RiverNorth Marketplace Lending Corporation

 (Ticker: RSF)

March 23, 2020

This supplement contains information which amends, supplements or modifies certain information contained in the Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) of RiverNorth Marketplace Lending Corporation (the “Fund”), dated October 29, 2018. Capitalized terms used in this supplement have the same meanings as in the SAI, unless otherwise stated herein.

Effective March 23, 2020, the Fund will change its name to “RiverNorth Specialty Finance Corporation.”

Fred G. Steingraber and James G. Kelley are no longer Directors of the Fund’s Board of Directors. Accordingly, all references to Fred G. Steingraber and James G. Kelley in the SAI are hereby removed.

The table following the section entitled “Board Members and Officers” beginning on page 22 of the SAI is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

For Mr. Galley, Mr. Carter and Mr. Oakes, the Fund Complex consists of the Fund (1 Fund), RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (1 Fund), RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund, Inc. (1 Fund), RiverNorth Opportunities Fund, Inc. (1 Fund), RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund, Inc (1 Fund) and the RiverNorth Funds (3 Funds). For Mr. Hutchens and Mr. Swanson, the Fund Complex consists of the Fund (1 Fund), RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund, Inc (1 Fund), Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (1 Fund) and RiverNorth Opportunities Fund, Inc. (1 Fund). For Mr. Raio, the Fund Complex consists of the Fund (1 Fund) and RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund, Inc (1 Fund), RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund, Inc. (1 Fund) and RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (1 Fund).

The second and third paragraphs under the subheading entitled “Board Leadership Structure” beginning on page 24 of the SAI are hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Carter, Oakes, Hutchens, and Swanson. Mr. Hutchens is the Chair of the Audit Committee and has been determined to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Form N-CSR. The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of (i) the quality and integrity of the Fund’s financial statements, reporting process and the independent registered public accounting firm (the “independent accountants”) and reviews thereof, (ii) the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting policies and practices, its internal controls and, as appropriate, the internal controls of certain service providers, (iii) the Fund’s compliance with certain legal and regulatory requirements, and (iv) the independent accountants’ qualifications, independence and performance. The Audit Committee is also required to prepare an audit committee report pursuant to the rules of the SEC for inclusion in the Fund’s annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to the Audit Committee Charter that was most recently reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors on August 20, 2019. The Audit Committee Charter is available at the Fund’s website, www.rivernorth.com. As set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, management is responsible for maintaining appropriate systems for accounting and internal control, and the Fund’s independent accountants are responsible for planning and carrying out proper audits and reviews. The independent accountants are ultimately accountable to the Board of Directors and to the Audit Committee, as representatives of the Common Shareholders. The independent accountants for the Fund report directly to the Audit Committee. During the last fiscal year, the Audit Committee held three meetings.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of Messrs. Carter, Oakes, Hutchens, and Swanson. Mr. Carter is the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending to the Board of Directors individuals believed to be qualified to become members of the Board of Directors in the event that a position is vacated or created. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by Common Shareholders. In considering candidates submitted by Common Shareholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board of Directors, the qualifications of the candidate and the interests of Common Shareholders. Common Shareholders wishing to recommend candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should submit such recommendations to the Secretary of the Fund, who will forward the recommendations to the committee for consideration. The submission must include: (i) whether the Common Shareholder proposing such nominee believes the proposed nominee is, or is not, an “interested person”, (ii) the name and address, as they appear on the Fund’s books, of the Common Shareholder proposing such business or nomination, (iii) a representation that the Common Shareholder is a holder of record of Shares entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to present such nomination; (iv) whether the Common Shareholder plans to deliver or solicit proxies from other Common Shareholders; (v) the class and number of Shares of the capital stock of the Fund, which are beneficially owned by the Common Shareholder and the proposed nominee to the Board of Directors, (vi) any material interest of the Common Shareholder or nominee in such business; (vii) the extent to which such Common Shareholder (including such Common Shareholder’s principals) or the proposed nominee to the Board of Directors has entered into any hedging transaction or other arrangement with the effect or intent of mitigating or otherwise managing profit, loss or risk of changes in the value of the Shares or the daily quoted market price of the Fund held by such Common Shareholder (including the Common Shareholder’s principals) or the proposed nominee, including independently verifiable information in support of the foregoing; (viii) any substantial interest, direct or indirect, of such Common Shareholder or the proposed nominee in the Fund other than interest arising from ownership of Common Shares; (ix) to the extent known by such Common Shareholder, the name and address of any other Common Shareholder supporting the proposed nominee; (x) the nominee holder for, and number of, Common Shares owned beneficially but not of record by such Common Shareholder; (xi) the investment strategy or objective, if any, of such Common Shareholder who is not an individual and a copy of the prospectus, offering memorandum, or similar document, if any; and (xii) such other information regarding such nominee proposed by such Common Shareholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Each eligible Common Shareholder or Common Shareholder group may submit no more than one Independent Director nominee each calendar year. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not determined any minimum qualifications necessary to serve as a director of the Fund. During the last fiscal year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting.

