sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 16, 2007
Registration
No. 333-145569
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
Under
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Orion Energy Systems,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
39-1847269
|
|
3646
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
1204 Pilgrim Road
Plymouth, WI 53073
(920) 892-9340
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Neal R. Verfuerth
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Orion Energy Systems,
Inc.
1204 Pilgrim Road
Plymouth, WI 53073
Tel:
(920) 892-9340
Fax:
(920) 892-4274
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Barth, Esq.
Carl R. Kugler, Esq.
Foley & Lardner LLP
777 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Tel:
(414) 271-2400
Fax:
(414) 297-4900
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Eric von Estorff, Esq.
Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
1204 Pilgrim Road
Plymouth, Wisconsin 53073
Tel: (920) 892-9340
Fax: (920) 892-4274
|
|
Kirk A. Davenport II, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
885 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022-4834
Tel: (212) 906-1200
Fax: (212) 751-4864
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of
this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) of the Securities Act, check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) of the Securities Act, check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering Price(1)
|
|
|
Registration Fee(1)
|
Common Stock, no par value
|
|
|
$
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,070(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee in accordance with
Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act. Includes shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option.
|
(2)
|
|
Previously paid.
|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION,
DATED ,
2007
Shares
Common
Stock
Orion Energy
Systems, Inc. is
selling shares
of common stock and the selling shareholders identified in this
prospectus are selling an
additional shares.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the
shares by the selling shareholders. We have granted the
underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an
additional shares
from us to cover over-allotments, if any.
This is an initial
public offering of our common stock. We currently expect the
initial public offering price to be between
$ and
$ per share. We have applied to
list our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol OESX.
INVESTING
IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES RISKS. SEE RISK FACTORS
BEGINNING ON PAGE 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling shareholders
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Thomas
Weisel Partners LLC
|
|
|
Pacific
Growth Equities, LLC
|
The
date of this prospectus
is ,
2007.

Orion Energy Systems designs, manufactures and implements energy management systems
consisting primarily of high-performance, energy efficient lighting systems, controls and related
services. Our energy management systems deliver energy savings and efficiency gains to our
commercial and industrial customers without compromising their quantity or quality of light. Since
December 1, 2001, we estimate that we have: Saved our customers over $265 million in electricity
costs Saved over 3.4 billion kilowatt hours from the electrical grid Reduced electricity
demand by 278 megawatts Retrofitted over 490 million square feet of commercial and industrial
building space Reduced indirect carbon dioxide emissions by over 3.4 million tons We have sold
and installed our systems in over 2,100 facilities across North America since December 1, 2001,
including for 78 Fortune 500 companies. Crate&Barrel A. Duie Pyle Inc., Advance Auto Parts,
Americold Logistics, Anheuser-Busch, Avery Dennison, Ball, Bemis Manufacturing Company, Big 5
Sporting Goods, Big Lots, Brown Printing Company, Brunswick, Cabela#fs Inc., Cessna Aircraft,
Company, CNH Global, Crate & Barrel, Daimler Chrysler, Dana, Ecolab, Fastenal, Gannett, Gap Inc.,
General Electric, General Mills, General Motors, Green Bay Packaging, Kimberly-Clark, Kohl#fs,
Kraft, Kroger., Newell Rubbermaid, Office Max, Parker Hannifin, Pepsi-Cola, Quad Graphics, Rexam,
RR Donnelley, Sealed Air, Sherwin Williams, Shiloh Industries, Smurfit-Stone, Stora Enso,
SuperValu, Sysco Food Services, Technicolor, Toyota, Trane, True Value, United Stationers, Waukesha
Engine/Dresser, are all registered trademarks held by their respective companies or corporations. |
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate as of the date of this document.
Dealer
Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
(25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
i
This summary highlights information about our company and the
offering contained elsewhere in this prospectus and is qualified
in its entirety by the more detailed information and financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. You should
read this entire prospectus carefully, including Risk
Factors and our financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus before making an
investment decision. In this prospectus, unless otherwise
specified or the context otherwise requires, the terms
Orion, we, us,
our, our company, or ours,
refer to Orion Energy Systems, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Our
Business
We design, manufacture and implement energy management systems
consisting primarily of high-performance, energy efficient
lighting systems, controls and related services. Our energy
management systems deliver energy savings and efficiency gains
to our commercial and industrial customers without compromising
their quantity or quality of light. The core of our energy
management system is our high intensity fluorescent, or HIF,
lighting system that we estimate cuts our customers
lighting-related electricity costs by approximately 50%, while
increasing their quantity of light by approximately 50% and
improving lighting quality, when replacing high intensity
discharge, or HID, fixtures. We have sold and installed our
high-performance HIF lighting systems in over 2,100 facilities
across North America, representing over 489 million square
feet of commercial and industrial building space, including for
78 Fortune 500 companies, such as Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc., General Electric Co., Kraft Foods Inc., Newell
Rubbermaid Inc., OfficeMax, Inc., SYSCO Corp., and Toyota Motor
Corp.
Our energy management system is comprised of: our HIF lighting
system; our InteLite intelligent lighting controls; our Apollo
Light Pipe, which collects and focuses daylight and consumes no
electricity; and integrated energy management services. We
believe that the implementation of our complete energy
management system enables our customers to further reduce
electricity costs, while permanently reducing base and peak load
electricity demand.
Our annual total revenue has increased from $12.4 million
in fiscal 2004 to $48.2 million in fiscal 2007. For the six
months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized total
revenue of $35.1 million, compared to $20.3 million
for the six months ended September 30, 2006. We estimate
that the use of our HIF fixtures has resulted in cumulative
electricity cost savings for our customers of approximately
$265 million and has reduced base and peak load electricity
demand by approximately 278 megawatts, or MW, through
September 30, 2007. We estimate that this reduced
electricity consumption has reduced associated indirect carbon
dioxide emissions by approximately 3.4 million tons over
the same period.
For a description of the assumptions behind our calculations of
customer kilowatt demand reduction, customer kilowatt hours and
electricity costs saved and reductions in indirect carbon
dioxide emissions associated with our products used throughout
this prospectus, see notes (6) through (11) under
Summary Historical Consolidated and Pro Forma
Financial Data and Other Information.
Our
Market Opportunity
Our market opportunity is created by growing electricity
capacity shortages, underinvestment in transmission and
distribution, or T&D, infrastructure, high electricity
costs and the high financial and environmental costs associated
with adding generation capacity and upgrading the T&D
infrastructure.
According to the Department of Energy, or DOE, lighting accounts
for 22% of electric power consumption in the United States, with
commercial and industrial lighting accounting for 65% of that
amount. Based on this information, we estimate that the United
States commercial and industrial sectors spent approximately
$42 billion on electricity for lighting in 2005. Commercial
and industrial facilities in the United States employ a variety
of lighting technologies, including HID, traditional fluorescent
and incandescent lighting fixtures. Our HIF lighting systems
typically replace HID fixtures, which operate inefficiently due
to higher wattages and operating temperatures. The Energy
Information Administration, or EIA, estimates that as of 2003
there were 455,000 buildings in the United States representing
20.6 billion square feet that utilized HID fixtures.
1
Our
Solution
50/50 Value Proposition. We estimate our HIF
lighting systems generally reduce lighting-related electricity
costs by approximately 50% compared to HID fixtures, while
increasing the quantity of light by approximately 50% and
improving lighting quality.
Rapid Payback Period. In most retrofit
projects where we replace HID fixtures, our customers typically
realize a two to three year payback period on our HIF lighting
systems without considering utility incentives or government
subsidies.
Comprehensive Energy Management Systems. In
addition to our HIF lighting systems, our energy management
system includes our InteLite intelligent lighting controls and
our Apollo Light Pipe, which collects and focuses daylight
without consuming electricity. We believe that implementation of
our complete energy management system enables our customers to
realize even further reduced electricity costs while permanently
reducing base and peak load electricity demand.
Easy Installation, Implementation and
Maintenance. Our HIF fixtures are designed with a
lightweight construction and modular architecture that allows
for fast and easy installation, facilitates maintenance and
allows for easy integration of other components of our energy
management system.
Base and Peak Load Relief for Utilities. Our
energy management systems can substantially reduce electricity
demand during peak and off-peak periods, which can reduce the
need for utilities to invest in additional capacity, reduce the
impact of peak demand periods on the electrical grid, and better
enable utilities to provide reliable electric power to their
customers.
Environmental Benefits. We estimate that the
use of our HIF fixtures has reduced indirect carbon dioxide
emissions by 3.4 million tons through September 30,
2007 by permanently reducing our customers electricity
consumption.
Our
Competitive Strengths
Compelling Value Proposition. We believe our
ability to deliver improved lighting quality while reducing
electricity costs differentiates our value proposition from
other demand management solutions which require end users to
alter the time, manner or duration of their electricity use to
achieve cost savings.
Large and Growing Customer Base. We have
installed our products in over 2,100 commercial and industrial
facilities across North America. As of September 30, 2007,
we have completed or are in the process of completing retrofits
in over 400 facilities for our 78 Fortune 500 customers, which
we believe is a significant endorsement of our value proposition.
Systematized Sales Process. We primarily sell
directly to our end user customers using a systematized
multi-step sales process that focuses on our value proposition.
We have also developed relationships with numerous electrical
contractors, who often have significant influence over the
choice of lighting solutions that their customers adopt.
Innovative Technology. We have developed a
portfolio of 16 United States patents primarily covering
elements of our HIF lighting systems and nine patents pending
primarily covering elements of our InteLite controls and our
Apollo Light Pipe.
Strong, Experienced Leadership Team. Our
senior executive management team of seven individuals has a
combined 40 years of experience with our company and a
combined 77 years of experience in the lighting and energy
management industries.
Efficient, Scalable Manufacturing Process. We
have made significant investments in production efficiencies,
automated processes and modern production equipment to increase
our production capacity, reduce our cost of revenue, better
control production quality and allow us to respond timely to
customer needs.
2
Our
Growth Strategies
Leverage Existing Customer Base. We are
expanding our customer relationships from single-site facility
implementations of our HIF lighting systems to comprehensive
enterprise-wide roll-outs of our complete energy management
systems for our existing customers.
Target Additional Customers. We are expanding
our customer base by executing our systematized sales process,
increasing our direct sales force, expanding our marketing
efforts and developing relationships with electrical
contractors, value-added resellers and their customers.
Provide Load Relief to Utilities and Grid
Operators. As we increase our market penetration,
we believe our systems will, in the aggregate, have a
significant impact on reducing base and peak load electricity
demand. We therefore intend to market our energy management
systems directly to utilities and grid operators as a
lower-cost, permanent alternative to capacity expansion to help
them provide reliable electric power to their customers in a
cost-effective and environmentally-friendly manner.
Continue to Improve Operational
Efficiencies. We are focused on continually
improving the efficiency of our operations by reducing our costs
of materials, components, manufacturing and installation, as
well as gaining additional leverage from our systematized
multi-step sales process, in order to enhance the profitability
of our business and allow us to continue to deliver our
compelling value proposition.
Develop New Sources of Revenue. In addition to
our recently introduced InteLite and Apollo Light Pipe products,
we are continuing to develop new energy management products and
services that can be utilized in connection with our current
energy management systems.
Recent
Developments
On August 3, 2007, we issued $10.6 million of 6%
convertible subordinated notes (which we refer to as the
Convertible Notes), to an indirect affiliate of GE Energy
Financial Services, Inc. (which we refer to as GEEFS), Clean
Technology Fund II, LP (which we refer to as Clean
Technology) and affiliates of Capvest Venture Fund, LP (which we
refer to as Capvest). The Convertible Notes will convert
automatically upon closing of this offering into
2,360,802 shares of our common stock.
Risk
Factors
The following risks, as well as the other risks described in
Risk Factors, should be carefully considered before
purchasing any of our shares in this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
we have a limited operating history, have previously incurred
net operating losses, and only recently achieved profitability;
|
|
|
|
some of our competitors are larger, have long-standing customer
relationships at existing commercial and industrial facilities,
and have greater resources than we have;
|
|
|
|
we are dependent on the skills, experience and efforts of our
senior management;
|
|
|
|
our success depends on market acceptance of our energy
management products and services;
|
|
|
|
our component parts and raw materials are subject to price
fluctuations, potential shortages and interruptions of supply;
|
|
|
|
we are dependent upon our intellectual property, and our
inability to protect our intellectual property or enforce our
rights could negatively affect our business and results of
operations;
|
|
|
|
if the price of electricity decreases, there may be less demand
for our energy management products and services;
|
|
|
|
we may fail to maintain adequate internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
|
|
our common stock has never traded publicly, and the market price
of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
|
3
Our
Corporate Information
We were incorporated as a Wisconsin corporation in April 1996.
Our headquarters are located at 1204 Pilgrim Road,
Plymouth, Wisconsin 53073, and our telephone number is
(920) 892-9340.
Our approximately 266,000 square foot manufacturing
facility is located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. Our website is
www.oriones.com. Information on, or accessible through, this
website is not a part of, and is not incorporated into, this
prospectus.
4
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares
( shares if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full) |
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the selling shareholders |
|
shares |
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering |
|
shares
( shares if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full) |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be approximately $ million
(or $ million if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full),
assuming an initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. The
principal purposes of this offering are to generate funds for
working capital and general corporate purposes, including to
fund potential future acquisitions, and to create a public
market for our common stock. We will not receive any proceeds
from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders. See
Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
Dividend policy |
|
We currently do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our
common stock. |
|
Directed share program |
|
The underwriters intend to reserve up
to shares
for sale at the initial public offering price to shareholders,
employees, officers, directors and certain other persons
associated with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing
our common stock in this offering. See Underwriting. |
|
Risk factors |
|
You should carefully read and consider the information set forth
under Risk Factors, together with all of the other
information set forth in this prospectus, before deciding to
invest in shares of our common stock. |
|
Listing and trading symbol |
|
We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbol OESX. |
The number of shares of our common stock that will be
outstanding after this offering includes 12,489,205 shares
of common stock outstanding as of October 15, 2007. Unless
otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus,
including the number of shares that will be outstanding after
this offering and other share related information:
|
|
|
|
|
reflects the automatic conversion upon closing of this offering
of all of our outstanding shares of Series B preferred
stock on a one-for-one basis into 2,989,830 shares of
common stock;
|
|
|
|
reflects the automatic conversion upon closing of this offering
of all of our outstanding shares of Series C preferred
stock on a one-for-one basis into 1,818,182 shares of
common stock;
|
|
|
|
reflects the automatic conversion upon closing of this offering
of the Convertible Notes into 2,360,802 shares of common
stock;
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
excludes 750,822 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants outstanding as of October 15, 2007
with a weighted average exercise price of $2.24 per share;
|
|
|
|
excludes 4,566,687 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of options outstanding as of October 15, 2007 with
a weighted average exercise price of $1.89 per share;
|
|
|
|
excludes 396,490 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance as of October 15, 2007 under our stock option
plans;
|
|
|
|
assumes an initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase
from us up
to
additional shares to cover over-allotments.
|
6
SUMMARY
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
AND OTHER INFORMATION
The following tables set forth our summary historical
consolidated and pro forma financial data and other information
for the periods indicated. We prepared the summary historical
consolidated financial data using our consolidated financial
statements for each of the periods presented. The summary
historical consolidated financial data for each fiscal year in
the three-year period ended March 31, 2007 were derived
from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, and the summary consolidated
historical financial data for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2007 were derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited consolidated
financial statements include all adjustments which, in our
opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
position and results of operations for these periods. You should
read this financial data in conjunction with our audited and
unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. See Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. The summary
historical consolidated financial data are not necessarily
indicative of future results.
The summary unaudited pro forma financial data are presented for
informational purposes only and do not represent what our
financial condition would have been had the transactions
described actually occurred on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
19,628
|
|
|
$
|
29,993
|
|
|
$
|
40,201
|
|
|
$
|
17,444
|
|
|
$
|
28,752
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
21,783
|
|
|
|
33,280
|
|
|
|
48,183
|
|
|
|
20,311
|
|
|
|
35,126
|
|
Cost of product revenue(1)
|
|
|
12,099
|
|
|
|
20,225
|
|
|
|
26,511
|
|
|
|
11,422
|
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
14,043
|
|
|
|
22,524
|
|
|
|
32,487
|
|
|
|
13,633
|
|
|
|
23,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
Operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
9,090
|
|
|
|
12,037
|
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
|
6,171
|
|
|
|
8,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends(2)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Conversion of preferred stock(3)
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed
earnings(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
|
|
9,003
|
|
|
|
10,712
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
15,666
|
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma(5)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,864
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
56,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary equity (Series C convertible redeemable preferred
stock)
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
14,317
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative From
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2001
|
|
|
|
Through September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
Other information:
|
|
|
|
|
HIF lighting systems sold(6)
|
|
|
971
|
|
Total units sold (including HIF lighting systems)
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
Customer kilowatt demand reduction(7)
|
|
|
278
|
|
Customer kilowatt hours saved(7)(8)
|
|
|
3,444,047
|
|
Customer electricity costs saved(9)
|
|
$
|
265,192
|
|
Indirect carbon dioxide emission reductions from customers
energy savings (tons)(10)
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
Square footage retrofitted(11)
|
|
|
489,616
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of product revenue includes stock-based compensation
expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) of $24,000 and $44,000
for fiscal 2007 and our fiscal 2008 first half, respectively.
Operating expenses include stock-based compensation expense
recognized under SFAS 123(R) of $0.3 million and
$0.5 million for fiscal 2007 and our fiscal 2008 first
half, respectively. See note (1) under Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Stock-Based
Compensation. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For fiscal 2007 and our fiscal 2008 first half, represents the
impact attributable to the accretion of accumulated dividends on
our Series C preferred stock, plus accumulated dividends on
our Series A preferred stock prior to its conversion into
common stock on March 31, 2007. The Series C preferred
stock will convert automatically into common stock on a
one-for-one basis upon the |
8
|
|
|
|
|
closing of this offering and our obligation to pay accumulated
dividends will be extinguished. For fiscal 2005 and 2006,
represents accumulated dividends on our Series A preferred
stock prior to its conversion into common stock. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Revenue and
Expense Components Accretion of Preferred Stock and
Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the estimated fair market value of the premium paid
to holders of Series A preferred stock upon induced
conversion. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue and Expense Components Conversion of
Preferred Stock. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents undistributed earnings allocated to participating
preferred shareholders as described under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Revenue and
Expense Components Participation Rights of Preferred
Stock in Undistributed Earnings. All of our preferred
stock will convert automatically into common stock on a
one-for-one basis upon the closing of this offering and,
thereafter, we will no longer be required to allocated any
undistributed earnings to our preferred shareholders. |
|
(5) |
|
Gives effect to (i) the automatic conversion of the
Convertible Notes into 2,360,802 shares of our common
stock; (ii) the automatic conversion of
4,808,012 shares of our outstanding preferred stock into
common stock on a one-for-one basis; and (iii) the receipt
of estimated net proceeds of
$ million from our sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share (the
midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus), less estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, as if
each of these transactions had occurred on September 30,
2007. |
|
(6) |
|
HIF lighting systems includes all HIF units sold
under the brand name Compact Modular and its
predecessor, Illuminator. |
|
(7) |
|
A substantial majority of our HIF lighting systems, which
generally operate at approximately 224 watts per six-lamp
fixture, are installed in replacement of HID fixtures, which
generally operate at approximately 465 watts per fixture in
commercial and industrial applications. We calculate that each
six-lamp HIF lighting system we install in replacement of an HID
fixture generally reduces electricity consumption by
approximately 241 watts (the difference between 465 watts and
224 watts). In retrofit projects where we replace fixtures
other than HID fixtures, or where we replace fixtures with
products other than our HIF lighting systems (which other
products generally consist of products with lamps similar to
those used in our HIF systems, but with varying frames, ballasts
or power packs), we generally achieve similar wattage reductions
(based on an analysis of the operating wattages of each of our
fixtures compared to the operating wattage of the fixtures they
typically replace). We calculate the amount of kilowatt demand
reduction by multiplying (i) 0.241 kilowatts per six-lamp
equivalent unit we install by (ii) the number of units we
have installed in the period presented, including products other
than our HIF lighting systems (or a total of approximately
1.2 million units). |
|
(8) |
|
We calculate the number of kilowatt hours saved on a cumulative
basis by assuming the reduction of 0.241 kilowatts of
electricity consumption per six-lamp equivalent unit we install
and assuming that each such unit has averaged 7,500 annual
operating hours since its installation. |
|
(9) |
|
We calculate our customers electricity costs saved by
multiplying the cumulative total customer kilowatt hours saved
indicated in the table by $0.077 per kilowatt hour. The national
average rate for 2005, which is the most current full year for
which this information is available, was $0.0814 per kilowatt
hour according to the United States Energy Information
Administration. |
|
(10) |
|
We calculate this figure by multiplying (i) the estimated
amount of carbon dioxide emissions that result from the
generation of one kilowatt hour of electricity (determined using
the Emissions and Generation Resource Integration Database, or
EGrid, prepared by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency), by (ii) the number of customer kilowatt hours
saved as indicated in the table. |
|
(11) |
|
Based on 1.2 million total units sold, which contain a
total of approximately 6.0 million lamps. Each lamp
illuminates approximately 75 square feet. The majority of
our installed fixtures contain six lamps and typically
illuminate approximately 450 square feet. |
9
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully read and consider each of the risks
and uncertainties described below together with the other
information contained in this prospectus, including our
financial statements and the notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, before deciding to
invest in shares of our common stock. If any of these events
actually occurs, then our business, financial condition, results
of operations, and future growth prospects may suffer. As a
result, the market price of our common stock could decline, and
you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
We
have a limited operating history, have previously incurred net
losses, and only recently achieved profitability that we may not
be able to sustain.
We began operating in April 1996 and first achieved a full
fiscal year of profitability in fiscal 2003. However, we
incurred net losses attributable to common shareholders of
$2.3 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 2005 and 2006,
respectively, before achieving net income attributable to common
shareholders of $0.4 million in fiscal 2007. As of
September 30, 2007, our accumulated deficit was
$2.1 million. As a result of our limited operating history,
we have limited financial data that can be used to evaluate our
business, strategies, performance, prospects, revenue or
profitability potential or an investment in our common stock.
Any evaluation of our business and our prospects must be
considered in light of our limited operating history and the
risks and uncertainties encountered by companies at our stage of
development and in our market.
Initially, our net losses were principally driven by
start-up
costs, the costs of developing our technology and research and
development costs. More recently, our net losses were
principally driven by increased sales and marketing and general
and administrative expenses, as well as inefficiencies due to
excess manufacturing capacity in fiscal 2005 and 2006. We expect
to incur increased general and administrative, sales and
marketing, and research and development expenses in the near
term. These increased operating costs may cause us to recognize
reduced net income or incur net losses, and there can be no
assurance that we will be able to increase our revenue, sustain
our revenue growth rate, expand our customer base or remain
profitable. Furthermore, increased cost of revenue, warranty
claims, stock-based compensation costs or interest expense on
our outstanding debt and on any debt that we incur in the future
could contribute to reduced net income or net losses. As a
result, even if we significantly increase our revenue, we may
incur reduced net income or net losses in the future.
We
operate in a highly competitive industry and if we are unable to
compete successfully our revenue and profitability will be
adversely affected.
We face strong competition primarily from manufacturers and
distributors of energy management products and services, as well
as from electrical contractors. We compete primarily on the
basis of customer relationships, price, quality, energy
efficiency, customer service and marketing support. Our products
are in direct competition primarily with high intensity
discharge, or HID, technology, as well as other HIF products and
older fluorescent technology in the lighting systems retrofit
market.
Many of our competitors are better capitalized than we are, have
strong existing customer relationships, greater name
recognition, and more extensive engineering, manufacturing,
sales and marketing capabilities. Competitors could focus their
substantial resources on developing a competing business model
or energy management products or services that may be
potentially more attractive to customers than our products or
services. In addition, we may face competition from other
products or technologies that reduce demand for electricity. Our
competitors may also offer energy management products and
services at reduced prices in order to improve their competitive
positions. Any of these competitive factors could make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain customers, require us to
lower our prices in order to remain competitive, and reduce our
revenue and profitability, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
10
Our
success is largely dependent upon the skills, experience and
efforts of our senior management, and the loss of their services
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to expand
our business or to maintain profitable operations.
Our continued success depends upon the continued availability,
contributions, skills, experience and effort of our senior
management. We are particularly dependent on the services of
Neal R. Verfuerth, our president, chief executive officer and
principal founder. Mr. Verfuerth has major responsibilities
with respect to sales, engineering, product development and
executive administration. We do not have a formal succession
plan in place for Mr. Verfuerth. Our current and proposed
new employment agreements with Mr. Verfuerth do not
guarantee his services for a specified period of time. All of
the current and proposed new employment agreements with our
senior management team may be terminated by the employee at any
time and without notice. While all such agreements include
noncompetition and confidentiality covenants, there can be no
assurance that such provisions will be enforceable or adequately
protect us. The loss of the services of any of these persons
might impede our operations or the achievement of our strategic
and financial objectives, and we may not be able to attract and
retain individuals with the same or similar level of experience
or expertise. Additionally, while we have key man insurance on
the lives of Mr. Verfuerth and other members of our senior
management team, such insurance may not adequately compensate us
for the loss of these individuals. The loss or interruption of
the service of members of our senior management, particularly
Mr. Verfuerth, or our inability to attract or retain other
qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to expand our business, implement our strategy or
maintain profitable operations.
The
success of our business depends on the market acceptance of our
energy management products and services.
Our future success depends on commercial acceptance of our
energy management products and services. If we are unable to
convince current and potential customers of the advantages of
our HIF lighting systems and energy management products and
services, then our ability to sell our HIF lighting systems and
energy management products and services will be limited. In
addition, because the market for energy management products and
services is rapidly evolving, we may not be able to accurately
assess the size of the market, and we may have limited insight
into trends that may emerge and affect our business. If the
market for our HIF lighting systems and energy management
products and services does not continue to develop, or if the
market does not accept our products, then our ability to grow
our business could be limited and we may not be able to increase
or maintain our revenue or profitability.
Sales
of our products and services are dependent upon our
customers capital budgets.
We derive a substantial majority of our revenue from sales of
HIF lighting systems to customers who may experience constraints
in their capital spending due to other competing uses for
capital or other factors. Our HIF lighting systems are typically
purchased as capital assets and therefore are subject to review
as part of a customers capital budgeting process.
Customers may decline or defer purchases of our products and our
related services as a result of many factors, including mergers
and acquisitions, regulatory decisions, rising interest rates,
lower electricity costs, the availability of lower cost or other
alternative products or solutions or general economic downturns.
We have experienced, and may in the future experience,
variability in our operating results, on both an annual and a
quarterly basis, as a result of these factors.
Our
products use components and raw materials that may be subject to
price fluctuations, shortages or interruptions of
supply.
We may be vulnerable to price increases for components or raw
materials that we require for our products, including aluminum,
ballasts, power supplies and lamps. In particular, our cost of
aluminum can be subject to commodity price fluctuation. Further,
suppliers inventories of certain components that our
products require may be limited and are subject to acquisition
by others. We may purchase quantities of these items that are in
excess of our estimated near-term requirements. As a result, we
may need to devote additional working capital to support a large
amount of component and raw material inventory that may not be
used over a reasonable period to produce saleable products, and
we may be
11
required to increase our excess and obsolete inventory reserves
to provide for these excess quantities, particularly if demand
for our products does not meet our expectations. Also, any
shortages or interruptions in supply of our components or raw
materials could disrupt our operations. If any of these events
occurs, our results of operations and financial condition could
be materially adversely affected.
We
depend on a limited number of key suppliers.
We depend on certain key suppliers for the raw materials and key
components that we require for our current products, including
sheet, coiled and specialty reflective aluminum, power supplies,
ballasts and lamps. In particular, we buy most of our specialty
reflective aluminum from a single supplier and we also purchase
most of our ballast and lamp components from a single supplier.
Purchases of components from our current primary ballast and
lamp supplier constituted 14% and 26% of our total cost of
revenue in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, respectively. If these
components become unavailable, or our relationships with
suppliers become strained, particularly as relates to our
primary suppliers, our results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
We
experienced component quality problems related to certain
suppliers in the past, and our current suppliers may not deliver
satisfactory components in the future.
In fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2005, we experienced higher than
normal failure rates with certain components purchased from two
suppliers. These quality issues led to an increase in warranty
claims from our customers and we recorded warranty expenses of
approximately $0.1 million and $0.7 million in fiscal
2005 and 2006, respectively. We may experience quality problems
with suppliers in the future, which could decrease our gross
margin and profitability, lengthen our sales cycles, adversely
affect our customer relations and future sales prospects and
subject our business to negative publicity. Additionally, we
sometimes satisfy warranty claims even if they are not covered
by our general warranty policy as a customer accommodation. If
we were to experience quality problems with the ballasts or
lamps purchased from our primary ballast and lamp supplier,
these adverse consequences could be magnified, and our results
of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
We
depend upon a limited number of customers in any given period to
generate a substantial portion of our revenue.
We do not have long-term contracts with our customers, and our
dependence on individual key customers can vary from period to
period as a result of the significant size of some of our
retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects. Our top 10
customers accounted for approximately 39%, 27%, and 35%,
respectively, of our total revenue in fiscal 2007, 2006 and
2005, and 53% and 43%, respectively, of our fiscal 2008 and 2007
first half total revenue. No single customer accounted for more
than 9% of our revenue in any of such fiscal years, although
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. accounted for approximately 20% of
our fiscal 2008 first half total revenue. We expect large
retrofit and roll-out projects to become a greater component of
our total revenue in the near term. As a result, we may
experience more customer concentration in any given future
period. The loss of, or substantial reduction in sales to, any
of our significant customers could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations in any given future period.
Product
liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
We face exposure to product liability claims in the event that
our energy management products fail to perform as expected or
cause bodily injury or property damage. Since the majority of
our products use electricity, it is possible that our products
could result in injury, whether by product malfunctions,
defects, improper installation or other causes. Particularly
because our products often incorporate new technologies or
designs, we cannot predict whether or not product liability
claims will be brought against us in the future or result in
negative publicity about our business or adversely affect our
customer relations. Moreover, we may not have adequate resources
in the event of a successful claim against us. A successful
product liability claim against us that is not covered by
insurance or is in excess of our available insurance limits
could require us to make significant payments of damages and
could materially adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
12
We
depend on our ability to develop new products and
services.
The market for our products and services is characterized by
rapid market and technological changes, uncertain product life
cycles, changes in customer demands and evolving government,
industry and utility standards and regulations. As a result, our
future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue
to design and manufacture new products and services. We may not
be able to successfully develop and market new products or
services that keep pace with technological or industry changes,
satisfy changes in customer demands or comply with present or
emerging government and industry regulations and technology
standards.
We may
pursue acquisitions and investments in new product lines,
businesses or technologies that involve numerous risks, which
could disrupt our business or adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
In the future, we may make acquisitions of, or investments in,
new product lines, businesses or technologies to expand our
current capabilities. We may use a portion of the net proceeds
from the sale of our common stock in this offering to fund such
future acquisitions. We have limited experience in making such
acquisitions or investments. Acquisitions present a number of
potential risks and challenges that could disrupt our business
operations, increase our operating costs or capital expenditure
requirements and reduce the value of the acquired product line,
business or technology. For example, if we identify an
acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully
negotiate or finance the acquisition on favorable terms. The
process of negotiating acquisitions and integrating acquired
products, services, technologies, personnel, or businesses might
result in significant transaction costs, operating difficulties
or unexpected expenditures, and might require significant
management attention that would otherwise be available for
ongoing development of our business. If we are successful in
consummating an acquisition, we may not be able to integrate the
acquired product line, business or technology into our existing
business and products, and we may not achieve the anticipated
benefits of any acquisition. Furthermore, potential acquisitions
and investments may divert our managements attention,
require considerable cash outlays and require substantial
additional expenses that could harm our existing operations and
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. To complete future acquisitions, we may issue equity
securities, incur debt, assume contingent liabilities or incur
amortization expenses and write-downs of acquired assets, which
could dilute the interests of our shareholders or adversely
affect our profitability.
Our
inability to protect our intellectual property, or our
involvement in damaging and disruptive intellectual property
litigation, could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition or result in the loss of use
of the product or service.
We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a
combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret
laws, as well as third-party nondisclosure and assignment
agreements. Our failure to obtain or maintain adequate
protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
We own United States patents and patent applications for some of
our products, systems, business methods and technologies. We
offer no assurance about the degree of protection which existing
or future patents may afford us. Likewise, we offer no assurance
that our patent applications will result in issued patents, that
our patents will be upheld if challenged, that competitors will
not develop similar or superior business methods or products
outside the protection of our patents, that competitors will not
infringe our patents, or that we will have adequate resources to
enforce our patents. Because some patent applications are
maintained in secrecy for a period of time, we could adopt a
technology without knowledge of a pending patent application,
and such technology could infringe a third party patent.
We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. It is
possible that others will independently develop the same or
similar technology or otherwise learn of our unpatented
technology. To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary
information, we generally require employees, consultants,
advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality
agreements. We cannot assure you that these agreements will
provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or
other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized
use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets,
know-how or other proprietary information. If we are unable to
maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, our
business could be materially adversely affected.
13
We rely on our trademarks, trade names, and brand names to
distinguish our company and our products and services from our
competitors. Some of our trademarks may conflict with trademarks
of other companies. Failure to obtain trademark registrations
could limit our ability to protect our trademarks and impede our
sales and marketing efforts. Further, we cannot assure you that
competitors will not infringe our trademarks, or that we will
have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.
In addition, third parties may bring infringement and other
claims that could be time-consuming and expensive to defend. In
addition, parties making infringement and other claims may be
able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief that could
effectively block our ability to provide our products, services
or business methods and could cause us to pay substantial
damages. In the event of a successful claim of infringement, we
may need to obtain one or more licenses from third parties,
which may not be available at a reasonable cost, or at all. It
is possible that our intellectual property rights may not be
valid or that we may infringe existing or future proprietary
rights of others. Any successful infringement claims could
subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek
licenses on unfavorable terms, prevent us from manufacturing or
selling products, services and business methods and require us
to redesign or, in the case of trademark claims, re-brand our
company or products, any of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
Some
of the intellectual property we use in our business is owned by
our chief executive officer.
Companies that develop technology generally require employees
involved in research and development efforts to execute
agreements acknowledging that the company owns the intellectual
property developed by such employee within the scope of his or
her employment and, if necessary, also assigning to the company
such intellectual property. We generally enter into these types
of agreements with all of our employees, except our president
and chief executive officer, Neal R. Verfuerth. Under
Mr. Verfuerths employment agreement, all intellectual
property (which includes all writings, documents, inventions,
ideas, techniques, research, processes, procedures, designs,
products, and marketing and business plans and all know-how,
data and rights relating to such items, whether or not
copyrightable or patentable) that Mr. Verfuerth makes,
conceives, discovers or develops at any time during the term of
his employment is the property of Mr. Verfuerth. For a
further discussion of Mr. Verfuerths employment
agreement, see Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Retirement and
Other Benefits. We have the option to acquire any such
intellectual property work product from Mr. Verfuerth. To
date, we have acquired all rights, title and interest in and to
all patents and patent applications (and the patents that may
issue therefrom) on which Mr. Verfuerth is named as one of
the inventors and from which we currently recognize revenue, but
have not exercised our option with respect to any other
intellectual property that is subject to his employment
agreement. The amount of our revenue that we derive from
intellectual property still owned by Mr. Verfuerth is not
quantifiable.
If Mr. Verfuerth leaves our company, we would not own, or
have the right to acquire, any of the intellectual property
created by him unless we had previously exercised our option to
acquire such intellectual property. The ownership, use and
enforcement of such intellectual property may be necessary for,
or desirable in the continued operation of, our business. If
Mr. Verfuerth leaves our company, we may not be able to
obtain sufficient rights to own, use or enforce such
intellectual property, and if we are able to obtain such rights,
we may be required to accept unfavorable terms. Even if we are
able to obtain rights in such intellectual property, we could be
required to pay substantial fees, and we may not be able to
prevent our competitors from using such intellectual property.
If we are unable to obtain sufficient rights in such
intellectual property, we may have to cease offering certain
products or otherwise have to change our business processes or
strategies. Any of these events could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
If the
price of electricity decreases, there may be less demand for our
products and services.
Demand for our products and services is highly dependent on the
continued high cost of electricity. Increased competition in
wholesale and retail electricity markets has resulted in greater
price competition in those markets. If the price of electricity
decreases, either regionally or nationally, then there may be
less demand for our products and services, which could impact
our ability to grow our
14
business or increase or maintain our revenue or profitability
and our results of operations could be materially adversely
affected.
We may
face additional competition if government subsidies and utility
incentives for renewable energy increase or if such sources of
energy are mandated.
Several states have adopted a variety of government subsidies
and utility incentives to allow renewable energy sources, such
as biofuels, wind and solar energy, to compete with currently
less expensive conventional sources of energy, such as fossil
fuels. We may face additional competition from providers of
renewable energy sources if government subsidies and utility
incentives for those sources of energy increase or if such
sources of energy are mandated. Additionally, the availability
of subsidies and other incentives from utilities or government
agencies to install alternative renewable energy sources may
negatively impact our customers desire to purchase our
products and services, or may be utilized by our existing or new
competitors to develop a competing business model or products or
services that may be potentially more attractive to customers
than ours, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or financial condition.
If our
information technology systems fail, or if we experience an
interruption in their operation, then our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially adversely
affected.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our
information technology systems. We rely on those systems
generally to manage the day-to-day operation of our business,
manage relationships with our customers, maintain our research
and development data and maintain our financial and accounting
records. The failure of our information technology systems, our
inability to successfully maintain and enhance our information
technology systems, or any compromise of the integrity or
security of the data we generate from our information technology
systems, could adversely affect our results of operations,
disrupt our business and product development and make us unable,
or severely limit our ability, to respond to customer demands.
In addition, our information technology systems are vulnerable
to damage or interruption from:
|
|
|
|
|
earthquake, fire, flood and other natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
employee or other theft;
|
|
|
|
attacks by computer viruses or hackers;
|
|
|
|
power outages; and
|
|
|
|
computer systems, Internet, telecommunications or data network
failure.
|
Any interruption of our information technology systems could
result in decreased revenue, increased expenses, increased
capital expenditures, customer dissatisfaction and potential
lawsuits, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or financial condition.
We own
and operate an industrial property that we purchased in 2004
and, if any environmental contamination is discovered, we could
be responsible for remediation of the property.
We own our manufacturing and distribution facility located at an
industrial site. We purchased this property from an adjacent
aluminum rolling mill and cookware manufacturing facility in
2004. As part of the transaction to purchase this facility, we
agreed to hold the seller harmless from most claims for
environmental remediation or contamination. Accordingly, if
environmental contamination is discovered at our facility and we
are required to remediate the property, our recourse against the
prior owners may be limited. Any such potential remediation
could be costly and could adversely affect our results of
operations or financial condition.
15
The
cost of compliance with environmental laws and regulations and
any related environmental liabilities could adversely affect our
results of operations or financial condition.
Our operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air,
discharge to water, the remediation of contaminated properties
and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment
and disposal of, and exposure to, waste and other materials, as
well as laws and regulations relating to occupational health and
safety. These laws and regulations frequently change, and the
violation of these laws or regulations can lead to substantial
fines, penalties and other liabilities. The operation of our
manufacturing facility entails risks in these areas and there
can be no assurance that we will not incur material costs or
liabilities in the future which could adversely affect our
results of operations or financial condition.
Our
retrofitting process frequently involves responsibility for the
removal and disposal of components containing hazardous
materials.
When we retrofit a customers facility, we typically assume
responsibility for removing and disposing of its existing
lighting fixtures. Certain components of these fixtures
typically contain trace amounts of mercury and other hazardous
materials. Older components may also contain trace amounts of
polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs. We currently rely on
contractors to remove the components containing such hazardous
materials at the customer job site. The contractors then arrange
for the disposal of such components at a licensed disposal
facility. Failure by such contractors to remove or dispose of
the components containing these hazardous materials in a safe,
effective and lawful manner could give rise to liability for us,
or could expose our workers or other persons to these hazardous
materials, which could result in claims against us.
If we
are unable to manage our anticipated revenue growth effectively,
our operations, and profitability could be adversely
affected.
We intend to undertake a number of strategies in an effort to
grow our revenue. If we are successful, our revenue growth may
place significant strain on our limited resources. To properly
manage any future revenue growth, we must continue to improve
our management, operational, administrative, accounting and
financial reporting systems and expand, train and manage our
employee base, which may involve significant expenditures and
increased operating costs. Due to our limited resources and
experience, we may not be able to effectively manage the
expansion of our operations or recruit and adequately train
additional qualified personnel. If we are unable to manage our
anticipated revenue growth effectively, the quality of our
customer care may suffer, we may experience customer
dissatisfaction, reduced future revenue or increased warranty
claims, and our expenses could substantially and
disproportionately increase. Any of these circumstances could
adversely affect our results of operations.
If we
are unable to obtain additional capital as needed in the future,
our ability to grow our revenue could be limited and we may be
unable to pursue our current and future business
strategies.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including the rate of our revenue growth, our introduction of
new products and services and enhancements to existing products
and services, and our expansion of sales, marketing and product
development activities. In addition, we may consider
acquisitions of product lines, businesses or technologies in an
attempt to grow our business, which could require significant
capital and could increase our capital expenditures related to
future operation of the acquired business or technology. We may
not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to
us, if at all, and, as a result, we may be unable to expand our
business or continue to pursue our current and future business
strategies. Additionally, if we raise funds through debt
financing, we may become subject to additional covenant
restrictions and incur increased interest expense and principal
payments. If we raise additional funds through further issuances
of equity or securities convertible into equity, our existing
shareholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new
securities we issue could have rights, preferences and
privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock.
16
We
expect our quarterly revenue and operating results to fluctuate.
If we fail to meet the expectations of market analysts or
investors, the market price of our common stock could decline
substantially, and we could become subject to securities
litigation.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results have fluctuated in
the past and will likely vary from quarter to quarter in the
future. You should not rely upon the results of one quarter as
an indication of our future performance. Our revenue and
operating results may fall below the expectations of market
analysts or investors in some future quarter or quarters. Our
failure to meet these expectations could cause the market price
of our common stock to decline substantially. If the price of
our common stock is volatile or falls significantly below our
initial public offering price, we may be the target of
securities litigation. If we become involved in this type of
litigation, regardless of the outcome, we could incur
substantial legal costs, managements attention could be
diverted from the operation of our business, and our reputation
could be damaged, which could adversely affect our business,
results of operations or financial condition.
Our
ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards will be
subject to limitation.
As of March 31, 2007, we had aggregate federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$5.1 million. Generally, a change of more than 50% in the
ownership of a companys stock, by value, over a three-year
period constitutes an ownership change for federal income tax
purposes. An ownership change may limit a companys ability
to use its net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the
period prior to such change. We believe that past issuances and
transfers of our stock caused an ownership change in fiscal 2007
that may affect the timing of the use of our net operating loss
carryforwards, but we do not believe the ownership change
affects the use of the full amount of our net operating loss
carryforwards. As a result, our ability to use our net operating
loss carryforwards attributable to the period prior to such
ownership change to offset taxable income will be subject to
limitations in a particular year, which could potentially result
in increased future tax liability for us.
Risks
Relating to this Offering and Our Common Stock
Because
there is no existing market for our common stock, our initial
public offering price may not be indicative of the market price
of our common stock after this offering, which may decrease
significantly.
There is currently no public market for our common stock, and an
active trading market may not develop or be sustained after this
offering. Our initial public offering price has been determined
through negotiation between us and the underwriters and may not
be indicative of the market price for our common stock after
this offering. We cannot predict the extent to which investor
interest in our company will lead to the development of an
active trading market on the Nasdaq Global Market or otherwise.
The lack of an active market may reduce the value of your shares
and impair your ability to sell your shares at the time or price
at which you wish to sell them. An inactive market may also
impair our ability to raise capital by selling our common stock
and may impair our ability to acquire or invest in other
companies, products or technologies by using our common stock as
consideration.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate
significantly as a result of a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our financial performance;
|
|
|
|
economic and stock market conditions generally and specifically
as they may impact us, participants in our industry or
comparable companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities
analysts following our common stock or comparable companies;
|
|
|
|
earnings and other announcements by, and changes in market
evaluations of, us, participants in our industry or comparable
companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in business or regulatory conditions affecting us,
participants in our industry or comparable companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
announcements or implementation by our competitors or us of
acquisitions, technological innovations or new products, or
other strategic actions by our competitors; or
|
|
|
|
trading volume of our common stock or the sale of stock by our
management team, directors or principal shareholders.
|
Purchasers
of our common stock will experience immediate and substantial
dilution.
Purchasers of our common stock in this offering will experience
immediate and substantial dilution. Investors purchasing common
stock in this offering will contribute
approximately % of the total amount
invested by shareholders since our inception, but will only own
approximately % of the shares of
common stock outstanding upon the closing of this offering. In
addition, following this offering, we will have a significant
number of outstanding warrants and options to purchase our
common stock having exercise prices significantly below the
initial public offering price of our common stock. See
Shares Eligible for Future Sale. You will incur
further dilution to the extent outstanding warrants or options
to purchase common stock are exercised.
In addition, we expect that our amended and restated articles of
incorporation that will be in effect upon closing of this
offering will allow us to issue significant numbers of
additional shares, including blank check preferred
stock. Upon the closing of this offering, we will also have the
authority to issue a substantial number of additional shares of
our common stock under our existing compensation plans. Issuance
of such additional shares could result in further dilution to
purchasers of our common stock in this offering and cause the
market price of our common stock to decline. See
Dilution.
The
market price of our common stock could be adversely affected by
future sales of our common stock in the public
market.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the public market following this offering, or the perception
that such sales might occur, could cause a decline in the market
price of our common stock or could impair our ability to obtain
capital through a subsequent offering of our equity securities
or securities convertible into equity securities. Under our
amended and restated articles of incorporation that will be in
effect upon closing of this offering, we are authorized to issue
up to 200 million shares of common stock, of
which shares
of common stock will be outstanding upon the closing of this
offering
( shares
if the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in
full). Of these shares, the shares of common stock sold in this
offering will be freely transferable without restriction or
further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, or the
Securities Act, by persons other than our
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act. In
addition, shares
of common stock will become freely tradable after the
termination of the
180-day
lock-up
agreements described below,
including shares
of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
outstanding options and
warrants. shares
of common stock, as well
as shares
of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
outstanding options and warrants, are not subject to the
lock-up
agreements and are currently freely tradable. See Shares
Eligible for Future Sale.
We, our executive officers, directors and shareholders
representing approximately % of our
fully-diluted common stock (including shares issuable upon
conversion of our preferred stock and the Convertible Notes and
upon exercise of outstanding warrants and stock options) have
entered into
lock-up
agreements described under the caption Underwriting,
pursuant to which we and they have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions and extensions, not to offer, sell, issue, contract
to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly,
any shares of our common stock, any securities convertible into
or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common
stock, enter into a transaction which would have the same
effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that
transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of our common stock or publicly disclose the
intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge or disposition,
or to enter into any such transaction, swap, hedge or other
arrangement for a period of 180 days from the date of this
prospectus or, subject to certain exceptions and extensions, to
make any demand or exercise any registration rights during such
period with respect to such shares. However, after the
lock-up
period expires, or if the
lock-up
restrictions are waived by Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, such
persons will be able to sell their shares and exercise
registration rights to cause them to be registered. We cannot
predict the size of future issuances
18
of our common stock or the effect, if any, that future sales
and issuances of shares of our common stock, or the perception
of such sales or issuances, would have on the market price of
our common stock. See Shares Eligible for Future
Sale. After the
lock-up
period expires, or if the
lock-up
restrictions are waived by Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, certain
of our shareholders will be able to cause us to register common
stock that they own under the Securities Act pursuant to
registration rights that are described in Description of
our Capital Stock Registration Rights. We also
intend to register all shares of common stock relating to awards
that we have granted or may grant under our outstanding equity
incentive compensation plans as in effect on the date of this
prospectus. Further, our president and chief executive officer
and chief financial officer have entered into
Rule 10b5-1
trading plans pursuant to which they will sell specified numbers
of shares of our common stock following the expiration of their
lock-up agreements. See Shares Eligible for Future
Sale.
Our
failure to maintain adequate internal control over financial
reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or to prevent or detect material
misstatements in our annual or interim consolidated financial
statements in the future could result in inaccurate financial
reporting, sanctions or securities litigation, or could
otherwise harm our business.
As a public company, we will be required to comply with the
standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley, regarding
internal control over financial reporting. We are not currently
in compliance with the requirements of Section 404, and the
process of becoming compliant with Section 404 may divert
internal resources and will take a significant amount of time
and effort to complete. We may experience higher than
anticipated operating expenses, as well as increased independent
auditor fees during the implementation of these changes and
thereafter. We are required to be compliant under
Section 404 by the end of fiscal 2009, and at that time our
management will be required to deliver a report that assesses
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, and we will be required to deliver an attestation
report of our auditors on our managements assessment of
our internal controls. Completing documentation of our internal
control system and financial processes, remediation of control
deficiencies and management testing of internal controls will
require substantial effort by us. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to complete the required management assessment by
our reporting deadline. Failure to implement these changes
timely, effectively or efficiently, could harm our operations,
financial reporting or financial results and could result in our
being unable to obtain an unqualified report on internal
controls from our independent auditors.
In connection with the audit of our fiscal 2007 consolidated
financial statements, our independent registered public
accounting firm identified certain significant deficiencies in
our internal control over financial reporting. These identified
significant deficiencies included (i) our lack of
segregation of certain key duties; (ii) our policies,
procedures, documentation and reporting of our equity
transactions; (iii) our lack of certain documented
accounting policies and procedures to clearly communicate the
standards of how transactions should be recorded or handled;
(iv) our controls in the area of information technology,
especially regarding change control and restricted access;
(v) our lack of a formal disaster recovery plan;
(vi) our need for enhanced restrictions on user access to
certain of our software programs; (vii) the necessity for
us to implement an enhanced project tracking/deferred revenue
accounting system to recognize the complexities of our business
processes and, ultimately, the recognition of revenue and
deferred revenue; (viii) our lack of a process for
determining whether a lease should be accounted for as a capital
or operating lease; (ix) our need for a formalized action
plan to understand all of our existing tax liabilities (and
opportunities) and properly account for them; and (x) our
need for improved financial statement closing and reporting
processes. A number of these significant deficiencies identified
in connection with the audit of our fiscal 2007 consolidated
financial statements were previously identified as material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies in connection with the
audit of our fiscal 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial
statements. We may not be able to remediate these significant
deficiencies in a timely manner, which may subject us to
sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, including
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, or the Nasdaq
Global Market, and cause investors to lose confidence in our
financial information, which in turn could cause the market
price of our common stock to significantly decrease. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis
19
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources Internal Control
over Financial Reporting.
