Class
|
| |
Number of Shares
|
| |
Votes/Share
|
| |
Number of Votes
|
|
Common Stock
|
| |
1,659,097,754
|
| | One/share | | | 1,659,097,754 | |
Series A Preferred Stock
|
| |
1,925
|
| | 1,000/share | | | 1,925,000 | |
Series AA Preferred Stock*
|
| |
1
|
| | 1,300,000,000 /share only on Reverse Stock Split Proposal | | | 1,300,000,000 votes only on Reverse Stock Split Proposal | |
Series B Preferred Stock
|
| |
0
|
| | One/share on an as-converted to common basis | | | 0 | |
Series C Preferred Stock
|
| |
1,211,757
|
| | One/share on an as-converted to common basis | | | 1,211,757 | |
Proposal
|
| |
Vote Required
|
| |
Broker
Discretionary Vote Allowed |
|
Reverse Stock Split | | | The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and our Series C Preferred Stock, all voting together, present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. | | |
Yes
|
|
Authorized Share Increase | | | The affirmative vote of a majority of (i) the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) outstanding shares of our Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and our Series C Preferred Stock, all voting together, present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. | | |
Yes
|
|
Reincorporation | | | The affirmative vote of a majority of the total outstanding shares of our Common Stock, Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred, all voting together, present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. | | |
No
|
|
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d) Proposal | | | The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred, all voting together. | | |
No
|
|
Adjournment | | | Majority of votes represented by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon | | |
Yes
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
After the Reverse Stock Split(1)
|
| |||||||||
| | |
Current
|
| |
If Minimum 1:2
Ratio is Selected |
| |
If Maximum 1:25
Ratio is Selected |
| |||||||||
Authorized Common Stock(2)
|
| | | | 1,750,000,000 | | | | | | 1,750,000,000 | | | | | | 1,750,000,000 | | |
Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Record
Date |
| | | | 1,659,097,754 | | | | | | 829,548,877 | | | | | | 66,363,910 | | |
Reserved for Issuance(3)
|
| | | | 570,865,410 | | | | | | 285,614,252 | | | | | | 22,834,614 | | |
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock:
|
| | The Delaware Charter authorizes 2,250,000,000 shares, of which (a) 1,750,000,000 are designated as common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and (b) 500,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 200,000 shares are designated as “Series A Preferred Stock”, 12,000,000 shares are designated as “Series B Preferred Stock”, 40,000,000 shares are designated as “Series C Preferred Stock”, and 437,500,001 shares are designated as “Series D Preferred Stock”. | | | If Proposal No. 3 is approved at the Special Stockholders Meeting, the Maryland Charter will authorize 5,500,000,000 shares, of which (a) 5,000,000,000 shares will be designated as common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and (b) 500,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 200,000 shares are designated as “Series A Preferred Stock”, 12,000,000 shares are designated as “Series B Preferred Stock”, 40,000,000 shares are designated as “Series C Preferred Stock”, and 437,500,001 shares are designated as “Series D Preferred Stock”. | |
Voting Rights:
|
| | Under the Delaware Charter, each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held on matters | | | Under the Maryland Charter, each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share held on | |
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | | submitted to a vote of stockholders. The holder of each share of Series B Preferred Stock and each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall have the right to one vote for each share of Common Stock into which such Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock, as applicable, could then be converted, and such holder and such holder thereof is entitled to vote with the Common Stock on such as-converted-to-common-stock basis.. The holder of each share of Series D Preferred Stock has no voting rights except in a liquidation event, issuance of equity security having a preference over the Series D Preferred Stock, amendment of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws that adversely affect the rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, corporate dissolution or bankruptcy, as set forth in Section 8 of the Certificate of Designation for Series D Preferred Stock. To the extent the holders of a share of Series D Preferred Stock is entitled to vote on a matter pursuant to Section 8, then the holder of each share of Series D Preferred Stock has the right to one vote for each share. | | | matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The holder of each share of Series B Preferred Stock and each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall have the right to one vote for each share of Common Stock into which such Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock, as applicable, could then be converted, and such holder thereof is entitled to vote with the Common Stock on such as-converted-to-common-stock basis. The holder of each share of Series D Preferred Stock has no voting rights except in a liquidation event, issuance of equity security having a preference over the Series D Preferred Stock, amendment of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws that adversely affect the rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, corporate dissolution or bankruptcy, as set forth in Section 8 of the Certificate of Designation for Series D Preferred Stock. To the extent the holders of a share of Series D Preferred Stock is entitled to vote on a matter pursuant to Section 8, then the holder of each share of Series D Preferred Stock has the right to one vote for each share. | |
Cumulative Voting Right:
|
| | Under the DGCL and the Delaware Charter, the holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. | | | Under the Maryland Charter, the holders of common stock will not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. | |
Rights of Holders of Preferred Stock:
|
| | The Delaware Charter provides that the Board is authorized to fix the designation, powers, preferences, rights, and any qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of such preferred stock. | | | The Maryland Charter will provide that the Board is authorized to fix the preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of such preferred stock. | |
Number and Classification of Directors:
|
| | The Delaware Charter provides that the number of directors shall initially be seven (7) and, thereafter, shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors (whether or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships at the time any such resolution is presented to the Board for adoption). Each | | |
The Maryland Charter will provide that the number of directors is seven (7), which number may be increased or decreased only by the board of directors pursuant to the bylaws of the Corporation but shall never be less than the minimum number required by the MGCL.
