def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
CC Media Holdings, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
200 East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas 78209
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 26, 2010
As a stockholder of CC Media Holdings, Inc. (CC Media or the Company), you are hereby
given notice of and invited to attend, in person or by proxy, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
CC Media to be held at the corporate headquarters of CC Media, located at 200 East Basse Road, San
Antonio, Texas 78209, on May 26, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:
|
1. |
|
to elect 12 directors to serve for the coming year; |
|
|
2. |
|
to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm of CC Media for the year ending December 31, 2010; and |
|
|
3. |
|
to transact any other business which may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment thereof. |
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2010 are entitled to notice
of and to vote at the annual meeting.
Two cut-out admission tickets are included on the back cover of this document and are required
for admission to the annual meeting. Please contact the Secretary of CC Media at the corporate
headquarters of CC Media if you need additional tickets. If you plan to attend the annual meeting,
please note that space limitations make it necessary to limit attendance to stockholders and one
guest per each stockholder. Admission to the annual meeting will be on a first-come, first-served
basis. Registration and seating will begin at 8:30 a.m. local time. Each stockholder may be asked
to present valid picture identification, such as a drivers license or passport. Stockholders
holding stock in brokerage accounts (street name holders) will need to bring a copy of a
brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date. Cameras (including cellular
telephones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other electronic devices will not
be permitted at the annual meeting. The annual meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. local
time.
Your attention is directed to the accompanying proxy statement. In addition, although mere
attendance at the annual meeting will not revoke your proxy, if you attend the annual meeting you
may revoke your proxy and vote in person. To assure that your shares are represented at the annual
meeting, please complete, date, sign and mail the enclosed proxy card in the return envelope
provided for that purpose.
By Order of the Board of Directors

Robert H. Walls, Jr.
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
San Antonio, Texas
April 26, 2010
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2010:
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at:
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/ccmo
2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement contains information related to the annual meeting of stockholders
of CC Media Holdings, Inc. (herein referred to as CC Media, Company, we, our, or us) to
be held on Wednesday, May 26, 2010, beginning at 9:00 a.m. local time, at the corporate offices of
CC Media located at 200 East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas, and at any postponements or
adjournments thereof. This proxy statement is first being mailed to stockholders on or about May
3, 2010.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND
THE ANNUAL MEETING
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Why am I receiving these materials? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The Board of Directors of CC Media (the Board) is providing
these proxy materials to you in connection with CC Medias annual
meeting of stockholders (the annual meeting), which will take
place on May 26, 2010. The Board is soliciting proxies to be used
at the annual meeting. You are also invited to attend the annual
meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in
this proxy statement. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What information is contained in these materials? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The information included in this proxy statement relates to the
proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting, the voting
process, the compensation of our directors and our most highly
paid executive officers and certain other required information.
Following this proxy statement are excerpts from CC Medias 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K including Consolidated Financial
Statements, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. A proxy card and a return envelope are
also enclosed. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What proposals will be voted on at the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
There are two proposals scheduled to be voted on at the annual
meeting: the election of 12 directors to serve for the coming year
and the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as CC Medias
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Which of my shares may I vote? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Each share of Class A common stock and each share of Class B
common stock owned by you as of the close of business on April 1,
2010 (the Record Date) may be voted by you. These shares include
shares that are: (1) held directly in your name as the
stockholder of record, and (2) held for you as the beneficial
owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee. Each share of
your Class A common stock is entitled to one vote at the annual
meeting. Each holder of shares of Class B common stock will be
entitled to a number of votes per share equal to the number
obtained by dividing (a) the sum of the total number of shares of
Class B common stock outstanding as of the Record Date and the
number of shares of Class C common stock outstanding as of the
Record Date for such vote by (b) the number of shares of Class B
common stock outstanding as of the Record Date for such vote.
Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of outstanding
shares of Class C common stock will not be entitled to any votes
upon any questions presented to stockholders of CC Media. As of
the Record Date, all of the outstanding shares of Class B common
stock and Class C common stock are held by CC IV (as defined
below) and CC V (as defined below), respectively. |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of
record and as a beneficial owner? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Most stockholders of CC Media hold their shares through a
stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their
own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between
shares held of record and those owned beneficially. |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD: If your shares are registered directly in your name with CC Medias
transfer agent, BNY Mellon Investor Services LLC (Mellon), you are considered, with
respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent
directly to you by Mellon on behalf of CC Media. As the stockholder of record, you have the
right to grant your voting proxy directly to CC Media or to vote in person at the annual
meeting. CC Media has enclosed a proxy card for you to use. |
|
|
|
|
|
BENEFICIAL OWNER: If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other
nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these
proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee who is considered, with
respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the
right to direct your broker on how to vote and are also invited to attend the annual
meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares
in person at the annual meeting, unless you obtain and present at the meeting a signed proxy
from the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares. Your broker or nominee has
enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker or nominee
regarding how to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
If my shares are held in street name by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Brokers will have discretion to vote the shares of customers who fail to provide voting instructions on routine matters,
but brokers may not vote such shares on non-routine matters without voting instructions. When a broker is not permitted
to vote the shares of a customer who does not provide voting instructions, it is called a broker non-vote. The election
of directors is a non-routine matter. Your broker will send you directions on how you can instruct your broker to vote. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
How can I vote my shares in person at the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted by you in person at the annual meeting. If you
choose to do so, please bring the enclosed proxy card and proof of identification. Even if you plan to attend the annual
meeting, CC Media recommends that you also submit your proxy as described below so that your vote will be counted if you
later decide not to attend the annual meeting. You may request that your previously submitted proxy card not be used if
you desire to vote in person when you attend the annual meeting. Shares held in street name may be voted in person by
you at the annual meeting only if you obtain and present at the meeting a signed proxy from the record holder giving you
the right to vote the shares. Your vote is important. Accordingly, you are urged to sign and return the accompanying
proxy card whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you plan to attend the annual meeting, please note that space limitations make it
necessary to limit attendance to stockholders and one guest per each stockholder. Admission
to the annual meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration and seating
will begin at 8:30 a.m. local time. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture
identification, such as a drivers license or passport. Stockholders holding stock in
brokerage accounts (street name holders) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage
statement reflecting stock ownership as of the Record Date. Cameras (including cellular
telephones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other electronic devices
will not be permitted at the annual meeting. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, when you return your proxy
card or voting instructions accompanying this proxy statement, properly signed, the shares represented will be voted in
accordance with your directions. You can specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the enclosed proxy card. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
May I change my vote? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before your shares are voted
at the annual meeting by sending the Secretary of CC Media a proxy card dated later than your last vote, notifying the
Secretary of CC Media in writing or voting at the annual meeting. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What if I return my proxy card without specifying my voting choices? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
If your proxy card is signed and returned without specifying choices, the shares will be voted as recommended by the Board. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy or voting instruction card? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
It means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all
proxy and voting instruction cards you receive. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of outstanding shares of CC Medias common stock representing a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast is necessary to constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Votes withheld,
abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What are CC Medias voting recommendations? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The Board recommends that you vote your shares FOR each of the nominees to the Board and FOR the ratification of Ernst
& Young LLP as CC Medias independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
CC Media will announce preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and publish final results in CC Medias current
report on Form 8-K within four business days after the date of the annual meeting, which we anticipate will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) by June 1, 2010. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board, which consists of 12 members, is responsible for the management and direction
of CC Media and for establishing broad corporate policies. However, in accordance with corporate
legal principles, it is not involved in day-to-day operating details. Members of the Board are kept
informed of CC Medias business through discussions with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and other executive officers, by reviewing analyses and reports sent to them and
by participating in Board and committee meetings.
Holders of CC Medias Class A common stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect
two members of the Board. However, since several entities controlled by Bain Capital Investors, LLC
and its affiliates (collectively, Bain Capital) and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. and its
affiliates (collectively, THL and, together
3
with Bain Capital, the Sponsors) hold a majority of the outstanding capital stock and voting
power of CC Media, the holders of CC Medias Class A common stock do not have the voting power to
elect the remaining 10 members of our Board. Pursuant to an amended and restated voting agreement
(the Voting Agreement) entered into among B Triple Crown Finco, LLC, T Triple Crown Finco, LLC,
BT Triple Crown Merger Co., Inc. (Merger Sub), CC Media, Highfields Capital I LP, Highfields
Capital II LP, Highfields Capital III L.P. (collectively, with Highfields Capital I LP and
Highfields Capital II LP, the Highfields Funds), and Highfields Capital Management LP on May 13,
2008, one of the members of the Board who was to be elected by holders of CC Medias Class A common
stock was selected by Highfields Capital Management LP, which member was named to CC Medias
nominating and governance committee (the Nominating and Governance Committee) and who the parties
to the Voting Agreement agreed would be Jonathon S. Jacobson, and the other director was selected
by the Nominating and Governance Committee after consultation with Highfields Capital Management
LP, who the parties to the Voting Agreement agreed would be David C. Abrams. These directors are
nominated to stand for reelection at the annual meeting. Until the date that the Highfields Funds
own less than five percent of the Class A common stock of CC Media, CC Media will nominate two
candidates for election by the holders of Class A common stock, of which one candidate (who
initially was Mr. Jacobson) will be selected by Highfields Capital Management LP, and one candidate
(who initially was Mr. Abrams) will be selected by the Nominating and Governance Committee after
consultation with Highfields Capital Management LP. CC Media has also agreed that until the
termination of the Voting Agreement and subject to the fiduciary duties of its Board, CC Media
shall cause at least one of the independent directors to be appointed to each of the committees of
the Board and if such independent director shall cease to serve as a director of CC Media or
otherwise is unable to fulfill his or her duties on any such committee, CC Media shall cause the
director to be succeeded by another independent director.
The following section sets forth information, as of April 1, 2010, regarding those individuals
who currently serve as our directors, all of whom are also the nominees to be elected as directors
of CC Media at the 2010 annual meeting of CC Media, to serve as directors of CC Media until the
2011 annual meeting of CC Media. Below is a list of the names, ages and positions of the
individuals who serve as members of our Board. For a brief account of the business experience of
the individuals who serve as members of our Board, please refer to the heading PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS in this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director of CC |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
Media Since |
Mark P. Mays
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Randall T. Mays
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
|
2008 |
|
David C. Abrams
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Steven W. Barnes
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Richard J. Bressler
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Charles A. Brizius
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
John P. Connaughton
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Blair E. Hendrix
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Jonathon S. Jacobson
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Ian K. Loring
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Scott M. Sperling
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Kent R. Weldon
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007 |
|
BOARD MEETINGS
During 2009, the Board held eight meetings (four regular meetings and four special meetings).
Each of the nominees named below attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of
meetings of the Board held
4
during such directors term and the total number of meetings held by committees of the Board
on which that director served.
STOCKHOLDER MEETING ATTENDANCE
CC Media encourages, but does not require, directors to attend the annual meetings of
stockholders. Mr. Mark P. Mays and Mr. Randall T. Mays attended the annual meeting of stockholders
in 2009.
INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS
In February 2009, the Board adopted the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ) for determining the independence of its members. To be considered independent under
NASDAQ rules, a director may not be employed by CC Media or engage in certain types of business
dealings with CC Media. As required by NASDAQ rules, the Board has made a determination as to each
independent director that no relationship exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would
interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director. In making these determinations, the Board reviewed and discussed information provided by
the directors and by CC Media with regard to each directors business and personal activities as
they relate to CC Media. As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that, of
the directors nominated for election at the annual meeting, David C. Abrams and Jonathon S.
Jacobson are independent directors under the listing standards of NASDAQ.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board has three standing committees: the Compensation Committee (the Compensation
Committee), the Nominating and Governance Committee
(Nominating and Governance Committee) and the Audit Committee (the Audit
Committee). Each committee has a written charter which guides its operations. The written
charters are all available on CC Medias Internet website at www.ccmediaholdings.com. The table
below sets forth the members of each committee.
BOARD COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and |
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
Governance |
|
Audit |
Name |
|
Committee |
|
Committee |
|
Committee |
David C. Abrams
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X* |
Steven W. Barnes
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Charles A. Brizius
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Richard J. Bressler
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X |
John P. Connaughton
|
|
X*
|
|
X |
|
|
Blair E. Hendrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Jonathon S. Jacobson
|
|
X
|
|
X |
|
|
Ian K. Loring
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Mark P. Mays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall T. Mays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott M. Sperling
|
|
|
|
X* |
|
|
Kent R. Weldon
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
= Chairman |
|
X |
|
= Committee member |
The Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee administers CC Medias stock option plans and performance-based
compensation plans, determines compensation arrangements for all executives and makes
recommendations to the Board concerning the compensation, if any, of directors of CC Media and its
subsidiaries (except with respect to matters related to the compensation of the officers and
directors of CC Medias publicly traded indirect subsidiary, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCOH), other than certain of CCOHs officers). The Compensation
5
Committee met four times during 2009. David C. Abrams and Jonathon S. Jacobson are
independent as defined by CC Medias independence standards.
The Compensation Committee has the ability, under its charter, to select and retain, at the
expense of CC Media, independent legal and financial counsel and other consultants necessary to
assist the Compensation Committee as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate, in its sole
discretion. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to select and retain any
compensation consultant to be used to survey the compensation practices in CC Medias industry and
to provide advice so that CC Media can maintain its competitive ability to recruit and retain
highly qualified personnel. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to approve related
fees and retention terms for any of its counsel and consultants.
The Compensation Committees primary responsibilities, which are discussed in detail within
its charter, are to:
|
|
|
assist the Board in developing and evaluating potential candidates for
executive positions (including the Chief Executive Officer) and oversee the development of
executive succession plans; |
|
|
|
|
review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the
compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of CC Media, to evaluate
the Chief Executive Officers and other executive officers performance in light of those goals and
objectives and to determine and approve the Chief Executive Officers and other executive officers
compensation level based on this evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
make recommendations to the Board with respect to the adoption of new
compensation, incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans and administer existing
compensation, incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans. |
The full text of the Compensation Committees charter can be found on our website at
www.ccmediaholdings.com.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to delegate its responsibilities to subcommittees
of the Compensation Committee if the Compensation Committee determines such delegation would be in
the best interest of CC Media. Such subcommittees shall be composed solely of directors, each of
whom is an outside director within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the Code) and/or a non-employee director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Securities Exchange Act). In order to
help it carry out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee has created an Executive
Performance Subcommittee (the Subcommittee).
The Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committees primary responsibilities, which are discussed in
detail within its charter, include the following: identify individuals qualified to become Board
members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board; receive nominations for qualified
individuals and review recommendations put forward by the Chief Executive Officer or recommended by
stockholders of the Company; select, or recommend that the Board select, the director nominees for
the next annual meeting of stockholders; make recommendations to the Board regarding committee
membership; review policies with respect to significant issues of corporate public responsibility;
recommend to the Board processes for annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, the
appropriate Board committees and the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer; and
consider any possible conflict of interest of Board members. The Nominating and Governance
Committee met once during 2009. Jonathon S. Jacobson is independent as defined by CC Medias
independence standards.
The full text of the Nominating and Governance Committees charter can be found on our website
at www.ccmediaholdings.com.
Our directors play a critical role in guiding CC Medias strategic direction and oversee the
management of CC Media. CC Media does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of
diversity in identifying director nominees, but the Nominating and Governance Committee strives to
nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board will
possess the appropriate mix of experience, skills, and expertise to oversee CC Medias business.
Director candidates should have experience in positions with a high
6
degree of responsibility, be leaders in the organizations with which they are affiliated and have the time, energy,
interest and willingness to serve as a member of the Board. The Nominating and Governance
Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of
recommending a group that can best perpetuate the success of our business and represent stockholder
interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience. The Nominating
and Governance Committee evaluates each incumbent director to determine whether he or she should be
nominated to stand for re-election, based on the types of criteria outlined above as well as the
directors contributions to the Board during their current term. Recent developments in corporate
governance and financial reporting have resulted in an increased demand for such highly qualified
and productive public company directors.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by
stockholders, so long as such recommendation is made in accordance with the Amended and Restated
Bylaws of CC Media (the Bylaws). The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates candidates
recommended by stockholders in the same manner in which it evaluates other nominees. Any
stockholder wishing to propose a nominee must submit a recommendation in writing to the Secretary
of CC Media not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date
on which CC Media first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding years annual meeting of
stockholders. Such a written recommendation must set forth (1) all information relating to the
director candidate that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of
directors in a contested election, or that is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to
Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act, such as the director candidates written consent
to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected and (2) a
description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements,
arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships,
between or among the recommending stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, and their respective
affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert with them, on the one hand, and each
proposed director candidate, and his or her respective affiliates and associates, or others acting
in concert with them, on the other hand, including, without limitation all information that would
be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the
stockholder making the recommendation and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is
made, if any, or any affiliate or associate thereof or person acting in concert therewith, were the
registrant for purposes of such rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such
registrant. Stockholders should direct such proposals to: Secretary, CC Media Holdings, Inc., 200
East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas 78209.
The Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing CC Medias accounting practices and audit
procedures. Additionally, Audit Committee member David C. Abrams has been designated an Audit
Committee Financial Expert as defined by the SEC. The Audit Committee met 13 times during 2009.
David C. Abrams is independent as defined by the standards of the rules and regulations of the SEC
and CC Medias independence standards.
The Audit Committees purpose is to assist the Board in its general oversight of CC Medias
financial reporting, internal control and audit functions. The Audit Committees primary
responsibilities, which are discussed in detail within its charter, include the following: select
the independent registered public accounting firm; approve or pre-approve all auditing and
non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm; review, evaluate and
discuss reports regarding the independent registered public accounting firms independence; review
with the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm the scope and plan
for audits; review with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public
accounting firm the Companys system of internal control, financial and critical accounting
practices and policies relating to risk assessment and risk management; review and discuss with
management and the independent registered public accounting firm the annual and quarterly financial
statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of the Company prior to the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q; and review material pending legal proceedings involving the Company and other
contingent liabilities.
The full text of the Audit Committees charter can be found on our website at
www.ccmediaholdings.com.
7
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
Mark P. Mays serves as both the principal executive officer and chairman of the Board. The
Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interests of CC Media to make that
determination based on the position and direction of CC Media and the membership of the Board.
Our risk management philosophy strives to (i) timely identify the material risks that CC Media
faces, (ii) communicate necessary information with respect to material risks to senior management
and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant Board committee, (iii) implement appropriate and
responsive risk management strategies consistent with CC Medias risk profile, and (iv) integrate
risk management into CC Medias decision-making.
The Board has designated the Audit Committee to oversee risk management. The Audit Committee
makes an annual report to the Board regarding briefings provided by management and advisors as well
as the Audit Committees own analysis and conclusions regarding the adequacy of CC Medias risk
management processes.
Additionally, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates
risk management into CC Medias corporate strategy and day-to-day operations. For example,
management is working to centralize and disseminate certain policies and procedures which will
provide for greater control over and uniformity in its risk management.
STOCKHOLDER AND INTERESTED PARTY COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD
Stockholders and interested parties desiring to communicate with the Board should do so by
sending regular mail to: Board of Directors, CC Media Holdings, Inc., 200 East Basse Road, San
Antonio, Texas 78209.
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board intends to nominate at the annual meeting of stockholders the 12 persons listed
as nominees below. Each of the directors elected at the annual meeting will serve until the next
annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified,
subject to earlier resignation, removal, death or disqualification. The directors are to be
elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting by the holders of the shares of CC
Media common stock represented and entitled to be voted at the annual meeting. Holders of CC
Medias Class A common stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect two members of the
Board. However, since the Sponsors hold a majority of the outstanding capital stock and voting
power of CC Media, the holders of CC Media Class A common stock do not have the voting power to
elect the remaining 10 members of our Board. Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, one of the members
of the Board who was to be elected by holders of CC Medias Class A common stock was selected by
Highfields Capital Management LP, which member was named to the Nominating and Governance Committee
and who the parties to the Voting Agreement agreed would be Jonathon S. Jacobson, and the other
director was selected by the Nominating and Governance Committee after consultation with Highfields
Capital Management LP, who the parties to the Voting Agreement agreed would be David C. Abrams.
These directors are nominated to stand for reelection at the annual meeting. Until the date that
the Highfields Funds own less than five percent of the Class A common stock of CC Media, CC Media
will nominate two candidates for election by the holders of Class A common stock, of which one
candidate (who initially was Mr. Jacobson) will be selected by Highfields Capital Management LP,
and one candidate (who initially was Mr. Abrams) will be selected by the Nominating and Governance
Committee after consultation with Highfields Capital Management LP. CC Media has also agreed that
until the termination of the Voting Agreement and subject to the fiduciary duties of its Board, CC
Media shall cause at least one of the independent directors to be appointed to each of the
committees of the Board and if such independent director shall cease to serve as a director of CC
Media or otherwise is unable to fulfill his or her duties on any such committee, CC Media shall
cause the director to be succeeded by another independent director.
Votes withheld, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted toward a nominees
achievement of a plurality and will have no effect on the outcome of this matter. Each of the
nominees listed below is currently a director and is standing for re-election. Each nominee has
indicated a willingness to serve as director if elected. Should any nominee become unavailable for
election, discretionary authority is conferred on the proxies to vote for
8
a substitute. Management has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or
unwilling to serve if elected.
Nominees for Director
The nominees for director are Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays, David C. Abrams, Steven W.
Barnes, Richard J. Bressler, Charles A. Brizius, John P. Connaughton, Blair E. Hendrix, Jonathon S.
Jacobson, Ian K. Loring, Scott M. Sperling and Kent R. Weldon.
Mark P. Mays was appointed Chief Executive Officer and a director of CC Media on July 30,
2008. Mr. Mark P. Mays also served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Clear Channel
Communications, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CC Media (Clear Channel), from
February 1997 until his appointment as its President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2004.
He relinquished his duties as President of Clear Channel in February 2006 until he was reappointed
as President in January 2010. Mr. Mark P. Mays has been one of Clear Channels directors since May
1998. Additionally, he serves as a director for CC Medias publicly traded subsidiary, CCOH. Mr.
Mark P. Mays is the son of L. Lowry Mays, CC Medias Chairman Emeritus and the brother of Randall
T. Mays, CC Medias former President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Mark P. Mays was selected to
serve as a director because of his position as Chief Executive Officer of CC Media as well as his
experience in the industry.
Randall T. Mays was appointed CC Medias Vice Chairman in January 2010 and has served as a
member of the Board since July 2008. Mr. Randall T. Mays served as President and Chief Financial
Officer of CC Media from July 2008 until January 2010. Mr. Randall T. Mays was appointed as Clear
Channels Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in February 1997 and was appointed
as Clear Channels Secretary in April 2003. He relinquished his duties as Secretary in 2004. Mr.
Randall T. Mays was appointed Clear Channels President in February 2006 and relinquished his
duties as President upon transitioning to the role of Vice Chairman in January 2010. Mr. Randall T.
Mays has been one of Clear Channels directors since April 1999. Additionally, he serves as a
director for CC Medias publicly traded subsidiary, CCOH. Mr. Randall T. Mays is the son of L.
Lowry Mays, CC Medias Chairman Emeritus and the brother of Mark P. Mays, CC Medias Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Randall T. Mays was selected to serve as a director because of his
operational knowledge of CC Media as well as his experience in the industry.
David C. Abrams is the managing partner of Abrams Capital, a Boston-based investment firm he
founded in 1998. Abrams Capital manages in excess of $3 billion in assets across a wide spectrum of
investments. Mr. Abrams serves on the Board of Directors of Crown Castle International, Inc. (NYSE:
CCI) and several private companies and also serves as a Trustee of Berklee College of Music and
Milton Academy. He received a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Abrams has been one of
CC Medias directors since July 30, 2008. Mr. Abrams was selected to serve on the Board because of
his experience in acquisitions and financings gained through his work at Abrams Capital and his
strategic experience gained through serving on the board of directors of public and private
companies.
Steven W. Barnes has been associated with Bain Capital Partners, LLC since 1988 and has been a
Managing Director since 2000. In addition to working for Bain Capital Partners, LLC, he also held
senior operating roles of several Bain Capital portfolio companies including Chief Executive
Officer of Dade Behring, Inc., President of Executone Business Systems, Inc., and President of
Holson Burnes Group, Inc. Prior to 1988, he held several senior management positions in the Mergers
& Acquisitions Support Group of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Barnes presently serves on several
boards including CRC Health Corporation and Ideal Standard. He is also active in numerous community
activities including being a member of the Board of Directors of Make-A-Wish Foundation of
Massachusetts, the Trust Board of Childrens Hospital in Boston and a Trustee of Syracuse
University. He received a B.S. from Syracuse University and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr.
Barnes has been one of CC Medias directors since May 2007. Mr. Barnes was selected to serve as a
director because of his operational experience gained through his work as an executive of several
large organizations and his experience in acquisitions and financing gained from his work at Bain
Capital and PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Richard J. Bressler is a Managing Director at Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (sometimes referred
to as THL). Prior to joining THL, Mr. Bressler was the Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Viacom Inc. from May 2001 through 2005, with responsibility for managing all
strategic, financial, business development and technology functions. Prior to that, Mr. Bressler
served in various capacities with Time Warner
9
Inc., including as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Time Warner Digital Media. He also
served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Time Warner Inc. from March 1995
to June 1999. Prior to joining Time Inc. in 1988, Mr. Bressler was a partner with the accounting
firm of Ernst & Young LLP since 1979. Mr. Bressler is currently a Director of Clear Channel,
Warner Music Group Corp. (NYSE:WMG), Gartner, Inc. (NYSE:IT) and The Nielsen Company. In addition
Mr. Bressler is a Board Observer at Univision Communications, Inc., and a member of the J.P. Morgan
Chase National Advisory Board. Mr. Bressler holds a B.B.A. from Adelphi University. Mr. Bressler
has been one of CC Medias directors since May 2007. Mr. Bressler was selected to serve as a
director for his experience in and knowledge of the industry gained through his various positions
with Viacom and Time Warner as well as his knowledge of finance and accounting gained from his
experience at THL and Ernst & Young LLP.
Charles A. Brizius is a Managing Director of THL. Prior to joining THL, Mr. Brizius worked in
the Corporate Finance Department at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. Mr. Brizius has also worked
as a securities analyst at The Capital Group Companies, Inc. and as an accounting intern at Coopers
& Lybrand. Mr. Brizius is currently a director of Ariel Holdings Ltd. His prior directorships
include Big V Supermarkets, Inc., Eye Care Centers of America, Inc., Front Line Management
Companies, Inc., Houghton Mifflin Company, Spectrum Brands, Inc., TransWestern Publishing, United
Industries Corporation and Warner Music Group Corp. Mr. Brizius holds a B.B.A., magna cum laude, in
Finance and Accounting from Southern Methodist University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business
School. Mr. Brizius presently serves as President of the Board of Trustees of The Institute of
Contemporary Art, Boston, Trustee of the Buckingham Browne & Nichols School and Board Member of The
Steppingstone Foundation. Mr. Brizius has been one of CC Medias directors since May 2007. Mr.
Brizius was selected to serve as a director because of his knowledge of finance and his experience
in strategic acquisitions gained through his positions with THL, Morgan Stanley and The Capital
Group Companies, as well as his strategic experience gained from service on a variety of boards of
directors.
John P. Connaughton has been a Managing Director of Bain Capital Partners, LLC since 1997 and
a member of the firm since 1989. He has played a leading role in transactions in the media,
technology and medical industries. Prior to joining Bain Capital Partners, LLC, Mr. Connaughton was
a consultant at Bain & Company, Inc., where he advised Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Connaughton
currently serves as a director of Warner Music Group Corp., AMC Theatres, SunGard Data Systems,
Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), Quintiles Transnational Corp., Warner Chilcott and CRC
Health Corporation. He also volunteers for a variety of charitable organizations, serving as a
member of The Berklee College of Music Board of Trustees and the UVA McIntire Foundation Board of
Trustees. Mr. Connaughton received a B.S. in commerce from the University of Virginia and an M.B.A.
from the Harvard Business School. Mr. Connaughton has been one of CC Medias directors since May
2007. Mr. Connaughton was selected to serve as a director because of his knowledge of and
experience in the industry gained from his various positions with Bain Capital and his service on
various boards of directors.
Blair E. Hendrix is a Managing Director of Bain Capital and one of the leaders of the firms
operationally focused Portfolio Group. Mr Hendrix joined Bain Capital in 2000. Prior to joining
Bain Capital, Mr. Hendrix was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of DigiTrace
Care Services, Inc. (now SleepMed), a national healthcare services company he co-founded. Earlier
in his career, Mr. Hendrix was employed by Corporate Decisions, Inc. (now Oliver Wyman), a
management consulting firm. Mr. Hendrix also serves as a director of Keystone Automotive
Operations, Inc. and has previously served as a director of Innophos Holdings, Inc. (IPHS) and SMTC
Corporation (SMTX). Mr Hendrix received a B.A. from Brown University, awarded with honors. Mr.
Hendrix has been a member of our Board since August 2008. Mr. Hendrix was selected to serve as a
director because of his operational knowledge gained from his experience with Bain Capital and in
management consulting.
Jonathon S. Jacobson founded Highfields Capital Management, a Boston-based investment firm, in
July 1998. Prior to founding Highfields, he spent eight years as a senior equity portfolio manager
at Harvard Management Company, Inc. (HMC), which is responsible for investing Harvard
Universitys endowment. At HMC, Mr. Jacobson managed both a U.S. and an emerging markets equity
fund. Prior to that, Mr. Jacobson spent three years in the Equity Arbitrage Group at Lehman
Brothers and two years in investment banking at Merrill Lynch Capital Markets. Mr. Jacobson
received an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School in 1987 and graduated magna cum laude with a
B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania in 1983. Mr. Jacobson is a
member of the Asset Managers Committee of the Presidents Working Group on Financial Markets,
which was formed in 2007 to foster a dialogue with the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of
the Treasury on issues of
10
significance to the investment industry. He is the Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees of
Brandeis University, where he is a member of both the Executive and Investment Committees, and
Gilman School, where he also serves on the investment committee. He also serves on the boards of
the Birthright Israel Foundation and Facing History and Ourselves and is a past member of the Board
of Deans Advisors at the Harvard Business School. Mr. Jacobson has been one of CC Medias
directors since July 30, 2008. Mr. Jacobson was selected to serve as a director because of his
knowledge of finance and capital markets gained from his investment experience at Highfields and
other investment funds as well as his work with the Federal Reserve and the Department of Treasury.
Ian K. Loring is a Managing Director at Bain Capital Partners, LLC. Since joining the firm in
1996, Mr. Loring has played a leading role in prominent media, technology and telecommunications
investments such as Warner Music Group Corp., Pro Seiben Sat 1 Media AG, Advertising Directory
Solutions, Cumulus Media Partners, Eschelon Telecom, NXP Technologies and Therma-Wave. Currently,
Mr. Loring sits on the Board of Directors of Warner Music Group, The Weather Channel, NXP
Technologies, Denon and Marantz Holdings and CHL, Ltd. He also volunteers for a variety of
non-profit organizations and is a Director of the Linda Loring Nature Foundation. Prior to joining
Bain Capital Partners, LLC, Mr. Loring was a Vice President of Berkshire Partners, with experience
in its specialty manufacturing, technology and retail industries. Previously, Mr. Loring worked in
the Corporate Finance department at Drexel Burnham Lambert. He received an M.B.A. from the Harvard
Business School and a B.A. from Trinity College. Mr. Loring has been one of CC Medias directors
since May 2007. Mr. Loring was selected as a director because of his knowledge of the industry
gained through his experience at Bain Capital.
Scott M. Sperling is Co-President of THL. Mr. Sperlings current directorships include Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc. and Warner Music Group Corp. and his prior directorships include Hawkeye
Holdings, Experian Information Solutions, Fisher Scientific, Front Line Management Companies, Inc.,
Houghton Mifflin Co., The Learning Company, LiveWire, LLC, PriCellular Corp., ProcureNet,
ProSiebenSat.1, Tibbar, LLC, Wyndham Hotels and several other private companies. Prior to joining
THL in 1994, Mr. Sperling was Managing Partner of The Aeneas Group, Inc., the private capital
affiliate of Harvard Management Company, for more than ten years. Before that he was a senior
consultant with the Boston Consulting Group. Mr. Sperling is also a director of several charitable
organizations including the Brigham & Womens / Faulkner Hospital Group, Chairman of The Citi
Center for Performing Arts, the Harvard Business Schools Board of Deans Advisors and the Harvard
Business Schools Rock Center for Entrepreneurship. Mr. Sperling received an M.B.A. from the
Harvard Business School and a B.S. from Purdue University. Mr. Sperling has been one of CC Medias
directors since May 2007. Scott Sperling was selected as a director because of his operational and
strategic knowledge gained from his experience at THL and various directorships.
Kent R. Weldon is a Managing Director of THL. Prior to joining THL, Mr. Weldon worked at
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated in the Financial Institutions Group. Mr. Weldon also worked at
Wellington Management Company, an institutional money management firm. Mr. Weldon is currently a
director of Michael Foods. His prior directorships include FairPoint Communications, Inc., Fisher
Scientific and Progressive Moulded Products. Mr. Weldon holds a B.A., summa cum laude, in Economics
and Arts and Letters Program for Administrators from the University of Notre Dame and an M.B.A.
from the Harvard Business School. Mr. Weldon has been one of CC Medias directors since May 2007.