In addition, in connection with preparing the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, we identified
certain errors in our prior year consolidated financial
statements. These errors related to accounting for the induced
conversion of our Series A preferred stock in fiscal 2005
and fiscal 2007 and for the exercise of a stock option through
the issuance of a full recourse promissory note in fiscal 2006
that we subsequently determined was issued at a below market
interest rate. These errors resulted in the restatement of our
previously issued fiscal 2006 and 2007 consolidated financial
statements.
If we are unable to maintain effective control over financial
reporting, such conclusion would be disclosed in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ending March 31, 2009. In the future, we may
identify material weaknesses and significant deficiencies which
we may not be able to remediate in a timely manner. If we fail
to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with Section 404, we will not be able to
conclude that we have and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting or our independent registered
accounting firm may not be able to issue an unqualified report
on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. As a result, our ability to report our financial
results on a timely and accurate basis may be adversely
affected, we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by
regulatory authorities, including the SEC or the Nasdaq Global
Market, and investors may lose confidence in our financial
information, which in turn could cause the market price of our
common stock to significantly decrease. We may also be required
to restate our financial statements from prior periods.
We may
pursue opportunities for future institutional investment, which
could result in additional dilution to investors in this
offering.
We may conduct discussions and negotiations with one or more
institutional investors to invest in our company. Institutional
investors may purchase different classes of securities and
negotiate terms that differ from those provided to individual
investors, such as favorable dividend, conversion
and/or
redemption rights, the right to attend board meetings or to
receive additional information, favorable share prices, or
anti-dilution clauses. We may decide to issue preferred stock or
convertible debt or other securities to institutional investors
and the terms of an institutional investment may be different
from, or more favorable than, those provided in this offering.
Any such investment made on more favorable pricing terms could
initially result in additional dilution to investors in this
offering. See Dilution.
We
have no plans to pay dividends on our common
stock.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to
retain future earnings, if any, to finance our operations. Our
future dividend policy is within the discretion of our board of
directors and will depend upon various factors, including our
business, financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements, investment opportunities and credit agreement
restrictions. Further, after closing of this offering, the terms
of our current revolving credit facility and our bank term loan
and mortgage preclude us, and the terms of agreements covering
any future indebtedness may preclude us, from paying dividends.
Anti-takeover
provisions included in the Wisconsin Business Corporation Law
and provisions in our amended and restated articles of
incorporation or bylaws could delay or prevent a change of
control of our company, which could adversely impact the value
of our common stock and may prevent or frustrate attempts by our
shareholders to replace or remove our current board of directors
or management.
A change of control of our company may be discouraged, delayed
or prevented by Sections 180.1140 to 180.1144 of the
Wisconsin Business Corporation Law. These provisions generally
restrict a broad range of business combinations between a
Wisconsin corporation and a shareholder owning 15% or more of
our outstanding voting stock. These and other provisions in our
amended and restated articles of incorporation that will be in
effect upon closing of this offering, including our staggered
board of directors and our ability to issue blank
check preferred stock, as well as the provisions of our
amended and restated bylaws and Wisconsin law, could make it
more difficult for
20
shareholders or potential acquirors to obtain control of our
board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the
then-current board of directors, including to delay or impede a
merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. See
Description of Capital Stock. In addition, our
employment arrangements that will be in effect upon closing of
this offering with senior management provide for severance
payments and accelerated vesting of benefits, including
accelerated vesting of stock options, upon a change of control.
This offering will not constitute a change of control under such
agreements. These provisions may discourage or prevent a change
of control or result in a lower price per share paid to our
shareholders.
Our
management will have broad discretion in allocating the net
proceeds of this offering.
We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering for working
capital and general corporate purposes, including to fund
potential future acquisitions. Consequently, our management will
have broad discretion in allocating the net proceeds of this
offering. See Use of Proceeds. You may not agree
with such uses and our use of the proceeds from this offering
may not yield a significant return or any return at all for our
shareholders. The failure by our management to apply these funds
effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition.
The
requirements of being a public company, including compliance
with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the Nasdaq Global Market, will require greater
resources, increase our costs and distract our management, and
we may be unable to comply with these requirements in a timely
or cost-effective manner.
As a public company with equity securities expected to be listed
on the Nasdaq Global Market, we will need to comply with
statutes and regulations of the SEC, including the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Exchange
Act, and requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market, with which we
were not required to comply prior to the closing of this
offering. Complying with these statutes, regulations and
requirements will occupy a significant amount of the time of our
board of directors and management and will substantially
increase our costs and expenses. Our management team has no
experience managing a public company. We also expect to incur
substantial additional annual costs as a result of becoming a
public company due to the anticipated increased legal,
accounting, compliance and related costs. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Components of
Revenue and Expenses Operating Expenses.
Also, as a public company we will need to:
|
|
|
|
|
institute a comprehensive compliance function;
|
|
|
|
prepare and distribute periodic and current public reports in
compliance with our obligations under the federal securities
laws;
|
|
|
|
establish new internal policies, such as those relating to
internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls
and procedures and insider trading;
|
|
|
|
maintain appropriate committees of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
prepare public reports of our audit and finance committee and
our compensation committee;
|
|
|
|
involve and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and
accountants in the above activities; and
|
|
|
|
establish and maintain an investor relations function, including
the provision of certain information on our website.
|
These factors could make it more difficult for us to attract and
retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly
to serve on our audit and finance committee and our compensation
committee.
21
Insiders
will continue to have substantial control over us after this
offering, which could delay or prevent a change of corporate
control or result in the entrenchment of management and/or the
board of directors.
After this offering, our directors, executive officers and
principal shareholders, together with their affiliates and
related persons, will beneficially own, in the aggregate,
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock ( % if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full).
As a result, these shareholders, if acting together, will have
substantial influence over the outcome of matters submitted to
our shareholders for approval, including the election and
removal of directors and any merger, consolidation, or sale of
all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these
persons, if acting together, will have the ability to
substantially influence the management and affairs of our
company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may harm
the market price of our common stock by, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
delaying, deferring, or preventing a change of control, even at
a per share price that is in excess of the then current price of
our common stock;
|
|
|
|
impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover, or other business
combination involving us, even at a per share price that is in
excess of the then current price of our common stock; or
|
|
|
|
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or
otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, even at a per
share price that is in excess of the then current price of our
common stock.
|
In addition, Wisconsin corporate law limits the protection
afforded minority shareholders, and we have not enacted
provisions that may be beneficial to minority shareholders, such
as cumulative voting, preemptive rights or majority voting for
directors.
22
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements that are
based on our beliefs and assumptions and on information
currently available to us. The forward-looking statements are
contained principally in the sections entitled Prospectus
Summary, Risk Factors, Use of
Proceeds, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Business. When used in this prospectus, the words
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, intend,
may, plan, potential,
predict, project, should,
will, would, and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that
our plans, intentions, and expectations reflected in any
forward-looking statements are reasonable, these plans,
intentions, or expectations are based on assumptions, are
subject to risks and uncertainties and may not be achieved.
These statements are based on assumptions made by us based on
our experience and perception of historical trends, current
conditions, expected future developments and other factors that
we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Such statements
are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond our control. Our actual results, performance or
achievements could differ materially from those contemplated,
expressed, or implied, by the forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking
statements are set forth in this prospectus, including under the
heading Risk Factors. Given these uncertainties, you
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our
beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by the cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus. These
forward-looking statements include, among other things,
statements relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
our estimates regarding our future revenue, cost of revenue,
gross margin, expenses, capital requirements, liquidity and
borrowing capacity and our needs for additional financing;
|
|
|
|
our estimates of market sizes and anticipated uses of, and
benefits from, our products and services;
|
|
|
|
our ability to market and achieve market acceptance for our
products and services;
|
|
|
|
our anticipated use of the net proceeds of this offering and of
our Convertible Notes placement;
|
|
|
|
our business strategy and our underlying assumptions about
trends in our industry and about market data, including the
relative demand for, and cost of, energy;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our
business without infringing upon the intellectual property
rights of others; and
|
|
|
|
managements goals, expectations and objectives and other
similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical
facts.
|
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from
our expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not
possible to identify all of these factors, they include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our limited operating history;
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete in a highly competitive market;
|
|
|
|
our ability to respond successfully to market competition;
|
|
|
|
the retention of our senior management;
|
|
|
|
the market acceptance of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on our customers capital budgets to
generate sales of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
price fluctuations, shortages or interruptions of component
supplies and raw materials used to manufacture our products;
|
|
|
|
loss of one or more key customers;
|
|
|
|
delivery of satisfactory components by our current suppliers;
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
loss of one or more key suppliers;
|
|
|
|
warranty and product liability claims;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop new products and services;
|
|
|
|
the success of potential acquisitions or investments in new
product lines;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property or to respond
to any intellectual property litigation brought by others;
|
|
|
|
exercising our option to acquire intellectual property rights
owned by our chief executive officer;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the price of electricity;
|
|
|
|
the cost to comply with, and the effects of, any current and
future government regulations, laws and policies;
|
|
|
|
increased competition from government subsidiaries and utility
incentive programs;
|
|
|
|
the failure of our information technology systems;
|
|
|
|
the discovery of environmental contamination at our
manufacturing facility or the expenses and responsibility
associated with disposal of hazardous materials;
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively manage our anticipated growth;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional capital;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results;
|
|
|
|
our ability to use our net operating losses;
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with being a public company and our ability
to comply with the internal control and financial reporting
obligations of the SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley; and
|
|
|
|
other factors discussed in more detail under Risk
Factors.
|
You are urged to carefully consider these factors and the other
factors described under Risk Factors when evaluating
any forward-looking statements and you should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Except as required by applicable law, we assume no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements publicly or to update the
reasons why actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new
information becomes available in the future.
INDUSTRY
AND MARKET DATA AND FORECASTS
This prospectus includes market and industry data and industry
forecasts that we obtained from publicly available sources,
including information from governmental agencies such as the
United States Energy Information Administration, the United
States Department of Energy and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency, and industry publications and surveys from a
variety of sources, including the American Council for an Energy
Efficient Economy, the National Electric Reliability Council,
the Electric Power Research Institute and the International
Energy Agency. Certain market and industry data included in this
prospectus are also based on our own internal estimates and
assumptions. Unless otherwise noted, statements based on the
above-mentioned third party data and internal analysis,
estimates or assumptions are as of the date of this prospectus.
Although we believe the industry and market data and forecasts
included in this prospectus are reliable as of the date of this
prospectus, we have not independently verified such data and
such data could prove inaccurate. Industry and market data may
be incorrect because of the method by which sources obtained
their data and because information cannot always be verified
with certainty due to the limits on the availability and
reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data
gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties. In
addition, we do not know all of the assumptions regarding the
size of our market, future energy demands and pricing, general
economic conditions or growth that were used in preparing the
forecasts from sources cited herein.
24
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering,
assuming an initial public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), will be
approximately $ million
($ million if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full),
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling
shareholders.
A 10% change in the number of shares of common stock sold by us
in this offering would result in a change in our net proceeds of
$ million, assuming an
initial public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus). A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from
this offering by $ million,
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us (assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same).
The principal purposes for this offering are to generate funds
for working capital and general corporate purposes, including to
fund potential future acquisitions, and to create a public
market for our common stock. As of the date of this prospectus,
we have not entered into any purchase agreements, understandings
or commitments with respect to any acquisitions.
We will have broad discretion in the way that we use the net
proceeds of this offering. Pending the final application of the
net proceeds of this offering, we intend to invest the net
proceeds of this offering in short-term, interest-bearing,
investment-grade securities. See Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business Our management team
will have broad discretion in allocating the net proceeds of
this offering.
We have never paid or declared cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any
future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our
business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at
the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon
various factors, including our results of operations, financial
condition, capital requirements, investment opportunities, and
other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. After
the closing of this offering, the terms of our current revolving
credit facility and our bank term loan and mortgage preclude us,
and the terms of any agreements governing any future
indebtedness may preclude us, from paying dividends. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Indebtedness.
25
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to (i) the automatic
conversion of the Convertible Notes into 2,360,802 shares
of our common stock; (ii) the automatic conversion of
4,808,012 shares of our outstanding preferred stock into
common stock on a one-for-one basis; and (iii) the receipt
of estimated net proceeds of
$ million from our sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share (the
midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this
prospectus), less the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
A 10% change in the number of shares of common stock sold by us
in this offering would result in a change in our net proceeds of
$ million, assuming an
initial public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus), which would result in an equal change to
each of total shareholders equity and total
capitalization. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page
of the prospectus) would change each of the total
shareholders equity and total capitalization line items by
approximately $ million,
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us (assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same).
You should read this table in conjunction with Use of
Proceeds, Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
Data, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
$
|
8,933
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C convertible redeemable preferred stock
($0.01 par value 1,818,182 shares issued and
outstanding, actual; no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma)
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible preferred stock ($0.01 par value
2,989,830 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma)
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (no par value 80,000,000 shares authorized and
12,489,205 shares outstanding, actual;
200,000,000 shares authorized
and shares
outstanding, pro forma)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
14,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
39,019
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares outstanding data in the preceding table excludes as
of October 15, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
750,822 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of outstanding warrants with a weighted average exercise price
of $2.24 per share;
|
|
|
|
4,566,687 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of outstanding options with a weighted average exercise price of
$1.89 per share; and
|
|
|
|
396,490 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance
under our stock option plans.
|
26
If you invest in our common stock, your economic interest will
be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial
public offering price per share of our common stock and the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately
after the closing of this offering. Dilution results from the
fact that the initial public offering price per share of the
common stock is substantially in excess of the book value per
share attributable to our existing shareholders for our
presently outstanding stock.
As of September 30, 2007, our net tangible book value would
have been approximately $29.7 million, or approximately
$1.51 per share of common stock, on a pro forma basis after
giving effect to (i) the automatic conversion of the
Convertible Notes into 2,360,802 shares of our common
stock; and (ii) the automatic conversion of
4,808,012 shares of our outstanding preferred stock into
common stock on a one-for-one basis. Net tangible book value per
share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less
our total liabilities, divided by the number of our shares of
common stock outstanding.
Our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of
September 30, 2007 would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share, after giving effect
to (i) the pro forma adjustments described above and
(ii) the receipt of estimated net proceeds of
$ million from our sale of
shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus), less the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. This
represents an immediate increase in pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value of $ per share
to our existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors
purchasing common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates this dilution to new investors
on a per share basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share
attributable to new investors in this offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A 10% increase (decrease) in the number of shares of common
stock sold by us in this offering would result in a decrease
(increase) in dilution per share to new investors of
$ , assuming an initial public
offering price of $ per share (the
midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus). A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the initial public
offering price would increase (decrease) dilution per share to
new investors by approximately $ ,
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us (assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same).
The following table summarizes, as of September 30, 2007,
the differences between the number of shares of common stock
owned by existing shareholders and to be owned by new public
investors, the aggregate cash consideration paid to us and the
average price per share paid by our existing shareholders and to
be paid by new public investors purchasing shares of common
stock in this offering at an estimated initial public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus).
All information in the row titled Existing
shareholders in the following table is presented on a pro
forma basis assuming (i) the conversion of
4,808,012 shares of our outstanding preferred stock into
common stock on a one-for-one basis; and (ii) the
conversion of the Convertible Notes into 2,360,802 shares
of our common stock.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
New public investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares for existing shareholders includes shares
being sold by the selling shareholders in this offering. The
number of shares disclosed for the new public investors does not
include the shares being purchased by the new public investors
from the selling shareholders in this offering. |
The discussion and tables above assume no exercise of the
4,566,687 options to purchase shares of common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $1.89 outstanding as of
October 15, 2007, or the 750,822 warrants to purchase
common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $2.24
outstanding as of October 15, 2007, all of which are
in-the-money compared to the mid-point of the range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. To the extent
any of these options or warrants outstanding as of
October 15, 2007 is exercised, there will be further
dilution to new public investors. If all of our options and
warrants outstanding as of October 15, 2007 are exercised,
you will experience additional dilution of
$ per share.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, the number of shares of common stock held by new public
investors will increase to
approximately shares,
or approximately % of the total
number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding upon the
closing of this offering, our existing shareholders would own
approximately % of the total number
of shares of our common stock to be outstanding upon the closing
this offering, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value
per share of common stock would be approximately
$ and the dilution in pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock to
new public investors would be $ .
These calculations do not include the shares being purchased by
the new public investors from the selling shareholders in this
offering.
28
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth our selected historical
consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. We
prepared the selected historical consolidated financial data
using our consolidated financial statements for each of the
periods presented. The selected historical consolidated
financial data for each year in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2007 were derived from our audited historical
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, the selected historical consolidated financial data
for each year in the two-year period ended March 31, 2004
were derived from our historical consolidated financial
statements not appearing in this prospectus, and the selected
historical consolidated financial data for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2007 were derived
from our unaudited historical consolidated financial statements
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited historical
consolidated financial statements include all adjustments,
which, in our opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of
our financial position and results of operations for these
periods. You should read this selected historical financial data
in conjunction with our audited and unaudited historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes,
Prospectus Summary Summary Historical
Consolidated and Pro Forma Financial Data and Other
Information and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical
consolidated financial data are not necessarily indicative of
future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
9,018
|
|
|
$
|
12,031
|
|
|
$
|
19,628
|
|
|
$
|
29,993
|
|
|
$
|
40,201
|
|
|
$
|
17,444
|
|
|
$
|
28,752
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
12,423
|
|
|
|
21,783
|
|
|
|
33,280
|
|
|
|
48,183
|
|
|
|
20,311
|
|
|
|
35,126
|
|
Cost of product revenue(1)
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
|
7,016
|
|
|
|
12,099
|
|
|
|
20,225
|
|
|
|
26,511
|
|
|
|
11,422
|
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
|
7,376
|
|
|
|
14,043
|
|
|
|
22,524
|
|
|
|
32,487
|
|
|
|
13,633
|
|
|
|
23,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
5,047
|
|
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses(1)
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
6,459
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
Research and development expenses(1)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Dividend and interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative change in accounting principle
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends(2)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Conversion of preferred stock(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed
earnings(4)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
5,964
|
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
|
|
9,003
|
|
|
|
10,712
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,169
|
|
|
|
10,218
|
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
15,666
|
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
6,864
|
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
|
|
11,147
|
|
|
|
21,397
|
|
|
|
24,738
|
|
|
|
33,583
|
|
|
|
56,728
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
7,921
|
|
|
|
10,492
|
|
|
|
10,603
|
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
Temporary equity (Series C convertible redeemable preferred
stock)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
Series A convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
Shareholder notes receivable
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,192
|
|
|
$
|
3,448
|
|
|
$
|
5,699
|
|
|
$
|
6,622
|
|
|
$
|
9,355
|
|
|
$
|
14,317
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense recognized under
SFAS 123(R) as follows: |
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For fiscal 2007 and our fiscal 2008 first half, represents the
impact attributable to the accretion of accumulated dividends on
our Series C preferred stock, plus accumulated dividends on
our Series A preferred stock prior to its conversion into
common stock on March 31, 2007. The Series C preferred
stock will convert automatically into common stock on a
one-for-one basis upon the closing of this offering and our
obligation to pay accumulated dividends will be extinguished.
For fiscal 2005 and 2006, represents accumulated dividends on
our Series A preferred stock prior to its conversion into
common stock. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Revenue and Expense
Components Accretion of Preferred Stock and
Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the estimated fair market value of the premium paid
to holders of Series A preferred stock upon induced
conversion. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue and Expense Components Conversion of
Preferred Stock. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents undistributed earnings allocated to participating
preferred shareholders as described under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Revenue and
Expense Components Participation Rights of Preferred
Stock in Undistributed Earnings. All of our preferred
stock will convert automatically into common stock on a one
for-one basis upon the closing of this offering and, thereafter,
we will no longer be required to allocated any undistributed
earnings to our preferred shareholders. |
31
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion together with the
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are based on our current expectations, estimates
and projections about our business and operations. The
cautionary statements made in this prospectus should be read as
applying to all related forward-looking statements wherever they
appear in this prospectus. Our actual results may differ
materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in
such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of
factors, including those we discuss under Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read
Risk Factors and Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We design, manufacture and implement energy management systems
consisting primarily of high-performance, energy-efficient
lighting systems, controls and related services.
We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue
from sales of high intensity fluorescent, or HIF, lighting
systems and related services to commercial and industrial
customers. We typically sell our HIF lighting systems in
replacement of our customers existing high intensity
discharge, or HID, fixtures. We call this replacement process a
retrofit. We frequently engage our customers
existing electrical contractor to provide installation and
project management services. We also sell our HIF lighting
systems on a wholesale basis, principally to electrical
contractors and value-added resellers to sell to their own
customer bases.
We have sold and installed more than 970,000 of our HIF lighting
systems in over 2,100 facilities from December 1, 2001
through September 30, 2007. We have sold our products to 78
Fortune 500 companies, many of which have installed our HIF
lighting systems in multiple facilities. Our top customers by
revenue in fiscal 2007 included Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.,
General Electric Co., Kraft Foods Inc., Newell Rubbermaid Inc.,
OfficeMax, Inc., SYSCO Corp. and Toyota Motors Corp.
Our fiscal year ends on March 31. We call our fiscal years
ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, fiscal
2005, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007,
respectively. We call our current fiscal year, which will end on
March 31, 2008, fiscal 2008. Our fiscal first
quarter ends on June 30, our fiscal second quarter ends on
September 30, our fiscal third quarter ends on December 31
and our fiscal fourth quarter ends on March 31.
Revenue
and Expense Components
Revenue. We sell our energy management
products and services directly to commercial and industrial
customers, and indirectly to end users through wholesale sales
to electrical contractors and value-added resellers. We
currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from
sales of HIF lighting systems and related services to commercial
and industrial customers. While our services include
comprehensive site assessment, site field verification, utility
incentive and government subsidy management, engineering design,
project management, installation and recycling in connection
with our retrofit installations, we separately recognize service
revenue only for our installation and recycling services. Except
for our installation and recycling services, all other services
historically have been completed prior to product shipment and
revenue from such services was included in product revenue
because evidence of fair value for these services did not exist.
Wholesale sales to electrical contractors and value-added
resellers, which have historically accounted for only a
relatively small percentage of our total revenue, are expected
to continue to constitute a relatively small percentage of our
total revenue.
We recognize revenue on product only sales at the time of
shipment. For projects consisting of multiple elements of
revenue, such as a combination of product sales and services, we
separate the project into separate units of accounting based on
their relative fair values for revenue recognition purposes.
Additionally, the deferral of revenue on a delivered element may
be required if such revenue is contingent upon the delivery of
the remaining undelivered elements. We recognize revenue at the
time of product shipment on product sales and on services
completed prior to product shipment. We recognize revenue
associated with services provided after product shipment, based
on their fair value, when the services are completed and
customer acceptance has been received. When other significant
32
obligations or acceptance terms remain after products are
delivered, revenue is recognized only after such obligations are
fulfilled or acceptance by the customer has occurred. We also
offer our products under a sales-type financing program where we
finance our customers purchase. The contractual future
cash flows and residual rights to the related equipment are then
sold without recourse to a third party finance company. We
recognize revenue for the net present value of the future
payments from the finance company upon completion of the
project. See Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates. Revenue recognized from our sales-type
financing program has historically been immaterial as a
percentage of our total revenue and we do not anticipate that
revenue from such program will comprise a material portion of
our total revenue in fiscal 2008.
Our dependence on individual key customers can vary from period
to period as a result of the significant size of some of our
retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects. Our top 10
customers accounted for approximately 35%, 27%, and 39%,
respectively, of our total revenue in fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007, and 43% and 53%, respectively, of our fiscal 2007 and 2008
first half total revenue. No single customer accounted for more
than 9% of our total revenue in any of such fiscal years,
although Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. accounted for approximately
20% of our fiscal 2008 first half total revenue. As large
retrofit and roll-out projects become a greater component of our
total revenue, we may experience more customer concentration in
given periods. The loss of, or substantial reduction in sales
volume to, any of our significant customers could have a
material adverse effect on our total revenue in any given period
and may result in significant quarterly revenue variations.
Our level of total revenue for any given period is dependent
upon a number of factors, including (i) the demand for our
products and systems; (ii) the number and timing of large
retrofit and multi-facility retrofit, or roll-out,
projects; (iii) the level of our wholesale sales;
(iv) our ability to realize revenue from our services and
our sales-type financing program; (v) our execution of our
sales process; (vi) the selling price of our products and
services; (vii) changes in capital investment levels by our
customers and prospects; and (viii) customer sales cycles.
As a result, our total revenue may be subject to quarterly
variations and our total revenue for any particular fiscal
quarter may not be indicative of future results. See
Quarterly Results of Operations. We
expect our total revenue to increase in fiscal 2008 primarily as
we solicit new customers, expand our joint lead generation and
sales initiative with electrical contractors and value-added
resellers, expand our sales force and sales locations, roll-out
our products and services to multiple customer locations and
attempt to expand implementation of all aspects of our energy
management system for existing national customers.
Cost of Revenue. Our total cost of revenue
consists of costs for: (i) raw materials, including sheet,
coiled and specialty reflective aluminum; (ii) electrical
components, including ballasts, power supplies and lamps;
(iii) wages and related personnel expenses, including
stock-based compensation charges, for our fabricating assembly,
logistics and project installation service organizations;
(iv) manufacturing facilities, including depreciation on
our manufacturing facilities and equipment, taxes, insurance and
utilities; (v) warranty expenses; (vi) installation
and integration; and (vii) shipping and handling. Our cost
of aluminum can be subject to commodity price fluctuations,
which we attempt to mitigate with forward fixed-price, minimum
quantity purchase commitments with our suppliers. We also
purchase many of our electrical components through forward
purchase contracts. We buy most of our specialty reflective
aluminum from a single supplier, and most of our ballast and
lamp components from a single supplier, although we believe we
could obtain sufficient quantities of these raw materials and
components on a price and quality competitive basis from other
suppliers if necessary. Purchases from our current primary
supplier of ballast and lamp components constituted 14% of our
total cost of revenue in fiscal 2006 and 26% in fiscal 2007. Our
production labor force is non-union and, as a result, our
production labor costs have been relatively stable. We
anticipate adding additional production personnel to support our
anticipated increase in sales volumes, although we are
attempting to achieve efficiencies in our cost of revenue by
implementing more highly systematized production and assembly
processes. We are also expanding our network of qualified
third-party installers to realize efficiencies in the
installation process.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit has been and
will continue to be, affected by the relative levels of our
total revenue and our total cost of revenue, and as a result,
our gross profit may be subject to quarterly variation. Our
gross profit as a percentage of total revenue, or gross margin,
is affected by a number of factors, including: (i) our mix
of large retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects with
national
33
accounts; (ii) the level of our wholesale sales (which
generally have historically resulted in higher relative gross
margins, but lower relative net margins, than our sales to
direct customers); (iii) our realization rate on our
billable services (which generally have recently resulted in
higher relative gross margins than product revenue);
(iv) our project pricing; (v) our level of warranty
claims; (vi) our level of utilization of our manufacturing
facilities and related absorption of our manufacturing overhead
costs; (vii) our level of efficiencies in our manufacturing
operations; and (viii) our level of efficiencies from our
subcontracted installation service providers. As a result, our
gross margin may be subject to quarterly variation.
Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses
consist of: (i) general and administrative expenses;
(ii) sales and marketing expenses; and (iii) research
and development expenses. Personnel related costs are our
largest operating expense and we expect these costs to increase
on an absolute dollar basis in fiscal 2008 as a result of our
planned expansion of our sales force, as well as contemplated
additions to our personnel infrastructure, as we attempt to
generate and support additional revenue growth.
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
costs for: (i) salaries and related personnel expenses,
including stock-based compensation charges, related to our
executive, finance, human resource, information technology and
operations organizations; (ii) occupancy expenses;
(iii) professional services fees; (iv) technology
related costs and amortization; and (v) corporate-related
travel.
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs for:
(i) salaries and related personnel expenses, including
stock-based compensation charges, related to our sales and
marketing organization; (ii) internal and external sales
commissions and bonuses; (iii) travel, lodging and other
out-of-pocket expenses associated with our selling efforts;
(iv) marketing programs; (v) pre-sales costs; and
(vi) other related overhead.
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of costs
for: (i) salaries and related personnel expenses, including
stock-based compensation charges, related to our engineering
organization; (ii) payments to consultants; (iii) the
design and development of new energy management products and
enhancements to our existing energy management system;
(iv) quality assurance and testing; and (v) other
related overhead. We expense research and development costs as
incurred.
In addition to expected increased administrative personnel
costs, we expect to incur increased general and administrative
expenses in connection with becoming a public company, including
increased accounting, audit, legal and support services and
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance fees and expenses. We also expect our
sales and marketing expenses to substantially increase in the
near term as we further increase the number of our sales people
and sales locations and market our products, brands and trade
names, including our planned expanded advertising and
promotional campaign. Additionally, we expense all pre-sale
costs incurred in connection with our sales process prior to
obtaining a purchase order. These pre-sale costs may reduce our
net income in a given period prior to recognizing any
corresponding revenue. We also intend to continue to invest in
our research and development of new and enhanced energy
management products and services.
In fiscal 2007, we began recognizing compensation expense for
the fair value of our stock option awards granted over their
related vesting period using the modified prospective method of
adoption under the provisions of the Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment. Prior to fiscal 2007, we accounted for our stock
option awards under the intrinsic value method under the
provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and we did not recognize the fair value expense of our stock
option awards in our statements of operations, although we did
report our pro forma stock option award fair value expense in
the footnotes to our financial statements. We recognized
$0.4 million of stock-based compensation expense in fiscal
2007 and $0.6 million in our fiscal 2008 first half. As a
result of prior option grants, including option grants in fiscal
2008 through the date of this prospectus, we expect to recognize
a total of $3.5 million of stock-based compensation over a
weighted average period of approximately four years, including
$0.6 million in the second half of fiscal 2008. These
charges have been, and will continue to be, allocated to cost of
product revenue, general and administrative expenses, sales and
marketing expenses and research and development expenses based
on the departments in which the personnel receiving such awards
have primary responsibility. A substantial majority of these
34
charges have been, and likely will continue to be, allocated to
general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing
expenses. See Critical Accounting
Policies Stock-Based Compensation and the
notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense is
comprised primarily of interest expense on outstanding
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and our other
long-term debt obligations described under
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Indebtedness below, including the amortization of
previously incurred financing costs. Our interest expense also
has historically included guarantee fees previously paid to our
chief executive officer in connection with his guarantees of
various of our debt obligations. These guarantees have been
released. We amortize deferred financing costs to interest
expense over the life of the related debt instrument, ranging
from six to fifteen years.
Dividend and Interest Income. Our dividend
income consists of dividends paid on preferred shares that we
acquired in July 2006. The terms of these preferred shares
provide for annual dividend payments to us of $0.1 million.
We also report interest income earned on our cash and cash
equivalents. We expect our interest income to increase in fiscal
2008 as a result of our investment of the net proceeds from our
recent placement of convertible subordinated notes and from this
offering in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade
securities until final application of such net proceeds.
Income Taxes. As of March 31, 2007, we
had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$5.1 million for both federal and state tax purposes.
Included in the $5.1 million loss carryforward were
$3.0 million of compensation expenses that were associated
with the exercise of nonqualified stock options. The benefit
from our net operating losses created from these compensation
expenses has not been recognized and will be accounted for in
our shareholders equity as a credit to additional paid-in
capital as the deduction reduces our income taxes payable. We
also had federal and state credit carryforwards of approximately
$0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, as of
March 31, 2007. These federal and state net operating
losses and credit carryforwards are available, subject to the
discussion in the following paragraph, to offset future taxable
income and, if not utilized, will begin to expire in varying
amounts between 2016 and 2027. Our income before income tax in
fiscal 2007 was $1.2 million. If we maintain this level of
income before income tax in future fiscal years, we would expect
to utilize our federal net operating loss carryforwards in less
than six fiscal years, or over a shorter period if our income
before income tax increases further. State net operating loss
carryforwards would be utilized over approximately 10 fiscal
years or a shorter period if our income before income taxes
increases further.
Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a
companys stock, by value, over a three year period
constitutes an ownership change for federal income tax purposes.
An ownership change may limit a companys ability to use
its net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the period
prior to such change. We believe that past issuances and
transfers of our stock caused an ownership change in fiscal 2007
that may affect the timing of the use of our net operating loss
carryforwards, but we do not believe the ownership change affect
the use of the full amount of our net operating loss
carryforwards. As a result, our ability to use our net operating
loss carryforwards attributable to the period prior to such
ownership change to offset taxable income will be subject to
limitations in a particular year, which could potentially result
in increased future tax liability for us.
A valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets as of
September 30, 2007 has not been provided because we believe
that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets
will be fully realized. The factors included in this assessment
were: (i) our recognition of income before taxes of
$3.1 million in our fiscal 2008 first half and $1.2 million
in fiscal 2007; (ii) our anticipated fiscal 2008 revenue
growth due to our backlog of orders as of September 30,
2007; and (iii) our previous profitability in fiscal 2003
and 2004 that preceded our planned efforts in fiscal 2005 and
2006 to increase our manufacturing capacity and sales and
marketing efforts to increase our revenue.
Our effective tax rate of 19.5% in fiscal 2007 was favorably
impacted by federal research and development tax credits, as
well as state income tax credits from jobs creation. These
benefits were partially offset by the impact of state income
taxes. We do not expect to generate state credits in fiscal 2008
and our federal research credits will decline, resulting in our
effective tax rate increasing in fiscal 2008 to the federal
statutory rate plus state income taxes.
35
Accretion of Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock
Dividends. Our accretion of redeemable preferred
stock and preferred stock dividends consists of accumulated
unpaid dividends on our Series A and Series C
preferred stock during the periods that such shares remain
outstanding. The terms of our Series C preferred stock
provide for a 6% per annum cumulative dividend unless we
complete a qualified initial public offering or sale. As a
result, the carrying amount of our Series C preferred stock
has been increased each period to reflect the accretion of
accumulated unpaid dividends. The obligation to pay these
accumulated unpaid dividends will be extinguished upon
conversion of the Series C preferred stock because this
offering will constitute a qualified initial public offering
under the terms of our Series C preferred stock. The
Series C preferred stock will automatically convert into
common stock upon closing of this offering, and the carrying
amount of our Series C preferred stock, along with
accumulated unpaid dividends, will be credited to additional
paid-in capital at that time. Our Series A preferred stock
was issued beginning in fiscal 2000 and provided for a 12% per
annum cumulative dividend. Our Series A preferred stock was
converted into shares of our common stock in fiscal 2005 and
fiscal 2007 as described under Conversion of
Preferred Stock.
Conversion of Preferred Stock. In fiscal 2005,
we offered our holders of then outstanding Series A
preferred stock the opportunity to convert each of their
Series A preferred shares, together with the accumulated
unpaid dividends thereon and their other rights and preferences
related thereto, into three shares of our common stock. Since
the Series A preferred shareholders had the existing right
to convert each of their Series A preferred shares into two
shares of common stock, we determined that the increase in the
conversion ratio from two to three shares of common stock was an
inducement offer. As a result, we accounted for the value of the
change in this conversion ratio as an increase to additional
paid-in capital and a charge to our accumulated deficit at the
time of conversion. In fiscal 2005, 648,010 outstanding
Series A preferred shares were converted into shares of our
common stock. The remaining 20,000 outstanding Series A
preferred shares were converted into shares of our common stock
on March 31, 2007. The premium amount recorded for the
inducement, calculated using the number of additional common
shares offered multiplied by the estimated fair market value of
our common stock at the time of conversion, was
$1.0 million for fiscal 2005 and $83,000 for fiscal 2007.
Participation Rights of Preferred Stock in Undistributed
Earnings. Because all series of our preferred
stock participate in all undistributed earnings with the common
stock, we allocated earnings to the common shareholders and
participating preferred shareholders under the two-class method
as required by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 03-6,
Participating Securities and the
Two-Class Method
under FASB Statement No. 128. The two-class method is
an earnings allocation method under which basic net income per
share is calculated for our common stock and participating
preferred stock considering both accrued preferred stock
dividends and participation rights in undistributed earnings as
if all such earnings had been distributed during the year.
Because our participating preferred stock was not contractually
required to share in our losses, in applying the two-class
method to compute basic net income per common share, we did not
make any allocation to our preferred stock if a net loss existed
or if an undistributed net loss resulted from reducing net
income by the accrued preferred stock dividends. All of our
preferred stock will convert automatically into common stock on
a one-for-one basis upon the closing of this offering and,
thereafter, we will no longer be required to allocate any
undistributed earnings to our preferred shareholders.
36
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth the line items of our
consolidated statements of operations on an absolute dollar
basis and as a relative percentage of our revenue for each
applicable period, together with the relative percentage change
in such line item between applicable comparable periods set
forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
90.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,993
|
|
|
|
90.1
|
%
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,201
|
|
|
|
83.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,444
|
|
|
|
85.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,752
|
|
|
|
81.9
|
%
|
|
|
64.8
|
%
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
142.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
122.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
21,783
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
33,280
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
|
48,183
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
|
20,311
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
35,126
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
12,099
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
%
|
|
|
20,225
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
|
|
67.2
|
%
|
|
|
26,511
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
11,422
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
64.8
|
%
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
159.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
98.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
14,043
|
|
|
|
64.5
|
%
|
|
|
22,524
|
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
|
|
32,487
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
%
|
|
|
44.2
|
%
|
|
|
13,633
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
23,202
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
%
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
|
|
78.6
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
6,459
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
449.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
593.7
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
84.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
Dividend and interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(21.4
|
)%
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)%
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)%
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
97.1
|
%
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(226.1
|
)%
|
Conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Six
Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months
Ended September 30, 2006
Revenue. Our product revenue and service
revenue each increased for our fiscal 2008 first half from our
fiscal 2007 first half primarily as a result of increased sales
of our HIF lighting systems and related services. The relative
increase in our service revenue was also the result of our
increased emphasis on achieving higher billing rates for our
services. As of September, 2007, we had a backlog of firm
purchase orders of approximately $11.0 million, compared to
approximately $10.1 million as of March 31, 2007. We
generally expect this level of firm purchase order backlog to be
converted into revenue within the following quarter. Principally
as a result of the continued shortening of our customer sales
cycles, a comparison of backlog from period to period is not
necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative of actual
revenue recognized in future periods.
Cost of Revenue. Our total cost of product and
services revenue increased for our fiscal 2008 first half
compared to our fiscal 2007 first half principally because of
our higher sales volumes, as well as increased production
personnel costs as we increased the number of our production
employees to support our sales growth.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit increased for
our fiscal 2008 first half from our fiscal 2007 first half as a
result of our increased total revenue. Our gross margin
increased for our fiscal 2008 first half from our fiscal 2007
first half as a result of our increased higher gross margin
service revenue, reduced headcount due to production efficiency
improvements, and volume rebates on raw material purchases.
Operating
Expenses
General and Administrative. Our general and
administrative expenses increased for our fiscal 2008 first half
from our fiscal 2007 first half on an absolute dollar basis
principally as a result of: (i) increased travel expenses
and compensation costs related to hiring additional employees in
our accounting and administration departments;
(ii) additional legal expenses; and (iii) increased
consulting costs for technology, audit and tax support. We also
incurred increased stock-based compensation expenses. As a
percentage of total revenue, our general and administrative
expenses decreased as our revenue growth exceeded growth in our
general and administrative expenses.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing
expenses increased for our fiscal 2008 first half compared to
our fiscal 2007 first half on an absolute dollar basis primarily
as a result of increased employee compensation and commission
expenses resulting from our hiring additional sales personnel
and our payment of higher sales commissions in conjunction with
our increased sales volume. Travel expenses increased in support
of generating our revenue growth. Our marketing costs increased
as a result of our efforts to increase our brand awareness and
participation in national trade shows. We also incurred
increased stock-based compensation expenses. As a percentage of
total revenue, our sales and marketing expenses decreased as a
result of our revenue growth and improved efficiencies from
better executing our sales process.
Research and Development. Our research and
development expenses increased for our fiscal 2008 first half
from our fiscal 2007 first half on an absolute dollar basis and
as a percentage of total revenue as a result of increased
employee compensation costs and increased engineering and
consulting expenses.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense
increased for our fiscal 2008 first half from our fiscal 2007
first half as a result of interest expense from our convertible
note.
Dividend and Interest Income. Dividend and
interest income increased for our fiscal 2008 first half from
our fiscal 2007 first half due to interest income earned on the
invested proceeds from the issuance of our $10.6 million of
6% convertible subordinated notes, convertible note issuance and
dividends from our preferred stock investment completed in the
second quarter of fiscal 2007.
Income Taxes. Our income tax expense increased
for our fiscal 2008 first half compared to our fiscal 2007 first
half due to our increased profitability and because of our
utilization in our fiscal 2007 first half of state job tax and
federal research credits. Our effective income tax rate for our
fiscal 2008 first half was 41.7% compared to 19.4% for our
fiscal 2007 first half.
Accretion of Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock
Dividends. We recognized accretion of accumulated
unpaid dividends on our Series C redeemable preferred stock
during our fiscal 2008 first half. We did not accrete
Series C dividends in our fiscal 2007 first half until we
completed our Series C preferred stock placement in the
second quarter of fiscal 2007.
38
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2006
Revenue. Our fiscal 2007 total revenue
increased from our fiscal 2006 total revenue primarily as a
result of increased sales of our HIF lighting systems and
related services, including a substantial increase in our
retrofit project sales to multiple location large commercial and
industrial end users as we began to recognize the benefits of
our sales process. The relative increase in our service revenue
in fiscal 2007 was the result of our emphasis on increasing our
relative level of billing rates for our services.
Cost of Revenue. Our fiscal 2007 total cost of
revenue increased from fiscal 2006 primarily due to our higher
sales volume.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit increased in
fiscal 2007 from fiscal 2006 as a result of our increased total
revenue. Our fiscal 2007 gross margin was positively
impacted by an improved mix of higher margin retrofit projects
and improved project pricing, especially as a result of our
increased billing realization on our services. Additionally, in
fiscal 2007, our gross margin benefited from our improved
leveraging of our manufacturing facility and related fixed
operating costs and implementing manufacturing process
improvements.
Operating
Expenses
General and Administrative. Our general and
administrative expenses increased in fiscal 2007 from fiscal
2006 on an absolute dollar basis primarily due to increased
compensation and travel expenses related to hiring additional
employees and initiating technology improvement consulting
projects. Our fiscal 2007 general and administrative costs
included a $0.2 million non-cash charge for stock-based
compensation expenses as a result of our April 1, 2006
adoption of SFAS 123(R). As a percentage of total revenue,
our general and administrative expenses decreased as our revenue
growth exceeded growth in our general and administrative
expenses.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing
expenses increased in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 on an
absolute dollar basis as a result of increased marketing costs
associated with our advertising and promotional campaigns. These
increased marketing costs were partially offset by decreased
employee compensation and commission expenses resulting from the
streamlining of our internal sales force. Our fiscal 2007 sales
and marketing expenses included a $0.2 million non-cash
charge for stock-based compensation expenses as a result of our
adoption of SFAS 123(R). As a percentage of total revenue,
our sales and marketing expenses decreased in fiscal 2007
compared to fiscal 2006 as a result of our increased revenue and
improved efficiencies from better execution of our sales process.
Research and Development. Our research and
development expenses in fiscal 2007 decreased from fiscal 2006
on an absolute dollar basis primarily due to the termination of
a consulting agreement with a third party developer. As a
percentage of total revenue, our research and development
expenses decreased as a result of our decreased expenses and
increased revenue.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense in
fiscal 2007 was comparable to fiscal 2006 due to our retirement
of long-term debt obligations, offset by increased revolving
credit facility borrowings.
Dividend and Interest Income. We began
receiving dividend income in fiscal 2007 related to our July
2006 preferred stock investment. We did not receive dividend
income prior to fiscal 2007 and our interest income in 2007 was
not material.
Income Taxes. As a result of our profitability
in fiscal 2007 compared to our net loss in fiscal 2006, we
recognized an income tax expense in fiscal 2007 compared to an
income tax benefit in fiscal 2006. Our effective tax rate was
19.5% in fiscal 2007 compared to a negative 32.7% in fiscal
2006. Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2007 was favorably
impacted by federal research and development tax credits, as
well as state income tax credits from jobs creation. These
benefits were partially offset by the impact of state income
taxes.
Accretion of Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock
Dividends. We recognized the accretion of
accumulated unpaid dividends on our Series C redeemable
preferred stock in fiscal 2007 from our issuance date in the
second quarter of fiscal 2007. We did not recognize accretion on
our Series C preferred stock prior to fiscal 2007. We
recognized a nominal amount of accumulated unpaid dividends on
our remaining 20,000 outstanding shares of Series A
preferred stock in both fiscal 2007 and 2006.
39
Conversion of Preferred Stock. In fiscal 2007,
we recognized the estimated fair market value of the premium
paid to holders of Series A preferred shares upon the
induced conversion into shares of our common stock. There were
no conversions of Series A preferred shares in fiscal 2006.
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2005
Revenue. Our total revenue increased in fiscal
2006 from fiscal 2005 principally because of an increase in our
sales to direct end user customers, which constituted the
substantial majority of our total revenue in each fiscal year.
We also recognized significant increases in our wholesale sales.
Service revenue in each fiscal year was only approximately 10%
of our total revenue.
Cost of Revenue. Our total cost of revenue
increased in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 primarily as a result
of our increased total revenue.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit increased in
fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 as a result of our increased total
revenue. Our gross margin for fiscal 2006 decreased from fiscal
2005 primarily due to our increased volume of large multiple
facility retrofit projects for national customers that included
lower billing realization for our services. Our fiscal
2006 gross margin was also negatively impacted by a full
fiscal year of recognizing facility costs relating to our
manufacturing facility that we purchased in early fiscal 2005.
In fiscal 2006, we also incurred $0.7 million of warranty
charges, which further negatively impacted our fiscal
2006 gross margin.
Operating
Expenses
General and Administrative. Our general and
administrative expenses increased in fiscal 2006 compared to
fiscal 2005 on an absolute dollar basis primarily as the result
of a significant increase in compensation expense related to our
hiring additional employees. We also recognized
(i) $0.5 million of additional compensation expense in
fiscal 2006 in connection with a directors exercise of
stock options through the issuance of a recourse promissory note
with a below market interest rate and
(ii) $0.2 million of expense in fiscal 2006 in
connection with the loss on the sale of an asset. As a
percentage of total revenue, our general and administrative
expenses decreased in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005
because our revenue growth exceeded the growth in our general
and administrative expenses.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing
expenses increased in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 on an
absolute dollar basis because of an increase in our employee
compensation and commission expenses due to additions to our
sales force. As a percentage of total revenue, our sales and
marketing expenses decreased in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal
2005, reflecting our increased revenue and the leveraging of our
sales force over a significantly greater revenue base.
Research and Development. Our research and
development expenses for fiscal 2006 increased compared to
fiscal 2005 on an absolute dollar basis, primarily due to
additional employee costs for product design and engineering,
consulting costs incurred to research new markets and product
testing. As a percentage of total revenue, our research and
development expenses decreased in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal
2005 as our revenue growth exceeded the growth in our research
and development expenses.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense
increased in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 due to increased
borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Income Taxes. We recognized an income tax
benefit in both fiscal 2006 and 2005 as a result of our loss
before income tax in each fiscal year.
Accretion of Preferred Stock Dividends. Our
accretion of accumulated unpaid dividends on our Series A
preferred stock decreased significantly in fiscal 2006 from
fiscal 2005 as a result of the induced conversion in fiscal 2005
of a substantial majority of our then outstanding Series A
preferred stock into shares of our common stock.
Conversion of Preferred Stock. No
Series A preferred shares were converted into common shares
in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005, we recognized $1.0 million
in the estimated fair market value of the premium paid to
holders of Series A preferred shares upon the induced
conversion into shares of our common stock.
40
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following tables present our unaudited quarterly results of
operations for the last ten fiscal quarters in the period ended
September 30, 2007 (i) on an absolute dollar basis (in
thousands) and (ii) as a percentage of total revenue for
the applicable fiscal quarter. You should read the following
tables in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and related notes contained elsewhere in this prospectus. In our
opinion, the unaudited financial information presented below has
been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated
financial statements, and includes all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary
for a fair presentation of our operating results for the fiscal
quarters presented. Operating results for any fiscal quarter are
not necessarily indicative of the results for any future fiscal
quarters or for a full fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
4,706
|
|
|
$
|
6,959
|
|
|
$
|
7,947
|
|
|
$
|
10,381
|
|
|
$
|
8,688
|
|
|
$
|
8,756
|
|
|
$
|
11,256
|
|
|
$
|
11,501
|
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
$
|
14,247
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
2,808
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
4,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
7,984
|
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
11,394
|
|
|
|
9,680
|
|
|
|
10,631
|
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
14,309
|
|
|
|
16,721
|
|
|
|
18,405
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
6,883
|
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
7,419
|
|
|
|
7,671
|
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
9,375
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
5,509
|
|
|
|
5,759
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
6,255
|
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
9,654
|
|
|
|
11,118
|
|
|
|
12,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
5,603
|
|
|
|
6,321
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Dividend and interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,282
|
)
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(1,282
|
)
|
|
$
|
(377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(258
|
)
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
87.2
|
%
|
|
|
89.3
|
%
|
|
|
91.1
|
%
|
|
|
89.8
|
%
|
|
|
82.4
|
%
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
|
|
86.7
|
%
|
|
|
77.4
|
%
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
71.3
|
%
|
|
|
60.3
|
%
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
56.1
|
%
|
|
|
54.7
|
%
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
75.9
|
%
|
|
|
69.0
|
%
|
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
64.6
|
%
|
|
|
69.4
|
%
|
|
|
67.8
|
%
|
|
|
67.4
|
%
|
|
|
66.5
|
%
|
|
|
65.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(33.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Dividend and interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
(38.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total revenue can fluctuate from quarter to quarter
depending on the purchasing decisions of our customers and our
overall level of sales activity. Historically, our customers
have tended to increase their purchases near the beginning or
end of their capital budget cycles, which tend to correspond to
the beginning or end of the calendar year. As a result, we have
in the past experienced lower relative total revenue in our
fiscal first and second quarters and higher relative total
revenue in our fiscal third and fourth quarters. These seasonal
fluctuations have been largely offset by our customers
decisions to initiate multiple facility roll-outs. We expect
that there may be future variations in our quarterly total
revenue depending on our level of national account roll-out
projects and wholesale sales. Our results for any particular
fiscal quarter may not be indicative of results for other fiscal
quarters or an entire fiscal year.
