Filed pursuant to Rule 497
File Nos. 333-171987 and 811-22524
Name | Ticker Symbol | |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | NKY |
July 29, 2013 | ||
Not FDIC Insured | May Lose Value | No Bank Guarantee |
Management Fee | 0.50% |
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees | 0.00% |
Other Expenses | 0.03% |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | 0.53% |
Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement(a) | (0.03)% |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement | 0.50% |
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years |
$51 | $167 | $293 | $662 |
Best Quarter | (March 31, 2012): | 11.89% |
Worst Quarter | (June 30, 2012): | -7.49% |
Average Annual Total Returns (for the periods ended December 31, 2012) | One Year | Since Inception of Fund | Inception Date of Fund | |||
Before Taxes | 11.11% | -1.52% | July 8, 2011 | |||
After Taxes on Distributions | 10.95% | -1.65% | = | |||
After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Shares | 7.68% | -1.20% | = | |||
Nikkei 225 Index* | 9.23% | -3.36% | = |
• | Geographic Risk. Japan is located in a part of the world that has historically been prone to natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis and is economically sensitive to environmental events. Any such event could result in a significant adverse impact on the Japanese economy. |
• | Lack of Natural Resources Risk. Japan is an island state with few natural resources and limited land area and is reliant on imports for its commodity needs. In particular, the Japanese economy is dependent on global sources of petroleum products, including those in the Middle East. Any disruptions, fluctuations or shortages in the commodity markets could have a negative impact on the Japanese economy. |
• | Reliance On Trading Partners Risk. The Japanese economy is heavily dependent on international trade, including trade with the U.S., other Asian countries and European nations, and has been adversely affected by trade tariffs, other protectionist measures and rising commodity prices. Japanese economic growth has generally been dependent on the U.S. and Chinese economies, with trade increasing with China in recent years. |
○ | Asian Economic Risk. Certain Asian economies have experienced over-extension of credit, currency devaluations and restrictions, high unemployment, high inflation, decreased exports and economic recessions. Economic or political events in any one country can have a significant economic effect on the entire Asian region as well as on major trading partners outside Asia and any adverse event in the Asian markets may have a significant adverse effect on the Japanese economy. |
○ | U.S. Economic Risk. The U.S. is a significant trading partner of Japan. Decreasing U.S. imports, new trade regulations, changes in the U.S. Dollar exchange rates or a recession in the U.S. may have an adverse impact on the Japanese economy. The U.S. economy has been in recession for a number of years and the U.S. Dollar has experienced weakness against the Japanese Yen. Continued weakness in the U.S. economy or the U.S. Dollar could adversely affect Japanese trade with U.S. |
○ | European Economic Risk. The Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union (‘‘EU’’) requires compliance with restrictions on inflation rates, deficits, interest rates, debt levels and fiscal and monetary controls, each of which may significantly affect every country in Europe. Decreasing imports or exports, changes in governmental or EU |
• | National Security Risk. Japan’s relations with its neighbors, particularly China, North Korea, South Korea and Russia, have at times been strained due to territorial disputes, historical animosities and defense concerns. Most recently, the Japanese government has shown concern over the increased nuclear and military activity of North Korea and about maritime territorial claims asserted by China. Strained relations may cause uncertainty in the Japanese markets and adversely affect the overall Japanese economy in times of crisis. |
• | Structural Risks. Japan may be subject to risks relating to political, economic and labor risks. Any of these risks, individually or in the aggregate, could adversely affect investments in the Fund: |
○ | Political Risk. Historically, Japan has been subject to unpredictable national politics and may experience frequent political turnover. Future political developments may lead to changes in policy that might adversely affect the Fund’s investments. |
○ | Large Government Debt Risk. The Japanese economy faces several concerns, including a financial system with large levels of nonperforming loans, over-leveraged corporate balance sheets, extensive cross-ownership by major corporations, a changing corporate governance structure, and large government deficits. |