Mr. Weldon was selected as a director because of his financial and strategic knowledge gained from
his experience at THL and various directorships.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
In 2002, Clear Channel adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as amended from
time to time (the Code), applicable to all of its directors and employees, including its
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, which
constitutes a code of ethics as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. Upon the consummation of
the Merger (as defined below), Clear Channel became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CC Media
and certain members of Clear Channel management entered into employment agreements with, and were
appointed as officers of, CC Media. Accordingly, the Code applies to the principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of CC Media, as these
individuals are the principal
11
executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, respectively,
of Clear Channel. The Code is publicly available on CC Medias Internet website at
www.ccmediaholdings.com.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Except as otherwise stated, the table below sets forth information concerning the
beneficial ownership of CC Medias common stock as of April 1, 2010 for each director currently
serving on the Board and each of the nominees for director, each of the executive officers not
listed as a director, the directors and executive officers as a group and each person known to CC
Media to beneficially own more than 5% of CC Medias outstanding shares of common stock. At the
close of business on April 1, 2010, there were 23,275,919 shares of CC Media Class A common stock,
555,556 shares of CC Media Class B common stock and 58,967,502 shares of CC Media Class C common
stock outstanding. Except as otherwise noted, each stockholder has sole voting and investment power
with respect to the shares beneficially owned.
All of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock are held by Clear Channel Capital IV,
LLC (CC IV) and all of our outstanding shares of Class C common stock are held by Clear Channel
Capital V, L.P. (CC V), each of which are ultimately controlled jointly by the Sponsors. Subject
to certain limitations discussed in the footnotes below, each share of Class B common stock and
Class C common stock is convertible, at the election of the holder thereof, into one share of Class
A common stock at any time. These shares represent in the aggregate approximately 72% (whether
measured by voting power or economic interest) of the equity of CC Media.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
of Shares |
|
Shares of |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Class A |
|
of Class B |
|
Class C |
|
Outstanding Common |
Name and Address of |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Stock on an As- |
Beneficial Owner (a) |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Converted Basis (b) |
Bain Capital Investors, LLC
and Related Investment Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,556 |
(c) |
|
|
58,967,502 |
(d) |
|
|
72 |
% |
Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P.
and Related Investment Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,556 |
(e) |
|
|
58,967,502 |
(f) |
|
|
72 |
% |
Highfields Capital Management LP
and Managed Investment Funds (g) |
|
|
9,950,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
FMR LLC and Related Investment Funds
(h) |
|
|
4,287,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Mark P. Mays (i) |
|
|
804,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Randall T. Mays (j) |
|
|
1,049,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
L. Lowry Mays (k) |
|
|
718,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
John E. Hogan (l) |
|
|
42,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Andrew W. Levin (m) |
|
|
18,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Paul J. Meyer |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
of Shares |
|
Shares of |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Class A |
|
of Class B |
|
Class C |
|
Outstanding Common |
Name and Address of |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Stock on an As- |
Beneficial Owner (a) |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Converted Basis (b) |
David C. Abrams (n) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven W. Barnes (o) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Bressler (p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Brizius (p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John P. Connaughton (o) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blair E. Hendrix (o) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathon S. Jacobson (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian K. Loring (o) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott M. Sperling (p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent R. Weldon (p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers
as a group (16 individuals) (q) |
|
|
2,634,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Means less than 1%. |
|
(a) |
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for all beneficial owners is c/o CC Media Holdings,
Inc., 200 East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas 78209. |
|
(b) |
|
Percentage ownership calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Securities
Exchange Act. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the 555,556 shares of Class B common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, of CC
Media (the Class B common stock) owned by CC IV. Subject to certain limitations set forth in
the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CC Media (the Certificate of
Incorporation), each share of Class B common stock is convertible, at the election of the
holder thereof, into one share of Class A common stock at any time. Each holder of shares of
Class B common stock will be entitled to a number of votes per share equal to the number
obtained by dividing (a) the sum of total number of shares of Class B common stock outstanding
as of the record date for such vote and the number of shares of Class C common stock (as
defined below) outstanding as of the record date for such vote by (b) the number of shares of
Class B common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote. Bain Capital Investors,
LLC (BCI) is the general partner of Bain Capital Partners (CC) IX, L.P. (BCP IX), which is
the general partner of Bain Capital (CC) IX, L.P. (Bain Fund IX), which holds 50% of the
limited liability company interests in CC IV. Each of BCI, BCP IX and Bain Fund IX expressly
disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person
or persons other than itself for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) and Rule 13d-3 of the Securities
Exchange Act and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such securities except to the
extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The business address of CC IV is c/o Bain Capital
Partners, LLC, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199 and c/o Thomas H. Lee
Partners, L.P., 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the 58,967,502 shares of Class C common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of CC
Media (the Class C common stock) owned by CC V. Subject to certain limitations set forth in
the Certificate of Incorporation, each share of Class C common stock is convertible, at the
election of the holder thereof, into one share of Class A common stock at any time. Except as
otherwise required by law, the holders of outstanding shares of Class C common stock will not
be entitled to any votes upon any questions presented to stockholders of CC Media. BCI is the
sole member of Bain Capital CC Partners, LLC (Bain CC Partners), which is the general
partner of Bain Capital CC Investors, L.P. (Bain CC Investors) |
13
|
|
|
|
|
and which also holds 50% of the limited liability company interests in CC Capital V Manager, LLC (CC V Manager). CC V
Manager is the general partner of CC V. BCI is the general partner of BCP IX, which is the
general partner of each of Bain Fund IX, Bain Capital (CC) IX Coinvestment, L.P. (Bain Coinvest IX), Bain Capital
(CC) IX Offshore, L.P. (Bain Offshore Fund IX), and Bain Capital (CC) IX Coinvestment
Offshore, L.P. (Bain Offshore Coinvest IX and, together with Bain Fund IX, Bain Coinvest IX
and Bain Offshore Fund IX, collectively, the Bain Fund IX Entities). BCI is also the general
partner of Bain Capital Partners (CC) X, L.P. (BCP X), which is the general partner of each
of Bain Capital (CC) X, L.P. (Bain Fund X), Bain Capital (CC) X Coinvestment, L.P. (Bain
Coinvest X), Bain Capital (CC) X Coinvestment Offshore, L.P. (Bain Offshore Coinvest X) and
Bain Capital (CC) X Offshore, L.P. (Bain Offshore Fund X and, together with Bain Fund X, Bain
Coinvest X and Bain Offshore Coinvest X, the Bain Fund X Entities). BCI is also the managing
partner of each of BCIP Associates G (BCIP Associates G), BCIP Associates III (BCIP
Associates III), BCIP Associates III B (BCIP Associates III B), BCIP Trust Associates
III (BCIP Trust Associates III) and BCIP Trust Associates III-B (BCIP Trust Associates III
B) and BCIP Associates III is the manager and sole member of BCIP Associates III, LLC, BCIP
Associates III-B is the manager and sole member of BCIP Associates III-B, LLC, BCIP Trust
Associates III is the manager and sole member of BCIP T Associates III, LLC, and BCIP Trust
Associates III-B is the manager and sole member of BCIP T Associates III-B, LLC. BCIP
Associates III, LLC, BCIP Associates III-B, LLC, BCIP T Associates III, LLC, BCIP T Associates
III-B, LLC and BCIP Associates G are collectively referred to as the BCIP Entities. Each of
the Bain Fund IX Entities, the Bain Fund X Entities and the BCIP Entities hold limited
partnership interests of Bain CC Investors, which holds 50% of the limited partnership
interests in CC V. Each of BCI, Bain CC Partners, Bain CC Investors, CC V Manager, BCP IX, BCP
X, each of the Bain Fund IX Entities, each of the Bain Fund X Entities, BCIP Associates III,
BCIP Associates III-B, BCIP Trust Associates III, BCIP Trust Associates III-B and each of the
BCIP Entities expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person or persons other than itself for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) and Rule
13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such
securities except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The business address of CC V
is c/o Bain Capital Partners, LLC, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199 and c/o
Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents the 555,556 shares of Class B common stock owned by CC IV. Subject to certain
limitations set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation, each share of Class B common stock
is convertible, at the election of the holder thereof, into one share of Class A common stock
at any time. Each holder of shares of Class B common stock will be entitled to a number of
votes per share equal to the number obtained by dividing (a) the sum of total number of shares
of Class B common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote and the number of
Class C common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote by (b) the number of
shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote. Thomas H. Lee
Advisors, LLC (THLA) is the general partner of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (THLP), which
is the sole member of THL Equity Advisors VI, LLC (THL Advisors), which is the general
partner of Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VI, L.P. (the THL Fund), which holds 50% of the limited
liability company interests in CC IV. Each of THLA, THLP, THL Advisors and the THL Fund
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person or persons other than itself for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) and Rule 13d-3 of the
Securities Exchange Act and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such securities
except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The business address of CC IV is c/o
Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 and c/o Bain
Capital Partners, LLC, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents the 58,967,502 shares of Class C common stock owned by CC V. Subject to certain
limitations set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation, each share of Class C common stock
is convertible, at the election of the holder thereof, into one share of Class A common stock
at any time. Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of outstanding shares of Class C
common stock will not be entitled to any votes upon any questions presented to stockholders of
CC Media. THLA is the general partner of THLP, which is the sole member of THL Advisors, which
is the general partner of each of the THL Fund and THL Equity Fund VI Investors (Clear
Channel), L.P. (the THL Investors Fund). THLP is the general partner of each of THL
Coinvestment Partners, L.P. (THL Coinvestment) and THL Operating Partners, L.P. (THL
Operating) and THL Advisors is the general partner of each of Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VI,
L.P. (THL Parallel) and Thomas H. Lee Parallel (DT) Fund VI, L.P. (THL Parallel DT), each
of which entities is a limited partner in the THL Investors Fund. THL Advisors also holds 50%
of the limited liability company interests in CC V Manager, which is the general partner of CC
V. The THL Fund and the THL Investors Fund collectively hold 50% of the limited partnership
interests in CC V. Each of THLA, THLP, THL Advisors, CC V Manager, the THL Fund, the THL
Investors Fund, THL Coinvestment, THL Operating, THL Parallel and THL Parallel DT expressly
disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person
or persons other than itself for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) and Rule 13d-3 of the Securities
Exchange Act and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such securities except to the
extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The business address of CC V is c/o Thomas H. Lee
Partners, L.P., 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 and c/o Bain Capital Partners,
LLC, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199. |
|
(g) |
|
Highfields Capital Management LP (Highfields Capital Management) is the investment manager
to Highfields Capital I LP, a Delaware limited partnership (Highfields I), Highfields
Capital II LP, a Delaware limited partnership (Highfields |
14
|
|
|
|
|
II), and Highfields Capital III L.P., an exempted limited partnership organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands, B.W.I.
(Highfields III). Highfields GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Highfields GP),
is the general partner of Highfields Capital Management. Highfields Associates LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (Highfields Associates), is the general partner of each of Highfields I,
Highfields II and Highfields III. Each of Highfields Capital Management, Highfields GP,
Highfields Associates, Highfields I, Highfields II and Highfields III disclaims beneficial
ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person or persons other than
itself. Mr. Jacobson is a Managing Member of Highfields GP and a Senior Managing Member of
Highfields Associates. Mr. Jacobson may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power with
respect to all of the shares of Class A common stock held by Highfields I, Highfields II and
Highfields III. Mr. Jacobson disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned
beneficially or of record by any other person or persons. The business address of Mr. Jacobson,
Highfields Capital Management, Highfields GP, Highfields Associates, Highfields I and
Highfields II is John Hancock Tower, 200 Clarendon Street, 59th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts
02116. The business address of Highfields III is c/o Goldman Sachs (Cayman) Trust, Limited,
Suite 3307, Gardenia Court, 45 Market Street, Camana Bay, P.O. Box 896, Grand Cayman KY1-1103,
Cayman Islands. |
|
(h) |
|
As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed on February 17, 2009. FMR LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, is a parent holding company in accordance with Section 240.13d-1(b)(ii)(G)
of the Exchange Act. Fidelity Management & Research Company, a Delaware corporation, is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940, and provides investment advisory services to various
investment companies registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Fidelity Management & Research Company was the beneficial owner of and had sole dispositive
power over 4,287,500 shares of Class A common stock as of December 31, 2008. Fidelity Dividend
Growth Fund was the beneficial owner of 1,200,000 shares of Class A common stock as of
December 31, 2008. Fidelity Equity-Income Fund was the beneficial owner of 2,159,142 shares of
Class A common stock as of December 31, 2008. Members of the family of Edward C. Johnson 3d,
Chairman of FMR LLC, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B
voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson
family group and all other Series B stockholders have entered into a stockholders voting
agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the
majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting
common shares and the execution of the stockholders voting agreement, members of the Johnson
family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group
with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Edward C. Johnson 3d has the sole power to vote
or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the funds, which power resides with the
funds Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of
the shares under written guidelines established by the funds Boards of Trustees. Each of
Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR LLC, through its control of Fidelity Management & Research
Company, and the funds each have sole power to dispose of the 4,287,500 shares of Class A
common stock owned by the funds. The business address of FMR LLC, Fidelity Management &
Research Company, Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund, Fidelity Equity-Income Fund and Mr. Edward C.
Johnson 3d is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. |
|
(i) |
|
Includes stock options representing 66,628 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Mark P.
Mays and 687,066 shares of Class A common stock held by trusts of which Mr. Mark P. Mays is
the trustee. |
|
(j) |
|
Includes stock options representing 413,850 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr.
Randall T. Mays and 584,898 shares of Class A common stock held by trusts of which Mr. Randall
T. Mays is the trustee. |
|
(k) |
|
Includes stock options representing 102,137 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. L.
Lowry Mays and 542,112 shares of Class A common stock held by LLM Partners, Ltd. Mr. L. Lowry
Mays shares control of the sole general partner of LLM Partners, Ltd. |
|
(l) |
|
Includes stock options representing 21,663 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. John E.
Hogan. |
|
(m) |
|
Includes stock options representing 8,266 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Andrew
W. Levin. |
|
(n) |
|
David C. Abrams is the managing member of Abrams Capital Management, LLC (Abrams Capital)
and Pamet Capital Management, LLC (Pamet LLC). Pamet LLC is the general partner of Pamet
Capital Management, L.P. (Pamet LP). Pamet LP is the investment manager of Abrams Capital
International, Ltd., Abrams Capital Partners I, L.P., Abrams Capital Partners II, L.P. and
Whitecrest Partners, LP, and Abrams Capital is the investment manager of Riva Capital
Partners, L.P. (collectively, with Abrams Capital Partners I, L.P., Abrams Capital Partners
II, L.P. and Whitecrest Partners, LP, the Abrams Funds), which collectively owned 2,495,506
shares of Class A common stock as of December 31, 2008. By virtue of this relationship, Mr.
Abrams may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares
of Class A common stock held by the Abrams Funds. Mr. Abrams expressly disclaims beneficial
ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person or persons other
than himself for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) and Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act.
The business address of Mr. Abrams is c/o Abrams Capital, LLC, 222 Berkeley Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02116. |
15
|
|
|
(o) |
|
Steven W. Barnes, John P. Connaughton, Blair E. Hendrix and Ian K. Loring are managing
directors and members of BCI and, by virtue of this and the relationships described in
footnotes (c) and (d) above, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect
to all of the shares of Class B common stock held by CC IV and all of the shares of Class C
common stock held by CC V. Each of Messrs. Barnes, Connaughton, Hendrix and Loring expressly
disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by any person
or persons other than himself, including, without limitation, CC IV or CC V, for purposes of
Section 13(d)(3) and Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent of his
pecuniary interest therein. The business address of each of Messrs. Barnes, Connaughton,
Hendrix and Loring is c/o Bain Capital Partners, LLC, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston,
Massachusetts 02199. |
|
(p) |
|
Richard J. Bressler, Charles A. Brizius, Scott M. Sperling and Kent R. Weldon are managing
directors of THLA and limited partners of THLP and, by virtue of this and the relationships
described in footnotes (e) and (f) above, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power
with respect to all of the shares of Class B common stock held by CC IV and all of the shares
of Class C common stock held by CC V. Each of Messrs. Bressler, Brizius, Sperling and Weldon
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned beneficially or of record by
any person or persons other than himself, including, without limitation, CC IV or CC V, for
purposes of Section 13(d)(3) and Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act, except to the
extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The business address of each of Messrs. Bressler,
Brizius, Sperling and Weldon is c/o Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., 100 Federal Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02110. |
|
(q) |
|
Includes stock options representing 612,544 shares of Class A common stock held by such
persons, 1,271,964 shares of Class A common stock held by trust of which the reporting person
is the trustee and 542,112 shares of Class A common stock held by LLM Partners, Ltd. |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management. Based on such review and
discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Respectfully submitted,
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
David C. Abrams, Richard J. Bressler, John P.
Connaughton, Jonathon S. Jacobson, Ian K. Loring and
Kent R. Weldon
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains statements regarding company
and individual performance measures and other goals. These goals are disclosed in the limited
context of CC Medias executive compensation program and should not be understood to be statements
of managements expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. CC Media specifically
cautions investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.
INTRODUCTION
On November 16, 2006, Clear Channel entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended
by Amendment No. 1, dated April 18, 2007, Amendment No. 2, dated May 17, 2007, and Amendment No. 3,
dated May 13, 2008, to effect the acquisition of Clear Channel by CC Media (the Merger
Agreement). On July 30, 2008, upon the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Merger
Agreement, CC Media acquired Clear Channel (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, Clear
Channel became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CC Media, held indirectly through intermediate holding
companies. Upon the consummation of the Merger, CC Media became a public company and Clear Channel
ceased to be a public company.
In the Merger, Clear Channels shareholders had the option to elect to receive cash in the
amount of $36.00 for each pre-merger share of Clear Channels outstanding common stock they owned
or to exchange their pre-merger shares of Clear Channel on a one-for-one basis for shares of common
stock in CC Media. Immediately following the Merger, former Clear Channel stockholders held
approximately 25% (whether measured by voting power or economic interest) of the equity of CC
Media.
16
Several new entities controlled by the Sponsors acquired directly or indirectly through newly
formed companies (each of which is ultimately controlled jointly by the Sponsors) shares of stock
in CC Media. Immediately following the Merger, those shares represented, in the aggregate,
approximately 72% (whether measured by voting power or economic interest) of the equity of CC Media. In connection with
the Merger, certain members of Clear Channels management rolled over restricted equity securities
and in the money stock options exercisable for common stock of Clear Channel in exchange for
equity securities of CC Media. Accordingly, the remaining approximately 3% of the equity of CC
Media was held by Messrs. Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays, L. Lowry Mays and certain members of Clear
Channels management.
Upon the consummation of the Merger, a new Board of CC Media was constituted, the new
Compensation Committee, the new Audit Committee and the new Nominating and Governance Committee
were formed and certain members of Clear Channels management entered into employment agreements
with CC Media.
Accordingly, upon the consummation of the Merger, CC Medias named executive officers were
governed by the new compensation programs and practices developed and implemented by CC Media.
Consequently, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the proxy statement primarily
focuses on the objectives, administration and payment of executive compensation following the
consummation of the Merger. Except where relevant to provide context for the payment of
post-Merger compensation, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section does not contain a
detailed analysis of pre-Merger compensation since CC Media is of the view that, as a recently
formed, publicly-held company, an analysis of the compensation decisions that were made for the
named executive officers during their employment with Clear Channel prior to the Merger or a
detailed discussion of CC Medias compensation programs or philosophies prior to the Merger would
not accurately reflect CC Medias compensation programs and philosophies going forward.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the 2009 Summary Compensation Table and each of the other related
tables set forth below in this proxy statement contain all of the plan and non-plan compensation
awarded to, earned by or paid to the named executive officers during 2009, 2008 and 2007.
The named executive officers for fiscal year 2009 were as follows: Mark P. Mays, the Chief
Executive Officer of CC Media (the Principal Executive Officer of CC Media); Randall T. Mays, at
the time President and Chief Financial Officer of CC Media (the Principal Financial Officer of CC
Media); L. Lowry Mays, the Chairman Emeritus of the Board of CC Media; John E. Hogan, the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Clear Channels Radio division; Andrew W. Levin, at the time
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of CC Media and Paul J. Meyer, at the
time President and Chief Executive Officer of the Outdoor Americas division of CC Media. Mr.
Thomas W. Casey became the Chief Financial Officer of Clear Channel Communications, effective as of
January 4, 2010, and the Board of CC Media appointed Mr. Casey to be the Chief Financial Officer of
CC Media as well. Mr. Randall T. Mays now serves as Vice Chairman of CC Media. Mr. Robert H. Walls,
Jr. became the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of CC Media Holdings
effective as of January 1, 2010, succeeding to the position previously held by Mr. Andrew W. Levin.
Effective as of December 10, 2009, Mr. Ronald H. Cooper became the President and Chief Executive
Officer of CC Medias Outdoor Americas division, succeeding to the position previously held by Mr.
Paul J. Meyer. In connection with his retirement as President and Chief Executive Officer of CC
Medias Outdoor Americas division, Mr. Paul J. Meyer entered into a new employment agreement with
CCOH and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. under which, as of January 10, 2010, he began performing
consulting duties and serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of Clear Channel Digital,
LLC (Clear Channel Digital), an indirect subsidiary of CCOH.
OVERVIEW AND OBJECTIVES OF CC MEDIAS COMPENSATION PROGRAM
CC Media believes that compensation of its named executive officers should be directly and
materially linked to operating performance. The fundamental objective of CC Medias compensation
program is to attract, retain and motivate top quality executives through compensation and
incentives which are competitive with the various labor markets and industries in which CC Media
competes for talent and which align the interests of CC Medias executives with the interests of CC
Medias stockholders.
Overall, CC Media has designed its compensation program to:
|
|
|
support its business strategy and business plan by clearly communicating what is
expected of executives with respect to goals and results and by rewarding achievement; |
17
|
|
|
recruit, motivate and retain executive talent; and |
|
|
|
|
create a strong performance alignment with stockholders. |
|
|
CC Media seeks to achieve these objectives through a variety of compensation elements: |
|
|
|
|
annual base salary; |
|
|
|
|
an annual incentive bonus, the amount of which is dependent on CC Medias
performance and, for certain executives, individual performance during the prior fiscal
year; |
|
|
|
|
long-term incentive compensation, delivered in the form of equity awards that are
awarded based on competitive pay practices and other factors described below, and that
are designed to align the executives interests with those of stockholders by rewarding
outstanding performance and providing long-term incentives; and |
|
|
|
|
other executive benefits and perquisites. |
COMPENSATION PRACTICES
The Compensation Committee will typically determine total compensation, as well as the
individual components of such compensation, of CC Medias named executive officers on an annual
basis. All compensation decisions are made within the scope of any employment agreement.
In making decisions with respect to each element of executive compensation, the Compensation
Committee will consider the total compensation that may be awarded to the executive, including
salary, annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive compensation. Multiple factors will be
considered in determining the amount of total compensation (the sum of base salary, annual
incentive bonus and long-term incentive compensation delivered through equity awards) to award the
named executive officers. These factors may include, among others:
|
|
|
the terms of any employment agreement; |
|
|
|
|
the Chief Executive Officers recommendations (other than for himself); |
|
|
|
|
the value of previous equity awards; |
|
|
|
|
internal pay equity considerations; and |
|
|
|
|
broad trends in executive compensation generally. |
The Compensation Committees goal will be to award compensation that is reasonable when all
elements of potential compensation are considered.
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee believe that a combination of various elements
of compensation best serves the interests of CC Media and its stockholders. Having a variety of
compensation elements enables CC Media to meet the requirements of the highly competitive
environment in which CC Media operates while ensuring that its named executive officers are
compensated in a way that advances the interests of all stockholders. Under this approach,
executive compensation generally involves a significant portion of pay that is at risk, namely,
the annual incentive bonus. The annual incentive bonus is based entirely on CC Medias financial
performance, individual performance, or a combination of both. Equity awards constitute a
significant portion of long-term remuneration that is tied directly to stock price appreciation
that benefits all of CC Medias stockholders.
CC Medias practices with respect to each of the elements of executive compensation are set
forth below, followed by a discussion of the specific factors considered in determining the amounts
for each of the key elements.
Base Salary
Purpose. The objective of base salary is to reflect job responsibilities, value to CC
Media and individual performance with respect to market competitiveness.
18
Administration. Base salaries for the named executive officers will typically be
reviewed on an annual basis and at the time of promotion or other change in responsibilities. In
general, any increases in salary will be based on the subjective evaluation of such factors as the
level of responsibility, individual performance, level of pay both of the executive in question and
other similarly situated executives and competitive pay practices. All decisions regarding
increasing or decreasing a named executive officers base salary will be made within the scope of
his or her respective employment agreement, if any.
In reviewing base salaries, the Compensation Committee will consider the importance of linking
a significant proportion of the named executive officers compensation to performance in the form
of the annual incentive bonus, which is tied to CC Medias financial performance measures,
individual performance, or a combination of both, as well as long-term incentive compensation.
Analysis. In setting compensation for 2009, the Compensation Committee was primarily
concerned with the continued impact of global economic conditions and their effect on the business
and markets of CC Media. Consequently, the annual base salaries of the named executive officers
remained unchanged from their 2008 annual base salaries, with the exception of Messrs. Mark P.
Mays and Randall T. Mays, whose annual base salaries were decreased pursuant to amendments to
their respective employment agreements. For a more detailed description of the employment
agreements of Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays please refer to Employment Agreements
with the Named Executive Officers.
Annual Incentive Bonus
Purpose. CC Medias executive compensation program provides for an annual incentive
bonus that is performance-linked. The objective of the annual incentive bonus compensation element
is to compensate an executive based on the achievement of specific goals that are intended to
correlate closely with growth of long-term stockholder value.
Administration. The named executive officers and other key executives of CC Media
participate in the Clear Channel 2008 Annual Incentive Plan (the Annual Incentive Plan).
On July 28, 2008, CC Medias sole stockholder at that time, Clear Channel Capital IV, LLC,
approved the Annual Incentive Plan. The Annual Incentive Plan may be administered by the
Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee and is intended to provide an incentive to the named
executive officers and other selected key executives to contribute to the growth, profitability and
increased stockholder value of CC Media and to retain such executives. Under the Annual Incentive
Plan, participants are eligible for performance-based awards, which represent the conditional right
to receive cash or other property based upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals
within a specified performance period. No single participant may receive more than $15,000,000 in
awards in any calendar year.
The performance goals for each named executive officer are set pursuant to an extensive annual
operating plan developed by the Chief Executive Officer of CC Media in consultation with CC Medias
Board, the Chief Financial Officer of CC Media and other senior executive officers of CC Media.
The Chief Executive Officer of CC Media makes recommendations as to the compensation levels and
performance goals of CC Medias named executive officers (other than his own) to the Compensation
Committee or the Subcommittee for its review, consideration and approval. The Compensation
Committee or the Subcommittee has complete discretion to accept, reject, or modify the
recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer.
The 2009 annual incentive bonuses were based on the following performance goals (as further
described below), (i) Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays performance goals were based upon
achievement of a targeted EBITDA, which provides a link between profitability and cash flows from
operating activities, (ii) Mr. Andrew W. Levins performance goals were based upon achievement of
certain qualitative targets, which were directly relevant to his position and responsibilities,
(iii) Mr. John E. Hogans performance goals were based upon achievement of a targeted EBITDA of the
Radio division and certain other qualitative targets, which contribute to divisional performance,
(iv) Mr. L. Lowry Mays performance goals were based on OIBDAN on a company-wide basis, which the
Board believed best reflected operating performance and (v) Mr. Paul J. Meyers performance goals
were based upon achievement of a targeted EBITDA in the Outdoor Americas division, and other
performance measures, which were directly relevant to his position and responsibilities.
19
In 2009, the annual incentive bonus was paid in cash. The aggregate annual incentive bonus is
determined according to the level of achievement of the objective performance goals and any
individual performance goals, as applicable. Below a minimum threshold level of performance, no
awards may be granted pursuant to the objective performance goal, and the Compensation Committee or
the Subcommittee may, in its discretion, reduce the awards pursuant to either objective or
individual performance goals, as applicable.
The annual incentive bonus process for each of the named executive officers will involve three
basic steps:
|
|
|
At the outset of the fiscal year: |
|
|
|
Set performance goals for the year for CC Media and each participant; and |
|
|
|
|
Set a target bonus for each participant. |
|
|
|
After the end of the fiscal year, measure actual performance (individual and
company-wide) against the predetermined goals of CC Media and any individual performance
goals to determine the bonus. |
Analysis. In determining whether the 2009 financial performance goals were met, the
Compensation Committee considered the financial results of CC Media from January 1, 2009 to
December 31, 2009.
For 2009, the performance-based goals applicable to the named executive officers are set forth
below:
Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays
As contemplated by their respective employment agreements, Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall
T. Mays 2009 performance-based goal consisted of achieving a targeted EBITDA on a company-wide
basis, which is linked to a targeted bonus that may be adjusted (upward or downward) based on the
percentage of the targeted EBITDA achieved, provided that at least 90% of the targeted EBITDA must
be achieved in order to receive a bonus. EBITDA is an important measure of CC Medias operational
strength and performance of its business because it provides a link between profitability and cash
flows from operating activities. The Compensation Committee believes that in the current operating
environment, EBITDA is the best measure of Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays performance.
Target EBITDA is determined by the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee in consultation with
CC Media management. CC Media defines EBITDA, for the limited purposes of the Mays bonus
calculations, to mean the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA, as calculated in the manner
provided in the Clear Channel senior secured credit facilities documentation; provided that, unless
otherwise approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of CC Media, achieved EBITDA for
the applicable year will (i) exclude EBITDA generated from joint venture entities formed after the
date of the amended Mays employment agreements, to the extent not included in the calculation of
target EBITDA and (ii) include EBITDA that is excluded from Consolidated EBITDA by reason of
being generated from discontinued operations. Achieved EBITDA will also take into account any
acquisitions or divestitures made during the applicable year, as reasonably determined by the
Compensation Committee and the Board of CC Media. The target bonus of each of Messrs. Mr. Mark P.
Mays and Randall T. Mays was set at $2.0 million if Clear Channel and CC Media achieved, on a
combined basis, an EBITDA in 2009 of approximately $1.8 billion. The 2009 achieved EBITDA for
purposes of the Mays bonus calculation was approximately $1.6 billion, or approximately 91% of the
targeted EBITDA. As such, each of Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays was awarded a bonus of
$236,670.
L. Lowry Mays
Mr. L. Lowry Mays 2009 performance-based goal consisted of achieving a targeted amount of
OIBDAN, on a company-wide basis. OIBDAN is calculated by adjusting net income to exclude non-cash
compensation and the following line items presented in the statement of operations: (i) minority
interest income (expense), (ii) income tax (expense) benefit, (iii) other income (expense) net,
(iv) equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates, (v) gain (loss) on marketable securities,
(vi) interest expense, (vii) gain (loss) on disposition of assets net and (viii) depreciation
and amortization. Pursuant to Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment agreement, his annual incentive bonus
was to be at least $1.0 million provided OIBDAN achieved in 2009 was at least 80% of budgeted
OIBDAN for the year. Mr. L. Lowry Mays elected to forego an annual incentive bonus for 2009.
20
Andrew W. Levin
Mr. Andrew W. Levins 2009 performance-based goals consisted of (i) implementing cost savings
initiatives related to legal expenses, (ii) lobbying against certain legislative initiatives
relevant to our business, (iii) transitioning to a new general counsel for CC Media and (iv)
transitioning the Clear Channel legal department to the CC Media legal department. Mr. Levins
aggregate target bonus for 2009 was set at $150,000, with each of the above components respectively
weighted at (i) 30%, (ii) 30%, (iii) 20% and (iv) 20%. Mr. Levin received a bonus payment of
$137,500, representing the maximum bonus under all performance metrics with the exception of
transitioning to a new general counsel, for which Mr. Levin received 50% of his target bonus.
John E. Hogan
Mr. John E. Hogans 2009 performance-based goals consisted of (i) achieving a targeted EBITDA
in the Radio division of approximately $1.1 billion, (ii) achieving certain cost savings
initiatives, (iii) achieving strategic initiatives, (iv) achieving a strategic audience development
plan to increase and maintain overall radio audiences of Clear Channels radio stations, (v)
achieving a plan to increase and maintain ratings and (vi) achieving improvements in average minute
rate for CC Medias radio stations. Mr. Hogans aggregate target bonus for 2009 was set at $1.0
million, with each of the above components respectively weighted at 75% for achieving a targeted
EBITDA and 5% for each other qualitative performance objective. The Radio division, on a combined
basis, did not achieve its targeted EBITDA in 2009, resulting in no award for EBITDA component of
Mr. Hogans performance-based bonus. However, it was determined that Mr. Hogan had earned a bonus
award with respect to each of the elements described in (ii)-(v) above. Additionally, Mr. Hogan
was awarded a discretionary bonus of $125,000. Mr. Hogans total performance-based bonus for 2009
was $350,000.
Paul J. Meyer
Mr. Paul J. Meyers 2009 performance-based goals consisted of (i) achieving EBITDA in the
Outdoor Americas division of approximately $309.7 million, (ii) attaining budgeted expense targets
and (iii) qualitatively evaluated initiatives deemed critical to Clear Channels short and
long-term success. Mr. Meyers aggregate target bonus for 2009 was set at $749,250, with each of
the above components respectively weighted at (i) 75%, (ii) 10% and (iii) 15%. It was determined
that Mr. Meyer had earned a bonus award with respect to each of the elements described in (i)-(iii)
above and Mr. Meyer was awarded $123,216, $75,000 and $112,500, respectively, for a total of
$310,716, for such achievement, all of which was paid by CCOH.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Purpose. The long-term incentive compensation element provides an award that is
performance-based. The objective of the program is to align compensation of the named executive
officers over a multi-year period directly with the interests of stockholders of CC Media by
motivating and rewarding creation and preservation of long-term stockholder value. In general, the
level of long-term incentive compensation is determined based on an evaluation of competitive
factors in conjunction with total compensation provided to the named executive officers and the
overall goals of the compensation program described above. Long-term incentive compensation may be
paid in cash, stock options and restricted stock. Additionally, CC Media may from time to time
grant equity awards to the named executive officers that are not tied to predetermined performance
goals. Equity ownership for the named executive officers is important for purposes of incentive,
retention and alignment with stockholders.
