[Janus Capital Letterhead]
June 18, 2020
VIA EDGAR
John Grzeskiewicz
Division of Investment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-0505
Re: | JANUS INVESTMENT FUND (the Registrant) |
1933 Act File No. 002-34393
1940 Act File No. 811-01879
Post-Effective Amendment No. 295
Dear Mr. Grzeskiewicz:
On behalf of the Registrant and Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity Fund (the Fund), this letter is in response to your comments made by telephone on May 21, 2020 with respect to the Registrants Post-Effective Amendment No. 295 filed pursuant to Rule 485(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on April 6, 2020. We have summarized your (referred to herein as the Staff) comments to the best of our understanding and provided our responses to your comments below.
1. | Staff Comment: The Staff requested completed fee tables for the Fund at least a week before the effective date of the post-effective amendment to the registration statement. |
Response: The Registrant has provided completed fee tables for the Fund in Appendix A to this letter.
2. | Staff Comment: Given the use of sustainable equity in the Funds name, the Staff stated that the disclosure in the principal investment strategies section should clarify that the Funds 80% investment policy encompasses investing in equity securities that meet globally sustainable criteria. The Staff noted that the concept of sustainable investing suggests investments in environmentally-friendly companies (e.g., natural resources, issuers with strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies), so the Fund should have an 80% policy to invest either in environmentally-friendly or ESG issuers. |
Response: Rule 35d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Names Rule), generally requires that if a funds name suggests a particular type of investment, industry or geographic focus, then the fund must invest 80% of its assets in the type of investment, industry, country or geographic region suggested by the name. The Names Rule does not apply to fund names that describe a funds investment objective, strategy, or policies. The Registrant believes that its use of sustainable in the Funds name, as well as the ESG investing style, both suggest a type of investment strategy (to which the Names Rules does not apply) as opposed to a type of investment. In the context of the investment advisers style, these terms connote subjective factors that are considered, among other factors, in the investment process rather than types of securities (see Comment/Responses No. 5 and No. 6 below). Accordingly, the Registrant believes that the Names Rule does not apply to its use of Sustainable in its name.
Further, the Registrant believes the Funds disclosure clearly communicates to investors that the Fund will incorporate elements of sustainability and ESG principles in selecting equity securities for the Funds portfolio. For example, the Registrant notes that the Glossary of Investment Terms includes definitions of ESG factors and sustainable investing.
3. | Staff Comment: The Staff noted that many funds with global in their names invest at least 40% of their assets in securities outside of the United States (or 30% in the event that a fund is taking a temporary defensive position). The Staff stated that it expects the Registrant to include disclosure in the registration statement that clarifies the global nature of the Funds investments. |
Response: The SEC stated explicitly in the adopting release for the Names Rule that the use of the term global is not subject to the Names Rule.1 The Registrants disclosure in the principal investment strategies section states that, under normal circumstances, the Fund expects to maintain investments in securities of issuers or companies that are economically tied to different countries throughout the world, including the United States. Accordingly, the Registrant believes that the Funds disclosure of its principal investment strategies is consistent with the Names Rule and related guidance regarding the use of the term global in fund names.
4. | Staff Comment: To the extent that investing in emerging markets issuers is a principal investment strategy for the Fund, the Staff asked the Registrant to include disclosure regarding such investments in the summary prospectus. |
Response: The Registrant confirms that investing in emerging markets issuers is not a principal investment strategy for the Fund.
5. | Staff Comment: The Staff noted that the Funds name suggests a focus on ESG factors in the security selection process. The Staff asked the Registrant to consider revising the disclosure in the principal investment strategies section to the extent ESG factors are prioritized in the stock selection process over other considerations, such as a companys return of capital or financial models. |
Response: The Registrant notes that while ESG factors are considered in the investment process, the portfolio managers also employ a bottom-up approach in selecting investments based on fundamental research. The portfolio managers consider, among other factors, a companys growth potential, competitive positioning, operational quality and strategy, as well as return of capital or financial models. Since both ESG factors and fundamental research factors are considered together, the Registrant believes its current disclosure accurately reflects the Funds investment process.
