N-PX 1 npxffbeehive0623.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 

FORM N-PX
 
 

ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANY
Investment Company Act file number 811-03023
 
 

FORUM FUNDS
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 600
Portland, Maine 04101
207-347-2090
Zac Tackett, President
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 600
Portland, Maine 04101
Date of fiscal year end:
DECEMBER 31
The BeeHive Fund
Date of reporting period: July 1, 2022—June 30, 2023


ITEM 1: PROXY VOTING RECORD


Vote Summary
                                     
   
BERRY GLOBAL GROUP, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
08579W103
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
BERY
           
Meeting Date
 
16-Feb-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US08579W1036
           
Agenda
   
935541551 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
28-Dec-2021
           
Holding Recon Date
28-Dec-2021
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-Feb-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: B. Evan Bayh
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation Committee
   According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or
more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Needs
Attention   Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held
accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and
procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term
interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives
critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
                                               
                                               
   
1B.
Election of Director: Jonathan F. Foster
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention   Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held
accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and
procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term
interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives
critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
                                               
   
1C.
Election of Director: Idalene F. Kesner
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of Director: Jill A. Rahman
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1E.
Election of Director: Carl J. Rickertsen
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention   Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held
accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and
procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term
interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives
critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
                                               
   
1F.
Election of Director: Thomas E. Salmon
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director: Paula A. Sneed
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: Robert A. Steele
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director: Stephen E. Sterrett
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director: Scott B. Ullem
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention   Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held
accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and
procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term
interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives
critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
                                               
   
2.
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as Berry's independent registered public
accountants for the fiscal year ending
October 1, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
To approve, on an advisory, non-binding
basis, our executive compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
APPLE INC.
                                     
   
Security
     
037833100
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
AAPL
           
Meeting Date
 
04-Mar-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US0378331005
           
Agenda
   
935541549 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
03-Jan-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
03-Jan-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
03-Mar-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: James Bell
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director: Tim Cook
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: Al Gore
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1D.
Election of Director: Alex Gorsky
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1E.
Election of Director: Andrea Jung
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1F.
Election of Director: Art Levinson
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1G.
Election of Director: Monica Lozano
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: Ron Sugar
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1I.
Election of Director: Sue Wagner
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as Apple's independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal
2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory vote to approve executive
compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
Approval of the Apple Inc. 2022 Employee
Stock Plan.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
5.
A shareholder proposal entitled
"Reincorporate with Deeper Purpose".
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
6.
A shareholder proposal entitled
"Transparency Reports".
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will reduce the posed significant legal, reputational,
and financial risk to Apple and its shareholders brought by lack of transparency that affects freedom of
expression or access to information. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in
accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
7.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Report on
Forced Labor".
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Pay
Equity".
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay
disparities by gender and race in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational
damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder
proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
9.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Civil Rights
Audit".
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity in the
community it serves. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders.  As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a
vote FOR this Proposal.
   
10.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Report on
Concealment Clauses".
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
10948C107
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
BV
             
Meeting Date
 
08-Mar-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US10948C1071
           
Agenda
   
935543593 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
12-Jan-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
12-Jan-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
07-Mar-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
James R. Abrahamson
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
2
 
Jane Okun Bomba
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Frank Lopez
         
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
4
 
Andrew V. Masterman
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
5
 
Paul E. Raether
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
6
 
Richard W. Roedel
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
7
 
Mara Swan
         
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
8
 
Joshua T. Weisenbeck
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of our named executive
officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as BrightView Holdings, Inc.'s
independent registered public accounting
firm for 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
NESTLE S.A.
                                     
   
Security
     
641069406
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
NSRGY
           
Meeting Date
 
07-Apr-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US6410694060
           
Agenda
   
935561464 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
01-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
01-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
30-Mar-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A
Approval of the Annual Review, the
financial statements of Nestlé S.A. and the
consolidated financial statements of the
Nestlé Group for 2021
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B
Acceptance of the Compensation Report
2021 (advisory vote)
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2
Discharge to the members of the Board of
Directors and of the Management
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3
Appropriation of profit resulting from the
balance sheet of Nestlé S.A. (proposed
dividend) for the financial year 2021
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AA
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Paul Bulcke, as member and
Chairman
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Over-Boarded (Board Chair)
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board
and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should
hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her
fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised
   
4AB
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Ulf Mark Schneider
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AC
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Henri de Castries
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AD
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Renato Fassbind
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AE
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Pablo Isla
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AF
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Eva Cheng
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AG
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Patrick Aebischer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AH
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Kimberly A. Ross
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AI
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Dick Boer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AJ
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Dinesh Paliwal
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AK
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Hanne Jimenez de Mora
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AL
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4BA
Election to the Board of Director: Chris
Leong
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4BB
Election to the Board of Director: Luca
Maestri
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4CA
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Pablo Isla
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4CB
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Patrick
Aebischer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4CC
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Dick Boer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4CD
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Dinesh Paliwal
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4D
Election of the statutory auditors Ernst &
Young Ltd, Lausanne branch
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a
grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Resolution.
   
4E
Election of the Independent Representative
Hartmann Dreyer, Attorneys-at-law
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5A
Approval of the compensation of the Board
of Directors
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5B
Approval of the compensation of the
Executive Board
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
6
Capital reduction (by cancellation of shares)
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
7
In the event of any yet unknown new or
modified proposal by a shareholder during
the General Meeting, I instruct the
Independent Representative to vote as
follows.
Management
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
                         
   
Security
     
963320106
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
WHR
           
Meeting Date
 
19-Apr-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US9633201069
           
Agenda
   
935557085 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
22-Feb-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
22-Feb-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
18-Apr-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: Samuel R. Allen
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1B.
Election of Director: Marc R. Bitzer
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: Greg Creed
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1D.
Election of Director: Gary T. DiCamillo
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1E.
Election of Director: Diane M. Dietz
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1F.
Election of Director: Gerri T. Elliott
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1G.
Election of Director: Jennifer A. LaClair
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: John D. Liu
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director: James M. Loree
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1J.
Election of Director: Harish Manwani
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1K.
Election of Director: Patricia K. Poppe
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1L.
Election of Director: Larry O. Spencer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1M.
Election of Director: Michael D. White
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
2.
Advisory vote to approve Whirlpool
Corporation's executive compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as Whirlpool Corporation's
independent registered public accounting
firm for 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
APTIV PLC
                                     
   
Security
     
G6095L109
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
APTV
           
Meeting Date
 
27-Apr-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
JE00B783TY65
           
Agenda
   
935560309 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
02-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
02-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
22-Apr-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: Kevin P. Clark
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director: Richard L. Clemmer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: Nancy E. Cooper
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of Director: Joseph L. Hooley
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1E.
Election of Director: Merit E. Janow
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1F.
Election of Director: Sean O. Mahoney
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1G.
Election of Director: Paul M. Meister
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: Robert K. Ortberg
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director: Colin J. Parris
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director: Ana G. Pinczuk
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Proposal to re-appoint auditors, ratify
independent public accounting firm and
authorize the directors to determine the
fees paid to the auditors.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Say-on-Pay - To approve, by advisory vote,
executive compensation.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.
                             
   
Security
     
37940X102
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
GPN
             
Meeting Date
 
28-Apr-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US37940X1028
           
Agenda
   
935564585 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
04-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
04-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
27-Apr-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: F. Thaddeus Arroyo
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director: Robert H.B. Baldwin,
Jr.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: John G. Bruno
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1D.
Election of Director: Kriss Cloninger III
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1E.
Election of Director: Joia M. Johnson
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1F.
Election of Director: Ruth Ann Marshall
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director: Connie D. McDaniel
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: William B. Plummer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director: Jeffrey S. Sloan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director: John T. Turner
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1K.
Election of Director: M. Troy Woods
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the
compensation of our named executive
officers for 2021.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Advisory vote on shareholder proposal
regarding shareholders' right to call a
special meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 25% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of
common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.
                             
   
Security
     
228368106
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CCK
             
Meeting Date
 
28-Apr-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US2283681060
           
Agenda
   
935573700 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
08-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
08-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
27-Apr-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Timothy J. Donahue
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21         Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
       
2
 
Richard H. Fearon
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Andrea J. Funk
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
4
 
Stephen J. Hagge
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
     
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
5
 
James H. Miller
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
6
 
Josef M. Müller
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
7
 
B. Craig Owens
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
Caesar F. Sweitzer
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
Marsha C. Williams
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
10
 
Dwayne A. Wilson
     
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of
independent auditors for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Approval by advisory vote of the resolution
on executive compensation as described in
the Proxy Statement.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
Adoption of the 2022 Stock-Based Incentive
Compensation Plan.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
5.
Consideration of a Shareholder's proposal
requesting the Board of Directors to adopt
shareholder special meeting rights.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.
                         
   
Security
     
084670702
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
BRKB
           
Meeting Date
 
30-Apr-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US0846707026
           
Agenda
   
935562137 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
02-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
02-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
29-Apr-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Warren E. Buffett
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21       Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
       
2
 
Charles T. Munger
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Gregory E. Abel
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
4
 
Howard G. Buffett
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
5
 
Susan A. Buffett
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
Stephen B. Burke
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
7
 
Kenneth I. Chenault
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
Christopher C. Davis
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
Susan L. Decker
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
10
 
David S. Gottesman
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
11
 
Charlotte Guyman
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
12
 
Ajit Jain
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
13
 
Ronald L. Olson
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
14
 
Wallace R. Weitz
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
15
 
Meryl B. Witmer
     
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Shareholder proposal regarding the
adoption of a policy requiring that the Board
Chair be an independent director.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability.  After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
3.
Shareholder proposal regarding the
publishing of an annual assessment
addressing how the Corporation manages
climate risks.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the report on climate change will develop new methods that can be applied
globally when sufficient observations exist. Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and
recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies
should review how climate change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how
shareholder resolutions on climate change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies.
After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'
Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
4.
Shareholder proposal regarding how the
Corporation intends to measure, disclose
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related
to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy
by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. We believe that the
proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the
transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities.  After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this
Proposal.
   
