As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2025

Registration No. 333-288087

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

TRI-COUNTY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

706 Washington Street

Mendota, Illinois 61342

(815) 538-2265

(Address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Timothy McConville

President and Chief Executive Officer

Tri-County Financial Group, Inc.

706 Washington Street

Mendota, Illinois 61342

(815) 538-2265

(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Robert M. Fleetwood

Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP

200 West Madison Street, Suite 3900

Chicago, Illinois 60606

(312) 984-3100

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ☒

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐

PROSPECTUS

563,064 Shares

Common Stock

$1.00 Par Value Per Share

This prospectus relates to the sale of up to 563,064 shares of our voting common stock which may be offered by the selling shareholder, Castle Creek Capital Partners VI, LP, which we refer to as “Castle Creek,” or the “Selling Shareholder.” Unlike an initial public offering, the resale by the Selling Stockholder is not being underwritten by any investment bank. The shares of common stock offered by the Selling Shareholder are subject to a Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 6, 2017, as subsequently amended, which we refer to as the “Rights Agreement.” See “The Selling Shareholder” for a description of the Rights Agreement. Such registration does not mean that the Selling Shareholder will actually offer or sell any of these shares. We are not selling any shares of our common stock under this prospectus and will not receive any proceeds from the sales of the above shares of our common stock by the Selling Shareholder.

All references to “common stock” in this prospectus relate to our shares of voting common stock, unless otherwise noted. We also have a class of nonvoting common stock authorized by our certificate of incorporation. No shares of nonvoting common stock are currently issued and we do not anticipate issuing any shares of nonvoting common stock in the future.

Shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Market Group, Inc. OTCQX Marketplace under the symbol “TYFG”. On July 17, 2025, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the OTCQX was $44.25 per share. Please see “Market Price and Dividend Information” for more information.

As of the date of this prospectus, we had 2,388,443 shares of common stock outstanding, of which 707,356 shares were held by affiliates, including the Selling Shareholder. As of the date of this prospectus, there are no shares of any other class of securities issued.

The Selling Shareholder may sell all or a portion of these shares from time to time in market transactions through any market on which our common stock is then traded, if any, in negotiated transactions or otherwise, and at prices and on terms that will be determined by the then prevailing market price or at negotiated prices, directly or through a broker or brokers, who may act as agent or as a principal or by a combination of such methods of sale. The Selling Shareholder will receive all proceeds from the sale of the common stock.

Investing in our common stock involves risks. We encourage you to read and carefully consider this prospectus in its entirety, in particular, the “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 as well as other information in any documents we incorporate by reference into this prospectus, for a discussion of factors that you should consider with respect to this prospectus.

The shares of common stock offered are not savings accounts, deposits or other obligations of any of our bank or non-bank subsidiaries and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) or any other governmental agency.

Neither the SEC, any state securities commission, the FDIC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is July 18, 2025.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

As used in this prospectus, the terms “Company” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Tri-County Financial Group, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. When we refer to the “Bank” or “our Bank” in this prospectus, we are referring to First State Bank, an Illinois state-chartered bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares offered by this prospectus, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. You should only rely on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the Selling Shareholder has not, authorized anyone to provide you with additional information or information different from that contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of the delivery of this prospectus or any sale of our common stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since the date of this prospectus. The Selling Shareholder is offering to sell common stock only in jurisdictions where those sales are permitted. Any references to our website herein are not intended to be active links and the information on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not, and you must not consider the information to be, a part of this prospectus or any other filings we make with the SEC.

This prospectus describes the specific details regarding the sale of our common stock by the Selling Shareholder, the terms of the common stock being offered and the risks of investing in our common stock. You should read this prospectus before making your investment decision. You should not interpret the contents of this prospectus to be legal, business, investment or tax advice. You should consult with your own advisors for that type of advice and consult with them about the legal, tax, business, financial and other issues that you should consider before investing in our common stock.

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate, including our general expectations, market position, market opportunity and market size is based on information from various sources, including information obtained from various independent, third-party industry sources, publications, government reports, trade and business organizations and other contacts in the markets in which we operate and our own internal data, estimates and forecasts, as well as assumptions that we have made that are based on such data and other similar sources, and on our knowledge of the market for our products and services.

Although we believe that this information (including the industry publications and third-party research surveys and studies) is generally reliable, information of this sort is inherently imprecise. This information involves a number of assumptions and limitations. In addition, estimates, forecasts and assumptions of our future performance and the performance of the industry in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and by us.

IMPLICATIONS OF BEING AN EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY

As a company with less than $1.235 billion in revenues during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of reduced reporting requirements and is relieved of certain other significant requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies. As an emerging growth company:

In this prospectus, we have elected to take advantage of the reduced disclosure requirements and other relief described above, and in the future we may take advantage of any or all of these exemptions for as long as we remain an emerging growth company. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the end of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.235 billion or more, (ii) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of this prospectus, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt and (iv) the end of the first fiscal year in which (A) the market value of our equity securities that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of that year, (B) we have been a public reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, for at least twelve calendar months and (C) we have filed at least one annual report on Form 10-K.

In addition to the relief described above, the JOBS Act permits us to take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards affecting public companies. We have elected to use this extended transition period, which means that the financial statements included in this prospectus, as well as any financial statements that we file in the future, will not be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies for the transition period for so long as we remain an emerging growth company or until we affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards on a non-delayed basis.

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect us are described below. Before you decide to invest, you should carefully review and consider the risks described below, together with all other information included in this prospectus. Any of the following risks, as well as risks that we do not know or currently deem immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. As a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could experience a partial or complete loss of your investment. Further, to the extent that any of the information in this prospectus constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors below are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” on page 22.

Credit Risks

We must effectively manage our credit risk.

There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, risks of nonpayment, risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral and risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions. In general, these risks have increased as a result of sustained elevated interest rates, uncertainties associated with inflation, and uncertainties associated with new economic policies being announced by the Trump Administration and Congress, including, in particular, tariff policy and implementation. These factors and uncertainties potentially increased the risk of a near-term decline in growth or an economic downturn. We attempt to minimize our credit risk through prudent loan application approval procedures, careful monitoring of the concentration of our loans within specific industries and periodic independent reviews of outstanding loans by our credit review department and external consultants. However, we cannot assure you that such approval and monitoring procedures will reduce these credit risks.

Most of our loans are commercial, real estate or agricultural loans or residential real estate loans each of which is subject to distinct types of risk. To reduce the lending risks we face, we generally take a security interest in borrowers’ property for all four types of loans. Nevertheless, the risk of non-payment is inherent in all types of loans, and if we are unable to collect amounts owed, it may materially affect our operations and financial performance.

Our business is subject to domestic and, to a lesser extent, international economic conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control and could materially and adversely affect us.

Our financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of customers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer, is highly dependent upon the business environment not only in the markets where we operate, but also in the state of Illinois generally and in the United States as a whole. A favorable business environment is generally characterized by, among other factors: economic growth; efficient capital markets; low inflation; low unemployment; high business and investor confidence; and strong business earnings. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by: declines in economic growth, business activity or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; high unemployment; uncertainty in U.S. trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs; natural disasters; acts of war or terrorism, including the current conflicts in Israel and Ukraine; widespread disease or pandemics; or a combination of these or other factors.

Economic conditions in the state of Illinois are generally impacted by commodity prices, which may adversely impact the Illinois economy, specifically the agricultural sector. Declines in commodity prices could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. The agricultural economy in the Midwest, including Illinois, has generally weakened over the previous several years. A prolonged period of weakness in the agricultural economy could result in a decrease in demand for loans or other products and services offered by us, an increase in agricultural loan delinquencies and defaults, an increase in impaired assets and foreclosures, a decline in the value of our loans secured by real estate, and an inability to sell foreclosed assets. The effects of a prolonged period of a weakened agricultural economy could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Elevated levels of inflation could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

The United States is experiencing elevated levels of inflation. Continued levels of inflation could have complex effects on our business and results of operations, some of which could be materially adverse. For example, elevated inflation harms consumer purchasing power, which could negatively affect our retail customers and the economic environment and, ultimately, many of our business customers, and could also negatively affect our levels of non-interest expense. When interest rates rise in response to, or as a result of, elevated levels of inflation, the value of our securities portfolio would be negatively impacted. Continued elevated levels of inflation could also cause increased volatility and uncertainty in the business environment, which could adversely affect loan demand and our clients’ ability to repay indebtedness. It is also possible that governmental responses to inflation could adversely affect our business, such as changes to monetary and fiscal policy that are too strict, or the imposition or threatened imposition of price controls. The duration and severity of an inflationary period cannot be estimated with precision.

Our allowance for credit losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.

As of January 1, 2023, the Company was required to adopt accounting standard update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), commonly referred to as “CECL”. CECL changed how the Company calculates its allowance for credit losses by requiring the Company to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for credit losses. This is a change from the previous method of providing allowances for credit losses that are probable.

We maintain our allowance for credit losses at a level considered appropriate by management to absorb all expected future losses in the loan portfolio and off balance sheet exposures at the balance sheet date. Additionally, our Board of Directors regularly monitors the appropriateness of our allowance for credit losses. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and a determination by the regulatory agencies as to the appropriate level of the allowance. The amount of future credit losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates and the value of the underlying collateral, which may be beyond our control, and such losses may exceed current estimates. At December 31, 2024, our allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans, was 1.13%, and as a percentage of total non-performing loans was 346.9%. Although management believes that the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to absorb future losses on any existing loans and off balance sheet exposures that may become uncollectible, we cannot predict credit losses with certainty, nor can we assure you that our allowance for credit losses will prove sufficient to cover actual credit losses in the future. Credit losses in excess of our reserves will adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our loan portfolio has a large concentration of real estate loans, which involve risks specific to real estate value.

Real estate lending (including commercial and agricultural real estate, construction and land and residential real estate) is a large portion of our loan portfolio. These categories totaled $1.1 billion, or approximately 87.6% of our total loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, construction and land loans comprised $21.8 million, or 1.7%, of our loan portfolio; one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, excluding $9.0 million of loans held for sale, comprised $386.5 million, or 30.3%, of our loan portfolio; commercial real estate loans compromised $538.8 million, or 42.2%, of our total loan portfolio; and agricultural real estate loans totaled $170.4 million, or 13.4%, of our total loan portfolio. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Although a significant portion of commercial real estate, agricultural real estate and construction and land loans are secured by a secondary form of collateral, adverse developments affecting real estate values in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio. Additionally, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the control of the borrower or lender could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties, (i) declines in the rents or decreases in occupancy and, therefore, in the cash flows generated by those real properties on which the borrowers depend to fund their loan payments to us, (ii) decreases in the values of those real properties, which make it more difficult for the borrowers to sell those real properties for amounts sufficient to repay their loans in full, and (iii) job losses of residential home buyers, which makes it more difficult for these borrowers to fund their loan payments. Adverse changes affecting real estate values, including decreases in office occupancy due to the shift to remote working environments, and the liquidity of real estate in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with the our loan portfolio, significantly impair the value of property pledged as collateral on loans and affect the our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure without a loss or additional losses or the our ability to sell those loans on the secondary market.

If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then we may not be able to realize the amount of security that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. In light of such risks as discussed above, the uncertainty that exists in the economy and credit markets nationally, there can be no guarantee that we will not experience additional deterioration in credit performance by our real estate loan customers.

Our construction and land loans expose us to increased lending risks.

Construction and land loans comprised $21.8 million, or 1.7% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2024. A majority of these loans are made to contractors and builders to finance the construction of single and multifamily homes, subdivisions, as well as commercial properties. Land loans include the purchase or refinance of unimproved land held for future residential development, improved residential lots held for speculative investment purposes, lines of credit secured by land, and land development loans. We originate these loans regardless of whether the borrower has a sales contract for the property used as collateral. Therefore, ultimate repayment of the loan is dependent on finding end-purchasers for finished projects.

Construction lending involves inherent risks due to estimating costs in relation to project values. Uncertainties in construction costs, market value, the timing of project completion and regulatory impacts make accurately evaluating total project funds and loan-to-value ratios challenging. Moreover, certain construction loans do not require borrower payments during the term, accumulating interest into the principal. Therefore, repayment depends heavily on project success and the borrower’s ability to sell, lease, or secure permanent financing, rather than their ability to repay principal and interest directly. Misjudging a project’s value could leave us with inadequate security and potential losses upon completion. Additionally, factors like shifts in housing demand and unexpected building costs can significantly deviate actual results from estimates. A downturn of real estate in the markets we serve could escalate delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures, and compromise collateral value.

Our concentration of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans may result in lower yields and profitability.

We originate one-to-four family loans through our traditional banking operations as well as through FSM, the Bank’s wholly-owned mortgage subsidiary. One-to-four family residential mortgage loans, excluding $9.0 million of loans held for sale, comprised $386.5 million, or 30.3%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2024. These loans are secured primarily by properties located in the state of Illinois. Our concentration of these loans results in lower yields relative to other loan categories within our loan portfolio. While these loans generally possess higher yields than investment securities, their repayment characteristics are not as well defined, and they generally possess a higher degree of interest rate risk versus other loans and investment securities within our portfolio. This increased interest rate risk is due to the repayment and prepayment options inherent in residential mortgage loans which are exercised by borrowers based upon the overall level of interest rates. These residential mortgage loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayments from his or her employment and the value of the property securing the loan. Thus, as a result, repayment of these loans is also subject to general economic and employment conditions within the communities and surrounding areas where the property is located.