The following paragraphs are hereby added after the third paragraph under the subheading entitled “Trustee Qualifications” on page 25 of the SAI:

Mr. Hutchens was President and CEO of the University of Colorado (CU) Foundation from April 2006 to December 2012 and Executive Director for the CU Real Estate Foundation from April 2009 to December 2012. Prior to these positions, Mr. Hutchens spent over 30 years in the banking industry, retiring as Chairman of Chase Bank Colorado. Mr. Hutchens is a graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder’s School of Business and has done graduate study at Syracuse University and the University of Colorado. He was selected to serve as a Director of the Fund based on his business and financial services experience.

Mr. Swanson founded SwanDog Marketing, a marketing consulting firm to asset managers, in 2006. He currently serves as SwanDog’s Managing Partner. He has over 30 years of senior management and marketing experience, with approximately 20 years in financial services. Before joining SwanDog, Mr. Swanson most recently served as Executive Vice President and Head of Distribution for Calamos Investments, an investment management firm. He previously held positions as Chief Operating Officer of Van Kampen Investments, President of CEO of Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Canada, Ltd. And Managing Director and Head of Global Investment Products at Morgan Stanley. Mr. Swanson holds a Master of Management from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and a Bachelors in Journalism from Southern Illinois University. He was selected to serve as a Director of the Fund based on his business, financial services and investment management experience.

Mr. Raio has many years of experience in the securities industry, including management roles in the banking and investment management industries. He has more than 15 years of experience in equity capital markets, having worked on the retail syndicate desks at both Citigroup and Morgan Stanley. He served as the Managing Director and Head of Retail Origination for Wells Fargo from 2005 to 2018. Prior to working at Wells Fargo he served as Director and Head of Closed-End Funds for Citigroup Asset Management. He was selected to serve as a Director of the Fund based on his business, financial services and investment management experience.

The table following the subheading entitled “Compensation” on page 26 of the SAI is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The table following the subheading entitled “Director Ownership in the Fund” on page 27 of the SAI is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

The following table shows the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each director in the Fund and Fund Complex as of December 31, 2019.

At a meeting held on February 19 – 20, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Fund approved changes, effective as of May 22, 2020, to the principal investment strategy of the Fund. The Fund’s investment objective, seeking a high level of current income, will remain the same. On May 22, 2020, the Fund will change its investment strategy from investing, directly or indirectly, at least 80% of its Managed Assets (as defined below) in marketplace lending investments to investing in credit instruments, including a portfolio of securities of specialty finance and other financial companies that RiverNorth Capital Management, LLC believes offer attractive opportunities for income. Accordingly, all references to Marketplace Lending and Marketplace Loans will be replaced with Alternative Credit. “Managed Assets” means the total assets of the Fund, including assets attributable to leverage, minus liabilities (other than debt representing leverage and any preferred stock that may be outstanding).

Accordingly, effective on May 22, 2020, the section entitled “Investment Policies and Techniques” beginning on page 2 of the SAI is deleted, except for the section entitled “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund,” and replaced with the following:

Alternative Credit

The Fund’s alternative credit investments may be made through a combination of: (i) investing in loans to small- and mid-sized companies (“SMEs”); (ii) investing in notes or other pass-through obligations issued by an alternative credit platform (or an affiliate) representing the right to receive the principal and interest payments on an Alternative Credit investment (or fractional portions thereof) originated through the platform (“Pass-Through Notes”); (iii) purchasing asset-backed securities representing ownership in a pool of Alternative Credit; (iv) investing in private investment funds that purchase Alternative Credit, (v) acquiring an equity interest in an alternative credit platform (or an affiliate); and (vi) providing loans, credit lines or other extensions of credit to an alternative credit platform (or an affiliate) (the foregoing listed investments are collectively referred to herein as the “Alternative Credit Instruments”). The Fund may invest without limit in any of the foregoing types of Alternative Credit Instruments, except that the Fund will not invest greater than 45% of its Managed Assets in the securities of, or loans originated by, any single platform (or a group of related platforms) and the Fund’s investments in private investment funds will be limited to no more than 10% of the Fund’s Managed Assets. The Alternative Credit in which the Fund typically invests are newly issued and/or current as to interest and principal payments at the time of investment. As a fundamental policy (which cannot be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund), the Fund does not invest in Alternative Credit that are of subprime quality at the time of investment. The Fund considers an SME loan to be of “subprime quality” if the likelihood of repayment on such loan is determined by the Adviser based on its due diligence and the credit underwriting policies of the originating platform to be similar to that of consumer loans that are of subprime quality. The Fund has no intention as of the date of this SAI to invest in Alternative Credit originated from lending platforms based outside the United States or made to non-U.S. borrowers. However, the Fund may in the future invest in such Alternative Credit and, prior to such time, will amend the Prospectus and/or SAI (as applicable) to provide additional information on such investments, including the associated risks. See “Additional Investments and Practices of the Fund—Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund.”