5.
Shareholder proposal regarding the
reporting of the Corporation's diversity,
equity and inclusion efforts.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal
would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of
skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging workforce. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
PROLOGIS, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
74340W103
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
PLD
             
Meeting Date
 
04-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US74340W1036
           
Agenda
   
935572380 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
07-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
07-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
03-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: Hamid R. Moghadam
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director: Cristina G. Bita
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: George L. Fotiades
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1D.
Election of Director: Lydia H. Kennard
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1E.
Election of Director: Irving F. Lyons III
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1F.
Election of Director: Avid Modjtabai
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director: David P. O'Connor
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: Olivier Piani
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director: Jeffrey L. Skelton
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1J.
Election of Director: Carl B. Webb
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1K.
Election of Director: William D. Zollars
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
2.
Advisory Vote to Approve the Company's
Executive Compensation for 2021
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG
LLP as the Company's Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm for the
Year 2022
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
CLARIVATE PLC
                                 
   
Security
     
G21810109
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CLVT
           
Meeting Date
 
05-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
JE00BJJN4441
           
Agenda
   
935609543 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
07-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
07-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
04-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: Jerre Stead
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director: Valeria Alberola
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: Michael Angelakis
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of Director: Jane Okun Bomba
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1E.
Election of Director: Usama N. Cortas
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1F.
Election of Director: Konstantin Gilis
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director: Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: Adam T. Levyn
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director: Anthony Munk
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director: Richard W. Roedel
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1K.
Election of Director: Andrew Snyder
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1L.
Election of Director: Sheryl von Blucher
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1M.
Election of Director: Roxane White
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
AUTHORIZATION TO REPURCHASE
ORDINARY SHARES IN OPEN-MARKET
TRANSACTIONS.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We note, however, that in absence of the purpose of the proposed share repurchase, we
believe that approval of the proposal could be detrimental to the interests of the shareholders and could
unintentionally manipulate the Company's true value. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this
Proposal.
   
3.
AUTHORIZATION TO REPURCHASE
ORDINARY SHARES FROM ANY
SHAREHOLDER PARTY TO THAT
CERTAIN REGISTRATION RIGHTS
AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPANY
DATED AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2020, AS
AMENDED.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We note, however, that in absence of the purpose of the proposed share repurchase, we
believe that approval of the proposal could be detrimental to the interests of the shareholders and could
unintentionally manipulate the Company's true value. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this
Proposal.
   
4.
AUTHORIZATION TO REPURCHASE
5.25% SERIES A MANDATORY
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SHARES IN
OPEN-MARKET TRANSACTIONS.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We note, however, that in absence of the purpose of the proposed share repurchase, we
believe that approval of the proposal could be detrimental to the interests of the shareholders and could
unintentionally manipulate the Company's true value. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this
Proposal.
   
5.
APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY, NON-
BINDING BASIS, OF THE
COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
6.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
DANAHER CORPORATION
                           
   
Security
     
235851102
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
DHR
             
Meeting Date
 
10-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US2358511028
           
Agenda
   
935575057 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
11-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
11-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
09-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Rainer M. Blair
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Linda Filler
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Teri
List
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Walter G. Lohr, Jr.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6          Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1E.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Jessica L. Mega, MD, MPH
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1F.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Mitchell P. Rales
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Steven M. Rales
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Pardis C. Sabeti, MD, D. PHIL
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: A.
Shane Sanders
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: John
T. Schwieters
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6          Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1K.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Alan
G. Spoon
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6          Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1L.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Raymond C. Stevens, Ph.D
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1M.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Elias
A. Zerhouni, MD
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as Danaher's independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
To approve on an advisory basis the
Company's named executive officer
compensation.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4.
To act upon a shareholder proposal
requesting that Danaher amend its
governing documents to reduce the
percentage of shares required for
shareholders to call a special meeting of
shareholders from 25% to 10%.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of
common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
45866F104
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
ICE
             
Meeting Date
 
13-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US45866F1049
           
Agenda
   
935583408 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
15-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
15-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
12-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Hon. Sharon Y. Bowen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Shantella E. Cooper
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Duriya M. Farooqui
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: The Rt. Hon. the Lord Hague of
Richmond
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F20       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones
Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly
as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any
similar plan that may be proposed in the future.
   
1E.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Mark F. Mulhern
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F20       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones
Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly
as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any
similar plan that may be proposed in the future.
   
1F.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Thomas E. Noonan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Caroline L. Silver
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Judith A. Sprieser
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director for term expiring in
2023: Martha A. Tirinnanzi
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To approve, by non-binding vote, the
advisory resolution on executive
compensation for named executive officers.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
To approve the Intercontinental Exchange,
Inc. 2022 Omnibus Employee Incentive
Plan.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
To approve the Intercontinental Exchange,
Inc. 2022 Omnibus Non-Employee Director
Incentive Plan.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5.
To approve the adoption of amendments to
our current Certificate of Incorporation to
eliminate supermajority voting provisions.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
6.
To approve the adoption of amendments to
our current Certificate of Incorporation to
lower the special meeting ownership
threshold to 20%.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this
Proposal.
   
7.
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
8.
A stockholder proposal regarding special
stockholder meeting improvement, if
properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
                           
   
Security
     
46625H100
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
JPM
             
Meeting Date
 
17-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US46625H1005
           
Agenda
   
935580515 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
18-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
18-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
16-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Linda B. Bammann
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Stephen B. Burke
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director: Todd A. Combs
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d.
Election of Director: James S. Crown
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: James Dimon
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21       Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Timothy P. Flynn
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Mellody Hobson
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Michael A. Neal
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Phebe N. Novakovic
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Virginia M. Rometty
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
Advisory resolution to approve executive
compensation
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of independent registered public
accounting firm
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Fossil fuel financing
     
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
5.
Special shareholder meeting improvement
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
Independent board chairman
 
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability.  After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
7.
Board diversity resolution
 
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal
would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of
skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
Conversion to public benefit corporation
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
9.
Report on setting absolute contraction
targets
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related
to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy
by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'  Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
                         
   
Security
     
883556102
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
TMO
           
Meeting Date
 
18-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US8835561023
           
Agenda
   
935585058 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
25-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
25-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of director: Marc N. Casper
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B.
Election of director: Nelson J. Chai
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of director: Ruby R. Chandy
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of director: C. Martin Harris
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1E.
Election of director: Tyler Jacks
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1F.
Election of director: R. Alexandra Keith
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of director: Jim P. Manzi
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1H.
Election of director: James C. Mullen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1I.
Election of director: Lars R. Sorensen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of director: Debora L. Spar
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1K.
Election of director: Scott M. Sperling
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1L.
Election of director: Dion J. Weisler
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
An advisory vote to approve named
executive officer compensation.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
Ratification of the Audit Committee's
selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as the Company's independent auditors for
2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
609207105
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
MDLZ
           
Meeting Date
 
18-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US6092071058
           
Agenda
   
935587379 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
14-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
14-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A.
Election of Director: Lewis W.K. Booth
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1B.
Election of Director: Charles E. Bunch
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C.
Election of Director: Ertharin Cousin
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1D.
Election of Director: Lois D. Juliber
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1E.
Election of Director: Jorge S. Mesquita
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1F.
Election of Director: Jane Hamilton Nielsen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1G.
Election of Director: Christiana S. Shi
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H.
Election of Director: Patrick T. Siewert
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1I.
Election of Director: Michael A. Todman
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1J.
Election of Director: Dirk Van de Put
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21         Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
2.
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive
Compensation.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as Independent Registered Public
Accountants for Fiscal Year Ending
December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Conduct and Publish Racial Equity Audit.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval.  After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
5.
Require Independent Chair of the Board.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability.  After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
FISERV, INC.
                                   
   
Security
     
337738108
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
FISV
             
Meeting Date
 
18-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US3377381088
           
Agenda
   
935593788 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
21-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
21-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Frank J. Bisignano
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
2
 
Alison Davis
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Henrique de Castro
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
4
 
Harry F. DiSimone
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
5
 
Dylan G. Haggart
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
Wafaa Mamilli
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
7
 
Heidi G. Miller
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
Doyle R. Simons
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
9
 
Kevin M. Warren
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of the named executive
officers of Fiserv, Inc.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as the independent registered
public accounting firm of Fiserv, Inc. for
2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Shareholder proposal requesting the board
seek shareholder approval of senior
manager severance and termination
payments.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a
key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal
would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is
in the best interests of the  Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to
retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE COMPANY
                       
   
Security
     
60871R209
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
TAP
             
Meeting Date
 
18-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US60871R2094
           
Agenda
   
935598031 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
25-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
25-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Roger G. Eaton
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6          Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
2
 
Charles M. Herington
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6          Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
3
 
H. Sanford Riley
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6          Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of Molson Coors Beverage
Company's named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
US FOODS HOLDING CORP.
                           
   
Security
     
912008109
             
Meeting Type
 
Contested-Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
USFD
           
Meeting Date
 
18-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US9120081099
           
Agenda
   
935611485 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
21-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
21-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Cheryl A. Bachelder
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
2
 
Court D. Carruthers
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
3
 
Robert M. Dutkowsky
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F3        Over-Boarded (Board Chair)
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board
and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should
hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her
fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised.
       