The Maryland Charter will provide for a classified Board that all directors will be elected to hold office for staggered
|
|
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | |
director shall serve until his successor is duly elected and qualified or until his death, resignation or removal.
The Delaware Charter provides for a classified board of directors so that all directors will be elected to hold office for staggered three-year terms expiring at the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at which such director was elected.
|
| | three-year terms expiring at the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at which such director was elected. | |
Removal of Directors:
|
| | The Delaware Charter provides that any directors, or the entire Board of Directors, may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. | | | The Maryland Charter will provide that any directors, or the entire Board of Directors, may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. | |
Special Meetings of Stockholders:
|
| | The Delaware Bylaws and the Delaware Charter provide that the special meetings of stockholders may be called by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the President (in the absence of a Chief Executive Officer) of the Corporation and may not be called by any other person. Furthermore, the Delaware Bylaws provide that whenever holders of one or more classes or series of Preferred Stock shall have the right, voting separately as a class or series, to elect directors, such holders may call, pursuant to the terms of the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors, special meetings of holders of such Preferred Stock. | | |
The Maryland Bylaws will provide that the special meetings of stockholders may be called by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the President. Special meetings of stockholders may also be called upon the written request of stockholders holding not less than majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting.
Furthermore, the Maryland Bylaws will provide that whenever holders of one or more classes or series of Preferred Stock shall have the right, voting separately as a class or series, to elect directors, such holders may call, pursuant to the terms of the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors, special meetings of holders of such Preferred Stock.
|
|
Special Meetings of Board:
|
| | The Delaware Bylaws provide that special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the Chairman of the Board or the President and shall be called by the Chairman of the Board, President or Secretary on the written request of three directors. Notice of special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be given to each director at least three days before the date of the meeting in such manner as is determined | | | The Maryland Bylaws will provide that special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the Chairman of the Board or the President and shall be called by the Chairman of the Board, President or Secretary on the written request of three directors. Notice of special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be given to each director at least three days before the date of the meeting in such manner as is determined | |
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | | by the Board of Directors. | | | by the Board of Directors. | |
Stockholder Action by Written Consent:
|
| |
The DGCL permits corporate action without a meeting of stockholders of a corporation upon the written consent of the holders of that number of shares necessary to authorize the proposed corporate action being taken, unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation expressly provides otherwise.
The Delaware Bylaws provide that stockholders may not take any action by written consent without a meeting.
|
| |
The MGCL permits Holders of common stock to vote generally in the election of directors to take action by less than unanimous written consent without a meeting only if authorized by the articles of incorporation.
Under MGCL, the Maryland Bylaws will provide that any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of stockholders may be taken without a meeting only by a unanimous consent of the stockholders entitled to vote on the matter.
|
|
Quorum of Stockholders:
|
| | Under the Delaware Bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority at least 331∕3% of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. | | | Under the Maryland Bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority at least 331∕3% of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. | |
Advance Notice Procedures for Stockholder Proposal or Director Nomination:
|
| | A stockholder entitled to vote at an annual meeting may nominate an individual for election as a director and propose business for consideration at the annual meeting by providing written notice as set forth in the Delaware Bylaws to the Secretary not less than 60 nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided, that in the event that the date of the meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so delivered no later than the 70th day prior to the date of the meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. | | | A stockholder entitled to vote at an annual meeting may nominate an individual for election as a director and propose business for consideration at the annual meeting by providing written notice as set forth in the Maryland Bylaws to the Secretary not less than 60 nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided, that in the event that the date of the meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so delivered no later than the 70th day prior to the date of the meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. | |
Business Combinations with Certain Persons:
|
| |
Section 203 of the DGCL provides that a corporation may not engage in any business combination with any “interested stockholder” for a three-year period following the time that such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder unless:
unless:
(1) prior to such date, the board of directors approved either the business
|
| | Under the MGCL, certain “business combinations” (as defined in the MGCL) between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. Under the MGCL, an “interested stockholder” includes a person (other than the corporation or any subsidiary) who is: | |
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | |
combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
(2) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding shares held by directors who are also officers and employee stock purchase plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether plan shares will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer); or
(3) on or subsequent to such date, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and by the affirmative vote at an annual or special meeting, and not by written consent, of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.
|
| |
•
the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10 percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation after the date on which the corporation had 100 or more beneficial owners of its stock; or
•
is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10 percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation (i) at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, and (ii) after the date on which the corporation had 100 or more beneficial owners of its stock.
