenaxthera.com, and our investor relations website is located at http://investors.tenaxthera.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference herein. Copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and our proxy statements for our meetings of stockholders, and any amendments to those reports, as well as Section 13 and 16 reports filed by our insiders, are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file the reports with, or furnish the reports to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also publicly available on the SEC’s website located at www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A—RISK FACTORS

Our business, financial condition and operating results may be affected by a number of factors, including but not limited to those described below. Any one or more of such factors could directly or indirectly cause our actual results of operations and financial condition to vary materially from our past or anticipated future results of operations and financial condition. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. The following information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the accompanying financial statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Our Business and Our Operations

We are limited in the number of products we can simultaneously pursue and therefore our survival depends on our success with a small number of product opportunities.

At present we are focusing our resources on developing levosimendan for the treatment of PH-HFpEF, while imatinib for the treatment of PAH remains part of our portfolio. We intend to commit most of our resources to advancing levosimendan to the point it receives regulatory approval for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with HFpEF. Depending on whether we raise additional funds in the future, as well as on decisions made by the USPTO, clinical trial results and other information revealed by competitors, and other factors, we will prioritize our funding and other resources. If as a consequence of the results of our planned Phase 3 trials for levosimendan, or the results of prior clinical trials performed using levosimendan or imatinib, we are unable to receive regulatory approval of one or both of our existing product candidates, then we may not have resources to pursue development of any other products and our business could terminate.

We currently have no approved drug products for sale, and we cannot guarantee that we will ever have marketable drug products.

We currently have no approved drug products for sale and our business depends on the successful development and commercialization of our product candidates. The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, selling, marketing, and distribution of drug products are extensively regulated by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and other countries, with regulations differing from country to country. We are not permitted to market our product candidates in the United States until we receive approval of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) from the FDA for each product candidate. We have not submitted an NDA or received marketing approval for any of our product candidates. In addition, markets outside of the United States also have requirements for approval of drug candidates which we must comply with prior to marketing. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will ever have marketable drug products.

The process of developing new drugs and/or therapeutic products is inherently complex, unpredictable, time-consuming, expensive and uncertain. We must make long-term investments and commit significant resources before knowing whether our development programs will result in products that will receive regulatory approval and achieve market acceptance. Product candidates that appear to be promising at some or all stages of development may not receive approval or reach the market for a number of reasons that may not be predictable based on results and data of the clinical program. Product candidates may be found ineffective or may cause harmful side effects during clinical trials, may take longer to progress through clinical trials than had been anticipated, may not be able to achieve the

pre-defined clinical endpoints due to statistical anomalies even though clinical benefit may have been achieved, may fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals, may prove impracticable to manufacture in commercial quantities at reasonable cost and with acceptable quality, or may fail to achieve market acceptance. Even if we believe the preclinical or clinical data for our product candidates are favorable, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. Additionally, the FDA may require us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials for our product candidates either prior to or post-approval, or it may object to elements of our clinical development program.

We are required to conduct additional clinical trials, including the LEVEL and LEVEL-2 trials for oral levosimendan, which are expensive and time consuming, and the outcome of the clinical trials is uncertain.

We expect to commit a substantial portion of our financial and business resources in the short-term to completing the LEVEL and LEVEL-2 trials and advancing this product through to regulatory approval for use in PH-HFpEF, and potentially other indications. We may in the future commit resources to clinical trials for our other product candidates, including imatinib. All of these clinical trials and product testing efforts will be expensive and time consuming and the timing of the regulatory review process is uncertain. The applicable regulatory agencies may suspend clinical trials at any time if they believe that the subjects participating in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete our clinical trials successfully or obtain FDA or other governmental or regulatory approval of our product candidates, or that such approval, if obtained, will not include limitations on the indicated uses for which our product candidates may be marketed. Our business, financial condition and results of operations are critically dependent on obtaining capital to advance our testing program and receiving FDA and other governmental and regulatory approvals of our products. A significant delay in or failure of our planned clinical trials or a failure to achieve these approvals would have a material adverse effect on us and could result in major business and financial setbacks.

Delays in the enrollment and completion of clinical testing could result in increased costs to us and delay or limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

Delays in the commencement, enrollment and completion of clinical testing could significantly affect our ability to gain FDA approval of current product candidates, and to gain this approval in the timeline planned, and could significantly increase our future product development costs. The completion of clinical trials requires us to identify and maintain a sufficient number of trial sites, many of which might already be engaged in other clinical trial programs for the same indication as our product candidates, might be required to withdraw from our clinical trial as a result of changing standards of care, might suffer from staff shortages at the institutional or clinic level that impact their ability to enroll and treat patients under our protocols, or might become ineligible to participate in clinical studies. The enrollment and completion of clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of other reasons, including delays related to:

In addition, a clinical trial may be suspended or terminated by us, the FDA or other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including:

Changes in regulatory requirements and guidance may occur and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes with appropriate regulatory authorities. Amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs for re-examination, which may impact the costs, design, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial. If we experience delays in the completion of, or if we terminate, our clinical trials, the commercial prospects for our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues will be delayed. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate. Even if we are ultimately able to commercialize our product candidates, other therapies for the same or similar indications may have been introduced to the market and established a competitive advantage.

The market may not accept our products.

If any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, they may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If our product candidates do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant revenue and we may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

Nonfinal results from our clinical trials announced or published from time to time on an interim, preliminary, or “top-line” basis, and conclusions that may be drawn from such results, may change as more patient data become available, and these results are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we may publish or reference interim, top-line, or preliminary results from our clinical trials, including of blinded or unblinded data. Interim or top-line results from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcome measurements may materially change as patient enrollment and treatment extends and more patient experience is observed. Preliminary or top-line results also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final and complete data are available. Differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects and may cause the trading price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.

Any collaboration we enter with third parties to develop and commercialize any future product candidates may place the development of our product candidates outside our control, may require us to relinquish important rights or may otherwise be on terms unfavorable to us.

We may enter into collaborations with third parties to develop and commercialize future product candidates. Our dependence on future partners for development and commercialization of our product candidates would subject us to a number of risks, including the following:

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

We will require substantial additional funding to further develop our product candidates, including to complete the open label extension stage of our ongoing Phase 3 LEVEL trial and to complete a second planned global Phase 3 study, Level-2, as well as to initiate or complete an imatinib Phase 3 trial. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed on acceptable terms, or at all, or execute on an alternative strategic path, could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our clinical trials, product development efforts and business operations.