○ | Currency Risk. The Japanese Yen has fluctuated widely at times and any increase in its value may cause a decline in exports that could weaken the economy. |
○ | Labor Risk. Japan has an aging workforce. Its labor market is undergoing fundamental structural changes, as traditional lifetime employment clashes with the need for increased labor mobility, which may adversely affect Japan’s economic competitiveness. |
• | Consumer Discretionary Sector Risk. The success of consumer product manufacturers and retailers is closely tied to the performance of domestic and international economies, interest rates, exchange rates, competition, consumer confidence, changes in demographics and consumer preferences. Companies in this sector depend heavily on disposable household income and consumer spending and may be strongly affected by fads and marketing campaigns. These companies may be subject to severe competition, which may adversely affect their profitability. |
• | Industrials Sector Risk. The stock prices of companies in the industrials sector are affected by supply and demand both for their specific product or service and for industrials sector products in general. The products of manufacturing companies may face product obsolescence due to rapid technological developments and frequent new product introduction. Government regulations, world events and economic conditions affect the performance of companies in the industrials sector. Industrial companies may be adversely affected by liability for environmental damage, product liability claims and exchange rates. The industrials sector may also be adversely affected by changes or trends in commodity prices, which may be influenced or characterized by unpredictable factors. |
• | Information Technology Sector Risk. Information technology companies can be significantly affected by the failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, financing or regulatory approval, intense competition, product compatibility, consumer preferences, corporate capital expenditure, rapid obsolescence and research and development of new products. Companies in the information technology sector also face competition or potential competition with numerous alternative technologies. In addition, the highly competitive information technology sector may cause the prices for these products and services to decline in the future. |
• | Options Risk. Options invested in by the Fund may be closed out only on an exchange providing a secondary market therefor. If no liquid secondary market exists for an option, the Fund may not be able to close out the position it holds in the option, subjecting the Fund to the risk of adverse price movements. If the Fund cannot close out a position on an option, it would continue to be required to make margin payments in cash. There also exists a risk of loss by the Fund of margin deposits in the event of the bankruptcy of a broker with whom the Fund has an open position. |
• | Futures Risk. Futures contracts invested in by the Fund may be closed out only on an exchange providing a secondary market therefor. If no liquid secondary market exists for a futures contract, the Fund may not be able to close out the position it holds in the futures contract, subjecting the Fund to the risk of adverse price movements. The lack of a secondary market may occur due to triggering of daily limits in price movement for futures contracts on certain exchanges. When a daily limit set by an exchange is met, the exchange does not permit additional trading on such day, potentially preventing the Fund from closing out the position it holds in any applicable future. If the Fund cannot close out a position on a futures contract, it would continue to be required to make margin payments in cash. The index tracked by a futures contract may differ from and even have a negative correlation to the Fund’s Underlying Index, resulting in the returns from such a contract not matching the performance of the Underlying Index and the possible risk of loss. There also exists a risk of loss by the Fund of margin deposits in the event of the bankruptcy of a broker with whom the Fund has an open position. |
• | Swaps Risk. If the value of the specified security, index or other instrument tracked by a swap moves against the position held by the Fund, the Fund may be required to pay the dollar value of the decrease in value (or increase in value, for an inverse swap) to the counterparty. To the extent that the Fund utilizes total return swaps, such instruments will be considered illiquid by the Fund and the Fund will be required to segregate liquid assets under contractual obligations. Such segregation could limit the Fund’s investment flexibility or impact the Fund’s ability to meet current obligations, such as redemption requests from Authorized Participants. |