Business combinations for the purposes of the preceding paragraph are defined by the MGCL to include certain mergers, consolidations, recapitalizations, share exchanges and asset transfers, some issuances and reclassifications of equity securities, the adoption of a plan of liquidation or dissolution or the receipt by an interested stockholder or its affiliate of any loan advance, guarantee, pledge or other financial assistance or tax advantage provided by the Company. After the five-year moratorium period, any such business combination must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
•
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation voting together as a single group; and
•
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than voting stock held by the interested stockholder with whom (or with whose affiliate) the business combination is to be effected or by any affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder voting together as a single voting group.
The super-majority vote requirements will not apply if, among other things, the corporation’s stockholders receive an aggregate amount of cash and non-cash
|
|
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | | | | | consideration that has a market value determined as of the valuation date and in accordance with the requirements of Section 3-603(b)(1) or (2), as applicable, of the MGCL for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. These provisions of Maryland law do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by the board of directors of the corporation prior to the most recent time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. As permitted by the MGCL, our board of directors intends to adopt a resolution exempting any business combination between us and any other person from the provisions of this statute. | |
Charter Amendments:
|
| |
The DGCL provides that a corporation may amend its certificate of incorporation upon the adoption of a resolution setting forth the proposed amendment by the board of directors and thereafter by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter, unless the certificate of incorporation provides for a different vote of the stockholders.
The Delaware Charter provides that the charter may be amended in any manner permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware, except that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66-2/3%) of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required to amend or repeal in ARTICLE XI or ARTICLE VII of the Delaware Charter.
|
| |
Under MGCL, After the corporation issues shares, the board of directors may adopt an amendment without stockholder approval (if authorized or not prohibited by the articles of incorporation) to:
•
Increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any authorized class or series.
•
Effect a reverse stock split in specific circumstances for certain types of corporations.
•
Change the corporation’s name.
•
Change the name or other designation or the par value of any class or series of the corporation’s stock and the aggregate par value of the corporation’s stock.
If authorized by the articles of incorporation, the board of directors may file articles supplementary to classify or reclassify any unissued stock from time to time by setting or changing the stock’s preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption. The board of directors may not issue any of the stock that is classified, reclassified, or newly
|
|
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | | | | |
authorized by a charter amendment before the amendment becomes effective. In all other cases, amending the articles of incorporation requires stockholder approval.
The Maryland Charter will provide that the charter may be amended in any manner permitted by the laws of the State of Maryland, except that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66-2/3%) of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required to amend or repeal ARTICLE XIII or ARTICLE IX of the Maryland Charter.
|
|
Bylaw Amendments:
|
| | The Delaware Bylaws may be amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of the holders of 662∕3% of the total voting power of all outstanding securities of the Corporation then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class or by a majority of the Board of Directors | | | The Maryland Bylaws may be amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of the holders of 662∕3% of the total voting power of all outstanding securities of the Corporation then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class or by a majority of the Board of Directors. | |
Extraordinary Transactions
|
| | Under the DGCL, generally, a merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of a corporation’s assets (other than a sale to a wholly owned subsidiary) or dissolution must be approved by the corporation’s board of directors and a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. The Delaware Organizational Documents do not contain any additional voting requirements with respect to charter amendments or extraordinary corporate actions. | | | Under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation generally may not dissolve, merge or consolidate with, or convert to, another entity, sell all or substantially all of its assets or engage in a statutory share exchange unless the action is declared advisable by the board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, unless a lesser percentage (but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter) is specified in the corporation’s charter. The Maryland Charter provides that these actions must be approved by a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. | |
Dividends:
|
| | The Delaware Bylaws provide that subject to limitations contained in Delaware Law and the certificate of incorporation, the Board of Directors may declare and pay dividends upon the | | | The Maryland Bylaws will provide that subject to limitations contained in MCGL and the certificate of incorporation, the Board of Directors may declare and pay dividends upon the | |
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | |
shares of capital stock of the Corporation, which dividends may be paid either in cash, in property or in shares of the capital stock of the Corporation.