The following supplements the discussion of Alternative Credit contained in the Prospectus and includes additional considerations and risks associated with the Fund’s investments in Alternative Credit. See “Investment Objective, Strategies and Policies—Alternative Credit” and “Risks—Alternative Credit Risks” in the Prospectus.

Regulatory Considerations

The following highlights various laws and regulations impacting alternative credit and its participants.

The Equal Credit Opportunity Act. This law prohibits discrimination in the extension of all credit (consumer or business) on the basis of certain protected classes including on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. It also requires notice of adverse action to be given to applicants who are denied credit.

OFAC, USA Patriot Act and Bank Secrecy Act. Certain participants in alternative credit, including the platforms through which the Fund may invest in Alternative Credit, may be required to comply with various anti-money laundering and related regulations. The Fund is not able to control or monitor such compliance. Moreover, in the Fund’s participation with the platforms, it is subject to compliance with OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control), the USA PATRIOT Act and Bank Secrecy Act regulations applicable to all businesses, which, for the Fund, generally involves cooperation with authorities in investigating any purported improprieties. Any material failure to comply with OFAC and other similar anti-money laundering restrictions or any investigation relating thereto could result in fines or penalties. Such fines or penalties could have a material adverse effect on the Fund directly for amounts owed for fines or penalties or indirectly as a negative consequence of the decreased demand for Alternative Credit from the platforms in violation of such requirements resulting from the adverse publicity and other reputation risks associated with any such fines and penalties assessed against the platforms or other industry participants.

Federal Trade Commission Act. Section 5 of this law (as well as analogous state laws) prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. The FTC’s Holder in Due Course Rule allows borrowers in certain circumstances to assert any claim or defense they have against a seller of goods or services obtained with the proceeds of a loan against the originator or subsequent purchaser of the loan.

CAN-SPAM Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule. These laws and analogous state laws govern the marketing of credit and other products and services by use of email or telephone marketing and would affect programs of alternative credit platforms marketing by these means.

Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. This law, along with analogous state laws including the Uniform Electronic Transactions Acts, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements electronically and utilizing electronic records and signatures govern the circumstances in which a person may electronically be provided disclosures otherwise required to be in writing. Alternative Credit Lenders must obtain consent to conduct business electronically from applicants and borrowers.

Bankruptcy Code. This law limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against borrowers who have filed for bankruptcy protection.

In addition, funding banks are subject to banking laws and regulations and the supervision by federal and/or state banking agencies and such laws and regulators could impose restrictions on the funding bank.

Alternative Credit lenders may not always be in compliance with these laws and borrowers may make counterclaims regarding the enforceability of their obligations under borrower laws after collection actions have been commenced or otherwise seek damages under these laws.

Registration with the SEC. Pass-Through Notes are typically offered through private offerings and thus may not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). In addition, platforms are not registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act. If a platform (or an affiliate thereof) were to fail to comply with a private offering exemption under the 1933 Act, or if it were fail to maintain an exemption from registration as an investment company under the 1940 Act, it (or such affiliate) could become subject to regulatory actions and/or significant civil liabilities. Although a platform (or its affiliate) may intend to operate in compliance with all applicable securities laws, these laws are complex and sometimes subject to alternative interpretations and any failure by a platform (or such affiliate) to comply with applicable securities laws could adversely affect its (or such affiliate’s) ability to make payments on the Pass-Through Notes.

Trust Indenture Act of 1939. Any Pass-Through Note offering made in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act will not be subject to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. Consequently, holders of Pass-Through Notes will not have the protection of an indenture setting forth obligations of the Pass-Through Note issuers for the protection of the Pass-Through Note holders or a trustee appointed to represent their interests.

State Usury Laws. Some platforms (or their affiliates) may attempt to take advantage of policies in certain states that allow lenders to make Alternative Credit investments at advantageous interest rates by incorporating choice of law provisions into Alternative Credit agreements that hold that the agreements are to be governed by the laws of those lender-friendly states. This is sometimes the case in the origination of business as opposed to consumer loans. In the event that a borrower or state regulator successfully invalidates such choice-of-law clause, platforms (of their affiliates) may not be able to collect some or all of the interest and principal due on such Alternative Credit Instruments, such loans may not be found to be enforceable or the platforms (or their affiliates) could become subject to penalties and damages. Other platforms may engage in arrangements with funding banks where the platform assists the bank in originating loans that are funded by the bank. In some cases, the loans are sold to the platforms and the platforms as assignees of the bank under applicable law and precedent utilize the bank’s rate and fee exportation authority. At least one federal circuit has cast doubt upon this theory and other litigation challenges the ability of assignees to utilize a bank’s exportation authority as an assignee of the bank’s loans. Legislation is also pending in Congress that would validate an assignee’s ability to utilize the rates and fees of the originating lender.