Developing biopharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials and establishing manufacturing and sales and marketing capabilities, is expensive. We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, including the completion of the LEVEL and LEVEL-2 trials. In addition, our expenses could increase beyond expectations if applicable regulatory authorities, including the FDA, require that we perform studies additional to those we currently anticipate, in which case the timing of any potential product approval may be delayed.

As of December 31, 2024, we had $94.9 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and subsequent to year end, on March 5, 2025 we raised an additional $25.0 million of gross proceeds from an offering of common stock and pre-funded warrants. We will need substantial additional capital in order to develop our product candidates, including to complete the LEVEL and LEVEL-2 trials, to complete the regulatory approval process and commercialization of levosimendan, and, potentially, imatinib, or any future product candidates. We continue to evaluate pursuing additional public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. Such funding may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

In addition, to the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience additional significant dilution; debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. We may seek to access the public or private capital markets whenever conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital at that time.

Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

In the event we are unable to obtain additional capital as needed or execute on an alternative strategic path, we may further delay, limit, reduce or terminate our current development efforts and business operations.

We may be required to make milestone and royalty payments to the licensor of the levosimendan intellectual property in connection with the development and commercialization of levosimendan, which could adversely affect the profitability of levosimendan, if approved.

Under the terms of our license agreement with Orion, we are required to pay to Orion tiered royalties based on worldwide net sales of the product by the Company and any sublicensees, a $10.0 million milestone payment upon the grant of FDA approval of a levosimendan-based product, a $5.0 milestone payment upon the grant of regulatory approval for a levosimendan-based product in Japan, as well as certain non-refundable commercialization milestone payments, aggregating to up to $45.0 million, contingent upon achievement of certain cumulative worldwide sales of the product by the Company. In the event that no regulatory approval for a product containing levosimendan has been granted in the United States on or before September 20, 2030, however, either party will have the right to terminate the license with immediate effect.

These development and milestone obligations and royalties could impose substantial additional costs on us, divert resources from other aspects of the business, and adversely affect the overall profitability of levosimendan, if approved. We may need to obtain additional financing to satisfy these milestone and royalty payments, and cannot be sure that any additional funding, if needed, will be available on favorable terms, or at all.

We expect a number of factors to cause our operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis, which may make it difficult to predict our future performance.

Our financial condition and operating results have varied significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors relating to our business that may contribute to these fluctuations include the following factors, among others:

Due to the various factors mentioned above, and others, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of our future operating performance.

We have incurred losses since our inception, expect to continue to incur losses in the foreseeable future, and may never become profitable.

We have incurred losses since inception. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we incurred net operating losses of $19.5 million and $8.2 million, respectively. We have funded our operations since 2013 principally through the issuance of debt and equity securities. We will continue to incur losses until we generate sufficient revenue to offset our expenses, and we anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for at least the next several years. We expect to incur additional expenses related to our development and potential commercialization of levosimendan for pulmonary hypertension and other potential indications, imatinib for PAH, as well as identifying and developing other potential product candidates, and as a result, we will need to generate significant net product sales, royalty and other revenues to achieve profitability.

Risks Relating to Our Industry

Intense competition might render our cardiovascular and pulmonary product candidates noncompetitive or obsolete.

Competition in the pharmaceutical industry in general and in our therapeutic areas is intense and characterized by extensive research efforts and rapid technological progress. Technological developments by competitors, regulatory approval for marketing competitive products, including potential generic or over-the-counter products, or superior marketing resources possessed by competitors could adversely affect the commercial potential of our cardiovascular and pulmonary disease product candidates and could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue and results of operations. We believe that there are numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as academic research groups throughout the world, engaged in research and development efforts with respect to pharmaceutical products targeted at cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases and conditions addressed by our product pipeline. Developments by others might render our product pipeline obsolete or noncompetitive. Competitors might be able to complete the development and regulatory approval process sooner and, therefore, market their cardiovascular and pulmonary disease products earlier than we can.

Many of our current competitors have significant financial, marketing and personnel resources and development capabilities. For example, many large, well-capitalized companies already offer cardiovascular and pulmonary products and services in the United States and Europe that target the indications for which our product candidates are being developed, or related indications. Currently, as an example, at least twelve vasodilators are marketed in the U.S. for use in patients with PAH, and sales teams from Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and other large companies with marketing and sales capabilities represent these products in the specialized care centers where the

disease is treated. While there are no products currently marketed to treat PH-HFpEF, specifically, some products are under development to treat this prevalent disease, and some products marketed for other conditions or for HFpEF alone, are used in these patients and could constitute competition at the patient, payor, or overall market level in future.

Our activities are and will continue to be subject to extensive government regulation, which is expensive and time-consuming, and we will not be able to sell our products without regulatory approval.

Our development, marketing, and distribution of levosimendan and, potentially in the future, imatinib, are, and will continue to be, subject to extensive regulation, monitoring and approval by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. There are significant risks at each stage of regulation.

Product approval stage

During the product approval stage, we study and attempt to prove the safety and efficacy of our product candidate for its indicated uses. There are numerous problems that could arise during this stage, including:

Post-commercialization stage

Discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, or unanticipated problems with our manufacturing arrangements, even after FDA and other regulatory approvals of our products for commercial sale, may result in the imposition of significant restrictions, including withdrawal of the product from the market.

Additional laws and regulations may also be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products, including laws or regulations relating to the price or cost-effectiveness of medical products. Any delay or failure to achieve regulatory approval of commercial sales of our products is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies continue to review products even after they receive agency approval. If and when the FDA or another regulatory agency outside the United States approves one of our products, its manufacture and marketing will be subject to ongoing regulation, which could include compliance with current good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting requirements and general prohibitions against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses. We are also subject to inspection and market surveillance by the FDA for compliance with these and other requirements. Any enforcement action resulting from failure, even by inadvertence, to comply with these requirements could affect the manufacture and marketing of levosimendan, imatinib or our other products. In addition, the FDA or other regulatory agencies could withdraw a previously approved product from the market upon receipt of newly discovered information. The FDA or another regulatory agency could also require us to conduct additional, and potentially expensive, studies in areas outside our approved indicated uses.

We may not receive all of the anticipated market exclusivity benefits of imatinib’s orphan drug designation, if we prioritize imatinib development in the future.

TNX-201, our proprietary formulation of imatinib mesylate, a kinase inhibitor, received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA in the second quarter of 2020. Orphan Drug Designation may provide market exclusivity in the United States for seven years if (i) imatinib receives market approval before a competitor using a similar mechanism for the same indication, (ii) we are able to produce sufficient supply to meet demand in the marketplace, and (iii) another product with the same active ingredient is not subsequently deemed clinically superior.