6. | Staff Comment: The Staff asked the Registrant to disclose whether a proprietary or a third party model is used to select stocks for the Fund. |
Response: The Registrant notes that both proprietary and third-party processes are used to select stocks for the Fund. This process involves the use of a negative screen administered by a third-party that identifies companies that are considered to have a potentially negative impact on the development of a sustainable global economy. Once such companies are eliminated from the pool of viable investments, the portfolio managers
1 See also Question 10 of Frequently Asked Questions About Rule 35d-1 (Investment Company Names) at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/guidance/rule35d-1faq.htm (The terms international and global connote diversification among investments in a number of different countries throughout the world, and therefore the use of these terms in a fund name is not subject to the rule.).
2
employ a proprietary process that considers ESG factors and a companys fundamentals to select securities. The Registrant will update the disclosure in response to this comment.
7. | Staff Comment: The Staff asked the Registrant to clarify whether ESG factors or investments in environmentally-friendly companies are considered for every investment. For other factors considered in the investment process, the Staff stated that such factors can be disclosed in the disclosure required under Item 9 of Form N-1A. |
Response: The Registrant confirms that except for cash and similar instruments, ESG factors are considered in connection with selecting each security. However, and as noted above, the portfolio managers also consider a companys fundamentals in the security selection process. For example, when choosing between two similar companies that both demonstrate adherence to ESG practices, the portfolio managers will evaluate the strength of each companys fundamentals before arriving at an investment decision. Accordingly, the Registrant believes that it is appropriate to disclose the two-pronged nature of the security selection process in the disclosure required under Item 2 of Form N-1A.
8. | Staff Comment: The Staff asked the Registrant to briefly describe the criteria used in the negative screening process. |
Response: The Registrant notes that the negative screening process is designed to identify products or services that are considered to negatively impact the environment or society, such as issuers based in countries subject to economic sanctions, issuers that stand to be disrupted by the transition to a low-carbon economy, and issuers that engage in activities related to the production or sale of products such as fossil fuels, alcohol, tobacco, and armaments. The negative screening process is not designed to consider factors such as a companys historic and projected return on capital, balance sheets, and financial models; however, and as noted above, these factors are considered by the portfolio managers in identifying potential investments for the Fund. In response to the comment, the Registrant will update the disclosure to reflect that the screening process is intended to identify products or services that are considered to negatively impact the environment or society.
9. | Staff Comment: As it relates to the current global pandemic of COVID-19, the Staff asked the Registrant to consider if risk disclosures should be revised based on how current events could affect the Fund and its investments. The Staff further noted that if the Registrant felt that no revisions to risk disclosures are warranted, to explain its reasoning. |
Response: The Registrant has updated the risk disclosure in the prospectuses and statement of additional information to contemplate risks related to global pandemics, such as COVID-19.
10. | Staff Comment: The Staff requested completed composite performance tables for the Fund at least a week before the effective date of the post-effective amendment to the registration statement. |
Response: The Registrant has provided completed composite performance tables for the Fund in Appendix B to this letter.
11. | Staff Comment: The Staff noted that the comments provided also apply to the prospectus for Class D Shares of the Fund. |
Response: The Registrant acknowledges the above comment.
* * *
3
Please call me at (303) 394-7310 with any questions or comments.
Respectfully,
/s/ Mary Clarke-Pearson
Mary Clarke-Pearson, Esq.
Senior Legal Counsel
Enclosure (via EDGAR only)
cc: | Kathryn Santoro, Esq. |
Thea Kelley
Deborah B. Eades, Esq.
Bruce A. Rosenblum, Esq.
4
Appendix A
2
|
Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity Fund
|
3
|
Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity Fund
|
2
|
Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity Fund
|
Appendix B
40
|
Janus Investment Fund
|
37
|
Janus Investment Fund
|