• | Futures and Swaps Counterparty Risk. All counterparties are subject to pre-approval by the Board and the number of counterparties may vary over time. During periods of credit market turmoil or when the amount invested by the Fund in futures contracts or total return swaps is limited relative to the Fund’s total net assets, the Fund may have only one or a few counterparties. In such circumstances, the Fund will be exposed to greater counterparty risk and the Fund may be unable to enter into futures contracts or total return swaps on terms that make economic sense, potentially preventing the Fund from achieving its investment objective or requiring it to enter into other types of derivative transactions which feature greater cost or risks. Further, a decline in the creditworthiness of a counterparty may impair the value of that counterparty’s futures or swaps with the Fund, which could result in the loss of all value of the derivative. |
Fund Name | Management Fee | |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | 0.50% |
Fund Name | Operating Expense Limit | |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | 0.50% |
Fund Name | Other Expenses | |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | 0.03% |
(a) | 0.004167% multiplied by: (i) the value of the average daily net assets of the Fund during the then prior month; or (ii) $1 billion, whichever is less, plus |
(b) | 0.003333% multiplied by the excess of the average daily net assets of the Fund during the then prior month above $1 billion (if any); |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | |||||
Year-Ended March 31, 2013 | July 8, 2011* through March 31, 2012 | ||||
PER SHARE OPERATING PERFORMANCE (for a share outstanding throughout the period): | |||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $14.67 | $15.00 | |||
Investment Operations: | |||||
Net investment income(a) | 0.22 | 0.24 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.14 | (0.48)(b) | |||
Total investment operations | 1.36 | (0.24) | |||
Distributions: | |||||
Net investment income | (0.23) | (0.09) | |||
Total distibutions | (0.23) | (0.09) | |||
Net asset value, end of period | $15.80 | $14.67 | |||
Market value, end of period | $15.80(i) | $14.76 | |||
Total Return: | |||||
Net asset value(c) | 9.53% | (1.55)%(d) | |||
Market value(e) | 8.85%(i) | (0.97)%(d) | |||
Ratios and Supplemental Data: | |||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 0.53% | 0.53%(f) | |||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets, net of reimbursement | 0.50% | 0.50%(f) | |||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | 1.58% | 2.37%(f) | |||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $229,199 | $198,131 | |||
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | —(h) | —(d)(h) |
* | Commencement of investment operations. |
(a) | Per share net investment income (loss) has been calculated using the average daily share method. |
(b) | The amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period is not in accordance with the aggregate net realized and unrealized gain (loss) for that period because of the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund shares in relation to fluctuating market value of the investments in the Fund. |
(c) | Net asset value total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period, reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemption on the last day of the period at net asset value. This percentage is not an indication of the performance of a shareholder’s investment in the Fund based on market value due to differences between the market price of the shares and the net asset value per share of the Fund. |
(d) | Not annualized for periods less than one year. |
(e) | Market value total return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the market value at the beginning of the period, reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, if any, and redemption on the last day of the period at market value. Market value is determined by the official midpoint bid/ask from the NYSE Arca. Market value may be greater or less than net asset value, depending on the Fund’s closing price on the listed market. |
(f) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(g) | In-kind transactions are not included in portfolio turnover calculations. |
(h) | Less than 0.5%. |
(i) | The market value return is for the period April 1, 2012 through March 28, 2013. The market price is from March 28, 2013. March 28, 2013 was the last day of NYSE Arca trading for the Fund’s fiscal year. The NYSE Arca is the principal exchange on which the Fund’s shares trade. |
By telephone: | 1-855-621-0930 |
By mail: | Precidian ETFs Trust |
c/o Foreside Fund Services, LLC | |
3 Canal Plaza, Suite 100 | |
Portland, Maine 04101 | |