Obtaining an Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA may not effectively protect our product candidates from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition, and orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving the same or a different drug in another indication. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve a later application for the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer in a substantial portion of the target populations, more effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care. In addition, a designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. Moreover, orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Orphan Drug Designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

Even after products are commercialized, we would expect to spend considerable time and money complying with federal and state laws and regulations governing their sale, and, if we are unable to fully comply with such laws and regulations, we could face substantial penalties.

Health care providers, physicians and others would play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of our clinical products. Our arrangements with third-party payers and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other health care laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we will market, sell and distribute our products. Applicable federal and state health care laws and regulations are expected to include, but not be limited to, the following:

Our failure to comply with any of these federal and state health care laws and regulations, or health care laws in foreign jurisdictions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, result of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to uncertainty relating to healthcare reform measures and reimbursement policies that, if not favorable to our products, could hinder or prevent our products’ commercial success, if any of our product candidates are approved.

Our ability to successfully commercialize our products will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities, such as Medicare, private health insurers and other organizations establish what we believe to be appropriate coverage and reimbursement for our approved products. The unavailability or inadequacy of third-party payer coverage and reimbursement could negatively affect the market acceptance of our product candidates and the future revenues we may expect to receive from any approved products. The commercial success of our product candidates, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which the costs of such products will be covered by third-party payers, such as government health programs, commercial insurance and other organizations. Third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy. If these third-party payers do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other therapies, we may not obtain coverage for our products after approval as a benefit under the third-party payers’ plans or, even if we do, the level of coverage or payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.

Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status for newly approved drug products, including coding, coverage and payment. There is no uniform policy requirement for coverage and reimbursement for drug products among third-party payers in the United States; therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly by payer. The coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payer separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate payment will be applied consistently or obtained. The process for determining whether a payer will cover and how much it will reimburse a product may be separate from the process of seeking approval of the product or for setting the price of the product. Even if reimbursement is provided, market acceptance of our products may be adversely affected if the amount of payment for our products proves to be unprofitable for healthcare providers or less profitable than alternative treatments or if administrative burdens make our products less desirable to use. Third-party payer reimbursement to providers of our products, if approved, may be subject to a bundled payment that also includes the procedure of administering our products or third-party payers may require providers to perform additional patient testing to justify the use of our products. To the extent there is no separate payment for our products, there may be further uncertainty as to the adequacy of reimbursement amounts.

The containment of healthcare costs is a priority of federal, state and foreign governments and the prices of drug products have been a focus in this effort. The continuing efforts of government, private insurance companies and other organizations to contain or reduce costs of healthcare, including through such recent legislation as the Inflation Reduction Act in the U.S., the effects of which are evolving over time, may adversely affect our ability to set as high a price for our products as we might otherwise and the rate and scope of adoption of our products by healthcare providers. We expect that federal, state and local governments in the United States, as well as governments in other countries, will continue to consider legislation directed at lowering the total cost of healthcare. In addition, in certain foreign markets, the pricing of drug products is subject to government control and reimbursement may in some cases be unavailable or insufficient. It is uncertain whether and how future legislation, whether domestic or abroad, could affect prospects for our product candidates or what actions governmental or private payers for healthcare treatment and services may take in response to any such healthcare reform proposals or legislation. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, may prevent or limit our ability to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates.

These potential courses of action are unpredictable and the potential impact of new legislation on our operations and financial position is uncertain, but may result in more rigorous coverage criteria, lower reimbursement and additional downward pressure on the price we may receive for an approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payers. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products, if approved.

Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls and reimbursement approval policies, which may adversely affect our prospects for generating revenue outside the United States.

We have worldwide distribution rights for levosimendan and our formulation of imatinib, and in some countries, particularly European Union countries and Canada, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition, there can be considerable pressure by

governments and other stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures. Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained. To obtain or maintain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries with respect to any product candidate that achieves regulatory approval, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available therapies. If reimbursement of our products upon approval, if at all, is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our prospects for generating revenue, if any, could be adversely affected, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, if we achieve regulatory approval of any product, we must successfully negotiate product pricing for such product in individual countries. As a result, if our products are approved, the pricing of our products in different countries may vary widely, thus creating the potential for third-party trade in our products in an attempt to exploit price differences between countries. This third-party trade of our products could undermine our sales in markets with higher prices.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities, limit sales of our existing products and limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

Our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, distribution, and sale of pharmaceutical products. We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and an even greater risk when we commercially sell any products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

We currently maintain limited product liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials in the total amount of $5 million. However, our profitability will be adversely affected by a successful product liability claim in excess of our insurance coverage. There can be no assurance that product liability insurance will be available in the future or be available on reasonable terms.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyber-attacks or deficiencies in our cybersecurity.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, malware, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber-terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our product development programs. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or ongoing or planned clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach was to result in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur material legal claims and liability, and damage to our reputation, and the further development of our product candidates could be delayed.

Our disclosure controls and procedures address cybersecurity and include elements intended to ensure that there is an analysis of potential disclosure obligations arising from security breaches. We also maintain compliance programs to address the potential applicability of restrictions against trading while in possession of material, nonpublic information generally and in connection with a cybersecurity breach. However, a breakdown in existing controls and procedures

around our cybersecurity environment may prevent us from detecting, reporting or responding to cyber-incidents in a timely manner and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and value of our stock. For more information, see Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We have historically relied on and we will continue to substantially rely on third parties to conduct our nonclinical testing and clinical studies and other aspects of our development programs. If those third parties do not satisfactorily perform their contractual obligations or meet anticipated deadlines, the development of our product candidates could be adversely affected.

We do not currently employ personnel or possess the facilities necessary to conduct many of the activities associated with our development programs. We have historically and we will continue to engage consultants, advisors, CROs and others to assist in the design and conduct of nonclinical and clinical studies of our product candidates, with interpretation of the results of those studies and with regulatory activities and expect to continue to outsource all or a significant amount of such activities. As a result, many important aspects of our development programs are and will continue to be outside our direct control and our third-party service providers may not perform their activities as required or expected, including the maintenance of Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”) or Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) compliance, which are ultimately our responsibility to ensure. Further, such third parties may not be as committed to the success of our programs as our own employees and, therefore, may not devote the same time, thoughtfulness, or creativity to completing projects or problem-solving as our own employees would. To the extent we are unable to successfully manage the performance of third-party service providers, our business may be adversely affected.