A decline in residential real estate market prices or home sales has the potential to adversely affect our one-to-four family residential mortgage portfolio in several ways, such as a decrease in collateral values and an increase in non-performing loans, each of which could adversely affect our operating results and/or financial condition. Additionally, the profitability of FSM, our mortgage subsidiary, is dependent upon its ability to originate loans and sell them to investors. Loan production levels are sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates and changes in economic conditions. Loan production levels may suffer if we experience a slowdown in housing markets, tightening credit conditions or increasing interest rates. Any sustained period of decreased activity caused by fewer refinancing transactions, higher interest rates, housing price pressure, or loan underwriting restrictions would adversely affect our mortgage originations and, consequently, could significantly reduce our income from mortgage activities. Operating FSM as a separate mortgage subsidiary adds a layer of costs associated with our mortgage activities, including operational, regulatory and compliance costs. With the recent interest rate environment, mortgage volume has been muted, and FSM, as a stand-alone subsidiary, has not been profitable since 2021. If mortgage volume does not improve, then FSM’s profitability will continue to lag and will adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s loan portfolio has a large concentration of commercial real estate loans, which involve risks specific to real estate values and the health of the real estate market generally.

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $538.8 million of commercial real estate loans, consisting of $182.1 million of non-owner occupied loans, $173.7 million of owner occupied loans, and $183.0 million of loans secured by multifamily residential properties. Commercial real estate loans represented 42.2% of the Company’s total loan portfolio and 321.6% of the Bank’s total capital at December 31, 2024.

Total commercial real estate loans as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 and 2023 are scheduled below, together with their respective nonperforming loans and other past due loans and net loan charge-offs (recoveries) during the period.

The levels of nonperforming loans and total past due loans have remained at manageable levels during the first quarter of 2025 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, with each measure less than 1% of total commercial real estate loans at the end of each period. There were no commercial real estate loan charge-offs or recoveries during the first quarter of 2025, compared to minimal net charge-offs in 2024 and net recoveries in 2023.

The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of interest rates and market conditions in the area in which the real estate is located and some of these values have been negatively affected by the rise in prevailing interest rates. Adverse developments affecting real estate values in the Company’s market areas could increase the credit risk associated with the Company’s loan portfolio. Additionally, the repayment of commercial real estate loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then the Company may not be able to realize the full value of the collateral that the Company anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could force the Company to take charge-offs or require the Company to increase the Company’s provision for credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Commercial loans make up a significant portion of our loan portfolio.

Commercial loans comprised $69.7 million, or 5.5%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2024. Our commercial loans are made based primarily on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Most often, this collateral consists of accounts receivable, inventory, or machinery. Credit support provided by the borrower for most of these loans, and the probability of repayment is based on the liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement of a personal guarantee, if any exists. As a result, in the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. The collateral securing other loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Due to the larger average size of each commercial loan as compared with other loans such as consumer and residential real estate loans, as well as collateral that is generally less readily marketable, losses incurred on a small number of commercial loans could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our agricultural loans and the ability of the borrower to repay may be affected by many factors outside of the borrower’s control.

Agricultural operating loans comprised $80.6 million, or 6.3%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2024. The repayment of agricultural operating loans is dependent on the successful operation or management of the farm property. Likewise, agricultural operating loans involve a greater degree of risk than lending on residential properties, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as farm equipment, livestock or crops. We generally secure agricultural operating loans with a blanket lien on livestock, equipment, feed, hay, grain and crops. Nevertheless, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation.

We also originate agricultural real estate loans. At December 31, 2024, agricultural real estate loans totaled $170.4 million, or 13.4% of our total loan portfolio. Agricultural real estate lending involves a greater degree of risk and typically involves larger loans to single borrowers than lending on single-family residences. As with agricultural operating loans, payments on agricultural real estate loans are dependent on the profitable operation or management of the farm property securing the loan. The success of the farm may be affected by many factors outside the control of the farm borrower, including adverse weather conditions that prevent the planting of a crop or limit crop yields (such as hail, drought and floods), loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally) and the impact of government regulations (including changes in price supports, tariffs, trade agreements, subsidies and environmental regulations). In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may significantly affect the successful operation of the farm. If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. The primary crops in our market areas are wheat, corn and soybeans. Accordingly, adverse circumstances affecting wheat, corn and soybean crops could have an adverse effect on our agricultural real estate loan portfolio.

Our business is concentrated in and dependent upon the continued growth and welfare of the markets in which we operate, including north-central Illinois and the far west suburbs of Chicago.

We operate primarily in north central Illinois and the far west suburbs of Chicago, and as a result, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to changes in the economic conditions in those areas. Although each market we operate in is geographically and economically diverse, our success depends upon the business activity, population, income levels, deposits and real estate activity in each of these markets. Although our customers’ business and financial interests may extend well beyond our market area, adverse economic conditions that affect our specific market area could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans to us and generally affect our financial condition and results of operations. Because of our geographic concentration, we are less able than other regional or national financial institutions to diversify our credit risks across multiple markets.

Non-performing assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, and could result in further losses in the future.

As of December 31, 2024, our non-performing loans (which consist of non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest) totaled $4.2 million, or 0.33% of our loan portfolio, and our non-performing assets (which include non-performing loans plus other real estate owned) totaled $5.1 million, or 0.33% of total assets. In addition, we had $5.3 million in accruing loans that were 30-89 days delinquent as of December 31, 2024.

Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or other real estate owned, thereby adversely affecting our net income and returns on assets and equity, increasing our loan administration costs and adversely affecting our efficiency ratio. When we take collateral in foreclosure and similar proceedings, we are required to mark the collateral to its then-fair market value less the cost to sell, which may result in a loan charge off. These non-performing loans and other real estate owned also increase our risk profile and may affect the capital our regulators believe is appropriate in light of such risks. The resolution of non-performing assets requires significant time commitments from management and can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities. If we experience increases in non-performing loans and non-performing assets, our net interest income may be negatively impacted and our loan administration costs could increase, each of which could have an adverse effect on our net income and related ratios, such as return on assets and equity.

Interest Rate Risks

Monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, our earnings and growth are affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve. An important function of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.

The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our business, financial condition and results of operations cannot be predicted.

The Federal Reserve has indicated that it is working to avoid abrupt or unpredictable changes in economic or financial conditions so as not to disrupt the financial systems, also known as “shocks;” despite this, the impact of these changes cannot be certain. Vulnerabilities in the financial system can amplify the impact of an initial shock following rate increases, potentially leading to unintended volatility, as well as to disruptions in the provision of financial services, such as clearing payments, the provision of liquidity, and the availability of credit. Furthermore, asset liquidation pressures can be amplified by liquidity mismatches and the leverage of certain nonbank financial intermediaries such as hedge funds. The financial crisis in March 2020, closely related to the COVID-19 pandemic, also demonstrated that pressures on dealer intermediation can limit the availability of liquidity during times of market stress. Given the interconnectedness of the global financial system, these vulnerabilities could impact the Company’s business operations and financial condition.

Interest rates and other conditions impact our results of operations.

Our profitability is in part a function of the spread between the interest rates earned on investments and loans and the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Like most banking institutions, our net interest spread and margin are affected by general economic conditions and other factors, including fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government that influence market interest rates and our ability to respond to changes in such rates. At any given time, our assets and liabilities will be such that they are affected differently by a given change in interest rates. Some observers expect that during 2025, and perhaps beyond, the FOMC may decrease interest rates. In September 2024, the FOMC began lowering interest rates with the target range for the federal funds rate decreasing by 100 basis points to a range of 4.25% to 4.50% by the end of 2024. The decrease was expressly made in response to inflation moderating and the labor market weakening. The FOMC has not lowered its target range for the federal funds rate since its December 2024 meeting. These effects from interest rate changes or from other sustained economic stress or a recession, among other matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. We measure interest rate risk under various rate scenarios and using specific criteria and assumptions. Although we believe our current level of interest rate sensitivity is reasonable and effectively managed, significant fluctuations in interest rates may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

High interest rates may result in a further decline in value of our fixed-rate debt securities. The unrealized losses resulting from holding these securities would be recognized in other comprehensive income and reduce total stockholders’ equity. Unrealized losses, unrelated to credit, on available for sale debt securities, do not negatively impact our regulatory capital ratios, unless we are required to or plan to sell the security before its fair value is recovered; however, tangible common equity and the associated ratios would be reduced. If debt securities in an unrealized loss position are sold, such losses become realized and will reduce our regulatory capital ratios.

Declines in value may adversely impact the carrying amount of our investment portfolio and result in credit losses.

We may be required to record an allowance for credit loss on our investment securities if they suffer declines in value that relate to a permanent decline in credit quality. If the credit quality of the securities in our investment portfolio deteriorates, we may also experience a loss in interest income from the suspension of either interest or dividend payments. Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for resales of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for investment securities, adverse changes in business climate or adverse actions by regulators could have a negative effect on our investment portfolio in future periods.

The value of the financial instruments we own may decline in the future.

An increase in market interest rates may affect the market value of our securities portfolio, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. Additionally, an increase in market interest rates may reduce the value of our loan portfolio, although, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), such a decline in value may not be reflected in the carrying balance of our loans in the same manner as our debt securities available-for-sale. The market value of these investments may be affected by factors other than the underlying performance of the servicer of the securities or the mortgages underlying the securities, such as changes in the interest rate environment, negative trends in the residential and commercial real estate markets, ratings downgrades, adverse changes in the business climate and a lack of liquidity in the secondary market for certain investment securities. In addition, we may determine to sell securities in our available for sale investment securities portfolio, and any such sale could cause us to realize currently unrealized losses that resulted from increases in prevailing interest rates.

Downgrades in the credit rating of one or more insurers that provide credit enhancement for our state and municipal securities portfolio may have an adverse impact on the market for and valuation of these types of securities.

We invest in tax-exempt and taxable state and local municipal investment securities, some of which are insured by monoline insurers. As of December 31, 2024, we had $60.0 million of municipal securities, which represented 38.0% of our total securities portfolio. Even though management generally purchases municipal securities on the overall credit strength of the issuer, the reduction in the credit rating of an insurer may negatively impact the market for and valuation of our investment securities. Such downgrade could adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Legal, Accounting and Compliance Risks

Legislative and regulatory reforms applicable to the financial services industry may have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The laws, regulations, rules, policies and regulatory interpretations governing us are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time as Congress and various regulatory agencies react to adverse economic conditions or other matters. The implementation of any current, proposed or future regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry may impact the profitability of our business activities and may change certain of our business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose us to additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These regulations and legislation may be impacted by the political ideologies of the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government as well as the heads of regulatory and administrative agencies, which may change as a result of elections.

The Company and the Bank are subject to stringent capital and liquidity requirements.

The Basel III Rule imposes stringent capital requirements on bank holding companies and banks. In addition to the minimum capital requirements, banks and bank holding companies are also required to maintain a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital on top of minimum risk-weighted asset ratios to make capital distributions (including for dividends and repurchases of stock) and pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers without restriction. Banking institutions that do not maintain capital in excess of the Basel III Rule standards including the capital conservation buffer face constraints on the payment of dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. Accordingly, if the Bank fails to maintain the applicable minimum capital ratios and the capital conservation buffer, distributions from the Bank to the parent Company may be prohibited or limited.

Future increases in minimum capital requirements could adversely affect our net income. Furthermore, our failure to comply with the minimum capital requirements could result in our regulators taking formal or informal actions against us, which could restrict our future growth or operations.

We are subject to changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines.

Our financial performance is impacted by accounting principles, policies and guidelines. Some of these policies require the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Some of our accounting policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. If such estimates or assumptions underlying our financial statements are incorrect, we may experience material losses.

From time to time, the FASB and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements, such as the implementation of CECL. In addition, trends in financial and business reporting, including environmental social and governance (ESG) related disclosures, could require us to incur additional reporting expense. These changes are beyond our control, can be difficult to predict and could materially impact how we report our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in these standards are continuously occurring, and more drastic changes may occur in the future. The implementation of such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be required to pay higher FDIC insurance premiums in the future.

Future bank failures may prompt the FDIC to increase its premiums above the current levels or to issue special assessments. The Bank generally is unable to control the amount of premiums or special assessments that it or its subsidiary is required to pay for FDIC insurance. Any future changes in the calculation or assessment of FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s results of operations, financial condition, and the ability to continue to pay dividends on common stock at the current rate or at all.

Operational, Strategic and Reputational Risks

We face intense competition in all phases of our business from other banks and financial institutions.

The banking and financial services business in our market is highly competitive. Our competitors include large national and regional banks, local community banks, savings and loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market mutual funds, credit unions, fintech companies, and other non-bank financial service providers, many of which have greater financial, marketing and technological resources than us. Many of these competitors are not subject to the same regulatory restrictions that we are and may be able to compete more effectively as a result. Increased competition in our market may result in a decrease in the amounts of our loans and deposits, reduced spreads between loan rates and deposit rates or loan terms that are more favorable to the borrower. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow and remain profitable. If increased competition causes us to significantly discount the interest rates we offer on loans or increase the amount we pay on deposits, our net interest income could be adversely impacted. If increased competition causes us to relax our underwriting standards, we could be exposed to higher losses from lending activities. Additionally, many of our competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and offer a broader range of financial services than we can offer.

Technology and other changes are allowing consumers and businesses to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, the wide acceptance of internet-based commerce has resulted in a number of alternative payment processing systems and lending platforms in which banks play only minor roles. Customers can also maintain funds in prepaid debit cards or digital currencies and pay bills and transfer funds directly without the direct assistance of banks. The diminishing role of banks as financial intermediaries has resulted and could continue to result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the potential loss of lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

While we do not offer products relating to digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins and other similar assets, there has been a significant increase in digital asset adoption globally over the past several years. Certain characteristics of digital asset transactions, such as the speed with which such transactions can be conducted, the ability to transact without the involvement of regulated intermediaries, the ability to engage in transactions across multiple jurisdictions, and the anonymous nature of the transactions, are appealing to certain consumers notwithstanding the various risks posed by such transactions. Accordingly, digital asset service providers—which, at present are not subject to the same degree of scrutiny and oversight as banking organizations and other financial institutions—are becoming active competitors to more traditional financial institutions. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Potential partnerships with digital asset companies, moreover, could also entail significant investment.

The financial services industry continues to undergo rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, including internet services, cryptocurrencies and payment systems. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency as well as enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our market area. Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products to those that we will be able to offer, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, we cannot provide you with assurance that we will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to our customers.