Administration. The named executive officers participate in the 2008 Executive
Incentive Plan (the 2008 Incentive Plan), which allows for the issuance of incentive and
nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock and other equity awards. The 2008 Incentive Plan is
administered by the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee. See Grants of Plan-Based
Awards for a more detailed description of the 2008 Incentive Plan.
As of April 1, 2010, there were approximately 160 employees holding outstanding stock
incentive awards under the 2008 Incentive Plan.
Stock Options. Long-term incentive compensation may be granted to the named executive
officers in the form of stock options, with exercise prices of not less than fair market value of
CC Media stock on the date of grant. Vesting schedules are set by the Compensation Committee or
the Subcommittee in their discretion and vary per named executive officer, as further described
below. All vesting is contingent on continued employment, with rare
21
exceptions made by the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee. CC Media typically defines fair market value as the closing price on the date of grant. All decisions to award the named executive
officers stock options are in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee or the
Subcommittee.
Restricted Stock Awards. Long-term incentive compensation may also be granted to the
named executive officers in the form of restricted stock awards. Vesting schedules are set by the
Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee in their discretion and vary per named executive
officer, as further described below. All vesting is contingent on continued employment, with rare
exceptions made by the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee. All decisions to award the
named executive officers restricted stock are in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee
or the Subcommittee.
Analysis. No awards of stock options or restricted stock were made to our named
executive officers in 2009. At the closing of the Merger, a significant majority of the options and
other equity securities permitted to be issued under the 2008 Incentive Plan were granted. For a
further discussion of equity award grants, please refer to Grant of Plan Based Awards.
Equity Award Grant Timing Practices
Employee New Hires/Promotions Grant Dates. Grants of stock options, if any, to
newly-hired or newly-promoted employees are made at the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board
immediately following the hire or promotion.
Initial Equity Award Grant Dates for Newly-Elected Non-Employee Directors. Grants of
stock options, if any, to newly-elected non-employee members of the Board will be made at the
regularly scheduled meeting of the Board immediately following his or her election. If a
non-employee member of the Board is appointed between regularly scheduled meetings, then grants of
stock options, if any, will be made at the first meeting in attendance after such appointment, and
the first meeting after election thereafter.
Timing of Equity Awards. CC Media does not have a formal policy on timing equity
awards in connection with the release of material non-public information to affect the value of
compensation. In the event that material non-public information becomes known to the Compensation
Committee or the Subcommittee, as applicable, prior to granting equity awards, the Compensation
Committee or the Subcommittee will take the existence of such information under advisement and make
an assessment in its business judgment whether to delay the grant of the equity award in order to
avoid any potential impropriety.
Executive Benefits and Perquisites
Each of the named executive officers are entitled to participate in all pension, profit
sharing and other retirement plans, and all group health, hospitalization, disability and other
insurance and employee welfare benefit plans in which other similarly situated employees of CC
Media may participate.
CC Media provides certain other perquisites to the named executive officers. As provided in
their employment agreements, Messrs. Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays, and L. Lowry Mays are entitled
to use company-owned aircraft for all business and personal air travel in accordance with the Clear
Channel policy as in effect on November 16, 2006. With the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer, other executive officers and members of management are permitted limited personal use of
company-owned aircraft.
Additionally, as a result of Clear Channels high public profile and due in part to threats
against Clear Channel, its operations and management, Clear Channel engaged an outside security
consultant to assess security risks to Clear Channels physical plant and operations, as well as
its employees, including executive management. Based upon the findings and recommendation of this
security consultant, Clear Channel implemented, and management and the Board of CC Media intends to
continue the implementation of, numerous security measures for CC Medias operations and employees,
including a general security program covering selected senior executives.
Although Messrs. Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays are each entitled under the
terms of their respective employment agreements to the use of a company-owned automobile, none of
Messrs. Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays uses a company-owned automobile. Messrs.
Mark P. Mays and L. Lowry
22
Mays are reimbursed for the annual dues for memberships in two social
dining clubs and Mr. Mark P. Mays is reimbursed for the annual dues for membership at a health and
fitness club.
The Compensation Committee believes that the above benefits provide a more tangible incentive
than an equivalent amount of cash compensation. In determining the named executive officers total
compensation, the Compensation Committee will consider these benefits. However, as these benefits
and perquisites represent a relatively insignificant portion of the named executive officers total
compensation, it is unlikely that they will materially influence the Compensation Committees
decision in setting such named executive officers total compensation. For further discussion of
these benefits and perquisites, including the methodology for computing their costs, please refer
to the 2009 Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement.
Severance Arrangements
Pursuant to the employment agreements, as amended, of Messrs. Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays,
L. Lowry Mays and Mr. John E. Hogan are entitled to certain severance payments and, except for Mr.
John E. Hogan, other benefits upon the termination of such individuals employment with CC Media
(or, in the case of Mr. John E. Hogan, with the Radio division). Mr. Paul J. Meyer, under his new
employment agreement, and Mr. Andrew W. Levin, under his separation agreement, are each
respectively entitled to certain bonus payments in connection with their departures from CC Media.
For further discussion of these severance payments and benefits, see Potential Post-Employment
Payments set forth below in this proxy statement. Upon a change in control of CC Media, Messrs.
Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays are entitled to receive a tax gross-up payment in the event a
change in control causes them to pay an excise tax. The named executive officers are not entitled
to any additional severance or benefits upon a change in control of CC Media.
Roles and Responsibilities
Role of the Compensation Committee and the Subcommittee. The Compensation
Committee and the Subcommittee, as applicable, are primarily responsible for conducting reviews of
CC Medias executive compensation policies and strategies and overseeing and evaluating CC Medias
overall compensation structure and programs. Direct responsibilities include, but are not limited
to:
|
|
|
evaluating and approving goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the
Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers, and evaluating the
performance of the named executive officers in light of those goals and objectives; |
|
|
|
|
determining and approving the compensation level for the Chief Executive Officer; |
|
|
|
|
evaluating and approving compensation levels of the other named executive officers; |
|
|
|
|
evaluating and approving any grants of equity-based compensation to the named
executive officers; |
|
|
|
|
recommending to the Board compensation policies for outside directors; and |
|
|
|
|
reviewing performance-based and equity-based incentive plans for the Chief Executive
Officer and the other named executive officers and reviewing other benefit programs
presented to the Compensation Committee by the Chief Executive Officer. |
Role of Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer provides reviews and
recommendations for the Compensation Committees consideration regarding CC Medias executive
compensation programs, policies and governance. Direct responsibilities include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
providing an ongoing review of the effectiveness of the compensation programs,
including their level of competitiveness and their alignment with CC Medias
objectives; |
|
|
|
|
recommending changes and new programs, if necessary, to ensure achievement of all
program objectives; and |
|
|
|
|
recommending pay levels, payout and awards for the named executive officers other
than himself. |
The Compensation Committee has the ability to delegate to the Subcommittee certain of its
responsibilities in administrating performance awards under the Annual Incentive Plan. These
delegated duties may include, among
23
other things, setting the performance period, setting the
performance goals, and certifying the achievement of the predetermined performance goals by each
named executive officer.
TAX AND ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Although Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation
a publicly held corporation may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any one year with respect
to certain senior executives, in 2009, CC Media was not a publicly held corporation within the
meaning of applicable provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations. This is
because, on December 31, 2009, CC Media would not have been subject to the reporting obligations of
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act, had CC Media not voluntarily registered its Class A
common stock by filing a registration statement on Form 8-A on July 30, 2008. In the event that CC
Media subsequently becomes a publicly held corporation within the meaning of Section 162(m), the
Compensation Committee will consider the anticipated tax treatment to CC Media and to senior
executives covered by these rules of various payments and benefits. In that event, the
Compensation Committee will consider various alternatives to preserving the deductibility of
compensation and benefits to the extent reasonably practicable and consistent with its other
compensation objectives.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
CC Media accounts for stock-based payments including awards under the 2008 Incentive Plan in
accordance with the requirements of ASC 718-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123).
CORPORATE SERVICES AGREEMENT
In connection with CCOHs initial public offering, CCOH entered into a corporate services
agreement with Clear Channel Management Services, L.P., now known as Clear Channel Management
Services, Inc. (the Corporate Services Agreement). Under the terms of the agreement, Clear
Channel Management Services, Inc. provides, among other things, executive officer services to CCOH.
These executive officer services are charged to CCOH based on CCOHs 2008 OIBDAN as a percentage
of Clear Channels total 2008 OIBDAN. For 2009, CCOH reimbursed 41% of Mr. Mark P. Mays and Mr.
Randall T. Mays base salary and bonus. CC Media and CCOH considered these allocations to be a
reflection of the utilization of services provided. For 2009, CCOH reimbursed CC Media $218,496
and $217,812 of Mr. Mark P. Mays and Mr. Randall T. Mays base salary, respectively, pursuant to
the terms of the Corporate Services Agreement. For further information on Messrs. Mark P. Mays
and Randall T. Mays base salary and bonus, please refer to the 2009 Summary Compensation Table
contained in this proxy statement.
24
SUMMARY COMPENSATION
The Summary Compensation table shows certain compensation information for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 for the named executive officers of CC Media. All data presented
below for the period from January 1, 2007 through July 30, 2008 represents compensation paid by
Clear Channel.
2009 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
|
Bonus |
|
|
Awards (a) |
|
|
Awards (a) |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Position |
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Mark P. Mays |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
314,421 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,635 |
(b) |
|
|
107,491 |
(d) |
|
|
561,547 |
|
Chief Executive |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
528,050 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000,016 |
|
|
|
23,635,424 |
(c) |
|
|
2,655,000 |
(b) |
|
|
260,695 |
(d) |
|
|
47,079,185 |
|
Officer (PEO) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
581,750 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,039,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,306,250 |
(b) |
|
|
298,770 |
(d) |
|
|
9,226,430 |
|
Randall T. Mays |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
313,438 |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,635 |
(e) |
|
|
162,491 |
(d) |
|
|
615,564 |
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
516,250 |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000,016 |
|
|
|
23,635,424 |
(c) |
|
|
2,655,000 |
(e) |
|
|
340,811 |
(d) |
|
|
47,147,501 |
|
Financial Officer (PFO) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
568,750 |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,039,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,306,250 |
(e) |
|
|
412,920 |
(d) |
|
|
9,327,580 |
|
Andrew W. Levin |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
769,417 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,500 |
|
|
|
7,760 |
(h) |
|
|
1,314,677 |
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
395,833 |
|
|
|
223,000 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,720 |
(g) |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
11,737 |
(h) |
|
|
1,125,290 |
|
Chief Legal Officer and |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
347,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,500 |
|
|
|
25,449 |
(h) |
|
|
950,076 |
|
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John E. Hogan |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
775,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
8,850 |
(j) |
|
|
1,133,850 |
|
President and CEO of |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
772,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,154,977 |
(i) |
|
|
232,000 |
|
|
|
65,502 |
(j) |
|
|
2,225,396 |
|
the Radio Division |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,500 |
|
|
|
73,125 |
(j) |
|
|
2,123,925 |
|
L. Lowry Mays |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
287,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,809 |
(d) |
|
|
450,892 |
|
Chairman Emeritus |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
695,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,500 |
|
|
|
187,550 |
(d) |
|
|
1,335,050 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
695,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,019,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,028 |
(d) |
|
|
2,955,858 |
|
Paul J. Meyer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
1,310,716 |
(m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,861 |
(l) |
|
|
2,020,577 |
|
President and COO of |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
672,115 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,545 |
(l) |
|
|
867,660 |
|
the Outdoor Division(k) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
647,115 |
|
|
|
1,484,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,470 |
(l) |
|
|
2,150,351 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts reflect fair value of restricted stock awards and stock options granted during
the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. See Note M Stockholders Equity on
page A-95 of Appendix A for a discussion of the assumptions made in calculating the grant date
fair value of share based compensation. Dividends are paid on shares of restricted stock at
the same rate as paid on CC Media common stock. |
|
(b) |
|
Mr. Mark P. Mays Salary earned during each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007 was $532,917, $895,000 and $895,000, respectively, of which $218,496, $366,950 and
$313,250, respectively, was reimbursed by CCOH pursuant to the Corporate Services Agreement.
Mr. Mark P. Mays Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation earned during each of the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $236,670, $4,500,000 and $6,625,000, respectively,
of which $97,035, $1,845,000 and $2,318,750, respectively, was reimbursed by CCOH pursuant to
the Corporate Services Agreement. For a further discussion of the Corporate Services
Agreement, please refer to Corporate Services Agreement. |
|
(c) |
|
Amount does not include $21,286,445 which represent the grant date fair value of options that
contain performance based vesting term that have not yet been determined probable to meet. |
|
(d) |
|
As a result of Clear Channels high public profile and due in part to threats against Clear
Channel, its operations and management, Clear Channel engaged an outside security consultant
to assess security risks to Clear Channels physical plant and operations, as well as its
employees, including executive management. Based upon the findings and recommendation of this
security consultant, Clear Channels management and Board of Directors implemented, and CC
Medias management and Board intends to continue the implementation of, numerous security
measures for CC Media operations and employees, including a general security program covering
selected senior executives. |
|
|
|
For security purposes and at the direction of the Board of CC Media, Messrs. Mark P. Mays,
Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays utilize a company-owned airplane for all business and personal
air travel. Included in All Other Compensation for 2009 is $82,671, $142,827 and $122,283 of
personal use of such airplane by Mr. Mark P. Mays, Mr. Randall T. Mays and |
25
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. L. Lowry Mays, respectively. Included in All Other Compensation for 2008 is $152,240,
$238,604 and $105,204 of personal use of such airplane by Mr. Mark P. Mays, Mr. Randall T. Mays
and Mr. L. Lowry Mays, respectively. Included in All Other Compensation for 2007 is $55,012,
$172,934 and $92,980 of personal use of such airplane by Mr. Mark P. Mays, Mr. Randall T. Mays
and Mr. L. Lowry Mays, respectively. |
|
|
|
Also included in Mr. Mark P. Mays All Other Compensation is $6,125, $5,750 and $5,625 in
company matching contribution to an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $63,750 and $215,250 in dividends paid on his
unvested restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The remainder of Mr. Mark P. Mays All Other Compensation consists of personal club
memberships provided by Clear Channel during the pre-merger period of January 1, 2007 through
July 30, 2008 (the Pre-Merger Period), and by CC Media during the post-merger period of July
31, 2008 through December 31, 2009 (the Post-Merger Period), and wages paid by Clear Channel
during the Pre-Merger Period and by CC Media during the Post-Merger Period for personnel who
provide personal accounting and tax services to Mr. Mark P. Mays. |
|
|
|
Also included in Mr. Randall T. Mays All Other Compensation is $6,125, $5,750 and $5,625 in
company matching contribution to an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $63,750 and $215,250 in dividends paid on his
unvested restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The remainder of Mr. Randall T. Mays All Other Compensation consists of personal club
memberships provided by Clear Channel during the Pre-Merger Period and by CC Media during the
Post-Merger Period, and wages paid by Clear Channel during the Pre-Merger Period and by CC Media
during the Post-Merger Period for personnel who provide personal accounting and tax services to
Mr. Randall T. Mays. |
|
|
|
Also included in Mr. L. Lowry Mays All Other Compensation is $6,125, $5,750 and $5,625 in
company matching contribution to an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $25,687 and $82,875 in dividends paid on his unvested
restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
remainder of Mr. L. Lowry Mays All Other Compensation consists of personal club memberships
provided by Clear Channel during the Pre-Merger Period and by CC Media during the Post-Merger
Period, wages paid by Clear Channel during the Pre-Merger Period and by CC Media during the
Post-Merger Period for personnel who provide personal accounting and tax services to Mr. L.
Lowry Mays, and wages paid Clear Channel during the Pre-Merger Period and by CC Media during the
Post-Merger Period for security personnel who provide personal security services to Mr. L. Lowry
Mays. |
|
|
|
The value of personal airplane usage reported above is based on CC Medias direct operating
costs. This methodology calculates aggregate incremental cost based on the average weighted
variable cost per hour of flight for fuel and oil expenses, mileage, trip-related maintenance,
crew travel expenses, landing fees and other miscellaneous variable costs. Since the airplane
is used primarily for business travel, this methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change
based on usage, such as pilot salaries, the cost of the plane, depreciation and administrative
expenses. On certain occasions, an executives spouse or other family members may accompany the
executive on a flight when such persons are invited to attend an event for appropriate business
purposes. No additional direct operating cost is incurred in such situations under the
foregoing methodology. The value of all other perquisites included in All Other Compensation
is based upon CC Medias actual costs. |
|
(e) |
|
Mr. Randall T. Mays Salary earned during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
was $531,250, $875,000 and $875,000, respectively, of which $217,812, $358,750 and $306,250
were reimbursed by CCOH pursuant to the Corporate Services Agreement. Mr. Randall T. Mays
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation earned during each of the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 was $236,670, $4,500,000 and $6,625,000, respectively, of which $97,035,
$1,845,000 and $2,318,750 was reimbursed by CCOH pursuant to the Corporate Services Agreement.
For a further discussion of the Corporate Services Agreement, please refer to Corporate
Services Agreement. |
|
(f) |
|
Mr. Andrew W. Levin was awarded a bonus of $769,417 related to a separation agreement signed
during 2009. Mr. Andrew W. Levins employment with the Company ended effective January 8,
2010. Mr. Andrew W. Levin was awarded a bonus of $223,000 upon the closing of the Merger on
July 30, 2008. |
|
(g) |
|
Amount does not include $844,436 which represent the grant date fair value of options that
contain performance based vesting term that have not yet been determined probable to meet. |
|
(h) |
|
Amount reflects $6,125, $5,750 and $5,625 in company matching contributions to an
employer-sponsored 401(k) plan paid during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively and $5,987 and $19,824 in dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards
during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remainder of Mr. Andrew
W. Levins All Other Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2009 consists of personal
use of the company-owned airplane by Mr. Andrew W. Levin. |
|
(i) |
|
Amount does not include $2,213,049 which represent the grant date fair value of options that
contain performance based vesting term that have not yet been determined probable to meet. |
26
|
|
|
(j) |
|
Amount reflects $6,125, $5,750 and $5,625 in company matching contributions to an
employer-sponsored 401(k) plan paid during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively and $19,688 and $67,500 in dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards
during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remainder of Mr. John E.
Hogans All Other Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 consists of
personal use of the company-owned airplane by Mr. John E. Hogan. |
|
(k) |
|
Mr. Paul J. Meyers Salary and Bonus are paid by CCOH. |
|
(l) |
|
Amount reflects $6,125, $5,750 and $5,625 in company matching contributions to an
employer-sponsored 401(k) plan paid during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively; $7,200, $7,200 and $6,950 in personal club memberships paid during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively; and $21,536, $7,595 and $5,895 in claims
and administrative expenses associated with a Medical Executive Reimbursement Plan paid during
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(m) |
|
Amount includes $1,000,000 bonus payment made by CCOH pursuant to the terms of the employment
agreement entered into between Mr. Paul J. Meyer and Clear Channel in December 2009. For a
further discussion regarding Mr. Paul J. Meyers employment agreement, please refer to
Employment Agreements with the Named Executive Officers. |
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The descriptions of the employment agreements set forth herein do not purport to be complete
and are qualified in their entirety by the employment agreements. Each of the employment agreements
discussed below provides for severance and change-in-control payments as more fully described under
the heading Potential Post-Employment Payments in this proxy statement, which descriptions are
incorporated herein by reference.
Certain elements of the compensation of the named executive officers are determined based on
their respective employment agreements. In connection with the Merger and effective as of the
consummation of the Merger, CC Media and Merger Sub entered into employment agreements with each of
Messrs. Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays (collectively, the Mays executives), each
such employment agreement amending and restating in its entirety each of the Mays executives
respective existing employment agreement with Clear Channel. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays
entered into amendments to their respective employment agreements on January 20, 2009 and Randall
T. Mays entered into a further amended and restated employment agreement and amendments to his
option agreements on December 22, 2009 (such amended and restated employment agreements, as further
amended, the amended Mays employment agreements, and together with the amended and restated
employment agreement of L. Lowry Mays, the Mays employment agreements).
Under the Mays employment agreements, each of the Mays executives receives compensation
consisting of a base salary, incentive awards and other benefits and perquisites. Each of the Mays
executives is required to assign certain intellectual property rights to Clear Channel and to
refrain from competing against Clear Channel and from soliciting its customers, employees and
independent contractors during employment and for a period of two years following termination of
employment. Each of the Mays executives is further required to protect the secrecy of Clear
Channels confidential information for the duration of his employment and after his employment
terminates, regardless of the reason for such termination.
Clear Channel will indemnify each of Messrs. L. Lowry Mays, Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays
from any losses incurred by them because they were made a party to a proceeding as a result of
their being an officer of Clear Channel. Furthermore, any expenses incurred by them in connection
with any such action shall be paid by Clear Channel in advance upon request that Clear Channel pay
such expenses, but only in the event that they have delivered in writing to Clear Channel (i) an
undertaking to reimburse Clear Channel for such expenses with respect to which they are not
entitled to indemnification and (ii) an affirmation of their good faith belief that the standard of
conduct necessary for indemnification by Clear Channel has been met.
Mark P. Mays
Upon the consummation of the Merger, Mr. Mark P. Mays was employed by CC Media and Clear
Channel as the Chief Executive Officer of each entity. Mr. Mark P. Mays employment agreement
provides for a term of five years and will be automatically extended for consecutive one-year
periods unless 12 months prior notice of non-renewal is provided by the terminating party. Upon the
consummation of the Merger, the parties agreed that Mr.
27
Mark P. Mays would receive an annual base
salary of not less than $895,000. Pursuant to the amendment to his
employment agreement, Mr. Mark P. Mays received a base salary of $500,000 in 2009 and will
receive an annual base salary thereafter of not less than $1,000,000. Mr. Mark P. Mays will also
receive benefits and perquisites consistent with his previous arrangement with Clear Channel
(including gross-up payments for excise taxes that may be payable by Mr. Mark P. Mays in
connection with any payments made in connection with the Merger). Pursuant to the amendment to his
employment agreement, beginning in 2009, Mr. Mark P. Mays is entitled to receive an annual bonus of
between $0 and $4,000,000 based on the percentage of target EBITDA that is achieved for the
applicable year; under this calculation, achievement of 100% of target EBITDA would entitle Mr.
Mark P. Mays to a bonus of $2,000,000. For 2009, Mr. Mark P. Mays received a bonus of $236,670.
Target EBITDA is determined by the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee, in consultation with
the management team, and EBITDA, for this limited purpose, is calculated in the manner discussed
below. Mr. Mark P. Mays is bound by customary restrictive covenants not to compete and not to
solicit employees during the term of his employment agreement and for two years following
termination. Additionally, pursuant to his original employment agreement with CC Media, upon the
consummation of the Merger, Mr. Mark P. Mays received an equity incentive award of options to
purchase 2,083,333 shares of CC Media stock (subject to vesting requirements) and was issued
restricted shares of CC Medias Class A common stock with a value equal to $20 million (subject to
vesting requirements).
Randall T. Mays
Upon the consummation of the Merger, Mr. Randall T. Mays was employed by CC Media and Clear
Channel as the President and Chief Financial Officer of each entity. Upon ceasing to serve as
President and Chief Financial Officer on January 4, 2010, Mr. Randall T. Mays became Vice Chairman
of CC Media. Mr. Randall T. Mays employment agreement provides for a term through July 31, 2013
and will be automatically extended for consecutive one-year periods unless 12 months prior notice
of non-renewal is provided by the terminating party. Upon the consummation of the Merger, the
parties agreed that Mr. Randall T. Mays would receive an annual base salary of not less than
$875,000. Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Randall T. Mays received a
base salary of $500,000 in 2009, and, as Vice Chairman, will continue to receive an annual base
salary of $500,000 thereafter. Mr. Randall T. Mays will also receive benefits and perquisites
consistent with his previous arrangement with Clear Channel (including gross-up payments for
excise taxes that may be payable by Mr. Randall T. Mays in connection with any payments made in
connection with the Merger and for additional taxes that may be payable by Mr. Randall T. Mays
under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code). Pursuant to the December 2009 amended and
restated employment agreement, Mr. Randall T. Mays is entitled to receive an annual bonus, to be
determined at the discretion of the Board of CC Media. For 2009, Mr. Randall T. Mays received a
bonus of $236,670. Mr. Randall T. Mays is bound by customary restrictive covenants not to compete
during the term of his employment agreement and for six months following termination and not to
solicit employees during the term of his employment agreement and for two years following
termination. Additionally, pursuant to his original employment agreement with CC Media, upon the
consummation of the Merger, Mr. Randall T. Mays received an equity incentive award of options to
purchase 2,083,333 shares of CC Media stock (subject to vesting requirements) and was issued
restricted shares of CC Medias Class A common stock with a value equal to $20 million (subject to
vesting requirements). Pursuant to the December 2009 amendments made to Mr. Randall T. Mays
employment and option agreements, two-thirds of his time-based and all of his performance based
options were cancelled and vesting on his remaining options were accelerated. Accordingly, 347,222
shares underlying Mr. Randall T. Mays option grant remain outstanding.
L. Lowry Mays
Upon the consummation of the Merger, L. Lowry Mays was employed by CC Media and Clear Channel
as the Chairman Emeritus of each entity. Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment agreement provides for a
term of five years and will be automatically extended for consecutive one-year periods unless
terminated by either party. Mr. L. Lowry Mays will receive an annual salary of $250,000 and
benefits and perquisites consistent with his previous arrangement with Clear Channel. Also, Mr. L.
Lowry Mays is entitled to use of company-owned aircraft for personal travel, in accordance with
Clear Channels policy as in effect on November 16, 2006, for ten years from the date of the
closing of the Merger, regardless of whether he remains employed by CC Media. Mr. L. Lowry Mays
also will be eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount to be determined by the Board of CC
Media, in its sole discretion, provided, however, that if in any year Clear Channel achieves at
least 80% of the budgeted OIBDAN for the given year, Mr. L. Lowry Mays annual bonus for that year
will be no less than $1,000,000. Mr. L. Lowry Mays
28
elected to forego an annual bonus for 2009. Mr. L. Lowry Mays is bound by customary covenants
not to compete and not to solicit employees during the term of his employment agreement.
The following is a calculation of OIBDAN based upon CC Medias results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(expense) - net, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
and |
|
|
and impairment |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
income (loss) |
|
|
expense |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
charge |
|
|
OIBDAN |
|
Radio Broadcasting |
|
$ |
639,854 |
|
|
$ |
8,276 |
|
|
$ |
261,246 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
909,376 |
|
Americas Outdoor |
|
|
217,617 |
|
|
|
7,977 |
|
|
|
210,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,874 |
|
International Outdoor |
|
|
(68,727 |
) |
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
229,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,052 |
|
Other |
|
|
(43,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,416 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(4,118,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expense net |
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
(262,166 |
) |
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
(3,687,146 |
) |
|
$ |
39,786 |
|
|
$ |
765,474 |
|
|
$ |
4,169,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,287,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Media defines EBITDA, for the limited purposes of the amended Mays employment agreements,
to mean the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA, as calculated in the manner provided in the
senior secured credit facilities documentation; provided that, unless otherwise approved by the
Compensation Committee and the Board of CC Media, achieved EBITDA for the applicable year will
(i) exclude EBITDA generated from joint venture entities formed after the date of the amended Mays
employment agreements, to the extent not included in the calculation of target EBITDA and (ii)
include EBITDA that is excluded from Consolidated EBITDA by reason of being generated from
discontinued operations. Achieved EBITDA will also take into account any acquisitions or
divestitures made during the applicable year, as reasonably determined by the Compensation
Committee and the Board of CC Media.
John E. Hogan
Effective June 29, 2008, subject to the consummation of the Merger, Mr. John E. Hogan entered
into an employment agreement with Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. (CCB), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CC Media, such employment agreement amending and restating in its entirety Mr. John
E. Hogans existing employment agreement with CCB. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. John
E. Hogan will serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Radio division for an initial
five year term, which is automatically extended from year to year thereafter unless either party
gives prior notice.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. John E. Hogan will receive compensation consisting of a
base salary, incentive awards and other benefits and perquisites. Mr. John E. Hogans current
annual base salary is $775,000 and he will be eligible for additional annual raises commensurate
with company policy. No later than March 15 of each calendar year, Mr. John E. Hogan is eligible to
receive a performance bonus. Mr. John E. Hogan is also entitled to participate in all pension,
profit sharing and other retirement plans, all incentive compensation plans, and all group health,
hospitalization and disability or other insurance plans, paid vacation, sick leave and other
employee welfare benefit plans in which other similarly situated employees may participate.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. John E. Hogan is required to protect the secrecy of CCBs
confidential information and to assign certain intellectual property rights to CCB. Mr. John E.
Hogan is prohibited by the agreement from activities that compete with CCB or its affiliates for
one year after he leaves CCB, and he is prohibited from soliciting CCBs employees for employment
for 12 months after termination regardless of the reason for termination of employment. However,
after Mr. John E. Hogans employment with CCB has terminated, upon receiving written permission
from the Board of Directors of CCB, Mr. John E. Hogan is permitted to engage in competing
activities that would otherwise be prohibited by his employment agreement if such activities are
determined in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors of CCB in good faith to be immaterial
to the operations
29
of CCB, or any subsidiary or affiliate thereof, in the location in question. Mr. John E. Hogan
is also prohibited from using CCBs confidential information at any time following the termination
of his employment in competing, directly or indirectly, with CCB.
Mr. John E. Hogan is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable attorneys fees and expenses and
full indemnification from any losses related to any proceeding to which he may be made a party by
reason of his being or having been an officer of CCB or any of its subsidiaries (other than any
dispute, claim, or controversy arising under or relating to his employment agreement).
Paul J. Meyer
On August 5, 2005, Clear Channel entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Paul J. Meyer.
The initial term of the agreement ended on the third anniversary of the date of the agreement;
however the term automatically extends one day at a time beginning on the second anniversary of the
date of the agreement, unless either party gives the other one years prior written notice of
termination. The agreement set Mr. Paul J. Meyers initial base salary of $600,000 for the first
year of the agreement; $625,000 for the second year of the agreement; and $650,000 for the third
year of the agreement, subject to additional annual raises in accordance with company policies. In
fiscal year 2009, Mr. Paul J. Meyer was employed under this agreement as an annual base salary of
$675,000. Mr. Paul J. Meyer is also eligible to receive a performance bonus as decided at the sole
discretion of the Compensation Committee and is entitled to certain other employee benefits.
Mr. Paul J. Meyers employment agreement also contains a non-compete provision and
non-solicitation provision, each with a one-year term, and a confidentiality provision with a
perpetual term.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
2008 Incentive Plan
CC Media grants equity incentive awards to named executive officers and other eligible
participants under the 2008 Incentive Plan adopted in connection with, and prior to, the
consummation of the Merger. The 2008 Incentive Plan is intended to advance the interests of CC
Media and its affiliates by providing for the grant of stock-based and other incentive awards to
the key employees and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, CC Media or its affiliates who
are in a position to make a significant contribution to the success of CC Media and its affiliates.
The 2008 Incentive Plan allows for the issuance of restricted stock, restricted stock units,
incentive and nonstatutory stock options, cash awards and stock appreciation rights to eligible
participants, who include the key employees of CC Media and its subsidiaries in the case of
incentive stock options, and the key employees and directors of, and consultants and advisors to,
CC Media or any of its affiliates in the case of other awards. An aggregate of 10,187,406 shares of
Class A common stock are available for grant under the 2008 Incentive Plan. Shares withheld to pay
the exercise price of an award or to satisfy tax withholding requirements with respect to an award,
restricted stock that is forfeited and shares subject to an award that is exercised or satisfied,
or that terminates or expires, without the delivery of the shares do not reduce the number of
shares available for issuance under the 2008 Incentive Plan. To the extent necessary to prevent the
enlargement or dilution of the benefits intended to be made available under the 2008 Incentive
Plan, equitable and proportionate adjustments will be made to the number of shares available for
issuance under the 2008 Incentive Plan in the event of a stock dividend or similar distribution,
recapitalization, stock split, and similar transactions and events. The maximum number of shares of
Class A common stock for which stock options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to any
person in any calendar year is 2,700,000. The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock
subject to other awards granted to any person in any calendar year is 700,000. The maximum amount
payable to any one person under a cash award in any calendar year is $20,000,000.
At the closing of the Merger, a significant majority of the options and other equity
securities permitted to be issued under the 2008 Incentive Plan were granted. As part of this
grant, Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays each received grants of options equal to 2.5% of
the fully diluted equity of CC Media and received grants of restricted stock equal to $20 million
(based on the per share price paid by the Sponsors for shares of CC Media in connection with the
Merger). The equity awards for Mr. Randall T. Mays were subsequently reduced such that his
respective remaining options (which are all fully vested) now equal 0.4% of the fully diluted
equity of CC Media. See Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers for a more detailed
description of the
30
amendments to Mr. Randall T. Mays awards. The other officers and employees of Clear Channel
received grants of options equal to 3.9% of the fully diluted equity of CC Media. After this
initial grant, 1.7% of the fully diluted equity subject to the 2008 Incentive Plan remains
available for future grants to employees. The shares of restricted stock granted to Messrs. Mark P.