The CROs we engage or may engage to execute our clinical studies play a significant role in the conduct of the studies, including the collection and analysis of study data, and we likely will depend on CROs and clinical investigators to conduct future clinical studies and to assist in analyzing data from completed studies and developing regulatory strategies for our product candidates. Individuals working at the CROs with which we contract, as well as investigators at the sites at which our studies are conducted, are not our employees, and we have limited control over the amount or timing of resources that they devote to their programs. If our CROs, study investigators, and/or third-party sponsors fail to devote sufficient time and resources to studies of our product candidates, if we and/or our CROs do not comply with all GLP and GCP regulatory and contractual requirements, or if their performance is substandard, it could adversely affect the development of our product candidates.

In addition, the third parties we engage may have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. Through intentional or unintentional means, our competitors may benefit from lessons learned on the project that could ultimately harm our competitive position. Moreover, if a CRO fails to properly, or at all, perform our activities during a clinical study, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs on acceptable terms or in a timely manner, or at all. Switching CROs may increase costs and divert management time and attention. In addition, there likely would be a transition period before a new CRO commences work. These challenges could result in delays in the commencement or completion of our clinical studies, which could materially impact our ability to meet our desired and/or announced development timelines and have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

We depend on third parties to formulate and manufacture our products.

We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities for the clinical- or commercial-scale production of our products.

Pursuant to the terms of our license for levosimendan, Orion is at present our sole manufacturing source for TNX-103; should they opt not to provide us the product, our license agreement provides for 24 months’ notice to the Company of same, to allow an alternative manufacturer to be brought onboard. We might engage other third-party suppliers and CMOs for the supply and manufacture of TNX-102, or other formulations we might develop. Accordingly, our business is susceptible to disruption, and our results of operations can be adversely affected, by any disruption in supply or other adverse developments in our relationship with Orion. If supply from Orion is delayed or terminated, or if its facilities suffer any damage or disruption, we may need to successfully qualify an alternative supplier in a timely manner in order to avoid disruption of our business. If we cannot obtain an alternate manufacturer

in a timely manner, we would experience a significant interruption in supply of levosimendan, which could negatively affect our clinical trial conduct and other product development efforts and timelines, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

To potentially manufacture imatinib in the future, we have contracted with various third-party suppliers and CMOs making us highly dependent on these CMOs. We do not at present have alternative CMOs planned or contracted to back up our primary vendors of clinical trial material or, if approved, commercial supply material. Identification of and discussions with other CMOs may be protracted and/or unsuccessful, or these new CMOs may be unsuccessful in producing the same results as the current primary CMOs producing the material. Therefore, if our primary CMOs become unable or unwilling to perform their required activities, we could experience protracted delays or interruptions in the supply of clinical trial material and, ultimately, product for commercial sale, which would materially and adversely affect our development programs, commercial activities, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the FDA or regulatory authorities outside of the United States may require us to have an alternate manufacturer of a drug product before approving any product candidate for marketing and sale in the United States or abroad. Securing such alternate manufacturer, if possible, could result in considerable additional time and cost prior to approval.

If we fail to attract and retain senior management and key scientific personnel, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates.

We have historically operated with a limited number of employees. As of December 31, 2024, we had four full-time employees and two part-time employees, and in the first quarter of 2025 added one additional full-time employee. Therefore, institutional knowledge is concentrated within a small number of employees. Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical and scientific personnel to continue the development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our product candidates. We will need to hire or contract with additional qualified personnel with expertise in preclinical testing, clinical research and testing, government regulation, formulation and manufacturing, and sales and marketing. Additionally, our future success is highly dependent upon the contributions of our senior management team. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our product pipeline, completion of our planned clinical trials or the commercialization of our product candidates.

We face competition from other companies and organizations for qualified personnel. Other companies and organizations with which we compete for personnel may have greater financial and other resources and different risk profiles than we do, and a history of successful development and commercialization of their product candidates. Replacing employees and attracting sufficiently skilled new employees may be difficult and costly, and we may not have other personnel with the capacity to assume all the responsibilities of an existing employee upon his or her departure or to take on the duties necessary to continue growing our company and pursuing our business strategy. If we cannot attract and retain skilled personnel, as needed, we may not achieve our development and other goals.

In addition, the success of our business will depend on our ability to develop and maintain relationships with respected service providers and industry-leading consultants and advisors. If we cannot develop and maintain such relationships, as needed, the rate and success at which we can develop and commercialize product candidates may be limited. In addition, our insourcing and outsourcing strategies, which have included engaging consultants to manage core administrative and operational functions, may subject us to scrutiny under labor laws and regulations, which may divert management time and attention and have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We expect to need to increase the size of our organization to further develop our product candidates, and we may experience difficulties in managing growth.

We will need to manage our anticipated growth and increased operational activity, including as a result of the continuing development of levosimendan and any other product candidates. Our personnel, systems, and facilities currently in place may not be adequate to support this future growth. Our need to effectively execute our growth strategy will require that we:

This planned future growth could place a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure and may require our management to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day activities. We may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel, which may result in weaknesses in our infrastructure, and give rise to operational mistakes, loss of business opportunities, loss of employees and consultants and reduced productivity among remaining employees and consultants. We may not be able to make improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls. If our management is unable to effectively manage our expected growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, our ability to generate or increase our revenues could be reduced and we may not be able to implement our business strategy. Our future financial performance and our ability to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively manage any future growth.

We currently have very limited marketing capabilities and no sales organization. If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities on our own or through third parties, we will be unable to successfully commercialize our products, if approved, or generate product revenue.

To commercialize our products, if approved, in the United States and other jurisdictions in which we may seek approvals, we must build our marketing, sales, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in doing so. We have not decided upon a commercialization strategy in these areas. We have no experience in the sale and marketing of approved medical products and marketing the licensing of such products before FDA or other regulatory approval. We do not know of any third party that is prepared to distribute our products should they be approved. If we decide to establish our own commercialization capability, we will need to recruit, train and retain a marketing staff and sales force with sufficient technical expertise. We do not know whether we can establish a commercialization program at a cost that is acceptable in relation to revenue or whether we can be successful in commercializing our product. Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our products directly and without strategic partners include:

Further, we may pursue arrangements regarding the sales and marketing and distribution of one or more of our product candidates and our future revenues may depend, in part, on our ability to enter into and maintain arrangements with other companies having sales, marketing and distribution capabilities and the ability of such companies to successfully market and sell any such products. Any failure to enter into such arrangements and marketing alliances on favorable terms, if at all, could delay or impair our ability to commercialize our product candidates and could increase our costs of commercialization. Any use of distribution arrangements and marketing alliances to commercialize our product candidates will subject us to a number of risks, including the following:

If we are unable to implement our own sales and marketing capability or are unable to contract with one or more third parties for such services on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our products in certain markets. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal or external sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the commercialization of our products. If we are not successful in commercializing our products, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future product revenue will suffer and we would incur significant additional losses.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Our success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining effective patent and other intellectual property protection for our product candidates and proprietary technology.

Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining effective patent protection and other intellectual property protection of our product candidates and the methods used to manufacture them, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our products, if any, will be dependent upon the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that cover these activities.

We are pursuing a multi-faceted IP strategy for levosimendan that includes filing patent applications in the U.S. and Canada, Europe, and multiple other countries that, if granted, could protect various uses and formulations of levosimendan In January 2022, the USPTO granted us a patent protecting claims for different uses of various cyclodextrin-based subcutaneous formulations of levosimendan, including a claim for its use in the treatment of PH-HFpEF patients. In addition, we received in March 2023 another patent protecting the use of levosimendan in the treatment of PH-HFpEF. Two subsequent patents expanded these protections on the use of levosimendan in the treatment of PH-HFpEF. Other patent applications are pending globally.

Our strategy to maximize market exclusivity for imatinib relies on two forms of exclusivity. First, we have been granted Orphan Drug Designation for the treatment of PAH by the FDA which would provide seven years of regulatory exclusivity in the U.S. if our imatinib formulation is the first to receive FDA approval for PAH. In addition, we may file one or more patent applications to cover patentable subject matter that may result from our imatinib development. If granted, a patent would provide protection for 20 years from its filing date.

The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biopharmaceutical patents has emerged to date in the United States. The biopharmaceutical patent situation outside the United States is less certain still. Changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in the patents we own. Further, if any of our patents are deemed invalid and unenforceable, it could impact our ability to commercialize or license our technology.

The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:

We also may rely on trade secrets to protect our technology, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. Although we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, our employees, consultants, contractors, outside scientific collaborators and other advisors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using any of our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how.

We rely on confidentiality agreements that, if breached, may be difficult to enforce and could have a material adverse effect on our business and competitive position.

Our policy is to enter into agreements relating to the non-disclosure and non-use of confidential information with third parties, including our contractors, consultants, advisors and research collaborators, as well as agreements that purport to require the disclosure and assignment to us of the rights to the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions of our employees and consultants while we employ them. However, these agreements can be difficult and costly to enforce. Moreover, to the extent that our contractors, consultants, advisors and research collaborators apply or independently develop intellectual property in connection with any of our projects, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to the intellectual property. If a dispute arises, a court may determine that the right belongs to a third party, and enforcement of our rights can be costly and unpredictable. In addition, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how that we seek to protect in part by confidentiality agreements with our employees, contractors, consultants, advisors or others. Despite the protective measures we employ, we still face the risk that:

Any breach of our confidentiality agreements or our failure to effectively enforce such agreements would have a material adverse effect on our business and competitive position.

We may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation or other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights and we may be unable to protect our rights to, or use, our technology.

If we or our partners choose to go to court to stop someone else from using the inventions claimed in our patents, that individual or company has the right to ask the court to rule that these patents are invalid and/or should not be enforced against that third party. These lawsuits are expensive and would consume time and other resources even if we were successful in stopping the infringement of these patents. In addition, there is a risk that the court will decide that these patents are not valid and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the inventions. There is also the risk that, even if the validity of these patents is upheld, the court will refuse to stop the other party on the ground that such other party’s activities do not infringe our rights to these patents.

Furthermore, a third party may claim that we or our manufacturing or commercialization partners are using inventions covered by the third party’s patent rights and may go to court to stop us from engaging in our normal operations and activities, including making or selling our product candidates. These lawsuits are costly and could affect our results of operations and divert the attention of managerial and technical personnel. There is a risk that a court would decide that we or our commercialization partners are infringing the third party’s patents and would order us or our partners to stop the activities covered by the patents. In addition, there is a risk that a court will order us or our partners to pay the other party damages for having violated the other party’s patents. We have agreed to indemnify certain of our commercial partners against certain patent infringement claims brought by third parties. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries have produced a proliferation of patents, and it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of products or methods of use. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform. If we are sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our products or methods of use either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent and/or that the patent claims are invalid, and we may not be able to do this. Proving invalidity, in particular, is

difficult since it requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence to overcome the presumption of validity enjoyed by issued patents.

Because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, because patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing and because publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our issued patents or our pending applications, or that we were the first to invent the technology. Our competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering technology similar to ours. Any such patent application may have priority over our patent applications or patents, which could further require us to obtain rights to issued patents by others covering such technologies. If another party has filed a U.S. patent application on inventions similar to ours, we may have to participate in an interference proceeding declared by the USPTO to determine priority of invention in the United States. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that such efforts would be unsuccessful if, unbeknownst to us, the other party had independently arrived at the same or similar invention prior to our own invention, resulting in a loss of our U.S. patent position with respect to such inventions.

Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our operations.

Under current law, we may not be able to enforce all employees’ covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees.

We have entered into non-competition agreements with certain of our employees. These agreements prohibit our employees, if they cease working for us, from competing directly with us or working for our competitors for a limited period. Under current law, we may be unable to enforce these agreements against certain of our employees and it may be difficult for us to restrict our competitors from gaining the expertise our former employees gained while working for us. If we cannot enforce our employees’ non-compete agreements, we may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of our former employees.

We may infringe or be alleged to infringe intellectual property rights of third parties.

Our products or product candidates may infringe on, or be accused of infringing on, one or more claims of an issued patent or may fall within the scope of one or more claims in a published patent application that may be subsequently issued and to which we do not hold a license or other rights. Third parties may own or control these patents or patent applications in the United States and abroad. These third parties could bring claims against us or our collaborators that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successful against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement suit were brought against us or our collaborators, we or they could be forced to stop or delay research, development, manufacturing or sales of the product or product candidate that is the subject of the suit.

If we are found to infringe the patent rights of a third party, or in order to avoid potential claims, we or our collaborators may choose or be required to seek a license from a third party and be required to pay license fees or royalties or both. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we or our collaborators were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a product, or be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations, if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we or our collaborators are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms.

There have been substantial litigation and other proceedings regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. In addition to infringement claims against us, we may become a party to other patent litigation and other proceedings, including interference proceedings declared by the USPTO and opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office, regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products. Our products, after commercial launch, may become subject to Paragraph IV certification under the Hatch-Waxman Act, thus forcing us to initiate infringement proceedings against such third-party filers. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our competitors may

be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time.