The Delaware Charter provides that any dividends or distributions, other than dividends or distributions accruing or paid on shares of the Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to Article VI(B)1(a), shall be distributed among all holders of Common Stock and Preferred Stock in proportion to the number of shares of Common Stock that would be held by each such holder if all shares of Preferred Stock were converted to Common Stock at the then effective conversion rate without regard to any limitations on the conversion of the Preferred Stock contained in the Delaware Charter.
|
| |
shares of capital stock of the Corporation, which dividends may be paid either in cash, in property or in shares of the capital stock of the Corporation.
The Maryland Charter will provide that any dividends or distributions, other than dividends or distributions accruing or paid on shares of the Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to Article VI, shall be distributed among all holders of common stock and preferred stock in proportion to the number of shares of common stock that would be held by each such holder if all shares of preferred stock were converted to common stock at the then effective conversion rate without regard to any limitations on the conversion of the preferred stock contained in the Maryland Charter.
|
|
Limitation of Liability:
|
| | As permitted by the DGCL, the Delaware Certificate of Incorporation provides that no director will have personal liability to the Company or any of its stockholders for money damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided however that such provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL, or (iv) for any transaction from which such director derived an improper personal benefit. | | | As permitted by the MGCL, the Maryland Charter exculpates the directors and officers from liability to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages, except to the extent (i) it is proved that the person actually received an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services, for the amount of the benefit or profit in money, property or services actually received, or (ii) a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the person is entered in a proceeding based on a finding in the proceeding that the person’s action, or failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and was material to the cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding. | |
Indemnification of Officers and Directors:
|
| | Pursuant to the DGCL, a corporation has the power to indemnify its directors and officers against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with a third-party action, other than a derivative action, and against expenses actually and reasonably incurred in the defense or settlement of a derivative action, provided there is a determination that the individual acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not | | |
Under MGCL, a corporation may indemnify any director made a party to any proceeding by reason of service in that capacity unless it is established that:
•
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad faith or (ii) was a result of active and deliberate dishonesty; or
•
the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in
|
|
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | |
opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the individual’s conduct was unlawful.
The DGCL requires indemnification of directors and officers for expenses relating to a successful defense on the merits or otherwise of a derivative or third-party action.
The DGCL permits a corporation to advance expenses relating to the defense of any proceeding to directors and officers contingent upon such individuals’ commitment to repay any advances unless it is determined ultimately that such individuals are entitled to be indemnified.
Under the DGCL, the rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses provided in the law are nonexclusive, in that, subject to public policy issues, indemnification and advancement of expenses beyond that provided by statute may be provided by bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders, disinterested directors or otherwise.
The Delaware Charter contains indemnification provisions consistent with the DGCL.
|
| |
money, property or services, or
•
in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.
Under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify a director or officer in a suit by the Maryland corporation or in its right in which the director or officer was adjudged liable to the Maryland corporation or in a suit in which the director or officer was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. Nevertheless, a court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification in view of all the relevant circumstances, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. However, indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by the corporation or in the corporation’s right, or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, is limited to expenses.
In addition, the MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon receipt of (i) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification and (ii) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
The Maryland Charter will provide that the directors and officers of the Corporation shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent permitted by Maryland law.
|
|
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
Stockholders’ Right to Inspect Books and Records:
|
| | The DGCL provides that any stockholder of record may demand to examine the corporation’s stock ledger, a list of its stockholders and its other books and records for any proper purpose. If management of the corporation refuses, the stockholder can compel release of the books by court order. | | | The MGCL provides that any stockholder, on written request, may inspect and copy during usual business hours the corporation’s bylaws, minutes of the proceedings of stockholders, annual statements of affairs, any voting trust agreements deposited with the corporation at the corporation’s principal office and a statement showing all stock and securities issued by the corporation during a specified period of not more than 12 months before the date of the request. | |
Appraisal and Dissenters Rights:
|
| |
Under the DGCL, stockholders have appraisal rights in the event of certain corporate actions such as a merger or consolidation. These rights include the right to dissent from voting to approve such corporate action, and demand fair value for the shares of the dissenting stockholder.
If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters’ rights is submitted to a vote at a stockholder meeting, a stockholder who wishes to assert dissenters’ rights must:
(1)
deliver to the corporation, before the vote is taken, written notice of his intent to demand payment for shares if the proposed action is effected; and
(2)
not vote his shares in favor of the proposed action.