Mays and Randall T. Mays vest 20% a year over five years. Of the option grants to other employees
of Clear Channel, including officers of Clear Channel, 33.34% will vest solely upon continued
employment (with 20% vesting annually over five years) and the remaining 66.66% will vest both upon
continued employment and the achievement of predetermined performance targets. All options granted
at closing have an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant, which was
the same price per share paid by the Sponsors for shares of CC Media in connection with the Merger.
The 2008 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee. The
Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee determines which eligible persons receive an award and
the types of awards to be granted as well as the amounts, terms and conditions of each award,
including, if relevant, the exercise price, the form of payment of the exercise price, the number
of shares, cash or other consideration subject to the award and the vesting schedule. These terms
and conditions will be set forth in the award agreement furnished to each participant at the time
an award is granted to him or her under the 2008 Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee or the
Subcommittee will also make all other determinations and interpretations necessary to carry out the
purposes of the 2008 Incentive Plan.
In general, awards under the 2008 Incentive Plan will, unless expressly provided otherwise by
the Compensation Committee or the Subcommittee in the terms of a participants award agreement,
automatically and immediately terminate upon a participants termination of employment. However, if
a participant holds vested and exercisable awards (including options) at the time of his or her
termination, those awards will remain exercisable for up to 90 days after the participants date of
termination. In addition, if the participants termination is due to his or her death or
disability, vested and exercisable awards (including options) will remain exercisable for up to a
one-year period ending with the first anniversary of the participants death or disability.
Certain key participants who receive equity awards under the 2008 Incentive Plan are subject
to additional restrictions on their ability to transfer the shares they receive pursuant to awards
granted under the 2008 Incentive Plan. In addition, all participants in the 2008 Incentive Plan are
required to enter into a lock up or similar agreement with respect to the shares they receive
pursuant to awards granted under the 2008 Incentive Plan in connection with a public offering of CC
Medias shares on terms and conditions requested by CC Media or its underwriters.
Annual Incentive Plan
As discussed above, the named executive officers also are eligible to receive awards under the
Annual Incentive Plan. See Elements of CompensationAnnual Incentive Bonus for a more
detailed description of the Annual Incentive Plan and the grant of awards to the named executive
officers thereunder.
31
The following table sets forth certain information concerning plan-based awards granted
to the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2009.
2009 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under |
|
Under Equity Incentive |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Exercise or |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|
Plan Awards |
|
Shares of |
|
Securities |
|
Base Price |
|
of Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thres- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thres- |
|
|
|
|
|
Maxi- |
|
Stock or |
|
Under-lying |
|
of Option |
|
and Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
hold |
|
Target |
|
mum |
|
Units |
|
Options |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
($) |
Mark P. Mays (PEO) (a) |
|
|
2/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall T. Mays (PFO) (a) |
|
|
2/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew W. Levin (b) |
|
|
2/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John E. Hogan (c) |
|
|
2/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Lowry Mays (d) |
|
|
2/6/09 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Meyer (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
On February 6, 2009, each of Messrs. Mark P. Mays and Randall T. Mays was granted a cash
incentive award based on the achievement of a targeted EBITDA. For further discussion of their
2009 cash incentive award, see Elements of CompensationAnnual Incentive Bonus. |
|
(b) |
|
On February 6, 2009, Mr. Andrew W. Levin was granted a cash incentive award based on the
achievement of certain performance metrics. For further discussion of his 2009 cash incentive
award, see Elements of CompensationAnnual Incentive Bonus. |
|
(c) |
|
On February 6, 2009, Mr. John E. Hogan was granted a cash incentive award based on the
achievement of a targeted EBITDA and certain performance metrics. For further discussion of
his 2009 cash incentive award, see Elements of CompensationAnnual Incentive Bonus. |
|
(d) |
|
Mr. L. Lowry Mays elected to forego a cash incentive award based for 2009. For further
discussion of his 2009 cash incentive award, see Elements of CompensationAnnual
Incentive Bonus. |
|
(e) |
|
Mr. Paul J. Meyer did not receive a cash incentive award from CC Media; rather, his cash
incentive award was granted and paid by CCOH. |
32
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding equity awards of the
named executive officers at December 31, 2009.
2009 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market Value |
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
of Shares or |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of |
|
Units of |
|
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
Stock That |
|
Stock That |
|
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Options (#) |
|
Price ($) |
|
Date |
|
Vested (#) |
|
Vested ($) |
Mark P. Mays (PEO) |
|
|
2,851 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.06 |
|
|
|
2/19/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,324 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
2/19/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,298 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.31 |
|
|
|
1/12/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,554 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
1/12/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,601 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
2/16/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041,667 |
(c) |
|
|
1,041,666 |
(d) |
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
7/30/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,445 |
(e) |
|
|
1,542,080 |
|
Randall T. Mays (PFO) |
|
|
2,851 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.06 |
|
|
|
2/19/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,324 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
2/19/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,298 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.31 |
|
|
|
1/12/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,554 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
1/12/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,601 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
2/16/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,223 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
7/30/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,445 |
(e) |
|
|
1,542,080 |
|
Andrew W. Levin |
|
|
4,132 |
(g) |
|
|
16,529 |
(h) |
|
|
41,324 |
(i) |
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
7/30/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500 |
(j) |
|
|
17,050 |
|
John E. Hogan |
|
|
10,829 |
(g) |
|
|
43,319 |
(h) |
|
|
108,297 |
(i) |
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
7/30/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
(j) |
|
|
46,500 |
|
L. Lowry Mays |
|
|
8,426 |
(k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
2/19/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,270 |
(l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
1/12/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,601 |
(m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
2/16/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,840 |
(n) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
12/22/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,500 |
(j) |
|
|
82,150 |
|
Paul J. Meyer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Options became exercisable on February 19, 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Options became exercisable on July 30, 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Options representing 260,416 shares of common stock will vest and become exercisable on May
13, 2011, options representing 260,417 shares of common stock will vest and become exercisable
on May 13, 2012 and options representing 520,834 shares of common stock will vest and become
exercisable on May 13, 2013. |
|
(d) |
|
Options will vest only if certain predetermined performance and market targets are met. See
Elements of CompensationAnnual Incentive Bonus for a detailed description of the
performance and market targets. |
|
(e) |
|
Restricted stock awards representing 53,000 shares of common stock will vest in two equal
annual installments of 26,500 shares beginning on May 22, 2010 and restricted stock awards
representing 444,445 shares of common stock will vest in three equal annual installments of
111,111 shares beginning on July 30, 2010, with the final installment of 111,112 vesting on
July 30, 2013. |
|
(f) |
|
In connection with the December 2009 amendments made to Mr. Randall T. Mays employment and
option agreements, options became exercisable on December 22, 2009. |
33
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Options became exercisable on May 13, 2009. |
|
(h) |
|
Options will vest and become exercisable 25% annually beginning on May 13, 2010. |
|
(i) |
|
Options become available to vest 20% annually beginning on May 13, 2009 and will vest only if
certain predetermined performance and market targets are met. See Elements of
CompensationAnnual Incentive Bonus for a detailed description of the performance and market
targets. |
|
(j) |
|
Restricted stock awards will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on May 22,
2009. |
|
(k) |
|
Options became exercisable on February 19, 2003. |
|
(l) |
|
Options became exercisable on January 12, 2005. |
|
(m) |
|
Options became exercisable on February 16, 2005. |
|
(n) |
|
Options became exercisable on December 22, 2005. |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table sets forth certain information concerning option exercises by and stock
vesting for the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2009.
2009 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
|
|
Acquired on Exercise |
|
Exercise |
|
Acquired on Vesting |
|
Vesting |
Name |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
Mark P. Mays (PEO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,611 |
|
|
|
167,783 |
|
Randall T. Mays (PFO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,611 |
|
|
|
167,783 |
|
Andrew W. Levin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
John E. Hogan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
L. Lowry Mays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,250 |
|
|
|
17,225 |
|
Paul J. Meyer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PENSION BENEFITS
Neither CC Media nor Clear Channel have any pension plans.
NONQUALIFIED DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND OTHER NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
CC Media offers a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its highly compensated
executives, under which its named executive officers are able to make an annual election to defer
up to 50% of their annual salary and up to 80% of their bonus before taxes. Matching credits on
amounts deferred may be made in CC Medias sole discretion and CC Media retains ownership of all
assets until distributed. Participants in the plan have the opportunity to allocate their
deferrals and any CC Media matching credits among different investment options, the performance of
which is used to determine the amounts to be paid to participants under the plan.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the nonqualified deferred
compensation plans for the named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2009.
34
2009 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
Registrant |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Contributions in |
|
Contributions in |
|
Earnings (Loss) |
|
Withdrawals/ |
|
Balance at Last |
|
|
Last FY |
|
Last FY |
|
in Last FY |
|
Distributions |
|
FYE |
Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
Mark P. Mays (PEO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall T. Mays (PFO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew W. Levin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John E. Hogan |
|
|
100,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,195 |
|
L. Lowry Mays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Meyer |
|
|
43,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,972 |
|
POTENTIAL POST-EMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS
Mark P. Mays
Mr. Mark P. Mays amended employment agreement provides for the following severance and
change-in-control payments in the event that CC Media terminates his employment without Cause or
if he terminates for Good Reason.
Under the employment agreement, Cause is defined as Mr. Mark P. Mays (i) willful and
continued failure to perform his duties, following 10 days notice of the misconduct, (ii) willful
misconduct that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or otherwise, to CC Media, the
Sponsors or any of their respective affiliates, (iii) conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to,
a felony or any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude that causes material and demonstrable injury,
monetarily or otherwise, to CC Media, the Sponsors or any of their respective affiliates, (iv)
committing any act of fraud, embezzlement, or other act of dishonesty against CC Media or its
affiliates, that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or otherwise, to CC Media, the
Sponsors or any of their respective affiliates and (v) breach of any of the restrictive covenants
in the employment agreement.
The term Good Reason includes, subject to certain exceptions, (i) a reduction in Mr. Mark P.
Mays base pay or annual incentive compensation opportunity, (ii) substantial diminution of his
title, duties and responsibilities, (iii) failure to provide him with the use of a company provided
aircraft for personal travel, and (iv) transfer of his primary workplace outside the city limits of
San Antonio, Texas. Neither an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action taken in good faith
and which is remedied by CC Media within 10 days after receipt of notice thereof given by Mr. Mark
P. Mays will constitute, nor the consummation of the Merger alone constituted, Good Reason.
If Mr. Mark P. Mays is terminated by CC Media without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason,
then he will receive (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to his accrued but unpaid base salary
through the date of termination, a prorated bonus (determined by reference to the bonus he would
have earned had he remained employed for the full year in which the termination occurs) and accrued
vacation pay through the date of termination, and (ii) provided he executes a release of claims, a
lump-sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of his base salary and bonus (using the bonus
paid to him for the year prior to the year in which termination occurs). For purposes of Mr. Mark
P. Mays amended employment agreement, if he is terminated by CC Media without Cause or he resigns
for Good Reason, base salary will be equal to no less than $1,000,000.
In addition, in the event that Mr. Mark P. Mays employment is terminated by CC Media without
Cause or by him for Good Reason, and provided that he executes a release of claims, CC Media must
maintain in full force and effect, for the continued benefit of him, his spouse and his dependents
for a period of three years following the date of termination, the medical, hospitalization, dental
and life insurance programs in which he, his spouse and his dependents were participating
immediately prior to the date of termination, at the level in effect and upon substantially the
same terms and conditions (including, without limitation, contributions required by him for such
benefits) as existed immediately prior to the date of termination. However, if he, his spouse, or
his dependents cannot continue to participate in our programs providing such benefits, CC Media
must arrange to provide him, his spouse and his dependents with the economic equivalent of such
benefits which they otherwise would have been entitled to receive under such plans and programs.
The aggregate value of these continued benefits are capped at $50,000, even if the cap is reached prior to the end of the three-year period. CC Media is
also obligated to pay to
35
him a tax gross-up payment to cover any taxes, interest or penalties
imposed by Section 4999 of the Code in connection with the Merger.
Furthermore, pursuant to an agreement entered into by CC Media, CC IV, CC V and Mr. Mark P.
Mays, in the event that Mr. Mark P. Mays employment is terminated by CC Media without Cause or by
him for Good Reason, Mr. Mark P. Mays is entitled to require CC Media to purchase all or a portion
of the restricted stock granted to him in connection with the closing of the Merger at a price
equal to $36.00 per share. For a description of the restricted stock received by Mr. Mark P. Mays
at the closing of the Merger, see 2008 Incentive Plan.
If Mr. Mark P. Mays employment is terminated by CC Media for Cause or by him other than for
Good Reason, (i) CC Media will pay to him his base salary, bonus and his accrued vacation pay
through the date of termination, as soon as practicable following the date of termination, (ii) CC
Media will reimburse him for reasonable expenses incurred, but not paid prior to such termination
of employment, and (iii) he will be entitled to any other rights, compensation and/or benefits as
may be due to him in accordance with the terms and provisions of any of CC Medias agreements,
plans, or programs.
During any period in which he fails to perform his duties under his employment agreement as a
result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness, Mr. Mark P. Mays will continue to receive
his full base salary until his employment is terminated. If, as a result of his incapacity due to
physical or mental illness, he has been substantially unable to perform his duties under his
employment agreement for an entire period of six consecutive months, and within 30 days after
written notice of termination is given after such six-month period, he has not returned to the
substantial performance of his duties on a full-time basis, CC Media will have the right to
terminate his employment for disability. In the event his employment is terminated for disability,
CC Media will pay to him his base salary, bonus and accrued vacation pay through the date of
termination. If his employment is terminated by his death, CC Media will pay in a lump sum to his
beneficiary, legal representatives, or estate, as the case may be, his base salary, bonus and
accrued vacation pay through the date of his death.
Pursuant to the Corporate Services Agreement, a percentage of potential payments owed to Mr.
Mark P. Mays upon termination or change in control, other than payments regarding the vesting of
equity awards, would be reimbursable by CCOH. This allocation is based on CCOHs OIBDAN as a
percentage of Clear Channel Communication, Inc.s OIBDAN. Accordingly, for 2009, 41% of any
payments to Mr. Mark P. Mays upon termination or change in control, other than payments regarding
the vesting of equity awards, would have been allocated to CCOH. For a further discussion of the
Corporate Services Agreement, please refer to Corporate Services Agreement.
Randall T. Mays
Mr. Randall T. Mays amended employment agreement provides for the following severance and
change-in-control payments in the event that CC Media terminates his employment without Cause or
if he terminates for Good Reason.
Under the employment agreement, Cause is defined as Mr. Randall T. Mays (i) conviction of,
or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or
otherwise, to CC Media, (ii) committing any act of fraud, embezzlement, or other act of dishonesty
against CC Media or its affiliates, that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or
otherwise, to CC Media and (iii) breach of any of the restrictive covenants in the employment
agreement.
The term Good Reason includes, subject to certain exceptions, (i) a reduction in Mr. Randall
T. Mays base pay, (ii) failure to provide him with the use of a company provided aircraft for
personal travel, (iii) transfer of his primary workplace outside the city limits of San Antonio,
Texas and (iv) Mr. Mark P. Mays ceasing to serve as Chief Executive Officer of CC Media. Neither an
isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action taken in good faith and which is remedied by CC
Media within 10 days after receipt of notice thereof given by Mr. Randall T. Mays will constitute,
nor the consummation of the Merger alone constituted, Good Reason.
If Mr. Randall T. Mays is terminated by CC Media without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason,
then he will receive (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to his accrued but unpaid base salary
through the date of termination and accrued vacation pay through the date of termination and (ii)
continued payment of his base salary through July
36
31, 2013. For purposes of Mr. Randall T. Mays amended employment agreement, if he is
terminated by CC Media without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason, base salary will be equal to no
less than $1,000,000.
In addition, in the event that Mr. Randall T. Mays employment is terminated by CC Media
without Cause or by him for Good Reason, CC Media must maintain in full force and effect, for the
continued benefit of him, his spouse and his dependents through July 31, 2013, the medical,
hospitalization, dental and life insurance programs in which he, his spouse and his dependents were
participating immediately prior to the date of termination, at the level in effect and upon
substantially the same terms and conditions (including, without limitation, contributions required
by him for such benefits) as existed immediately prior to the date of termination. However, if he,
his spouse, or his dependents cannot continue to participate in our programs providing such
benefits, CC Media must arrange to provide him, his spouse and his dependents with the economic
equivalent of such benefits which they otherwise would have been entitled to receive under such
plans and programs. The aggregate value of these continued benefits are capped at $50,000, even if
the cap is reached prior to the end of the benefits continuation period. CC Media is also
obligated to pay to him a tax gross-up payment to cover any taxes, interest or penalties imposed by
Section 4999 of the Code in connection with the Merger.
If Mr. Randall T. Mays employment is terminated by CC Media for Cause or by him other than
for Good Reason, (i) CC Media will pay to him his base salary, bonus and his accrued vacation pay
through the date of termination, as soon as practicable following the date of termination, (ii) CC
Media will reimburse him for reasonable expenses incurred, but not paid prior to such termination
of employment, and (iii) he will be entitled to any other rights, compensation and/or benefits as
may be due to him in accordance with the terms and provisions of any of CC Medias agreements,
plans, or programs.
During any period in which Mr. Randall T. Mays fails to perform his duties under his
employment agreement as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness, he will continue
to receive his full base salary until his employment is terminated. If, as a result of his
incapacity due to physical or mental illness, he has been substantially unable to perform his
duties under his employment agreement for an entire period of six consecutive months, and within 30
days after written notice of termination is given after such six-month period, he has not returned
to the substantial performance of his duties on a full-time basis, CC Media will have the right to
terminate his employment for disability. In the event his employment is terminated for disability,
CC Media will pay to him his base salary, bonus and accrued vacation pay through the date of
termination. If his employment is terminated by his death, CC Media will pay in a lump sum to his
beneficiary, legal representatives, or estate, as the case may be, his unpaid base salary, bonus
and accrued vacation pay through the date of his death.
Pursuant to the Corporate Services Agreement, a percentage of potential payments owed to Mr.
Randall T. Mays upon termination or change in control, other than payments regarding the vesting of
equity awards, would be reimbursable by CCOH. This allocation is based on CCOHs OIBDAN as a
percentage of Clear Channel Communication, Inc.s OIBDAN. Accordingly, for 2009, 41% of any
payments to Mr. Randall T. Mays upon termination or change in control other than payments regarding
the vesting of equity awards, would have been allocated to CCOH. For a further discussion of the
Corporate Services Agreement, please refer to Corporate Services Agreement.
L. Lowry Mays
The new employment agreement for Mr. L. Lowry Mays, which was effective upon consummation of
the Merger, provides for the following severance and change-in-control payments in the event that
CC Media terminates his employment without Extraordinary Cause.
Under Mr. L. Lowry Mays agreement, CC Media may terminate Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment only
for Extraordinary Cause during the initial five-year term of his agreement. Subsequent to the
initial five year term, CC Media may terminate his employment with or without Extraordinary Cause.
Extraordinary Cause is defined as his (i) willful misconduct that causes material and
demonstrable injury to CC Media and (ii) conviction of a felony or other crime involving moral
turpitude.
If Mr. L. Lowry Mays is terminated by CC Media without Extraordinary Cause then he will
receive (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to his accrued but unpaid base salary through the date of
termination, a prorated bonus (determined by reference to the bonus he would have earned had he
remained employed for the full year in
37
which the termination occurs) and accrued vacation pay through the date of termination, and
(ii) provided he executes a release of claims, a lump-sum cash payment equal to the base salary and
bonus to which he would otherwise have been entitled to had he remained employed for the remainder
of the then current term.
In addition, if Mr. L. Lowry Mays is terminated by CC Media without Extraordinary Cause, and
provided he executes a release of claims, CC Media must maintain in full force and effect, for the
continued benefit of him, his spouse and his dependents for a period of five years following the
date of termination, the medical and hospitalization insurance programs in which Mr. L. Lowry Mays,
his spouse and his dependents were participating immediately prior to the date of termination, at
the level in effect and upon substantially the same terms and conditions (including, without
limitation, contributions required by him for such benefits) as existed immediately prior to the
date of termination. However, if Mr. L. Lowry Mays, his spouse, or his dependents cannot continue
to participate in CC Medias programs providing such benefits, CC Media must arrange to provide
him, his spouse and his dependents with the economic equivalent of such benefits which they
otherwise would have been entitled to receive under such plans and programs. CC Media also must
make an additional cash payment to Mr. L. Lowry Mays in an amount equal to the federal, state and
local taxes due in connection with these continued benefits (a gross-up payment). The aggregate
value of these continued benefits and gross-up payments are capped at $3,000,000, even if the cap
is reached prior to the end of the five-year period.
If Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment is terminated by CC Media for Extraordinary Cause, by him for
any reason, or due to death or disability (i) CC Media will pay him his base salary, bonus and his
accrued vacation pay through the date of termination, as soon as practicable following the date of
termination and (ii) CC Media will reimburse him for reasonable expenses incurred, but not paid
prior to such termination of employment.
At any time following the initial five-year term of his agreement, during any period in which
Mr. L. Lowry Mays fails to perform his duties under his employment agreement as a result of
incapacity due to physical or mental illness, he will continue to receive his full base salary
until his employment is terminated. If, as a result of his incapacity due to physical or mental
illness, Mr. L. Lowry Mays has been substantially unable to perform his duties under the employment
agreement for an entire period of six consecutive months, and within 30 days after written notice
of termination is given after such six-month period, he has not returned to the substantial
performance of his duties on a full-time basis, CC Media will have the right to terminate his
employment for disability. In the event Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment is terminated for disability,
CC Media will pay to him his base salary, bonus and accrued vacation pay through the date of
termination. If Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment is terminated by his death, CC Media will pay in a
lump sum to his beneficiary, legal representatives, or estate, as the case may be, his base salary,
bonus and accrued vacation pay through the date of his death.
Andrew W. Levin
In July 2009, CC Media accepted the resignation of Mr. Andrew W. Levin as Executive Vice
President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the Company effective January 8, 2010. In order to
induce Mr. Andrew W. Levin to remain in these positions through January 8, 2010, the CC Media
entered into an employment separation agreement pursuant to which Mr. Andrew W. Levin received (i)
a cash bonus of $989,250 payable in installments; and (ii) a performance bonus under the 2008
Annual Incentive Plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Mr. Andrew W. Levin also
released CC Media and its affiliates from all potential claims, and agreed to employee
non-solicitation covenants until May 31, 2011. Pursuant to the separation agreement and an
amendment thereto, Mr. Andrew W. Levin also agreed to provide consulting services to the CC Media
(i) for the period commencing on April 9, 2010 and continuing until October 8, 2010, on an
as-needed basis at a rate of $5,000 per month, and (ii) for the period commencing on October 9,
2010 and continuing until May 31, 2011, on an as-needed basis at a rate of $200 per hour for hours
worked in excess of five hours per week.
John E. Hogan
If Mr. John E. Hogans employment is terminated by CCB for Cause, CCB will, within 45 days,
pay in a lump sum to Mr. John E. Hogan his accrued and unpaid base salary and any payments to which
he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan (according to the terms of such plans
and policies). A termination for Cause must be for one or more of the following reasons: (i)
conduct by Mr. John E. Hogan constituting a material act of willful misconduct in connection with
the performance of his duties, including violation of CCBs policy on sexual harassment,
misappropriation of funds or property of CCB, or other willful misconduct as determined in the
38
sole reasonable discretion of CCB, (ii) continued, willful and deliberate non-performance by
Mr. John E. Hogan of his duties under his employment agreement (other than by reason of Mr. John E.
Hogans physical or mental illness, incapacity, or disability) where such non-performance has
continued for more than 10 days following written notice of such non-performance, (iii) Mr. John E.
Hogans refusal or failure to follow lawful directives where such refusal or failure has continued
for more than 30 days following written notice of such refusal or failure, (iv) a criminal or civil
conviction of Mr. John E. Hogan, a plea of nolo contendere by Mr. John E. Hogan, or other conduct
by Mr. John E. Hogan that, as determined in the sole reasonable discretion of the Board of
Directors of CCB, has resulted in, or would result in if he were retained in his position with CCB,
material injury to the reputation of CCB, including conviction of fraud, theft, embezzlement, or a
crime involving moral turpitude, (v) a material breach by Mr. John E. Hogan of any of the
provisions of his employment agreement, or (vi) a material violation by Mr. John E. Hogan of CCBs
employment policies.
If Mr. John E. Hogans employment with CCB is terminated by CCB without Cause, by CCB giving
notice of non-renewal or by Mr. John E. Hogan for Good Cause, CCB will, within 45 days, pay Mr.
John E. Hogan his accrued and unpaid base salary, any payments to which he may be entitled under
any applicable employee benefit plan (according to the terms of such plans and policies) and a
pro-rata bonus equal to the actual bonus Mr. John E. Hogan would have received if he had remained
employed for the full year in which the termination occurs. In addition, if Mr. John E. Hogan signs
a severance agreement and general release of claims, CCB will pay Mr. John E. Hogan, in periodic
payments twice per month over a period of three years, in accordance with ordinary payroll
practices, an amount equal to three times the average of his annualized base salary for the current
and prior full year of employment. The term Good Cause includes: (i) a repeated willful failure
of CCB to comply with a material term of the employment agreement, (ii) a substantial and unusual
change in Mr. John E. Hogans position, material duties, responsibilities or authority without an
offer of additional reasonable compensation, or (iii) a substantial and unusual reduction in Mr.
John E. Hogans material duties, responsibility or authority. Mr. John E. Hogans termination of
employment will be treated as being terminated by him for Good Cause if he terminates employment in
the event that he no longer reports directly to Mr. L. Lowry Mays, Mr. Mark P. Mays or Mr. Randall
T. Mays.
If Mr. John E. Hogan gives notice of non-renewal of his employment term on or before April 1,
2013 or on each April 1 thereafter, Mr. John E. Hogans employment with CCB will end on a date to
be determined by CCB and CCB will (i) pay, within 45 days, Mr. John E. Hogan his accrued and unpaid
base salary and any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan
(according to the terms of such plans and policies) and (ii) if Mr. John E. Hogan signs a severance
agreement and general release of claims, pay Mr. John E. Hogan his then current base salary for one
year, payable in periodic payments twice per month over a period of one year during Mr. John E.
Hogans one year noncompete obligations, in accordance with ordinary payroll practices.
If Mr. John E. Hogans employment with CCB terminates by reason of his death, CCB will, within
45 days, pay in a lump sum to such person as Mr. John E. Hogan designates in a notice filed with
CCB or, if no such person is designated, to Mr. John E. Hogans estate, Mr. John E. Hogans accrued
and unpaid base salary and prorated bonus, if any, and any payments to which Mr. John E. Hogans
spouse, beneficiaries, or estate may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan
(according to the terms of such plans and policies). If Mr. John E. Hogans employment with CCB
terminates by reason of his disability (defined as Mr. John E. Hogans incapacity due to physical
or mental illness such that Mr. John E. Hogan is unable to perform his duties under his employment
agreement on a full-time basis for more than 90 days in any 12-month period, as determined by CCB),
CCB will, within 45 days, pay in a lump sum to Mr. John E. Hogan his accrued and unpaid base salary
and prorated bonus, if any, and any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable
employee benefit plan (according to the terms of such plans and policies).
Paul J. Meyer
In December 2009, Mr. Paul J. Meyer entered into a new employment agreement with Clear
Channel. Under the new agreement, Mr. Paul J. Meyer memorialized his intent to retire from his
positions as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Outdoor Americas division of CC Media
effective as of December 31, 2009. Pursuant to the new employment agreement, Mr. Paul J. Meyer
remained compensated at his 2009 annual base salary of $675,000 through December 31, 2009 and, in
connection with his retirement from CC Media, received bonus payments totaling $1,500,000
($1,000,000 to be paid on January 10, 2010 and $500,000 to be paid on January 10, 2011), all of
which will be paid by CCOH. Therefore no bonus payments are reflected for Mr. Paul J. Meyer in the
39
tabular summary of potential post-employment payments due from CC Media below.
Additionally, the expiration date of Mr. Paul J. Meyers 365,000 options dated November 11, 2005 at
the price of $18 per share was extended two years through November 10, 2014.
The following is a summary of potential post-employment payments due to each of the named
executive officers pursuant to each of the circumstances described below.
2009 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
Termination |
|
Termination |
|
|
|
Retirement |
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
with |
|
without |
|
due to |
|
Termination |
|
or |
|
Control of |
|
Name |
|
Benefit |
|
Cause |
|
Cause |
|
Disability |
|
due to Death |
|
Resignation |
|
Company |
|
Mark P. Mays
(b) |
|
Cash payment |
|
|
|
9,735,000 |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Benefits (d) |
|
|
|
18,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
164,300 |
(f) |
164,300 |
(e) |
|
|
1,542,076 |
(e) |
|
|
Repurchase of Restricted stock |
|
|
|
11,800,009 |
|
11,800,009 |
|
11,800,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (g) |
|
|
|
8,191,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
29,744,700 |
|
11,964,309 |
|
11,964,309 |
|
|
|
1,542,076 |
|
Randall T.
Mays
(b) |
|
Cash payment |
|
|
|
2,114,165 |
(m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Benefits (d) |
|
|
|
25,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
164,300 |
(f) |
164,300 |
(e) |
|
|
1,542,076 |
(e) |
|
|
Repurchase of Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
2,139,872 |
|
164,300 |
|
164,300 |
|
|
|
1,542,076 |
|
Andrew W.
Levin |
|
Cash payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989,250 |
|
|
|
John E. Hogan |
|
Cash payment |
|
|
|
2,321,875 |
(l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
46,500 |
(f) |
46,500 |
(e) |
|
|
46,500 |
(e) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
2,321,875 |
|
46,500 |
|
46,500 |
|
|
|
46,500 |
|
L. Lowry Mays
(h) |
|
Cash payment |
|
|
|
4,479,166 |
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Benefits |
|
|
|
25,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
82,150 |
(f) |
82,150 |
(e) |
82,150 |
(j) |
82,150 |
(e) |
|
|
Other (k) |
|
|
|
15,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
4,520,248 |
|
82,150 |
|
82,150 |
|
82,150 |
|
82,150 |
|
Paul J. Meyer |
|
Cash payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts reflected in the table were calculated assuming a December 31, 2009 termination date,
which was the last business day of the 2009 fiscal year. Each named executive officer is
entitled to receive amounts earned during the term of his employment regardless of the manner
in which he is terminated, including termination for Cause. These amounts include base
salary, unused vacation pay and other benefits entitled to under applicable employee benefit
plans, and are not reflected in the above table. The table reflects only the additional
compensation and benefits (collectively, Additional Compensation) the named executive
officers are estimated to receive upon termination or a change in control of CC Media. The
actual amounts to be paid to a named executive officer can only be determined at the time of
his actual termination. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts reflected in the table represent CC Medias portion of post-employment payments.
Pursuant to the Corporate Services Agreement, a percentage of payments made to Mr. Mark P.
Mays and Mr. Randall T. Mays upon termination or change in control, other than Vesting of
Equity Awards payments, would be reimbursable by CCOH. For 2009, this allocation is based on
CCOHs 2008 OIBDAN as a percentage of Clear Channel Communication, Inc.s 2008 OIBDAN.
Accordingly, 41% of any payments to Mr. Mark P. Mays or Randall T. Mays upon termination or
change in control in 2009, other than Vesting of Equity Awards payments, would have been
allocated to CCOH. For a further discussion of the Corporate Services Agreement, please refer
to Corporate Services Agreement. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents three times the sum of the annual base salary for the year ended December 31, 2009
and the annual incentive bonus for the year ended December 31, 2008 for Mr. Mark P. Mays. |
|
(d) |
|
The values associated with the continued provision of health benefits are based on the total
2010 premiums for medical and life insurance multiplied the number of years the executive is
entitled to those benefits pursuant to his employment agreement. |
|
(e) |
|
Amount reflects the value of unvested equity awards held by the respective named executive
officer on December 31, 2009 that would be subject to accelerated vesting. This value is
based upon the closing sale price of CC Medias common stock on December 31, 2009 of $3.10,
but it excludes stock options where the exercise price exceeds the closing sale price of CC
Medias common stock on December 31, 2009. |
|
(f) |
|
Amount reflects the value of unvested equity awards held by the respective named executive
officer on December 31, 2009 that generally continue to vest upon Disability in accordance
with their original vesting schedule. This value is based upon the closing sale price of CC
Medias common stock on December 31, 2009 of $3.10, but it excludes stock options where the
exercise price exceeds the closing sale price of CC Medias common stock on December 31, 2009. |
|
(g) |
|
Represents the excise tax gross up payment due to Mr. Mark P. Mays under the terms of his
employment agreement related to the Merger. If Mr. Mark P. Mays were terminated by the
Company without Cause on December 31, 2009, portions of the benefits he would receive in
connection with the termination along with benefits he received at the time of the Merger may
constitute excess parachute payments under Section 280G. |
|
(h) |
|
Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. L. Lowry Mays employment may be terminated
by CC Media only for Extraordinary Cause during the initial five-year term of his agreement.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. L. Lowry Mays is entitled to use of company-owned
aircraft for personal travel, in accordance with Clear Channels policy as in effect on
November 16, 2006, for ten years from the date of the closing of the Merger, regardless of
whether he remains employed by CC Media. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, the cost for Mr. L. Lowry
Mays personal travel on company-owned aircraft was $122,283, $105,204 and $92,980,
respectively. The cost for Mr. L. Lowry Mays personal use of company-owned aircraft for this
period will fluctuate over time. |
|
(i) |
|
Represents the remaining annual base salary and minimum annual bonus due to Mr. L. Lowry Mays
under the terms of his employment agreement, namely, three years and seven months of Mr. L.