Some of our employees were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us. We may, however, be subject to claims that we or these employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, trade secrets or other proprietary information of any such employee’s former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims and, even if we are successful in defending ourselves, could result in substantial costs to us or be distracting to our management. If we fail to defend any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.

Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock

Our share price has been volatile, and may continue to be volatile, which may subject us to securities class action litigation in the future.

Our stock price has in the past been, and is likely to be in the future, volatile. The stock market in general, and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular, has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, our existing stockholders may not be able to sell their stock at a favorable price. The market price for our Common Stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have had securities class action lawsuits filed against them. Such lawsuits, should they be filed against us in the future, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Investors may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock.

For the foreseeable future, to finance our operations, including possible acquisitions or strategic transactions, we expect to issue equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue an aggregate of 400,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2024, there were 3,420,906 shares of common stock outstanding, 19,874,360

shares underlying warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $5.77 per share, 31,882,671 shares underlying pre-funded warrants with an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and 3,126,750 shares underlying options with a weighted average exercise price of $6.96 per share. We may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock or common stock equivalents may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, which could discourage takeover attempts and lead to management entrenchment, and the market price of our common stock may be lower as a result.

Certain provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Charter”), and our Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), may make it difficult for a third party to acquire, or attempt to acquire, control of the Company, even if a change in control was considered favorable by the stockholders. For example, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The issuance of shares of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control transaction. As a result, the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of our stockholders may be adversely affected. An issuance of shares of preferred stock may result in the loss of voting control to other stockholders.

Our organizational documents also contain other provisions that could have an anti-takeover effect, including provisions that:

In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limit the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock, including transactions that may be in stockholder best interests. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management or limit the price that certain investors are willing to pay for our stock.

Our Bylaws contain an exclusive forum provision, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees, or agents.

Our Bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, any North Carolina state court that has jurisdiction, or the Delaware Court of Chancery shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any internal corporate claims, including without limitation (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of us, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of us to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case subject to said court having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants in such action. This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or any other claim for which federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

This exclusive forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees or could result in increased costs for our stockholders to bring a claim in the chosen forum. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provision in our Bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable

in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could harm our results of operations. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.

We have U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”), which expire in various years if not utilized. In addition, we have federal research and development credit carryforwards. The federal research and development credit carryforwards expire in various years if not utilized. Under Sections 382 and 383 of Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its future post-change income and taxes may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5% shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. We have not performed a formal study to determine whether any of our NOLs are subject to these limitations. We have recorded deferred tax assets for our NOLs and research and development credits and have recorded a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets. In the event that it is determined that we have in the past experienced additional ownership changes, or if we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of future transactions in our stock, then we may be further limited in our ability to use our NOLs and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn in the event that we attain profitability. Any such limitations on the ability to use our NOLs and other tax assets could adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results in the event that we attain profitability.

ITEM 1B—UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 2—PROPERTIES

We own no real property. Beginning November 1, 2022, we maintain a membership providing dedicated office space, as well as shared services and shared space for meetings, catering, and other business activities, at our principal executive office located at 101 Glen Lennox Drive, Suite 300, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517.

ITEM 3—LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to litigation in the normal course of business, none of which management believes will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4— MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers as of March 21, 2025:

Christopher T. Giordano joined the Company as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors in July 2021 and became President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2021. From March 2018 to July 2021, he served as President of IQVIA Biotech LLC and IQVIA MedTech Inc., a provider of integrated clinical and commercial solutions to medical device and small biotech companies, where he led an executive team that managed a clinical trial portfolio of several hundred active projects during his three years of leadership. Prior to that role, from August 2008 to March 2018, Mr. Giordano held roles of increasing responsibility at Quintiles Transnational Holdings Inc., a provider of pharmaceutical outsourcing services (acquired by IMS Health Holdings, Inc. in October 2016 to become IQVIA Holdings Inc.), and was most recently Global Vice President of the cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic group. From January 2001 to July 2008, Mr. Giordano served in various sales and operational roles at PPD, Inc., a global clinical research organization. Mr. Giordano holds a B.A. (summa cum laude) in English from the University of San Diego and a M.A. in English from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Thomas McGauley joined the Company as our Interim Chief Financial Officer in December 2024. Mr. McGauley of Danforth Advisors, LLC is a senior life sciences financial executive with an extensive background in finance, life science companies, SEC reporting, and fundraising. Since July 2021, Mr. McGauley has been a member of Danforth Advisors, LLC, providing executive financial services to several public and private companies. From 2018 to 2022, Mr. McGauley was a director at CBIZ in their accounting advisory practice. Prior to that, from 2009 to 2018, he served as the chief financial officer and a consultant to several public and private life science companies, including Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq: GALT), where he was the interim chief financial officer from 2012 to 2013 and the company’s financial/accounting and SEC consultant from 2009 to 2012. Prior to that, he was a senior financial executive for deCODE genetics, Inc., a formerly Nasdaq-listed company. Mr. McGauley began his financial career in public accounting working with several accounting firms, and was most recently a manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP specializing in life sciences and technology companies. Prior to that, he was an officer in the U.S. Army and later the MA National Guard, ending his military career as a captain and company commander. Mr. McGauley holds a B.S.B.A in Accounting from Stonehill College and is a Certified Public Accountant in Massachusetts.

Stuart Rich, MD has served as our Chief Medical Officer since January 2021 and a director since February 2021. Dr. Rich joined the Company from PHPrecisionMed Inc. (PHPM), where he was a co-founder and held the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Director from October 2018 until PHPM’s merger with the Company in January 2021. Beginning July 2015, Dr. Rich has served as Professor of Medicine (and since 2021, Professor Emeritus) at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. He was co-founder and a Trustee of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute from 2006 until 2023, a U.K. based charity. From July 2015 until January 2021 he also served as the Director of the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Program at the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute of Northwestern

University, and since January 2006 he has served as a Director of the Cardiovascular Medical and Research Foundation, a U.S. based charity. He was a standing member of the Cardiovascular and Renal Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from 2002 through 2013. Prior to Northwestern University, Dr. Rich was Professor of Medicine at the Section of Cardiology of the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine from September 2004 to July 2015. Dr. Rich also served as the Chief Medical Officer (part-time) of United Therapeutics from October 2003 until December 2004. He was Professor of Medicine at the Rush Heart Institute of the Rush University School of Medicine from July 1996 to September 2004 and Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Section of Cardiology at the University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago from July 1980 to July 1996. Dr. Rich received his B.S. in Biology at the University of Illinois and his M.D. at Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, and he completed his residency in medicine at the Washington University of St. Louis and his fellowship in cardiology at the University of Chicago.