We experienced a higher than normal gross margin in our fiscal
2007 first quarter due to several large projects completed at
higher margins in that quarter as compared to our historical
patterns. In our fiscal 2006 third quarter, we experienced
higher than normal (i) interest expense due to transaction
costs associated with our restructuring certain long-term debt
obligations as part of obtaining our revolving credit facility
and (ii) general and administrative expenses resulting from
the $0.5 million of
42
compensation expense recognized from our directors
exercise of a stock option with a below market interest rate
promissory note.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Overview
We have historically funded our operations and capital
expenditures primarily through issuances of an aggregate of
$5.4 million common stock, an aggregate of
$10.8 million of preferred stock and borrowings under our
revolving credit facility and the other debt instruments and
obligations described under Indebtedness
below. We applied the net proceeds from these offerings and
borrowings to fund (i) our operations and capital
expenditures as well as our product development and research
capabilities; (ii) the purchase of our manufacturing
facility and related investments in equipment and personnel; and
(iii) expenses relating to the development of our
management, sales and marketing teams.
On August 3, 2007, we completed a placement of
$10.6 million of 6% convertible subordinated notes with an
indirect affiliate of GEEFS, Clean Technology and affiliates of
Capvest. We intend to use the net proceeds of this placement to
(i) finance our growing need for additional working capital
to support our anticipated revenue growth; (ii) further
expand our national customer account relationships, sales and
marketing force and production and distribution capabilities;
and (iii) enhance our liquidity and reduce our dependency
on obtaining additional debt financing.
We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for working
capital and general corporate purposes, including to fund
potential future acquisitions. As of the date of this
prospectus, we have no current purchase agreement, commitment or
understanding regarding any specific acquisition. Pending the
final application of the net proceeds of our convertible note
placement and this offering, we intend to invest these net
proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade
securities. See Use of Proceeds.
Cash
Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for our fiscal
2005, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 and for our fiscal 2007 and
2008 halves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,401
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,234
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,869
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(5,888
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(969
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(4,844
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
|
|
9,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
(804
|
)
|
|
$
|
(507
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Related to Operating
Activities. Cash provided from operating
activities was $1.9 million for our fiscal 2008 first half
compared to cash used of $3.9 million for our fiscal 2007
first half. The $5.8 million change was primarily due to
increased net income and a $3.4 million change in net
working capital. The net working capital change was due to
increased payables related to increased inventory purchases to
support our revenue growth and our increased use of installation
service vendors.
Cash used in operating activities was $6.2 million,
$3.4 million, and $0.9 million for fiscal 2007, fiscal
2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The $2.8 million
increase in cash used in operating activities in fiscal 2007
compared to fiscal 2006 resulted primarily from an increase in
our net working capital of $5.9 million to support our
revenue and order backlog growth, partially offset by our change
from a net loss of $1.6 million in fiscal 2006 to net
income of $0.9 million in fiscal 2007. Cash used in our
operating activities for fiscal 2006 increased $2.5 million
compared to fiscal 2005. This increase was due to an increase of
$3.3 million in our net working capital to fund increased
inventory levels required to support our revenue growth.
43
Cash Flows Related to Investing
Activities. Cash used in investing activities was
$4.8 million for our fiscal 2008 first half compared to
$0.3 million for our fiscal 2007 first half. This increase
was due to $3.9 million invested in government agency bonds,
purchases of processing equipment for capacity and cost
improvement measures and the continued development of our
intellectual property.
Cash used in investing activities was $1.0 million,
$0.2 million, and $5.9 million for fiscal 2007, fiscal
2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. Our principal cash
investments were for purchases of real property and processing
equipment, improvements to our facility and continued
development of our intellectual property. In fiscal 2007, we
invested $1.1 million to improve our facility
infrastructure, purchase technology assets, and purchase
operating equipment and tooling as a result of our production
design changes, offset by proceeds of $0.3 million from an
asset sale. In fiscal 2006, we invested $0.9 million to
increase our manufacturing capacity, offset by proceeds of
$0.7 million from an asset sale. In fiscal 2005, we
invested $5.8 million to acquire our manufacturing facility
and purchase new equipment to increase our manufacturing and
distribution capacities and to transition from outsourcing our
manufactured components to internally manufacturing these
components.
Cash Flows Related to Financing
Activities. Cash provided by financing activities
was $9.6 million for our fiscal 2008 first half compared to
$3.8 million for our fiscal 2007 first half. This increase
in cash provided was due to $10.6 million of gross proceeds
raised from the issuance of our convertible notes and $1.3
million of stock option and warrant exercises that occurred in
the first half of fiscal 2008 as compared to the $5.0 million of
gross proceeds from Series C redeemable preferred stock issued
in the first half of fiscal 2007.
Cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal 2007 were
$6.4 million, primarily consisting of: (i) the sale of
our Series C preferred stock, resulting in net proceeds of
$4.8 million; (ii) the exercise of common stock
options, resulting in net proceeds of $0.8 million;
(iii) the sale of our Series B preferred stock,
resulting in net proceeds of $0.4 million;
(iv) borrowings under our revolving credit agreement,
resulting in net proceeds of $1.2 million; and (v) the
impact of deferred taxes on our stock-based compensation,
resulting in a tax benefit of $0.4 million. These cash
flows were partially offset by $1.2 million of long-term
debt repayments.
Cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal 2006 were
$4.2 million, primarily consisting of: (i) the sale of
our Series B preferred stock, resulting in net proceeds of
$1.5 million; (ii) borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, resulting in proceeds of $4.9 million, net
of financing costs of $0.1 million to secure our revolving
credit facility; (iii) the exercise of common stock options
and collection of shareholder notes, resulting in net proceeds
of $0.2 million; and (iv) debt proceeds used to
finance capital assets, resulting in net proceeds of
$0.1 million. These cash flows were partially offset by
$2.5 million of long-term debt repayments.
Cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal 2005 were
$7.1 million, primarily consisting of: (i) the sale of
our Series B preferred stock, resulting in net proceeds of
$3.9 million; (ii) debt proceeds used for the
acquisition of our manufacturing facility and equipment and to
retire prior long-term debt, resulting in net proceeds of
$10.1 million; and (iii) the exercise of common stock
options and collection of shareholder notes, resulting in net
proceeds of $0.1 million. These cash flows were partially
offset by payments to retire long-term debt of $5.9 million
and $0.3 million to repurchase treasury shares.
Working
Capital
Our net working capital as of September 30, 2007 was
$26.2 million, consisting of $43.7 million in current
assets and $17.5 million in current liabilities. Our net
working capital as of March 31, 2007 was
$14.1 million, consisting of $22.6 million in current
assets and $8.5 million in current liabilities. Our working
capital changes in our fiscal 2008 first half were due to an
increase of $10.5 million in cash equivalents and
short-term investment due to the net proceeds from our
convertible note issuance, an increase of $2.3 million in
accounts receivable as a result of revenue growth, a
$6.2 million increase in inventories required to support
our current backlog, a $7.6 million increase in accounts
payable resulting from additional inventory purchases and a
$1.4 million increase in accrued expenses for service costs
accrued as a result of increasing installation service revenue.
We expect to continue to increase our inventories of raw
materials and components to support our anticipated increase in
sales volumes and to reduce our risk of unexpected raw material
or component shortages or supply interruptions. We attempt
44
to maintain a two month supply of on-hand inventory of purchased
components and raw materials to meet anticipated demand. We also
expect that our accounts receivable and payables will continue
to increase as a result of our anticipated revenue growth and
increased inventory levels. We had available borrowing capacity
under our revolving credit facility of $8.7 million as of
September 30, 2007, based upon our revolving credit
facility borrowing base formula described below. The net
proceeds of this offering will help support our ongoing working
capital needs. Pending final application, these net proceeds
will be invested in short-term, interest-bearing,
investment-grade securities. See Use of Proceeds.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, our
anticipated cash flows from operating activities, our borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility and the net
proceeds from our recent convertible subordinated note placement
and this offering will be sufficient to meet our anticipated
cash needs for at least the remainder of fiscal 2008. Our future
working capital requirements for the remainder of fiscal 2008
and thereafter on a longer-term basis will depend on many
factors, including the rate of our anticipated revenue growth,
our introduction of new products and services and enhancements
to our existing energy management system, the timing and extent
of our planned expansion of our sales force and other
administrative and production personnel, the timing and extent
of our planned advertising and promotional campaign, and our
research and development activities. To the extent that our cash
and cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities and
net proceeds from our recent convertible subordinated note
placement and this offering are insufficient to fund our future
activities, we may need to raise additional funds through
additional public or private equity or debt financings. We also
may need to raise additional funds in the event we decide to
acquire product lines, businesses or technologies. In the event
additional funding is required, we may not be able to obtain the
financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Indebtedness
On December 22, 2005, we entered into a credit and security
agreement, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to provide us
with up to $25.0 million of financing to fund our working
capital requirements. Availability under this revolving credit
facility is subject to a borrowing base that is calculated as a
percentage of eligible accounts receivable and eligible
inventory, less certain collateral or business valuation
reserves and reserves for certain other credit exposures. As of
September 30, 2007, there were $4.7 million of
borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility, and
our borrowing availability was $8.7 million. This revolving
credit facility matures in December 2008. Borrowings under this
revolving credit facility bear interest at prime plus 1.0% per
annum, plus annual fees and minimum monthly interest costs, if
applicable. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility are
secured by a first priority security interest in our accounts
receivable, inventory and intangible assets. Our revolving
credit facility contains customary financial and restrictive
covenants, including minimum net worth requirements; minimum net
income requirements; restrictions on capital expenditures over
$4.0 million in the aggregate per year; and restrictions on
our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, guaranty
obligations, make loans or advances, invest or acquire interests
in other persons or companies, pay dividends or make other
shareholder distributions. We were in compliance with all
covenants under our revolving credit facility as of
September 30, 2007.
We were not in compliance with our minimum net income covenant
under our revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2006.
This covenant was initially established when we first entered
into our revolving credit facility in December 2005, which was
prior to our realizing sustained profitability and prior to the
issuance of our Series C preferred stock. Certain operational
issues contributed to that default, including reduced gross
margins, in part resulting from increased warranty expense;
higher general and administrative and sales and marketing
expenses relating to sales and marketing initiatives; and
certain one-time losses on disposal of assets. As a result of
this noncompliance, we obtained amendments to our revolving
credit facility to reduce net income and net worth covenant
requirements going forward and to waive the default described
above. We received such amendments and waivers in March 2007
without any additional borrowing cost to us or the addition of
any restrictive covenants. We undertook various efforts to
address these operational issues, including focus on increased
margins through a higher realization rate on our billable
services and increased utilization of our manufacturing
facility. We have subsequently remained in compliance with our
covenants under our revolving credit facility.
45
In addition to our revolving credit facility, we also have other
existing long-term indebtedness and obligations under various
debt instruments and capital lease obligations, including
pursuant to a bank term note, a bank first mortgage, a debenture
to a community development organization, a federal block grant
loan, a city industrial revolving loan and various capital
leases and equipment purchase notes. As of September 30,
2007, the total amount of principal outstanding on these various
obligations was $4.9 million. These obligations have
varying maturity dates between 2010 and 2024 and bear interest
at annual rates of between 2.0% and 16.2%. The weighted average
annual interest rate of such obligations as of
September 30, 2007 was 7.7%. Based on interest rates in
effect as of September 30, 2007, we expect that our total
debt service payments on such obligations for fiscal 2008,
including scheduled principal, lease and interest payments, will
approximate $1.0 million. All of these obligations are
subject to security interests on our assets. Several of these
obligations have covenants, such as customary financial and
restrictive covenants, including maintenance of a minimum debt
service coverage ratio; a minimum current ratio; minimum net
worth requirements; limitations on executive compensation and
advances; limits on capital expenditures over $4.0 million
in the aggregate per year; limits on distributions; and
restrictions on our ability to make loans, advances, extensions
of credit, investments, capital contributions, incur additional
indebtedness, create liens, guaranty obligations, merge or
consolidate or undergo a change in control. As of
September 30, 2007, we were in compliance with all such
covenants, as amended.
On August 3, 2007, we completed a placement of
$10.6 million of 6% convertible subordinated notes with an
indirect affiliate of GEEFS, Clean Technology and affiliates of
Capvest. Interest on these notes until they are repaid or
converted into our common stock is payable quarterly in arrears
at the annual rate of 6%. The convertible notes mature in August
2012. See Description of Capital Stock for a
detailed description of the terms of our Convertible Notes and
our common stock.
Capital
Spending
We expect to incur approximately $2.0 million in capital
expenditures during the second half of fiscal 2008 to begin
initial planning and development of our new technology center
and the expansion of our administrative offices at our
manufacturing facility, as well as to add production equipment
to increase our production capacity and to further develop our
internal capacity to perform certain processes currently
performed by our suppliers. We expect to finance the production
equipment expenditures primarily through equipment secured loans
and leases, to the extent needed, and by using our available
capacity under our revolving credit facility.
Contractual
Obligations
Information regarding our known contractual obligations of the
types described below as of March 31, 2007 is set forth in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Debt and capital leases, including interest(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
13,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,290
|
|
|
$
|
8,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,346
|
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cancellable purchase commitments(3)
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,862
|
|
|
$
|
5,164
|
|
|
$
|
8,598
|
|
|
$
|
1,584
|
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include any payment amounts under our 6% convertible
subordinated notes issued on August 3, 2007, which notes
will convert automatically upon the closing of this offering
into shares of our common stock. See Description of
Capital Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Debt and capital leases includes fixed contractual interest
payments by period of $554,000 (less than 1 year); $667,000
(1-3 years); $346,000 (3-5) years); and $324,000 (more than
5 years). |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects non-cancellable purchase commitments for certain
inventory items and capital expenditure commitments entered into
in order to secure better pricing and ensure materials on hand. |
46
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
In connection with the audit of our fiscal 2006 and 2005
consolidated financial statements, our independent registered
public accounting firm identified certain significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting. In connection with the audit of our
fiscal 2007 consolidated financial statements, our independent
registered public accounting firm identified certain significant
deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. A
significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination
of control deficiencies, that adversely affects a companys
ability to initiate, authorize, record, process or report
financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles such that there is more than a remote
likelihood that a misstatement of the companys financial
statements that is more than inconsequential will not be
prevented or detected by the companys internal control. A
material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
The following significant deficiencies were identified in
connection with the audit of our fiscal 2007 consolidated
financial statements: (i) our lack of segregation of
certain key duties; (ii) our policies, procedures,
documentation and reporting of our equity transactions;
(iii) our lack of certain documented accounting policies
and procedures to clearly communicate the standards of how
transactions should be recorded or handled; (iv) our
controls in the area of information technology, especially
regarding change control and restricted access; (v) our
lack of a formal disaster recovery plan; (vi) our need for
enhanced restrictions on user access to certain of our software
programs; (vii) the necessity for us to implement an
enhanced project tracking/deferred revenue accounting system to
recognize the complexities of our business processes and,
ultimately, the recognition of revenue and deferred revenue;
(viii) our lack of a process for determining whether a
lease should be accounted for as a capital or operating lease;
(ix) our need for a formalized action plan to understand
all of our existing tax liabilities (and opportunities) and
properly account for them; and (x) our need for improved
financial statement closing and reporting processes.
A number of these significant deficiencies identified in
connection with the audit of our fiscal 2007 consolidated
financial statements were previously identified as material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies in connection with the
audit of our fiscal 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial
statements, including numbers (i), (ii), (v), (vii),
(x) in the foregoing paragraph.
In connection with the filing of the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part, we identified certain errors in
our prior year consolidated financial statements. These errors
related to accounting for the induced conversion of our
Series A preferred stock in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2007 and
for the exercise of a stock option through the issuance of a
full recourse promissory note in fiscal 2006 that we
subsequently determined was issued at a below market interest
rate. These errors resulted in the restatement of our previously
issued fiscal 2006 and 2007 consolidated financial statements.
Specifically, prior to fiscal 2006, we offered our Series A
preferred shareholders the opportunity to exchange each share of
their Series A preferred stock for three shares of our
common stock instead of the two shares of our common stock to
which they were otherwise entitled. We had previously reported
this transaction as a reclassification to paid-in capital for
the historical carrying value of the Series A preferred
stock at the time of conversion. We subsequently determined that
we had incorrectly applied accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States to these conversions because,
under the guidance provided in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 84, Induced Conversions of Convertible
Debt (SFAS 84), the fair value of the inducement offer
should have been accounted for as an increase to common stock
and a charge to accumulated deficit at the time of conversion.
We determined the fair values of the inducement offers in fiscal
2005 and fiscal 2007 to be $972,000 and $83,000, respectively.
Additionally, in November 2005, we received a full recourse
below market interest rate promissory note in connection with
the exercise of a stock option by Patrick J. Trotter, one of our
directors. We had previously reported this transaction as an
event that did not result in additional stock-based
compensation. We subsequently determined that we had incorrectly
applied accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States to this transaction because, under
EITF 00-23,
Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation
47
Under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation
No. 44
(EITF 00-23),
the exercise of the option through payment with a below market
interest rate full recourse promissory note was effectively a
repricing of the option and resulted in the recognition of a
variable accounting adjustment for the award on the date the
note was issued and the option was exercised, in the amount of
the intrinsic value difference between the then current fair
value of our common stock and the exercise price of the option.
This adjustment resulted in an increase of $0.5 million to
operating expenses in fiscal 2006. Since a material weakness had
already been identified with respect to our accounting for
equity transactions, no further material weakness was identified
by our independent registered public accounting firm in
connection with these corrections.
To improve our internal control over our financial reporting
process and remediate and correct the significant deficiencies
identified in connection with our fiscal 2007 audit, we have
hired a director of business risk and internal audit manager who
has experience with the requirements of Section 404 of
Sarbanes-Oxley. In order to comply with Section 404, we
have already started to review our processes and implement new
systems and controls to help us remediate the significant
deficiencies noted above and we are interviewing consulting
firms to assist us in overseeing our Section 404 compliance
process. In particular, we have begun performing system process
evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial
reporting to better allow our management and auditors to assess
the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial
reporting so that our independent auditors can deliver a report
to us addressing these assessments. We are not required to be
compliant under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley until the
audit of our fiscal 2009 consolidated financial statements. See
Risk Factors Risks Relating to the
Offering Our failure to maintain adequate internal
control over financial reporting in accordance with
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley or to prevent or detect
material misstatements in our annual or interim consolidated
financial statements in the future could result in inaccurate
financial reporting, sanctions or securities litigation or
otherwise harm our business.
We may in the future identify further material weaknesses in our
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, material
weaknesses may exist when we report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financing reporting for purposes of our
attestation required by reporting requirements under the
Exchange Act or Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley after this
offering. The existence of one or more material weaknesses
precludes a conclusion that we maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting. Such conclusion would be
required to be disclosed in our future Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
and may impact the accuracy and timing of our financial
reporting and the reliability of our internal control over
financial reporting.
Inflation
Our results have operations have not been, and we do not expect
them to be, materially affected by inflation.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss related to changes in market
prices, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates and
commodity pricing that may adversely impact our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Foreign Exchange Risk. We face minimal
exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange
rates. Our foreign currency losses for all reporting periods
have been nominal.
Interest Rate Risk. As of September 30,
2007, $5.8 million of our $9.6 million of outstanding
debt was at floating interest rates. An increase of 1.0% in the
prime rate would result in an increase in our interest expense
of approximately $58,000 per year.
Commodity Price Risk. We are exposed to
certain commodity price risks associated with our purchases of
raw materials, most significantly our aluminum. We attempt to
mitigate commodity price fluctuation for our aluminum through
six- to
12-month
forward fixed-price, minimum quantity purchase commitments.
48
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements
requires us to make certain estimates and judgments that affect
our reported assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and our
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We
re-evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those
related to revenue recognition, inventory valuation, the
collectibility of receivables, stock-based compensation and
income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and
on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates. A summary of our critical accounting policies is set
forth below.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when
the following criteria have been met: there is persuasive
evidence of an arrangement; delivery has occurred and title has
passed to the customer; the price is fixed and determinable and
no further obligation exists; and collectibility is reasonably
assured. The majority of our revenue is recognized when products
are shipped to a customer or when services are completed and
acceptance provisions, if any, have been met. In certain of our
contracts, we provide multiple deliverables. We record the
revenue associated with each element of these arrangements based
on its fair value, which is generally the price charged for the
element when sold on a standalone basis. Since we contract with
vendors for installation services to our customers, which
includes recycling of old fixtures, we determine the fair value
of our installation services based on negotiated pricing with
such vendors. Additionally, we offer a sales-type financing
program under which we finance the customers purchase. Our
contracts under this sales-type financing program are typically
one year in duration and, at the completion of the initial
one-year term, provide for (i) four automatic one-year
renewals at agreed upon pricing; (ii) an early buyout for
cash; or (iii) the return of the equipment at the
customers expense. The monthly revenue that we are
entitled to receive from the sale of our lighting fixtures under
our sales-type financing program is fixed and is based on the
cost of the lighting fixtures and applicable profit margin. Our
revenue from agreements entered into under this program is not
dependent upon our customers actual energy savings. Upon
completion of the installation, we sell the future lease cash
flows and residual rights to the equipment on a non-recourse
basis to an unrelated third party finance company in exchange
for cash and future payments. We recognize revenue based on the
net present value of the future payments from the third party
finance company upon completion of the project. Revenue
recognized from our sales-type financing program has not been
material to our recent results of operations.
Deferred revenue or deferred costs are recorded for project
sales consisting of multiple elements, where the criteria for
revenue recognition have not been met. The majority of our
deferred revenue relates to prepaid services to be provided at
determined future dates. As of September 30, 2006 and 2007,
our deferred revenue was $0.1 million and
$0.2 million, respectively. In the event that a customer
project contains multiple elements that are not sold on a
standalone basis, we defer all related revenue and costs until
the project is complete. Deferred costs on product are recorded
as a current asset as project completions occur within a few
months. As of September 30, 2006 and 2007, our deferred
costs were $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market value and include raw materials, work in
process and finished goods. Items are removed from inventory
using the
first-in,
first-out method. Work in process inventories are comprised of
raw materials that have been converted into components for final
assembly. Inventory amounts include the cost to manufacture the
item, such as the cost of raw materials and related freight,
labor and other applied overhead costs. We review our inventory
for obsolescence and marketability. If the estimated market
value, which is based upon assumptions about future demand and
market conditions, falls below cost, then the inventory value is
reduced to its market value. Our inventory obsolescence reserves
were $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million
at March 31, 2006, March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007, respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We perform
ongoing evaluations of our customers and continuously monitor
collections and payments and estimate an allowance for doubtful
accounts based upon the aging of the underlying receivables, our
historical experience with write-offs and specific customer
collection issues that we have identified. While such credit
losses have historically been within
49
our expectations, and we believe appropriate reserves have been
established, we may not adequately predict future credit losses.
If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate
and result in an impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances might be required which would result in
additional general and administrative expense in the period such
determination is made. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was
$38,000, $0.1 million and $0.1 million at
March 31, 2006, March 31, 2007 and September 30,
2007, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation. We have historically
issued stock options to our employees, executive officers and
directors. Prior to April 1, 2006, we accounted for these
option grants under the recognition and measurement principles
of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
interpretations, and applied the disclosure provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS,
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as
amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
an Amendment of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
Statement No. 123. This accounting treatment resulted
in a pro forma stock option expense that was reported in the
footnotes to our consolidated financial statements for those
years.
For options granted prior to April 1, 2006, we recorded
stock-based compensation expense, typically associated with
options granted to employees, executive officers or directors,
based upon the difference, if any, between the estimated fair
market value of common stock underlying the options on the date
of grant and the option exercise price. For purposes of
establishing the exercise price of options granted prior to
April 1, 2006, our compensation committee and board of
directors used (i) known independent third-party sales of
our common stock and (ii) the per share prices at which we
issued shares of our common and preferred stock to third-party
investors. In fiscal 2006, in accordance with APB No. 25,
we recognized $33,000 of stock-based compensation expense,
excluding the $0.5 million compensation charge associated
with a directors exercise of a stock option with a full
recourse below market interest rate promissory note. In fiscal
2005, no stock-based compensation expense was recognized.
Effective April 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which
requires us to expense the estimated fair value of employee
stock options and similar awards based on the fair value of the
award on the date of grant. We adopted SFAS 123(R) using
the modified prospective method. Under this transition method,
compensation cost recognized for fiscal 2007 included the
current periods cost for all stock options granted prior
to, but not yet vested as of, April 1, 2006. This cost was
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of SFAS 123. The cost for all stock
options granted subsequent to March 31, 2006 represented
the grant date fair value that was estimated in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Results for prior periods
have not been restated. Compensation cost for options granted
after March 31, 2006 has been and will be recognized in
earnings, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period.
Both prior to and following our April 1, 2006 adoption of
SFAS 123(R), the fair value of each option for financial
reporting purposes was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions used for grants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
6 Years
|
|
|
|
6 Years
|
|
|
|
6.6 Years
|
|
|
|
2.4 Years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
Estimated volatility
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Estimated forfeiture rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the use of
certain assumptions, including fair value, expected term,
risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, expected
dividends, and expected forfeiture rate to calculate the fair
value of stock-based payment awards.
We estimated the expected term of our stock options based on the
vesting term of our options and expected exercise behavior.
50
Our risk-free interest rate was based on the implied yield
available on United States treasury zero-coupon issues as of the
option grant date with a remaining term approximately equal to
the expected life of the option.
In fiscal 2005 and 2006, we estimated volatility based upon an
internal computation analyzing historical volatility based on
our share transaction data and share valuations established by
our compensation committee and board of directors, which we
believe collectively provided us with a reasonable basis for
estimating volatility. In fiscal 2007, we determined volatility
based on an analysis of a peer group of public companies. We
intend to continue to consistently use the same methodology and
group of publicly traded peer companies as we used in fiscal
2007 to determine volatility in the future until sufficient
information regarding the volatility of our share price becomes
available or the selected companies are no longer suitable for
this purpose.
We have not paid dividends in the past and we do not expect to
declare dividends in the future, resulting in a dividend yield
of 0%.
Our estimated pre-vesting forfeiture rate was based on our
historical experience and the composition of our option plan
participants, among other factors, and reduces our compensation
expense recognized. If our actual forfeitures differ from our
estimates, adjustments to our compensation expense may be
required in future periods.
The following table sets forth our stock option grants made
since April 1, 2006 through the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Reporting
|
|
|
|
Underlying Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Date of Grant
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Per Share(1)
|
|
|
Per Share(2)
|
|
|
Per Share(3)
|
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.25-2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
May 2006
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2006
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2006
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2006
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
920,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
436,500
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
July 2007
|
|
|
429,432
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The exercise price per share was at least equal to the fair
market value of our common stock on each applicable stock option
grant date as determined by our compensation committee and board
of directors on the basis described in the paragraphs below. For
option grants made between April 2006 and November 2006, the per
share exercise price was established principally based on the
per share issuance price of our then recent preferred stock
placements to third-party investors and, in our opinion, such
per share exercise prices were above the then current fair
market value of our common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair market value per share was determined by our
compensation committee and board of directors on each applicable
stock option grant date on the basis described in the paragraphs
below. However, for option grants in March and April 2007, fair
market value per share was reassessed subsequent to the grant
dates for financial statement reporting purposes as described in
the paragraphs below. |
|
(3) |
|
The financial reporting intrinsic value per share is the
difference between the subsequently reassessed fair value per
share for financial statement reporting purposes as described in
the paragraphs below and the fair market value exercise price
per share as established on each applicable stock grant date by
our compensation committee and board of directors on the basis
described in the paragraphs below. |
51
For options granted between April 2006 and November 2006, our
compensation committee and board of directors established the
exercise price of such stock options principally based on the
per share issuance price of our then recent preferred stock
placements to third-party investors and, in our opinion, such
per share exercise prices were above the then current fair
market value of our common stock otherwise reflected in
independent third party sales of our common stock.
We engaged Wipfli LLP, an independent third party valuation
firm, or Wipfli to perform an independent valuation analysis of
the fair market value of our common stock as of
November 30, 2006. Wipflis report assessed the fair
market value of our common stock at $2.20 per share as of such
date. Wipflis analysis was prepared in accordance with the
methodology prescribed by the AICPA Practice Aid Valuation of
Privately-Held Company Equity Securities Issued as
Compensation, or the AICPA Practice Aid. Specifically,
Wipflis valuation placed particular emphasis on the
publicly traded guideline company method and the discounted cash
flow method, as well as referencing company stock transactions.
The results from the discounted cash flow method were weighted
higher by Wipfli than the publicly traded guideline company
method, and various company stock transactions provided
corroborating support for Wipflis conclusion. The Wipfli
report took into account our issuance in July and September 2006
of a total of 1.8 million shares of our Series C
preferred stock at a price of $2.75 per share. Wipfli recognized
that the Series C preferred stock provided for certain
rights and preferences not otherwise available to shareholders
of our common stock, including a 6% cumulative dividend, a
senior liquidation preference to our Series B preferred
stock and common stock, a conversion right on a share-for-share
basis into common stock at the holders option or upon
certain qualified events, and a redemption right if certain
liquidity events were not achieved within five years.
Wipflis assessment noted that recent transactions had
taken place involving the sale of common and preferred stock
among our shareholders, as well as our issuances of new shares,
at prices between $2.00 and $3.00 per share. The report took
into account that our sales had increased significantly over the
past four years, but that our profitability had decreased
significantly in fiscal 2005 and 2006, resulting in net losses
in both fiscal years. However, the report noted that we had
shown an increase in profitability for the 12 months prior
to November 30, 2006. Wipfli noted that we had experienced
difficulty obtaining our revolving credit facility in fiscal
2006, but that our financial situation had improved in fiscal
2007. Wipfli believed that, due to the borrowing base
limitations in our revolving credit facility, we could continue
to experience cash flow difficulties as we continued to grow,
depending upon our level of profitability and working capital
needs. Based on our financial condition and growth potential,
our outlook from a financial perspective was deemed neutral by
Wipfli. Since we were only in the very early stages during the
last quarter of calendar 2006 of investigating the possibility
of potentially pursuing an initial public offering or similar
transaction, no reliable information was then available for
Wipfli to assess or provide any relative probability or
quantification to any such scenario for purposes of
supplementing the private company valuation conclusions
otherwise reached by Wipfli as described above.
For options granted from December 2006 to the June 18, 2007
release date of Wipflis April 30, 2007 valuation
described below, our compensation committee and board of
directors considered various sources to establish the fair
market value of our common stock for purposes of establishing
the exercise price of such stock options, including:
(i) independent third-party sales of our common stock;
(ii) transactions in which we issued shares of our common
and preferred stock to third-party investors; and
(iii) Wipflis November 30, 2006 independent
valuation described above. Our compensation committee and our
board determined that there were no other significant events
that had occurred during this period that would have given rise
to a change in the fair market value of our common stock from
these indicia of fair market value and that the exercise prices
of stock options granted during this period were at least equal
to our common stocks fair market value on each applicable
grant date.
We engaged Wipfli to perform another valuation analysis of the
fair value of our common stock as of April 30, 2007.
Wipflis analysis was prepared in accordance with the
methodology prescribed by the AICPA Practice Aid. Wipfli
considered a variety of valuation methodologies and economic
outcomes and calculated its final valuation using the
Probability Weighted Expected Return Method. Specifically,
Wipflis valuation again placed particular emphasis on the
publicly traded guideline company method and the discounted cash
flow method, as well as referencing pending company stock
transactions. The valuation results from utilizing these private
company enterprise methods were then supplemented by Wipfli
assessing additional scenarios to reflect the increased
possibility of our pursuing a potential initial public offering
or similar transaction. The Wipfli analysis took into account
that, in April 2007, we had
52
signed an arms-length negotiated letter of intent to issue
a new series of preferred stock to institutional investors on
terms similar to our Series C preferred stock,
contemplating gross proceeds of approximately $9.0 million
at a per share price of $4.49. Wipflis analysis stated
that the proposed per share price of the new series of preferred
stock reflected liquidation preferences and dividend rights not
otherwise available to our shareholders of common stock. The
analysis also noted that transactions involving the sale of our
common stock among shareholders within the prior six months had
occurred at prices between $2.50 and $3.00 per share.
Wipflis analysis took into account that we had experienced
liquidity and profitability difficulties in fiscal 2005 and
2006, but that we had recovered in fiscal 2007 and that, based
on our financial condition and growth potential, our outlook
from a financial perspective had improved from neutral to
positive. Based on the foregoing criteria, Wipfli concluded that
a private company enterprise fair value for our common stock as
of April 30, 2007 was $3.50 per share. In accordance with
the AICPA Practice Aid, and unlike Wipflis November 2006
valuation, which only considered private company enterprise
valuation approaches, Wipflis valuation then gave further
supplementary recognition and quantification to our increasingly
likely consideration of a potential initial public offering,
while also considering the economic value of other potential
strategic alternatives or economic outcomes that might occur. In
this regard, Wipfli analyzed various preliminary valuation data
received in May 2007 by our board of directors in connection
with our potential initial public offering. Wipfli assessed our
probability of an initial public offering at 50%, our
probability of completing a strategic alternative at 40%, and
our probability of our remaining a private company at 10%. Based
on such relative probabilities and (i) preliminary
indications of the potential increase in value of our common
stock resulting from a potential initial public offering;
(ii) the potential increase in value of our common stock
from other potential strategic alternatives; (iii) the
value of our common stock resulting from remaining a
privately-held company; and (iv) the per share value
implied by the arms-length negotiated letter of intent
related to our proposed new series of preferred stock, Wipfli
concluded that the fair value of our common stock as of
April 30, 2007 was $4.15 per share.
Upon release of the April 30, 2007 Wipfli valuation on
June 18, 2007, we determined that it was appropriate to
reassess the fair market value of our stock options granted in
March and April 2007 and use the $4.15 per share fair market
value as set forth in Wipflis April 30, 2007
valuation solely for financial statement reporting purposes for
such stock option grants. Due to the proximity of Wipflis
November 30, 2006 independent valuation to our December
2006 option grants, we believe that the $2.20 per share exercise
price established by our compensation committee and board of
directors for such stock option grants appropriately represented
fair market value on the date of grant for financial reporting
purposes. Based on this reassessment for financial statement
reporting purposes, we will recognize additional stock-based
compensation expense of $0.8 million over the three-year
weighted-average term of such stock options, including
$0.1 million in fiscal 2008.
On July 27, 2007, we granted stock options for
429,432 shares at an exercise price of $4.49 per share. Our
compensation committee and board of directors determined that
the exercise price of such stock options was at least equal to
the fair market value of our common stock as of such date
primarily based on the $4.49 per share conversion price of our
substantially simultaneous subordinated convertible note
placement. Our compensation committee and board of directors
based this determination on the fact that the valuation of our
common stock reflected in such conversion price was the result
of significant arms- length negotiations with
sophisticated institutional investors, led by an indirect
affiliate of GEEFS, and took into account the possibility of our
potential near-term initial public offering. In determining that
such exercise price was at least equal to the fair market value
of our common stock on such date, our compensation committee and
board of directors also took into account Wipflis
April 30, 2007 valuation of our common stock at $4.15 per
share, which also took into account Wipflis assessed 50%
possibility of our potential initial public offering and the
potential resulting value of our common stock. Our compensation
committee and board of directors determined that there were no
other significant events that had occurred during this period
that would have given rise to a change in the fair market value
of our common stock and that, despite the increasing possibility
of a near-term initial public offering, such potential offering
remained contingent upon many variable factors, including:
(i) our financial results; (ii) investor interest in
our company; (iii) economic and stock market conditions
generally and specifically as they may impact us, participants
in our industry or comparable companies; (iv) changes in
financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts
following participants in our industry or comparable companies;
(v) earnings and other announcements by, and changes in
market evaluations of, us, participants in our
53
industry or comparable companies; (vi) changes in business
or regulatory conditions affecting us, participants in our
industry or comparable companies; and (vii) announcements
or implementation by our competitors or us of acquisitions,
technological innovations or new products.
Our estimated initial public offering price of
$ (the midpoint of the range set
forth on the cover of this prospectus) represents a significant
increase in the value of our common stock from the fair value of
our common stock as assessed by our compensation committee and
board of directors as of July 27, 2007 and as assessed by
Wipfli in its April 30, 2007 valuation report (each of
which assessments took into account our potential near-term
initial public offering). One of the principal reasons for the
increase in value of our common stock implied by our estimated
initial public offering price is attributable to the August 2007
investment in our company by GEEFS, as supported by the
significant increase in value realized by a European
publicly-traded alternative energy company which received a
similar type of investment by GEEFS in early 2007. This increase
is also in significant part attributable to our improved results
of operations for our fiscal 2008 second quarter following our
strong fiscal 2008 first quarter, and our expectations for
continued increased revenue for the remainder of our fiscal
2008. During our fiscal 2008 second quarter, we realized further
customer acceptance of our comprehensive energy management
systems, as well as an increased volume of large customer
roll-out initiatives. Another important reason for this increase
is related to the increase in valuation multiples of comparable
public companies during this period, particularly due to
(i) the impact of the initial public offering by another
company in the energy management sector, which was completed in
May 2007, and its subsequent stock price performance;
(ii) the impact of two recently announced follow-on public
offerings by companies in the energy management sector;
(iii) the overall increased market values of
publicly-traded comparable companies in the energy management
and alternative energy sectors; (iv) the increased market
values of certain other publicly-traded comparable companies in
the energy management sector resulting from several announced
acquisitions of privately-held energy management companies, and
the implied valuations attributable to such acquired companies;
and (v) the valuation implied by the June 2007 announced
acquisition of a publicly-traded comparable company in the
lighting systems and equipment sector. Additionally, market
conditions have improved significantly for publicly-traded
companies in the energy management and alternative energy
sectors and for initial and follow-on public offerings of energy
management, alternative energy and clean technology companies.
Our estimated initial public offering price also reflects the
increased value of our common stock associated with it becoming
a publicly-traded security, compared to the relative lack of
marketability of our common stock prior to this offering.
After the closing of this offering, we will solely use the
closing sale price of our common shares on the Nasdaq Global
Market (or other applicable stock exchange on which our shares
are then traded) on the date of grant to establish the exercise
price of our stock options, as required by our 2004 Stock and
Incentive Awards Plan.
We recognized stock-based compensation expense related to the
adoption of SFAS 123(R) of $0.4 million for fiscal
2007 and $0.6 million for our fiscal 2008 first half. As of
March 31, 2007, $3.0 million of total stock option
compensation cost was expected to be recognized by us over a
weighted average period of three years. We expect to recognize
$0.7 million of stock-based compensation expense in fiscal
2008 based on our stock options outstanding as of March 31,
2007. This expense will increase further to the extent we have
granted, or will grant, additional stock options in fiscal 2008,
as described above. Taking into account our stock options
granted during fiscal 2008 through the date of this prospectus,
a total of $3.5 million of stock option compensation cost
is expected to be recognized by us over a weighted average
period of approximately four years, including $0.6 million
in the second half of fiscal 2008.
Common Stock Warrants. We issued common stock
warrants to placement agents in connection with our various
stock offerings and services rendered in fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007. The value of warrants recorded as offering costs was
$0.4 million, $30,000 and $18,000 in fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively. The value of warrants recorded for services
was $6,000 in fiscal 2006. As of March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007, warrants were outstanding to purchase a
total of 1,109,390 and 778,322 shares, respectively, of our
common stock at weighted average exercise prices of
$2.24 per share. These warrants were valued using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions:
54
(i) contractual terms of five years;
(ii) weighted average risk-free interest rates of 4.32% to
4.62%; (iii) expected volatility ranging between 39% and
60%; and (iv) dividend yields of 0%.
Accounting for Income Taxes. As part of the
process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we
are required to determine our income taxes in each of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves
estimating our actual current tax expenses, together with
assessing temporary differences resulting from recognition of
items for income tax and accounting purposes. These differences
result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are
included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then
assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be
recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we
believe that recovery is not likely, establish a valuation
allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or
increase this allowance in a period, we must reflect this
increase as an expense within the tax provision in our
statements of operations.
Our judgment is required in determining our provision for income
taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any
valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax
assets. We continue to monitor the realizability of our deferred
tax assets and adjust the valuation allowance accordingly. We
have determined that a valuation allowance against our net
deferred tax assets was not necessary as of March 31, 2006
or 2007. In making this determination, we considered all
available positive and negative evidence, including projected
future taxable income, tax planning strategies, recent financial
performance and ownership changes.
We believe that past issuances and transfers of our stock caused
an ownership change in fiscal 2007 that may affect the timing of
the use of our net operating loss carryforwards, but we do not
believe the ownership change affects the use of the full amount
of the net operating loss carryforwards. As a result, our
ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards attributable
to the period prior to such ownership change to offset taxable
income will be subject to limitations in a particular year,
which could potentially result in increased future tax liability
for us.
As of March 31, 2007, our federal and state net operating
loss carryforwards were $5.1 million. Included in the
$5.1 million loss carryforwards are $3.0 million of
federal and $2.7 million of state expenses that are
associated with the exercise of non-qualified stock options. The
benefit from the net operating losses created from these
expenses will be recorded as a reduction in taxes payable and an
increase in additional paid in capital when the benefits are
realized.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or
FIN 48, which became effective for us on April 1,
2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and a
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax
position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon
examination by taxing authorities. The adoption of FIN 48
resulted in an increase to our accumulated deficit of
$0.2 million at September 30, 2007. As of the adoption
date, the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits was
$1.6 million, $0.3 million of which would impact our
effective tax rate if recognized. Of this amount, $60,000 and
$0.3 million were recorded as current and deferred tax
liabilities, respectively. The remaining amount of unrecognized
tax benefits of $1.2 million relates to net operating loss
carryforwards created by the exercise of non-qualified stock
options. The benefit from the net operating losses created from
these expenses will be recorded as a reduction in taxes payable
and a credit to additional paid-in capital in the period in
which the benefits are realized. We first recognize tax benefits
from current period stock option expenses against current period
income. The remaining current period income is offset by net
operating losses under the tax law ordering approach. Under this
approach, we will utilize the net operating losses from stock
option expenses last. As of September 30. 2007, the unaudited
amount of unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $0.5 million to
$1.2 million due to the utilization of unrecognized tax benefits
from stock option expenses. We expect that the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12 months
if we generate sufficient taxable income to realize some or all
of the $0.8 million unrecognized tax benefits for stock
option expenses. The remaining $0.4 million of gross
unrecognized tax benefits is comprised of $0.3 million for
expenses that may not be deductible for federal income tax
purposes and $0.1 million for potential state income tax
liabilities. We recognize penalties and interest related to
uncertain tax liabilities in income tax expense. Penalties and
interest were immaterial as of the date of adoption and are
included in unrecognized tax
55
benefits. Due to the existence of net operating loss and credit
carryforwards, all years since 2000 are open to examination by
tax authorities.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. In September 2006, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157
provides a common definition of fair value and establishes a
framework to make the measurement of fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles more consistent and comparable.
SFAS 157 also requires expanded disclosures to provide
information about the extent to which fair value, and the effect
of fair value measures on earnings. SFAS 157 is effective
for years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the potential effect of SFAS 157 on
our financial statements.
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities. On
February 15, 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or
SFAS 159. Under this standard, we may elect to report
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on a
contract-by-contract
basis with changes in value reported in earnings. This election
is irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective for years beginning
after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
potential effect of SFAS 159 on our financial statements.
EITF
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used
in Future Research and Development Activities. In
June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be
Used in Future Research and Development Activities, or
EITF 07-3.
This requires that nonrefundable advance payments for future
research and development activities be deferred and capitalized.
EITF 07-3
is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the potential effect of
EITF 07-3
on our financial statements.
56
Overview
We design, manufacture and implement energy management systems
consisting primarily of high-performance, energy efficient
lighting systems, controls and related services. Our energy
management systems deliver energy savings and efficiency gains
to our commercial and industrial customers without compromising
their quantity or quality of light. The core of our energy
management system is our HIF lighting system that we estimate
cut our customers lighting-related electricity costs by
approximately 50%, while increasing their quantity of light by
approximately 50% and improving lighting quality when replacing
HID fixtures. Our customers typically realize a two-to three
-year payback period from electricity cost savings generated by
our HIF lighting systems without considering utility incentives
or government subsidies. We have sold and installed our HIF
fixtures in over 2,100 facilities across North America,
representing over 489 million square feet of commercial and
industrial building space, including for 78 Fortune
500 companies, such as Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., General
Electric Co., Kraft Foods Inc., Newell Rubbermaid Inc.,
OfficeMax, Inc., SYSCO Corp., and Toyota Motor Corp.
Our energy management system is comprised of: our HIF lighting
system; our InteLite intelligent lighting controls; our Apollo
Light Pipe, which collects and focuses daylight and consumes no
electricity; and integrated energy management services. We
believe that the implementation of our complete energy
management system enables our customers to further reduce
electricity costs, while permanently reducing base and peak load
electricity demand. From December 1, 2001 through
September 30, 2007, we have installed over 970,000 HIF
lighting systems for our commercial and industrial customers. We
are focused on leveraging this installed base to expand our
customer relationships from single-site implementations of our
HIF lighting systems to enterprise-wide roll-outs of our
complete energy management system. We are also expanding our
customer base by executing our systematized,
multi-step
sales process.
Our annual total revenue has increased from $12.4 million
in fiscal 2004 to $48.2 million in fiscal 2007. For the six
months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized total
revenue of $35.1 million, compared to $20.3 million
for the six months ended September 30, 2006. We estimate
that the use of our HIF fixtures has resulted in cumulative
electricity cost savings for our customers of approximately
$265 million and has reduced base and peak load electricity
demand by approximately 278 MW through September 30,
2007. We estimate that this reduced electricity consumption has
reduced associated indirect carbon dioxide emissions by
approximately 3.4 million tons over the same period.
For a description of the assumptions behind our calculations of
customer kilowatt demand reduction, customer kilowatt hours and
electricity costs saved and reductions in indirect carbon
dioxide emissions associated with our products used throughout
this prospectus, see notes (6) through (11) under
Summary Historical Consolidated and Pro Forma Financial
Data and Other Information.
Our
Industry
As a company focused on providing energy management systems, our
market opportunity is created by growing electricity capacity
shortages, underinvestment in T&D infrastructure, high
electricity costs and the high financial and environmental costs
associated with adding generation capacity and upgrading the
T&D infrastructure. The United States electricity market is
characterized by rising demand, increasing electricity costs and
power reliability issues due to continued constraints on
generation and T&D capacity. Electricity demand is expected
to grow steadily over the coming decades and significant
challenges exist in meeting this increase in demand. These
constraints are causing governments, utilities and businesses to
focus on demand reduction initiatives, including energy
efficiency and other
demand-side
management solutions.
Todays
Electricity Market
Growing Demand for Electricity. Demand for
electricity in the United States has grown steadily in recent
years and is expected to grow significantly for the foreseeable
future. According to the EIA, $298 billion was spent on
electricity in 2005 in the United States, up from
$203 billion in 1994, an increase of 47%. Additionally, the
EIA predicts consumption will increase from 3,821 billion
kWh in 2005
57
to 5,478 billion kWh in 2030, or approximately 43%. As a
result of this rapidly growing demand, the National Electric
Reliability Council, or NERC, expects capacity margins to drop
below minimum target levels in Texas, New England, the
Mid-Atlantic, the Midwest and the Rocky Mountain area within the
next two to three years. We believe that meeting this increasing
domestic electricity demand will require either an increase in
energy supply through capacity expansion, broader adoption of
demand management programs, or a combination of these solutions.
Challenges to Capacity Expansion. Based on the
forecasted growth in electricity demand, the EIA estimates that
the United States will require 292 GW of new generating capacity
between 2006 and 2030 (the equivalent of 584 power plants rated
at an average of 500 MW each). According to data provided
by the International Energy Agency, or IEA, we estimate that new
generating capacity and associated T&D investment will cost
approximately $2.2 million per MW.
In addition to the high financial costs associated with adding
power generation capacity, there are environmental concerns
about the effects of emissions from additional power plants,
especially coal-fired power plants. According to the IEA, global
energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2030 are expected to
exceed 2003 levels by 52%, with power generation expected to
contribute to about half of this increase. Coal-fired plants,
which generate significant emissions of carbon dioxide and other
pollutants, are projected by the EIA to account for 54% of the
power generation capacity expansion expected in the United
States between 2006 and 2030. We believe that concerns over
emissions may make it increasingly difficult for utilities to
add coal-fired generating capacity. Clean coal energy
initiatives are characterized by an uncertain legislative and
regulatory framework and would involve substantial
infrastructure cost to readily commercialize.
Although the EIA expects clean-burning natural gas-fired plants
to account for 36% of total required domestic capacity
additions, natural gas production has recently leveled off,
which may make it difficult to fuel significant numbers of
additional plants, and natural gas prices have approximately
doubled in the last decade according to the EIA.
Environmentally-friendly renewable energy alternatives, such as
solar and wind, generally require subsidies and rebates to be
cost competitive and do not provide continuous electricity
generation. As a result, we do not believe that renewable energy
sources will account for a meaningful percentage of overall
electricity supply growth in the near term. We believe these
challenges to expanding generating capacity will increase the
need for energy efficiency initiatives to meet demand growth.
Underinvestment in Electricity Transmission and
Distribution. According to the DOE, the majority
of United States transmission lines, transformers and
circuit breakers the backbone of the United
States T&D system is more than
25 years old. The underinvestment in T&D
infrastructure has led to
well-documented
power reliability issues, such as the August 2003 blackout that
affected a number of states in the northeastern United States.
To upgrade and maintain the United States T&D system,
the Electric Power Research Institute, or EPRI, estimates that
the United States will need to invest over $110 billion, or
$5.5 billion per year, by 2025. This underinvestment is
projected to become more pronounced as electricity demand grows.
According to NERC, electricity demand is expected to increase by
19% between 2006 and 2015, while transmission capacity is
expected to increase by only 7%.
High Electricity Costs. The price of one kWh
of electricity (in nominal dollars, including the effects of
inflation) has reached historic highs, according to the EIA.
Rising electricity prices, coupled with increasing electricity
consumption, are resulting in increasing electricity costs,
particularly for businesses. Based on the most recent EIA
electricity rate and consumption data available, we estimate
that commercial and industrial electricity expenditures rose 74%
and 21%, respectively, from 1994 to 2005, and rose 9% and 6%,
respectively, in comparing monthly expenditures in April 2006
and April 2007. As a result, we believe that electricity costs
are an increasingly significant expense for businesses,
particularly those with large commercial and industrial
facilities.