If fair value is unsettled, the DGCL provides for the dissenter and the corporation to petition the Delaware Court of Chancery.
|
| | Under the MGCL, a stockholder of a Maryland corporation generally has the right to demand and receive payment of the fair value of the stockholder’s stock from the successor if the corporation consolidates or merges with or converts into another corporation, the stockholder’s stock is to be acquired in a share exchange, the corporation transfers all or substantially all its assets, the corporation amends its charter in certain circumstances (unless the right to do so is reserved by the charter, which the Maryland Charter does) or the transaction is governed by or exempted from the applicable business combination provisions of the MGCL described above. | |
Exclusive Forum:
|
| | The Delaware Charter provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of the corporation to the corporation or the corporation’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against the corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or the Delaware Charter or Bylaws, or (iv) any action | | | The Maryland Bylaws will provide that unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, or, if that Court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division, will be the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any Internal Corporate Claim, as such term is defined in the MGCL, or any successor provision thereof, (b) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, other than | |
| | |
DELAWARE
|
| |
MARYLAND
|
|
| | | asserting a claim against the Corporation governed by the internal affairs doctrine. | | |
actions arising under federal securities laws, (c) any action asserting a claim of breach of any duty owed by any director or officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or to the stockholders of the Company, (d) any action asserting a claim against the Corporation or any director or officer or other employee of the Corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the MGCL or the charter of the Corporation or the Bylaws, or (e) any other action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer or other employee of the Company that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine.
Furthermore, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.
|
|
Class
|
| |
Number of Shares
|
| |
Votes/Share
|
| |
Number of Votes
|
| ||||||
Common Stock
|
| | | | 1,659,097,754 | | | | One/share | | | | | 1,659,097,754 | | |
Series A Preferred Stock
|
| | | | 1,925 | | | | 1,000/share | | | | | 1,925,000 | | |
Series B Preferred Stock
|
| | | | 0 | | | |
One/share on an
as-converted to common basis |
| | | | 0 | | |
Series C Preferred Stock
|
| | | | 1,211,757 | | | |
One/share on an
as-converted to common basis |
| | | | 1,211,757 | | |
Series D Preferred Stock
|
| | | | 363,097 | | | | One/share | | | | | 363,097 | | |
| | |
Common Stock(1)
|
| |
Total Voting Power(2)
|
| ||||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owners
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
| |
%
|
| |||||||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David Michery(3)
|
| | | | 690,391,537 | | | | | | 33.4% | | | | | | 33.4% | | |
Jonathan New
|
| | | | 8,611 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Calin Popa
|
| | | | 309,729 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Mary Winter
|
| | | | 87,453 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Jonathan K. Andersen
|
| | | | 500,000 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Mark Betor
|
| | | | 159,869 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
William Miltner
|
| | | | 18,611 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Ignacio Novoa
|
| | | | 283,000 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Kent Puckett
|
| | | | 18,611 | | | | | | * | | | | | | * | | |
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (9 Persons)(3)
|
| | | | 691,777,421 | | | | | | 33.4% | | | | | | 33.5% | | |
| | |
Common Stock(1)
|
| |
Total Voting Power(2)
|
| ||||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owners
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
| |
%
|
| |||||||||
5% Beneficial Owners: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acuitas Group Holdings, LLC(4)
|
| | | | 80,301,289 | | | | | | 4.4% | | | | | | 4.4% | | |
Esousa Holdings LLC(5)
|
| | | | 81,907,312 | | | | | | 4.5% | | | | | | 4.5% | | |
Davis-Rice Pty Limited(6)
|
| | | | 40,150,642 | | | | | | 2.3% | | | | | | 2.3% | | |
| | |
Beneficial Ownership of Series
AA Preferred Stock |
| |||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
Percent
|
| ||||||
David Michery(1)
|
| | | | 1 | | | | | | 100% | | |
| Year 1 | | | No Redemption | |
| Year 2 | | | Redemption at 120% of the Series C Redemption Price | |
| Year 3 | | | Redemption at 115% of the Series C Redemption Price | |
| Year 4 | | | Redemption at 110% of the Series C Redemption Price | |
| Year 5 | | | Redemption at 105% of the Series C Redemption Price | |
|
Year 6 and thereafter
|
| | Redemption at 100% of the Series C Redemption Price | |
| Year 1 | | | No Redemption | |
| Year 2 | | | Redemption at 120% of the Series D Redemption Price | |
| Year 3 | | | Redemption at 115% of the Series D Redemption Price | |
| Year 4 | | | Redemption at 110% of the Series D Redemption Price | |
| Year 5 | | | Redemption at 105% of the Series D Redemption Price | |
|
Year 6 and thereafter
|
| | Redemption at 100% of the Series D Redemption Price | |