On the Internet: | SEC Edgar database: www.sec.gov; or |
The Trust: www.precidianfunds.com |
Fund Name | Ticker Symbol | CUSIP | Exchange | |||
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | NKY | 74016W106 | NYSE Arca |
A. | Invest 25% of its total assets in the securities of issuers conducting their principal business activities in the same industry or group of industries (excluding the U.S. government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities). Nonetheless, to the extent the Fund’s Underlying Index is concentrated in a particular industry or group of industries, the Fund’s investments will exceed this 25% limitation to the extent that it is necessary to gain exposure to Underlying Index Components (as defined below) to track its Underlying Index. |
B. | Borrow money, except as permitted under the 1940 Act, and as interpreted or modified by regulation from time to time. |
C. | Make loans, except through: (a) the purchase of debt obligations in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and policies; (b) repurchase agreements with banks, brokers, dealers and other financial institutions; and (c) loans of securities as permitted by applicable law. |
D. | Underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that the sale of portfolio securities by the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriting. |
E. | Purchase, hold or deal in real estate, although the Fund may purchase and sell securities or other investments that are secured by real estate or interests therein or that reflect the return of an index of real estate values, securities of real estate investment trusts and other companies that are engaged primarily in real estate-related businesses and mortgage-related securities and may hold and sell real estate acquired by the Fund as a result of the ownership of securities. |
F. | Invest in commodities or currencies, except that the Fund may invest in: (a) publicly traded commodity pools or (b) financial instruments (such as structured notes, swaps, futures contracts, forward contracts, and options on such contracts) (i) on commodities or currencies; (ii) that represent indices of commodity or currency prices; (iii) that reflect the return of such indices; or (iv) that are securities or other instruments backed by commodities. |
G. | Issue senior securities to the extent such issuance would violate applicable law. |
Name and Year of Birth(1) | Position(s) Held with Trust | Length of Time Served(2) | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee | Other Directorships Held by Trustee | |||||
Independent Trustees: | ||||||||||
John V. Sinon, 1964 | Trustee | Since May 2011 | President, The Sinon Group LLC (2001 to present) (recruiting firm). | 1 | None | |||||
Geoffrey G. Clark, 1972 | Trustee | Since May 2011 | Managing Director (and Officer), Starr Principal Holdings, LLC (2012 to present) (a registered investment advisor); Managing Director, C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. (2007 to 2012) (a privately held company with a portfolio of global investments and financial services businesses). | 1 | Board of Directors, GRD Holdings (2013 to present) | |||||
Interested Trustees(3): | ||||||||||
Mark S. Criscitello, 1961 | Chairman & Trustee Chief Operating Officer Treasurer & Principal Financial Officer | Since August 2010 Since May 2011 From January 2011 to May 2011 | Chief Financial Officer, Precidian Funds LLC (2011 to present); Chief Financial Officer, Precidian Investments LLC (2007 to present); Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Clearance and Execution Division, Bear Hunter (1999 to 2007). | 1 | None | |||||
Other Officers: | ||||||||||
Daniel J. McCabe, 1963 | President and Principal Executive Officer | Since January 2011 | Chief Executive Officer, Precidian Funds LLC (2011 to present); Chief Executive Officer, Precidian Investments LLC (2007 to present). | N/A | N/A | |||||
J. Stuart Thomas, 1966 | Secretary | Since January 2011 | Secretary, Precidian Funds LLC (2011 to present); Principal, Precidian Investments LLC (2005 to present). | N/A | N/A | |||||
William Cox, 1966 | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since May 2013 | Director, Principal Financial Officer, Foreside Management Services LLC (May 2013 to present); Department Head Vice President, Fund Administration, State Street Corp. (1997 to 2012).(4) | N/A | N/A | |||||
Donna M. Rogers, 1966 | Chief Compliance Officer | Since May 2011 | Managing Director, Foreside Compliance Services, LLC (December 2010 to present); Senior Vice President, State Street Bank (formerly Investors Bank & Trust Company) (September 2004 to December 2010)(4) | N/A | N/A |
Name of Trustee | Fund Name | Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Fund | Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in Family of Investment Companies(1) | |||