Tax Treatment of Pass-Through Notes. There are no statutory provisions, regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions that address the characterization of Pass-Through Notes or other Alternative Credit Instruments substantially similar to Pass-Through Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the proper tax characterization of Pass-Through Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes is uncertain. To address this concern, some Pass-Through Note issuers require investors to agree to treat the Pass-Through Notes as debt of the Pass-Through Note issuer for federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes. Further, prospective Pass-Through Note holders should be aware that a Pass-Through Note issuer may intend to treat (and report) the Pass-Through Notes as debt instruments that have original issue discount (“OID”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, Pass-Through Note holders will be required to include OID in income as it accrues under a constant yield method, regardless of such note holder’s regular method of tax accounting, and so may be required to include OID in income in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to the related Note interest or principal.

Pass-Through Note holders also should be aware that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the courts are not bound by the Pass-Through Note issuer’s characterization of the Pass-Through Notes, and may take a different position with respect to the Pass-Through Notes’ proper characterization. For example, if the Pass-Through Notes were treated as equity in the Pass-Through Note issuer, (i) the issuer would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income, including interest, accrued on the underlying loans but would not be entitled to deduct interest or OID on the Pass-Through Notes, and (ii) payments on the Pass-Through Notes would be treated by the Pass-Through Note holder as dividends (that may be ineligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income taxation or the dividends received deduction) for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of the issuer’s earnings and profits. Alternatively, the IRS could determine that, in substance, each Pass-Through Note holder owns a proportionate interest in the underlying loans for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or it could instead seek to treat the Pass-Through Notes as some other financial instrument or contract (including a derivative financial instrument). Such different characterizations could significantly reduce the amount available to the Pass-Through Note issuer to pay interest on the Pass-Through Notes, and could significantly affect the amount, timing, and character of income, gain or loss recognized in respect of a Pass-Through Note.

Risk of Including Foreign Investors. An issuer of Pass-Through Notes may accept investors who are non-U.S. persons, in which case interest payments made to such an investor by the issuer could be subject to withholding taxes. In the event that the issuer fails to properly withhold on such payments, it could remain liable for a non-U.S. person’s individual tax liabilities. There is a further risk that a non-U.S. person investor could be named on the Department of the Treasury’s list of “Specially Designated Nationals,” “Blocked Persons,” or “Sanctioned Countries or Individuals,” which, if undiscovered, could result in an enforcement action against the issuer.

Additional Risk Considerations

Bankruptcy Risk. In the event that a platform (or its affiliate) or its service providers become subject to a bankruptcy, the Fund’s investments in Pass-Through Notes issued by such platform (or affiliate) may be negatively impacted.

Although many of the platforms (or their affiliates) through which the Fund invests may have been organized and operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that such platforms (or affiliates) will become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if the platforms (or their affiliates) were to become subject to bankruptcy proceedings, payments on the Pass-Through Notes issued by such platforms (or their affiliates) could be substantially delayed or reduced, and any interest accrued on those obligations may never be paid.

Platforms (or their affiliates) may have arrangements with servicers who monitor payments by the borrowers of the Alternative Credit and take action to enforce the platforms’ (or affiliates’) rights to payment. Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If a platform’s (or affiliate’s) servicer fails to maintain operations or the agreement between the platform (or affiliate) and the servicer is rejected or terminated in a bankruptcy of the servicer, the Fund may experience delays in the distribution of loan proceeds and increased costs in connection with its investments through such platform (or its affiliate). In some instances, the platform operator and its affiliates may be unable to collect and process payments from underlying borrowers and thus the Fund may not realize its expected return on investment on those instruments.

Platforms (or their affiliates) may have arrangements with administrators who manage the daily operations of the platforms (and/or their affiliates). Among other duties, an administrator may calculate the amounts payable by the platform operator or its affiliates on any outstanding Pass-Through Notes and supervise the platform’s (or affiliate’s) payment of such amounts. If the administrator were to become subject to bankruptcy proceedings and its agreement with the platform operator or its affiliates were terminated for any reason, the platform (or affiliate) would endeavor to locate a replacement administrator but there is no assurance that it would be able to do so. Accordingly, any termination of an administration agreement that occurs in connection with a bankruptcy of the administrator may impair the platform’s (or affiliate’s) ability to continue to make timely payments on the Pass-Through Notes. This could also prevent the platform operator or its affiliates from issuing any additional Pass-Through Notes until another administrator was located.

Chargeback Risk. The Fund may invest in Alternative Credit Instruments through securities issued by private investment funds that operate accounts with an independent bank whereby investors, such as the Fund, may deposit funds for the purchase of such securities and receive the proceeds from borrower payments on the underlying loans. These accounts may be affected by “borrower chargebacks.” A borrower chargeback is a process by which a borrower who has made a payment on an underlying loan has its bank cancel the payment or request a refund of that payment. If a borrower successfully processes a chargeback on a loan payment after proceeds have been distributed to such accounts, the issuer will deduct the amount of that payment from each account where the proceeds were deposited. To offset this risk, issuers utilizing this system may refrain from distributing borrower loan proceeds to these accounts for a period of time after a borrower payment on a loan. In the event that a borrower chargeback is executed after the proceeds of that payment have been distributed to investor accounts and an account holder has withdrawn those distributed proceeds, a negative cash balance may result. Amounts that would otherwise be credited to an investor’s account (including amounts deposited or that are payable on other notes) are subject to set-off against any such negative cash balance.