DIRECTORS

Gerald T. Proehl, Director and Chairman

Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors, Dermata Therapeutics, Inc.

June Almenoff, MD, PhD, Director

Member of the Board of Directors, Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. and Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Executive Venture Partner, 82 Venture Studios and Member of Investment Advisory Board, Harrington Discovery Institute

Michael Davidson, MD, Director

Chief Executive Officer, New Amsterdam Pharma B.V.

Declan Doogan, MD, Director

Co-founder and Chief Medical Officer, Juvenescence Ltd.

Christopher T. Giordano, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.

Robyn M. Hunter, Director

Global Chief Financial Officer, Sotio Biotech Inc.

Stuart Rich, MD, Chief Medical Officer and Director

Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.

PART II

ITEM 5—MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information and Number of Stockholders

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “TENX”.

Based upon information furnished by our transfer agent, as of March 21, 2025, there were 1,337 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared dividends on our equity securities, and currently do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. We expect to retain our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Subject to the foregoing, the payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, our overall financial condition and any other factors deemed relevant by our Board.

Repurchases of Common Stock

None.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we did not issue or sell any unregistered securities not previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

ITEM 6—RESERVED

ITEM 7—MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those statements included in Part II, Item 8 – “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

Overview

Tenax Therapeutics is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company using clinical insights to develop novel cardiopulmonary therapies. We employ a clinician-focused drug development approach, led by key opinion leaders and heart failure experts and informed by their clinical insights to precisely target disease pathophysiology. We are currently actively conducting the LEVEL clinical trial to evaluate levosimendan as our prioritized product candidate, and have deprioritized a Phase 3 clinical trial of imatinib, two drugs supported by promising evidence that they may significantly improve the lives of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Importantly, both levosimendan and imatinib have already been approved in other indications and prescribed around the world for more than 20 years, and we believe their mechanisms of action are uniquely suitable to target and treat pulmonary hypertension. We believe this derisked approach of using already-approved drugs that provide well-established safety profiles from millions of patients, combined with a development path led by preeminent cardiology and pulmonary hypertension experts, puts us in a strong position to deliver breakthrough cardiopulmonary therapies designed to improve patients’ function and quality of life.

Recent Events

In August 2024, we closed a private placement financing (the “August 2024 Offering”) raising gross proceeds of approximately $100 million and in March 2025 we closed a private placement financing (“the March 2025 Offering”) raising gross proceeds of $25.0 million. We intend to use the net proceeds from the August 2024 and March 2025 Offerings to advance our Phase 3 oral levosimendan program, by completing our ongoing Phase 3 LEVEL study and initiating a second planned global Phase 3 study, LEVEL-2. We intend to submit marketing authorization applications following completion of the two Phase 3 trials of levosimendan and, when appropriate, a single Phase 3 trial of imatinib. Given our resources on December 31, 2024 and gross proceeds of $25.0 million from our March 2025 offering, we believe we can continue our operations for at least the next 12 months.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands)

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses were $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to $3.2 million for the same period in the prior year. Research and development expenses include, but are not limited to, (i) expenses incurred under agreements with CROs and investigative sites, which conduct a substantial portion of our pre-clinical and our clinical studies; (ii) the cost of supplying clinical trial materials; (iii) payments to contract service organizations as well as consultants; (iv) employee-related expenses, which include salaries and benefits; and (v) facilities, depreciation and other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities and equipment, depreciation of leasehold improvements, equipment, and other supplies. All research and development expenses are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses and percentage changes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, are as follows (in thousands):

Clinical and preclinical development costs increased $8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Clinical and preclinical development costs for 2024, consists of expenses associated with our Phase 3 LEVEL trial for oral levosimendan, compared with costs for 2023, associated primarily with our Phase 2 HELP Open Label Extension Study for levosimendan, and imatinib formulation development.

Salary and benefits expense increased $218 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher salaries and bonuses in 2024. Stock-based compensation expense increased $286 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 due to stock option grants made in 2024.

Other costs increased $161 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to higher regulatory costs over the prior year as we expanded our clinical trial during 2024.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2023. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for executive, finance, legal and administrative personnel, including stock-based compensation. Other general and

administrative expenses include facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses, legal and accounting services, and other professional and consulting services. General and administrative expenses and percentage changes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, are as follows (in thousands):

Salary and benefits expense increased $271 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the same period in the prior year due primarily to higher salaries and bonuses. Stock-based compensation expense increased $648 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 due to stock option grants in 2024.

Legal fees consist of the cost of our legal counsel as well as legal costs related to our intellectual property. Professional fees consist of the costs incurred for accounting fees, capital market expenses, consulting fees and investor relations services, as well as fees paid to the members of our Board of Directors. Legal and professional fees increased $725 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to increased capital market expenses, consulting expenses, and accounting expenses, offset by a decrease in intellectual property related legal costs.

Other costs increased $136 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the same period in the prior year. Other costs include expenses incurred for franchise and other taxes, travel, supplies, insurance, depreciation and other miscellaneous charges. The increase was primarily attributable to increased costs for franchise and other taxes.

Other Income and Expense, Net

Other income and expenses include non-operating income and expense items. These items include but are not limited to interest income earned and fixed asset disposals. Other income increased $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year due to higher interest income on increased cash deposits as a result of the August 2024 Offering.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred losses since our inception and, as of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $314.9 million. We will continue to incur losses until we generate sufficient revenue to offset our expenses, and we anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for at least the next several years. We expect to incur additional expenses related to our development and potential commercialization of levosimendan and, over the long term, imatinib for PAH, and other potential indications, as well as identifying and developing other potential product candidates, and as a result, we will need to generate significant net product sales, royalty and other revenues to achieve profitability.

The process of conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials necessary to obtain approval from the FDA is costly and time consuming. The probability of success for each product candidate and clinical trial may be affected by a variety of factors, including, among other things, the quality of the product candidate’s early clinical data, investment in the program, competition, manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability. As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, uncertainty associated with clinical trial enrollment and risks inherent in the development process, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of current or future clinical stages of our product candidates or when, or to what extent, we will generate revenues from the commercialization and sale of any of our product candidates. Development timelines, probability of success and development costs vary widely. We are currently focused on developing our two product candidates, levosimendan and imatinib, and have prioritized levosimendan; however, we will need substantial additional capital in the future in order to finalize the development of levosimendan, commence its commercialization, potentially develop imatinib, and to continue with the development of other potential product candidates.

Liquidity

We have financed our operations since September 1990 through the issuance of debt and equity securities and loans from stockholders. We had total current assets of $96.7 million and $11.7 million and working capital of $92.0 million and $8.1 million as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Our practice is to invest excess cash, where available, in short-term money market investment instruments and high quality corporate and government bonds.