4
 
Marla Gottschalk
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
5
 
Sunil Gupta
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
Carl Andrew Pforzheimer
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
7
 
Quentin Roach
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
Pietro Satriano
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
David M. Tehle
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
10
 
Ann E. Ziegler
       
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the
compensation paid to our named executive
officers
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal 2022
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Consideration of a shareholder proposal, if
properly presented at the Annual Meeting
Shareholder
For
 
None
           
     
Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related
to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy
by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'  Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
US FOODS HOLDING CORP.
                           
   
Security
     
912008109
             
Meeting Type
 
Contested-Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
USFD
           
Meeting Date
 
18-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US9120081099
           
Agenda
   
935614962 - Opposition
   
   
Record Date
   
21-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
21-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
James J. Barber, Jr
         
For
           
       
2
 
Scott D. Ferguson
         
For
           
       
3
 
Jeri B. Finard
           
For
           
       
4
 
John J. Harris
           
For
           
       
5
 
David A. Toy
           
For
           
       
6
 
MGT NOM: R M Dutkowsky
       
For
           
       
7
 
MGT NOM: M. Gottschalk
         
For
           
       
8
 
MGT NOM: Quentin Roach
         
For
           
       
9
 
MGT NOM: P. Satriano
         
For
           
       
10
 
MGT NOM: Ann E Ziegler
         
For
           
   
2.
Company's proposal to approve, on an
advisory basis, the compensation paid to
the Company's named executive officers,
as disclosed in the Company's proxy
statement.
Management
 
None
           
   
3.
Company's proposal to ratify the
appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal 2022.
Management
 
None
           
   
4.
Stockholder proposal concerning the
Company's greenhouse gas emissions.
Shareholder
   
None
           
   
CHUBB LIMITED
                                 
   
Security
     
H1467J104
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CB
             
Meeting Date
 
19-May-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
CH0044328745
           
Agenda
   
935586101 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
25-Mar-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
25-Mar-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
17-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1
Approval of the management report,
standalone financial statements and
consolidated financial statements of Chubb
Limited for the year ended December 31,
2021
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2A
Allocation of disposable profit
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2B
Distribution of a dividend out of legal
reserves (by way of release and allocation
to a dividend reserve)
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3
Discharge of the Board of Directors
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4A
Election of PricewaterhouseCoopers AG
(Zurich) as our statutory auditor
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4B
Ratification of appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (United
States) as independent registered public
accounting firm for purposes of U.S.
securities law reporting
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4C
Election of BDO AG (Zurich) as special
audit firm
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5A
Election of Director: Evan G. Greenberg
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair positions and the Company earns a board score of Some
Concerns
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
5B
Election of Director: Michael P. Connors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation and Nominating
Committees
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
   
5C
Election of Director: Michael G. Atieh
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5D
Election of Director: Kathy Bonanno
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5E
Election of Director: Sheila P. Burke
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5F
Election of Director: Mary Cirillo
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5G
Election of Director: Robert J. Hugin
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5H
Election of Director: Robert W. Scully
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5I
Election of Director: Theodore E. Shasta
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit Committee
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
   
5J
Election of Director: David H. Sidwell
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5K
Election of Director: Olivier Steimer
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5L
Election of Director: Luis Téllez
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5M
Election of Director: Frances F. Townsend
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
6
Election of Evan G. Greenberg as
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair positions and the Company earns a board score of Some
Concerns
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability
   
7A
Election of Director of the Compensation
Committee: Michael P. Connors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation and Nominating
Committees
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
   
7B
Election of Director of the Compensation
Committee: Mary Cirillo
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
7C
Election of Director of the Compensation
Committee: Frances F. Townsend
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
8
Election of Homburger AG as independent
proxy
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
9
Amendment to the Articles of Association
relating to authorized share capital for
general purposes
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
10
Reduction of share capital
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
11A
Compensation of the Board of Directors
until the next annual general meeting
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
11B
Compensation of Executive Management
for the next calendar year
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
12
Advisory vote to approve executive
compensation under U.S. securities law
requirements
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
13
Shareholder proposal regarding a policy
restricting underwriting of new fossil fuel
supplies
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We do not believe that the expenditure of the additional human and financial resources that
would be required to adopt this proposal would be a necessary or prudent use of Company and shareholder
assets. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-
Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
14
Shareholder proposal regarding a report on
greenhouse gas emissions
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and recognizing the need to adapt,
involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies should review how climate
change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how shareholder resolutions on climate
change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies.  After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
A
If a new agenda item or a new proposal for
an existing agenda item is put before the
meeting, I/we hereby authorize and instruct
the independent proxy to vote as follows.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We do not recommend that shareholders approve in advance matters of which they have no
knowledge. Accordingly, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
COMCAST CORPORATION
                           
   
Security
     
20030N101
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CMCSA
           
Meeting Date
 
01-Jun-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US20030N1019
           
Agenda
   
935613693 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
04-Apr-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
04-Apr-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
31-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Kenneth J. Bacon
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
2
 
Madeline S. Bell
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Edward D. Breen
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
4
 
Gerald L. Hassell
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
5
 
Jeffrey A. Honickman
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
6
 
Maritza G. Montiel
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
7
 
Asuka Nakahara
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
David C. Novak
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
9
 
Brian L. Roberts
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21       Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
 
F22       Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
2.
Advisory vote on executive compensation
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the appointment of our
independent auditors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
To report on charitable donations
 
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its charitable
contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in
any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions
that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
5.
To perform independent racial equity audit
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such,
we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.  As
such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
To report on risks of omitting "viewpoint"
and "ideology" from EEO policy
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to avoid legal and
reputational risk arising from harassment and discrimination. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
7.
To conduct and publicly release the results
of an independent investigation into the
effectiveness of sexual harassment policies
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to avoid legal and
reputational risk arising from harassment and discrimination. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
To report on how retirement plan options
align with company climate goals
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed
resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests
of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
ALPHABET INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
02079K305
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
GOOGL
           
Meeting Date
 
01-Jun-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US02079K3059
           
Agenda
   
935618578 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
05-Apr-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
05-Apr-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
31-May-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Larry Page
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Sergey Brin
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Sundar Pichai
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: John L. Hennessy
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
F22       Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Frances H. Arnold
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: L. John Doerr
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
     
F20       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution
Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly
as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any
similar plan that may be proposed in the future.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Roger W. Ferguson Jr.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Ann Mather
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: K. Ram Shriram
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F20       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones
Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly
as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any
similar plan that may be proposed in the future.
   
1j.
Election of Director: Robin L. Washington
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F20       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones
Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly
as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any
similar plan that may be proposed in the future.
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as Alphabet's independent
registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
The amendment of Alphabet's 2021 Stock
Plan to increase the share reserve by
4,000,000 shares of Class C capital stock.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
The amendment of Alphabet's Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5.
A stockholder proposal regarding a lobbying
report, if properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to
industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and
industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal
seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is
unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any
meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal
and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
6.
A stockholder proposal regarding a climate
lobbying report, if properly presented at the
meeting.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to
industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and
industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal
seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is
unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any
meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal
and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
7.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on physical risks of climate change, if
properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on water management risks, if properly
presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
9.
A stockholder proposal regarding a racial
equity audit, if properly presented at the
meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such,
we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.  As
such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
10.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on concealment clauses, if properly
presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the
proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
11.
A stockholder proposal regarding equal
shareholder voting, if properly presented at
the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that shareholder approval is warranted. We oppose such differential voting power
as it may have the effect of denying shareholders the opportunity to vote on matters of critical economic
importance to them. We prefer that companies do not utilize multiple class capital structures to provide
equal voting rights to all shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and
in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
12.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on government takedown requests, if
properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability is needed to meet the company's
long-term responsibility to its many investors. We believe that the preparation of the report will allow the
Company to evaluate its activities related to political advertising and potential censorship issues, and at the
same time assess the operational, reputational, and social implications of such to the Company.  After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
13.
A stockholder proposal regarding a human
rights assessment of data center siting, if
properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive human rights policy, coupled with
implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting will
assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
14.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on data collection, privacy, and security, if
properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
15.
A stockholder proposal regarding algorithm
disclosures, if properly presented at the
meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
16.
A stockholder proposal regarding
misinformation and disinformation, if
properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
17.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on external costs of disinformation, if
properly presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
18.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on board diversity, if properly presented at
the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal
would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of
skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
19.
A stockholder proposal regarding the
establishment of an environmental
sustainability board committee, if properly
presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that environmental issues are needed to be escalated at the board level to ensure
proper accountability and oversight. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in
accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
20.
A stockholder proposal regarding a policy
on non-management employee
representative director, if properly
presented at the meeting.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the
Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend
a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
21.
A stockholder proposal regarding a report
on policies regarding military and militarized
policing agencies, if properly presented at
the meeting.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We do not believe that the review and report requested by this proposal are warranted or that
the report would be informative to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder
proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this
Proposal.
   