Risk of Inadequate Resources Devoted to the Collection of Alternative Credit. A substantial amount, if not all, of a platform operator’s revenues may be derived from origination fees or loan rate “spreads” generated through making and arranging Alternative Credit and offering related Pass-Through Notes. As a result, it has an incentive to originate as many loans as possible to maximize the amount of origination fees it is able to generate. Increased loan volumes increases the demands on a platform’s management resources and its ability to devote adequate attention and resources to the collection of corresponding Alternative Credit. The ability of a platform and its affiliates to collect the payments due from borrowers and/or to make timely payments on their Pass-Through Notes may be adversely affected in the event that they take on loan volumes that exceed their ability to service outstanding Alternative Credit.

Risk of Platform Failure to Meet Certain Obligations. Platforms might incur indemnification and repurchase obligations with respect to the Alternative Credit they originate that exceed their projections, in which case they might not have sufficient capital to meet such obligations. There can be no assurances that platforms can meet their repurchase and indemnification obligations and, if they are unable to do so, the Fund may incur losses related to payments on the affected Alternative Credit Instruments in which it invests.

Risks Associated With “Balloon” Payments. Some of the Alternative Credit may be interest-only loans providing for relatively small monthly payments with a large “balloon” payment of principal due at the end of the term. Borrowers may be unable to repay such balloon payments out of their own funds and will be compelled to refinance or sell their property. Fluctuations in real estate values, interest rates and the unavailability of mortgage funds could adversely affect the ability of borrowers to refinance their loans at maturity or successfully sell the property for enough money to pay off the corresponding Alternative Credit Instrument.

Servicer Autonomy. A platform (or its affiliate) may have an arrangement with a servicer that authorizes the servicer to waive or modify any non-material term of an Alternative Credit Instrument or consent to the postponement of strict compliance with any such term or in any manner grant a non-material indulgence to any borrower. In addition, if an Alternative Credit Instrument is in default, or the servicer determines that default is reasonably foreseeable or otherwise determines that such action is consistent with its servicing obligation, the servicer may be permitted to waive or modify any material term of an Alternative Credit Instrument, to accept payment of an amount less than the principal balance in final satisfaction of an Alternative Credit Instrument and to grant any indulgence to a borrower, provided that the servicer has reasonably determined that such action will not be materially adverse to the interests of the holder of such Alternative Credit or of the holders of any corresponding Pass-Through Note.

Subprime Borrower Risk. Although the Fund will not invest in Alternative Credit that is of subprime quality at the time of investment, loans held by the Fund may, subsequent to their purchase, become of subprime quality. The risks associated with an investment in Alternative Credit (as disclosed in the Prospectus and this SAI) are heightened for such loans that have been made to subprime borrowers, particularly with respect to the risk of default. In addition, loans to subprime borrowers could be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny.

Tax Considerations. The ability of a platform (or its affiliate) to pay principal and interest on a Pass-Through Note may be affected by its ability, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to match the timing of income it receives from an underlying Alternative Credit Instrument that it holds and the timing of deductions that it may be entitled to in respect of payments made on the Pass-Through Notes that it issues. For example, if the Pass-Through Notes are treated as contingent payment debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes but the corresponding Alternative Credit Instruments are not, there could be a potential mismatch in the timing of the Pass-Through Note issuer’s income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the Pass-Through Note issuer’s resulting tax liabilities could affect its ability to make payments on the Pass-Through Notes.

Additional Considerations with Regard to Real Estate Alternative Credit Instruments

Construction, Rehabilitation, Home Improvement and Entitlement Loans. Real estate-related loans may include construction, rehabilitation, home improvement and entitlement loans for various types of properties, including single family residential, condominiums, multi-family residential, industrial, small commercial, foreclosed (REO), unimproved land with entitlements and small tract properties. The loan underwriting for construction, rehabilitation and unimproved land with entitlement loans is typically based upon a determined “as completed” value, i.e., the projected value of the property after the completion of the construction or rehabilitation of a property. Special builder’s risk insurance, or “course of construction” insurance, may be required by the platform operator and its affiliates in these cases. This specialized insurance is intended to insure structures while they are under construction. Materials, fixtures and appliances that are intended to become an integral part of the structure being built are also insured. The insurance is provided for loss resulting from accidental direct physical damage to the structure under construction. The policies generally include broad coverage, but exclude earthquake, flood and damage caused by earth movement. Some builder’s risk policies limit coverage to physical damage caused by specifically named perils, such as fire and theft. These perils would be specifically listed in the policy.

Risk of Inadequate Revenues from a Property. The payment schedules with respect to many real estate-related loans are based on projected revenues generated by the property over the term of the loan. These projections are based on factors such as expected vacancy rates, expense rates and other projected income and expense figures relating to the property. The actual revenues generated by a property could fall short of projections due to factors such as lower-than-expected rental revenues, or greater-than-expected vacancy rates or property management expenses. In such event, the borrower’s cash flow could be inadequate to repay its loan in full.