Issues with the use of artificial intelligence in our marketplace may result in reputational harm or liability, or could otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business.

Artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, is or may be enabled by or integrated into the Company’s products or those developed by its third party partners. As with many developing technologies, artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that could affect its further development, adoption, and use, and therefore our business. Artificial intelligence algorithms may be flawed, for example datasets may contain biased information or otherwise be insufficient, and inappropriate or controversial data practices could impair the acceptance of artificial intelligence solutions and result in burdensome new regulations. If the analyses that products incorporating artificial intelligence assist in producing for the Company or its third party partners are deficient, biased or inaccurate, the Company could be subject to competitive harm, potential legal liability and brand or reputational harm. The use of artificial intelligence may also present ethical issues. If the Company or its third party partners offer artificial intelligence enabled products that are controversial because of their purported or real impact on human rights, privacy, or other issues, the Company may experience competitive harm, potential legal liability and brand or reputational harm. In addition, the Company expects that governments will continue to assess and implement new laws and regulations concerning the use of artificial intelligence, which may affect or impair the usability or efficiency of products and services and those developed by the Company’s third party partners.

Our community banking strategy relies heavily on our management team, and the unexpected loss of key managers may adversely affect our operations.

Much of our success to date has been influenced strongly by our ability to attract and to retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services and familiar with the communities in our market area. Our ability to retain executive officers, the current management teams, branch managers and loan officers will continue to be important to the successful implementation of our strategy. It is also critical, as we grow, to be able to attract and retain qualified additional management and loan officers with the appropriate level of experience and knowledge about our market area to implement our community-based operating strategy. The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Labor shortages and failure to attract and retain qualified employees could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

A number of factors may adversely affect the labor force available to us or increase labor costs, including high employment levels, and decreased labor force size and participation. Although we have not experienced any material labor shortage to date, we have recently observed an overall tightening and increasingly competitive local labor market. As of December 31, 2024, Illinois’ unemployment rate was 4.9%. A sustained labor shortage or increased turnover rates within our employee base could lead to increased costs, such as increased compensation expense to attract and retain employees.

In addition, if we are unable to hire and retain employees capable of performing at a high-level, or if mitigation measures we may take to respond to a decrease in labor availability have unintended negative effects, our business could be adversely affected. An overall labor shortage, lack of skilled labor, increased turnover or labor inflation, could have a material adverse impact on our operations, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.

The occurrence of fraudulent activity, breaches or failures of our information security controls or cybersecurity-related incidents could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

As a bank, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity, information security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents that may be committed against us or our clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. Information security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents may include fraudulent or unauthorized access to systems used by us or our clients, denial or degradation of service attacks and malware or other cyber-attacks.

In recent periods, there continues to be a rise in electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches and cyber-attacks within the financial services industry, especially in the commercial banking sector due to cyber criminals targeting commercial bank accounts. Moreover, several large corporations, including financial institutions and retail companies, have suffered major data breaches, in some cases exposing not only confidential and proprietary corporate information, but also sensitive financial and other personal information of their customers and employees and subjecting them to potential fraudulent activity. Some of our clients may have been affected by these breaches, which could increase their risks of identity theft and other fraudulent activity that could involve their accounts with us.

Information pertaining to us and our clients is maintained, and transactions are executed, on networks and systems maintained by us and certain third party partners, such as our online banking, mobile banking or accounting systems. The secure maintenance and transmission of confidential information, as well as execution of transactions over these systems, are essential to protect us and our clients against fraud and security breaches and to maintain the confidence of our clients. Breaches of information security also may occur through intentional or unintentional acts by those having access to our systems or the confidential information of our clients, including employees. In addition, increases in criminal activity levels and sophistication, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries, vulnerabilities in third party technologies (including browsers and operating systems) or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions and to protect data about us, our clients and underlying transactions, as well as the technology used by our clients to access our systems. Our third party partners’ inability to anticipate, or failure to adequately mitigate, breaches of security could result in a number of negative events, including losses to us or our clients, loss of business or clients, damage to our reputation, the incurrence of additional expenses, disruption to our business, additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties or our exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

We depend on information technology and telecommunications systems of third parties, and any systems failures, interruptions or data breaches involving these systems could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

Our business is highly dependent on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems, third party servicers, accounting systems, mobile and online banking platforms and financial intermediaries. We outsource to third parties many of our major systems, such as data processing and mobile and online banking. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third party systems fail or experience interruptions. A system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration of our ability to process loans or gather deposits and provide customer service, compromise our ability to operate effectively, result in potential noncompliance with applicable laws or regulations, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business or subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. In addition, failures of third parties to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or fraud or misconduct on the part of employees of any of these third parties, could disrupt our operations or adversely affect our reputation.

It may be difficult for us to replace some of our third party vendors, particularly vendors providing our core banking and information services, in a timely manner if they are unwilling or unable to provide us with these services in the future for any reason and even if we are able to replace them, it may be at higher cost or result in the loss of customers. Any such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of information and the monitoring of a large number of transactions on a minute-by-minute basis, and even a short interruption in service could have significant consequences. We also interact with and rely on retailers, for whom we process transactions, as well as financial counterparties and regulators. Each of these third parties may be targets of the same types of fraudulent activity, computer break-ins and other cyber security breaches described above, and the cyber security measures that they maintain to mitigate the risk of such activity may be different than our own and may be inadequate.

As a result of financial entities and technology systems becoming more interdependent and complex, a cyber-incident, information breach or loss, or technology failure that compromises the systems or data of one or more financial entities could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including ourselves. As a result of the foregoing, our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by any significant disruptions to us or to third parties with whom we interact.

We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud, losses related to our depositors and data processing system failures and errors.

Employee errors and misconduct could subject us to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm our reputation. Misconduct by our employees could include hiding unauthorized activities from us, improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of our customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject us to financial claims for negligence. We are also subject to losses related to our depositors, whether due to simple errors or mistakes, circumvention of controls, or unauthorized override of controls by our employees, other financial institutions or other third parties.

We maintain a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate against operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. Should our internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating risk and loss to us.

Our risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and loss to us. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the types of risk to which we are subject, including liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, operational risk, compensation risk, legal and compliance risk, cyber risk, and reputational risk, among others. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. Our ability to successfully identify and manage risks facing us is an important factor that can significantly impact our results. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected.

Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, we may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. We may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports or other financial information could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Risks

Our growth or future losses may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. We anticipate that our existing capital resources will satisfy our capital requirements for the foreseeable future. However, we may at some point need to raise additional capital to support continuing growth. Our ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities, and on our financial condition and performance. In particular, if we were required to raise additional capital in the current environment, we believe the pricing and other terms investors may require in such an offering may not be attractive to us. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital if needed on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

An active, liquid trading market for our common stock does not currently exist and may not develop, and as a result, you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the price you paid for them, or at all.

Our shares are not listed for trading on any exchanges, and the trading in our common shares has substantially less liquidity than publicly traded companies. As a result, an active trading market for shares of our common stock may never develop or be sustained. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling your shares of common stock at an attractive price, or at all. A trading market for our stock depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Our stock will not be listed on an exchange following this registration and will continue to be quoted on OTCQX, which provides limited liquidity. Consequently, you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the price you paid for them or any other price or at the time that you would like to sell. As we are not a public company, we do not raise capital by selling our common stock and do not currently have the ability to expand our business by using our common stock as consideration in an acquisition.

The stock market can be volatile, and fluctuations in our operating results and other factors could cause our stock price to decline.

The stock market has experienced, and may continue to experience, fluctuations that significantly impact the market prices of securities issued by many companies. Market fluctuations could adversely affect our stock price. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, systemic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, loss of investor confidence, interest rate changes, tariffs, government shutdowns, Brexit, or international currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Moreover, our operating results may fluctuate and vary from period to period due to the risk factors set forth herein. As a result, period-to-period comparisons should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Our stock price could fluctuate significantly in response to our quarterly or annual results, annual projections and the impact of these risk factors on our operating results or financial position.

The price of our common stock could be volatile, and you could lose some or all of your investment as a result.

Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. The market price of our common stock may be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in price in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among other things:

If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.

In addition, the stock market and, in particular, the market for financial institution stocks have experienced substantial fluctuations in recent years, which in many cases have been unrelated to the operating performance and prospects of particular companies. If the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition, results of operations or growth prospects. In addition, significant fluctuations in the trading volume in our common stock may cause significant price variations to occur. Increased market volatility may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock, which could make it difficult to sell your shares at the volume, prices and times desired.

An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit and is subject to risk of loss.

An investment in our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, the deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this prospectus and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you could lose some or all of your investment.

Our dividend policy may change.

Although we have historically paid dividends to our stockholders and currently intend to maintain or increase our current dividend levels in future quarters, we have no obligation to continue doing so and may change our dividend policy at any time without notice to our stockholders. Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such cash dividends as our board of directors, in its discretion, may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Further, consistent with our strategic plans, growth initiatives, capital availability, projected liquidity needs, and other factors, we have made, and will continue to make, capital management decisions and policies that could adversely impact the amount of dividends paid to our common stockholders.

In addition, we are a bank holding company, and our ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that bank and bank holding companies should generally pay dividends on capital stock only out of earnings, and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs, asset quality and financial condition.

We are a separate and distinct legal entity from our subsidiaries, including the Bank. We receive substantially all of our revenue from dividends from the Bank, which we use as the principal source of funds to pay our expenses. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank and certain of our non-bank subsidiaries may pay us. Such limits are also tied to the earnings of our subsidiaries. If the Bank does not receive regulatory approval or if its earnings are not sufficient to make dividend payments to us while maintaining adequate capital levels, our ability to pay our expenses and our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market, including by our current stockholders, could lower our stock price, and any increase in shares issued as part of our equity-based compensation plans or for other purposes may dilute your ownership in us.

The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock available for sale pursuant to this prospectus or from the perception that such sales could occur. The shares sold pursuant to this prospectus will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except that any shares purchased or held by our affiliates as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, may be sold only in compliance with the certain limitations imposed by the securities laws.

We cannot predict the size of future issuances or sales of our common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances or sales of shares of our common stock may have on the market price of our common stock. Sales or distributions of substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline or to be more volatile.

This prospectus is for the resale of stock held by a current shareholder, we will not receive the net proceeds from common stock sold under this prospectus and have no discretion in the use of the net proceeds.

The net proceeds of this sale will go to the Selling Shareholder, and will not be reinvested in the Company. You should therefore be aware that the net proceeds from common stock sold under this prospectus will not be used in a manner that increases our market value or enhances our profitability.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and because we have decided to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and other requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common stock could be less attractive to investors.

For as long as we remain an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), we will have the option to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and other requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, being permitted to have an extended transition period for adopting any new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the FASB or the SEC, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We have elected to, and expect to continue to, take advantage of certain of these and other exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the end of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.235 billion or more, (ii) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt and (iv) the end of the first fiscal year in which (A) the market value of our equity securities that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of that year, (B) we have been a public reporting company under the Exchange Act for at least twelve calendar months and (C) we have filed at least one annual report on Form 10-K. Further, it is possible that the Company will not continue to file Exchange Act reports after its contractual obligations with the Selling Shareholder expire and, if that is the case, the amount of publicly available information about the Company will be limited.

Future issuances of common stock could result in dilution, which could cause our common stock price to decline.

We are generally not restricted from issuing additional shares of stock, and may issue up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock, 467,500 shares of non-voting common stock and 100,000 shares of preferred stock authorized in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which in each case could be increased by a vote of the holders of a majority of our shares of common stock. We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future pursuant to current or future equity compensation plans, upon conversions of preferred stock or debt, or in connection with future acquisitions or financings. If we choose to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock for any reason, the issuance would have a dilutive effect on the holders of our common stock and could have a material negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

Certain banking laws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect.

Provisions of federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to our stockholders. In general, acquisitions of 10% or more of any class of voting stock of a bank holding company or depository institution, including shares of our common stock following completion of this offering, generally creates a rebuttable presumption that the acquirer “controls” the bank holding company or depository institution. Also, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before, among other things, acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank, including the Bank.

There are also provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging another party from acquiring control of us, even if such acquisition would be viewed by our stockholders to be in their best interests. These include requirements relating to stockholder meetings and nominations or proposals. Upon the completion of this offering, we will also be subject to a statutory antitakeover provision included in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or DGCL. In addition, our board of directors is authorized under our certificate of incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock, and determine the rights, terms conditions and privileges of such preferred stock, without stockholder approval. These provisions may effectively inhibit a non-negotiated merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains, and future oral and written statements by us and our management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of our management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this prospectus, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and you are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including those factors identified in “Risk Factors” or “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” or the following:

The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with the other cautionary statements included in this prospectus, in particular, the risk factors beginning on page 7. Because of these risks and other uncertainties, our actual future results, performance or achievement, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by the forward-looking statements in this prospectus. In addition, our past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future results. You should not rely on any forward-looking statements, which represent our beliefs, assumptions and estimates only as of the dates on which they were made, as predictions of future events. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict which will arise. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

USE OF PROCEEDS

This prospectus relates to the sale of our voting common stock by the Selling Shareholder. The Selling Shareholder may, or may not, elect to sell shares of our common stock covered by this prospectus. To the extent the Selling Shareholder chooses to sell shares of our common stock covered by this prospectus, we will not receive any proceeds from any such sales of our common stock.

MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQX under the symbol “TYFG.” As of May 31, 2025, we had 2,388,443 shares of our common stock outstanding, which were held by approximately 469 shareholders of record. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for shares of our common stock for the periods indicated, as obtained from the OTCQX and as adjusted for dividends. These reported market quotations reflect interdealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. Also presented are the cash dividends declared for our common stock during the periods indicated.

On July 17, 2025, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the OTCQX was $44.25 per share.

Dividend Policy

It has been our policy to pay quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock. Our dividend policy and practice may change in the future, however, and our board of directors may change or eliminate the payment of future dividends at its discretion, without notice to our stockholders. Any future determination to pay dividends to holders of our common stock will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, banking regulations, contractual restrictions and any other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Dividend Restrictions

As a Delaware corporation, we are subject to certain restrictions on dividends under the DGCL. In general, a Delaware corporation may only pay dividends either out of surplus (as defined and computed in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL) or out of the current or the immediately preceding year’s net profits. Surplus is defined as the excess, if any, at any given time, of the total assets of a corporation over its total liabilities and statutory capital. The value of a corporation’s assets can be measured in a number of ways and may not necessarily equal their book value.

In addition, we are subject to certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends as a result of banking laws, regulations and policies. See “Supervision and Regulation—Supervision and Regulation of the Company—Dividend Payments.” Because we are a holding company and do not engage directly in business activities of a material nature, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders depends, in large part, upon our receipt of dividends from the Bank, which is also subject to numerous limitations on the payment of dividends under federal banking laws, regulations and policies. See “Supervision and Regulation—Supervision and Regulation of the Bank—Dividend Payments.”

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Business

The Company is a bank holding company that was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1986. The Company conducts a majority of its business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First State Bank. As of March 31, 2025, the Company had approximately $1.54 billion in consolidated total assets. The Company and the Bank are headquartered in Mendota, Illinois.

The Bank was founded in 1940 and has focused on providing comprehensive banking services to the communities it serves. For the first several decades, the Bank conducted its business through its headquarters in Mendota. In the 1980s and 1990s, the Bank began expanding to nearby communities, including facilities in LaMoille, Peru, Streator, Ottawa and McNabb. During the early 2000s, the Bank focused on expanding its service offerings and established First State Insurance, a full-serve insurance agency. As the Bank increased its branch locations, it also developed a full-service mortgage lending operation in 2007, now referred to as First State Mortgage. Over the next several years, the Bank engaged in the acquisition of several smaller banks and grew to over $1.0 billion in assets. Currently, the Bank has 19 branch offices in 18 communities located primarily in north central Illinois.

The Bank focuses primarily on the origination and servicing of three categories of loans: (i) commercial loans, including commercial and industrial loans; (ii) real estate loans, including commercial real estate, agricultural real estate and one-to-four family residential mortgage loans; and (iii) agricultural loans, including agricultural operating loans. Demand, savings (including money market), and time deposits are the Bank’s primary funding sources. The funding mix also includes securities sold under agreement to repurchase and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago.

Our results of operations are dependent primarily upon net interest income and, to a lesser extent, upon other income derived from sales of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, loan servicing, trust and insurance services, and customer deposit services. Significant non-interest expenses include salaries and employee benefits, data processing, occupancy and equipment expense, professional services, and deposit and other insurance coverage.

Deposits of the Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) of the FDIC up to the maximum amount allowable under applicable federal laws and regulations. The Bank is regulated by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the “IDFPR”), as the chartering authority for state banks in Illinois, and the FDIC, as the administrator of the DIF. The Bank is also subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve with respect to reserves required to be maintained against deposits and certain other matters.

The Bank also owns one mortgage subsidiary, FSM, and one insurance subsidiary, FSI. FSM, headquartered in Bloomington, Illinois, has lending capabilities in most states and offers a wide range of residential mortgage loan products. Operations began in 2007, and the entity became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank in 2011. FSM’s revenues and profitability vary greatly based on the mortgage interest rates. First State Insurance, an independent insurance agency headquartered in Mendota, Illinois, has been serving clients in North Central Illinois since 2000. Home, auto, motorcycle, health, life insurance coverage is offered to consumers and businesses. The agency also serves the agricultural community with farm policies, crop hail and multi-peril insurance.

The Company’s executive office and the Bank’s main office are located at 706 Washington Street, Mendota, Illinois 61342. The telephone number is (815) 538-2265. Our website address is www.firststatebank.biz. The information contained on our website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus.

Market Areas

The Bank’s primary deposit gathering and lending markets are geographically diversified throughout north central Illinois. We are headquartered in Mendota, Illinois, and have branches in Batavia, Bloomington, Champaign, Geneva, LaMoille, McNabb, North Aurora, Ottawa, Peru, Princeton, Rochelle, Shabonna, St. Charles, Streator, Sycamore, Waterman and West Brooklyn, Illinois. The primary industries within these respective markets are also diverse and dependent upon a wide array of industry and governmental activity for their economic base. The Bank has a designated a community president to oversee the northern market areas and southern market areas (Bloomington and Champaign). FSM and FSI operate out of our bank branches or ancillary facilities. Additionally, FSM has one loan production office located in Sussex, Wisconsin, which is our only office location outside of Illinois.

Competition

The Company faces strong competition both in attracting deposits and making real estate, commercial and other loans. Its most direct competition for deposits and loans comes from large national and regional banks, local community banks, savings and loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market mutual funds, credit unions, financial technology (fintech) companies and other non-bank financial service providers located in its principal market areas, including many larger financial institutions which have greater financial and marketing resources available to them. The ability of the Bank to attract and retain deposits generally depends on its ability to provide a rate of return, service levels, liquidity and risk comparable to or better than those offered by competing investment opportunities. The Bank competes for loans principally through the interest rates and loan fees it charges and the efficiency and quality of services it provides borrowers.

Human Capital Resources

Employees. The Company is a relationship driven company and its ability to attract and retain exceptional employees is key to its success. At December 31, 2024, the Bank, FSI and FSM had a total of 288 full-time equivalent employees. The Company has one employee, President and Chief Executive Officer, Timothy McConville. Employees are provided with a comprehensive benefits program, including basic and major medical insurance, life and disability insurance, sick leave, and a 401(k) profit sharing plan. Employees are not represented by any union or collective bargaining group, and the Bank considers its employee relations to be excellent.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. The Company believes that a diverse workforce is critical to achieving its strategic goals. The Company strives to foster a strong and inclusive culture that is committed to delivering extraordinary service to our clients and communities by meeting the financial needs of families and businesses across Illinois.

Talent development and retention. The Company utilizes various processes to recruit employees with values that align with the Company’s vision of providing exceptional services to the local communities we serve. The long-term success of the Company revolves around the ability to continue to develop and retain these employees. The Company encourages and supports the growth and development of its employees and, wherever possible, seeks to fill positions by promotion and transfer from within the organization. Continual learning and career development is advanced through ongoing performance and development conversations with employees, internally developed training programs and external training opportunities.

Properties

The Company’s headquarters is located at 706 Washington Street, Mendota, Illinois. The Company maintains numerous other facilities, including Bank branch locations. The Bank owns 17 properties, and leases two branch locations throughout Illinois. FSM also operates various loan production offices. Additional information regarding our locations is set forth below.

Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we are named or threatened to be named as a defendant in various lawsuits. Management, following consultation with legal counsel, does not expect the ultimate disposition of any or a combination of these matters to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or growth prospects. However, given the nature, scope and complexity of the extensive legal and regulatory landscape applicable to our business (including laws and regulations governing consumer protection, fair lending, fair labor, privacy, information security and anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws), we, like all banking organizations, are subject to heightened legal and regulatory compliance and litigation risk.

Lending Activities

General.

The Bank strives to provide a full range of financial products and services to individuals as well as to small- and medium-sized businesses in each market area it serves. The Bank targets consumers for their mortgage needs as well as owner-operated businesses for small business and commercial real estate. The Bank has a loan committee with authority to approve credits within established guidelines. Concentrations in excess of those guidelines must be approved by either a corporate loan committee comprised of the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Credit Officer, and other senior commercial lenders or the Bank’s board of directors. When lending to an entity, the Bank generally obtains a guaranty from the principals of the entity. The loan mix is subject to the discretion of the Bank’s board of directors and the demands of the local marketplace.

The following is a description of each major category of the Bank’s lending activity.

Real Estate Lending.

Commercial Real Estate Lending. Commercial real estate loans, including multi-family loans, generally have amortization periods of 15 or 20 years. Commercial real estate and multi-family loans are generally limited, by policy, to 80% of the appraised value of the property and are subject to strict underwriting guidelines. Commercial real estate loans are also supported by an analysis demonstrating the borrower’s ability to repay. The Bank continues to focus on generating additional commercial real estate loans, which are part of an overall banking relationship with the customer and does not focus on originating transactional type loans where the borrower does not have other financial relationships with the Bank. This focus results in more owner-occupied commercial real estate loans that are diversified by borrower type and geography. The Bank monitors the commercial real estate loan portfolio closely for concentrations in loan types as well as the financial performance of the borrowers. Currently, the Bank has not identified any negative trends related to the commercial real estate loan portfolio. The Bank’s loan growth over the past few years has been driven in large part by commercial real estate loans.

One-to-Four Family Residential Real Estate Lending. The Bank originates one-to-four family residential real estate loans with both fixed and variable rates. One-to-four family residential real estate loans are typically priced and originated following underwriting standards that are consistent with guidelines established by the major buyers in the secondary market. Generally, residential real estate loans retained in the Bank’s loan portfolio have fixed or variable rates with adjustment periods of seven years or less and amortization periods of typically either 15, 20 or 30 years. A significant portion of these loans prepay prior to maturity. The Bank has no potential negative amortization loans. While the origination of fixed-rate, one-to-four family residential loans continues to be a key component of our business, the majority of these loans are sold in the secondary market. One-to-four family residential real estate loans that exceed 90% of the appraised value of the real estate generally are required, by policy, to be supported by private mortgage insurance, although on occasion the Bank will retain non-conforming residential loans to known customers. The balances of one-to-four family residential real estate loans increased as of December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023 primarily due to increasing mortgage rates, which increased demand for the Bank’s 7/1 ARM loans. These loans are retained in portfolio and were the primary factor for the increase in balances during 2022 and 2023. While the Bank retains some of the new fixed rate mortgage loan originations, most of the new fixed rate mortgage loans continue to be sold.

Construction and Land Lending. Loans in this category include loans to facilitate the development of both residential and commercial real estate. Construction and land loans generally have terms of less than 18 months, and the Bank will retain a security interest in the borrower’s real estate. Construction loans are generally limited, by policy, to 80% of the appraised value of the property. Land loans are generally limited, by policy, to 65% of the appraised value of the property. The origination of construction and land loans has not been a primary strategy of the Bank over the past few years to reduce risk in the Bank’s loan portfolio. The balances of construction and land loans decreased as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023 primarily due to lower demand from the Bank’s loan customers and lack of Bank’s strategic focus for these types of loans.

Commercial Lending.

Commercial loans include loans to service, retail, wholesale and light manufacturing businesses. Commercial loans are made based on the financial strength and repayment ability of the borrower, as well as the collateral securing the loans. The Bank targets owner-operated businesses as its customers and makes lending decisions based upon a cash flow analysis of the borrower as well as a collateral analysis. Accounts receivable loans and loans for inventory purchases are generally on a one-year renewable term, and loans for equipment generally have a term of seven years or less. The Bank generally takes a blanket security interest in all assets of the borrower. Equipment loans are generally limited to 75% of the cost or appraised value of the equipment. Inventory loans are generally limited to 50% of the value of the inventory, and accounts receivable loans are generally limited to 75% of a predetermined eligible base.

Agricultural Lending.

Agricultural real estate loans generally have amortization periods of 20 years or less, during which time the Bank generally retains a security interest in the borrower’s real estate. The Bank also provides short-term credit for operating loans and intermediate-term loans for farm product, livestock and machinery purchases and other agricultural improvements. Farm product loans generally have a one-year term, and machinery, equipment and breeding livestock loans generally have five to seven year terms. Extension of credit is based upon the borrower’s ability to repay, as well as the existence of crop insurance coverage. These loans are generally secured by a blanket lien on livestock, equipment, feed, hay, grain and growing crops. Equipment and breeding livestock loans are generally limited to 75% of appraised value. The Bank continues to focus on generating additional agricultural loan relationships in each of its market areas.

Consumer and Other Lending.

Loans classified as consumer and other loans include automobile, boat, home improvement and home equity loans. With the exception of home improvement loans and home equity loans, the Bank generally takes a purchase money security interest in collateral for which it provides the original financing. Home improvement loans and home equity loans are principally secured through second mortgages. The terms of the loans typically range from one to seven years, depending upon the use of the proceeds, and generally range from 75% to 90% of the value of the collateral. The majority of these loans are installment loans with fixed interest rates. Home improvement and home equity loans are generally secured by a second mortgage on the borrower’s personal residence and, when combined with the first mortgage, limited to 90% of the value of the property unless further protected by private mortgage insurance. Home improvement loans are generally made for terms of five to seven years with fixed interest rates. Home equity loans are generally made for terms of seven years on a revolving basis with adjustable monthly interest rates tied to the national prime interest rate. While the Bank primarily provides consumer loans to its existing customers, consumer lending is not a category the Bank targets for organic growth.

Loan Origination and Processing

Loan originations are derived from a number of sources. Residential loan originations result from real estate broker referrals, direct solicitation by the Bank and FSM’s loan officers, present depositors and borrowers, referrals from builders and attorneys, walk-in customers and, in some instances, other lenders. Consumer and commercial real estate loan originations generally emanate from many of the same sources.

Residential loan applications are underwritten and closed based upon standards which generally meet secondary market guidelines. The loan underwriting procedures followed by the Bank and FSM conform to regulatory specifications and are designed to assess both the borrower’s ability to make principal and interest payments and the value of any assets or property serving as collateral for the loan. Generally, as part of the process, a loan officer meets with each applicant to obtain the appropriate employment and financial information as well as any other required loan information. The Bank and FSM obtain reports with respect to the borrower’s credit record, and on real estate loans, orders and reviews an appraisal of any collateral for the loan (prepared for the Bank and FSM by an independent appraiser).

Loan applicants are notified promptly of the decision of the Bank or FSM. Prior to closing any long-term loan, the borrower must provide proof of fire and casualty insurance on the property serving as collateral, and such insurance must be maintained during the full term of the loan. Title insurance is required on loans collateralized by real property.

The Bank is focusing on the generation of commercial, commercial real estate and agricultural loans to grow and diversify the loan portfolio. In 2023, the Bank was able to generate loan growth across the geographic markets that it serves, primarily in commercial, commercial real estate and one-to-four residential real estate loans. The substantial growth in 2023 was in commercial real estate, agricultural real estate, and consumer real estate. Total portfolio loan growth was essentially flat in 2024, increasing 0.2% from year-end 2023.

Deposits

The Bank has a diversified deposit base. The deposit base consists of retail, commercial and public fund customers located in the markets in which the Bank operates. The Bank provides a diverse financial suite of products to its deposit customers and seeks to be the primary financial service provider for these customers. The Bank considers these deposit relationships to be its core deposit base. If the Bank requires funding that exceeds these customers’ deposit balances, non-core or brokered deposits may be utilized. The balance of these non-core or brokered deposits at December 31, 2024 was $49.2 million, or 3.9% of total deposits.

In order for the Bank to attract and retain stable deposit relationships, the Bank offers business cash management solution services to help local companies better manage their cash flow. The Bank also offers InterFi and CDARS to provide customers with FDIC insurance coverage for deposit balances that exceed the insurance limit of $250,000. The expertise and experience of the Bank’s management coupled with the latest technology accessed through third party providers enables the Bank to maximize the growth of business-related deposits.

As for consumers, deposit growth is driven by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, population growth, bank and non-bank competition, local bank mergers and consolidations, increases in household income, interest rates, accessibility of location and the sales efforts of Bank personnel. Time deposits can be attracted and increased by paying an interest rate higher than that offered by competitors, but are the costliest type of deposit. The most profitable type of deposits are non-interest bearing demand (checking) accounts, which can be attracted by offering free checking. However, both high interest rates and free checking accounts generate certain expenses for a bank and the desire to increase deposits must be balanced with the need to be profitable and the extent of banking relationships with the customers. The deposit services of the Bank are generally comprised of demand deposits, savings deposits, money market deposits, time deposits and Individual retirement accounts.

Supervision and Regulation

General

FDIC-insured institutions, their holding companies, and their affiliates are extensively regulated under federal and state law. As a result, our growth and earnings performance may be affected not only by management decisions and general economic conditions, but also by the requirements of federal and state statutes, and by the regulations and policies of various banking agencies, including the IDFPR, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”). Furthermore, taxation laws administered by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and state taxing authorities, accounting rules developed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), securities laws administered by the SEC and state securities authorities, and anti-money laundering and sanctions laws enforced by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) have an impact on our business. The effect of these statutes, regulations, regulatory policies, and accounting rules are significant to our operations and results.

We are subject to federal and state banking laws that impose a comprehensive system of supervision, regulation, and enforcement on our operations that is intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC-insured deposits and depositors of banks, rather than shareholders. These laws, and the regulations of the banking agencies issued under them, affect, among other things, the scope of our business, the kinds and amounts of investments that the Company and the Bank may make, required capital levels relative to assets, the nature and amount of collateral for loans, the establishment of branches, the ability of the Company and the Bank to merge, consolidate and acquire, dealings with the Company’s and the Bank’s insiders and affiliates, and our payment of dividends.

In reaction to the global financial crisis, and particularly following the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), we experienced heightened regulatory requirements and scrutiny. Although the reforms primarily targeted large banking organizations and systemically important financial institutions, their influence filtered down in varying degrees to community banking organizations over time and caused our compliance and risk management processes, and the costs thereof, to increase. The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (“Regulatory Relief Act”) eliminated questions about the applicability of certain Dodd-Frank Act reforms to community banking systems, including relieving us of any requirement to engage in mandatory stress tests, maintain a risk committee or comply with the Volcker Rule’s complicated prohibitions on proprietary trading and ownership of private funds. These reforms have been favorable to our operations. It is anticipated that the Trump Administration and the current U.S. Congress likely will not increase the regulatory burden on community banking organizations, and instead appear poised to reduce and streamline certain prudential and regulatory requirements applicable to these banking organizations at a federal level based on statements made by relevant congressional leaders, the Secretary of the Treasury and the leaders of the federal banking agencies. At this time, however, it is not possible to predict with any certainty the actual impact that the Trump Administration may have on the regulation of the banking industry or our operations.

The supervisory framework for U.S. banking organizations subjects banks and bank holding companies to regular examination by their respective banking agencies, which results in examination reports and ratings that are not publicly available, and that can impact the conduct and growth of their business. These examinations consider not only compliance with applicable laws and regulations, but also capital levels, asset quality and risk, management ability and performance, earnings, liquidity, and various other factors. The banking agencies generally have broad discretion to impose restrictions and limitations on the operations of a regulated entity where the agencies determine, among other things, that such operations are unsafe or unsound, fail to comply with applicable law, or are otherwise inconsistent with laws and regulations. As a result, the approach to supervision adopted by each banking agency may have significant impacts on the operations and results of the Company and the Bank, as well as the banking industry in general. Based on statements made and actions taken by congressional leaders, the Secretary of the Treasury and the current leaders of the federal banking agencies, there have been and are likely to continue to be changes in the supervisory processes and approach made by the federal banking agencies.

The following is a summary of the material elements of the supervisory and regulatory framework applicable to the Company and our subsidiary bank. It does not describe all of the statutes, regulations and regulatory policies that apply, nor does it restate all of the requirements of those that are described. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provision.

The Role of Capital

Regulatory capital represents the net assets of a banking organization available to absorb losses. Because of the risks attendant to their business, FDIC-insured institutions, such as banks, as well as their holding companies (i.e., banking organizations) generally are required to hold more capital than other businesses, which directly affects our earnings capabilities. Although capital historically has been one of the key measures of the financial health of both bank holding companies and banks, its role became fundamentally more important in the wake of the global financial crisis, as the federal banking agencies determined that the amount and quality of capital held by banking organizations prior to that crisis was insufficient to absorb losses during periods of severe stress.

Capital Levels. Banking organizations have been required to hold minimum levels of capital based on guidelines established by the federal banking agencies since 1983. The minimum capital levels for banking organizations have been expressed in terms of ratios of “capital” divided by “total assets.” The capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations beginning in 1989 have been based upon international capital accords (known as the “Basel” accords) adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, a committee of central banks and bank supervisors that acts as the primary global standard-setter for prudential regulation, as implemented by the U.S. federal banking agencies on an interagency basis. The accords recognized that bank assets, for the purpose of the capital ratio calculations, needed to be risk weighted (the theory being that riskier assets should require more capital), and that off-balance sheet exposures needed to be factored in the calculations. Following the global financial crisis, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision, the oversight body of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, announced an agreement on a strengthened set of capital requirements for banking organizations around the world, known as the Basel III accords, to address deficiencies recognized in connection with the global financial crisis.

The Basel III Rule. The federal banking agencies adopted the U.S. Basel III regulatory capital reforms, and, at the same time, effected changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, in regulations that were effective (with certain phase-ins) in 2015 (the “Basel III Rule”). The Basel III Rule established capital standards for banks and bank holding companies that are meaningfully more stringent than those in place previously. The Basel III Rule is applicable to all banking organizations that are subject to minimum capital requirements, including national and state banks and savings and loan associations, as well as to most bank and savings and loan holding companies. The Bank is subject to the Basel III Rule.

The Basel III Rule also increased the required quantity and quality of capital. Not only did it increase most of the required minimum capital ratios in effect prior to January 1, 2015, but, in requiring that forms of capital be of higher quality to absorb loss, it introduced the concept of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, which consists primarily of common stock, related surplus (net of Treasury stock), retained earnings, and Common Equity Tier 1 minority interests subject to certain regulatory adjustments. The Basel III Rule also changed the definition of capital by establishing more stringent criteria that instruments must meet to be considered Additional Tier 1 Capital (primarily non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock that meets certain requirements) and Tier 2 Capital (primarily other types of preferred stock and subordinated debt, subject to limitations). The Basel III Rule also constrained the inclusion of minority interests, mortgage-servicing assets, and deferred tax assets in capital, and it required deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital if such assets exceeded a percentage of a banking organization’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital.

The Basel III Rule requires banking organizations to maintain minimum capital ratios as follows:

In addition, banking organizations that want to make capital distributions (including for dividends and repurchases of stock), and pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers without restriction, also must maintain 2.5% in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital attributable to a capital conservation buffer. The purpose of the conservation buffer is to ensure that banking organizations maintain a buffer of capital that can be used to absorb losses during periods of financial and economic stress. Factoring in the conservation buffer increases the minimum ratios depicted above to 7% for Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, 8.5% for Tier 1 Capital and 10.5% for Total Capital.

In July 2023, the Biden Administration federal banking agencies had proposed wide-ranging and significant changes to the Basel III Rule (the “Basel III Endgame Proposal”), which would have, among other requirements, imposed structural changes to the calculation of capital requirements and risk-weighted assets in an effort to finish the implementation of the Basel III accords. The Basel III Endgame Proposal would generally have impacted the capital requirements applicable to banking organizations with $100 billion or more in total assets, and, as a general matter, would not have had a significant impact on the Company or the Bank. The Basel III Endgame Proposal has not been, and is not expected to be, adopted in a form substantially similar to the Basel III Endgame Proposal. Based on statements made by the current leaders of the federal banking agencies, as well as the Secretary of the Treasury, the agencies may issue a new version of this proposal.

Well-Capitalized Requirements. The capital ratios described above are minimum standards for banking organizations to be considered “adequately capitalized.” Banking agencies uniformly encourage banking organizations to hold more capital and be “well-capitalized” and, to that end, federal law and regulations provide various incentives for banking organizations to maintain regulatory capital at levels in excess of minimum regulatory requirements. For example, a banking organization that is well-capitalized may: (i) qualify for exemptions from prior notice or application requirements otherwise applicable to certain types of activities; (ii) qualify for expedited processing of other required notices or applications; and (iii) accept, roll-over, or renew brokered deposits. Higher capital levels also could be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profiles of individual banking organizations. For example, the Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines contemplate that additional capital may be required to take adequate account of, among other things, interest rate risk, or the risks posed by concentrations of credit, nontraditional activities, or securities trading activities. Further, any banking organization experiencing or anticipating significant growth would be expected to maintain capital ratios, including tangible capital positions (i.e., Tier 1 Capital less all intangible assets), well above the minimum levels.

Under the capital regulations of the Federal Reserve and FDIC, in order to be well capitalized, a banking organization must maintain:

It is possible under the Basel III Rule to be well-capitalized while remaining out of compliance with the capital conservation buffer discussed above.

As of March 31, 2025: (i) the Bank was not subject to a directive from the FDIC or the IDFPR to increase its capital; and (ii) the Bank was well-capitalized, as defined by FDIC regulations.

Prompt Corrective Action. The concept of a banking organization being “well-capitalized” is part of a regulatory enforcement regime that provides the federal banking agencies with broad power to take “prompt corrective action” to resolve the problems of depository institutions based on the capital level of each particular institution. The extent of the banking agencies’ powers depends on whether the banking organization in question is “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” in each case as defined by regulation. Depending on the capital category to which a banking organization is assigned, the banking agencies’ corrective powers include: (i) requiring the institution to submit a capital restoration plan; (ii) limiting the institution’s asset growth and restricting its activities; (iii) requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock (including additional voting stock) or to sell itself; (iv) restricting transactions between the institution and its affiliates; (v) restricting the interest rate that the institution may pay on deposits; (vi) ordering a new election of directors of the institution; (vii) requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed; (viii) prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; (ix) requiring the institution to divest certain subsidiaries; (x) prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; and (xi) ultimately, appointing a receiver for the institution.

Community Bank Capital Simplification. Community banking organizations have long raised concerns with the federal banking agencies about the regulatory burden, complexity, and costs associated with certain provisions of the Basel III Rule. In response, the U.S. Congress provided an “off-ramp” for institutions, like the Company, with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion as part of the Regulatory Relief Act. Section 201 of the Regulatory Relief Act specifically instructed the federal banking agencies to establish a single “Community Bank Leverage Ratio” (“CBLR”) of between 8% and 10%. Under the final rule, a community banking organization is eligible to elect to comply with its capital requirements under the CBLR framework if it has (i) less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, (ii) limited amounts of certain assets and off-balance sheet exposures, and (iii) a CBLR greater than 9%. The Company and the Bank may elect the CBLR framework at any time, but have not currently determined to do so.

Supervision and Regulation of the Company

General. As the sole shareholder of the Bank, we are a bank holding company. As a bank holding company, we are registered with, and are subject to regulation, supervision and enforcement by, the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). We are legally obligated to act as a source of financial strength to the Bank, and to commit resources to support the Bank in circumstances where we might not otherwise do so. Under the BHCA, we are subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve. We are required to file with the Federal Reserve periodic reports of our operations, and such additional information regarding us and our subsidiaries as the Federal Reserve may require.

Acquisitions and Activities. The primary purpose of a bank holding company is to control and manage banks. The BHCA generally requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve for any merger involving a bank holding company, or any acquisition by a bank holding company of another bank or bank holding company. Subject to certain conditions (including deposit concentration limits established by the BHCA), the Federal Reserve may allow a bank holding company to acquire banks located in any state of the United States. In approving interstate acquisitions, the Federal Reserve is required to give effect to applicable state law limitations on the aggregate amount of deposits that may be held by the acquiring bank holding company and its FDIC-insured institution affiliates in the state in which the target bank is located (provided that those limits do not discriminate against out-of-state institutions or their holding companies) and state laws that require that the target bank have been in existence for a minimum period of time (not to exceed five years) before being acquired by an out-of-state bank holding company. Furthermore, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, bank holding companies must be well-capitalized and well-managed in order to effect interstate mergers or acquisitions. For a discussion of the capital requirements, see “—The Role of Capital” above.

The BHCA and implementing regulations generally prohibit us from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% a class of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank, and from engaging in any business other than that of banking, managing and controlling banks, or furnishing services to banks and their subsidiaries. This general prohibition is subject to a number of exceptions. The principal exception allows bank holding companies to engage in, and to own shares of companies engaged in, certain businesses found by the Federal Reserve prior to November 11, 1999 to be “so closely related to banking ... as to be a proper incident thereto.” This authority permits the Company to engage in a variety of banking-related businesses, including the ownership and operation of a savings association, or any entity engaged in consumer finance, equipment leasing, the operation of a computer service bureau (including software development), and mortgage banking and brokerage services. The BHCA does not place territorial restrictions on the domestic activities of nonbank subsidiaries of bank holding companies. In addition to approval from the Federal Reserve that may be required in certain circumstances to make acquisitions or engage in additional activities, the Company also may need to seek prior approval from other agencies, such as the IDFPR or other agencies that regulate the target company involved in an acquisition.

Additionally, bank holding companies that meet certain eligibility requirements prescribed by the BHCA and elect to operate as bank holding companies may engage in, or own shares in companies engaged in, a wider range of nonbanking activities, including securities and insurance underwriting and sales, merchant banking, and any other activity that the Federal Reserve, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines by regulation or order is financial in nature or incidental to any such financial activity, or that the Federal Reserve determines by order to be complementary to any such financial activity, as long as the activity does not pose a substantial risk to the safety or soundness of FDIC-insured institutions or the financial system generally. The Company has not elected to operate as a bank holding company at this time.

Change in Control. Federal law prohibits any person or company from acquiring “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution or its holding company without prior notice to the appropriate federal banking agency. “Control” is conclusively presumed to exist upon the acquisition of 25% or more of the outstanding voting securities of a bank or bank holding company, but may arise under certain circumstances between 10% and 24.99% ownership.

Capital Requirements. Bank holding companies are required to maintain capital in accordance with Federal Reserve capital adequacy requirements. For a discussion of capital requirements, see “—The Role of Capital” above.

Dividend Payments. The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its stockholders may be affected by both general corporate law considerations and the policies and capital requirements of the Federal Reserve applicable to bank holding companies. As a Delaware corporation, the Company is subject to the limitations of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), which allow the Company to pay dividends only out of its surplus (as defined and computed in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL) or if the Company has no such surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.

As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of directors of a bank holding company should eliminate, defer or significantly reduce dividends to shareholders if: (i) the company’s net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (iii) the company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.

The Federal Reserve also possesses enforcement powers over bank holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries to prevent or remedy actions that represent unsafe or unsound practices or violations of applicable statutes and regulations. Among these powers is the ability to proscribe the payment of dividends by banks and bank holding companies. In addition, under the Basel III Rule, banking organizations that want to pay unrestricted dividends have to maintain 2.5% in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital attributable to the capital conservation buffer. See “—The Role of Capital” above.

Incentive Compensation. There have been a number of developments in recent years focused on incentive compensation plans sponsored by bank holding companies and banks, reflecting a determination by the federal banking agencies and the U.S. Congress that flawed incentive compensation practices in the financial industry were one of many factors contributing to the global financial crisis. To address such concerns, the federal banking and financial services agencies released interagency guidance on sound incentive compensation practices for banking organizations.

The interagency guidance recognized three core principles. Effective incentive plans should: (i) provide employees incentives that appropriately balance risk and reward; (ii) be compatible with effective controls and risk-management; and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. Much of the guidance is directed at large banking organizations and, because of the size and complexity of their operations, the federal banking agencies expect those organizations to maintain systematic and formalized policies, procedures, and systems for ensuring that the incentive compensation arrangements for all executive and non-executive employees covered by this guidance are identified and reviewed, and appropriately balance risks and rewards. Smaller banking organizations that use incentive compensation arrangements, like us, are expected to implement less extensive, formalized, and detailed policies, procedures, and systems than those of larger banks.

In addition, Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act directs the federal banking and other financial services agencies to implement formal regulations regarding incentive-based compensation arrangements at certain financial institutions. In the latest attempt to address this statutory requirement, a subset of the required agencies released a proposed rule regarding incentive-based compensation arrangements at certain financial institutions with at least $1 billion in assets in May 2024. The Federal Reserve and the SEC, however, did not join this proposal and it was not published in the Federal Register, signaling potential interagency misalignment. In March 2025, the FDIC withdrew its support for this proposed rule, making it unlikely that any rule in a substantially similar form will be finalized.

Monetary Policy. The monetary policy of the Federal Reserve has a significant effect on the operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the tools available to the Federal Reserve to affect the money supply are open market transactions in U.S. government securities, and changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits, which may impact the Company’s and the Bank’s business and operations.

Corporate Governance. The Dodd-Frank Act addressed many investor protection, corporate governance, and executive compensation matters that will affect most U.S. publicly traded companies. The Dodd-Frank Act increased shareholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give shareholders a nonbinding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and authorizing the SEC to promulgate rules that would allow shareholders to nominate and solicit voters for their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. As discussed in the “—Incentive Compensation” section above, the Dodd-Frank Act also directed the Federal Reserve, together with the other federal banking and financial services agencies, to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to executives of bank holding companies, regardless of whether such companies are publicly traded. Despite several proposed rules regarding incentive compensation arrangements, these agencies have not yet adopted any such rules at this time.

Supervision and Regulation of the Bank

General. The Bank is an Illinois-chartered bank. The deposit accounts of the Bank are insured by the FDIC’s DIF to the maximum extent provided under federal law and FDIC regulations, currently $250,000 per insured depositor category. As an Illinois-chartered FDIC-insured bank, the Bank is subject to the examination, supervision, reporting and enforcement requirements of the IDFPR, the chartering authority for Illinois banks. Because the Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve, it is subject to the examination, supervision, reporting and enforcement requirements of the FDIC, as the Bank’s primary federal regulator.

Deposit Insurance. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to pay deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC. The FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system, whereby FDIC-insured institutions pay insurance premiums at rates based on their risk classification. For institutions like the Bank that are not considered large and highly complex banking organizations, the risk-based assessment is now based on examination ratings and financial ratios. The total base assessment rates for most institutions currently range from 2.5 basis points to 32 basis points.

At least semi-annually, the FDIC updates its loss and income projections for the DIF and, if needed, increases or decreases the assessment rates, following notice and comment on proposed rulemaking. For this purpose, the reserve ratio is the DIF balance divided by estimated insured deposits. In response to the global financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% of the estimated amount of total insured deposits. In its May 2025 semiannual update, the FDIC stated that the reserve ratio likely will reach the statutory minimum by the September 30, 2028 deadline, and no adjustments to the base assessment rates is currently projected.

In addition, because the total cost of the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank to the DIF in 2023 was significant, the FDIC adopted a special assessment applicable to banking organizations with $5 billion or more of total assets. Because the Company is a banking organization with less than $5 billion in total assets, this special assessment does not apply to the Bank.

Supervisory Assessments. All Illinois-chartered banks are required to pay supervisory assessments to the IDFPR to fund the operations of that agency. The amount of the assessment is calculated on the basis of the Bank’s total assets. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Bank paid supervisory assessments to the IDFPR totaling $154,972.

Capital Requirements. Banks are generally required to maintain capital levels in excess of other businesses. For a discussion of capital requirements, see “—The Role of Capital” above.

Liquidity Requirements. Liquidity is a measure of the ability and ease with which bank assets may be converted to meet financial obligations to pay deposits or other funding sources. Banks are required to implement liquidity risk management frameworks that ensure they maintain sufficient liquidity, including a cushion of unencumbered, high-quality liquid assets, to withstand a range of stress events. The level and speed of deposit outflows contributing to the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank in the first half of 2023 was unprecedented and contributed to acute liquidity and funding strain. These events have further underscored the importance of liquidity risk management and contingency funding planning by insured depository institutions like the Bank, as highlighted in a 2023 addendum to existing interagency guidance on funding and liquidity risk management.

The primary role of liquidity risk management is to: (i) prospectively assess the need for funds to meet obligations; and (ii) ensure the availability of cash or collateral to fulfill those needs at the appropriate time by coordinating the various sources of funds available to the institution under normal and stressed conditions. The Basel III Rule includes a liquidity framework that requires the largest insured institutions to measure their liquidity against specific liquidity tests. One test, referred to as the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, is designed to ensure that the banking organization has an adequate stock of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets that can be converted easily and immediately in private markets into cash to meet liquidity needs for a 30-calendar day liquidity stress scenario. The other test, known as the Net Stable Funding Ratio, or NSFR, is designed to promote more intermediate and long-term funding of the assets and activities of FDIC-insured institutions over a one-year horizon. These tests provide an incentive for banks and bank holding companies to increase their holdings in Treasury securities and other sovereign debt as a component of assets, increase the use of long-term debt as a funding source and rely on stable funding like core deposits (in lieu of brokered deposits).

Although these tests do not, and are not expected to, apply to the Bank, we continue to review our liquidity risk management policies in light of regulatory requirements and industry developments. For instance, in July 2024, the FDIC released a request for information on deposits, soliciting information on whether and to what extent certain types of deposits may behave differently from each other (particularly during periods of economic or financial stress), the results of which could impact liquidity monitoring and risk management expectations for FDIC-insured institutions going forward.

Dividend Payments. The Company’s primary source of funds is dividends from the Bank. Under Illinois banking law, Illinois-chartered banks generally may pay dividends only out of undivided profits. The IDFPR may restrict the declaration or payment of a dividend by an Illinois-chartered bank, such as the Bank. Moreover, the payment of dividends by any FDIC-insured institution is impacted by the requirement to maintain adequate capital pursuant to applicable capital adequacy guidelines and regulations, and an FDIC-insured institution generally is prohibited from paying any dividends if, following payment thereof, the institution would be undercapitalized. As described above, the Bank exceeded its capital requirements under applicable guidelines as of March 31, 2025.

Notwithstanding the availability of funds for dividends, however, the FDIC and the IDFPR may prohibit the payment of dividends by the Bank if either or both determine that such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, under the Basel III Rule, banking organizations that want to pay unrestricted dividends have to maintain 2.5% in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital attributable to the capital conservation buffer. See “—The Role of Capital” above.

State Bank Investments and Activities. The Bank is permitted to make investments and engage in activities directly or through subsidiaries as authorized by Illinois law. However, under federal law and FDIC regulations, FDIC-insured state banks are prohibited, subject to certain exceptions, from making or retaining equity investments of a type, or in an amount, that are not permissible for a national bank. Federal law and FDIC regulations also prohibit FDIC-insured state banks and their subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions, from engaging as principal in any activity that is not permitted for a national bank unless the bank meets, and continues to meet, its minimum regulatory capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity would not pose a significant risk to the DIF. These restrictions have not had, and are not currently expected to have, a material impact on the operations of the Bank.

The Bank may be required to seek approval from the IDFPR, the FDIC and other banking or financial services agencies before engaging in certain acquisitions or mergers under applicable state and federal law. In 2024, the OCC and the FDIC separately released updated policy statements—and in the case of the OCC, a final rule—regarding how each banking agency reviews applications submitted pursuant to the Bank Merger Act based on statutory factors. In March 2025, the FDIC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to repeal its 2024 policy statement and reinstate its prior policy statement on bank mergers, while it considers wider changes to its bank merger review practices. The OCC may follow suit, and there also are Congressional Review Act resolutions introduced in both chambers of U.S. Congress seeking to overturn the OCC’s final rule.

Insider Transactions. The Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by federal law on “covered transactions” between the Bank and its “affiliates.” The Company is an affiliate of the Bank for purposes of these restrictions, and covered transactions subject to the restrictions include extensions of credit to us, investments in our stock or other securities, and the acceptance of our stock and other securities as collateral for loans made by the Bank. The Dodd-Frank Act enhanced the requirements for certain transactions with affiliates, including an expansion of the definition of “covered transactions” and an increase in the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered transactions must be maintained.

Certain limitations and reporting requirements also are placed on extensions of credit by the Bank to its directors and officers, to directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, to principal shareholders of the Company, and to “related interests” of such directors, officers and principal shareholders. In addition, federal law and regulations may affect the terms on which any person who is a director or officer of the Company or the Bank, or a principal shareholder of the Company, may obtain credit from banks with which the Bank maintains a correspondent relationship.

Safety and Soundness Standards/Risk Management. The federal banking agencies have adopted operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and soundness of FDIC-insured institutions. The standards apply to internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality, and earnings.

In general, the safety and soundness standards prescribe the goals to be achieved in each area, and each institution is responsible for establishing its own procedures to achieve those goals. Although regulatory standards do not have the force of law, if an institution operates in an unsafe and unsound manner, the FDIC-insured institution’s primary federal regulator may require the institution to submit a plan for achieving and maintaining compliance. If an FDIC-insured institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, or fails in any material respect to implement a compliance plan that has been accepted by its primary federal regulator, the banking agency is required to issue an order directing the institution to cure the deficiency. Until the deficiency cited in the banking agency’s order is cured, the agency may restrict the FDIC-insured institution’s rate of growth, require the FDIC-insured institution to increase its capital, restrict the rates that the institution pays on deposits, or require the institution to take any action that the agency deems appropriate under the circumstances. Noncompliance with safety and soundness also may constitute grounds for other enforcement action by the federal banking agencies, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalty assessments.

During the past decade, the banking agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of sound risk management processes and strong internal controls when evaluating the activities of the FDIC-insured institutions that they supervise. Properly managing risks has been identified as critical to the conduct of safe and sound banking activities and has become even more important as new technologies, new third-party relationships, product innovation, and the size and speed of financial transactions have changed the nature of banking markets. The agencies have identified a spectrum of risks facing a banking organization including, but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, legal, and reputational risk. The Bank is expected to have active board and senior management oversight; adequate policies, procedures, and limits; adequate risk measurement, monitoring, and management information systems; and comprehensive internal controls. The federal banking agencies also have released specific risk management guidance on certain topics, including third-party relationships, in response to the proliferation of relationships between banking organizations and financial technology companies (although the guidance applies more broadly).

Privacy and Cybersecurity. The Bank is subject to many U.S. federal and state laws and regulations governing requirements for maintaining policies and procedures to protect non-public personal and confidential information of their customers. These laws require the Bank to periodically disclose its privacy policies and practices relating to sharing such information, and permit consumers to opt out of their ability to share information with unaffiliated third parties under certain circumstances. They also impact the Bank’s ability to share certain information with affiliates and non-affiliates for marketing and/or non-marketing purposes, or to contact customers with marketing offers. In addition, the Bank is required to implement a comprehensive information security program that includes administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information. These security and privacy policies and procedures are in effect across all businesses and geographic locations.

Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity require financial institutions to design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. Bank management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. The Bank and the Company also are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations requiring notifications and disclosures regarding certain cybersecurity incidents.

Branching Authority. Illinois banks, such as the Bank, have the authority under Illinois law to establish branches anywhere in the State of Illinois, subject to receipt of all required regulatory approvals. The Dodd-Frank Act permits well-capitalized and well-managed banks to establish new interstate branches or acquire individual branches of a bank in another state (rather than the acquisition of an out-of-state bank in its entirety) without impediments.

In addition, federal law permits state and national banks to merge with banks in other states subject to: (i) regulatory approval; (ii) federal and state deposit concentration limits; and (iii) state law limitations requiring the merging bank to have been in existence for a minimum period of time (not to exceed five years) prior to the merger.

Community Reinvestment Act Requirements. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”) requires the Bank to have a continuing and affirmative obligation in a safe and sound manner to help meet the credit needs of the entire community that it serves, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The FDIC regularly assesses the Bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its communities in dedicated examinations. The Bank’s CRA ratings derived from these examinations can have significant impacts on the activities in which the Bank and the Company may engage. For example, a low CRA rating may impact the review of regulatory applications made by the Bank.

In April 1995, the federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, issued a regulation clarifying how they would evaluate banks’ compliance with the CRA (the “1995 CRA Rule”), which has been amended several times. In October 2023, the federal banking agencies issued a final rule representing a significant overhaul of the 1995 CRA Rule intended to strengthen and modernize the agencies’ CRA regulations (the “2023 CRA Rule”). However, the 2023 CRA Rule has been subject to ongoing litigation claiming that the federal banking agencies exceeded their statutory authority in promulgating this rule. In March 2025, this ongoing lawsuit, as well as an administration change, led the federal banking agencies to announce their intention to rescind the 2023 CRA Rule and continue using the 1995 CRA Rue (as amended) in conducting their CRA evaluations. The federal banking agencies are expected to release a notice of proposed rulemaking to this effect.

In 2022, the Bank, like all Illinois chartered banks, became subject to state-level CRA standards, following passage of the Illinois Community Reinvestment Act (the “Illinois CRA”). This means that, in addition to the federal CRA review, the Bank will be reviewed by the IDFPR to assess the Bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its communities. Like the potential impact under the federal CRA, applications for additional acquisitions or activities would be affected by the evaluation of the Bank’s effectiveness in meeting its Illinois CRA requirements.

Anti-Money Laundering. The Bank Secrecy Act ( “BSA”) is the common name for a series of laws and regulations enacted in the United States to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. They are designed to deny terrorists and criminals the ability to obtain access to the U.S. financial system and have significant implications for FDIC-insured institutions and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The so-called Anti-Money Laundering / Countering the Financing of Terrorism (“AML/CFT”) regime under the BSA provides a foundation to promote financial transparency and deter and detect those who seek to misuse the U.S. financial system to launder criminal proceeds, finance terrorist acts, or move funds for other illicit purposes.

The laws mandate financial services companies to have policies and procedures with respect to measures designed to address: (i) customer identification programs; (ii) money laundering; (iii) terrorist financing; (iv) identifying and reporting suspicious activities and currency transactions; (v) currency crimes; and (vi) cooperation between FDIC-insured institutions and law enforcement authorities. The Bank also must comply with stringent economic and trade sanctions regimes administered and enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Federal Home Loan Bank Membership. The Bank is a member of a Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), which serves as a central credit facility for its members. The FHLB is funded primarily from proceeds from the sale of obligations of the FHLB system. It makes loans to member banks in the form of FHLB advances. All advances from the FHLB are required to be fully collateralized as determined by the FHLB.

Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate. Concentration risk exists when FDIC-insured institutions deploy too many assets to any one industry or segment. A concentration in commercial real estate (“CRE”) is one example of regulatory concern, which has been subject to additional scrutiny by federal banking agencies as well as the SEC (for publicly-traded banking organizations) in recent years. The Interagency Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”) Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices guidance (“CRE Guidance”) provides supervisory criteria, including the following numerical indicators, to assist bank examiners in identifying banks with potentially significant CRE loan concentrations that may warrant greater supervisory scrutiny: (i) CRE loans exceeding 300% of capital and increasing 50% or more in the preceding three years, or (ii) construction and land development loans exceeding 100% of capital. The CRE Guidance does not limit banks’ levels of CRE lending activities, but rather guides institutions in developing risk management practices and levels of capital that are commensurate with the level and nature of their CRE concentrations. On December 18, 2015, and again in recent years, the federal banking agencies issued statements to reinforce prudent risk-management practices related to CRE lending, having observed substantial growth in many CRE asset and lending markets, increased competitive pressures, rising CRE concentrations in banks, and an easing of CRE underwriting standards. The federal banking agencies have reminded FDIC-insured institutions to maintain underwriting discipline and exercise prudent risk-management practices to identify, measure, monitor, and manage the risks arising from CRE lending. In addition, FDIC-insured institutions must maintain capital commensurate with the level and nature of their CRE concentration risk. On December 18, 2023, the FDIC issued a statement to reemphasize the importance of strong capital, appropriate credit loss allowance levels, and robust credit risk-management practices for institutions with CRE concentrations. As of March 31, 2025, the Bank did not exceed the CRE guidelines.

Consumer Financial Services. The historical structure of federal consumer protection regulation applicable to all providers of consumer financial products and services changed significantly on July 21, 2011, when the CFPB commenced operations to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all providers of consumer products and services, including the Bank, as well as the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over providers with more than $10 billion in assets. FDIC-insured institutions with $10 billion or less in assets, like the Bank, continue to be examined by their applicable primary federal regulators.

Because abuses in connection with residential mortgages were a significant factor contributing to the global financial crisis, many rules issued by the CFPB, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, addressed mortgage and mortgage-related products, their underwriting, origination, servicing and sales. The Dodd-Frank Act significantly expanded underwriting requirements applicable to loans secured by one-to-four family residential real property and augmented federal law combating predatory lending practices. In addition to numerous disclosure requirements, the Dodd-Frank Act and the CFPB’s enabling rules imposed new standards for mortgage loan originations on all lenders, including banks and savings associations, in an effort to strongly encourage lenders to verify a borrower’s ability to repay, while also establishing a presumption of compliance for certain “qualified mortgages.”

The current acting leader of the CFPB has indicated that the CFPB will adopt a deregulatory approach, and the CFPB has recently announced that it plans to roll back certain rulemakings adopted over the last several years. The U.S. Congress is also pursuing Congressional Review Act resolutions or otherwise taking steps to overturn certain recent CFPB rulemaking. While some of the CPFB’s recent rulemakings did not impact the Bank directly, the CFPB’s retreat from the aggressive approach to regulation (and supervision, where applicable) that it has previously adopted may benefit the operations of the Bank.

The CFPB’s rules have not had a significant impact on the Bank’s operations, except for higher compliance costs. The Bank must also comply with certain state consumer protection laws and requirements in the states in which it operates.

Regulation and Supervision of Bank Subsidiaries

The Bank has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSI and FSM. FSI offers insurance agency services and maintains a state insurance licenses in Illinois. FSM offers mortgage banking services. As operating subsidiaries of the Bank, both FSI and FSM are subject to the supervision, examination and enforcement authority of the IDFPR and the FDIC as part of the operation of their parent bank.

Management

Board of Directors

Our board of directors currently consists of ten members. Our certificate of incorporation provides that our board is authorized to have not less than nine nor more than 15 directors. The number of directors may be changed only by resolution of our board within the range set forth in our certificate of incorporation. We have a classified board of directors, with each director elected to serve a three year term.

The following table sets forth information as of the date of this prospectus regarding the members of our board of directors. Ages are given as of the date of this prospectus and the expiration year is when the director’s current term will expire at that year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

The following is a brief discussion of the business and banking background and experience of each of our directors for at least the past five years. The biographies contain information regarding the person’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that the person should serve as a director. No director has any family relationship, as defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-K, with any other director or with any of our executive officers.

Spencer T. Cohn. Mr. Cohn is a director of Castle Creek Capital, which he joined in 2014. Mr. Cohn serves on our board under an agreement that we made with Castle Creek Capital Partners VI, LP. Castle Creek Capital Partners VI, LP has the right to designate a representative to serve on our board for so long as Castle Creek Capital Partners VI, LP beneficially owns at least 4.9% of our common stock then outstanding. Castle Creek Capital is an asset management firm focused on the community banking industry. Located in San Diego, California and Dallas, Texas, Castle Creek Capital has been an investor in community banking since the firm’s inception in 1990.

Mr. Cohn is a director of Bancorp 34, Inc. and subsidiary Southwest Heritage Bank, each headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, since January 27, 2023. Mr. Cohn is a director of Lincoln Bancorp and subsidiary Lincoln Savings Bank, each of Reinbeck, Iowa, since August 2022. Mr. Cohn has been a director at CNB Bank Shares, Inc., headquartered in Carlinville, Illinois, since January 2022. Previous board experience includes director service with Aquesta Financial Holdings, Inc. and subsidiary Aquesta Bank, each of Cornelius, North Carolina, from 2019 to October 1, 2021, and Citizens Bancshares Company, Kansas City, Missouri, and its subsidiary Citizens Bank & Trust from 2019 through January 1, 2023.

Prior to joining Castle Creek Capital, Mr. Cohn worked at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods as an investment banking associate in the Financial Institutions Group where he concentrated on mergers and acquisitions and capital markets transactions. Since April 2019, Mr. Cohn is a Director of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (San Diego Chapter) and serves as Co-Chair of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation’s Tomorrow’s Leaders program (San Diego Chapter). In addition to his charitable involvement, Mr. Cohn is a Senior Mentor and Resume Reviewer for Wall Street Oasis. Mr. Cohn holds dual Bachelor of Science degrees in Finance and Accountancy from The University of Illinois and is both a graduate and Capstone Advisor of the ABA Stonier Graduate School of Banking at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

Matthew P. Faber. Mr. Faber is a sixth generation farmer who began operating alongside his father in 2006. He took over the farm management in 2018. He graduated from Illinois State University in 2005 with a Bachelor of Science Degree where he majored in Business Administration and minored in Agriculture. He has been involved in many community outreach clubs and projects, previously served as president of the Mendota Optimist Club and is currently a member of the Mendota Lions Club.

John Holland III. Mr. Holland is currently the Corporate Controller at HCC, Inc., a manufacturing firm specializing in agricultural equipment, with 24 years of experience in various industries including manufacturing and services. Mr. Holland also serves as Treasurer for the Mendota Golf Club and Alderman on the Mendota, Illinois city council. He is a United States Air Force veteran with 9 years of service.

Timothy J. McConville. Mr. McConville is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Tri-County Financial Group, Inc., a role which he has held since 2024. Prior to his current position, Mr. McConville served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of First State Bank from 1994 to 2024, when he transitioned to his current role. Mr. McConville began his banking career in 1978 after graduating from Illinois State University, where he majored in Agri-Business. He worked in the loan department until he became President of First State Bank in 1994. He retired from that position in 2024.

Kenneth D. Otterbach. Ken Otterbach is a lifelong farmer in the Mendota area. He also owns and operates an excavating business based in Mendota that specializes in excavation, demolition, and trucking. He has been a director since 2004 and is currently Vice Chairman of the Board.

Thomas K. Prescott. Mr. Prescott is the President and Dealer Principal of Prescott Brothers Inc., a Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram dealership in Mendota, Illinois, and Prescott Brothers Ford Inc., a Ford dealership in Rochelle Illinois. Mr. Prescott has served as a Dealer Council Member of the Stellantis Midwest Business Center since 2019. From 1998 to 2008, he served as a member Chrysler Jeep Dealer Advertising Board and from 1998 to 2002 he served on the Board of the Mendota Chamber of Commerce.

Kirk L. Ross. Mr. Ross began his banking career in 1989 and has worked for First State Bank since 1994 with his primary responsibilities in the commercial lending area. He served as Executive Vice President prior to being named Chief Executive Officer and President of First State Bank in 2024. Mr. Ross is a graduate of the University of Illinois with a bachelor’s degree in Agricultural Economics.

Julie Setchell. Ms. Setchell began her career in 1979 as a self-employed business owner with the acquisition of a retail clothing business. Through dedication, hard work and commitment, she and her husband successfully expanded their business to additional locations. Ms. Setchell has been involved in the Mendota Chamber of Commerce and has served on its Board of Directors and as its President. Along with her retail experience, she has been involved in agriculture through the management of the family farm since 1983. Throughout her career, she has been responsible for all aspects of her business, including the purchasing of merchandise, marketing, accounts payable and receivable, payroll, human resources, tax preparation and ensuring full regulatory compliance.

Kathleen Stevenson. Ms. Stevenson is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Illinois since 2005 and State of Florida since 2004. Ms. Stevenson focuses her practice on real estate transactions, title searches, title work and real estate settlement services, estate planning and probate. She was born and grew up in the Mendota community and has relationships and familiarity with the community and surrounding communities.

Goodwin W. Toraason. Mr. Toraason began his career in 1976 and has worked at various Illinois community banks holding positions as Controller, Senior Lender, Executive Vice President, board member, and Community President. He joined First State Bank as Executive Vice President and Board member in 1994. Mr. Toraason retired from First State Bank in July 2022.

The board also appointed several former directors to serve as Director Emeritus to the full board of directors. The board believes that the Company benefits from having these individuals remain affiliated with the Company in an informal capacity so the board can use their knowledge and experience in business, banking and the community. Such individuals may attend board meetings upon the board’s invitation, but they are not entitled to vote on matters requiring the board’s approval.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers, including their names, ages and positions:

The business and banking background and experience of each of our executive officers, other than Mr. McConville and Mr. Ross, who also serve as a director of the Company and the Board, for at least the past five years is set forth below. No executive officer has any family relationship, as defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-K, with any other executive officer or any of our current directors. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the officers and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an officer.