Lowry Mays annual base salary and annual bonus. |
|
(j) |
|
Amount reflects the value of unvested equity awards held by Mr. L. Lowry Mays on December 31,
2009 that would generally continue to vest upon Retirement in accordance with their original
vesting schedule. This value is based upon the closing sale price of CC Medias common stock
on December 31, 2009 of $3.10. |
|
(k) |
|
Represents the income tax gross up payment due to Mr. L. Lowry Mays under the terms of his
employment agreement. |
|
(l) |
|
Represents three times the average of the annual base salary for the years ended December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2009 for Mr. John E. Hogan. The bonus portion of Mr. John E. Hogans
cash severance cannot be estimated as his annual incentive bonus is determined and awarded
based upon his performance at the end of each year. |
|
(m) |
|
Represents the remaining annual base salary due to Mr. Randall T. Mays under the terms of his
employment agreement, namely, three years and seven months of Mr. Randall T. Mays annual base
salary. |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The directors of CC Media currently do not receive compensation for their services.
RELATIONSHIP OF COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMS TO RISK MANAGEMENT
In consultation with the Compensation Committee, management conducted an assessment of whether
the Companys compensation policies and practices encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking
by our employees,
41
including employees other than our named executive officers. This assessment
included discussions with members
of the corporate Human Resources, Legal, Finance, Internal Audit departments, as well as
personnel in the business units, and a review of corporate and operational compensation
arrangements. The assessment analyzed the risk characteristics of our business and the design and
structure of our incentive plans and policies. Although a significant portion of our executive
compensation program is performance-based, the Compensation Committee has focused on aligning the
Companys compensation policies with the long- term interests of the Company and avoiding rewards
or incentive structures that could create unnecessary risks to the Company.
Management reported its findings to the Compensation Committee, which agreed with managements
assessment that our plans and policies do not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking and
determined such policies or practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect
on the Company.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires CC Medias directors, executive
officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of equity securities of CC Media to
file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and
greater than 10% stockholders are required to furnish CC Media with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file.
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us during, and
Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to, the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, and any written representations from reporting persons that no Form 5 is required, we have
determined that all such Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied during fiscal year 2009,
except for late filings of the Form 5 for each of David C. Abrams and Abrams Capital LLC.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS
AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
None of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2009 or as of the date of
this proxy statement is or has been an officer or employee of CC Media.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Merger and the Management Agreement
In connection with the Merger, we became party to a management agreement with the Sponsors,
Clear Channel and certain other parties thereto, pursuant to which the Sponsors will provide
management and financial advisory services to CC Media and its wholly-owned subsidiaries until
2018, at a rate not greater than $15.0 million per year. Pursuant to the management agreement, we
paid the Sponsors $15.0 million in 2009.
Stockholders Agreements
Prior to the consummation of the Merger, Merger Sub entered into a stockholders agreement with
CC Media, CC IV, CC V, Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays. The stockholders agreement,
among other things, (i) specifies how the parties vote in elections to the Board, (ii) restricts
the transfer of shares subject to the agreement, (iii) includes the ability of CC IV to compel the
parties to sell their shares in a change-of-control transaction or participate in a
recapitalization of CC Media, (iv) gives the parties the right to subscribe for their pro rata
share of proposed future issuances of equity securities by CC Media or its subsidiaries to the
Sponsors or their affiliates, (v) requires the parties to agree to customary lock-up agreements in
connection with underwritten public offerings and (vi) provides the parties with customary demand
and piggy-back registration rights. CC Media, CC
42
IV and CC V also entered into a separate
agreement with Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays that set forth terms and conditions
under which certain of their shares of CC Media common stock would be repurchased
by CC Media following the termination of their employment (through the exercise of a call
option by CC Media or a put option by Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays and L. Lowry Mays, as
applicable). Any shares of CC Media common stock that Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays, L. Lowry Mays
or their estate-planning entities acquired pursuant to stock elections are not subject to the
stockholders agreement.
Affiliate Transaction Agreement
As contemplated by the Voting Agreement entered into with the Highfields Funds and Highfields
Capital Management, the Sponsors, Merger Sub (which obligation has been assumed by Clear Channel)
and CC Media entered into an agreement under which CC Media agreed that neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries will enter into or effect any affiliate transaction between CC Media or one of its
subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any Sponsor or any other private investment fund under common
control with either Sponsor (collectively, the principal investors), on the other hand, without
the prior approval of either a majority of the independent directors of CC Media or a majority of
the then-outstanding shares of Class A common stock of CC Media (excluding for purposes of such
calculation from both (i) the votes cast and (ii) the outstanding shares of Class A common stock,
all shares held at that time by any principal investor, any affiliate of a principal investor, or
members of management and directors of CC Media whose beneficial ownership information is required
to be disclosed in filings with the SEC pursuant to Item 403 of Regulation S-K (the public
shares)). Such agreement became effective as of the effective time of the merger and expires upon
the earlier of (i) an underwritten public offering and sale of CC Medias common stock which
results in aggregate proceeds in excess of $250 million to CC Media and after which CC Medias
common stock is listed on NASDAQs National Market System or another national securities exchange
(a qualified public offering) and (ii) the consummation of a certain transaction resulting in a
change of control (as defined in the agreement and summarized below) of CC Media. The following are
not deemed to be affiliate transactions for purposes of the affiliate transaction agreement: (i)
any commercial transaction between CC Media or any of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any
portfolio company in which any principal investor or any affiliate of a principal investor has a
direct or indirect equity interest, on the other, so long as such transaction was entered into on
an arms-length basis; (ii) any purchase of bank debt or securities by a principal investor or an
affiliate of a principal investor or any transaction between a principal investor or affiliate of a
principal investor on the one hand, and CC Media or one of its subsidiaries, on the other hand,
related to the ownership of bank debt or securities, provided such purchase or transaction is on
terms (except with respect to relief from all or part of any underwriting or placement fee
applicable thereto) comparable to those consummated within an offering made to unaffiliated third
parties; (iii) the payment by CC Media or one of its subsidiaries of up to $87.5 million in
transaction fees to the principal investors or their affiliates in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; (iv) any payment of management, transaction, monitoring, or
any other fees to the principal investors or their affiliates pursuant to an arrangement or
structure whereby the holders of public shares of CC Media are made whole for the portion of such
fees paid by CC Media that would otherwise be proportionate to their share holdings; and (v) any
transaction to which a principal investor or an affiliate thereof is a party in its capacity as a
stockholder of CC Media that is offered generally to other stockholders of CC Media (including the
holders of shares of Class A common stock) on comparable or more favorable terms.
A change of control of CC Media will be deemed to have occurred upon the occurrence of any of
the following: (i) any consolidation or merger of CC Media with or into any other corporation or
other entity, or any other corporate reorganization or transaction (including the acquisition of
stock of CC Media), in which the direct and indirect stockholders of CC Media immediately prior to
such consolidation, merger, reorganization, or transaction, own stock either representing less than
50% of the economic interests in and less than 50% of the voting power of CC Media or other
surviving entity immediately after such consolidation, merger, reorganization, or transaction or
that does not have, through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise, the
power to elect a majority of the entire Board or other surviving entity immediately after such
consolidation, merger, reorganization, or transaction, excluding any bona fide primary or secondary
public offering; (ii) any stock sale or other transaction or series of related transactions, after
giving effect to which in excess of 50% of CC Medias voting power is owned by any person or entity
and its affiliates or associates (as such terms are defined in the rules adopted by the SEC
under the Securities Exchange Act), other than the principal investors and their respective
affiliates, excluding any bona fide primary or secondary public offering; or (iii) a sale, lease,
or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of CC Media.
43
The agreement described above terminates upon the earlier of a qualified public offering and
the consummation of a change of control (as defined therein). Other than as described in the prior
sentence, such
agreement may not be terminated, amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified without the
prior written approval of either (i) a majority of the independent directors of CC Media elected by
the holders of Class A common stock of CC Media or (ii) a majority of the then-outstanding public
shares.
Policy on Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
CC Media has not adopted any formal policies or procedures for the review, approval, or
ratification of certain related party transactions that may be required to be reported under the
SEC disclosure rules. Such transactions, if and when they are proposed or have occurred, will be
reviewed by the Board (other than the directors involved, if any) on a case-by-case basis. The
Board may consider any relevant factors when reviewing the appropriateness of a related party
transaction, including (i) the importance of the transaction to CC Media, (ii) the amount involved
in the proposed transaction, (iii) the specific interest of the director or executive officer (or
immediate family members of same) in the proposed transaction, and (iv) the overall fairness of the
terms of the transaction to CC Media.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The following Report of the Audit Committee concerns the Committees activities regarding
oversight of CC Media Holdings, Inc.s financial reporting and auditing process and does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any
other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent CC Media Holdings specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.
The Audit Committee is comprised three directors, of which at least two members satisfy the
independence requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and it operates under a written
charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter reflects standards set forth in SEC
regulations. The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and the
responsibilities of the Committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance
with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The Committee reviews and assesses
the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis. The full text of the Audit Committees charter can
be found on CC Media Holdings Internet website at www.ccmediaholdings.com. A copy may also be
obtained upon request from the Secretary of CC Media Holdings.
As set forth in more detail in the charter, the Audit Committees purpose is to assist the
Board of Directors in its general oversight of CC Media Holdings financial reporting, internal
control and audit functions. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and
integrity of CC Media Holdings financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles
and internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards,
applicable laws and regulations. Ernst & Young LLP, CC Media Holdings independent auditing firm,
is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting in accordance with auditing standards established by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and for issuing reports thereon.
The Audit Committee members are not professional accountants or auditors, and their functions
are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent
auditor, nor can the Committee certify that the independent auditor is independent under
applicable rules. The Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice,
counsel and direction to management and the auditors on the basis of the information it receives,
discussions with management and the auditors and the experience of the Committees members in
business, financial and accounting matters.
Among other matters, the Audit Committee monitors the activities and performance of CC Media
Holdings internal and external auditors, including the audit scope, external audit fees, auditor
independence matters and the extent to which the independent auditor may be retained to perform
non-audit services. The Audit Committee has ultimate authority and responsibility to select,
evaluate and, when appropriate, replace CC Media
44
Holdings independent auditor. The Audit
Committee also reviews the results of the internal and external audit work with regard to the
adequacy and appropriateness of CC Media Holdings financial, accounting and internal controls.
Management and independent auditor presentations to and discussions with the Audit Committee also
cover various topics and events that may have significant financial impact or are the subject
of discussions between management and the independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee
generally oversees CC Media Holdings internal compliance programs.
The Committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year
it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate to each of the matters assigned to
it under the Committees charter.
During the course of 2009, management completed the documentation, testing and evaluation of
CC Media Holdings internal control over financial reporting in response to the requirements set
forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations. The Audit Committee
was kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation and provided oversight and advice to management
during the process. In connection with this oversight, the Audit Committee received periodic
updates provided by management and Ernst & Young LLP at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee
meeting. At the conclusion of the process, management provided the Audit Committee with a report on
the effectiveness of CC Media Holdings internal control over financial reporting. The Audit
Committee also reviewed the report of management contained in CC Media Holdings Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC, as well as Ernst & Young LLPs
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in CC Media Holdings Annual
Report on Form 10-K related to its audit of (i) the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule, (ii) managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and (iii) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
In overseeing the preparation of CC Media Holdings financial statements, the Committee met
with both management and CC Media Holdings outside auditors to review and discuss all financial
statements prior to their issuance and to discuss significant accounting issues. Management advised
the Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Committees review included discussion with the outside auditors of
matters required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication
With Audit Committees).
With respect to CC Media Holdings outside auditors, the Committee, among other things,
discussed with Ernst & Young LLP matters relating to its independence, including its letter and the
written disclosures made to the Committee as required by the Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees).
Finally, the Committee continued to monitor the scope and adequacy of CC Media Holdings
internal auditing program, including proposals for adequate staffing and to strengthen internal
procedures and controls where appropriate.
On the basis of these reviews and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of
Directors that the Board approve the inclusion of CC Media Holdings audited financial statements
in CC Media Holdings Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
David Abrams, Chairman
Richard Bressler and
Blair Hendrix
45
AUDITOR FEES
Ernst & Young LLP billed CC Media the following fees for services provided during the
year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (including pre-merger fees related to Clear Channel
Communications, Inc.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Paid During Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Audit fees (a) |
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
7,791 |
|
Audit-related fees (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
Tax fees (c) |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
All other fees (d) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees for services |
|
$ |
7,640 |
|
|
$ |
8,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Annual audit fees are for professional services rendered for the audit of annual financial
statements and reviews of quarterly financial statements. This category also includes fees for
statutory audits required domestically and internationally, comfort letters, consents,
assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC, attest services, work done by tax
professionals in connection with the audit or quarterly reviews, and accounting consultations
and research work necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards. |
|
(b) |
|
Audit-related fees are for assurance and related services not reported under annual audit
fees that reasonably relate to the performance of the audit or review of our financial
statements, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, internal control
reviews and attest services not required by statute or regulations. |
|
(c) |
|
Tax fees are for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning, except those provided in connection with the audit or quarterly reviews. Of the
$937,733 in tax fees for 2009, $348,444 was related to tax compliance services. Of the
$952,315 in tax fees for 2008, $58,056 was related to tax compliance services. |
|
(d) |
|
All other fees are the fees for products and services other than those in the above three
categories. This category includes permitted corporate finance services and certain advisory
services. |
CC Medias Audit Committee has considered whether Ernst & Young LLPs provision of
non-audit services to CC Media is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLPs independence.
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services (including the
fees and terms thereof) to be performed for CC Media by its independent auditor. The chairperson
of the Audit Committee may represent the entire Audit Committee for the purposes of pre-approving
permissible non-audit services, provided that the decision to pre-approve any service is disclosed
to the Audit Committee no later than its next scheduled meeting.
Representatives of the firm of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the annual
meeting of stockholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will
be available to respond to appropriate questions.
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Subject to ratification by the stockholders, the Audit Committee has reappointed Ernst &
Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the financial statements of
CC Media for the year ending December 31, 2010.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting of
stockholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be
available to respond to appropriate questions. The Audit Committee may terminate the appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditor without stockholder approval whenever the Audit
Committee deems termination necessary or appropriate.
46
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of CC Medias outstanding shares of common
stock present or represented by proxy who are entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to
approve the proposal for the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm. Votes
withheld and abstentions will have the same effect as votes against this matter. Unless
indicated to the contrary, the enclosed proxy will be voted for the proposal.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2011 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials for
the annual meeting of stockholders in 2011 may do so by following the procedures prescribed in SEC
Rule 14a-8. To be eligible for inclusion, stockholder proposals must be received by the Secretary
of CC Media no later than December 27, 2010. Proposals should be sent to: Secretary, CC Media
Holdings, Inc., 200 East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas 78209.
ADVANCE NOTICE PROCEDURES
Under our Bylaws, stockholders may not present a proposal for consideration at any
stockholders meeting unless the Secretary of CC Media receives such proposal not less than 90 days
and not more than 120 days prior to the meeting. These requirements are separate from and in
addition to the SECs requirements that a stockholder must meet in order to have a stockholder
proposal included in CC Medias proxy statement.
OTHER MATTERS
Neither CC Media management nor the Board knows of any other business to be brought
before the annual meeting other than the matters described above. If any other matters properly
come before the annual meeting, the proxies will be voted on such matters in accordance with the
judgment of the persons named as proxies therein, or their substitutes, present and acting at the
meeting.
GENERAL
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by CC Media. Following the original mailing
of the proxy soliciting material, regular employees of CC Media or its subsidiaries may solicit
proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail and personal interview. Proxy cards and materials
will also be distributed to beneficial owners of stock, through brokers, custodians, nominees and
other like parties. CC Media expects to reimburse such parties for their charges and expenses
connected therewith.
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy
delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the
same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process,
which is commonly referred to as householding, potentially provides extra convenience for
stockholders and cost savings for companies. CC Media and some brokers household proxy materials,
whereby a single proxy statement is delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless
contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received
notice from your broker or us that they or we will be householding materials to your address,
householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If,
at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a
separate proxy statement, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account
or us if you hold registered shares. You can notify us by sending a written request to: Investor
Relations, CC Media Holdings, Inc., 200 East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas 78209.
47
An electronic copy of CC Medias Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16,
2010 is available free of charge at CC Medias Internet website at www.ccmediaholdings.com. A
paper copy of the Form 10-K is also available without charge to stockholders upon written request
to: Investor Relations, CC Media Holdings, Inc., 200 East Basse Road, San Antonio, Texas 78209.
This document is dated April 26, 2010 and is first being mailed to stockholders on or about
May 3, 2010.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder
Meeting to be Held on May 26, 2010.
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at:
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/ccmo.

Robert H. Walls, Jr.
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
48
APPENDIX A
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, FOOTNOTES AND OTHER DATA
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following chart demonstrates a comparison of the cumulative total returns, adjusted for
stock splits and dividends, for CC Media, a Radio Index, and the NASDAQ Stock Market Index for the
period from July 30, 2008 through December 31, 2009.
Indexed Yearly Stock Price Close
(Price adjusted for Stock Splits and Dividends)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/30/08 |
|
12/31/08 |
|
12/31/09 |
CC Media |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
Radio Index* |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
1,543 |
|
NASDAQ Stock Market Index |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Radio Index is comprised of Cox Radio, Cumulus Media, Emmis Communications, Entercom
Communications, Radio One and Spanish Broadcasting. |
EXCERPTS FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities |
Market Information
Our Class A common shares are quoted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
CCMO. There were 385 shareholders of record as of March 10, 2010. This figure does not include
an estimate of the indeterminate number of beneficial holders whose shares may be held of record by
brokerage firms and clearing agencies. The following quotations obtained from the OTC Bulletin
Board reflect the high and low bid prices for our Class A common stock based on inter-dealer
prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
13.25 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
There is no established public trading market for our Class B and Class C common stock. There
were 555,556 Class B common shares and 58,967,502 Class C common shares outstanding on March 10,
2010. All of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock are held by Clear Channel Capital IV,
LLC and all of our outstanding shares of Class C common stock are held by Clear Channel Capital V,
L.P.
A-1
Dividend Policy
The Company currently does not intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends on the shares of
its common stock. The Company has not declared any dividend on its common stock since its
incorporation. Clear Channels debt financing arrangements include restrictions on its ability to
pay dividends, which in turn affects the Companys ability to pay dividends.
Equity Compensation Plan
The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2009, relating to the Companys
equity compensation plan pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock or other rights to
acquire shares may be granted from time to time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted- |
|
remaining available for |
|
|
securities to be |
|
average |
|
future issuance under |
|
|
issued upon exercise |
|
exercise price |
|
equity compensation |
|
|
price of outstanding |
|
of outstanding |
|
plans (excluding |
|
|
options, warrants |
|
warrants and |
|
securities reflected in |
Plan category |
|
and rights |
|
rights |
|
column (a)) |
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
6,791,922 |
|
|
$ |
31.29 |
|
|
|
5,307,985 |
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (2) |
|
|
6,791,922 |
|
|
$ |
31.29 |
|
|
|
5,307,985 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the Clear Channel 2008 Executive Incentive Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include option to purchase an aggregate of 745,621 shares, at a weighted average
exercise price of $5.42, granted under plans assumed in connection with acquisition
transactions. No additional options may be granted under these assumed plans. |
Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did not sell any equity securities during 2009 that were not registered under the
Securities Act of 1933.
Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not purchase any shares of our Class A common stock during the fourth quarter of 2009.
A-2
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following tables set forth our summary historical consolidated financial and other data as
of the dates and for the periods indicated. The summary historical financial data are derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for future periods. Acquisitions and dispositions impact the
comparability of the historical consolidated financial data reflected in this schedule of Selected
Financial Data.
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, codified in ASC 810-10-45 on
January 1, 2009. Adoption of this standard requires retrospective application in the financial
statements of earlier periods on January 1, 2009. In connection with our subsidiarys offering of
$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series A Senior Notes and $2.0 billion aggregate
principal amount of Series B Senior Notes, we filed a Form 8-K on December 11, 2009 to
retrospectively recast the historical financial statements and certain disclosures included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for the adoption of ASC 810-10-45.
The summary historical consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 is
comprised of two periods: post-merger and pre-merger. We applied purchase accounting adjustments
to the opening balance sheet on July 31, 2008 as the merger occurred at the close of business on
July 30, 2008. The merger resulted in a new basis of accounting beginning on July 31, 2008. For
additional discussion regarding the pre-merger and post-merger periods, please refer to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
|
2006 (2) |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Results of Operations Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
5,551,909 |
|
|
$ |
6,688,683 |
|
|
$ |
6,921,202 |
|
|
$ |
6,567,790 |
|
|
$ |
6,126,553 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (excludes depreciation
and amortization) |
|
|
2,583,263 |
|
|
|
2,904,444 |
|
|
|
2,733,004 |
|
|
|
2,532,444 |
|
|
|
2,351,614 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(excludes depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
1,466,593 |
|
|
|
1,829,246 |
|
|
|
1,761,939 |
|
|
|
1,708,957 |
|
|
|
1,651,195 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
765,474 |
|
|
|
696,830 |
|
|
|
566,627 |
|
|
|
600,294 |
|
|
|
593,477 |
|
Corporate expenses (excludes depreciation and
amortization) |
|
|
253,964 |
|
|
|
227,945 |
|
|
|
181,504 |
|
|
|
196,319 |
|
|
|
167,088 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,769 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
7,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges (3) |
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expense) net |
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
28,032 |
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
71,571 |
|
|
|
49,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,687,146 |
) |
|
|
(4,366,377 |
) |
|
|
1,685,479 |
|
|
|
1,593,714 |
|
|
|
1,412,835 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,500,866 |
|
|
|
928,978 |
|
|
|
451,870 |
|
|
|
484,063 |
|
|
|
443,442 |
|
Gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
(13,371 |
) |
|
|
(82,290 |
) |
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
(702 |
) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(20,689 |
) |
|
|
100,019 |
|
|
|
35,176 |
|
|
|
37,845 |
|
|
|
38,338 |
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
679,716 |
|
|
|
126,393 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
(8,593 |
) |
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued
operations |
|
|
(4,542,356 |
) |
|
|
(5,151,233 |
) |
|
|
1,280,853 |
|
|
|
1,141,209 |
|
|
|
1,018,045 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
493,320 |
|
|
|
524,040 |
|
|
|
(441,148 |
) |
|
|
(470,443 |
) |
|
|
(403,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(4,627,193 |
) |
|
|
839,705 |
|
|
|
670,766 |
|
|
|
614,998 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
638,391 |
|
|
|
145,833 |
|
|
|
52,678 |
|
|
|
338,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,988,802 |
) |
|
|
985,538 |
|
|
|
723,444 |
|
|
|
953,509 |
|
Amount attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(14,950 |
) |
|
|
16,671 |
|
|
|
47,031 |
|
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(4,034,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,005,473 |
) |
|
$ |
938,507 |
|
|
$ |
691,517 |
|
|
$ |
935,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Five |
|
|
For the Seven |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
July 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
|
2006 (2) |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income (loss) per
common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
attributable to the
Company before
discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.04 |
) |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
.30 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
|
.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.06 |
) |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
attributable to the
Company before
discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.04 |
) |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
|
.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.06 |
) |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
|
$ |
.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
|
2006 (2) |
|
|
2005 |
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
3,658,845 |
|
|
$ |
2,066,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,294,583 |
|
|
$ |
2,205,730 |
|
|
$ |
2,398,294 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
net, including
discontinued operations
(5) |
|
|
3,332,393 |
|
|
|
3,548,159 |
|
|
|
3,215,088 |
|
|
|
3,236,210 |
|
|
|
3,255,649 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
18,047,101 |
|
|
|
21,125,463 |
|
|
|
18,805,528 |
|
|
|
18,886,455 |
|
|
|
18,718,571 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
1,544,136 |
|
|
|
1,845,946 |
|
|
|
2,813,277 |
|
|
|
1,663,846 |
|
|
|
2,107,313 |
|
Long-term debt, net of
current maturities |
|
|
20,303,126 |
|
|
|
18,940,697 |
|
|
|
5,214,988 |
|
|
|
7,326,700 |
|
|
|
6,155,363 |
|
Shareholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(6,844,738 |
) |
|
|
(2,916,231 |
) |
|
|
9,233,851 |
|
|
|
8,391,733 |
|
|
|
9,116,824 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, codified in ASC 740-10. In accordance with the provisions
of ASC 740-10, the effects of adoption were accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment
recorded to the balance of retained earnings on the date of adoption. The adoption of ASC
740-10 resulted in a decrease of $0.2 million to the January 1, 2007 balance of Retained
deficit, an increase of $101.7 million in Other long term-liabilities for unrecognized
tax benefits and a decrease of $123.0 million in Deferred income taxes. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, codified in ASC 718-10. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 718-10, the
Company elected to adopt the standard using the modified prospective method. |
|
(3) |
|
We recorded non-cash impairment charges of $4.1 billion in 2009 and $5.3 billion in
2008 as a result of the global economic downturn which adversely affected advertising
revenues across our businesses, as discussed more fully in Item 7. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes the results of operations of our live entertainment and sports representation
businesses, which we spun-off on December 21, 2005, our television business, which we sold
on March 14, 2008, and certain of our non-core radio stations. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes the property, plant and equipment net of our live entertainment and sports
representation businesses,
which we spun-off on December 21, 2005. |
A-4
ITEM 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Consummation of Merger
We were formed in May 2007 by private equity funds sponsored by Bain Capital Partners, LLC and
Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (together, the Sponsors) for the purpose of acquiring the business
of Clear Channel Communications, Inc., (Clear Channel). The acquisition was completed pursuant
to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 16, 2006, as amended on April 18, 2007, May 17,
2007 and May 13, 2008. As a result of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of Clear
Channel, other than shares held by certain of our principals that were rolled over and exchanged
for shares of our Class A common stock, was either exchanged for (i) $36.00 in cash consideration
or (ii) one share of our Class A common stock.
We accounted for our acquisition of Clear Channel as a purchase business combination in
conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, and
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 88-16, Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions. We allocated a
portion of the consideration paid to the assets and liabilities acquired at their respective fair
values with the remaining portion recorded at the continuing shareholders basis. Excess
consideration after this allocation was recorded as goodwill.
During the first seven months of 2009, we decreased the initial fair value estimate of our
permits, contracts, site leases and other assets and liabilities primarily in our Americas segment
by $116.1 million based on additional information received, which resulted in an increase to
goodwill of $71.7 million and a decrease to deferred taxes of $44.4 million. During the third
quarter of 2009, we adjusted deferred taxes by $44.3 million to true-up our tax rates in certain
jurisdictions that were estimated in the initial purchase price allocation. Also, during the third
quarter of 2009, we recorded a $45.0 million increase to goodwill in our International outdoor
segment related to the fair value of certain noncontrolling interests which existed at the merger
date, with no related tax effect. This noncontrolling interest was recorded pursuant to ASC
480-10-S99 which determines the classification of redeemable noncontrolling interests. We
subsequently determined that the increase in goodwill related to these noncontrolling interests
should have been included in the impairment charge resulting from the December 31, 2008 interim
goodwill impairment test. As a result, during the fourth quarter of 2009, we impaired this entire
goodwill amount, which after considering the effects of foreign exchange movements, was $41.4
million.
The purchase price allocation was complete as of July 30, 2009 in accordance with ASC
805-10-25, which requires that the allocation period not exceed one year from the date of
acquisition.
Format of Presentation
Our consolidated statements of operations and statements of cash flows are presented for two
periods: post-merger and pre-merger. The merger resulted in a new basis of accounting beginning on
July 31, 2008 and the financial reporting periods are presented as follows:
|
|
|
The year ended December 31, 2009 and the period from July 31 through December 31, 2008
reflect our post-merger period. Subsequent to the acquisition, Clear Channel became an
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ours and our business became that of Clear Channel and
its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
The period from January 1 through July 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007
reflect the pre-merger period of Clear Channel. Prior to the consummation of our
acquisition of Clear Channel, we had not conducted any activities, other than activities
incident to our formation and in connection with the acquisition, and did not have any
assets or liabilities, other than as related to the acquisition. The consolidated
financial statements for all pre-merger periods were prepared using the historical basis of
accounting for Clear Channel. As a result of the merger and the associated purchase
accounting, the consolidated financial statements of the post-merger periods are not
comparable to periods preceding the merger. |
The discussion in this MD&A is presented on a combined basis of the pre-merger and post-merger
periods for 2008. The 2008 post-merger and pre-merger results are presented but are not discussed
separately. We believe that the discussion on a combined basis is more meaningful as it allows the
results of operations to be analyzed to comparable periods in 2009 and 2007.
Managements discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes.
Our discussion is presented on both a consolidated and segment basis. Our reportable operating
segments are radio broadcasting (radio or radio
broadcasting), which includes our national syndication business, Americas Outdoor Advertising
(Americas or
A-5
Americas outdoor advertising), and International Outdoor Advertising
(International or International outdoor advertising). Included in the other segment are our
media representation business, Katz Media, as well as other general support services and
initiatives.
We manage our operating segments primarily focusing on their operating income, while Corporate
expenses, Merger expenses, Impairment charge, Other operating income (expense) net, Interest
expense, Gain (loss) on marketable securities, Equity in earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated
affiliates, Other income (expense) net, Income tax benefit (expense) and Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net are managed on a total company basis and are, therefore, included only
in our discussion of consolidated results.
Cash Flow and Liquidity
Our primary source of liquidity is cash on hand as well as cash flow from operations. We have
a large amount of indebtedness, and a substantial portion of our operating income and cash flow are
used to service debt. At December 31, 2009, we had $1.9 billion of cash on our balance sheet,
with $609.4 million held by our subsidiary, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., and its
subsidiaries. We have debt maturities totaling $403.2 million and $873.0 million in 2010 and 2011,
respectively. Based on our current operations and anticipated levels of operations and conditions
in our markets, we believe that cash on hand as well as cash flow from operations will enable us to
meet our working capital, capital expenditure, debt service and other funding requirements for at
least the next 12 months.
Our ability to fund our working capital needs, debt service and other obligations depends on
our future operating performance and cash flow. If our future operating performance does not meet
our expectation or our plans materially change in an adverse manner or prove to be materially
inaccurate, we may need additional financing. Continuing adverse securities and credit market
conditions could significantly affect the availability of equity or credit financing. Consequently,
there can be no assurance that such financing, if permitted under the terms of our financing
agreements, will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. The inability to obtain
additional financing in such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and on our ability to meet our obligations.
Impairment Charges
Impairments to Definite-lived Tangible and Intangible Assets
We review our definite-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment when events and
circumstances indicate that amortizable long-lived assets might be impaired and the undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated from those assets are less than the carrying amount of those
assets. When specific assets are determined to be unrecoverable, the cost basis of the asset is
reduced to reflect the current fair market value.
We use various assumptions in determining the current fair market value of these assets,
including future expected cash flows, industry growth rates and discount rates. Impairment loss
calculations require management to apply judgment in estimating future cash flows, including
forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk
inherent in future cash flows.
During fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded impairments of $28.8 million primarily related to
contract intangible assets and street furniture tangible assets in our International segment and
$11.3 million related to corporate assets based on the provisions of ASC 360-10. ASC 360-10 states
that long-lived assets should be tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The decline in our contract
intangible assets was primarily driven by a decline in cash flow projections from these contracts.
The remaining balance of the contract intangible assets, for the contracts that were impaired, and
the remaining balance of the corporate assets after impairment was $4.4 million and $20.2 million,
respectively.
During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a $21.3 million impairment to taxi contract
intangible assets in our Americas segment and a $26.2 million impairment primarily related to
street furniture tangible assets and contract intangible assets in our International segment under
ASC 360-10. We determined fair values using a discounted cash flow model. The decline in fair
value of the contracts was primarily driven by a decline in the revenue projections since the date
of the merger. The decline in revenue related to taxi contract intangible assets and street
furniture and billboard contract intangible assets was in the range of 10% to 15%. The balance of
these taxi contract intangible assets and street furniture and billboard contract intangible assets
after the impairment charges, for the contracts that were impaired, was $3.3 million and $16.0
million, respectively. We subsequently sold our taxi advertising business in the fourth quarter of
2009 and recorded a loss of $20.9 million.
A-6
Interim Impairments to FCC Licenses
FCC broadcast licenses are granted to radio stations for up to eight years under the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act). The Act requires the FCC to renew a broadcast license
if the FCC finds that the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity, there
have been no serious violations of either the Communications Act of 1934 or the FCCs rules and
regulations by the licensee, and there have been no other serious violations which taken together
constitute a pattern of abuse. The licenses may be renewed indefinitely at little or no cost.
The United States and global economies have undergone an economic downturn, which caused,
among other things, a general tightening in the credit markets, limited access to the credit
markets, lower levels of liquidity and lower consumer and business spending. These disruptions in
the credit and financial markets and the impact of adverse economic, financial and industry
conditions on the demand for advertising negatively impacted the key assumptions in the discounted
cash flow models used to value our FCC licenses since the merger. Therefore, we performed an
interim impairment test on our FCC licenses as of December 31, 2008, which resulted in a non-cash
impairment charge of $936.2 million.