Risk of Rising Insurance Costs or Unavailability of Insurance. Real estate properties are typically insured against risk of fire damage and other property casualties, but are sometimes not covered by severe weather or natural disaster events such as landslides, earthquakes, or floods. Changes in the conditions affecting the economic environment in which insurance companies do business could affect the borrower’s ability to continue insuring the property at a reasonable cost or could result in insurance being unavailable altogether. Moreover, any hazard losses not then covered by the borrower’s insurance policy would result in the Alternative Credit related to the affected property becoming significantly under secured, which could result in a loss to the investors of any corresponding Pass-Through Note.

Environmental Risks. If toxic environmental contamination is discovered to exist on a property underlying an Alternative Credit Instrument, it might affect the borrower’s ability to repay the Alternative Credit. To the extent that the platform operator and/or its affiliates are forced to foreclose and/or operate such a property, potential additional liabilities and responsibilities include reporting requirements, remediation costs, fines, penalties and damages. Of particular concern may be those properties that are, or have been, the site of manufacturing, industrial or disposal activity. These environmental risks may give rise to a diminution in value of the security property or liability for clean-up costs or other remedial actions. This liability could exceed the value of the real property or the principal balance of the related loan. For this reason, the platform operator and its affiliates may choose not to foreclose on contaminated property rather than risk incurring liability for remedial actions.

Under the laws of certain states, an owner’s failure to perform remedial actions required under environmental laws may give rise to a lien on mortgaged property to ensure the reimbursement of remedial costs. In some states this lien has priority over the lien of an existing mortgage against the real property. Because the costs of remedial action could be substantial, the value of a mortgaged property as collateral for a real estate-related loan could be adversely affected by the existence of an environmental condition giving rise to a lien.

The state of law is currently unclear as to whether and under what circumstances clean-up costs, or the obligation to take remedial actions, can be imposed on a secured lender. If a lender does become liable for cleanup costs, it may bring an action for contribution against the current owners or operators, the owners or operators at the time of on-site disposal activity or any other party who contributed to the environmental hazard, but these persons or entities may be bankrupt or otherwise judgment-proof. Furthermore, an action against the borrower may be adversely affected by the limitations on recourse in the loan documents.

Risk of Declining Property Value. The value of the real property security for Alternative Credit will be subject to the risks generally incident to the ownership of improved and unimproved real estate, including changes in general or local economic conditions, increases in interest rates for real estate financing, physical damage that is not covered by insurance, zoning, entitlements, and other risks. Many borrowers expect to use resale proceeds to repay their borrower loan. A decline in property values could result in a borrower loan amount being greater than the property value, which could increase the likelihood of borrower default. The maximum permissible loan-to-value ratio of the Fund’s real estate-related investments is 80% (determined at the time of investment).

Risks of Construction and Rehabilitation Loans. Construction and rehabilitation loans involve a number of particular risks, involving, among other things, the timeliness of the project’s completion, the integrity of appraisal values, whether or not the completed property can be sold for the amount anticipated, and the length of the sale process. If construction work is not completed (due to contractor abandonment, unsatisfactory work performance, or various other factors) and all the Alternative Credit funds have already been expended, then, in the event of a default, the platform operator and its affiliates may have to invest significant additional funds to complete the construction work. Any such investment would be recuperated by the platform operator and its affiliates prior to any payment on any corresponding Pass-Through Notes. Default risk also exists where it takes a borrower longer than anticipated either to construct or then resell the property, or if the borrower does not receive sufficient proceeds from the sale to repay the corresponding Alternative Credit Instrument in full.

Certain Risks Associated With Foreclosure. Different property types involve different types of risks in terms of realizing on the collateral in the event that the borrower defaults. These risks include completion costs in the case of an incomplete project, partial resale for condominiums and tracts and lease-up (finding tenants) for multi-family residential, small commercial and industrial properties. The platform operator and its affiliates may not be able to sell a foreclosed commercial property, for example, before expending efforts to find tenants to make the property more fully leased and more attractive to potential buyers.

Moreover, foreclosure statutes vary widely from state to state. Properties underlying defaulted loans will need to be foreclosed upon in compliance with the laws of the state where such property is located. Many states require lengthy processing periods or the obtaining of a court decree before a mortgaged property may be sold or otherwise foreclosed upon. Further, statutory rights to redemption and the effects of anti-deficiency and other laws may limit the ability for a platform operator (and its affiliates) to timely recover the value of a loan in the event of borrower default.

Certain Risks Associated With Bankruptcy. If a borrower enters bankruptcy, an automatic stay of all proceedings against the borrower’s property will be granted. This stay will prevent platforms and their affiliates from foreclosing on such property unless relief from the stay can be obtained from the bankruptcy court, and there is no guarantee that any such relief will be obtained. Significant legal fees and costs may be incurred in attempting to obtain relief from a bankruptcy stay from the bankruptcy court and, even if such relief is ultimately granted, it may take several months or more to obtain. In such event, the platform operator and its affiliates will be unable to promptly exercise their foreclosure remedy and realize any proceeds from a property sale.