Our
Market Opportunity
We believe that energy efficiency measures represent permanent,
cost-effective and environmentally-friendly alternatives to
expanding electricity capacity in order to meet demand growth.
The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, or ACEEE,
estimates that the United States can save up to 24% of its
estimated electricity usage from 2000 to 2020 by deploying
currently available
58
energy efficiency products and technologies across all sectors,
the equivalent of over $70 billion per year in energy
savings.
As a result, we believe governments, utilities and businesses
are increasingly focused on demand reduction through energy
efficiency and demand management programs. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-two states have, through legislation or regulation,
ordered utilities to design and fund programs that promote or
deliver energy efficiency.
|
|
|
|
Twelve states have implemented, or are in the process of
implementing, Energy Efficiency Resource Standards, which
generally require utilities to allocate funds to energy
efficiency programs to meet near-term savings targets set by
state governments or regulatory authorities. These states
include California, Texas, Colorado, New Jersey and Illinois.
|
|
|
|
In recent years, there has also been an increasing focus on
decoupling, a regulatory initiative designed to
break the linkage between utility kWh sales and revenues, in
order to remove the disincentives for utilities to promote load
reducing initiatives. Decoupling aims to encourage utilities to
actively promote energy efficiency by allowing utilities to
generate revenues and returns on investment from employing
energy management solutions. To date, nearly half of all states
have adopted or are adopting forms of decoupling for gas or
electric utilities.
|
One method utilities use to reduce demand is the implementation
of demand response programs. Demand response is a method of
reducing electricity usage during periods of peak demand in
order to promote grid stability, either by temporarily
curtailing end use or by shifting generation to backup sources,
typically at customer facilities. While demand response is an
effective tool for addressing peak demand, these programs
typically reduce consumption for only up to 100 hours per
year, based on demand conditions, and require end users to
compromise their consumption patterns, for example by reducing
lighting or air conditioning.
We believe that given the costs of adding new capacity and the
limited number of hours that are addressed by current demand
response initiatives, there is a significant opportunity for
more comprehensive energy efficiency solutions to permanently
reduce electricity demand during both peak and off-peak periods.
We believe such solutions are a compelling way for businesses,
utilities and regulators to meet rising demand in a
cost-effective and environmentally-friendly manner. We also
believe that, in order to gain acceptance among end users,
energy efficiency solutions must offer substantial energy
savings and return on investment, without requiring compromises
in energy usage patterns.
The
Role of Lighting
According to the DOE, lighting accounts for 22% of electric
power consumption in the United States, with commercial and
industrial lighting accounting for 65% of that amount. Based on
this information, we estimate that approximately
$42 billion was spent on electricity for lighting in the
United States commercial and industrial sectors in 2005.
Commercial and industrial facilities in the United States employ
a variety of lighting technologies, including HID, traditional
fluorescents and incandescent lighting fixtures. Our HIF
lighting systems usually replace HID fixtures, which operate
inefficiently and, according to EPRI, only convert approximately
36% of the energy they consume into visible light. The EIA
estimates that as of 2003 there were 455,000 buildings in the
United States representing 20.6 billion square feet that
utilized HID lighting.
Our
Solution
50/50 Value Proposition. We estimate our HIF
lighting systems generally reduce lighting-related electricity
costs by approximately 50% compared to HID fixtures, while
increasing the quantity of light by approximately 50% and
improving lighting quality. From December 1, 2001 through
September 30, 2007, we believe that the use of our HIF
fixtures has saved our customers $265 million in
electricity costs and reduced their energy consumption by
3.4 billion kWh.
Rapid Payback Period. In most retrofit
projects where we replace HID fixtures, our customers typically
realize a two- to three -year payback period on our HIF lighting
systems. These returns are achieved without considering utility
incentives or government subsidies (although subsidies and
incentives are increasingly being made available to our
customers and us in connection with the installation of our
systems).
59
Comprehensive Energy Management System. Our
comprehensive energy management system enables us to reduce our
customers base and peak load electricity consumption. By
replacing existing HID fixtures with our HIF lighting systems,
our customers permanently reduce base load electricity
consumption while significantly increasing their quantity and
quality of light. We can also add intelligence to the
customers lighting system through the implementation of
our InteLite line of motion control and ambient light sensors.
This gives our customers the ability to control and adjust
lighting and energy use levels for additional cost savings.
Finally, we offer a further permanent reduction in electricity
consumption through the installation and integration of our
Apollo Light Pipe, which is a lens-based device that collects
and focuses daylight without consuming electricity. By
integrating our Apollo Light Pipe and HIF lighting system with
the intelligence of our InteLite product line, the output and
electricity consumption of our HIF lighting systems can be
automatically adjusted based on the level of natural light being
provided by our Apollo Light Pipe.
Easy Installation, Implementation and
Maintenance. Our HIF fixtures are designed with a
lightweight construction and modular
plug-and-play
architecture that allows for fast and easy installation,
facilitates maintenance and allows for easy integration of other
components of our energy management system. We believe our
systems design reduces installation time and expense
compared to other lighting solutions, which further improves our
customers return on investment. We also believe that our
use of standard components reduces our customers ongoing
maintenance costs.
Base and Peak Load Relief for Utilities. The
implementation of our energy management systems can
substantially reduce our customers electricity demand
during peak and off-peak periods. Since commercial and
industrial lighting represents approximately 14% of total energy
usage in the United States, our systems can substantially reduce
the need for additional base and peak load generation and
distribution capacity, while reducing the impact of peak demand
periods on the electrical grid. We estimate that the HIF
fixtures we have installed from December 1, 2001 through
September 30, 2007 have had the effect of reducing base and
peak load demand by approximately 278 MW.
Environmental Benefits. By permanently
reducing electricity consumption, our energy management systems
reduce associated indirect carbon dioxide emissions that would
otherwise have resulted from generation of this energy. We
estimate that one of our HIF lighting systems, when replacing a
standard HID fixture, displaces 0.241 kW of electricity, which,
based on information provided by the EPA, reduces a
customers indirect carbon dioxide emissions by
approximately 1.8 tons per year. Based on these figures, we
estimate that the use of our HIF fixtures has reduced indirect
carbon dioxide emissions by 3.4 million tons through
September 30, 2007.
Our
Competitive Strengths
Compelling Value Proposition. By permanently
reducing lighting-related electricity usage, our systems enable
our commercial and industrial customers to achieve significant
cost savings, without compromising the quantity or quality of
light in their facilities. As a result, our energy management
systems offer our customers a rapid return on their investment,
without relying on government subsidies or utility incentives.
We believe our ability to deliver improved lighting quality
while reducing electricity costs differentiates our value
proposition from other demand management solutions which require
end users to alter the time, manner or duration of their
electricity use to achieve cost savings.
Large and Growing Customer Base. We have
developed a large and growing national customer base, and have
installed our products in over 2,100 commercial and industrial
facilities across North America. As of September 30, 2007,
we have completed or are in the process of completing retrofits
in over 400 facilities for our 78 Fortune 500 customers. We
believe that the willingness of our blue-chip customers to
install our products across multiple facilities represents a
significant endorsement of our value proposition, which in turn
helps us sell our energy management systems to new customers.
Systematized Sales Process. We have invested
substantial resources in the development of our innovative sales
process. We primarily sell directly to our end user customers
using a systematized
multi-step
sales process that focuses on our value proposition and provides
our sales force with specific, identified tasks that govern
their interactions with our customers from the point of lead
generation through delivery of our products and services. In
addition, we have developed relationships with numerous
electrical contractors, who often have significant influence
over the choice of lighting solutions that their customers adopt.
60
Innovative Technology. We have developed a
portfolio of 16 United States patents primarily covering
various elements of our HIF fixtures. We also have nine patents
pending that primarily cover various elements of our InteLite
controls and our Apollo Light Pipe and certain business methods.
To complement our innovative energy management products, we have
introduced integrated energy management services to provide our
customers with a turnkey solution. We believe that our
demonstrated ability to innovate provides us with significant
competitive advantages.
Strong, Experienced Leadership Team. We have a
strong and experienced senior management team led by our
president and chief executive officer, Neal R. Verfuerth, who
was the principal founder of our company in 1996 and invented
many of the products that form our energy management system. Our
senior executive management team of seven individuals has a
combined 40 years of experience with our company and a
combined 77 years of experience in the lighting and energy
management industries.
Efficient, Scalable Manufacturing Process. We
have made significant investments in our manufacturing facility
since fiscal 2005, including investments in production
efficiencies, automated processes and modern production
equipment. These investments have substantially increased our
production capacity, which we expect will enable us to support
substantially increased demand from our current level. In
addition, these investments, combined with our modular product
design and use of standard components, enable us to reduce our
cost of revenue, while better controlling production quality and
allowing us to be responsive to customer needs on a timely basis.
Our
Growth Strategies
Leverage Existing Customer Base. We are
expanding our relationships with our existing customers by
transitioning from single-site facility implementations to
comprehensive enterprise-wide roll-outs of our HIF lighting
systems. For the quarter ended as of September 30, 2007, we
had completed or were in the process of completing retrofits at
over 100 facilities for our top five customers by revenue for
that quarter. We also intend to leverage our large installed
base of HIF lighting systems to implement all aspects of our
energy management system for our existing customers.
Target Additional Customers. We are expanding
our base of commercial and industrial customers by executing our
systematized sales process and by increasing our direct sales
force. We focus our sales efforts in geographic locations where
we already have existing customer sites. We plan to increase the
visibility of our brand name and raise awareness of our value
proposition by expanding our marketing efforts. In addition, we
are implementing a sales and marketing program to leverage
existing and develop new relationships with electrical
contractors and their customers.
Provide Load Relief to Utilities and Grid
Operators. Because commercial and industrial
lighting represents a significant percentage of overall
electricity usage, we believe that as we increase our market
penetration, our systems will, in the aggregate, have a
significant impact on reducing base and peak load electricity
demand. We estimate our HIF lighting systems can generally
eliminate demand at a cost of approximately $1.0 million
per MW when used in replacement of typical HID fixtures, as
compared to the IEAs estimate of approximately
$2.2 million per MW of capacity for new generation and
T&D assets. We intend to market our energy management
systems directly to utilities and grid operators as a
lower-cost, permanent alternative to capacity expansion. We
believe that utilities and grid operators may increasingly view
our systems as a way to help them meet their requirements to
provide reliable electric power to their customers in a
cost-effective and environmentally-friendly manner. In addition,
we believe that potential regulatory decoupling initiatives
could increase the amount of incentives that utilities and grid
operators will be willing to pay us or our customers for the
installation of our systems.
Continue to Improve Operational
Efficiencies. We are focused on continually
improving the efficiency of our operations to increase the
profitability of our business. In our manufacturing operations,
we pursue opportunities to reduce our materials, component and
manufacturing costs through product engineering, manufacturing
process improvements, research and development on alternative
materials and components, volume purchasing and investments in
manufacturing equipment and automation. We also seek to reduce
our installation costs by training our authorized installers to
perform retrofits more efficiently, and by aligning with
regional installers to achieve volume discounts. We have also
undertaken initiatives to achieve operating expense efficiencies
by more effectively
61
executing our systematized multi-step sales process and focusing
on geographically-concentrated sales efforts. We believe that
realizing these efficiencies will enhance our profitability and
allow us to continue to deliver our compelling value proposition.
Develop New Sources of Revenue. We recently
introduced our InteLite and Apollo Light Pipe products to
complement our core HIF lighting systems. We are continuing to
develop new energy management products and services that can be
utilized in connection with our current products, including
intelligent HVAC integration controls, direct solar solutions,
comprehensive lighting management software and controls and
additional consulting services. We are also exploring
opportunities to monetize emissions offsets based on our
customers electricity savings from implementation of our
energy management systems, and executed our first sale of
indirect carbon dioxide emissions offset credits in fiscal 2007.
Products
and Services
We provide a variety of products and services that together
comprise our energy management system. The core of our energy
management system is our HIF lighting system, which we primarily
sell under the Compact Modular brand name. We offer our
customers the option to build on our core HIF lighting system by
adding our InteLite controls and Apollo Light Pipe. Together
with these products, we offer our customers a variety of
integrated energy management services such as system design,
project management and installation. We refer to the combination
of these products and services as our energy management system.
We currently generate, and have generated for the last three
fiscal years, the substantial majority of our revenue from sales
of our core HIF lighting systems and related products, all of
which we believe constitute one class of products. We generated
product revenue of $19.6 million, $30.0 million and $40.2
million in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. We
generated service revenue of $2.2 million, $3.3 million and
$8.0 million in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Products
The following is a description of our primary products:
The Compact Modular. Our primary product is
our line of high-performance HIF lighting systems, the Compact
Modular, which includes a variety of fixture configurations to
meet customer specifications. The Compact Modular generally
operates at 224 watts per six-lamp fixture, compared to
approximately 465 watts for the HID fixtures that it typically
replaces. This wattage difference is the primary reason our HIF
lighting systems are able to reduce electricity consumption by
approximately 50% compared to HID fixtures. Our Compact Modular
has a thermally efficient design that allows it to operate at
significantly lower temperatures than HID fixtures and most
other legacy lighting fixtures typically found in commercial and
industrial facilities. Because of the lower operating
temperatures of our fixtures, our ballasts and lamps operate
more efficiently, allowing more electricity to be converted to
light rather than to heat or vibration, while allowing these
components to last longer before needing replacement. In
addition, the heat reduction provided by installing our HIF
lighting systems reduces the electricity consumption required to
cool our customers facilities, which further reduces their
electricity costs. The EPRI estimates that commercial buildings
use 5% to 10% of their electricity consumption for cooling
required to offset the heat generated by lighting fixtures.
In addition, our patented optically-efficient reflector
increases light quantity by efficiently harvesting and focusing
emitted light. We and some of our customers have conducted tests
that generally show that our Compact Modular product line can
increase light quantity in footcandles by approximately 50% when
replacing HID fixtures. Further, we believe, based on customer
data, that our Compact Modular products provide a greater
quantity of light per watt than competing HIF fixtures.
The Compact Modular product line also includes our modular power
pack, which enables us to customize our customers lighting
systems to help achieve their specified lighting and energy
savings goals. Our modular power pack integrates easily into a
wide variety of electrical configurations at our customers
facilities, allowing for faster and less expensive installation
compared to lighting systems that require customized electrical
connections. In addition, our HIF lighting systems are
lightweight, which further reduces installation and maintenance
costs.
62
InteLite Motion Control and Ambient Light
Sensors. Our InteLite products include motion
control and ambient light sensors which can be programmed
to turn individual fixtures on and off based on
user-defined
parameters regarding motion
and/or light
levels in a given area. Our InteLite products can be added to
our HIF lighting systems at or after installation on a
plug and play basis by coupling the sensors directly
to the modular power pack. Because of their modular design, our
InteLite products can be added to our energy management system
easily and at lower cost when compared to lighting systems that
require similar controls to be included at original installation
or retrofitted.
Apollo Light Pipe. Our Apollo Light Pipe is a
lens-based device that collects and focuses daylight, bringing
natural light indoors without consuming electricity. Our Apollo
Light Pipe is designed and manufactured to maximize light
collection during times of low sun angles, such as those that
occur during early morning and late afternoon. The Apollo Light
Pipe produces maximum lighting power in peak summer
months and during peak daylight hours, when electricity is most
expensive. By integrating our Apollo Light Pipe with our HIF
lighting systems and InteLite controls, the output and
associated electricity consumption of our HIF lighting systems
can be automatically adjusted based on the level of natural
light being provided by our Apollo Light Pipe to offer further
energy savings for our customers.
Wireless Controls. We are currently in the
final stages of testing our wireless control devices. These
devices will allow our customers to remotely communicate with
and give commands to individual light fixtures through web-based
software, and will allow the customer to configure and easily
change the control parameters of each individual sensor based on
a variety of inputs and conditions. We expect to begin selling
these products in fiscal 2008.
Other Products. We also offer our customers a
variety of other HIF fixtures to address their lighting and
energy management needs, including fixtures designed for
agribusinesses and private label resale.
The installation of our products generally requires the services
of qualified and licensed professionals trained to deal with
electrical components and systems.
Services
We are expanding the scope of our fee-based lighting-relating
energy management services. We provide our customers with, and
derive revenue from, energy management services, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive site assessment, which includes a review of the
current lighting requirements and energy usage at the
customers facility;
|
|
|
|
site field verification, where we perform a test implementation
of our energy management system at a customers facility
upon request;
|
|
|
|
utility incentive and government subsidy management, where we
assist our customers in identifying, applying for and obtaining
available utility incentives or government subsidies;
|
|
|
|
engineering design, which involves designing a customized system
to suit our customers facility lighting and energy
management needs, and providing the customer with a written
analysis of the potential energy savings and lighting and
environmental benefits associated with the designed system;
|
|
|
|
project management, which involves our working with the
electrical contractor in overseeing and managing all phases of
implementation from delivery through installation;
|
|
|
|
installation services, which we provide through our national
network of qualified third-party installers; and
|
|
|
|
recycling in connection with our retrofit installations, where
we remove, dispose of and recycle our customers legacy
lighting fixtures.
|
In addition, we have begun to place more emphasis on offering
our products under a sales-type financing program, under which
our customers purchase of our energy management systems
may be financed through a third-party financing company without
recourse to us.
Our warranty policy generally provides for a limited one-year
warranty on our products. Ballasts, lamps and other electrical
components are excluded from our standard warranty since they
are covered by a separate warranty offered by the original
equipment manufacturer. We coordinate and process customer
warranty inquiries and claims, including inquiries and claims
relating to ballast and lamp
63
components, through our customer service department.
Additionally, we sometimes satisfy our warranty claims even if
they are not covered by our warranty policy as a customer
accommodation.
We are also expanding our offering of other energy management
services that we believe will represent additional sources of
revenue for us in the future. Those services primarily include
review and management of electricity bills, as well as
management and control of power quality and remote monitoring
and control of our installed systems.
Our
Customers
We primarily target commercial and industrial end users who have
warehousing and manufacturing facilities. As of
September 30, 2007, we have installed our products in 2,100
commercial and industrial facilities across North America,
including for 78 Fortune 500 companies. We have completed
or are in the process of completing installations at over 400
facilities for these Fortune 500 customers. Our diversified
customer base includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Standard International Inc.
Avery Dennison Corporation
Big Lots Inc.
Blyth Inc.
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.
|
|
Ecolab, Inc.
Gap, Inc.
General Electric Co.
Kraft Foods Inc.
Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
|
|
OfficeMax, Inc.
Pepsi Americas Inc.
Sealed Air Corp.
Sherwin-Williams Co.
|
|
SYSCO Corp.
Textron, Inc.
Toyota Motor Corp.
United Stationers Inc.
|
In the first half of fiscal 2008, Coca-Cola Enterprises
Inc. accounted for approximately 20% of our total revenue.
Sales and
Marketing
We primarily sell our products directly to commercial and
industrial customers using a systematized multi-step process
that focuses on our value proposition and provides our sales
force with specific, identified tasks that govern their
interactions with our customers from the point of lead
generation through delivery of our products and services. We
intend to significantly expand our sales force in fiscal 2008.
We also sell our products and services indirectly to our
customers through their electrical contractors or distributors,
or to electrical contractors and distributors who buy our
products and resell them to end users as part of an installed
project. Even in cases where we sell through these indirect
channels, we strive to have our own relationship with the end
user customer.
We also sell our products on a wholesale basis to electrical
contractors and value-added resellers. We often train our
value-added resellers to implement our systematized sales
process to more effectively resell our products to their
customers. We attempt to leverage the customer relationships of
these electrical contractors and value-added resellers to
further extend the geographic scope of our selling efforts.
We are implementing a joint marketing initiative with electrical
contractors designed to generate additional sales. We believe
these relationships will allow us to increase penetration into
the lighting retrofit market because electrical contractors
often have significant influence over their customers
lighting product selections.
We have historically focused our marketing efforts on
traditional direct advertising, as well as developing brand
awareness through customer education and active participation in
trade organizations and energy management seminars. We intend to
launch an expanded advertising and marketing campaign to
increase the visibility of our brand name and raise awareness of
our value proposition.
Competition
The market for energy management products and services is
fragmented. We face strong competition primarily from
manufacturers and distributors of energy management products and
services as well as electrical contractors. We compete primarily
on the basis of customer relationships, price, quality, energy
efficiency, customer service and marketing support.
64
There are a number of lighting fixture manufacturers that sell
HIF products that compete with our Compact Modular product line.
Some of these manufacturers also sell HID products that compete
with our HIF lighting systems, including Cooper Industries,
Ltd., Ruud Lighting, Inc. and Acuity Brands, Inc. These
companies generally have large, diverse product lines. Many of
these competitors are better capitalized than we are, have
strong existing customer relationships, greater name
recognition, and more extensive engineering and marketing
capabilities. We also compete for sales of our HIF lighting
systems with manufacturers and suppliers of older fluorescent
technology in the retrofit market. Some of the manufacturers of
HIF and HID products that compete with our HIF lighting systems
sell their systems at a lower initial capital cost than the cost
at which we sell our systems, although we believe based on our
industry experience that these systems generally do not deliver
the light quality and the cost savings that our HIF lighting
systems deliver over the long-term.
Many of our competitors market their manufactured lighting and
other products primarily to distributors who resell their
products for use in new commercial, residential, and industrial
construction. These distributors, such as Graybar Electric
Company, Gexpro (GE Supply) and W.W. Grainger, Inc., generally
have large customer bases and wide distribution networks and
supply to electrical contractors.
We also face competition from companies who provide energy
management services. Some of these competitors, such as Johnson
Controls, Inc. and Honeywell International, provide basic
systems and controls designed to further energy efficiency.
Other competitors provide demand response systems that compete
with our energy management systems, such as Comverge, Inc. and
EnerNOC, Inc.
Intellectual
Property
We have been issued 16 United States patents, and have applied
for nine additional United States patents. The patented and
patent pending technologies include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Portions of our core HIF lighting technology (including our
optically efficient reflector and some of our thermally
efficient fixture I-frame constructions) are patented.
|
|
|
|
Our ballast assembly method is patent pending.
|
|
|
|
Our light pipe technology and its manufacturing methods are
patent pending.
|
|
|
|
Our wireless lighting control system is patent pending.
|
|
|
|
The technology and methodology of our sales-type financing
program is patent pending.
|
Our 16 United States patents have expiration dates ranging from
2015 to 2024, with slightly less than half of these patents
having expiration dates of 2021 or later.
We believe that our patent portfolio as a whole is material to
our business. We also believe that our patents covering certain
component parts of our Compact Modular, including our thermally
efficient
I-frame and
our optically efficient reflector, are material to our business,
and that the loss of these patents could significantly and
adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
See Risk Factors Risks Related to Our
Business Our inability to protect our intellectual
property, or our involvement in damaging and disruptive
intellectual property litigation, could negatively affect our
business and results of operations and financial condition or
result in the loss of use of the product or service.
Manufacturing
and Distribution
We own an approximately 266,000 square foot manufacturing
and distribution facility located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. Since
fiscal 2005, we have made significant investments in new
equipment and in the development of our workforce to expand our
internal production capabilities and increase production
capacity. As a result of these investments, we are generally
able to manufacture and assemble our products internally. We
supplement our in-house production with outsourcing contracts as
required to meet short-term production needs. We believe we have
sufficient production capacity to support a substantial
expansion of our business.
We generally maintain a
60-day
supply of raw material and purchased component inventory. We
manufacture products to order and are typically able to ship
most orders within 30 days of our receipt of
65
a purchase order. We contract with transportation companies to
ship our products and we manage all aspects of distribution
logistics. We generally ship our products directly to the end
user.
Research
and Development
Our research and development efforts are centered on developing
new products and technologies, enhancing existing products, and
improving operational and manufacturing efficiencies. Most
recently we have focused our research and developments efforts
on the development and testing of our InteLite controls and
Apollo Light Pipe, and we are currently finalizing testing on
our wireless control products and software. We are also in the
process of developing intelligent HVAC integration controls,
direct solar solutions and comprehensive lighting management
software. Our research and development expenditures were
$1.1 million during fiscal 2007 and $0.9 million
during our fiscal 2008 first half.
Regulation
Our operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air,
discharge to water, the remediation of contaminated properties
and the generation, handling, storage transportation, treatment,
and disposal of, and exposure to, waste and other materials, as
well as laws and regulations relating to occupational health and
safety. We believe that our business, operations, and facilities
are being operated in compliance in all material respects with
applicable environmental and health and safety laws and
regulations.
State, county or municipal statutes often require that a
licensed electrician be present and supervise each retrofit
project. Further, all installations of electrical fixtures are
subject to compliance with electrical codes in virtually all
jurisdictions in the United States. In cases where we engage
independent contractors to perform our retrofit projects, we
believe that compliance with these laws and regulations is the
responsibility of the applicable contractor.
Employees
As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately
200 full-time employees. Our employees are not represented
by any labor union, and we have never experienced a work
stoppage or strike. We consider our relations with our employees
to be good.
Properties
We own our approximately 266,000 square foot manufacturing
and distribution facility in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. We are
beginning the initial planning and development of our new
technology center and the expansion of our administrative
offices at our manufacturing and distribution facility. We
currently contemplate that our new technology center will house
our research and development and sales support functions and a
customer care center. We own our approximately
23,000 square foot corporate headquarters in Plymouth,
Wisconsin. This facility houses our executive and corporate
services offices, sales and implementation team, custom
fabrication facilities and warehouse space.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to various claims and legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We
are not currently subject to any material litigation.
Our
History and Development
At the inception of our business in 1996, we were a distributor
of compact fluorescent energy-efficient lighting products for
the hospitality and agricultural markets. We developed and sold
a fluorescent-based lighting fixture for agricultural
applications under the Orion brand name in the late 1990s.
Beginning in 2000, we began development of a high-performance
lighting fixture for application in commercial and industrial
facilities. In December 2001, we began manufacturing our HIF
fixtures and sold our first Orion brand energy-efficient
lighting fixture by marketing directly to end-users. In early
fiscal 2005, we significantly expanded our production
capabilities with the acquisition and equipping of our
manufacturing center in Manitowoc. In fiscal 2005 and 2006, we
focused on significantly increasing our sales volumes,
particularly to Fortune 500 companies. We stopped serving
as a distributor of products manufactured by others in 2001.
66
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth information as of
September 30, 2007 regarding our current executive officers
and directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Director
|
Eric von Estorff
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President of Operations
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Business Development
|
Erik G. Birkerts
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President of Strategic Initiatives
|
Thomas A. Quadracci
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Diana Propper de Callejon
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Director
|
James R. Kackley
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Eckhart G. Grohmann
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Director
|
Patrick J. Trotter
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director
|
The following biographies describe the business experience of
our executive officers and directors:
Neal R. Verfuerth has been our president and a director
since 1998, and our chief executive officer since 2005. He
co-founded our company in 1996 and served until 1998 as our vice
president. From 1993 to 1996, he was employed as director of
sales/marketing and product development of Lights of America,
Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of compact fluorescent
lighting technology. Prior to that time, Mr. Verfuerth
served as president of Energy 2000/Virtus Corp., a solar heating
and energy efficient lighting business. Mr. Verfuerth has
invented many of our products, principally our Compact Modular
energy efficient lighting system, and other related energy
control technologies used by our company. He is married to our
vice president of operations, Patricia A. Verfuerth.
Daniel J. Waibel has been our chief financial officer and
treasurer since 2001. Mr. Waibel has over 19 years of
financial management experience, and is a certified public
accountant and a certified management accountant. From 1998 to
2001, he was employed by Radius Capital Partners, LLC, a venture
capital and business formation firm, as a principal and chief
financial officer. From 1994 through 1998, Mr. Waibel was
chief financial officer of Ryko Corporation, an independent
recording music label. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Waibel was
controller and general manager of Chippewa Springs, Ltd., a
premium beverage company. From 1990 to 1992, Mr. Waibel was
director of internal audit for Musicland Stores Corporation, a
music retailer. Mr. Waibel was employed by Arthur Andersen,
LLP from 1982 to 1990 as an audit manager.
Michael J. Potts has been our executive vice president
since 2003 and has served as a director since 2001.
Mr. Potts joined our company as our vice
president technical services in 2001. From 1988
through 2001, Mr. Potts was employed by Kohler Co., one of
the worlds largest manufacturers of plumbing products.
From 1990 through 1999 he held the position of supervising
engineer energy in Kohlers energy and
utilities department. In 2000, Mr. Potts assumed the
position of supervisor energy management group of
Kohlers entire corporate energy portfolio, as well as the
position of general manager of its natural gas subsidiary.
Mr. Potts is licensed as a professional engineer in
Wisconsin.
Eric von Estorff has been our vice president, general
counsel and secretary since 2003. From 1997 to 2003, Mr. von
Estorff was employed as corporate counsel and corporate
secretary of Quad/Graphics, Inc. one of the United States
largest commercial printing companies, where he concentrated in
the areas of acquisitions and strategic combinations, complex
contracts and business transactions, finance and lending
agreements, real estate and litigation management. Prior to his
employment at Quad/Graphics, Inc., Mr. von Estorff was
associated with a Milwaukee, Wisconsin-based law firm from 1994
to 1997.
67
Patricia A. Verfuerth has been our vice president of
operations since 1997 and served as corporate secretary of our
company from 1998 through mid-2003. Ms. Verfuerth was
employed by Lights of America, Inc., a manufacturer and
distributor of compact fluorescent lighting technology, from
1991 to 1997. At Lights of America, Inc., Ms. Verfuerth was
responsible for recruiting and training of staff and as liaison
to investor-owned utilities for their residential demand side
management initiatives. From 1989 to 1992, she was operations
manager for Energy 2000/Virtus Corp, a solar heating and energy
efficient lighting business. She is married to our president and
chief executive officer, Neal R. Verfuerth.
John H. Scribante has been our senior vice president of
business development since 2007. Mr. Scribante served as
our vice president of sales from 2004 until 2007. Prior to
joining our company, Mr. Scribante co-founded and served as
chief executive officer of Xe Energy, LLC, a distribution
company that specialized in marketing energy reduction
technologies, from 2003 to 2004. From 1996 to 2003, he
co-founded and served as president of Innovize, LLC, a company
that provided outsourcing services to mid-market manufacturing
companies.
Erik G. Birkerts has been our vice president of strategic
initiatives since March 2007. Mr. Birkerts founded and
served as president of The Prairie Partners Group LLC, a
business strategy consulting firm that worked with Fortune 500
and middle-market companies to create sales strategies, from
2000 through February 2007. Mr. Birkerts was the general
manager of strategic development for Network Commerce, a
technology company, from 1999 to 2000. From 1997 to 1999, he was
a management consultant with Frank Lynn & Associates,
a marketing consulting firm. Mr. Birkerts also worked as a
bank examiner with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from
1989 to 1994.
Thomas A. Quadracci has served as chairman of our board
since 2006. Mr. Quadracci was executive chairman of
Quad/Graphics, Inc., one of the United States largest
commercial printing companies that he co-founded in 1971, until
January 1, 2007, where he also served at various times as
executive vice president, president and chief executive officer,
and chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Quadracci
also founded and served as President of Quad/Tech, Inc., a
manufacturer and marketer of industrial controls, until 2002.
Diana Propper de Callejon has served as a director since
January 2007. Since 2003, Ms. Propper de Callejon has been
a general partner of Expansion Capital Partners, LLC, a venture
capital firm focused on investing in clean technologies. Prior
to joining Expansion Capital Partners, LLC, Ms. Propper de
Callejon co-founded and was managing director of EA Capital, a
financial services firm focused on clean technologies.
Ms. Propper de Callejon is currently the managing member of
Expansion Capital Partners II General Partner, LLC,
the general partner of Expansion Capital Partners II, LP, the
general partner of Clean Technology Fund II, LP, which is
one of our principal shareholders. See Principal and
Selling Shareholders. She is also a director and member of
the compensation committee of Tiger Optics, LLC, an optical
sensors company that is a portfolio company of Clean Technology
Fund II, LP., and ConsumerPowerline, a provider of demand
response and energy management solutions.
James R. Kackley has served as a director since
2005. Mr. Kackley practiced as a public
accountant for Arthur Andersen, LLP from 1963 to 1999. From 1974
to 1999, he was an audit partner for the firm. In addition, in
1998 and 1999, he served as chief financial officer for Andersen
Worldwide. From June 1999 to May 2002, Mr. Kackley served
as an adjunct professor at the Kellstadt School of Management at
DePaul University. Mr. Kackley serves as a director, a
member of the executive committee and the audit committee
chairman of Herman Miller, Inc., as a recent director and a
member of the nominating and governance committee and the audit
committee of Ryerson, Inc. prior to its sale, and as a director
and member of the management resources and compensation
committee and audit committee of PepsiAmericas, Inc.
Eckhart G. Grohmann has served as a director since 2004.
Mr. Grohmann is president and chairman of Aluminum
Casting & Engineering Co., Inc., an aluminum foundry
company with over 300 employees. Mr. Grohmann is
currently serving as a director of the Wisconsin Cast Metals
Association and previously served as the Wisconsin president and
national director of the American Foundrymens Society.
Mr. Grohmann has also served as a regent of the Milwaukee
School of Engineering since 1990.
Patrick J. Trotter has served as a director since 1996.
From 1998 to 2006, Mr. Trotter served as chairman of our
board of directors. From our inception to 1998, he was president
of our company. Mr. Trotter is currently president of
Health Solutions, Ltd, a national health care consulting
company. He
68
has over 30 years of senior leadership experience in the
American health care system and holds a masters degree in health
care administration. Mr. Trotter is a fellow in the
American College of Healthcare Executives.
Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors immediately following closing of this
offering will consist of seven members divided into three
classes, with each class holding office for staggered three-year
terms. Upon expiration of the term of a class of directors,
directors of that class will be elected for three-year terms at
the annual meeting of shareholders in the year in which their
term expires. Following the closing of this offering, the terms
of office of the Class I directors, consisting of
Ms. Propper de Callejon and Messrs. Quadracci and
Potts, will expire upon our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
The terms of office of the Class II directors, consisting
of Messrs. Trotter and Grohmann, will expire upon our 2009
annual meeting of shareholders. The terms of office of the
Class III directors, consisting of Messrs. Kackley and
Verfuerth, will expire upon our 2010 annual meeting of
shareholders.
Our amended and restated bylaws immediately following closing of
this offering will provide that any vacancies in our board of
directors and newly-created directorships may be filled for
their remaining terms only by our remaining board of directors
and the authorized number of directors may be changed only by
our board of directors.
Ms. Propper de Callejon and Messrs. Quadracci,
Trotter, Kackley and Grohmann are independent directors under
the independence standards applicable to us under Nasdaq Global
Market rules.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors has established an audit and finance
committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and
corporate governance committee. Our board may establish other
committees from time to time to facilitate our corporate
governance.
Our audit and finance committee is comprised of
Messrs. Kackley, Trotter and Grohmann. Mr. Kackley
chairs the audit and finance committee and is an audit committee
financial expert, as defined under SEC rules implementing
Section 407 of Sarbanes-Oxley. The principal
responsibilities and functions of our audit and finance
committee are to (i) oversee the reliability of our
financial reporting, the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, and the independence of our internal
and external auditors and audit functions and (ii) oversee
the capital structure of our company and assist our board of
directors in assuring that appropriate capital is available for
operations and strategic initiatives. In carrying out its
accounting and financial reporting oversight responsibilities
and functions, our audit and finance committee, among other
things, oversees and interacts with our independent auditors
regarding the auditors engagement
and/or
dismissal, duties, compensation, qualifications and performance;
reviews and discusses with our independent auditors the scope of
audits and our accounting principles, policies and practices;
reviews and discusses our audited annual financial statements
with our independent auditors and management; and reviews and
approves or ratifies (if appropriate) related party
transactions. Our audit and finance committee also is directly
responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and
oversight of our independent auditors. Our audit and finance
committee meets the requirements for independence under the
current Nasdaq Global Market and SEC rules, as
Messrs. Kackley, Trotter and Grohmann are independent
directors for such purposes.
Our compensation committee is comprised of Ms. Propper de
Callejon and Messrs. Quadracci, Trotter and Grohmann, with
Mr. Quadracci acting as the chair. The principal functions
of our compensation committee include (i) administering our
incentive compensation plans; (ii) establishing performance
criteria for, and evaluating the performance of, our executive
officers; (iii) annually setting salary and other
compensation for our executive officers; and (iv) annually
reviewing the compensation paid to our non-employee directors.
Our compensation committee meets the requirements for
independence under the current Nasdaq Global Market and SEC
rules, as Ms. Propper de Callejon and
Messrs. Quadracci, Trotter and Grohmann are independent
directors for such purposes.
69
Our nominating and corporate governance committee is comprised
of Messrs. Grohmann, Kackley and Quadracci, with
Mr. Grohmann acting as the chair. The principal functions
of our nominating and corporate governance committee are, among
other things, to (i) establish and communicate to
shareholders a method of recommending potential director
nominees for the committees consideration;
(ii) develop criteria for selection of director nominees,
(iii) identify and recommend persons to be selected by our
board of directors as nominees for election as directors;
(iv) plan for continuity on our board of directors;
(v) recommend action to our board of directors upon any
vacancies on the board; and (vi) consider and recommend to
our board other actions relating to our board of directors, its
members and its committees. Our nominating and corporate
governance committee meets the requirements for independence
under the current Nasdaq Global Market and SEC rules, as
Messrs. Grohmann, Kackley and Quadracci are independent
directors for such purposes.
70
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This compensation discussion and analysis describes the material
elements of compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each
of our named executive officers, whom we refer to as our
NEOs, during fiscal 2007 and describes our policies
and decisions made with respect to the information contained in
the following tables, related footnotes and narrative for fiscal
2007. We also describe actions regarding compensation taken
before or after fiscal 2007 when it enhances the understanding
of our executive compensation program, particularly with respect
to our executive and director compensation programs that will be
effective upon the closing of this offering.
Overview
of Our Executive Compensation Philosophy and
Design
We believe that a skilled, experienced and dedicated senior
management team is essential to the future performance of our
company and to building shareholder value. We have sought to
establish competitive compensation programs that enable us to
attract and retain executive officers with these qualities. The
other objectives of our compensation programs for our executive
officers are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
to motivate our executive officers to achieve strong financial
performance, particularly sales, profitability growth and
increased shareholder value;
|
|
|
|
to provide stability during our development stage; and
|
|
|
|
to align the interests of our executive officers with the
interests of our shareholders.
|
In light of these objectives, we have sought to reward our NEOs
for achieving performance goals, creating value for our
shareholders, and for loyalty to our company. We also seek to
reward initiative, innovation and creation of new products,
technologies, business methods and applications since we believe
our continued success depends in part on our ability to continue
to create new competitive products and services.
Effective upon the closing of this offering, our compensation
committee intends to follow a philosophy that will generally
establish overall total direct compensation, consisting of base
salary, annual cash bonus and long-term equity incentive
compensation, for our executives at levels that equal or exceed
the median level for similarly situated executives at comparable
public companies in order to attract, retain and motivate
highly-qualified, entrepreneurial and growth-oriented executives
who will drive the creation of shareholder value. In the case of
individual executives whom we deem to be key contributors to our
current and future performance, our compensation committee
believes that we should, as a public company, target their total
direct compensation (and/or individual components thereof) at
relative levels that equal or exceed the
75th percentile
level for similarly situated executives at comparable public
companies.
We may make exceptions to the foregoing general philosophy,
including as it may apply to the determination of any
and/or all
of the relative base salaries, annual cash bonuses, long-term
incentive compensation
and/or total
direct compensation of our executives, for outstanding
contributions to the overall success of our company and the
creation of shareholder value, as well as in cases where it may
be necessary or advisable to attract
and/or
retain executives who our compensation committee believes are or
will be key contributors to creating and sustaining shareholder
value, as determined by our compensation committee based on the
recommendations of our chief executive officer (in all cases
other than our chief executive officers own compensation).
Setting
Executive Compensation
Our board of directors, our compensation committee and our chief
executive officer each play a role in setting the compensation
of our NEOs. Our board of directors appoints the members of our
compensation committee and delegates to the compensation
committee the direct responsibility for overseeing the design
and administration of our executive compensation program. Our
compensation committee currently is comprised of
Ms. Propper de Callejon and Messrs. Quadracci, Trotter
and Grohmann, each of whom is an outside director
for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal
71
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or IRC, and a
non-employee director for purposes of
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act.
During fiscal 2007 and in previous years, our compensation
committees role was limited to setting compensation for,
and negotiating employment agreements with, our chief executive
officer, and to determining and approving equity awards for all
of our NEOs. Historically, our chief executive officer set base
salaries and performance targets, to the extent applicable, for
our executive officers other than himself, including the base
salary of his wife, who is our vice president of operations. Our
chief executive officer also negotiated employment agreements
with those executive officers who entered into such agreements,
and made recommendations to our compensation committee
concerning equity awards for our executive officers other than
himself, including his wife. For fiscal 2008 and future years,
our compensation committee will have primary responsibility for,
among other things, determining our compensation philosophy,
evaluating the performance of our executive officers, setting
the compensation and other benefits of our executive officers,
and administering our incentive compensation plans. Our chief
executive officer will make recommendations to our compensation
committee regarding the compensation of other executive
officers, including his wife, and may attend meetings of our
compensation committee at which our compensation committee
considers the compensation of other executives.
Holders of our Series C preferred stock have had, and
holders of our Series C preferred stock and the Convertible
Notes currently have, a potential role in determining
compensation of our NEOs. Under certain of the agreements
governing their investments prior to August 3, 2007, we
were not permitted to increase materially the salary, bonuses,
benefits or other compensation of our management without prior
written consent from the holders of a majority of our
Series C preferred stock. Currently, we are not permitted
to increase materially the salary, bonuses, benefits or other
compensation of our management without prior written consent
from the holders of a majority of our Series C preferred
stock and our Convertible Notes. We regularly provide
information relating to the compensation of our executive
officers to GEEFS, which owns indirectly a majority of the
Convertible Notes, and Ms. Propper de Callejon, who is
associated with Clean Technology, which owns a majority of our
Series C preferred stock, and is a member of our
compensation committee. All of these contractual obligations
will terminate upon the automatic conversion of Series C
preferred stock and Convertible Notes into common stock upon the
closing of this offering.
For fiscal 2007, we did not engage in a formal benchmarking
process for our compensation programs for NEOs. We based
compensation levels on the collective experience of the members
of our compensation committee and our chief executive officer,
their business judgment and our experiences in recruiting and
retaining executives. In anticipation of our becoming a public
company and to develop our executive compensation program that
will take effect upon the closing of this offering, our
compensation committee engaged Towers Perrin, a
nationally-recognized compensation consulting firm, to provide
recommendations and advice on our executive and director
compensation programs to benchmark our NEOs and
directors compensation, to provide advice on
change-of-control severance provisions, and to provide advice
regarding initial public offering bonuses for our NEOs.
Pursuant to its engagement, Towers Perrin provided our
compensation committee with certain benchmarking data for
salaries, annual bonuses, long-term incentive compensation,
total direct compensation, IPO bonuses, and non-employee
director and independent chairman of the board compensation. In
compiling the benchmarking data, Towers Perrin relied on the
Towers Perrin 2007 Long-Term Incentive Survey, the Towers Perrin
2007 Executive Compensation Survey, the Watson Wyatt 2006/2007
Top Management Compensation Survey and the Watson Wyatt
2007/2008 Middle Management Compensation Survey. To approximate
our labor market, Towers Perrin used market results
corresponding to the 96 participating companies in the surveys
who are in the electrical equipment and supplies industry or, to
the extent such results were not available for a position,
results corresponding to participating companies in the durable
goods manufacturing industry. Towers Perrin used regression
analysis to adjust the survey data to compensate for differences
among the revenue sizes of the companies in the survey and our
revenue size. The following is a list of the 96 participating
companies in the surveys as provided to us by Towers Perrin:
Acuity Brands Inc.
ADC Telecommunications
Adtran Incorporated
Advanced Micro Devices
Agere Systems Inc.
American Power Conversion CP
72
American Superconductor
Ametek Inc
Amphenol Corp.
Analog Devices
Andrew Corporation
Applied Materials Inc.
Arrow Electronics Inc.
Asco Value
Atlantic Scientific Corp
Atmel Corp.
Audiovox Corp CL A
Avnet Inc.
Basler Electric Company
Bell Microproducts Inc.
Brightpoint Inc.
Broadcom Corp.
BSH Home Appliances Corp
Ceridian Corp.
Chamberlain Group Inc
Cisco Systems Inc.
Cobra Electronics Corporation
CommScope Inc
Corning Inc.
CTS Corporation
Dell Inc.
Diebold Inc.
Directed Electronics Inc
Electrolux Home Products
EMC Corp/Ma
Energizer Holdings Inc.
Fairchild Semiconductor Intl.
Fargo Electronics
Gateway Inc.
General Electric Co.
Harman International
Harris Corp.
Hewlett Packard Co.
Hitachi
Hubbell Inc.
Hutchinson Technology Inc
Ikon Office Solutions
Ingram Micro Inc.
In-Sink-Erator
Intel Corp.
Intl Business Machines Corp.
Jabil Circuit Inc
Kyocera America Inc
L-3 Communications Hldgs Inc.
Lab Volt System
Lanier Worldwide Inc
Lexmark Intl Inc. -CL A
LSI Logic Corp
Lucent Technologies Inc.
Lutron Electronics
Maxtor Corp.
Maytag Corporation
Microdynamics
Micron Technology Inc.
Molex Inc.
Motorola Inc.
National Semiconductor Corp
Nvidia Corp.
Panasonic
Panduit Corporation
Pitney Bows Inc.
Plexus Corp
Preformed Line Products Co
Prestolite Wire Corporation
Nogales
Qualcomm Inc.
Ricoh Electronics Inc
Rimage Corporation
Rockwell Automation
Rockwell Collins Inc.
Sanmina SCI Corp.
Schneider Electric NA
Sharp Electronics Corporation
A.O. Smith Corp.
Solectron Corp.
Sony Corporation of America
St. Jude Medical Inc.
Sun Microsystems
Symbol Technologies
Texas Instruments Inc.
The Lamson & Sessions Company
Thermo Electron Corp
Thomas & Betts Corp.
Tyco Electronics
Universal Lighting Technology
Western Digital Corp.
Zebra Technologies Corporation
Our compensation committee also specifically benchmarked the
salaries, annual bonuses, long-term incentive compensation,
total direct compensation, perquisites and IPO bonuses paid to
named executive officers at the following industry peer group
companies deemed potentially comparable to our company: Color
Kinetics, Inc., Comverge, Inc., Echelon Corp., EnerNOC, Inc. and
First Solar, Inc. Our compensation committee considered this
industry peer group benchmarking data, along with the Towers
Perrin benchmarking data, in connection with the proposed
changes to our executive compensation programs described below,
which will become effective upon the closing of this offering.
The benchmarking data for these specifically identified peer
group companies was substantially identical to the Towers Perrin
benchmarking data.
Changes
to Executive Compensation in Connection with Our Initial Public
Offering
In fiscal 2008, in connection with, and subject to the closing
of, this offering, we have implemented several changes to our
executive compensation programs and policies, with the goal of
establishing executive compensation programs and policies
appropriate for a public company. The changes include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
We are in the process of entering into proposed new,
standardized employment agreements with our NEOs that will
become effective upon the closing of this offering. Our NEOs
have not signed the new employment agreements to date. Among
other things, the new employment agreements do the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specify the executives position, base salary for fiscal
2008 and fiscal 2009 and incentive and benefit plan
participation during the specified term;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide that our board of directors or our compensation
committee may increase the executives base salary from
time to time in its discretion;
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
Specify the term of employment under the agreement and that the
term will automatically renew unless either party gives written
notice in advance of the expiration of the term;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide for employment protections and severance benefits in the
event of certain terminations, and for enhanced protections and
benefits following a change of control; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except in the case of our chief executive officer, provide for
assignment of inventions and technical or business innovations
developed by the NEO while employed by us. As described below,
we are continuing our chief executive officers current
arrangement with respect to his intellectual property work
product. See Elements of Compensation
Retirement and Other Benefits.
|
Our compensation committees goals in proposing the new
employment agreements were to secure and retain our executive
officers and to ensure stability and structure during our
development stage, particularly as a new public company. These
employment agreements will replace the existing employment
agreements we have with certain of our NEOs. We discuss the
terms of the new employment agreements below under
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control New
Employment Agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
We have established new base salaries for our NEOs effective for
fiscal 2009, as described below under Base Salary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have amended and restated our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan,
which will be renamed the Orion Energy Systems, Inc. 2004 Stock
and Incentive Awards Plan. Among other things, the amendment and
restatement does the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases the shares available under the plan from
1.0 million to 3.5 million shares;
|
|
|
|
Replaces the authority of our chief executive officer to make
grants of awards with the ability of our board of directors to
delegate to another committee of the board, including a
committee comprised solely of our chief executive officer, the
ability to make grants of awards, subject to various
restrictions and limitations on such delegated authority;
|
|
|
|
Expands the list of performance goals that may be used for IRC
Section 162(m) awards;
|
|
|
|
Permits the grant of annual and long-term cash bonus awards for
IRC Section 162(m) purposes;
|
|
|
|
Includes a provision requiring that awards be adjusted in
certain circumstances, such as in the event of a stock split, to
avoid potential adverse accounting consequences;
|
|
|
|
Imposes a
10-year
limit on the term of a stock option;
|
|
|
|
Permits cashless exercises of stock options through a
broker-dealer;
|
|
|
|
Adds restricted stock units as a form of award available under
the plan;
|
|
|
|
Caps the amount of an award that may vest or be paid upon a
change of control to the extent needed to preserve our deduction
under the IRC excess parachute payment rules;
|
|
|
|
Permits awards to be assumed under the plan in the event we
acquire another entity;
|
|
|
|
Prohibits the repricing or backdating of stock options and stock
appreciation rights; and
|
|
|
|
Expands the list of plan provisions that may be amended only
with shareholder approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have revised and amended our compensation committee charter
to reflect our compliance with current rules and guidelines of
the Nasdaq Global Market, the Exchange Act, and Sarbanes Oxley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have implemented a cash bonus program contingent upon the
closing of this offering and, in the case of our chief executive
officer, also upon the post-offering price performance of our
common stock, which is described below under Short-Term
Cash Bonus Incentive Compensation and Other Cash Bonus
Compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our compensation committee has recommended that our board of
directors adopt stock ownership guidelines for our executive
officers and non-employee directors.