The industry cash flows forecast by BIA Financial Network, Inc. (BIA) during the first six
months of 2009 were below the BIA forecast used in the discounted cash flow model used to calculate
the impairment at December 31, 2008. As a result, we performed another interim impairment test as
of June 30, 2009 on our FCC licenses resulting in an additional non-cash impairment charge of
$590.3 million.
Our impairment tests consisted of a comparison of the fair value of the FCC licenses at the
market level with their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the FCC license exceeded its
fair value, an impairment loss was recognized equal to that excess. After an impairment loss is
recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the FCC license is its new accounting basis. The fair
value of the FCC licenses was determined using the direct valuation method as prescribed in ASC
805-20-S99. Under the direct valuation method, the fair value of the FCC licenses was calculated
at the market level as prescribed by ASC 350-30-35. We engaged Mesirow Financial Consulting LLC
(Mesirow Financial), a third-party valuation firm, to assist us in the development of the
assumptions and our determination of the fair value of our FCC licenses.
Our application of the direct valuation method attempts to isolate the income that is properly
attributable to the license alone (that is, apart from tangible and identified intangible assets
and goodwill). It is based upon modeling a hypothetical greenfield build up to a normalized
enterprise that, by design, lacks inherent goodwill and whose only other assets have essentially
been paid for (or added) as part of the build-up process. We forecasted revenue, expenses, and
cash flows over a ten-year period for each of our markets in our application of the direct
valuation method. We also calculated a normalized residual year which represents the perpetual
cash flows of each market. The residual year cash flow was capitalized to arrive at the terminal
value of the licenses in each market.
Under the direct valuation method, it is assumed that rather than acquiring indefinite-lived
intangible assets as part of a going concern business, the buyer hypothetically develops
indefinite-lived intangible assets and builds a new operation with similar attributes from scratch.
Thus, the buyer incurs start-up costs during the build-up phase which are normally associated with
going concern value. Initial capital costs are deducted from the discounted cash flow model which
results in value that is directly attributable to the indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Our key assumptions using the direct valuation method are market revenue growth rates, market
share, profit margin, duration and profile of the build-up period, estimated start-up capital costs
and losses incurred during the build-up period, the risk-adjusted discount rate and terminal
values. This data is populated using industry normalized information representing an average FCC
license within a market.
Management uses publicly available information from BIA regarding the future revenue
expectations for the radio broadcasting industry.
The build-up period represents the time it takes for the hypothetical start-up operation to
reach normalized operations in terms of achieving a mature market share and profit margin.
Management believes that a three-year build-up period is required for a start-up operation to
obtain the necessary infrastructure and obtain advertisers. It is estimated that a start-up
operation would gradually obtain a mature market revenue share in three years. BIA forecasted
industry revenue growth of 1.9% and negative 1.8%, respectively, during the build-up period used in
the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The cost structure is expected to reach
the normalized level over three years due to the time required to establish operations and
recognize the synergies and cost savings associated with the ownership of the FCC licenses within
the market.
A-7
The estimated operating margin in the first year of operations was assumed to be 12.5% based
on observable market data for an independent start-up radio station for both the December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The estimated operating margin in the second year of
operations was assumed to be the mid-point of the first-year operating margin and the normalized
operating margin. The normalized operating margin in the third year was assumed to be the industry
average margin of 30% and 29% based on an analysis of comparable companies for the December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment tests, respectively. The first and second-year expenses include
the non-operating start-up costs necessary to build the operation (i.e. development of customers,
workforce, etc.).
In addition to cash flows during the projection period, a normalized residual cash flow was
calculated based upon industry-average growth of 2% beyond the discrete build-up projection period
for both the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The residual cash flow was then
capitalized to arrive at the terminal value.
The present value of the cash flows is calculated using an estimated required rate of return
based upon industry-average market conditions. In determining the estimated required rate of
return, management calculated a discount rate using both current and historical trends in the
industry.
We calculated the discount rate as of the valuation date and also one-year, two-year, and
three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate was calculated by weighting the
required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their
estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based
on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the radio broadcasting industry.
The calculation of the discount rate required the rate of return on debt, which was based on a
review of the credit ratings for comparable companies (i.e., market participants). We calculated
the average yield on a Standard & Poors B and CCC rated corporate bond which was used for the
pre-tax rate of return on debt and tax-effected such yield based on applicable tax rates.
The rate of return on equity capital was estimated using a modified Capital Asset Pricing
Model (CAPM). Inputs to this model included the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds,
forecast betas for comparable companies, calculation of a market risk premium based on research and
empirical evidence and calculation of a size premium derived from historical differences in returns
between small companies and large companies using data published by Ibbotson Associates.
Our concluded discount rate used in the discounted cash flow models to determine the fair
value of the licenses was 10% for our 13 largest markets and 10.5% for all of our other markets in
both the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models. Applying the discount rate, the
present value of cash flows during the discrete projection period and terminal value were added to
estimate the fair value of the hypothetical start-up operation. The initial capital investment was
subtracted to arrive at the value of the licenses. The initial capital investment represents the
fixed assets needed to operate the radio station.
The discount rate used in the December 31, 2008 impairment model increased 150 basis points
compared to the discount rate used in the preliminary purchase price allocation as of July 30, 2008
which resulted in a decline in the fair value of our licenses. As a result, we recognized a
non-cash impairment charge in approximately one-quarter of our markets, which totaled $936.2
million. The fair value of our FCC licenses was $3.0 billion at December 31, 2008.
The BIA forecast for 2009 declined 8.7% and declined between 13.8% and 15.7% through 2013
compared to the BIA forecasts used in the 2008 impairment test. Additionally, the industry profit
margin declined 100 basis points from the 2008 impairment test. These market driven changes were
primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the FCC licenses below their carrying value.
As a result, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge in approximately one-quarter of our
markets, which totaled $590.3 million. The fair value of our FCC licenses was $2.4 billion at
June 30, 2009.
In calculating the fair value of our FCC licenses, we primarily relied on the discounted cash
flow models. However, we relied on the stick method for those markets where the discounted cash
flow model resulted in a value less than the stick method indicated.
To estimate the stick values for our markets, we obtained historical radio station transaction
data from BIA which involved sales of individual radio stations whereby the station format was
immediately abandoned after acquisition. These transactions are highly indicative of stick
transactions in which the buyer does not assign value to any of the other acquired assets (i.e.
tangible or intangible assets) and is only purchasing the FCC license.
A-8
In addition, we analyzed publicly available FCC license auction data involving radio broadcast
licenses. Periodically, the FCC will hold an auction for certain FCC licenses in various markets
and these auction prices reflect the purchase of only the FCC radio license.
Based on this analysis, the stick values were estimated to be the minimum value of a radio
license within each market. This value was considered to be the fair value of the license for those
markets where the present value of the cash flows and terminal value did not exceed the estimated
stick value. Approximately 17% and 23% of the fair value of our FCC licenses at December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2009, respectively, was determined using the stick method.
The following table shows the increase to the FCC license impairment that would have occurred
using hypothetical percentage reductions in fair value, had the hypothetical reductions in fair
value existed at the time of our impairment testing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Percent change in fair value |
|
Change to impairment |
|
|
Change to impairment |
|
5% |
|
$ |
118,877 |
|
|
$ |
151,008 |
|
10% |
|
$ |
239,536 |
|
|
$ |
302,016 |
|
15% |
|
$ |
360,279 |
|
|
$ |
453,025 |
|
Annual Impairment Test to FCC Licenses
We perform our annual impairment test on October 1 of each year. We engaged Mesirow
Financial, a third-party valuation firm, to assist us in the development of the assumptions and our
determination of the fair value of our FCC licenses. The aggregate fair value of our FCC licenses
on October 1, 2009 increased approximately 11% from the fair value at June 30, 2009. The increase
in fair value resulted primarily from an increase of $120.4 million related to improved revenue
forecasts and an increase of $195.9 million related to a decline in the discount rate of 50 basis
points. We calculated the discount rate as of the valuation date and also one-year, two-year, and
three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate was calculated by weighting the
required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their
estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based
on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the radio broadcasting industry.
These market driven changes were responsible for the decline in the calculated discount rate.
As a result of the increase in the fair value of our FCC licenses, no impairment was recorded
at October 1, 2009. The fair value of our FCC licenses at October 1, 2009 was approximately $2.7
billion.
While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and utilized reasonable assumptions to
calculate the fair value of our FCC licenses, it is possible a material change could occur. If our
future actual results are not consistent with our estimates, we could be exposed to future
impairment losses that could be material to our results of operations. The following table shows
the decline in the fair value of our FCC licenses that would result from a 100 basis point decline
in our discrete and terminal period revenue growth rate and profit margin assumptions and a 100
basis point increase in our discount rate assumption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible |
|
Revenue growth rate |
|
|
Profit margin |
|
|
Discount rate |
|
FCC licenses |
|
$ |
275,410 |
|
|
$ |
117,410 |
|
|
$ |
378,300 |
|
Interim Impairments to Billboard Permits
Our billboard permits are effectively issued in perpetuity by state and local governments as
they are transferable or renewable at little or no cost. Permits typically specify the locations
at which we are allowed to operate an advertising structure. Due to significant differences in
both business practices and regulations, billboards in our International segment are subject to
long-term, finite contracts unlike our permits in the United States and Canada. Accordingly, there
are no indefinite-lived assets in our International segment.
The United States and global economies have undergone a period of economic uncertainty, which
caused, among other things, a general tightening in the credit markets, limited access to the
credit markets, lower levels of liquidity and lower consumer and business spending. These
disruptions in the credit and financial markets and the impact of adverse economic, financial and
industry conditions on the demand for advertising negatively impacted the key assumptions in the
discounted cash flow models used to value our billboard permits since the merger. Therefore, we
performed an interim impairment test on our billboard permits as of December 31, 2008, which
resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of $722.6 million.
A-9
Our cash flows during the first six months of 2009 were below those in the discounted cash
flow model used to calculate the impairment at December 31, 2008. As a result, we performed an
interim impairment test as of June 30, 2009 on our billboard permits resulting in a non-cash
impairment charge of $345.4 million.
Our impairment tests consisted of a comparison of the fair value of the billboard permits at
the market level with their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the billboard permit
exceeded its fair value, an impairment loss was recognized equal to that excess. After an
impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the billboard permit is its new
accounting basis. The fair value of the billboard permits was determined using the direct
valuation method as prescribed in ASC 805-20-S99. Under the direct valuation method, the fair
value of the billboard permits was calculated at the market level as prescribed by ASC 350-30-35.
We engaged Mesirow Financial to assist us in the development of the assumptions and our
determination of the fair value of our billboard permits.
Our application of the direct valuation method utilized the greenfield approach as discussed
above. Our key assumptions using the direct valuation method are market revenue growth rates,
market share, profit margin, duration and profile of the build-up period, estimated start-up
capital costs and losses incurred during the build-up period, the risk-adjusted discount rate and
terminal values. This data is populated using industry normalized information representing an
average billboard permit within a market.
Management uses its internal forecasts to estimate industry normalized information as it
believes these forecasts are similar to what a market participant would expect to generate. This
is due to the pricing structure and demand for outdoor signage in a market being relatively
constant regardless of the owner of the operation. Management also relied on its internal
forecasts because there is little public data available for each of its markets.
The build-up period represents the time it takes for the hypothetical start-up operation to
reach normalized operations in terms of achieving a mature market revenue share and profit margin.
Management believes that a one-year build-up period is required for a start-up operation to erect
the necessary structures and obtain advertisers in order to achieve mature market revenue share.
It is estimated that a start-up operation would be able to obtain 10% of the potential revenues in
the first year of operations and 100% in the second year. Management assumed industry revenue
growth of negative 9% and negative 16% during the build-up period for the December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 interim impairment tests, respectively. However, the cost structure is expected to
reach the normalized level over three years due to the time required to recognize the synergies and
cost savings associated with the ownership of the permits within the market.
For the normalized operating margin in the third year, management assumed a hypothetical
business would operate at the lower of the operating margin for the specific market or the industry
average margin of 46% and 45% based on an analysis of comparable companies in the December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2009 impairment models, respectively. For the first and second year of operations,
the operating margin was assumed to be 50% of the normalized operating margin for both the
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models. The first and second-year expenses include
the non-recurring start-up costs necessary to build the operation (i.e. development of customers,
workforce, etc.).
In addition to cash flows during the projection period, a normalized residual cash flow was
calculated based upon industry-average growth of 3% beyond the discrete build-up projection period
in both the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models. The residual cash flow was then
capitalized to arrive at the terminal value.
The present value of the cash flows is calculated using an estimated required rate of return
based upon industry-average market conditions. In determining the estimated required rate of
return, management calculated a discount rate using both current and historical trends in the
industry.
We calculated the discount rate as of the valuation date and also one-year, two-year, and
three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate was calculated by weighting the
required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their
estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based
on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the outdoor advertising industry.
The calculation of the discount rate required the rate of return on debt, which was based on a
review of the credit ratings for comparable companies (i.e. market participants). We used the
yield on a Standard & Poors B rated corporate bond for the pre-tax rate of return on debt and
tax-effected such yield based on applicable tax rates.
A-10
The rate of return on equity capital was estimated using a modified CAPM. Inputs to this
model included the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, forecast betas for comparable companies,
calculation of a market risk premium based on research and empirical evidence and calculation of a
size premium derived from historical differences in returns between small companies and large
companies using data published by Ibbotson Associates.
Our concluded discount rate used in the discounted cash flow models to determine the fair
value of the permits was 9.5% at December 31, 2008 and 10% at June 30, 2009. Applying the discount
rate, the present value of cash flows during the discrete projection period and terminal value were
added to estimate the fair value of the hypothetical start-up operation. The initial capital
investment was subtracted to arrive at the value of the permits. The initial capital investment
represents the expenditures required to erect the necessary advertising structures.
The discount rate used in the December 31, 2008 impairment model increased approximately 100
basis points over the discount rate used to value the permits in the preliminary purchase price
allocation as of July 30, 2008. Industry revenue forecasts declined 10% through 2013 compared to
the forecasts used in the preliminary purchase price allocation as of July 30, 2008. These market
driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the billboard permits
below their carrying value. As a result, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge which totaled
$722.6 million. The fair value of our permits was $1.5 billion at December 31, 2008.
The discount rate used in the June 30, 2009 impairment model increased approximately 50 basis
points over the discount rate used to value the permits at December 31, 2008. Industry revenue
forecasts declined 8% through 2013 compared to the forecasts used in the 2008 impairment test.
These market driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the
billboard permits below their carrying value. As a result, we recognized a non-cash impairment
charge in all but five of our markets in the United States and Canada, which totaled $345.4
million. The fair value of our permits was $1.1 billion at June 30, 2009.
The following table shows the increase to the billboard permit impairment that would have
occurred using hypothetical percentage reductions in fair value, had the hypothetical reductions in
fair value existed at the time of our impairment testing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Percent change in fair value |
|
Change to impairment |
|
Change to impairment |
5% |
|
$ |
55,776 |
|
|
$ |
80,798 |
|
10% |
|
$ |
111,782 |
|
|
$ |
156,785 |
|
15% |
|
$ |
167,852 |
|
|
$ |
232,820 |
|
Annual Impairment Test to Billboard Permits
We perform our annual impairment test on October 1 of each year. We engaged Mesirow Financial
to assist us in the development of the assumptions and our determination of the fair value of our
billboard permits. The aggregate fair value of our permits on October 1, 2009 increased
approximately 8% from the fair value at June 30, 2009. The increase in fair value resulted
primarily from an increase of $57.7 million related to improved industry revenue forecasts. The
discount rate was unchanged from the June 30, 2009 interim impairment analysis. We calculated the
discount rate as of the valuation date and also one-year, two-year, and three-year historical
quarterly averages. The discount rate was calculated by weighting the required returns on
interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their estimated percentages in an
expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based on the quarterly average of
data for publicly traded companies in the outdoor advertising industry.
The fair value of our permits at October 1, 2009 was approximately $1.2 billion.
While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and utilized reasonable assumptions to
calculate the fair value of our permits, it is possible a material change could occur. If our
future actual results are not consistent with our estimates, we could be exposed to future
impairment losses that could be material to our results of operations. The following table shows
the decline in the fair value of our billboard permits that would result from a 100 basis point
decline in our discrete and terminal period revenue growth rate and profit margin assumptions and a
100 basis point increase in our discount rate assumption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible |
|
Revenue growth rate |
|
|
Profit margin |
|
|
Discount rate |
|
Billboard permits |
|
$ |
405,900 |
|
|
$ |
102,500 |
|
|
$ |
428,100 |
|
A-11
Interim Impairments to Goodwill
We test goodwill at interim dates if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill
might be impaired. The United States and global economies have undergone a period of economic
uncertainty, which caused, among other things, a general tightening in the credit markets, limited
access to the credit markets, lower levels of liquidity and lower consumer and business spending.
These disruptions in the credit and financial markets and the impact of adverse economic, financial
and industry conditions on the demand for advertising negatively impacted the key assumptions in
the discounted cash flow model used to value our reporting units since the merger. Therefore, we
performed an interim impairment test resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $3.6 billion as
of December 31, 2008.
Our cash flows during the first six months of 2009 were below those used in the discounted
cash flow model used to calculate the impairment at December 31, 2008. Additionally, the fair
value of our debt and equity at June 30, 2009 was below the carrying amount of our reporting units
at June 30, 2009. As a result of these indicators, we performed an interim goodwill impairment
test as of June 30, 2009 resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $3.1 billion.
Our goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step, used to screen for
potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount,
including goodwill. If applicable, the second step, used to measure the amount of the impairment
loss, compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of
that goodwill. We engaged Mesirow Financial to assist us in the development of the assumptions and
our determination of the fair value of our reporting units.
Each of our U.S. radio markets and outdoor advertising markets are components. Our U.S. radio
markets are aggregated into a single reporting unit and our U.S. outdoor advertising markets are
aggregated into a single reporting unit for purposes of the goodwill impairment test using the
guidance in ASC 350-20-55. We also determined that in our Americas segment, Canada, Mexico, Peru,
and Brazil constitute separate reporting units and each country in our International segment
constitutes a separate reporting unit.
The discounted cash flow model indicated that we failed the first step of the impairment test
for substantially all reporting units as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, which required us
to compare the implied fair value of each reporting units goodwill with its carrying value.
The discounted cash flow approach we use for valuing our reporting units involves estimating
future cash flows expected to be generated from the related assets, discounted to their present
value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. Terminal values are also estimated and discounted to
their present value.
We forecasted revenue, expenses, and cash flows over a ten-year period for each of our
reporting units. In projecting future cash flows, we consider a variety of factors including our
historical growth rates, macroeconomic conditions, advertising sector and industry trends as well
as company-specific information. Historically, revenues in our industries have been highly
correlated to economic cycles. Based on these considerations, our assumed 2008 and 2009 revenue
growth rates used in the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models were negative
followed by assumed revenue growth with an anticipated economic recovery in 2009 and 2010,
respectively. To arrive at our projected cash flows and resulting growth rates, we evaluated our
historical operating results, current management initiatives and both historical and anticipated
industry results to assess the reasonableness of our operating margin assumptions. We also
calculated a normalized residual year which represents the perpetual cash flows of each reporting
unit. The residual year cash flow was capitalized to arrive at the terminal value of the reporting
unit.
We calculated the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as of December 31, 2008 and June
30, 2009 and also one-year, two-year, and three-year historical quarterly averages for each of our
reporting units. WACC is an overall rate based upon the individual rates of return for invested
capital (equity and interest-bearing debt). The WACC is calculated by weighting the required
returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their estimated
percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based on the
quarterly average data for publicly traded companies in the radio and outdoor advertising industry.
Our calculation of the WACC considered both current industry WACCs and historical trends in the
industry.
The calculation of the WACC requires the rate of return on debt, which was based on a review
of the credit ratings for comparable companies (i.e. market participants) and the indicated yield
on similarly rated bonds.
A-12
The rate of return on equity capital was estimated using a modified CAPM. Inputs to this
model included the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, forecast betas for comparable companies,
calculation of a market risk premium based on research and empirical evidence and calculation of a
size premium derived from historical differences in returns between small companies and large
companies using data published by Ibbotson Associates.
In line with advertising industry trends, our operations and expected cash flow are subject to
significant uncertainties about future developments, including timing and severity of the
recessionary trends and customers behaviors. To address these risks, we included company-specific
risk premiums for each of our reporting units in the estimated WACC. Based on this analysis, as of
December 31, 2008, company-specific risk premiums of 100 basis points, 300 basis points and 300
basis points were included for our Radio, Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments,
respectively, resulting in WACCs of 11%, 12.5% and 12.5% for each of our reporting units in the
Radio, Americas and International segments, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, company-specific
risk premiums of 100 basis points, 250 basis points and 350 basis points were included for our
Radio, Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments, respectively, resulting in WACCs of
11%, 12.5% and 13.5% for each of our reporting units in the Radio, Americas and International
segments, respectively. Applying these WACCs, the present value of cash flows during the discrete
projection period and terminal value were added to estimate the fair value of the reporting units.
The discount rate utilized in the valuation of the FCC licenses and outdoor permits as of
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 excludes the company-specific risk premiums that were added to
the industry WACCs used in the valuation of the reporting units. Management believes the exclusion
of this premium is appropriate given the difference between the nature of the licenses and
billboard permits and reporting unit cash flow projections. The cash flow projections utilized
under the direct valuation method for the licenses and permits are derived from utilizing industry
normalized information for the existing portfolio of licenses and permits. Given that the
underlying cash flow projections are based on industry normalized information, application of an
industry average discount rate is appropriate. Conversely, our cash flow projections for the
overall reporting unit are based on our internal forecasts for each business and incorporate future
growth and initiatives unrelated to the existing license and permit portfolio. Additionally, the
projections for the reporting unit include cash flows related to non-FCC license and non-permit
based assets. In the valuation of the reporting unit, the company-specific risk premiums were
added to the industry WACCs due to the risks inherent in achieving the projected cash flows of the
reporting unit.
We also utilized the market approach to provide a test of reasonableness to the results of the
discounted cash flow model. The market approach indicates the fair value of the invested capital
of a business based on a companys market capitalization (if publicly traded) and a comparison of
the business to comparable publicly traded companies and transactions in its industry. This
approach can be estimated through the quoted market price method, the market comparable method, and
the market transaction method.
One indication of the fair value of a business is the quoted market price in active markets
for the debt and equity of the business. The quoted market price of equity multiplied by the
number of shares outstanding yields the fair value of the equity of a business on a marketable,
noncontrolling basis. We then apply a premium for control and add the estimated fair value of
interest-bearing debt to indicate the fair value of the invested capital of the business on a
marketable, controlling basis.
The market comparable method provides an indication of the fair value of the invested capital
of a business by comparing it to publicly traded companies in similar lines of business. The
conditions and prospects of companies in similar lines of business depend on common factors such as
overall demand for their products and services. An analysis of the market multiples of companies
engaged in similar lines of business yields insight into investor perceptions and, therefore, the
value of the subject business. These multiples are then applied to the operating results of the
subject business to estimate the fair value of the invested capital on a marketable, noncontrolling
basis. We then apply a premium for control to indicate the fair value of the business on a
marketable, controlling basis.
The market transaction method estimates the fair value of the invested capital of a business
based on exchange prices in actual transactions and on asking prices for controlling interests in
similar companies recently offered for sale. This process involves comparison and correlation of
the subject business with other similar companies that have recently been purchased.
Considerations such as location, time of sale, physical characteristics, and conditions of sale are
analyzed for comparable businesses.
The three variations of the market approach indicated that the fair value determined by our
discounted cash flow model was within a reasonable range of outcomes as of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009.
A-13
Our revenue forecasts for 2009 declined 18%, 21% and 29% for Radio, Americas outdoor and
International outdoor, respectively, compared to the forecasts used in the July 30, 2008
preliminary purchase price allocation primarily as a result of our revenues realized for the year
ended December 31, 2008. These market driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in
fair value of our reporting units below their carrying value. As a result, we recognized a
non-cash impairment charge to reduce our goodwill of $3.6 billion at December 31, 2008.
Our revenue forecasts for 2009 declined 8%, 7% and 9% for Radio, Americas outdoor and
International outdoor, respectively, compared to the forecasts used in the 2008 impairment test
primarily as a result of our revenues realized during the first six months of 2009. These market
driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of our reporting units
below their carrying value. As a result, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge to reduce our
goodwill of $3.1 billion at June 30, 2009.
The following table shows the increase to the goodwill impairment that would have occurred
using hypothetical percentage reductions in fair value, had the hypothetical reduction in fair
value existed at the time of our impairment testing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Change to impairment |
|
|
Change to impairment |
|
Reportable
segment |
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
10% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
10% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Radio Broadcasting |
|
$ |
353,000 |
|
|
$ |
706,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,000 |
|
|
$ |
460,007 |
|
|
$ |
920,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,007 |
|
Americas Outdoor |
|
$ |
164,950 |
|
|
$ |
329,465 |
|
|
$ |
493,915 |
|
|
$ |
166,303 |
|
|
$ |
341,303 |
|
|
$ |
516,303 |
|
International Outdoor |
|
$ |
7,207 |
|
|
$ |
18,452 |
|
|
$ |
33,774 |
|
|
$ |
6,761 |
|
|
$ |
14,966 |
|
|
$ |
24,830 |
|
Annual Impairment Test to Goodwill
We perform our annual impairment test on October 1 of each year. We engaged Mesirow Financial
to assist us in the development of the assumptions and our determination of the fair value of our
reporting units. The fair value of our reporting units on October 1, 2009 increased from the fair
value at June 30, 2009. The increase in fair value of our radio reporting unit was primarily the
result of a 50 basis point decline in the WACC as well as a 130 basis point increase in the
long-term operating margin. The increase in fair value of our Americas reporting unit was primarily
the result of a 150 basis point decline in the WACC. Application of the market approach described
above supported lowering the company-specific risk premium used in the discounted cash flow model
to fair value the Americas reporting unit. The increase in the aggregate fair value of the
reporting units in our International outdoor segment was primarily the result of an improvement in
the long-term revenue forecasts. A certain reporting unit in our International outdoor segment
recognized a $41.4 million impairment to goodwill related to the fair value adjustments of certain
noncontrolling interests recorded in the merger pursuant to ASC 480-10-S99.
While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and utilized appropriate assumptions to
calculate the fair value of our reporting units, it is possible a material change could occur. If
future results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, we may be exposed to
impairment charges in the future. The following table shows the decline in the fair value of each
of our reportable segments that would result from a 100 basis point decline in our discrete and
terminal period revenue growth rate and profit margin assumptions and a 100 basis point increase in
our discount rate assumption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable segment |
|
Revenue growth rate |
|
|
Profit margin |
|
|
Discount rates |
|
Radio Broadcasting |
|
$ |
770,000 |
|
|
$ |
210,000 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
Americas Outdoor |
|
$ |
480,000 |
|
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
430,000 |
|
International Outdoor |
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
A-14
A rollforward of our goodwill balance from July 30, 2008 through December 31, 2009 by
reporting unit is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of |
|
(In thousands) |
|
July 30, 2008 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Dispositions |
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
United States Radio
Markets |
|
$ |
6,691,260 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,115,033 |
) |
|
$ |
(523 |
) |
|
$ |
5,579,190 |
|
United States
Outdoor Markets |
|
|
3,121,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,296,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
824,730 |
|
France |
|
|
122,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,747 |
) |
|
|
(23,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,498 |
|
Switzerland |
|
|
57,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
56,885 |
|
Australia |
|
|
40,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
28,178 |
|
Belgium |
|
|
37,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,549 |
) |
|
|
(7,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,928 |
|
Sweden |
|
|
31,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
Norway |
|
|
26,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,808 |
|
Ireland |
|
|
16,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,285 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
32,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,162 |
) |
|
|
(22,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy |
|
|
23,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(2,808 |
) |
|
|
(20,521 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
|
31,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(31,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain |
|
|
21,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
(18,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turkey |
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finland |
|
|
13,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
|
|
(12,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas Outdoor
Canada |
|
|
35,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,783 |
) |
|
|
(24,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
All Others Americas |
|
|
86,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,948 |
|
All Others
International
Outdoor |
|
|
54,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
(19,692 |
) |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
35,285 |
|
Other |
|
|
331,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,793,951 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
(542 |
) |
|
$ |
(93,124 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,610,070 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,080 |
) |
|
$ |
7,090,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of |
|
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Dispositions |
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
United States Radio
Markets |
|
$ |
5,579,190 |
|
|
$ |
4,518 |
|
|
$ |
(62,410 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,420,897 |
) |
|
$ |
46,468 |
|
|
$ |
3,146,869 |
|
United States
Outdoor Markets |
|
|
824,730 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(324,892 |
) |
|
|
69,844 |
|
|
|
571,932 |
|
Switzerland |
|
|
56,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
(7,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,334 |
|
Ireland |
|
|
14,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(12,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Baltics |
|
|
10,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas Outdoor
Mexico |
|
|
8,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,440 |
|
|
|
(10,085 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
5,642 |
|
Americas Outdoor
Chile |
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas Outdoor
Peru |
|
|
45,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
Americas Outdoor
Brazil |
|
|
4,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
|
|
(9,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas Outdoor
Canada |
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
All Others
International
Outdoor |
|
|
205,744 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,913 |
|
|
|
(42,717 |
) |
|
|
45,042 |
|
|
|
224,092 |
|
Other |
|
|
331,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211,988 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
116,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,090,621 |
|
|
$ |
6,878 |
|
|
$ |
(64,686 |
) |
|
$ |
33,705 |
|
|
$ |
(3,097,023 |
) |
|
$ |
155,510 |
|
|
$ |
4,125,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-15
Restructuring Program
In 2008 and continuing into 2009, the global economic downturn adversely affected advertising
revenues across our businesses. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated an ongoing,
company-wide strategic review of our costs and organizational structure to identify opportunities
to maximize efficiency and realign expenses with our current and long-term business outlook. As
of December 31, 2009, we had incurred a total of $260.3 million of costs in conjunction with this
restructuring program. We estimate the benefit of the restructuring program was an approximate
$441.3 million aggregate reduction to fixed operating and corporate expenses in 2009 and that the
benefit of these initiatives will be fully realized by 2011.
No assurance can be given that the restructuring program will achieve all of the anticipated
cost savings in the timeframe expected or at all, or that the cost savings will be sustainable. In
addition, we may modify or terminate the restructuring program in response to economic conditions
or otherwise.
The following table shows the expenses related to our restructuring program recognized as
components of direct operating expenses, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and
corporate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
Year Ended
December |
|
|
Year Ended
December |
|
(In thousands) |
|
31, 2009 |
|
|
31, 2008 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
89,604 |
|
|
$ |
31,704 |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
39,193 |
|
|
|
57,909 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
35,612 |
|
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
164,409 |
|
|
$ |
95,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Non-core Radio Stations
Clear Channels sale of non-core radio stations was substantially complete in the first half
of 2008. We determined that each radio station market in Clear Channels non-core radio station
sales represents a disposal group consistent with the provisions of ASC 360-10. Consistent with
the provisions of ASC 360-10, Clear Channel classified these assets sales as discontinued
operations. Additionally, net income and cash flow from these non-core radio station sales were
classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and the
consolidated statements of cash flows, respectively, in 2008 through the date of sale and for all
of 2007.
Sale of the Television Business
On March 14, 2008, Clear Channel completed the sale of its television business to Newport
Television, LLC for $1.0 billion, adjusted for certain items including proration of expenses and
adjustments for working capital. As a result, Clear Channel recorded a gain of $662.9 million as a
component of Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net in our consolidated statement of
operations during 2008. Additionally, net income and cash flows from the television business were
classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and the
consolidated statements of cash flows, respectively, in 2008 through the date of sale and for all
of 2007.
Radio Broadcasting
Our radio business has been adversely impacted and may continue to be adversely impacted by
the recession in the United States. The weak economy in the United States has, among other things,
adversely affected our clients need for advertising and marketing services thereby reducing demand
for, and prices for, our advertising spots. Continued weak demand for these services could
materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our revenue is derived from selling advertising time, or spots, on our radio stations, with
advertising contracts typically less than one year in duration. The programming formats of our
radio stations are designed to reach audiences with targeted demographic characteristics that
appeal to our advertisers. Management monitors average advertising rates, which are principally
based on the length of the spot and how many people in a targeted audience listen to our stations,
as measured by an independent ratings service. The size of the market influences rates as well,
with larger markets typically receiving higher rates than smaller markets. Also, our advertising
rates are influenced by the time of day the advertisement airs, with morning and evening drive-time
hours typically highest priced. Management monitors yield per available minute in addition to
average rates because yield allows management to track revenue performance across our inventory.
Yield is measured by management in a variety of ways, including revenue earned divided by
minutes of advertising sold.
A-16
Management monitors macro level indicators to assess our radio operations performance. Due
to the geographic diversity and autonomy of our markets, we have a multitude of market specific
advertising rates and audience demographics. Therefore, management reviews average unit rates
across each of our stations.
Management looks at our radio operations overall revenue as well as the revenue from each
type of advertising, including local advertising, which is sold predominately in a stations local
market, and national advertising, which is sold across multiple markets. Local advertising is sold
by each radio stations sales staff while national advertising is sold, for the most part, through
our national representation firm. Local advertising, which is our largest source of advertising
revenue, and national advertising revenues are tracked separately, because these revenue streams
have different sales forces and respond differently to changes in the economic environment. We
periodically review and refine our selling structures in all markets in an effort to maximize the
value of our offering to advertisers and, therefore, our revenue.