In addition, bankruptcy courts have broad powers to permit the sale of any real property free of any lien that a platform operator or its affiliate may have, to compel the platform operator and its affiliates to accept an amount less than the balance due under a loan and to permit the borrower to repay the loan over a term which may be substantially longer than the original term of the loan.

Additional Investments and Practices of the Fund

The Fund may invest in income-producing securities of any maturity and credit quality, including below investment grade, and equity securities, including exchange-traded funds and registered closed-end funds. Below investment grade securities are commonly referred to as “junk” or “high yield” securities and are considered speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Such income-producing securities in which the Fund may invest may include, without limitation, corporate debt securities, U.S. government debt securities, short-term debt securities, asset backed securities, exchange-traded notes, loans, including secured and unsecured senior loans, Alternative Credit (as defined below), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other structured finance securities, and cash and cash equivalents. The following describes these instruments in which the Fund may, but is not required to, invest, and certain of the risks associated with an investment in such instruments, and supplements the discussion from the Prospectus. See “Risks—Other Investment-Related Risks” in the Prospectus. It is possible that certain types of financial instruments or investment techniques described herein may not be available, permissible, economically feasible or effective for their intended purposes in all markets. Certain practices, techniques or instruments may not be principal activities of the Fund but, to the extent employed, could from time to time have a material impact on the Fund’s performance.

Asset-Backed Securities. Asset-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of assets such as, among other things, motor vehicle installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from revolving credit (credit card) agreements or a combination of the foregoing. These assets are securitized through the use of trusts and special purpose entities. Credit enhancements, such as various forms of cash collateral accounts or letters of credit, may support payments of principal and interest on asset-backed securities. Although these securities may be supported by letters of credit or other credit enhancements, payment of interest and principal ultimately depends upon individuals paying the underlying loans or accounts, which payment may be adversely affected by general downturns in the economy. Asset-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. There is risk that recovery on repossessed collateral might be unavailable or inadequate to support payments on the underlying investments.

Below Investment Grade Securities. The Fund may invest in securities of any credit quality, including securities that are rated below investment grade. Below investment grade securities are rated below “BBB-“ by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, or Fitch Ratings, Inc., below “Baa” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) or, if unrated, determined by the Adviser to be of comparable credit quality at the time of purchase. Below investment grade securities are commonly referred to as “junk” or “high yield” securities and are considered speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Ratings assigned by an NRSRO are not absolute standards of credit quality and do not evaluate market risk or the liquidity of securities. Consequently, securities with the same maturity, duration, coupon and rating may have different yields. Any shortcomings or inefficiencies in an NRSRO’s processes for determining credit ratings may adversely affect the credit ratings of securities held by the Fund and, as a result, may adversely affect those securities’ perceived or actual credit risk. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—Below Investment Grade Securities Risk.”

Commercial Paper. Commercial paper represents short-term unsecured promissory notes issued in bearer form by corporations such as banks or bank holding companies and finance companies. The rate of return on commercial paper may be linked or indexed to the level of exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and a foreign currency or currencies.

Corporate Debt Securities. Corporate debt securities are debt obligations issued by U.S. and foreign corporations and other business entities to borrow money from investors. Corporate debt securities may be either secured or unsecured. Collateral used for secured debt includes, but is not limited to, real property, machinery, equipment, accounts receivable, stocks, bonds, or notes. If a bond is unsecured, it is known as a debenture. Holders of corporate debt securities, as creditors, have a prior legal claim over common and preferred stockholders as to both income and assets of the corporation for the principal and interest due them and may have a prior claim over other creditors if liens or mortgages are involved. Interest on corporate debt securities may be fixed rate, floating rate, adjustable rate, zero coupon, contingent, deferred, or have payment-in-kind features. Interest on corporate debt securities is typically paid semi-annually and is fully taxable to the holder of such securities. Corporate debt securities contain elements of both interest rate risk and credit risk. The market value of a corporate debt security generally may be expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates and may also be affected by the credit rating of the corporation, the corporation’s performance, and perceptions of the corporation in the marketplace. Corporate debt securities usually yield more than government or agency securities due to the presence of credit risk. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—Fixed Income Securities Risk.”

Equity Securities. The Fund may invest in equity securities, including but not limited to common stock, preferred stock and shares of exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”).

Common stock represents an equity ownership interest in a company, providing voting rights and entitling the holder to a share of the company’s success through dividends and/or capital appreciation. In the event of liquidation, common stockholders have rights to a company’s remaining assets after bondholders, other debt holders and preferred stockholders have been paid in full. Typically, common stockholders are entitled to one vote per share to elect the company’s board of directors (although the number of votes is not always directly proportional to the number of shares owned). Common stockholders also receive voting rights regarding other company matters such as mergers and certain important company policies such as issuing securities to management. Common stock fluctuates in price in response to many factors, including historical and prospective earnings of the issuer, the value of its assets, general economic conditions, interest rates, investor perceptions and market liquidity. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—Common Stock Risk.”