We are currently conducting the LEVEL trial and intend to recruit patients through approximately the end of 2025. Our ability to continue to pursue development of our products, including completion of a second Phase 3 oral levosimendan trial, beyond 2027, will depend on obtaining license income, income from warrants exercised by investors should they elect to do so, or outside financial resources. There is no assurance that we will obtain any license agreement or outside financing or that we will otherwise succeed in obtaining any necessary resources.

Financings

On August 8, 2024, we sold in the August 2024 Offering an aggregate of 1,450,661 shares of our common stock, and Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase 31,882,671 shares of our common stock, along with accompanying Warrants to purchase up to 16,666,666 shares of our common stock. The purchase price for each share and accompanying Warrant was $3.00, with the accompanying Warrant having an exercise price of $4.50 (provided, the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant and accompanying Warrant was $2.99, with the Pre-Funded Warrants having an exercise price of $0.01). Gross proceeds from the August 2024 Offering were $99.7 million, before deducting the placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. Net proceeds from the offering were $92.3 million, after deducting the placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by the Company.

On February 8, 2024, we sold in a registered public offering (the “February 2024 Offering”) (i) an aggregate of 421,260 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,178,740 shares of our common stock and (ii) accompanying warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 3,200,000 shares of our common stock at a combined offering price of $5.65 per share of common stock and accompanying warrant, or $5.649 per pre-funded warrant and accompanying warrant, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $9.0 million. Net proceeds of the offering were $8.0 million, after deducting the placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by the Company.

On February 3, 2023, we sold in a registered public offering (the "February 2023 Offering") (i) an aggregate of 86,994 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 21,341 shares of our common stock and (ii) accompanying warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 216,667 shares of our common stock at a combined offering price of $144.00 per share of common stock and accompanying warrant, or $143.92 per pre-funded warrant and accompanying warrant, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $15.6 million. Net proceeds of the offering were $14.1 million, after deducting the placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by the Company.

Cash Flows

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in cash used for operating activities was primarily due to higher study expense activity in the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the prior year.

Investing Activities

There was no net cash provided or consumed by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $3 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2023 from the sale of office furniture when the Company relocated its' headquarters.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $99.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $13.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was due to higher net proceeds received from the August 2024 Offering and February 2024 Offering, compared to the February 2023 Offering.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors that include, but are not limited to the following:

Based on our working capital on December 31, 2024, we believe we have sufficient capital on hand to continue to fund operations through 2027.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since our inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates—The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Preclinical Study and Clinical Accruals—We estimate our preclinical study and clinical trial expenses based on the services received pursuant to contracts with several research institutions and CROs that conduct and manage preclinical and clinical trials on our behalf. The financial terms of the agreements vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven expenses and payment flows. Preclinical study and clinical trial expenses include the following:

Warrants for Common Shares and Derivative Financial Instruments—Warrants for shares of common stock and other derivative financial instruments are classified as equity if the contracts: (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement

or net-share settlement). Contracts are classified as equity or liabilities if the contracts: (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (iii) contain reset provisions that do not qualify for the scope exception. The Company assesses the classification of its warrants for shares of common stock and other derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between equity and liabilities is required.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which is intended to provide enhanced segment disclosures. The standard will require disclosures about significant segment expenses and other segment items and identifying the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") and how they use the reported segment profitability measures to assess segment performance and allocate resources. These enhanced disclosures are required for all entities on an interim and annual basis, even if they have only a single reportable segment. The standard is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Adopting this standard for the year ended December 31, 2024 resulted in enhanced disclosures but did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company operates in one reportable segment, which is focused on identifying and developing therapeutics that address cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases with high unmet medical need. The determination of a single reportable segment is consistent with the consolidated financial information regularly provided to the Company’s CODM, which is its President and Chief Executive Officer, who reviews and evaluates consolidated net income (loss) for purposes of assessing performance, making operating decisions, allocating resources and planning and forecasting for future periods. The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as total assets.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which is intended to provide enhancements to annual income tax disclosures. The standard will require more detailed information in the rate reconciliation table and for income taxes paid, among other enhancements. The standard is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2024 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating this standard to determine if adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Topic 220-40), which addresses the disaggregation of income statement expenses. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating this standard to determine if adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A—QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 8—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the financial statements included at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9—CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A—CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 promulgated under the Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on

Form 10-K, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Based on their evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2024, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in that they provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We routinely review our internal controls over financial reporting and from time to time make changes intended to enhance the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and will take action as appropriate.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, management reviewed all work generated in support of the financial statements and corresponding footnotes to determine areas which may be susceptible to human error. The review focused on limiting manual inputs into work papers wherever possible and tying inputs to external source documents. In addition, management also enhanced its work paper review to compare figures to prior year amounts or source documents and increased the number of calculations in the work papers that are reviewed and re-performed.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer and affected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting can also be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making its assessment, management used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.

Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our independent registered public accounting firm has not assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and, under SEC rules, will not be required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting so long as we qualify as a “non-accelerated filer”.

ITEM 9B—OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C—DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10— DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this Item concerning our directors is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance Matters” contained in our proxy statement related to the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders currently scheduled to be held on June 11, 2025, which we intend to file with the SEC within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K.

The information required by this Item concerning our Audit and Compliance Committee is incorporated by reference from the section captioned “Corporate Governance Matters – Standing Committees – Audit and Compliance Committee” contained in our proxy statement related to the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the “Code of Ethics”) applicable to all of our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this Code of Ethics is available free of charge and is posted on our website at http://investors.tenaxthera.com/corporate-governance. In the event the Code of Ethics is revised, or any waiver is granted under the Code of Ethics with respect to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions, notice of such revision or waiver will be posted on our website or disclosed on a current report on Form 8-K as required.

The information required by this Item concerning our executive officers is set forth at the end of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The information required by this Item, if any, concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act will be incorporated by reference from the section of the proxy statement captioned “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports”.

ITEM 11— EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information under the sections captioned “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in our proxy statement.

ITEM 12— SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2024.

The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information under the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” contained in our proxy statement.

ITEM 13— CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information under the section captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and Corporate Governance Matters” in our proxy statement.

ITEM 14— PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information under the section captioned “Audit and Compliance Committee Report” in our proxy statement.

PART IV

ITEM 15—EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The financial statements of the Company and the related reports of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm thereon have been filed under Item 8 hereof.

None.

The following exhibits have been or are being filed herewith and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K: