UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-23148
Guardian Variable Products Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
10 Hudson Yards New York, N.Y. 10001
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Dominique Baede
President
Guardian Variable Products Trust
10 Hudson Yards
New York, N.Y. 10001
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212-598-8000
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2024
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders. |
(a) | A copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is as follows: |
Item 1. (continued)
(b) Not applicable.
Item 2. | Code of Ethics. |
Not applicable.
Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
Not applicable.
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
Not applicable.
Item 6. | Investments. |
(a) | The Schedule of Investments is included as part of Item 7 of this Form N-CSR. |
(b) | None. |
Item 7. | Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies | ||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 10 | |||
Statement of Operations | 10 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 11 | |||
Financial Highlights | 12 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 14 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 21 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 21 | |||
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies | 21 | |||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements | 21 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities – 15.6% |
| |||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. |
$ | 2,558,243 | $ | 2,178,799 | ||||
3.50% due 6/1/2052 |
6,238,457 | 5,522,343 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2037 |
377,321 | 362,684 | ||||||
4.00% due 6/1/2052 |
2,951,386 | 2,700,629 | ||||||
4.50% due 8/1/2052 |
3,629,702 | 3,424,547 | ||||||
4.50% due 9/1/2052 |
454,067 | 428,278 | ||||||
5.50% due 9/1/2053 |
4,068,717 | 4,018,636 | ||||||
6.00% due 8/1/2053 |
2,009,702 | 2,015,345 | ||||||
6.00% due 10/1/2053 |
3,927,735 | 3,937,116 | ||||||
6.00% due 3/1/2054 |
1,994,397 | 2,004,057 | ||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association |
3,406,592 | 2,896,447 | ||||||
3.00% due 5/1/2052 |
9,110,397 | 7,756,098 | ||||||
3.50% due 6/1/2052 |
4,635,521 | 4,103,408 | ||||||
3.50% due 9/1/2052 |
3,642,279 | 3,228,122 | ||||||
3.50% due 10/1/2052 |
3,798,376 | 3,361,477 | ||||||
4.00% due 6/1/2052 |
4,564,995 | 4,182,401 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2052 |
4,734,906 | 4,332,618 | ||||||
4.50% due 10/1/2053 |
4,595,389 | 4,330,637 | ||||||
5.00% due 2/1/2053 |
295,348 | 285,573 | ||||||
5.50% due 1/1/2054 |
1,066,467 | 1,051,246 | ||||||
6.00% due 9/1/2053 |
286,710 | 287,423 | ||||||
Total Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $65,141,011) |
|
62,407,884 | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities – 20.5% |
| |||||||
AGL CLO 17 Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,199,400 | ||||||
Aligned Data Centers Issuer LLC |
2,016,000 | 1,857,234 | ||||||
Allegro CLO VI Ltd. |
2,000,000 | 1,997,400 | ||||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust |
2,394,102 | 2,364,198 | ||||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust |
2,227,411 | 2,186,991 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 17 Ltd. |
2,800,000 | 2,798,040 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 21 Ltd. |
1,750,000 | 1,748,600 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Ares XXVII CLO Ltd. |
$ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,000,928 | ||||
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC |
2,440,000 | 2,396,046 | ||||||
Barings CLO Ltd. |
2,800,000 | 2,802,125 | ||||||
Battalion CLO X Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,000 | ||||||
Battery Park CLO II Ltd. |
3,550,000 | 3,563,135 | ||||||
Benefit Street Partners CLO XVI Ltd. |
2,800,000 | 2,797,200 | ||||||
Canyon Capital CLO Ltd. |
2,000,000 | 1,998,934 | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust |
2,200,000 | 2,148,362 | ||||||
Cathedral Lake VI Ltd. |
2,500,000 | 2,503,868 | ||||||
CIFC Funding Ltd. |
2,000,000 | 1,998,200 | ||||||
Dryden 80 CLO Ltd. |
3,350,000 | 3,345,645 | ||||||
Dryden Senior Loan Fund |
2,100,000 | 2,098,320 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust |
$ | 2,400,000 | $ | 2,347,134 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust |
2,625,200 | 2,602,178 | ||||||
Hyundai Auto Lease Securitization Trust |
417,345 | 416,817 | ||||||
ICG U.S. CLO Ltd. |
2,500,000 | 2,499,000 | ||||||
Jamestown CLO XI Ltd. |
2,800,000 | 2,797,480 | ||||||
KKR CLO 38 Ltd. |
2,800,000 | 2,799,350 | ||||||
Marble Point CLO XVIII Ltd. |
2,500,000 | 2,497,250 | ||||||
Midocean Credit CLO VIII |
700,000 | 700,280 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman Loan Advisers CLO 26 Ltd. |
1,050,000 | 1,049,895 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman Loan Advisers CLO 40 Ltd. |
2,900,000 | 2,904,350 | ||||||
NextGear Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
2,500,000 | 2,491,881 | ||||||
Nissan Auto Lease Trust |
1,600,000 | 1,590,513 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Octagon Investment Partners 45 Ltd. |
$ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,199,640 | ||||
OHA Credit Partners XIV Ltd. |
2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | ||||||
Oscar U.S. Funding XV LLC |
1,300,000 | 1,304,586 | ||||||
RRX 6 Ltd. |
1,800,000 | 1,799,100 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust |
346,701 | 345,953 | ||||||
TCW CLO Ltd. |
850,000 | 850,255 | ||||||
TIAA CLO IV Ltd. |
1,240,000 | 1,238,884 | ||||||
Series 2018-1A, Class A2R |
1,240,000 | 1,240,000 | ||||||
Toyota Auto Loan Extended Note Trust |
2,175,000 | 2,028,727 | ||||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust |
2,800,000 | 2,681,598 | ||||||
Total Asset-Backed Securities (Cost $81,882,762) |
|
82,188,497 | ||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes – 26.1% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 0.6% |
| |||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
400,000 | 397,072 | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
800,000 | 821,056 | ||||||
6.10% due 3/15/2034 |
1,000,000 | 1,053,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,271,128 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agriculture – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
$ | 500,000 | $ | 493,600 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
493,600 | ||||||||
Apparel – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Tapestry, Inc. |
700,000 | 726,285 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
726,285 | ||||||||
Auto Manufacturers – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Hyundai Capital America |
1,500,000 | 1,493,055 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,493,055 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc. |
600,000 | 562,494 | ||||||
PepsiCo, Inc. |
2,700,000 | 2,520,666 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,083,160 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 0.0% |
| |||||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
100,000 | 99,820 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
99,820 | ||||||||
Building Materials – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Carrier Global Corp. |
500,000 | 387,195 | ||||||
CRH America Finance, Inc. |
1,200,000 | 1,188,180 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,575,375 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Nutrien Ltd. |
800,000 | 788,584 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
788,584 | ||||||||
Commercial Banks – 6.8% |
| |||||||
AIB Group PLC |
500,000 | 496,855 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
1,000,000 | 823,140 | ||||||
4.271% (4.271% fixed rate until 7/23/2028; 3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.57% thereafter) |
2,900,000 | 2,793,628 | ||||||
Barclays PLC |
600,000 | 587,136 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
$ | 800,000 | $ | 796,928 | ||||
Citibank NA |
800,000 | 813,256 | ||||||
Comerica, Inc. |
1,500,000 | 1,478,265 | ||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
3,900,000 | 3,598,764 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
1,900,000 | 1,831,942 | ||||||
5.04% (5.04% fixed rate until 1/23/2027; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.19% thereafter) |
700,000 | 696,409 | ||||||
5.581% (5.581% fixed rate until 4/22/2029; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.16% thereafter) |
1,000,000 | 1,015,840 | ||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC |
1,400,000 | 1,316,994 | ||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. |
1,500,000 | 1,496,400 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
900,000 | 736,254 | ||||||
5.123% (5.123% fixed rate until 2/1/2028; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.73% thereafter) |
1,000,000 | 996,070 | ||||||
5.173% (5.173% fixed rate until 1/16/2029; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.45% thereafter) |
1,500,000 | 1,495,485 | ||||||
NatWest Group PLC |
2,500,000 | 2,531,850 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Ltd. |
$ | 400,000 | $ | 402,624 | ||||
Truist Bank |
800,000 | 783,624 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
2,800,000 | 2,482,452 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
27,173,916 | ||||||||
Computers – 0.0% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
100,000 | 93,626 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
93,626 | ||||||||
Cosmetics & Personal Care – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. |
500,000 | 482,785 | ||||||
Haleon U.S. Capital LLC |
700,000 | 626,689 | ||||||
Kenvue, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 988,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,098,224 | ||||||||
Diversified Financial Services – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
700,000 | 729,022 | ||||||
Jefferies Financial Group, Inc. |
400,000 | 403,940 | ||||||
6.20% due 4/14/2034 |
800,000 | 810,736 | ||||||
Mastercard, Inc. |
200,000 | 199,024 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,142,722 | ||||||||
Electric – 2.0% |
| |||||||
Alabama Power Co. |
1,000,000 | 918,860 | ||||||
Constellation Energy Generation LLC |
600,000 | 581,634 | ||||||
DTE Energy Co. |
2,000,000 | 2,029,120 | ||||||
Public Service Co. of Colorado |
500,000 | 494,250 | ||||||
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. |
300,000 | 295,557 | ||||||
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. |
700,000 | 694,260 | ||||||
Vistra Operations Co. LLC |
500,000 | 500,550 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Electric (continued) |
| |||||||
Wisconsin Public Service Corp. |
$ | 400,000 | $ | 247,012 | ||||
Xcel Energy, Inc. |
2,200,000 | 2,167,440 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,928,683 | ||||||||
Electronics – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
1,400,000 | 1,193,360 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,193,360 | ||||||||
Environmental Control – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Waste Management, Inc. |
3,300,000 | 3,109,392 | ||||||
4.95% due 7/3/2031 |
800,000 | 794,600 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,903,992 | ||||||||
Food – 0.2% |
| |||||||
JBS USA Holding Lux SARL/JBS USA Food Co./JBS Lux Co. SARL |
727,000 | 723,009 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
723,009 | ||||||||
Gas – 0.3% |
| |||||||
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. |
1,100,000 | 1,099,406 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,099,406 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
800,000 | 772,224 | ||||||
5.125% due 2/15/2053 |
200,000 | 184,008 | ||||||
HCA, Inc. |
600,000 | 597,648 | ||||||
5.50% due 6/15/2047 |
500,000 | 461,510 | ||||||
5.60% due 4/1/2034 |
500,000 | 496,765 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
200,000 | 199,780 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,711,935 | ||||||||
Insurance – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Aon North America, Inc. |
800,000 | 796,440 | ||||||
5.75% due 3/1/2054 |
100,000 | 97,715 | ||||||
Assurant, Inc. |
800,000 | 723,480 | ||||||
Chubb INA Holdings LLC |
1,000,000 | 990,770 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,608,405 | ||||||||
Internet – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc. |
1,300,000 | 1,290,757 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,290,757 | ||||||||
Machinery-Diversified – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Deere & Co. |
200,000 | 166,936 | ||||||
John Deere Capital Corp. |
900,000 | 897,255 | ||||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Machinery-Diversified (continued) |
| |||||||
Series I |
$ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,503,615 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
2,567,806 | ||||||||
Media – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC/Charter Communications Operating Capital |
1,000,000 | 1,003,670 | ||||||
Comcast Corp. |
500,000 | 442,630 | ||||||
3.75% due 4/1/2040 |
400,000 | 325,048 | ||||||
4.25% due 1/15/2033 |
500,000 | 467,320 | ||||||
5.35% due 5/15/2053 |
400,000 | 383,240 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,621,908 | ||||||||
Oil & Gas – 1.2% |
| |||||||
BP Capital Markets America, Inc. |
1,900,000 | 1,771,009 | ||||||
4.812% due 2/13/2033 |
1,300,000 | 1,260,454 | ||||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc. |
400,000 | 330,912 | ||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
500,000 | 494,925 | ||||||
5.75% due 4/18/2054 |
500,000 | 484,460 | ||||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. |
600,000 | 559,350 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,901,110 | ||||||||
Packaging & Containers – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Berry Global, Inc. |
600,000 | 600,096 | ||||||
Packaging Corp. of America |
1,000,000 | 1,016,250 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,616,346 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.1% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
800,000 | 694,224 | ||||||
5.05% due 3/15/2034 |
1,500,000 | 1,495,365 | ||||||
5.40% due 3/15/2054 |
500,000 | 494,720 | ||||||
Astrazeneca Finance LLC |
1,200,000 | 1,193,064 | ||||||
AstraZeneca PLC |
800,000 | 890,224 | ||||||
Becton Dickinson & Co. |
500,000 | 468,665 | ||||||
Cigna Group |
1,400,000 | 1,404,886 | ||||||
CVS Health Corp. |
700,000 | 694,701 | ||||||
5.30% due 6/1/2033 |
1,400,000 | 1,366,946 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
1,100,000 | 1,078,484 | ||||||
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte. Ltd. |
1,400,000 | 1,364,006 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Pharmaceuticals (continued) |
| |||||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. |
$ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,193,124 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
12,338,409 | ||||||||
Pipelines – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Cheniere Energy Partners LP |
800,000 | 810,008 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LLC |
800,000 | 776,992 | ||||||
4.85% due 3/15/2044 |
400,000 | 360,760 | ||||||
MPLX LP |
600,000 | 590,838 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,538,598 | ||||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts – 0.9% |
| |||||||
American Homes 4 Rent LP |
300,000 | 295,566 | ||||||
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. |
400,000 | 400,056 | ||||||
Crown Castle, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 891,480 | ||||||
5.80% due 3/1/2034 |
800,000 | 807,968 | ||||||
Extra Space Storage LP |
1,200,000 | 1,174,524 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,569,594 | ||||||||
Retail – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Darden Restaurants, Inc. |
700,000 | 722,673 | ||||||
Home Depot, Inc. |
1,400,000 | 1,387,316 | ||||||
Lowe’s Cos., Inc. |
600,000 | 440,586 | ||||||
5.15% due 7/1/2033 |
400,000 | 398,012 | ||||||
Target Corp. |
900,000 | 867,105 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,815,692 | ||||||||
Software – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Oracle Corp. |
1,700,000 | 1,799,790 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,799,790 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 999,040 | ||||||
5.30% due 2/26/2054 |
500,000 | 490,250 | ||||||
Rogers Communications, Inc. |
1,300,000 | 1,275,365 | ||||||
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
300,000 | 250,854 | ||||||
3.00% due 2/15/2041 |
600,000 | 428,790 | ||||||
3.40% due 10/15/2052 |
200,000 | 136,512 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,580,811 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Transportation – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC |
$ | 200,000 | $ | 201,082 | ||||
Norfolk Southern Corp. |
500,000 | 476,500 | ||||||
5.55% due 3/15/2034 |
500,000 | 509,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,187,332 | ||||||||
Trucking & Leasing – 0.2% |
| |||||||
SMBC Aviation Capital Finance DAC |
700,000 | 686,581 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
686,581 | ||||||||
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (Cost $104,822,995) |
|
104,723,019 | ||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities – 9.1% |
| |||||||
1211 Avenue of the Americas Trust |
1,400,000 | 1,351,100 | ||||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust |
2,550,000 | 2,379,906 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class AM |
1,430,000 | 1,472,240 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class B |
600,000 | 603,603 | ||||||
BMO Mortgage Trust |
1,600,000 | 1,694,285 | ||||||
BX Trust |
2,000,000 | 1,777,866 | ||||||
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust |
2,750,000 | 2,738,626 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust |
2,920,000 | 2,733,440 | ||||||
Series 2019-GC44, Class AM |
2,415,000 | 2,106,646 | ||||||
DBGS Mortgage Trust |
2,400,000 | 2,189,395 | ||||||
DBUBS Mortgage Trust |
1,760,000 | 1,672,722 | ||||||
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust |
2,200,000 | 2,222,175 | ||||||
Series 2021-HQA4, Class M1 |
1,156,096 | 1,153,108 | ||||||
Series 2022-DNA1, Class M1A |
937,752 | 938,000 | ||||||
Series 2022-HQA3, Class M1A |
2,100,779 | 2,150,485 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Hilton USA Trust |
$ | 1,875,000 | $ | 1,786,211 | ||||
Jackson Park Trust |
2,000,000 | 1,713,703 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust |
3,120,000 | 3,043,678 | ||||||
Series 2018-C43, Class A4 |
3,000,000 | 2,847,165 | ||||||
Total Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $37,383,656) |
|
36,574,354 | ||||||
Senior Secured Loans – 3.2% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Outfront Media Capital LLC |
588,050 | 587,609 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
587,609 | ||||||||
Airlines – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Air Canada |
623,438 | 623,631 | ||||||
United Airlines, Inc. |
548,625 | 549,113 | ||||||
WestJet Loyalty LP |
1,150,000 | 1,154,600 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,327,344 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Vestis Corp. |
249,375 | 247,921 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
247,921 | ||||||||
Distribution/Wholesale – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Core & Main LP |
648,375 | 648,783 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
648,783 |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Electric – 0.2% |
| |||||||
ExGen Renewables IV LLC |
$ | 724,351 | $ | 724,952 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
724,952 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
1,246,875 | 1,245,703 | ||||||
Flutter Financing BV |
1,119,375 | 1,118,681 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,364,384 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.1% |
| |||||||
DaVita, Inc. |
440,050 | 439,667 | ||||||
ICON Luxembourg SARL |
118,367 | 118,704 | ||||||
PRA Health Sciences, Inc. |
29,491 | 29,575 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
587,946 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Alterra Mountain Co. |
400,000 | 401,752 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
401,752 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Fertitta Entertainment LLC |
403,934 | 404,188 | ||||||
Hilton Grand Vacations Borrower LLC |
748,125 | 747,564 | ||||||
Station Casinos LLC |
1,122,188 | 1,120,886 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,272,638 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Media – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
$ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,102,134 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
1,102,134 | ||||||||
Software – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. |
997,500 | 997,500 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
997,500 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Frontier Communications Corp. |
500,000 | 498,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
498,750 | ||||||||
Total Senior Secured Loans (Cost $12,722,366) |
|
12,761,713 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 18.8% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
33,500,000 | 33,437,187 | ||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2054 |
19,000,000 | 19,267,188 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
21,000,000 | 21,144,375 | ||||||
4.875% due 5/31/2026 |
1,500,000 | 1,503,047 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $74,451,469) |
|
75,351,797 | ||||||
Commercial Paper – 1.6% |
| |||||||
Florida Power & Light Co. |
6,500,000 | 6,500,000 | ||||||
Total Commercial Paper (Cost $6,500,000) |
|
6,500,000 | ||||||
Shares |
Value | |||||||
Exchange-Traded Funds – 4.0% |
| |||||||
iShares MBS ETF |
90,140 | 8,275,753 | ||||||
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF |
175,580 | 7,971,332 | ||||||
Total Exchange–Traded Funds (Cost $15,612,871) |
|
16,247,085 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $551,022, due 7/1/2024(5) |
$ | 550,949 | 550,949 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $550,949) |
|
550,949 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value |
|||||
Total Investments – 99.0% (Cost $399,068,079) |
$ | 397,305,298 | ||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 1.0% | 3,902,491 | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 401,207,789 |
(1) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $88,010,763, representing 21.9% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(2) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(3) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(4) | Represents an unsettled loan commitment. The coupon rate will be determined at time of settlement. |
(5) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 0.75% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 601,600 | $ | 562,070 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 538 | Long | $ | 109,805,054 | $ | 109,869,688 | $ | 64,634 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. 5-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 319 | Long | 33,795,731 | 33,998,422 | 202,691 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Long Bond | September 2024 | 30 | Long | 3,694,112 | 3,549,375 | (144,737 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra Bond | September 2024 | 32 | Long | 3,984,608 | 4,011,000 | 26,392 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | 151,279,505 | $ | 151,428,485 | $ | 148,980 |
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 132 | Short | $ | (15,142,438 | ) | $ | (14,986,125 | ) | $ | 156,313 | |||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | (15,142,438 | ) | $ | (14,986,125 | ) | $ | 156,313 |
Legend:
CLO — Collateralized Loan Obligation
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury
REMIC — Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
STACR — Structured Agency Credit Risk
USD — United States Dollar
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | $ | — | $ | 62,407,884 | $ | — | $ | 62,407,884 | ||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities | — | 82,188,497 | — | 82,188,497 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes | — | 104,723,019 | — | 104,723,019 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 36,574,354 | — | 36,574,354 | ||||||||||||
Senior Secured Loans | — | 12,761,713 | — | 12,761,713 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 75,351,797 | — | 75,351,797 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Paper | — | 6,500,000 | — | 6,500,000 | ||||||||||||
Exchange-Traded Funds | 16,247,085 | — | — | 16,247,085 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 550,949 | — | 550,949 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 16,247,085 | $ | 381,058,213 | $ | — | $ | 397,305,298 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 450,030 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 450,030 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
(144,737 | ) | — | — | (144,737 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 305,293 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 305,293 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 397,305,298 | ||
Cash |
2,103,562 | |||
Interest receivable |
2,979,058 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
2,887,436 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
1,043,520 | |||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts |
271,580 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
6,579 | |||
Receivable for fund shares subscribed |
10 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
5,007 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
406,602,050 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
4,829,087 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
355,239 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
145,444 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
15,763 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
4,304 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
44,424 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
5,394,261 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 401,207,789 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 400,030,690 | ||
Distributable earnings |
1,177,099 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 401,207,789 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 399,068,079 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with |
39,762,857 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$10.09 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 10,404,969 | ||
Dividends |
181,779 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
10,586,748 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
895,366 | |||
Professional fees |
66,230 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
61,678 | |||
Administrative fees |
40,198 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
30,382 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
10,776 | |||
Shareholder reports |
6,237 | |||
Other expenses |
12,349 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,123,216 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(76,931 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,046,285 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
9,540,463 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
643,140 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
(691,635 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts |
(266,558 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(10,537,703 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(935,895 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on swap contracts |
128,533 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
(11,660,118 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | (2,119,655 | ) | |
|
|
|||
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 9,540,463 | $ | 18,116,419 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivative contracts |
(315,053 | ) | (32,907,044 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
(11,345,065 | ) | 37,348,689 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
(2,119,655 | ) | 22,558,064 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
30,908,818 | 36,651,130 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(52,134,926 | ) | (84,460,527 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(21,226,108 | ) | (47,809,397 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(23,345,763 | ) | (25,251,333 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
424,553,552 | 449,804,885 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 401,207,789 | $ | 424,553,552 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
3,084,345 | 3,747,836 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(5,210,115 | ) | (8,649,366 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(2,125,770 | ) | (4,901,530 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 11 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 10.14 | $ | 0.23 | $ | (0.28) | $ | (0.05) | $ | 10.09 | (0.49)% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.61 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 10.14 | 5.52% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/22(5) |
10.00 | 0.22 | (0.61) | (0.39) | 9.61 | (3.90)% | (4) |
12 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 401,208 | 0.51% | (4) | 0.55% | (4) | 4.65% | (4) | 4.61% | (4) | 122% | (4) | |||||||||||
424,554 | 0.50% | 0.54% | 4.13% | 4.09% | 316% | |||||||||||||||||
449,805 | 0.50% | (4) | 0.52% | (4) | 3.41% | (4) | 3.39% | (4) | 90% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2022, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on May 2, 2022. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on May 2, 2022. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks to provide a high level of current income and capital appreciation without undue risk to principal.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not
limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5c). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Exchange-traded financial futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
14 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing
sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the
15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indices. The Fund may use these investments (i) as alternatives to direct long or short investment in a particular security or securities, (ii) to adjust the Fund’s asset allocation or risk exposure, (iii) to enhance potential return, or (iv) for hedging purposes. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund entered into credit default swaps for risk exposure management and to enhance potential return. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Options Transactions The Fund can write (sell) put and call options on securities and indexes to earn premiums, for hedging purposes, for risk management purposes or otherwise as part of its investment strategies. In writing options, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker or counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the face value of the options. When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability that is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the written option. These liabilities, if any, are reflected as written options, at value, in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a written call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a written put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Fund purchasing or selling a security at a price different from its current market value. There were no options transactions as of June 30, 2024.
16 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.45% of the first $300 million, and 0.40% in excess of $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fund has no sub-adviser.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.53% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.50%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $76,931.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold (excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 217,361,727 | $ | 273,691,442 | ||||
Sales | 188,799,558 | 318,799,439 |
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase
17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
d. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Below Investment Grade Securities The Fund may invest in below investment grade securities (i.e. lower-quality, “junk” debt), which are subject to various risks. Lower-quality debt is considered to be speculative because it is less certain that the issuer will be able to pay interest or repay the principal than in the case of investment grade debt. These securities can involve a substantially greater risk of default than higher-rated securities, and their values can decline significantly over short periods of time. Lower-quality debt securities
tend to be more sensitive to adverse news about their issuers, the market and the economy in general, than higher-quality debt securities. The market for these securities can be less liquid, especially during periods of recession or general market decline.
g. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
h. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face
18 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
i. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into U.S. Treasury futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
Under certain market conditions, the Fund may use credit default swaps to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve exposure, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. Credit default swaps involve the exchange of a floating or fixed rate payment in return for assuming potential credit losses of an underlying security or pool of securities.
The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a “notional amount,” i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate, in a particular foreign currency or security, or in a “basket” of securities representing a particular index. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCM”s) that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. Funds post initial and variation margin by making payments to their clearing member FCMs.
Generally, the Fund will enter into credit default swaps on a net basis, which means that the two payment streams are netted out, with a Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Credit default swaps do not normally involve
the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to credit default swaps is normally limited to the net amount of payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a credit default swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive, if any.
In addition to the risks generally applicable to derivatives, risks associated with credit default swap agreements include adverse changes in the returns of the underlying instruments, failure of the counterparties to perform under the agreement’s terms and the possible lack of liquidity with respect to the agreements.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | 450,030 | ||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (144,737 | ) | |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
Credit Default Contracts |
|||||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | (691,635 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts2 |
— | (266,558 | ) | |||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
||||||||
Futures Contracts3 | $ | (935,895 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts4 |
— | 128,533 | ||||||
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
||||||||
Futures Contracts5 | 742 | — | ||||||
Swap Contracts – Buy/Sell Protection |
$ | — | $ | 6,257,143 | ||||
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts. |
3 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
4 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on swap contracts. |
5 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
j. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital
purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
20 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
21 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including
22 |
investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the
23 |
reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that
the Sub-advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
24 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
• | Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund |
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the |
Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
25 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information |
26 |
in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
27 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11740
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies | ||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 12 | |||
Statement of Operations | 12 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 13 | |||
Financial Highlights | 14 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 16 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 23 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 23 | |||
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies | 23 | |||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements | 23 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities – 27.3% |
| |||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. |
$ | 1,153,966 | $ | 1,099,649 | ||||
5.00% due 7/1/2052 |
511,388 | 499,659 | ||||||
5.00% due 8/1/2052 |
779,514 | 763,608 | ||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association |
491,445 | 386,123 | ||||||
2.00% due 11/1/2051 |
383,145 | 303,741 | ||||||
2.50% due 8/1/2050 |
3,299,794 | 2,763,659 | ||||||
2.50% due 9/1/2050 |
2,484,327 | 2,075,424 | ||||||
2.50% due 1/1/2051 |
1,112,617 | 928,714 | ||||||
2.50% due 6/1/2051 |
756,360 | 627,303 | ||||||
2.50% due 8/1/2051 |
250,597 | 209,164 | ||||||
2.50% due 9/1/2051 |
391,181 | 325,366 | ||||||
2.50% due 12/1/2051 |
2,350,899 | 1,953,106 | ||||||
3.00% due 12/1/2048 |
1,822,962 | 1,592,471 | ||||||
3.00% due 1/1/2051 |
506,435 | 438,672 | ||||||
3.50% due 7/1/2045 |
517,910 | 469,034 | ||||||
3.50% due 9/1/2051 |
220,397 | 198,131 | ||||||
3.50% due 4/1/2052 |
933,496 | 836,153 | ||||||
4.00% due 5/1/2052 |
957,761 | 888,577 | ||||||
4.00% due 6/1/2052 |
1,005,156 | 927,703 | ||||||
5.00% due 7/1/2052 |
677,360 | 663,369 | ||||||
5.00% due 8/1/2052 |
1,042,221 | 1,016,673 | ||||||
Freddie Mac Multifamily Structured Pass-Through Certificates |
680,000 | 574,017 | ||||||
Series K145, Class A2 |
641,000 | 548,774 | ||||||
Series KG07, Class A2 |
1,146,000 | 1,019,873 | ||||||
Government National Mortgage Association |
572,000 | 462,928 | ||||||
2.50% due 8/20/2054(3) |
1,490,000 | 1,253,331 | ||||||
3.00% due 7/20/2054(3) |
1,389,000 | 1,209,976 | ||||||
3.00% due 8/20/2054(3) |
1,612,000 | 1,404,937 | ||||||
3.50% due 7/20/2054(3) |
1,850,000 | 1,661,590 | ||||||
3.50% due 8/20/2054(3) |
1,201,000 | 1,079,250 | ||||||
4.00% due 7/20/2054(3) |
1,338,000 | 1,236,170 | ||||||
4.00% due 8/20/2054(3) |
1,009,000 | 932,837 | ||||||
4.50% due 7/20/2054(3) |
1,050,000 | 997,970 | ||||||
5.00% due 7/20/2054(3) |
1,001,000 | 974,645 | ||||||
5.00% due 8/20/2054(3) |
612,000 | 596,005 | ||||||
5.50% due 7/20/2054(3) |
1,262,000 | 1,252,135 | ||||||
5.50% due 8/20/2054(3) |
824,000 | 817,204 | ||||||
6.00% due 7/20/2054(3) |
366,000 | 367,501 | ||||||
6.00% due 8/20/2054(3) |
448,000 | 449,559 | ||||||
6.50% due 7/20/2054(3) |
791,000 | 801,947 | ||||||
6.50% due 8/20/2054(3) |
1,441,000 | 1,459,474 | ||||||
Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security |
1,453,000 | 1,137,430 | ||||||
2.50% due 8/1/2054(3) |
651,000 | 532,047 | ||||||
3.00% due 8/1/2054(3) |
297,000 | 252,773 | ||||||
5.00% due 7/1/2054(3) |
1,182,000 | 1,142,115 | ||||||
5.50% due 8/1/2039(3) |
1,890,000 | 1,893,194 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
5.50% due 7/1/2054(3) |
$ | 1,537,000 | $ | 1,515,328 | ||||
5.50% due 8/1/2054(3) |
1,251,000 | 1,233,462 | ||||||
6.00% due 8/1/2039(3) |
2,530,000 | 2,556,894 | ||||||
6.00% due 7/1/2054(3) |
2,002,000 | 2,007,265 | ||||||
6.00% due 8/1/2054(3) |
974,000 | 976,425 | ||||||
6.50% due 7/1/2054(3) |
641,000 | 652,294 | ||||||
6.50% due 8/1/2054(3) |
976,000 | 992,904 | ||||||
7.00% due 8/1/2054(3) |
1,674,000 | 1,720,470 | ||||||
Total Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $56,419,301) |
|
54,679,023 | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities – 18.9% |
| |||||||
Affirm Asset Securitization Trust |
945,000 | 955,931 | ||||||
Series 2024-A, Class 1A |
355,000 | 353,843 | ||||||
American Express Credit Account Master Trust |
445,000 | 452,856 | ||||||
Avant Loans Funding Trust |
644,117 | 644,519 | ||||||
Avid Automobile Receivables Trust |
830,000 | 804,036 | ||||||
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC |
1,545,000 | 1,517,169 | ||||||
Bain Capital Credit CLO Ltd. |
250,000 | 251,750 | ||||||
Series 2023-4A, Class D |
540,000 | 552,418 | ||||||
Ballyrock CLO 23 Ltd. |
250,000 | 252,651 | ||||||
Ballyrock CLO 25 Ltd. |
500,000 | 501,272 | ||||||
Bank of America Auto Trust |
545,000 | 545,764 | ||||||
Series 2024-1A, Class A3 5.35% due 11/15/2028(4) |
395,000 | 396,001 | ||||||
Barings CLO Ltd. |
500,000 | 500,250 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Benefit Street Partners CLO V-B Ltd. |
$ | 880,000 | $ | 880,000 | ||||
Capital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust |
1,025,000 | 1,005,677 | ||||||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO Ltd. |
284,416 | 284,814 | ||||||
Carlyle U.S. CLO Ltd. |
1,400,000 | 1,398,880 | ||||||
Series 2024-1A, Class B |
450,000 | 450,763 | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust |
850,000 | 841,052 | ||||||
CarMax Select Receivables Trust |
380,000 | 379,687 | ||||||
Chase Auto Owner Trust |
890,000 | 889,440 | ||||||
CIFC Funding Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 1,000,500 | ||||||
Citizens Auto Receivables Trust |
1,005,000 | 1,009,450 | ||||||
Series 2024-2, Class A4 |
545,000 | 547,364 | ||||||
Driven Brands Funding LLC |
221,375 | 205,867 | ||||||
Elmwood CLO 24 Ltd. |
470,000 | 470,478 | ||||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust |
1,100,000 | 1,103,071 | ||||||
Series 2022-2A, Class B |
152,945 | 152,790 | ||||||
First National Master Note Trust |
805,000 | 807,207 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust |
$ | 285,000 | $ | 289,317 | ||||
GLS Auto Select Receivables Trust |
520,000 | 520,182 | ||||||
GoldenTree Loan Management U.S. CLO 19 Ltd. |
330,000 | 329,978 | ||||||
HPEFS Equipment Trust |
420,000 | 419,681 | ||||||
Kubota Credit Owner Trust |
805,000 | 804,028 | ||||||
Lending Funding Trust |
936,000 | 875,437 | ||||||
Lendmark Funding Trust |
750,000 | 686,770 | ||||||
LoanCore Issuer Ltd. |
478,427 | 476,013 | ||||||
Madison Park Funding LVIII Ltd. |
320,000 | 322,660 | ||||||
Magnetite XXXVIII Ltd. |
420,000 | 420,762 | ||||||
Marble Point CLO XVII Ltd. |
613,030 | 612,785 | ||||||
Marlette Funding Trust |
160,676 | 160,167 | ||||||
Mercury Financial Credit Card Master Trust |
360,000 | 360,748 | ||||||
MF1 LLC |
490,000 | 489,835 | ||||||
Mountain View CLO LLC |
124,704 | 124,704 | ||||||
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
OCP CLO Ltd. |
$ | 222,933 | $ | 223,201 | ||||
Palmer Square CLO Ltd. |
530,000 | 530,000 | ||||||
Peebles Park CLO Ltd. |
350,000 | 350,842 | ||||||
Rad CLO 24 Ltd. |
390,000 | 389,505 | ||||||
RR 24 Ltd. |
530,000 | 534,743 | ||||||
Santander Consumer Auto Receivables Trust |
1,115,599 | 1,106,416 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust |
1,060,000 | 1,077,368 | ||||||
Series 2024-2, Class D |
530,000 | 533,084 | ||||||
SBNA Auto Receivables Trust |
660,000 | 658,026 | ||||||
SCF Equipment Leasing LLC |
1,000,000 | 946,215 | ||||||
SEB Funding LLC |
371,070 | 352,837 | ||||||
Signal Peak CLO 8 Ltd. |
1,003,948 | 1,003,546 | ||||||
Sunrun Demeter Issuer LLC |
435,090 | 355,939 | ||||||
Texas Debt Capital CLO Ltd. |
560,000 | 561,194 | ||||||
Valley Stream Park CLO Ltd. |
470,000 | 469,931 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Voya CLO Ltd. |
$ | 320,000 | $ | 318,432 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust |
750,000 | 745,438 | ||||||
Series 2023-1A, Class C |
1,015,000 | 1,010,214 | ||||||
World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust |
600,000 | 603,043 | ||||||
Total Asset-Backed Securities (Cost $38,116,356) |
|
37,818,541 | ||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes – 43.8% | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 0.4% | ||||||||
Boeing Co. |
299,000 | 306,101 | ||||||
6.858% due 5/1/2054(4) |
225,000 | 230,688 | ||||||
Bombardier, Inc. |
206,000 | 211,490 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
748,279 | ||||||||
Agriculture – 1.3% | ||||||||
BAT Capital Corp. |
833,000 | 829,835 | ||||||
5.834% due 2/20/2031 |
211,000 | 213,882 | ||||||
6.343% due 8/2/2030 |
500,000 | 522,150 | ||||||
Imperial Brands Finance PLC |
627,000 | 621,508 | ||||||
Viterra Finance BV |
398,000 | 391,158 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,578,533 | ||||||||
Airlines – 0.2% | ||||||||
American Airlines, Inc. |
210,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
VistaJet Malta Finance PLC/Vista Management Holding, Inc. |
267,000 | 235,886 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
445,886 | ||||||||
Auto Manufacturers – 1.6% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Co. |
288,000 | 334,970 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC |
200,000 | 187,886 | ||||||
3.375% due 11/13/2025 |
275,000 | 266,139 | ||||||
4.134% due 8/4/2025 |
253,000 | 248,254 | ||||||
6.125% due 3/8/2034 |
356,000 | 352,693 | ||||||
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi AS |
200,000 | 201,820 | ||||||
General Motors Financial Co., Inc. |
408,000 | 405,328 | ||||||
Hyundai Capital America |
402,000 | 383,021 | ||||||
5.40% due 1/8/2031(4) |
332,000 | 329,769 | ||||||
5.80% due 6/26/2025(4) |
278,000 | 278,361 | ||||||
JB Poindexter & Co., Inc. |
272,000 | 282,045 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,270,286 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Beverages – 0.1% | ||||||||
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. |
$ | 218,000 | $ | 219,945 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
219,945 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 0.1% | ||||||||
Baxalta, Inc. |
175,000 | 172,426 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
172,426 | ||||||||
Building Materials – 0.5% | ||||||||
EMRLD Borrower LP/Emerald Co-Issuer, Inc. |
204,000 | 206,670 | ||||||
Sisecam U.K. PLC |
200,000 | 203,308 | ||||||
Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete LLC |
249,000 | 243,253 | ||||||
Standard Industries, Inc. |
303,000 | 273,733 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
926,964 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 1.3% | ||||||||
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC |
810,000 | 810,356 | ||||||
CVR Partners LP/CVR Nitrogen Finance Corp. |
265,000 | 254,702 | ||||||
International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. |
1,008,000 | 953,639 | ||||||
NOVA Chemicals Corp. |
295,000 | 311,750 | ||||||
Rain Carbon, Inc. |
249,000 | 268,345 | ||||||
Rain CII Carbon LLC/CII Carbon Corp. |
6,000 | 5,863 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,604,655 | ||||||||
Coal – 0.1% | ||||||||
SunCoke Energy, Inc. |
263,000 | 238,415 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
238,415 | ||||||||
Commercial Banks – 10.6% | ||||||||
ABN AMRO Bank NV |
400,000 | 328,812 | ||||||
AIB Group PLC |
389,000 | 401,397 | ||||||
Akbank TAS |
200,000 | 199,022 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
769,000 | 682,334 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
3.593% (3.593% fixed rate until 7/21/2027; 3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.63% thereafter) |
$ | 987,000 | $ | 939,328 | ||||
BankUnited, Inc. |
613,000 | 551,651 | ||||||
BBVA Bancomer SA |
400,000 | 405,144 | ||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
1,019,000 | 985,220 | ||||||
4.375% (4.375% fixed rate until |
599,000 | 565,210 | ||||||
5.738% (5.738% fixed rate until |
200,000 | 199,134 | ||||||
BPCE SA |
500,000 | 498,300 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc. |
963,000 | 930,037 | ||||||
3.98% (3.98% fixed rate until |
750,000 | 707,617 | ||||||
5.827% (5.827% fixed rate until |
953,000 | 944,623 | ||||||
Danske Bank AS |
434,000 | 435,176 | ||||||
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. |
518,000 | 512,545 | ||||||
Freedom Mortgage Corp. |
200,000 | 215,412 | ||||||
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA |
440,000 | 454,903 | ||||||
M&T Bank Corp. |
376,000 | 347,883 | ||||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) | ||||||||
Macquarie Bank Ltd. |
$ | 203,000 | $ | 180,573 | ||||
Macquarie Group Ltd. |
678,000 | 561,777 | ||||||
4.654% (4.654% fixed rate until |
700,000 | 684,768 | ||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. |
320,000 | 319,594 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
500,000 | 483,365 | ||||||
5.297% (5.297% fixed rate until |
1,004,000 | 961,581 | ||||||
NatWest Group PLC |
327,000 | 331,166 | ||||||
8.125% (8.125% fixed rate until due 11/10/2033(2) |
200,000 | 202,514 | ||||||
Truist Financial Corp. |
466,000 | 464,057 | ||||||
U.S. Bancorp |
785,000 | 743,952 | ||||||
5.678% (5.678% fixed rate until |
472,000 | 474,209 | ||||||
UBS Group AG |
473,000 | 441,560 | ||||||
1.494% (1.494% fixed rate until |
504,000 | 462,329 | ||||||
4.703% (4.703% fixed rate until |
365,000 | 358,273 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) | ||||||||
4.988% (4.988% fixed rate until |
$ | 449,000 | $ | 428,279 | ||||
6.327% (6.327% fixed rate until |
403,000 | 409,363 | ||||||
6.373% (6.373% fixed rate until |
690,000 | 693,491 | ||||||
6.442% (6.442% fixed rate until |
509,000 | 521,934 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
652,000 | 633,144 | ||||||
2.393% (2.393% fixed rate until |
864,000 | 796,064 | ||||||
3.584% (3.584% fixed rate until |
723,000 | 688,535 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
21,144,276 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.7% | ||||||||
Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd. |
300,000 | 276,648 | ||||||
Allied Universal Holdco LLC |
348,000 | 349,249 | ||||||
Block, Inc. |
246,000 | 249,336 | ||||||
GXO Logistics, Inc. |
521,000 | 529,143 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,404,376 | ||||||||
Diversified Financial Services – 3.5% |
| |||||||
Air Lease Corp. |
288,000 | 281,822 | ||||||
Aircastle Ltd. |
600,000 | 542,406 | ||||||
Aviation Capital Group LLC |
408,000 | 383,932 | ||||||
5.50% due 12/15/2024(4) |
767,000 | 764,952 | ||||||
6.375% due 7/15/2030(4) |
805,000 | 832,233 | ||||||
Avolon Holdings Funding Ltd. |
800,000 | 752,104 | ||||||
4.25% due 4/15/2026(4) |
800,000 | 776,776 | ||||||
5.75% due 11/15/2029(4) |
312,000 | 310,493 | ||||||
Blue Owl Finance LLC |
135,000 | 135,466 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Diversified Financial Services (continued) |
| |||||||
Capital One Financial Corp. |
$ | 303,000 | $ | 304,221 | ||||
GGAM Finance Ltd. |
221,000 | 228,496 | ||||||
LPL Holdings, Inc. |
672,000 | 627,635 | ||||||
Navient Corp. |
221,000 | 202,155 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman Group LLC/Neuberger Berman Finance Corp. |
365,000 | 350,499 | ||||||
4.875% due 4/15/2045(4) |
198,000 | 158,731 | ||||||
Nuveen LLC |
304,000 | 305,429 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,957,350 | ||||||||
Electric – 3.3% | ||||||||
AES Corp. |
525,000 | 480,154 | ||||||
Alfa Desarrollo SpA |
292,918 | 220,145 | ||||||
American Transmission Systems, Inc. |
238,000 | 197,840 | ||||||
Appalachian Power Co. |
334,000 | 330,870 | ||||||
Ausgrid Finance Pty. Ltd. |
580,000 | 557,090 | ||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc. |
145,000 | 148,181 | ||||||
Duke Energy Indiana LLC |
236,000 | 223,133 | ||||||
Enel Finance International NV |
287,000 | 282,767 | ||||||
Entergy Louisiana LLC |
327,000 | 322,285 | ||||||
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. |
500,000 | 502,535 | ||||||
Minejesa Capital BV |
440,725 | 421,576 | ||||||
Narragansett Electric Co. |
333,000 | 329,717 | ||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. |
280,000 | 264,200 | ||||||
Oglethorpe Power Corp. |
194,000 | 190,304 | ||||||
Southern Co. |
1,156,000 | 1,153,341 | ||||||
Vistra Operations Co. LLC |
841,000 | 839,907 | ||||||
7.75% due 10/15/2031(4) |
198,000 | 206,237 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,670,282 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Electronics – 0.2% | ||||||||
EquipmentShare.com, Inc. |
$ | 337,000 | $ | 348,104 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
348,104 | ||||||||
Energy-Alternate Sources – 0.2% | ||||||||
Greenko Dutch BV |
358,540 | 338,415 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
338,415 | ||||||||
Engineering & Construction – 0.4% | ||||||||
Aeropuertos Dominicanos Siglo XXI SA |
200,000 | 202,350 | ||||||
IRB Infrastructure Developers Ltd. |
266,000 | 266,226 | ||||||
Weekley Homes LLC/Weekley Finance Corp. |
361,000 | 334,376 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
802,952 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.3% | ||||||||
Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. |
255,000 | 237,242 | ||||||
Warnermedia Holdings, Inc. |
442,000 | 435,692 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
672,934 | ||||||||
Gas – 0.4% | ||||||||
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. |
301,000 | 245,472 | ||||||
National Fuel Gas Co. |
554,000 | 551,889 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
797,361 | ||||||||
Hand & Machine Tools – 0.3% | ||||||||
Regal Rexnord Corp. |
541,000 | 543,380 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
543,380 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Products – 0.6% | ||||||||
Revvity, Inc. |
750,000 | 742,305 | ||||||
Solventum Corp. |
443,000 | 437,520 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,179,825 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 1.4% | ||||||||
Centene Corp. |
536,000 | 475,984 | ||||||
3.375% due 2/15/2030 |
383,000 | 339,851 | ||||||
4.25% due 12/15/2027 |
419,000 | 400,061 | ||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
472,000 | 389,447 | ||||||
Concentra Escrow Issuer Corp. |
58,000 | 58,859 | ||||||
DaVita, Inc. |
238,000 | 215,364 | ||||||
Humana, Inc. |
375,000 | 339,852 | ||||||
LifePoint Health, Inc. |
302,000 | 322,267 | ||||||
Molina Healthcare, Inc. |
247,000 | 232,279 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,773,964 |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Holding Companies-Diversified – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Stena International SA |
$ | 207,000 | $ | 211,411 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
211,411 | ||||||||
Insurance – 2.1% | ||||||||
Athene Global Funding |
710,000 | 710,469 | ||||||
Brighthouse Financial Global Funding |
408,000 | 408,102 | ||||||
Brown & Brown, Inc. |
363,000 | 361,044 | ||||||
CNO Global Funding |
362,000 | 363,231 | ||||||
GA Global Funding Trust |
898,000 | 883,659 | ||||||
Howden U.K. Refinance PLC/Howden U.K. Refinance 2 PLC/Howden U.S. Refinance LLC |
251,000 | 249,288 | ||||||
HUB International Ltd. |
307,000 | 311,442 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I |
302,000 | 297,793 | ||||||
New York Life Global Funding |
187,000 | 177,702 | ||||||
Principal Life Global Funding II |
433,000 | 430,415 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,193,145 | ||||||||
Internet – 0.2% | ||||||||
Prosus NV |
500,000 | 467,210 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
467,210 | ||||||||
Iron & Steel – 0.1% | ||||||||
ATI, Inc. |
197,000 | 203,962 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
203,962 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.1% | ||||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. |
243,000 | 244,835 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
244,835 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.2% | ||||||||
MGM China Holdings Ltd. |
240,000 | 228,487 | ||||||
Wynn Macau Ltd. |
250,000 | 234,313 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
462,800 | ||||||||
Machinery-Diversified – 0.4% |
|
|||||||
nVent Finance SARL |
818,000 | 795,096 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
795,096 | ||||||||
Media – 0.7% | ||||||||
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp. |
653,000 | 526,618 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Media (continued) | ||||||||
FactSet Research Systems, Inc. |
$ | 600,000 | $ | 522,906 | ||||
Globo Comunicacao e Participacoes SA |
275,000 | 243,172 | ||||||
Gray Television, Inc. |
226,000 | 207,990 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,500,686 | ||||||||
Mining – 1.2% | ||||||||
Anglo American Capital PLC |
340,000 | 318,471 | ||||||
Antofagasta PLC |
200,000 | 206,768 | ||||||
FMG Resources August 2006 Pty. Ltd. |
280,000 | 250,267 | ||||||
Freeport Indonesia PT |
270,000 | 261,784 | ||||||
Glencore Funding LLC |
342,000 | 340,269 | ||||||
5.634% due 4/4/2034(4) |
483,000 | 475,639 | ||||||
6.375% due 10/6/2030(4) |
216,000 | 225,219 | ||||||
Hecla Mining Co. |
246,000 | 246,576 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,324,993 | ||||||||
Miscellaneous Manufacturing – 0.1% |
| |||||||
LSB Industries, Inc. |
257,000 | 247,928 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
247,928 | ||||||||
Oil & Gas – 4.6% | ||||||||
Antero Resources Corp. |
449,000 | 462,174 | ||||||
Apache Corp. |
268,000 | 248,712 | ||||||
Baytex Energy Corp. |
200,000 | 209,168 | ||||||
California Resources Corp. |
203,000 | 207,182 | ||||||
CITGO Petroleum Corp. |
245,000 | 252,534 | ||||||
Civitas Resources, Inc. |
194,000 | 203,549 | ||||||
CNX Resources Corp. |
229,000 | 224,566 | ||||||
Comstock Resources, Inc. |
361,000 | 349,813 | ||||||
Continental Resources, Inc. |
1,333,000 | 1,310,885 | ||||||
Cosan Luxembourg SA |
200,000 | 202,460 | ||||||
Coterra Energy, Inc. |
524,000 | 522,742 | ||||||
Crescent Energy Finance LLC |
204,000 | 204,777 | ||||||
Diamond Foreign Asset Co./Diamond Finance LLC |
230,000 | 241,192 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Oil & Gas (continued) |
| |||||||
Ecopetrol SA |
$ | 324,000 | $ | 318,609 | ||||
Encino Acquisition Partners Holdings LLC |
196,000 | 204,352 | ||||||
EQT Corp. |
345,000 | 341,484 | ||||||
7.00% due 2/1/2030 |
891,000 | 945,289 | ||||||
Medco Maple Tree Pte. Ltd. |
250,000 | 261,265 | ||||||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
734,000 | 769,489 | ||||||
Ovintiv, Inc. |
400,000 | 410,644 | ||||||
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. |
175,000 | 164,626 | ||||||
Rockcliff Energy II LLC |
240,000 | 224,654 | ||||||
Transocean, Inc. |
413,000 | 412,591 | ||||||
Valaris Ltd. |
207,000 | 214,276 | ||||||
Vital Energy, Inc. |
216,000 | 219,305 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,126,338 | ||||||||
Oil & Gas Services – 0.1% | ||||||||
Kodiak Gas Services LLC |
216,000 | 221,523 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
221,523 | ||||||||
Packaging & Containers – 0.2% | ||||||||
LABL, Inc. |
226,000 | 228,352 | ||||||
Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Co. |
214,000 | 215,098 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
443,450 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 0.5% | ||||||||
Bayer Corp. |
343,000 | 354,360 | ||||||
Bayer U.S. Finance LLC |
400,000 | 409,876 | ||||||
Organon & Co./Organon Foreign Debt Co-Issuer BV |
226,000 | 202,917 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
967,153 | ||||||||
Pipelines – 2.2% | ||||||||
Cheniere Energy Partners LP |
344,000 | 293,343 | ||||||
Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. |
339,000 | 334,891 | ||||||
Eastern Gas Transmission & Storage, Inc. |
428,000 | 382,944 | ||||||
EIG Pearl Holdings SARL |
299,000 | 257,059 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Pipelines (continued) | ||||||||
Enbridge, Inc. |
$ | 512,000 | $ | 552,566 | ||||
EQM Midstream Partners LP |
231,000 | 246,193 | ||||||
Galaxy Pipeline Assets Bidco Ltd. |
276,000 | 210,668 | ||||||
Genesis Energy LP/Genesis Energy Finance Corp. |
205,000 | 211,538 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP |
643,000 | 641,000 | ||||||
NGL Energy Operating LLC/NGL Energy Finance Corp. |
276,000 | 280,179 | ||||||
NGPL PipeCo LLC |
314,000 | 268,074 | ||||||
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC |
278,000 | 277,455 | ||||||
Venture Global LNG, Inc. |
367,000 | 380,539 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,336,449 | ||||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts – 1.5% |
| |||||||
American Tower Corp. |
448,000 | 437,391 | ||||||
2.95% due 1/15/2025 |
235,000 | 231,315 | ||||||
3.80% due 8/15/2029 |
616,000 | 572,591 | ||||||
Crown Castle, Inc. |
491,000 | 437,717 | ||||||
EPR Properties |
180,000 | 172,271 | ||||||
4.95% due 4/15/2028 |
344,000 | 329,322 | ||||||
Iron Mountain Information Management Services, Inc. |
225,000 | 205,661 | ||||||
VICI Properties LP |
332,000 | 317,770 | ||||||
VICI Properties LP/VICI Note Co., Inc. |
314,000 | 296,560 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,000,598 | ||||||||
Retail – 0.5% | ||||||||
Home Depot, Inc. |
274,000 | 273,647 | ||||||
5.30% due 6/25/2054 |
179,000 | 174,983 | ||||||
Macy’s Retail Holdings LLC |
235,000 | 227,715 | ||||||
PetSmart, Inc./PetSmart Finance Corp. |
250,000 | 243,230 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
919,575 | ||||||||
Semiconductors – 0.3% | ||||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
427,000 | 393,382 | ||||||
SK Hynix, Inc. |
308,000 | 307,754 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
701,136 |
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Software – 0.4% | ||||||||
Atlassian Corp. |
$ | 269,000 | $ | 266,466 | ||||
Cloud Software Group, Inc. |
213,000 | 204,619 | ||||||
9.00% due 9/30/2029(4) |
424,000 | 411,178 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
882,263 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.7% | ||||||||
Frontier Communications Holdings LLC |
238,000 | 224,284 | ||||||
5.875% due 11/1/2029 |
385,000 | 335,246 | ||||||
Sprint Capital Corp. |
212,000 | 254,934 | ||||||
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
572,000 | 534,746 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,349,210 | ||||||||
Transportation – 0.1% | ||||||||
Rand Parent LLC |
206,000 | 208,361 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
208,361 | ||||||||
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (Cost $88,842,412) |
|
87,646,730 | ||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities – 8.7% |
| |||||||
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust |
25,465 | 23,960 | ||||||
ARZ Trust |
150,000 | 150,466 | ||||||
Bank5 |
260,000 | 270,678 | ||||||
BBCMS Mortgage Trust |
160,000 | 48,186 | ||||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust |
250,000 | 258,398 | ||||||
BMO Mortgage Trust |
220,000 | 222,352 | ||||||
BRAVO Residential Funding Trust |
514,834 | 485,122 | ||||||
BSPRT Issuer Ltd. |
192,115 | 191,679 | ||||||
BX Commercial Mortgage Trust |
161,195 | 159,157 | ||||||
Series 2024-XL4, Class A |
541,726 | 539,939 | ||||||
Series 2024-XL5, Class A |
268,515 | 267,265 | ||||||
BX Trust |
150,000 | 149,476 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Chase Home Lending Mortgage Trust |
$ | 228,369 | $ | 196,255 | ||||
CIM Trust |
851,563 | 689,725 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust |
620,000 | 610,610 | ||||||
Series 2015-LC21, Class AM 4.043% due 7/10/2048(1)(2) |
522,000 | 507,421 | ||||||
Connecticut Avenue Securities Trust |
325,991 | 326,030 | ||||||
Series 2023-R01, Class 1M1 |
912,276 | 938,497 | ||||||
Series 2023-R02, Class 1M1 |
425,056 | 436,175 | ||||||
Series 2023-R03, Class 2M2 |
400,000 | 428,498 | ||||||
Series 2023-R04, Class 1M1 |
287,582 | 294,804 | ||||||
Series 2023-R07, Class 2M1 |
167,092 | 168,373 | ||||||
Series 2024-R03, Class 2M2 |
350,000 | 351,805 | ||||||
Series 2024-R04, Class 1M2 |
165,000 | 165,453 | ||||||
Deephaven Residential Mortgage Trust |
146,994 | 124,607 | ||||||
EQUS Mortgage Trust |
237,995 | 235,819 | ||||||
Flagstar Mortgage Trust |
585,156 | 471,650 | ||||||
Series 2021-7, Class A1 |
545,608 | 438,228 | ||||||
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust |
365,000 | 371,407 | ||||||
Series 2022-HQA3, Class M1A |
187,570 | 192,008 | ||||||
Series 2023-DNA2, Class M1A |
486,812 | 495,964 | ||||||
Series 2024-DNA1, Class A1 |
578,852 | 580,667 | ||||||
Series 2024-DNA2, Class M1 |
235,886 | 236,280 | ||||||
GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Trust |
660,000 | 205,654 | ||||||
GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust |
450,963 | 364,801 | ||||||
Series 2021-PJ8, Class A2 |
608,396 | 482,775 | ||||||
Series 2022-PJ6, Class A4 |
538,768 | 451,321 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust |
$ | 339,000 | $ | 315,331 | ||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust |
473,212 | 376,732 | ||||||
Series 2021-15, Class A2 |
787,225 | 663,272 | ||||||
Series 2021-INV8, Class A2 |
444,377 | 370,863 | ||||||
Series 2022-4, Class A3 |
349,710 | 290,528 | ||||||
PFP Ltd. |
400,000 | 402,249 | ||||||
Rate Mortgage Trust |
630,000 | 624,148 | ||||||
RCKT Mortgage Trust |
200,000 | 200,705 | ||||||
Ready Capital Mortgage Financing LLC |
861,661 | 861,287 | ||||||
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust |
135,978 | 128,152 | ||||||
Towd Point Mortgage Trust |
210,000 | 220,978 | ||||||
Verus Securitization Trust |
45,366 | 43,416 | ||||||
Vista Point Securitization Trust |
98,344 | 91,288 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed |
395,808 | 319,033 | ||||||
Total Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $18,230,097) |
|
17,439,487 | ||||||
Foreign Government – 2.9% | ||||||||
Angola Government International Bonds |
USD | 314,000 | 294,231 | |||||
Brazil Government International Bonds |
USD | 313,000 | 300,708 | |||||
Colombia Government International Bonds |
USD | 326,000 | 325,579 | |||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Foreign Government (continued) |
| |||||||
Japan Finance Organization for Municipalities |
USD | 2,350,000 | $ | 2,375,780 | ||||
Mexico Government International Bonds |
USD | 470,000 | 433,020 | |||||
Ontario Teachers’ Finance Trust |
USD | 1,881,000 | 1,874,868 | |||||
Senegal Government International Bonds |
USD | 290,000 | 242,379 | |||||
Total Foreign Government (Cost $5,875,557) |
|
5,846,565 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 9.8% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
$ | 4,234,000 | 3,827,801 | |||||
4.25% due 2/15/2054 |
3,995,200 | 3,805,428 | ||||||
4.375% due 8/15/2043 |
3,309,600 | 3,195,315 | ||||||
4.50% due 2/15/2044 |
2,914,000 | 2,859,362 | ||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2054 |
1,230,000 | 1,247,297 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
4,652,000 | 4,632,556 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $19,784,592) |
|
19,567,759 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills – 1.5% | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills |
3,057,000 | 3,055,220 | ||||||
Total U.S. Treasury Bills (Cost $3,055,219) |
|
3,055,220 | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 3.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $6,500,856, due 7/1/2024(6) |
6,499,989 | 6,499,989 | ||||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $6,499,989) |
|
6,499,989 | ||||||
Total Investments – 116.2% (Cost $236,823,523) |
|
232,553,314 | ||||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (16.2)% |
|
(32,398,008 | ) | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 200,155,306 |
(1) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(2) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(3) | TBA — To be announced. |
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
(4) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $101,945,241, representing 50.9% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(5) | Interest rate shown reflects the discount rate at time of purchase. |
(6) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value |
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 6,592,400 | $ | 6,630,073 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 257 | Long | $ | 52,447,644 | $ | 52,484,219 | $ | 36,575 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. 5-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 19 | Long | 2,016,098 | 2,024,984 | 8,886 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra Bond | September 2024 | 71 | Long | 8,809,527 | 8,899,406 | 89,879 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | 63,273,269 | $ | 63,408,609 | $ | 135,340 |
Legend:
CLO — Collateralized Loan Obligation
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury
REMIC — Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
STACR — Structured Agency Credit Risk
USD — United States Dollar
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | $ | — | $ | 54,679,023 | $ | — | $ | 54,679,023 | ||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities | — | 37,818,541 | — | 37,818,541 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes | — | 87,646,730 | — | 87,646,730 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 17,439,487 | — | 17,439,487 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Government | — | 5,846,565 | — | 5,846,565 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 19,567,759 | — | 19,567,759 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | — | 3,055,220 | — | 3,055,220 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 6,499,989 | — | 6,499,989 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | 232,553,314 | $ | — | $ | 232,553,314 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 135,340 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 135,340 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 135,340 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 135,340 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 11 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 232,553,314 | ||
Cash |
20 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
33,208,902 | |||
Interest receivable |
1,956,201 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
685,050 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
9,622 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,623 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
268,415,732 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
67,867,956 | |||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts |
112,911 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
98,737 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
74,997 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
41,665 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
17,523 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
9,598 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,892 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
34,147 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
68,260,426 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 200,155,306 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 181,591,501 | ||
Distributable earnings |
18,563,805 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 200,155,306 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 236,823,523 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
19,062,971 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$10.50 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 5,590,833 | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
5,590,833 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
473,185 | |||
Distribution fees |
262,881 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
47,405 | |||
Professional fees |
43,340 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
32,704 | |||
Administrative fees |
27,808 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,198 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,237 | |||
Other expenses |
6,897 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
905,655 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(53,922 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
851,733 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
4,739,100 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
(1,423,971 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
(423,109 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(1,841,398 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(1,365,605 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
(5,054,083 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | (314,983 | ) | |
|
|
|||
12 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 4,739,100 | $ | 9,723,654 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivative contracts |
(1,847,080 | ) | (12,403,543 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
(3,207,003 | ) | 15,399,657 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
(314,983 | ) | 12,719,768 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
16,058,794 | 21,664,266 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(40,233,528 | ) | (62,872,005 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(24,174,734 | ) | (41,207,739 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(24,489,717 | ) | (28,487,971 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
224,645,023 | 253,132,994 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 200,155,306 | $ | 224,645,023 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
1,543,211 | 2,138,054 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,868,874 | ) | (6,235,297 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(2,325,663 | ) | (4,097,243 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 13 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 10.50 | $ | 0.23 | $ | (0.23) | $ | 0.00 | $ | 10.50 | 0.00% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.93 | 0.41 | 0.16 | 0.57 | 10.50 | 5.74% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
11.58 | 0.26 | (1.91) | (1.65 | ) | 9.93 | (14.25)% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
11.58 | 0.16 | (0.16) | 0.00 | 11.58 | 0.00% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
10.78 | 0.24 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 11.58 | 7.42% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
9.95 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.83 | 10.78 | 8.34% |
14 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Average Net |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 200,155 | 0.81% | (4) | 0.86% | (4) | 4.51% | (4) | 4.46% | (4) | 70% | (4) | |||||||||||
224,645 | 0.81% | 0.84% | 4.02% | 3.99% | 137% | |||||||||||||||||
253,133 | 0.81% | 0.81% | 2.46% | 2.46% | 198% | |||||||||||||||||
345,332 | 0.80% | 0.80% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 181% | |||||||||||||||||
341,827 | 0.80% | 0.83% | 2.12% | 2.09% | 183% | |||||||||||||||||
350,049 | 0.79% | 0.84% | 2.53% | 2.48% | 211% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.‘s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation to produce a high total return.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation
oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5c). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Exchange-traded financial futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
16 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing
sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indices. The Fund may use these investments for hedging and non-hedging purposes. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Options Transactions The Fund can write (sell) put and call options on securities and indexes to earn premiums, for hedging purposes, for risk management purposes or otherwise as part of its investment strategies. In writing options, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker or counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the face value of the options. When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability that is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the written option. These liabilities, if any, are reflected as written options, at value, in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a written call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a written put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Fund purchasing or selling a security at a price different from its current market value. There were no options transactions as of June 30, 2024.
18 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.45% of the first $300 million, and 0.40% in excess of $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.81% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $53,922.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC (“Lord Abbett”). Lord Abbett is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $262,881 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold (excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 71,455,449 | $ | 72,401,601 | ||||
Sales | 88,355,701 | 75,275,607 |
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
d. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may
sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Below Investment Grade Securities The Fund may invest in below investment grade securities (i.e. lower-quality, “junk” debt), which are subject to various risks. Lower-quality debt is considered to be speculative because it is less certain that the issuer will be able to pay interest or repay the principal than in the case of investment grade debt. These securities can involve a substantially greater risk of default than higher-rated securities, and their values can decline significantly over short periods of time. Lower-quality debt securities tend to be more sensitive to adverse news about their issuers, the market and the economy in general, than higher-quality debt securities. The market for these securities can be less liquid, especially during periods of recession or general market decline.
g. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home
20 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
h. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
i. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into U.S. Treasury futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | 135,340 |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (423,109 | ) | |
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
| |||
Futures Contracts2 |
$ | (1,365,605 | ) | |
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
||||
Futures Contracts3 |
409 | |||
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
3 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
j. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN CORE PLUS FIXED INCOME VIP FUND
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund,
each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
22 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
23 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and
24 |
administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also
25 |
considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that
the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-Adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
26 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark |
index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the |
27 |
1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board |
28 |
noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
29 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8167
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.4% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Boeing Co.(1) |
724 | $ | 131,775 | |||||
Howmet Aerospace, Inc. |
5,790 | 449,478 | ||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
825 | 185,279 | ||||||
Northrop Grumman Corp. |
1,593 | 694,468 | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
4,677 | 469,524 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,930,524 | ||||||||
Air Freight & Logistics – 1.1% |
| |||||||
FedEx Corp. |
4,779 | 1,432,935 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,432,935 | ||||||||
Automobiles – 1.1% |
| |||||||
General Motors Co. |
4,962 | 230,535 | ||||||
Tesla, Inc.(1) |
6,324 | 1,251,393 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,481,928 | ||||||||
Banks – 2.9% |
| |||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
47,502 | 1,889,155 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc. |
30,539 | 1,938,005 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,827,160 | ||||||||
Beverages – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Coca-Cola Co. |
20,728 | 1,319,337 | ||||||
Monster Beverage Corp.(1) |
4,723 | 235,914 | ||||||
PepsiCo, Inc. |
9,356 | 1,543,085 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,098,336 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 2.1% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
9,752 | 1,672,663 | ||||||
Ascendis Pharma AS, ADR(1) |
5,047 | 688,310 | ||||||
Exact Sciences Corp.(1) |
1,736 | 73,346 | ||||||
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
387 | 406,749 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,841,068 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 4.5% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
31,048 | 6,000,026 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,000,026 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 1.7% |
| |||||||
BlackRock, Inc. |
202 | 159,039 | ||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
15,513 | 1,143,153 | ||||||
CME Group, Inc. |
1,102 | 216,653 | ||||||
KKR & Co., Inc. |
5,473 | 575,978 | ||||||
Quilter PLC (United Kingdom)(2) |
124,315 | 188,479 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,283,302 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Corteva, Inc. |
18,657 | 1,006,359 | ||||||
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. |
5,653 | 455,010 | ||||||
Eastman Chemical Co. |
3,394 | 332,510 | ||||||
Linde PLC |
738 | 323,842 | ||||||
PPG Industries, Inc. |
2,505 | 315,354 | ||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
1,922 | 573,582 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,006,657 | ||||||||
Construction Materials – 0.4% |
| |||||||
CRH PLC |
6,443 | 483,096 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
483,096 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Capital One Financial Corp. |
10,207 | 1,413,159 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,413,159 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 2.2% |
| |||||||
BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.(1) |
2,610 | $ | 229,263 | |||||
Costco Wholesale Corp. |
894 | 759,891 | ||||||
Target Corp. |
3,580 | 529,983 | ||||||
Walmart, Inc. |
20,700 | 1,401,597 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,920,734 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Avery Dennison Corp. |
1,419 | 310,264 | ||||||
Ball Corp. |
1,722 | 103,354 | ||||||
Berry Global Group, Inc. |
3,297 | 194,029 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
607,647 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Exelon Corp. |
14,546 | 503,437 | ||||||
NextEra Energy, Inc. |
9,893 | 700,523 | ||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. |
13,712 | 1,067,616 | ||||||
PG&E Corp. |
22,732 | 396,901 | ||||||
PPL Corp. |
13,309 | 367,994 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,036,471 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Vertiv Holdings Co. |
6,717 | 581,491 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
581,491 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Vontier Corp. |
13,194 | 504,011 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
504,011 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.(1) |
47,594 | 737,231 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
737,231 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Netflix, Inc.(1) |
1,120 | 755,865 | ||||||
Walt Disney Co. |
4,885 | 485,032 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,240,897 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 3.9% |
| |||||||
Apollo Global Management, Inc. |
9,740 | 1,150,002 | ||||||
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B(1) |
2,130 | 866,484 | ||||||
Mastercard, Inc., Class A |
4,527 | 1,997,131 | ||||||
Visa, Inc., Class A |
4,205 | 1,103,687 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,117,304 | ||||||||
Food Products – 0.2% |
| |||||||
General Mills, Inc. |
4,587 | 290,174 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
290,174 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. |
5,616 | 442,148 | ||||||
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.(1) |
3,033 | 10,707 | ||||||
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
1,749 | 308,873 | ||||||
Uber Technologies, Inc.(1) |
4,424 | 321,536 | ||||||
Union Pacific Corp. |
2,873 | 650,045 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,733,309 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Abbott Laboratories |
3,603 | 374,388 | ||||||
Becton Dickinson & Co. |
432 | 100,963 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
10,278 | 791,509 | ||||||
Dexcom, Inc.(1) |
2,921 | 331,183 | ||||||
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) |
1,771 | 787,829 | ||||||
Medtronic PLC |
3,197 | 251,636 | ||||||
Stryker Corp. |
494 | 168,083 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,805,591 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 3.0% |
| |||||||
Cigna Group |
1,688 | $ | 558,002 | |||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
345 | 186,942 | ||||||
McKesson Corp. |
1,745 | 1,019,150 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
4,252 | 2,165,373 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,929,467 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.0% |
| |||||||
Booking Holdings, Inc. |
259 | 1,026,028 | ||||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) |
13,500 | 845,775 | ||||||
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. |
2,810 | 613,142 | ||||||
Vail Resorts, Inc. |
661 | 119,066 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,604,011 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 0.8% |
| |||||||
PulteGroup, Inc. |
9,077 | 999,378 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
999,378 | ||||||||
Household Products – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Clorox Co. |
1,019 | 139,063 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
11,144 | 1,837,868 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,976,931 | ||||||||
Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Vistra Corp. |
887 | 76,264 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
76,264 | ||||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
3,998 | 853,733 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
853,733 | ||||||||
Insurance – 1.9% |
| |||||||
AIA Group Ltd. (Hong Kong) |
103,800 | 703,863 | ||||||
Assured Guaranty Ltd. |
8,514 | 656,855 | ||||||
AXA SA (France) |
26,134 | 860,523 | ||||||
Prudential PLC (United Kingdom) |
36,159 | 328,031 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,549,272 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 7.1% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
30,773 | 5,605,302 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
7,473 | 3,768,036 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,373,338 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Class A(1) |
1,913 | 522,459 | ||||||
Danaher Corp. |
2,534 | 633,120 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
1,572 | 869,316 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,024,895 | ||||||||
Machinery – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Fortive Corp. |
10,996 | 814,804 | ||||||
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
4,990 | 453,292 | ||||||
Otis Worldwide Corp. |
9,656 | 929,486 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,197,582 | ||||||||
Media – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Charter Communications, Inc., Class A(1) |
3,334 | 996,733 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
996,733 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (Canada) |
4,545 | 297,274 | ||||||
Glencore PLC (Australia) |
54,454 | 310,485 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
607,759 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Multi-Utilities – 0.2% |
| |||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. |
10,629 | $ | 329,286 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
329,286 | ||||||||
Office REITs – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Vornado Realty Trust |
10,583 | 278,227 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
278,227 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 3.7% |
| |||||||
BP PLC (United Kingdom) |
55,664 | 335,403 | ||||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc. (Canada) |
37,283 | 732,824 | ||||||
ConocoPhillips |
5,977 | 683,649 | ||||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. |
22,240 | 2,560,269 | ||||||
Shell PLC (United Kingdom) |
16,821 | 604,503 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,916,648 | ||||||||
Passenger Airlines – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Southwest Airlines Co. |
10,922 | 312,478 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
312,478 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.3% |
| |||||||
4Front Ventures Corp.(1) |
491,328 | 42,254 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
1,938 | 1,754,627 | ||||||
Innoviva, Inc.(1) |
43,580 | 714,712 | ||||||
Johnson & Johnson |
4,668 | 682,275 | ||||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
8,006 | 991,143 | ||||||
Zoetis, Inc. |
990 | 171,626 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,356,637 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 11.5% |
| |||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.(1) |
20,461 | 3,318,979 | ||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
1,605 | 2,576,876 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
58,466 | 7,222,889 | ||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
10,389 | 2,069,281 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
15,188,025 | ||||||||
Software – 10.9% |
| |||||||
Fair Isaac Corp.(1) |
343 | 510,610 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
22,801 | 10,190,907 | ||||||
Nutanix, Inc., Class A(1) |
7,016 | 398,860 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
21,442 | 3,027,611 | ||||||
Salesforce, Inc. |
1,082 | 278,182 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
14,406,170 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.8% |
| |||||||
American Tower Corp. |
1,533 | 297,984 | ||||||
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. |
16,313 | 737,511 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,035,495 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Home Depot, Inc. |
5,485 | 1,888,157 | ||||||
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(1) |
173 | 182,698 | ||||||
TJX Cos., Inc. |
4,180 | 460,218 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,531,073 | ||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 7.7% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
38,433 | 8,094,759 | ||||||
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC |
20,282 | 2,094,522 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,189,281 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Levi Strauss & Co., Class A |
8,082 | $ | 155,821 | |||||
Lululemon Athletica, Inc.(1) |
892 | 266,440 | ||||||
NIKE, Inc., Class B |
1,461 | 110,116 | ||||||
On Holding AG, Class A(1) |
3,420 | 132,696 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
665,073 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 0.4% |
| |||||||
United Rentals, Inc. |
843 | 545,193 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
545,193 | ||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0.8% |
| |||||||
T-Mobile U.S., Inc. |
5,841 | 1,029,067 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,029,067 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $78,219,505) |
|
131,345,067 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $893,390, due 7/1/2024(3) |
$ | 893,271 | 893,271 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $893,271) |
|
893,271 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value | |||||
Total Investments – 100.1% (Cost $79,112,776) |
$ | 132,238,338 | ||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.1)% | (71,461 | ) | ||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 132,166,877 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | Security that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of the security amounted to $188,479, representing 0.1% of net assets. This security has been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(3) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 906,000 | $ | 911,207 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 128,013,780 | $ | 3,331,287 | * | $ | — | $ | 131,345,067 | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 893,271 | — | 893,271 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 128,013,780 | $ | 4,224,558 | $ | — | $ | 132,238,338 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 132,238,338 | ||
Foreign currency, at value |
7,769 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
57,345 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
9,422 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
5,619 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
1,336 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
1,819 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
132,321,648 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Investment advisory fees payable |
64,962 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
27,067 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
20,458 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
13,278 | |||
Accrued legal fees |
10,980 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
5,579 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,370 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
11,077 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
154,771 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 132,166,877 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | (15,820,472 | ) | |
Distributable earnings |
147,987,349 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 132,166,877 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 79,112,776 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency, at Cost |
$ | 7,768 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with |
4,485,549 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$29.47 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 903,007 | ||
Interest |
6,015 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(11,174 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
897,848 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
401,334 | |||
Distribution fees |
167,223 | |||
Professional fees |
30,157 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
22,863 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
20,089 | |||
Administrative fees |
18,852 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,406 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,899 | |||
Other expenses |
4,076 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
674,899 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(32,765 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
642,134 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
255,714 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
15,395,472 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(849 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
6,105,037 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
575 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
21,500,235 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 21,755,949 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 255,714 | $ | 724,263 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
15,394,623 | 10,328,829 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and |
6,105,612 | 24,981,584 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
21,755,949 | 36,034,676 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
175,242 | 827,524 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(27,512,630 | ) | (40,156,270 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(27,337,388 | ) | (39,328,746 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(5,581,439 | ) | (3,294,070 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
137,748,316 | 141,042,386 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 132,166,877 | $ | 137,748,316 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
6,286 | 39,772 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,014,974 | ) | (1,799,566 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,008,688 | ) | (1,759,794 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 25.07 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 4.35 | $ | 4.40 | $ | 29.47 | 17.55% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
19.44 | 0.11 | 5.52 | 5.63 | 25.07 | 28.96% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
23.63 | 0.11 | (4.30 | ) | (4.19 | ) | 19.44 | (17.73)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
19.05 | 0.08 | 4.50 | 4.58 | 23.63 | 24.04% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
15.85 | 0.08 | 3.12 | 3.20 | 19.05 | 20.19% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
11.84 | 0.11 | 3.90 | 4.01 | 15.85 | 33.87% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 132,167 | 0.96% | (4) | 1.01% | (4) | 0.38% | (4) | 0.33% | (4) | 26% | (4) | |||||||||||
137,748 | 0.96% | 1.00% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 39% | |||||||||||||||||
141,042 | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 45% | |||||||||||||||||
192,042 | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.36% | 0.36% | 44% | |||||||||||||||||
193,384 | 1.01% | 1.02% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 76% | |||||||||||||||||
196,050 | 1.01% | 1.03% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 88% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of
premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.60% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.96% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $32,765.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Putnam Investment Management LLC (“Putnam”). Putnam is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $167,223 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $35,298,702 and $62,005,100, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include,
but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN DIVERSIFIED RESEARCH VIP FUND
f. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder
redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and
14 |
administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
15 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in |
16 |
the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
17 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile |
of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly |
18 |
performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8168
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.1% |
| |||||||
Bermuda – 3.1% |
| |||||||
CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd. |
298,500 | $ | 1,685,259 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
1,685,259 | ||||||||
Brazil – 2.6% |
| |||||||
Cia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo |
105,100 | 1,409,518 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,409,518 | ||||||||
China – 2.6% |
| |||||||
China Longyuan Power Group Corp. Ltd., Class H |
1,555,613 | 1,396,878 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,396,878 | ||||||||
France – 4.7% |
| |||||||
Engie SA |
177,119 | 2,522,699 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,522,699 | ||||||||
Germany – 4.5% |
| |||||||
RWE AG |
70,479 | 2,411,117 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,411,117 | ||||||||
Italy – 4.5% |
| |||||||
Enel SpA |
341,844 | 2,384,537 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,384,537 | ||||||||
Japan – 4.5% |
| |||||||
Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. |
102,100 | 1,719,681 | ||||||
Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd. |
31,900 | 680,594 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,400,275 | ||||||||
Portugal – 2.3% |
| |||||||
EDP-Energias de Portugal SA |
334,844 | 1,254,529 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,254,529 | ||||||||
Spain – 4.8% |
| |||||||
Iberdrola SA |
198,443 | 2,574,302 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,574,302 | ||||||||
United Kingdom – 4.8% |
| |||||||
National Grid PLC |
229,370 | 2,557,819 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,557,819 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
United States – 60.7% |
| |||||||
American Electric Power Co., Inc. |
45,282 | $ | 3,973,043 | |||||
Atmos Energy Corp. |
22,810 | 2,660,786 | ||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. |
54,884 | 1,700,306 | ||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc. |
49,568 | 2,428,832 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp. |
24,412 | 2,446,815 | ||||||
Edison International |
33,980 | 2,440,104 | ||||||
Exelon Corp. |
46,210 | 1,599,328 | ||||||
NextEra Energy, Inc. |
35,311 | 2,500,372 | ||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. |
2,552 | 198,699 | ||||||
PG&E Corp. |
145,746 | 2,544,725 | ||||||
Sempra |
48,729 | 3,706,328 | ||||||
Southern Co. |
23,744 | 1,841,822 | ||||||
Vistra Corp. |
51,323 | 4,412,751 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
32,453,911 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $45,020,446) |
|
53,050,844 |
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
$ | 358,746 | 358,746 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $358,746) |
|
358,746 | ||||||
Total Investments – 99.8% (Cost $45,379,192) |
|
53,409,590 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.2% |
|
86,353 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 53,495,943 |
(1) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 363,900 | $ | 366,034 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||||||
Bermuda |
$ | — | $ | 1,685,259 | * | $ | — | $ | 1,685,259 | |||||||
Brazil |
1,409,518 | — | — | 1,409,518 | ||||||||||||
China |
— | 1,396,878 | * | — | 1,396,878 | |||||||||||
France |
— | 2,522,699 | * | — | 2,522,699 | |||||||||||
Germany |
— | 2,411,117 | * | — | 2,411,117 | |||||||||||
Italy |
— | 2,384,537 | * | — | 2,384,537 | |||||||||||
Japan |
— | 2,400,275 | * | — | 2,400,275 | |||||||||||
Portugal |
— | 1,254,529 | * | — | 1,254,529 | |||||||||||
Spain |
— | 2,574,302 | * | — | 2,574,302 | |||||||||||
United Kingdom |
— | 2,557,819 | * | — | 2,557,819 | |||||||||||
United States |
32,453,911 | — | — | 32,453,911 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 358,746 | — | 358,746 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 33,863,429 | $ | 19,546,161 | $ | — | $ | 53,409,590 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 53,409,590 | ||
Foreign currency, at value |
70 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
169,622 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
155,334 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
92,738 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
9,642 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
669 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
53,837,665 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
168,871 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
97,574 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
33,301 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
15,394 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
11,405 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
5,111 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
533 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
9,533 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
341,722 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 53,495,943 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 30,778,258 | ||
Distributable earnings |
22,717,685 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 53,495,943 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 45,379,192 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency, at Cost |
$ | 70 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
4,023,922 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$13.29 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,410,997 | ||
Interest |
3,292 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(75,471 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,338,818 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
209,806 | |||
Distribution fees |
71,851 | |||
Professional fees |
22,117 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
22,075 | |||
Administrative fees |
13,610 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
8,515 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
6,694 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,501 | |||
Other expenses |
2,353 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
359,522 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(61,593 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
297,929 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1,040,889 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
2,526,577 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(1,716 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
448,773 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(4,354 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
2,969,280 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 4,010,169 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 1,040,889 | $ | 1,676,837 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
2,524,861 | 1,185,661 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and |
444,419 | (2,229,599 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
4,010,169 | 632,899 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
4,497,976 | 8,064,774 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(13,302,332 | ) | (14,738,514 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(8,804,356 | ) | (6,673,740 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(4,794,187 | ) | (6,040,841 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
58,290,130 | 64,330,971 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 53,495,943 | $ | 58,290,130 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
376,345 | 671,006 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,028,973 | ) | (1,212,810 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(652,628 | ) | (541,804 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 12.46 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 13.29 | 6.66% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
12.33 | 0.33 | (0.20 | ) | 0.13 | 12.46 | 1.05% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
12.45 | 0.28 | (0.40 | ) | (0.12 | ) | 12.33 | (0.96)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
10.70 | 0.28 | 1.47 | 1.75 | 12.45 | 16.36% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
10.27 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 10.70 | 4.19% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/19(5) |
10.00 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 10.27 | 2.70% | (4) |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 53,496 | 1.04% | (4) | 1.25% | (4) | 3.62% | (4) | 3.41% | (4) | 17% | (4) | |||||||||||
58,290 | 1.03% | 1.23% | 2.77% | 2.57% | 34% | |||||||||||||||||
64,331 | 1.03% | 1.21% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 14% | |||||||||||||||||
88,121 | 1.03% | 1.16% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 22% | |||||||||||||||||
84,619 | 1.03% | 1.22% | 2.35% | 2.16% | 43% | |||||||||||||||||
85,307 | 0.89% | (4) | 1.37% | (4) | 1.56% | (4) | 1.08% | (4) | 50% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2019, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on October 21, 2019. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 21, 2019. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks total return.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
e. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.73% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 1.03%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $61,593.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”). Wellington is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $71,851 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $9,817,727 and $17,424,049, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GLOBAL UTILITIES VIP FUND
prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the
14 |
Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the
Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would
15 |
be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive
because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-advisors and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
16 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark |
index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the |
17 |
1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
18 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB10537
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.7% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Curtiss-Wright Corp. |
3,423 | $ | 927,565 | |||||
RTX Corp. |
18,955 | 1,902,892 | ||||||
Textron, Inc. |
21,568 | 1,851,828 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,682,285 | ||||||||
Air Freight & Logistics – 0.5% |
| |||||||
United Parcel Service, Inc., Class B |
4,430 | 606,246 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
606,246 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Aptiv PLC(1) |
9,993 | 703,707 | ||||||
BorgWarner, Inc. |
27,854 | 898,013 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,601,720 | ||||||||
Banks – 9.2% |
| |||||||
Bank OZK |
2,447 | 100,327 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc. |
37,785 | 2,397,836 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
22,598 | 4,570,672 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
75,334 | 4,474,086 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,542,921 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 7.3% |
| |||||||
Amgen, Inc. |
5,780 | 1,805,961 | ||||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
20,914 | 1,434,910 | ||||||
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
4,278 | 4,496,306 | ||||||
United Therapeutics Corp.(1) |
4,485 | 1,428,697 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,165,874 | ||||||||
Building Products – 2.2% |
| |||||||
A.O. Smith Corp. |
8,303 | 679,019 | ||||||
Allegion PLC |
6,164 | 728,277 | ||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc.(1) |
9,385 | 1,298,978 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,706,274 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 2.0% |
| |||||||
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. |
8,351 | 618,976 | ||||||
LyondellBasell Industries NV, Class A |
8,582 | 820,954 | ||||||
PPG Industries, Inc. |
8,756 | 1,102,293 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,542,223 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Veralto Corp. |
9,552 | 911,929 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
911,929 | ||||||||
Communications Equipment – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
19,438 | 923,499 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
923,499 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 0.7% |
| |||||||
EMCOR Group, Inc. |
2,333 | 851,732 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
851,732 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 3.2% |
| |||||||
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. |
1,649 | 629,192 | ||||||
Walmart, Inc. |
48,995 | 3,317,452 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,946,644 | ||||||||
Distributors – 1.0% |
| |||||||
LKQ Corp. |
30,477 | 1,267,538 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,267,538 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electrical Equipment – 2.6% |
| |||||||
Emerson Electric Co. |
9,699 | $ | 1,068,442 | |||||
Generac Holdings, Inc.(1) |
4,593 | 607,286 | ||||||
nVent Electric PLC |
19,933 | 1,527,067 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,202,795 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 1.0% |
| |||||||
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
7,931 | 1,193,060 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,193,060 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 1.4% |
| |||||||
ChampionX Corp. |
12,965 | 430,568 | ||||||
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. |
35,409 | 1,279,681 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,710,249 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Electronic Arts, Inc. |
15,837 | 2,206,569 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,206,569 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 8.6% |
| |||||||
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B(1) |
12,079 | 4,913,737 | ||||||
Fiserv, Inc.(1) |
16,798 | 2,503,574 | ||||||
Mastercard, Inc., Class A |
5,139 | 2,267,121 | ||||||
MGIC Investment Corp. |
50,629 | 1,091,055 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,775,487 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 0.9% |
| |||||||
JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc. |
6,700 | 1,072,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,072,000 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 1.1% |
| |||||||
GE HealthCare Technologies, Inc. |
17,256 | 1,344,588 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,344,588 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 6.8% |
| |||||||
Cencora, Inc. |
14,111 | 3,179,208 | ||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
8,610 | 4,665,415 | ||||||
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. |
4,560 | 624,173 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,468,796 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 0.8% |
| |||||||
D.R. Horton, Inc. |
6,803 | 958,747 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
958,747 | ||||||||
Insurance – 3.1% |
| |||||||
American International Group, Inc. |
14,943 | 1,109,368 | ||||||
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. |
24,692 | 1,744,490 | ||||||
MetLife, Inc. |
14,684 | 1,030,670 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,884,528 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class C |
13,220 | 2,424,812 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,424,812 | ||||||||
IT Services – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Accenture PLC, Class A |
7,973 | 2,419,088 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,419,088 | ||||||||
Machinery – 4.0% |
| |||||||
Dover Corp. |
5,967 | 1,076,745 | ||||||
Oshkosh Corp. |
9,083 | 982,781 | ||||||
PACCAR, Inc. |
17,128 | 1,763,156 | ||||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
7,396 | 1,168,938 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,991,620 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Media – 2.5% |
| |||||||
Comcast Corp., Class A |
80,179 | $ | 3,139,810 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
3,139,810 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 1.5% |
| |||||||
BHP Group Ltd., ADR |
8,319 | 474,932 | ||||||
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
10,737 | 1,390,441 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,865,373 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 7.6% |
| |||||||
Chevron Corp. |
15,224 | 2,381,338 | ||||||
ConocoPhillips |
16,576 | 1,895,963 | ||||||
EOG Resources, Inc. |
17,985 | 2,263,772 | ||||||
Phillips 66 |
20,830 | 2,940,571 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,481,644 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.3% |
| |||||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
18,213 | 2,254,770 | ||||||
Roche Holding AG, ADR |
55,590 | 1,927,305 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,182,075 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Robert Half, Inc. |
27,796 | 1,778,388 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,778,388 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 7.0% |
| |||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
20,127 | 4,008,896 | ||||||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd., ADR |
12,489 | 2,170,713 | ||||||
Texas Instruments, Inc. |
13,057 | 2,539,978 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,719,587 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Public Storage |
2,597 | 747,027 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
747,027 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Ross Stores, Inc. |
15,213 | 2,210,753 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,210,753 | ||||||||
Tobacco – 3.0% |
| |||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
37,518 | 3,801,699 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,801,699 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Ferguson PLC |
9,738 | $ | 1,885,764 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
1,885,764 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $90,627,638) |
|
123,213,344 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,375,408, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 1,375,225 | 1,375,225 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,375,225) |
|
1,375,225 | ||||||
Total Investments – 99.8% (Cost $92,002,863) |
|
124,588,569 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.2% |
|
198,369 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 124,786,938 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,394,800 | $ | 1,402,794 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 123,213,344 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 123,213,344 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,375,225 | — | 1,375,225 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 123,213,344 | $ | 1,375,225 | $ | — | $ | 124,588,569 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 124,588,569 | ||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
130,022 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
121,713 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
92,799 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
8,168 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
1,766 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
124,943,037 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Investment advisory fees payable |
66,004 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
25,794 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
20,987 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued legal fees |
10,864 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
6,003 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,432 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
10,717 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
156,099 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 124,786,938 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 21,455,053 | ||
Distributable earnings |
103,331,885 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 124,786,938 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 92,002,863 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
5,728,846 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$21.78 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,264,020 | ||
Interest |
15,653 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(18,734 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,260,939 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
419,068 | |||
Distribution fees |
164,252 | |||
Professional fees |
29,937 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
19,811 | |||
Administrative fees |
18,802 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
16,968 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,360 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,901 | |||
Other expenses |
4,021 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
683,120 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(50,267 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
632,853 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
628,086 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
8,626,424 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
365,923 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments |
8,992,347 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 9,620,433 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 628,086 | $ | 1,633,947 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
8,626,424 | 6,537,897 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
365,923 | 6,878,882 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
9,620,433 | 15,050,726 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
270,451 | 7,656,932 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(21,294,913 | ) | (29,556,171 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(21,024,462 | ) | (21,899,239 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(11,404,029 | ) | (6,848,513 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
136,190,967 | 143,039,480 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 124,786,938 | $ | 136,190,967 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
12,899 | 416,709 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,001,834 | ) | (1,569,999 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(988,935 | ) | (1,153,290 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 20.27 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 21.78 | 7.45% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
18.17 | 0.22 | 1.88 | 2.10 | 20.27 | 11.56% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
19.17 | 0.23 | (1.23 | ) | (1.00 | ) | 18.17 | (5.22)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
14.95 | 0.14 | 4.08 | 4.22 | 19.17 | 28.23% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
14.64 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 14.95 | 2.12% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
11.81 | 0.14 | 2.69 | 2.83 | 14.64 | 23.96% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 124,787 | 0.96% | (4) | 1.04% | (4) | 0.96% | (4) | 0.88% | (4) | 20% | (4) | |||||||||||
136,191 | 0.96% | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 41% | |||||||||||||||||
143,039 | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.25% | 1.22% | 39% | |||||||||||||||||
193,598 | 0.97% | 0.98% | 0.82% | 0.81% | 26% | |||||||||||||||||
198,155 | 1.01% | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.15% | 36% | |||||||||||||||||
187,172 | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.01% | 0.98% | 36% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers, expense limitations, and recoupments, if any. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and
carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of
trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and
expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.65% up to $100 million, 0.60% from $100 to $300 million, 0.55% from $300 to $500 million, and 0.53% in excess of $500 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.97% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.96%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $50,267.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with AllianceBernstein L.P. (“AllianceBernstein”). AllianceBernstein is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $164,252 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $26,192,606 and $47,314,196, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or
sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN GROWTH & INCOME VIP FUND
$10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility.
The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration
Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the Sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would
15 |
be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and Sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and Sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than Sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that
may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the |
16 |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
17 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year |
periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board |
18 |
also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8169
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.3% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Boeing Co.(1) |
3,969 | $ | 722,398 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp. |
2,060 | 597,688 | ||||||
General Electric Co. |
3,732 | 593,276 | ||||||
Howmet Aerospace, Inc. |
6,423 | 498,618 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,411,980 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Aptiv PLC(1) |
10,376 | 730,678 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
730,678 | ||||||||
Banks – 3.4% |
| |||||||
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc., Class A |
7,754 | 215,329 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
15,094 | 3,052,912 | ||||||
M&T Bank Corp. |
3,398 | 514,321 | ||||||
Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. |
7,047 | 161,870 | ||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
6,655 | 1,034,719 | ||||||
United Community Banks, Inc. |
7,418 | 188,862 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
16,879 | 1,002,444 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,170,457 | ||||||||
Beverages – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC |
9,251 | 674,120 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc., Class A |
2,067 | 531,798 | ||||||
Monster Beverage Corp.(1) |
12,326 | 615,684 | ||||||
PepsiCo, Inc. |
7,895 | 1,302,122 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,123,724 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 2.3% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
14,453 | 2,478,978 | ||||||
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
3,394 | 1,590,836 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,069,814 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 4.4% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
41,363 | 7,993,400 | ||||||
7,993,400 | ||||||||
Building Products – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc.(1) |
1,814 | 251,076 | ||||||
Johnson Controls International PLC |
6,451 | 428,798 | ||||||
Masco Corp. |
7,133 | 475,557 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,155,431 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 3.4% |
| |||||||
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. |
1,027 | 174,652 | ||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
9,529 | 702,192 | ||||||
CME Group, Inc. |
2,877 | 565,618 | ||||||
KKR & Co., Inc. |
10,562 | 1,111,545 | ||||||
Moody’s Corp. |
1,883 | 792,611 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
9,563 | 929,428 | ||||||
Morningstar, Inc. |
2,572 | 760,926 | ||||||
Northern Trust Corp. |
3,103 | 260,590 | ||||||
Raymond James Financial, Inc. |
4,436 | 548,334 | ||||||
TPG, Inc. |
7,634 | 316,429 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,162,325 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. |
1,901 | 490,553 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Chemicals (continued) |
| |||||||
Corteva, Inc. |
8,583 | $ | 462,967 | |||||
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. |
5,154 | 414,845 | ||||||
Eastman Chemical Co. |
5,998 | 587,624 | ||||||
International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. |
3,746 | 356,657 | ||||||
Linde PLC |
1,780 | 781,082 | ||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
1,826 | 544,933 | ||||||
Tronox Holdings PLC |
12,092 | 189,724 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,828,385 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 0.6% |
| |||||||
GFL Environmental, Inc. |
28,046 | 1,091,831 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,091,831 | ||||||||
Communications Equipment – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
1,580 | 609,959 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
609,959 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 0.1% |
| |||||||
API Group Corp.(1) |
5,912 | 222,469 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
222,469 | ||||||||
Construction Materials – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Summit Materials, Inc., Class A(1) |
16,684 | 610,801 | ||||||
Vulcan Materials Co. |
1,439 | 357,851 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
968,652 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 0.5% |
| |||||||
American Express Co. |
3,871 | 896,330 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
896,330 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 1.2% |
| |||||||
Dollar General Corp. |
4,282 | 566,209 | ||||||
Target Corp. |
5,417 | 801,933 | ||||||
U.S. Foods Holding Corp.(1) |
14,350 | 760,263 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,128,405 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Crown Holdings, Inc. |
2,855 | 212,383 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
212,383 | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.(1) |
1,765 | 246,941 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
246,941 | ||||||||
Diversified REITs – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. |
25,940 | 411,668 | ||||||
WP Carey, Inc. |
6,990 | 384,799 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
796,467 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Constellation Energy Corp. |
2,450 | 490,661 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp. |
4,495 | 450,534 | ||||||
Exelon Corp. |
7,352 | 254,453 | ||||||
NextEra Energy, Inc. |
10,552 | 747,187 | ||||||
PG&E Corp. |
47,989 | 837,888 | ||||||
Southern Co. |
2,562 | 198,734 | ||||||
Xcel Energy, Inc. |
5,343 | 285,370 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,264,827 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 2.1% |
| |||||||
AMETEK, Inc. |
4,396 | 732,857 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electrical Equipment (continued) |
| |||||||
Eaton Corp. PLC |
5,287 | $ | 1,657,739 | |||||
Emerson Electric Co. |
4,307 | 474,459 | ||||||
GE Vernova, Inc.(1) |
2,553 | 437,865 | ||||||
nVent Electric PLC |
5,004 | 383,357 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,686,277 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Amphenol Corp., Class A |
13,439 | 905,385 | ||||||
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
2,443 | 367,501 | ||||||
Zebra Technologies Corp., Class A(1) |
1,119 | 345,693 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,618,579 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Schlumberger NV |
7,871 | 371,354 | ||||||
TechnipFMC PLC |
10,649 | 278,471 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
649,825 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Electronic Arts, Inc. |
4,122 | 574,318 | ||||||
Spotify Technology SA(1) |
2,688 | 843,468 | ||||||
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.(1) |
2,488 | 386,859 | ||||||
Vivid Seats, Inc., Class A(1) |
21,426 | 123,200 | ||||||
Walt Disney Co. |
10,846 | 1,076,899 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,004,744 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 2.8% |
| |||||||
Block, Inc.(1) |
4,097 | 264,215 | ||||||
Corebridge Financial, Inc. |
16,153 | 470,375 | ||||||
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
4,677 | 352,459 | ||||||
Fiserv, Inc.(1) |
3,468 | 516,871 | ||||||
Flywire Corp.(1) |
8,764 | 143,642 | ||||||
Visa, Inc., Class A |
11,040 | 2,897,669 | ||||||
Voya Financial, Inc. |
5,496 | 391,040 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,036,271 | ||||||||
Food Products – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Mondelez International, Inc., Class A |
14,151 | 926,041 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
926,041 | ||||||||
Gas Utilities – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. |
7,946 | 559,239 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
559,239 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. |
12,843 | 1,011,129 | ||||||
JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc. |
3,010 | 481,600 | ||||||
Saia, Inc.(1) |
960 | 455,319 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,948,048 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 3.0% |
| |||||||
Becton Dickinson & Co. |
5,482 | 1,281,198 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
21,005 | 1,617,595 | ||||||
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.(1) |
561 | 273,319 | ||||||
Medtronic PLC |
18,099 | 1,424,573 | ||||||
STERIS PLC |
3,404 | 747,314 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,343,999 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Cigna Group |
6,050 | 1,999,949 | ||||||
McKesson Corp. |
2,186 | 1,276,711 | ||||||
Option Care Health, Inc.(1) |
22,749 | 630,147 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,906,807 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Health Care Technology – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Veeva Systems, Inc., Class A(1) |
4,341 | $ | 794,446 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
794,446 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Booking Holdings, Inc. |
378 | 1,497,447 | ||||||
DraftKings, Inc., Class A(1) |
4,888 | 186,575 | ||||||
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. |
3,469 | 756,936 | ||||||
International Game Technology PLC |
6,697 | 137,020 | ||||||
Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
3,571 | 158,017 | ||||||
Starbucks Corp. |
11,006 | 856,817 | ||||||
Viking Holdings Ltd.(1) |
998 | 33,872 | ||||||
Wingstop, Inc. |
880 | 371,941 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,998,625 | ||||||||
Household Products – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Colgate-Palmolive Co. |
7,596 | 737,116 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
4,179 | 689,201 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,426,317 | ||||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
4,035 | 861,634 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
861,634 | ||||||||
Industrial REITs – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Terreno Realty Corp. |
5,695 | 337,030 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
337,030 | ||||||||
Insurance – 3.2% |
| |||||||
American International Group, Inc. |
8,977 | 666,452 | ||||||
Aon PLC, Class A |
4,689 | 1,376,597 | ||||||
Arthur J Gallagher & Co. |
3,773 | 978,377 | ||||||
Assurant, Inc. |
1,673 | 278,136 | ||||||
Chubb Ltd. |
4,809 | 1,226,680 | ||||||
Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. |
2,439 | 305,948 | ||||||
MetLife, Inc. |
5,105 | 358,320 | ||||||
Willis Towers Watson PLC |
2,231 | 584,834 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,775,344 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 6.7% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
40,742 | 7,421,155 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
9,072 | 4,574,284 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,995,439 | ||||||||
IT Services – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Accenture PLC, Class A |
917 | 278,227 | ||||||
Gartner, Inc.(1) |
1,057 | 474,657 | ||||||
Okta, Inc.(1) |
2,758 | 258,176 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,011,060 | ||||||||
Leisure Products – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Hasbro, Inc. |
3,586 | 209,781 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
209,781 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 1.1% |
| |||||||
ICON PLC(1) |
2,265 | 710,010 | ||||||
Illumina, Inc.(1) |
2,904 | 303,119 | ||||||
Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc., Class A(1) |
26,506 | 189,783 | ||||||
Waters Corp.(1) |
2,367 | 686,714 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,889,626 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Machinery – 1.3% |
| |||||||
AGCO Corp. |
4,487 | $ | 439,188 | |||||
Crane Co. |
1,659 | 240,522 | ||||||
Nordson Corp. |
2,624 | 608,610 | ||||||
Pentair PLC |
4,688 | 359,429 | ||||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
4,655 | 735,723 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,383,472 | ||||||||
Media – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Altice USA, Inc., Class A(1) |
41,058 | 83,758 | ||||||
Cable One, Inc. |
1,230 | 435,420 | ||||||
Comcast Corp., Class A |
14,085 | 551,569 | ||||||
Omnicom Group, Inc. |
3,154 | 282,914 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,353,661 | ||||||||
Multi-Utilities – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc. |
2,696 | 132,104 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
132,104 | ||||||||
Office REITs – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Douglas Emmett, Inc. |
15,891 | 211,509 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
211,509 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Cheniere Energy, Inc. |
2,123 | 371,164 | ||||||
Chesapeake Energy Corp. |
3,944 | 324,157 | ||||||
ConocoPhillips |
11,580 | 1,324,520 | ||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
1,754 | 351,133 | ||||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. |
25,157 | 2,896,074 | ||||||
Permian Resources Corp. |
18,483 | 298,501 | ||||||
Phillips 66 |
3,051 | 430,710 | ||||||
Targa Resources Corp. |
3,217 | 414,285 | ||||||
Valero Energy Corp. |
2,398 | 375,911 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,786,455 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.4% |
| |||||||
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.(1) |
802 | 168,997 | ||||||
Kenvue, Inc. |
34,931 | 635,046 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
804,043 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
2,739 | 2,479,836 | ||||||
Johnson & Johnson |
19,143 | 2,797,941 | ||||||
Pfizer, Inc. |
52,452 | 1,467,607 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,745,384 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. |
169,362 | 1,568,292 | ||||||
Insperity, Inc. |
11,034 | 1,006,411 | ||||||
Jacobs Solutions, Inc. |
4,637 | 647,835 | ||||||
Leidos Holdings, Inc. |
4,259 | 621,303 | ||||||
TransUnion |
20,941 | 1,552,985 | ||||||
TriNet Group, Inc. |
8,588 | 858,800 | ||||||
Verisk Analytics, Inc. |
2,280 | 614,574 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,870,200 | ||||||||
Real Estate Management & Development – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.(1) |
1,174 | 240,999 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
240,999 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Residential REITs – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Sun Communities, Inc. |
3,421 | $ | 411,683 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
411,683 | ||||||||
Retail REITs – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Federal Realty Investment Trust |
7,199 | 726,883 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
726,883 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 9.4% |
| |||||||
Analog Devices, Inc. |
6,363 | 1,452,418 | ||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. |
7,422 | 1,751,518 | ||||||
Lam Research Corp. |
2,104 | 2,240,445 | ||||||
Marvell Technology, Inc. |
25,267 | 1,766,163 | ||||||
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
837 | 687,746 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
65,558 | 8,099,035 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
3,372 | 907,372 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,904,697 | ||||||||
Software – 12.1% |
| |||||||
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.(1) |
6,774 | 2,084,698 | ||||||
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings, Inc.(1) |
27,188 | 302,059 | ||||||
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.(1) |
945 | 155,925 | ||||||
Datadog, Inc., Class A(1) |
2,535 | 328,764 | ||||||
Guidewire Software, Inc.(1) |
3,169 | 436,973 | ||||||
HubSpot, Inc.(1) |
596 | 351,515 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
31,016 | 13,862,601 | ||||||
Salesforce, Inc. |
8,130 | 2,090,223 | ||||||
ServiceNow, Inc.(1) |
1,512 | 1,189,445 | ||||||
Tyler Technologies, Inc.(1) |
1,034 | 519,875 | ||||||
Zscaler, Inc.(1) |
2,693 | 517,568 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
21,839,646 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Extra Space Storage, Inc. |
2,306 | 358,376 | ||||||
SBA Communications Corp. |
2,368 | 464,838 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
823,214 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Burlington Stores, Inc.(1) |
1,167 | 280,080 | ||||||
Five Below, Inc.(1) |
2,400 | 261,528 | ||||||
Home Depot, Inc. |
6,197 | 2,133,255 | ||||||
Ross Stores, Inc. |
4,650 | 675,738 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,350,601 | ||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
30,583 | 6,441,391 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,441,391 | ||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.4% |
| |||||||
NIKE, Inc., Class B |
6,165 | 464,656 | ||||||
PVH Corp. |
1,738 | 184,002 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
648,658 | ||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0.6% |
| |||||||
T-Mobile U.S., Inc. |
6,455 | 1,137,242 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,137,242 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $138,795,224) |
|
178,875,432 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,583,684, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 1,583,473 | $ | 1,583,473 | ||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,583,473) |
|
1,583,473 | ||||||
Total Investments – 100.2% (Cost $140,378,697) |
|
180,458,905 | ||||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.2)% |
|
(418,317 | ) | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 180,040,588 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,606,000 | $ | 1,615,192 |
Legend:
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 178,875,432 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 178,875,432 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,583,473 | — | 1,583,473 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 178,875,432 | $ | 1,583,473 | $ | — | $ | 180,458,905 |
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 180,458,905 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
271,035 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
91,502 | |||
Receivable for fund shares subscribed |
424 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,288 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
180,824,154 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
614,364 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
64,852 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
36,848 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
17,740 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
11,085 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
916 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
23,463 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
783,566 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 180,040,588 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 137,023,184 | ||
Distributable earnings |
43,017,404 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 180,040,588 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 140,378,697 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
15,428,458 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$11.67 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,167,018 | ||
Interest |
7,759 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(1,805 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,172,972 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
391,053 | |||
Distribution fees |
222,189 | |||
Professional fees |
34,273 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
28,281 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
25,302 | |||
Administrative fees |
20,548 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
9,005 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,970 | |||
Other expenses |
4,570 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
738,191 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(29,953 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
708,238 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
464,734 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
5,717,900 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(40 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
14,327,873 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
7 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
20,045,740 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 20,510,474 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 464,734 | $ | 1,189,056 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
5,717,860 | (968,918 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
14,327,880 | 34,051,693 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
20,510,474 | 34,271,831 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
1,541,930 | 1,598,005 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(16,477,164 | ) | (20,589,641 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(14,935,234 | ) | (18,991,636 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets |
5,575,240 | 15,280,195 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
174,465,348 | 159,185,153 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 180,040,588 | $ | 174,465,348 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
142,442 | 169,513 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,483,140 | ) | (2,211,996 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,340,698 | ) | (2,042,483 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
7 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 10.40 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 1.24 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 11.67 | 12.21% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
8.46 | 0.07 | 1.87 | 1.94 | 10.40 | 22.93% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.26 | 0.07 | (1.87) | (1.80) | 8.46 | (17.54)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/21(5) |
10.00 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 10.26 | 2.60% | (4) |
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 180,041 | 0.80% | (4) | 0.83% | (4) | 0.52% | (4) | 0.49% | (4) | 16% | (4) | |||||||||||
174,465 | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 32% | |||||||||||||||||
159,185 | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 37% | |||||||||||||||||
31,370 | 0.38% | (4) | 1.14% | (4) | 1.06% | (4) | 0.30% | (4) | 7% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2021, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on October 25, 2021. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 25, 2021. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the
valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may
have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust,
based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.44% of the first $500 million, and 0.40% in excess of $500 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.93% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.78%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $29,953.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”). MFS is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
12 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $222,189 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $27,811,797 and $42,378,378, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or
sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a
13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN ALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
$10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility.
The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
14 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
15 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees
16 |
recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also
17 |
considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive
because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
18 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark |
index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
19 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information |
20 |
in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
21 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11407
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies | ||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 11 | |||
Statement of Operations | 11 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 12 | |||
Financial Highlights | 14 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 16 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 23 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 23 | |||
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies | 23 | |||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements | 23 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 65.8% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Boeing Co.(1) |
1,589 | $ | 289,214 | |||||
General Dynamics Corp. |
4,327 | 1,255,436 | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
3,847 | 386,200 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,930,850 | ||||||||
Air Freight & Logistics – 0.2% |
| |||||||
CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc. |
5,182 | 456,638 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
456,638 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.(1) |
15,645 | 177,571 | ||||||
Modine Manufacturing Co.(1) |
1,300 | 130,247 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
307,818 | ||||||||
Banks – 1.9% |
| |||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
10,294 | 2,082,064 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
36,087 | 2,143,207 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,225,271 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Celsius Holdings, Inc.(1) |
4,187 | 239,036 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc., Class A |
2,583 | 664,554 | ||||||
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. |
11,562 | 386,171 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,289,761 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 1.6% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
7,730 | 1,325,850 | ||||||
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
415 | 100,845 | ||||||
Amgen, Inc. |
408 | 127,480 | ||||||
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
1,132 | 43,424 | ||||||
Ascendis Pharma AS, ADR(1) |
450 | 61,371 | ||||||
Avidity Biosciences, Inc.(1) |
1,306 | 53,350 | ||||||
Biogen, Inc.(1) |
720 | 166,910 | ||||||
Bridgebio Pharma, Inc.(1) |
892 | 22,594 | ||||||
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
1,726 | 63,879 | ||||||
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
1,103 | 49,403 | ||||||
Cytokinetics, Inc.(1) |
3,401 | 184,266 | ||||||
Immunocore Holdings PLC, ADR(1) |
1,043 | 35,347 | ||||||
Moderna, Inc.(1) |
650 | 77,188 | ||||||
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
437 | 459,300 | ||||||
REVOLUTION Medicines, Inc.(1) |
2,187 | 84,877 | ||||||
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
1,643 | 35,374 | ||||||
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
285 | 45,030 | ||||||
Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
1,657 | 34,018 | ||||||
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical, Inc.(1) |
1,091 | 44,840 | ||||||
United Therapeutics Corp.(1) |
183 | 58,295 | ||||||
Vaxcyte, Inc.(1) |
848 | 64,033 | ||||||
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
1,114 | 522,154 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,659,828 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
41,921 | 8,101,233 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,101,233 | ||||||||
Building Products – 0.6% |
| |||||||
AZEK Co., Inc.(1) |
9,671 | 407,439 | ||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc.(1) |
3,577 | 495,093 | ||||||
Johnson Controls International PLC |
6,572 | 436,841 | ||||||
Trane Technologies PLC |
258 | 84,864 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,424,237 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Capital Markets – 1.6% |
| |||||||
Ares Management Corp., Class A |
10,076 | $ | 1,342,929 | |||||
KKR & Co., Inc. |
7,717 | 812,137 | ||||||
S&P Global, Inc. |
3,092 | 1,379,032 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,534,098 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Arcadium Lithium PLC(1) |
15,817 | 53,145 | ||||||
Cabot Corp. |
5,599 | 514,492 | ||||||
Celanese Corp. |
2,816 | 379,850 | ||||||
FMC Corp. |
6,079 | 349,846 | ||||||
Ingevity Corp.(1) |
3,324 | 145,292 | ||||||
Linde PLC |
2,833 | 1,243,149 | ||||||
PPG Industries, Inc. |
3,977 | 500,665 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,186,439 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Clean Harbors, Inc.(1) |
2,832 | 640,457 | ||||||
Waste Connections, Inc. |
2,115 | 370,886 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,011,343 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 0.7% |
| |||||||
American Express Co. |
6,726 | 1,557,405 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,557,405 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 0.1% |
| |||||||
U.S. Foods Holding Corp.(1) |
5,085 | 269,403 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
269,403 | ||||||||
Distributors – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Pool Corp. |
2,829 | 869,437 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
869,437 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Exelon Corp. |
1,975 | 68,355 | ||||||
NextEra Energy, Inc. |
6,125 | 433,711 | ||||||
PG&E Corp. |
56,010 | 977,935 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,480,001 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Flex Ltd.(1) |
32,058 | 945,390 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
945,390 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Schlumberger NV |
10,303 | 486,096 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
486,096 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Netflix, Inc.(1) |
1,873 | 1,264,050 | ||||||
Spotify Technology SA(1) |
1,318 | 413,575 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,677,625 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 2.6% |
| |||||||
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B(1) |
4,983 | 2,027,084 | ||||||
Block, Inc.(1) |
13,587 | 876,226 | ||||||
Corpay, Inc.(1) |
1,207 | 321,557 | ||||||
Equitable Holdings, Inc. |
9,578 | 391,357 | ||||||
Global Payments, Inc. |
2,398 | 231,887 | ||||||
PayPal Holdings, Inc.(1) |
8,965 | 520,239 | ||||||
Visa, Inc., Class A |
3,239 | 850,140 | ||||||
WEX, Inc.(1) |
3,958 | 701,120 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,919,610 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Food Products – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Freshpet, Inc.(1) |
3,539 | $ | 457,911 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
457,911 | ||||||||
Gas Utilities – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Atmos Energy Corp. |
5,056 | 589,782 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
589,782 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. |
7,937 | 396,215 | ||||||
Ryder System, Inc. |
3,376 | 418,219 | ||||||
Uber Technologies, Inc.(1) |
20,074 | 1,458,978 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,273,412 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
13,873 | 1,068,360 | ||||||
Dexcom, Inc.(1) |
5,132 | 581,866 | ||||||
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(1) |
8,380 | 774,061 | ||||||
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) |
2,123 | 944,417 | ||||||
Stryker Corp. |
2,042 | 694,790 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,063,494 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc.(1) |
4,342 | 293,259 | ||||||
agilon health, Inc.(1) |
40,262 | 263,314 | ||||||
Cencora, Inc. |
3,514 | 791,704 | ||||||
Centene Corp.(1) |
5,369 | 355,965 | ||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
1,330 | 720,674 | ||||||
HCA Healthcare, Inc. |
2,015 | 647,379 | ||||||
Humana, Inc. |
648 | 242,125 | ||||||
Molina Healthcare, Inc.(1) |
1,301 | 386,787 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
2,023 | 1,030,233 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,731,440 | ||||||||
Health Care REITs – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Welltower, Inc. |
6,841 | 713,174 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
713,174 | ||||||||
Hotel & Resort REITs – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. |
4,468 | 446,174 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
446,174 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) |
30,550 | 1,913,958 | ||||||
Domino’s Pizza, Inc. |
1,006 | 519,428 | ||||||
DoorDash, Inc., Class A(1) |
8,120 | 883,294 | ||||||
Dutch Bros, Inc., Class A(1) |
3,585 | 148,419 | ||||||
Hyatt Hotels Corp., Class A |
3,872 | 588,234 | ||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.(1) |
1,394 | 222,245 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,275,578 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Lennar Corp., Class A |
2,481 | 371,827 | ||||||
Skyline Champion Corp.(1) |
7,022 | 475,741 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
847,568 | ||||||||
Household Products – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. |
4,138 | 429,028 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
11,754 | 1,938,470 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,367,498 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Vistra Corp. |
5,050 | $ | 434,199 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
434,199 | ||||||||
Insurance – 2.1% |
| |||||||
American International Group, Inc. |
11,879 | 881,897 | ||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.(1) |
7,608 | 767,571 | ||||||
Assured Guaranty Ltd. |
4,445 | 342,932 | ||||||
Everest Group Ltd. |
2,684 | 1,022,658 | ||||||
Progressive Corp. |
4,044 | 839,979 | ||||||
SiriusPoint Ltd.(1) |
28,558 | 348,408 | ||||||
Trupanion, Inc.(1) |
13,288 | 390,667 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,594,112 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 4.4% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
42,435 | 7,729,535 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
4,138 | 2,086,463 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,815,998 | ||||||||
IT Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
MongoDB, Inc.(1) |
2,476 | 618,901 | ||||||
Squarespace, Inc., Class A(1) |
33,893 | 1,478,752 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,097,653 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Agilent Technologies, Inc. |
2,811 | 364,390 | ||||||
Danaher Corp. |
3,715 | 928,193 | ||||||
ICON PLC(1) |
1,601 | 501,865 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
450 | 248,850 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,043,298 | ||||||||
Machinery – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc.(1) |
3,846 | 110,688 | ||||||
Flowserve Corp. |
3,038 | 146,128 | ||||||
Fortive Corp. |
7,509 | 556,417 | ||||||
Helios Technologies, Inc. |
3,100 | 148,025 | ||||||
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
1,883 | 171,052 | ||||||
Middleby Corp.(1) |
4,242 | 520,111 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,652,421 | ||||||||
Media – 0.4% |
| |||||||
New York Times Co., Class A |
6,737 | 345,002 | ||||||
Omnicom Group, Inc. |
7,084 | 635,435 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
980,437 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Nucor Corp. |
1,035 | 163,613 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
163,613 | ||||||||
Multi-Utilities – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Sempra |
13,734 | 1,044,608 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,044,608 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 2.8% |
| |||||||
EQT Corp. |
7,253 | 268,216 | ||||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. |
25,375 | 2,921,170 | ||||||
Marathon Petroleum Corp. |
4,485 | 778,058 | ||||||
Shell PLC, ADR |
21,855 | 1,577,494 | ||||||
Targa Resources Corp. |
4,830 | 622,007 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,166,945 | ||||||||
Passenger Airlines – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
16,275 | 772,086 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
772,086 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.9% |
| |||||||
BellRing Brands, Inc.(1) |
5,930 | $ | 338,840 | |||||
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.(1) |
1,877 | 395,522 | ||||||
Haleon PLC, ADR |
58,190 | 480,649 | ||||||
Unilever PLC, ADR |
15,196 | 835,628 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,050,639 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 2.7% |
| |||||||
AstraZeneca PLC, ADR |
8,330 | 649,657 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
3,391 | 3,070,144 | ||||||
GSK PLC, ADR |
10,115 | 389,427 | ||||||
Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
3,900 | 105,417 | ||||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
12,065 | 1,493,647 | ||||||
Novartis AG, ADR |
1,150 | 122,429 | ||||||
Structure Therapeutics, Inc., ADR(1) |
4,634 | 181,977 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,012,698 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Dayforce, Inc.(1) |
9,451 | 468,770 | ||||||
Science Applications International Corp. |
4,538 | 533,442 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,002,212 | ||||||||
Real Estate Management & Development – 0.1% |
| |||||||
CoStar Group, Inc.(1) |
2,442 | 181,050 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
181,050 | ||||||||
Residential REITs – 0.2% | ||||||||
Camden Property Trust |
4,000 | 436,440 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
436,440 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 7.2% |
| |||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.(1) |
13,990 | 2,269,318 | ||||||
First Solar, Inc.(1) |
1,028 | 231,773 | ||||||
KLA Corp. |
1,510 | 1,245,010 | ||||||
Micron Technology, Inc. |
12,586 | 1,655,437 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
60,997 | 7,535,569 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
2,506 | 674,339 | ||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
4,586 | 913,439 | ||||||
Texas Instruments, Inc. |
8,169 | 1,589,116 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,114,001 | ||||||||
Software – 6.7% |
| |||||||
Adobe, Inc.(1) |
5,068 | 2,815,477 | ||||||
Atlassian Corp., Class A(1) |
5,030 | 889,706 | ||||||
HubSpot, Inc.(1) |
1,504 | 887,044 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
19,365 | 8,655,187 | ||||||
ServiceNow, Inc.(1) |
844 | 663,949 | ||||||
Synopsys, Inc.(1) |
1,882 | 1,119,903 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
15,031,266 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Equinix, Inc. |
797 | 603,010 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
603,010 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.0% |
| |||||||
TJX Cos., Inc. |
20,750 | 2,284,575 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,284,575 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 4.1% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
43,268 | $ | 9,113,106 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
9,113,106 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 0.1% |
| |||||||
AerCap Holdings NV |
2,831 | 263,849 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
263,849 | ||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 0.6% |
| |||||||
T-Mobile U.S., Inc. |
7,697 | 1,356,057 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,356,057 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $115,847,203) |
|
147,312,787 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
||||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities – 9.5% |
| |||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. |
$ | 1,298,785 | 1,026,516 | |||||
2.00% due 4/1/2052 |
1,239,091 | 982,972 | ||||||
2.50% due 7/1/2041 |
356,207 | 306,977 | ||||||
2.50% due 2/1/2042 |
524,193 | 453,417 | ||||||
2.50% due 7/1/2051 |
1,185,776 | 983,082 | ||||||
2.50% due 10/1/2051 |
413,433 | 338,807 | ||||||
2.50% due 11/1/2051 |
386,237 | 317,801 | ||||||
3.00% due 10/1/2049 |
301,788 | 260,372 | ||||||
3.00% due 10/1/2051 |
101,851 | 87,796 | ||||||
3.00% due 11/1/2051 |
392,356 | 333,600 | ||||||
3.00% due 5/1/2052 |
177,644 | 151,044 | ||||||
4.00% due 4/1/2047 |
8,899 | 8,335 | ||||||
4.00% due 11/1/2048 |
116,650 | 108,563 | ||||||
4.00% due 5/1/2049 |
15,495 | 14,471 | ||||||
4.00% due 7/1/2049 |
18,305 | 17,144 | ||||||
4.00% due 4/1/2052 |
329,112 | 301,918 | ||||||
4.50% due 1/1/2038 |
111,162 | 108,784 | ||||||
4.50% due 5/1/2038 |
23,016 | 22,509 | ||||||
4.50% due 11/1/2048 |
23,090 | 22,098 | ||||||
4.50% due 8/1/2049 |
54,988 | 52,846 | ||||||
4.50% due 8/1/2052 |
55,388 | 52,260 | ||||||
4.50% due 9/1/2052 |
58,186 | 54,890 | ||||||
4.50% due 10/1/2052 |
86,425 | 81,563 | ||||||
5.00% due 11/1/2043 |
122,800 | 120,778 | ||||||
5.00% due 10/1/2052 |
235,400 | 227,901 | ||||||
5.00% due 1/1/2053 |
122,982 | 118,988 | ||||||
5.00% due 6/1/2053 |
302,582 | 292,269 | ||||||
5.50% due 9/1/2052 |
243,935 | 241,305 | ||||||
5.50% due 1/1/2053 |
570,090 | 562,523 | ||||||
5.50% due 2/1/2053 |
24,627 | 24,286 | ||||||
5.50% due 3/1/2053 |
36,504 | 36,004 | ||||||
5.50% due 5/1/2053 |
476,257 | 469,667 | ||||||
5.50% due 6/1/2053 |
74,338 | 73,304 | ||||||
5.50% due 9/1/2053 |
36,405 | 36,006 | ||||||
5.50% due 11/1/2053 |
165,386 | 163,046 | ||||||
6.00% due 8/1/2053 |
142,547 | 142,888 | ||||||
6.00% due 11/1/2053 |
409,274 | 410,251 | ||||||
6.50% due 11/1/2053 |
399,484 | 406,947 | ||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association |
1,172,265 | 923,657 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
2.50% due 2/1/2041 |
$ | 61,134 | $ | 52,949 | ||||
2.50% due 5/1/2051 |
557,961 | 461,485 | ||||||
3.00% due 6/1/2043 |
223,223 | 197,793 | ||||||
3.00% due 6/1/2051 |
232,258 | 201,021 | ||||||
3.00% due 10/1/2051 |
722,846 | 618,036 | ||||||
3.50% due 6/1/2037 |
63,624 | 60,098 | ||||||
3.50% due 8/1/2043 |
223,659 | 204,236 | ||||||
3.50% due 7/1/2051 |
493,811 | 441,699 | ||||||
3.50% due 4/1/2052 |
360,987 | 321,166 | ||||||
4.00% due 1/1/2038 |
242,936 | 233,512 | ||||||
4.00% due 3/1/2046 |
8,910 | 8,334 | ||||||
4.00% due 1/1/2049 |
11,512 | 10,768 | ||||||
4.00% due 8/1/2049 |
7,839 | 7,332 | ||||||
4.00% due 8/1/2051 |
10,473 | 9,809 | ||||||
4.00% due 8/1/2052 |
129,788 | 118,761 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2052 |
129,128 | 118,427 | ||||||
4.50% due 4/1/2038 |
425,785 | 416,391 | ||||||
4.50% due 7/1/2048 |
78,886 | 75,948 | ||||||
4.50% due 11/1/2048 |
33,847 | 32,559 | ||||||
4.50% due 10/1/2050 |
16,990 | 16,260 | ||||||
4.50% due 8/1/2052 |
15,562 | 14,707 | ||||||
4.50% due 9/1/2052 |
233,183 | 220,956 | ||||||
4.50% due 11/1/2052 |
78,253 | 74,545 | ||||||
4.50% due 1/1/2053 |
143,553 | 135,910 | ||||||
5.00% due 8/1/2052 |
650,612 | 630,479 | ||||||
5.00% due 9/1/2052 |
37,871 | 36,714 | ||||||
5.00% due 10/1/2052 |
25,071 | 24,319 | ||||||
5.50% due 1/1/2053 |
150,883 | 148,969 | ||||||
5.50% due 8/1/2053 |
36,127 | 35,645 | ||||||
6.00% due 9/1/2053 |
1,107,662 | 1,111,628 | ||||||
Freddie Mac Multifamily Structured Pass-Through Certificates |
78,000 | 72,194 | ||||||
Series K-156, Class A2 |
165,000 | 160,536 | ||||||
Government National Mortgage Association |
406,066 | 329,131 | ||||||
2.00% due 1/20/2051 |
110,884 | 89,953 | ||||||
2.00% due 2/20/2051 |
97,634 | 79,093 | ||||||
2.50% due 5/20/2051 |
505,970 | 425,908 | ||||||
2.50% due 8/20/2051 |
508,860 | 428,105 | ||||||
3.00% due 1/20/2051 |
473,846 | 414,442 | ||||||
3.00% due 5/20/2051 |
245,680 | 214,344 | ||||||
3.50% due 1/20/2052 |
433,835 | 390,109 | ||||||
3.50% due 2/20/2052 |
429,944 | 386,576 | ||||||
4.00% due 4/20/2052 |
81,991 | 75,762 | ||||||
4.00% due 5/20/2052 |
234,341 | 216,539 | ||||||
4.00% due 8/20/2052 |
347,023 | 320,660 | ||||||
4.50% due 8/20/2048 |
169,011 | 162,647 | ||||||
4.50% due 6/20/2052 |
591,313 | 562,835 | ||||||
Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security |
249,000 | 227,814 | ||||||
5.00% due 7/1/2054(4) |
54,000 | 52,178 | ||||||
6.00% due 7/1/2054(4) |
226,000 | 226,594 | ||||||
Total Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $22,012,903) |
|
21,213,461 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset-Backed Securities – 1.4% |
| |||||||
CF Hippolyta Issuer LLC |
$ | 183,777 | $ | 168,416 | ||||
Series 2022-1A, Class A1 |
97,713 | 96,403 | ||||||
Chesapeake Funding II LLC |
174,405 | 174,317 | ||||||
Enterprise Fleet Financing LLC |
245,000 | 247,634 | ||||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust |
27,552 | 27,522 | ||||||
Series 2023-2, Class A3 |
105,000 | 103,803 | ||||||
GM Financial Revolving Receivables Trust |
174,000 | 178,502 | ||||||
Series 2024-1, Class A |
230,000 | 229,099 | ||||||
Kubota Credit Owner Trust |
155,000 | 154,658 | ||||||
Navient Private Education Refi Loan Trust |
179,532 | 179,641 | ||||||
New Economy Assets Phase 1 Sponsor LLC |
335,000 | 298,862 | ||||||
Retained Vantage Data Centers Issuer LLC |
346,000 | 334,069 | ||||||
SFS Auto Receivables Securitization Trust |
43,113 | 43,135 | ||||||
Vantage Data Centers Issuer LLC |
175,000 | 160,703 | ||||||
Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust |
190,000 | 189,714 | ||||||
Wheels Fleet Lease Funding 1 LLC |
349,189 | 349,344 | ||||||
Series 2023-2A, Class A |
165,000 | 166,788 | ||||||
Total Asset-Backed Securities (Cost $3,105,830) |
|
3,102,610 |
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes – 8.7% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 0.1% |
| |||||||
HEICO Corp. |
$ | 309,000 | $ | 306,170 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
306,170 | ||||||||
Agriculture – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
275,000 | 269,813 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
269,813 | ||||||||
Airlines – 0.0% |
| |||||||
United Airlines Pass-Through Trust |
39,421 | 36,372 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
36,372 | ||||||||
Auto Manufacturers – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Daimler Truck Finance North America LLC |
150,000 | 149,240 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
149,240 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc. |
34,000 | 30,074 | ||||||
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. |
267,000 | 268,111 | ||||||
5.45% due 6/1/2034 |
80,000 | 80,713 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
378,898 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Royalty Pharma PLC |
273,000 | 197,141 | ||||||
3.35% due 9/2/2051 |
170,000 | 108,679 | ||||||
5.90% due 9/2/2054 |
30,000 | 28,939 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
334,759 | ||||||||
Commercial Banks – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Bank of America NA |
295,000 | 297,021 | ||||||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. |
214,000 | 208,511 | ||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
230,000 | 235,773 | ||||||
BPCE SA |
325,000 | 337,096 | ||||||
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce |
200,000 | 199,810 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) | ||||||||
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. |
$ | 60,000 | $ | 59,800 | ||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia |
250,000 | 251,958 | ||||||
Danske Bank AS |
256,000 | 243,343 | ||||||
5.705% (5.705% fixed rate until |
200,000 | 200,532 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
107,000 | 103,943 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
123,000 | 98,848 | ||||||
4.35% due 9/8/2026 |
268,000 | 262,096 | ||||||
5.466% (5.466% fixed rate until |
105,000 | 104,757 | ||||||
UBS AG |
500,000 | 534,965 | ||||||
UBS Group AG |
200,000 | 207,670 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
229,000 | 220,447 | ||||||
6.303% (6.303% fixed rate until |
220,000 | 228,199 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,794,769 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Ashtead Capital, Inc. 2.45% due 8/12/2031(5) |
400,000 | 322,824 | ||||||
5.80% due 4/15/2034(5) |
200,000 | 198,576 | ||||||
Element Fleet Management Corp. |
95,000 | 95,216 | ||||||
ERAC USA Finance LLC |
120,000 | 118,766 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
735,382 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Diversified Financial Services – 0.5% |
| |||||||
American Express Co. |
$ | 225,000 | $ | 220,025 | ||||
6.489% (6.489% fixed rate until 10/30/2030; 1 day USD |
25,000 | 26,642 | ||||||
Aviation Capital Group LLC |
620,000 | 613,552 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp. |
50,000 | 50,202 | ||||||
6.051% (6.051% fixed rate until 1/2/2034; 1 day USD |
97,000 | 97,566 | ||||||
6.312% (6.312% fixed rate until 6/8/2028; 1 day USD |
125,000 | 127,915 | ||||||
7.149% (7.149% fixed rate until |
70,000 | 72,309 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,208,211 | ||||||||
Electric – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Alabama Power Co. |
18,000 | 14,658 | ||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc. |
39,000 | 35,226 | ||||||
Series C |
275,000 | 241,939 | ||||||
Emera U.S. Finance LP |
135,000 | 111,297 | ||||||
4.75% due 6/15/2046 |
39,000 | 32,078 | ||||||
FirstEnergy Corp. |
155,000 | 148,667 | ||||||
FirstEnergy Pennsylvania Electric Co. |
34,000 | 31,605 | ||||||
5.15% due 3/30/2026(5) |
5,000 | 4,967 | ||||||
5.20% due 4/1/2028(5) |
10,000 | 9,986 | ||||||
Georgia Power Co. |
335,000 | 326,809 | ||||||
Series 2010-C |
38,000 | 34,242 | ||||||
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. |
487,025 | 401,435 | ||||||
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. |
75,000 | 74,385 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Electric (continued) | ||||||||
Southern California Edison Co. |
$ | 29,000 | $ | 22,193 | ||||
4.65% due 10/1/2043 |
12,000 | 10,313 | ||||||
5.875% due 12/1/2053 |
115,000 | 114,763 | ||||||
Texas Electric Market Stabilization Funding LLC |
194,689 | 187,749 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,802,312 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Warnermedia Holdings, Inc. |
184,000 | 169,930 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
169,930 | ||||||||
Food – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc. |
302,000 | 300,644 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
300,644 | ||||||||
Gas – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Boston Gas Co. |
35,000 | 32,609 | ||||||
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. |
65,000 | 64,432 | ||||||
KeySpan Gas East Corp. |
162,000 | 152,704 | ||||||
Southern Co. Gas Capital Corp. |
105,000 | 107,479 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
357,224 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Products – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Smith & Nephew PLC |
215,000 | 211,734 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
211,734 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.2% |
| |||||||
HCA, Inc. |
60,000 | 59,948 | ||||||
Icon Investments Six DAC |
210,000 | 214,578 | ||||||
Providence St. Joseph Health Obligated Group |
110,000 | 109,478 | ||||||
Sutter Health |
25,000 | 21,456 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
405,460 | ||||||||
Insurance – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Athene Global Funding |
382,000 | 342,719 | ||||||
5.583% due 1/9/2029(5) |
175,000 | 175,681 | ||||||
Brighthouse Financial Global Funding |
266,000 | 266,066 | ||||||
CNO Global Funding |
189,000 | 189,642 | ||||||
Corebridge Financial, Inc. |
60,000 | 61,422 | ||||||
Corebridge Global Funding |
300,000 | 299,016 | ||||||
5.90% due 9/19/2028(5) |
35,000 | 35,740 | ||||||
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Insurance (continued) |
||||||||
Equitable Financial Life Global Funding |
$ | 162,000 | $ | 143,461 | ||||
GA Global Funding Trust |
180,000 | 179,946 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,693,693 | ||||||||
Investment Companies – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Abu Dhabi Developmental Holding Co. PJSC |
230,000 | 233,448 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
233,448 | ||||||||
Machinery-Diversified – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
380,000 | 381,923 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
381,923 | ||||||||
Mining – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Glencore Funding LLC |
110,000 | 109,443 | ||||||
5.893% due 4/4/2054(5) |
60,000 | 57,712 | ||||||
6.375% due 10/6/2030(5) |
470,000 | 490,060 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
657,215 | ||||||||
Oil & Gas – 0.3% |
| |||||||
BP Capital Markets America, Inc. |
270,000 | 268,010 | ||||||
Equinor ASA |
359,000 | 341,222 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
609,232 | ||||||||
Pipelines – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Cheniere Energy Partners LP |
428,000 | 388,765 | ||||||
Columbia Pipelines Holding Co. LLC |
40,000 | 39,332 | ||||||
Columbia Pipelines Operating Co. LLC |
45,000 | 45,953 | ||||||
6.497% due 8/15/2043(5) |
89,000 | 92,621 | ||||||
Eastern Gas Transmission & Storage, Inc. |
24,000 | 23,721 | ||||||
Energy Transfer LP |
12,000 | 11,842 | ||||||
Galaxy Pipeline Assets Bidco Ltd. |
245,000 | 199,293 | ||||||
Gray Oak Pipeline LLC |
85,000 | 81,572 | ||||||
3.45% due 10/15/2027(5) |
15,000 | 14,100 | ||||||
MPLX LP |
130,000 | 128,015 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,025,214 | ||||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts – 0.7% |
| |||||||
American Tower Trust I |
315,000 | 316,351 | ||||||
Extra Space Storage LP |
60,000 | 60,427 | ||||||
5.90% due 1/15/2031 |
120,000 | 122,543 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (continued) |
| |||||||
GLP Capital LP/GLP Financing II, Inc. |
$ | 250,000 | $ | 261,930 | ||||
Kite Realty Group LP |
207,000 | 202,417 | ||||||
LXP Industrial Trust |
185,000 | 191,558 | ||||||
Realty Income Corp. |
350,000 | 339,650 | ||||||
VICI Properties LP |
60,000 | 57,428 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC |
20,000 | 18,578 | ||||||
3.50% due 6/15/2029(5) |
45,000 | 40,369 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,611,251 | ||||||||
Semiconductors – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
317,000 | 270,160 | ||||||
Foundry JV Holdco LLC |
200,000 | 204,030 | ||||||
6.25% due 1/25/2035(5) |
400,000 | 408,784 | ||||||
6.40% due 1/25/2038(5) |
200,000 | 206,140 | ||||||
Intel Corp. |
78,000 | 75,649 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,164,763 | ||||||||
Software – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Constellation Software, Inc. |
| |||||||
5.158% due 2/16/2029(5) |
30,000 | 29,997 | ||||||
5.461% due 2/16/2034(5) |
384,000 | 383,770 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
26,000 | 18,155 | ||||||
3.65% due 3/25/2041 |
352,000 | 269,202 | ||||||
5.55% due 2/6/2053 |
142,000 | 134,291 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
835,415 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.2% |
| |||||||
AT&T, Inc. |
68,000 | 46,154 | ||||||
3.65% due 6/1/2051 |
95,000 | 67,087 | ||||||
3.85% due 6/1/2060 |
19,000 | 13,257 | ||||||
4.30% due 12/15/2042 |
242,000 | 201,303 | ||||||
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
80,000 | 82,823 | ||||||
Verizon Communications, Inc. |
50,000 | 31,448 | ||||||
2.987% due 10/30/2056 |
70,000 | 42,852 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
484,924 | ||||||||
Trucking & Leasing – 0.1% |
| |||||||
DAE Funding LLC |
294,000 | 292,786 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
292,786 | ||||||||
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (Cost $19,387,857) |
|
19,450,782 | ||||||
Municipals – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Chicago Transit Authority Sales & Transfer Tax Receipts Revenue |
48,515 | 53,659 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Municipals (continued) | ||||||||
Dallas Fort Worth International Airport |
$ | 100,000 | $ | 83,980 | ||||
Metropolitan Transportation Authority |
10,000 | 9,150 | ||||||
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia |
146,000 | 158,747 | ||||||
Regents of the University of California Medical Center Pooled Revenue |
125,000 | 84,355 | ||||||
State of Illinois |
329,412 | 323,369 | ||||||
Texas Natural Gas Securitization Finance Corp. |
116,405 | 116,685 | ||||||
5.169% due 4/1/2041 |
90,000 | 90,079 | ||||||
Total Municipals (Cost $977,940) |
|
920,024 | ||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Fannie Mae REMIC |
262,629 | 236,866 | ||||||
Series 2020-27, Class HC |
374,893 | 288,462 | ||||||
Freddie Mac REMIC |
244,349 | 230,991 | ||||||
Series 5170, Class DP |
225,599 | 190,112 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae REMIC |
275,630 | 235,294 | ||||||
Total Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities |
|
1,181,725 | ||||||
Foreign Government – 0.2% |
|
|||||||
Israel Government International Bonds |
USD | 220,000 | 215,666 | |||||
Saudi Government International Bonds |
USD | 215,000 | 209,567 | |||||
Total Foreign Government (Cost $426,598) |
|
425,233 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 13.2% |
|
|||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
$ | 805,700 | 513,256 | |||||
2.375% due 2/15/2042 |
1,035,200 | 753,431 | ||||||
3.25% due 5/15/2042 |
25,000 | 20,785 | ||||||
3.375% due 8/15/2042 |
129,600 | 109,471 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities (continued) |
|
|||||||
3.625% due 2/15/2053 |
$ | 694,300 | $ | 590,697 | ||||
3.625% due 5/15/2053 |
630,800 | 536,870 | ||||||
3.875% due 2/15/2043 |
943,500 | 852,983 | ||||||
3.875% due 5/15/2043 |
820,300 | 740,193 | ||||||
4.00% due 11/15/2042 |
976,900 | 900,427 | ||||||
4.00% due 11/15/2052 |
652,100 | 594,124 | ||||||
4.125% due 8/15/2053 |
268,100 | 249,710 | ||||||
4.25% due 2/15/2054 |
782,100 | 744,950 | ||||||
4.375% due 8/15/2043 |
538,600 | 520,001 | ||||||
4.50% due 2/15/2044 |
640,200 | 628,196 | ||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2044 |
175,000 | 174,672 | ||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2054 |
279,000 | 282,923 | ||||||
4.75% due 11/15/2043 |
895,000 | 907,166 | ||||||
4.75% due 11/15/2053 |
567,800 | 587,141 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
447,100 | 425,968 | ||||||
3.50% due 4/30/2028 |
519,000 | 502,011 | ||||||
3.50% due 4/30/2030 |
70,000 | 66,937 | ||||||
3.625% due 5/15/2026 |
924,000 | 905,159 | ||||||
3.625% due 3/31/2028 |
163,000 | 158,416 | ||||||
3.625% due 5/31/2028 |
204,000 | 198,183 | ||||||
3.75% due 4/15/2026 |
575,000 | 564,668 | ||||||
3.75% due 12/31/2028 |
943,300 | 919,349 | ||||||
3.75% due 5/31/2030 |
78,000 | 75,544 | ||||||
3.75% due 6/30/2030 |
247,000 | 239,127 | ||||||
3.75% due 12/31/2030 |
298,000 | 287,896 | ||||||
3.875% due 11/30/2027 |
419,000 | 411,013 | ||||||
3.875% due 12/31/2027 |
219,600 | 215,414 | ||||||
3.875% due 12/31/2029 |
237,100 | 231,506 | ||||||
4.00% due 12/15/2025 |
332,000 | 327,707 | ||||||
4.00% due 1/15/2027 |
197,000 | 194,153 | ||||||
4.00% due 2/29/2028 |
651,800 | 641,819 | ||||||
4.00% due 6/30/2028 |
155,000 | 152,651 | ||||||
4.00% due 1/31/2029 |
882,700 | 869,253 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/31/2029 |
574,900 | 565,109 | ||||||
4.00% due 7/31/2030 |
57,200 | 56,119 | ||||||
4.125% due 9/30/2027 |
423,400 | 418,637 | ||||||
4.125% due 10/31/2027 |
339,000 | 335,213 | ||||||
4.125% due 7/31/2028 |
493,200 | 487,998 | ||||||
4.125% due 3/31/2029 |
324,900 | 321,626 | ||||||
4.25% due 2/28/2029 |
646,400 | 643,572 | ||||||
4.375% due 8/15/2026 |
135,000 | 134,114 | ||||||
4.375% due 12/15/2026 |
250,000 | 248,594 | ||||||
4.375% due 8/31/2028 |
462,700 | 462,158 | ||||||
4.375% due 11/30/2028 |
410,000 | 410,000 | ||||||
4.375% due 11/30/2030 |
20,000 | 20,020 | ||||||
4.375% due 5/15/2034 |
396,300 | 396,424 | ||||||
4.50% due 3/31/2026 |
281,900 | 280,424 | ||||||
4.50% due 7/15/2026 |
275,000 | 273,818 | ||||||
4.50% due 5/15/2027 |
555,400 | 554,706 | ||||||
4.50% due 5/31/2029 |
1,267,500 | 1,276,214 | ||||||
4.625% due 3/15/2026 |
40,000 | 39,863 | ||||||
4.625% due 6/30/2026 |
695,600 | 694,350 | ||||||
4.625% due 9/15/2026 |
198,000 | 197,768 | ||||||
4.625% due 10/15/2026 |
157,000 | 156,877 | ||||||
4.625% due 11/15/2026 |
648,000 | 647,747 | ||||||
4.625% due 9/30/2028 |
937,800 | 945,713 | ||||||
4.625% due 4/30/2029 |
554,400 | 560,810 | ||||||
4.625% due 4/30/2031 |
232,600 | 236,380 | ||||||
4.875% due 11/30/2025 |
565,200 | 564,538 | ||||||
4.875% due 5/31/2026 |
415,800 | 416,645 | ||||||
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
4.875% due 10/31/2028 |
$ | 927,000 | $ | 944,454 | ||||
4.875% due 10/31/2030 |
121,000 | 124,431 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $30,397,328) |
|
29,508,092 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills – 0.4% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills |
826,200 | 817,655 | ||||||
Total U.S. Treasury Bills (Cost $817,678) |
|
817,655 | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $784,234, due 7/1/2024(7) |
784,129 | 784,129 | ||||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $784,129) |
|
784,129 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value | |||||
Total Investments – 100.4% (Cost $195,021,450) |
$ | 224,716,498 | ||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.4)% | (798,583 | ) | ||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 223,917,915 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(3) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(4) | TBA — To be announced. |
(5) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $11,613,496, representing 5.2% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(6) | Interest rate shown reflects the discount rate at time of purchase. |
(7) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 795,300 | $ | 799,868 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 6 | Short | $ | (662,866 | ) | $ | (659,906 | ) | $ | 2,960 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 6 | Short | (675,877 | ) | (681,188 | ) | (5,311 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | (1,338,743 | ) | $ | (1,341,094 | ) | $ | (2,351 | ) |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
REMIC — Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
USD — United States Dollar
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 147,312,787 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 147,312,787 | ||||||||
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 21,213,461 | — | 21,213,461 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities | — | 3,102,610 | — | 3,102,610 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes | — | 19,450,782 | — | 19,450,782 | ||||||||||||
Municipals | — | 920,024 | — | 920,024 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 1,181,725 | — | 1,181,725 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Government | — | 425,233 | — | 425,233 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 29,508,092 | — | 29,508,092 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | — | 817,655 | — | 817,655 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 784,129 | — | 784,129 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 147,312,787 | $ | 77,403,711 | $ | — | $ | 224,716,498 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 2,960 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,960 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
(5,311 | ) | — | — | (5,311 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (2,351 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (2,351 | ) |
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 224,716,498 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
2,376,218 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
698,778 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
30,360 | |||
Receivable for fund shares subscribed |
288 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,772 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
227,824,914 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
3,193,192 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
501,517 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
88,438 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
46,061 | |||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts |
27,337 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
11,771 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
8,280 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,458 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
28,945 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
3,906,999 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 223,917,915 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 182,017,828 | ||
Distributable earnings |
41,900,087 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 223,917,915 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 195,021,450 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
18,451,991 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$12.14 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 1,820,647 | ||
Dividends |
747,815 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(2,929 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
2,565,533 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
533,933 | |||
Distribution fees |
278,090 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
50,672 | |||
Professional fees |
40,453 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
32,146 | |||
Administrative fees |
23,689 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
9,255 | |||
Shareholder reports |
3,869 | |||
Other expenses |
6,021 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
978,128 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1,587,405 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments, Derivative Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
10,052,508 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
34,447 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(3 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
7,281,904 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(4,040 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments, Derivative Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions |
17,364,816 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 18,952,221 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 11 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 1,587,405 | $ | 3,061,866 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments, derivative contracts and foreign currency transactions |
10,086,952 | 2,145,134 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
7,277,864 | 30,488,179 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
18,952,221 | 35,695,179 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
3,174,976 | 1,554,263 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(20,111,374 | ) | (29,544,596 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(16,936,398 | ) | (27,990,333 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets |
2,015,823 | 7,704,846 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
221,902,092 | 214,197,246 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 223,917,915 | $ | 221,902,092 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
277,868 | 152,685 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,728,289 | ) | (2,891,540 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,450,421 | ) | (2,738,855 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
12 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
13 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 11.15 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 12.14 | 8.88% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.46 | 0.14 | 1.55 | 1.69 | 11.15 | 17.86% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/22(5) |
10.00 | 0.07 | (0.61) | (0.54) | 9.46 | (5.40)% | (4) |
14 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 223,918 | 0.88% | (4) | 0.88% | (4) | 1.43% | (4) | 1.43% | (4) | 43% | (4) | |||||||||||
221,902 | 0.88% | 0.88% | 1.41% | 1.41% | 93% | |||||||||||||||||
214,197 | 0.86% | (4) | 0.86% | (4) | 1.17% | (4) | 1.17% | (4) | 59% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2022, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on May 2, 2022. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on May 2, 2022. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks to provide capital appreciation and moderate current income while seeking to manage volatility.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of
fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Exchange-traded financial futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s
16 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of
17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indices. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is
required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest
18 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
f. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
g. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
h. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.48% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.95% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.89%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees, and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue did not waive any fees or pay any Fund expenses.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”). Wellington is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $278,090 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold (excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 66,247,709 | $ | 27,819,806 | ||||
Sales | 83,086,002 | 25,235,339 |
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The
collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
f. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
g. Below Investment Grade Securities The Fund may invest in below investment grade securities (i.e. lower-quality, “junk” debt), which are subject to various risks. Lower-quality debt is considered to be speculative because it is less certain that the issuer will be able to pay interest or repay the principal than in the case of investment grade debt. These securities can involve a
20 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
substantially greater risk of default than higher-rated securities, and their values can decline significantly over short periods of time. Lower-quality debt securities tend to be more sensitive to adverse news about their issuers, the market and the economy in general, than higher-quality debt securities. The market for these securities can be less liquid, especially during periods of recession or general market decline.
h. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
i. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the
principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
j. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into U.S. Treasury futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | 2,960 | ||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | (5,311 | ) |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | 34,447 | ||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
| |||
Futures Contracts2 | $ | (4,040 | ) | |
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
||||
Futures Contracts3 | 6 |
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
21 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN BALANCED ALLOCATION VIP FUND
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
3 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
k. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit
Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
22 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
23 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard,
24 |
the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also
25 |
considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that
the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
26 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark |
index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
27 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile |
of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board |
28 |
noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
29 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11738
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.7% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 3.2% |
| |||||||
General Dynamics Corp. |
7,552 | $ | 2,191,137 | |||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
9,127 | 2,049,742 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,240,879 | ||||||||
Air Freight & Logistics – 1.6% |
| |||||||
United Parcel Service, Inc., Class B |
14,980 | 2,050,013 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,050,013 | ||||||||
Banks – 9.2% |
| |||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
38,853 | 1,545,184 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
23,115 | 4,675,240 | ||||||
M&T Bank Corp. |
13,592 | 2,057,285 | ||||||
Regions Financial Corp. |
96,133 | 1,926,505 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Canada (Canada) |
17,085 | 1,818,962 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,023,176 | ||||||||
Beverages – 2.9% |
| |||||||
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. |
60,820 | 2,031,388 | ||||||
Pernod Ricard SA (France) |
12,417 | 1,689,796 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,721,184 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
34,720 | 2,382,139 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,382,139 | ||||||||
Building Products – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Johnson Controls International PLC |
24,754 | 1,645,398 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,645,398 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 6.1% |
| |||||||
Ares Management Corp., Class A |
14,116 | 1,881,380 | ||||||
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
11,558 | 1,582,175 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
19,277 | 1,873,532 | ||||||
Nasdaq, Inc. |
11,399 | 686,904 | ||||||
Raymond James Financial, Inc. |
15,307 | 1,892,098 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,916,089 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Celanese Corp. |
7,978 | 1,076,153 | ||||||
PPG Industries, Inc. |
9,824 | 1,236,743 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,312,896 | ||||||||
Communications Equipment – 2.0% |
| |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
56,256 | 2,672,722 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,672,722 | ||||||||
Distributors – 1.1% |
| |||||||
LKQ Corp. |
34,158 | 1,420,631 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,420,631 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 3.7% |
| |||||||
American Electric Power Co., Inc. |
15,129 | 1,327,418 | ||||||
Exelon Corp. |
57,490 | 1,989,729 | ||||||
PPL Corp. |
54,683 | 1,511,985 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,829,132 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Emerson Electric Co. |
16,005 | 1,763,111 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,763,111 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 2.7% |
| |||||||
Corning, Inc. |
46,391 | $ | 1,802,291 | |||||
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
11,661 | 1,754,164 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,556,455 | ||||||||
Food Products – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. |
24,495 | 1,480,723 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,480,723 | ||||||||
Gas Utilities – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Atmos Energy Corp. |
17,205 | 2,006,963 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,006,963 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Canadian National Railway Co. (Canada) |
8,412 | 994,031 | ||||||
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. |
20,593 | 1,028,002 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,022,033 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 4.1% |
| |||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
2,938 | 1,591,985 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
7,351 | 3,743,570 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,335,555 | ||||||||
Hotel & Resort REITs – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. |
63,239 | 1,137,037 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,137,037 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Booking Holdings, Inc. |
335 | 1,327,103 | ||||||
Starbucks Corp. |
10,704 | 833,306 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,160,409 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Lennar Corp., Class A |
6,542 | 980,449 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
980,449 | ||||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
6,583 | 1,405,734 | ||||||
Siemens AG, Reg S (Germany) |
5,270 | 980,163 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,385,897 | ||||||||
Insurance – 3.5% |
| |||||||
Allstate Corp. |
4,514 | 720,705 | ||||||
American International Group, Inc. |
23,997 | 1,781,538 | ||||||
MetLife, Inc. |
29,364 | 2,061,059 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,563,302 | ||||||||
IT Services – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Amdocs Ltd. |
16,398 | 1,294,130 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,294,130 | ||||||||
Machinery – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Deere & Co. |
1,742 | 650,863 | ||||||
PACCAR, Inc. |
12,504 | 1,287,162 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,938,025 | ||||||||
Media – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Omnicom Group, Inc. |
8,686 | 779,134 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
779,134 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 2.5% |
| |||||||
Barrick Gold Corp. |
68,773 | 1,147,134 | ||||||
Rio Tinto PLC, ADR |
32,400 | 2,136,132 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,283,266 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Multi-Utilities – 2.6% |
| |||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc. |
25,074 | $ | 1,228,626 | |||||
Sempra |
28,038 | 2,132,570 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,361,196 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 9.3% |
| |||||||
ConocoPhillips |
24,603 | 2,814,091 | ||||||
Coterra Energy, Inc. |
70,669 | 1,884,742 | ||||||
EOG Resources, Inc. |
22,976 | 2,891,989 | ||||||
EQT Corp. |
49,192 | 1,819,120 | ||||||
Phillips 66 |
10,282 | 1,451,510 | ||||||
Targa Resources Corp. |
10,189 | 1,312,140 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,173,592 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 3.3% |
| |||||||
Kenvue, Inc. |
93,870 | 1,706,557 | ||||||
Unilever PLC, ADR |
46,301 | 2,546,092 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,252,649 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 10.2% |
| |||||||
AstraZeneca PLC, ADR |
24,983 | 1,948,424 | ||||||
Johnson & Johnson |
22,390 | 3,272,523 | ||||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
20,033 | 2,480,085 | ||||||
Pfizer, Inc. |
138,707 | 3,881,022 | ||||||
Roche Holding AG (Switzerland) |
6,229 | 1,728,637 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,310,691 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 3.3% |
| |||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
725 | 1,164,009 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
8,639 | 2,324,669 | ||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
4,401 | 876,591 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,365,269 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 4.6% |
| |||||||
Crown Castle, Inc. |
24,257 | 2,369,909 | ||||||
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. |
46,504 | 2,102,446 | ||||||
Weyerhaeuser Co. |
55,177 | 1,566,475 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,038,830 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Tractor Supply Co. |
4,712 | $ | 1,272,240 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
1,272,240 | ||||||||
Tobacco – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
26,570 | 2,692,338 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,692,338 | ||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 1.0% |
| |||||||
T-Mobile U.S., Inc. |
7,633 | 1,344,782 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,344,782 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $122,569,726) |
|
128,712,335 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,077,665, due 7/1/2024(1) |
$ | 1,077,521 | 1,077,521 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,077,521) |
|
1,077,521 | ||||||
Total Investments – 99.5% (Cost $123,647,247) |
|
129,789,856 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.5% |
|
661,619 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 130,451,475 |
(1) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,092,900 | $ | 1,099,205 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 124,313,739 | $ | 4,398,596 | * | $ | — | $ | 128,712,335 | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,077,521 | — | 1,077,521 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 124,313,739 | $ | 5,476,117 | $ | — | $ | 129,789,856 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 129,789,856 | ||
Foreign currency, at value |
4,426 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
2,038,798 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
177,076 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
31,654 | |||
Receivable for fund shares subscribed |
1,381 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
1,737 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
132,044,928 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
1,389,083 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
110,701 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
54,018 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
13,762 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
8,981 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,447 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
15,461 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
1,593,453 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 130,451,475 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 111,735,085 | ||
Distributable earnings |
18,716,390 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 130,451,475 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 123,647,247 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency, at Cost |
$ | 4,422 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
11,383,911 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$11.46 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 2,136,102 | ||
Interest |
11,679 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(27,687 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
2,120,094 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
337,001 | |||
Professional fees |
30,184 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
22,701 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
20,105 | |||
Administrative fees |
18,731 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,631 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,741 | |||
Other expenses |
3,937 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
443,031 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(47,934 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
395,097 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1,724,997 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
2,775,626 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(483 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
820,162 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(1,122 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
3,594,183 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 5,319,180 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 1,724,997 | $ | 3,597,003 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
2,775,143 | 3,006,425 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
819,040 | 3,069,218 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
5,319,180 | 9,672,646 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
3,009,955 | 5,297,926 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(16,753,093 | ) | (19,203,659 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(13,743,138 | ) | (13,905,733 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(8,423,958 | ) | (4,233,087 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
138,875,433 | 143,108,520 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 130,451,475 | $ | 138,875,433 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
274,104 | 512,455 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,492,500 | ) | (1,854,623 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,218,396 | ) | (1,342,168 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 11.02 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 11.46 | 3.99% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
10.26 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 11.02 | 7.41% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/22(5) |
10.00 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 10.26 | 2.60% | (4) |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 130,451 | 0.59% | (4) | 0.66% | (4) | 2.56% | (4) | 2.49% | (4) | 18% | (4) | |||||||||||
138,875 | 0.55% | 0.65% | 2.60% | 2.50% | 37% | |||||||||||||||||
143,109 | 0.54% | (4) | 0.64% | (4) | 2.68% | (4) | 2.58% | (4) | 36% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2022, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on May 2, 2022. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on May 2, 2022. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks a high level of current income consistent with growth of capital.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation
oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of
premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.70% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.55%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $47,934.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”). Wellington is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $23,553,442 and $34,377,084, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN EQUITY INCOME VIP FUND
redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The
Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees
14 |
recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the
Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would
15 |
be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive
because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
16 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the |
17 |
1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board |
18 |
noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11739
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.4% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.9% |
| |||||||
HEICO Corp., Class A |
12,516 | $ | 2,221,840 | |||||
Howmet Aerospace, Inc. |
19,080 | 1,481,181 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,703,021 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Adient PLC(1) |
10,966 | 270,970 | ||||||
Autoliv, Inc. |
11,371 | 1,216,583 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,487,553 | ||||||||
Automobiles – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Harley-Davidson, Inc. |
24,982 | 837,896 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
837,896 | ||||||||
Banks – 5.3% |
| |||||||
Associated Banc-Corp |
48,961 | 1,035,525 | ||||||
Axos Financial, Inc.(1) |
5,990 | 342,329 | ||||||
Bancorp, Inc.(1) |
107,868 | 4,073,096 | ||||||
East West Bancorp, Inc. |
23,178 | 1,697,325 | ||||||
Pathward Financial, Inc. |
16,393 | 927,352 | ||||||
Piraeus Financial Holdings SA (Greece)(1) |
102,915 | 375,580 | ||||||
Popular, Inc. |
25,221 | 2,230,293 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,681,500 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Boston Beer Co., Inc., Class A(1) |
951 | 290,102 | ||||||
Celsius Holdings, Inc.(1) |
10,387 | 592,994 | ||||||
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. |
748 | 811,580 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,694,676 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
6,500 | 1,027,000 | ||||||
United Therapeutics Corp.(1) |
2,750 | 876,013 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,903,013 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.(1) |
13,232 | 1,298,985 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,298,985 | ||||||||
Building Products – 2.7% |
| |||||||
Carlisle Cos., Inc. |
7,216 | 2,923,996 | ||||||
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. |
10,200 | 662,388 | ||||||
Owens Corning |
5,050 | 877,286 | ||||||
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
2,210 | 372,451 | ||||||
Trex Co., Inc.(1) |
8,910 | 660,409 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,496,530 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 3.2% |
| |||||||
AllianceBernstein Holding LP |
31,451 | 1,062,729 | ||||||
Blue Owl Capital, Inc. |
93,518 | 1,659,944 | ||||||
Bridge Investment Group Holdings, Inc., Class A |
31,964 | 237,173 | ||||||
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., Class A |
14,341 | 1,758,207 | ||||||
Palmer Square Capital BDC, Inc. |
29,747 | 480,711 | ||||||
Patria Investments Ltd., Class A |
92,443 | 1,114,863 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,313,627 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Celanese Corp. |
4,698 | 633,713 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Chemicals (continued) |
| |||||||
OCI NV (Netherlands) |
30,076 | $ | 734,019 | |||||
RPM International, Inc. |
14,413 | 1,551,992 | ||||||
Westlake Corp. |
9,050 | 1,310,621 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,230,345 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Brink’s Co. |
19,246 | 1,970,790 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,970,790 | ||||||||
Communications Equipment – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Ciena Corp.(1) |
18,000 | 867,240 | ||||||
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.(1) |
20,900 | 1,064,228 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,931,468 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 1.2% |
| |||||||
EMCOR Group, Inc. |
1,160 | 423,493 | ||||||
MDU Resources Group, Inc. |
16,854 | 423,035 | ||||||
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.(1) |
41,675 | 1,568,647 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,415,175 | ||||||||
Construction Materials – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Eagle Materials, Inc. |
8,068 | 1,754,467 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,754,467 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 0.7% |
| |||||||
NerdWallet, Inc., Class A(1) |
57,356 | 837,398 | ||||||
OneMain Holdings, Inc. |
12,555 | 608,792 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,446,190 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 2.9% |
| |||||||
BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.(1) |
14,431 | 1,267,619 | ||||||
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. |
2,880 | 1,098,893 | ||||||
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.(1) |
12,225 | 270,417 | ||||||
Performance Food Group Co.(1) |
23,626 | 1,561,915 | ||||||
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.(1) |
5,918 | 495,100 | ||||||
U.S. Foods Holding Corp.(1) |
18,937 | 1,003,282 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,697,226 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging – 0.8% |
| |||||||
AptarGroup, Inc. |
12,033 | 1,694,367 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,694,367 | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Service Corp. International |
26,215 | 1,864,673 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,864,673 | ||||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.(1) |
16,813 | 440,164 | ||||||
Iridium Communications, Inc. |
7,959 | 211,869 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
652,033 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Pinnacle West Capital Corp. |
4,028 | 307,659 | ||||||
PNM Resources, Inc. |
10,761 | 397,726 | ||||||
Portland General Electric Co. |
14,286 | 617,727 | ||||||
1,323,112 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Acuity Brands, Inc. |
1,700 | 410,448 | ||||||
nVent Electric PLC |
19,160 | 1,467,848 | ||||||
Regal Rexnord Corp. |
8,092 | 1,094,200 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,972,496 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Avnet, Inc. |
14,811 | $ | 762,619 | |||||
Cognex Corp. |
4,849 | 226,739 | ||||||
Coherent Corp.(1) |
8,200 | 594,172 | ||||||
Jabil, Inc. |
4,300 | 467,797 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,051,327 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Liberty Energy, Inc. |
44,688 | 933,532 | ||||||
Valaris Ltd.(1) |
8,111 | 604,270 | ||||||
Weatherford International PLC(1) |
16,392 | 2,007,200 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,545,002 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One, Class C(1) |
2,102 | 151,008 | ||||||
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. |
5,402 | 583,362 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
734,370 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 3.4% |
| |||||||
AvidXchange Holdings, Inc.(1) |
58,616 | 706,909 | ||||||
Cannae Holdings, Inc. |
15,158 | 274,966 | ||||||
Essent Group Ltd. |
23,464 | 1,318,442 | ||||||
Flywire Corp.(1) |
42,856 | 702,410 | ||||||
Repay Holdings Corp.(1) |
73,838 | 779,729 | ||||||
Shift4 Payments, Inc., Class A(1) |
5,472 | 401,371 | ||||||
UWM Holdings Corp. |
83,522 | 578,808 | ||||||
Voya Financial, Inc. |
12,132 | 863,192 | ||||||
WEX, Inc.(1) |
6,473 | 1,146,627 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,772,454 | ||||||||
Food Products – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Darling Ingredients, Inc.(1) |
10,341 | 380,032 | ||||||
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. |
3,342 | 280,995 | ||||||
Lancaster Colony Corp. |
2,034 | 384,365 | ||||||
Post Holdings, Inc.(1) |
3,915 | 407,787 | ||||||
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.(1) |
5,955 | 218,191 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,671,370 | ||||||||
Gas Utilities – 0.9% |
| |||||||
National Fuel Gas Co. |
7,876 | 426,801 | ||||||
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. |
11,813 | 831,399 | ||||||
UGI Corp. |
23,418 | 536,272 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,794,472 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Landstar System, Inc. |
10,838 | 1,999,394 | ||||||
XPO, Inc.(1) |
22,801 | 2,420,326 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,419,720 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Glaukos Corp.(1) |
7,200 | 852,120 | ||||||
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.(1) |
3,900 | 521,937 | ||||||
Masimo Corp.(1) |
8,700 | 1,095,678 | ||||||
Penumbra, Inc.(1) |
7,200 | 1,295,784 | ||||||
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.(1) |
11,800 | 475,422 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,240,941 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 3.0% |
| |||||||
Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc.(1) |
14,700 | 992,838 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Health Care Providers & Services (continued) |
| |||||||
agilon health, Inc.(1) |
76,500 | $ | 500,310 | |||||
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.(1) |
109,000 | 852,380 | ||||||
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.(1) |
38,900 | 441,904 | ||||||
Chemed Corp. |
2,750 | 1,492,095 | ||||||
Molina Healthcare, Inc.(1) |
2,000 | 594,600 | ||||||
Privia Health Group, Inc.(1) |
34,000 | 590,920 | ||||||
Surgery Partners, Inc.(1) |
26,200 | 623,298 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,088,345 | ||||||||
Health Care REITs – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Ventas, Inc. |
29,503 | 1,512,324 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,512,324 | ||||||||
Health Care Technology – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Evolent Health, Inc., Class A(1) |
20,200 | 386,224 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
386,224 | ||||||||
Hotel & Resort REITs – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. |
2,430 | 242,660 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
242,660 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 3.1% |
| |||||||
Aramark |
52,041 | 1,770,435 | ||||||
Brinker International, Inc.(1) |
12,001 | 868,752 | ||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.(1) |
17,645 | 701,212 | ||||||
Churchill Downs, Inc. |
11,918 | 1,663,753 | ||||||
Domino’s Pizza, Inc. |
1,412 | 729,058 | ||||||
Dutch Bros, Inc., Class A(1) |
11,088 | 459,043 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,192,253 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 1.3% |
| |||||||
PulteGroup, Inc. |
761 | 83,786 | ||||||
Taylor Morrison Home Corp.(1) |
14,537 | 805,931 | ||||||
Tempur Sealy International, Inc. |
25,911 | 1,226,627 | ||||||
TopBuild Corp.(1) |
1,331 | 512,794 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,629,138 | ||||||||
Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Ormat Technologies, Inc. |
1,551 | 111,207 | ||||||
Talen Energy Corp.(1) |
3,600 | 399,672 | ||||||
Vistra Corp. |
12,822 | 1,102,435 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,613,314 | ||||||||
Industrial REITs – 1.3% |
| |||||||
EastGroup Properties, Inc. |
8,320 | 1,415,232 | ||||||
Terreno Realty Corp. |
18,590 | 1,100,156 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,515,388 | ||||||||
Insurance – 3.6% |
| |||||||
American Financial Group, Inc. |
9,908 | 1,218,882 | ||||||
Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., Class A(1) |
69,454 | 2,463,534 | ||||||
Primerica, Inc. |
6,583 | 1,557,406 | ||||||
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. |
3,877 | 795,832 | ||||||
Unum Group |
22,919 | 1,171,390 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,207,044 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 0.2% |
| |||||||
IAC, Inc.(1) |
2,075 | 97,214 | ||||||
Ziff Davis, Inc.(1) |
2,388 | 131,459 | ||||||
ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc.(1) |
16,608 | 212,084 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
440,757 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
IT Services – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Akamai Technologies, Inc.(1) |
5,289 | $ | 476,433 | |||||
EPAM Systems, Inc.(1) |
5,000 | 940,550 | ||||||
Okta, Inc.(1) |
9,900 | 926,739 | ||||||
Twilio, Inc., Class A(1) |
17,100 | 971,451 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,315,173 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 1.1% |
| |||||||
10X Genomics, Inc., Class A(1) |
18,500 | 359,825 | ||||||
Bruker Corp. |
16,650 | 1,062,437 | ||||||
Repligen Corp.(1) |
6,300 | 794,178 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,216,440 | ||||||||
Machinery – 5.0% |
| |||||||
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. |
9,626 | 730,613 | ||||||
Chart Industries, Inc.(1) |
5,120 | 739,021 | ||||||
Crane Co. |
11,800 | 1,710,764 | ||||||
Dover Corp. |
5,350 | 965,408 | ||||||
Esab Corp. |
20,210 | 1,908,430 | ||||||
Flowserve Corp. |
38,945 | 1,873,254 | ||||||
ITT, Inc. |
15,611 | 2,016,629 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,944,119 | ||||||||
Marine Transportation – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Kirby Corp.(1) |
17,642 | 2,112,277 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,112,277 | ||||||||
Media – 0.5% |
| |||||||
New York Times Co., Class A |
10,857 | 555,987 | ||||||
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. |
3,148 | 522,599 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,078,586 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Alcoa Corp. |
7,808 | 310,602 | ||||||
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.(1) |
57,402 | 883,417 | ||||||
Lundin Mining Corp. (Canada) |
117,109 | 1,303,732 | ||||||
Reliance, Inc. |
7,244 | 2,068,886 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,566,637 | ||||||||
Office REITs – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Douglas Emmett, Inc. |
18,060 | 240,379 | ||||||
Postal Realty Trust, Inc., Class A |
86,568 | 1,153,951 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,394,330 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Chesapeake Energy Corp. |
16,435 | 1,350,793 | ||||||
Chord Energy Corp. |
8,386 | 1,406,164 | ||||||
HF Sinclair Corp. |
23,360 | 1,246,022 | ||||||
Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. |
25,071 | 931,889 | ||||||
Permian Resources Corp. |
89,938 | 1,452,499 | ||||||
Targa Resources Corp. |
9,093 | 1,170,997 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,558,364 | ||||||||
Paper & Forest Products – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Louisiana-Pacific Corp. |
15,034 | 1,237,749 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,237,749 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.5% |
| |||||||
BellRing Brands, Inc.(1) |
6,476 | 370,039 | ||||||
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.(1) |
3,407 | 717,923 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,087,962 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Professional Services – 2.6% |
| |||||||
CACI International, Inc., Class A(1) |
5,960 | $ | 2,563,575 | |||||
Dayforce, Inc.(1) |
1,646 | 81,642 | ||||||
KBR, Inc. |
40,240 | 2,580,993 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,226,210 | ||||||||
Real Estate Management & Development – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.(1) |
5,910 | 1,213,205 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,213,205 | ||||||||
Residential REITs – 1.3% |
| |||||||
American Homes 4 Rent, Class A |
14,620 | 543,279 | ||||||
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. |
24,197 | 1,575,951 | ||||||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. |
1,740 | 473,628 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,592,858 | ||||||||
Retail REITs – 1.1% |
| |||||||
NETSTREIT Corp. |
48,240 | 776,664 | ||||||
SITE Centers Corp. |
68,894 | 998,963 | ||||||
Tanger, Inc. |
13,460 | 364,901 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,140,528 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Cirrus Logic, Inc.(1) |
8,800 | 1,123,408 | ||||||
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.(1) |
20,700 | 1,200,393 | ||||||
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.(1) |
10,420 | 263,209 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,587,010 | ||||||||
Software – 4.6% |
| |||||||
BILL Holdings, Inc.(1) |
13,200 | 694,584 | ||||||
Blackbaud, Inc.(1) |
9,437 | 718,816 | ||||||
BlackLine, Inc.(1) |
18,100 | 876,945 | ||||||
Dynatrace, Inc.(1) |
32,200 | 1,440,628 | ||||||
Elastic NV(1) |
7,328 | 834,733 | ||||||
Five9, Inc.(1) |
23,500 | 1,036,350 | ||||||
Gen Digital, Inc. |
30,603 | 764,463 | ||||||
Pagaya Technologies Ltd., Class A(1) |
38,367 | 489,563 | ||||||
PTC, Inc.(1) |
2,126 | 386,230 | ||||||
Tenable Holdings, Inc.(1) |
23,073 | 1,005,521 | ||||||
Workiva, Inc.(1) |
12,421 | 906,609 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,154,442 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 1.6% |
| |||||||
CubeSmart |
26,239 | 1,185,216 | ||||||
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. |
43,310 | 1,068,458 | ||||||
Lamar Advertising Co., Class A |
7,950 | 950,263 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,203,937 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 5.0% |
| |||||||
Aritzia, Inc. (Canada)(1) |
23,336 | 660,480 | ||||||
Burlington Stores, Inc.(1) |
6,674 | 1,601,760 | ||||||
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. |
6,139 | 1,318,964 | ||||||
Five Below, Inc.(1) |
8,239 | 897,804 | ||||||
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., Class A(1) |
10,833 | 1,076,909 | ||||||
JD Sports Fashion PLC (United Kingdom) |
507,826 | 760,073 | ||||||
Valvoline, Inc.(1) |
40,330 | 1,742,256 | ||||||
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. |
6,590 | 1,860,818 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,919,064 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Crocs, Inc.(1) |
9,704 | $ | 1,416,202 | |||||
PVH Corp. |
16,240 | 1,719,329 | ||||||
Tapestry, Inc. |
33,309 | 1,425,292 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,560,823 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 2.9% |
| |||||||
Air Lease Corp. |
25,820 | 1,227,224 | ||||||
Core & Main, Inc., Class A(1) |
19,450 | 951,883 | ||||||
Watsco, Inc. |
3,450 | 1,598,178 | ||||||
WESCO International, Inc. |
12,359 | 1,959,149 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,736,434 | ||||||||
Water Utilities – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Essential Utilities, Inc. |
9,615 | 358,928 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
358,928 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $171,286,535) |
|
196,631,322 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills – 0.1% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills |
||||||||
5.368% due 9/26/2024(2) |
$ | 60,000 | 59,243 | |||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value |
||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills (continued) |
| |||||||
5.389% due 9/19/2024(2) |
$ | 50,000 | $ | 49,421 | ||||
Total U.S. Treasury Bills (Cost $108,664) |
|
108,664 | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $2,271,256, due 7/1/2024(3) |
2,270,953 | 2,270,953 | ||||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $2,270,953) |
|
2,270,953 | ||||||
Total Investments – 99.6% (Cost $173,666,152) |
|
199,010,939 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.4% |
|
811,213 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 199,822,152 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | Interest rate shown reflects the discount rate at time of purchase. |
(3) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 2,303,300 | $ | 2,316,523 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
S&P Midcap 400 E-Mini | September 2024 | 2 | Long | $ | 595,909 | $ | 591,620 | $ | (4,289 | ) |
Legend:
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 194,761,650 | $ | 1,869,672 | * | $ | — | $ | 196,631,322 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | — | 108,664 | — | 108,664 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 2,270,953 | — | 2,270,953 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 194,761,650 | $ | 4,249,289 | $ | — | $ | 199,010,939 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts |
|
|||||||||||||||
Liabilities | $ | (4,289 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,289 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | (4,289 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,289 | ) |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 199,010,939 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
3,919,476 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
171,526 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
30,200 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
4,241 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,643 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
203,139,025 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
2,884,998 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
217,550 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
88,043 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
41,530 | |||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts |
27,348 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
12,999 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
10,565 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,377 | |||
Foreign currency overdraft |
139 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
31,324 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
3,316,873 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 199,822,152 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 191,341,951 | ||
Distributable earnings |
8,480,201 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 199,822,152 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 173,666,152 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency Overdraft, at Cost |
$ | 139 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
19,006,567 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$10.51 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,459,934 | ||
Interest |
19,292 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(7,878 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,471,348 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
566,429 | |||
Distribution fees |
267,183 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
41,026 | |||
Professional fees |
40,073 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
32,649 | |||
Administrative fees |
23,709 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,770 | |||
Shareholder reports |
3,591 | |||
Other expenses |
6,053 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
988,483 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(37,813 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
950,670 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
520,678 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments, Derivative Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
6,859,665 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
18,403 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
655 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
2,438,017 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(9,055 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(172 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments, Derivative Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions |
9,307,513 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 9,828,191 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 520,678 | $ | 1,383,827 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments, derivative contracts and foreign currency transactions |
6,878,723 | (18,729,928 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments, derivative contracts and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
2,428,790 | 51,553,842 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
9,828,191 | 34,207,741 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
212,850 | 21,125,875 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(34,141,897 | ) | (49,509,215 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(33,929,047 | ) | (28,383,340 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
(24,100,856 | ) | 5,824,401 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
223,923,008 | 218,098,607 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 199,822,152 | $ | 223,923,008 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
20,569 | 2,373,254 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,281,328 | ) | (5,313,857 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(3,260,759 | ) | (2,940,603 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
7 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 10.06 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 10.51 | 4.47% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
8.65 | 0.06 | 1.35 | 1.41 | 10.06 | 16.30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.08 | 0.06 | (1.49 | ) | (1.43 | ) | 8.65 | (14.19)% | ||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/21(5) |
10.00 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 10.08 | 0.80% | (4) |
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 199,822 | 0.89% | (4) | 0.92% | (4) | 0.49% | (4) | 0.46% | (4) | 22% | (4) | |||||||||||
223,923 | 0.87% | 0.92% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 56% | |||||||||||||||||
218,099 | 0.87% | 0.90% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 74% | |||||||||||||||||
261,849 | 0.82% | (4) | 0.90% | (4) | 0.96% | (4) | 0.88% | (4) | 93% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2021, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on October 25, 2021. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 25, 2021. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks long term growth of capital.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market
events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Exchange-traded financial futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.53% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.06% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.87%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $37,813.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with FIAM LLC (“FIAM”). FIAM is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the
12 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $267,183 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $47,684,287 and $81,329,265, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into equity futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to equitize cash and keep the Fund fully invested. Using futures contracts involves various risks, including market, interest rate and equity risks. Risks of entering into futures contracts include the possibility that there may be an illiquid market or that a change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. To the extent that market prices move in an unexpected direction, there is a risk that a Fund will not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contract or may realize a loss.
13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SELECT MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (4,289 | ) | |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) | ||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | 18,403 | ||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
| |||
Futures Contracts2 |
$ | (9,055 | ) | |
Average Number of Notional Amounts | ||||
Futures Contracts3 |
2 | |||
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
3 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
f. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of
the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
14 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
15 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including
16 |
investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
17 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status
under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s |
18 |
performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for |
the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
19 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s |
20 |
short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
21 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11408
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 97.8% | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.9% | ||||||||
Melrose Industries PLC (United Kingdom) |
705,367 | $ | 4,926,049 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
4,926,049 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
Gentherm, Inc.(1) |
63,312 | 3,122,548 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,122,548 | ||||||||
Banks – 5.2% |
|
|||||||
Ameris Bancorp |
46,759 | 2,354,316 | ||||||
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. |
39,101 | 3,129,644 | ||||||
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. |
36,407 | 2,225,924 | ||||||
Webster Financial Corp. |
76,285 | 3,325,263 | ||||||
Wintrust Financial Corp. |
22,748 | 2,242,043 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,277,190 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 0.0% |
|
|||||||
Sage Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
11,117 | 120,731 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
120,731 | ||||||||
Building Products – 4.1% |
|
|||||||
AAON, Inc. |
40,836 | 3,562,533 | ||||||
AZEK Co., Inc.(1) |
60,635 | 2,554,552 | ||||||
Carlisle Cos., Inc. |
10,819 | 4,383,967 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,501,052 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 2.4% |
|
|||||||
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. |
16,015 | 2,723,511 | ||||||
Raymond James Financial, Inc. |
27,121 | 3,352,427 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,075,938 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 4.9% |
|
|||||||
Ashland, Inc. |
57,531 | 5,436,104 | ||||||
Olin Corp. |
81,382 | 3,837,161 | ||||||
Westlake Corp. |
23,118 | 3,347,949 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,621,214 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 1.9% |
|
|||||||
Republic Services, Inc. |
13,091 | 2,544,105 | ||||||
Stericycle, Inc.(1) |
41,029 | 2,385,016 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,929,121 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
API Group Corp.(1) |
82,752 | 3,113,958 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,113,958 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
Crown Holdings, Inc. |
42,210 | 3,140,002 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,140,002 | ||||||||
Distributors – 1.3% |
|
|||||||
LKQ Corp. |
78,123 | 3,249,136 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,249,136 | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services – 1.1% |
|
|||||||
Service Corp. International |
38,833 | 2,762,191 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,762,191 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 3.8% |
|
|||||||
Atkore, Inc. |
37,213 | 5,021,150 | ||||||
Regal Rexnord Corp. |
34,877 | 4,716,068 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,737,218 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Littelfuse, Inc. |
15,802 | $ | 4,038,833 | |||||
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.(1) |
13,497 | 5,236,566 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,275,399 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 1.4% |
|
|||||||
Essent Group Ltd. |
65,036 | 3,654,373 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,654,373 | ||||||||
Food Products – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
Nomad Foods Ltd. |
192,133 | 3,166,352 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,166,352 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 4.3% |
|
|||||||
Haemonetics Corp.(1) |
39,974 | 3,307,049 | ||||||
Integer Holdings Corp.(1) |
29,499 | 3,415,689 | ||||||
LivaNova PLC(1) |
78,735 | 4,316,253 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,038,991 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 3.0% |
|
|||||||
HealthEquity, Inc.(1) |
52,687 | 4,541,619 | ||||||
Humana, Inc. |
8,370 | 3,127,451 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,669,070 | ||||||||
Health Care Technology – 0.3% |
|
|||||||
Schrodinger, Inc.(1) |
36,128 | 698,715 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
698,715 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 1.3% |
|
|||||||
Planet Fitness, Inc., Class A(1) |
45,636 | 3,358,353 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,358,353 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 1.3% |
|
|||||||
Mohawk Industries, Inc.(1) |
28,396 | 3,225,502 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,225,502 | ||||||||
Household Products – 1.4% |
|
|||||||
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. |
35,855 | 3,717,446 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,717,446 | ||||||||
Industrial REITs – 1.7% |
|
|||||||
Terreno Realty Corp. |
72,275 | 4,277,234 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,277,234 | ||||||||
Insurance – 6.5% |
|
|||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.(1) |
43,090 | 4,347,350 | ||||||
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. |
58,534 | 4,135,427 | ||||||
Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.(1) |
26,440 | 669,990 | ||||||
First American Financial Corp. |
65,952 | 3,558,110 | ||||||
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. |
19,327 | 3,967,253 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,678,130 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 0.7% |
|
|||||||
Bumble, Inc., Class A(1) |
170,431 | 1,791,230 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,791,230 | ||||||||
IT Services – 1.8% |
|
|||||||
Okta, Inc.(1) |
48,745 | 4,563,019 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,563,019 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 4.4% |
|
|||||||
Azenta, Inc.(1) |
64,714 | $ | 3,405,251 | |||||
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Class A(1) |
15,983 | 4,365,117 | ||||||
Bruker Corp. |
31,108 | 1,985,001 | ||||||
Sotera Health Co.(1) |
125,238 | 1,486,575 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,241,944 | ||||||||
Machinery – 0.7% |
|
|||||||
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
20,406 | 1,853,681 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,853,681 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
Commercial Metals Co. |
56,631 | 3,114,139 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,114,139 | ||||||||
Paper & Forest Products – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
Louisiana-Pacific Corp. |
36,925 | 3,040,035 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,040,035 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 4.8% |
|
|||||||
CACI International, Inc., Class A(1) |
6,156 | 2,647,880 | ||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. |
317,846 | 2,943,254 | ||||||
TransUnion |
42,574 | 3,157,288 | ||||||
WNS Holdings Ltd.(1) |
68,918 | 3,618,195 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,366,617 | ||||||||
Residential REITs – 4.5% |
|
|||||||
American Homes 4 Rent, Class A |
75,529 | 2,806,658 | ||||||
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. |
28,921 | 4,124,424 | ||||||
Sun Communities, Inc. |
38,687 | 4,655,593 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,586,675 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Marvell Technology, Inc. |
69,436 | 4,853,577 | ||||||
ON Semiconductor Corp.(1) |
62,615 | 4,292,258 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,145,835 | ||||||||
Software – 9.0% |
|
|||||||
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings, Inc.(1) |
294,147 | 3,267,973 | ||||||
Dynatrace, Inc.(1) |
76,255 | 3,411,649 | ||||||
Instructure Holdings, Inc.(1) |
150,891 | 3,532,359 | ||||||
PagerDuty, Inc.(1) |
166,956 | 3,828,301 | ||||||
Q2 Holdings, Inc.(1) |
59,616 | 3,596,633 | ||||||
Riskified Ltd., Class A(1) |
185,331 | 1,184,265 | ||||||
Sprinklr, Inc., Class A(1) |
214,652 | 2,064,952 | ||||||
SPS Commerce, Inc.(1) |
11,943 | 2,247,195 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
23,133,327 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Specialized REITs – 2.6% |
|
|||||||
CubeSmart |
61,404 | $ | 2,773,619 | |||||
SBA Communications Corp. |
20,195 | 3,964,278 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,737,897 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 4.8% |
|
|||||||
Burlington Stores, Inc.(1) |
23,033 | 5,527,920 | ||||||
Leslie’s, Inc.(1) |
606,038 | 2,539,299 | ||||||
National Vision Holdings, Inc.(1) |
112,396 | 1,471,264 | ||||||
Revolve Group, Inc.(1) |
169,437 | 2,695,743 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,234,226 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 2.3% |
|
|||||||
Air Lease Corp. |
89,298 | 4,244,334 | ||||||
United Rentals, Inc. |
2,437 | 1,576,081 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,820,415 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $238,973,350) |
|
250,964,953 | ||||||
Exchange-Traded Funds – 1.5% | ||||||||
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF |
41,981 | 3,892,059 | ||||||
Total Exchange-Traded Funds (Cost $3,794,580) |
|
3,892,059 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.8% |
|
|||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,997,969, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 1,997,702 | 1,997,702 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,997,702) |
1,997,702 | |||||||
Total Investments – 100.1% (Cost $244,765,632) |
256,854,714 | |||||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.1)% |
|
(377,244 | ) | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 256,477,470 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 2,026,100 | $ | 2,037,674 |
Legend:
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 246,038,904 | $ | 4,926,049 | * | $ | — | $ | 250,964,953 | |||||||
Exchange-Traded Funds | 3,892,059 | — | — | 3,892,059 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,997,702 | — | 1,997,702 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 249,930,963 | $ | 6,923,751 | $ | — | $ | 256,854,714 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 256,854,714 | ||
Dividends/interest receivable |
161,177 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
16,499 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
3,415 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
257,035,805 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
316,802 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
136,351 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
53,398 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
12,095 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
5,268 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
3,526 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
30,895 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
558,335 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 256,477,470 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 270,424,508 | ||
Distributable loss |
(13,947,038 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 256,477,470 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 244,765,632 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
26,269,330 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$9.76 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,339,152 | ||
Interest |
20,085 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,359,237 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
874,153 | |||
Distribution fees |
343,511 | |||
Professional fees |
48,188 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
42,926 | |||
Administrative fees |
27,973 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
20,288 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,981 | |||
Shareholder reports |
3,682 | |||
Other expenses |
7,805 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,376,507 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(63,984 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,312,523 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
46,714 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
(1,450,406 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
255 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
4,558,990 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(508 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
3,108,331 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 3,155,045 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 46,714 | $ | 199,996 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
(1,450,151 | ) | (11,859,745 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and |
4,558,482 | 58,040,242 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
3,155,045 | 46,380,493 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
2,751,920 | 38,773,392 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(44,838,623 | ) | (80,322,935 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(42,086,703 | ) | (41,549,543 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
(38,931,658 | ) | 4,830,950 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
295,409,128 | 290,578,178 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 256,477,470 | $ | 295,409,128 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
282,859 | 4,547,992 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(4,586,737 | ) | (8,864,964 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(4,303,878 | ) | (4,316,972 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of |
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 9.66 | $ | 0.00 | (4) | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 9.76 | 1.04% | (5) | |||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
8.33 | 0.01 | 1.32 | 1.33 | 9.66 | 15.97% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.09 | (0.01 | ) | (1.75 | ) | (1.76 | ) | 8.33 | (17.44)% | |||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/21(6) |
10.00 | (0.00 | )(7) | 0.09 | 0.09 | 10.09 | 0.90% | (5) |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net |
Net Ratio of Net Income/(Loss) to Average |
Gross Ratio of Net Income/(Loss) to Average |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 256,477 | 0.96% | (5) | 1.00% | (5) | 0.03% | (5) | (0.01)% | (5) | 23% | (5) | |||||||||||
295,409 | 0.93% | 0.99% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 49% | |||||||||||||||||
290,578 | 0.93% | 0.97% | (0.15)% | (0.19)% | 39% | |||||||||||||||||
385,128 | 0.90% | (5) | 0.98% | (5) | (0.12)% | (5) | (0.20)% | (5) | 59% | (5) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Rounds to $0.00 per share. |
(5) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2021, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(6) | Commenced operations on October 25, 2021. |
(7) | Rounds to $(0.00) per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 25, 2021. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of
premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.65% of the first $200 million, and 0.60% in excess of $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.07% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.93%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $63,984.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Allspring Global Investments, LLC (“Allspring”). Allspring is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $343,511 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $62,237,250 and $101,171,494, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include,
but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL-MID CAP CORE VIP FUND
effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when
the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as
the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
15 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded
entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in |
16 |
the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
17 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the |
3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11409
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.9% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.1% |
| |||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
12,062 | $ | 2,708,884 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
2,708,884 | ||||||||
Banks – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
50,171 | 1,995,301 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
16,902 | 3,418,598 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,413,899 | ||||||||
Beverages – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Coca-Cola Co. |
56,667 | 3,606,855 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,606,855 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 4.0% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
31,701 | 5,437,355 | ||||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
31,718 | 2,176,172 | ||||||
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
4,797 | 2,248,450 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,861,977 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
14,041 | 2,713,423 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,713,423 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. |
10,321 | 1,755,189 | ||||||
MSCI, Inc. |
2,033 | 979,398 | ||||||
S&P Global, Inc. |
3,961 | 1,766,606 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,501,193 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
4,040 | 1,205,657 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,205,657 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 0.6% |
| |||||||
AECOM |
15,915 | 1,402,748 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,402,748 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV, ADR |
52,744 | 1,560,695 | ||||||
Walmart, Inc. |
38,913 | 2,634,799 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,195,494 | ||||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Verizon Communications, Inc. |
29,932 | 1,234,396 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,234,396 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 2.6% |
| |||||||
American Electric Power Co., Inc. |
40,736 | 3,574,176 | ||||||
NextEra Energy, Inc. |
39,064 | 2,766,122 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,340,298 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Eaton Corp. PLC |
3,331 | 1,044,435 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,044,435 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Electronic Arts, Inc. |
18,278 | 2,546,674 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,546,674 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 4.5% |
| |||||||
Fiserv, Inc.(1) |
26,894 | 4,008,282 | ||||||
Mastercard, Inc., Class A |
4,924 | 2,172,272 | ||||||
Visa, Inc., Class A |
18,663 | 4,898,477 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,079,031 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Medtronic PLC |
24,828 | $ | 1,954,212 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
1,954,212 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 5.6% |
| |||||||
Cencora, Inc. |
5,839 | 1,315,527 | ||||||
Cigna Group |
7,573 | 2,503,406 | ||||||
McKesson Corp. |
7,307 | 4,267,580 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
10,841 | 5,520,888 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,607,401 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 3.3% |
| |||||||
Booking Holdings, Inc. |
743 | 2,943,394 | ||||||
Compass Group PLC, ADR |
98,481 | 2,728,909 | ||||||
Yum! Brands, Inc. |
17,111 | 2,266,523 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,938,826 | ||||||||
Household Products – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Colgate-Palmolive Co. |
14,950 | 1,450,748 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
17,141 | 2,826,894 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,277,642 | ||||||||
Industrial REITs – 0.4% |
| |||||||
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. |
20,412 | 969,774 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
969,774 | ||||||||
Insurance – 5.2% |
| |||||||
American Financial Group, Inc. |
9,451 | 1,162,662 | ||||||
Everest Group Ltd. |
7,420 | 2,827,168 | ||||||
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. |
15,687 | 3,305,565 | ||||||
Progressive Corp. |
11,096 | 2,304,750 | ||||||
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. |
6,907 | 1,417,800 | ||||||
Willis Towers Watson PLC |
6,543 | 1,715,182 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,733,127 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 6.8% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class C |
69,052 | 12,665,518 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
7,706 | 3,885,519 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,551,037 | ||||||||
IT Services – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Amdocs Ltd. |
35,413 | 2,794,794 | ||||||
VeriSign, Inc.(1) |
13,822 | 2,457,552 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,252,346 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
1,548 | 856,044 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
856,044 | ||||||||
Media – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Comcast Corp., Class A |
75,210 | 2,945,224 | ||||||
New York Times Co., Class A |
31,317 | 1,603,743 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,548,967 | ||||||||
Multi-Utilities – 0.8% |
| |||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. |
61,118 | 1,893,436 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,893,436 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 2.6% |
| |||||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. |
13,833 | 1,592,455 | ||||||
Shell PLC, ADR |
65,719 | 4,743,597 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,336,052 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 4.3% |
| |||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
4,621 | $ | 4,183,761 | |||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
49,900 | 6,177,620 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,361,381 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 4.6% |
| |||||||
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. |
10,647 | 2,541,332 | ||||||
Experian PLC, ADR |
49,128 | 2,291,330 | ||||||
Genpact Ltd. |
61,927 | 1,993,430 | ||||||
Paychex, Inc. |
18,626 | 2,208,299 | ||||||
RELX PLC, ADR |
24,358 | 1,117,545 | ||||||
Verisk Analytics, Inc. |
4,219 | 1,137,232 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,289,168 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 7.9% |
| |||||||
Analog Devices, Inc. |
10,007 | 2,284,198 | ||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. |
10,279 | 2,425,741 | ||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
6,194 | 9,944,653 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
37,559 | 4,640,039 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
19,294,631 | ||||||||
Software – 17.1% |
| |||||||
Adobe, Inc.(1) |
7,367 | 4,092,663 | ||||||
Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Class A |
23,441 | 1,857,231 | ||||||
Gen Digital, Inc. |
53,924 | 1,347,022 | ||||||
Intuit, Inc. |
6,474 | 4,254,778 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
49,753 | 22,237,103 | ||||||
Nice Ltd., ADR(1) |
4,420 | 760,107 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
32,541 | 4,594,789 | ||||||
ServiceNow, Inc.(1) |
3,202 | 2,518,917 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
41,662,610 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Public Storage |
5,456 | 1,569,418 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,569,418 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 2.6% |
| |||||||
AutoZone, Inc.(1) |
1,491 | 4,419,473 | ||||||
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(1) |
1,003 | 1,059,228 | ||||||
Ulta Beauty, Inc.(1) |
2,536 | 978,567 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,457,268 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 4.9% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
49,405 | $ | 10,405,681 | |||||
NetApp, Inc. |
11,553 | 1,488,027 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,893,708 | ||||||||
Tobacco – 1.6% |
| |||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
37,698 | 3,819,938 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,819,938 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $184,221,293) |
241,121,950 | |||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,339,322, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 1,339,143 | 1,339,143 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,339,143) |
1,339,143 | |||||||
Total Investments – 99.4% (Cost $185,560,436) |
242,461,093 | |||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.6% |
|
1,351,743 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 243,812,836 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,358,200 | $ | 1,365,980 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 241,121,950 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 241,121,950 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,339,143 | — | 1,339,143 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 241,121,950 | $ | 1,339,143 | $ | — | $ | 242,461,093 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 242,461,093 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
1,676,585 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
219,749 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
26,117 | |||
Receivable for fund shares subscribed |
1,872 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
113 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
3,264 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
244,388,793 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
357,072 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
108,414 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
50,109 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
9,470 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,407 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
34,187 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
575,957 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 243,812,836 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 190,539,039 | ||
Distributable earnings |
53,273,797 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 243,812,836 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 185,560,436 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
19,377,230 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$12.58 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,897,662 | ||
Interest |
38,316 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(3,525 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,932,453 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
666,781 | |||
Distribution fees |
308,527 | |||
Professional fees |
43,378 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
36,837 | |||
Administrative fees |
26,829 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
18,717 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
8,612 | |||
Shareholder reports |
3,636 | |||
Other expenses |
7,507 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,120,824 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(55,729 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,065,095 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
867,358 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
12,071,125 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
17,214,416 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments |
29,285,541 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 30,152,899 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 867,358 | $ | 2,078,263 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
12,071,125 | (1,373,034 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
17,214,416 | 47,776,944 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
30,152,899 | 48,482,173 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
3,576,799 | 8,434,161 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(41,795,116 | ) | (75,498,612 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(38,218,317 | ) | (67,064,451 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(8,065,418 | ) | (18,582,278 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
251,878,254 | 270,460,532 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 243,812,836 | $ | 251,878,254 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
303,191 | 880,403 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,514,566 | ) | (7,451,550 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(3,211,375 | ) | (6,571,147 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 11.15 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.43 | $ | 12.58 | 12.83% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.28 | 0.08 | 1.79 | 1.87 | 11.15 | 20.15% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.32 | 0.08 | (1.12) | (1.04) | 9.28 | (10.08)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/21(5) |
10.00 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 10.32 | 3.20% | (4) |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 243,813 | 0.86% | (4) | 0.91% | (4) | 0.71% | (4) | 0.66% | (4) | 18% | (4) | |||||||||||
251,878 | 0.84% | 0.90% | 0.78% | 0.72% | 38% | |||||||||||||||||
270,461 | 0.84% | 0.87% | 0.80% | 0.77% | 45% | |||||||||||||||||
372,001 | 0.81% | (4) | 0.89% | (4) | 0.82% | (4) | 0.74% | (4) | 80% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.‘s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2021, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on October 25, 2021. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 25, 2021. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/
discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.55% of the first $200 million, and 0.50% in excess of $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.91% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.84%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $55,729.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with AllianceBernstein L.P. (“AllianceBernstein”). AllianceBernstein is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $308,527 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $42,996,965 and $77,408,450, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include,
but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN STRATEGIC LARGE CAP CORE VIP FUND
effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when
the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as
the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including
14 |
investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
15 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in |
16 |
the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
17 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the |
3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s |
performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11410
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.6% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 2.2% |
| |||||||
General Dynamics Corp. |
13,476 | $ | 3,909,927 | |||||
RTX Corp. |
32,306 | 3,243,199 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,153,126 | ||||||||
Banks – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
111,340 | 4,427,992 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
39,087 | 7,905,736 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,333,728 | ||||||||
Beverages – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc., Class A |
12,276 | 3,158,369 | ||||||
Monster Beverage Corp.(1) |
34,459 | 1,721,227 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,879,596 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
2,632 | 2,766,311 | ||||||
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
6,346 | 2,974,497 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,740,808 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 5.1% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
84,624 | 16,353,588 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,353,588 | ||||||||
Building Products – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc.(1) |
13,088 | 1,811,510 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,811,510 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
45,610 | 3,361,001 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
42,691 | 4,149,138 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,510,139 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
10,112 | 3,017,724 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,017,724 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 1.2% |
| |||||||
American Express Co. |
16,750 | 3,878,462 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,878,462 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Duke Energy Corp. |
31,171 | 3,124,269 | ||||||
PG&E Corp. |
126,853 | 2,214,854 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,339,123 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 2.2% |
| |||||||
AMETEK, Inc. |
15,777 | 2,630,184 | ||||||
Emerson Electric Co. |
20,051 | 2,208,818 | ||||||
GE Vernova, Inc.(1) |
13,562 | 2,326,018 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,165,020 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 0.8% |
| |||||||
CDW Corp. |
11,989 | 2,683,618 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,683,618 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Netflix, Inc.(1) |
7,955 | 5,368,670 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,368,670 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Mastercard, Inc., Class A |
12,809 | 5,650,818 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,650,818 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Gas Utilities – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Atmos Energy Corp. |
18,620 | $ | 2,172,023 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
2,172,023 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.2% |
| |||||||
Uber Technologies, Inc.(1) |
52,317 | 3,802,400 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,802,400 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 2.9% |
| |||||||
Abbott Laboratories |
32,887 | 3,417,288 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
57,040 | 4,392,651 | ||||||
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(1) |
17,920 | 1,655,270 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,465,209 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 1.8% |
| |||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
11,456 | 5,834,083 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,834,083 | ||||||||
Health Care REITs – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Welltower, Inc. |
28,920 | 3,014,910 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,014,910 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Marriott International, Inc., Class A |
15,131 | 3,658,222 | ||||||
McDonald’s Corp. |
10,585 | 2,697,481 | ||||||
Viking Holdings Ltd.(1) |
21,093 | 715,897 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,071,600 | ||||||||
Household Products – 2.0% |
| |||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
38,411 | 6,334,742 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,334,742 | ||||||||
Insurance – 3.1% |
| |||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.(1) |
26,731 | 2,696,891 | ||||||
Chubb Ltd. |
11,252 | 2,870,160 | ||||||
Progressive Corp. |
21,359 | 4,436,478 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,003,529 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 8.0% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
83,171 | 15,149,598 | ||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class C |
4,363 | 800,261 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
19,813 | 9,990,111 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
25,939,970 | ||||||||
IT Services – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Accenture PLC, Class A |
9,051 | 2,746,164 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,746,164 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Danaher Corp. |
13,603 | 3,398,709 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
5,927 | 3,277,631 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,676,340 | ||||||||
Machinery – 3.0% |
| |||||||
Deere & Co. |
7,190 | 2,686,400 | ||||||
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. |
8,453 | 2,003,023 | ||||||
Nordson Corp. |
8,426 | 1,954,326 | ||||||
Parker-Hannifin Corp. |
5,927 | 2,997,936 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,641,685 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. |
41,821 | 2,032,501 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,032,501 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 3.4% |
| |||||||
Chesapeake Energy Corp. |
17,701 | $ | 1,454,845 | |||||
ConocoPhillips |
20,400 | 2,333,352 | ||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
10,934 | 2,188,878 | ||||||
EOG Resources, Inc. |
24,739 | 3,113,898 | ||||||
Phillips 66 |
12,971 | 1,831,116 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,922,089 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Estee Lauder Cos., Inc., Class A |
26,982 | 2,870,885 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,870,885 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.9% |
| |||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
9,163 | 8,295,997 | ||||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
35,546 | 4,400,595 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,696,592 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 12.1% |
| |||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
5,064 | 8,130,404 | ||||||
KLA Corp. |
5,326 | 4,391,340 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
184,755 | 22,824,633 | ||||||
Texas Instruments, Inc. |
18,466 | 3,592,191 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
38,938,568 | ||||||||
Software – 11.2% |
| |||||||
Intuit, Inc. |
5,391 | 3,543,019 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
54,775 | 24,481,686 | ||||||
PTC, Inc.(1) |
13,575 | 2,466,170 | ||||||
Salesforce, Inc. |
12,976 | 3,336,130 | ||||||
Workday, Inc., Class A(1) |
10,477 | 2,342,238 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
36,169,243 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Equinix, Inc. |
2,775 | 2,099,565 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,099,565 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 2.1% |
| |||||||
AutoZone, Inc.(1) |
1,116 | 3,307,936 | ||||||
TJX Cos., Inc. |
31,754 | 3,496,115 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,804,051 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 7.4% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
113,116 | $ | 23,824,492 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
23,824,492 | ||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Lululemon Athletica, Inc.(1) |
5,710 | 1,705,577 | ||||||
NIKE, Inc., Class B |
24,364 | 1,836,315 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,541,892 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $236,910,561) |
|
321,488,463 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
$ | 765,508 | 765,508 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $765,508) |
765,508 | |||||||
Total Investments – 99.9% (Cost $237,676,069) |
322,253,971 | |||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.1% |
|
454,265 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 322,708,236 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 776,400 | $ | 780,845 |
Legend:
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 321,488,463 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 321,488,463 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 765,508 | — | 765,508 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 321,488,463 | $ | 765,508 | $ | — | $ | 322,253,971 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 322,253,971 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
1,326,664 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
75,635 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
4,322 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
323,660,592 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
436,450 | |||
Payable for investments purchased |
260,685 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
125,531 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
66,505 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
3,357 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
1,958 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
43,572 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
952,356 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 322,708,236 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 242,284,507 | ||
Distributable earnings |
80,423,729 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 322,708,236 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 237,676,069 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
12,864,860 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$25.08 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,771,477 | ||
Interest |
11,152 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,782,629 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
779,468 | |||
Distribution fees |
415,685 | |||
Professional fees |
53,948 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
50,225 | |||
Administrative fees |
32,644 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
18,895 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
8,392 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,301 | |||
Other expenses |
9,923 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,373,481 | |||
Expenses recouped by adviser |
30,234 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,403,715 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
378,914 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
14,048,040 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
38,496,639 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments |
52,544,679 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 52,923,593 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 378,914 | $ | 2,087,085 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
14,048,040 | (12,965,398 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
38,496,639 | 87,416,843 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
52,923,593 | 76,538,530 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
118,730 | 6,134,830 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(73,342,324 | ) | (93,566,372 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(73,223,594 | ) | (87,431,542 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(20,300,001 | ) | (10,893,012 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
343,008,237 | 353,901,249 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 322,708,236 | $ | 343,008,237 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
5,227 | 331,565 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,145,537 | ) | (4,849,601 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(3,140,310 | ) | (4,518,036 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 21.43 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 3.62 | $ | 3.65 | $ | 25.08 | 17.03% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
17.24 | 0.11 | 4.08 | 4.19 | 21.43 | 24.30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
21.86 | 0.12 | (4.74 | ) | (4.62 | ) | 17.24 | (21.13)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
17.06 | 0.11 | 4.69 | 4.80 | 21.86 | 28.14% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
14.31 | 0.20 | (6) | 2.55 | 2.75 | 17.06 | 19.22% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
11.26 | 0.14 | 2.91 | 3.05 | 14.31 | 27.09% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 322,708 | 0.84% | (4) | 0.84% | (4) | 0.23% | (4) | 0.23% | (4) | 15% | (4) | |||||||||||
343,008 | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 28% | |||||||||||||||||
353,901 | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 24% | |||||||||||||||||
321,218 | 0.86% | 0.91% | 0.53% | 0.48% | 274% | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
12,432 | 0.96% | 2.08% | 1.36% | (6) | 0.24% | (6) | 61% | |||||||||||||||
11,852 | 0.96% | 2.30% | 1.08% | (0.26)% | 117% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers, expense limitations, and recoupments, if any. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | The Fund’s portfolio turnover rate during the year reflects higher purchase and sale activities due to a significant inflow of assets into the fund. |
(6) | Reflects a special dividend paid out during the year by one of the Fund’s holdings. Had the Fund not received the special dividend, the Net Investment Income per share would have been $0.11, the Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets would have been 0.76%, and the Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) to Average Net Assets would have been (0.36)%. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing
sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of
premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.50% up to $200 million, 0.43% from $200 to $300 million, and 0.40% in excess of $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.97% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.84%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue did not waive any fees or pay any Fund expenses.
Park Avenue may be entitled to recoupment of previously waived fees and reimbursed expenses from the Fund for three years from the date of the waiver or reimbursement, subject to the expense limitation in effect at the time of the waiver or reimbursement and at the time of the recoupment, if any. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation after October 25, 2021 were not subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue recouped previously waived or reimbursed expenses in the amount of $30,234.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”). Wellington is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $415,685 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from
investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $48,905,342 and $123,225,236, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTEGRATED RESEARCH VIP FUND
risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable
Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure
14 |
and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
15 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in |
16 |
the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
17 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the |
3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8170
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.9% |
| |||||||
Australia – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Rio Tinto Ltd. |
46,770 | $ | 3,711,624 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
3,711,624 | ||||||||
Austria – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Erste Group Bank AG |
72,686 | 3,442,488 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,442,488 | ||||||||
Belgium – 1.3% |
| |||||||
UCB SA |
22,360 | 3,313,697 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,313,697 | ||||||||
Canada – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Nutrien Ltd. |
27,567 | 1,403,488 | ||||||
Toronto-Dominion Bank |
25,205 | 1,385,487 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,788,975 | ||||||||
Cayman Islands – 1.2% |
| |||||||
NU Holdings Ltd., Class A(1) |
117,621 | 1,516,135 | ||||||
Tencent Holdings Ltd. |
24,500 | 1,162,794 | ||||||
Tencent Music Entertainment Group, ADR |
32,741 | 460,011 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,138,940 | ||||||||
China – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., Class A |
34,700 | 857,176 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
857,176 | ||||||||
Denmark – 4.6% |
| |||||||
Novo Nordisk AS, Class B |
63,694 | 9,099,081 | ||||||
Vestas Wind Systems AS(1) |
125,277 | 2,891,058 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,990,139 | ||||||||
France – 8.6% |
| |||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
46,924 | 3,006,888 | ||||||
Carrefour SA |
51,863 | 732,834 | ||||||
EssilorLuxottica SA |
20,697 | 4,440,916 | ||||||
Legrand SA |
22,558 | 2,247,978 | ||||||
Sanofi SA |
38,632 | 3,713,359 | ||||||
Schneider Electric SE |
21,280 | 5,077,489 | ||||||
TotalEnergies SE |
45,361 | 3,023,269 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
22,242,733 | ||||||||
Germany – 9.5% |
| |||||||
Allianz SE, Reg S |
14,613 | 4,060,140 | ||||||
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG |
18,887 | 1,786,933 | ||||||
Beiersdorf AG |
15,350 | 2,242,672 | ||||||
Infineon Technologies AG |
69,619 | 2,557,612 | ||||||
SAP SE |
45,844 | 9,307,933 | ||||||
Siemens AG, Reg S |
25,063 | 4,661,446 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
24,616,736 | ||||||||
Hong Kong – 1.8% |
| |||||||
AIA Group Ltd. |
179,400 | 1,216,503 | ||||||
BOC Hong Kong Holdings Ltd. |
771,000 | 2,379,916 | ||||||
Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. |
101,500 | 1,159,005 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,755,424 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Indonesia – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Bank Central Asia Tbk. PT |
2,768,900 | $ | 1,670,392 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
1,670,392 | ||||||||
Ireland – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Kingspan Group PLC |
12,133 | 1,027,976 | ||||||
Linde PLC |
2,589 | 1,136,079 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,164,055 | ||||||||
Italy – 1.1% |
| |||||||
FinecoBank Banca Fineco SpA |
196,778 | 2,932,358 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,932,358 | ||||||||
Japan – 20.7% |
| |||||||
Bridgestone Corp. |
46,700 | 1,840,625 | ||||||
Daikin Industries Ltd. |
15,200 | 2,099,765 | ||||||
FANUC Corp. |
54,500 | 1,495,838 | ||||||
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp. |
130,500 | 3,068,053 | ||||||
Hitachi Ltd. |
202,500 | 4,564,647 | ||||||
Japan Exchange Group, Inc. |
101,400 | 2,377,046 | ||||||
KDDI Corp. |
98,900 | 2,620,873 | ||||||
Keyence Corp. |
1,100 | 485,293 | ||||||
Kubota Corp. |
140,400 | 1,972,685 | ||||||
Mitsubishi Estate Co. Ltd. |
97,400 | 1,534,335 | ||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. |
594,100 | 6,409,692 | ||||||
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. |
159,700 | 3,567,238 | ||||||
Nintendo Co. Ltd. |
38,300 | 2,046,405 | ||||||
Nitori Holdings Co. Ltd. |
20,100 | 2,126,236 | ||||||
Recruit Holdings Co. Ltd. |
57,400 | 3,089,197 | ||||||
Sekisui Chemical Co. Ltd. |
85,500 | 1,186,926 | ||||||
Shimano, Inc. |
9,100 | 1,410,023 | ||||||
SMC Corp. |
4,500 | 2,148,492 | ||||||
Sony Group Corp. |
43,300 | 3,679,286 | ||||||
Terumo Corp. |
178,600 | 2,965,159 | ||||||
Toyota Industries Corp. |
22,100 | 1,870,877 | ||||||
Toyota Motor Corp. |
67,100 | 1,381,475 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
53,940,166 | ||||||||
Luxembourg – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Spotify Technology SA(1) |
9,080 | 2,849,213 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,849,213 | ||||||||
Netherlands – 4.4% |
| |||||||
ASM International NV |
2,248 | 1,712,299 | ||||||
ASML Holding NV |
7,094 | 7,318,863 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
4,812 | 1,294,861 | ||||||
Stellantis NV |
58,088 | 1,142,463 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,468,486 | ||||||||
Norway – 1.5% |
| |||||||
DNB Bank ASA |
141,443 | 2,777,437 | ||||||
Norsk Hydro ASA |
189,110 | 1,177,168 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,954,605 | ||||||||
Portugal – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Jeronimo Martins SGPS SA |
105,376 | 2,057,760 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,057,760 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Republic of Korea – 1.7% | ||||||||
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. |
56,075 | $ | 3,295,292 | |||||
Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. |
4,138 | 1,058,042 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,353,334 | ||||||||
Spain – 3.6% | ||||||||
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA |
369,519 | 3,686,439 | ||||||
Iberdrola SA |
224,621 | 2,913,896 | ||||||
Industria de Diseno Textil SA |
55,635 | 2,749,348 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,349,683 | ||||||||
Sweden – 1.9% | ||||||||
Nibe Industrier AB, Class B |
43,977 | 185,386 | ||||||
Sandvik AB |
152,560 | 3,066,711 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Class A |
167,619 | 1,596,687 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,848,784 | ||||||||
Switzerland – 5.5% | ||||||||
Alcon, Inc. |
29,296 | 2,606,495 | ||||||
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG |
193 | 2,254,023 | ||||||
Cie Financiere Richemont SA, Reg S, Class A |
23,022 | 3,593,015 | ||||||
Lonza Group AG, Reg S |
4,256 | 2,312,943 | ||||||
Roche Holding AG |
12,897 | 3,579,103 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
14,345,579 | ||||||||
Taiwan – 0.8% | ||||||||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. |
66,000 | 1,962,940 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,962,940 | ||||||||
United Kingdom – 21.1% | ||||||||
Antofagasta PLC |
56,532 | 1,499,051 | ||||||
ARM Holdings PLC, ADR(1) |
5,636 | 922,162 | ||||||
AstraZeneca PLC |
35,084 | 5,469,455 | ||||||
BAE Systems PLC |
132,913 | 2,219,309 | ||||||
Bunzl PLC |
55,020 | 2,087,097 | ||||||
Burberry Group PLC |
104,825 | 1,163,974 | ||||||
Diageo PLC |
73,568 | 2,314,477 | ||||||
Ferguson PLC |
6,525 | 1,263,566 | ||||||
GSK PLC |
270,286 | 5,209,200 | ||||||
Haleon PLC |
502,442 | 2,045,387 | ||||||
Kingfisher PLC |
496,126 | 1,561,760 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
United Kingdom (continued) | ||||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC |
4,572,796 | $ | 3,168,079 | |||||
National Grid PLC |
229,857 | 2,563,249 | ||||||
Prudential PLC |
214,623 | 1,947,040 | ||||||
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC |
48,835 | 2,635,338 | ||||||
RELX PLC |
86,910 | 3,984,046 | ||||||
Shell PLC |
199,116 | 7,153,373 | ||||||
Unilever PLC |
112,677 | 6,203,731 | ||||||
Whitbread PLC |
41,368 | 1,548,550 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
54,958,844 | ||||||||
United States – 2.2% | ||||||||
Booking Holdings, Inc. |
553 | 2,190,710 | ||||||
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One, Class C(1) |
25,500 | 1,831,920 | ||||||
Lululemon Athletica, Inc.(1) |
2,229 | 665,802 | ||||||
MercadoLibre, Inc.(1) |
546 | 897,296 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,585,728 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $231,165,860) |
257,299,859 | |||||||
Preferred Stocks – 0.5% | ||||||||
Germany – 0.5% | ||||||||
Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG(2) |
17,507 | 1,301,572 | ||||||
Total Preferred Stocks (Cost $1,461,137) |
1,301,572 | |||||||
Total Investments – 99.4% (Cost $232,626,997) |
258,601,431 | |||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.6% |
|
1,674,159 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 260,275,590 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | Security that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of the security amounted to $1,301,572, representing 0.5% of net assets. This security has been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||||||
Australia |
$ | — | $ | 3,711,624 | * | $ | — | $ | 3,711,624 | |||||||
Austria |
— | 3,442,488 | * | — | 3,442,488 | |||||||||||
Belgium |
— | 3,313,697 | * | — | 3,313,697 | |||||||||||
Canada |
2,788,975 | — | — | 2,788,975 | ||||||||||||
Cayman Islands |
1,976,146 | 1,162,794 | * | — | 3,138,940 | |||||||||||
China |
— | 857,176 | * | — | 857,176 | |||||||||||
Denmark |
— | 11,990,139 | * | — | 11,990,139 | |||||||||||
France |
— | 22,242,733 | * | — | 22,242,733 | |||||||||||
Germany |
— | 24,616,736 | * | — | 24,616,736 | |||||||||||
Hong Kong |
— | 4,755,424 | * | — | 4,755,424 | |||||||||||
Indonesia |
— | 1,670,392 | * | — | 1,670,392 | |||||||||||
Ireland |
1,136,079 | 1,027,976 | * | — | 2,164,055 | |||||||||||
Italy |
— | 2,932,358 | * | — | 2,932,358 | |||||||||||
Japan |
— | 53,940,166 | * | — | 53,940,166 | |||||||||||
Luxembourg |
2,849,213 | — | — | 2,849,213 | ||||||||||||
Netherlands |
1,294,861 | 10,173,625 | * | — | 11,468,486 | |||||||||||
Norway |
— | 3,954,605 | * | — | 3,954,605 | |||||||||||
Portugal |
— | 2,057,760 | * | — | 2,057,760 | |||||||||||
Republic of Korea |
— | 4,353,334 | * | — | 4,353,334 | |||||||||||
Spain |
— | 9,349,683 | * | — | 9,349,683 | |||||||||||
Sweden |
— | 4,848,784 | * | — | 4,848,784 | |||||||||||
Switzerland |
— | 14,345,579 | * | — | 14,345,579 | |||||||||||
Taiwan |
— | 1,962,940 | * | — | 1,962,940 | |||||||||||
United Kingdom |
2,185,728 | 52,773,116 | * | — | 54,958,844 | |||||||||||
United States |
5,585,728 | — | — | 5,585,728 | ||||||||||||
Preferred Stocks | ||||||||||||||||
Germany |
— | 1,301,572 | * | — | 1,301,572 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 17,816,730 | $ | 240,784,701 | $ | — | $ | 258,601,431 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 258,601,431 | ||
Cash |
68,760 | |||
Foreign currency, at value |
370,479 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
879,213 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
651,905 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
398,335 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
9,155 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
3,698 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
260,982,976 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
403,216 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
167,836 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
54,579 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
23,225 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
15,394 | |||
Payable for investments purchased |
6,733 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,402 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
34,001 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
707,386 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 260,275,590 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 233,791,275 | ||
Distributable earnings |
26,484,315 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 260,275,590 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 232,626,997 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency, at Cost |
$ | 381,280 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
18,673,595 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$13.94 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 5,605,477 | ||
Interest |
9,944 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(607,526 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
5,007,895 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
1,079,002 | |||
Distribution fees |
351,379 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
60,089 | |||
Professional fees |
48,791 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
42,302 | |||
Administrative fees |
28,878 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,165 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,259 | |||
Other expenses |
11,375 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,633,240 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(92,696 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,540,544 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
3,467,351 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments, Foreign Currency Transactions and Foreign Capital Gains Tax |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
1,542,364 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
2,108 | |||
Foreign capital gains taxes refund |
2,014 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
11,646,114 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(52,712 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments, Foreign Currency Transactions and Foreign Capital Gains Tax |
13,139,888 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 16,607,239 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 3,467,351 | $ | 4,479,936 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments, foreign currency transactions and foreign capital gains tax |
1,546,486 | (13,044,029 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
11,593,402 | 54,573,377 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
16,607,239 | 46,009,284 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
5,670,509 | 18,966,554 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(55,612,542 | ) | (96,377,576 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(49,942,033 | ) | (77,411,022 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(33,334,794 | ) | (31,401,738 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
293,610,384 | 325,012,122 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 260,275,590 | $ | 293,610,384 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
432,074 | 1,516,044 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(4,064,677 | ) | (7,747,234 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(3,632,603 | ) | (6,231,190 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 13.16 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 13.94 | 5.93% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
11.39 | 0.18 | 1.59 | 1.77 | 13.16 | 15.54% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
13.87 | 0.15 | (2.63 | ) | (2.48 | ) | 11.39 | (17.88)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
13.16 | 0.30 | (5) | 0.41 | 0.71 | 13.87 | 5.40% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
12.15 | 0.12 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 13.16 | 8.31% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
10.01 | 0.22 | 1.92 | 2.14 | 12.15 | 21.38% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 260,276 | 1.10% | (4) | 1.16% | (4) | 2.46% | (4) | 2.40% | (4) | 17% | (4) | |||||||||||
293,610 | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.47% | 1.40% | 29% | |||||||||||||||||
325,012 | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.26% | 136% | |||||||||||||||||
411,907 | 1.06% | 1.13% | 2.20% | (5) | 2.13% | (5) | 40% | |||||||||||||||
234,233 | 1.00% | 1.18% | 1.03% | 0.85% | 38% | |||||||||||||||||
220,989 | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.99% | 1.73% | 32% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | Reflects a special dividend paid out during the year by one of the Fund’s holdings. Had the Fund not received the special dividend, the Net Investment Income per share would have been $0.19, the Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets would have been 1.37%, and the Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets would have been 1.30%. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian International Equity VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing
sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
e. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.80% of the first $100 million, and 0.75% in excess of $100 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.13% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 1.08%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $92,696.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Schroder Investment Management North America, Inc. (“Schroder Inc.”). Schroder Inc. is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund. Schroder Inc. also entered into a Sub-subadvisory Agreement with its affiliate, Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (‘‘Schroder Limited’’). The sub-subadvisory fees under the Sub-subadvisory Agreement are paid by Schroder Inc. to Schroder Limited and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $351,379 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses,
deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $46,132,950 and $92,677,423, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL EQUITY VIP FUND
right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the
“Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-Advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also
15 |
considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive
because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
16 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the |
Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
17 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it |
18 |
would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8172
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.9% | ||||||||
Australia – 1.6% | ||||||||
Goodman Group |
31,510 | $ | 726,193 | |||||
QBE Insurance Group Ltd. |
67,911 | 787,562 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,513,755 | ||||||||
Cayman Islands – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Tencent Holdings Ltd. |
21,200 | 1,006,173 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,006,173 | ||||||||
Denmark – 6.6% |
| |||||||
Coloplast AS, Class B |
4,831 | 580,184 | ||||||
Novo Nordisk AS, Class B |
39,186 | 5,597,962 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,178,146 | ||||||||
France – 14.1% |
| |||||||
Air Liquide SA |
13,915 | 2,395,635 | ||||||
Dassault Systemes SE |
32,108 | 1,208,687 | ||||||
L’Oreal SA |
1,435 | 630,990 | ||||||
Legrand SA |
7,046 | 702,157 | ||||||
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE |
3,728 | 2,862,922 | ||||||
Safran SA |
14,702 | 3,093,092 | ||||||
Sanofi SA |
8,967 | 861,920 | ||||||
Schneider Electric SE |
2,092 | 499,159 | ||||||
Vinci SA |
8,725 | 917,824 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,172,386 | ||||||||
Germany – 3.9% |
| |||||||
Delivery Hero SE(1)(2) |
11,764 | 278,551 | ||||||
Deutsche Boerse AG |
4,667 | 954,002 | ||||||
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG, Reg S |
2,464 | 1,232,086 | ||||||
SAP SE |
5,713 | 1,159,939 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,624,578 | ||||||||
Ireland – 2.7% |
| |||||||
Linde PLC |
3,884 | 1,706,913 | ||||||
Ryanair Holdings PLC, ADR |
6,719 | 782,360 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,489,273 | ||||||||
Japan – 24.2% |
| |||||||
Advantest Corp. |
13,300 | 538,322 | ||||||
Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd. |
19,300 | 674,219 | ||||||
Daikin Industries Ltd. |
9,400 | 1,298,539 | ||||||
Denso Corp. |
50,100 | 781,913 | ||||||
Hitachi Ltd. |
94,900 | 2,139,185 | ||||||
Hoya Corp. |
17,200 | 2,012,532 | ||||||
Keyence Corp. |
5,300 | 2,338,230 | ||||||
Otsuka Corp. |
48,500 | 935,195 | ||||||
Rakuten Bank Ltd.(2) |
40,600 | 735,901 | ||||||
Recruit Holdings Co. Ltd. |
52,000 | 2,798,575 | ||||||
Shimano, Inc. |
7,700 | 1,193,097 | ||||||
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. |
47,900 | 1,863,127 | ||||||
Sony Group Corp. |
26,700 | 2,268,752 | ||||||
Terumo Corp. |
60,100 | 997,794 | ||||||
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. |
52,600 | 1,974,372 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
22,549,753 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Netherlands – 12.5% |
| |||||||
Adyen NV(1)(2) |
165 | $ | 196,722 | |||||
Airbus SE |
12,299 | 1,695,856 | ||||||
Argenx SE(2) |
1,610 | 695,970 | ||||||
ASML Holding NV |
5,719 | 5,900,279 | ||||||
Ferrovial SE |
20,356 | 788,531 | ||||||
Heineken NV |
13,026 | 1,257,322 | ||||||
Wolters Kluwer NV |
6,744 | 1,114,858 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,649,538 | ||||||||
Republic of Korea – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. |
7,962 | 467,893 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
467,893 | ||||||||
Singapore – 1.7% |
| |||||||
DBS Group Holdings Ltd. |
59,240 | 1,561,014 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,561,014 | ||||||||
Spain – 2.0% |
| |||||||
Industria de Diseno Textil SA |
37,691 | 1,862,599 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,862,599 | ||||||||
Sweden – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Atlas Copco AB, Class A |
122,896 | 2,316,136 | ||||||
Volvo AB, Class B |
40,343 | 1,034,951 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,351,087 | ||||||||
Switzerland – 6.5% |
| |||||||
Cie Financiere Richemont SA, Reg S, Class A |
14,056 | 2,193,703 | ||||||
Nestle SA, Reg S |
32,792 | 3,347,326 | ||||||
Straumann Holding AG, Reg S |
4,187 | 515,417 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,056,446 | ||||||||
Taiwan – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd., ADR |
9,576 | 1,664,405 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,664,405 | ||||||||
United Kingdom – 14.8% |
| |||||||
3i Group PLC |
59,768 | 2,304,882 | ||||||
Allfunds Group PLC |
26,038 | 145,682 | ||||||
AstraZeneca PLC |
7,409 | 1,155,033 | ||||||
Diageo PLC |
12,532 | 394,262 | ||||||
Ferguson PLC |
4,252 | 817,132 | ||||||
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC |
23,350 | 2,448,071 | ||||||
London Stock Exchange Group PLC |
15,713 | 1,862,569 | ||||||
Next PLC |
3,730 | 426,538 | ||||||
RELX PLC |
57,893 | 2,654,002 | ||||||
Sage Group PLC |
51,592 | 707,633 | ||||||
SSE PLC |
39,521 | 891,371 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,807,175 | ||||||||
United States – 1.3% |
| |||||||
MercadoLibre, Inc.(2) |
323 | 530,818 | ||||||
Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
20,600 | 635,304 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,166,122 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value | |||||||
Total Investments – 98.9% (Cost $64,526,074) |
$ | 92,120,343 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 1.1% |
|
1,062,117 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 93,182,460 |
(1) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as |
amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $475,273, representing 0.5% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(2) | Non–income–producing security. |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||||||
Australia |
$ | — | $ | 1,513,755 | * | $ | — | $ | 1,513,755 | |||||||
Cayman Islands |
— | 1,006,173 | * | — | 1,006,173 | |||||||||||
Denmark |
— | 6,178,146 | * | — | 6,178,146 | |||||||||||
France |
— | 13,172,386 | * | — | 13,172,386 | |||||||||||
Germany |
— | 3,624,578 | * | — | 3,624,578 | |||||||||||
Ireland |
782,360 | 1,706,913 | * | — | 2,489,273 | |||||||||||
Japan |
— | 22,549,753 | * | — | 22,549,753 | |||||||||||
Netherlands |
— | 11,649,538 | * | — | 11,649,538 | |||||||||||
Republic of Korea |
— | 467,893 | * | — | 467,893 | |||||||||||
Singapore |
— | 1,561,014 | * | — | 1,561,014 | |||||||||||
Spain |
— | 1,862,599 | * | — | 1,862,599 | |||||||||||
Sweden |
— | 3,351,087 | * | — | 3,351,087 | |||||||||||
Switzerland |
— | 6,056,446 | * | — | 6,056,446 | |||||||||||
Taiwan |
1,664,405 | — | — | 1,664,405 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
— | 13,807,175 | * | — | 13,807,175 | |||||||||||
United States |
1,166,122 | — | — | 1,166,122 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,612,887 | $ | 88,507,456 | $ | — | $ | 92,120,343 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 92,120,343 | ||
Foreign currency, at value |
18,360 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
885,066 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
414,827 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
42,356 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
9,403 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
1,249 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
93,491,604 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Due to custodian |
119,504 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
64,810 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
62,319 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
19,475 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
15,394 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
13,930 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
921 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
12,791 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
309,144 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 93,182,460 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 45,740,031 | ||
Distributable earnings |
47,442,429 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 93,182,460 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 64,526,074 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency, at Cost |
$ | 18,359 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
5,409,400 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$17.23 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,111,161 | ||
Interest |
5,250 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(120,927 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
995,484 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
394,309 | |||
Distribution fees |
123,310 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
41,996 | |||
Professional fees |
27,266 | |||
Administrative fees |
16,464 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
15,037 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
6,956 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,994 | |||
Other expenses |
3,039 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
631,371 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(50,939 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
580,432 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
415,052 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
5,468,799 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(21,024 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
1,442,372 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(18,165 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
6,871,982 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 7,287,034 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 415,052 | $ | 732,830 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
5,447,775 | 2,940,122 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
1,424,207 | 13,456,536 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
7,287,034 | 17,129,488 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
19,185 | 9,240,804 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(17,987,051 | ) | (37,169,315 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(17,967,866 | ) | (27,928,511 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(10,680,832 | ) | (10,799,023 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
103,863,292 | 114,662,315 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 93,182,460 | $ | 103,863,292 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
1,124 | 612,756 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,077,160 | ) | (2,445,654 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,076,036 | ) | (1,832,898 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 16.01 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 17.23 | 7.62% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
13.78 | 0.10 | 2.13 | 2.23 | 16.01 | 16.18% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
19.21 | 0.05 | (5.48 | ) | (5.43 | ) | 13.78 | (28.27)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
17.34 | (0.01 | ) | 1.88 | 1.87 | 19.21 | 10.78% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
13.53 | (0.00 | )(5) | 3.81 | 3.81 | 17.34 | 28.16% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
10.24 | 0.07 | 3.22 | 3.29 | 13.53 | 32.13% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income/ |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income/ (Loss) to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 93,182 | 1.18% | (4) | 1.28% | (4) | 0.84% | (4) | 0.74% | (4) | 12% | (4) | |||||||||||
103,863 | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.68% | 0.60% | 50% | |||||||||||||||||
114,662 | 1.18% | 1.21% | 0.35% | 0.32% | 40% | |||||||||||||||||
148,827 | 1.17% | 1.17% | (0.05)% | (0.05)% | 31% | |||||||||||||||||
146,998 | 1.18% | 1.24% | (0.00)% | (6) | (0.06)% | 25% | ||||||||||||||||
146,555 | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 25% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | Rounds to $(0.00) per share. |
(6) | Rounds to (0.00)%. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian International Growth VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks total return consisting of long-term capital growth and current income.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation
oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing
sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
e. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.80% of the first $100 million, and 0.75% in excess of $100 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.17% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 1.18%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $50,939.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“J.P. Morgan”). J.P. Morgan is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $123,310 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $11,735,429 and $29,080,336, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital
purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP
Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the
15 |
reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the
potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s |
16 |
performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that |
17 |
the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance |
was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8171
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.5% | ||||||||
Automobiles – 1.1% | ||||||||
Tesla, Inc.(1) |
23,517 | $ | 4,653,544 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
4,653,544 | ||||||||
Beverages – 1.8% |
|
|||||||
Brown-Forman Corp., Class B |
59,893 | 2,586,779 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc., Class A |
10,773 | 2,771,677 | ||||||
Monster Beverage Corp.(1) |
49,743 | 2,484,663 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,843,119 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 1.0% |
|
|||||||
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
9,628 | 4,512,836 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,512,836 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 5.0% |
|
|||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
112,262 | 21,694,631 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
21,694,631 | ||||||||
Building Products – 0.5% |
|
|||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc.(1) |
17,090 | 2,365,427 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,365,427 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 2.7% |
|
|||||||
Ares Management Corp., Class A |
22,452 | 2,992,403 | ||||||
KKR & Co., Inc. |
23,323 | 2,454,512 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
26,664 | 2,591,474 | ||||||
S&P Global, Inc. |
7,894 | 3,520,724 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
11,559,113 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 1.0% |
|
|||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
14,712 | 4,390,502 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,390,502 | ||||||||
Communications Equipment – 0.8% |
|
|||||||
Arista Networks, Inc.(1) |
10,125 | 3,548,610 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,548,610 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 0.9% |
|
|||||||
American Express Co. |
15,990 | 3,702,485 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,702,485 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 3.2% |
| |||||||
Amphenol Corp., Class A |
85,324 | 5,748,278 | ||||||
CDW Corp. |
20,188 | 4,518,882 | ||||||
Coherent Corp.(1) |
33,509 | 2,428,062 | ||||||
Jabil, Inc. |
10,042 | 1,092,469 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,787,691 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 3.2% |
|
|||||||
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.(1) |
42,560 | 3,989,574 | ||||||
Netflix, Inc.(1) |
14,753 | 9,956,505 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,946,079 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 2.8% |
|
|||||||
Mastercard, Inc., Class A |
27,631 | 12,189,692 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,189,692 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.5% |
|
|||||||
Uber Technologies, Inc.(1) |
89,576 | 6,510,384 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,510,384 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 1.6% |
|
|||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
46,401 | $ | 3,573,341 | |||||
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(1) |
33,922 | 3,133,375 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,706,716 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 1.0% |
| |||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
8,574 | 4,366,395 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,366,395 | ||||||||
Health Care Technology – 0.9% |
|
|||||||
Veeva Systems, Inc., Class A(1) |
20,987 | 3,840,831 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,840,831 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Airbnb, Inc., Class A(1) |
19,294 | 2,925,549 | ||||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) |
96,850 | 6,067,653 | ||||||
DoorDash, Inc., Class A(1) |
32,194 | 3,502,063 | ||||||
DraftKings, Inc., Class A(1) |
48,864 | 1,865,139 | ||||||
Viking Holdings Ltd.(1) |
56,939 | 1,932,510 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,292,914 | ||||||||
Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Vistra Corp. |
22,160 | 1,905,317 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,905,317 | ||||||||
Insurance – 0.8% |
|
|||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.(1) |
32,187 | 3,247,346 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,247,346 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 10.2% |
|
|||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
117,507 | 21,403,900 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
39,939 | 20,138,043 | ||||||
Pinterest, Inc., Class A(1) |
58,619 | 2,583,339 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
44,125,282 | ||||||||
IT Services – 1.4% |
|
|||||||
Gartner, Inc.(1) |
8,467 | 3,802,191 | ||||||
MongoDB, Inc.(1) |
9,666 | 2,416,113 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,218,304 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 0.2% |
|
|||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
1,621 | 896,413 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
896,413 | ||||||||
Machinery – 2.4% |
|
|||||||
Deere & Co. |
8,023 | 2,997,634 | ||||||
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
46,291 | 4,205,074 | ||||||
Nordson Corp. |
14,064 | 3,262,004 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,464,712 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
9,419 | 1,885,590 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,885,590 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.9% |
|
|||||||
Estee Lauder Cos., Inc., Class A |
37,124 | 3,949,994 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,949,994 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 4.9% |
|
|||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
18,665 | 16,898,918 | ||||||
Merck & Co., Inc. |
34,415 | 4,260,577 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
21,159,495 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 16.9% |
| |||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.(1) |
18,738 | $ | 3,039,491 | |||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
10,858 | 17,432,845 | ||||||
KLA Corp. |
7,998 | 6,594,431 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
316,460 | 39,095,468 | ||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
22,161 | 4,414,028 | ||||||
Texas Instruments, Inc. |
12,985 | 2,525,972 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
73,102,235 | ||||||||
Software – 17.2% |
|
|||||||
Adobe, Inc.(1) |
9,819 | 5,454,847 | ||||||
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.(1) |
14,803 | 4,555,623 | ||||||
HubSpot, Inc.(1) |
3,749 | 2,211,123 | ||||||
Intuit, Inc. |
9,467 | 6,221,807 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
77,597 | 34,681,979 | ||||||
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.(1) |
8,881 | 3,010,748 | ||||||
PTC, Inc.(1) |
19,125 | 3,474,439 | ||||||
Salesforce, Inc. |
20,867 | 5,364,905 | ||||||
ServiceNow, Inc.(1) |
7,858 | 6,181,653 | ||||||
Workday, Inc., Class A(1) |
16,037 | 3,585,232 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
74,742,356 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.7% |
|
|||||||
Equinix, Inc. |
4,159 | 3,146,699 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,146,699 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(1) |
4,857 | 5,129,283 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,129,283 | ||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 7.9% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
163,221 | 34,377,607 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
34,377,607 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 1.2% |
|
|||||||
Lululemon Athletica, Inc.(1) |
10,152 | $ | 3,032,403 | |||||
NIKE, Inc., Class B |
31,449 | 2,370,311 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,402,714 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $261,368,997) |
|
431,664,316 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.4% |
|
|||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,561,116, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 1,560,908 | 1,560,908 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,560,908) |
1,560,908 | |||||||
Total Investments – 99.9% (Cost $262,929,905) |
433,225,224 | |||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.1% |
|
372,277 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 433,597,501 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,583,100 | $ | 1,592,148 |
Legend:
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 431,664,316 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 431,664,316 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,560,908 | — | 1,560,908 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 431,664,316 | $ | 1,560,908 | $ | — | $ | 433,225,224 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 433,225,224 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
4,462,442 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
75,921 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
16,870 | |||
Receivable for fund shares subscribed |
1,138 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
5,903 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
437,787,498 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
3,405,035 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
417,946 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
200,902 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
88,706 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
5,555 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
3,987 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
53,568 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
4,189,997 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 433,597,501 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | (22,053,055 | ) | |
Distributable earnings |
455,650,556 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 433,597,501 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 262,929,905 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
13,068,581 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$33.18 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,183,554 | ||
Interest |
12,225 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,195,779 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
1,241,358 | |||
Distribution fees |
548,993 | |||
Professional fees |
66,485 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
66,106 | |||
Administrative fees |
39,132 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
20,096 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
9,002 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,985 | |||
Other expenses |
12,345 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
2,008,502 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(98,007 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,910,495 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
(714,716 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
73,845,567 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
4,711,177 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments |
78,556,744 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 77,842,028 | ||
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | (714,716 | ) | $ | (718,324 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
73,845,567 | 42,483,878 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
4,711,177 | 118,933,471 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
77,842,028 | 160,699,025 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
1,727,224 | 2,909,193 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(96,959,083 | ) | (152,162,094 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(95,231,859 | ) | (149,252,901 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
(17,389,831 | ) | 11,446,124 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
450,987,332 | 439,541,208 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 433,597,501 | $ | 450,987,332 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
57,277 | 119,516 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,163,920 | ) | (6,308,587 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(3,106,643 | ) | (6,189,071 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, |
Net Investment Loss(1) |
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 27.88 | $ | (0.05) | $ | 5.35 | $ | 5.30 | $ | 33.18 | 19.01% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
19.65 | (0.04) | 8.27 | 8.23 | 27.88 | 41.88% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
28.69 | (0.03) | (9.01 | ) | (9.04 | ) | 19.65 | (31.51)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
23.83 | (0.09) | 4.95 | 4.86 | 28.69 | 20.39% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
17.47 | (0.02) | 6.38 | 6.36 | 23.83 | 36.41% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
12.52 | (0.00) | (5) | 4.95 | 4.95 | 17.47 | 39.54% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net |
Net Ratio of Net to Average |
Gross Ratio of Net Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 433,598 | 0.87% | (4) | 0.91% | (4) | (0.33)% | (4) | (0.37)% | (4) | 22% | (4) | |||||||||||
450,987 | 0.87% | 0.91% | (0.16)% | (0.20)% | 37% | |||||||||||||||||
439,541 | 0.87% | 0.89% | (0.15)% | (0.17)% | 38% | |||||||||||||||||
622,763 | 0.87% | 0.87% | (0.34)% | (0.34)% | 28% | |||||||||||||||||
621,402 | 0.87% | 0.89% | (0.12)% | (0.14)% | 24% | |||||||||||||||||
625,755 | 0.87% | 0.96% | (0.01)% | (0.10)% | 116% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers, expense limitations, and recoupments, if any. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | Rounds to $(0.00) per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks to maximize long-term growth.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation
oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of
premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.62% up to $100 million, 0.57% from $100 to $300 million, 0.52% from $300 to $500 million, and 0.50% in excess of $500 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.87% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $98,007.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”). Wellington is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $548,993 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $94,324,825 and $191,578,794, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include,
but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED GROWTH VIP FUND
effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as
the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure
14 |
and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
15 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in |
16 |
the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
17 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the |
3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8173
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.7% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 2.2% |
| |||||||
General Dynamics Corp. |
5,864 | $ | 1,701,381 | |||||
Howmet Aerospace, Inc. |
10,963 | 851,058 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,552,439 | ||||||||
Banks – 7.6% |
| |||||||
Huntington Bancshares, Inc. |
110,178 | 1,452,146 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
25,488 | 5,155,203 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
37,054 | 2,200,637 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,807,986 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC |
9,689 | 706,037 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
706,037 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 2.8% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
9,034 | 1,549,512 | ||||||
Amgen, Inc. |
5,336 | 1,667,233 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,216,745 | ||||||||
Building Products – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Allegion PLC |
4,663 | 550,933 | ||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc.(1) |
5,930 | 820,771 | ||||||
Masco Corp. |
10,889 | 725,970 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,097,674 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 6.2% |
| |||||||
Blue Owl Capital, Inc. |
32,812 | 582,413 | ||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
13,764 | 1,014,269 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
2,996 | 1,355,151 | ||||||
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
7,123 | 975,067 | ||||||
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. |
2,533 | 707,467 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
26,075 | 2,534,229 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,168,596 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Olin Corp. |
3,241 | 152,813 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
152,813 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 0.5% |
| |||||||
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.(1) |
16,956 | 638,224 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
638,224 | ||||||||
Construction Materials – 1.4% |
| |||||||
CRH PLC |
22,182 | 1,663,206 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,663,206 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 1.5% |
| |||||||
American Express Co. |
7,752 | 1,794,976 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,794,976 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 4.1% |
| |||||||
Target Corp. |
6,957 | 1,029,914 | ||||||
U.S. Foods Holding Corp.(1) |
30,525 | 1,617,214 | ||||||
Walmart, Inc. |
31,543 | 2,135,777 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,782,905 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 0.7% |
| |||||||
FirstEnergy Corp. |
21,259 | 813,582 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
813,582 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 1.6% |
| |||||||
Flex Ltd.(1) |
40,422 | $ | 1,192,045 | |||||
Keysight Technologies, Inc.(1) |
4,656 | 636,708 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,828,753 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 1.8% |
| |||||||
NOV, Inc. |
21,857 | 415,502 | ||||||
Schlumberger NV |
35,341 | 1,667,388 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,082,890 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.(1) |
5,428 | 844,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
844,000 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 5.9% |
| |||||||
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B(1) |
9,977 | 4,058,644 | ||||||
Corpay, Inc.(1) |
3,963 | 1,055,783 | ||||||
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
23,656 | 1,782,716 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,897,143 | ||||||||
Food Products – 0.7% |
| |||||||
J M Smucker Co. |
6,970 | 760,009 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
760,009 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Norfolk Southern Corp. |
5,853 | 1,256,581 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,256,581 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 1.2% |
| |||||||
Abbott Laboratories |
13,771 | 1,430,945 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,430,945 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 7.0% |
| |||||||
Cencora, Inc. |
8,848 | 1,993,454 | ||||||
Centene Corp.(1) |
16,595 | 1,100,249 | ||||||
Cigna Group |
4,132 | 1,365,915 | ||||||
McKesson Corp. |
2,715 | 1,585,669 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
4,166 | 2,121,577 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,166,864 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Booking Holdings, Inc. |
252 | 998,298 | ||||||
MGM Resorts International(1) |
21,411 | 951,505 | ||||||
Starbucks Corp. |
7,353 | 572,431 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,522,234 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Lennar Corp., Class A |
7,563 | 1,133,467 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,133,467 | ||||||||
Industrial Conglomerates – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
6,999 | 1,494,566 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,494,566 | ||||||||
Insurance – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Aon PLC, Class A |
2,493 | 731,895 | ||||||
Arthur J Gallagher & Co. |
3,149 | 816,567 | ||||||
Chubb Ltd. |
4,311 | 1,099,650 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,648,112 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
22,915 | 4,173,967 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,173,967 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
IT Services – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Class A |
9,480 | $ | 644,640 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
644,640 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Avantor, Inc.(1) |
30,676 | 650,331 | ||||||
ICON PLC(1) |
4,907 | 1,538,197 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,188,528 | ||||||||
Machinery – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Deere & Co. |
1,552 | 579,874 | ||||||
Fortive Corp. |
13,372 | 990,865 | ||||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
7,215 | 1,140,331 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,711,070 | ||||||||
Media – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Omnicom Group, Inc. |
12,249 | 1,098,735 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,098,735 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Kinross Gold Corp. |
43,060 | 358,259 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., Class B |
16,318 | 781,632 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,139,891 | ||||||||
Multi-Utilities – 0.6% |
| |||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. |
23,421 | 725,583 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
725,583 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 8.1% |
| |||||||
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. |
31,609 | 1,125,280 | ||||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc. |
94,659 | 1,860,996 | ||||||
ConocoPhillips |
13,104 | 1,498,836 | ||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
9,111 | 1,823,931 | ||||||
Marathon Petroleum Corp. |
9,437 | 1,637,131 | ||||||
Phillips 66 |
10,411 | 1,469,721 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,415,895 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Kenvue, Inc. |
49,706 | 903,655 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
903,655 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 2.3% |
| |||||||
Jacobs Solutions, Inc. |
9,189 | 1,283,795 | ||||||
Leidos Holdings, Inc. |
9,512 | 1,387,611 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,671,406 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 7.3% |
| |||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.(1) |
9,355 | 1,517,474 | ||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. |
7,628 | 1,800,132 | ||||||
Lam Research Corp. |
574 | 611,224 | ||||||
Microchip Technology, Inc. |
15,822 | 1,447,713 | ||||||
Micron Technology, Inc. |
12,917 | 1,698,973 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
2,820 | 758,834 | ||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
3,153 | 628,014 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,462,364 | ||||||||
Software – 3.2% |
| |||||||
Nice Ltd., ADR(1) |
3,490 | 600,175 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
21,910 | 3,093,692 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,693,867 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Specialized REITs – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Extra Space Storage, Inc. |
5,067 | $ | 787,462 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
787,462 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 3.1% |
| |||||||
AutoNation, Inc.(1) |
5,274 | 840,570 | ||||||
AutoZone, Inc.(1) |
673 | 1,994,840 | ||||||
Ulta Beauty, Inc.(1) |
1,898 | 732,381 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,567,791 | ||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 1.6% |
| |||||||
Dell Technologies, Inc., Class C |
8,588 | 1,184,371 | ||||||
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. |
33,812 | 715,800 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,900,171 | ||||||||
Tobacco – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
20,840 | 2,111,717 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,111,717 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 1.6% |
| |||||||
United Rentals, Inc. |
2,117 | 1,369,127 | ||||||
WESCO International, Inc. |
3,072 | 486,974 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,856,101 | ||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 1.0% |
| |||||||
T-Mobile U.S., Inc. |
6,893 | 1,214,409 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,214,409 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $80,737,516) |
|
114,727,999 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,540,165, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 1,539,960 | 1,539,960 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,539,960) |
|
1,539,960 | ||||||
Total Investments – 100.0% (Cost $82,277,476) |
|
116,267,959 | ||||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.0)% |
|
(43,567 | ) | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 116,224,392 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,561,900 | $ | 1,570,873 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 114,727,999 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 114,727,999 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,539,960 | — | 1,539,960 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 114,727,999 | $ | 1,539,960 | $ | — | $ | 116,267,959 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 116,267,959 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
107,973 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
96,093 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
71,466 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
9,630 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
1,708 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
116,554,829 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
138,757 | |||
Payable for investments purchased |
69,169 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
62,077 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
24,158 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,828 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
20,150 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
330,437 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 116,224,392 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | (2,319,551 | ) | |
Distributable earnings |
118,543,943 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 116,224,392 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 82,277,476 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
5,256,542 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$22.11 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,084,897 | ||
Interest |
9,765 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(32,272 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,062,390 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
409,636 | |||
Distribution fees |
160,322 | |||
Professional fees |
30,194 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
20,588 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
20,135 | |||
Administrative fees |
19,429 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
6,266 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,903 | |||
Other expenses |
4,389 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
673,862 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(51,813 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
622,049 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
440,341 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
13,570,439 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
206 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(957,015 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(335 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
12,613,295 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 13,053,636 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 440,341 | $ | 1,310,460 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
13,570,645 | 14,662,038 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and |
(957,350 | ) | 2,184,001 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
13,053,636 | 18,156,499 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
148,578 | 15,419,105 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(34,069,621 | ) | (49,677,108 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(33,921,043 | ) | (34,258,003 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(20,867,407 | ) | (16,101,504 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
137,091,799 | 153,193,303 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 116,224,392 | $ | 137,091,799 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
6,921 | 863,101 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,592,605 | ) | (2,696,010 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,585,684 | ) | (1,832,909 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 20.04 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 22.11 | 10.33% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
17.66 | 0.16 | 2.22 | 2.38 | 20.04 | 13.48% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
18.57 | 0.18 | (1.09 | ) | (0.91 | ) | 17.66 | (4.90)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
14.30 | 0.12 | 4.15 | 4.27 | 18.57 | 29.86% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
14.13 | 0.19 | (5) | (0.02 | ) | 0.17 | 14.30 | 1.20% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
11.45 | 0.16 | 2.52 | 2.68 | 14.13 | 23.41% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 116,224 | 0.97% | (4) | 1.05% | (4) | 0.69% | (4) | 0.61% | (4) | 26% | (4) | |||||||||||
137,092 | 0.97% | 1.02% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 56% | |||||||||||||||||
153,193 | 0.97% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.00% | 33% | |||||||||||||||||
219,108 | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.71% | 0.71% | 45% | |||||||||||||||||
223,410 | 0.97% | 1.02% | 1.53% | (5) | 1.48% | (5) | 73% | |||||||||||||||
213,249 | 0.97% | 1.03% | 1.22% | 1.16% | 66% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | Reflects a special dividend paid out during the year by one of the Fund’s holdings. Had the Fund not received the special dividend, the Net Investment Income per share would have been $0.14, the Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets would have been 1.15%, and the Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets would have been 1.10%. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth of capital primarily through investment in equity securities. Current income is a secondary objective.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on
results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not
considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as
dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.65% up to $100 million, 0.60% from $100 to $300 million, 0.55% from $300 to $500 million, and 0.53% in excess of $500 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.97% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $51,813.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. (“Boston Partners”). Boston Partners is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $160,322 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $32,569,673 and $65,172,226, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions)
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP DISCIPLINED VALUE VIP FUND
adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when
the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP
Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also
15 |
considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that
the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s |
16 |
performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that |
17 |
the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher |
than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the |
18 |
1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8174
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 4 | |||
Statement of Operations | 4 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 5 | |||
Financial Highlights | 6 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 8 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
13 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
13 | |||
13 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
13 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.8% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.4% |
| |||||||
General Electric Co. |
20,116 | $ | 3,197,841 | |||||
Loar Holdings, Inc.(1) |
200 | 10,682 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,208,523 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Mobileye Global, Inc., Class A(1) |
7,090 | 199,123 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
199,123 | ||||||||
Automobiles – 0.3% |
| |||||||
BYD Co. Ltd., Class H (China) |
23,627 | 701,194 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
701,194 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Monster Beverage Corp.(1) |
27,699 | 1,383,565 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,383,565 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 4.0% |
| |||||||
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
8,506 | 2,066,958 | ||||||
Arcellx, Inc.(1) |
1,302 | 71,857 | ||||||
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
5,499 | 142,919 | ||||||
Beam Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
1,196 | 28,022 | ||||||
BioNTech SE, ADR(1) |
3,300 | 265,188 | ||||||
Blueprint Medicines Corp.(1) |
874 | 94,200 | ||||||
Cytokinetics, Inc.(1) |
4,468 | 242,076 | ||||||
Exact Sciences Corp.(1) |
29,827 | 1,260,191 | ||||||
Galapagos NV, ADR(1) |
9,009 | 223,243 | ||||||
Gamida Cell Ltd.(1)(2) |
59,800 | 1 | ||||||
Hookipa Pharma, Inc.(1) |
22,700 | 13,434 | ||||||
Immunocore Holdings PLC, ADR(1) |
3,803 | 128,884 | ||||||
Insmed, Inc.(1) |
22,734 | 1,523,178 | ||||||
Janux Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
600 | 25,134 | ||||||
Krystal Biotech, Inc.(1) |
839 | 154,074 | ||||||
Legend Biotech Corp., ADR(1) |
4,893 | 216,711 | ||||||
Moderna, Inc.(1) |
2,240 | 266,000 | ||||||
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
2,140 | 2,249,204 | ||||||
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
1,268 | 200,344 | ||||||
Vor BioPharma, Inc.(1) |
6,333 | 6,333 | ||||||
XOMA Corp.(1) |
6,280 | 148,773 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,326,724 | ||||||||
Broadline Retail – 6.3% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) |
59,142 | 11,429,192 | ||||||
MercadoLibre, Inc.(1) |
1,213 | 1,993,444 | ||||||
PDD Holdings, Inc., ADR(1) |
7,164 | 952,454 | ||||||
Savers Value Village, Inc.(1) |
16,277 | 199,230 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
14,574,320 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 0.2% |
| |||||||
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. |
814 | 227,350 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
900 | 87,471 | ||||||
MSCI, Inc. |
200 | 96,350 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
411,171 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.(1) |
11,041 | 263,328 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
263,328 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 0.0% |
| |||||||
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.(1) |
1,500 | $ | 66,840 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
66,840 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Capital One Financial Corp. |
7,033 | 973,719 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
973,719 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging – 0.1% |
| |||||||
International Paper Co. |
5,000 | 215,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
215,750 | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Duolingo, Inc.(1) |
1,185 | 247,274 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
247,274 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Eaton Corp. PLC |
8,119 | 2,545,712 | ||||||
GE Vernova, Inc.(1) |
8,815 | 1,511,861 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,057,573 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Coherent Corp.(1) |
3,500 | 253,610 | ||||||
Fabrinet(1) |
900 | 220,311 | ||||||
Flex Ltd.(1) |
95,623 | 2,819,922 | ||||||
Jabil, Inc. |
9,572 | 1,041,338 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,335,181 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 4.3% |
| |||||||
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.(1) |
6,593 | 618,028 | ||||||
Netflix, Inc.(1) |
6,575 | 4,437,336 | ||||||
Universal Music Group NV (Netherlands) |
125,999 | 3,735,027 | ||||||
Warner Music Group Corp., Class A |
39,578 | 1,213,065 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,003,456 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 4.0% |
| |||||||
Corebridge Financial, Inc. |
17,557 | 511,260 | ||||||
Fiserv, Inc.(1) |
2,819 | 420,144 | ||||||
Global Payments, Inc. |
10,410 | 1,006,647 | ||||||
Mastercard, Inc., Class A |
8,192 | 3,613,983 | ||||||
Rocket Cos., Inc., Class A(1) |
28,059 | 384,408 | ||||||
Visa, Inc., Class A |
12,917 | 3,390,325 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,326,767 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 4.0% |
| |||||||
Uber Technologies, Inc.(1) |
127,940 | 9,298,679 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,298,679 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Align Technology, Inc.(1) |
3,690 | 890,877 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
74,613 | 5,745,947 | ||||||
Glaukos Corp.(1) |
4,616 | 546,304 | ||||||
Hologic, Inc.(1) |
8,606 | 638,995 | ||||||
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.(1) |
2,031 | 163,069 | ||||||
Penumbra, Inc.(1) |
1,500 | 269,955 | ||||||
Pulmonx Corp.(1) |
3,191 | 20,231 | ||||||
RxSight, Inc.(1) |
1,117 | 67,210 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,342,588 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
HealthEquity, Inc.(1) |
23,812 | $ | 2,052,594 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
2,052,594 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Airbnb, Inc., Class A(1) |
17,761 | 2,693,100 | ||||||
Domino’s Pizza, Inc. |
2,514 | 1,298,054 | ||||||
Kura Sushi USA, Inc., Class A(1) |
2,664 | 168,072 | ||||||
Trip.com Group Ltd., ADR(1) |
3,734 | 175,498 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,334,724 | ||||||||
Household Durables – 0.0% |
| |||||||
TopBuild Corp.(1) |
300 | 115,581 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
115,581 | ||||||||
Insurance – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Arthur J Gallagher & Co. |
6,270 | 1,625,874 | ||||||
Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., Class A(1) |
15,127 | 536,554 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,162,428 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 6.5% |
| |||||||
Alphabet, Inc., Class A |
63,394 | 11,547,217 | ||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc., Class A |
6,949 | 3,503,825 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
15,051,042 | ||||||||
IT Services – 1.6% |
| |||||||
Gartner, Inc.(1) |
1,831 | 822,229 | ||||||
MongoDB, Inc.(1) |
11,201 | 2,799,802 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,622,031 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 2.5% |
| |||||||
Bio-Techne Corp. |
5,354 | 383,614 | ||||||
Bruker Corp. |
22,945 | 1,464,120 | ||||||
Chemometec AS (Denmark) |
2,531 | 110,152 | ||||||
Codexis, Inc.(1) |
30,200 | 93,620 | ||||||
Danaher Corp. |
6,962 | 1,739,456 | ||||||
MaxCyte, Inc.(1) |
24,276 | 95,162 | ||||||
Repligen Corp.(1) |
843 | 106,269 | ||||||
Sartorius Stedim Biotech (France) |
1,454 | 237,575 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
2,679 | 1,481,487 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,711,455 | ||||||||
Machinery – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Chart Industries, Inc.(1) |
1,601 | 231,088 | ||||||
Energy Recovery, Inc.(1) |
5,664 | 75,275 | ||||||
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
24,623 | 2,236,753 | ||||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
4,273 | 675,348 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,218,464 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 2.4% |
| |||||||
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. |
10,100 | 359,560 | ||||||
Cheniere Energy, Inc. |
11,187 | 1,955,823 | ||||||
Range Resources Corp. |
31,564 | 1,058,341 | ||||||
Reliance Industries Ltd., GDR(3) |
29,752 | 2,219,499 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,593,223 | ||||||||
Personal Care Products – 0.0% |
| |||||||
Puig Brands SA, Class B (Spain)(1) |
3,511 | 98,139 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
98,139 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.7% |
| |||||||
Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
4,400 | $ | 4,840 | |||||
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Japan) |
12,659 | 451,886 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
7,194 | 6,513,304 | ||||||
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., ADR(1) |
79,811 | 1,296,929 | ||||||
UCB SA (Belgium) |
1,770 | 262,309 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8,529,268 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 3.0% |
| |||||||
Equifax, Inc. |
11,258 | 2,729,615 | ||||||
KBR, Inc. |
40,900 | 2,623,326 | ||||||
RELX PLC, ADR |
21,793 | 999,863 | ||||||
UL Solutions, Inc., Class A |
14,196 | 598,929 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,951,733 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 13.4% |
| |||||||
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.(1) |
32,700 | 923,448 | ||||||
ASML Holding NV |
3,231 | 3,304,441 | ||||||
Astera Labs, Inc.(1) |
400 | 24,204 | ||||||
BE Semiconductor Industries NV (Netherlands) |
13,675 | 2,284,813 | ||||||
Micron Technology, Inc. |
11,235 | 1,477,740 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. |
87,735 | 10,838,782 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
9,600 | 2,583,264 | ||||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
7,489 | 1,491,659 | ||||||
SiTime Corp.(1) |
12,484 | 1,552,760 | ||||||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd., ADR |
30,356 | 5,276,176 | ||||||
Universal Display Corp. |
5,977 | 1,256,664 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
31,013,951 | ||||||||
Software – 15.2% |
| |||||||
Autodesk, Inc.(1) |
994 | 245,965 | ||||||
HubSpot, Inc.(1) |
3,485 | 2,055,418 | ||||||
Manhattan Associates, Inc.(1) |
5,765 | 1,422,110 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. |
65,859 | 29,435,680 | ||||||
Nice Ltd., ADR(1) |
4,779 | 821,845 | ||||||
ServiceNow, Inc.(1) |
1,623 | 1,276,766 | ||||||
Volue ASA (Norway)(1) |
25,743 | 72,196 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
35,329,980 | ||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals – 12.2% |
| |||||||
Apple, Inc. |
133,854 | 28,192,329 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
28,192,329 | ||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 0.3% |
| |||||||
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (France) |
996 | 764,879 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
764,879 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Ferguson PLC (United Kingdom) |
9,390 | 1,804,532 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,804,532 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $154,115,514) |
|
231,482,128 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,013,235, due 7/1/2024(4) |
$ | 1,013,100 | $ | 1,013,100 | ||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,013,100) |
|
1,013,100 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value | |||||
Total Investments – 100.2% (Cost $155,128,614) |
$ | 232,495,228 | ||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.2)% | (492,353 | ) | ||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 232,002,875 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | Fair valued security. See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements. |
(3) | Security that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of the security amounted to $2,219,499, representing 1.0% of net assets. This security has been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(4) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,027,500 | $ | 1,033,368 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
GDR — Global Depositary Receipt
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 221,057,564 | $ | 10,424,563 | * | $ | 1 | $ | 231,482,128 | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,013,100 | — | 1,013,100 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 221,057,564 | $ | 11,437,663 | $ | 1 | $ | 232,495,228 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Notes to Schedule of Investments). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 232,495,228 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
291,101 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
55,117 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
7,326 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
3,312 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
232,852,084 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
358,645 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
282,788 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
112,518 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
47,552 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
13,278 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,148 | |||
Foreign currency overdraft |
178 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
32,102 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
849,209 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 232,002,875 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | (36,479,623 | ) | |
Distributable earnings |
268,482,498 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 232,002,875 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 155,128,614 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency Overdraft, at Cost |
$ | 178 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
7,365,659 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$31.50 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 599,101 | ||
Interest |
4,651 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(25,400 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
578,352 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
704,395 | |||
Distribution fees |
298,040 | |||
Professional fees |
42,779 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
36,076 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
27,904 | |||
Administrative fees |
26,092 | |||
Shareholder reports |
8,572 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,511 | |||
Other expenses |
6,847 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,158,216 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
(579,864 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
51,003,175 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
141 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
557,954 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(31 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
51,561,239 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 50,981,375 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | (579,864 | ) | $ | (809,720 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
51,003,316 | 48,476,880 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
557,923 | 47,904,081 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
50,981,375 | 95,571,241 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
115,336 | 902,641 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(66,012,205 | ) | (103,158,755 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(65,896,869 | ) | (102,256,114 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(14,915,494 | ) | (6,684,873 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
246,918,369 | 253,603,242 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 232,002,875 | $ | 246,918,369 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
4,071 | 43,185 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(2,320,667 | ) | (4,737,816 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(2,316,596 | ) | (4,694,631 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 25.50 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 6.07 | $ | 6.00 | $ | 31.50 | 23.53% | (4) | |||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
17.64 | (0.07 | ) | 7.93 | 7.86 | 25.50 | 44.56% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
26.23 | (0.05 | ) | (8.54 | ) | (8.59 | ) | 17.64 | (32.75)% | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
21.57 | (0.08 | ) | 4.74 | 4.66 | 26.23 | 21.60% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
16.50 | (0.03 | ) | 5.10 | 5.07 | 21.57 | 30.73% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
12.51 | 0.00 | (5) | 3.99 | 3.99 | 16.50 | 31.89% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 232,003 | 0.97% | (4) | 0.97% | (4) | (0.48)% | (4) | (0.48)% | (4) | 25% | (4) | |||||||||||
246,918 | 0.96% | 0.96% | (0.31)% | (0.31)% | 98% | |||||||||||||||||
253,603 | 0.93% | 0.93% | (0.25)% | (0.25)% | 31% | |||||||||||||||||
348,302 | 0.91% | 0.91% | (0.34)% | (0.34)% | 21% | |||||||||||||||||
339,890 | 1.00% | 1.00% | (0.18)% | (0.18)% | 20% | |||||||||||||||||
349,921 | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 44% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income/(Loss) to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers, expense limitations, and recoupments, if any. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | Rounds to $0.00 per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified
within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had one security classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/
discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.62% up to $100 million, 0.57% from $100 to $300 million, 0.52% from $300 to $500 million, and 0.50% in excess of $500 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.01% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees, and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue did not waive any fees or pay any Fund expenses.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with FIAM LLC (“FIAM”). FIAM is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $298,040 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $59,968,362 and $127,166,544, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include,
but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities
of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN LARGE CAP FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH VIP FUND
effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of
the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as
the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees
14 |
recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the
15 |
reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the
potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s |
16 |
performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that |
17 |
the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance |
was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8175
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies | ||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 4 | |||
Statement of Operations | 4 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 5 | |||
Financial Highlights | 6 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 8 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
13 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
13 | |||
13 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
13 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 99.1% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 2.7% |
| |||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
16,175 | $ | 3,632,581 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
3,632,581 | ||||||||
Automobile Components – 1.1% | ||||||||
Aptiv PLC(1) |
20,700 | 1,457,694 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,457,694 | ||||||||
Banks – 3.0% | ||||||||
Fifth Third Bancorp |
74,063 | 2,702,559 | ||||||
Regions Financial Corp. |
65,677 | 1,316,167 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,018,726 | ||||||||
Beverages – 3.0% | ||||||||
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. |
120,591 | 4,027,739 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,027,739 | ||||||||
Building Products – 3.1% | ||||||||
Carlisle Cos., Inc. |
10,010 | 4,056,152 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,056,152 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 2.4% | ||||||||
Jefferies Financial Group, Inc. |
63,505 | 3,160,009 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,160,009 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 2.4% | ||||||||
Ashland, Inc. |
9,238 | 872,899 | ||||||
Huntsman Corp. |
60,486 | 1,377,266 | ||||||
RPM International, Inc. |
8,620 | 928,201 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,178,366 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 2.8% |
|
|||||||
Republic Services, Inc. |
19,265 | 3,743,960 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,743,960 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 2.4% | ||||||||
API Group Corp.(1) |
39,829 | 1,498,765 | ||||||
MasTec, Inc.(1) |
15,872 | 1,698,146 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,196,911 | ||||||||
Construction Materials – 2.7% | ||||||||
Vulcan Materials Co. |
14,517 | 3,610,088 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,610,088 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging – 2.9% | ||||||||
AptarGroup, Inc. |
7,906 | 1,113,244 | ||||||
Graphic Packaging Holding Co. |
106,186 | 2,783,135 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,896,379 | ||||||||
Distributors – 2.4% | ||||||||
LKQ Corp. |
76,991 | 3,202,056 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,202,056 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 4.5% | ||||||||
American Electric Power Co., Inc. |
35,442 | 3,109,681 | ||||||
FirstEnergy Corp. |
75,777 | 2,899,986 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,009,667 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 1.5% |
|
|||||||
Baker Hughes Co. |
40,444 | 1,422,416 | ||||||
NOV, Inc. |
27,517 | 523,098 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,945,514 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Financial Services – 2.1% | ||||||||
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.(1) |
26,329 | $ | 2,725,051 | |||||
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd.(1)(2)(3) |
125,172 | 0 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,725,051 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 1.2% | ||||||||
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. |
32,942 | 1,644,465 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,644,465 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 3.4% |
|
|||||||
Alcon, Inc. |
23,426 | 2,086,788 | ||||||
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. |
22,691 | 2,462,654 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,549,442 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 3.2% |
|
|||||||
Humana, Inc. |
4,188 | 1,564,846 | ||||||
Labcorp Holdings, Inc. |
13,344 | 2,715,638 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,280,484 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 1.3% |
|
|||||||
Wendy’s Co. |
39,142 | 663,849 | ||||||
Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
32,392 | 998,969 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,662,818 | ||||||||
Household Products – 4.3% | ||||||||
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. |
24,387 | 2,528,444 | ||||||
Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. |
112,282 | 3,141,650 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,670,094 | ||||||||
Insurance – 10.3% | ||||||||
Allstate Corp. |
21,560 | 3,442,269 | ||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.(1) |
43,027 | 4,340,994 | ||||||
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. |
8,381 | 592,118 | ||||||
Brown & Brown, Inc. |
34,924 | 3,122,555 | ||||||
Loews Corp. |
27,865 | 2,082,630 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
13,580,566 | ||||||||
IT Services – 1.0% | ||||||||
Amdocs Ltd. |
16,902 | 1,333,906 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,333,906 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 2.3% |
|
|||||||
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.(1) |
11,246 | 2,323,199 | ||||||
Qiagen NV(1) |
17,912 | 736,004 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,059,203 | ||||||||
Machinery – 2.2% | ||||||||
Donaldson Co., Inc. |
12,075 | 864,087 | ||||||
Gates Industrial Corp. PLC(1) |
104,549 | 1,652,920 | ||||||
Toro Co. |
4,300 | 402,093 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,919,100 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 1.6% | ||||||||
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. |
44,509 | 2,163,137 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,163,137 | ||||||||
Mortgage REITs – 2.1% | ||||||||
Annaly Capital Management, Inc. |
146,744 | 2,796,941 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,796,941 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Office REITs – 1.8% | ||||||||
BXP, Inc. |
37,538 | $ | 2,310,839 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
2,310,839 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 4.3% |
| |||||||
Devon Energy Corp. |
23,997 | 1,137,458 | ||||||
EOG Resources, Inc. |
16,280 | 2,049,164 | ||||||
Targa Resources Corp. |
6,621 | 852,652 | ||||||
Valero Energy Corp. |
10,850 | 1,700,846 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,740,120 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 3.9% | ||||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. |
143,197 | 1,326,004 | ||||||
Jacobs Solutions, Inc. |
27,078 | 3,783,068 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,109,072 | ||||||||
Real Estate Management & Development – 3.3% |
| |||||||
CBRE Group, Inc., Class A(1) |
49,340 | 4,396,687 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,396,687 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 3.3% |
| |||||||
ON Semiconductor Corp.(1) |
20,960 | 1,436,808 | ||||||
Teradyne, Inc. |
19,652 | 2,914,195 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,351,003 | ||||||||
Software – 0.3% | ||||||||
Informatica, Inc., Class A(1) |
10,526 | 325,043 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
325,043 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 4.0% | ||||||||
CubeSmart |
36,625 | 1,654,351 | ||||||
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. |
45,902 | 2,075,230 | ||||||
Weyerhaeuser Co. |
54,906 | 1,558,781 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,288,362 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 0.8% | ||||||||
Foot Locker, Inc. |
24,556 | 611,935 | ||||||
RH(1) |
2,053 | 501,836 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,113,771 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 3.7% |
|
|||||||
AerCap Holdings NV |
51,877 | 4,834,936 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,834,936 | ||||||||
Water Utilities – 1.8% | ||||||||
American Water Works Co., Inc. |
18,142 | 2,343,221 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,343,221 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $95,372,571) |
|
131,334,103 | ||||||
Warrants – 0.0% | ||||||||
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd.(1)(2) |
14,344 | 0 | ||||||
Total Warrants (Cost $0) |
|
0 | ||||||
Rights – 0.0% | ||||||||
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd.(1)(2) |
38,465 | 0 | ||||||
Total Rights (Cost $0) |
|
0 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.9% |
| |||||||||||||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $1,257,881, due 7/1/2024(4) |
$ | 1,257,713 | $ | 1,257,713 | ||||||||||||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $1,257,713) |
|
1,257,713 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Investments – 100.0% (Cost $96,630,284) |
|
132,591,816 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.0)% |
|
(33,955 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 132,557,861 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents securities deemed illiquid by the investment adviser. |
Security | Shares | Cost | Value | Acquisition Date |
% of Fund’s Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. | 125,172 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | 7/26/2022 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. | 14,344 | 0 | 0 | 7/26/2022 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. | 38,465 | 0 | 0 | 12/19/2023 | 0.00 |
(3) | Escrow interests represent beneficial interests in bankruptcy reorganizations or liquidation proceedings and may be subject to resale, redemption or transferability restrictions. The amount and timing of future payments, if any, cannot be predicted with certainty. |
(4) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 1,275,600 | $ | 1,282,895 |
Legend:
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 131,334,103 | $ | 0 | $ | — | $ | 131,334,103 | ||||||||
Warrants | — | 0 | — | 0 | ||||||||||||
Rights | — | 0 | — | 0 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 1,257,713 | — | 1,257,713 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 131,334,103 | $ | 1,257,713 | $ | — | $ | 132,591,816 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 132,591,816 | ||
Dividends/interest receivable |
253,720 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
158,882 | |||
Foreign tax reclaims receivable |
5,623 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
4,321 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
1,762 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
133,016,124 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
212,920 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
92,939 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
78,013 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
27,580 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
5,220 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,820 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
25,473 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
458,263 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 132,557,861 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | (1,039,372 | ) | |
Distributable earnings |
133,597,233 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 132,557,861 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 96,630,284 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
6,503,713 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$20.38 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,453,124 | ||
Interest |
10,636 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(962 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,462,798 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
510,151 | |||
Distribution fees |
181,078 | |||
Professional fees |
32,061 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
22,499 | |||
Administrative fees |
20,220 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
18,561 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,131 | |||
Shareholder reports |
3,234 | |||
Other expenses |
4,733 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
799,668 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(17,411 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
782,257 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
680,541 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
11,435,330 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(2,838,456 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments |
8,596,874 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 9,277,415 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 680,541 | $ | 1,576,739 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
11,435,330 | 10,762,512 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(2,838,456 | ) | 1,872,796 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
9,277,415 | 14,212,047 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
1,558,005 | 11,958,943 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(32,083,363 | ) | (46,224,201 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(30,525,358 | ) | (34,265,258 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(21,247,943 | ) | (20,053,211 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
153,805,804 | 173,859,015 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 132,557,861 | $ | 153,805,804 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
81,752 | 680,437 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(1,605,939 | ) | (2,553,606 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,524,187 | ) | (1,873,169 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund's financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 19.16 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 20.38 | 6.37% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
17.56 | 0.17 | 1.43 | 1.60 | 19.16 | 9.11% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
18.45 | 0.14 | (1.03 | ) | (0.89 | ) | 17.56 | (4.82)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
14.32 | 0.05 | 4.08 | 4.13 | 18.45 | 28.84% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
13.93 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 14.32 | 2.80% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
10.28 | 0.10 | 3.55 | 3.65 | 13.93 | 35.51% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 132,558 | 1.08% | (4) | 1.10% | (4) | 0.94% | (4) | 0.92% | (4) | 7% | (4) | |||||||||||
153,806 | 1.08% | 1.08% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 23% | |||||||||||||||||
173,859 | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 24% | |||||||||||||||||
237,063 | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.32% | 0.32% | 31% | |||||||||||||||||
244,930 | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.70% | 0.65% | 56% | |||||||||||||||||
235,342 | 1.00% | 1.10% | 0.83% | 0.73% | 37% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.‘s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers, expense limitations, and recoupments, if any. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing
vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not
considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate
investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.72% up to $100 million, 0.67% from $100 to $300 million, 0.62% from $300 to $500 million, and 0.60% in excess of $500 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.08% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $17,411.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Allspring Global Investments, LLC (“Allspring”). Allspring is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $181,078 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $10,114,685 and $41,076,711, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP RELATIVE VALUE VIP FUND
Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund held three illiquid securities.
f. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit
Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In
addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also
15 |
considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that
the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
16 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the |
Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
17 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the |
18 |
1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8176
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 4 | |||
Statement of Operations | 4 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 5 | |||
Financial Highlights | 6 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 8 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
13 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
13 | |||
13 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
13 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 100.2% |
| |||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.5% |
| |||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
4,268 | $ | 958,508 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
958,508 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 2.9% |
| |||||||
Argenx SE, ADR(1) |
1,143 | 491,536 | ||||||
Ascendis Pharma AS, ADR(1) |
3,044 | 415,141 | ||||||
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
2,860 | 451,880 | ||||||
Vaxcyte, Inc.(1) |
5,514 | 416,362 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,774,919 | ||||||||
Capital Markets – 2.9% |
| |||||||
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. |
1,913 | 325,325 | ||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
7,511 | 553,485 | ||||||
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. |
3,373 | 942,079 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,820,889 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Corteva, Inc. |
14,780 | 797,233 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
797,233 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies – 5.6% |
| |||||||
Cimpress PLC(1) |
7,375 | 646,124 | ||||||
Clean Harbors, Inc.(1) |
2,744 | 620,556 | ||||||
RB Global, Inc. |
9,229 | 704,726 | ||||||
Rentokil Initial PLC (United Kingdom) |
39,682 | 231,378 | ||||||
Rentokil Initial PLC, ADR |
19,734 | 585,113 | ||||||
Veralto Corp. |
6,917 | 660,366 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,448,263 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 0.8% |
| |||||||
API Group Corp.(1) |
13,639 | 513,236 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
513,236 | ||||||||
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Dollar Tree, Inc.(1) |
3,860 | 412,132 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
412,132 | ||||||||
Electric Utilities – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Alliant Energy Corp. |
22,733 | 1,157,110 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,157,110 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 1.9% |
| |||||||
Sensata Technologies Holding PLC |
32,098 | 1,200,144 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,200,144 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 5.1% |
| |||||||
Flex Ltd.(1) |
50,556 | 1,490,897 | ||||||
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
2,858 | 429,929 | ||||||
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.(1) |
3,231 | 1,253,563 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,174,389 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One, Class A(1) |
2,177 | 139,829 | ||||||
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One, Class C(1) |
16,735 | 1,202,242 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,342,071 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Financial Services – 4.0% |
| |||||||
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
7,024 | $ | 529,329 | |||||
Global Payments, Inc. |
4,005 | 387,283 | ||||||
WEX, Inc.(1) |
8,873 | 1,571,763 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,488,375 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 3.4% |
| |||||||
JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc. |
8,088 | 1,294,080 | ||||||
TFI International, Inc. |
5,745 | 833,944 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,128,024 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 8.8% |
| |||||||
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) |
31,095 | 2,394,626 | ||||||
Cooper Cos., Inc. |
6,333 | 552,871 | ||||||
Dentsply Sirona, Inc. |
13,868 | 345,452 | ||||||
ICU Medical, Inc.(1) |
4,073 | 483,668 | ||||||
Teleflex, Inc. |
8,136 | 1,711,245 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,487,862 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.5% |
| |||||||
Aramark |
25,603 | 871,014 | ||||||
DoorDash, Inc., Class A(1) |
3,537 | 384,755 | ||||||
Entain PLC (United Kingdom) |
37,229 | 294,748 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,550,517 | ||||||||
Insurance – 5.8% |
| |||||||
Intact Financial Corp. (Canada) |
10,387 | 1,731,179 | ||||||
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. |
7,179 | 415,736 | ||||||
W.R. Berkley Corp. |
18,879 | 1,483,512 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,630,427 | ||||||||
Interactive Media & Services – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Ziff Davis, Inc.(1) |
4,034 | 222,072 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
222,072 | ||||||||
IT Services – 6.1% |
| |||||||
Amdocs Ltd. |
15,241 | 1,202,820 | ||||||
GoDaddy, Inc., Class A(1) |
18,450 | 2,577,649 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,780,469 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 4.8% |
| |||||||
Avantor, Inc.(1) |
33,505 | 710,306 | ||||||
Illumina, Inc.(1) |
2,375 | 247,903 | ||||||
Revvity, Inc. |
13,255 | 1,389,919 | ||||||
Waters Corp.(1) |
2,192 | 635,943 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,984,071 | ||||||||
Machinery – 4.5% |
| |||||||
Fortive Corp. |
12,248 | 907,577 | ||||||
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
9,142 | 830,459 | ||||||
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
6,704 | 1,059,567 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,797,603 | ||||||||
Multi-Utilities – 2.4% |
| |||||||
Ameren Corp. |
10,824 | 769,695 | ||||||
DTE Energy Co. |
6,258 | 694,700 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,464,395 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Passenger Airlines – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Ryanair Holdings PLC, ADR |
7,261 | $ | 845,471 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
845,471 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Catalent, Inc.(1) |
4,764 | 267,880 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
267,880 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 6.5% |
| |||||||
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. |
5,541 | 1,091,577 | ||||||
Dayforce, Inc.(1) |
11,586 | 574,665 | ||||||
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. |
27,525 | 1,724,992 | ||||||
TransUnion |
6,417 | 475,885 | ||||||
UL Solutions, Inc., Class A |
3,244 | 136,864 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,003,983 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 7.7% |
| |||||||
KLA Corp. |
974 | 803,073 | ||||||
Lam Research Corp. |
404 | 430,199 | ||||||
Microchip Technology, Inc. |
7,332 | 670,878 | ||||||
NXP Semiconductors NV |
5,946 | 1,600,009 | ||||||
ON Semiconductor Corp.(1) |
18,553 | 1,271,808 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,775,967 | ||||||||
Software – 7.0% |
| |||||||
AppLovin Corp., Class A(1) |
3,885 | 323,310 | ||||||
Constellation Software, Inc. (Canada) |
1,106 | 3,186,813 | ||||||
Dynatrace, Inc.(1) |
7,445 | 333,089 | ||||||
Nice Ltd., ADR(1) |
1,288 | 221,497 | ||||||
Topicus.com, Inc. (Canada) |
2,992 | 255,886 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,320,595 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Lamar Advertising Co., Class A |
7,245 | 865,995 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
865,995 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 2.7% |
| |||||||
Burlington Stores, Inc.(1) |
2,300 | 552,000 | ||||||
CarMax, Inc.(1) |
11,370 | 833,876 | ||||||
Wayfair, Inc., Class A(1) |
5,336 | 281,367 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,667,243 | ||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Gildan Activewear, Inc. |
24,324 | 922,366 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
922,366 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Ferguson PLC |
6,774 | 1,311,785 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,311,785 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $44,446,830) |
|
62,113,994 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value |
||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $113,130, due 7/1/2024(2) |
$ | 113,115 | $ | 113,115 | ||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $113,115) |
|
113,115 | ||||||
Total Investments – 100.4% (Cost $44,559,945) |
|
62,227,109 | ||||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.4)% |
|
(251,277 | ) | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 61,975,832 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 114,800 | $ | 115,533 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 61,587,868 | $ | 526,126 | * | $ | — | $ | 62,113,994 | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 113,115 | — | 113,115 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 61,587,868 | $ | 639,241 | $ | — | $ | 62,227,109 |
* | Consists of certain foreign securities whose values were determined by a pricing service using pricing models (See Note 2a in Notes to Financial Statements). These investments in securities were classified as Level 2 rather than Level 1. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 62,227,109 | ||
Foreign currency, at value |
7,809 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
34,695 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
24,824 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
11,305 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
891 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
62,306,633 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
165,564 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
80,433 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
41,328 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
12,915 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
12,095 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,298 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
319 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
16,849 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
330,801 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 61,975,832 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | (13,528,323 | ) | |
Distributable earnings |
75,504,155 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 61,975,832 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 44,559,945 | ||
|
|
|||
Foreign Currency, at Cost |
$ | 7,801 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
2,609,310 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$23.75 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 316,964 | ||
Interest |
4,661 | |||
Withholding taxes on foreign dividends |
(9,163 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
312,462 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
277,455 | |||
Distribution fees |
86,705 | |||
Professional fees |
23,340 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
20,336 | |||
Administrative fees |
15,044 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
11,453 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
5,944 | |||
Shareholder reports |
2,594 | |||
Other expenses |
2,406 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
445,277 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(67,245 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
378,032 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
(65,570 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
6,649,301 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions |
(331 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(2,772,013 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
192 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Gain on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions |
3,877,149 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 3,811,579 | ||
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | (65,570 | ) | $ | (91,156 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions |
6,648,970 | 5,905,684 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies |
(2,771,821 | ) | 7,980,691 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
3,811,579 | 13,795,219 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
496,475 | 8,918,254 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(20,302,905 | ) | (33,162,416 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(19,806,430 | ) | (24,244,162 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(15,994,851 | ) | (10,448,943 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
77,970,683 | 88,419,626 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 61,975,832 | $ | 77,970,683 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
21,121 | 444,103 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(864,690 | ) | (1,572,013 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(843,569 | ) | (1,127,910 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Loss (1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 22.58 | $ | (0.02) | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 23.75 | 5.18% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
19.30 | (0.02) | (5) | 3.30 | 3.28 | 22.58 | 16.99% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
23.32 | (0.06) | (3.96 | ) | (4.02 | ) | 19.30 | (17.24)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
19.91 | (0.05) | 3.46 | 3.41 | 23.32 | 17.13% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
16.71 | (0.04) | 3.24 | 3.20 | 19.91 | 19.15% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/19 |
12.27 | (0.01) | 4.45 | 4.44 | 16.71 | 36.19% |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 61,976 | 1.09% | (4) | 1.28% | (4) | (0.19)% | (4) | (0.38)% | (4) | 6% | (4) | |||||||||||
77,971 | 1.09% | 1.24% | (0.11)% | (5) | (0.26)% | (5) | 19% | |||||||||||||||
88,420 | 1.10% | 1.21% | (0.29)% | (0.40)% | 16% | |||||||||||||||||
123,102 | 1.10% | 1.17% | (0.24)% | (0.31)% | 10% | |||||||||||||||||
130,558 | 1.10% | 1.23% | (0.25)% | (0.38)% | 19% | |||||||||||||||||
125,058 | 1.10% | 1.26% | (0.07)% | (0.23)% | 10% |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. |
(5) | Reflects a special dividend paid out during the year by one of the Fund’s holdings. Had the Fund not received the special dividend, the Net Investment Loss per share would have been $(0.04), the Net Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets would have been (0.17)%, and the Gross Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets would have been (0.32)%. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on September 1, 2016. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of
premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.80% up to $100 million, 0.75% from $100 to $300 million, and 0.73% in excess of $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.09% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $67,245.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with Janus Henderson Investors US LLC (“Janus”). Janus is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $86,705 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $4,128,057 and $23,873,227, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include,
but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MID CAP TRADITIONAL GROWTH VIP FUND
effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as
the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
12 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
13 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including investment, legal and administrative
14 |
capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
15 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in
light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in |
16 |
the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
17 |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the |
3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
18 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
19 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB8177
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 10 | |||
Statement of Operations | 10 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 11 | |||
Financial Highlights | 12 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 14 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
21 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
21 | |||
21 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
21 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 17.6% |
| |||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. |
$ | 3,500,767 | $ | 2,863,455 | ||||
3.50% due 6/1/2052 |
2,851,866 | 2,524,500 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2037 |
377,321 | 362,684 | ||||||
4.00% due 6/1/2052 |
3,964,548 | 3,627,711 | ||||||
4.50% due 9/1/2052 |
454,067 | 428,277 | ||||||
5.00% due 12/1/2052 |
996,981 | 964,601 | ||||||
5.50% due 9/1/2053 |
2,103,712 | 2,077,817 | ||||||
6.00% due 10/1/2053 |
2,150,902 | 2,156,039 | ||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association |
1,163,846 | 951,969 | ||||||
3.00% due 7/1/2051 |
1,703,296 | 1,448,224 | ||||||
3.00% due 3/1/2052 |
3,778,370 | 3,214,463 | ||||||
3.00% due 5/1/2052 |
2,053,170 | 1,747,845 | ||||||
3.50% due 6/1/2052 |
4,635,521 | 4,103,408 | ||||||
3.50% due 10/1/2052 |
1,852,866 | 1,639,745 | ||||||
3.50% due 11/1/2052 |
1,764,962 | 1,561,679 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2052 |
2,367,453 | 2,166,309 | ||||||
4.00% due 12/1/2052 |
1,206,686 | 1,104,163 | ||||||
4.50% due 10/1/2053 |
2,346,582 | 2,211,389 | ||||||
5.00% due 2/1/2053 |
345,330 | 333,901 | ||||||
6.00% due 9/1/2053 |
332,954 | 333,782 | ||||||
Total Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $36,868,685) |
|
35,821,961 | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities – 20.1% |
| |||||||
AIMCO CLO |
1,800,000 | 1,793,700 | ||||||
Allegro CLO VI Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 998,700 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 17 Ltd. |
1,500,000 | 1,498,950 | ||||||
Ares XXXIV CLO Ltd. |
300,000 | 300,150 | ||||||
Barings CLO Ltd. |
1,350,000 | 1,351,025 | ||||||
Battalion CLO X Ltd. |
1,500,000 | 1,499,661 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Battery Park CLO II Ltd. |
$ | 1,800,000 | $ | 1,806,660 | ||||
BlueMountain CLO Ltd. |
600,000 | 599,460 | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust |
1,250,000 | 1,220,660 | ||||||
Cathedral Lake VI Ltd. |
1,400,000 | 1,402,166 | ||||||
CIFC Funding Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,198,920 | ||||||
DB Master Finance LLC |
926,250 | 814,165 | ||||||
Dryden 80 CLO Ltd. |
1,700,000 | 1,697,790 | ||||||
Elmwood CLO IX Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 997,000 | ||||||
Greywolf CLO II Ltd. |
2,400,000 | 2,348,333 | ||||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust |
64,569 | 64,434 | ||||||
ICG U.S. CLO Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 1,002,343 | ||||||
Series 2022-1A, Class A1 |
1,300,000 | 1,299,480 | ||||||
KKR CLO 38 Ltd. |
1,500,000 | 1,499,652 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Madison Park Funding XXIII Ltd. |
$ | 1,150,000 | $ | 1,149,310 | ||||
Marble Point CLO XVIII Ltd. |
1,500,000 | 1,498,350 | ||||||
Midocean Credit CLO VIII |
900,000 | 900,360 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman CLO XVII Ltd. |
1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman Loan Advisers CLO 40 Ltd. |
1,400,000 | 1,402,100 | ||||||
NextGear Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
1,000,000 | 996,752 | ||||||
Octagon Investment Partners 50 Ltd. |
400,000 | 390,800 | ||||||
OHA Credit Funding 2 Ltd. |
1,800,000 | 1,795,860 | ||||||
Oscar U.S. Funding XV LLC |
700,000 | 702,469 | ||||||
RRX 6 Ltd. |
1,300,000 | 1,299,350 | ||||||
TCW CLO Ltd. |
1,500,000 | 1,500,450 | ||||||
TIAA CLO IV Ltd. |
1,520,000 | 1,518,632 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Series 2018-1A, Class A2R |
$ | 1,520,000 | $ | 1,520,000 | ||||
Trinitas CLO XVI Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,199,160 | ||||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust |
174,055 | 173,739 | ||||||
Total Asset–Backed Securities (Cost $40,738,462) |
|
40,840,581 | ||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes – 28.9% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Neptune Bidco U.S., Inc. |
550,000 | 526,592 | ||||||
Outfront Media Capital LLC/Outfront Media Capital Corp. |
500,000 | 455,535 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
982,127 | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Bombardier, Inc. |
247,000 | 247,773 | ||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
300,000 | 297,804 | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
800,000 | 821,056 | ||||||
6.10% due 3/15/2034 |
500,000 | 526,500 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,893,133 | ||||||||
Apparel – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Tapestry, Inc. |
500,000 | 518,775 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
518,775 | ||||||||
Auto Manufacturers – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Hyundai Capital America |
1,000,000 | 995,370 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
995,370 | ||||||||
Auto Parts & Equipment – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Adient Global Holdings Ltd. |
1,050,000 | 1,093,837 | ||||||
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. |
800,000 | 732,608 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,826,445 | ||||||||
Beverages – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc. |
300,000 | 281,247 | ||||||
PepsiCo, Inc. |
1,600,000 | 1,493,728 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,774,975 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS – GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Biotechnology – 0.0% |
| |||||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
$ | 100,000 | $ | 99,820 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
99,820 | ||||||||
Building Materials – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Carrier Global Corp. |
200,000 | 154,878 | ||||||
CRH America Finance, Inc. |
700,000 | 693,105 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
847,983 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Nutrien Ltd. |
400,000 | 394,292 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
394,292 | ||||||||
Commercial Banks – 5.9% |
| |||||||
AIB Group PLC |
400,000 | 397,484 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
500,000 | 411,570 | ||||||
4.271% (4.271% fixed rate until 7/23/2028; 3 mo. USD Term |
1,700,000 | 1,637,644 | ||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
600,000 | 597,696 | ||||||
Comerica, Inc. |
700,000 | 689,857 | ||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
1,900,000 | 1,753,244 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
600,000 | 578,508 | ||||||
5.04% (5.04% fixed rate until 1/23/2027; 1 day USD |
300,000 | 298,461 | ||||||
5.581% (5.581% fixed rate until 4/22/2029; 1 day USD |
500,000 | 507,920 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC |
$ | 800,000 | $ | 752,568 | ||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. |
700,000 | 698,320 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
600,000 | 490,836 | ||||||
5.173% (5.173% fixed rate until 1/16/2029; 1 day USD |
600,000 | 598,194 | ||||||
NatWest Group PLC |
900,000 | 911,466 | ||||||
Truist Bank |
500,000 | 489,765 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
1,400,000 | 1,241,226 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
12,054,759 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc. |
800,000 | 732,608 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
732,608 | ||||||||
Cosmetics & Personal Care – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. |
300,000 | 289,671 | ||||||
Haleon U.S. Capital LLC |
500,000 | 447,635 | ||||||
Kenvue, Inc. |
600,000 | 593,250 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,330,556 | ||||||||
Diversified Financial Services – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
500,000 | 520,730 | ||||||
Jefferies Financial Group, Inc. |
400,000 | 405,368 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
926,098 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Electric – 1.8% |
| |||||||
DTE Energy Co. |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,014,560 | ||||
Public Service Co. of Colorado |
200,000 | 197,700 | ||||||
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. |
100,000 | 98,519 | ||||||
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. |
700,000 | 694,260 | ||||||
Vistra Operations Co. LLC |
400,000 | 400,440 | ||||||
Wisconsin Public Service Corp. |
100,000 | 61,753 | ||||||
Xcel Energy, Inc. |
1,300,000 | 1,280,760 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,747,992 | ||||||||
Electronics – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
400,000 | 340,960 | ||||||
4.875% due 9/1/2029 |
800,000 | 801,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,141,960 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
500,000 | 510,215 | ||||||
Cinemark USA, Inc. |
250,000 | 238,843 | ||||||
Light & Wonder International, Inc. |
500,000 | 502,540 | ||||||
Wynn Resorts Finance LLC/Wynn Resorts Capital Corp. |
450,000 | 466,587 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,718,185 | ||||||||
Environmental Control – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Waste Management, Inc. |
1,600,000 | 1,507,584 | ||||||
4.95% due 7/3/2031 |
500,000 | 496,625 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,004,209 | ||||||||
Food – 0.4% |
| |||||||
B&G Foods, Inc. |
550,000 | 510,174 | ||||||
JBS USA Holding Lux SARL/JBS USA Food Co./JBS Lux Co. SARL |
364,000 | 362,002 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
872,176 | ||||||||
Gas – 0.1% |
| |||||||
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. |
200,000 | 199,892 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
199,892 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
$ | 500,000 | $ | 412,550 | ||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
300,000 | 256,992 | ||||||
4.75% due 2/15/2033 |
400,000 | 386,112 | ||||||
5.125% due 2/15/2053 |
100,000 | 92,004 | ||||||
HCA, Inc. |
300,000 | 298,824 | ||||||
5.50% due 6/15/2047 |
300,000 | 276,906 | ||||||
5.60% due 4/1/2034 |
200,000 | 198,706 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,922,094 | ||||||||
Insurance – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Aon North America, Inc. |
300,000 | 298,665 | ||||||
Assurant, Inc. |
400,000 | 361,740 | ||||||
Chubb INA Holdings LLC |
400,000 | 396,308 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,056,713 | ||||||||
Internet – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Amazon.com, Inc. |
600,000 | 595,734 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
595,734 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Carnival Holdings Bermuda Ltd. |
500,000 | 541,465 | ||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. |
500,000 | 517,735 | ||||||
VOC Escrow Ltd. |
500,000 | 484,840 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,544,040 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Station Casinos LLC |
500,000 | 470,205 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
470,205 | ||||||||
Machinery – Diversified – 0.3% |
| |||||||
John Deere Capital Corp. |
400,000 | 398,780 | ||||||
Series I |
300,000 | 300,723 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
699,503 | ||||||||
Media – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC/Charter Communications Operating Capital |
600,000 | 602,202 | ||||||
Comcast Corp. |
700,000 | 619,682 | ||||||
3.75% due 4/1/2040 |
200,000 | 162,524 | ||||||
5.35% due 5/15/2053 |
200,000 | 191,620 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,576,028 |
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Oil & Gas – 1.1% |
| |||||||
BP Capital Markets America, Inc. |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 969,580 | ||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc. |
500,000 | 413,640 | ||||||
Comstock Resources, Inc. |
500,000 | 484,505 | ||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
300,000 | 290,676 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,158,401 | ||||||||
Packaging & Containers – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Berry Global, Inc. |
400,000 | 400,064 | ||||||
Packaging Corp. of America |
900,000 | 914,625 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,314,689 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 2.7% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
400,000 | 347,112 | ||||||
5.05% due 3/15/2034 |
700,000 | 697,837 | ||||||
5.40% due 3/15/2054 |
300,000 | 296,832 | ||||||
Astrazeneca Finance LLC |
600,000 | 596,532 | ||||||
AstraZeneca PLC |
400,000 | 445,112 | ||||||
Becton Dickinson & Co. |
200,000 | 187,466 | ||||||
Cigna Group |
600,000 | 602,094 | ||||||
CVS Health Corp. |
600,000 | 585,834 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
500,000 | 490,220 | ||||||
Organon & Co./Organon Foreign Debt Co-Issuer BV |
550,000 | 493,823 | ||||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. |
700,000 | 695,989 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,438,851 | ||||||||
Pipelines – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LLC |
400,000 | 388,496 | ||||||
4.85% due 3/15/2044 |
200,000 | 180,380 | ||||||
MPLX LP |
400,000 | 393,892 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
962,768 | ||||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts – 0.8% |
| |||||||
American Homes 4 Rent LP |
200,000 | 197,044 | ||||||
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. |
300,000 | 300,042 | ||||||
Crown Castle, Inc. |
400,000 | 356,592 | ||||||
5.80% due 3/1/2034 |
200,000 | 201,992 | ||||||
Extra Space Storage LP |
500,000 | 489,385 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,545,055 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Retail – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Darden Restaurants, Inc. |
$ | 300,000 | $ | 309,717 | ||||
Home Depot, Inc. |
700,000 | 693,658 | ||||||
Lowe’s Cos., Inc. |
300,000 | 220,293 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,223,668 | ||||||||
Software – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Cloud Software Group, Inc. |
500,000 | 480,325 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
400,000 | 423,480 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
903,805 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
500,000 | 499,520 | ||||||
5.30% due 2/26/2054 |
200,000 | 196,100 | ||||||
Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA |
300,000 | 279,840 | ||||||
Rogers Communications, Inc. |
800,000 | 784,840 | ||||||
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
250,000 | 209,045 | ||||||
3.00% due 2/15/2041 |
300,000 | 214,395 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,183,740 | ||||||||
Transportation – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC |
300,000 | 301,623 | ||||||
Norfolk Southern Corp. |
400,000 | 407,800 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
709,423 | ||||||||
Trucking & Leasing – 0.2% |
| |||||||
SMBC Aviation Capital Finance DAC |
400,000 | 392,332 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
392,332 | ||||||||
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (Cost $58,592,065) |
|
58,758,404 | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 14.1% |
| |||||||
1211 Avenue of the Americas Trust |
1,100,000 | 1,061,578 | ||||||
BAMLL Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust |
550,000 | 533,256 | ||||||
BANK |
| |||||||
Series 2017-BNK5, Class AS |
1,500,000 | 1,404,868 | ||||||
Series 2019-BNK24 |
1,412,000 | 1,237,518 | ||||||
Series 2022-BNK43, Class B |
500,000 | 461,736 | ||||||
BB-UBS Trust |
1,200,000 | 1,174,164 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Bear Stearns ARM Trust |
$ | 743,812 | $ | 715,450 | ||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust |
| |||||||
Series 2019-B12, Class AS |
2,000,000 | 1,774,199 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class AM |
735,000 | 756,711 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class B |
300,000 | 301,802 | ||||||
BMO Mortgage Trust |
| |||||||
Series 2023-C6, Class AS |
815,000 | 863,026 | ||||||
Series 2024-C9, Class AS 6.127% due 7/15/2057(2)(3) |
870,000 | 896,098 | ||||||
BX Trust |
1,000,000 | 888,933 | ||||||
Chevy Chase Funding LLC Mortgage-Backed Certificates |
1,521,357 | 1,373,841 | ||||||
CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust |
530,231 | 489,691 | ||||||
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust |
1,000,000 | 927,807 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust |
994,091 | 989,626 | ||||||
CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust |
401,376 | 389,115 | ||||||
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust |
| |||||||
Series 2021-DNA7, Class M2 7.135% due 11/25/2041(1)(2)(3) |
1,100,000 | 1,111,088 | ||||||
Series 2021-HQA4, Class M1 6.285% due 12/25/2041(1)(2)(3) |
578,048 | 576,554 | ||||||
Series 2022-DNA1, Class M1A 6.335% due 1/25/2042(1)(2)(3) |
490,904 | 491,033 | ||||||
Series 2022-HQA3, Class M1A 7.635% due 8/25/2042(1)(2)(3) |
1,087,903 | 1,113,644 | ||||||
HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust |
1,410,339 | 1,326,758 | ||||||
Home Equity Asset Trust |
578,046 | 581,070 | ||||||
Jackson Park Trust |
1,000,000 | 856,852 | ||||||
Series 2019-LIC, Class B 2.914% due 10/14/2039(1) |
640,000 | 531,745 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust |
$ | 788,571 | $ | 751,382 | ||||
MASTR Specialized Loan Trust |
901,537 | 899,881 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust |
| |||||||
Series 2004-SD2, Class M1 6.39% due 4/25/2034(2)(3) |
257,315 | 258,393 | ||||||
Series 2018-H4, Class A4 4.31% due 12/15/2051 |
800,000 | 761,217 | ||||||
Series 2020-L4, Class AS 2.88% due 2/15/2053 |
1,000,000 | 850,991 | ||||||
NYC Commercial Mortgage Trust |
385,000 | 255,441 | ||||||
SLG Office Trust |
1,600,000 | 1,309,313 | ||||||
Stack Infrastructure Issuer LLC |
750,000 | 698,079 | ||||||
Total Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $29,824,982) |
|
28,612,860 | ||||||
Senior Secured Loans – 3.9% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Outfront Media Capital LLC |
156,813 | 156,696 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
156,696 | ||||||||
Airlines – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Air Canada |
324,188 | 324,288 | ||||||
American Airlines, Inc. |
363,053 | 374,587 | ||||||
Kestrel Bidco, Inc. |
46,440 | 46,518 | ||||||
United Airlines, Inc. |
274,313 | 274,556 | ||||||
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Airlines (continued) |
| |||||||
WestJet Loyalty LP |
$ | 625,000 | $ | 627,500 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
1,647,449 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Vestis Corp. |
149,625 | 148,753 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
148,753 | ||||||||
Distribution/Wholesale – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Core & Main LP |
399,000 | 399,251 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
399,251 | ||||||||
Electric – 0.2% |
| |||||||
ExGen Renewables IV LLC |
386,320 | 386,641 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
386,641 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Bally’s Corp. |
494,924 | 469,252 | ||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
648,375 | 647,766 | ||||||
Flutter Financing BV |
597,000 | 596,630 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,713,648 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.2% |
| |||||||
DaVita, Inc. |
293,367 | 293,111 | ||||||
ICON Luxembourg SARL |
142,096 | 142,499 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Healthcare-Services (continued) |
| |||||||
PRA Health Sciences, Inc. |
$ | 35,403 | $ | 35,504 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
471,114 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Alterra Mountain Co. |
200,000 | 200,876 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
200,876 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Fertitta Entertainment LLC |
494,937 | 495,248 | ||||||
Hilton Grand Vacations Borrower LLC |
249,375 | 249,188 | ||||||
Station Casinos LLC |
598,500 | 597,806 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,342,242 | ||||||||
Media – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
650,000 | 651,261 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
651,261 | ||||||||
Software – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. |
498,750 | 498,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
498,750 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Frontier Communications Corp. |
250,000 | 249,375 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
249,375 | ||||||||
Total Senior Secured Loans (Cost $7,858,133) |
|
7,866,056 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 9.1% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
13,500,000 | 13,474,687 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2054 |
$ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,070,313 | ||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $18,299,374) |
|
18,545,000 | ||||||
Commercial Paper – 2.0% |
| |||||||
Florida Power & Light Co. |
4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | ||||||
Total Commercial Paper (Cost $4,000,000) |
|
4,000,000 | ||||||
Shares | Value | |||||||
Exchange–Traded Funds – 3.6% |
| |||||||
iShares MBS ETF |
40,585 | 3,726,109 | ||||||
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF |
80,585 | 3,658,559 | ||||||
Total Exchange–Traded Funds (Cost $7,106,903) |
|
7,384,668 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
$ | 524,823 | 524,823 | |||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $524,823) |
|
524,823 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value | |||||
Total Investments – 99.6% (Cost $203,813,427) |
$ | 202,354,353 | ||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.4% | 829,829 | |||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 203,184,182 |
(1) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $64,380,354, representing 31.7% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(2) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(3) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(4) | Represents an unsettled loan commitment. The coupon rate will be determined at time of settlement. |
(5) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 0.75% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 573,100 | $535,468 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 274 | Long | $ | 56,172,742 | $ | 55,955,938 | $ | (216,804 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 5-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 190 | Long | 20,133,182 | 20,249,844 | 116,662 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Long Bond | September 2024 | 48 | Long | 5,651,222 | 5,679,000 | 27,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra Bond | September 2024 | 59 | Long | 7,255,042 | 7,395,281 | 140,239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | 89,212,188 | $ | 89,280,063 | $ | 67,875 |
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 106 | Short | $ | (12,087,493 | ) | $ | (12,034,313 | ) | $ | 53,180 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | (12,087,493 | ) | $ | (12,034,313 | ) | $ | 53,180 |
Legend:
CLO — Collateralized Loan Obligation
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury
REMIC — Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
STACR — Structured Agency Credit Risk
USD — United States Dollar
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | $ | — | $ | 35,821,961 | $ | — | $ | 35,821,961 | ||||||||
Asset–Backed Securities | — | 40,840,581 | — | 40,840,581 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes | — | 58,758,404 | — | 58,758,404 | ||||||||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | — | 28,612,860 | — | 28,612,860 | ||||||||||||
Senior Secured Loans | — | 7,866,056 | — | 7,866,056 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 18,545,000 | — | 18,545,000 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Paper | — | 4,000,000 | — | 4,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Exchange–Traded Funds | 7,384,668 | — | — | 7,384,668 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 524,823 | — | 524,823 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,384,668 | $ | 194,969,685 | $ | — | $ | 202,354,353 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 337,859 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 337,859 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
(216,804 | ) | — | — | (216,804 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 121,055 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 121,055 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 202,354,353 | ||
Cash |
1,679,561 | |||
Interest receivable |
1,696,257 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
1,560,730 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
943,426 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,589 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
208,236,916 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
4,562,075 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
220,134 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
87,929 | |||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts |
84,651 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
42,273 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
21,451 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,348 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
631 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
31,242 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
5,052,734 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 203,184,182 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 221,453,544 | ||
Distributable loss |
(18,269,362 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 203,184,182 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 203,813,427 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with |
21,590,198 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$9.41 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 5,830,713 | ||
Dividends |
78,436 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
5,909,149 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
545,419 | |||
Distribution fees |
262,221 | |||
Professional fees |
44,258 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
38,252 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
31,784 | |||
Administrative fees |
26,998 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
6,854 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,949 | |||
Other expenses |
6,446 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
967,181 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
4,941,968 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
142,221 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
(432,819 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts |
(52,953 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(5,007,927 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(492,858 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
(5,844,336 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | (902,368 | ) | |
|
|
|||
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the 6/30/24 |
For the 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 4,941,968 | $ | 8,840,512 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivative contracts |
(343,551 | ) | (16,730,266 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
(5,500,785 | ) | 18,271,579 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
(902,368 | ) | 10,381,825 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
16,701,570 | 24,606,130 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(31,413,551 | ) | (48,782,159 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(14,711,981 | ) | (24,176,029 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(15,614,349 | ) | (13,794,204 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
218,798,531 | 232,592,735 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 203,184,182 | $ | 218,798,531 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
||||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
1,786,388 | 2,692,031 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,366,126 | ) | (5,356,848 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,579,738 | ) | (2,664,817 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 11 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 9.44 | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.25) | $ | (0.03) | $ | 9.41 | (0.32)% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.00 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.44 | 9.44 | 4.89% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.74 | 0.26 | (2.00) | (1.74) | 9.00 | (16.20)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
10.74 | 0.21 | (0.21) | 0.00 | 10.74 | 0.00% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
10.03 | 0.14 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 10.74 | 7.08% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/19(5) |
10.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | (6) | 0.03 | 10.03 | 0.30% | (4) |
12 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||||
$ | 203,184 | 0.92% | (4) | 0.92% | (4) | 4.71% | (4) | 4.71% | (4) | 99% | (4) | |||||||||||||
218,799 | 0.91% | 0.91% | 3.88% | 3.88% | 343% | |||||||||||||||||||
232,593 | 0.88% | 0.88% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 182% | |||||||||||||||||||
315,505 | 0.87% | 0.87% | 1.99% | 1.99% | 172% | |||||||||||||||||||
306,696 | 0.89% | 0.89% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 163% | |||||||||||||||||||
309,877 | 0.93% | (4) | 0.93% | (4) | 1.33% | (4) | 1.33% | (4) | 27% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2019, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on October 21, 2019. |
(6) | Rounds to $0.00 per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 21, 2019. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks to provide a high current income with a secondary objective of capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5c). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Exchange-traded financial futures and swap contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
14 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing
sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the
15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indices. The Fund may use these investments to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve positioning, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance potential returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund entered into credit default swaps for risk exposure management and to enhance potential return. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Options Transactions The Fund can write (sell) put and call options on securities and indexes to earn premiums, for hedging purposes, for risk management purposes or otherwise as part of its investment strategies. In writing options, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker or counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the face value of the options. When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability that is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the written option. These liabilities, if any, are reflected as written options, at value, in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a written call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a written put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Fund purchasing or selling a security at a price different from its current market value. There were no options transactions as of June 30, 2024.
16 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.52% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fund has no sub-adviser.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2024 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.97% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 1.00%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue did not waive any fees or pay any Fund expenses.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as
defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $262,221 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold (excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 123,094,816 | $ | 80,405,224 | ||||
Sales | 95,298,146 | 114,293,394 |
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically
17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
d. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of
Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Below Investment Grade Securities The Fund may invest in below investment grade securities (i.e. lower-quality, “junk” debt), which are subject to various risks. Lower-quality debt is considered to be speculative because it is less certain that the issuer will be able to pay interest or repay the principal than in the case of investment grade debt. These securities can involve a substantially greater risk of default than higher-rated securities, and their values can decline significantly over short periods of time. Lower-quality debt securities tend to be more sensitive to adverse news about their issuers, the market and the economy in general, than higher-quality debt securities. The market for these securities can be less liquid, especially during periods of recession or general market decline.
g. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
18 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
h. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
i. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into U.S. Treasury futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
Under certain market conditions, the Fund may use credit default swaps to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve exposure, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. Credit default swaps involve the exchange of a floating or fixed rate payment in return for assuming potential credit losses of an underlying security or pool of securities.
The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties are generally calculated with
respect to a “notional amount,” i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate, in a particular foreign currency or security, or in a “basket” of securities representing a particular index. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCM”s) that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. Funds post initial and variation margin by making payments to their clearing member FCMs.
Generally, the Fund will enter into credit default swaps on a net basis, which means that the two payment streams are netted out, with a Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Credit default swaps do not normally involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to credit default swaps is normally limited to the net amount of payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a credit default swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive, if any.
In addition to the risks generally applicable to derivatives, risks associated with credit default swap agreements include adverse changes in the returns of the underlying instruments, failure of the counterparties to perform under the agreement’s terms and the possible lack of liquidity with respect to the agreements.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | 337,859 | ||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (216,804 | ) | |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN MULTI-SECTOR BOND VIP FUND
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
Credit Default Contracts |
|||||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (432,819 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts2 |
— | (52,953 | ) | |||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
| |||||||
Futures Contracts3 |
$ | (492,858 | ) | $ | — | |||
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
| |||||||
Futures Contracts4 |
498 | — | ||||||
Swap Contracts – Buy/Sell Protection | $ | — | $ | 3,250,000 | ||||
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts. |
3 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
4 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
j. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
20 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
21 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure and resources, including
22 |
investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
23 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the |
24 |
3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile |
25 |
and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s |
26 |
short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
27 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB10525
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 8 | |||
Statement of Operations | 8 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 9 | |||
Financial Highlights | 10 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 12 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
19 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
19 | |||
19 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
19 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities – 25.0% |
| |||||||
Aligned Data Centers Issuer LLC |
$ | 900,000 | $ | 829,122 | ||||
Allegro CLO VI Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 998,700 | ||||||
American Express Credit Account Master Trust |
2,000,000 | 1,964,360 | ||||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust |
954,605 | 937,282 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 17 Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,300 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 21 Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,200 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 7 Ltd. |
924,000 | 924,766 | ||||||
Apidos CLO XXII Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 1,003,385 | ||||||
Ares XXVII CLO Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 1,000,464 | ||||||
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC |
1,100,000 | 1,005,587 | ||||||
Barings CLO Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,200,911 | ||||||
Battalion CLO X Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,000 | ||||||
Benefit Street Partners CLO XVI Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,198,800 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Canyon Capital CLO Ltd. |
$ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,199,360 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust |
850,000 | 830,049 | ||||||
Cathedral Lake VI Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,201,856 | ||||||
CIFC Funding Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,100 | ||||||
Domino’s Pizza Master Issuer LLC |
705,000 | 672,774 | ||||||
Dryden 53 CLO Ltd. |
1,100,000 | 1,099,780 | ||||||
Dryden Senior Loan Fund |
1,000,000 | 999,200 | ||||||
Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
1,100,000 | 1,043,221 | ||||||
ICG U.S. CLO Ltd. |
700,000 | 699,720 | ||||||
Jamestown CLO XI Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,198,920 | ||||||
KKR CLO 38 Ltd. |
1,225,000 | 1,224,716 | ||||||
Madison Park Funding XXIII Ltd. |
1,050,000 | 1,049,370 | ||||||
Midocean Credit CLO VIII |
1,500,000 | 1,500,600 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Neuberger Berman Loan Advisers CLO 26 Ltd. |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 999,900 | ||||
Neuberger Berman Loan Advisers CLO 40 Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,201,800 | ||||||
NextGear Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
1,000,000 | 996,752 | ||||||
Nissan Auto Lease Trust |
700,000 | 695,849 | ||||||
Octagon Investment Partners 36 Ltd. |
1,209,375 | 1,209,859 | ||||||
OHA Credit Partners XIV Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Oscar U.S. Funding XV LLC |
600,000 | 602,117 | ||||||
RRX 6 Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,500 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust |
148,586 | 148,265 | ||||||
TIAA CLO IV Ltd. |
1,170,000 | 1,168,947 | ||||||
Series 2018-1A, Class A2R |
1,170,000 | 1,170,000 | ||||||
Toyota Auto Loan Extended Note Trust |
1,735,000 | 1,618,318 | ||||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust |
1,200,000 | 1,149,256 | ||||||
Total Asset–Backed Securities (Cost $40,582,326) |
|
40,740,106 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes – 30.4% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Stagwell Global LLC |
$ | 750,000 | $ | 693,053 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
693,053 | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 1.2% |
| |||||||
Boeing Co. |
700,000 | 705,075 | ||||||
Bombardier, Inc. |
750,000 | 810,855 | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
500,000 | 505,360 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,021,290 | ||||||||
Agriculture – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Reynolds American, Inc. |
400,000 | 395,312 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
395,312 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.7% |
| |||||||
LYB International Finance III LLC |
600,000 | 567,966 | ||||||
NOVA Chemicals Corp. |
500,000 | 478,200 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,046,166 | ||||||||
Commercial Banks – 9.8% |
| |||||||
ABN AMRO Bank NV |
500,000 | 506,275 | ||||||
Banco Santander SA |
1,000,000 | 974,020 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
500,000 | 491,105 | ||||||
3.419% (3.419% fixed rate until 12/20/2027; 3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.30% thereafter) |
500,000 | 470,055 | ||||||
3.559% (3.559% fixed rate until 4/23/2026; 3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.32% thereafter) |
1,000,000 | 967,080 | ||||||
5.08% (5.08% fixed rate |
500,000 | 496,850 | ||||||
Barclays PLC |
1,000,000 | 974,910 | ||||||
7.325% (7.325% fixed rate |
200,000 | 203,562 | ||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
1,100,000 | 1,063,535 | ||||||
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
2.591% (2.591% fixed rate until 1/20/2027; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.23% thereafter) |
$ | 700,000 | $ | 650,377 | ||||
Danske Bank AS |
200,000 | 190,112 | ||||||
4.298% (4.298% fixed rate until 4/1/2027; 1 yr. |
300,000 | 290,352 | ||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
150,000 | 142,364 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
1,000,000 | 918,250 | ||||||
2.005% (2.005% fixed rate until 3/13/2025; 3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.59% thereafter) |
200,000 | 194,844 | ||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. |
550,000 | 526,988 | ||||||
5.354% (5.354% fixed rate until 9/13/2027; 1 yr. |
300,000 | 300,438 | ||||||
5.719% (5.719% fixed rate until 2/20/2025; 1 yr. |
200,000 | 199,936 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Bank NA |
1,000,000 | 992,510 | ||||||
NatWest Group PLC |
250,000 | 250,582 | ||||||
7.472% (7.472% fixed rate until 11/10/2025; 1 yr. |
300,000 | 306,633 | ||||||
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Ltd. |
300,000 | 299,922 | ||||||
Toronto-Dominion Bank |
1,000,000 | 990,990 | ||||||
Truist Bank |
| |||||||
2.636% (2.636% fixed rate until 9/17/2024; 5 yr. |
500,000 | 489,765 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
3.625% due 9/16/2025 |
$ | 250,000 | $ | 243,482 | ||||
Truist Financial Corp. |
1,000,000 | 986,120 | ||||||
4.26% (4.26% fixed rate |
1,000,000 | 983,640 | ||||||
U.S. Bancorp |
900,000 | 879,993 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
15,984,690 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Global Payments, Inc. |
1,100,000 | 1,078,143 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,078,143 | ||||||||
Diversified Financial Services – 2.0% |
| |||||||
AerCap Ireland Capital DAC/AerCap Global Aviation Trust |
500,000 | 490,770 | ||||||
6.50% due 7/15/2025 |
800,000 | 806,896 | ||||||
Air Lease Corp. |
200,000 | 191,880 | ||||||
American Express Co. |
600,000 | 597,408 | ||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
200,000 | 185,034 | ||||||
Synchrony Financial |
1,000,000 | 983,190 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,255,178 | ||||||||
Electric – 0.8% |
| |||||||
DTE Energy Co. |
1,100,000 | 1,054,372 | ||||||
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. |
300,000 | 292,884 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,347,256 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
500,000 | 510,215 | ||||||
Cinemark USA, Inc. |
500,000 | 477,685 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
987,900 | ||||||||
Food – 0.2% |
| |||||||
JBS USA Holding Lux SARL/JBS USA Food Co./JBS Lux Co. SARL |
250,000 | 232,423 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
232,423 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 1.2% |
| |||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. |
500,000 | 440,875 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Healthcare-Services (continued) |
| |||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
$ | 200,000 | $ | 198,412 | ||||
LifePoint Health, Inc. |
500,000 | 437,880 | ||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
600,000 | 557,982 | ||||||
3.10% due 3/15/2026 |
400,000 | 387,060 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,022,209 | ||||||||
Home Builders – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
750,000 | 739,057 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
739,057 | ||||||||
Insurance – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Allstate Corp. |
600,000 | 574,026 | ||||||
Athene Global Funding |
700,000 | 701,057 | ||||||
Progressive Corp. |
800,000 | 750,352 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,025,435 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Viking Cruises Ltd. |
500,000 | 502,675 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
502,675 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
1,000,000 | 1,005,080 | ||||||
Marriott International, Inc. |
200,000 | 191,932 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,197,012 | ||||||||
Media – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC/Charter Communications Operating Capital |
231,000 | 229,030 | ||||||
Discovery Communications LLC |
200,000 | 197,096 | ||||||
McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. |
500,000 | 482,255 | ||||||
Nexstar Media, Inc. |
500,000 | 474,880 | ||||||
Paramount Global |
350,000 | 313,036 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,696,297 | ||||||||
Oil & Gas – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
200,000 | 191,060 | ||||||
Hess Corp. |
500,000 | 487,425 | ||||||
PBF Holding Co. LLC/PBF Finance Corp. |
500,000 | 487,930 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Oil & Gas (continued) |
| |||||||
Shell International Finance BV |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 960,750 | ||||
Transocean, Inc. |
873,000 | 870,486 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,997,651 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 2.0% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 995,500 | ||||||
Astrazeneca Finance LLC |
1,000,000 | 994,280 | ||||||
CVS Health Corp. |
1,100,000 | 1,055,164 | ||||||
3.875% due 7/20/2025 |
200,000 | 196,394 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,241,338 | ||||||||
Pipelines – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Energy Transfer LP |
1,100,000 | 1,073,105 | ||||||
New Fortress Energy, Inc. |
500,000 | 455,485 | ||||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. |
500,000 | 500,390 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,028,980 | ||||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts – 1.3% |
| |||||||
American Tower Corp. |
1,200,000 | 1,171,584 | ||||||
Essex Portfolio LP |
500,000 | 491,525 | ||||||
Extra Space Storage LP |
500,000 | 480,915 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,144,024 | ||||||||
Retail – 0.3% |
| |||||||
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. |
500,000 | 504,800 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
504,800 | ||||||||
Semiconductors – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Broadcom, Inc. |
200,000 | 192,438 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
192,438 | ||||||||
Software – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Cloud Software Group, Inc. |
500,000 | 484,880 | ||||||
Fiserv, Inc. |
200,000 | 196,642 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
300,000 | 293,031 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
974,553 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 1.3% |
| |||||||
AT&T, Inc. |
1,500,000 | 1,408,050 | ||||||
Frontier Communications Holdings LLC |
500,000 | 471,185 | ||||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Telecommunications (continued) |
| |||||||
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
$ | 200,000 | $ | 196,642 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
2,075,877 | ||||||||
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (Cost $49,329,990) |
|
49,383,757 | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 8.9% |
| |||||||
1211 Avenue of the Americas Trust |
600,000 | 579,043 | ||||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust |
1,150,000 | 1,073,291 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class AM |
580,000 | 597,132 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class B |
240,000 | 241,441 | ||||||
BMO Mortgage Trust |
635,000 | 672,419 | ||||||
BX Trust |
800,000 | 711,146 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust |
1,200,000 | 1,123,332 | ||||||
Series 2019-GC44, Class AM |
1,085,000 | 946,465 | ||||||
DBGS Mortgage Trust |
1,100,000 | 1,003,473 | ||||||
DBUBS Mortgage Trust |
793,000 | 753,675 | ||||||
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust |
900,000 | 909,072 | ||||||
Series 2021-HQA4, Class M1 |
471,950 | 470,731 | ||||||
Series 2022-DNA1, Class M1A |
377,618 | 377,718 | ||||||
Series 2022-HQA3, Class M1A |
862,820 | 883,235 | ||||||
Hilton USA Trust |
845,000 | 804,986 | ||||||
Jackson Park Trust |
800,000 | 685,481 | ||||||
SLG Office Trust |
500,000 | 409,160 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust |
1,380,000 | 1,346,242 | ||||||
Series 2016-LC24, Class A4 |
1,000,000 | 944,425 | ||||||
Total Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $14,852,252) |
|
14,532,467 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Senior Secured Loans – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Outfront Media Capital LLC |
$ | 274,423 | $ | 274,217 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
274,217 | ||||||||
Airlines – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Air Canada |
274,313 | 274,397 | ||||||
United Airlines, Inc. |
274,313 | 274,557 | ||||||
WestJet Loyalty LP |
550,000 | 552,200 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,101,154 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Vestis Corp. |
124,688 | 123,961 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
123,961 | ||||||||
Distribution/Wholesale – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Core & Main LP |
399,000 | 399,251 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
399,251 | ||||||||
Electric – 0.2% |
| |||||||
ExGen Renewables IV LLC |
338,030 | 338,311 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
338,311 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
498,750 | 498,281 | ||||||
Flutter Financing BV |
522,375 | 522,051 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,020,332 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.3% |
| |||||||
DaVita, Inc. |
$ | 146,683 | $ | 146,556 | ||||
ICON Luxembourg SARL |
272,191 | 272,964 | ||||||
PRA Health Sciences, Inc. |
67,817 | 68,010 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
487,530 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.1% |
| |||||||
Alterra Mountain Co. |
150,000 | 150,657 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
150,657 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Fertitta Entertainment LLC |
248,728 | 248,885 | ||||||
Hilton Grand Vacations Borrower LLC |
199,500 | 199,350 | ||||||
Station Casinos LLC |
523,688 | 523,080 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
971,315 | ||||||||
Media – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
500,000 | 500,970 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
500,970 | ||||||||
Software – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. |
498,750 | 498,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
498,750 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Frontier Communications Corp. |
250,000 | 249,375 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
249,375 | ||||||||
Total Senior Secured Loans (Cost $6,096,394) |
|
6,115,823 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
U.S. Government Agencies – 2.4% |
| |||||||
Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corp. |
$ | 4,000,000 | $ | 3,847,640 | ||||
Total U.S. Government Agencies (Cost $3,974,055) |
|
3,847,640 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 13.2% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
21,500,000 | 21,543,672 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $21,494,339) |
|
21,543,672 | ||||||
Commercial Paper – 1.1% |
| |||||||
Florida Power & Light Co. |
1,800,000 | 1,800,000 | ||||||
Total Commercial Paper (Cost $1,800,000) |
|
1,800,000 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills – 14.3% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills |
23,800,000 | 23,289,297 | ||||||
Total U.S. Treasury Bills (Cost $23,315,389) |
|
23,289,297 | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $612,238, due 7/1/2024(6) |
612,156 | 612,156 | ||||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $612,156) |
|
612,156 | ||||||
Total Investments – 99.5% (Cost $162,056,901) |
|
161,864,918 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 0.5% |
|
892,245 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 162,757,163 |
(1) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $52,553,385, representing 32.3% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(2) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(3) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(4) | Represents an unsettled loan commitment. The coupon rate will be determined at time of settlement. |
(5) | Interest rate shown reflects the discount rate at time of purchase. |
(6) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 620,900 | $ | 624,489 |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 316 | Long | $ | 64,375,397 | $ | 64,533,125 | $ | 157,728 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | 64,375,397 | $ | 64,533,125 | $ | 157,728 | |||||||||||||||||
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 5-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 42 | Short | $ | (4,384,917 | ) | $ | (4,476,281 | ) | $ | (91,364 | ) | ||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 7 | Short | (790,242 | ) | (794,719 | ) | (4,477 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | (5,175,159 | ) | $ | (5,271,000 | ) | $ | (95,841 | ) |
Legend:
CLO — Collateralized Loan Obligation
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury
REMIC — Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
STACR — Structured Agency Credit Risk
USD — United States Dollar
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Asset–Backed Securities | $ | — | $ | 40,740,106 | $ | — | $ | 40,740,106 | ||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes | — | 49,383,757 | — | 49,383,757 | ||||||||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | — | 14,532,467 | — | 14,532,467 | ||||||||||||
Senior Secured Loans | — | 6,115,823 | — | 6,115,823 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies | — | 3,847,640 | — | 3,847,640 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 21,543,672 | — | 21,543,672 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Paper | — | 1,800,000 | — | 1,800,000 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | — | 23,289,297 | — | 23,289,297 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 612,156 | — | 612,156 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | 161,864,918 | $ | — | $ | 161,864,918 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts |
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 157,728 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 157,728 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
(95,841 | ) | — | — | (95,841 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 61,887 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 61,887 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 161,864,918 | ||
Interest receivable |
1,216,988 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
1,017,398 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
327,775 | |||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts |
136,725 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
17,639 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,039 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
164,583,482 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
1,568,750 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
154,492 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
60,691 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
20,836 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,377 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
20,173 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
1,826,319 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 162,757,163 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 157,784,171 | ||
Distributable earnings |
4,972,992 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 162,757,163 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 162,056,901 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
15,737,359 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$10.34 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 4,582,588 | ||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
4,582,588 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
379,139 | |||
Professional fees |
38,741 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
24,965 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
24,774 | |||
Administrative fees |
24,324 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
8,701 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,654 | |||
Other expenses |
5,398 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
510,696 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(94,953 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
415,743 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
4,166,845 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
(903,969 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
(348,304 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts |
(95,683 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
6,780 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(129,623 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on swap contracts |
57,733 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
(1,413,066 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | 2,753,779 | ||
|
|
|||
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 4,166,845 | $ | 7,541,916 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivative contracts |
(1,347,956 | ) | (7,586,580 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
(65,110 | ) | 7,268,825 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
2,753,779 | 7,224,161 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
15,594,599 | 23,933,439 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(25,642,769 | ) | (47,703,727 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(10,048,170 | ) | (23,770,288 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(7,294,391 | ) | (16,546,127 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
170,051,554 | 186,597,681 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 162,757,163 | $ | 170,051,554 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
1,525,989 | 2,431,881 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(2,505,791 | ) | (4,811,534 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(979,802 | ) | (2,379,653 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized Loss |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 10.17 | $ | 0.25 | $ | (0.08) | $ | 0.17 | $ | 10.34 | 1.67% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.77 | 0.40 | (0.00) | (5) | 0.40 | 10.17 | 4.09% | |||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/22(6) |
10.00 | 0.20 | (0.43) | (0.23 | ) | 9.77 | (2.30)% | (4) |
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 162,757 | 0.49% | (4) | 0.61% | (4) | 4.95% | (4) | 4.83% | (4) | 106% | (4) | |||||||||||
170,052 | 0.50% | 0.59% | 4.07% | 3.98% | 274% | |||||||||||||||||
186,598 | 0.49% | (4) | 0.58% | (4) | 3.00% | (4) | 2.91% | (4) | 61% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2022, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Rounds to $(0.00) per share. |
(6) | Commenced operations on May 2, 2022. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on May 2, 2022. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks to provide a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of
fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5c). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Exchange-traded financial futures and swap contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation
12 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities.
Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indicesThe Fund may use these investments to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve positioning,, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance potential returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid
by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund entered into credit default swaps for risk exposure management and to enhance potential return. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Options Transactions The Fund can write (sell) put and call options on securities and indexes to earn premiums, for hedging purposes, for risk management purposes or otherwise as part of its investment strategies. In writing options, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker or counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the face value of the options. When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability that is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the written option. These liabilities, if any, are reflected as written options, at value, in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a written call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a written put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Fund purchasing or selling a
14 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
security at a price different from its current market value. There were no options transactions as of June 30, 2024.
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.45% of the first $300 million, and 0.40% in excess of $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fund has no sub-adviser.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.48% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.50%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to
Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $94,953.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold (excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 40,131,062 | $ | 108,127,719 | ||||
Sales | 23,678,214 | 129,740,887 |
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn
15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
d. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Below Investment Grade Securities The Fund may invest in below investment grade securities (i.e. lower-quality, “junk” debt), which are subject to various risks. Lower-quality debt is considered to be speculative because it is less certain that the issuer will be able to pay interest or repay the principal than in the case of
investment grade debt. These securities can involve a substantially greater risk of default than higher-rated securities, and their values can decline significantly over short periods of time. Lower-quality debt securities tend to be more sensitive to adverse news about their issuers, the market and the economy in general, than higher-quality debt securities. The market for these securities can be less liquid, especially during periods of recession or general market decline.
g. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
h. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on
16 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
i. Loan Risk Investments in loans are particularly subject to, among other risks, credit risk, interest rate risk, and counterparty risk. The Fund’s investments in loans can be difficult to value accurately and may be more susceptible to liquidity risk than fixed income (or debt) investments of similar credit quality and/or maturity. Investments or transactions in loans are often subject to long settlement periods (potentially longer than seven days), which could limit the ability of the Fund to invest sale proceeds in other investments and to use proceeds to meet its current redemption obligations. As a result, the Fund may be forced to sell other, more desirable, liquid investments, sell illiquid investments at a loss or take other measures to raise cash. Loans often are rated below investment-grade and may be unrated and subject the Fund to the risk that the value of the collateral for the loan may be insufficient to cover the borrower’s obligations should the borrower fail to make payments or become insolvent. Participations in loans may subject the Fund to the credit risk of both the borrower and the issuer of the participation and may make enforcement of loan covenants (if any) more difficult for the Fund as legal action may have to go through the issuer of the participations. Investments in loans that lack or possess fewer or contingent contractual restrictive covenants are particularly susceptible to the risks associated with these investments. In addition, loans and other similar investments may not be considered “securities” and, as a result, the Fund may not be entitled to rely on the anti-fraud protections under the federal securities laws and instead may have to resort to state law and direct claims.
j. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into U.S. Treasury futures contracts
for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
Under certain market conditions, the Fund may use credit default swaps to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve exposure, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. Credit default swaps involve the exchange of a floating or fixed rate payment in return for assuming potential credit losses of an underlying security or pool of securities.
The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a “notional amount,” i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate, in a particular foreign currency or security, or in a “basket” of securities representing a particular index. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCM”s) that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. Funds post initial and variation margin by making payments to their clearing member FCMs.
Generally, the Fund will enter into credit default swaps on a net basis, which means that the two payment streams are netted out, with a Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Credit default swaps do not normally involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to credit default swaps is normally limited to the net amount of payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a credit default swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive, if any.
In addition to the risks generally applicable to derivatives, risks associated with credit default swap agreements include adverse changes in the returns of the underlying instruments, failure of the counterparties to perform under the agreement’s terms and the possible lack of liquidity with respect to the agreements.
17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SHORT DURATION BOND VIP FUND
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | 157,728 | ||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | (95,841 | ) |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
Credit Default Contracts |
|||||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) |
||||||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (348,304 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts2 |
— | (95,683 | ) | |||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
| |||||||
Futures Contracts3 |
$ | (129,623 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts4 |
— | 57,733 | ||||||
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
| |||||||
Futures Contracts5 |
410 | — | ||||||
Swap Contracts – Buy/Sell Protection |
$ | — | $ | 3,642,857 | ||||
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts. |
3 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
4 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on swap contracts. |
5 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
k. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting
the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
18 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
19 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure
20 |
and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
21 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in
light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the |
22 |
3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the |
Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
23 |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s |
24 |
short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
25 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB11741
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 4 | |||
Statement of Operations | 4 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 5 | |||
Financial Highlights | 6 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 8 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
14 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
14 | |||
14 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
14 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Common Stocks – 98.5% |
| |||||||
Automobile Components – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Visteon Corp.(1) |
17,340 | $ | 1,850,178 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
1,850,178 | ||||||||
Banks – 8.1% |
| |||||||
Bank OZK |
70,893 | 2,906,613 | ||||||
Home Bancshares, Inc. |
131,400 | 3,148,344 | ||||||
Independent Bank Corp. |
46,600 | 2,363,552 | ||||||
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.(1) |
38,200 | 2,335,548 | ||||||
WaFd, Inc. |
89,905 | 2,569,485 | ||||||
Wintrust Financial Corp. |
37,706 | 3,716,303 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
17,039,845 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) |
14,800 | 607,688 | ||||||
Scholar Rock Holding Corp.(1) |
115,700 | 963,781 | ||||||
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical, Inc.(1) |
26,822 | 1,102,384 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,673,853 | ||||||||
Building Products – 2.6% |
| |||||||
Janus International Group, Inc.(1) |
186,300 | 2,352,969 | ||||||
Tecnoglass, Inc. |
60,400 | 3,030,872 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,383,841 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 2.2% |
| |||||||
Avient Corp. |
46,528 | 2,030,947 | ||||||
Olin Corp. |
55,623 | 2,622,625 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,653,572 | ||||||||
Communications Equipment – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Extreme Networks, Inc.(1) |
143,400 | 1,928,730 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,928,730 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Centuri Holdings, Inc.(1) |
48,326 | 941,391 | ||||||
Primoris Services Corp. |
51,472 | 2,567,938 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,509,329 | ||||||||
Construction Materials – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Eagle Materials, Inc. |
12,200 | 2,653,012 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,653,012 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance – 3.8% |
| |||||||
Encore Capital Group, Inc.(1) |
59,166 | 2,468,997 | ||||||
OneMain Holdings, Inc. |
65,200 | 3,161,548 | ||||||
PROG Holdings, Inc. |
64,851 | 2,249,033 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,879,578 | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services – 1.2% |
| |||||||
Stride, Inc.(1) |
36,976 | 2,606,808 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,606,808 | ||||||||
Diversified REITs – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. |
86,200 | 1,461,952 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,461,952 | ||||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Anterix, Inc.(1) |
46,439 | 1,838,520 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,838,520 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Electric Utilities – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Portland General Electric Co. |
70,104 | $ | 3,031,297 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
3,031,297 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment – 1.2% |
| |||||||
EnerSys |
24,935 | 2,581,271 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,581,271 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 3.2% |
| |||||||
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. |
16,092 | 1,750,166 | ||||||
Crane NXT Co. |
32,700 | 2,008,434 | ||||||
Itron, Inc.(1) |
18,842 | 1,864,604 | ||||||
nLight, Inc.(1) |
94,922 | 1,037,498 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,660,702 | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services – 3.3% |
| |||||||
Atlas Energy Solutions, Inc. |
103,300 | 2,058,769 | ||||||
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. |
52,894 | 1,911,589 | ||||||
Valaris Ltd.(1) |
38,500 | 2,868,250 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,838,608 | ||||||||
Entertainment – 1.1% |
| |||||||
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.(1)(2) |
325,000 | 672,750 | ||||||
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.(1) |
1,895 | 3,923 | ||||||
Vivid Seats, Inc., Class A(1) |
300,300 | 1,726,725 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,403,398 | ||||||||
Financial Services – 2.7% |
| |||||||
Essent Group Ltd. |
40,400 | 2,270,076 | ||||||
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.(1) |
32,000 | 3,312,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,582,076 | ||||||||
Food Products – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Utz Brands, Inc. |
107,904 | 1,795,523 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,795,523 | ||||||||
Gas Utilities – 1.1% |
| |||||||
ONE Gas, Inc. |
36,000 | 2,298,600 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,298,600 | ||||||||
Ground Transportation – 0.9% |
| |||||||
Marten Transport Ltd. |
100,689 | 1,857,712 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,857,712 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies – 1.3% |
| |||||||
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.(1) |
33,744 | 2,709,306 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,709,306 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services – 4.7% |
| |||||||
Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc.(1) |
43,105 | 2,911,312 | ||||||
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.(1) |
26,300 | 1,347,349 | ||||||
HealthEquity, Inc.(1) |
37,282 | 3,213,708 | ||||||
R1 RCM, Inc.(1) |
190,447 | 2,392,014 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,864,383 | ||||||||
Hotel & Resort REITs – 0.9% |
| |||||||
RLJ Lodging Trust |
190,783 | 1,837,240 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,837,240 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.5% |
| |||||||
Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. |
84,900 | 1,632,627 | ||||||
Everi Holdings, Inc.(1) |
429,355 | 3,606,582 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,239,209 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Household Durables – 1.7% |
| |||||||
Century Communities, Inc. |
44,238 | $ | 3,612,475 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
3,612,475 | ||||||||
Industrial REITs – 0.9% |
| |||||||
LXP Industrial Trust |
195,178 | 1,780,023 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,780,023 | ||||||||
Insurance – 1.4% |
| |||||||
Abacus Life, Inc.(1) |
79,500 | 687,675 | ||||||
Assured Guaranty Ltd. |
29,205 | 2,253,166 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,940,841 | ||||||||
IT Services – 0.9% |
| |||||||
BigCommerce Holdings, Inc., Series 1(1) |
240,300 | 1,936,818 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,936,818 | ||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc., Class A(1) |
175,800 | 1,258,728 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,258,728 | ||||||||
Machinery – 3.4% |
| |||||||
Hillman Solutions Corp.(1) |
302,675 | 2,678,674 | ||||||
Terex Corp. |
52,800 | 2,895,552 | ||||||
Wabash National Corp. |
75,000 | 1,638,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,212,226 | ||||||||
Media – 1.8% |
| |||||||
Criteo SA, ADR(1) |
45,200 | 1,704,944 | ||||||
Gambling.com Group Ltd.(1) |
137,200 | 1,127,784 | ||||||
Gray Television, Inc. |
192,816 | 1,002,643 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,835,371 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining – 3.6% |
| |||||||
Commercial Metals Co. |
31,966 | 1,757,810 | ||||||
Constellium SE(1) |
126,544 | 2,385,354 | ||||||
MP Materials Corp.(1) |
131,376 | 1,672,417 | ||||||
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. |
28,600 | 1,795,222 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,610,803 | ||||||||
Mortgage REITs – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Redwood Trust, Inc. |
266,058 | 1,726,716 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,726,716 | ||||||||
Office REITs – 1.4% |
| |||||||
COPT Defense Properties |
120,534 | 3,016,966 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,016,966 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 5.2% |
| |||||||
CNX Resources Corp.(1) |
94,314 | 2,291,830 | ||||||
HF Sinclair Corp. |
53,648 | 2,861,585 | ||||||
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp., Class A |
83,445 | 2,114,496 | ||||||
Matador Resources Co. |
59,900 | 3,570,040 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,837,951 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Shares | Value | ||||||
Passenger Airlines – 2.1% |
| |||||||
Allegiant Travel Co. |
30,400 | $ | 1,526,992 | |||||
SkyWest, Inc.(1) |
35,900 | 2,946,313 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
4,473,305 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 4.9% |
| |||||||
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
17,800 | 1,432,900 | ||||||
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.(1) |
87,600 | 2,846,124 | ||||||
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.(1) |
36,071 | 2,470,503 | ||||||
Prestige Consumer Healthcare, Inc.(1) |
36,500 | 2,513,025 | ||||||
Verona Pharma PLC, ADR(1) |
68,900 | 996,294 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
10,258,846 | ||||||||
Professional Services – 2.7% |
| |||||||
ICF International, Inc. |
20,694 | 3,072,231 | ||||||
Korn Ferry |
39,761 | 2,669,554 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,741,785 | ||||||||
Retail REITs – 1.2% |
| |||||||
Kite Realty Group Trust |
115,048 | 2,574,774 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,574,774 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 2.8% |
| |||||||
indie Semiconductor, Inc., Class A(1) |
233,400 | 1,440,078 | ||||||
Photronics, Inc.(1) |
81,100 | 2,000,737 | ||||||
SMART Global Holdings, Inc.(1) |
104,075 | 2,380,195 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,821,010 | ||||||||
Software – 2.5% |
| |||||||
CommVault Systems, Inc.(1) |
16,125 | 1,960,316 | ||||||
Q2 Holdings, Inc.(1) |
37,400 | 2,256,342 | ||||||
Rapid7, Inc.(1) |
24,934 | 1,077,897 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,294,555 | ||||||||
Specialized REITs – 1.0% |
| |||||||
PotlatchDeltic Corp. |
52,400 | 2,064,036 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,064,036 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail – 4.6% |
| |||||||
Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. |
30,600 | 1,629,450 | ||||||
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. |
9,629 | 2,862,509 | ||||||
Murphy USA, Inc. |
10,879 | 5,107,255 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
9,599,214 | ||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Oxford Industries, Inc. |
21,800 | 2,183,270 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,183,270 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors – 3.2% |
| |||||||
Custom Truck One Source, Inc.(1) |
279,817 | 1,217,204 | ||||||
GATX Corp. |
21,901 | 2,898,816 | ||||||
Rush Enterprises, Inc., Class A |
64,340 | 2,693,916 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
6,809,936 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $170,579,825) |
|
206,768,192 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., 1.60%, dated 6/28/2024, proceeds at maturity value of $732,059, due 7/1/2024(3) |
$ | 731,962 | $ | 731,962 | ||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $731,962) |
|
731,962 | ||||||
Total Investments — 98.8% (Cost $171,311,787) |
|
207,500,154 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities — 1.2% |
|
2,498,257 | ||||||
Total Net Assets — 100.0% |
|
$ | 209,998,411 |
(1) | Non–income–producing security. |
(2) | Security is restricted. Acquired through a private placement transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. May be subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of the security amounted to $672,750, representing 0.3% of net assets. |
(3) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 742,400 | $ | 746,675 |
Legend:
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
REITs — Real Estate Investment Trusts
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 206,768,192 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 206,768,192 | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 731,962 | — | 731,962 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 206,768,192 | $ | 731,962 | $ | — | $ | 207,500,154 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 207,500,154 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
3,057,644 | |||
Dividends/interest receivable |
190,048 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
4,181 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,896 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
210,754,923 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
287,007 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
247,005 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
119,970 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
43,467 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,298 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
5,688 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
3,659 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
35,418 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
756,512 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 209,998,411 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 130,566,367 | ||
Distributable earnings |
79,432,044 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 209,998,411 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 171,311,787 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
17,296,450 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$12.14 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,603,337 | ||
Interest |
19,886 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
1,623,223 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
784,805 | |||
Distribution fees |
284,350 | |||
Professional fees |
42,861 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
36,182 | |||
Administrative fees |
25,957 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
17,841 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,790 | |||
Shareholder reports |
3,751 | |||
Other expenses |
7,012 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,210,549 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(16,280 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
1,194,269 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
428,954 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
1,184,930 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(6,877,002 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments |
(5,692,072 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | (5,263,118 | ) | |
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
| |||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 428,954 | $ | 1,032,407 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
1,184,930 | (5,831,067 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(6,877,002 | ) | 46,725,968 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
(5,263,118 | ) | 41,927,308 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
5,462,081 | 38,742,693 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(39,227,806 | ) | (78,168,165 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(33,765,725 | ) | (39,425,472 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets |
(39,028,843 | ) | 2,501,836 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
249,027,254 | 246,525,418 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 209,998,411 | $ | 249,027,254 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
448,695 | 3,540,433 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,206,065 | ) | (6,690,181 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(2,757,370 | ) | (3,149,748 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 12.42 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.30) | $ | (0.28) | $ | 12.14 | (2.25)% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
10.62 | 0.05 | 1.75 | 1.80 | 12.42 | 16.95% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
13.42 | 0.03 | (2.83) | (2.80) | 10.62 | (20.86)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
11.40 | 0.00 | (5) | 2.02 | 2.02 | 13.42 | 17.72% | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
11.13 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 11.40 | 2.43% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/19(6) |
10.00 | 0.01 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 11.13 | 11.30% | (4) |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 209,998 | 1.05% | (4) | 1.06% | (4) | 0.38% | (4) | 0.37% | (4) | 11% | (4) | |||||||||||
249,027 | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.42% | 0.42% | 48% | |||||||||||||||||
246,525 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 48% | |||||||||||||||||
284,144 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 45% | |||||||||||||||||
337,527 | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 69% | |||||||||||||||||
310,451 | 1.01% | (4) | 1.09% | (4) | 0.57% | (4) | 0.49% | (4) | 98% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.’s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2019, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Rounds to $0.00 per share. |
(6) | Commenced operations on October 21, 2019. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 21, 2019. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation oversight, including but not limited to consideration of
security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Forward foreign currency contracts, if any, are valued at the mean between the bid and ask rates for the specified time interpolated from rates for proximate time periods.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the values of the Fund’s investments in foreign securities are generally determined by a pricing service using pricing models designed to estimate likely changes in the values of those securities. Certain foreign equity instruments are valued by applying international fair value factors provided by approved pricing services. The factors seek to adjust the local closing price for movements of local markets post closing, but prior to the time the NAVs are calculated. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, price below current market value, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not
considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, private investment in public equity, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any derivatives.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
c. Foreign Currency Translation The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and all other assets and liabilities of the Fund denominated in a foreign currency are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates quoted at the close of the NYSE on each business day. The market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the valuation date. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts, and expense payments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the respective transactions. The Fund does not isolate the portion of the fluctuations on investments resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the fluctuations in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in the Net change in net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Reported realized foreign currency gains and losses arise from the disposition of foreign currency, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books on the transaction date and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. These reported realized foreign currency gains and losses, if any, are included in Net realized gain/(loss) from foreign currency transactions on the Statement of Operations. Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arise from changes (due to changes in exchange rates) in the value of foreign currency and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which are held at period end, if any, and are included in Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Statement of Operations.
d. Foreign Capital Gains Tax The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments or currency purchases/repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon their current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which they invest.
e. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the
ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
f. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.69% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 1.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $16,280.
Park Avenue has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with ClearBridge Investments LLC (“ClearBridge”). ClearBridge is responsible for providing day-to-day investment advisory services to the Fund, subject to the supervision of Park Avenue and the
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
oversight of the Board of Trustees. Sub-advisory fees are paid by Park Avenue and do not represent a separate or additional expense to the Fund.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $284,350 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments purchased and the proceeds from investments sold (excluding short-term investments) amounted to $23,947,126 and $59,160,813, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund held one restricted security, and did not hold any illiquid securities.
f. Private Investment in Public Equity A Fund may invest in securities that are purchased in private investment in public equity (“PIPE”) transactions. PIPEs are an accredited investor’s purchase of stock in a public company at a discount to the current market value per share for the purpose of raising capital and may also issue warrants enabling a Fund to purchase additional shares at a price equal to or at a premium to current market prices. Securities acquired by a Fund in such transactions are subject to resale restrictions under securities laws. Because the shares issued in a PIPE transaction are “restricted securities” under the federal securities laws, a Fund cannot freely trade the securities until the issuer files a registration statement to provide for the public resale of the shares, which typically occurs after the completion of the PIPE transaction and the public registration process with the SEC is completed, a period which can last many months. While issuers in PIPE transactions typically agree that they will register the securities for resale by a Fund after the transaction closes (thereby removing resale restrictions), there is no guarantee that the securities will in fact be registered, or that the registration will be maintained. In addition, a PIPE issuer may require a Fund to agree to other resale restrictions as a condition to the sale of such securities. Thus, a Fund’s ability to resell securities acquired in PIPE transactions may be limited, and even though a public market may exist for such securities, the securities held by a Fund may be deemed illiquid. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any PIPEs.
g. Special Purpose Acquisition Companies A Fund may invest in stock, warrants, rights and other securities of special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) or similar special purpose entities in a private placement transaction or as part of a public offering. A SPAC, sometimes referred to as “blank check company,” is a private or publicly traded company that raises investment capital for the purpose of acquiring or merging with an existing company. The shares of a SPAC are typically issued in “units” that include one share of common stock and one right or warrant (or partial right or warrant) conveying the right to purchase additional shares of common stock. At a specified time, the rights and warrants may be separated from the common stock at the election of the holder, after which time each security typically is freely tradeable. Private companies can combine with a SPAC to go public by taking the SPAC’s place on an exchange as an alternative to making an initial public offering. Additionally, a Fund may purchase units or shares of SPACs that have completed an IPO on a secondary market, during a SPAC’s IPO or
through a PIPE offering. PIPE transactions involve the purchase of securities typically at a discount to the market price of the company’s common stock and may be subject to transfer restrictions, which typically would make them less liquid than equity issued through a public offering. Investments in SPACs also have risks peculiar to the SPAC structure and investment process. Until an acquisition or merger is completed, a SPAC generally invests its assets, less a portion retained to cover expenses, in U.S. government securities, money market securities and cash and does not typically pay dividends in respect of its common stock. To the extent a SPAC is invested in cash or similar securities, this may impact a Fund’s ability to meet its investment objective. SPAC shareholders may not approve any proposed acquisition or merger, or an acquisition or merger, once effected, may prove unsuccessful. If an acquisition or merger is not completed within a pre-established period (typically, two years), the remainder of funds invested in the SPAC are returned to its shareholders. While a SPAC investor may receive both stock in the SPAC, as well as warrants or other rights at no marginal cost, those warrants or other rights may expire worthless or may be repurchased or retired by the SPAC at an unfavorable price. A Fund may also be delayed in receiving any redemption or liquidation proceeds from a SPAC to which it is entitled. An investment in a SPAC is typically subject to a higher risk of dilution by additional later offerings of interests in the SPAC or by other investors exercising existing rights to purchase shares of the SPAC. Moreover, interests in SPACs may be illiquid and/or be subject to restrictions on resale, which may remain for an extended time, and may only be traded in the over-the-counter market. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any SPACs.
h. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
12 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN SMALL CAP CORE VIP FUND
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for
such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
13 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
14 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure
15 |
and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
16 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded
entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the |
17 |
3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that |
18 |
the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index |
for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the |
19 |
1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
20 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB10526
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 10 | |||
Statement of Operations | 10 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 11 | |||
Financial Highlights | 12 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 14 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
21 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies | 21 | |||
21 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
21 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 16.7% |
| |||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. |
||||||||
3.00% due 3/1/2052 |
$ | 1,961,320 | $ | 1,670,413 | ||||
3.50% due 6/1/2052 |
3,564,833 | 3,155,625 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2037 |
377,321 | 362,684 | ||||||
4.00% due 6/1/2052 |
660,758 | 604,618 | ||||||
4.50% due 9/1/2052 |
454,067 | 428,278 | ||||||
5.00% due 12/1/2052 |
1,178,251 | 1,139,983 | ||||||
5.50% due 9/1/2053 |
2,404,242 | 2,374,649 | ||||||
6.00% due 10/1/2053 |
2,431,455 | 2,437,262 | ||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association |
||||||||
2.50% due 1/1/2052 |
3,709,719 | 3,028,414 | ||||||
2.50% due 5/1/2052 |
2,527,435 | 2,067,318 | ||||||
3.00% due 7/1/2051 |
2,129,120 | 1,810,279 | ||||||
3.00% due 3/1/2052 |
3,225,437 | 2,744,053 | ||||||
3.00% due 5/1/2052 |
4,463,413 | 3,799,663 | ||||||
3.50% due 6/1/2052 |
4,100,653 | 3,629,938 | ||||||
3.50% due 10/1/2052 |
2,223,440 | 1,967,694 | ||||||
3.50% due 11/1/2052 |
2,136,533 | 1,890,453 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2052 |
2,731,677 | 2,499,587 | ||||||
4.00% due 12/1/2052 |
1,206,686 | 1,104,163 | ||||||
4.50% due 10/1/2053 |
2,737,678 | 2,579,954 | ||||||
5.00% due 2/1/2053 |
395,312 | 382,228 | ||||||
6.00% due 9/1/2053 |
379,197 | 380,140 | ||||||
Total Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $41,298,020) |
|
40,057,396 | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities – 21.6% |
| |||||||
Allegro CLO VI Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 998,700 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 17 Ltd. |
1,700,000 | 1,698,810 | ||||||
Anchorage Capital CLO 7 Ltd. |
462,000 | 462,383 | ||||||
Ares XXXIIR CLO Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,199,280 | ||||||
Ares XXXIV CLO Ltd. |
450,000 | 450,225 | ||||||
Barings CLO Ltd. |
1,550,000 | 1,551,177 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Battalion CLO XX Ltd. |
$ | 2,000,000 | $ | 1,921,032 | ||||
BlueMountain CLO Ltd. |
800,000 | 799,280 | ||||||
Carlyle U.S. CLO Ltd. |
3,000,000 | 2,993,700 | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust |
1,400,000 | 1,367,139 | ||||||
Cathedral Lake VI Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,201,856 | ||||||
CIFC Funding Ltd. |
800,000 | 799,280 | ||||||
DB Master Finance LLC |
1,023,750 | 899,867 | ||||||
Elmwood CLO IX Ltd. |
3,000,000 | 2,991,000 | ||||||
Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
1,500,000 | 1,422,574 | ||||||
ICG U.S. CLO Ltd. |
1,300,000 | 1,303,046 | ||||||
Series 2022-1A, Class A1 |
1,500,000 | 1,499,400 | ||||||
KKR CLO 38 Ltd. |
1,725,000 | 1,724,600 | ||||||
Madison Park Funding XXIII Ltd. |
1,300,000 | 1,299,220 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Midocean Credit CLO VIII |
$ | 900,000 | $ | 900,360 | ||||
Neuberger Berman CLO XVI-S Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 997,300 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman CLO XVII Ltd. |
1,100,000 | 1,100,000 | ||||||
Neuberger Berman Loan Advisers CLO 40 Ltd. |
1,500,000 | 1,502,250 | ||||||
NextGear Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
1,500,000 | 1,495,128 | ||||||
Octagon Investment Partners 50 Ltd. |
1,100,000 | 1,074,700 | ||||||
Octagon Loan Funding Ltd. |
3,200,000 | 3,193,280 | ||||||
OHA Credit Funding 3 Ltd. |
3,000,000 | 2,992,500 | ||||||
Oscar U.S. Funding XV LLC |
800,000 | 802,822 | ||||||
Riserva CLO Ltd. |
3,000,000 | 2,997,900 | ||||||
RRX 6 Ltd. |
1,150,000 | 1,149,425 | ||||||
Synchrony Card Funding LLC |
1,190,000 | 1,169,169 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
TCW CLO Ltd. |
$ | 1,650,000 | $ | 1,650,495 | ||||
TIAA CLO IV Ltd. |
1,720,000 | 1,718,452 | ||||||
Series 2018-1A, Class A2R 7.075% (3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.75%) |
1,720,000 | 1,720,000 | ||||||
Trinitas CLO XVI Ltd. |
800,000 | 799,440 | ||||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust |
198,920 | 198,558 | ||||||
Total Asset–Backed Securities (Cost $52,157,968) |
|
52,044,348 | ||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes – 29.5% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.2% | ||||||||
Neptune Bidco U.S., Inc. |
450,000 | 430,848 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
430,848 | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense – 0.5% | ||||||||
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
300,000 | 297,804 | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
500,000 | 513,160 | ||||||
6.10% due 3/15/2034 |
400,000 | 421,200 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,232,164 | ||||||||
Agriculture – 0.1% | ||||||||
Philip Morris International, Inc. |
300,000 | 296,160 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
296,160 | ||||||||
Apparel – 0.2% | ||||||||
Tapestry, Inc. |
500,000 | 518,775 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
518,775 | ||||||||
Auto Manufacturers – 0.5% | ||||||||
Hyundai Capital America |
1,200,000 | 1,194,444 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,194,444 | ||||||||
Auto Parts & Equipment – 0.4% |
|
|||||||
Adient Global Holdings Ltd. |
450,000 | 468,788 | ||||||
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. |
450,000 | 412,092 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
880,880 |
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Beverages – 0.8% | ||||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc. |
$ | 400,000 | $ | 374,996 | ||||
PepsiCo, Inc. |
1,600,000 | 1,493,728 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,868,724 | ||||||||
Biotechnology – 0.1% | ||||||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
||||||||
5.25% due 10/15/2033 |
200,000 | 201,330 | ||||||
5.55% due 10/15/2053 |
100,000 | 99,820 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
301,150 | ||||||||
Building Materials – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Carrier Global Corp. |
300,000 | 232,317 | ||||||
CRH America Finance, Inc. |
700,000 | 693,105 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
925,422 | ||||||||
Chemicals – 0.2% | ||||||||
Nutrien Ltd. |
400,000 | 394,292 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
394,292 | ||||||||
Commercial Banks – 6.7% |
| |||||||
AIB Group PLC |
500,000 | 496,855 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp. |
600,000 | 493,884 | ||||||
4.271% (4.271% fixed rate until 7/23/2028; 3 mo. USD Term SOFR + 1.57% thereafter) |
2,000,000 | 1,926,640 | ||||||
BNP Paribas SA |
600,000 | 597,696 | ||||||
Citibank NA |
500,000 | 508,285 | ||||||
Comerica, Inc. |
800,000 | 788,408 | ||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
2,200,000 | 2,030,072 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Banks (continued) |
| |||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
$ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,060,598 | ||||
5.04% (5.04% fixed rate |
400,000 | 397,948 | ||||||
5.581% (5.581% fixed rate until 4/22/2029; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.16% thereafter) |
600,000 | 609,504 | ||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC |
900,000 | 846,639 | ||||||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 997,600 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley |
400,000 | 327,224 | ||||||
5.123% (5.123% fixed rate until 2/1/2028; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.73% thereafter) |
300,000 | 298,821 | ||||||
5.173% (5.173% fixed rate until 1/16/2029; 1 day USD SOFR + 1.45% thereafter) |
1,300,000 | 1,296,087 | ||||||
NatWest Group PLC |
1,400,000 | 1,417,836 | ||||||
Truist Bank |
450,000 | 440,788 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. |
1,700,000 | 1,507,203 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
16,042,088 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Commercial Services – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc. |
$ | 450,000 | $ | 412,092 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
412,092 | ||||||||
Computers – 0.4% | ||||||||
Apple, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 936,260 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
936,260 | ||||||||
Cosmetics & Personal Care – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. |
300,000 | 289,671 | ||||||
Haleon U.S. Capital LLC |
500,000 | 447,635 | ||||||
Kenvue, Inc. |
600,000 | 593,250 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,330,556 | ||||||||
Diversified Financial Services – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Charles Schwab Corp. |
500,000 | 520,730 | ||||||
Jefferies Financial Group, Inc. |
500,000 | 506,710 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,027,440 | ||||||||
Electric – 2.1% | ||||||||
Alabama Power Co. |
550,000 | 505,373 | ||||||
Constellation Energy Generation LLC |
300,000 | 290,817 | ||||||
DTE Energy Co. |
1,200,000 | 1,217,472 | ||||||
Public Service Co. of Colorado |
300,000 | 296,550 | ||||||
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. |
100,000 | 98,519 | ||||||
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. |
900,000 | 892,620 | ||||||
Vistra Operations Co. LLC |
400,000 | 400,440 | ||||||
Wisconsin Public Service Corp. |
150,000 | 92,629 | ||||||
Xcel Energy, Inc. |
1,400,000 | 1,379,280 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
5,173,700 | ||||||||
Electronics – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. |
600,000 | 511,440 | ||||||
4.875% due 9/1/2029 |
800,000 | 801,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,312,440 | ||||||||
Environmental Control – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Waste Management, Inc. |
1,900,000 | 1,790,256 | ||||||
4.95% due 7/3/2031 |
500,000 | 496,625 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,286,881 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Food – 0.4% |
| |||||||
B&G Foods, Inc. |
$ | 450,000 | $ | 417,416 | ||||
JBS USA Holding Lux SARL/JBS USA Food Co./JBS Lux Co. SARL |
436,000 | 433,606 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
851,022 | ||||||||
Gas – 0.2% |
| |||||||
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. |
500,000 | 499,730 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
499,730 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.8% |
| |||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. |
600,000 | 579,168 | ||||||
5.125% due 2/15/2053 |
100,000 | 92,004 | ||||||
HCA, Inc. |
400,000 | 398,432 | ||||||
5.50% due 6/15/2047 |
300,000 | 276,906 | ||||||
5.60% due 4/1/2034 |
500,000 | 496,765 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,843,275 | ||||||||
Insurance – 0.6% | ||||||||
Aon North America, Inc. |
500,000 | 497,775 | ||||||
Assurant, Inc. |
400,000 | 361,740 | ||||||
Chubb INA Holdings LLC |
600,000 | 594,462 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,453,977 | ||||||||
Internet – 0.3% | ||||||||
Amazon.com, Inc. |
700,000 | 695,023 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
695,023 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.4% | ||||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. |
500,000 | 517,735 | ||||||
Viking Cruises Ltd. |
500,000 | 541,160 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,058,895 | ||||||||
Machinery – Diversified – 0.6% | ||||||||
Deere & Co. |
100,000 | 83,468 | ||||||
John Deere Capital Corp. |
500,000 | 498,475 | ||||||
Series I |
900,000 | 902,169 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,484,112 | ||||||||
Media – 1.0% | ||||||||
Charter Communications Operating LLC/Charter Communications Operating Capital |
1,000,000 | 1,003,670 | ||||||
Comcast Corp. |
500,000 | 442,630 | ||||||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Media (continued) | ||||||||
3.75% due 4/1/2040 |
$ | 300,000 | $ | 243,786 | ||||
5.35% due 5/15/2053 |
300,000 | 287,430 | ||||||
Nexstar Media, Inc. |
500,000 | 474,880 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,452,396 | ||||||||
Oil & Gas – 1.1% |
| |||||||
BP Capital Markets America, Inc. |
700,000 | 652,477 | ||||||
4.812% due 2/13/2033 |
900,000 | 872,622 | ||||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc. |
600,000 | 496,368 | ||||||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
300,000 | 296,955 | ||||||
5.75% due 4/18/2054 |
300,000 | 290,676 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,609,098 | ||||||||
Packaging & Containers – 0.5% |
| |||||||
Berry Global, Inc. |
400,000 | 400,064 | ||||||
Packaging Corp. of America |
800,000 | 813,000 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,213,064 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals – 3.0% |
| |||||||
AbbVie, Inc. |
500,000 | 433,890 | ||||||
5.05% due 3/15/2034 |
1,200,000 | 1,196,292 | ||||||
5.40% due 3/15/2054 |
200,000 | 197,888 | ||||||
Astrazeneca Finance LLC |
900,000 | 894,798 | ||||||
AstraZeneca PLC |
400,000 | 445,112 | ||||||
Becton Dickinson & Co. |
200,000 | 187,466 | ||||||
Cigna Group |
300,000 | 298,698 | ||||||
5.40% due 3/15/2033 |
700,000 | 702,443 | ||||||
CVS Health Corp. |
300,000 | 297,729 | ||||||
5.30% due 6/1/2033 |
700,000 | 683,473 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co. |
700,000 | 686,308 | ||||||
Organon & Co./Organon Foreign Debt Co-Issuer BV |
450,000 | 404,037 | ||||||
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. |
900,000 | 894,843 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
7,322,977 | ||||||||
Pipelines – 0.6% |
| |||||||
Cheniere Energy Partners LP |
500,000 | 506,255 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LLC |
400,000 | 388,496 | ||||||
4.85% due 3/15/2044 |
300,000 | 270,570 | ||||||
MPLX LP |
400,000 | 393,892 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,559,213 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts – 0.9% |
| |||||||
American Homes 4 Rent LP |
$ | 200,000 | $ | 197,044 | ||||
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. |
200,000 | 200,028 | ||||||
Crown Castle, Inc. |
600,000 | 534,888 | ||||||
5.80% due 3/1/2034 |
500,000 | 504,980 | ||||||
Extra Space Storage LP |
800,000 | 783,016 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,219,956 | ||||||||
Retail – 1.0% |
| |||||||
Darden Restaurants, Inc. |
400,000 | 412,956 | ||||||
Home Depot, Inc. |
900,000 | 891,846 | ||||||
Lowe’s Cos., Inc. |
300,000 | 220,293 | ||||||
5.15% due 7/1/2033 |
300,000 | 298,509 | ||||||
Target Corp. |
700,000 | 674,415 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
2,498,019 | ||||||||
Software – 0.7% |
| |||||||
Cloud Software Group, Inc. |
500,000 | 480,325 | ||||||
9.00% due 9/30/2029(1) |
500,000 | 484,880 | ||||||
Oracle Corp. |
700,000 | 741,090 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,706,295 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 1.5% |
| |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
700,000 | 699,328 | ||||||
5.30% due 2/26/2054 |
300,000 | 294,150 | ||||||
Frontier Communications Holdings LLC |
500,000 | 487,855 | ||||||
Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA |
450,000 | 419,760 | ||||||
Rogers Communications, Inc. |
1,000,000 | 981,050 | ||||||
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
600,000 | 501,708 | ||||||
3.00% due 2/15/2041 |
300,000 | 214,395 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
3,598,246 | ||||||||
Transportation – 0.4% |
| |||||||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC |
400,000 | 402,164 | ||||||
Norfolk Southern Corp. |
500,000 | 509,750 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
911,914 | ||||||||
Trucking & Leasing – 0.2% |
| |||||||
SMBC Aviation Capital Finance DAC |
400,000 | 392,332 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
392,332 | ||||||||
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes (Cost $71,002,758) |
|
70,933,860 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 9.3% |
| |||||||
1211 Avenue of the Americas Trust |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,206,339 | ||||
BAMLL Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust |
450,000 | 436,301 | ||||||
BANK |
1,413,000 | 1,238,394 | ||||||
Series 2022-BNK43, Class B |
500,000 | 461,736 | ||||||
BB-UBS Trust |
1,250,000 | 1,223,088 | ||||||
Benchmark Mortgage Trust |
855,000 | 880,255 | ||||||
Series 2024-V5, Class B |
360,000 | 362,162 | ||||||
BMO Mortgage Trust |
950,000 | 1,005,982 | ||||||
BX Trust |
1,200,000 | 1,066,720 | ||||||
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust |
1,125,000 | 1,043,783 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust |
1,058,997 | 1,054,241 | ||||||
Freddie Mac STACR REMIC Trust |
||||||||
Series 2021-DNA7, Class M2 |
1,300,000 | 1,313,104 | ||||||
Series 2021-HQA4, Class M1 |
658,536 | 656,834 | ||||||
Series 2022-DNA1, Class M1A |
553,840 | 553,986 | ||||||
Series 2022-HQA3, Class M1A |
1,200,445 | 1,228,848 | ||||||
Jackson Park Trust |
||||||||
Series 2019-LIC, Class A |
1,200,000 | 1,028,222 | ||||||
Series 2019-LIC, Class B |
680,000 | 564,979 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust |
||||||||
Series 2018-H4, Class A4 |
900,000 | 856,369 | ||||||
Series 2020-L4, Class AS |
750,000 | 638,243 | ||||||
NYC Commercial Mortgage Trust |
580,000 | 384,820 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
SLG Office Trust |
$ | 1,800,000 | $ | 1,472,977 | ||||
Stack Infrastructure Issuer LLC |
1,250,000 | 1,163,465 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust |
2,000,000 | 1,872,782 | ||||||
Series 2021-SAVE, Class A |
744,439 | 738,904 | ||||||
Total Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $23,914,671) |
|
22,452,534 | ||||||
Senior Secured Loans – 3.4% |
| |||||||
Advertising – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Outfront Media Capital LLC |
392,033 | 391,739 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
391,739 | ||||||||
Airlines – 0.6% | ||||||||
Air Canada |
408,975 | 409,102 | ||||||
United Airlines, Inc. |
374,063 | 374,395 | ||||||
WestJet Loyalty LP |
700,000 | 702,800 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,486,297 | ||||||||
Commercial Services – 0.1% | ||||||||
Vestis Corp. |
174,563 | 173,545 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
173,545 | ||||||||
Distribution/Wholesale – 0.2% | ||||||||
Core & Main LP |
448,875 | 449,158 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
449,158 | ||||||||
Electric – 0.2% | ||||||||
ExGen Renewables IV LLC |
482,900 | 483,301 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
483,301 |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Entertainment – 0.6% | ||||||||
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
$ | 748,125 | $ | 747,422 | ||||
Flutter Financing BV |
746,250 | 745,787 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,493,209 | ||||||||
Healthcare-Services – 0.2% | ||||||||
DaVita, Inc. |
293,367 | 293,112 | ||||||
ICON Luxembourg SARL |
177,551 | 178,055 | ||||||
PRA Health Sciences, Inc. |
44,237 | 44,363 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
515,530 | ||||||||
Leisure Time – 0.1% | ||||||||
Alterra Mountain Co. |
250,000 | 251,095 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
251,095 | ||||||||
Lodging – 0.6% | ||||||||
Fertitta Entertainment LLC |
298,473 | 298,661 | ||||||
Hilton Grand Vacations Borrower LLC |
299,250 | 299,026 | ||||||
Station Casinos LLC |
748,125 | 747,257 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
1,344,944 | ||||||||
Media – 0.3% | ||||||||
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
750,000 | 751,455 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
751,455 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Software – 0.2% | ||||||||
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. |
$ | 498,750 | 498,750 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
498,750 | ||||||||
Telecommunications – 0.1% | ||||||||
Frontier Communications Corp. |
350,000 | $ | 349,125 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
349,125 | ||||||||
Total Senior Secured Loans (Cost $8,162,720) |
|
8,188,148 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 14.0% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
||||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2044 |
19,000,000 | 18,964,375 | ||||||
4.625% due 5/15/2054 |
9,000,000 | 9,126,562 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
5,500,000 | 5,537,813 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $33,203,563) |
|
33,628,750 | ||||||
Shares |
Value | |||||||
Exchange–Traded Funds – 3.6% |
| |||||||
iShares MBS ETF |
47,985 | 4,405,503 | ||||||
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF |
93,285 | 4,235,139 | ||||||
Total Exchange–Traded Funds (Cost $8,316,338) |
|
8,640,642 | ||||||
Principal Amount |
Value | |||||||
Commercial Paper – 1.8% | ||||||||
Florida Power & Light Co. |
$ | 4,400,000 | 4,400,000 | |||||
Total Commercial Paper (Cost $4,400,000) |
|
4,400,000 | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.2% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
492,654 | 492,654 | ||||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $492,654) |
|
492,654 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Value | |||||
Total Investments – 100.1% (Cost $242,948,692) |
$ | 240,838,332 | ||||
Liabilities in excess of other assets – (0.1)% | (145,492 | ) | ||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ | 240,692,840 |
(1) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $71,402,468, representing 29.7% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(2) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(3) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(4) | Represents an unsettled loan commitment. The coupon rate will be determined at time of settlement. |
(5) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 0.75% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 537,900 | $ | 502,512 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 348 | Long | $ | 71,014,823 | $ | 71,068,125 | $ | 53,302 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. 5-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 192 | Long | 20,352,938 | 20,463,000 | 110,062 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Long Bond | September 2024 | 10 | Long | 1,423,107 | 1,183,125 | (239,982 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra Bond | September 2024 | 41 | Long | 5,056,357 | 5,139,094 | 82,737 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 97,847,225 | $ | 97,853,344 | $ | 6,119 | ||||||||||||||||||
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 110 | Short | $ | (12,544,698 | ) | $ | (12,488,438 | ) | $ | 56,260 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | (12,544,698 | ) | $ | (12,488,438 | ) | $ | 56,260 |
Legend:
CLO — Collateralized Loan Obligation
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury
REMIC — Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
STACR — Structured Agency Credit Risk
USD — United States Dollar
8 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | $ | — | $ | 40,057,396 | $ | — | $ | 40,057,396 | ||||||||
Asset–Backed Securities | — | 52,044,348 | — | 52,044,348 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes | — | 70,933,860 | — | 70,933,860 | ||||||||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | — | 22,452,534 | — | 22,452,534 | ||||||||||||
Senior Secured Loans | — | 8,188,148 | — | 8,188,148 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 33,628,750 | — | 33,628,750 | ||||||||||||
Exchange–Traded Funds | 8,640,642 | — | — | 8,640,642 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Paper | — | 4,400,000 | — | 4,400,000 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 492,654 | — | 492,654 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,640,642 | $ | 232,197,690 | $ | — | $ | 240,838,332 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 302,361 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 302,361 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
(239,982 | ) | — | — | (239,982 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 62,379 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 62,379 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 9 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 240,838,332 | ||
Cash |
167,898 | |||
Receivable for investments sold |
2,375,236 | |||
Interest receivable |
2,006,432 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
760,760 | |||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts |
140,290 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
8,922 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
3,098 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
246,300,968 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for investments purchased |
5,227,909 | |||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
190,055 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
89,913 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
49,952 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
21,452 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
2,616 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
26,231 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
5,608,128 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 240,692,840 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 261,708,045 | ||
Distributable loss |
(21,015,205 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 240,692,840 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 242,948,692 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
25,548,252 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$9.42 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 6,500,881 | ||
Dividends |
91,535 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
6,592,416 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
552,171 | |||
Distribution fees |
306,762 | |||
Professional fees |
48,264 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
36,858 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
29,348 | |||
Administrative fees |
29,220 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,213 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,960 | |||
Other expenses |
7,356 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
1,022,152 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(52,785 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
969,367 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
5,623,049 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
86,573 | |||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
(533,641 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts |
(67,520 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(5,266,169 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(612,652 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
(6,393,409 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | (770,360 | ) | |
|
|
|||
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 5,623,049 | $ | 10,318,292 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivative contracts |
(514,588 | ) | (21,880,799 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
(5,878,821 | ) | 24,273,349 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
(770,360 | ) | 12,710,842 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
18,886,809 | 26,581,652 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(31,462,687 | ) | (51,622,991 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(12,575,878 | ) | (25,041,339 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(13,346,238 | ) | (12,330,497 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
254,039,078 | 266,369,575 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 240,692,840 | $ | 254,039,078 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
2,020,187 | 2,911,694 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(3,368,823 | ) | (5,668,610 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,348,636 | ) | (2,756,916 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 11 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 9.44 | $ | 0.21 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 9.42 | (0.21)% | (4) | ||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
8.98 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 9.44 | 5.12% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.61 | 0.24 | (1.87 | ) | (1.63 | ) | 8.98 | (15.36)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
10.70 | 0.18 | (0.27 | ) | (0.09 | ) | 10.61 | (0.84)% | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
10.03 | 0.14 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 10.70 | 6.68% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/19(5) |
10.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | (6) | 0.03 | 10.03 | 0.30% | (4) |
12 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 240,693 | 0.79% | (4) | 0.83% | (4) | 4.58% | (4) | 4.54% | (4) | 114% | (4) | |||||||||||
254,039 | 0.79% | 0.82% | 3.94% | 3.91% | 324% | |||||||||||||||||
266,370 | 0.79% | 0.80% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 154% | |||||||||||||||||
355,203 | 0.79% | 0.79% | 1.68% | 1.68% | 155% | |||||||||||||||||
333,391 | 0.79% | 0.81% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 112% | |||||||||||||||||
337,312 | 0.75% | (4) | 0.85% | (4) | 1.56% | (4) | 1.46% | (4) | 18% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.‘s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2019, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | Commenced operations on October 21, 2019. |
(6) | Rounds to $0.00 per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 21, 2019. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks total return with an emphasis on current income as well as capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation
oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5c). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Exchange-traded financial futures and swap contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
14 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
15 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indices. The Fund may use these investments (i) as alternatives to direct long or short investment in a particular security or securities, (ii) to adjust the Fund’s asset allocation or risk exposure, (iii) to enhance potential return, or (iv) for hedging purposes. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid
by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund entered into credit default swaps for risk exposure management and to enhance potential return. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Options Transactions The Fund can write (sell) put and call options on securities and indexes to earn premiums, for hedging purposes, for risk management purposes or otherwise as part of its investment strategies. In writing options, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker or counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the face value of the options. When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability that is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the written option. These liabilities, if any, are reflected as written options, at value, in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a written call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a written put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Fund purchasing or selling a
16 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
security at a price different from its current market value. There were no options transactions as of June 30, 2024.
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.45% of the first $300 million, and 0.40% in excess of $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fund has no sub-adviser.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.79% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to
Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $52,785.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $306,762 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold
17 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
(excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 142,681,302 | $ | 132,766,649 | ||||
Sales | 112,805,897 | 164,690,727 |
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
d. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
e. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
f. Below Investment Grade Securities The Fund may invest in below investment grade securities (i.e. lower-quality, “junk” debt), which are subject to various risks. Lower-quality debt is considered to be speculative because it is less certain that the issuer will be able to pay interest or repay the principal than in the case of investment grade debt. These securities can involve a substantially greater risk of default than higher-rated securities, and their values can decline significantly over short periods of time. Lower-quality debt securities tend to be more sensitive to adverse news about their issuers, the market and the economy in general, than higher-quality debt securities. The market for these securities can be less liquid, especially during periods of recession or general market decline.
g. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued
18 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
h. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
i. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into U.S. Treasury futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
Under certain market conditions, the Fund may use credit default swaps to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield
curve exposure, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. Credit default swaps involve the exchange of a floating or fixed rate payment in return for assuming potential credit losses of an underlying security or pool of securities.
The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a “notional amount,”i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate, in a particular foreign currency or security, or in a “basket” of securities representing a particular index. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCM“s) that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. Funds post initial and variation margin by making payments to their clearing member FCMs.
Generally, the Fund will enter into credit default swaps on a net basis, which means that the two payment streams are netted out, with a Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Credit default swaps do not normally involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to credit default swaps is normally limited to the net amount of payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a credit default swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive, if any.
In addition to the risks generally applicable to derivatives, risks associated with credit default swap agreements include adverse changes in the returns of the underlying instruments, failure of the counterparties to perform under the agreement’s terms and the possible lack of liquidity with respect to the agreements.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | 302,361 | ||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | (239,982 | ) |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as |
19 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN TOTAL RETURN BOND VIP FUND
reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
Credit Default Contracts |
|||||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) |
||||||||
Futures Contracts1 | $ | (533,641 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts2 | — | (67,520 | ) | |||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
||||||||
Futures Contracts3 | $ | (612,652 | ) | $ | — | |||
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
||||||||
Futures Contracts4 | 532 | — | ||||||
Swap Contracts – Buy/Sell Protection |
$ | — | $ | 3,714,286 |
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts. |
3 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
4 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
j. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
20 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund;
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
21 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure
22 |
and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
23 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to
the Funds’ status under the tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s |
24 |
performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that |
25 |
the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance |
was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
26 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
27 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB10524
Guardian Variable
Products Trust
2024
Semi-Annual Report
Financial Statements and Other Information
All Data as of June 30, 2024
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
Not FDIC insured. May lose value. No bank guarantee. | www.guardianlife.com |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
||||
Schedule of Investments | 1 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 4 | |||
Statement of Operations | 4 | |||
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 5 | |||
Financial Highlights | 6 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | 8 | |||
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
15 | |||
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
15 | |||
15 | ||||
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements |
15 |
Except as otherwise specifically stated, all information, including portfolio security positions, is as of June 30, 2024. Fund holdings will vary. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but is not guaranteed.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 49.7% |
| |||||||
Fannie Mae ACES |
||||||||
Series 2018-M2, Class A2 |
$ | 1,439,296 | $ | 1,355,641 | ||||
Series 2019-M4, Class A2 |
7,087,576 | 6,607,630 | ||||||
Series 2021-M4, Class A2 |
1,000,000 | 814,476 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. |
||||||||
2.50% due 9/1/2037 |
1,605,613 | 1,450,897 | ||||||
3.00% due 4/1/2052 |
2,734,181 | 2,328,641 | ||||||
3.50% due 11/1/2052 |
3,033,162 | 2,684,046 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2052 |
2,656,088 | 2,430,421 | ||||||
4.50% due 2/1/2053 |
1,529,669 | 1,442,080 | ||||||
5.00% due 12/1/2052 |
3,625,387 | 3,507,640 | ||||||
5.50% due 6/1/2053 |
1,528,738 | 1,507,539 | ||||||
5.50% due 9/1/2053 |
1,826,299 | 1,803,820 | ||||||
6.00% due 8/1/2053 |
1,531,201 | 1,535,501 | ||||||
6.00% due 10/1/2053 |
1,776,832 | 1,781,076 | ||||||
6.00% due 3/1/2054 |
1,994,397 | 2,004,057 | ||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association |
||||||||
2.00% due 6/1/2037 |
1,824,269 | 1,604,034 | ||||||
2.00% due 9/1/2037 |
1,754,958 | 1,543,090 | ||||||
2.50% due 10/1/2037 |
21,431 | 19,366 | ||||||
2.50% due 11/1/2037 |
833,755 | 753,414 | ||||||
2.50% due 1/1/2052 |
1,966,689 | 1,605,498 | ||||||
2.50% due 3/1/2052 |
1,855,859 | 1,518,001 | ||||||
2.50% due 4/1/2052 |
1,851,308 | 1,515,424 | ||||||
2.50% due 5/1/2052 |
1,823,074 | 1,492,313 | ||||||
2.50% due 7/1/2052 |
7,280,718 | 5,955,269 | ||||||
3.00% due 11/1/2037 |
1,028,676 | 950,832 | ||||||
3.00% due 7/1/2051 |
1,532,966 | 1,303,401 | ||||||
3.00% due 3/1/2052 |
724,174 | 616,763 | ||||||
3.00% due 4/1/2052 |
899,083 | 765,750 | ||||||
3.00% due 11/1/2052 |
4,261,265 | 3,624,074 | ||||||
3.50% due 10/1/2052 |
1,667,580 | 1,475,771 | ||||||
3.50% due 11/1/2052 |
3,251,246 | 2,876,777 | ||||||
4.00% due 10/1/2052 |
2,003,230 | 1,833,031 | ||||||
4.50% due 9/1/2052 |
1,008,430 | 951,160 | ||||||
4.50% due 2/1/2053 |
1,520,097 | 1,433,057 | ||||||
4.50% due 10/1/2053 |
2,053,259 | 1,934,965 | ||||||
5.00% due 2/1/2053 |
1,581,248 | 1,528,913 | ||||||
6.00% due 9/1/2053 |
1,424,302 | 1,427,844 | ||||||
Freddie Mac Multifamily Structured Pass-Through Certificates |
||||||||
Series K048, Class A2 |
2,170,000 | 2,129,216 | ||||||
Series K078, Class A2 |
600,000 | 578,623 | ||||||
Series K082, Class A2 |
3,385,000 | 3,267,794 | ||||||
Series K102, Class A2 |
3,510,000 | 3,151,223 | ||||||
Series K104, Class A2 |
1,950,000 | 1,717,990 | ||||||
Series K123, Class A2 |
465,000 | 385,103 | ||||||
Series K124, Class A2 |
4,200,000 | 3,480,475 | ||||||
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Series K730, Class A2 |
$ | 3,661,246 | $ | 3,622,684 | ||||
Total Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $89,972,094) |
|
86,315,320 | ||||||
Asset–Backed Securities – 4.3% |
| |||||||
Barings CLO Ltd. |
1,100,000 | 1,100,835 | ||||||
BlueMountain CLO Ltd. |
600,000 | 599,460 | ||||||
Cathedral Lake VI Ltd. |
1,200,000 | 1,201,856 | ||||||
Golden Credit Card Trust |
525,000 | 517,487 | ||||||
KKR CLO 38 Ltd. |
1,250,000 | 1,249,710 | ||||||
Midocean Credit CLO VIII |
500,000 | 500,200 | ||||||
NextGear Floorplan Master Owner Trust |
700,000 | 697,726 | ||||||
Oscar U.S. Funding XV LLC |
600,000 | 602,117 | ||||||
RRX 6 Ltd. |
1,000,000 | 999,500 | ||||||
Total Asset–Backed Securities (Cost $7,388,360) |
|
7,468,891 | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities – 2.1% |
| |||||||
BX Trust |
500,000 | 444,466 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust |
638,780 | 625,503 | ||||||
Series 2015-CR23, Class A4 |
1,400,000 | 1,373,560 | ||||||
SLG Office Trust |
600,000 | 490,992 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 1 |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (continued) |
| |||||||
Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust |
$ | 418,000 | $ | 394,770 | ||||
Series 2021-SAVE, Class A |
400,852 | 397,872 | ||||||
Total Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities (Cost $3,801,698) |
|
3,727,163 | ||||||
U.S. Government Agencies – 4.0% |
| |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
7,000,000 | 6,996,920 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Agencies (Cost $7,000,000) |
|
6,996,920 | ||||||
U.S. Government Securities – 28.8% |
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
||||||||
4.375% due 5/15/2034 |
7,100,000 | 7,102,219 | ||||||
4.50% due 5/31/2029 |
22,200,000 | 22,352,625 | ||||||
4.875% due 5/31/2026 |
20,500,000 | 20,541,640 | ||||||
Total U.S. Government Securities (Cost $49,713,318) |
|
49,996,484 | ||||||
Shares | Value | |||||||
Exchange–Traded Funds – 9.2% |
| |||||||
iShares MBS ETF |
86,290 | 7,922,285 | ||||||
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF |
176,050 | 7,992,670 | ||||||
Total Exchange–Traded Funds (Cost $15,629,015) |
|
15,914,955 |
June 30, 2024 (unaudited) | Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements – 0.3% |
| |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
$ | 600,400 | $ | 600,400 | ||||
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $600,400) |
|
600,400 | ||||||
Total Investments – 98.4% (Cost $174,104,885) |
|
171,020,133 | ||||||
Assets in excess of other liabilities – 1.6% |
|
2,766,215 | ||||||
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
$ | 173,786,348 |
(1) | Variable rate securities, which may include step-up bonds or adjustable rate mortgages. The rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2024. |
(2) | Variable coupon rate based on weighted average interest rate of underlying mortgages. |
(3) | Securities that may be resold in transactions exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, normally to certain qualified buyers. At June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $8,802,221, representing 5.1% of net assets. These securities have been deemed liquid by the investment adviser pursuant to the Fund’s liquidity procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(4) | Interest rate shown reflects the discount rate at time of purchase. |
(5) | The table below presents collateral for repurchase agreements. |
Security | Coupon | Maturity Date |
Principal Amount |
Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | 4.50% | 3/31/2026 | $ | 609,000 | $ | 612,545 |
Open futures contracts at June 30, 2024:
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 215 | Long | $ | 43,887,211 | $ | 43,907,031 | $ | 19,820 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | 43,887,211 | $ | 43,907,031 | $ | 19,820 | |||||||||||||||||
Type | Expiration | Contracts | Position | Notional Amount |
Notional Value |
Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Long Bond | September 2024 | 15 | Short | $ | (1,608,877 | ) | $ | (1,774,687 | ) | $ | (165,810 | ) | ||||||||||||
U.S. Ultra 10-Year Treasury Note | September 2024 | 26 | Short | (2,982,601 | ) | (2,951,812 | ) | 30,789 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ | (4,591,478 | ) | $ | (4,726,499 | ) | $ | (135,021 | ) |
Legend:
ACES — Alternative Credit Enhancement Securities
CLO — Collateralized Loan Obligation
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
USD — United States Dollar
2 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2024 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For more information on valuation inputs, please refer to Note 2a of the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities (unaudited) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | $ | — | $ | 86,315,320 | $ | — | $ | 86,315,320 | ||||||||
Asset–Backed Securities | — | 7,468,891 | — | 7,468,891 | ||||||||||||
Non–Agency Mortgage–Backed Securities | — | 3,727,163 | — | 3,727,163 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies | — | 6,996,920 | — | 6,996,920 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | — | 49,996,484 | — | 49,996,484 | ||||||||||||
Exchange–Traded Funds | 15,914,955 | — | — | 15,914,955 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements | — | 600,400 | — | 600,400 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 15,914,955 | $ | 155,105,178 | $ | — | $ | 171,020,133 | ||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 50,609 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 50,609 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
(165,810 | ) | — | — | (165,810 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (115,201 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (115,201 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 3 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
Statement of Assets and Liabilities As of June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
$ | 171,020,133 | ||
Receivable for investments sold |
2,017,980 | |||
Interest receivable |
576,348 | |||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts |
238,229 | |||
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
236,335 | |||
Reimbursement receivable from adviser |
18,481 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
2,154 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
174,109,660 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for fund shares redeemed |
169,141 | |||
Investment advisory fees payable |
67,876 | |||
Distribution fees payable |
36,104 | |||
Accrued audit fees |
14,218 | |||
Accrued custodian and accounting fees |
4,325 | |||
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees |
1,780 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
29,868 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
323,312 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 173,786,348 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Assets Consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 181,449,907 | ||
Distributable loss |
(7,663,559 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Net Assets |
$ | 173,786,348 | ||
|
|
|||
Investments, at Cost |
$ | 174,104,885 | ||
|
|
|||
Pricing of Shares |
||||
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding with No Par Value |
17,779,343 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share |
$9.77 | |||
Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 (unaudited) |
||||
Investment Income |
||||
Interest |
$ | 3,481,005 | ||
Dividends |
220,061 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Investment Income |
3,701,066 | |||
|
|
|||
Expenses |
||||
Investment advisory fees |
420,955 | |||
Distribution fees |
223,912 | |||
Professional fees |
38,680 | |||
Trustees’ and officers’ fees |
26,800 | |||
Administrative fees |
25,000 | |||
Custodian and accounting fees |
21,163 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
7,751 | |||
Shareholder reports |
4,572 | |||
Other expenses |
5,674 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
774,507 | |||
Less: Fees waived |
(105,714 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses, Net |
668,793 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
3,032,273 | |||
|
|
|||
Realized Gain/(Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments |
(230,349 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts |
(37,055 | ) | ||
Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts |
(120,745 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments |
(2,932,765 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts |
(396,192 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on swap contracts |
80,113 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Loss on Investments and Derivative Contracts |
(3,636,993 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
$ | (604,720 | ) | |
|
|
|||
4 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
Statements of Changes in Net Assets Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||
For the Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
For the Year Ended 12/31/23 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 3,032,273 | $ | 6,045,300 | ||||
Net realized gain/(loss) from investments and derivative contracts |
(388,149 | ) | (11,728,270 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and derivative contracts |
(3,248,844 | ) | 13,016,521 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
(604,720 | ) | 7,333,551 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital Share Transactions |
| |||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares |
16,712,976 | 22,882,316 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(26,783,924 | ) | (47,076,568 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions |
(10,070,948 | ) | (24,194,252 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets |
(10,675,668 | ) | (16,860,701 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Assets |
| |||||||
Beginning of period |
184,462,016 | 201,322,717 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 173,786,348 | $ | 184,462,016 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Information: |
| |||||||
Shares |
||||||||
Sold |
1,719,224 | 2,396,108 | ||||||
Redeemed |
(2,761,702 | ) | (4,942,331 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Decrease |
(1,042,478 | ) | (2,546,223 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 5 |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
The Financial Highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance for the past six reporting periods (or, if shorter, the period since inception). Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund.
Financial Highlights Six Months Ended Numbers are unaudited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income(1) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Total Operations |
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 6/30/24 |
$ | 9.80 | $ | 0.16 | $ | (0.19) | $ | (0.03) | $ | 9.77 | (0.31)% | (4) | ||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/23 |
9.42 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.38 | 9.80 | 4.03% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/22 |
10.27 | 0.11 | (0.96) | (0.85) | 9.42 | (8.28)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/21 |
10.53 | 0.06 | (0.32) | (0.26) | 10.27 | (2.47)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 12/31/20 |
10.00 | 0.09 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 10.53 | 5.30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended 12/31/19(6) |
10.00 | 0.02 | (0.02) | 0.00 | 10.00 | 0.00% | (4) |
6 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000s) |
Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets(3) |
Gross Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 173,786 | 0.75% | (4) | 0.86% | (4) | 3.38% | (4) | 3.27% | (4) | 146% | (4) | |||||||||||
184,462 | 0.75% | 0.85% | 3.07% | 2.97% | 369% | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
201,323 | 0.75% | 0.83% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 52% | |||||||||||||||||
273,908 | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.61% | 0.54% | 64% | |||||||||||||||||
263,190 | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.75% | 76% | |||||||||||||||||
270,003 | 0.70% | (4) | 0.89% | (4) | 1.29% | (4) | 1.10% | (4) | 31% | (4) |
(1) | Calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total returns do not reflect the effects of charges deducted pursuant to the terms of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.‘s variable contracts. Inclusion of such charges would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. |
(3) | Net Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets and Net Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets include the effect of fee waivers and expense limitations. |
(4) | Ratios for periods less than one year have been annualized, except for total return and portfolio turnover rate. For the period ended December 31, 2019, certain non-recurring fees (i.e., audit fees) are not annualized. |
(5) | The Fund’s portfolio turnover rate during the year reflects higher purchase and sale activities due to a significant inflow of assets into the fund. |
(6) | Commenced operations on October 21, 2019. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 7 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
June 30, 2024 (unaudited)
1. Organization
Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on January 12, 2016, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust currently has twenty-four series. Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (the “Fund”) is a series of the Trust. The Fund is a diversified fund and commenced operations on October 21, 2019. The financial statements for other series of the Trust are presented in separate reports.
The Trust has authorized an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value. Shares are bought and sold at closing net asset value (“NAV”). Shares of the Fund are only sold to certain separate accounts of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (“GIAC”) that fund certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies issued by GIAC. GIAC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian Life”).
The Fund seeks total return with an emphasis on current income as well as capital appreciation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies. The following policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
a. Investment Valuations The Board of Trustees has designated Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (“Park Avenue”) as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. Park Avenue has established a Fair Valuation Committee and has adopted fair valuation procedures that provide methodologies for fair valuing securities. These procedures include monitoring the appropriateness of fair values based on results of ongoing valuation
oversight, including but not limited to consideration of security specific events, market events, and pricing vendor and broker-dealer evaluation. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees and carries out the policies for the valuation of investments held in the Fund. The Fair Valuation Committee is responsible for discussing and assessing the potential impacts to the fair values on an ongoing basis, and reports to the Board of Trustees on at least a quarterly basis.
The valuations of debt securities for which quoted bid prices are readily available are valued at the bid price by independent pricing services (each, a “Service”). Debt securities for which quoted bid prices are not readily available are valued by a Service at the evaluated bid price provided by the Service or the bid price provided by an independent broker-dealer or at a calculated price based on the spread to an appropriate benchmark provided by such broker-dealer.
Equity securities traded on an exchange other than NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last reported sale price on the principal exchange or market on which they are traded; or, if there were no sales that day, at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Securities traded on the NASDAQ are generally valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not be the last sale price. If the NASDAQ official closing price is not available for a security, that security is generally valued at the mean between the closing bid and ask prices. Repurchase agreements are carried at cost, which approximates fair value (see Note 5d). Foreign securities are valued in the currencies of the markets in which they trade and then converted to U.S. dollars by the application of foreign exchange rates at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Exchange-traded financial futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price on the market where they are primarily traded.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or securities whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s valuation time but after the close of the securities’ principal exchange or market are valued at their fair values as determined in good faith by Park Avenue, as the Board of Trustee’s valuation designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), in accordance with Park Avenue’s procedures and under the general oversight of the Board of Trustees. Valuations reflected in this report are as of the report date. As a result, changes in valuation due to market events and/or issuer related events after the report date and prior to issuance of the report are not reflected herein.
8 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
Various inputs are used in determining the valuation of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 – unadjusted inputs using quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar investments, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for investments (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or other market corroborated inputs. |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics, and other factors. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input; both individually and in aggregate, that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Trust. The Trust considers observable data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of a financial instrument’s assigned level within the hierarchy.
The FASB requires reporting entities to make disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 securities on a gross basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In determining a financial instrument’s placement within the hierarchy, the Trust separates the Fund’s investment portfolio into two categories: investments and derivatives (e.g., futures). A summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of June 30, 2024 is included in the Schedule of Investments.
Investments Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted
market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include certain U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and certain foreign equity securities, including securities whose prices may have been affected by events occurring after the close of trading on their principal exchange or market and, as a result, whose values are determined by a pricing service as described above, or securities whose values are otherwise determined using fair valuation methods approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or not at all. Level 3 investments include, among others, private placement securities. When observable prices are not available for these securities, the Trust uses one or more valuation techniques for which sufficient and reliable data is available. The inputs used by the Trust in estimating the value of Level 3 investments include, for example, the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations, and other transactions across the capital structure. Level 3 investments may also be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the Trust in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the Trust due to the lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Fund’s results of operations. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no securities classified as Level 3.
Derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures contracts, exchange-traded option contracts and certain swaps, are typically classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether or not they are deemed to be actively traded. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives, such as generic forwards, certain swaps and options, have inputs which can generally be corroborated by market data and are therefore classified within Level 2.
b. Securities Transactions Securities transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains or losses on securities transactions are determined on the basis of specific identification.
9 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
c. Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. In entering into such contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the face value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
d. Credit Derivatives The Fund may enter into credit derivatives, including credit default swaps on individual obligations or credit indices. The Fund may use these investments to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve positioning, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance potential returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. The use by the Fund of credit default swaps may have the effect of creating a short position in a security. Credit derivatives can create investment leverage and may create additional investment risks that may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in more traditional securities, as described in the Statement of Additional Information.
The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or seller. The Fund may buy protection under a credit default swap to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market. The Fund may sell protection under a credit default swap in an attempt to gain exposure to an underlying issuer’s credit quality characteristics without investing directly in that issuer.
For swaps entered with an individual counterparty, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the uncollateralized amount expected to be received under a credit default swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty. Credit default swap agreements are generally valued at a price at which the counterparty to such agreement would terminate the agreement. In entering into swap contracts, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker (or for the benefit of the broker), either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the notional value of the contract. Subsequent payments are received or made by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the values of the contracts, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as variation margin received or paid
by the Fund. Daily changes in variation margin are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.
The Fund may also enter into cleared swaps with a central clearinghouse. In a centrally cleared derivative transaction, a Fund typically enters into the transaction with a financial institution counterparty serving as the clearinghouse, and performance of the transaction is effectively guaranteed against default by such counterparty, thereby reducing or eliminating the Fund’s exposure to the credit risk of the original counterparty. The Fund typically will be required to post specified levels of margin with the clearinghouse or at the instruction of the clearinghouse. The margin required by a clearinghouse may be greater than the margin the Fund would be required to post in an uncleared derivative transaction.
The Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of swap contracts and may realize a loss. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund entered into credit default swaps for risk exposure management and to enhance potential return. There were no credit default swaps held as of June 30, 2024.
e. Options Transactions The Fund can write (sell) put and call options on securities and indexes to earn premiums, for hedging purposes, for risk management purposes or otherwise as part of its investment strategies. In writing options, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker or counterparty, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a percentage of the face value of the options. When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability that is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the written option. These liabilities, if any, are reflected as written options, at value, in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchased transactions, as a realized loss. If a written call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss. If a written put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security. In writing an option, the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option. Exercise of a written option could result in the Fund purchasing or selling a
10 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
security at a price different from its current market value. There were no options transactions as of June 30, 2024.
f. Investment Income Dividend income net of foreign taxes withheld, if any, is generally recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from real estate investment trusts, if any, may be classified as dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Interest income, which includes amortization/accretion of premium/discount, is determined using the interest income accrual method, and is accrued and recorded daily.
g. Allocation of Income and Expenses Many of the expenses of the Trust can be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust. Expenses that cannot be directly attributed to a specific series of the Trust are generally apportioned among all the series in the Trust, based on relative net assets. In calculating net asset value per share for each series of the Trust, investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and expenses other than series-specific expenses are allocated daily to each series based upon the proportion of net assets attributable to each series.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
a. Investment Advisory Fee and Expense Limitation Under the terms of the advisory agreement, which, after its two year initial term, is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Trustees, the Fund pays an investment advisory fee to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life and receives an investment advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.47% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fund has no sub-adviser.
Park Avenue has contractually agreed through April 30, 2025 to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Fund to the extent necessary to limit the Fund’s total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement to 0.74% of the Fund’s average daily net assets (excluding, if applicable, any acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, interest, transaction costs and brokerage commissions, litigation and extraordinary expenses). Prior to May 1, 2024, the expense limitation was 0.75%. The limitation may not be increased or terminated prior to this time without action by the Board of Trustees and may be terminated only upon approval of the Board of Trustees. Amounts waived or reimbursed by Park Avenue pursuant to any expense limitation will not be subject to Park Avenue’s recoupment rights. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, Park Avenue waived fees and/or paid Fund expenses in the amount of $105,714.
b. Compensation of Trustees and Officers Trustees and officers who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no compensation from the Fund, except for the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust. Trustees of the Trust who are not interested persons of the Trust, and the Chief Compliance Officer, receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Trust.
c. Distribution Fees Park Avenue Securities LLC (“PAS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian Life, is the principal underwriter of Fund shares. The Trust has entered into a distribution and service agreement with PAS, which governs the sale and distribution of shares of the Fund. Under a distribution and service plan adopted by the Trust (“12b-1 plan”), PAS is compensated for services in such capacity, including its expenses in connection with the promotion and distribution of shares of the Fund, at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Fund incurred distribution fees in the amount of $223,912 to PAS.
PAS has directed that certain payments under the 12b-1 plan be used to compensate GIAC for shareholder services provided to contract owners.
4. Federal Income Taxes
a. Distributions to Shareholders For federal income tax purposes, the Fund is treated as a disregarded entity (“DRE”). As a DRE, the Fund is not subject to an entity-level income tax; and any income, gains, losses, deductions, taxes, and credits of the Fund would instead be “passed through” directly to the separate accounts of GIAC that invest in the Fund and retain the same character for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund is not required to distribute taxable income and capital gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no dividends and capital gains distributions were paid by the Fund.
5. Investments
a. Investment Purchases and Sales The cost of investments and U.S. government agency obligations purchased and the proceeds from U.S. government agency obligations and other investments sold (excluding short-term investments and to be announced (TBA) securities) for the six months ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Other Investments |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|||||||
Purchases | $ | 21,118,210 | $ | 231,392,926 | ||||
Sales | 24,099,810 | 234,289,741 |
11 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
b. Foreign Securities Foreign securities investments involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk; adverse political, regulatory, social, and economic developments; and less reliable information about issuers. Moreover, securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
c. Industry or Sector Concentration In its normal course of business, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in companies within a limited number of industries or sectors. As a result, the Fund may be subject to a greater risk of loss than that of a fund invested in a wider spectrum of industries or sectors because the stocks of many or all of the companies in the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors may decline in value due to developments adversely affecting the industry, group of industries, sector, or sectors.
d. Repurchase Agreements The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements to maintain liquidity and earn income over periods of time as short as overnight. The collateral for repurchase agreements is either cash or fully negotiable U.S. government securities (including U.S. government agency securities). Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized (including the interest accrued thereon) and such collateral is marked to market daily while the agreements remain in force. If the value of the collateral falls below the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the Fund will typically require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults, the Fund maintains the right to sell the collateral (although it may be prevented or delayed from doing so in certain circumstances) and may be required to claim any resulting loss against the seller. Park Avenue monitors the creditworthiness of the seller with which the Fund enters into repurchase agreements.
e. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued or Delayed-Delivery Basis The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than at the trade date purchase price. Although the Fund will generally enter into these transactions with the intention of taking delivery of the securities, it may sell the securities before the settlement date. Assets
will be segregated when a fund agrees to purchase on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. These transactions may create investment leverage.
f. Restricted and Illiquid Securities A restricted security cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (except pursuant to an applicable exemption). The values of these securities may be highly volatile. If the security is subsequently registered and resold, the issuer would typically bear the expense of all registrations at no cost to the Fund. Restricted and illiquid securities are valued according to the policies and procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees and are noted, if any, in the Fund’s Schedule of Investments. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund did not hold any restricted, other than 144A restricted securities or illiquid securities.
g. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities The values of some mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early repayment of principal on some mortgage-related securities may expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. The values of mortgage- and asset-backed securities depend in part on the credit quality and adequacy of the underlying assets or collateral and may fluctuate in response to the market’s perception of these factors as well as current and future repayment rates. Some mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Ginnie Mae”), while other mortgage-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as “Fannie Mae” and “Freddie Mac”), are backed only by the credit of the government entity issuing them. In addition, some mortgage-backed securities are issued by private entities and, as such, are not guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government. In addition, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are subject to the risk that underlying obligations will be repaid sooner (known as “prepayment risk”) or later (known as “extension risk”) than expected because of changes in interest rates, either of which may result in lower than expected returns for the Fund. Because mortgage-backed securities are backed by mortgage loans, they also are subject to risks associated with the ownership of real estate and the real estate industry.
12 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
h. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury whose principal and/or interest payments are adjusted for inflation, unlike debt securities that make fixed principal and interest payments. The interest rate paid by the TIPS is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls based on changes in a published Consumer Price Index (“CPI”). Thus, if inflation occurs, the principal and interest payments on TIPS are adjusted accordingly to protect investors from inflationary loss. During a deflationary period, the principal and interest payments decrease, although the TIPS principal amounts will not drop below their face amounts at maturity. In exchange for the inflation protection, the TIPS generally pay lower interest rates than typical U.S. Treasury securities. Only if inflation occurs will TIPS offer a higher real yield than a conventional Treasury bond of the same maturity.
i. Derivative Instruments Investments in derivatives (including short exposures through derivatives) pose risks in addition to, and potentially greater than, those associated with investing directly in other investments, including potentially heightened liquidity and valuation risk, counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, and legal risk. In addition, certain derivatives result in leverage, which can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivatives by the Fund. The Fund entered into futures contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2024 to manage portfolio duration. The Fund bears the risk of interest rates moving unexpectedly, in which case the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and realize a loss. With respect to exchange traded futures, the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees futures contracts against default.
Under certain market conditions, the Fund may use credit default swaps to seek to (i) hedge various investments, (ii) manage or adjust duration and yield curve exposure, (iii) manage risk, (iv) enhance returns, or (v) as substitutes for permitted Fund investments. Credit default swaps involve the exchange of a floating or fixed rate payment in return for assuming potential credit losses of an underlying security or pool of securities.
The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a “notional amount,” i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate, in a particular foreign currency or security, or in a “basket” of securities representing a particular index. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCM”s) that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. Funds post initial and variation margin by making payments to their clearing member FCMs.
Generally, the Fund will enter into credit default swaps on a net basis, which means that the two payment streams are netted out, with a Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Credit default swaps do not normally involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to credit default swaps is normally limited to the net amount of payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a credit default swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive, if any.
In addition to the risks generally applicable to derivatives, risks associated with credit default swap agreements include adverse changes in the returns of the underlying instruments, failure of the counterparties to perform under the agreement’s terms and the possible lack of liquidity with respect to the agreements.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had the following derivatives at fair value, grouped into appropriate risk categories that illustrate the Fund’s use of derivative instruments:
Interest Rate Contracts |
||||
Asset Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | 50,609 | ||
Liability Derivatives |
||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (165,810 | ) | |
1 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Includes cumulative unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
13 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — GUARDIAN U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES VIP FUND
Transactions in derivative investments for the six months ended June 30, 2024 were as follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
Credit Default Contracts |
|||||||
Net Realized Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||
Futures Contracts1 |
$ | (37,055 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts2 |
— | (120,745 | ) | |||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
| |||||||
Futures Contracts3 |
$ | (396,192 | ) | $ | — | |||
Swap Contracts4 |
— | 80,113 | ||||||
Average Number of Notional Amounts |
| |||||||
Futures Contracts5 |
189 | — | ||||||
Swap Contracts – Buy/Sell Protection | $ | — | $ | 3,900,000 | ||||
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from futures contracts. |
2 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain/(loss) from swap contracts. |
3 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on futures contracts. |
4 | Statement of Operations location: Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on swap contracts. |
5 | Amount represents number of contracts. |
j. Market Risk An investment in the Fund is based on the values of the Fund’s investments, which may change due to economic and other events that affect markets generally, as well as those that affect particular regions, countries, industries, companies or governments. The risks associated with these developments may be magnified if social, political, economic and other conditions and events (such as war, natural disasters, health emergencies (e.g., epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions) adversely interrupt the global economy and financial markets. It is difficult to predict when events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). These events may negatively impact broad segments of the markets, which may result in significant and rapid negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments.
For additional information about the Fund’s investments and related risks, please refer to the prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information.
6. Temporary Borrowings
The Fund, with other funds in the Trust managed by Park Avenue, is party to a credit agreement with respect to a $10 million committed revolving credit facility from State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Credit Agreement”) for general short-term working capital purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemptions and trade settlements. Interest is based on a daily fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) that is subject to change from time to time as and when the Applicable Rate changes. Under the current Credit Agreement, the Applicable Rate for any day is defined as the rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) 0.10% plus (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day and (ii) the Overnight Bank Funding Rate for such day; the Applicable Margin is 1.25%. In addition to the interest charged on any borrowings by the Fund, each fund pays a commitment fee of 0.30% per annum on its share of the unused portion of the credit facility. The agreement is in place until January 3, 2025. The Fund did not utilize the credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2024.
7. Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents and, in some cases, by contract, officers and Trustees of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with its vendors and others that provide certain indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
14 |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies
Included in Item 7.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Management and Sub-advisory Agreements
Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), requires that a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements be approved initially by the fund’s board of trustees. Section 15(c) also requires that the continuation of these agreements, after an initial term of up to two years, be annually reviewed and approved by the board. Any such agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a party to the agreement at a meeting of the board called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
At a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Guardian Variable Products Trust (the “Trust”) held on March 27-28, 2024 (the “Meeting”), the Board, including the trustees who are not parties to the agreement or “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing investment management agreement between the Trust, on behalf of Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund; Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund; Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund; Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund; Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund; Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund; Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Select Mid-Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund; Guardian Small
Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund and Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”), in substantially the form presented at this meeting (the “Management Agreement”); and Park Avenue Institutional Advisers LLC (the “Manager”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-advisory agreements (the “Sub-advisory Agreements,” collectively with the Management Agreement and Sub-Subadvisory Agreement, the “Agreements”) between the Manager and investment advisory firms engaged to serve as sub-advisers to certain of the Funds (the “Sub-advised Funds”), namely (i) ClearBridge Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund; (ii) AllianceBernstein L.P. with respect to Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund and Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund; (iii) J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. with respect to Guardian International Growth VIP Fund; (iv) Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund; (v) Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund, Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund, Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund, Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund; (vi) Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. with respect to Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund; (vii) Janus Henderson Investors US LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund; (viii) Allspring Global Investments, LLC with respect to Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund and Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; (ix) Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC with respect to Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund; (x) FIAM LLC with respect to Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund and Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund; and (xi) Massachusetts Financial Services Company with respect to Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund, each in substantially the form presented at this meeting, (each, a “Sub-Adviser” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”) for a one-year term.
The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered and voted unanimously to renew the existing sub-subadvisory agreement (the “Sub-Subadvisory Agreement”) between Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. and Schroder Investment Management North America Limited (also a Sub-Adviser) with respect to Guardian International Equity VIP Fund for a one-year term.
15 |
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of each Fund. In determining whether to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Trustees evaluated information and factors that they considered to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their own business judgment. The Trustees considered certain information and factors in light of advice furnished to them by legal counsel to the Trust and, in the case of the Independent Trustees, their independent legal counsel. In advance of the Meeting, the Trustees received materials and information designed to assist their consideration of the Agreements. The Trustees received written responses from the Manager and each Sub-Adviser to a series of questions and requests for information encompassing a wide variety of topics provided by independent counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees also received materials and information regarding the legal standards applicable to their consideration of the Agreements and the process and criteria used by the Manager to identify and select the Sub-Advisers.
During the course of their deliberations, the Independent Trustees met twice to discuss and evaluate the materials, information and Agreements in executive session with their independent legal counsel, outside of the presence of the Trustees who are not Independent Trustees and representatives from Fund management, the Manager or any Sub-Adviser.
In reaching its decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements, the Board took into account the materials and information described above, as well as other materials and information provided to the Board throughout the year. Individual Trustees may have given different weight to different factors and information with respect to each Agreement, and the Trustees did not identify any single factor or information that, in isolation, would be controlling in deciding to approve the Agreements. The discussion below is intended to summarize the broad factors that figured prominently in the Board’s decisions to renew its approval of the Agreements rather than to be all-inclusive. These broad factors included: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Manager and to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) estimated profitability of the Manager; (iv) fees and expenses; (v) the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds; and (vi) any other benefits derived by the Manager or the Sub-Advisers (or their respective affiliates) from their relationships with the Funds.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Management Agreement and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Manager. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the range of non-investment advisory services provided by the Manager consistent with the terms of the Management Agreement, notably coordinating the preparation and filing of various regulatory documents, coordinating the preparation and assembly of Board meeting materials, and assisting the Board with certain valuation matters. The Board also received a description of the Manager’s and each Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans and of their respective approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity, and related testing. The Board received information regarding the response of the Manager and the Sub-Advisers to the continuation of remote work arrangements and return-to-office plans. The Board also received information about the Manager’s role as administrator of the Funds’ derivatives risk and liquidity risk management programs, the Manager’s approach to risk management, and the Manager’s vendor oversight programs.
The Trustees considered that the Sub-advised Funds operate in a “manager-of-managers” structure and reviewed the responsibilities that the Manager has under this structure, including monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Sub-Advisers, monitoring the Sub-Advisers for adherence to the stated investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions of the Funds and supervising the Sub-Advisers with respect to the services that the Sub-Advisers would provide under the Sub-advisory Agreements. The Trustees also considered the process used by the Manager, consistent with this structure, to identify and recommend sub-advisers, and the Manager’s ability to monitor and oversee sub-advisers and recommend replacement sub-advisers, when necessary, and provide other services under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that investment management staff of the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer conduct oversight meetings with the Sub-Advisers on a periodic basis, follow through with additional inquiries on any questions or concerns that arise during the meetings and, as necessary, then report the results of the meetings to the Board. The Trustees reviewed information regarding the experience and background of the Manager’s key personnel and the Manager’s organizational structure
16 |
and resources, including investment, legal and administrative capabilities of the Manager. In this regard, the Trustees recognized that the Funds may benefit from the Manager’s ability to use resources and capabilities of its affiliates in providing services to the Funds.
The Trustees considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Sub-advised Funds by the Sub-Advisers. The Trustees also considered, among other things, the terms of the Sub-advisory Agreements and the range of investment advisory services provided by the Sub-Advisers under the oversight of the Manager. In evaluating these investment advisory services, the Trustees considered, among other things, the Sub-Advisers’ investment philosophies, styles and/or processes and approaches to managing the respective Sub-advised Funds. The Trustees received and evaluated information regarding the background, education, expertise and/or experience of the investment professionals who serve as portfolio managers for the Sub-advised Funds and the capabilities and resources of the Sub-Advisers.
Based upon these considerations, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their full deliberations, that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-advised Funds by each respective Sub-Adviser were appropriate.
Investment Performance
In connection with each of its regular quarterly meetings, the Board receives information on the performance of each Fund, including net performance, relative performance rankings within the relevant Morningstar peer group, and performance as compared to benchmark index returns. At each quarterly Board meeting, members of the Manager’s funds management team review with the Board the economic and market environment, absolute and relative performance of each Fund, and any relevant information about risk management and style consistency in connection with management of the Funds. The Board considered investment performance for each Fund over the one-year, three-year (where available), five-year (where available) and since-inception periods.
The Board also received and reviewed a report prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of mutual fund industry data, which included comparisons of the performance of each Fund to performance of an appropriate peer universe. For details regarding each Fund’s performance, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
The Manager discussed with the Board factors contributing to the Funds’ performance results. In addition, for certain Funds, the Manager provided to the Board longer term performance records of the Sub-Advisers for strategies used in managing the Funds. The Board concluded that the investment performance generated by the Manager and each Sub-Adviser was generally satisfactory, or, that any steps being taken by the Manager and Sub-Advisers to address any performance issues were satisfactory.
Profitability
The Board received and considered the Manager’s estimate of its profitability, which included allocations by the Manager of its costs in providing management services to the Funds. The Board considered the estimated profitability of the Manager both overall and on a Fund-by-Fund basis.
The Board received and considered profitability information from most of the Sub-Advisers, but noted that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Sub-Advisers is a less relevant factor than Manager profitability.
Based on the consideration of this information, the Board concluded that the profitability of the Funds to the Manager was acceptable.
Fees and Expenses
The Trustees considered the management fees paid by the Funds to the Manager under the Management Agreement and evaluated the reasonableness of these fees. The Trustees received and reviewed comparative information with respect to the management fee and total expenses for each Fund and the management fees and total expenses for a peer group of other funds selected by Broadridge. The Trustees considered the Manager’s commitment to limit the total expenses of each Fund through an expense limitation agreement with the Trust. Although the Board recognized that the comparisons between the management fees and actual expenses of the Funds and those of the identified peer group are imprecise, given different terms of agreements and variations in fund strategies, the Trustees found that the comparative information supported their consideration and approval of the management fees and evaluation of the total expenses. For details regarding each Fund’s fee and expense comparisons, see the “Fund-by-Fund Factors” section below.
17 |
The Trustees considered the sub-advisory fees paid under the Sub-advisory Agreements and evaluated the reasonableness of those fees. The Trustees also considered that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers would be paid by the Manager and not the Funds and that the Manager had negotiated the fees with the Sub-Advisers at arm’s-length.
Based on the consideration of the information and factors summarized above, as well as other relevant information and factors, the Board concluded that the management and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services rendered to the Funds by the Manager and the Sub-Advisers.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale may exist, and the extent to the benefits of economies of scale are shared with the Funds. In this regard, the Board noted that for sixteen of twenty-four Funds, the management and sub-advisory fee included breakpoints that are tiered based on growth in asset levels of each such Fund and that for the other Funds, the fees reflected appropriate levels based on current and expected asset levels. The Board also noted that the expenses of the Funds are subject to expense limitations provided by the Manager. The Board noted that expected economies of scale, where they exist, may be shared through the use of fee breakpoints, expense limitations by the Manager, and/or a lower overall fee.
Ancillary Benefits
The Board considered the potential benefits, other than management fees, that the Manager and/or its affiliates may receive because of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds. The Trustees considered that the Funds were designed to serve as investment options under variable contracts issued by affiliates of the Manager that would receive fees under those contracts and that Park Avenue Securities LLC, an affiliate of the Manager and principal underwriter of the Funds, and participating insurance companies, including insurance companies affiliated with the Manager, would be entitled to receive fees from the Funds under a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Trustees considered that the Manager and its affiliates may benefit from (i) greater efficiencies in annuity administration and operations and potential cost savings due to a reduction in the number of unaffiliated funds available as annuity contract investment options, and (ii) increased dividends-received deductions due to the Funds’ status under the
tax laws as disregarded entities. In addition, the Trustees considered the potential benefits, other than sub-advisory fees, that the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates may receive because of their relationships with the Funds, including the ability to receive research from soft dollar commissions consistent with Trust policies. The Trustees concluded that benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates are reasonable and the benefits that may accrue to the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates are consistent with those expected for a sub-adviser to a mutual fund such as the applicable Fund.
Fund-by-Fund Factors
The Broadridge report groups fees, expenses and performance into five quintiles, with the top quintile having the highest performance or lowest fees/expenses, and the bottom quintile having the lowest performance or highest fees/expenses. For purposes of the descriptions below, a Fund’s performance is considered “in line with” the benchmark index if it is within 0.20%.
Guardian Large Cap Fundamental Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 3rd quintile for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile for the 5-year period and 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Integrated Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the |
18 |
3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Diversified Research VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Strategic Large Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Large Cap Disciplined Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Growth & Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the |
1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and that the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Equity Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian All Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Traditional Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period, in the 1st quintile for the 3-year period and in the 5th quintile for 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year and 5-year periods and higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group, that |
19 |
the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile. |
Guardian Select Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports |
from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Mid Cap Relative Value VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 5th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods and below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small-Mid Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Small Cap Core VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 2nd quintile for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance |
was higher than the benchmark index for the 3-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Growth VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 5-year period and in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1- and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 5-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian International Equity VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year and 5-year periods and in the 4th quintile for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Global Utilities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group. |
20 |
Guardian Balanced Allocation VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian Core Plus Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 5-year periods and in the 2nd quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was higher than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year and 5-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual management fee were in the 2nd quintile of the expense group and that actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Total Return Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 1st quintile, the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile. |
Guardian Core Fixed Income VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 3rd quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in line with the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee, the actual management fee and the actual total expenses were in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Multi-Sector Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year and 3-year periods The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year and 3-year periods. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and actual total expenses were in the 1st quintile and the actual management fee was in the 2nd quintile. |
Guardian Short Duration Bond VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 5th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board acknowledged the Fund’s short operational history. The Board noted that it would have an opportunity to review such information in connection with future annual reviews. The Board noted that, in the meantime, it received monthly performance reports from the Manager. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee was in the 3rd quintile of the expense group, the actual management fee was in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 4th quintile of the expense group. |
Guardian U.S. Government Securities VIP Fund
• | The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was in the 1st quintile of its performance universe for the 3-year period and in the 4th quintile of its performance universe for the 1-year period. The Board also noted that the Fund’s performance was lower than the benchmark index for the 1-year period and in line with the benchmark index for the 3-year period. |
• | The Board noted that the contractual management fee and the actual management fee were in the 1st quintile of the expense group and the actual total expenses were in the 3rd quintile of the expense group. |
Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive consideration and evaluation of all of the information and factors summarized above, among others, the Board as a whole, including the Independent Trustees, approved the Agreements.
21 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Fund unless accompanied or preceded by the Fund’s current prospectus.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America New York, NY 10001-2159
PUB10527
Item 8. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Included in Item 7 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 9. | Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Included in Item 7 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 10. | Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Included in Item 7 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 11. | Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract. |
Included in Item 7 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 12. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
Item 13. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
Item 14. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Not applicable.
Item 15. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the
registrant’s Board of Trustees.
Item 16. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a) | Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 17. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
Item 18. | Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation. |
Not applicable.
Item 19. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) | Guardian Variable Products Trust | |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Dominique Baede | |
Dominique Baede, President | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: September 3, 2024
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Dominique Baede | |
Dominique Baede, President | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: September 3, 2024
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Larry Weiss | |
Larry Weiss, Treasurer | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Date: September 3, 2024