Preferred stock represents an equity ownership interest in an issuer, but generally entitles the holder to receive, in preference to the holders of other stocks such as common stock, dividends and a fixed share of the proceeds resulting from the liquidation of the issuer. Some preferred stock also entitles their holders to receive additional liquidation proceeds on the same basis as holders of the issuer’s common stock. Some preferred stock offers a fixed rate of return with no maturity date. Preferred stock with no maturity may perform similarly to long term bonds, and can be more volatile than other types of preferred stock with heightened sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Other preferred stock has a variable dividend, generally determined on a quarterly or other periodic basis. Because preferred stock represents an equity ownership interest in a company, its value usually will react more strongly than bonds and other debt instruments to actual or perceived changes in an issuer’s financial condition or prospects or to fluctuations in the equity markets. Unlike common stock, preferred stock does not usually have voting rights absent the occurrence of specified events; preferred stock, in some instances, is convertible into common stock. In order to be payable, dividends on preferred stock must be declared by the issuer’s board of directors. There is, however, no assurance that dividends will be declared by the boards of directors of issuers of the preferred stocks in which the Fund invests. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—Preferred Stock Risk” below.

ETFs are funds whose shares are traded on securities exchanges and generally seek to approximate the investment performance of their respective benchmarks by investing in a variety of U.S. and foreign equity, debt, commodities, money market securities, futures and other instruments. The shares of an ETF may be assembled in a block (typically 50,000 shares) known as a creation unit and redeemed in-kind for a portfolio of the underlying securities (based on the ETF’s net asset value (“NAV”)) together with a cash payment generally equal to accumulated dividends as of the date of redemption. Conversely, a creation unit may be purchased from the ETF by depositing a specified portfolio of the ETF’s underlying securities, as well as a cash payment generally equal to accumulated dividends of the securities (net of expenses) up to the time of deposit. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—ETFs Risk.”

Exchange-Traded Notes. The Fund may invest in exchange-traded notes (“ETNs”), which are a type of unsecured, unsubordinated debt security. ETNs combine certain aspects of bonds and ETFs. Similar to ETFs, ETNs are traded on a major exchange (e.g., the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”)) during normal trading hours, although trading volume can be limited. However, investors can also hold the ETN until maturity. At maturity, the issuer pays to the investor a cash amount equal to the principal amount, subject to the day’s index factor. ETN returns are based upon the performance of a market index minus applicable fees. ETNs do not make periodic coupon payments and provide no principal protection. The value of an ETN may be influenced by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying markets, changes in the applicable interest rates, changes in the issuer’s credit rating and economic, legal, political or geographic events that affect the referenced index. The value of the ETN may drop due to a downgrade in the issuer’s credit rating, despite the underlying index remaining unchanged. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—ETNs Risk.”

Government Debt Securities. The Fund may invest in government debt securities, which are debt securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities. Obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities include bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, as well as “stripped” or “zero coupon” U.S. Treasury obligations representing future interest or principal payments on U.S. Treasury notes or bonds. Stripped securities are sold at a discount to their “face value,” and may exhibit greater price volatility than interest-bearing securities because investors receive no payment until maturity. Other obligations of certain agencies and instrumentalities of the U.S. Government are supported only by the credit of the instrumentality. The U.S. Government may choose not to provide financial support to U.S. Government-sponsored agencies or instrumentalities if it is not legally obligated to do so, in which case, if the issuer were to default, the Fund might not be able to recover its investment from the U.S. Government.

Loans. In addition to Alternative Credit Instruments, the Fund may invest in loans other than Alternative Credit Instruments that are senior and secured loans as well as unsecured or subordinated loans. In addition, the Fund may invest in secured and unsecured participations in loans. While the loans purchased by the Fund may be secured by a first-priority security interest in most tangible and intangible assets of the issuer, they are not required to be and the Fund will not be subject to any limit on purchasing loans with lower-priority security interests or loans whose security interests exclude material assets of the issuer.

The Fund may invest in term loans and other types of loans, including those that are attached to a term loan tranche or otherwise required to be purchased along with the purchase of a term loan tranche. The loans purchased by the Fund may be negotiated and structured by a syndicate of lenders consisting of commercial banks, investment banks, thrift institutions, insurance companies, finance companies or other financial institutions, one or more of which will administer the loan on behalf of all the lenders. The Fund may purchase assignments of these loans, in which case it will typically become a lender for purposes of the relevant loan agreement with direct contractual rights against the borrower, including the right to receive payments of principal and interest. However, the Fund may also purchase participation interests, in which case it will not have any direct relationship with the borrower and will instead rely on the lender or participant that sold the participation interest for enforcement of rights against the borrower and to receive and process payments of interest, principal and other amounts due to the Fund. See “Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund—Loan Risk.”

*            *            *

This Supplement should be retained with the SAI for future reference.