TABULA RASA HEALTHCARE, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
873379101
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
TRHC
           
Meeting Date
 
10-Jun-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US8733791011
           
Agenda
   
935623935 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
18-Apr-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
18-Apr-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
09-Jun-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Dr. Calvin Knowlton
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
       
2
 
Dr. Orsula Knowlton
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
       
3
 
A Gordon Tunstall
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
   
2.
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the
compensation of Tabula Rasa HealthCare,
Inc.'s named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
   
3.
Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP
as Tabula Rasa HealthCare, Inc.'s
independent registered public accounting
firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2022.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
                         
   
Security
     
37045V100
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
GM
             
Meeting Date
 
13-Jun-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US37045V1008
           
Agenda
   
935631778 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
19-Apr-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
19-Apr-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
10-Jun-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Mary T. Barra
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Aneel Bhusri
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Wesley G. Bush
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18      Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d.
Election of Director: Linda R. Gooden
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Joseph Jimenez
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18      Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Judith A. Miscik
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Patricia F. Russo
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18      Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1h.
Election of Director: Thomas M. Schoewe
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1i.
Election of Director: Carol M. Stephenson
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18      Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1j.
Election of Director: Mark A. Tatum
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Devin N. Wenig
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1l.
Election of Director: Margaret C. Whitman
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18      Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
Advisory Approval of Named Executive
Officer Compensation
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the Selection of Ernst &
Young LLP as the Company's Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Shareholder Proposal to Lower the
Ownership Threshold to Call a Special
Meeting
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of
common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
5.
Shareholder Proposal Regarding
Separation of Chair and CEO Roles
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability.  After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report
on the Use of Child Labor in Connection
with Electric Vehicles
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the
proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.
                     
   
Security
     
76131D103
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
QSR
             
Meeting Date
 
15-Jun-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
CA76131D1033
           
Agenda
   
935638520 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
20-Apr-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
20-Apr-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
14-Jun-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Alexandre Behring
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
2
 
João M. Castro-Neves
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
M. de Limburg Stirum
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
4
 
Paul J. Fribourg
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
5
 
Neil Golden
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
Ali Hedayat
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
7
 
Golnar Khosrowshahi
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
8
 
Marc Lemann
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
Jason Melbourne
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
10
 
Giovanni (John) Prato
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
11
 
Daniel S. Schwartz
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
12
 
Thecla Sweeney
     
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis,
of the compensation paid to named
executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Appoint KPMG LLP as our auditors to serve
until the close of the 2023 Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders and authorize our
directors to fix the auditors' remuneration.
Management
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a
grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Consider a shareholder proposal to report
on business strategy in the face of labour
market pressure including information on
franchisee human capital management.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
AON PLC
                                       
   
Security
     
G0403H108
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
AON
             
Meeting Date
 
17-Jun-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
IE00BLP1HW54
           
Agenda
   
935632857 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
14-Apr-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
14-Apr-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-Jun-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Lester B. Knight
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F22         Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Gregory C. Case
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Jin-Yong Cai
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Jeffrey C. Campbell
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Fulvio Conti
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Cheryl A. Francis
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: J. Michael Losh
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1h.
Election of Director: Richard C. Notebaert
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1i.
Election of Director: Gloria Santona
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Byron O. Spruell
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Carolyn Y. Woo
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Advisory vote to approve the compensation
of the Company's named executive officers.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as the Company's independent
registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Resolution..
   
4.
Re-appoint Ernst & Young Chartered
Accountants as the Company's statutory
auditor under Irish law.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
these Resolutions.
   
5.
Authorize the Board or the Audit Committee
of the Board to determine the remuneration
of Ernst & Young Ireland, in its capacity as
the Company's statutory auditor under Irish
law.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
these Resolutions.
   
VMWARE, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
928563402
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
VMW
           
Meeting Date
 
12-Jul-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US9285634021
           
Agenda
   
935657645 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
16-May-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
16-May-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
11-Jul-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Nicole Anasenes
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Marianne Brown
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director: Paul Sagan
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
An advisory vote to approve named
executive officer compensation, as
described in VMware's Proxy Statement.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
To ratify the selection by the Audit
Committee of VMware's Board of Directors
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
VMware's independent auditor for the fiscal
year ending February 3, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.
                     
   
Security
     
874054109
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
TTWO
           
Meeting Date
 
16-Sep-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US8740541094
           
Agenda
   
935695366 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
25-Jul-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
25-Jul-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-Sep-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Strauss Zelnick
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21       Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Michael Dornemann
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director: J. Moses
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
     
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d.
Election of Director: Michael Sheresky
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1e.
Election of Director: LaVerne Srinivasan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Susan Tolson
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Paul Viera
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Roland Hernandez
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1i.
Election of Director: William "Bing" Gordon
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Ellen Siminoff
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis,
of the compensation of the Company's
"named executive officers" as disclosed in
the Proxy Statement.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
PROLOGIS, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
74340W103
           
Meeting Type
 
Special
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
PLD
             
Meeting Date
 
28-Sep-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US74340W1036
           
Agenda
   
935697651 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
29-Jul-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
29-Jul-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
27-Sep-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
To approve the "Prologis common stock
issuance proposal" (as defined in the Proxy
Statement), which involves the issuance of
common stock of Prologis, Inc. in
connection with the merger of Duke Realty
Corporation with and into Compton Merger
Sub LLC, pursuant to which each
outstanding share of Duke Realty
Corporation common stock will be
converted into the right to receive 0.475 of a
newly issued share of Prologis, Inc.
common stock, on the terms and conditions
set forth in the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of June 11, 2022.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To approve one or more adjournments of
the Prologis, Inc. special meeting to another
date, time or place, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in
favor of the Prologis common stock
issuance proposal (the "Prologis
adjournment proposal").
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
PROLOGIS, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
74340W103
           
Meeting Type
 
Special
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
PLD
             
Meeting Date
 
28-Sep-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US74340W1036
           
Agenda
   
935699554 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
08-Aug-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
08-Aug-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
27-Sep-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
To approve the "Prologis common stock
issuance proposal" (as defined in the Proxy
Statement), which involves the issuance of
common stock of Prologis, Inc. in
connection with the merger of Duke Realty
Corporation with and into Compton Merger
Sub LLC, pursuant to which each
outstanding share of Duke Realty
Corporation common stock will be
converted into the right to receive 0.475 of a
newly issued share of Prologis, Inc.
common stock, on the terms and conditions
set forth in the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of June 11, 2022.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To approve one or more adjournments of
the Prologis, Inc. special meeting to another
date, time or place, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in
favor of the Prologis common stock
issuance proposal (the "Prologis
adjournment proposal").
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
VMWARE, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
928563402
           
Meeting Type
 
Special
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
VMW
           
Meeting Date
 
04-Nov-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US9285634021
           
Agenda
   
935720563 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
30-Sep-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
30-Sep-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
03-Nov-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
The Merger Agreement Proposal: To vote
on a proposal to approve the First Merger
and the Second Merger (each as defined
below) & to adopt the Agreement & Plan of
Merger ("Merger Agreement"), dated as of
May 26, 2022, by and among VMware, Inc.
("VMware"), Broadcom Inc. ("Broadcom"),
Verona Holdco, Inc., a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of VMware ("Holdco"), Verona
Merger Sub, Inc., a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of Holdco ("Merger Sub 1"),
Barcelona Merger Sub 2, Inc., a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Broadcom
("Merger Sub 2"), and Barcelona Merger
Sub 3, LLC.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
The Merger-Related Compensation
Proposal: To vote on a proposal to approve
on an advisory (non-binding) basis the
compensation that may be paid or become
payable to VMware's named executive
officers that is based on or otherwise
relates to the Transactions.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: While, as described above, we support voting for the proposed merger, and while recognizing
that this golden parachute proposal is advisory (the voting results of which should not interfere with passage
of the merger), we are compelled to comment that, in our view, the total compensation of  the executives is
excessive by any reasonable standard. Excessive executive compensation packages have been on-going
cause of concern among shareholders and investors. While the Company argues that its severance and
termination payments are based upon the employment agreement, in our view and based on the foregoing,
the golden parachute exceeds of what we believe is excessive and is not in the best interests of the
Company and its stockholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
The Adjournment Proposal: To vote on a
proposal to approve the adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient
votes to approve the Merger Agreement
Proposal.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4.
Charter Amendment Proposal: To vote to
approve and adopt an amendment to
VMware's Certificate of Incorporation to
eliminate the personal liability of VMware's
officers for monetary damages for breach of
fiduciary duty as an officer, except to the
extent such an exemption from liability or
limitation thereof is not permitted by the
General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
ORACLE CORPORATION
                             
   
Security
     
68389X105
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
ORCL
           
Meeting Date
 
16-Nov-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US68389X1054
           
Agenda
   
935715182 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
19-Sep-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
19-Sep-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-Nov-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Awo Ablo
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
2
 
Jeffrey S. Berg
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
3
 
Michael J. Boskin
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
4
 
Safra A. Catz
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
5
 
Bruce R. Chizen
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
6
 
George H. Conrades
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a
compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
     
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
7
 
Lawrence J. Ellison
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs
Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
       
8
 
Rona A. Fairhead
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
Jeffrey O. Henley
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
10
 
Renee J. James
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
11
 
Charles W. Moorman
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
12
 
Leon E. Panetta
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
13
 
William G. Parrett
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
14
 
Naomi O. Seligman
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
15
 
Vishal Sikka
         
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Advisory Vote to Approve the
Compensation of our Named Executive
Officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the Selection of our
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
                         