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
Our compensation committee has recommended that our board of
directors adopt a new compensation program for our non-employee
directors.
|
Elements
of Compensation
Our current compensation program for our NEOs consists of the
following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Base salary;
|
|
|
|
Short-term incentive cash bonus compensation and other cash
bonus compensation;
|
|
|
|
Long-term equity incentive compensation; and
|
|
|
|
Retirement and other benefits.
|
Base
Salary
Prior to
the Closing of this Offering
We pay our NEOs a base salary to compensate them for services
rendered and to provide them with a steady source of income for
living expenses throughout the year. In the past, we set the
base salaries of our NEOs initially through an arms-length
negotiation with each individual executive during the hiring
process, and based upon the individuals level of
responsibility and our assessment of the individuals
experience, skills and knowledge. Currently, as in previous
fiscal years, we generally pay lower base salaries than what we
believe our competitors may pay for similar positions, based on
our compensation committees experience in our industry and
general knowledge, and offer what our compensation committee
believes to be comparatively higher levels of long-term
equity-based incentive compensation in order to better link pay
with performance and with the creation of shareholder value.
Our chief executive officer and our compensation committee
review the base salaries of our NEOs (other than our chief
executive officer) for potential increases once per year. Our
chief executive officer recommends changes in base salaries, and
our compensation committee accepts, modifies or rejects our
chief executive officers recommendation, based upon
various factors, including the individual NEOs experience,
level of responsibility, skills, knowledge, base salary in prior
years, contributions to our company in prior years and
compensation received through elements other than base salary.
Pursuant to the terms of our chief executive officers
existing employment agreement, his base salary is subject to a
guaranteed increase of 8% each year, so the compensation
committee did not review his base salary for potential increases
in fiscal 2008 along with the other NEOs. Under the terms of our
proposed new employment agreement with our chief executive
officer, the compensation committee may increase our chief
executive officers base salary from time to time in its
discretion, and there is no guaranteed annual increase in his
salary.
In fiscal 2007, we increased the base salary of
Mr. Scribante from $135,000 to $150,000 in recognition of
his increasing responsibilities, including leadership of our
sales function, which was significantly responsible for a
substantial part of our increased revenue in fiscal 2007,
development of internal sales tracking tools, responsibility for
an increasing number of national accounts, and in recognition of
his experience, knowledge, skill and past and expected future
contributions to our company. In fiscal 2007, we also increased
Mr. Verfuerths base salary by 8%, from $250,000 to
$270,000 and, effective at the beginning of fiscal 2008, we
increased Mr. Verfuerths base salary from $270,000 to
$291,600, in each case pursuant to the terms of his existing
employment agreement. In fiscal 2008, we increased the base
salaries of Ms. Verfuerth and Messrs. Waibel and Potts
by $15,000 each, to $165,000. We increased
Ms. Verfuerths base salary in light of the length of
time since her base salary had last been adjusted and her
increasing responsibilities associated with our growth,
including her oversight of increasingly significant transactions
with vendors and complex scheduling and production issues. We
increased Mr. Waibels base salary in light of the
length of time since his base salary had last been adjusted and
his increasing responsibilities associated with our growth,
including his oversight of the growing capital needs of our
company. We increased Mr. Pottss base salary in light
of the length of time since his base salary had last been
adjusted and his increasing responsibilities associated with our
growth, including his oversight of the formalization and
systematization of our companys management procedures and
processes.
75
As a
Public Company
Our compensation committee believes that, as a public company,
annual base salaries for our executives should generally be
established at a relative level that is equal to or exceeds the
median level for similarly situated executives at comparable
public companies. In the case of individual executives who are
deemed to be key contributors to our current and future
performance, we believe that, as a public company, we should
establish annual base salaries at a relative level that equals
or exceeds the
75th percentile
for similarly situated executives at comparable public
companies. These general philosophies and relative target levels
are subject to exceptions based on the judgment of our
compensation committee in order to further reward and
incentivize outstanding key contributors to our current and
future performance, as well as in cases where it may be
necessary or advisable to attract
and/or
retain executives who our compensation committee believes are or
will be key contributors to creating and sustaining shareholder
value, as determined by our compensation committee based on the
recommendations of our chief executive officer (in all cases
other than our chief executive officers own compensation).
For fiscal 2009, subject to the closing of this offering, our
compensation committee has approved the following base salaries
for our currently serving NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Position
|
|
Base Salary ($)
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
460,000
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Business Development
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Operations
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Our compensation committee based the fiscal 2009 salaries on the
recommendations of our chief executive officer (other than our
chief executive officers base salary), the benchmarking
data provided by Towers Perrin, data relating to the industry
peer group companies described above, and our compensation
committees views of the relative contributions of the NEOs
to our companys current and future performance.
Mr. Verfuerths base salary for fiscal 2009 is higher
than the base salaries of our other NEOs due in part to our use
of benchmarking data, which indicates that chief executive
officers typically receive higher base salaries than other
executive officers in their organizations, and in part to our
compensation committees recognition of
Mr. Verfuerths critical importance to our company and
his key role in our past performance and our future performance.
We set the base salaries of Messrs. Waibel and Scribante
for fiscal 2009 at a level higher than the
75th percentile
of the benchmarking data provided by Towers Perrin based on the
recommendation of our chief executive officer and our
compensation committees view that Messrs. Waibel and
Scribante are key contributors to our companys current and
future performance.
Short-Term
Cash Bonus Incentive Compensation and Other Cash Bonus
Compensation
Prior to
the Closing of this Offering
In fiscal 2007, we provided certain of our NEOs with
performance-based cash incentive bonus opportunities to provide
them with competitive compensation packages and to reward
achievement of our performance objectives. We also granted
discretionary cash bonuses to other NEOs to reward them for high
levels of individual performance during fiscal 2007. The NEOs
who participated in performance-based cash incentive bonus
opportunities in fiscal 2007 were Messrs. Verfuerth,
Scribante and Wadman, and the NEOs who received discretionary
cash bonuses were Ms. Verfuerth and Messrs. Waibel and
Potts.
76
We provided Mr. Verfuerths bonus opportunity pursuant
to his employment agreement, and established the performance
measures and targets applicable to the bonus opportunity at the
time we entered into his agreement in fiscal 2006. Under his
agreement, Mr. Verfuerths bonus opportunity for
fiscal 2007 was tied to achievement of the following
company-wide financial performance targets, which were
calculated in accordance with GAAP, to the extent applicable,
and with the related bonus payments based on a percentage of his
base salary for fiscal 2007: (i) a revenue target of
$70 million, which corresponded to a potential bonus
payment of 35% of base salary; (ii) an EBITDA target of
$12 million, which corresponded to a potential bonus
payment of 35% of base salary; (iii) a capital raising
target of $20 million, which corresponded to a potential
bonus payment of 15% of base salary; and (iv) a share price
target of $10 per share, which corresponded to a potential bonus
payment of 15% of base salary.
Our compensation committee based Mr. Verfuerths
target performance levels on our business plan, setting the
targets at what it considered a stretch level at the
time of grant. Our compensation committee viewed achievement of
75% of the designated targets as more likely to be achieved than
target performance. Our compensation committee selected the four
performance metrics described above as appropriate measures of
key elements of our companys financial performance that
were consistent with the overall goals and objectives of our
executive compensation program. The committee allocated
Mr. Verfuerths bonus potential among the metrics
seeking to balance metrics relating to growth and profitability
in order to reflect the relative importance of each metric to
what the committee considered the desired performance of our
company consistent with our executive compensation philosophy.
If we had achieved target performance for all of the measures,
Mr. Verfuerth would have been eligible to receive a cash
bonus equal to 100% of his base salary for fiscal 2007. Our
compensation committee viewed a target payout of 100% of base
salary as appropriate for Mr. Verfuerth as part of a
competitive compensation package and in light of his skills,
experience, past performance and expected contributions to our
company in the future. Mr. Verfuerths employment
agreement also specified that our board had discretion to award
a bonus ranging from 0% to 60% of the amount due for target
performance related to any measure for which we achieved
performance equal to 75% or more of the specified target.
Any short-term incentive compensation earned by
Mr. Verfuerth could, under the terms of his existing
employment agreement, be paid in cash, equity or a combination
of the two, as determined by our board in consultation with
Mr. Verfuerth. We did not achieve 75% or more of any of the
specified performance targets in fiscal 2007, so
Mr. Verfuerth did not receive a bonus payment for fiscal
2007.
Mr. Scribantes existing employment agreement provided
for a bonus of up to 100% of his base salary if our company
achieved $70 million in revenue for fiscal 2007. The
agreement also specified that our board had discretion to award
a bonus, ranging from 0% to 60% of Mr. Scribantes
base salary, if we achieved performance equal to 75% or more of
the revenue target. We set Mr. Scribantes target
payout at 100% of his base salary to provide competitive
compensation and in view of the importance of his position to
our growth strategies. We did not achieve 75% or more of the
revenue target for fiscal 2007. However, in view of
Mr. Scribantes significant contributions in fiscal
2007 to the performance of our company, including his
contributions to our revenue growth in fiscal 2007, his
development of substantial national account opportunities and
his importance to our continued performance, our compensation
committee authorized a discretionary cash bonus to be paid to
Mr. Scribante. Our compensation committee based the amount
of Mr. Scribantes bonus, which was $50,000, on our
chief executive officers subjective evaluation of
Mr. Scribantes contributions to our companys
performance in fiscal 2007 and our chief executive
officers corresponding recommendations.
Our compensation committee also awarded discretionary cash
bonuses of $20,000 each to Ms. Verfuerth and
Messrs. Waibel and Potts in light of their high levels of
performance and significant contributions to our company in
fiscal 2007. Our compensation committee based the amounts of
these bonuses on our chief executive officers subjective
evaluation of the recipients contributions to our
companys performance in fiscal 2007 and his corresponding
recommendation.
Mr. Wadman was eligible under the terms of his employment
agreement for a bonus equal to 30% of his base salary based on
achievement of the same performance targets applicable to
Mr. Verfuerths bonus opportunity. Because those
targets were not achieved, Mr. Wadman did not receive any
bonus
77
payment for fiscal 2007. Mr. Wadmans employment with
us ended on February 19, 2007. We describe the terms of his
separation agreement below under Payments upon
Termination or Change of Control.
As a
Public Company
Following completion of this offering, as a public company, we
intend our annual cash bonus program to reward executives with
annual cash bonuses based on a broad combination of factors,
including our financial performance and the executives
individual performance. Our compensation committee believes that
an executives annual cash performance bonus potential
should generally be established at a relative level that is
equal to or exceeds the median level for similarly situated
executives at comparable public companies. In the case of
individual executives who are deemed to be key contributors to
our companys current and future performance, our
compensation committee believes we should establish potential
annual cash bonus amounts at a level that equals or exceeds the
75th percentile
for similarly situated executives at comparable public
companies. This general philosophy is subject to exceptions
based on the judgment of our compensation committee in order to
further reward and incentivize outstanding key contributors to
our companys current and future performance, as well as in
cases where it may be necessary or advisable to attract
and/or
retain executives who our compensation committee believes are or
will be key contributors to creating and sustaining shareholder
value, as determined by our compensation committee based on the
recommendations of our chief executive officer (in all cases
other than our chief executive officers compensation).
For fiscal 2008, consistent with this philosophy, and based on
the recommendations of Towers Perrin, our compensation committee
has approved an Executive Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Cash Incentive
Program under our 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan. This
program, which we refer to as our Cash Incentive
Program, will become effective upon the closing of this
offering. The Cash Incentive Program provides for cash bonuses
to our NEOs based on a broad mix of factors, including our
financial performance, and the NEOs individual
performance. Our compensation committee set payout ranges for
our NEOs, expressed as a percentage of fiscal 2008 base salary,
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008 Bonus Range
|
|
|
|
(% of Fiscal 2008 Base
|
|
Name and Position
|
|
Salary)
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
75-125
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
|
|
|
29-49
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Business Development
|
|
|
30-50
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
29-49
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Operations
|
|
|
23-38
|
|
Our compensation committee established these bonus ranges at a
level such that they are centered near the median of the target
annual bonuses indicated by the benchmarking data described
above for each of our NEOs, other than Messrs. Verfuerth,
Waibel and Scribante. For Messrs. Verfuerth, Waibel and
Scribante, our compensation committee established ranges
centered at a higher percentage of base salary than the median
percentage of base salary indicated by the benchmarking data,
because our compensation committee views Messrs. Verfuerth,
Waibel and Scribante as key contributors to our companys
current and future performance. The final bonus payout amounts,
if any, will be determined in our compensation committees
subjective judgment based on a broad mix of factors, including
our financial performance and the NEOs individual
performance for fiscal 2008, and may be higher or lower than the
ranges shown in the table above.
78
The Cash Incentive Program will, in connection with the new
employment agreements we are entering into with our NEOs,
supersede the existing short-term incentive compensation
arrangements for Messrs. Verfuerth and Scribante.
In connection with and effective upon the closing of this
offering, our compensation committee also has established a cash
bonus program contingent upon the closing of this offering.
Under this program, our compensation committee awarded a cash
bonus of $100,000 to Mr. Waibel and a cash bonus of
$500,000 to Mr. Verfuerth. It also approved cash bonuses
totaling $150,000 to key employees other than our NEOs payable
upon the closing of this offering. Our compensation committee
also granted an additional award to Mr. Verfuerth
consisting of a potential stock price performance cash bonus of
$100,000 per each $1.00 that the price of a share of our common
stock has increased over the initial public offering price in
this offering as of the first annual anniversary date of the
closing of this offering. Mr. Verfuerths stock price
performance cash bonus is capped at $1.5 million. Our
compensation committee made these awards to Mr. Verfuerth
as a means of providing significant motivation for
Mr. Verfuerth to increase our share price and market
capitalization over the first year after the closing of this
offering, to reward Mr. Verfuerths extraordinary
efforts on behalf of our company and our shareholders prior to
and in connection with this offering and to help mitigate the
potential adverse tax consequences that may be realized by
Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth in connection with
their repayment of certain loans from our company. See
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation for a
description of the circumstances of Mr. Verfuerths
and Ms. Verfuerths repayment of the loans and the
related potential adverse tax consequences.
Long-Term
Equity Incentive Compensation
Prior to
the Closing of this Offering
We provide the opportunity for our NEOs to earn long-term equity
incentive awards under our 2003 Stock Option Plan and our 2004
Equity Incentive Plan, which will be replaced by our new 2004
Stock and Incentive Awards Plan effective upon the closing of
this offering. Our employees, officers, directors and
consultants are eligible to participate in these plans. We
believe that long-term equity incentive awards enhance the
alignment of the interests of our NEOs and the interests of our
shareholders and provide our NEOs with incentives to remain in
our employment. For these reasons, in fiscal 2007, as in
previous years, we provided a significant component of our
NEOs compensation through means of long-term equity
incentive awards.
We have generally granted long-term equity incentive awards in
the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock,
which are initially subject to forfeiture if the
executives employment terminates for any reason. The
options generally vest and become exercisable ratably over five
years, contingent on the executives continued employment.
In the past, we have granted both incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options to our NEOs. We use time-vesting
stock options as our primary source of long-term equity
incentive compensation to our NEOs because we believe that
(i) stock options help to align the interests of our NEOs
with the interests of our shareholders by linking their
compensation with the increase in value of our common stock over
time, (ii) stock options conserve our cash resources for
use in growing our business and (iii) vesting requirements
on stock options and the limited liquidity of our stock provide
our NEOs with incentive to continue their employment with us
which, in turn, provides us with greater stability.
Our compensation committee made awards for fiscal 2007 in
December 2006, when we granted time-vesting stock options to
Ms. Verfuerth and Messrs. Verfuerth, Waibel and Potts
under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. To determine the number of
options granted to Mr. Verfuerth, our compensation
committee took into account for comparative purposes the past
grants in fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2002 of options to purchase, in
each case, 500,000 shares. Our compensation committee also
considered the scope of Mr. Verfuerths increasing
responsibilities, his past performance and anticipated future
contributions to our companys performance, both with
respect to operations and our organization, prior option grants
(including the vesting schedule of such prior grants) to
Mr. Verfuerth, Mr. Verfuerths total cash
compensation and the desirability of retaining
Mr. Verfuerth, and determined upon consideration of these
facts, as well as upon their subjective judgment formed by their
collective professional experience and expertise, that a grant
of an option to purchase 250,000 shares was appropriate in
light of Mr. Verfuerths historical and current
compensation to provide a reward that would be significant in
79
amount to Mr. Verfuerth if he performed as anticipated and
increased shareholder value. Based on this number as a starting
point, our compensation committee determined the proportionately
smaller numbers of option shares that it considered appropriate
for grants to our other executives, including our other NEOs,
based directly on the compensation committees perception
of each NEOs respective importance to our companys
ongoing performance. Our compensation committee granted
Mr. Waibel an option to purchase 100,000 shares,
Mr. Potts an option to purchase 75,000 shares, and
Ms. Verfuerth an option to purchase 50,000 shares, in
each case at an exercise price of $2.20 per share. Following
approval of the grants by our compensation committee, our board
of directors ratified and approved the compensation
committees actions.
All of the options that we granted to our NEOs in December 2006
are subject to ratable vesting over five years of continuous
employment, measured from the grant date, and have an exercise
price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the
date of grant as determined at the time of grant by our
compensation committee and board of directors. Our compensation
committee and board of directors used various sources to
determine the fair market value of our common stock for purposes
of establishing the exercise price of stock options, including
(i) independent third-party sales of our common stock;
(ii) transactions in which we issued shares of our common
and preferred stock to third-party investors; and
(iii) independent valuations of the fair market value of
our common stock. For the options we granted to our NEOs in
December 2006, our compensation committee and board of directors
determined the fair market value or our common stock primarily
in reliance on a November 30, 2006 independent valuation of
the fair market value of our common stock performed by Wipfli
LLP, an independent third-party valuation firm that we retained
to perform such valuation. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Stock-Based Compensation.
In June 2006, we granted Mr. Scribante an option to
purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock in connection
with his entering into his new employment agreement. We granted
Mr. Scribante this option in view of his increasing
responsibilities and his past and expected future contributions
to our financial performance. The option is subject to ratable
vesting over five years of continuous employment, measured from
March 31, 2006, and has an exercise price of $2.50 per
share, the price at which we offered shares in our most recent
offering of our Series B preferred stock at the time of the
option grant. We determined the number of options granted to
Mr. Scribante through an arms-length negotiation over
the terms of his employment agreement and with a goal of
providing compensation commensurate with his responsibilities
and position within our company.
In March 2007, Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth
exercised previously granted non-qualified stock options for
1,000,000 and 750,000 shares of our common stock,
respectively, and paid the exercise price of such options in the
form of a promissory note in the principal amount of $812,500
and $565,625, respectively. Under Sarbanes-Oxley, a company may
not have loans outstanding to its executive officers at the time
it files its registration statement for an initial public
offering with the SEC. As a result, in order to extinguish these
outstanding loans to Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth
prior to the filing with the SEC of the registration statement
of which this prospectus is a part, effective on July 27,
2007, Mr. Verfuerth surrendered 180,958 shares of
common stock to us in satisfaction of the $812,500 outstanding
principal amount under his March 2007 promissory note. He paid
the accrued interest on such note to us in cash on
August 2, 2007. Similarly, effective on July 27, 2007,
Ms. Verfuerth surrendered 125,974 shares of common
stock to us in satisfaction of the $565,625 outstanding
principal amount under her March 2007 promissory note. She paid
the accrued interest on such note to us in cash on
August 2, 2007. We redeemed Mr. Verfuerths and
Ms. Verfuerths shares using a fair market value of
$4.49 per share, which is the same value as the per share
conversion price of the Convertible Notes issued to an indirect
affiliate of GEEFS, Clean Technology and affiliates of Capvest
on August 3, 2007. At the same time in order not to
economically penalize Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth
in connection with such share redemptions, our compensation
committee granted Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth a
non-qualified stock option to purchase 180,958 and
125,974 shares of our common stock, respectively. The
options have an exercise price of $4.49 per share, a one-year
vesting period and a four-year term. The options granted were
designated as non-qualified stock options instead of incentive
stock options in order to provide our company with a tax
deduction for the difference between the fair market value of
such shares on the date of option exercise and their exercise
price. The one-year vesting period was determined to be
important by our committee to enhance the retention benefits to
our company of granting such options.
80
The four-year exercise period is shorter than our more typical
option exercise period because our compensation committee
decided to carry over the then remaining exercise period that
was applicable to the stock options that were exercised by
Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth in March 2007. Our
compensation committee determined that this method of satisfying
Mr. Verfuerths and Ms. Verfuerths
outstanding loans was fair to our company and its shareholders
because it (i) allowed us to proceed with this initial
public offering; (ii) was not dilutive to our shareholders;
(iii) provided us with additional retention benefits; and
(iv) provided approximately the same economic consequences
to Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth as originally
contemplated, although Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth
may recognize certain originally unintended adverse tax
consequences, and we may recognize certain originally unintended
tax benefits, upon their ultimate exercise of the stock options
granted.
We made all of the option grants to our NEOs in fiscal 2007
under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. As required by the 2004
Equity Incentive Plan, all options granted in fiscal 2007 to our
NEOs had an exercise price equal to or higher than the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant as
determined at the time of grant by our compensation committee
and our board of directors. An exercise price equal to or higher
than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant is also required to prevent the options from being
classified as deferred compensation subject to the
election and payment timing requirements of Section 409A of
the IRC. The number of shares of our common stock covered by the
options granted to each of our NEOs in fiscal 2007 is reflected
in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. Except as
described above, the options expire to the extent unexercised on
the earliest of the tenth anniversary of the grant date, a
termination of employment for cause, three months following a
termination other than for cause or due to death, retirement or
disability and one year following a termination of employment
due to death or disability. See Payments upon
Termination or Change of Control for a description of the
terms of the options relating to a change of control of our
company.
As a
Public Company
As a public company, we intend to base a significant portion of
the total direct compensation payable to our executives on the
creation of shareholder value in order to better link executive
pay to shareholder value, and also to reward executives for
increasing shareholder value. Following the completion of this
offering, our compensation committee generally intends to
establish our executives long-term incentive compensation
potential at or above the median level for similarly situated
executives at comparable companies. In the case of individual
executives whom we deem to be key contributors to our current
and future performance, we believe we should target long-term
incentive compensation at a level that equals or exceeds the
75th percentile
for similarly situated executives at comparable public
companies. These general philosophies and relative target levels
are subject to exceptions based on the judgment of our
compensation committee in order to further reward and
incentivize outstanding key contributors to our current and
future performance, as well as in cases where it may be
necessary or advisable to attract
and/or
retain executives who our compensation committee believes are or
will be key contributors to creating and sustaining shareholder
value, as determined by our compensation committee based on the
recommendations of our chief executive officer (in all cases
other than our chief executive officers own compensation).
Our compensation committee also believes that this emphasis on
long-term equity-based incentive compensation will facilitate
executive retention and loyalty and will motivate our executives
to achieve strong financial performance.
Our compensation committee intends to award long-term equity
incentives to our executives on an annual basis beginning in
fiscal 2009. More frequent awards may be made at the discretion
of our compensation committee on other occasions. Future awards
will be made under our 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan,
which we have modified as described above under Changes to
Executive Compensation in Connection with Our Initial Public
Offering and which will become effective upon closing of
this offering.
81
Retirement
and Other Benefits
Welfare and Retirement Benefits. As part of a
competitive compensation package, we sponsor a welfare benefit
plan that offers health, life and disability insurance coverage
to participating employees. In addition, to help our employees
prepare for retirement, we sponsor the Orion Energy Systems Ltd
401(k) Plan and match employee contributions at a rate of 3% of
the first $5,000 of an employees contributions. Our NEOs
participate in the broad-based welfare plans and the 401(k) Plan
on the same basis as our other employees. We also provide
enhanced life and disability insurance benefits for our NEOs.
Under our enhanced life insurance benefit, we pay the full cost
of premiums for life insurance policies for our NEOs. The
amounts of the premiums are reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table below. Our enhanced disability insurance
benefit includes a higher maximum benefit level than under our
broad-based plan, cost of living adjustments and a portability
feature.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. We
provide perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe
are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation
program to better enable our executives to perform their duties
and to enable us to attract and retain employees for key
positions. Under their employment agreements, we provided
Mr. Verfuerth and, until his termination of employment,
Mr. Wadman with a car allowance of $1,000 per month. We
also provide Ms. Verfuerth and Messrs. Waibel and
Potts with a car allowance of $1,000 per month, and we provided
Mr. Scribante with a similar car allowance for the first
part of fiscal 2007, until we discontinued the allowance with
respect to all of our sales group members in May 2006.
Mr. Scribante now participates in a program under which we
provide mileage reimbursement for business travel.
In connection with the formation of our company, we loaned
Mr. Verfuerth $47,069 to purchase common stock. This note
bore interest at 1.46% and was payable upon demand. Interest of
$19,883 had accrued on the note through June 30, 2007.
Mr. Verfuerth paid this note and all accrued interest in
cash on August 2, 2007. In addition, from time to time, we
advanced Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth amounts net
of payment of the guarantee fees described below. Pursuant to
Mr. Verfuerths existing employment agreement, we
forgave $36,667 of these outstanding advances in fiscal 2007, as
reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. The outstanding
advances were $229,307 as of June 30, 2007 and did not bear
interest. Mr. Verfuerth paid the balance outstanding, net
of amounts that we forgave pursuant to his existing employment
agreement, in cash on August 2, 2007.
Mr. Verfuerths existing employment agreement entitled
him to a guarantee fee of 1% of portions of our indebtedness
that he personally guaranteed. We determined the amount of the
guarantee fee as a result of an arms length negotiation
with Mr. Verfuerth and based on our compensation
committees and our managements collective experience
with third-party debt obligation guarantee fees in other
contexts indicating that 1% was generally a reasonable
approximation of a market rate for such fees. Historically, we
used this arrangement to permit us to borrow money at lower
interest rates. These guarantees have been released. In fiscal
2007, we paid Mr. Verfuerth $77,880 in related guarantee
fees, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
Mr. Verfuerths existing employment agreement also
entitles him to ownership of any intellectual property work
product he creates during the term of his agreement, but
requires him to disclose to us, and give us the option to
acquire, all such work product. Under his existing employment
agreement, the price of such patented or patent pending work
product is subject to negotiation, but may not exceed $1,500 per
month per item of work product during the period in which we
significantly used or rely upon the item. The existing
employment agreement entitles us to acquire all of
Mr. Verfuerths intellectual property work product
with respect to which he does not intend to file a patent for a
single flat fee of $1,000. The agreement also requires
Mr. Verfuerth to communicate with us regarding any of his
intellectual property work product that we acquired and to
provide reasonable assistance to us in enforcing our rights in
any such work product. We provided this arrangement to give
Mr. Verfuerth an incentive to create potentially valuable
intellectual property for use in our business, to compensate him
for any such intellectual property he might create and to ensure
that we would have the option to acquire any such intellectual
property. In fiscal 2007, we paid Mr. Verfuerth $27,000 in
intellectual property fees for intellectual property work
product that we acquired, as reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table, and such fees currently total $12,000 per
month. Under Mr. Verfuerths proposed new employment
agreement, we will continue the existing arrangement with
Mr. Verfuerth with respect to intellectual property until
the end of fiscal 2008. See Risk Factors Risks
Relating to Our Business
82
Some of the intellectual property we use in our business is
owned by our chief executive officer. In determining the
other elements of Mr. Verfuerths total direct
compensation, our compensation committee considered the
intellectual property fees that we will pay to
Mr. Verfuerth under this arrangement as part of his total
direct compensation.
Severance
and Change of Control Arrangements
Under our new employment agreements with our NEOs, we will
provide certain protections to our NEOs in the event of certain
terminations of their employment, including enhanced protections
for certain terminations that may occur after a change of
control of our company after this offering. In general, under
the new employment agreements, our NEOs will become entitled to
severance benefits on the occurrence of an involuntary
termination without cause or a voluntary termination with good
reason, and these benefits will be enhanced following a change
of control of our company after this offering. Our NEOs will
only receive the enhanced severance benefits following a change
in control, however, if their employment terminates without
cause or for good reason. We describe this type of arrangement
as subject to a double trigger. Under the new
employment agreements, all payments, including any double
trigger payments, to be made to our NEOs in connection with a
change of control under the employment agreements and any other
of our agreements or plans will be subject to a potential
cut-back in the event any such payments or other
benefits become subject to non-deductibility or excise taxes as
excess parachute payments under Code
Section 280G or 4999. The cut-back provisions have been
structured such that all amounts payable under the employment
agreement and other of our agreements or plans that constitute
change of control payments will be cut back to one dollar less
than three times the executives base amount,
as defined by Code Section 280G, unless the executive would
retain a greater amount by receiving the full amount of the
payment and paying the related excise taxes.
Our 2003 Stock Option Plan and our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
also provide potential protections to our NEOs in the event of
certain changes of control. Under these plans, our NEOs
stock options that are unvested at the time of a change of
control may become vested on an accelerated basis in the event
of certain changes of control. This offering will not constitute
a change in control under our plans.
We have selected these triggering events to afford our NEOs some
protection in the event of a termination of their employment,
particularly after a change of control, that might occur after
the closing of this offering. We believe these types of
protections better enable them to focus their efforts on behalf
of our company. We also provide severance benefits in order to
obtain from our NEOs certain concessions that protect our
interests, including their agreement to confidentiality,
intellectual property rights waiver, non-solicitation and
non-competition provisions. See below under the heading
Payments upon Termination or Change of Control for a
description of the specific circumstances that would trigger
payment or the provision of other benefits under these
arrangements, as well as a description, explanation and
quantification of the payments and benefits under each
circumstance. This offering will not constitute a change
in control under the new employment agreements.
In connection with the termination of employment of
Messrs. Wadman and Prange in fiscal 2007, we entered into
separation agreements providing for certain payments and other
benefits. The terms of the separation agreements are described
below under Payments upon Termination or Change of
Control. We agreed to provide these payments and other
benefits in order to obtain certain protections for our company,
including a release of claims and certain restrictive covenants,
and to settle any disputes that might otherwise arise in
connection with the termination of employment.
Other
Policies
Policies On Timing of Option Grants. As a
privately-owned company, there has been no public market for our
common stock. Accordingly, in fiscal 2007, we did not have a
policy on the timing of option grants appropriate for a public
company. In connection with this offering, our compensation
committee and board of directors adopted such a policy, under
which our compensation committee generally will make annual
option grants beginning in fiscal 2009 effective as of the date
two business days after our next quarterly (or year-end)
earnings release following the decision to make the grant,
regardless of the timing of the decision. Our compensation
committee has elected to grant and price option awards shortly
following our earnings releases so that options are priced at a
point in time when
83
the most important information about our company then known to
management and our board is likely to have been disseminated in
the market.
Our board of directors has also delegated limited authority to
our chief executive officer, acting as a subcommittee of our
compensation committee, to grant equity-based awards under our
2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan. Our chief executive
officer may grant awards covering up to 250,000 shares of
our common stock per year to certain non-executive officers in
connection with offers of employment, promotions and certain
other circumstances. Under this delegation of authority, any
options or stock appreciation rights granted by our chief
executive officer must have an effective grant date on the first
business day of the month following the event giving rise to the
award.
As amended and restated in connection with this offering, our
2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan will not permit awards of
stock options or stock appreciation rights with an effective
grant date prior to the date our compensation committee or our
chief executive officer takes action to approve the award.
Executive Officer Stock Ownership
Guidelines. One of the key objectives of our
executive compensation program is alignment of the interests of
our executive officers with the interests of our shareholders.
We believe that ensuring that executive officers are
shareholders and have a significant financial interest in our
company is an effective means to accomplish this objective. Our
compensation committee has, therefore, adopted stock ownership
guidelines for our executive officers effective upon the closing
of this offering. The guidelines will require executive officers
to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to or in
excess of a multiple of, for our current executive officers, the
officers fiscal 2008 base salary and, for subsequently
hired, promoted, elected or appointed newly serving officers,
their base salary at the time of such hiring, promotion,
election or appointment. In determining to adopt these stock
ownership guidelines, and in determining the multiples set forth
below, our compensation committee reviewed and discussed
information provided by Towers Perrin regarding the prevalence
of stock ownership guidelines, the various ways in which
companies determine the parameters for those guidelines, and,
for companies that use a multiple of salaries as the basis for
their guidelines, the relevant multiples typically utilized. The
information provided by Towers Perrin was based on those
companies with stock ownership guidelines included in Towers
Perrins database of 96 surveyed companies. Our
compensation committee considered the information provided and
the recommendations of Towers Perrin in this regard, which it
subjectively believed to be reasonable, and determined the
multiples for each position to be as follows:
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Multiple of Base Salary
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Five
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
Three
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Three
|
General Counsel
|
|
Three
|
Vice President
|
|
One
|
We will determine the number of shares the ownership guidelines
require our executive officers to hold based on, for our current
executive officers, the initial public offering price of our
common stock and, for subsequently hired, promoted, elected or
appointed newly serving executive officers, the closing sale
price of our common stock on the first trading day on or after
their date of hiring, promotion, election or appointment, as the
case may be. Executive officers will be permitted to satisfy the
ownership guidelines with shares of our common stock that they
acquire through the exercise of stock options or other similar
equity-based awards, through retention upon vesting of
restricted shares or other similar equity-based awards and
through direct share purchases. Our current executive officers
will have five years following the closing of this offering to
satisfy their ownership guidelines, and subsequently hired,
promoted, elected or appointed newly serving executive officers
will be required to satisfy their ownership guidelines within
five years after such hiring, promotion, election or appointment.
Tax and Accounting Considerations. In setting
compensation for our NEOs, our compensation committee considers
the deductibility of compensation under the IRC. As a private
company, we were able to deduct all compensation that we paid to
our NEOs as long as it was reasonable. After the closing of this
offering, we will be subject to the provisions of
Section 162(m) of the IRC. Section 162(m)
84
prohibits us from taking a tax deduction for compensation in
excess of $1.0 million that is paid to our chief executive
officer and our NEOs, excluding our chief financial officer, and
that is not considered performance-based
compensation under Section 162(m). However, certain
transition rules of Section 162(m) permit us to treat as
performance-based compensation that is not subject to the
$1.0 million cap (i) the compensation resulting from
the exercise of stock options that we granted prior to this
offering; (ii) the compensation payable under bonus
arrangements that were in place prior to this offering; and
(iii) compensation resulting from the exercise of stock
options and stock appreciation rights, or the vesting of
restricted stock, that we may grant during the period that
begins after the closing of this offering and generally ends on
the date of our annual shareholders meeting that occurs in 2011.
Effective upon closing of this offering, our amended and
restated 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan will provide for
the grant of performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m). Our compensation committee may, however,
approve compensation that will not meet the requirements of
Section 162(m) in order to ensure competitive levels of
total compensation for our executive officers.
Effective April 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123(R), Share
Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R), which
requires us to expense the estimated fair value of employee
stock options and similar awards based on the fair value of the
award on the date of grant. Prior to fiscal 2007, we accounted
for our stock option awards under the intrinsic value method
under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock issued to Employees,
and we did not recognize the fair value expense of our stock
option awards in our statement of operations, although we did
report our pro forma stock option award fair value expense in
the footnotes to our financial statements. The new method of
expensing share-based payments will result generally in an
increase in the near-term expense associated with awards of
stock options. We recognized $0.4 million of stock-based
compensation expense in fiscal 2007. As of March 31, 2007,
we expected to recognize $3.0 million of total unrecognized
stock option compensation cost over a weighted average period of
three years. We expect to recognize $0.7 million of
stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2008 based on our
stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2007. This
expense will increase further to the extent we have granted
additional stock options in fiscal 2008. Taking into account our
stock options granted during fiscal 2008 through the date of
this prospectus, a total of $3.9 million of stock option
compensation is expected to be recognized by us over a weighted
average period of three years, including $1.0 million in
fiscal 2008. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Stock-Based Compensation. Despite these charges, we
continue to believe that stock options are an effective method
of compensation and we anticipate that we will continue to use
stock options as an integral part of our compensation program.
In fiscal 2007, as in past years, we granted incentive stock
options to our NEOs under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. We
have also granted non-qualified stock options under our
equity-based plans. We intend for the incentive stock options
that we grant to qualify under Section 422 of the IRC,
which would result in favorable tax treatment to the recipient
of the option if the recipient complies with various
restrictions and disposes of the stock acquired under the option
in a so-called qualifying disposition. Our company
does not receive an income tax deduction with respect to
incentive stock options unless there is a disqualifying
disposition of the stock acquired under the option. Our
compensation committee believes that the favorable tax treatment
of incentive stock options to the recipient is a valuable tool
in our efforts to provide competitive compensation to attract
and retain excellent employees for key positions and therefore,
despite the potential loss of income tax deductions to our
company, may continue to grant incentive stock options to our
executives.
We maintain certain deferred compensation arrangements for our
employees and non-employee directors that are potentially
subject to IRC Section 409A. If such an arrangement is
neither exempt from the application of IRC Section 409A nor
complies with the provisions of IRC Section 409A, then the
employee or non-employee director participant in such
arrangement is considered to have taxable income when the
deferred compensation vests, even if not paid at such time, and
such income is subject to an additional 20% income tax. In such
event, we are obligated to report such taxable income to the IRS
and, for employees, withhold both regular income taxes and the
20% additional income tax. If we fail to do so, we could be
liable for the withholding taxes and interest and penalties
thereon. Stock options with an exercise price lower than the
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant are
not exempt from coverage under IRC Section 409A. We believe
that all of our stock option
85
grants are exempt from coverage under IRC Section 409A. Our
deferred compensation arrangements are intended to either
qualify for an exemption from, or to comply with, IRC
Section 409A.
Summary
Compensation Table for Fiscal 2007
The following table sets forth for our NEOs: (i) the dollar
amount of base salary earned during fiscal 2007; (ii) the
dollar value of bonuses earned during fiscal 2007;
(iii) the dollar value of our SFAS 123(R) expense
during fiscal 2007 for all equity-based awards held by our NEOs;
(iv) all other compensation for fiscal 2007; and
(v) the dollar value of total compensation for fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,572
|
|
|
|
156,739
|
(2)
|
|
|
445,311
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
18,562
|
|
|
|
13,014
|
(3)
|
|
|
201,576
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Business Development
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
149,375
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,291
|
|
|
|
15,764
|
(4)
|
|
|
268,430
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
16,705
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
(3)
|
|
|
201,758
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Operations
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
14,848
|
|
|
|
12,366
|
(5)
|
|
|
197,214
|
|
Bruce Wadman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Chief Operating Officer(6)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
160,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,042
|
|
|
|
112,589
|
|
|
|
290,044
|
|
James L. Prange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Vice President of Business Development(7)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
126,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,419
|
|
|
|
40,306
|
|
|
|
180,225
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amount of expense recognized for financial
accounting purposes pursuant to SFAS 123(R) for fiscal 2007
in our financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the
impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes (i) $77,880 in guarantee fees we paid to
Mr. Verfuerth in exchange for his personal guarantee of
certain of our outstanding indebtedness (see Related Party
Transactions); (ii) $36,667 in forgiveness of
outstanding indebtedness pursuant to Mr. Verfuerths
existing employment agreement (see Related Party
Transactions); (iii) $27,000 in intellectual property
fees we paid to Mr. Verfuerth pursuant to his existing
employment agreement; (iv) an automobile allowance of
$12,000; and (v) $3,192 in life insurance premiums and
health club membership dues. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes (i) an automobile allowance of $12,000;
(ii) matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan; and
(iii) life insurance premiums. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes (i) an automobile allowance of $1,000;
(ii) life insurance premiums; and (iii) reimbursement
of health and disability insurance premiums pursuant to the
terms of Mr. Scribantes employment agreement. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (i) an automobile allowance of $12,000 and
(ii) life insurance premiums. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Wadmans employment with us ended on
February 19, 2007. The amounts shown in All Other
Compensation include (i) $101,439 of payments and
other benefits pursuant to a separation agreement that we
entered into in connection with Mr. Wadmans
termination of employment (see Payments upon Termination
or Change of Control); (ii) $11,000 as an automobile
allowance; and (iii) matching contributions under our
401(k) Plan. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Pranges employment with us ended on
March 12, 2007. The amounts shown in All Other
Compensation consist of payments for services rendered in
fiscal years prior to fiscal 2007 that we made to
Mr. Prange pursuant to a separation agreement in connection
with the termination of his employment (see Payments upon
Termination or Change of Control). |
86
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2007
As described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
under our current 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and employment
agreements with certain of our NEOs, we granted stock options
and non-equity incentive awards (i.e., cash bonuses) to our NEOs
in fiscal 2007. The following table sets forth information
regarding all such stock options and awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Price of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Max
|
|
Options
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)(2)
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
(5)
|
|
|
329,965
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
12/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
(5)
|
|
|
131,986
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
(6)
|
|
|
126,697
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
12/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
(5)
|
|
|
98,990
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
12/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
(5)
|
|
|
65,993
|
|
Bruce Wadman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Prange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts in the three columns below represent possible payments
for the cash bonus incentive compensation awards that we granted
with respect to the performance period of fiscal 2007. No
amounts were actually earned under these awards, although we did
pay Messrs. Scribante, Potts and Waibel and
Ms. Verfuerth discretionary bonuses of $50,000, $20,000,
$20,000 and $20,000, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
We granted the stock options listed in this column under our
2004 Equity Incentive Plan in fiscal 2007. As described under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Elements
of Compensation Long-Term Equity Incentive
Compensation we granted stock options on July 27,
2007 to Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth for
180,958 shares and 125,974 shares, respectively, at an
exercise price of $4.49 per share, in connection with their
satisfaction of certain loans from us through their surrender of
an equal number of shares of our common stock. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value of the stock options
computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R). |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the maximum discretionary payout of 60% of the target
payout for achievement of 75% of target performance with respect
to each performance measure under the award. |
|
(5) |
|
The exercise price per share was equal to the fair market value
of a share of our common stock on the grant date, as determined
by our compensation committee and board of directors. |
|
(6) |
|
The exercise price per share of $2.50 was equal to the price at
which we offered shares in our most recent offering of our
Series B preferred stock at the time of the option grant. |
87
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal 2007 Year End
The following table sets out information on outstanding stock
option awards held by our NEOs as of March 31, 2007,
including the number of shares underlying both exercisable and
unexercisable portions of each stock option, as well as the
exercise price and expiration date of each outstanding option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
(1)(2)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
12/20/2016
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
12/20/2016
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
06/02/2016
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
07/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
03/24/2014
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
12/20/2016
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.938
|
|
|
|
10/01/2011
|
|
|
|
|
340,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.688
|
|
|
|
06/01/2011
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(1)(8)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
12/20/2016
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.938
|
|
|
|
10/01/2011
|
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.688
|
|
|
|
10/01/2011
|
|
Bruce Wadman(9)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
05/20/2007
|
|
James L. Prange(10)
|
|
|
172,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.688
|
|
|
|
06/10/2007
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not reflect the July 27, 2007 grant of options to
purchase 180,958 and 125,974 shares of our common stock,
respectively, to Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth
described above under Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Elements of Compensation
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation, because such
stock options were not outstanding as of March 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 50,000 shares on
December 20 of each of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011,
contingent on Mr. Verfuerths continued employment
through the applicable vesting date. |
|
(3) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 20,000 shares on
December 20 of each of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011,
contingent on Mr. Waibels continued employment
through the applicable vesting date. |
|
(4) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 20,000 shares on March
31 of each of 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, contingent on
Mr. Scribantes continued employment through the
applicable vesting date. |
|
(5) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 50,000 shares on March
31 of each of 2008 and 2009, and with respect to
25,000 shares on March 31, 2010, contingent on
Mr. Scribantes continued employment through the
applicable vesting date. |
|
(6) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 8,000 shares on March
31 of each of 2008 and 2009, contingent on
Mr. Scribantes continued employment through the
applicable vesting date. |
|
(7) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 15,000 shares on
December 20 of each of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011,
contingent on Mr. Pottss continued employment through
the applicable vesting date. |
|
(8) |
|
The option will vest with respect to 10,000 shares on
December 20 of each of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011,
contingent on Ms. Verfuerths continued employment
through the applicable vesting date. |
|
(9) |
|
Subsequent to March 31, 2007, in connection with
Mr. Wadmans termination of employment, we entered
into a separation agreement with Mr. Wadman in which we
agreed to amend his option agreement to permit Mr. Wadman
to exercise the option with respect to an additional
20,000 shares during a nine-month period between
June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010, so long as he
complies with his obligations under his separation agreement.
The amendment also extends the exercise period of the option
with respect to the original 20,000 shares beyond the
normal expiration date of the option. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Mr. Pranges employment with us ended on
March 12, 2007. In connection with Mr. Pranges
termination of employment, we entered into a separation
agreement with Mr. Prange. In early October 2007, we
notified Mr. Prange that we believed that he had violated
his obligations of non-disparagement under his separation
agreement, and that we had taken action to cancel his options |
88
|
|
|
|
|
to purchase 172,222 shares of our common stock and also to
cancel 23,000 shares of our common stock held by him that
he received upon his previous exercise of options in connection
with the separation agreement. Mr. Prange has since
contested these actions and has threatened legal action if we do
not reinstate his options and shares. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2007
The following table sets forth information regarding the
exercise of stock options that occurred during fiscal 2007 for
each of our NEOs on an aggregated basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,387,500
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
920,625
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
59,682
|
|
|
|
90,239
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
783,334
|
|
|
|
1,134,776
|
|
Bruce Wadman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Prange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the difference, if any, between the fair market value
on the date of exercise of the shares purchased as determined by
our compensation committee and our board of directors and the
aggregate exercise price paid by the executive. |
Payments
Upon Termination or Change of Control
Arrangements
in Effect Prior to this Offering
Under Mr. Verfuerths employment agreement, in the
event of a termination other than for cause, he would be
entitled to a severance payment equal to 150% of his
then-current base salary, paid in a lump sum within 30 days
of his termination of employment, and a pro rated bonus, paid in
a lump sum within 90 days after the close of the otherwise
applicable bonus period. If Mr. Verfuerths employment
had terminated on the last day of fiscal 2007, other than for
cause, his employment agreement would have entitled him to a
lump sum severance payment of $405,000.
Mr. Wadmans employment with us terminated on
February 19, 2007. In connection with
Mr. Wadmans termination of employment, we entered
into a separation agreement, effective July 5, 2007,
pursuant to which we agreed to provide him with six months
severance pay and COBRA coverage at our expense for six months.
The severance pay was equal to $87,500 in the aggregate, and the
value of the COBRA coverage was approximately $5,435. We also
agreed to amend Mr. Wadmans existing option
agreement, which was exercisable with respect to
20,000 shares of common stock on the date of termination,
to permit Mr. Wadman to exercise the option with respect to
an additional 20,000 shares during a nine-month period
between June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010 so long as he
complies with his obligations under his separation agreement.
The amendment also extends the exercise period of the option
with respect to the original 20,000 shares beyond the
normal expiration date of the option. The weighted average
exercise price per share of Mr. Wadmans option is
$2.25. Based on an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share (the mid-point of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), the
aggregate intrinsic value of Mr. Wadmans
option, or the aggregate difference between the exercise price
and the value of the shares that Mr. Wadman could acquire
on a hypothetical exercise of his option with respect to all
40,000 of the shares underlying his options, would be
$ . In exchange for these benefits,
Mr. Wadman agreed to a release of claims and to certain
restrictive covenants, including mutual non-disparagement,
confidentiality and customary non-competition and
non-solicitation restrictions for a period of 20 months
following the effective date of his separation agreement. The
20-month
period will expire on March 5, 2009.
In connection with Mr. Pranges termination of
employment effective March 12, 2007, we entered into a
separation agreement, effective July 18, 2007, pursuant to
which we agreed to provide him with
89
approximately $40,306 in allegedly owed back pay and
approximately $7,725 in business expenses. We also agreed to
amend Mr. Pranges existing option agreement, which
was exercisable with respect to 172,222 shares of common
stock on the date of termination, to permit Mr. Prange to
exercise the option with respect to the 48,000 shares not
otherwise exercisable under his option during a
90-day
period following the effective date of his separation agreement.
We also agreed to amend Mr. Pranges option agreement
to permit him to exercise his option with respect to
17,222 shares for a
90-day
period commencing upon the closing of our initial public
offering, and to exercise his option with respect to the
remaining 172,222 shares (less any of the
17,222 shares he acquires following our initial public
offering) between March 12, 2009 and June 10, 2009, in
each case so long as Mr. Prange complied with his
obligations under his separation agreement. In exchange for
these benefits, Mr. Prange agreed to a release of claims
and certain restrictive covenants, including mutual
non-disparagement, confidentiality and customary non-competition
and non-solicitation restrictions for a period of 24 months
following the date of his termination of employment. The
24-month
period will end on March 12, 2009.
In early October 2007, we notified Mr. Prange that we
believed that he had violated his obligations of
non-disparagement under his separation agreement, and that we
had taken action to cancel his options to purchase
172,222 shares of our common stock and also to cancel
23,000 shares of our common stock held by him that he
received upon his previous exercise of options in connection
with the separation agreement. Mr. Prange has since
contested these actions and has threatened legal action if we do
not reinstate his options and shares.
New
Employment Agreements
Our proposed new employment agreements with our NEOs will become
effective upon the closing of this offering and their execution
by our NEOs. Under these new agreements, our NEOs will be
entitled to certain severance payments and other benefits on a
qualifying employment termination, including certain enhanced
protections under such circumstances occurring after a change in
control of our company. If the executives employment is
terminated without cause or for good
reason prior to the end of the employment period, the
executive will be entitled to a lump sum severance benefit equal
to a multiple (indicated in the table below) of the sum of his
base salary plus the average of the prior three years
bonuses; a pro rata bonus for the year of the termination; and
COBRA premiums at the active employee rate for the duration of
the executives COBRA continuation coverage period.
Cause is defined in the new employment agreements as
a good faith finding by our board of directors that the
executive has (i) failed, neglected, or refused to perform
the lawful employment duties related to his position or that we
assigned to him (other than due to disability);
(ii) committed any willful, intentional, or grossly
negligent act having the effect of materially injuring our
interests, business, or reputation; (iii) violated or
failed to comply in any material respect with our published
rules, regulations, or policies; (iv) committed an act
constituting a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude,
fraud, theft, or dishonesty; (v) misappropriated or
embezzled any of our property (whether or not an act
constituting a felony or misdemeanor); or (vi) breached any
material provision of the employment agreement or any other
applicable confidentiality, non-compete, non-solicit, general
release, covenant not-to-sue, or other agreement with us.