Lana Eddy. Ms. Eddy began her career in public accounting in 2004, specializing in audits of financial institutions, credit unions, and healthcare facilities. In 2015, she joined a local community bank, which was later acquired by First State Bank. She joined First State Bank in 2019 and held positions as Assistant Controller and Controller before becoming Chief Financial Officer in 2021.

Rene Shaffer. Ms. Shaffer began her banking career in November 1986 as a Mortgage Banking Officer. Over the years, she held various roles at a community bank, gaining extensive experience in the industry. In 2007, Rene joined First State Mortgage as an Account Executive and subsequently progressed through several key positions within the company. In 2015, she was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of FSM, a role she continues to hold today.

Director Independence

Because shares of our stock are not listed on a national securities exchange, such as Nasdaq or NYSE, we are not subject to many of the independence requirements that other “public” companies are required to meet. The OTCQX does not impose the same requirements regarding many of the corporate governance items.

In applying these standards, and based on information provided by each director concerning his background, employment and affiliations, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Messrs. McConville and Ross, each of our current directors is an “outside” director and “independent of management”, as defined under the FDICIA and as under the OTCQX rules. The board determined that Messrs. McConville and Ross do not qualify because of their roles as executive officers of either the Company or the Bank.

Board Committees

The standing committees of our board of directors consist of an Audit Committee and an Executive Committee.

Audit Committee. Mr. Faber, Mr. Otterbach, Mr. Holland, Ms. Stevenson, Ms. Setchell, Mr. Prescott and Mr. Cohn, serve on our audit committee. Our audit committee is composed solely of members who satisfy the applicable independence, financial literacy and other requirements of the FDIC, which requires that our audit committee be made up of “outside” directors who are independent from management. The board has determined that each member of our audit committee meets the requirements for the service on the committee.

Our Audit Committee is generally responsible for the following duties and responsibilities:

Executive Committee. Mr. Ross, Mr. Otterbach, Mr. Prescott, Mr. Holland and Mr. McConville serve on our Executive Committee, which also serves as the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Executive Committee consists of the president, the chairman of the board and three other directors appointed by the chairman of the board and ratified by the board at the first regularly scheduled meeting following the annual meeting of the stockholders. In decisions regarding compensation, no member of the Executive Committee participates in the decision making process of his or her own compensation.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Our board of directors believes that effective risk management and control processes are critical to our safety and soundness, our ability to predict and manage the challenges that we face and, ultimately, our long-term corporate success. Our board of directors, both directly and through its committees, is responsible for overseeing our risk management processes, with each of the committees of our board of directors assuming a different and important role in overseeing the management of the risks we face.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Results of Operations

The following discussion provides information about our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, and capital resources. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for the years then ended, and our unaudited condensed, consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, presented elsewhere in this document.

The consolidated Company is referred to as “we” or “our” or “the Company” in the following discussion.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Critical accounting policies are those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting policies relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses and valuation of goodwill, both of which involves significant judgment by management.

Allowance for Credit Losses

As a result of our January 1, 2023, adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-13 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASC 326), our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses changed significantly from prior years. ASC 326 replaces the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology that is referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology. In addition to loans, the CECL methodology is applicable to our off-balance sheet credit exposures such as loan commitments, unused customer credit lines, and standby letters of credit.

The CECL approach requires an estimate of credit losses expected over the life of a financial instrument. The CECL methodology replaces the incurred loss method of recognizing credit losses. Under the incurred loss methodology, recognition of a credit loss was delayed until it became probable that a loss event had occurred.

Our Company adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective method. Consequently, results for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023 are presented under ASC 326 while prior period amounts are reported under previously applicable GAAP.

Our methodologies for estimating the allowance for expected credit losses (ACL) consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. We also consider whether historical loss experience should be adjusted for asset-specific risk characteristics or current conditions that did not exist during the respective historical period.

We use third-party software in our quarterly ACL calculations, primarily to estimate credit losses on pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. We have also engaged independent consultants to validate the model, including its construction and our implementation, ongoing maintenance, and governance. When appropriate, refinements to the model’s inputs and calculations are made to arrive at a better estimate of future losses.

Substandard loans are individually analyzed to determine the expected credit loss, if any. Expected credit losses on pools of loans and individually analyzed loans are then totaled to arrive at the allowance for credit losses on loans.

Our accounting policies and related disclosures about credit losses are discussed in more detail in the Notes to our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Please refer to Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4 – Loans.

Goodwill

Goodwill results from business acquisitions that we made in prior years. The acquisition method of accounting requires that assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date, typically resulting in goodwill. The valuation of assets and liabilities in a business combination involves estimates that are inherently subjective. Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration we paid over the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired.

Our accounting policy for goodwill and other intangible assets is disclosed in Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies to the year-end financial statements. We evaluate goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually, or more often if impairment indicators are present. In addition to our internal, qualitative evaluations, goodwill recorded at FSM is supported by annual third party valuations indicating that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. Our qualitative assessment of goodwill noted FSM’s continuing net losses and a challenging interest rate environment. Consequently, we proceeded to the quantitative goodwill impairment test and engaged a third party firm to estimate the fair value of FSM’s equity.

The valuation firm considered but did not rely on the cost approach to valuing FSM, primarily because of the nature and expected future profitability of FSM and our intent to continue operating our mortgage subsidiary. The market approach was also considered, however, the valuation firm did not rely on the market approach due to the lack of sufficiently similar companies, given FSM’s operating characteristics, service offerings, and market geography. Ultimately, the valuation firm relied on the income approach in its valuation of FSM. The discounted cash flow method was selected as the most appropriate method due to FSM’s expectations for varying growth rates in the upcoming years. The discount rate calculation included an equity risk premium, the risk free rate, a size premium, and specific company risk. These key assumptions were determined through selection of a common industry approach and consistent application of the approach selected.

Cash flow assumptions were based on management’s projected financial results for fiscal years through December 31, 2029, discounted at 18.4%. The valuation included a residual value, discounted at 15.4%, net of a 3% long term annual sustainable cash flow growth rate assumption. Management projected FSM’s earnings to slightly exceed breakeven in 2025 and then return to normalized levels of operating profits beginning in 2026.

The appraisal firm’s valuation of FSM exceeded its carrying value by 44.9% as of the October 31, 2024 measurement date. The estimated fair value included cash recorded on FSM’s balance sheet.

FSM’s appraised fair value is an estimate subject to, among other factors, the risk that key assumptions will not materialize. Estimating future cash flows involves considerable judgment and actual results may differ materially from management’s projections. Further, a more favorable interest rate environment for the mortgage industry may never develop. Economic downturns, rising interest rates, increased competition, new regulations, and changing technology are among the various other factors that could have a material, adverse effect on future operating results.

If FSM incurred a future impairment loss, it would be a non-cash expense limited to its $2.2 million of recorded goodwill, which is about 1.5% of our Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2024. No income tax benefit would be expected from a goodwill impairment loss.

Goodwill is excluded from the Bank’s regulatory capital calculations. Consequently, although a goodwill impairment loss would decrease net income and stockholders’ equity, it would not affect the Bank’s capitalized status as of March 31, 2025.

Emerging Growth Company

Pursuant to the JOBS Act, an emerging growth company is provided the option to adopt new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the SEC either (i) within the same periods as those otherwise applicable to non-emerging growth companies or (ii) within the same time periods as private companies. We have irrevocably elected to adopt new accounting standards within the same time periods as private companies.

Selected Consolidated Financial Information – Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023

Selected consolidated financial information for the Company at or for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, follows:

Financial Condition

Our primary investing activities are the origination of real estate, commercial, and agricultural loans and the purchase of debt securities. Assets are funded primarily by deposits, borrowings such as FHLB advances, and stockholders’ equity.

Total assets were $1.54 billion at December 31, 2024, representing a decrease of $13.6 million, or 1%, from the prior year-end. The most significant change in assets was the $31.1 million decrease in securities available-for-sale. Debt security maturities and paydowns, together with $26.6 million of deposit growth, were used primarily to reduce our reliance on FHLB borrowing.

Our primary earning assets and funding sources are discussed below, including significant changes in our assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity during the year ended December 31, 2024 and the first quarter of 2025.

Securities Portfolio

The securities portfolio serves the following purposes: (i) it provides a source of pledged assets for securing certain deposits and borrowed funds, as may be required by law or by specific agreement with a depositor or lender; (ii) it provides liquidity to even out cash flows from the loan and deposit activities of customers; (iii) it can be used as an interest rate risk management tool, since it provides a large base of assets, the maturity and interest rate characteristics of which can be changed more readily than the loan portfolio to better match changes in the deposit base and other funding sources of the Company; and (iv) it is an alternative interest-earning use of funds when loan demand is weak or when deposits grow more rapidly than loans.

Consistent with our investment policy, our portfolio consists of (i) U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government sponsored entities’ debt securities for liquidity and pledging; (ii) mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, which in many instances can also be used for pledging, and which generally enhance the yield of the portfolio; and (iii) municipal obligations, which provide tax free income and limited pledging potential.

All debt securities are classified as available-for-sale. Accounting guidance requires available-for-sale securities to be marked to fair value with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is a component of stockholders’ equity. Monthly adjustments are made to reflect changes in the fair value of our available-for-sale securities.

The following table sets forth the carrying value of our investment securities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

The amortized cost and fair value of our Treasury securities were $25.8 million and $24.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2024. Our federal agency obligations consist of securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, primarily the FHLB. We also invest in SBA guaranteed loan participations.

Our agency mortgage-backed securities and CMO portfolio consist of securities predominantly underwritten to the standards of and guaranteed by the following government-sponsored agencies: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; Federal National Mortgage Association; and Government National Mortgage Association.

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately 72% of our state and municipal securities were issued by entities located in Illinois.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost, weighted average yields, and maturities of our investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 2024. Yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis, using the 21% federal tax rate. Mortgage-backed investment securities include scheduled principal payments and estimated prepayments based on observable market inputs. Actual prepayments will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

The following factors may be particularly relevant when comparing our investment portfolio with the performance of other financial institutions:

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

As shown above, the fair value of our debt securities recovered in the first quarter of 2025 compared to year-end 2024. Unrealized losses in our securities portfolio are due to increases in interest rates rather than credit deterioration. None of our securities has had a past due payment. As discussed earlier, we incurred significant net unrealized losses due to rapidly rising interest rates in 2022 and first half of 2023.

We did not sell any securities in 2024, 2023 or the first quarter of 2025. Absent credit quality concerns or further increases in market interest rates, unrealized losses on debt securities generally recover as the maturity date approaches.

Loan Portfolio

Loans represent the largest portion of our earning assets and typically provide higher yields than other assets. The quality and diversification of the loan portfolio is an important consideration when reviewing our financial condition. Our loan policy provides consistent standards and direction to achieve goals and objectives, which include maximizing earnings over the short and long term by managing risks. Internal concentration limits exist on all loan types, including commercial and agricultural real estate. We have established strong underwriting practices and procedures to assess borrower credit risk, including review of debt service ability and collateral values and evaluation of guarantors. Appropriate actions are taken when a borrower is past due on payments or no longer able to service its debt.

Our loan portfolio consists of various types of loans. The three segments of our loan portfolio are: commercial (including agricultural production); real estate; and consumer. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the real estate segment comprised 88% and 87%, respectively, of our loan portfolio. The real estate segment primarily consists of commercial and consumer loans. Smaller portions of the real estate segment are agricultural loans and construction and land loans. Our loans are primarily to borrowers in the Illinois markets where we operate.

Commercial real estate loans are primarily secured by office and industrial buildings, warehouses, small retail shopping centers, single family and multi-family residential buildings, and various other properties including restaurants and hotels. None of our loans are secured by, or dependent on, office buildings in large urban centers such as downtown Chicago. Agricultural real estate loans are primarily for land acquisition and other long-term farm financing.

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately 90% of our consumer real estate loans are secured by first liens on one-to-four family residential properties. The rest of the portfolio are home equity loans and other loans secured by junior liens. At origination, evaluation of borrower repayment ability includes a review of debt to income, credit scores, and certain other information. Collateral coverage is based on appraisals.

Construction and land development loans are secured by vacant land and/or property in the process of improvement, including (1) land development preparatory to erecting vertical improvements, and (2) the construction of industrial , commercial, residential, or farm buildings. Repayment of these loans typically depends on the sale of the property to third parties or the successful and timely completion of the improvements by the builder for the end user.

Commercial and agricultural loans are primarily for working capital, asset acquisition or expansion, and other business purposes. Underwriting of these loans is based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral. Financial information obtained from borrowers is used to evaluate debt service sufficiency. Such financial information and evaluations are updated periodically during the life of the loan.

Consumer loans for household, family, and other personal expenditures are less than 1% of our total loan portfolio. At the time of origination, we evaluate the borrower’s repayment ability primarily through a review of debt to income and credit scores.

Loan characteristics and risks and underwriting are described in more detail in our December 31, 2024 consolidated financial statements, primarily in accompanying Notes 1 and 4.

The following table sets forth loans within each segment of our portfolio at year-end 2024 and 2023, including their percentage of total loans and increase (decrease) during 2024:

The following table sets forth contractual maturities by loan portfolio segment. This table does not include unscheduled prepayments:

The following table presents loans that mature after one year, set forth by loan segment and fixed or adjustable interest rate:

Loan volume in the first quarter of 2025 was slightly less compared to year-end 2024 and the first quarter of 2024. Total loans were approximately 1% less at March 31, 2025 compared to year-end 2024. Similarly, average loan balances were approximately 1% less in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the first quarter of 2024.

The following table sets forth loans within each segment of our portfolio at March 31, 2025 and year-end 2024, including their percentage of total loans and increase (decrease) during the first quarter of 2025: