![]() |
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
2005 Market Street, Suite 2600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Telephone 215.564.8000
Fax 215.564.8120
|
Subject:
|
Filings on Form N-14 for Delaware Small Cap Value Fund, Delaware International Value Equity Fund, Delaware Corporate Bond Fund, and Delaware High-Yield
Opportunities Fund (File Nos. 333-255163, 333-255164, and 333-255167)
|
1.
|
Comment: Correct and refile the auditor’s
consents in order to clarify that the N-14 was not filed for the Acquired Funds.
|
2.
|
Comment: Please state that the
Reorganization of Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund is not contingent on the Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund merger contained in another N-14.
|
3.
|
Comment: Confirm that the fee waivers
shown will continue for at least one year following the Reorganizations.
|
4.
|
Comment: Confirm that no fees will be
recouped after the Reorganizations.
|
5.
|
Comment: Confirm that the pro forma
expenses shown will not change for Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund regardless of whether one or both Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund mergers go through.
|
6.
|
Comment: Confirm whether the costs of the
Reorganizations are included as part of the contractual fee waivers.
|
7.
|
Comment: Confirm that there are no plans for portfolio
repositioning as part of the Reorganizations.
|
8.
|
Comment: Revise the Part B to reflect the
recent amendment of Rule 6-11.
|
9.
|
Comment: Update the capitalization tables
to be as of a date within 30 days of filing.
Response: The requested changes will be made. |
10.
|
Comment: Confirm the accuracy of the fee
table for Delaware Small Cap Value Fund and that expenses will increase after the Reorganization.
|
11.
|
Comment: In the fee table for Delaware
International Fund Class R6 into Acquiring Fund Class R6, explain why DMC is waiving one basis point rather than two.
|
12.
|
Comment: Please clarify why the 1.26%
Total Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers for Class A shown in the fee table for Delaware International Value Equity Fund does not tie to the Prospectus.
|
Response: The 1.26% shown agrees to the audited financial statements which represent a blended waiver as the expense limitation during the fiscal year ending Nov. 30, 2020 was higher than the expense limitation in effect at Nov. 30, 2020. |
13.
|
Comment: Please clarify whether the Total
Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers shown in the fee table for the Institutional Class of the Pro Forma Delaware International Value Equity Fund should be 0.88% rather than 1.88%.
Response: The Registrants confirm that it is correct as stated at 0.88%. |
14.
|
Comment: For the fee table related to the
Reorganization of Delaware International Fund into Delaware International Value Equity Fund, please explain why footnote 4 is necessary and not superseded by footnote 3.
|
15.
|
Comment: For the fee table related to the
Reorganization of Delaware International Fund into Delaware International Value Equity Fund, please explain why footnote 5 is necessary given that the Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses for Delaware International Fund were already below
the expense cap.
|
16.
|
Comment: For the fee table for Delaware
Investment Grade Fund, please explain why the numbers do not correspond to footnote 2. Were the expense waivers applied?
|
17.
|
Comment: For the fee table for Delaware
Fund for Income Class R6, please explain why are you showing Total Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers of 0.89% rather than 0.80%?
|
18.
|
Comment: Provide the NAST analysis for
the reorganization of Delaware Fund for Income (“Target Fund”) into Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund (“Acquiring Fund”) since the Delaware Fund for Income is the larger fund.
|
(i)
|
Investment Adviser. Delaware Management Company (“DMC”),
a series of Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust, manages the investment of both the Target Fund’s and the Acquiring Fund’s assets and supervises the daily business affairs of both funds. DMC will continue to
|
(ii)
|
Portfolio Composition. As described below, the
investment objective of the Target Fund is similar to that of the Acquiring Fund. However, while the current portfolio composition of the Target Fund is substantially similar to that of the Acquiring Fund, the portfolio composition of the
Target Fund has been modified over time in accordance with its objective to become substantially similar to that of the Acquiring Fund. The fact that the Target Fund’s portfolio composition was modified over time to become similar to that
of the Acquiring Fund supports the determination that the Acquiring Fund should be the accounting survivor following the Reorganization.
|
(iii)
|
Investment Objectives, Policies and Restrictions.
The Target Fund and the Acquiring Fund have similar, but not identical, investment objectives, which seeks total return and, as a secondary objective, high current income. The investment strategies and policies of the Target Fund are
similar to those of the Acquiring Fund, with slight differences in each Fund’s asset allocations. The fundamental investment policies and restrictions of the Target Fund and the Acquiring Fund are similar and include certain investment
policies required by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
|
(iv)
|
Expense Structure and Expense Ratio. The
Target Fund and the Acquiring Fund have the similar expense structures, and as a result of the proposed Reorganization, Class A, Class R6 and Institutional Service Class shareholders of the Target Fund should expect to experience lower
expenses as a percentage of average daily net assets as shareholders in the Acquiring Fund. The Acquiring Fund currently has contractually limited the annual operating expenses of any share class to amounts lower than the Target Fund. This
factor supports that the Acquiring Fund should be the accounting survivor following the Reorganization.
|
(v)
|
Relative Asset Sizes of the Funds Involved in the Reorganization.
The Target Fund has larger assets than the Acquiring Fund. As of December 31, 2020, the Target Fund had net assets of $425.8 million, and the Acquiring Fund had net assets of $172.3 million.
|
19.
|
Comment: Fill in the bracketed space
under “Who will pay the expenses of the Reorganization?”
|
20.
|
Response: The “Who will pay the expenses
of the Reorganization?” section in the Information Statement/Prospectus will be revised to read as follows:
|
21.
|
Comment: Under the “What are the
capitalizations of the Funds and what might the capitalization be after the Reorganizations?” in the Information Statement/Prospectus, please clarify whether the capitalization tables reflect adjustments of the costs of the Reorganization
incurred by each Fund, as described in footnote 2.
|
22.
|
Comment: Please explain why it is
appropriate to send a combined information statement given that the Acquiring Funds are in separate trusts.
|
23.
|
Comment: At the beginning of the
Information Statement/Prospectus, explain why the Funds are being reorganized and the related potential benefits.
|
24.
|
Comment: Add a narrative describing the
comparative risks for each fund. Move the narrative before the comparison tables for the investment strategies and risks. In the narrative comparative strategy discussion for Delaware Special Situations Fund and Delaware Small Cap Value
Fund, consider adding the dollar range for what each Fund considers to be small cap securities. In addition, in the narrative comparative strategy discussion for Delaware International Fund and Delaware International Value Equity Fund,
describe how each Fund invests internationally and defines emerging markets, and whether the Funds have the same geographic focus. Describe each Fund’s comparative risk/return profile in the risk narrative disclosure.
|
25.
|
Comment: On page 30, add a space between
each merging pair of Funds in the chart that shows the aggregate fees under “Who manages the Funds?”
Response: The requested changes will be made. |
26.
|
Comment: Revise the “Portfolio Managers
of the Funds” section to only include the disclosure required by Item 5(b) of Form N-1A.
Response: The requested changes will be made. |
27.
|
Comment: Under the description of “Board
Considerations,” please state whether the Board considered factors that weighed against the approval of the Reorganizations.
|
28.
|
Comment: Under the description of “Board
Considerations,” state that the Trusts share the same Board.
|
29.
|
Comment: Under “INFORMATION ABOUT THE
REORGANIZATIONS AND THE PLAN”, please delete the following reference: “however, this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of Agreement.”
|