Independent Trustees: | ||||||
John Sinon | MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | None | None | |||
Geoffrey Clark | MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | None | None | |||
Interested Trustee: | ||||||
Mark Criscitello(2) | MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | None | None |
Name of Person, Position | Aggregate Compensation From The Trust | Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued As Part of Trust Expenses | Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement | Total Compensation From Trust and Fund Complex Paid to Trustees(1) | ||||
Independent Trustees: | ||||||||
John Sinon,Trustee | $25,000 | N/A | N/A | $25,000 | ||||
Geoffrey Clark, Trustee | $25,000 | N/A | N/A | $25,000 | ||||
Interested Trustee: | ||||||||
Mark Criscitello, Chairman and Trustee | None | None | None | None |
Owner Name | Percentage Ownership | |
E*Trade Securities LLC | 5.43% | |
Scottrade Inc. | 5.59% | |
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 6.09% | |
TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. | 6.30% | |
Pershing LLC | 9.72% | |
National Financial Services LLC | 14.73% | |
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 18.86% |
Fund Name | Operating Expense Limit | |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | 0.50% |
Fund Name | Management Fee | |
MAXIS® Nikkei 225 Index Fund | 0.50% |
Portfolio Manager | Registered Investment Companies | Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | Other Accounts | ||||||||
Number of Accounts | Total Assets ($mm) | Number of Accounts | Total Assets ($mm) | Number of Accounts | Total Assets ($mm) | ||||||
Chad M. Rakvin | 29 | $ 26,858.8 | 100 | $ 207,531.1 | 77 | $ 46,896.0 | |||||
Shaun Murphy | 14 | $ 9,270.4 | 47 | $ 49,914.8 | 33 | $ 24,528.0 | |||||
Jordan Dekhayser | 7 | $ 2,561.2 | 35 | $ 33,978.0 | 44 | $ 5,837.0 |
Regular Broker-Dealer | Debt (D)/Equity (E) | Aggregate Holdings (000’s) | ||
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | E | $413 | ||
Nomura Securities International, Inc. | E | $427 |
2013 – 2014 | |||
September 16, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | February 11, 2014 | July 21, 2014 |
September 23, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | March 21, 2014 |
2013 – 2014 | |||
October 14, 2013 | January 2, 2014 | April 29, 2014 | |
November 4, 2013 | January 3, 2014 | May 5, 2014 | |
December 23, 2013 | January 13, 2014 | May 6, 2014 |
December 31, 2013 | May 5, 2014 | 7* |
January 1, 2014 | May 6, 2014 | 9* |
January 3, 2014 | ||
1. | Policy |
2. | Fiduciary Duty |
3. | Procedures |
A. | Review of Advisor’s Proxy Voting Procedures. The Sub-Advisor shall present to the Board their policies, procedures and other guidelines for voting proxies at least annually, and must notify the Board promptly of material changes to any of these documents, including changes to policies and procedures addressing conflicts of interest. |
B. | Voting Record Reporting. The Sub-Advisor shall ensure that the voting record necessary for the completion and filing of Form N-PX is provided to the Fund’s administrator at least annually. Such voting record information shall be in a form acceptable to the Fund and shall be provided at such time(s) as are required for the timely filing of Form N-PX and at such additional times(s) as the Fund and the Sub-Advisor may agree from time to time. With respect to those proxies that the Sub-Advisor has identified as involving a conflict of interest, the Sub-Advisor shall submit a report indicating the nature of the conflict of interest and how that conflict was resolved with respect to the voting of the proxy. |
C. | Conflicts of Interest. Any actual or potential conflicts of interest between the Sub-Advisor and the Fund’s shareholders arising from the proxy voting process will be addressed by the relevant Sub-Advisor and the Sub-Advisor’s application of its proxy voting procedures pursuant to the delegation of proxy voting responsibilities to the Sub-Advisor. In the event that the Sub-Advisor notifies the Chief Compliance Officer of the Fund (the “CCO”) that a conflict of interest cannot be resolved under the Sub-Advisor’s Proxy Voting Procedures, and the CCO is responsible for notifying the Chairman of the Board of the Fund of the irreconcilable conflict of interest and assisting the Chairman with any actions he determines are necessary. |
4. | Revocation |
5. | Disclosure of Policy or Description/Proxy Voting Record |
6. | Related Procedures |
• | describing the proxy voting policy in the Fund’s SAI and disclosing in the Fund’s SAI that the information is available about how the Fund voted proxies during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 without charge, upon request by calling a specified toll-free telephone number and on the Commission’s website; |
• | disclosing in its annual and semi-annual shareholder reports that this proxy voting policy (and the advisor’s proxy voting policy or a description) is available without charge, upon request by calling a specified toll-free telephone number and on the Commission’s website; |
• | disclosing in its annual and semi-annual shareholder reports that information is available about how the Fund voted proxies during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 without charge, upon request, by calling a specified toll-free telephone number and on the Commission’s website; and |
• | providing any shareholder, upon request, a paper form of the most recently filed report on Form N-PX by first-class mail or other prompt delivery method within three business days of receipt of the request. |
7. | Review of Policy |
I. | The establishment, composition and authority of the Proxy Committee |
II. | The delegation of primary responsibility for proxy review and vote recommendation functions to the Proxy Voting Service, |
III. | Subject to paragraph IV below, if the Proxy Committee determines that a particular proxy vote involves a potential conflict of interest between Northern Trust and a person having an interest in the outcome of that vote, it will follow the vote recommendations of the Proxy Voting Service, provided pursuant to these policies and procedures, with respect to such proxy issue unless the Proxy Committee determines, consistent with its duty of loyalty and care, that the interests of clients/beneficiaries would be better served by voting contrary to such vote recommendations. Nothwithstanding Section 3, any determination by the Proxy Committee under this paragraph III to vote a proxy issue in a manner contrary to such vote recommendations must be made by a vote of at least 70% of the then current members of the Proxy Committee. |
IV. | If the Proxy Committee determines that a particular proxy issue involves a conflict of interest so severe that the Proxy Committee is unable to exercise independent judgment on the voting of such proxy issue, the Proxy Committee may resolve the conflict of interest in any of the following ways: |
I. | A copy of these policies and procedures. |
II. | A copy of each proxy statement Northern Trust receives regarding client securities. |
III. | A record of each vote cast by Northern Trust on behalf of a client. |
IV. | A copy of any document created by the Proxy Committee that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies on behalf of a client or that memorialized the basis for that decision. |
V. | A copy of each written client request for information on how Northern Trust voted proxies on behalf of the client, and a copy of any written response by Northern Trust to any (written or oral) client request for information on how Northern Trust voted proxies on behalf of the requesting client. |
Company Characteristics | Annual Stock Price Volatility | Multiplier |
High Volatility | 53% or greater | 1.5 to 1 |
Medium Volatility | 25% to 52.99% | 2.0 to 1 |
Low Volatility | 25% or lower | 4.0 to 1 |
14. Mergers & Acquisitions, Third-Party Share Issuances (Private Placements) | A-23 |
15. Shareholder Proposals | A-24 |
16. Social/Environmental Issues | A-24 |
Global Approach | A-24 |
1. | Approval of Financial Statements |
2. | Income Allocation |
3. | Election of Directors |
1 | In most cases, the top executive will be the “shacho” (president). However, there are companies where the ultimate decision-making authority rests with the “kaicho” (executive chairman) or “daihyo torishimariyaku” (representative director). |
2 | The attendance of inside directors is not disclosed in Japan. |
3 | In Japan, shareholder proposals in many cases take a form of article amendments which require two-thirds majority to pass. |
4 | Based on the widely held firms in the ISS research universe in 2011-12. |
4. | Election of Statutory Auditors |
5 | ISS uses the same independence criteria for directors and statutory auditors. See “Election of Directors.” |
6 | See “Election of Directors” for ISS criteria on independence. |
6. | Annual Bonuses for Directors/Statutory Auditors |
7. | Retirement Bonuses/Special Payments in Connection with Abolition of Retirement Bonus System |
8. | Stock Option Plans/Deep-Discounted Stock Option Plans |
7 | However, in rare occasions, ISS may support payment to outsiders on a case-by-case basis, if the individual amount is disclosed and the amount is not excessive. |
8 | Idem |
9. | Director Compensation Ceiling |
10. | Statutory Auditor Compensation Ceiling |
11. | Audit Firm Appointments |
12. | Share Repurchase Plans |
13. | Takeover Defense Plans (Poison Pills) |
14. | Mergers & Acquisitions, Third-Party Share Issuances (Private Placements) |
15. | Shareholder Proposals |
16. | Social/Environmental Issues |