|
Goodwin Procter LLP
620 8th Avenue New York, NY 10018
goodwinlaw.com +1 212 813 8800 |
July 10, 2019
VIA EDGAR AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Mail Stop 4561
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention: Mara Ransom
Katherine Bagley
Tony Watson
Donna Di Silvio
Re: | Phreesia, Inc. | |||
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 | ||||
Filed July 8, 2019 | ||||
File No. 333-232264 |
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is submitted on behalf of Phreesia, Inc. (the Company) in response to the comments of the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the Staff) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) with respect to the Companys Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on July 8, 2019 (Amendment No. 2), as set forth in the Staffs letter dated July 10, 2019 addressed to the Company (the Comment Letter).
For reference purposes, the text of the Comment Letter has been reproduced herein with responses below each numbered comment. For your convenience, we have italicized the reproduced Staff comments from the Comment Letter. Unless otherwise indicated, page references in responses and in the descriptions of the Staffs comments refer to Amendment No. 2. All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in Amendment No. 2.
The responses provided herein are based upon information provided to Goodwin Procter LLP by the Company.
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed July 8, 2019
Capitalization, page 64
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
July 10, 2019
Page 2
1. | It appears you reflected the payment of the accrued preferred dividend as a reduction to preferred stock and additional paid in capital without reflecting the decrease in cash in the Pro forma column. We also note the Pro forma as adjusted column reflects the decrease in cash related to the preferred dividend. Please revise your disclosure to reflect the total adjusting entry for the payment of the accrued preferred dividend in either the Pro forma column or the Pro forma as adjusted column accordingly. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and respectfully advises the Staff that the recording of the dividend for pro forma purposes was not reflected as a reduction to preferred stock, but was instead recorded as a dividend payable and a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital in the Pro forma column. The Company notes that the payment of the dividend is directly attributable to the offering, as also illustrated in the pro forma unaudited balance sheet on page F-41 of Amendment No. 2, because the Companys cash and cash equivalents are not sufficient to pay the dividend without the proceeds from the offering. The reconciliation between actual and pro forma stockholders equity (deficit) is as follows (in thousands):
Total stockholders deficit, actual |
$ | (224,063 | ) | |
Carrying value of preferred |
214,353 | |||
Carrying value of warrant liability |
5,921 | |||
Dividend payable |
(18,072 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total stockholders deficit, pro forma |
$ | (21,861 | ) | |
|
|
Additionally, the Company respectfully notes that the dividend payable of $18,072 is also reflected in the decrease between actual capitalization of $30,438 and pro forma capitalization of $12,366, and that reflecting the dividend as a reduction in cash would not change the total pro forma capitalization.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company does not believe that a revision to the disclosure is appropriate.
2. | Please tell us the nature of the other adjustment made to additional paid in capital, since the difference in the Pro forma and the Pro forma as adjusted columns is not equal to the net offering proceeds as disclosed in the first paragraph on page 61. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and respectfully advises the Staff that the difference relates to offering costs already paid of $573,000 as of April 30, 2019 but not yet deducted from stockholders equity (deficit), illustrated as follows:
Shares |
7,812,500 | |||
Mid-point |
$ | 16.00 | ||
|
|
|||
Gross proceeds from offering |
$ | 125,000,000 | ||
Underwriters commission |
(8,750,000 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Proceeds before payment of estimated offering costs |
116,250,000 | |||
Estimated offering costs |
(5,600,000 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Estimated net proceeds |
110,650,000 | |||
Addback: offering costs paid as of April 30, 2019 |
573,000 | |||
|
|
|||
Estimated proceeds disclosed on page 61 of Amendment No. 2 |
$ | 111,223,000 | ||
|
|
2
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
July 10, 2019
Page 3
Dilution, page 67
3. | It appears you overstated the pro forma tangible book value, as adjusted. Your definition suggests the only adjustments from pro forma tangible book value relate to the net offering proceeds of $111.2 million and the repayment of the debt of $15.176 million. Please advise or revise. For consistency, please ensure that, however you choose to reflect the adjusting entry for the payment of the preferred dividends related to the Capitalization comment above, you also reflect the payment in the same manner in the Dilution section and other sections throughout the document. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and respectfully advises the Staff that the dividend payable is deducted from pro forma tangible net book value and, therefore, it was not necessary to adjust in the reconciliation between pro forma tangible net book value and pro forma as adjusted tangible net book value. Additionally, the planned repayment of the Companys revolving line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank did not impact pro forma as adjusted tangible net worth because it had no impact on pro forma as adjusted stockholders equity (deficit). The differences between actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted tangible net book value are as follows (in thousands):
Stockholders equity (deficit) actual |
$ | (224,063 | ) | |
Less |
||||
Goodwill |
(250 | ) | ||
Intangible assets |
(1,377 | ) | ||
Deferred financing costs |
(1,121 | ) | ||
Deferred offering costs |
(2,232 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net tangible book value, actual |
(229,043 | ) | ||
Carrying value of preferred stock |
214,353 | |||
Carrying value of warrant liability |
5,921 | |||
Dividend payable |
(18,072 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net tangible book value, pro forma |
(26,841 | ) | ||
Net proceeds |
110,650 | |||
Deferred offering costs already deducted |
2,232 | |||
|
|
|||
Net tangible book value, pro forma as adjusted |
$ | 86,041 | ||
|
|
3
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
July 10, 2019
Page 4
If you should have any questions regarding the enclosed matters, please contact the undersigned at (212) 8138853.
Sincerely,
|
/s/ Edwin M. OConnor |
Edwin M. OConnor, Esq. |
Cc: | Chaim Indig, Phreesia, Inc. |
Thomas Altier, Phreesia, Inc.
Charles Kallenbach, Phreesia, Inc.
John J. Egan, Goodwin Procter LLP
Andrew R. Pusar, Goodwin Procter LLP
Stelios G. Saffos, Latham & Watkins LLP
Brittany D. Ruiz, Latham & Watkins LLP
4