   
Security
     
594918104
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
MSFT
           
Meeting Date
 
13-Dec-2022
   
   
ISIN
       
US5949181045
           
Agenda
   
935722567 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
12-Oct-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
12-Oct-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
12-Dec-2022 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Reid G. Hoffman
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Hugh F. Johnston
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Teri L. List
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Satya Nadella
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F22       Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs
Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Sandra E. Peterson
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Penny S. Pritzker
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Carlos A. Rodriguez
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Charles W. Scharf
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1i.
Election of Director: John W. Stanton
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: John W. Thompson
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Emma N. Walmsley
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1l.
Election of Director: Padmasree Warrior
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
Advisory vote to approve named executive
officer compensation
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratification of the Selection of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our Independent Auditor for
Fiscal Year 2023
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Shareholder Proposal - Cost/Benefit
Analysis of Diversity and Inclusion
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
5.
Shareholder Proposal - Report on Hiring of
Persons with Arrest or Incarceration
Records
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such,
we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.  As
such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
Shareholder Proposal - Report on
Investment of Retirement Funds in
Companies Contributing to Climate Change
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
7.
Shareholder Proposal - Report on
Government Use of Microsoft Technology
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the
proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
Shareholder Proposal - Report on
Development of Products for Military
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
9.
Shareholder Proposal - Report on Tax
Transparency
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
BERRY GLOBAL GROUP, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
08579W103
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
BERY
           
Meeting Date
 
15-Feb-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US08579W1036
           
Agenda
   
935756265 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
27-Dec-2022
           
Holding Recon Date
27-Dec-2022
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
14-Feb-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: B. Evan Bayh
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Jonathan F. Foster
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director: Idalene F. Kesner
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Jill A. Rahman
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Carl J. Rickertsen
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
     
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Thomas E. Salmon
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs
Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Chaney M. Sheffield
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Robert A. Steele
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Stephen E. Sterrett
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Scott B. Ullem
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as Berry's independent registered public
accountants for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
To approve, on an advisory, non-binding
basis, our executive compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
                             
   
Security
     
032654105
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
ADI
             
Meeting Date
 
08-Mar-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US0326541051
           
Agenda
   
935758740 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
03-Jan-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
03-Jan-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
07-Mar-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Vincent Roche
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs
Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1b.
Election of Director: James A. Champy
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1c.
Election of Director: André Andonian
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Anantha P.
Chandrakasan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Edward H. Frank
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Laurie H. Glimcher
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Karen M. Golz
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Mercedes Johnson
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Kenton J. Sicchitano
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1j.
Election of Director: Ray Stata
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Susie Wee
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
Advisory vote to approve the compensation
of our named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory vote on the frequency of future
advisory votes on the compensation of our
named executive officers.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratification of the selection of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
APPLE INC.
                                     
   
Security
     
037833100
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
AAPL
           
Meeting Date
 
10-Mar-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US0378331005
           
Agenda
   
935757700 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
09-Jan-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
09-Jan-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
09-Mar-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a
Election of Director: James Bell
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b
Election of Director: Tim Cook
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c
Election of Director: Al Gore
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d
Election of Director: Alex Gorsky
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e
Election of Director: Andrea Jung
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f
Election of Director: Art Levinson
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
     
F18       Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
 
F22       Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1g
Election of Director: Monica Lozano
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h
Election of Director: Ron Sugar
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1i
Election of Director: Sue Wagner
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as Apple's independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal
2023
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory vote to approve executive
compensation
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory
votes on executive compensation
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
5.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Civil Rights
and Non-Discrimination Audit Proposal"
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity in the
community it serves. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders.  As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a
vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Communist
China Audit"
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
7.
A shareholder proposal on Board policy for
communication with shareholder
proponents
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
8.
A shareholder proposal entitled "Racial and
Gender Pay Gaps"
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay
disparities by gender and race in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational
damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder
proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
9.
A shareholder proposal entitled
"Shareholder Proxy Access Amendments"
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that adopting a proxy access bylaw in accordance to the shareholder proposal is in
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
ADOBE INC.
                                     
   
Security
     
00724F101
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
ADBE
           
Meeting Date
 
20-Apr-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US00724F1012
           
Agenda
   
935770126 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
21-Feb-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
21-Feb-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
19-Apr-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Amy Banse
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1b.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Brett Biggs
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Melanie Boulden
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1d.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Frank Calderoni
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1e.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Laura Desmond
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1f.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Shantanu Narayen
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F22         Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1g.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Spencer Neumann
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Kathleen Oberg
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Dheeraj Pandey
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: David Ricks
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1k.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: Daniel Rosensweig
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1l.
Election of Director to serve for a one-year
term: John Warnock
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Approve the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended, to increase the available share
reserve by 12,000,000 shares.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our
independent registered public accounting
firm for our fiscal year ending on December
1, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
Approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of our named executive
officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
5.
Approve, on an advisory basis, the
frequency of the advisory vote on executive
compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
6.
Stockholder Proposal - Report on Hiring of
Persons with Arrest or Incarceration
Records.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw
upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal
is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.  As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones'
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
NESTLE S.A.
                                     
   
Security
     
641069406
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
NSRGY
           
Meeting Date
 
20-Apr-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US6410694060
           
Agenda
   
935795039 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
13-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
13-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
12-Apr-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A
Approval of the Annual Review, the
financial statements of Nestlé S.A. and the
consolidated financial statements of the
Nestlé Group for 2022
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B
Acceptance of the Compensation Report
2022 (advisory vote)
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Resolution.
   
2
Discharge to the members of the Board of
Directors and of the Management for 2022
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3
Appropriation of profit resulting from the
balance sheet of Nestlé S.A. (proposed
dividend) for the financial year 2022
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AA
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Paul Bulcke, as member and
Chairman
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AB
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Ulf Mark Schneider
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AC
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Henri de Castries
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AD
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Renato Fassbind
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AE
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Pablo Isla
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4AF
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Patrick Aebischer
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4AG
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Kimberly A. Ross
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AH
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Dick Boer
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4AI
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Dinesh Paliwal
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4AJ
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Hanne Jimenez de Mora
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AK
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AL
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Chris Leong
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4AM
Re-election of the member of the Board of
Director: Luca Maestri
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4BA
Election to the Board of Director: Rainer
Blair
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4BB
Election to the Board of Director: Marie-
Gabrielle Ineichen-Fleisch
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4CA
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Pablo Isla
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4CB
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Patrick
Aebischer
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4CC
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Dick Boer
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4CD
Election of the member of the
Compensation Committee: Dinesh Paliwal
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
4D
Election of the statutory auditors Ernst &
Young Ltd, Lausanne branch
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a
grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Resolution.
   
4E
Election of the Independent Representative
Hartmann Dreyer, Attorneys-at-law
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5A
Approval of the compensation of the Board
of Directors
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5B
Approval of the compensation of the
Executive Board
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: While we recognize that approval of this proposal will help the Company to attract, retain and
motivate its executives and key personnel whose efforts are essential to its success, however, given the
Compensation Score we give this Company, we recommend that clients vote AGAINST this Resolution.
   
6
Capital reduction (by cancellation of shares)
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
7A
Amendments of Provisions of the Articles of
Association pertaining to the General
Meeting
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
7B
Amendments of Provisions of the Articles of
Association pertaining to the Board of
Directors, Compensation, Contracts and
Mandates and Miscellaneous Provisions
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
8
In the event of any yet unknown new or
modified proposal by a shareholder during
the General Meeting, I instruct the
Independent Representative to vote as
follows.
Management
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We do not recommend that shareholders approve in advance matters of which they have no
knowledge. Accordingly, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution.
   
APTIV PLC
                                     
   
Security
     
G6095L109
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
APTV
           
Meeting Date
 
26-Apr-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
JE00B783TY65
           
Agenda
   
935775443 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
02-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
02-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
21-Apr-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Kevin P. Clark
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Richard L. Clemmer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Nancy E. Cooper
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Joseph L. Hooley
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Merit E. Janow
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Sean O. Mahoney
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Paul M. Meister
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1h.
Election of Director: Robert K. Ortberg
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Colin J. Parris
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Ana G. Pinczuk
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Proposal to re-appoint auditors, ratify
independent public accounting firm and
authorize the directors to determine the
fees paid to the auditors.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Say-on-Pay - To approve, by advisory vote,
executive compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.
                             
   
Security
     
37940X102
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
GPN
             
Meeting Date
 
27-Apr-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US37940X1028
           
Agenda
   
935777093 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
03-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
03-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
26-Apr-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: F. Thaddeus Arroyo
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Robert H.B. Baldwin,
Jr.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director: John G. Bruno
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d.
Election of Director: Joia M. Johnson
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Ruth Ann Marshall
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Connie D. McDaniel
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Joseph H. Osnoss
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1h.
Election of Director: William B. Plummer
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Jeffrey S. Sloan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: John T. Turner
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: M. Troy Woods
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the
compensation of our named executive
officers for 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the
frequency of the advisory vote on executive
compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
Advisory shareholder proposal on
shareholder ratification of termination pay.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a
key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal
would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is
in the best interests of the  Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to
retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.
                             
   
Security
     
228368106
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CCK
             
Meeting Date
 
27-Apr-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US2283681060
           
Agenda
   
935790116 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
07-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
07-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
26-Apr-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Timothy J. Donahue
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21         Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
       
2
 
Richard H. Fearon
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Andrea J. Funk
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
4
 
Stephen J. Hagge
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
5
 
Jesse A. Lynn
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
James H. Miller
       
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
7
 
Josef M. Muller
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
8
 
B. Craig Owens
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
Angela M. Snyder
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
10
 
Caesar F. Sweitzer
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
11
 
Andrew J. Teno
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
12
 
Marsha C. Williams
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
13
 
Dwayne A. Wilson
     
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of
independent auditors for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Approval by advisory vote of the resolution
on executive compensation as described in
the Proxy Statement.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders should support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered
on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this
Proposal.
   