Good reason is defined in the new employment
agreements as the occurrence of any of the following without the
executives consent: (i) a material diminution in the
executives base salary; (ii) a material diminution in
the executives authority, duties or responsibilities;
(iii) a material diminution in the authority, duties or
responsibilities of the supervisor to whom the executive is
required to report; (iv) a material diminution in the
budget over which the executive retains authority; (v) a
material change in the geographic location at which the
executive must perform services; or (vi) a material breach
by us of any provision of the employment agreement.
90
The severance multiples, employment and renewal terms and
restrictive covenants under the new employment agreements, prior
to any change of control occurring after this offering, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Renewal
|
|
|
Noncompete and
|
|
Executive
|
|
Severance
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Confidentiality
|
|
|
Chief executive officer
|
|
2 × Salary +
|
|
|
2 Years
|
|
|
|
2 Years
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief financial officer
|
|
1 × Salary +
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General counsel
|
|
1 × Salary +
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive vice presidents
|
|
1 × Salary +
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice presidents
|
|
1/2 × Salary +
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We set the severance multiples, employment and renewal terms and
restrictive covenants under the new employment agreements based
on advice from Towers Perrin and legal advisors that such
amounts and terms are consistent with general public company
practices and our belief that these amounts and terms were
necessary to provide our NEOs with compensation arrangements
that will help us to retain and attract high-quality executives
in a competitive job market. The severance multiples and
employment and renewal terms vary among our individual NEOs
according to position as a result of our attempt to remain
consistent with general public company practice.
The new employment agreements would also provide enhanced
benefits for our NEOs following a change of control after
closing of this offering. Upon a change of control, the
executives employment term would automatically be extended
for a specified period, which would vary based upon the
executives position, as shown in the chart below.
Following the change of control, the executive would be
guaranteed the same base salary and a bonus opportunity at least
equal to 100% of the prior years target award and with the
same general probability of achieving performance goals as was
in effect prior to the change of control. In addition, the
executive would be guaranteed participation in salaried and
executive benefit plans that provide benefits, in the aggregate,
at least as great as the benefits being provided prior to the
change of control.
The severance provisions would remain the same as in the
pre-change of control context as described above, except that
the multiplier used to determine the severance amount and the
post change of control employment term would increase, as is
shown in the table below. The table also indicates the
provisions in the employment agreements regarding triggering
events and the treatment of payments under the agreements if the
non-deductibility and excise tax provisions of Code
Sections 280G and 4999 were triggered, as discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
|
Excise Tax
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Severance
|
|
Term
|
|
Trigger
|
|
Gross-Up
|
|
Valley
|
|
Chief executive officer
|
|
3 × Salary +
|
|
3 Years
|
|
Double
|
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief financial officer
|
|
2 × Salary +
|
|
2 Years
|
|
Double
|
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General counsel
|
|
2 × Salary +
|
|
2 Years
|
|
Double
|
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive vice presidents
|
|
2 × Salary +
|
|
2 Years
|
|
Double
|
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice presidents
|
|
1 × Salary +
|
|
1 Year
|
|
Double
|
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Avg. Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We set the post change of control severance multiples and
employment terms under the new employment agreements based on
our belief that these amounts and terms will provide appropriate
levels of protection for our NEOs to enable them to focus their
efforts on behalf of our company without undue concern for their
employment following a change in control. In making this
determination, our
91
compensation committee considered information provided by
Towers Perrin indicating that the proposed change of control
severance multiples and employment terms were generally
consistent with the practices of Towers Perrins 96
surveyed companies.
A change of control under the new employment agreements would
generally occur when a third party acquires 20% or more of our
outstanding stock, there is a hostile board election, a merger
occurs in which our shareholders cease to own 50% of the equity
of the successor, or we are liquidated or dissolved, or
substantially all of our assets are sold, in each case after the
closing of this offering. We have agreed to treat these events
as triggering events under the new employment agreements because
such events would represent significant changes in the ownership
of our company and could signal potential uncertainty regarding
the job security of our NEOs. Specifically, we believe that an
acquisition by a third party of 20% or more of our outstanding
stock would constitute a significant change in ownership of our
company after this offering because we anticipate having a
diverse, widely-dispersed shareholder base. We believe the types
of protections provided under our new employment agreements
better enable our executives to focus their efforts on behalf of
our company during such times of uncertainty.
The new employment agreements contain a valley
excise tax provision to address the issue of Code
Sections 280G and 4999 non-deductibility and excise taxes
on excess parachute payments. Code
Sections 280G and 4999 may affect the deductibility
of, and impose additional excise taxes on, certain payments that
are made upon or in connection with a change of control. The
valley provision provides that all amounts payable under the
employment agreement and any other of our agreements or plans
that constitute change of control payments will be cut back to
one dollar less than three times the executives base
amount, as defined by Code Section 280G, unless the
executive would retain a greater amount by receiving the full
amount of the payment and personally paying the excise taxes.
Under the new employment agreements, we would not be obligated
to gross up executives for any excise taxes imposed on excess
parachute payments under Code Section 280G or 4999.
The new employment agreements were not in effect as of
March 31, 2007, and the payments and other benefits, if
any, to which our NEOs would have been entitled if a triggering
event had occurred on March 31, 2007 under their existing
employment agreements are summarized above under
Arrangements in Effect Prior to this
Offering. The following table summarizes the estimated
value of certain payments and other benefits to which our
currently-serving NEOs would be entitled under the new
employment agreements upon certain terminations of employment,
assuming, solely for purposes of calculation, that (i) the
triggering event or events occurred on September 30, 2007;
(ii) the new employment agreements were then in effect;
(iii) the Cash Incentive Program was then in effect;
(iv) in the case of a change of control, the vesting of all
stock options held by our NEOs was accelerated; and (v) the
value of a share of our common stock as of such change of
control was $ per share (the
mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus), which impacts the amounts receivable by the NEOs
upon the acceleration of non-vested stock options as a result of
the change of
92
control as set forth below under Equity Plans and
therefore affects the amounts set forth in the column below
entitled After Application of Valley
Provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Change in Control Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or for Good Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Change in
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Without
|
|
|
Application of
|
|
|
After Application of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or for Good
|
|
|
Valley
|
|
|
Valley
|
|
Name
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Reason ($)
|
|
|
Provision ($)(1)
|
|
|
Provision ($)(1)
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
583,200
|
|
|
|
874,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata Target Bonus
|
|
|
146,000
|
|
|
|
146,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
740,229
|
|
|
|
1,031,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
171,667
|
|
|
|
343,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata Target Bonus
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
16,304
|
|
|
|
16,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
220,471
|
|
|
|
392,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
83,333
|
|
|
|
166,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata Target Bonus
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
113,333
|
|
|
|
196,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
171,667
|
|
|
|
343,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata Target Bonus
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
16,304
|
|
|
|
16,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
220,471
|
|
|
|
392,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
85,833
|
|
|
|
171,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata Target Bonus
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
121,862
|
|
|
|
207,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for all NEOs
|
|
|
|
|
1,416,366
|
|
|
|
2,220,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The valley provision in the proposed new employment agreements
provides that all amounts payable under the employment agreement
and any other of our agreements or plans that constitute change
of control payments will be cut back to one dollar less than
three times the executives base amount, as
defined by Code Section 280G, unless the executive would
retain a greater amount by receiving the full amount of the
payment and paying the excise taxes. |
Equity
Plans
Our equity plans provide for certain benefits in the event of
certain changes of control. Under both our existing 2003 Stock
Option Plan and our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, and under our
amended and restated 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan, if
there is a change of control, our compensation committee may,
among other things, accelerate the exercisability of all
outstanding stock options
and/or
require that all outstanding options be cashed out. Our 2003
Stock Option Plan defines a change of control as the occurrence
of any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
With certain exceptions, any person (as such term is
used in sections 13(d) and l4(d) of the Exchange Act),
becomes a beneficial owner (as defined in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities
representing more than 50% of the voting power of our then
outstanding securities.
|
|
|
|
Our shareholders approve (or, if shareholder approval is not
required, our board approves) an agreement providing for
(i) our merger or consolidation with another entity where
our shareholders immediately prior to the merger or
consolidation will not beneficially own, immediately after the
merger or consolidation, securities of the surviving entity
representing more than 50% of the voting power of the then
outstanding securities of the surviving entity, (ii) the
sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our
assets, or (iii) our liquidation or dissolution.
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
Any person has commenced a tender offer or exchange offer for
30% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding shares.
|
|
|
|
Directors are elected such that a majority of the members of our
board shall have been members of our board for less than two
years, unless the election or nomination for election of each
new director who was not a director at the beginning of such
two-year period was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of
the directors then still in office who were directors at the
beginning of such period.
|
Following this offering, a change of control under our 2004
Stock and Incentive Awards Plan will generally occur when a
third party acquires 20% or more of our outstanding stock, there
is a hostile board election, a merger occurs in which our
shareholders cease to own 50% of the equity of the successor, or
we are liquidated or dissolved or substantially all of our
assets are sold. We have agreed to treat these events as
triggering events under the new employment agreements because
such events would represent significant changes in the ownership
of our company and could signal potential uncertainty regarding
the job security of our NEOs, and we believe these types of
protections will better enable our NEOs to focus their efforts
on behalf of our company during such times of uncertainty.
If a change of control had occurred on September 30, 2007,
and our compensation committee had cashed out all of the stock
options then held by our NEOs, whether or not vested, for a
payment equal to the product of (i) the number of shares
underlying such options and (ii) the difference between an
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share (the mid-point of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and the
exercise price per share of such options, our currently-serving
NEOs would have received approximately the following benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Option
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Cashed Out
|
|
|
Price per Option
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Share ($)
|
|
|
Value Realized ($)
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
430,958
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Waibel
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
John H. Scribante
|
|
|
241,000
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Potts
|
|
|
665,318
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth
|
|
|
233,639
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Compensation
We currently compensate our non-employee directors pursuant to
our directors compensation policy, under which we pay each
non-employee director a monthly retainer fee of $500, plus an
additional monthly retainer fee of $500 for non-employee
directors who also serve as chairman of our board or a committee
(subject to a $1,500 monthly maximum for a director who
chairs both our board and a committee). Our current policy also
calls for grants of options to our non-employee directors
representing 5,000 shares of our common stock per year of
service. In early fiscal 2006, in accordance with this policy,
we granted each non-employee director (other than
Mr. Kackley) an option to purchase 20,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. In
light of his commitment and contributions as chairman of our
audit and finance committee, we granted Mr. Kackley an
option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock in
early fiscal 2006 at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. These
option grants were intended in part to acknowledge our
directors service for periods prior to fiscal 2006 and in
part to compensate our directors for future services. We
intended the grants made to our longest-serving directors to
approximate the amounts that we believed would be appropriate
for four years worth of service covering a period of
approximately fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2007. For the sake of
future consistency in the compensation of our non-employee
directors, we made a subjective determination to issue the same
amount of options for all directors, regardless of their
respective years of service. These options were subject to
vesting in four equal installments on March 31 of each of 2006,
2007, 2008 and 2009. We made no option grants in fiscal 2007 to
our non-employee directors, other than to Mr. Kackley, as
described below. The per share exercise price was determined
based on an approximation of the fair market value of our common
stock over the prior four-year period. We recognized $33,000 of
stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2006 as a result of
these grants.
94
On December 20, 2006, we granted Mr. Kackley an
additional option to purchase 60,000 more shares of our common
stock to compensate him for his significant time commitment and
substantial contributions in his capacity as chairman of our
audit and finance committee. The exercise price per share of the
option was $2.20, which was the fair market value of a share of
our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our
compensation committee and board of directors based principally
on the November 30, 2006 independent valuation of the fair
market value of our common stock prepared by Wipfli LLP.
In October 2006, we paid Messrs. Kackley and Trotter $5,000
each in respect of consulting services they provided us in
connection with our evaluation in early fiscal 2007 of our
personnel and management structure and related governing and
reporting processes. Messrs. Kackley and Trotter conducted
extensive interviews with employees and a detailed evaluation of
our companys practices in the areas under consideration
for restructuring, and summarized their conclusions in a report
to our board of directors. We made the payments, and
Messrs. Kackley and Trotter rendered the consulting
services, pursuant to written agreements.
In connection with this offering, our compensation committee
retained Towers Perrin to provide it with recommendations
regarding our compensation program for non-employee directors
subsequent to this offering. Based on Towers Perrins
recommendations, our compensation committee has recommended that
our board of directors adopt the following new compensation
program for our non-employee directors effective upon the
closing of this offering: (a) an annual retainer of
$40,000, payable in cash or shares of our common stock at the
election of the recipient; (b) an annual stock option
grant, vesting ratably over three years, with a grant date fair
value of $45,000; (c) an annual retainer of $15,000 for
each of the independent chairman of our board of directors and
the chairman of the audit and finance committee of our board of
directors, payable in cash or shares of common stock at the
election of the recipient; and (d) an annual retainer of
$10,000 for each of the chairmen of the compensation committee
and the nominating and corporate governance committee of our
board of directors, payable in cash or shares of common stock at
the election of the recipient. In order to attract potential new
independent directors in the future, our compensation committee
also is recommending that our board of directors retain the
flexibility to make an initial stock option or other form of
equity-based grant or a cash award to any such new non-employee
directors upon joining our board.
Also in connection with this offering, based on the
recommendation of Towers Perrin, our compensation committee has
recommended for approval by our board of directors stock
ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors effective
upon the closing of this offering. The guidelines would require
non-employee directors to hold shares of our common stock with a
value equal to or in excess of, for current non-employee
directors, five times their fiscal 2008 retainer and, for
subsequently elected directors, five times their retainer for
the fiscal year of their election. We would determine the number
of shares the ownership guidelines would require the
non-employee directors to hold based on, for our current
non-employee directors, the initial public offering price of our
common stock and, for subsequently elected non-employee
directors, the closing sale price of our common stock on the
first trading day on or after their election. Non-employee
directors would be able to satisfy the ownership guidelines with
shares of our common stock that they acquire through the
exercise of stock options or other similar equity-based awards,
through retention upon vesting of restricted shares or other
similar equity-based awards or through direct share purchases.
Our currently serving non-employee directors would have five
years from the closing of this offering to satisfy the ownership
guidelines, and subsequently elected directors would be required
to satisfy the guidelines within five years after their election.
95
Director
Compensation for Fiscal 2007
The following table summarizes the compensation of our
non-employee directors for fiscal 2007. As employee directors,
none of Richard J. Olsen, our vice president of technical
services and former director, Mr. Verfuerth nor
Mr. Potts received any compensation for their service as
directors, and they are therefore omitted from the table.
Mr. Olsen retired from our board on July 28, 2007 in
connection with this offering to reduce the number of employee
directors on our board. We reimbursed each of our directors,
including our employee directors, for expenses incurred in
connection with attendance at meetings of our board and its
committees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash ($)
|
|
|
($)(1)(2)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Thomas A. Quadracci
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
James R. Kackley
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
26,827
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
43,827
|
|
Eckhart G. Grohmann
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,225
|
|
Patrick J. Trotter
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
18,180
|
|
Diana Propper de Callejon(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amount of expense recognized for financial
accounting purposes pursuant to SFAS 123(R) for fiscal 2007
as reflected in our financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown
exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to
service-based vesting conditions. |
|
(2) |
|
The aggregate number of option awards outstanding as of
March 31, 2007 for each director was as follows:
Mr. Kackley held options to purchase an aggregate of
114,000 shares of our common stock at a weighted average
exercise price of $1.44 per share; Mr. Grohmann held an
option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.75 per share; and Mr. Trotter held an
option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.75 per share. The grant date fair value of
our special fiscal 2007 option grant to Mr. Kackley,
computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R), was $53,110. We
also granted our non-employee directors additional stock options
on July 27, 2007, as follows: Messrs. Kackley,
Quadracci and Grohmann each received an option to purchase
10,000 shares of our common stock, and Ms. Propper de
Callejon and Mr. Trotter each received an option to
purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock. All of the
options granted on July 27, 2007 have an exercise price of
$4.49 per share. |
|
(3) |
|
Ms. Propper de Callejon, who is associated with Clean
Technology Fund II, LP, one of our principal shareholders,
received no additional compensation in fiscal 2007 for her
service as a director. |
96
PRINCIPAL
AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock and the shares
beneficially owned by all principal and selling shareholders as
of October 15, 2007, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of
our common stock offered by this prospectus, by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person (or group of affiliated persons) known to us to be
the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock
(assuming the conversion of all of our preferred stock into
4,808,012 shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis and
the conversion of our Convertible Notes into
2,360,802 shares of common stock upon closing of this
offering);
|
|
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and current and certain former executive
officers as a group; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
all selling shareholders.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and includes any shares over which a person exercises
sole or shared voting or investment power. Under these rules,
beneficial ownership also includes any shares as to which the
individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial
ownership of within 60 days of October 15, 2007
through the exercise of any warrant, stock option or other
right. Except as noted by footnote, and subject to community
property laws where applicable, we believe that the shareholders
named in the table below have sole voting and investment power
with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially
owned by them.
As of October 15, 2007, there were 12,489,205 shares
of common stock and 4,808,012 shares of Series B and
Series C preferred stock outstanding (with each such share
of preferred stock converting automatically into shares of
common stock on a one-for-one basis upon closing of this
offering). See Description of Capital Stock.
On August 3, 2007, we issued the Convertible Notes to an
indirect affiliate of GEEFS, Clean Technology and affiliates of
Capvest. The Convertible Notes will convert automatically upon
closing of this offering into 2,360,802 shares of our
common stock. Neither GEEFS nor any of its indirect or direct
affiliates owned any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into shares of our common stock prior to the
issuance of the Convertible Notes. See Description of
Capital Stock.
The percentage of beneficial ownership set forth in the table
below is based on (i) prior to this offering,
19,658,019 shares of common stock outstanding (assuming the
conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock and the
Convertible Notes); and (ii) after this
offering, shares
of common stock outstanding (assuming the conversion of all
outstanding shares of preferred stock and the Convertible Notes).
The selling shareholders listed in the table below are selling a
total of 1,978,881 shares of our common stock. Of these
shares, (i) 1,000 shares were acquired upon exercise
of warrants to purchase shares of common stock issued by us
between March 2002 and February 2005 at an exercise price of
$1.50 per share; (ii) 74,633 shares represent shares
of common stock to be received upon conversion of shares of
Series B preferred stock on the closing of this offering,
which shares of Series B preferred stock were purchased
from us between January 2004 and July 2006 at purchase prices of
between $2.25 and $2.50 per share; (iii) 31,343 shares
were acquired upon exercise of options to purchase shares of our
common stock granted by us under our 2003 Stock Option Plan at
exercise prices of between $0.69 and $2.25 per share;
(iv) 123,241 shares were acquired upon conversion of
shares of Series A preferred stock that were purchased from
us between March 1999 and January 2002 at $0.69 per share;
(v) 585,182 shares were purchased or received from us
between April 1996 and November 2005 at prices ranging from
$0.38 to $1.50 per share; (vi) 63,482 shares were
purchased or received in various private transactions from a
variety of third parties; and (vii) 1,100,000 shares
were acquired by Clean Technology and affiliates of Capvest from
us in a private placement of Series C preferred stock in
July and September 2006 for $2.75 per share.
97
Except as set forth below, the address of all shareholders
listed under Directors and current and certain former
executive officers and Principal shareholders
is
c/o Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. 1204 Pilgrim Road, Plymouth, WI 53073.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if Over-
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
to be Sold
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
in Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
is Exercised
|
|
|
Directors and current and certain former executive
officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth(1)
|
|
|
3,032,561
|
|
|
|
2,729,306
|
|
|
|
212,489
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Daniel J. Waibel(2)
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Potts(3)
|
|
|
806,986
|
|
|
|
726,288
|
|
|
|
80,698
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Scribante(4)
|
|
|
270,340
|
|
|
|
243,340
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia A. Verfuerth(5)
|
|
|
3,032,561
|
|
|
|
2,729,306
|
|
|
|
90,766
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas A. Quadracci(6)
|
|
|
36,409
|
|
|
|
36,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diana Propper de Callejon(7)
|
|
|
2,193,157
|
|
|
|
2,193,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Kackley(8)
|
|
|
262,000
|
|
|
|
262,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eckhart G. Grohmann(9)
|
|
|
1,270,000
|
|
|
|
1,270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Trotter(10)
|
|
|
514,790
|
|
|
|
463,311
|
|
|
|
51,479
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Wadman(11)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Prange(12)
|
|
|
6,801
|
|
|
|
6,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and current and certain former executive
officers as a group (14 individuals)
|
|
|
9,433,044
|
|
|
|
8,960,612
|
|
|
|
472,432
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clean Technology Affiliates(13)
|
|
|
2,193,157
|
|
|
|
1,184,066
|
|
|
|
1,009,091
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
GEEFS Indirect Affiliate(14)
|
|
|
1,781,737
|
|
|
|
1,781,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Olsen(15)
|
|
|
1,011,414
|
|
|
|
910,273
|
|
|
|
101,141
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edmund R. Knauf, Jr.(17)
|
|
|
452,000
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Mel Blanke(18)
|
|
|
307,216
|
|
|
|
276,495
|
|
|
|
30,721
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capvest(19)
|
|
|
204,090
|
|
|
|
113,181
|
|
|
|
90,909
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Heins(20)
|
|
|
179,433
|
|
|
|
156,090
|
|
|
|
17,343
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northland Capital Group(21)
|
|
|
160,072
|
|
|
|
144,072
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. and Patricia A. Frost(22)
|
|
|
135,200
|
|
|
|
121,680
|
|
|
|
13,520
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua Kurtz
|
|
|
133,530
|
|
|
|
129,130
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zachary Kurtz
|
|
|
129,272
|
|
|
|
125,272
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric von Estorff(23)
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Mazzie(24)
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
86,400
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leah Kurtz
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
|
|
78,850
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry and Karen Schneider(25)
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald C. Heimermam
|
|
|
76,010
|
|
|
|
68,409
|
|
|
|
7,601
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liesl M. Testwuide 1992 Trust(26)
|
|
|
74,354
|
|
|
|
66,919
|
|
|
|
7,435
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark and Toni McBride(27)
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
65,300
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if Over-
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
to be Sold
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
in Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
is Exercised
|
|
|
James C. and Cynthia Naleid(28)
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
57,600
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denis Peters(29)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Schomburg
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robinson J. Kirby(30)
|
|
|
57,976
|
|
|
|
52,179
|
|
|
|
5,797
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Lockwood Survivors Trust
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darrell Otto and Shana Hill(31)
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Gardner(32)
|
|
|
55,500
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Schwalbach(33)
|
|
|
51,822
|
|
|
|
47,640
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chuck Van Horn
|
|
|
42,816
|
|
|
|
38,535
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blakney Corporation(34)
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
37,800
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judith M. Gannon
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert E. Roenitz
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Willard M. Hunter 2002 Revocable Trust(35)
|
|
|
33,053
|
|
|
|
29,748
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. and Margot Dunn(36)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike and Kathy Sieren Revocable Living Trust(37)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. and Judy Kuphall(38)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard K. Huber(39)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Kleinjan(40)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin and Catherine Markey(41)
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
29,600
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Hill
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alvin and Renee Verfeurth
|
|
|
24,896
|
|
|
|
23,396
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Henke Trust
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
19,800
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Crowley, Jr.(42)
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leif G. and Patricia L. Gigstad
|
|
|
21,840
|
|
|
|
19,656
|
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen G. and Jared S. Arn(43)
|
|
|
21,334
|
|
|
|
19,201
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Rettler(44)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl and Irene Dittrich
|
|
|
17,582
|
|
|
|
15,824
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark and Deborah Hansen(45)
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alfred Kleppek
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Armin F. and Jerry A. Kuehl Revocable Trust of 1999(46)
|
|
|
14,548
|
|
|
|
13,093
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James T. and Virginia Petrie
|
|
|
14,446
|
|
|
|
13,280
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Sohn
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Barber(47)
|
|
|
11,850
|
|
|
|
10,850
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Heck
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
10,001
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yvonne A. Lockwood Living Trust of 2006(48)
|
|
|
10,914
|
|
|
|
9,914
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert E. and Ronna M. Cline Living Trust of 1996(49)
|
|
|
10,668
|
|
|
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if Over-
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
to be Sold
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
in Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
is Exercised
|
|
|
Thomas Cornell(50)
|
|
|
9,820
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other selling shareholders (34 individuals)(16)
|
|
|
155,846
|
|
|
|
121,846
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling shareholders
|
|
|
11,441,048
|
|
|
|
9,456,167
|
|
|
|
1,978,881
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates less than 1%. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of (i) 2,124,896 shares of common stock,
434,196 of which have been pledged as security for personal
loans (as pledged in 2003 and March 2007);
(ii) 850,000 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Verfuerths wife, Patricia A. Verfuerth; and
(iii) 57,665 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options held by
Mr. Verfuerths wife, Patricia A. Verfuerth. The
number does not reflect 430,958 shares of common stock
subject to options held by Mr. Verfuerth that will not
become exercisable within 60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Does not include 100,000 shares of common stock subject to
an option held by Mr. Waibel that will not become
exercisable within 60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Consists of (i) 216,668 shares of common stock and
(ii) 590,318 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. The number does not
include 75,000 shares of common stock subject to options
that will not become exercisable within 60 days of
October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Consists of (i) 231,110 shares of common stock held in
the TMS Trust; (ii) 19,230 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock held in
the TMS Trust; and (iii) 20,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of vested and exercisable options.
The number does not include 221,000 shares of common stock
subject to an option that will not become exercisable within
60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Consists of (i) 850,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 2,124,896 shares of common stock held by
Ms. Verfuerths husband, Neal R. Verfuerth, 434,196 of
which have been pledged as security for personal loans (as
pledged in 2003 and March 2007); and
(iii) 57,665 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. The number does not
reflect 175,974 shares of common stock subject to options
held by Ms. Verfuerth on October 15, 2007 that will
not become exercisable within 60 days of October 15,
2007. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Does not include 10,000 shares of common stock subject to
an option held by Mr. Quadracci that will not become
exercisable within 60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Consists of (i) 1,636,364 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of Series C preferred stock
owned by Clean Technology and (ii) 556,793 shares of
common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Convertible
Notes held by Clean Technology. Ms. Propper de Callejon is
the managing member of Expansion Capital Partners II
General Partner, LLC, which is the general partner of Expansion
Capital Partners II, LP, which is the general partner of Clean
Technology. Ms. Propper de Callejon disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares held by Clean Technology, except to the
extent of her pecuniary interest therein. The address of Clean
Technology is 90 Park Avenue, Suite 1700, New York, NY
10016. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Consists of (i) 213,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 4,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of options that are vested and exercisable or that will
become vested and exercisable within 60 days of
October 15, 2007; and (iii) 45,000 shares of
common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Kackleys
grandchildren. The number does not include 108,000 shares
of common stock subject to options held by Mr. Kackley that
will not become exercisable within 60 days of
October 15, 2007. |
100
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Consists of (i) 790,000 shares of common stock held in
the Eckhart Grohmann Revocable Trust and
(ii) 480,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock held in the Eckhart
Grohmann Revocable Trust. The number does not include
20,000 shares of common stock subject to options held by
Mr. Grohmann that will not become exercisable within
60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Consists of (i) 504,790 shares of common stock,
400,000 of which have been pledged as security for a loan (as
pledged in August 2007), and (ii) 10,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of vested and
exercisable options. The number does not include
15,000 shares of common stock subject to options held by
Mr. Trotter that will not become exercisable within
60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Consists of 20,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. The number does not
include 20,000 shares of common stock subject to an option
held by Mr. Wadman that will not become exercisable within
60 days of October 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Consists of 6,801 shares of common stock. In early October
2007, we notified Mr. Prange that we believed that he had
violated his obligations of non-disparagement under his
July 18, 2007 separation agreement, and that we had taken
action to cancel options to purchase 172,222 shares of our
common stock and also to cancel 23,000 shares of our common
stock held by him that he received upon his previous exercise of
options in connection with his separation agreement. See
Executive Compensation - Payments Upon Termination or
Change of Control Agreements in Effect Prior to this
Offering. Mr. Prange has contested these actions and
has threatened legal action if we do not reinstate his options
and shares. |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
Consists of (i) 1,636,364 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of Series C preferred stock
and (ii) 556,793 shares of common stock issuable upon
the conversion of the Convertible Notes. Clean Technology is the
name we use for Clean Technology Fund II, LP. The address
of Clean Technology is 90 Park Avenue, Suite 1700, New
York, NY 10016. |
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Consists of 1,781,737 shares of common stock issuable upon
the conversion of the Convertible Notes. GEEFS is the name we
use for GE Capital Equity Investments, Inc., an indirect
affiliate of GE Energy Financial Services, Inc. GE Capital
Equity Investments, Inc., is the holder of the Convertible
Notes. The address of GEEFS is
c/o GE
Capital Equity Investments, Inc., 201 Merritt 7,
P.O. Box 5201, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851. |
|
|
|
(15) |
|
Does not include 50,000 shares of common stock subject to
an option held by Mr. Olsen that will not become
exercisable within 60 days of October 15, 2007.
Mr. Olsen is our vice president of technical services and a
former director. |
|
|
|
(16) |
|
None of these other selling shareholders beneficially owns
individually or in the aggregate more than 1% of our outstanding
common stock prior to this offering, nor do they have prior to
this offering (or will they have after this offering) a
significant role in our management. The selling shareholders
indicated in this footnote are selling in the aggregate
34,000 shares of our common stock. Of these shares,
(i) 1,000 shares were acquired upon exercise of
warrants to purchase shares of common stock issued by us between
March 2002 and February 2005 at an exercise price of $1.50 per
share; (ii) 8,000 shares represent shares of common
stock to be received upon conversion of shares of Series B
preferred stock on the closing of this offering, which shares of
Series B preferred stock were purchased from us between
January 2004 and July 2006 at a purchase price of
$2.25 per share; (iii) 2,000 shares were acquired upon
exercise of options to purchase shares of our common stock
granted by us under our 2003 Stock Option Plan at an exercise
price of $1.50 per share; (iv) 3,000 shares were
acquired upon conversion of shares of Series A preferred
stock that were purchased from us between March 1999 and January
2002 at $0.69 per share; (v) 6,000 shares were
purchased or received from us between April 1996 and November
2005 at prices ranging from $0.69 to $1.50 per share; and
(vi) 14,000 shares were purchased or received in
various private transactions from a variety of third parties. |
|
|
|
(17) |
|
Consists of (i) 2,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 440,000 shares of common stock held by the Edmund
R. Knauf Jr. Living Trust; and (iii) 10,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of vested and
exercisable options. |
101
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Consists of (i) 64,796 shares of common stock and
(ii) 242,420 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(19) |
|
Consists of (i) 181,818 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of Series C preferred stock
and (ii) 22,272 shares of common stock issuable upon
the conversion of the Convertible Notes. Capvest is the name we
use for Capvest Venture Fund, L.P. and its affiliate, Technology
Transformation Venture Fund, L.P. The investment decisions of
Capvest Venture Fund, L.P. are made by William Custer and Jackie
Haussler, managing members of Capvest Venture Partners LLC, the
general partner of Capvest Venture Fund, L.P. The investment
decisions of Technology Transformation Venture Fund, L.P. are
made by William Custer, president of Custer Capital
Fund IV, Inc., the general partner of Transformation
Venture Fund, L.P. Mr. Custer and Ms. Haussler each
disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by the
foregoing entities except to the extent of his or her pecuniary
interest therein. |
|
|
|
(20) |
|
Consists of 179,433 shares of common stock issuable upon
the exercise of vested and exercisable options as of
October 15, 2007. On November 2, 2007, Mr. Heins
exercised options for 179,433 shares of common stock and
transferred 6,000 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
Consists of (i) 55,778 shares of common stock;
(ii) 78,220 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock; and
(iii) 26,074 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. Northland Capital Groups affiliate,
Northland Capital Financial Services, LLC, holds the common
stock. Northland Capital Group holds the Series B preferred
stock and warrants. |
|
|
|
(22) |
|
Consists of (i) 30,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 70,000 shares of common stock held by First
Trust Company of Onaga as Custodian for the benefit of
William E. Frost; (iii) 24,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock
held by First Trust Company of Onaga as Custodian for the
benefit of William E. Frost; (iv) 8,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants; and
(v) 3,200 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(23) |
|
Consists of (i) 10,000 shares of common stock and
(ii) 110,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(24) |
|
Consists of (i) 72,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 24,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(25) |
|
Consists of 80,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock. |
|
|
|
(26) |
|
Consists of (i) 66,354 shares of common stock and
(ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(27) |
|
Consists of (i) 37,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock;
(ii) 16,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants; and (iii) 16,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of vested and
exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(28) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 24,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock; and
(iii) 16,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(29) |
|
Consists of (i) 20,000 shares of common stock and
(ii) 40,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(30) |
|
Consists of (i) 17,452 shares of common stock;
(ii) 31,636 shares of common stock held by First
Trust Company Onaga Custodian for the benefit of Robinson
J. Kirby; and (iii) 8,888 shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(31) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 28,000 shares of common stock held in an IRA; and
(iii) 4,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock held in an IRA. |
|
|
|
(32) |
|
Consists of (i) 40,000 shares of common stock and
(ii) 15,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock. |
|
|
|
(33) |
|
Consists of (i) 41,822 shares of common stock and
(ii) 10,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
102
|
|
|
(34) |
|
Consists of (i) 34,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(35) |
|
Consists of (i) 20,937 shares of common stock and
(ii) 12,116 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock. Willard M. Hunter
2002 Rev. Trust is the name we use for Williard M. Hunter,
Trustee for the Williard M. Hunter 2002 Revocable Trust. |
|
|
|
(36) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of shares of common
stock issuable upon the conversion of Series B preferred
stock and (ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(37) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(38) |
|
Consists of (i) 16,000 shares of common stock;
(ii) 12,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock; and
(iii) 4,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(39) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(40) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(41) |
|
Consists of (i) 24,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 8,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(42) |
|
Consists of (i) 16,000 shares of common stock and
(ii) 6,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock. |
|
|
|
(43) |
|
Consists of (i) 16,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 5,334 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(44) |
|
Consists of (i) 2,000 shares of common stock and
(ii) 18,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
|
|
|
(45) |
|
Consists of (i) 12,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 4,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(46) |
|
Armin F. and Jerry A. Kuehl Rev. Trust of 1999 is the name we
use for Armin F. Kuehl and Jerry A. Kuehl, Tee, Armin F.
and Jerry A. Kuehl Rev Trust of 1999 UAD 7.9 99 as amd. |
|
|
|
(47) |
|
Consists of (i) 8,888 shares of common stock issuable
upon the conversion of Series B preferred stock and
(ii) 2,962 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants. |
|
|
|
(48) |
|
Yvonne A. Lockwood Living Trust of 2006 is the name we use for
Yvonne A. Lockwood, as Trustee Yvonne A. Lockwood Living Trust
of 2006 U/A dated June 20, 2006. |
|
|
|
(49) |
|
Consists of (i) 6,668 shares of common stock and
(ii) 4,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of Series B preferred stock. |
|
|
|
(50) |
|
Consists of (i) 5,820 shares of common stock and
(ii) 4,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested and exercisable options. |
103
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our policy is to enter into transactions with related persons on
terms that, on the whole, are no less favorable to us than those
available from unaffiliated third parties. In June 2007, our
board of directors adopted written policies and procedures
regarding related person transactions. For purposes of these
policies and procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
a related person means any of our directors,
executive officers, nominees for director, holder of 5% or more
of our common stock or any of their immediate family
members; and
|
|
|
|
a related person transaction generally is a
transaction (including any indebtedness or a guarantee of
indebtedness) in which we were or are to be a participant and
the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which a related
person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
|
Each of our executive officers, directors or nominees for
director is required to disclose to our audit and finance
committee certain information relating to related person
transactions for review, approval or ratification by our audit
and finance committee. In making a determination about approval
or ratification of a related person transaction, our audit and
finance committee will consider the information provided
regarding the related person transaction and whether
consummation of the transaction is believed by the committee to
be in our best interests. Our audit and finance committee may
take into account the effect of a directors related person
transaction on the directors status as an independent
member of our board of directors and eligibility to serve on
committees of our board under SEC rules and the listing
standards of the Nasdaq Global Market. Any related person
transaction must be disclosed to our full board of directors.
Set forth below are certain transactions that have occurred in
our fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007, and in our fiscal year
2008 through the date of this prospectus. Based on our
experience in the business sectors in which we participate and
the terms of our transactions with unaffiliated third persons,
we believe that all of the transactions set forth below
(i) were on terms and conditions that were not materially
less favorable to us than could have been obtained from
unaffiliated third parties and (ii) complied with the terms
of our new policies and procedures regarding related person
transactions. All of the transactions set forth below have been
ratified by our audit and finance committee.
Clean
Technology Fund II, LP and Diana Propper de
Callejon
On August 3, 2007, we issued a $2.5 million
Convertible Note to Clean Technology as part of our $10.6
Convertible Note placement described under Description of
Capital Stock. All material economic terms and conditions
of the Convertible Note issued to Clean Technology are the same
as those negotiated with and provided to an indirect affiliate
of GEEFS, and Ms. Propper de Callejon did not participate
in such negotiations. The Convertible Note issued to Clean
Technology will convert automatically upon closing of this
offering into 556,793 shares of our common stock.
Ms. Propper de Callejon is the managing member of Expansion
Capital Partners II General Partner, LLC, the
general partner of Expansion Capital Partners II, LP, the
general partner of Clean Technology. Ms. Propper de
Callejon is one of our directors and a member of our
compensation committee. Ms. Propper de Callejon was recused
from all of our board of director decisions regarding this
transaction.
Clean Technology also is a holder of 1,636,364 shares of
our Series C preferred stock, which will automatically
convert into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis
upon closing of this offering. Clean Technology purchased its
Series C preferred shares from us in a private placement on
July 31, 2006 at a purchase price of $2.75 per share.
Holders of Series C preferred shares are entitled to
certain registration rights with respect to the common stock
issuable upon conversion of those Series C preferred shares
according to the terms of an agreement between us and the
Series C holders. Clean Technology is selling certain of
its previously acquired shares in this offering. See
Description of Capital Stock.
GEEFS
On August 3, 2007, we issued an $8.0 million
Convertible Note to an indirect affiliate of GEEFS as part of
our $10.6 Convertible Note placement described under
Description of Capital Stock. This Convertible
104
Note will convert automatically upon closing of this offering
into 1,781,738 shares of our common stock. GEEFS is an
indirect affiliate of General Electric Co. Neither GEEFS nor any
other affiliates of General Electric Co. owned any interest in
our company prior to the issuance of the Convertible Note.
During fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, we recognized an aggregate of
$9,000, $1.0 million, and $3.7 million, respectively,
in revenue for products and services we sold to certain
operating affiliates of General Electric Co. In addition, during
fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, we purchased an aggregate of
$2.5 million, $3.2 million and $8.4 million,
respectively, of component parts from a different operating
affiliate of General Electric Co. GEEFS and the indirect
affiliate of GEEFS that was issued the Convertible Note are
principally financial investment affiliates of General Electric
Co. Neither GEEFS nor the indirect affiliate of GEEFS that was
issued the Convertible Note were involved in negotiating the
terms or conditions of our ongoing business relationships with
the operating affiliates of General Electronic Co. with which we
conduct business. Similarly, such operating affiliates of
General Electric Co. were not involved in negotiating the terms
and conditions of the Convertible Note. We do not believe that
the investment in us represented by the Convertible Note issued
to the indirect affiliate of GEEFS will result in any change or
modification to the terms and conditions of our purchases from,
or sales to, any operating affiliate of General Electric Co.
Richard
J. Olsen
Richard J. Olsen is our vice president of technical services, a
former director and one of our principal shareholders. We paid
Mr. Olsen approximately $157,000 in cash and equity
compensation for his service as our vice president of technical
services in fiscal 2007. We did not provide Mr. Olsen any
additional compensation for his service as a director, but
reimbursed him for expenses incurred in connection with his
attendance at meetings of our board on the same basis as the
rest of our directors. We also lease, on a month-to-month basis,
an aircraft owned by an entity controlled by Mr. Olsen. In
fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, we paid that entity $102,191,
$106,715 and $94,225, respectively, for use of the aircraft.
During fiscal 2007, we held a note receivable due from
Mr. Olsen in the principal amount of $375,000, bearing
interest at 7.65% per annum. This note was fully repaid on
August 2, 2007. This note was recorded as a shareholder
note receivable in our consolidated financial statements.
Thomas A.
Quadracci
During fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, we received an aggregate of
$209,996, $90,639 and $31,767, respectively, for products and
services we sold to Quad/Graphics, Inc. Thomas A. Quadracci, our
chairman of the board, was the executive chairman of
Quad/Graphics, Inc. until January 1, 2007 and is a
shareholder of Quad/Graphics, Inc.
Patrick
J. Trotter
During fiscal 2006, we received a promissory note from Patrick
J. Trotter, one of our directors, in the principal amount of
$375,000 to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock through
his exercise of vested stock options. The note bore interest at
4.23% per annum, which was then the applicable federal rate.
During fiscal 2007, Mr. Trotter paid $15,862 in interest on
this note by surrendering 7,210 shares of common stock to
us at a value of $2.20 per share. The principal and all accrued
interest on the note were fully repaid in cash on August 2,
2007. This note was recorded as a shareholder note receivable in
our consolidated financial statements.
We had previously believed that this transaction did not result
in additional stock-based compensation. We subsequently
determined that, under
EITF 00-23,
Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation Under
APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44
(EITF 00-23),
the exercise of the option through payment with a full recourse
promissory note, which subsequently was determined to bear a
below-market interest rate for accounting purposes, was
effectively a repricing of the option for accounting purposes
and resulted in the recognition of a variable accounting
adjustment for the award on the date the note was issued and the
option was exercised, in the amount of the intrinsic value
difference between the then current fair value of our common
stock and the exercise price of the option. This adjustment
resulted in an increase of $0.5 million to operating
expenses in fiscal
105
2006. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Neal and
Patricia Verfuerth
We provided certain non-interest bearing advances to Neal R.
Verfuerth, our president and chief executive officer,
and/or
Patricia Verfuerth, our vice president of operations, during
fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007. The largest aggregate amount of
principal advances outstanding at the end of any month during
fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $124,640, $159,912 and $167,690,
respectively. During fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007,
Mr. Verfuerth paid $46,500, $74,604 and $125,880 in
principal on these advances, respectively. All such advances
have been fully repaid as of August 2, 2007.
We also held an unsecured note receivable due from
Mr. Verfuerth in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 bearing
interest at 1.46% per annum. The largest aggregate amount of
principal outstanding on this note during fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007, including accrued interest, was $63,344, $65,849 and
$66,780, respectively. The note was fully repaid on
August 2, 2007. During fiscal 2007, we also held a note
receivable due from Mr. Verfuerth in the aggregate
principal amount of $812,500 and a note receivable due from
Ms. Verfuerth in the aggregate principal amount of
$565,625, each bearing interest at 7.65% per annum. These notes
were fully repaid as described under Executive
Compensation Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Long-Term Equity Compensation. These
notes were recorded as shareholder notes receivable in our
consolidated financial statements.
As part of our employment agreement with Mr. Verfuerth, we
paid guarantee fees to Mr. Verfuerth of $146,069, $109,808
and $77,880 in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, as
consideration for guaranteeing certain of our notes payable and
accounts payable, as described below. These fees were based on a
percentage applied to the monthly outstanding balances or
revolving credit commitments. These guarantees related to the
following debt arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, we refinanced a mortgage loan agreement with a
local bank to provide a $1.1 million note, as amended, for
the purpose of acquiring our manufacturing facility. The note
expires in September 2014 and bears interest a prime plus 2.0%
per annum. The note is secured by a first mortgage on our
manufacturing facility and was previously secured by a personal
guarantee of Mr. Verfuerth, which was released effective
August 15, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, the remaining
note balance was $1.1 million.
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, we entered into a debenture payable issued by
a certified development company to provide $1.0 million for
the purpose of acquiring our manufacturing and warehousing
facility. The instrument expires in December 2024 and carries an
effective interest rate, including service fees, of 6.18% per
annum. The note is guaranteed by the United States Small
Business Administration 504 program and is secured by a second
mortgage position on our manufacturing facility.
Mr. Verfuerth previously personally guaranteed the note,
which guarantee was released effective August 2, 2007. As
of March 31, 2007, the remaining balance on the note was
$1.0 million.
|
|
|
|
In March 2005, we entered into a loan and security agreement
with the State of Wisconsin to provide a $0.5 million
federal block grant loan to be used for the purchase of
manufacturing equipment. The loan expires in October 2012 and
bears interest at a rate of 2.0% per annum. The loan is secured
by a purchase money security interest and was previously secured
by a personal guarantee of Mr. Verfuerth, which was
released effective June 25, 2007. As of March 31,
2007, the remaining balance on the loan was $0.4 million.
|
|
|
|
In September 2005, we entered into an agreement with the
Industrial Development Corporation of the City of Manitowoc to
provide a $0.5 million loan for the purpose of acquiring
manufacturing equipment for our manufacturing facility. The loan
expires in October 2011 and bears interest a fixed rate of
2.925% per annum. The loan is secured by a purchase money
security interest and was also previously secured by a personal
guarantee of Mr. Verfuerth, which was released effective
July 5, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, the remaining
balance on the loan was $0.4 million.
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2004, we received a secured note from a local bank to
provide a $3.3 million loan for working capital purposes.
We pay principal and interest payments of $24,755 per month on
the note, which are payable through the expiration of the note
in February 2014. The note bears interest at a fixed rate of
6.9% per annum. The note is 75% guaranteed by the United States
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Association and was
also previously guaranteed by a personal guarantee of
Mr. Verfuerth, which was released effective August 15,
2007. As of March 31, 2007, the remaining balance on the
note was $1.6 million.
|
In May 2004, we entered into an agreement with
Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth to indemnify them for
all liabilities and expenses they may incur in connection with
their guarantees of our indebtedness, and to pay them a fee in
consideration of these guarantees. To secure our obligations to
Mr. Verfuerth and Ms. Verfuerth under this agreement,
in July 2006, we granted them a security interest in all of our
assets and in our real estate located in Plymouth, Wisconsin.
This security interest was junior to the security interests held
by our other lenders. The indemnification agreement and the
security agreements were terminated in August 2007, after the
termination of the Verfuerths guarantees of our
indebtedness.
During fiscal 2006 and 2007, we forgave $36,942 and $36,667,
respectively, of indebtedness owed to us by Mr. Verfuerth
as part of his existing employment agreement. In fiscal 2008, we
forgave $33,667 of indebtedness owed to us under this
arrangement. This loan was fully repaid effective August 2,
2007.
In fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, Josh Kurtz and Zach Kurtz, two of
our national account managers, each received $109,661, $113,400
and $127,300, respectively, of compensation from us in their
capacities as employees. Messrs. Kurtz and Kurtz are the
sons of Patricia A. Verfuerth and the stepsons of Neal R.
Verfuerth.
107
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
Upon closing of this offering and the effectiveness of our
amended and restated articles of incorporation, we will be
authorized to issue up to 200 million shares of common
stock, no par value per share, and up to 30 million shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. The description
below summarizes the material terms of our common stock,
preferred stock, and options and warrants to purchase our common
stock, the Convertible Notes that will be converted into our
common stock, and provisions of our amended and restated
articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that
will be effective upon the closing of this offering. This
description is only a summary. For more detailed information,
you should refer to our amended and restated articles of
incorporation and bylaws filed with this registration statement.
Common
Stock
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders
and do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common
stock are entitled to receive proportionately any dividends as
may be declared by our board of directors, subject to any
preferential dividend rights of outstanding preferred stock.
Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of
common stock are entitled to receive proportionately our net
assets available after the payment of all debts and other
liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding
preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive,
subscription, redemption or conversion rights. Our outstanding
shares of common stock are, and the shares offered by us in this
offering will be, when issued and paid for, fully paid and
nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders
of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected
by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of
preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the future.
As of October 15, 2007, there were 12,489,205 shares
of our common stock outstanding held by approximately
366 shareholders.
Preferred
Stock
Effective immediately upon closing of this offering and the
conversion of our 4,808,012 shares of preferred stock
outstanding into shares of common stock, there will be no shares
of preferred stock outstanding. Upon closing of this offering
and the effectiveness of our amended and restated articles of
incorporation, our board of directors will be authorized to
issue from time to time up to 30 million shares of
preferred stock in one or more series without shareholder
approval. Our board of directors will have the discretion to
determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions,
including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights,
redemption privileges and liquidation preferences, of each
series of preferred stock. It is not possible to state the
actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock
on the rights of holders of common stock until our board of
directors determines the specific rights associated with that
preferred stock. Although we have no current plans to issue
shares of preferred stock, the effects of issuing preferred
stock could include one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
decreasing the amount of earnings and assets available for
distribution to holders of common stock;
|
|
|
|
restricting dividends on the common stock;
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the common stock;
|
|
|
|
impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; or
|
|
|
|
delaying, deferring or preventing changes in our control or
management.
|
As of October 15, 2007, there were outstanding
2,989,830 shares of Series B preferred stock held by
approximately 135 shareholders and 1,818,182 shares of
Series C preferred stock held by two shareholders. No
shares of Series A preferred stock were outstanding as of
October 15, 2007.
Warrants
As of October 15, 2007, there were outstanding warrants,
issued in connection with our offerings of common stock and
Series B preferred stock, to purchase 750,822 shares
of our common stock at
108
exercise prices ranging between $1.50 and $2.60 per share, with
a weighted average exercise price of $2.24 per share. These
warrants were held by approximately 109 holders and expire
in various periods from December 31, 2007 through
December 31, 2014.
Stock
Options
As of October 15, 2007, we had granted options to purchase
a total of 4,566,687 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $1.89 per share. Of this total,
1,976,155 options have vested and 2,590,532 remain
unvested. As of October 15, 2007, an additional
396,490 shares of common stock were available for future
option grants under our 2003 Stock Option and 2004 Equity
Incentive Plans. Upon the closing of this offering, an
additional 2.5 million shares of our common stock will be
available for future option grants under our 2004 Stock and
Incentive Awards Plan.
Convertible
Notes
On August 3, 2007, we completed a placement of
$10.6 million in aggregate principal amount of Convertible
Notes to an indirect affiliate of GEEFS, Clean Technology and
affiliates of Capvest. The Convertible Notes are subordinated to
our current and future outstanding indebtedness and bear
interest at 6% per annum.