4.
Approval by advisory vote on the frequency
of future Say-on-Pay votes.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
5.
Consideration of a Shareholder's proposal
seeking Shareholder ratification of
termination pay.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a
key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal
would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is
in the best interests of the  Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to
retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
FRANCO-NEVADA CORPORATION
                         
   
Security
     
351858105
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual and Special Meeting
 
   
Ticker Symbol
 
FNV
             
Meeting Date
 
02-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
CA3518581051
           
Agenda
   
935800309 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
14-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
14-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
Canada
           
Vote Deadline
 
27-Apr-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
                                               
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1A
Election of Director - David Harquail
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1B
Election of Director - Paul Brink
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1C
Election of Director - Tom Albanese
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1D
Election of Director - Derek W. Evans
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1E
Election of Director - Catharine Farrow
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1F
Election of Director - Maureen Jensen
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1G
Election of Director - Jennifer Maki
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1H
Election of Director - Randall Oliphant
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1I
Election of Director - Jacques Perron
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18         Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2
Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants,
as Auditors of the Corporation for the
ensuing year and authorizing the Directors
to fix their remuneration.
Management
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3
Acceptance of the Corporation's approach
to executive compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
PROLOGIS, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
74340W103
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
PLD
             
Meeting Date
 
04-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US74340W1036
           
Agenda
   
935786814 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
07-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
07-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
03-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Hamid R. Moghadam
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21           Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score
of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
 
F22           Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the boardroom, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Cristina G. Bita
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: James B. Connor
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: George L. Fotiades
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
     
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Lydia H. Kennard
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Irving F. Lyons III
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Avid Modjtabai
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: David P. O'Connor
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1i.
Election of Director: Olivier Piani
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Jeffrey L. Skelton
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
   
1k.
Election of Director: Carl B. Webb
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
   
2.
Advisory Vote to Approve the Company's
Executive Compensation for 2022.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future
Advisory Votes on the Company's
Executive Compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG
LLP as the Company's Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm for the
Year 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.
                         
   
Security
     
084670702
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
BRKB
           
Meeting Date
 
06-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US0846707026
           
Agenda
   
935785418 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
08-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
08-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
05-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Warren E. Buffett
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21       Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
       
2
 
Charles T. Munger
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Gregory E. Abel
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
4
 
Howard G. Buffett
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
5
 
Susan A. Buffett
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
Stephen B. Burke
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
7
 
Kenneth I. Chenault
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
Christopher C. Davis
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
Susan L. Decker
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
10
 
Charlotte Guyman
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
11
 
Ajit Jain
         
For
 
For
For
         
       
12
 
Thomas S. Murphy, Jr.
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
13
 
Ronald L. Olson
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
14
 
Wallace R. Weitz
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
15
 
Meryl B. Witmer
     
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Non-binding resolution to approve the
compensation of the Company's Named
Executive Officers, as described in the 2023
Proxy Statement.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
Non-binding resolution to determine the
frequency (whether annual, biennial or
triennial) with which shareholders of the
Company shall be entitled to have an
advisory vote on executive compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
3 Years
Against
       
     
Comments: It is our opinion that an annual say-on-pay vote is the accepted standard for companies today
and a requirement for good corporate governance. Furthermore, we believe that triennial advisory vote on
executive compensation will hinder shareholders from providing the Company with direct input on their
respective compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement. We do not
concur with the current board's recommendation of a triennial ratification (non-binding vote) on this issue.
We recommend a vote AGAINST the option of triennial (every three years) as the frequency with which
shareholders will be provided an advisory vote on executive compensation.
   
4.
Shareholder proposal regarding how the
Company manages physical and
transitional climate related risks and
opportunities.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the report on climate change will develop new methods that can be applied
globally when sufficient observations exist. Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and
recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies
should review how climate change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how
shareholder resolutions on climate change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies.
After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'
Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
5.
Shareholder proposal regarding how
climate related risks are being governed by
the Company.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the report on climate change will develop new methods that can be applied
globally when sufficient observations exist. Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and
recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies
should review how climate change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how
shareholder resolutions on climate change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies.
After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'
Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
Shareholder proposal regarding how the
Company intends to measure, disclose and
reduce GHG emissions associated with its
underwriting, insuring and investment
activities.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related
to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy
by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. We believe that the
proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the
transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities.  After evaluating the details pursuant to the
shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this
Proposal.
   
7.
Shareholder proposal regarding the
reporting on the effectiveness of the
Corporation's diversity, equity and inclusion
efforts.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal
would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of
skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging workforce. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
Shareholder proposal regarding the
adoption of a policy requiring that two
separate people hold the offices of the
Chairman and the CEO.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability.  After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
9.
Shareholder proposal requesting that the
Company avoid supporting or taking a
public policy position on controversial social
and political issues.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is not in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
DANAHER CORPORATION
                           
   
Security
     
235851102
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
DHR
             
Meeting Date
 
09-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US2358511028
           
Agenda
   
935795510 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
10-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
10-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
08-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Rainer M. Blair
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Feroz Dewan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Linda Filler
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Teri
List
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1e.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Walter G. Lohr, Jr.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Jessica L. Mega, MD, MPH
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1g.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Mitchell P. Rales
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Steven M. Rales
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Pardis C. Sabeti, MD, D. PHIL
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: A.
Shane Sanders
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: John
T. Schwieters
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
   
1l.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Alan
G. Spoon
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1m.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Raymond C. Stevens, Ph.D
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1n.
Election of Director to hold office until the
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Elias
A. Zerhouni, MD
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as Danaher's independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
To approve on an advisory basis the
Company's named executive officer
compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
To hold an advisory vote relating to the
frequency of future shareholder advisory
votes on the Company's executive officer
compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
5.
To act upon a shareholder proposal
requesting adoption of a policy separating
the chair and CEO roles and requiring an
independent Board Chair whenever
possible.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
To act upon a shareholder proposal
requesting a report to shareholders on the
effectiveness of the Company's diversity,
equity and inclusion efforts.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw
upon the skills, expertise, and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this
proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, we recommend a vote FOR
this Proposal.
   
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
                           
   
Security
     
46625H100
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
JPM
             
Meeting Date
 
16-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US46625H1005
           
Agenda
   
935797223 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
17-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
17-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Linda B. Bammann
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Stephen B. Burke
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director: Todd A. Combs
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d.
Election of Director: James S. Crown
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Alicia Boler Davis
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: James Dimon
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21           Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score
of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Timothy P. Flynn
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
   
1h.
Election of Director: Alex Gorsky
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Mellody Hobson
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Michael A. Neal
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Phebe N. Novakovic
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1l.
Election of Director: Virginia M. Rometty
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
Advisory resolution to approve executive
compensation
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory vote on frequency of advisory
resolution to approve executive
compensation
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratification of independent registered public
accounting firm
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
Independent board chairman
 
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
Fossil fuel phase out
     
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We do not believe that the expenditure of the additional human and financial resources that
would be required to adopt this proposal would be a necessary or prudent use of Company and shareholder
assets. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-
Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
7.
Amending public responsibility committee
charter to include mandate to oversee
animal welfare impact and risk
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the
Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend
a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
8.
Special shareholder meeting improvement
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
9.
Report on climate transition planning
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: Climate change is one of the most financially significant environmental issues currently facing
investors.  Data on occupational safety and health, vendor and labor standards, waste and water reduction
targets and product-related environmental impacts are important business considerations. Not managing
these properly could pose significant regulatory, legal, reputational and financial risks. Tracking and
reporting on ESG business practices makes a company more responsive to a global business environment
which is characterized by finite natural resources, changing legislation, and heightened public expectations
for corporate accountability. Reporting also helps companies better integrate and gain strategic value from
existing sustainability efforts, identify gaps and opportunities in products and processes, develop company-
wide communications, publicize innovative practices, and receive feedback. We believe that approval of this
proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant
to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a
vote FOR this Proposal.
   
10.
Report on ensuring respect for civil liberties
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the
proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities.  After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
11.
Report analyzing the congruence of the
company's political and electioneering
expenditures
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions
and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional
benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would
negatively affect the business and results. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
12.
Absolute GHG reduction goals
 
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related
to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy
by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
FISERV, INC.
                                   
   
Security
     
337738108
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
FISV
             
Meeting Date
 
17-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US3377381088
           
Agenda
   
935806096 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
20-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
20-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
16-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Frank J. Bisignano
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
2
 
Henrique de Castro
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
3
 
Harry F. DiSimone
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
4
 
Dylan G. Haggart
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
5
 
Wafaa Mamilli
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
6
 
Heidi G. Miller
       
For
 
For
For
         
       
7
 
Doyle R. Simons
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
 
F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
     
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
       
8
 
Kevin M. Warren
     
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of the named executive
officers of Fiserv, Inc.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory
votes on the compensation of the named
executive officers of Fiserv, Inc.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as the independent registered
public accounting firm of Fiserv, Inc. for
2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
Shareholder proposal requesting an
independent board chair policy.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
609207105
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
MDLZ
           
Meeting Date
 
17-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US6092071058
           
Agenda
   
935809357 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
08-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
08-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
16-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Lewis W.K. Booth
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Charles E. Bunch
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Ertharin Cousin
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Jorge S. Mesquita
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors
for sound corporate governance practice.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Anindita Mukherjee
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Jane Hamilton Nielsen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Patrick T. Siewert
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F10           Affiliation - Ex-Officio - Member of a Key Board Committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director who serves on the Company board in an ex-officio
capacity is considered affiliated. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation, and
Nominating Committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate
governance practice.
   
1h.
Election of Director: Michael A. Todman
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Dirk Van de Put
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21           Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score
of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
2.
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive
Compensation.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3.
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future
Votes to Approve Executive Compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratification of the Selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Independent Registered Public Accountants
for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
Require Independent Chair of the Board.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict in having an Inside director serve as the
Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and
CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After
evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
6.
Publish Annual Benchmarks for Achieving
Company's 2025 Cage-Free Egg Goal.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the preparation of an additional report to stockholders as requested by the
proponent would not be a good use of company resources. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
7.
Adopt Public Targets to Eradicate Child
Labor in Cocoa Supply Chain
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. In accordance with Egan-
Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
CHUBB LIMITED
                                 
   
Security
     
H1467J104
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CB
             
Meeting Date
 
17-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
CH0044328745
           
Agenda
   
935813027 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
24-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
24-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1
Approval of the management report,
standalone financial statements and
consolidated financial statements of Chubb
Limited for the year ended December 31,
2022
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2a
Allocation of disposable profit
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2b
Distribution of a dividend out of legal
reserves (by way of release and allocation
to a dividend reserve)
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
3
Discharge of the Board of Directors
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
4a
Election of PricewaterhouseCoopers AG
(Zurich) as our statutory auditor
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4b
Ratification of appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (United
States) as independent registered public
accounting firm for purposes of U.S.
securities law reporting
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4c
Election of BDO AG (Zurich) as special
audit firm
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5a
Election of Director: Evan G. Greenberg
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair positions and the Company earns a board score of Some
Concerns
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
   
5b
Election of Director: Michael P. Connors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation and Nominating
Committees
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
   
5c
Election of Director: Michael G. Atieh
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5d
Election of Director: Kathy Bonanno
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5e
Election of Director: Nancy K. Buese
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5f
Election of Director: Sheila P. Burke
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5g
Election of Director: Michael L. Corbat
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5h
Election of Director: Robert J. Hugin
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5i
Election of Director: Robert W. Scully
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5j
Election of Director: Theodore E. Shasta
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit Committee
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
   
5k
Election of Director: David H. Sidwell
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5l
Election of Director: Olivier Steimer
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5m
Election of Director: Frances F. Townsend
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
6
Election of Evan G. Greenberg as
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair positions and the Company earns a board score of Some
Concerns
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability
   
7a
Election of the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors: Michael P. Connors
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation and Nominating
Committees
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees.
We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be
comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice.
   
7b
Election of the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors: David H. Sidwell
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
7c
Election of the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors: Frances F.
Townsend
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
8
Election of Homburger AG as independent
proxy
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
9a
Amendments to the Articles of Association:
Amendments relating to Swiss corporate
law updates
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
9b
Amendments to the Articles of Association:
Amendment to advance notice period
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
10a
Reduction of share capital: Cancellation of
repurchased shares
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
10b
Reduction of share capital: Par value
reduction
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
11a
Approval of the compensation of the Board
of Directors and Executive Management
under Swiss law requirements: Maximum
compensation of the Board of Directors until
the next annual general meeting
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
11b
Approval of the compensation of the Board
of Directors and Executive Management
under Swiss law requirements: Maximum
compensation of Executive Management for
the 2024 calendar year
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
11c
Approval of the compensation of the Board
of Directors and Executive Management
under Swiss law requirements: Advisory
vote to approve the Swiss compensation
report
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
12
Advisory vote to approve executive
compensation under U.S. securities law
requirements
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
13
Advisory vote on the frequency of the U.S.
securities law advisory vote on executive
compensation
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
14
Shareholder proposal on greenhouse gas
emissions targets, if properly presented
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and recognizing the need to adapt,
involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies should review how climate
change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how shareholder resolutions on climate
change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies.  After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
15
Shareholder proposal on human rights and
underwriting, if properly presented.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the
proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones'  Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
A
If a new agenda item or a new proposal for
an existing agenda item is put before the
meeting, I/we hereby authorize and instruct
the independent proxy to vote as follows.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: We do not recommend that shareholders approve in advance matters of which they have no
knowledge. Accordingly, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
45866F104
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
ICE
             
Meeting Date
 
19-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US45866F1049
           
Agenda
   
935812621 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
21-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
21-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
18-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Hon. Sharon Y. Bowen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Shantella E. Cooper
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1c.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Duriya M. Farooqui
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: The Rt. Hon. the Lord Hague of
Richmond
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1e.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Mark F. Mulhern
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1f.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Thomas E. Noonan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Caroline L. Silver
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Judith A. Sprieser
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director for terms expiring in
2024: Martha A. Tirinnanzi
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
To approve, by non-binding vote, the
advisory resolution on executive
compensation for named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
To approve, by non-binding vote, the
advisory resolution to approve the
frequency of future advisory votes on
executive compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
A stockholder proposal regarding special
stockholder meeting improvement, if
properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the
best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to
the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote
FOR this Proposal.
   
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.
                     
   
Security
     
76131D103
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
QSR
             
Meeting Date
 
23-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
CA76131D1033
           
Agenda
   
935817722 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
28-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
28-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
18-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Alexandre Behring
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19           Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success, and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly, as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Maximilien de Limburg
Stirum
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: J. Patrick Doyle
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Cristina Farjallat
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Jordana Fribourg
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Ali Hedayat
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: Marc Lemann
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Jason Melbourne
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Daniel S. Schwartz
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Thecla Sweeney
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
2.
Say-On-Pay: Approval, on a non-binding
advisory basis, of the compensation paid to
named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Appointment of Auditors: Appoint KPMG
LLP as our auditors to serve until the close
of the 2024 Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders and authorize our directors to
fix the auditors' remuneration
Management
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a
grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
4.
2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan: Approval of
2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
5.
Shareholder Proposal: Consider a
shareholder proposal regarding annual
glidepath ESG disclosure.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the
Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend
a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
6.
Shareholder Proposal: Consider a
shareholder proposal regarding the
Company's report on lobbying activities and
expenditures.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to
industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and
industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal
seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is
unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any
meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal
and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
7.
Shareholder Proposal: Consider a
shareholder proposal to report on the
Company's business strategy in the face of
labour market pressure.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
Shareholder Proposal: Consider a
shareholder proposal to report on reduction
of plastics use.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring
unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional
reports with information that is already available to shareholders. In accordance to Egan-Jones Proxy
Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
                         
   
Security
     
883556102
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
TMO
           
Meeting Date
 
24-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US8835561023
           
Agenda
   
935803709 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
27-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
27-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
23-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Marc N. Casper
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F22           Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of
Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Nelson J. Chai
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Ruby R. Chandy
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: C. Martin Harris
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Tyler Jacks
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: R. Alexandra Keith
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19           Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1g.
Election of Director: James C. Mullen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Lars R. Sørensen
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Debora L. Spar
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Scott M. Sperling
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6             Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19           Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1k.
Election of Director: Dion J. Weisler
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19           Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
2.
An advisory vote to approve named
executive officer compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
An advisory vote on the frequency of future
named executive officer advisory votes.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratification of the Audit Committee's
selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as the Company's independent auditors for
2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
Approval of the Company's Amended and
Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
6.
Approval of the Company's 2023 Global
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
FIDELITY NAT'L INFORMATION SERVICES,INC.
                     
   
Security
     
31620M106
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
FIS
             
Meeting Date
 
24-May-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US31620M1062
           
Agenda
   
935815184 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
31-Mar-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
31-Mar-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
23-May-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Lee Adrean
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Ellen R. Alemany
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Mark D. Benjamin
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: Vijay G. D'Silva
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Stephanie L. Ferris
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Jeffrey A. Goldstein
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Lisa A. Hook
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Kenneth T. Lamneck
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1i.
Election of Director: Gary L. Lauer
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1j.
Election of Director: Louise M. Parent
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Brian T. Shea
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1l.
Election of Director: James B. Stallings, Jr.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18           Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
2.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of the Company's named
executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
preferred frequency of stockholder advisory
votes on executive compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as
the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm for 2023.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
ALPHABET INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
02079K305
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
GOOGL
           
Meeting Date
 
02-Jun-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US02079K3059
           
Agenda
   
935830946 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
04-Apr-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
04-Apr-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
01-Jun-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Larry Page
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Sergey Brin
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Sundar Pichai
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1d.
Election of Director: John L. Hennessy
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
F22       Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Frances H. Arnold
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: R. Martin "Marty"
Chávez
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1g.
Election of Director: L. John Doerr
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
     
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1h.
Election of Director: Roger W. Ferguson Jr.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Ann Mather
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: K. Ram Shriram
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1k.
Election of Director: Robin L. Washington
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as Alphabet's independent
registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2023
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Approval of amendment and restatement of
Alphabet's Amended and Restated 2021
Stock Plan to increase the share reserve by
170,000,000 (post stock split) shares of
Class C capital stock
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
Advisory vote to approve compensation
awarded to named executive officers
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
5.
Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory
votes to approve compensation awarded to
named executive officers
Management
1 Year
 
3 Years
Against
       
     
Comments: It is our opinion that an annual say-on-pay vote is the accepted standard for companies today
and a requirement for good corporate governance. Furthermore, we believe that triennial advisory vote on
executive compensation will hinder shareholders from providing the Company with direct input on their
respective compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement. We do not
concur with the current board's recommendation of a triennial ratification (non-binding vote) on this issue.
We recommend a vote AGAINST the option of triennial (every three years) as the frequency with which
shareholders will be provided an advisory vote on executive compensation.
   
6.
Stockholder proposal regarding a lobbying
report
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to
industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and
industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal
seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is
unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any
meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal
and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
7.
Stockholder proposal regarding a
congruency report
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions
and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional
benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would
negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal
and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
8.
Stockholder proposal regarding a climate
lobbying report
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to
industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and
industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal
seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is
unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any
meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal
and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
9.
Stockholder proposal regarding a report on
reproductive rights and data privacy
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring
unnecessary costs and potential legal risk by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing
additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
10.
Stockholder proposal regarding a human
rights assessment of data center siting
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive human rights policy, coupled with
implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting will
assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
11.
Stockholder proposal regarding a human
rights assessment of targeted ad policies
and practices
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
12.
Stockholder proposal regarding algorithm
disclosures
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed
resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests
of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
13.
Stockholder proposal regarding a report on
alignment of YouTube policies with
legislation
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
14.
Stockholder proposal regarding a content
governance report
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and
stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details
pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
15.
Stockholder proposal regarding a
performance review of the Audit and
Compliance Committee
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the
Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend
a vote AGAINST this Proposal.
   
16.
Stockholder proposal regarding bylaws
amendment
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that approval of this proposal will ensure shareholders can vote on any proposal
that would impose inequitable restrictions. As such, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
17.
Stockholder proposal regarding "executives
to retain significant stock"
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: Given the foregoing, we believe that requiring senior executives to hold a significant portion of
stock obtained through executive pay plans would focus the executives on the Company's long-term
success. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
18.
Stockholder proposal regarding equal
shareholder voting
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that shareholder approval is warranted. We oppose such differential voting power
as it may have the effect of denying shareholders the opportunity to vote on matters of critical economic
importance to them. We prefer that companies do not utilize multiple class capital structures to provide
equal voting rights to all shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and
in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
COMCAST CORPORATION
                           
   
Security
     
20030N101
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
CMCSA
           
Meeting Date
 
07-Jun-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US20030N1019
           
Agenda
   
935845492 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
03-Apr-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
03-Apr-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
06-Jun-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
DIRECTOR
         
Management
                 
       
1
 
Kenneth J. Bacon
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
2
 
Thomas J. Baltimore Jr.
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
3
 
Madeline S. Bell
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
4
 
Edward D. Breen
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
5
 
Gerald L. Hassell
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
     
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
6
 
Jeffrey A. Honickman
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6        Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
       
7
 
Maritza G. Montiel
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
8
 
Asuka Nakahara
     
For
 
For
For
         
       
9
 
David C. Novak
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19       Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns
or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
       
10
 
Brian L. Roberts
     
Withheld
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F21       Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of
Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former
CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following
areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold
annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of
independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding
compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability.
 
F22       Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
     
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
2.
Ratification of the appointment of our
independent auditors.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Approval of Comcast Corporation 2023
Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
Approval of Amended and Restated
Comcast Corporation 2002 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan.
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
5.
Advisory vote on executive compensation.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
6.
Advisory vote on the frequency of the vote
on executive compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
7.
To perform independent racial equity audit.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the
proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities.  After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
8.
To report on climate risk in default
retirement plan options.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed
resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests
of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
9.
To set different greenhouse gas emissions
reduction targets.
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related
to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy
by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the
details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we
recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
10.
To report on political contributions and
company values alignment.
Shareholder
Against
 
Against
For
         
   
11.
To report on business in China.
 
Shareholder
For
 
Against
Against
       
     
Comments: Investors favor policies and practices that protect and enhance the value of their investments.
There is increasing recognition that company risks related to human rights violations, such as litigation,
reputational damage, and production disruptions, can adversely affect shareholder value. To manage such
risks effectively, companies must assess the risks posed by human rights practices in their operations and
supply chain, as well as by the use of their products. As such, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal.
   
AON PLC
                                       
   
Security
     
G0403H108
           
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
AON
             
Meeting Date
 
16-Jun-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
IE00BLP1HW54
           
Agenda
   
935852726 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
14-Apr-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
14-Apr-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
15-Jun-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Lester B. Knight
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
F22         Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
1b.
Election of Director: Gregory C. Case
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Jin-Yong Cai
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1d.
Election of Director: Jeffrey C. Campbell
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1e.
Election of Director: Fulvio Conti
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
   
1f.
Election of Director: Cheryl A. Francis
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Adriana Karaboutis
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Richard C. Notebaert
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs
Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
     
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1i.
Election of Director: Gloria Santona
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Sarah E. Smith
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1k.
Election of Director: Byron O. Spruell
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
1l.
Election of Director: Carolyn Y. Woo
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F19         Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some
Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for
such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are
centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its
shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the
Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes
that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a
whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the
performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be
proposed in the future.
   
2.
Advisory vote to approve the compensation
of the Company's named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
3.
Advisory vote on the frequency of holding
an advisory vote on executive
compensation.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
4.
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as the Company's independent
registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2023
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
5.
Re-appoint Ernst & Young Chartered
Accountants as the Company's statutory
auditor under Irish Law
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a
grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Resolution.
   
6.
Authorize the Board or the Audit Committee
of the Board to determine the remuneration
of Ernst & Young Ireland, in its capacity as
the Company's statutory auditor under Irish
law.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a
grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Resolution.
   
7.
Approve the Aon plc 2011 Incentive Plan,
as amended and restated.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could
cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We
recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work
to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
AUTODESK, INC.
                                 
   
Security
     
052769106
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
ADSK
           
Meeting Date
 
21-Jun-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US0527691069
           
Agenda
   
935863351 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
24-Apr-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
24-Apr-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
20-Jun-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Andrew Anagnost
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1b.
Election of Director: Karen Blasing
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1c.
Election of Director: Reid French
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1d.
Election of Director: Dr. Ayanna Howard
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1e.
Election of Director: Blake Irving
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1f.
Election of Director: Mary T. McDowell
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1g.
Election of Director: Stephen Milligan
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1h.
Election of Director: Lorrie M. Norrington
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1i.
Election of Director: Betsy Rafael
 
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
1j.
Election of Director: Rami Rahim
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F18        Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation
score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such
a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on
a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders
and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-
term success and the enhancement of shareholder value.
   
1k.
Election of Director: Stacy J. Smith
 
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: F6           Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee
 
According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is
considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit,
Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for
sound corporate governance practice.
 
F22        Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention
 
Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases
when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that
cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in
the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor
confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity
weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to
cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the
leadership of the Chairman of the Board.
   
2.
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as Autodesk, Inc.'s independent
registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending January 31, 2024.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor.
Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has
earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model.
 
After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that
shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST
this Proposal.
   
3.
Approve, on an advisory (non-binding)
basis, the compensation of Autodesk, Inc.'s
named executive officers.
Management
Against
 
For
Against
       
     
Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we
believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's
directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not
effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote
AGAINST this Proposal.
   
4.
Approve, on an advisory (non-binding)
basis, the frequency with which
stockholders are provided an advisory (non-
binding) vote on the compensation of
Autodesk, Inc.'s named executive officers.
Management
1 Year
 
1 Year
For
         
   
FIRST AMERICAN FUNDS, INC.
                         
   
Security
     
31846V328
           
Meeting Type
 
Special
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
FXFXX
           
Meeting Date
 
21-Aug-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US31846V3289
           
Agenda
   
935906935 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
23-Jun-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
23-Jun-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
18-Aug-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1.
To approve the Plan of Reorganization,
adopted by the FAF Board, which provides
for the reorganization (each, a
"Reorganization," and collectively, the
"Reorganizations") of each Acquired Fund
with and into a corresponding series of First
American Funds Trust (the "FAF Trust"), a
Massachusetts business trust (each series,
an "Acquiring Fund," and collectively, the
"Acquiring Funds") (the "Reorganization
Proposal").
Management
For
 
For
For
         
   
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.
                     
   
Security
     
874054109
             
Meeting Type
 
Annual
   
   
Ticker Symbol
 
TTWO
           
Meeting Date
 
21-Sep-2023
   
   
ISIN
       
US8740541094
           
Agenda
   
935910922 - Management
   
   
Record Date
   
25-Jul-2023
           
Holding Recon Date
25-Jul-2023
   
   
City /
Country
     
/
United
States
         
Vote Deadline
 
20-Sep-2023 11:59 PM ET
   
   
SEDOL(s)
                       
Quick Code
           
   
Item
Proposal
         
Proposed
by
Vote
Management
Recommendation
For/Against
Management
   
   
1a.
Election of Director: Strauss Zelnick
 
Management
 
For
           
   
1b.
Election of Director: Michael Dornemann
Management
 
For
           
   
1c.
Election of Director: J Moses
 
Management
 
For
           
   
1d.
Election of Director: Michael Sheresky
Management
 
For
           
   
1e.
Election of Director: LaVerne Srinivasan
Management
 
For
           
   
1f.
Election of Director: Susan Tolson
 
Management
 
For
           
   
1g.
Election of Director: Paul Viera
 
Management
 
For
           
   
1h.
Election of Director: Roland Hernandez
Management
 
For
           
   
1i.
Election of Director: William "Bing" Gordon
Management
 
For
           
   
1j.
Election of Director: Ellen Siminoff
 
Management
 
For
           
   
2.
Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis,
of the compensation of the Company's
"named executive officers" as disclosed in
the Proxy Statement.
Management
 
For
           
   
3.
Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis,
of the frequency of the advisory vote on the
compensation of the Company's "named
executive officers".
Management
 
1 Year
           
   
4.
Approval of an amendment and restatement
of the Amended and Restated Take-Two
Interactive Software, Inc. 2017 Stock
Incentive Plan.
Management
 
For
           
   
5.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2024.
Management
 
For
           



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FORUM FUNDS


By:
 /s/ Zachary Tackett
 
 
Zac Tackett, President and Principal Executive Officer
     
     
Date:
 August 24, 2023