The Convertible Notes contain customary terms and conditions,
including: (i) automatic conversion into
2,360,802 shares of our common stock upon a qualified
initial public offering resulting in at least $30.0 million
of proceeds to us at an offering price of at least $11.23 per
share; (ii) information and observation rights;
(iii) customary restrictions
and/or
approval rights with respect to, incurring additional
indebtedness, acquiring additional assets, issuing new
securities, paying dividends on or repurchasing our equity
securities, selling our assets, merging, or undergoing a change
in control, making material increases in compensation to our
management, incurring liens, making certain investments,
entering into transactions with our affiliates, amending our
articles of incorporation or bylaws (except in connection with
this offering), commencing or consenting to bankruptcy events or
entering non-core lines of business; (iv) customary events
of default; (v) customary anti-dilution and preemptive
rights protections; (vi) various registration rights with
respect to the shares of our common stock received upon
conversion of the notes (see Registration
Rights); and (viii) tag along and first offer rights
with respect to sales of any of our equity securities by certain
of our management members (other than in connection with this
offering). These terms and conditions are each subject to
customary exceptions and limitations.
All of these terms and conditions (other than the registration
rights related to the shares of our common stock received upon
conversion), will terminate upon conversion of the Convertible
Notes into common stock. Subject to certain exceptions and
extensions, the holders of the Convertible Notes have agreed not
to offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose
of, directly or indirectly, any of their shares of our common
stock, enter into any transaction which would have the same
effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that
transfers, in whole or in part, any economic consequences of
ownership of our common stock received upon conversion of the
Convertible Notes in this offering or for 180 days after
the date of this prospectus, although Clean Technology and
Capvest may sell certain of their previously acquired shares in
this offering. However, if certain individual members of our
management individually sell more than 15% of their respective
fully-diluted beneficially owned shares in this offering, then
the holders of the Convertible Notes may sell any or all of
their shares in this offering, subject to their
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters and any other limitations
imposed by our underwriters. See Principal and Selling
Shareholders.
Registration
Rights
Upon closing of this offering, all outstanding shares of our
convertible preferred stock will be automatically converted into
shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis according to
our current articles of incorporation. The shares of our
Series C preferred stock, which we call our Series C
shares, will be automatically converted into
1,818,182 shares of our common stock. Holders of
Series C shares are entitled to certain registration rights
with respect to common stock issuable upon conversion of those
Series C preferred shares according to the terms of an
agreement between us and the Series C holders.
Additionally, the holders of our Convertible Notes will also be
entitled to certain registration rights with respect to their
shares of common stock received upon conversion of the
Convertible Notes
109
according to the terms of an agreement between us and the
holders of the Convertible Notes. We are generally required to
pay all expenses incurred in connection with registrations
effected in connection with the exercise of these registration
rights, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, and
fees and expenses of counsel to the Series C holders in
excess of $50,000 per offering.
The holders of the Convertible Notes may not exercise these
registration rights for their shares of our common stock
received upon conversion of the Convertible Notes in connection
with this offering unless certain members of our management
individually determine to sell more than 15% of their
fully-diluted beneficially owned shares in this offering. No
member of management intends to sell more than 15% of their
full-diluted beneficially owned shares in this offering. See
Principal and Selling Shareholders.
The holders of our Series C preferred stock and the
Convertible Notes have entered into
lock-up
agreements described under the caption Underwriting,
pursuant to which they have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions and extensions, not to offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock, enter into any transaction which
would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or
other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any
economic consequences of their ownership of our common stock for
a period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus or to
exercise registration rights during such period with respect to
such shares, although they may sell certain shares in this
offering.
Demand
Rights
At any time beginning six months after the closing date of this
offering, subject to specified limitations, any Series C
holder may require that we register all or a portion of their
common shares received upon conversion of their Series C
shares for sale under the Securities Act, if the anticipated
gross proceeds from the sale of such shares would be at least
$10 million. We may be required to effect up to two such
registrations. Series C holders with these registration
rights who are not part of an initial registration demand are
entitled to notice and are entitled to include their own shares
of common stock in such registration.
Also, at any time beginning six months after the closing date of
this offering, the holders of the Convertible Notes may require,
subject to specified limitations, that we register all or a
portion of their common shares received upon conversion of the
Convertible Notes for sale under the Securities Act, other than
on
Form S-3,
if the anticipated aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of
such shares would be at least $5 million.
Piggyback
Rights
If we propose to register any of our equity securities under the
Securities Act, other than in connection with this offering (if
the underwriters make the determination that not all of the
Series C shares to be registered can be included in the
offering), the Series C holders are entitled to notice of
such registration and are entitled to include their shares of
common stock in such registration. Clean Technology and
affiliates of Capvest are selling certain of their previously
acquired shares in this offering. See Principal and
Selling Shareholders. Under certain circumstances, the
underwriters in any future offering may limit the number of
shares sold by selling shareholders in such offering, in which
case the Series C holders will have the first right to
participate in such offering as selling shareholders. The
Series C holders have agreed, subject to certain exceptions
and extensions, not to offer, sell, contract to sell or
otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any of their
common stock received upon conversion of their preferred stock
or enter into any transaction which would have the same effect,
or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that
transfers, in whole or in part, any economic consequences of
their ownership of our common stock for 180 days after the
date of this prospectus, although they may sell certain shares
in this offering. See Principal and Selling
Shareholders.
At any time beginning six months after the closing of this
offering, if we propose to register any of our equity securities
under the Securities Act, the holders of the common shares
received upon conversion of the Convertible Notes are entitled
to notice of such registration and are entitled to include their
shares of common stock in such registration. Such holders have
agreed not to exercise this right in connection with this
offering and, subject to certain exceptions and extensions
described below, have
110
agreed not to sell any of their common stock received upon
conversion of the Convertible Notes in this offering or for
180 days after the date of this prospectus.
In the event that certain of our management members elect to
sell more than 15% of his or her fully-diluted beneficially
owned common stock in this offering, the holders of the
Convertible Notes may sell any or all of their common stock in
this offering, subject to any limitations that may be imposed by
the underwriters in this offering. In this case, registration
rights of the holders of the Convertible Notes will be senior to
any other selling shareholder, except for Series C holders
and sales of shares by any individual management member in this
offering that do not exceed 15% of his or her fully-diluted
beneficial holdings. No member of management intends to sell
more than 15% of his or her fully-diluted shares beneficially
owned of common stock in this offering.
Form S-3
Rights
If we become eligible to file registration statements on
Form S-3
(which cannot occur until at least 12 months after the
closing of this offering), subject to specified limitations, the
Series C holders of not less than 25% of the converted
Series C preferred stock, and the holders of the common
shares received upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, can
require us to register all or a portion of the these shares on
Form S-3.
Shareholders with these registration rights who are not part of
an initial registration demand are entitled to notice and are
entitled to include their shares of common stock in the
registration.
Wisconsin
Anti-Takeover Law and Certain Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaw Provisions
Wisconsin law and our amended and restated articles of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will be
effective upon closing of this offering contain provisions that
could delay or prevent a change of control of our company or
changes in our board of directors that our shareholders might
consider favorable. The following is a summary of these
provisions.
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated
Bylaws
Classified board of directors; removal of directors for
cause. Our amended and restated articles of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will be
effective upon closing of this offering provide that our board
of directors will be divided into three classes, with the term
of office of the first class to expire at the 2008 annual
meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the second class
to expire at the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, and the
term of office of the third class to expire at the 2010 annual
meeting of shareholders. At each annual meeting of shareholders,
each director will be elected for a term ending on the date of
the third annual shareholders meeting following the annual
shareholders meeting at which such director was elected
and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall
qualify, subject to prior death, resignation or removal from
office. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation also
provide that the affirmative vote of shareholders possessing at
least 75% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of
our capital stock is required to amend, alter, change or repeal,
or to adopt any provision inconsistent with, the relevant
sections of the bylaws establishing the classified board;
provided that the board of directors may amend, alter, change or
repeal, or adopt any provision inconsistent with such sections
without the vote of the shareholders by resolution adopted by
the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors
then in office plus one director. Our amended and restated
articles of incorporation also provide that the affirmative vote
of shareholders possessing at least 75% of the voting power of
the then outstanding shares of our capital stock is required to
amend, alter, change or repeal, or adopt any provision
inconsistent with, the provisions of the amended and restated
articles of incorporation concerning the classified board. The
board of directors (or its remaining members, even if less than
a quorum) is also empowered to fill vacancies on the board of
directors occurring for any reason for the remainder of the term
of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred, unless
the vacancy was caused by the action of shareholders (in which
event such vacancy will be filled by the shareholders and may
not be filled by the directors).
Members of the board of directors may be removed only for cause
at a meeting of the shareholders called for the purpose of
removing the director, and the meeting notice must state that
the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is removal
of the director and must state the alleged cause upon which the
directors removal would be based.
111
These provisions are likely to increase the time required for
shareholders to change the composition of our board of
directors. For example, in general, at least two annual meetings
will be necessary for shareholders to effect a change in a
majority of the members of our board of directors.
Advance notice provisions for shareholder proposals and
shareholder nominations of directors. Our amended
and restated bylaws that will become effective upon closing of
this offering provide that, for nominations to the board of
directors or for other business to be properly brought by a
shareholder before a meeting of shareholders, the shareholder
must first have given timely notice of the proposal in writing
to our secretary. For an annual meeting, a shareholders
notice generally must be delivered on or before December 31 of
the year immediately preceding the annual meeting, unless the
date of the annual meeting is on or after May 1 in any year, in
which case notice must be received not later than the close of
business on the day which is determined by adding to December 31
of the year immediately preceding such annual meeting the number
of days starting with May 1 and ending on the date of the annual
meeting in such year. Detailed requirements as to the form of
the notice and information required in the notice are specified
in the amended and restated bylaws. If it is determined that
business was not properly brought before a meeting in accordance
with our amended and restated bylaws, such business will not be
conducted at the meeting.
Wisconsin
Business Corporation Law
We are subject to the provisions of the Wisconsin Business
Corporation Law.
Business Combination Statute. Wisconsin law
regulates a broad range of business combinations between a
resident domestic corporation and an
interested shareholder.
A business combination is defined to include any of the
following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
a merger or share exchange;
|
|
|
|
a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other
disposition of assets equal to 5% or more of the market value of
the stock or consolidated assets of the resident domestic
corporation or 10% of its consolidated earning power or income;
|
|
|
|
the issuance of stock or rights to purchase stock with a market
value equal to 5% or more of the outstanding stock of the
resident domestic corporation;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of a plan of liquidation or dissolution; or
|
|
|
|
certain other transactions involving an interested shareholder.
|
A resident domestic corporation is defined to mean a
Wisconsin corporation that has a class of voting stock that is
registered or traded on a national securities exchange or that
is registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act and
that, as of the relevant date, satisfies any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
its principal offices are located in Wisconsin;
|
|
|
|
it has significant business operations located in Wisconsin;
|
|
|
|
more than 10% of the holders of record of its shares are
residents of Wisconsin; or
|
|
|
|
more than 10% of its shares are held of record by residents of
Wisconsin.
|
Following the closing of this offering, we will be considered a
resident domestic corporation for purposes of these statutory
provisions.
An interested shareholder is defined to mean a
person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or
more of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of a
resident domestic corporation or who is an affiliate or
associate of the resident domestic corporation and beneficially
owned 10% or more of the voting power of its then outstanding
voting stock within the last three years.
Under Wisconsin law, a resident domestic corporation cannot
engage in a business combination with an interested shareholder
for a period of three years following the date such person
becomes an interested shareholder, unless the board of directors
approved the business combination or the acquisition of the
stock that resulted in the person becoming an interested
shareholder before such acquisition. A resident domestic
corporation may engage in a business combination with an
interested
112
shareholder after the three-year period with respect to that
shareholder expires only if one or more of the following
conditions is satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors approved the acquisition of the stock
prior to such shareholders acquisition date;
|
|
|
|
the business combination is approved by a majority of the
outstanding voting stock not beneficially owned by the
interested shareholder; or
|
|
|
|
the consideration to be received by shareholders meets certain
fair price requirements of the statute with respect to form and
amount.
|
Fair Price Statute. The Wisconsin law also
provides that certain mergers, share exchanges or sales, leases,
exchanges or other dispositions of assets in a transaction
involving a significant shareholder and a resident domestic
corporation require a supermajority vote of shareholders in
addition to any approval otherwise required, unless shareholders
receive a fair price for their shares that satisfies a statutory
formula. A significant shareholder for this purpose
is defined as a person or group who beneficially owns, directly
or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting stock of the resident
domestic corporation, or is an affiliate of the resident
domestic corporation and beneficially owned, directly or
indirectly, 10% or more of the voting stock of the resident
domestic corporation within the last two years. Any such
business combination must be approved by 80% of the voting power
of the resident domestic corporations stock and at least
two-thirds of the voting power of its stock not beneficially
owned by the significant shareholder who is party to the
relevant transaction or any of its affiliates or associates, in
each case voting together as a single group, unless the
following fair price standards have been met:
|
|
|
|
|
the aggregate value of the per share consideration is equal to
the highest of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the highest price paid for any common shares of the corporation
by the significant shareholder in the transaction in which it
became a significant shareholder or within two years before the
date of the business combination;
|
|
|
|
the market value of the corporations shares on the date of
commencement of any tender offer by the significant shareholder,
the date on which the person became a significant shareholder or
the date of the first public announcement of the proposed
business combination, whichever is higher; or
|
|
|
|
the highest preferential liquidation or dissolution distribution
to which holders of the shares would be entitled; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
either cash, or the form of consideration used by the
significant shareholder to acquire the largest number of shares,
is offered.
|
Limitations
of Directors Liability and Indemnification
Our amended and restated bylaws, which will become effective
upon closing of this offering, provide that, to the fullest
extent permitted or required by Wisconsin law, we will indemnify
all of our directors and officers, any trustee of any of our
employee benefit plans, and person who is serving at our request
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another entity,
against certain liabilities and losses incurred in connection
with these positions or services. We will indemnify these
parties to the extent the parties are successful in the defense
of a proceeding and in proceedings in which the party is not
successful in defense of the proceeding unless, in the latter
case only, it is determined that the party breached or failed to
perform his or her duties to us and this breach or failure
constituted:
|
|
|
|
|
a willful failure to deal fairly with us or our shareholders in
connection with a matter in which the director or officer has a
material conflict of interest;
|
|
|
|
a violation of criminal law, unless the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful;
|
|
|
|
a transaction from which the director or officer derived an
improper personal profit; or
|
|
|
|
willful misconduct.
|
113
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we are required to
indemnify our directors and executive officers and may indemnify
our employees and other agents to the fullest extent required or
permitted by Wisconsin law. Additionally, our amended and
restated bylaws require us under certain circumstances to
advance reasonable expenses incurred by a director or officer
who is a party to a proceeding for which indemnification may be
available.
Wisconsin law further provides that it is the public policy of
the State of Wisconsin to require or permit indemnification,
allowance of expenses and insurance to the extent required or
permitted under Wisconsin law for any liability incurred in
connection with a proceeding involving a federal or state
statute, rule or regulation regulating the offer, sale or
purchase of securities.
Under Wisconsin law, a director is not personally liable for
breach of any duty resulting solely from his or her status as a
director, unless it is proved that the directors conduct
constituted conduct described in the bullet points above. In
addition, we intend to obtain directors and officers
liability insurance that will insure against certain
liabilities, subject to applicable restrictions.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Wells
Fargo Shareowner Services.
114
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no market for our common
stock and a significant public market for our common stock may
not develop or be sustained after this offering. Future sales of
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or
the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect
prevailing market prices of our common stock. Furthermore, since
only a limited number of shares will be available for sale
shortly after this offering because of certain contractual and
legal restrictions on resale described below, sales of
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market
after the restrictions lapse could also adversely affect the
market price of our common stock and our ability to raise equity
capital in the future. See Risk Factors.
Eligibility
of Restricted Shares for Resale in the Public Markets
Upon closing of this offering, we will have outstanding an
aggregate
of shares
of common stock, assuming no exercise of options or warrants
that were outstanding as of October 15, 2007 and that the
underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option. Of
these shares,
the shares
sold in this offering will be freely transferable without
restriction or registration under the Securities Act, except for
any shares purchased by one of our existing
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act, who may sell only the volume of shares
described below and whose sales would be subject to additional
restrictions described below. The
remaining shares
of common stock will be held by our existing shareholders and
will be considered restricted securities as defined
in Rule 144. Restricted securities may be sold in the
public market only if registered or if they qualify for an
exemption from registration under Rules 144, 144(k) or 701
of the Securities Act, as described below.
Taking into account the
lock-up
agreements described below and the provisions of Rules 144,
144(k) and 701, the number of shares of common stock that will
be available for sale in the public market is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
shares,
which are not subject to the
180-day
lock-up
period described under the caption Underwriting, may
be sold immediately upon the date of this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
shares,
which are not subject to the
180-day
lock-up
period described under the caption Underwriting, may
be sold beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
additional
shares may be sold upon expiration of the
180-day
lock-up
period described under the caption Underwriting, of
which would
be subject to volume, manner of sale and other limitations under
Rule 144; and
|
|
|
|
the
remaining shares
will be eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144 upon the
expiration of various one-year holding periods during the six
months following the expiration of the
180-day
lock-up
period.
|
In addition, the shares underlying options and warrants will
become available for resale into the public markets as described
below under Stock Options and
Warrants.
Lock-up
Agreements
We, our executive officers, directors and shareholders
representing approximately % of our
outstanding common stock have entered into
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters described under the caption
Underwriting.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after the effective date of this
prospectus, a person, or persons whose shares are aggregated,
who owns shares that were purchased from us or an affiliate of
us at least one year previously, is entitled to sell within any
three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the
greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
one percent of our then-outstanding shares of common stock,
which is expected to equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering; and
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the filing of a notice of the sale on Form 144.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale
provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current
public information about us. Rule 144 also provides that
our affiliates that are selling shares of our common stock that
are not restricted shares must nonetheless comply with the same
restrictions applicable to restricted shares, other than the
holding period requirement. We are unable to estimate the number
of shares that will be sold under Rule 144 since this will
depend on the market price for our common stock, the personal
circumstances of the shareholder and other factors.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates at any time during the 90 days
preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares
proposed to be sold for at least two years, including the
holding period of any prior owner other than an affiliate, is
entitled to sell those shares without complying with the manner
of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice
provisions of Rule 144.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701, any of our employees,
directors, officers, consultants or advisors who acquires common
stock from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option
plan or other written agreement before the effective date of
this offering, to the extent not subject to a
lock-up
agreement, is entitled to resell such shares 90 days after
the effective date of this offering in reliance on Rule 144.
The SEC has indicated that Rule 701 will apply to typical
stock options granted by an issuer before it becomes subject to
the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, along with the
shares acquired upon exercise of such options, including
exercises after the date of this prospectus. Securities issued
in reliance on Rule 701 are restricted securities and,
subject to the
lock-up
agreements described above, beginning 90 days after the
date of this prospectus, may be sold by persons other than
affiliates, as defined in Rule 144, subject only to the
manner of sale provisions of Rule 144 and by affiliates
under Rule 144 without compliance with its one-year minimum
holding period requirement.
Stock
Options
As of October 15, 2007, we had granted options to purchase
a total of 4,566,687 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $1.89 per share. As of
October 15, 2007, an additional 396,490 shares of
common stock were available for future option grants under our
2003 Stock Option and 2004 Equity Incentive Plans. Upon the
closing of this offering, an additional 2.5 million shares
of our common stock will be available for future option grants
under our 2004 Stock and Equity Awards Plan.
We intend to file one or more registration statements on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act following closing of this offering to
register all shares of our common stock relating to awards that
we have granted or may grant under our outstanding equity
incentive compensation plans as in effect on the date of this
prospectus. These registration statements are expected to become
effective upon filing. Subject to Rule 144 volume
limitations applicable to affiliates and restrictions imposed by
lock-up
agreements, the amount of shares referenced above, once
registered under any registration statements, will be
immediately available for sale in the open market, except to the
extent that the shares are subject to vesting restrictions with
us or the
lock-up
agreements described under the caption Underwriting.
Warrants
As of October 15, 2007, there were outstanding warrants to
purchase 750,822 shares of our common stock at exercise
prices ranging between $1.50 and $2.60 per share, with a
weighted average exercise price of $2.24 per share. These
warrants expire in various periods from December 31, 2007
through December 31, 2014. Any purchase of our common
shares by affiliates pursuant to the exercise of warrants will
be subject to the one-year holding period under Rule 144,
which holding period will begin on the date of the exercise of
any warrant.
116
Rule 10b5-1
Trading Plans
Upon closing of this offering, certain of our directors and
executive officers may adopt written plans, known as
Rule 10b5-1
plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell
shares of our common stock on a periodic basis. Under these
Rule 10b5-1
plans, a broker may execute trades pursuant to parameters
established by the director or executive officer when entering
into the plan, without further direction from such director or
executive officer. Such sales would not commence until
expiration of the applicable
lock-up
agreements entered into by such directors and executive officers
in connection with this offering. Any director or executive
officer party to a
Rule 10b5-1
plan may amend or terminate it in some circumstances. Our
directors and executive officers may also buy or sell additional
shares outside of a
Rule 10b5-1
plan in accordance with our insider trading plan. Each of
Mr. Verfuerth and Mr. Waibel has adopted a
Rule 10b5-1
plan in accordance with guidelines specified by
Rule 10b5-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
in accordance with our policies with respect to insider trading
and
Rule 10b5-1
plans. Sales under Mr. Verfuerths and
Mr. Waibels Rule
10b5-1 plans
provide directions to potentially sell up
to ,
and shares,
respectively, based on certain predetermined terms and
conditions, in each case beginning after expiration of their
lock-up
agreements.
117
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSIDERATIONS FOR
NON-UNITED
STATES HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK
The following is a general discussion of the material United
States federal income and estate tax considerations applicable
to a
non-United
States holder with respect to such holders acquisition,
ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock. For
purposes of this discussion, a
non-United
States holder means a beneficial owner of our common stock who
is not for United States federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, partnership or any other organization taxable as
a corporation or partnership for United States federal income
tax purposes, created or organized in the United States or under
the laws of the United States or of any state thereof or the
District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is included in gross income for
United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust (A) if (i) a United States court is able to
exercise primary supervision over the trusts
administration and (ii) one or more United States persons
have the authority to control all of the trusts
substantial decisions or (B) that has a valid election in
effect under applicable United States Treasury Regulations to be
treated as a United States person.
|
If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership
for United States federal income tax purposes) holds shares of
our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such
partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner
and the activities of the partnership. Such a partner and
partnership should consult its tax advisor as to its tax
consequences.
This discussion is based on current provisions of the IRC,
existing, proposed and temporary United States Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder, current administrative
rulings and judicial decisions, in each case as in effect and
available as of the date of this prospectus, all of which are
subject to change or to differing interpretation, possibly with
retroactive effect. Any change could alter the tax consequences
to
non-United
States holders described in this prospectus.
This description addresses only the United States federal income
tax considerations of
non-United
States holders that are initial purchasers of our common stock
pursuant to the offering and that will hold our common stock as
capital assets. This discussion does not address all aspects of
United States federal income and estate taxation that may be
relevant to a particular
non-United
States holder in light of that
non-United
States holders individual circumstances nor does it
address any aspects of United States state or local or
non-United
States taxation. This discussion also does not consider any
specific facts or circumstances that may apply to a
non-United
States holder and does not address the special tax rules
applicable to particular
non-United
States holders, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
real estate investment companies, regulated investment companies
or grantor trusts;
|
|
|
|
corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid United States
federal income tax;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
brokers or dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
partnerships and other pass-through entities;
|
|
|
|
pension plans;
|
|
|
|
holders that own or are deemed to own more than 5% of our common
stock;
|
|
|
|
owners that hold our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment;
|
|
|
|
persons that received our common stock as compensation for
performance of services;
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
persons that have a functional currency other than the United
States dollar; and
|
|
|
|
certain former citizens or residents of the United States.
|
Moreover, except as set forth below, this description does not
address the United States federal estate and gift or alternative
minimum tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of our common stock.
There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service,
referred to as the IRS, will not challenge one or more of the
tax consequences described herein or that any such contrary
position would not be sustained by a court, and we have not
obtained, nor do we intend to obtain, an opinion of counsel or
ruling from the IRS with respect to the United States federal
income or estate tax consequences to a
non-United
States holder of the acquisition, ownership, or disposition of
our common stock.
We urge you to consult with your own tax advisor regarding
the United States federal, state, local and
non-United
States income and other tax considerations of acquiring, holding
and disposing of shares of our common stock.
Distributions
on Our Common Stock
We have not declared or paid distributions on our common stock
since our inception and do not intend to pay any distributions
on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In the event we
do pay distributions on our common stock, however, these
distributions generally will constitute dividends for United
States federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our
current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
United States federal income tax principles. If a distribution
exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits as
determined under United States federal income tax principles,
the excess will be treated first as a tax-free return of your
adjusted tax basis in our common stock and thereafter as capital
gain.
Generally, but subject to the discussions below under
Status as United States Real Property Holding
Corporation and Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting, distributions of cash or property paid to you
generally will be subject to withholding of United States
federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be
provided by an applicable United States income tax treaty. You
are urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding your
entitlement to benefits under a relevant United States income
tax treaty. If we determine, at a time reasonably close to the
date of payment of a distribution on our common stock, that the
distribution will not constitute a dividend because we do not
anticipate having current or accumulated earnings and profits as
determined under United States federal income tax principles, we
intend not to withhold any United States federal income tax on
the distribution as permitted by United States Treasury
Regulations.
Except as may be otherwise provided in an applicable United
States income tax treaty, if you conduct a trade or business
within the United States, you generally will be taxed at
graduated United States federal income tax rates applicable to
United States persons (on a net income basis) on dividends that
are effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or
business and such dividends will not be subject to the
withholding described above. If you are a corporation, you may
also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax unless
you qualify for a lower rate under an applicable United States
income tax treaty.
To claim the benefit of any applicable United States tax treaty
or an exemption from withholding because the income is
effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business
in the United States, you must provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
certifying your qualification for a reduced rate under an
applicable treaty or IRS
Form W-8ECI
certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with
your conduct of a trade or business within the United States (or
such successor form as the IRS designates), before the
distributions are made. These forms must be periodically
updated. You may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld
by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.
You should consult your tax advisors regarding any applicable
tax treaties that may provide for different rules.
119
Sale,
Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Our Common
Stock
Generally, but subject to the discussions below under
Status as United States Real Property Holding
Corporation and Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting, you will not be subject to United States
federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized on
the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of shares of our
common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade
or business in the United States (and if an applicable United
States income tax treaty so provides, is also attributable to a
permanent establishment or a fixed base in the United States
maintained by you), in which case you generally (unless an
applicable tax treaty provides otherwise) will be taxed at the
graduated United States federal income tax rates applicable to
United States persons and, if you are a corporation, the
additional branch profits tax described above in
Distributions on Our Common Stock may apply; or
|
|
|
|
you are an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale, exchange
or disposition and certain other conditions are met, in which
case you will be subject to a 30% tax on the net gain derived
from the disposition, which may be offset by your United States
source capital losses, if any.
|
Status as
a United States Real Property Holding Corporation
Under certain circumstances, gain recognized on the sale,
exchange or other disposition of, and certain distributions in
excess of basis with respect to, our common stock would be
subject to United States federal income tax, notwithstanding
your lack of other connections with the United States, if we are
or have been, at any time during the shorter of (i) your
holding period of our common stock or (ii) the five-year
period ending on the date of such sale, exchange or other
disposition (or distribution in excess of basis) a United
States real property holding corporation for United States
federal income tax purposes, unless our common stock is
regularly traded on an established securities market and you
actually or constructively hold no more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock. If we are determined to be a United
States real property holding corporation and the foregoing
exception does not apply, then a purchaser must withhold 10% of
the proceeds payable to you from your sale or other taxable
disposition of our common stock (unless our common stock is
regularly traded on an established securities market), and you
generally will be taxed on the net gain derived from the
disposition at the graduated United States federal income tax
rates applicable to United States persons. Generally, a
corporation is a United States real property holding corporation
only if the fair market value of its United States real property
interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market
value of its worldwide real property interests plus its other
assets used or held for use in a trade or business. Although
there can be no assurance, currently we do not believe that we
are, or have been, a United States real property holding
corporation, or that we are likely to become one in the future.
Furthermore, no assurance can be provided that our stock will be
regularly traded on an established securities market for
purposes of the rules described above.
United
States Federal Estate Tax
Shares of our common stock owned or treated as owned at the time
of death by an individual who is not a citizen or resident of
the United States, as specifically defined for United States
federal estate tax purposes, will be considered United States
situs assets and will be included in the individuals gross
estate for United States federal estate tax purposes. Such
shares, therefore, may be subject to United States federal
estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax or other treaty
provides otherwise.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
We must report annually to the IRS and to each
non-United
States holder the amount of dividends on our common stock paid
to such holder and the amount of any tax withheld with respect
to those dividends, together with other information. These
information reporting requirements apply even if no withholding
was required because the dividends were effectively connected
with the holders conduct of a United States trade or
business, or withholding was reduced or eliminated by an
applicable tax treaty. This information also may be made
available under a specific treaty or agreement to the tax
authorities
120
of the country in which the
non-United
States holder resides or is established. Under certain
circumstances, the Code imposes a backup withholding obligation
(currently at a rate of 28%) on certain reportable payments.
However, backup withholding generally will not apply to payments
of dividends to a
non-United
States holder of our common stock provided the
non-United
States holder furnishes to us or our paying agent the required
certification as to its
non-United
States status, such as by providing a valid IRS
Form W-8BEN
or W-8ECI,
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
Payments of the proceeds from a disposition by a
non-United
States holder of our common stock made by or through a
non-United
States office of a broker generally will not be subject to
information reporting or backup withholding. However,
information reporting (but not backup withholding) will apply to
those payments if the broker is a United States person, a
controlled foreign corporation for United States federal income
tax purposes, a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income
is effectively connected with a United States trade or business
for a specified three-year period or a foreign partnership if at
any time during its tax year (1) one or more of its
partners are United States persons who hold in the aggregate
more than 50 percent of the income or capital interest in
such partnership or (2) it is engaged in the conduct of a
United States trade or business, unless the broker has
documentary evidence that the beneficial owner is a
non-United
States holder or an exemption is otherwise established, provided
that the broker does not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that the holder is a United States person or that the conditions
of any other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied.
Payment of the proceeds from a
non-United
States holders disposition of our common stock made by or
through the United States office of a broker may be subject to
information reporting. Backup withholding will apply unless the
non-United
States holder certifies as to its
non-United
States holder status under penalties of perjury, such as by
providing a valid IRS
Form W-8BEN
or W-8ECI,
or otherwise establishes an exemption, provided that the broker
does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the holder
is a United States person or that the conditions of any other
exemption are not, in fact, satisfied.
Non-United
States holders should consult their tax advisors on the
application of information reporting and backup withholding to
them in their particular circumstances.
Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding tax rules from a payment
to a
non-United
States holder can be refunded or credited against the
non-United
States holders United States federal income tax liability,
if any, provided that the required information is furnished to
the IRS in a timely manner.
The above description is not intended to constitute a
complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to
acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common stock. You
should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax
consequences of your particular situation.
121
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
underwriting agreement, each of the underwriters named below has
severally agreed to purchase from us and the selling
shareholders the aggregate number of shares of common stock set
forth opposite its name below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Canaccord Adams Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Growth Equities, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the offering may be terminated.
We have granted to the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase on a pro rata basis up
to
additional shares from us at the initial public offering price
less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The option may
be exercised only to cover any over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $ per share.
The underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount
of $ per share on sales to other
broker/dealers. After the initial public offering, the
underwriters may change the public offering price and concession
and discount to broker/dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation to be paid to
the underwriters by us and the selling shareholders and the
proceeds, before expenses, payable to us and the selling
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters have informed us that they do not expect sales
to accounts over which the underwriters have discretionary
authority to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being
offered.
We have agreed that we will not (i) offer, sell, issue
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock; (ii) offer, sell, issue, contract to
sell, contract to purchase or grant any option, right or warrant
to purchase shares of our common stock or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock;
(iii) enter into any swap, hedge or any other agreement
that transfers, in whole or in part, the economic consequences
of ownership of shares of our common stock or any securities
convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock;
(iv) establish or increase a put equivalent position or
liquidate or decrease a call equivalent position in shares of
our common stock or any securities convertible or exchangeable
into shares of our common stock within the meaning of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act or (v) file with the
SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act relating
to shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into
or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, or publicly
disclose the intention to take any such action, in each case,
without the prior written consent of Thomas Weisel Partners LLC,
for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus
except for issuances pursuant to or the conversion of
convertible securities, options or warrants outstanding on the
date of this prospectus and the filing of a registration
statement on
Form S-8
for shares of common stock relating to awards that we have
granted or may grant under our outstanding equity incentive
compensation plans, as in effect on the date of this prospectus.
However, in the event that either (1) during the last
17 days of the
122
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in each case the
lock-up
period will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or material
event, as applicable, unless Thomas Weisel Partners LLC waives,
in writing, such extension.
Our officers, directors and shareholders
representing % of our outstanding
common stock have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions,
they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise
dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common
stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a
transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any
swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in
part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our
common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be
settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in
cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make
any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any
transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each
case, the prior written consent of Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus.
In addition, our officers, directors and these shareholders
agree that, without the prior written consent of Thomas Weisel
Partners LLC, they will not, during the period of the
lock-up
period, make any demand for or exercise any right with respect
to, the registration of our common stock or any security
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common
stock. However, in the event that either (1) during the
last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in each case the
lock-up
period will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless Thomas Weisel Partners LLC waives, in
writing, such an extension.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions described in the
paragraph above will not apply to transfers to a family member
or trust, provided the transferee agrees to be bound in writing
by the terms of the lock up agreement prior to such transfer,
such transfer shall not involve a disposition for value and no
filing by any party (donor, donee, transferor or transferee)
under the Exchange Act is required or voluntarily made in
connection with such transfer (other than a filing on a
Form 5 made after the expiration of the lock up
period).
The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public
offering price up
to shares,
or % of the total number of shares
offered in this prospectus by the company, of the common stock
for employees, directors, customers, vendors and other persons
associated with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing
common stock in the offering. The number of shares available for
sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to
the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any
reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the
underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the
other shares.
We and the selling shareholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect.
We have applied to list the shares of common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Market under the symbol OESX.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions, and penalty bids in accordance with
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of
123
shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the
number of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment
option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved
is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment
option. The underwriters may close out any covered short
position by either exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering.
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions. Stabilization and syndicate covering
transactions may cause the price of the shares to be higher than
it would be in the absence of these transactions. The imposition
of a penalty bid might also have an effect on the price of the
shares if it discourages presale of the shares.
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the Nasdaq Global Market or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price will be
determined by negotiations between us and the underwriters.
Among the factors to be considered in determining the initial
public offering price will be our future prospects and those of
our industry in general, our financial operating information in
recent periods, and market prices of securities and financial
and operating information of companies engaged in activities
similar to ours. There can be no assurance that the initial
public offering price will correspond to the price at which our
common stock will trade in the public market subsequent to this
offering or that an active trading market will develop and
continue after this offering.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant
Member State), each Underwriter has represented and agreed that,
with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus
Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the
Relevant Implementation Date), it has not made and will not make
an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State
prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the
shares which has been approved by the competent authority in
that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in
another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent
authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with
the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from
and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of
shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; or
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
in any other circumstances which do not require the publication
by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive.
|
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of shares to the public in relation to any
shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the
same may be varied in that Member State by any
124
measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State.
Each of the underwriters has represented and agreed that:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
it has not made or will not make an offer of shares to the
public in the United Kingdom within the meaning of
section 102B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
(as amended), or FSMA except to legal entities which are
authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or,
if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is
solely to invest in securities or otherwise in circumstances
which do not require the publication by us of a prospectus
pursuant to the Prospectus Rules of the Financial Services
Authority, or FSA;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will
only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or
inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning
of section 21 of FSMA) to persons who have professional
experience in matters relating to investments falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 or in circumstances in
which section 21 of FSMA does not apply to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
it has complied with, and will comply with, all applicable
provisions of FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the
United Kingdom.
|
The underwriters will not offer or sell any of our shares
directly or indirectly in Japan or to, or for the benefit of any
Japanese person or to others, for re-offering or re-sale
directly or indirectly in Japan or to any Japanese person,
except in each case pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with,
the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan and any other
applicable laws and regulations of Japan. For purposes of this
paragraph, Japanese person means any person resident
in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized
under the laws of Japan.
The underwriters and each of their affiliates have not
(i) offered or sold, and will not offer or sell, in Hong
Kong, by means of any document, our shares other than
(a) to professional investors as defined in the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong
and any rules made under that Ordinance or (b) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus as defined in the Companies Ordinance
(Cap. 32) of Hong Kong or which do not constitute an offer
to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance or
(ii) issued or had in its possession for the purposes of
issue, and will not issue or have in its possession for the
purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere any
advertisement, invitation or document relating to our shares
which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be
accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if
permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other
than with respect to our shares which are or are intended to be
disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to
professional investors as defined in the Securities
and Futures Ordinance any rules made under that Ordinance. The
contents of this document have not been reviewed by any
regulatory authority in Hong Kong. You are advised to exercise
caution in relation to the offer. If you are in any doubt about
any of the contents of this document, you should obtain
independent professional advice.
This prospectus or any other offering material relating to our
shares has not been and will not be registered as a prospectus
with the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the shares will be
offered in Singapore pursuant to exemptions under
Section 274 and Section 275 of the Securities and
Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore, or the Securities
and Futures Act. Accordingly our shares may not be offered or
sold, or be the subject of an invitation for subscription or
purchase, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material
relating to our shares be circulated or distributed, whether
directly or indirectly, to the public or any member of the
public in Singapore other than (a) to an institutional
investor or other person specified in Section 274 of the
Securities and Futures Act, (b) to a sophisticated
investor, and in accordance with the conditions specified in
Section 275 of the Securities and Futures Act or
(c) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the
conditions of, any other applicable provision of the Securities
and Futures Act.
In the ordinary course, the underwriters and their affiliates
may in the future provide investment banking, commercial
banking, investment management, or other financial services to
us and our affiliates for which services they may receive
compensation in the future.
125
The validity of the issuance of the common stock offered by us
in this offering will be passed upon for us by the law firm of
Foley & Lardner LLP. Certain legal matters in
connection with this offering will be passed upon for the
underwriters by the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP,
New York, New York.
Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm, has audited our financial statements as of March 31,
2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period
ended March 31, 2007 appearing in this prospectus and the
related registration statement, as set forth in their report
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance
on such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
Wipfli LLP, acted as an independent third party evaluator and
provided a valuation of the fair value of our common stock as of
April 30, 2007 and as of November 30, 2006, in each
case in connection with the board of directors determination of
stock value for financial reporting of stock option grants.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act, with respect to our common stock
offered hereby. This prospectus, which forms part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information
set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement. This prospectus omits
information contained in the registration statement as permitted
by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information
about us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration
statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration
statement filed as part of the registration statement.
Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of
any contract or other document filed as an exhibit are qualified
in all respects by reference to the actual text of the exhibit.
You may read and copy the registration statement, including the
exhibits and schedules to the registration statement, at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site at
www.sec.gov, from which you can electronically access the
registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules to
the registration statement.
Upon the closing of this offering, we will become subject to the
informational and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and
we intend to file periodic reports and other information with
the SEC. After the closing of this offering, our future SEC
filings will be available to you on our website at
www.oriones.com. Information on, or accessible through,
our website is not a part of, and is not incorporated into, this
prospectus.
126
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, temporary equity and
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended March 31, 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended March 31, 2007, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note A, effective April 1, 2006, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 16, 2007
F-2
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
6,864
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $38, $89 and $88
(unaudited)
|
|
|
6,051
|
|
|
|
11,197
|
|
|
|
13,542
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
|
9,496
|
|
|
|
15,678
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
3,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
14,471
|
|
|
|
22,619
|
|
|
|
43,764
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,106
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
8,084
|
|
Patents and licenses, net
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
24,738
|
|
|
$
|
33,583
|
|
|
$
|
56,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
4,767
|
|
|
$
|
5,607
|
|
|
$
|
13,178
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
8,539
|
|
|
|
17,526
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
|
10,492
|
|
|
|
10,603
|
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,116
|
|
|
|
19,275
|
|
|
|
37,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note F)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C convertible redeemable preferred stock,
$0.01 par value: zero, 1,818,182 and 1,818,182 shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2006, at March 31,
2007 and September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: Shares authorized
including Series C convertible redeemable preferred stock:
20,000,000 at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 and 2007 and September 30, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value:
20,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2006
and none at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value:
2,847,400, 2,989,830 and 2,989,830 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
Common stock, no par value: Shares authorized: 80,000,000 as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007 and September 30, 2007
(unaudited); shares issued: 8,982,764, 12,107,573 and 12,856,711
as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and September 30, 2007
(unaudited); shares outstanding: 8,920,900, 12,038,499 and
12,480,705 as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
9,438
|
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
Treasury stock: 61,864, 69,074 and 376,006 common shares as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007 and September 30, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(1,739
|
)
|
Shareholder notes receivable
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
(3,553
|
)
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
6,622
|
|
|
|
9,355
|
|
|
|
14,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, temporary equity and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
24,738
|
|
|
$
|
33,583
|
|
|
$
|
56,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated statements.
F-3
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
19,628
|
|
|
$
|
29,993
|
|
|
$
|
40,201
|
|
|
$
|
17,444
|
|
|
$
|
28,752
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
21,783
|
|
|
|
33,280
|
|
|
|
48,183
|
|
|
|
20,311
|
|
|
|
35,126
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
12,099
|
|
|
|
20,225
|
|
|
|
26,511
|
|
|
|
11,422
|
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
14,043
|
|
|
|
22,524
|
|
|
|
32,487
|
|
|
|
13,633
|
|
|
|
23,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
6,459
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
9,090
|
|
|
|
12,037
|
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
|
6,171
|
|
|
|
8,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
Dividend and interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
income tax benefit of $38
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
6,470,413
|
|
|
|
8,524,012
|
|
|
|
9,080,461
|
|
|
|
9,002,919
|
|
|
|
10,711,695
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and share equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
6,470,413
|
|
|
|
8,524,012
|
|
|
|
16,432,647
|
|
|
|
15,665,720
|
|
|
|
19,782,208
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated statements.
F-4
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF TEMPORARY EQUITY AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary Equity
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
732,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
392,000
|
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
|
|
6,355,776
|
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(392
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,554
|
|
Issuance of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,842,400
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
119,802
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,945
|
|
Conversion of Series A shares to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(648,010
|
)
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,944,030
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of stock for treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
Changes in shareholder notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
2,234,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
8,357,744
|
|
|
$
|
4,643
|
|
|
$
|
(345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,887
|
|
Issuance of stock and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,000
|
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants for cash and notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,378
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Changes in shareholder notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Issuance of common stock and warrants for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
2,847,400
|
|
|
$
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
8,920,900
|
|
|
$
|
5,859
|
|
|
$
|
(345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(398
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,622
|
|
Issuance of stock and warrants
|
|
|
1,818,182
|
|
|
|
4,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,430
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants for cash and notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,064,809
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Conversion to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
Treasury stock purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
Changes in shareholder notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,818,182
|
|
|
$
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,989,830
|
|
|
$
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
12,038,499
|
|
|
$
|
9,438
|
|
|
$
|
(361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,355
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants for cash and notes
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749,138
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
Stock-based compensation (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Changes in shareholder notes receivable (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(306,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Net income (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
1,818,182
|
|
|
$
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,989,830
|
|
|
$
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
12,480,705
|
|
|
$
|
12,209
|
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated statements.
F-5
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
(740
|
)
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Loss on write-off of patents and licenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(2,757
|
)
|
|
|
(5,161
|
)
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
(4,555
|
)
|
|
|
(4,022
|
)
|
|
|
(6,182
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
7,571
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
(3,401
|
)
|
|
|
(6,234
|
)
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,764
|
)
|
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,900
|
)
|
Additions to patents and licenses
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in amount due from shareholder
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,888
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(969
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(4,844
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
10,099
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
Payment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,840
|
)
|
|
|
(2,416
|
)
|
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Net activity in revolving line of credit
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
4,853
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
Excess benefit for deferred taxes on stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
Proceeds from shareholder notes receivable, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Deferred financing and offering costs
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,385
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
5,123
|
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
|
|
9,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
6,579
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
6,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases entered into for purchase of equipment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes receivable issued to shareholders
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investment in affiliate acquired through sale of
inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares surrendered for payment of stock note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
Preferred stock accretion
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated statements.
F-6
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
NOTE A
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The Company includes Orion Energy Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin
corporation, and all consolidated subsidiaries. The Company is a
developer, manufacturer and seller of lighting and energy
management systems. The corporate offices are located in
Plymouth, Wisconsin and manufacturing and operations facilities
are located in Plymouth and Manitowoc, Wisconsin.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Unaudited
financial information
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2007, the consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 and the consolidated statements
of temporary equity and shareholders equity for the six
months ended September 30, 2007 are unaudited and the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm has
not expressed an opinion on the statements for these periods.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements
and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments,
which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to
state fairly the Companys consolidated financial position
as of September 30, 2007 and consolidated results of
operations and cash flows for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007. The financial data and other
information disclosed in these notes to the consolidated
financial statements as of and related to the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 are unaudited. The results for
the six months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending
March 31, 2008 or for any other interim period or for any
future year.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during that reporting period. Areas that
require the use of significant management estimates include
revenue recognition, inventory obsolescence and bad debt
reserves, accruals for warranty expenses, income taxes and
certain equity transactions. Accordingly, actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash
and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid, short-term investments
with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Short-term
investments
The Companys short-term investments, which consist of
government agency bonds with maturities ranging from 91 to
125 days when acquired, are reported at fair value with any
net unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders
equity. At the time of sale, any realized appreciation or
depreciation, calculated by the specific identification method,
will be recognized in non-operating results. The Company has
classified all marketable securities as short-term since it has
the intent to maintain a liquid portfolio and the ability to
redeem the securities within one year. During the six months
ended September 30, 2007, there were no sales of the
Companys short-term investments. As of September 30,
2007 (unaudited), no unrealized gains or losses were recorded as
the marketable securities fair value approximated their
cost.
F-7
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair
value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable,
approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively
short-term nature of these instruments. Based upon interest
rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar
terms, the carrying value of the Companys long-term debt
is also approximately equal to its fair value.
Accounts
receivable
The majority of the Companys accounts receivable are due
from companies in the commercial, industrial and agricultural
industries, and wholesalers. Credit is extended based on an
evaluation of a customers financial condition. Generally,
collateral is not required for end users; however, the payment
of certain trade accounts receivable from wholesalers is secured
by irrevocable standby letters of credit. Accounts receivable
are due within
30-60 days.
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects
to collect from outstanding balances. The Company provides for
probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and
a credit to an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its
assessment of the current status of individual accounts.
Balances that are still outstanding after the Company has used
reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge
to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to accounts
receivable.
Included in accounts receivable are amounts due from a third
party finance company to which the Company has sold, without
recourse, the future cash flows from lease arrangements entered
into with customers. Such receivables are recorded at the
present value of the future cash flows discounted at 12.49%. As
of March 31, 2007, the following amounts were due from the
third party finance company in future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
2009
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross receivable
|
|
|
313
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net contracts receivable
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007 (unaudited), net contract receivables
amounted to $231,000, $186,000 of which is due in the next
12 months.
Inventories
Inventories consist of raw materials and components, such as
ballasts, metal sheet and coil stock and molded parts; work in
process inventories, such as frames and reflectors; and finished
goods, including completed fixtures or systems and accessories,
such as lamps, meters and power supplies. All inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or market value; with cost
determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. The Company reduces the carrying value
of its inventories for differences between the cost and
estimated net realizable value, taking into consideration usage
in the preceding 12 months, expected demand, and other
information indicating obsolescence. The Company records as a
charge to cost of revenue the amount required to reduce the
carrying value of inventory to net realizable value. As of
March 31, 2006 and 2007, and September 30, 2007
(unaudited), the Company had inventory obsolescence reserves of
$355,000, $448,000 and $642,000.
Costs associated with the procurement and warehousing of
inventories, such as inbound freight charges and purchasing and
receiving costs, are also included in cost of revenue.
F-8
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Inventories were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Raw materials and components
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
$
|
5,496
|
|
|
$
|
8,285
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
|
|
6,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,167
|
|
|
$
|
9,496
|
|
|
$
|
15,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist primarily of
prepaid insurance premiums, advance payments to contractors,
payments on construction of an asset to be sold to a finance
company and leased back, and miscellaneous receivables. The
balance at March 31, 2007 also included a $450,000 secured
note with 5% interest due from a third party. The note was paid
in full in May 2007.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for
additions and improvements are capitalized, while replacements,
maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the lives
of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Properties
sold, or otherwise disposed of, are removed from the property
accounts, with gains or losses on disposal credited or charged
to income from operations.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company periodically
reviews the carrying values of property and equipment for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the assets may be impaired. The estimated future undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and
their eventual disposition are compared to the assets
carrying amount to determine if a write down to market value is
required. No writedowns were recorded in fiscal 2005, 2006, 2007
or the six months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007
(unaudited).
Property and equipment were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
4,533
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
Plant equipment
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,159
|
|
|
|
10,298
|
|
|
|
11,290
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
$
|
8,106
|
|
|
$
|
7,588
|
|
|
$
|
8,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment included above under capital leases were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net equipment
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets, using the straight-line method. Depreciable
lives by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
|
10 15 years
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10 39 years
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
3 10 years
|
|
Plant equipment
|
|
|
3 10 years
|
|
No interest has been capitalized for construction in progress,
as it was not material for any of the periods presented.
Patents
and Licenses
Patents and licenses are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over
15-17 years.
The Company capitalized $40,000, $56,000 and $81,000 of costs
associated with obtaining patents and licenses in fiscal 2005,
2006 and 2007. An additional $123,000 was capitalized in the six
months ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited). Amortization
expense recorded to cost of revenue for fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007 was $9,000, $14,000 and $19,000. The costs and accumulated
amortization for patents and licenses was $246,000 and $52,000
as of March 31, 2006; $314,000 and $71,000 as of
March 31, 2007; and $437,000 and $83,000 as of
September 30, 2007 (unaudited). The average remaining
useful life of the patents and licenses as of September 30,
2007 was approximately 16 years. As of September 30,
2007, amortization expense of the patents and licenses for each
of the fiscal years ending 2008 through 2012 is estimated to be
$23,000, with $221,000 remaining after 2012.
The Companys management periodically reviews the carrying
value of patents and licenses for impairment. As a result of
this review, the Company wrote off an immaterial amount in
fiscal 2007.
Investment
The investment consists of 77,000 shares of preferred stock
of a manufacturer of specialty aluminum products which was
acquired in July 2006 by exchanging products with a fair value
of $794,000. The terms of the preferred stock contain protective
covenants regarding capital structure changes and also certain
provisions to require the redemption of the stock at a defined
liquidation value. The terms of the stock also require a
dividend payment of 12% on the liquidation value or $139,000
annually. The investment is being accounted for under the cost
method of accounting. The Company does not have the ability to
exert significant influence over the entity.
The Companys management periodically reviews the carrying
value of the investment for impairment. No impairment was
required at March 31, 2007 or September 30, 2007
(unaudited).
Other
Long-Term Assets
Other long-term assets includes deferred financing costs related
to debt issuances and the Companys contemplated initial
public offering, amounts due from shareholders unrelated to
stock transactions (see Note B) and other
miscellaneous items.
Deferred financing costs related to debt issuances are amortized
to interest expense over the life of the related debt issue (6
to 15 years). In fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company
capitalized $91,000, $94,000 and zero of deferred financing
costs. In the six months ended September 30, 2007
(unaudited), the Company deferred $213,000 of costs related to
its issuance of convertible notes that closed in August 2007
(see Note D). Interest expense related to the amortization
of deferred financing for fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 was
$11,000, $62,000, and $45,000. For the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 (unaudited), the amortization
was $19,000 and $26,000 respectively.
The balance at September 30, 2007 (unaudited) included
$2,173,000 of deferred equity issuance costs incurred in
connection with the Companys contemplated initial public
offering.
F-10
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accrued
Expenses
Accrued expenses include warranty accruals, accrued wages,
accrued vacations, sales tax payable, income tax payable and
other various unpaid expenses. Accrued subcontractor fees
amounted to $255,000, $548,000 and $770,000 as of March 31,
2006, 2007 and September 30, 2007 (unaudited). During
fiscal 2006, the Company experienced performance issues on
select inventory items and entered into a settlement agreement
with the supplier under which the Company was forgiven certain
payables outstanding and received a cash rebate of $432,000 in
exchange for an additional purchase obligation of $962,000 of
inventory. The cash rebate was received and included in other
current liabilities at March 31, 2006 as the purchase
obligation remained outstanding. As of March 31, 2007, the
Company had satisfied its purchase obligation and the rebate was
reclassified to inventory and is being amortized to cost of
revenue as the purchased product is used.
The Company generally offers a limited warranty of one year on
its products in addition to those standard warranties offered by
major original equipment component manufacturers. The
manufacturers warranties cover lamps and ballasts, which
are significant components in the Companys products. In
fiscal 2005 and 2006, the Company experienced significant
warranty problems with new ballast and lamp components
manufactured by a third party supplier. The Company charged back
costs against accounts payable due the supplier as partial
reimbursement for replacement material and labor costs incurred
to correct certain product failures at its customers
facilities. The Company also provided a general reserve for
warranty costs as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited).
Changes in the Companys warranty accrual were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Credit from supplier
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision to cost of revenue
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
(1,075
|
)
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletin, (SAB) No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. Based upon SAB 104, revenue is recognized
when the following four criteria are met:
|
|
|
|
|
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
|
|
delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer;
|
|
|
|
the sales price is fixed and determinable and no further
obligation exists; and
|
|
|
|
collectibility is reasonably assured.
|
These four criteria are met for the Companys product only
revenue upon delivery of the product and title passing to the
customer. At that time, the Company provides for estimated costs
that may be incurred for product warranties and sales returns.
For sales contracts consisting of multiple elements of revenue,
such as a combination of product sales and services, the Company
determines revenue by allocating the total contract revenue to
each element based on the relative fair values in accordance
with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables.
Services other than installation and recycling that are
completed prior to delivery of the product are recognized upon
shipment and are included in product revenue as evidence of fair
value does not exist.
F-11
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
These services include comprehensive site assessment, site field
verification, utility incentive and government subsidy
management, engineering design, and project management.
Service revenue includes revenue earned from installation, which
includes recycling services. Service revenue is recognized when
services are complete and customer acceptance has been received.
The Company contracts with third-party vendors for the
installation services provided to customers and, therefore,
determines fair value based upon negotiated pricing with such
third-party vendors. Recycling services provided in connection
with installation entail disposal of the customers legacy
lighting fixtures.
Costs of products delivered, and services performed, that are
subject to additional performance obligations or customer
acceptance are deferred and recorded in Other Current Assets on
the Balance Sheet. These deferred costs are expensed at the time
the related revenue is recognized. Deferred costs amounted to
$484,000 and $298,000 as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and
$707,000 as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited).
Deferred revenue of $109,000 and $133,000 as of March 31,
2006 and 2007, and $183,000 as of September 30, 2007
(unaudited) is included in Other Long-Term Liabilities on the
Balance Sheet and represents revenue deferred related to an
obligation to provide replacement lamps on certain sales. The
fair value of lamps is readily determinable based upon pricing
from third-party vendors. Deferred revenue is recognized when
the replacement lamps are delivered, which occurs in excess of a
year after the original contract.
A sales-type financing program is offered to customers where
their purchase is financed by the Company. The contracts are one
year in duration and at the completion of the initial one year
term, provide for automatic annual renewals of generally up to
four years at agreed pricing, an early buyout for cash or for
the return of the equipment at the customers expense. Upon
completion of the installation, the future lease cash flows and
residual rights to the related equipment are then sold by the
Company, without recourse, to an unrelated third party finance
company in exchange for cash and future payments.
In accordance with
EITF 01-8,
Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease,
SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases and SFAS 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities a Replacement of
FASB Statement No. 125, revenue is recognized for the
net present value of the future payments from the third party
finance company upon completion of the project. The
Companys contract terms with the third party finance
company provide for a non-recourse sale of the customers
installment contract, with the finance company providing 70% of
funding at contract origination, 15% in year two and 15% in year
three. Sales under this program amounted to 7.4%, 4.5% and 1.5%
of revenue for fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 and 3.1% and 0.4% of
revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
2007 (unaudited).
Shipping
and Handling Costs
In accordance with
EITF 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs, the
Company records costs incurred in connection with shipping and
handling of products as cost of revenue. Amounts billed to
customers in connection with these costs are included in revenue
and were not material for any periods presented in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Advertising
Advertising costs of $233,000, $233,000 and $272,000 for fiscal
2005, 2006, 2007 and $51,000 and $232,000 for the six months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 (unaudited) were charged
to operations as incurred.
Research
and Development
The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred.
F-12
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS 109
requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the future tax consequences of temporary differences between
financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and
liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and
laws expected to be in effect when the differences will reverse.
Deferred income taxes also arise from the future benefits of net
operating loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amounts expected to be realized.
Deferred tax benefits have not been recognized for income tax
effects resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock
options. These benefits will be recognized in the period in
which the benefits are realized as a reduction in taxes payable.
These future benefits will be reported as a reduction in income
taxes payable and an increase in additional paid-in capital.
Realized tax benefits from the exercise of stock options were
$435,000 and $922,000 for the year ended March 31, 2007 and
six months ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited).
Stock
Option Plans
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions
of SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, for its stock
option plans. The Company previously accounted for these plans
under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25), Financial Accounting Standards
Boards (FASB) Interpretation No. 44, Accounting
for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an
Interpretation of APB 25, and disclosure requirements
established by SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation as amended by SFAS 148 Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure.
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified
prospective method. Under this transition method, compensation
cost recognized for the year ended March 31, 2007 includes
the current periods cost for all stock options granted
prior to, but not yet vested as of April 1, 2006. This cost
was based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance
with the original provisions of SFAS 123. The cost for all
share-based awards granted subsequent to March 31, 2006,
represents the grant-date fair value that was estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Results for
prior periods have not been restated. Compensation cost for
options will be recognized in earnings, net of estimated
forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the
Companys financial results were lower than under our
previous accounting method for share-based compensation by the
following amounts (in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
292
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
|
|
292
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share attributable to
common shareholders
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company presented
all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as
operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash
flows. SFAS 123(R) requires that cash flows from the
exercise of stock options resulting from tax benefits in excess
of recognized cumulative compensation costs (excess tax
benefits) be classified as financing cash flows. For fiscal year
ended 2007, $435,000 of such excess tax benefits was classified
as financing cash flows. For the six months ended
September 30, 2007, this amount was $922,000 (unaudited).
F-13
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company has used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model both
prior to and following the adoption of SFAS 123(R). In
fiscal 2005 and 2006, the Company determined volatility based on
an analysis of the Companys common stock sales among
shareholders. Beginning in fiscal 2007, the Company determined
volatility based on an analysis of a peer group of public
companies which was determined to be more reflective of the
expected future volatility. The risk-free interest rate is the
rate available as of the option date on zero-coupon
U.S. Government issues with a remaining term equal to the
expected term of the option. The expected term is based upon the
vesting term of the Companys options and expected exercise
behavior. The Company has not paid dividends in the past and
does not plan to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
The Company estimates its forfeiture rate of unvested stock
awards based on historical experience. For fiscal 2007, the
forfeiture rate was 6%.
The fair value of each option grant in fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007 and for the six months ended September 30, 2007
(unaudited) was determined using the assumptions in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Weighted average expected term
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
6.6 years
|
|
|
|
2.4 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Expected forfeiture rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
The Company engaged Wipfli, LLP, an unrelated third-party
appraisal firm, to perform a contemporaneous valuation analysis
of the Companys common stock as of April 30, 2007.
That analysis, prepared in accordance with the methodology
prescribed by the AICPA Practice Aid Valuation of
Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as
Compensation, estimated the fair market value of the
Companys common stock at $4.15 per share. Wipfli, LLP
considered a variety of valuation methodologies and economic
outcomes and calculated its final valuation using the
Probability Weighted Expected Return Method. In accordance with
the AICPA Practice Aid, the valuation gave recognition to the
Companys consideration of an initial public offering;
while also considering the economic value of other strategic
alternatives or economic outcomes that might occur.
That same valuation firm also prepared a valuation report as of
November 2006 that valued the Companys common stock at
$2.20 per share. That valuation was considered appropriate by
the Board of Directors, in addition to considering other
relevant valuation factors, for determining the exercise price
of option grants made from December 2006 to April 2007. For
option grants in fiscal 2007 prior to December 2006, the Board
of Directors determined the exercise price of option grants
based upon estimates of fair value. Upon completion of the
November 2006 valuation report, for financial reporting
purposes, the Company determined that it was appropriate to use
the $2.20 per share value as the fair value within the
Black-Scholes option pricing model for all fiscal 2007 grants
prior to December 2006.
Upon completion of the April 30, 2007 valuation by Wipfli,
LLP, the Company determined that it was appropriate to use the
$4.15 per common share value in its Black-Scholes option pricing
model for financial reporting purposes for the March and April
2007 stock option grants. Due to the proximity of the November
2006 valuation to the December grants, the Company believes the
$2.20 per common share value used as the exercise price
approximates fair value for financial reporting purposes.
On July 27, 2007, the Company granted stock options for
429,432 shares at an exercise price of $4.49 per
share. The compensation committee and board of directors
determined that the exercise price of such stock options was at
least equal to the fair market value of the Companys
common stock as of such date primarily based on the
$4.49 per share conversion price of the substantially
simultaneous subordinated convertible note placement.
The exercise price and fair value of stock option grants in
fiscal 2005 and 2006 was based upon known independent
third-party sales of common stock and the per share prices at
which we issued shares of our common and preferred stock to
third-party investors.
F-14
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Net
Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing
net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period and does not consider common stock equivalents. In
accordance with EITF D-42, The Effect on the Calculation of
Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of
Preferred Stock, the $972,000 and $83,000 excess in fiscal
2005 and fiscal 2007 of (1) fair value of the consideration
transferred to the holders of the convertible preferred stock
over (2) the fair value of securities issuable pursuant to
the original conversion terms was subtracted from net income
(loss) to arrive at net income (loss) attributable to common
shareholders in the calculation of earnings per share.
In addition, all series of the Companys preferred stock
participate in all undistributed earnings with the common stock.
The Company allocated earnings to the common shareholders and
participating preferred shareholders under the two-class method
as required by
EITF 03-6,
Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB
Statement No. 128. The two-class method is an earnings
allocation method under which basic net income per share is
calculated for the Companys common stock and participating
preferred stock considering both accrued preferred stock
dividends and participation rights in undistributed earnings as
if all such earnings had been distributed during the year. Since
the Companys participating preferred stock was not
contractually required to share in the Companys losses, in
applying the two-class method to compute basic net income per
common share, no allocation was made to the preferred stock if a
net loss existed or if an undistributed net loss resulted from
reducing net income by the accrued preferred stock dividends.
Diluted net income per common share reflects the dilution that
would occur if preferred stock were converted, warrants and
employee stock options were exercised, and shares issued per
exercise of stock options for which the exercise price was paid
by a non-recourse loan from the Company were outstanding. In the
computation of diluted net income per common share, the Company
uses the if converted method for preferred stock and
restricted stock, and the treasury stock method for
outstanding options and warrants. In addition, in computing the
dilutive effect of the convertible notes, the numerator is
adjusted to add back the after-tax amount of interest recognized
in the period. The
F-15
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
effect of net income (loss) per common share is calculated based
upon the following shares (in thousands except share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock
dividends
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Adjustment for interest, net of income tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and participation rights of preferred
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
846
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
6,470,413
|
|
|
|
8,524,012
|
|
|
|
9,080,461
|
|
|
|
9,002,919
|
|
|
|
10,711,695
|
|
Weighted-average effect of preferred stock, restricted stock,
convertible notes and assumed conversion of stock options and
warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,352,186
|
|
|
|
6,662,801
|
|
|
|
9,070,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding
|
|
|
6,470,413
|
|
|
|
8,524,012
|
|
|
|
16,432,647
|
|
|
|
15,665,720
|
|
|
|
19,782,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For fiscal 2005 and 2006, the Company did not adjust for the
conversion or exercise affect of preferred stock, restricted
stock or common share equivalents or the issuance of shares
exercised with non-recourse loans, as the impact would be
anti-dilutive due to the Companys losses.
The following table indicates the number of potentially dilutive
securities as of each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Series A preferred
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred
|
|
|
2,234,400
|
|
|
|
2,847,400
|
|
|
|
2,989,830
|
|
|
|
2,989,830
|
|
|
|
2,989,830
|
|
Series C redeemable preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818,182
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,360,802
|
|
Common stock subject to non-recourse shareholder notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock options
|
|
|
6,412,108
|
|
|
|
6,394,730
|
|
|
|
4,714,547
|
|
|
|
6,608,532
|
|
|
|
4,742,909
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
1,064,314
|
|
|
|
1,098,574
|
|
|
|
1,109,390
|
|
|
|
1,096,908
|
|
|
|
778,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,730,822
|
|
|
|
10,360,704
|
|
|
|
12,781,949
|
|
|
|
10,715,270
|
|
|
|
12,690,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentration
of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties
The Companys cash is deposited with one major financial
institution. At times, deposits in this institution exceed the
amount of insurance provided on such deposits. The Company has
not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes that it
is not exposed to any significant risk on these balances.
The Company currently depends on one supplier for a number of
components necessary for its products, including ballasts and
lamps. If the supply of these components were to be disrupted or
terminated, or if this supplier were unable to supply the
quantities of components required, the Company may have
short-term difficulty in locating alternative suppliers at
required volumes. Purchases from this supplier accounted for
18%, 14% and 26% of cost of revenue in fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007.
In fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, there were no customers who
individually accounted for greater than 10% of revenue. For the
six months ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited), one
customer accounted for 20% of revenue.
No customers accounted for more than 10% of the accounts
receivable balance as of March 31, 2006. Two customers,
individually, each accounted for 11% of the accounts receivable
balance as of March 31, 2007. One customer accounted for
18% of accounts receivable as of September 30, 2007
(unaudited).
Segment
Information
The Company has determined that it operates in only one segment
in accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information, as it does not
disaggregate profit and loss information on a segment basis for
internal management reporting purposes to its chief operating
decision maker.
The Companys revenue and long-lived assets outside the
United States are insignificant.
Adoption
of FIN 48 (unaudited)
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
(FIN 48), which became effective for the Company on
April 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be
recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The adoption
of FIN 48 resulted in an increase of the Companys
accumulated deficit of $210,000 at April 1, 2007
(unaudited). As of the adoption date, the balance of gross
unrecognized tax benefits was $1.6 million, $370,000 of
which would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. Of this
amount, $60,000 and $310,000 were recorded as current and
deferred tax liabilities. The remaining amount of unrecognized
tax benefits of $1.2 million relates to net operating loss
carryforwards deductions created by the exercise of
non-qualified stock options. The benefit from the net operating
losses created from these expenses will be recorded as a
reduction in taxes payable and a credit to additional paid-in
capital in the period in which the benefits are realized. The
Company first recognizes tax benefits from current period stock
option expenses against current period income. The remaining
current period income is offset by net operating losses under
the tax law ordering approach. Under this approach, the Company
will utilize the net operating losses from stock option expenses
last. For the six months ended September 30, 2007, the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $450,000 to
$1.2 million due to the utilization of unrecognized tax
benefits from stock option expenses. It is expected that the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next
12 months if the Company generates sufficient taxable
income to realize some or all of the $750,000 unrecognized tax
benefits for stock option expenses. The remaining $400,000 of
gross unrecognized tax benefits is comprised of $300,000 for
expenses that may not be deductible for Federal income tax
purposes and $100,000 for potential State income tax
liabilities. The Company does not expect any of
F-17
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
these amounts to change in the next twelve months as none of the
issues is currently under examination, the statutes of
limitations do not expire within the period, and the Company is
not aware of any pending legislation. The Company recognizes
penalties and interest related to uncertain tax liabilities in
income tax expense. Penalties and interest are immaterial as of
the date of adoption and are included in unrecognized tax
benefits. Due to the existence of net operating loss and credit
carryforwards, all years since 2000 are open to examination by
tax authorities.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurement. SFAS 157 provides a common definition of
fair value and establishes a framework to make the measurement
of fair value in FAAP more consistent and comparable.
SFAS 157 also requires expanded disclosures about the
extent to which fair value measures impact earnings.
SFAS 157 is effective for years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential effect of SFAS 157 on its financial statements.
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. Under this standard, the Company may elect to
report financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value on a
contract-by-contract
basis with changes in value reported in earnings. This election
would be irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective for years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact SFAS 159 will have on its financial
statements.
In June 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 06-3,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement (that is, Gross versus Net Presentation), which
allows companies to adopt a policy of presenting taxes in the
income statement on either a gross or net basis. Taxes within
the scope of this EITF would include taxes that are imposed on a
revenue transaction between a seller and a customer. If such
taxes are significant, the accounting policy should be disclosed
as well as the amount of taxes included in the financial
statements if presented on a gross basis.
EITF 06-3
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2006. The adoption of EITF
Issue 06-3
had no impact on the Companys financial statements as the
Companys revenue has historically been, and will continue
to be, presented net of sales taxes.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue No.
07-3,
Accounting for Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used
in Future Research and Development Activities, or
EITF 07-3.
This requires that nonrefundable advance payments for future
research and development activities be deferred and capitalized.
EITF 07-3
is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2007. The
company is assessing the impact of
EITF 07-3
and has not determined whether it will have a material impact on
its results of operations or financial position.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2005 and 2006
financial statements to conform to the 2007 presentation. These
reclassifications do not affect the net earnings as previously
reported.
|
|
NOTE B
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
As of March 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had non-interest
bearing advances of $55,000 and $157,000, respectively, to a
shareholder, and also held an unsecured, 1.46% note
receivable due from the same shareholder in the amounts of
$66,000 and $67,000, including interest receivable. These
advances and this note were repaid subsequent to June 30,
2007. During 2006 and 2007, the Company forgave $37,000 and
$37,000, of shareholder advances as part of a contractual
employment relationship. The amount forgiven for the six months
ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) was $37,000.
The Company incurred fees of $146,000, $110,000 and $78,000,
which were paid to a shareholder as consideration for
guaranteeing notes payable and certain accounts payable during
2005, 2006 and 2007.
F-18
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
These fees were based on a percentage applied to the monthly
outstanding balances or revolving credit commitments. These
guarantees were released subsequent to March 31, 2007.
The Company leases, on a
month-to-month
basis, an aircraft owned by an entity controlled by an officer
and shareholder. Amounts paid during fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007
were $94,000, $107,000 and $102,000. Amounts paid for the six
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 (unaudited) were
$39,000 and $16,000.
The Company held a recourse note receivable in the amount of
$375,000 at March 31, 2006 and 2007 and held various
non-recourse notes receivable in the amount of $1.8 million
at March 31, 2007. These notes were entered into in
connection with the exercise of stock option grants by certain
directors and or officers of the Company. These notes were
repaid subsequent to March 31, 2007.
During fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company recorded revenue
of $210,000, $91,000 and $32,000 for products and services sold
to a entity for which the Companys Chairman of the Board
was the executive chairman.
Long-term debt as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited) consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revolving credit agreement
|
|
$
|
4,853
|
|
|
$
|
6,064
|
|
|
$
|
4,722
|
|
Term note
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
First mortgage note payable
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
Debenture payable
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
Lease obligations
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
Stock note payable to former shareholder
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
11,351
|
|
|
|
11,339
|
|
|
|
9,641
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
$
|
10,492
|
|
|
$
|
10,603
|
|
|
$
|
8,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Credit Agreement
The Companys $25 million revolving credit agreement
has an interest rate of prime plus 1% (effective rate of 9.25%
at March 31, 2007), plus annual fees and minimum monthly
interest costs. Borrowings under this agreement are
collateralized by accounts receivable and inventory. Borrowings
are limited to a percentage of eligible trade accounts
receivables and inventories. As of March 31, 2007,
remaining availability under the formula borrowing base
computation was approximately $4.6 million. The credit
agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, principally
for minimum net worth, net income and limits on capital
expenditures. In addition, the agreement precludes the payment
of dividends on our common stock. The Company was in compliance
with these covenants, as amended, as of March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited). The credit agreement
expires December 23, 2008 at which time all unpaid amounts
owed under the agreement are due.
Term
Note
The Companys term note requires principal and interest
payments of $25,000 per month payable through February 2014
at an interest rate of 6.9%. Amounts outstanding under the note
are secured by a first security interest and first mortgage in
certain long-term assets and a secondary interest in inventory
and accounts receivable and a secondary general business
security agreement on all assets. In addition, the agreement
precludes the payment of dividends on our common stock. Amounts
outstanding under the note are 75% guaranteed by the United
States Department of Agriculture Rural Development
F-19
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Association and a personal guarantee of a shareholder, which was
released subsequent to March 31, 2007.
First
Mortgage Note Payable
The Companys first mortgage has an interest rate of prime
plus 2% (effective rate of 9.75% at September 30,
2007) and requires monthly payments of principal and
interest of $10,000 through September 2014. The mortgage is
secured by a first mortgage on the Companys manufacturing
facility and a personal guarantee of a shareholder which was
released subsequent to March 31, 2007. The mortgage
includes certain prepayment penalties and various restrictive
covenants, with which the Company was in compliance as of
March 31, 2007.
Debenture
Payable
The Companys debenture payable was issued by Certified
Development Company at an effective interest rate of 6.18%. The
balance is payable in monthly principal and interest payments of
$8,000 through December 2024 and is guaranteed by United States
Small Business Administration 504 program. The amount due is
collateralized by a second mortgage on manufacturing facility
and personal guarantee of a shareholder, which was released
subsequent to March 31, 2007.
Lease
Obligations
The Companys capital lease obligations have been recorded
at rates of 6.5% to 16.2%. The leases are payable in
installments through February 2010 and are collateralized by
related equipment.
Other long-term debt consists of block grants and equipment
loans from local governments. Interest rates range from 2.0% to
2.9%. The amounts due are collateralized by purchase money
security interests in plant equipment and a personal guarantee
of a shareholder, which was released subsequent to
March 31, 2007. Repayment of up to $250,000 may be forgiven
beginning in 2010 if the Company is able to create certain types
and numbers of jobs within the lending localities.
As of March 31, 2007, aggregate maturities of long-term
debt, excluding the line of credit, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
750
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
705
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
509
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
491
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE D CONVERTIBLE
NOTES
In August 2007, the Company issued $10.6 million of
convertible subordinated notes, maturing in August 2012 and
bearing interest at 6% per annum with no scheduled
principal payments prior to maturity. The 6% interest
accrues at 2.1% payable in cash on a quarterly basis and
3.9% which accretes to the principal balance of the convertible
notes on a quarterly basis.
The convertible notes contain terms and conditions, including:
(i) automatic conversion into 2,360,802 shares of our
common stock upon a qualified public offering, (ii) various
registration rights with respect to the shares of our common
stock received upon conversion of the notes and (iii) a
requirement for the Company to reserve an equal number of shares
of its authorized common stock to satisfy the conversion
obligation.
F-20
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE E INCOME
TAXES
The total provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the
following for the fiscal years ending (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(740
|
)
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(740
|
)
|
|
$
|
(762
|
)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(628
|
)
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
State
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(740
|
)
|
|
$
|
(762
|
)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and
effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statutory federal tax rate
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Federal tax credit
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
State tax credit
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)%
|
Change in tax contingency reserve
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)%
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys provision for income taxes differs from
applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 34%
due primarily to nondeductible stock based compensation
expenses, state development zone tax credits granted, research
and development credits and the effect of state income taxes.
For the six months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007
(unaudited) the effective income tax rate was 19% and 42%.
The net deferred tax assets reported in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal and state operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
1,346
|
|
|
$
|
857
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Other
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
$
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $5.1 million for both
federal and state. Included in the $5.1 million loss
carryforwards are carryforward deductions of $3.0 million
of expenses that are associated with the exercise of
non-qualified stock options that have not yet been recognized by
the Company in its financial statements. The benefit from the
net operating losses created from these expenses will be
recorded as a reduction in taxes payable and a credit to
additional paid-in capital in the period in which the benefits
are realized. The Company also has federal and state tax credit
carryforwards of approximately $296,000 and $406,000 as of
March 31, 2007. Both the net operating losses and tax
credit carryforwards expire between 2016 and 2027. The Company
believes that past issuances and transfers of our stock caused
an ownership change in fiscal 2007 that may affect the timing of
the use of its net operating loss carryforwards, but the Company
does not believe the ownership change affects the use of the
full amount of the net operating loss carryforwards. As a
result, the Companys ability to use its net operating loss
carryforwards attributable to the period prior to such ownership
change to offset taxable income will be subject to limitations
in a particular year, which could potentially result in
increased future tax liability for the Company.
A valuation allowance against deferred tax assets has not been
provided as management believes it is more likely than not that
the Company will realize the benefits of these assets. The
factors included in this assessment were (i) the
Companys recognition of income before taxes of
$3.1 million for the six months ended September 30,
2007; (ii) the anticipated fiscal 2008 revenue growth due
to the backlog of orders as of September 30, 2007 and
(iii) previous profitability in fiscal 2003 and 2004 that
preceded the Companys planned efforts in fiscal 2005 and
2006 to increase manufacturing capacity and sales and marketing
efforts to increase revenue. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset
valuation allowance has not been recorded.
|
|
NOTE F
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
The Company leases vehicles and equipment under operating
leases. Rent expense under operating leases was $62,000,
$107,000 and $413,000 for fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007; and
$67,000 and $443,000 for the six months ended September 30,
2006 and 2007 (unaudited). Total annual commitments under
non-cancelable operating leases with terms in excess of one year
at March 31, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
853
|
|
2009
|
|
|
211
|
|
2010
|
|
|
201
|
|
2011
|
|
|
159
|
|
2012
|
|
|
79
|
|
In addition, the Company enters into non-cancellable purchase
commitments for certain inventory items and capital expenditure
commitments in order to secure better pricing and ensure
materials on hand. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had
entered into $3.0 million of purchase commitments related
to fiscal 2008.
The Company sponsors a tax deferred retirement savings plan that
permits eligible employees to contribute varying percentages of
their compensation up to the limit allowed by the Internal
Revenue Service. This plan also provides for discretionary
Company contributions. In fiscal 2007, the Company made matching
contributions totaling approximately $7,000. No contributions
were made in fiscal 2005 and 2006.
|
|
NOTE G
|
TEMPORARY
EQUITY AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Stock
Split
On March 23, 2006, the Company declared a 2 for 1 stock
split to shareholders of record as of April 1, 2006. All
share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the
stock split.
F-22
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Series C
Redeemable Preferred Stock
In August and September 2006, the Company sold an aggregate
1,818,182 shares of Series C redeemable preferred
stock to institutional investors for total proceeds of
approximately $4.8 million, net of offering costs of
$245,000. As of March 31, 2007, 2,000,000 shares of
authorized preferred stock had been reserved for Series C.
The terms of the Series C preferred stock provide for:
|
|
|
|
|
senior rank to other classes and series of stock with respect to
the payment of dividends and proceeds upon liquidation
|
|
|
|
entitlement to receive cumulative dividends accruing at a non
compounded annual rate of 6% upon the occurrence of certain
events (accumulated dividends through March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited) were $198,000 and $348,000)
|
|
|
|
liquidation preference equal to the purchase price plus any
accumulated dividends
|
|
|
|
conversion into common stock at a
one-to-one
ratio upon certain qualifying exit events resulting in net
proceeds to the Company of at least $30 million (upon
conversion in a qualifying event, all rights related to accrued
and unpaid dividends would be extinguished)
|
|
|
|
weighted average dilution protection for any issuance of stock
or other equity instruments (other than for stock options
granted under existing stock plans) at a price per share less
than the Series C purchase price of $2.75
|
|
|
|
proportional adjustment of the number of shares of common stock
into which one share of Series C preferred stock may be
converted in the event of stock splits, stock dividends
reclassifications and similar events
|
|
|
|
a redemption feature at the option of the holder, including
accumulated dividends, if certain liquidity events are not
achieved within five years from issuance
|
|
|
|
right to vote with common stock on all matters submitted to a
vote of shareholders
|
Due to the nature of the redemption feature and other
provisions, the Company has classified the Series C
redeemable preferred stock as temporary equity. The carrying
value is being accreted to its redemption value over a period of
five years at a non-compounded rate of 6%.
Series B
Preferred Stock
From October 2004 through June 2006, the Company completed
various private placements of Series B preferred stock for
net proceeds in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 of $3.5 million,
$1.4 million and $400,000. Proceeds were net of direct
offering costs of $398,000 and $81,000 and zero in fiscal 2005,
2006 and 2007. The Series B placements consisted of one
share of Series B preferred stock and, in certain
placements, a warrant to purchase one-third share of common
stock for $2.30 per share expiring at various dates through
January 2010. The terms of the Series B preferred stock
provide for:
|
|
|
|
|
a liquidation preference equal to the purchase price of the
Series B shares
|
|
|
|
automatic conversion to common stock at a
one-to-one
ratio upon registration of the common stock under a
1933 Act registration
|
|
|
|
no dividend preference
|
|
|
|
right to vote with common stock on all matters submitted to a
vote of shareholders
|
For the Series B transactions where common stock warrants
were issued, the value of the warrants issued to the placement
agent was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
F-23
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Series A
Preferred Stock
In December 2004, the Company offered its Series A 12%
preferred shareholders the opportunity to exchange each share of
their Series A preferred stock for three shares of the
Companys common stock. The Series A preferred stock
carried a liquidation preference over the common stock and a
cumulative 12% dividend and, prior to the December conversion
offer, a conversion entitling each share of the Series A
preferred stock the right to convert into two shares of common
stock feature. Under the guidance provided in SFAS 84,
Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt, the Company
determined that the increase in conversion ratio from 2 to 3 was
an inducement offer and accounted for the change in conversion
ratio as an increase to paid-in capital and a charge to
accumulated deficit. Furthermore, the historical carrying value
of the Series A preferred was reclassified to paid-in
capital at the time of conversion.
As of March 31, 2005, all but 20,000 shares of
Series A preferred stock had been converted. The remaining
20,000 shares were converted in March 2007. The amount
assigned to the inducement, calculated using the number of
additional common shares offered multiplied by the estimated
fair market value of common stock at the time of conversion, was
$972,000 for fiscal 2005 and $83,000 for fiscal 2007.
Treasury
Stock
Effective June 30, 2004, the Company entered into a lawsuit
settlement agreement and stock redemption note payable to a
former independent sales representative and shareholder. The
settlement of $500,000 consisted of a $450,000 four-year note
payable bearing interest at 5.84% and $50,000 cash. As part of
the settlement, the shareholder agreed to redeem to treasury
61,864 shares of common stock and 64,000 shares of
Series A preferred stock, relinquishing all rights to the
Series A 12% cumulative dividend preference and
Series A liquidation preference. The shares were pledged to
secure repayment of the stock note payable. Such note was repaid
in March 2007, including accrued interest at 6%, and the pledged
shares were retired.
The $500,000 cost of the settlement was allocated $345,000 to
treasury stock and $155,000 to commission expense based on the
fair value of the shares acquired as part of the settlement.
Shareholder
receivables
In fiscal 2006, the Company issued to a director a note
receivable with recourse, totaling $375,000, to
purchase 400,000 shares of common stock by exercise of
fully vested non-qualified stock options. The note matures in
November 2012 or earlier upon notice from the Company and bears
interest at 4.23% payable annually in cash or stock.
The interest rate was deemed to be a below market rate on
issuance and in accordance with
EITF 00-23,
Issues related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under
APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44,
the Company recorded additional compensation expense of $525,000
in fiscal 2006. This amount represents the appreciation of the
fair value of the Companys stock from the time of the
option grant through the issuance of the recourse note.
In fiscal 2007, the Company issued $1,753,000 of notes
receivable to officers to purchase 2,150,000 shares of
common stock by exercise of fully vested non-qualified stock
options. The notes mature in March 2012 or earlier upon notice
from the Company and bear interest at 7.65% payable annually in
cash or stock. As the notes are repaid, and interest collected,
interest received will be credited to compensation expense. For
accounting purposes, the notes are considered non-recourse and
therefore, the options are not deemed exercised until the note
is paid. Accordingly, the common stock is not considered issued
for accounting purposes until the Company has received payment
of the notes.
All notes receivable that had been issued to directors and
officers of the Company were repaid in full either in cash or by
tendering shares subsequent to March 31, 2007.
F-24
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In July and August 2007, all director and shareholder notes
and advances, along with accrued interest, were settled, either
in cash or with shares. Total principal payments were $985,800
and shares tendered totaled 306,932. Concurrent with the above
transaction, the Company issued 306,932 non-qualifying stock
options with a fair value exercise price of $4.49. In accordance
with SFAS 123(R) the Company will recognize stock-based
compensation expense with respect to such grants of $224,000 in
fiscal 2008 and $127,000 in fiscal 2009.
|
|
NOTE H
|
STOCK
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
|
The Company grants stock options under its 2003 Stock Option and
2004 Equity Incentive Plans (the Plans). Under the terms of the
Plans, the Company has reserved 9,000,000 shares for
issuance to key employees, consultants and directors. The
options generally vest and become exercisable ratably over five
years although longer vesting periods have been used in certain
circumstances. The options are contingent on the employees
continued employment and are subject to forfeiture if employment
terminates for any reason. In the past, we have granted both
incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. The
Plans also provide to certain employees accelerated vesting in
the event of certain changes of control of the Company.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) in fiscal 2007,
the following amounts of stock-based compensation were recorded
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2005 and 2006, in accordance with APB No. 25, the
Company recognized stock-based compensation of none and $558,000.
The number of shares available for grant under the plans were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Available at March 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,077,200
|
|
Amendment to plan
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(599,000
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available at March 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,505,200
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(735,000
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
278,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available at March 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,048,200
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(1,657,500
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
670,700
|
|
Granted (unaudited)
|
|
|
(479,432
|
)
|
Forfeited (unaudited)
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available at September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
224,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The options granted during fiscal 2007 and during the six months
ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited), are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Estimate Per Share
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.25-2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
May 2006
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2006
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2006
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2006
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
920,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
436,500
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
851,000
|
|
April 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
July 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
429,432
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information with respect to
outstanding stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
5,922,800
|
|
|
$
|
.89
|
|
|
|
6,412,108
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
6,394,730
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
6,394,730
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
4,714,547
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
599,000
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
735,000
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1,657,500
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
264,000
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
479,432
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(82,692
|
)
|
|
|
.82
|
|
|
|
(474,378
|
)
|
|
|
.91
|
|
|
|
(3,057,683
|
)
|
|
|
.84
|
|
|
|
(42,198
|
)
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
(418,070
|
)
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(27,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
(278,000
|
)
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
(280,000
|
)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
(33,000
|
)
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
6,412,108
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
6,394,730
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
4,714,547
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
6,608,532
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
4,742,909
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes the range of exercise prices on
outstanding stock options at March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
$.69
|
|
|
1,260,627
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
1,260,627
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
1,066,557
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
1,066,557
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
.75 .94
|
|
|
657,420
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
571,420
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
647,420
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
567,420
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
1.24 1.50
|
|
|
512,000
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
352,800
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
456,000
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
294,400
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
2.20 2.25
|
|
|
1,993,500
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
308,800
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1,862,500
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
176,801
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
2.50 2.75
|
|
|
291,000
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
73,866
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
281,000
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
47,200
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,432
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,714,547
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
2,567,513
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
4,742,909
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
2,152,378
|
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
$
|
12,207,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,861,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,927,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,714,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference
between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and
the fair value of the Companys common stock at
March 31, 2007.
A summary of the status of the Companys outstanding
non-vested stock options as of March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007 (unaudited), is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,334,200
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,657,500
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(579,266
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(265,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,147,034
|
|
Granted (unaudited)
|
|
|
479,432
|
|
Vested (unaudited)
|
|
|
(18,535
|
)
|
Forfeited (unaudited)
|
|
|
(17,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
2,590,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested common
stock-based compensation as of March 31, 2007 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
684
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
678
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
576
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
504
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
Remaining weighted average expected term
|
|
|
3.01 yrs
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, future compensation costs to be
recognized related to non-vested common stock-based compensation
amount to $3.5 million over a remaining weighted average
expected term of approximately 4 years.
The Company has issued warrants to placement agents in
connection with various stock offerings and services rendered.
The warrants grant the holder the option to purchase common
stock at specified prices for a specified period of time.
Warrants issued in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 were treated as
F-27
ORION
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
offering costs and valued at $400,000, $30,000, and $18,000.
Fiscal 2006 also included warrants valued at $6,000 that were
expensed. These warrants were valued using the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
Weighted average contractual term
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Outstanding warrants are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
239,766
|
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
1,064,314
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
1,098,574
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1,098,574
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1,109,390
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
824,548
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
45,260
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
19,580
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
(7,966
|
)
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
(331,068
|
)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
1,064,314
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
1,098,574
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1,109,390
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1,096,908
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
778,322
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of outstanding warrants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.50
|
|
|
79,236
|
|
|
|
67,836
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
$2.25
|
|
|
221,480
|
|
|
|
66,480
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
$2.30
|
|
|
763,914
|
|
|
|
599,246
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$2.50
|
|
|
37,260
|
|
|
|
37,260
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
$2.60
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,109,390
|
|
|
|
778,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
RADICAL IDEAS... ENERGY. SMARTER. |
Shares
Common
Stock
Thomas
Weisel Partners LLC
Canaccord
Adams
Pacific
Growth Equities, LLC
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following is a list of estimated expenses in connection with
the issuance and distribution of the securities being
registered, with the exception of underwriting discounts and
commissions:
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
3,070
|
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
10,550
|
|
Nasdaq Global Market listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing costs
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Blue sky fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
D&O insurance premium
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be completed by amendment |
All of the above expenses except the SEC registration fee and
NASD filing fee are estimates. All of the above expenses will be
borne by us.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Our amended and restated bylaws, which will become effective
upon closing of this offering, provide that, to the fullest
extent permitted or required by Wisconsin law, we will indemnify
all of our directors and officers, any trustee of any of our
employee benefit plans, and person who is serving at our request
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another entity,
against certain liabilities and losses incurred in connection
with these positions or services. We will indemnify these
parties to the extent the parties are successful in the defense
of a proceeding and in proceedings in which the party is not
successful in defense of the proceeding unless, in the latter
case only, it is determined that the party breached or failed to
perform his or her duties to us and this breach or failure
constituted:
|
|
|
|
|
a willful failure to deal fairly with us or our shareholders in
connection with a matter in which the director or officer has a
material conflict of interest;
|
|
|
|
a violation of criminal law, unless the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful;
|
|
|
|
a transaction from which the director or officer derived an
improper personal profit; or
|
|
|
|
willful misconduct.
|
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we are required to
indemnify our directors and executive officers and may indemnify
our employees and other agents to the fullest extent required or
permitted by Wisconsin law. Additionally, our amended and
restated bylaws require us under certain circumstances to
advance reasonable expenses incurred by a director or officer
who is a party to a proceeding for which indemnification may be
available.
Wisconsin law further provides that it is the public policy of
the State of Wisconsin to require or permit indemnification,
allowance of expenses and insurance to the extent required or
permitted under Wisconsin law for any liability incurred in
connection with a proceeding involving a federal or state
statute, rule or regulation regulating the offer, sale or
purchase of securities.
Under Wisconsin law, a director is not personally liable for
breach of any duty resulting solely from his or her status as a
director, unless it is proved that the directors conduct
constituted conduct described in the bullet points above. In
addition, we intend to obtain directors and officers
liability insurance that will insure against certain
liabilities, subject to applicable restrictions.
II-1
The Underwriting Agreement filed herewith as Exhibit 1.1
provides for indemnification of our directors, certain officers
and controlling persons by the underwriters against certain
civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities
Act.
In addition, we intend to obtain directors and
officers liability insurance that will insure against
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities
Act, subject to applicable restrictions.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
|
From January 1, 2004 through the date of this registration
statement, we sold or granted the following securities that were
not registered under the Securities Act. The following share
numbers give effect to a
2-for-1
split of our common stock and preferred stock that was effected
on April 1, 2006.
(a) Stock, Warrants and Convertible Subordinated Notes.
1. Between January 1, 2004 and February 2, 2005,
we issued an aggregate of 2,234,400 shares of Series B
preferred stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
746,802 shares of our common stock to certain Wisconsin
residents. The aggregate consideration received by us was
$4,968,000. In connection with the placement of these
securities, we issued warrants to purchase 221,480 shares
of our common stock to a placement agent in payment for its
services.
2. Between May 26, 2005 and September 30, 2005,
we issued an aggregate of 376,000 shares of Series B
preferred stock to certain Wisconsin residents who were
accredited investors. The aggregate consideration received by us
was $940,000. In connection with the placement of these
securities, we issued warrants to purchase 31,200 shares of
our common stock to a placement agent in payment for its
services.
3. Between January 10, 2006 and July 31, 2006, we
issued an aggregate of 379,430 shares of Series B
preferred stock to our existing shareholders. The aggregate
consideration received by us was $960,498. In connection with
the placement of these securities, we issued warrants to
purchase 6,060 shares of our common stock to a placement
agent in payment for its services.
4. Between July 31, 2006 and September 28, 2006,
we issued an aggregate of 1,818,182 shares of Series C
preferred stock to Clean Technology Fund II, LP and Capvest
Venture Fund, LP. The aggregate consideration received by us was
$5,000,000.
5. In 2006, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of
8,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant in
consideration for services.
6. On March 1, 2007, we issued warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 19,580 shares of our common stock to a
consultant in consideration for services.
7. On August 3, 2007, we issued $10.6 million of
convertible subordinated notes, bearing interest at 6% per
annum, to an indirect affiliate of GE Energy Financial Services,
Inc., Clean Technology Fund II, LP and affiliates of
Capvest Venture Fund, LP. The subordinated notes will
convert automatically upon closing of this offering into
2,360,802 shares of our common stock if the initial public
offering price is at least $11.23 per share.
We believe that the offers and sales of the securities
referenced in (1) and (2), above, were exempt from
registration under the Securities Act by virtue of
Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act and Rule 147
promulgated thereunder. We were resident and doing business in
Wisconsin at the time of the offering, and the offering was made
only to Wisconsin residents.
We believe that the offer and sale of the securities referenced
in (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) above were exempt from
registration under the Securities Act by virtue of
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
and/or
Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions not
involving any public offering. All of the purchasers of
unregistered securities for which we relied on Section 4(2)
and/or
Regulation D represented that they were accredited
investors as defined under the Securities Act, except for up to
35 non-accredited investors. The purchasers in each case
represented that they intended to acquire the securities for
investment only and not with a view to the distribution thereof
and that they either received adequate information about the
registrant or had access, through employment or other
relationships, to such information; appropriate legends were
affixed to the stock certificates issued in
II-2
such transactions; and offers and sales of these securities were
made without general solicitation or advertising.
(b) Options.
1. In 2004, we granted to our directors and employees
options to purchase an aggregate of 737,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $2.25 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options. As of October 15, 2007,
we had issued a total of 197,000 shares of common stock
upon the exercise of such options.
2. In 2005, we granted to our directors and employees
options to purchase an aggregate of 627,000 shares of our
common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.75 to $2.25 per
share. We received no consideration from these individuals in
connection with the issuance of such options. As of
October 15, 2007, we had issued a total of
110,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of such
options.
3. In 2006, we granted to our directors and employees
options to purchase an aggregate of 1,211,000 shares of our
common stock at exercise prices ranging from $2.20 to $2.75 per
share. We received no consideration from these individuals in
connection with the issuance of such options. As of
October 15, 2007, we had issued a total of
28,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of such
options.
4. On March 1, 2007, we granted to certain of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of
361,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$2.20 per share. We received no consideration from these
individuals in connection with the issuance of such options.
5. On March 5, 2007, we granted to certain of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of 75,000 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.20 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
6. On April 1, 2007, we granted to certain of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of 20,000 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.20 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
7. On April 2, 2007, we granted to certain of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of 30,000 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.20 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
8. On July 27, 2007, we granted to certain of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of
389,432 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$4.49 per share. We received no consideration from these
individuals in connection with the issuance of such options.
9. On July 27, 2007, we granted to certain of our
non-employee directors options to purchase an aggregate of
40,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$4.49 per share. We received no consideration from these
individuals in connection with the issuance of such options.
We believe that the offer and sale of the above-referenced
securities were exempt from registration under the Securities
Act by virtue of Section 4(2) and Rule 701 of the
Securities Act as securities issued pursuant to written
compensatory plans or arrangements.
(c) There were no underwritten offerings employed in
connection with any of the transactions set forth in
Item 15(a) or (b).
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are
filed (except where otherwise indicated) as part of this
Registration Statement.
II-3
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
All other schedules are omitted since the required information
is not present, or is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule, or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto.
(a) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide
to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to
directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be
governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) That, for the purpose of determining liability under
the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant
is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to
an offering, other than registration statements relying on
Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on
Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in
the registration statement as of the date it is first used after
effectiveness; provided, however, that no statement made in a
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement or made in a document incorporated or
deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will,
as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such
first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in
the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the
registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to such date of first use.
(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in
the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned
registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to such purchaser:
(i) any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
II-4
(ii) any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) the portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this amendment to the registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Plymouth, State of
Wisconsin, on November 16, 2007.
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Neal
R. Verfuerth
|
Neal R. Verfuerth
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
amendment to the registration statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities indicated on
November 16, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Neal
R. Verfuerth
Neal
R. Verfuerth
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel
J. Waibel
Daniel
J. Waibel
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
A. Quadracci
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
*
Michael
J. Potts
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Diana
Propper de Callejon
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
James
R. Kackley
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Eckhart
G. Grohmann
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Patrick
J. Trotter
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Neal
R. Verfuerth
Neal
R. Verfuerth
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
|
S-1
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of Series C Senior Convertible Preferred Stock
Purchase Agreement, including exhibits, by and among Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. and the signatories thereto.**
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Orion Energy
Systems, Inc.**
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.**
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. to be effective upon closing of this
offering.**
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Orion Energy Systems, Inc.**
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Orion Energy Systems,
Inc. to be effective upon closing of this offering.**
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement by and
among Orion Energy Systems, Inc. and the signatories thereto,
dated August 3, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated First Offer and Co-Sale Agreement among
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. and the signatories thereto, dated
August 3, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock of Orion Energy
Systems, Inc.**
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock of Orion Energy
Systems, Inc.**
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Credit and Security Agreement by and between Orion Energy
Systems, Inc., Great Lakes Energy Technologies, LLC and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, acting through its Wells Fargo
Business Credit Operating Division, dated December 22,
2005, as amended January 26, 2006, June 30, 2006,
March 29, 2007 and July 27, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note in favor of GE Capital
Equity Investments, Inc. dated August 3, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note in favor of Clean
Technology Fund II, L.P. dated August 3, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note in favor of Capvest
Venture Fund, LP, dated August 3, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note in favor of Technology
Transformation Venture Fund, LP, dated August 3, 2007.**
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement, including exhibits, between Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. and the signatories thereto dated
August 3, 2007.**
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Foley & Lardner LLP.*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Bruce Wadman and Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. dated October 1, 2005.**
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Neal Verfuerth and Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. dated April 1, 2005.**
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Separation Agreement by and between Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
and Bruce Wadman, effective July 5, 2007.**
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Separation Agreement by and between Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
and James Prange, effective July 18, 2007.**
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between John Scribante and Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. dated June 2, 2006.**
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan, as amended.**
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Orion Energy Systems,
Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan.**
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment to Stock Option Agreement between Bruce Wadman and
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. dated February 19, 2007.**
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards
Plan.**
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Orion Energy Systems,
Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.**
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Orion Energy Systems,
Inc. 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan.**
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Promissory Note and Collateral Pledge Agreement in favor
of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. in connection with option
exercises (all such notes were paid in full in July and August
2007).**
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Patent and Trademark Security Agreement by and between Orion
Energy Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
Acting Through its Wells Fargo Business Credit Operating
Division, dated December 22, 2005.**
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Patent and Trademark Security Agreement by and between Great
Lakes Energy Technologies, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, Acting Through its Wells Fargo Business Credit
Operating Division, dated December 22, 2005.**
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation, to be effective
upon closing of this offering.
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Neal Verfuerth and Orion
Energy Systems, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Proposed Employment Agreement by and between each of
Daniel Waibel, Michael Potts, John Scribante, Patricia
Verfuerth, Eric Von Estorff and Erik Birkerts and Orion Energy
Systems, Inc.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Orion Energy Systems, Inc.**
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Foley & Lardner LLP (contained in
Exhibit 5.1 hereto).*
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Wipfli LLP.
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (contained on signature page hereto).**
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
** |
|
Previously filed |
E-2