Management also looks at radio revenue by market size. Typically, larger markets can reach
larger audiences with wider demographics than smaller markets. Additionally, management reviews
our share of radio advertising revenues in markets where such information is available, as well as
our share of target demographics listening to the radio in an average quarter hour. This metric
gauges how well our formats are attracting and retaining listeners.
A portion of our radio segments expenses vary in connection with changes in revenue. These
variable expenses primarily relate to costs in our sales department, such as commissions and bad
debt. Our programming and general and administrative departments incur most of our fixed costs,
such as talent costs, rights fees, utilities and office salaries. Lastly, we incur discretionary
costs in our marketing and promotions, which we primarily use in an effort to maintain and/or
increase our audience share.
Americas and International Outdoor Advertising
Our outdoor advertising business has been, and may continue to be, adversely impacted by the
difficult economic conditions currently present in the United States and other countries in which
we operate. The recession has, among other things, adversely affected our clients need for
advertising and marketing services, resulted in increased cancellations and non-renewals by our
clients, thereby reducing our occupancy levels, and could require us to lower our rates in order to
remain competitive, thereby reducing our yield, or affect our clients solvency. Any one or more
of these effects could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our revenue is derived from selling advertising space on the displays we own or operate in key
markets worldwide, consisting primarily of billboards, street furniture and transit displays. We
own the majority of our advertising displays, which typically are located on sites that we either
lease or own or for which we have acquired permanent easements. Our advertising contracts with
clients typically outline the number of displays reserved, the duration of the advertising campaign
and the unit price per display.
Our advertising rates are based on a number of different factors including location,
competition, size of display, illumination, market and gross ratings points. Gross ratings points
are the total number of impressions delivered by a display or group of displays, expressed as a
percentage of a market population. The number of impressions delivered by a display is measured by
the number of people passing the site during a defined period of time and, in some international
markets, is weighted to account for such factors as illumination, proximity to other displays and
the speed and viewing angle of approaching traffic. Management typically monitors our business by
reviewing the average rates, average revenue per display, or yield, occupancy, and inventory levels
of each of our display types by market. In addition, because a significant portion of our
advertising operations are conducted in foreign markets, primarily the Euro area, the United
Kingdom and China, management reviews the operating results from our foreign operations on a
constant dollar basis. A constant dollar basis allows for comparison of operations independent of
foreign exchange movements.
The significant expenses associated with our operations include (i) direct production,
maintenance and installation expenses, (ii) site lease expenses for land under our displays and
(iii) revenue-sharing or minimum guaranteed amounts payable under our billboard, street furniture
and transit display contracts. Our direct production, maintenance and installation expenses
include costs for printing, transporting and changing the advertising copy on our displays, the
related labor costs, the vinyl and paper costs and the costs for cleaning and maintaining our
displays. Vinyl and paper costs vary according to the complexity of the advertising copy and the
quantity of displays. Our site lease expenses include lease payments for use of the land under our
displays, as well as any revenue-sharing arrangements or minimum guaranteed amounts payable that we
may have with the landlords. The terms of our site leases and revenue-sharing or minimum
guaranteed contracts generally range from one to 20 years.
A-17
In our International business, normal market practice is to sell billboards and street
furniture as network packages with contract terms typically ranging from one to two weeks, compared
to contract terms typically ranging from four weeks to one year in the U.S. In addition,
competitive bidding for street furniture and transit display contracts, which constitute a larger
portion of our International business, and a different regulatory environment for billboards,
result in higher site lease cost in our International business compared to our Americas business.
As a result, our margins are typically less in our International business than in the Americas.
Our street furniture and transit display contracts, the terms of which range from three to 20
years, generally require us to make upfront investments in property, plant and equipment. These
contracts may also include upfront lease payments and/or minimum annual guaranteed lease payments.
We can give no assurance that our cash flows from operations over the terms of these contracts will
exceed the upfront and minimum required payments.
THE COMPARISON OF YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 IS AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
Period from January |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December |
|
|
December |
|
|
1 through |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31, 2009 |
|
|
31, 2008 |
|
|
July 30, 2008 |
|
|
31, 2008 |
|
|
% |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
5,551,909 |
|
|
$ |
2,736,941 |
|
|
$ |
3,951,742 |
|
|
$ |
6,688,683 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (excludes
depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
2,583,263 |
|
|
|
1,198,345 |
|
|
|
1,706,099 |
|
|
|
2,904,444 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excludes depreciation and
amortization) |
|
|
1,466,593 |
|
|
|
806,787 |
|
|
|
1,022,459 |
|
|
|
1,829,246 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
765,474 |
|
|
|
348,041 |
|
|
|
348,789 |
|
|
|
696,830 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Corporate expenses (excludes
depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
253,964 |
|
|
|
102,276 |
|
|
|
125,669 |
|
|
|
227,945 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,085 |
|
|
|
87,684 |
|
|
|
155,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expense) net |
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
28,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,687,146 |
) |
|
|
(5,042,246 |
) |
|
|
675,869 |
|
|
|
(4,366,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,500,866 |
|
|
|
715,768 |
|
|
|
213,210 |
|
|
|
928,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
(13,371 |
) |
|
|
(116,552 |
) |
|
|
34,262 |
|
|
|
(82,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(20,689 |
) |
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
94,215 |
|
|
|
100,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
679,716 |
|
|
|
131,505 |
|
|
|
(5,112 |
) |
|
|
126,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations |
|
|
(4,542,356 |
) |
|
|
(5,737,257 |
) |
|
|
586,024 |
|
|
|
(5,151,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
76,129 |
|
|
|
76,729 |
|
|
|
(27,280 |
) |
|
|
49,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
417,191 |
|
|
|
619,894 |
|
|
|
(145,303 |
) |
|
|
474,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
493,320 |
|
|
|
696,623 |
|
|
|
(172,583 |
) |
|
|
524,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued
operations |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(5,040,634 |
) |
|
|
413,441 |
|
|
|
(4,627,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
638,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(5,042,479 |
) |
|
|
1,053,677 |
|
|
|
(3,988,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amount attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
(14,950 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
17,152 |
|
|
|
16,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the
Company |
|
$ |
(4,034,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,041,998 |
) |
|
$ |
1,036,525 |
|
|
$ |
(4,005,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue
Our consolidated revenue decreased $1.14 billion during 2009 compared to 2008. Revenue
declined $557.5
million during 2009 compared to 2008 from our radio business associated with decreases in both
local and national
A-18
advertising. Our Americas outdoor revenue also declined approximately $192.1
million attributable to decreases in bulletin, poster and airport revenues associated with
cancellations and non-renewals from larger national advertisers. Our International revenue
declined approximately $399.2 million primarily as a result of challenging advertising climates in
our markets and approximately $118.5 million from movements in foreign exchange.
Direct Operating Expenses
Our consolidated direct operating expenses decreased approximately $321.2 million during 2009
compared to 2008. Our international outdoor business contributed $217.6 million of the overall
decrease primarily from a decrease in site-lease expenses from lower revenue and cost savings from
the restructuring program and $85.6 million related to movements in foreign exchange. Our Americas
outdoor direct operating expenses decreased $39.4 million driven by decreased site-lease expenses
from lower revenue and cost savings from the restructuring program. Our radio broadcasting direct
operating expenses decreased approximately $77.5 million primarily related to decreased
compensation expense associated with cost savings from the restructuring program.
SG&A Expenses
Our SG&A expenses decreased approximately $362.7 million during 2009 compared to 2008. SG&A
expenses in our radio business decreased approximately $249.1 million primarily from decreases in
commission and salary expenses and decreased marketing and promotional expenses. Our international
outdoor SG&A expenses decreased approximately $71.3 million primarily attributable to $23.7 million
from movements in foreign exchange and an overall decline in compensation and administrative
expenses. Our Americas outdoor SG&A expenses decreased approximately $50.7 million primarily
related to a decline in commission expense.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $68.6 million in 2009 compared to 2008
primarily due to $139.9 million associated with the fair value adjustments to the assets acquired
in the merger. Partially offsetting the increase was a $43.2 million decrease in depreciation
expense associated with the impairment of assets in our International outdoor segment during the
fourth quarter of 2008 and a $20.6 million decrease from movements in foreign exchange.
Corporate Expenses
Corporate expenses increased $26.0 million in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily as a result of a
$29.3 million increase related to the restructuring program and a $23.5 million accrual related to
an unfavorable outcome of litigation concerning a breach of contract regarding internet advertising
and our radio stations. The increase was partially offset by $33.3 million primarily related to
reductions in the legal accrual as a result of litigation settled in the current year.
Other Operating Income (Expense) Net
The $50.8 million expense for 2009 is primarily related to a $42.0 million loss on the sale
and exchange of radio stations and a $20.9 million loss on the sale of our taxi advertising
business. The losses were partially offset by a $10.1 million gain on the sale of Americas and
International outdoor assets.
The $28.0 million income in 2008 consists of a gain of $3.3 million from the sale of sports
broadcasting rights, a $7.0 million gain on the disposition of a representation contract, a $4.0
million gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment, a $1.7 million gain on the sale of
international street furniture and $9.6 million from the favorable settlement of a lawsuit.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $571.9 million in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily from an increase
in outstanding indebtedness due to the merger. Additionally, we borrowed approximately $1.6
billion under Clear Channels $2.0 billion credit facility during the first quarter of 2009 to
improve our liquidity position in light of the uncertain economic environment.
Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities
The loss on marketable securities of $13.4 million in 2009 relates to the impairment of
Independent News & Media PLC (INM). The fair value of INM was below cost for an extended period
of time. As a result, we considered the guidance in ASC 320-10-S99 and reviewed the length of the
time and the extent to which the market value was less than cost and the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer. After this assessment, we concluded that the
impairment was other than temporary and recorded an $11.3 million non-cash impairment charge
to our investment in
A-19
INM. In addition, we recognized a $1.8 million loss on the third quarter sale
of our remaining 8.6% interest in Grupo ACIR Communicaciones (Grupo ACIR).
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge to INM and Sirius
XM Radio. The fair value of these available-for-sale securities was below their cost each month
subsequent to the closing of the merger. After considering the guidance in ASC 320-10-S99, we
concluded that the impairment was other than temporary and recorded a $116.6 million impairment
charge to our investments in INM and Sirius XM Radio. This loss was partially offset by a net gain
of $27.0 million recorded in the second quarter of 2008 on the unwinding of our secured forward
exchange contracts and the sale of our American Tower Corporation (AMT) shares.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Non-consolidated Affiliates
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated affiliates of $20.7 million in 2009 is primarily related to
a $22.9 million impairment of equity investments in our International outdoor segment in addition
to a $4.0 million loss on the sale of a portion of our investment in Grupo ACIR. Subsequent to the
January 2009 sale of 57% of our remaining 20% interest in Grupo ACIR, we no longer accounted for
our investment as an equity method investment and began accounting for it at cost in accordance
with ASC 323.
Included in equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates in 2008 is a $75.6 million gain
on the sale of Clear Channels 50% interest in Clear Channel Independent, a South African outdoor
advertising company.
Other Income (Expense) Net
Other income of $679.7 million in 2009 relates to an aggregate gain of $368.6 million on the
repurchases of certain of Clear Channels senior notes and an aggregate gain of $373.7 million on
the repurchases of certain of Clear Channels senior toggle notes and senior cash pay notes. The
gains on extinguishment of debt were partially offset by a $29.3 million loss related to loan costs
associated with the $2.0 billion retirement of certain of Clear Channels outstanding senior
secured debt. Please refer to the Sources and Uses section within this MD&A for additional
discussion of the repurchases and debt retirement.
Other income of $126.4 million in 2008 relates to an aggregate net gain of $94.7 million on
the tender of certain of Clear Channels outstanding notes, a $29.3 million foreign exchange gain
on translating short-term intercompany notes and an $8.0 million dividend received from a cost
investment, partially offset by a $4.7 million impairment of our investment in a radio partnership.
Income Taxes
Current tax benefits for 2009 increased $26.7 million compared to the full year for 2008
primarily due to our ability to carry back certain net operating losses to prior years. On
November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 (the Act) was
enacted into law. The Act amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code to allow net operating
losses realized in a tax year ended after December 31, 2007 and beginning before January 1, 2010 to
be carried back for up to five years (such losses were previously limited to a two-year carryback).
This change will allow us to carryback fiscal 2009 taxable losses of approximately $361 million,
based on our projections of projected taxable losses eligible for carryback, to prior years and
receive refunds of previously paid Federal income taxes of approximately $126.4 million. The
ultimate amount of such refunds realized from net operating loss carryback is dependent on our
actual taxable losses for fiscal 2009, which may vary from our current expectations.
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 10.9% as compared to 10.2% for
the year ended December 31, 2008. The effective tax rate for 2009 was impacted by the goodwill
impairment charges which are not deductible for tax purposes. In addition, as noted above, due to
the law change on November 6, 2009 that allows us to carryback a portion of our 2009 net operating
losses back five years and based on our expectations as to future taxable income from deferred tax
liabilities that reverse in the relevant carryforward period for those net operating losses that
cannot be carried back, we believe that the realization of the deferred tax assets associated with
the remaining net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets is more likely than
not and therefore no valuation allowance is needed for the majority of our deferred tax assets.
The 2008 effective tax rate was impacted by the impairment charge that resulted in a $5.3
billion decrease in Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations and tax
benefits of approximately $648.2 million. Partially offsetting this decrease to the effective rate
were tax benefits recorded as a result of the release of valuation allowances on the capital loss
carryforwards that were used to offset the taxable gain from the disposition of Clear Channels
investment in AMT and Grupo ACIR. Additionally, Clear Channel sold its 50% interest in Clear
Channel
Independent in 2008, which was structured as a tax free disposition. The sale resulted in a
gain of $75.6 million with no
A-20
current tax expense. Further, in 2008 valuation allowances were
recorded on certain net operating losses generated during the period that were not able to be
carried back to prior years.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, deferred tax benefits decreased $57.4 million as
compared to 2008 primarily due to larger impairment charges recorded in 2008 related to the tax
deductible intangibles. This decrease was partially offset by increases in deferred tax expense in
2009 as a result of the deferral of certain discharge of indebtedness income, for income tax
purposes, resulting from the reacquisition of business indebtedness, as provided by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 signed into law on February 17, 2009.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations of $638.4 million recorded during 2008 primarily relates
to a gain of $631.9 million, net of tax, related to the sale of Clear Channels television business
and the sale of radio stations.
Radio Broadcasting Results of Operations
Our radio broadcasting operating results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,736,404 |
|
|
$ |
3,293,874 |
|
|
|
(17%) |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
901,799 |
|
|
|
979,324 |
|
|
|
(8%) |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
933,505 |
|
|
|
1,182,607 |
|
|
|
(21%) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
261,246 |
|
|
|
152,822 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
639,854 |
|
|
$ |
979,121 |
|
|
|
(35%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our radio broadcasting revenue declined approximately $557.5 million in 2009 compared to 2008,
driven by decreases in local and national revenues of $388.5 million and $115.1 million,
respectively. Local and national revenue were down as a result of an overall weakness in
advertising and the economy. The decline in advertising demand led to declines in total minutes
sold and yield per minute in 2009 compared to 2008. Our radio revenue experienced declines across
markets and advertising categories.
Direct operating expenses declined approximately $77.5 million in 2009 compared to 2008.
Compensation expense declined approximately $55.0 million primarily as a result of cost savings
from the restructuring program. We also reclassified $34.2 million of direct operating expenses to
amortization expense related to a purchase accounting adjustment to talent contracts. Non-renewals
of sports contracts resulted in a decrease of $9.1 million while non-cash compensation decreased
$13.5 million as a result of accelerated expense taken in 2008 related to options that vested in
the merger. The declines were partially offset by an increase of approximately $9.4 million in
programming expenses primarily related to new contract talent payments in our national syndication
business and an increase of $34.1 million in expense primarily associated with severance accruals
related to the restructuring program. SG&A expenses decreased approximately $249.1 million in 2009
compared to 2008, primarily from a $43.3 million decline in marketing and promotional expenses, a
$122.9 million decline in commission and compensation expenses related to the decline in revenue
and cost savings from the restructuring program, and an $18.3 million decline in bad debt expense.
Non-cash compensation decreased $16.0 million as a result of accelerated expense taken in 2008 on
options that vested in the merger.
Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $108.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008,
primarily as a result of additional amortization associated with the purchase accounting
adjustments to intangible assets acquired in the merger.
A-21
Americas Outdoor Advertising Results of Operations
Our Americas outdoor advertising operating results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,238,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,430,258 |
|
|
|
(13%) |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
608,078 |
|
|
|
647,526 |
|
|
|
(6%) |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
202,196 |
|
|
|
252,889 |
|
|
|
(20%) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
210,280 |
|
|
|
207,633 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
217,617 |
|
|
$ |
322,210 |
|
|
|
(32%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Americas revenue decreased approximately $192.1 million in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily
driven by declines in bulletin, poster and transit revenues due to cancellations and non-renewals
from larger national advertisers resulting from the overall weakness in advertising and the
economy. The decline in bulletin, poster and transit revenues was also impacted by a decline in
rate compared to 2008.
Our Americas direct operating expenses decreased $39.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008,
primarily from a $25.3 million decrease in site-lease expenses associated with cost savings from
the restructuring program and the decline in revenues. This decrease was partially offset by $5.7
million related to the restructuring program. Our SG&A expenses decreased $50.7 million in 2009
compared to 2008, primarily from a $26.0 million decline in compensation expense associated with
the decline in revenue and cost savings from the restructuring program and a $16.2 million decline
in bad debt expense as a result of accounts collected and an improvement in the agings of our
accounts receivable during the current year.
International Outdoor Advertising Results of Operations
Our international operating results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,459,853 |
|
|
$ |
1,859,029 |
|
|
|
(21%) |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
1,017,005 |
|
|
|
1,234,610 |
|
|
|
(18%) |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
282,208 |
|
|
|
353,481 |
|
|
|
(20%) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
229,367 |
|
|
|
264,717 |
|
|
|
(13%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(68,727 |
) |
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
|
|
(1205%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our International revenue decreased approximately $399.2 million in 2009 compared to 2008,
with approximately $118.5 million from movements in foreign exchange. The revenue decline occurred
across most countries, with the most significant decline in France of $75.5 million due to weak
advertising demand. Other countries with significant declines include the U.K. and Italy, which
declined $30.4 million and $28.3 million, respectively, due to weak advertising markets.
Direct operating expenses decreased $217.6 million in 2009 compared to 2008, in part due to a
decrease of $85.6 million from movements in foreign exchange. The remaining decrease in direct
operating expenses was primarily attributable to a $146.4 million decline in site lease expenses
partially attributable to cost savings from the restructuring program. The decrease in direct
operating expenses was partially offset by $12.8 million related to the restructuring program and
the decline in revenue. SG&A expenses decreased $71.3 million in 2009 compared to 2008, primarily
from $23.7 million related to movements in foreign exchange, $34.3 million related to a decline in
compensation expense and a $25.8 million decrease in administrative expenses, both partially
attributable to cost savings from the restructuring program and the decline in revenue.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $35.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008, primarily
related to a $43.2 million decrease in depreciation expense associated with the impairment of
assets during the fourth quarter of 2008 and a $20.6 million decrease from movements in foreign
exchange. The decrease was partially offset by $31.9 million related to additional amortization
associated with the purchase accounting adjustments to the acquired intangible assets.
A-22
Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
Radio Broadcasting |
|
$ |
639,854 |
|
|
$ |
979,121 |
|
Americas Outdoor Advertising |
|
|
217,617 |
|
|
|
322,210 |
|
International Outdoor Advertising |
|
|
(68,727 |
) |
|
|
6,221 |
|
Other |
|
|
(43,963 |
) |
|
|
(31,419 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
(4,118,924 |
) |
|
|
(5,268,858 |
) |
Other operating income (expense) net |
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
28,032 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,769 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(262,166 |
) |
|
|
(245,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,687,146 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,366,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE COMPARISON OF YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 IS AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
6,688,683 |
|
|
$ |
6,921,202 |
|
|
|
(3%) |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (excludes depreciation and
amortization) |
|
|
2,904,444 |
|
|
|
2,733,004 |
|
|
|
6% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excludes
depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
1,829,246 |
|
|
|
1,761,939 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
696,830 |
|
|
|
566,627 |
|
|
|
23% |
|
Corporate expenses (excludes depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
227,945 |
|
|
|
181,504 |
|
|
|
26% |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
155,769 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income net |
|
|
28,032 |
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(4,366,377 |
) |
|
|
1,685,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
928,978 |
|
|
|
451,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
(82,290 |
) |
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
100,019 |
|
|
|
35,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net |
|
|
126,393 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations |
|
|
(5,151,233 |
) |
|
|
1,280,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
49,449 |
|
|
|
(252,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
474,591 |
|
|
|
(188,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
524,040 |
|
|
|
(441,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
(4,627,193 |
) |
|
|
839,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
638,391 |
|
|
|
145,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
|
(3,988,802 |
) |
|
|
985,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
16,671 |
|
|
|
47,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(4,005,473 |
) |
|
$ |
938,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-23
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue
Our consolidated revenue decreased $232.5 million during 2008 compared to 2007. Revenue
growth during the first nine months of 2008 was offset by a decline of $254.0 million in the
fourth quarter. Revenue declined $264.7 million during 2008 compared to 2007 from our radio
business associated with decreases in both local and national advertising. Our Americas
outdoor revenue also declined approximately $54.8 million attributable to decreases in poster
and bulletin revenues associated with cancellations and non-renewals from major national
advertisers. The declines were partially offset by an increase from our international outdoor
revenue of approximately $62.3 million, with roughly $60.4 million from movements in foreign
exchange.
Direct Operating Expenses
Our consolidated direct operating expenses increased approximately $171.4 million during
2008 compared to 2007. Our international outdoor business contributed $90.3 million to the
increase primarily from an increase in site-lease expenses and $39.5 million related to
movements in foreign exchange. Our Americas outdoor business contributed $57.0 million to the
increase primarily from new contracts. These increases were partially offset by a decline in
direct operating expenses in our radio segment of approximately $3.6 million related to a
decline in programming expenses.
SG&A Expenses
Our SG&A expenses increased approximately $67.3 million during 2008 compared to 2007.
Approximately $48.3 million of this increase occurred during the fourth quarter primarily as a
result of an increase in severance. Our international outdoor business contributed
approximately $41.9 million to the increase primarily from movements in foreign exchange of
$11.2 million and an increase in severance in 2008 associated with the restructuring program of
approximately $20.1 million. Our Americas outdoor SG&A expenses increased approximately $26.4
million largely from increased bad debt expense of $15.5 million and an increase in severance
in 2008 associated with the restructuring program of $4.5 million. SG&A expenses in our radio
business decreased approximately $7.5 million primarily from reduced marketing and promotional
expenses and a decline in commissions associated with the decline in revenues, partially offset
by increase in severance in 2008 associated with the restructuring program of approximately
$32.6 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $130.2 million in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily due to $86.0 million in additional depreciation and amortization associated with the
preliminary purchase accounting adjustments to the acquired assets, $29.3 million of
accelerated depreciation in our Americas and International outdoor segments from billboards
that were removed and approximately $11.3 million related to impaired advertising display
contracts in our international segment.
Corporate Expenses
The increase in corporate expenses of $46.4 million in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily
relates to a $16.7 million increase in non-cash compensation related to awards that vested at
closing of the merger, a $6.3 million management fee to the Sponsors in connection with the
management and advisory services provided following the merger, and $6.2 million related to
outside professional services.
Merger Expenses
Merger expenses for 2008 were $155.8 million and include accounting, investment banking,
legal and other expenses.
Impairment Charge
The global economic downturn has adversely affected advertising revenues across our
businesses in recent months. As discussed above, we performed an impairment test in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and recognized a non-cash impairment charge to our indefinite-lived intangible
assets and goodwill of $5.3 billion.
A-24
Other Operating Income Net
The $28.0 million income for 2008 consists of a gain of $3.3 million from the sale of
sports broadcasting rights, a $7.0 million gain on the disposition of a representation
contract, a $4.0 million gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment, a $1.7 million gain
on the sale of international street furniture and $9.6 million from the favorable settlement of
a lawsuit. The $14.1 million income in 2007 related primarily to $8.9 million gain from the
sale of street furniture assets and land in our international outdoor segment as well as $3.4
million from the disposition of assets in our radio segment.
Interest Expense
The increase in interest expense for 2008 over 2007 is the result of the increase in our
average debt outstanding after the merger. Our outstanding debt was $19.5 billion and $6.6
billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge to certain
available-for-sale securities. The fair value of these available-for-sale securities was below
their cost each month subsequent to the closing of the merger. As a result, we considered the
guidance in ASC 320-10-S99 and reviewed the length of the time and the extent to which the
market value was less than cost and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
issuer. After this assessment, we concluded that the impairment was other than temporary and
recorded a $116.6 million impairment charge. This loss was partially offset by a net gain of
$27.0 million recorded in the second quarter of 2008 on the unwinding of our secured forward
exchange contracts and the sale of our AMT shares.
The $6.7 million gain on marketable securities for 2007 primarily related to changes in
fair value of the shares of AMT held by Clear Channel and the related forward exchange
contracts.
Equity in Earnings of Non-consolidated Affiliates
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates increased $64.8 million in 2008 compared
to 2007 primarily from a $75.6 million gain recognized in the first quarter 2008 on the sale of
Clear Channels 50% interest in Clear Channel Independent, a South African outdoor advertising
company. We also recognized a gain of $9.2 million on the disposition of 20% of Grupo ACIR.
These gains were partially offset by a $9.0 million impairment charge to one of our
international outdoor equity method investments and declines in equity in income from our
investments in certain international radio broadcasting companies as well as the loss of equity
in earnings from the disposition of Clear Channel Independent.
Other Income Net
Other income of $126.4 million in 2008 relates to an aggregate gain of $124.5 million on
the fourth quarter 2008 tender of certain of Clear Channels outstanding notes, a $29.3 million
foreign exchange gain on translating short-term intercompany notes, an $8.0 million dividend
received, partially offset by a $29.8 million loss on the third quarter 2008 tender of certain
of Clear Channels outstanding notes and a $4.7 million impairment of our investment in a radio
partnership and $0.9 million of various other items.
Other income of $5.3 million in 2007 primarily relates to a foreign exchange gain on
translating short-term intercompany notes.
Income Taxes
Current tax expense for 2008 decreased $302.4 million compared to 2007 primarily due to a
decrease in income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations of $1.2 billion
which excludes the non-tax deductible impairment charge of $5.3 billion recorded in 2008. In
addition, current tax benefits of approximately $74.6 million were recorded during 2008 related
to the termination of Clear Channels cross currency swap. Also, we recognized additional tax
depreciation deductions as a result of the bonus depreciation provisions enacted as part of the
Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. These current tax benefits were partially offset by additional
current tax expense recorded in 2008 related to currently non deductible transaction costs as a
result of the merger.
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased to 10.2% as
compared to 34.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to the impairment charge
that resulted in a $5.3 billion decrease in income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations
and tax benefits of approximately $648.2 million.
A-25
Partially offsetting this decrease to the effective rate were tax
benefits recorded as a result of the release of valuation allowances on the capital loss
carryforwards that were used to offset the taxable gain from the disposition of Clear Channels
investment in AMT and Grupo ACIR. Additionally, Clear Channel sold its 50% interest in Clear
Channel Independent in 2008, which was structured as a tax free disposition. The sale resulted
in a gain of $75.6 million with no current tax expense. Further, in 2008 valuation allowances
were recorded on certain net operating losses generated during the period that were not able to
be carried back to prior years. Due to the lack of earnings history as a merged company and
limitations on net operating loss carryback claims allowed, the Company cannot rely on future
earnings and carryback claims as a means to realize deferred tax assets which may arise as a
result of future period net operating losses. Pursuant to the provision of ASC 740-10,
deferred tax valuation allowances would be required on those deferred tax assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, deferred tax expense decreased $662.8 million as
compared to 2007 primarily due to the impairment charge recorded in 2008 related to the tax
deductible intangibles. This decrease was partially offset by increases in deferred tax
expense in 2008 related to recording of valuation allowances on certain net operating losses as
well as the termination of the cross currency swap and the additional tax depreciation
deductions as a result of the bonus depreciation provisions enacted as part of the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 mentioned above.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations of $638.4 million recorded during 2008 primarily
relates to a gain of $631.9 million, net of tax, related to the sale of Clear Channels
television business and the sale of radio stations.
Radio Broadcasting Results of Operations
Our radio broadcasting operating results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
3,293,874 |
|
|
$ |
3,558,534 |
|
|
|
(7%) |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
979,324 |
|
|
|
982,966 |
|
|
|
(0%) |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
1,182,607 |
|
|
|
1,190,083 |
|
|
|
(1%) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
152,822 |
|
|
|
107,466 |
|
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
979,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,278,019 |
|
|
|
(23%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our radio broadcasting revenue declined approximately $264.7 million during 2008 compared
to 2007, with approximately 43% of the decline occurring during the fourth quarter. Our local
revenues were down $205.6 million in 2008 compared to 2007. National revenues declined as
well. Both local and national revenues were down as a result of overall weakness in
advertising. Our radio revenue experienced declines across advertising categories including
automotive, retail and entertainment advertising categories. For the year ended December 31,
2008, our total minutes sold and average minute rate declined compared to 2007.
Direct operating expenses declined approximately $3.6 million. Decreases in programming
expenses of approximately $21.2 million from our radio markets were partially offset by an
increase in programming expenses of approximately $16.3 million in our national syndication
business. The increase in programming expenses in our national syndication business was mostly
related to contract talent payments. SG&A expenses decreased approximately $7.5 million
primarily from reduced marketing and promotional expenses and a decline in commission expenses
associated with the revenue decline. Partially offsetting the decline in SG&A expenses was an
increase in severance in 2008 associated with the restructuring program of approximately $32.6
million and an increase in bad debt expense of approximately $17.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $45.4 million mostly as a result of
additional amortization associated with the preliminary purchase accounting adjustments to the
acquired intangible assets.
A-26
Americas Outdoor Advertising Results of Operations
Our Americas outdoor advertising operating results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,430,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,058 |
|
|
|
(4%) |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
647,526 |
|
|
|
590,563 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
252,889 |
|
|
|
226,448 |
|
|
|
12% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
207,633 |
|
|
|
189,853 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
322,210 |
|
|
$ |
478,194 |
|
|
|
(33%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue decreased approximately $54.8 million during 2008 compared to 2007, with the
entire decline occurring in the fourth quarter. Driving the decline was approximately $87.4
million attributable to poster and bulletin revenues associated with cancellations and
non-renewals from major national advertisers, partially offset by an increase of $46.2 million
in airport revenues, digital display revenues and street furniture revenues. Also impacting
the decline in bulletin revenue was decreased occupancy while the decline in poster revenue was
affected by a decrease in both occupancy and rate. The increase in airport and street
furniture revenues was primarily driven by new contracts while digital display revenue growth
was primarily the result of an increase in the number of digital displays. Other miscellaneous
revenues also declined approximately $13.6 million.
Our Americas direct operating expenses increased $57.0 million primarily from higher
site-lease expenses of $45.2 million primarily attributable to new taxi, airport and street
furniture contracts and an increase of $2.4 million in severance. Our SG&A expenses increased
$26.4 million largely from increased bad debt expense of $15.5 million and an increase of $4.5
million in severance in 2008 associated with our restructuring program.
Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $17.8 million mostly as a result of
$6.6 million related to additional depreciation and amortization associated with preliminary
purchase accounting adjustments to the acquired assets and $11.3 million of accelerated
depreciation from billboards that were removed.
International Outdoor Advertising Results of Operations
Our international operating results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,859,029 |
|
|
$ |
1,796,778 |
|
|
|
3% |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
1,234,610 |
|
|
|
1,144,282 |
|
|
|
8% |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
353,481 |
|
|
|
311,546 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
264,717 |
|
|
|
209,630 |
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
|
$ |
131,320 |
|
|
|
(95%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue increased approximately $62.3 million, with roughly $60.4 million from movements
in foreign exchange. The remaining revenue growth was primarily attributable to growth in
China, Turkey and Romania, partially offset by revenue declines in France and the United
Kingdom. China and Turkey benefited from strong advertising environments. We acquired
operations in Romania at the end of the second quarter of 2007, which also contributed to
revenue growth in 2008. The decline in France was primarily driven by the loss of a contract
to advertise on railways and the decline in the United Kingdom was primarily driven by weak
advertising demand.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, revenue declined approximately $88.6 million compared
to the fourth quarter of 2007, of which approximately $51.8 million was attributable to
movements in foreign exchange and the remainder primarily the result of a decline in
advertising demand.
Direct operating expenses increased $90.3 million. Included in the increase is
approximately $39.5 million related to movements in foreign exchange. The remaining increase
in direct operating expenses was driven by an increase in site-lease expenses. SG&A expenses
increased $41.9 million in 2008 over 2007 with approximately $11.2 million related to movements
in foreign exchange and $20.1 million related to severance in 2008 associated with the
restructuring program.
A-27
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $55.1 million with $18.8 million related
to additional depreciation and amortization associated with the preliminary purchase accounting
adjustments to the acquired assets, approximately $18.0 million related to an increase in
accelerated depreciation from billboards to be removed, approximately $11.3 million related to
impaired advertising display contracts and $4.9 million related to an increase from movements
in foreign exchange.
Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Radio Broadcasting |
|
$ |
979,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,278,019 |
|
Americas Outdoor Advertising |
|
|
322,210 |
|
|
|
478,194 |
|
International Outdoor Advertising |
|
|
6,221 |
|
|
|
131,320 |
|
Other |
|
|
(31,419 |
) |
|
|
(11,659 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
(5,268,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other operating income net |
|
|
28,032 |
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
(155,769 |
) |
|
|
(6,762 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(245,915 |
) |
|
|
(197,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,366,377 |
) |
|
$ |
1,685,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Payments
As of December 31, 2009, there was $83.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements that will vest
based on service conditions. This cost is expected to be recognized over three years. In
addition, as of December 31, 2009, there was $80.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net
of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements that will vest
based on market, performance and service conditions. This cost will be recognized when it becomes
probable that the performance condition will be satisfied.
Vesting of certain Clear Channel stock options and restricted stock awards was accelerated
upon the closing of the merger. As a result, holders of stock options, other than certain executive
officers and holders of certain options that could not, by their terms, be cancelled prior to their
stated expiration date, received cash or, if elected, an amount of Company stock, in each case
equal to the intrinsic value of the awards based on a market price of $36.00 per share while
holders of restricted stock awards received, with respect to each share of restricted stock, $36.00
per share in cash or, if elected, a share of Company stock. Approximately $39.2 million of
share-based compensation was recognized in the 2008 pre-merger period as a result of the
accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock awards and is included in the table
below.
The following table details compensation costs related to share-based payments for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Radio Broadcasting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Americas Outdoor Advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
International Outdoor Advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
SG&A expenses |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
$ |
78.6 |
|
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-28
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
July 31 through |
|
|
January 1 to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
July 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
181,175 |
|
|
$ |
246,026 |
|
|
$ |
1,035,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,281,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,576,428 |
|
Investing activities |
|
$ |
(141,749 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,711,703 |
) |
|
$ |
(416,251 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,127,954 |
) |
|
$ |
(482,677 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
$ |
1,604,722 |
|
|
$ |
17,554,739 |
|
|
$ |
(1,646,941 |
) |
|
$ |
15,907,798 |
|
|
$ |
(1,431,014 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,031,141 |
|
|
$ |
1,033,570 |
|
|
$ |
366,411 |
|
Operating Activities
2009
The decline in cash flow from operations in 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily driven by
a 17% decline in consolidated revenues associated with the weak economy and challenging
advertising markets and a 62% increase in interest expense to service our debt obligations.
Other factors contributing to our operating cash flow include a consolidated net loss of $4.0
billion adjusted for non-cash impairment charges of $4.1 billion related to goodwill and
intangible assets, depreciation and amortization of $765.5 million and $229.5 million related
to the amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of fair value adjustments related to
existing Clear Channel notes in the purchase accounting for the merger. In addition, we
recorded a $713.0 million gain on the extinguishment of debt discussed further in the Debt
Repurchases, Tender Offers, Maturities and Other section within this MD&A and deferred taxes of
$417.2 million. We also recorded a $20.7 million loss in equity of nonconsolidated affiliates
primarily due to a $22.9 million non-cash impairment of equity investments in our International
segment.
2008
Cash provided by operating activities for 2008 primarily reflects a net loss before
discontinued operations of $4.6 billion adjusted for non-cash impairment charges of $5.3
billion related to goodwill and intangible assets, depreciation and amortization of $696.8
million and $106.4 million related to the amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of
fair value adjustments made to existing Clear Channel notes in the purchase accounting for the
merger. In addition, we recorded a deferred tax benefit of $474.6 million that was partially
offset by share-based compensation of $78.6 million. In addition, Clear Channel recorded $100.0
million in equity in earnings primarily related to a $75.6 million gain in equity in earnings
of nonconsolidated affiliates related to the sale of its 50% interest in Clear Channel
Independent, a South African outdoor company, based on the fair value of the equity securities
received. Clear Channel also recorded a net gain of $27.0 million on the termination of its
secured forward sales contracts and sale of its AMT shares.
2007
Net cash flow from operating activities during 2007 primarily reflected income before
discontinued operations of $839.7 million plus depreciation and amortization of $566.6 million
and deferred taxes of $188.2 million.
Investing Activities
2009
In 2009, we spent $41.9 million for non-revenue producing capital expenditures in our
Radio segment. We spent $84.4 million in our Americas segment for the purchase of property,
plant and equipment mostly related to the construction of new billboards and $91.5 million in
our International segment for the purchase of property, plant and equipment related to new
billboard and street furniture contracts and renewals of existing contracts. We received
proceeds of $41.6 million primarily related to the sale of our remaining investment in Grupo
ACIR. In addition, we received proceeds of $48.8 million primarily related to the disposition
of radio stations and corporate assets.
2008
Cash used in investing activities during 2008 principally reflects cash used in the
acquisition of Clear Channel of $17.5 billion. In 2008, Clear Channel spent $61.5 million for
non-revenue producing capital expenditures in its Radio segment. Clear Channel spent $175.8
million in its Americas segment for the purchase of
property, plant and equipment mostly related to the construction of new billboards and
$182.5 million in its
A-29
International segment for the purchase of property, plant and equipment
related to new billboard and street furniture contracts and renewals of existing contracts.
Clear Channel spent $177.1 million primarily for the purchase of outdoor display faces and
additional equity interest in international outdoor companies, representation contracts and two
FCC licenses. In addition, Clear Channel received proceeds of $38.6 million primarily from the
sale of radio stations, $41.5 million related to the sale of Americas and International assets
and $9.6 million related to a litigation settlement.
2007
Net cash used in investing activities during 2007 principally reflects the purchase of
property, plant and equipment of $363.3 million. Clear Channel spent $79.7 million for
non-revenue producing capital expenditures in its Radio segment. Clear Channel spent $142.8
million in its Americas segment for the purchase of property, plant and equipment mostly
related to the construction of new billboards and $132.9 million in its International segment
for the purchase of property, plant and equipment related to new billboard and street furniture
contracts and renewals of existing contracts. During 2007, Clear Channel acquired domestic
outdoor display faces and additional equity interests in international outdoor companies for
$69.1 million. In addition, Clear Channels national representation business acquired
representation contracts for $53.0 million.
Financing Activities
2009
Cash provided by financing activities during 2009 primarily reflects a draw of remaining
availability of $1.6 billion under Clear Channels $2.0 billion revolving credit facility and
$2.5 billion of proceeds from issuance of subsidiary senior notes, offset by the $2.0 billion
paydown of Clear Channels senior secured credit facilities. We also redeemed the remaining
principal amount of Clear Channels 4.25% senior notes at maturity with a draw under the $500.0
million delayed draw term loan facility that is specifically designated for this purpose as
discussed in the Debt Repurchases, Tender Offers, Maturities and Other section within this
MD&A. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, CC Finco and CC Finco II, LLC, together repurchased
certain of Clear Channels outstanding senior notes for $343.5 million as discussed in the Debt
Repurchases, Tender Offers, Maturities and Other section within this MD&A. In addition, during
2009, our Americas Outdoor segment purchased the remaining 15% interest in our fully
consolidated subsidiary, Paneles Napsa S.A., for $13.0 million and our International Outdoor
segment acquired an additional 5% interest in our fully consolidated subsidiary, Clear Channel
Jolly Pubblicita SPA, for $12.1 million.
2008
Cash used in financing activities during 2008 primarily reflects $15.4 billion in debt
proceeds used to finance the acquisition of Clear Channel and an equity contribution of $2.1
billion to finance the merger. Also included in financing activities is $1.9 billion related
to the redemption of Clear Channels 4.625% senior notes due 2008 and 6.625% senior notes due
2008 at their maturity, the redemption of and cash tender offer for AMFM Operating Inc.s 8%
senior notes due 2008, and the cash tender offer and consent solicitation for Clear Channels
7.65% senior notes due 2010. In addition, $93.4 million relates to dividends paid.
2007
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 principally
reflects $372.4 million in dividend payments and a net reduction in debt of approximately $1.1
billion. Cash used in financing was partially offset by the proceeds from the exercise of
stock options of $80.0 million.
Discontinued Operations
During 2008, we completed the sale of Clear Channels television business to Newport
Television, LLC for $1.0 billion and completed the sales of certain radio stations for $110.5
million. The cash received from these sales was recorded as a component of cash flows from
discontinued operations during 2008.
The proceeds from the sale of 160 stations in 2007 are classified as cash flows from
discontinued operations in 2007.
A-30
Anticipated Cash Requirements
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations, which has been adversely
affected by the global economic downturn. The risks associated with our businesses become more
acute in periods of a slowing economy or recession, which may be accompanied by a decrease in
advertising. Expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic
conditions and budgeting and buying patterns. The current global economic downturn has
resulted in a decline in advertising and marketing services among our customers, resulting in a
decline in advertising revenues across our businesses. This reduction in advertising revenues
has had an adverse effect on our revenue, profit margins, cash flow and liquidity. A
continuation of the global economic downturn may continue to adversely impact our revenue,
profit margins, cash flow and liquidity.
Our ability to fund our working capital needs, debt service and other obligations, and to
comply with the financial covenant under our financing agreements depends on our future
operating performance and cash flow, which are in turn subject to prevailing economic
conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our future operating
performance does not meet our expectation or our plans materially change in an adverse manner
or prove to be materially inaccurate, we may need additional financing. Consequently, there
can be no assurance that such financing, if permitted under the terms of Clear Channels
financing agreements, will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. The inability to
obtain additional financing in such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and on our ability to meet Clear Channels obligations.
Based on our current and anticipated levels of operations and conditions in our markets,
we believe that cash on hand (including amounts drawn or available under Clear Channels senior
secured credit facilities) as well as cash flow from operations will enable us to meet our
working capital, capital expenditure, debt service and other funding requirements for at least
the next 12 months.
We expect to be in compliance with the covenants contained in Clear Channels material
financing agreements, including the subsidiary senior notes, in 2010, including the maximum
consolidated senior secured net debt to adjusted EBITDA limitation contained in our senior
secured credit facilities. However, our anticipated results are subject to significant
uncertainty and our ability to comply with this limitation may be affected by events beyond our
control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. The breach of any
covenants set forth in Clear Channels financing agreements would result in a default
thereunder. An event of default would permit the lenders under a defaulted financing agreement
to declare all indebtedness thereunder to be due and payable prior to maturity. Moreover, the
lenders under the revolving credit facility under Clear Channels senior secured credit
facilities would have the option to terminate their commitments to make further extensions of
revolving credit thereunder. If we are unable to repay Clear Channels obligations under any
secured credit facility, the lenders could proceed against any assets that were pledged to
secure such facility. In addition, a default or acceleration under any of Clear Channels
material financing agreements, including the subsidiary senior notes, could cause a default
under other of our obligations that are subject to cross-default and cross-acceleration
provisions. The threshold amount for a cross-default under the senior secured credit
facilities is $100 million dollars.
Our and Clear Channels current corporate ratings are CCC+ and Caa2 by Standard &
Poors Ratings Services and Moodys Investors Service, respectively, which are speculative
grade ratings. These ratings have been downgraded and then upgraded at various times during
the two years ended December 31, 2009. These adjustments had no impact on Clear Channels
borrowing costs under the credit agreements.
A-31
Sources of Capital
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had the following indebtedness outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan A Facility |
|
$ |
1,127.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,331.5 |
|
Term Loan B Facility |
|
|
9,061.9 |
|
|
|
10,700.0 |
|
Term Loan C Asset Sale Facility |
|
|
695.9 |
|
|
|
695.9 |
|
Delayed Draw Term Loan Facilities |
|
|
874.4 |
|
|
|
532.5 |
|
Receivables Based Facility |
|
|
355.7 |
|
|
|
445.6 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility (1) |
|
|
1,812.5 |
|
|
|
220.0 |
|
Secured Subsidiary Debt |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Secured Debt |
|
|
13,933.3 |
|
|
|
13,932.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Cash Pay Notes |
|
|
796.3 |
|
|
|
980.0 |
|
Senior Toggle Notes |
|
|
915.2 |
|
|
|
1,330.0 |
|
Clear Channel Senior Notes (2) |
|
|
2,479.5 |
|
|
|
3,192.3 |
|
Subsidiary Senior Notes |
|
|
2,500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Channel Subsidiary Debt |
|
|
77.7 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
20,702.0 |
|
|
|
19,503.7 |
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,884.0 |
|
|
|
239.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,818.0 |
|
|
$ |
19,263.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In February 2009, Clear Channel borrowed the approximately $1.6 billion of remaining
availability under this facility. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $788.1 million and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in
unamortized fair value purchase accounting discounts related to the merger with Clear
Channel. |
We and our subsidiaries have from time to time repurchased certain debt obligations of Clear
Channel and may in the future, as part of various financing and investment strategies we may elect
to pursue, purchase additional outstanding indebtedness of Clear Channel or its subsidiaries or
outstanding equity securities of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., in tender offers, open
market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. We may also sell certain assets
or properties and use the proceeds to reduce our indebtedness or the indebtedness of our
subsidiaries. These purchases or sales, if any, could have a material positive or negative impact
on our liquidity available to repay outstanding debt obligations or on our consolidated results of
operations. These transactions could also require or result in amendments to the agreements
governing outstanding debt obligations or changes in our leverage or other financial ratios, which
could have a material positive or negative impact on our ability to comply with the covenants
contained in our debt agreements. These transactions, if any, will depend on prevailing market
conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts
involved may be material.
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an
applicable margin plus, at Clear Channels option, either (i) a base rate determined by reference
to the higher of (A) the prime lending rate publicly announced by the administrative agent and (B)
the Federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, or (ii) a Eurocurrency rate
determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits for the interest period relevant to such
borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs.
The margin percentages applicable to the term loan facilities and revolving credit facility
are the following percentages per annum:
|
|
|
with respect to loans under the term loan A facility and the revolving credit
facility, (i) 2.40% in the case of base rate loans and (ii) 3.40% in the case of
Eurocurrency rate loans subject to downward adjustments if our leverage ratio of total
debt to EBITDA (as calculated in accordance with the senior secured credit facilities)
decreases below 7 to 1; and |
A-32
|
|
|
with respect to loans under the term loan B facility, term loan C asset sale
facility and delayed draw term loan facilities, (i) 2.65%, in the case of base rate
loans and (ii) 3.65%, in the case of Eurocurrency rate loans subject to downward
adjustments if our leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 7 to 1. |
Clear Channel is required to pay each revolving credit lender a commitment fee in respect of
any unused commitments under the revolving credit facility, which is 0.50% per annum, subject to
downward adjustments if Clear Channels leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 4 to
1. Clear Channel is required to pay each delayed draw term facility lender a commitment fee in
respect of any undrawn commitments under the delayed draw term facilities, which initially is
1.825% per annum until the delayed draw term facilities are fully drawn or commitments thereunder
terminated.
The senior secured credit facilities include two delayed draw term loan facilities. The first
is a $589.8 million facility which may be drawn to purchase or redeem Clear Channels outstanding
7.65% senior notes due 2010, of which $451.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2009, and a
$423.4 million facility which was drawn to redeem Clear Channels outstanding 4.25% senior notes in
May 2009.
The senior secured credit facilities require us to prepay outstanding term loans, subject to
certain exceptions, with:
|
|
|
50% (which percentage will be reduced to 25% and to 0% based upon our leverage
ratio) of our annual excess cash flow (as calculated in accordance with the senior
secured credit facilities), less any voluntary prepayments of term loans and revolving
credit loans (to the extent accompanied by a permanent reduction of the commitment) and
subject to customary credits; |
|
|
|
|
100% (which percentage will be reduced to 75% and 50% based upon our leverage
ratio) of the net cash proceeds of sales or other dispositions by us or our
wholly-owned restricted subsidiaries (including casualty and condemnation events) of
assets other than specified assets subject to reinvestment rights and certain other
exceptions; and |
|
|
|
|
100% of the net cash proceeds of any incurrence of certain debt, other than
debt permitted under the senior secured credit facilities. |
The foregoing prepayments with the net cash proceeds of certain incurrences of debt and annual
excess cash flow will be applied (i) first to the term loans other than the term loan C asset
sale facility loans (on a pro rata basis) and (ii) second to the term loan C asset sale facility
loans, in each case to the remaining installments thereof in direct order of maturity. The
foregoing prepayments with the net cash proceeds of the sale of assets (including casualty and
condemnation events) will be applied (i) first to the term loan C asset sale facility loans and
(ii) second to the other term loans (on a pro rata basis), in each case to the remaining
installments thereof in direct order of maturity.
We may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under our senior secured credit facilities at any
time without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs with respect to Eurocurrency
rate loans.
We are required to repay the loans under our term loan facilities, after giving effect to the
December 2009 prepayment of $2.0 billion of term loans with proceeds from the issuance of
subsidiary senior notes discussed elsewhere in this MD&A, as follows:
|
|
|
the term loan A facility will amortize in quarterly installments commencing on
the third interest payment date after the fourth anniversary of the closing date of the
merger, in annual amounts equal to 4.7% of the original funded principal amount of such
facility in year four, 10% thereafter, with the balance being payable on the final
maturity date (July 2014) of such term loans; and |
|
|
|
|
the term loan B facility and the delayed draw facilities will be payable in
full on the final maturity date (January 2016) of such term loans; and |
|
|
|
|
the term loan C facility will amortize in quarterly installments on the first
interest payment date after the third anniversary of the closing date of the merger, in
annual amounts equal to 2.5% of the original funded principal amount of such facilities
in years four and five and 1% thereafter, with the balance being payable on the final
maturity date (January 2016) of such term loans. |
We are required to repay all borrowings under the receivables based facility and the revolving
credit facility at their final maturity in July 2014.
The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by each of our existing and future
material wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.
A-33
All obligations under the senior secured credit facilities, and the guarantees of those
obligations, are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by:
|
|
|
a first-priority lien on the capital stock of Clear Channel; |
|
|
|
|
100% of the capital stock of any future material wholly-owned domestic license
subsidiary that is not a Restricted Subsidiary under the indenture governing the
Clear Channel senior notes; |
|
|
|
|
certain assets that do not constitute principal property (as defined in the
indenture governing the Clear Channel senior notes); |
|
|
|
|
certain assets that constitute principal property (as defined in the
indenture governing the Clear Channel senior notes) securing obligations under the
senior secured credit facilities up to the maximum amount permitted to be secured by
such assets without requiring equal and ratable security under the indenture governing
the Clear Channel senior notes; and |
|
|
|
|
a second-priority lien on the accounts receivable and related assets securing
our receivables based credit facility. |
The obligations of any foreign subsidiaries that are borrowers under the revolving credit
facility will also be guaranteed by certain of their material wholly-owned restricted subsidiaries,
and secured by substantially all assets of all such borrowers and guarantors, subject to permitted
liens and other exceptions.
The senior secured credit facilities require Clear Channel to comply on a quarterly basis with
a maximum consolidated senior secured net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio (maximum of 9.5:1). This
financial covenant becomes more restrictive over time beginning in the second quarter of 2013.
Clear Channels secured debt consists of the senior secured credit facilities, the receivables
based credit facility and certain other secured subsidiary debt. Secured leverage, defined as
secured debt, net of cash, divided by the trailing 12-month consolidated EBITDA was 7.4:1 at
December 31, 2009. Clear Channels consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $1.6 billion is calculated as
the trailing twelve months operating income before depreciation, amortization, impairment charge,
other operating income (expense) net, all as shown on the consolidated statement of operations
plus non-cash compensation, and is further adjusted for certain items, including: (i) an increase
for expected cost savings (limited to $100.0 million in any twelve month period) of $100.0 million;
(ii) an increase of $20.9 million for cash received from nonconsolidated affiliates; (iii) an
increase of $24.6 million for non-cash items; (iv) an increase of $164.4 million related to
expenses incurred associated with our cost savings program; and (v) an increase of $38.8 million
for various other items.
In addition, the senior secured credit facilities include negative covenants that, subject to
significant exceptions, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among
other things:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on assets; |
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and distributions or repurchase its capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
make investments, loans, or advances; |
|
|
|
|
prepay certain junior indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
amend material agreements governing certain junior indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
|
change our lines of business. |
The senior secured credit facilities include certain customary representations and warranties,
affirmative covenants and events of default, including payment defaults, breach of representations
and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain indebtedness, certain events of
bankruptcy, certain events under ERISA, material judgments, the invalidity of material provisions
of the senior secured credit facilities documentation, the failure of collateral under the security
documents for the senior secured credit facilities, the failure of the senior secured credit
facilities to be senior debt under the subordination provisions of certain of our subordinated debt
and a change of control. If an event of default occurs, the lenders under the senior secured
credit facilities will be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of all
amounts due under the senior secured credit facilities and all actions permitted to be taken by a
secured creditor.
Receivables Based Credit Facility
The receivables based credit facility of $783.5 million provides revolving credit commitments
in an amount equal to the initial borrowing of $533.5 million on the closing date plus $250
million, subject to a borrowing base. The
A-34
borrowing base at any time equals 85% of our and certain of our subsidiaries eligible
accounts receivable. The receivables based credit facility includes a letter of credit sub-facility
and a swingline loan sub-facility.
Borrowings, excluding the initial borrowing, under the receivables based credit facility are
subject to compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0 if at any time excess
availability under the receivables based credit facility is less than $50 million, or if aggregate
excess availability under the receivables based credit facility and revolving credit facility is
less than 10% of the borrowing base.
Borrowings under the receivables based credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to an
applicable margin plus, at Clear Channels option, either (i) a base rate determined by reference
to the higher of (A) the prime lending rate publicly announced by the administrative agent and (B)
the Federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, or (ii) a Eurocurrency rate
determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits for the interest period relevant to such
borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs.
The margin percentage applicable to the receivables based credit facility which is (i) 1.40%,
in the case of base rate loans and (ii) 2.40% in the case of Eurocurrency rate loans subject to
downward adjustments if Clear Channels leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 7 to
1.
Clear Channel is required to pay each lender a commitment fee in respect of any unused
commitments under the receivables based credit facility, which is 0.375% per annum, subject to
downward adjustments if Clear Channels leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 6 to
1.
If at any time the sum of the outstanding amounts under the receivables based credit facility
(including the letter of credit outstanding amounts and swingline loans thereunder) exceeds the
lesser of (i) the borrowing base and (ii) the aggregate commitments under the receivables based
credit facility, we will be required to repay outstanding loans and cash collateralize letters of
credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess.
We may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the receivables based credit facility at any
time without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs with respect to Eurocurrency
rate loans.
The receivables based credit facility is guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, the
guarantors of the senior secured credit facilities. All obligations under the receivables based
credit facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured by a perfected first priority
security interest in all of our and all of the guarantors accounts receivable and related assets
and proceeds thereof, subject to permitted liens and certain exceptions.
The receivables based credit facility includes negative covenants, representations,
warranties, events of default, conditions precedent and termination provisions substantially
similar to those governing our senior secured credit facilities.
Senior Cash Pay Notes and Senior Toggle Notes
We have outstanding $796.3 million aggregate principal amount of 10.75% senior cash pay notes
due 2016 and $915.2 million aggregate principal amount of 11.00%/11.75% senior toggle notes due
2016.
The senior toggle notes mature on August 1, 2016 and may require a special redemption of up to
$30.0 million on August 1, 2015. We may elect on each interest election date to pay all or 50% of
such interest on the senior toggle notes in cash or by increasing the principal amount of the
senior toggle notes or by issuing new senior toggle notes (such increase or issuance, PIK
Interest). Interest on the senior toggle notes payable in cash will accrue at a rate of 11.00%
per annum and PIK Interest will accrue at a rate of 11.75% per annum.
On January 15, 2009, Clear Channel made a permitted election under the indenture governing the
senior toggle notes to pay PIK Interest under the senior toggle notes for the semi-annual interest
period commencing February 1, 2009. For subsequent interest periods, Clear Channel must make an
election regarding whether the applicable interest payment on the senior toggle notes will be made
entirely in cash, entirely through PIK Interest or 50% in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. In the
absence of such an election for any interest period, interest on the senior toggle notes will be
payable according to the election for the immediately preceding interest period. As a result, Clear
Channel is deemed to have made the PIK Interest election for future interest periods unless and
until Clear Channel elects otherwise.
A contractual payment to bondholders will be required on August 1, 2013. The amount included
in Interest payments on long-term debt in the Contractual Obligations table of this MD&A assumes
that Clear Channel continues to make the PIK election.
A-35
Subsidiary Senior Notes
In December 2009 Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (CCWH), an indirect, wholly-owned
subsidiary of our publicly traded subsidiary, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCOH), issued
$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series A Senior Notes due 2017 and $2.0 billion
aggregate principal amount of Series B Senior Notes due 2017 (collectively, the Notes). The
Notes are guaranteed by CCOH, Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (CCOI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
CCOH, and certain other existing and future domestic subsidiaries of CCOH (collectively, the
Guarantors).
The Notes are senior obligations that rank pari passu in right of payment to all
unsubordinated indebtedness of CCWH and the guarantees of the Notes will rank pari passu in right
of payment to all unsubordinated indebtedness of the Guarantors.
The indentures governing the Notes require us to maintain at least $100 million in cash or
other liquid assets or have cash available to be borrowed under committed credit facilities
consisting of (i) $50.0 million at the issuer and guarantor entities (principally the Americas
outdoor segment) and (ii) $50.0 million at the non-guarantor subsidiaries (principally the
International outdoor segment) (together the Liquidity Amount), in each case under the sole
control of the relevant entity. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution,
reorganization, or similar proceeding of Clear Channel Communications, Inc., for the period
thereafter that is the shorter of such proceeding and 60 days, the Liquidity Amount shall be
reduced to $50.0 million, with a $25.0 million requirement at the issuer and guarantor entities and
a $25.0 million requirement at the non-guarantor subsidiaries.
In addition, interest on the Notes accrues daily and is payable into an account established by
the trustee for the benefit of the bondholders (the Trustee Account). Failure to make daily
payment on any day does not constitute an event of default so long as (a) no payment or other
transfer by CCOH or any of its Subsidiaries shall have been made on such day under the cash
management sweep with Clear Channel Communications, Inc. and (b) on each semiannual interest
payment date the aggregate amount of funds in the Trustee Account is equal to at least the
aggregate amount of accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes.
The indenture governing the Series A Notes contains covenants that limit CCOH and its
restricted subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional debt to persons other than Clear Channel Communications
and its subsidiaries (other than CCOH) or issue certain preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on its restricted subsidiaries assets to secure such debt; |
|
|
|
|
create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to CCOH from its
restricted subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the notes; |
|
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another person, or sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of its assets; |
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets, including capital stock of its subsidiaries, to persons other than
Clear Channel Communications and its subsidiaries (other than CCOH). |
The indenture governing the Series A Notes does not include limitations on dividends,
distributions, investments or asset sales.
The indenture governing the Series B Notes contains covenants that limit CCOH and its
restricted subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional debt or issue certain preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
redeem, repurchase or retire CCOHs subordinated debt; |
|
|
|
|
make certain investments; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on its or its restricted subsidiaries assets to secure debt; |
|
|
|
|
create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to it from its
restricted subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the Notes; |
|
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another person, or sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of its assets; |
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets, including capital stock of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
designate its subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other restricted payments; and |
A-36
|
|
|
purchase or otherwise effectively cancel or retire any of the Series B Notes if after
doing so the ratio of (a) the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Series A Notes
to (b) the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes shall be greater
than 0.250. This stipulation ensures, among other things, that as long as the Series A
Notes are outstanding, the Series B Notes are outstanding. |
The Series B Notes indenture restricts CCOHs ability to incur additional indebtedness and pay
dividends based on an incurrence test. In order to incur additional indebtedness, CCOHs debt to
adjusted EBITDA ratios (as defined by the indenture) must be lower than 6.5:1 and 3.25:1 for total
debt and senior debt, respectively. Similarly in order for CCOH to pay dividends from the proceeds
of indebtedness or the proceeds from asset sales, its debt to adjusted EBITDA ratios (as defined by
the indenture) must be lower than 6.0:1 and 3.0:1 for total debt and senior debt, respectively. If
these ratios are not met, CCOH has certain exceptions that allow it to incur additional
indebtedness and pay dividends, such as a $500.0 million exception for the payment of dividends.
CCOH was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2009.
A portion of the proceeds of the Notes were used to (i) pay the fees and expenses of the Notes
offering, (ii) fund $50.0 million of the Liquidity Amount (the $50.0 million liquidity amount of
the non-guarantor subsidiaries was satisfied) and (iii) apply $2.0 billion of the cash proceeds
(which amount is equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes) to repay an equal
amount of indebtedness under Clear Channels senior secured credit facilities. In accordance with
the senior secured credit facilities, the $2.0 billion cash proceeds were applied ratably to the
Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and both delayed draw term loan facilities, and within each such class,
such prepayment was applied to remaining scheduled installments of principal.
The balance of the proceeds is available to CCOI for general corporate purposes. In this
regard, all of the remaining proceeds could be used to pay dividends from CCOI to CCOH. In turn,
CCOH could declare a dividend to its shareholders of which Clear Channel would receive its
proportionate share. Payment of such dividends would not be prohibited by the terms of the Notes
or any of the loan agreements or credit facilities of CCOI or CCOH.
Dispositions and Other
During 2009, we sold six radio stations for approximately $12.0 million and recorded a loss of
$12.8 million in Other operating income (expense) net. In addition, we exchanged radio
stations in our radio markets for assets located in a different market and recognized a loss of
$28.0 million in Other operating income (expense) net.
During 2009, we sold international assets for $11.3 million resulting in a gain of $4.4
million in Other operating income (expense) net. In addition, we sold assets for $6.8 million
in our Americas outdoor segment and recorded a gain of $4.9 million in Other operating income
(expense) net. We sold our taxi advertising business and recorded a loss of $20.9 million in
our Americas outdoor segment included in Other operating income (expense) net. We also received
proceeds of $18.3 million from the sale of corporate assets during 2009 and recorded a loss of $0.7
million in Other operating income (expense) net.
In addition, we sold our remaining interest in Grupo ACIR for approximately $40.5 million and
recorded a loss of approximately $5.8 million during 2009.
During 2008, Clear Channel received proceeds of $110.5 million related to the sale of radio
stations recorded as investing cash flows from discontinued operations and recorded a gain of $28.8
million as a component of Income from discontinued operations, net during 2008. Clear Channel
received proceeds of $1.0 billion related to the sale of its television business recorded as
investing cash flows from discontinued operations and recorded a gain of $662.9 million as a
component of Income from discontinued operations, net.
In addition, Clear Channel sold its 50% interest in Clear Channel Independent during 2008 and
recognized a gain of $75.6 million in Equity in earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated affiliates
based on the fair value of the equity securities received in the pre-merger period.
Clear Channel sold a portion of its investment in Grupo ACIR for approximately $47.0 million
on July 1, 2008 and recorded a gain of $9.2 million in Equity in earnings (loss) of
nonconsolidated affiliates.
A-37
Uses of Capital
Debt Repurchases, Tender Offers, Maturities and Other
During 2009 and 2008, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, CC Finco, LLC, and CC Finco II,
LLC, repurchased certain of Clear Channels outstanding senior notes through open market
repurchases, privately negotiated transactions and tenders as shown in the table below. Notes
repurchased and held by CC Finco, LLC and CC Finco II, LLC, are eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
CC Finco, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of debt repurchased |
|
$ |
801,302 |
|
|
$ |
102,241 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments (1) |
|
|
(146,314 |
) |
|
|
(24,367 |
) |
Deferred loan costs and other |
|
|
(1,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain recorded in Other income (expense) net (2) |
|
|
(368,591 |
) |
|
|
(53,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for repurchases of long-term debt |
|
$ |
284,929 |
|
|
$ |
24,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Finco II, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of debt repurchased (3) |
|
$ |
433,125 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred loan costs and other |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain recorded in Other income (expense) net (2) |
|
|
(373,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for repurchases of long-term debt |
|
$ |
58,537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents unamortized fair value purchase accounting discounts recorded as a result of
the merger. |
|
(2) |
|
CC Finco, LLC, and CC Finco II, LLC, repurchased certain of Clear Channels legacy
notes, senior cash pay notes and senior toggle notes at a discount, resulting in a gain on
the extinguishment of debt. |
|
(3) |
|
CC Finco II, LLC immediately cancelled these notes subsequent to the purchase. |
On January 15, 2008, Clear Channel redeemed its 4.625% senior notes at their maturity for
$500.0 million with proceeds from its bank credit facility. On June 15, 2008, Clear Channel
redeemed its 6.625% senior notes at their maturity for $125.0 million with available cash on hand.
Clear Channel terminated its cross currency swaps on July 30, 2008 by paying the counterparty
$196.2 million from available cash on hand.
On August 7, 2008, Clear Channel announced that it commenced a cash tender offer and consent
solicitation for the outstanding $750.0 million principal amount of 7.65% senior notes due 2010.
The tender offer and consent payment expired on September 9, 2008. The aggregate principal amount
of 7.65% senior notes validly tendered and accepted for payment was $363.9 million. Clear Channel
recorded a $21.8 million loss in Other income (expense) net during the pre-merger period as a
result of the tender.
Clear Channel repurchased $639.2 million aggregate principal amount of the AMFM Operating Inc.
8% senior notes pursuant to a tender offer and consent solicitation in connection with the merger.
The remaining 8% senior notes were redeemed at maturity on November 1, 2008. The aggregate loss on
the extinguishment of debt recorded in 2008 as a result of the tender offer for the AMFM Operating
Inc. 8% notes was $8.0 million.
On November 24, 2008, Clear Channel announced that it commenced another cash tender offer to
purchase its outstanding 7.65% Senior Notes due 2010. The tender offer and consent payment expired
on December 23, 2008. The aggregate principal amount of 7.65% senior notes validly tendered and
accepted for payment was $252.4 million. The aggregate gain on the extinguishment of debt recorded
during the post-merger period as a result of the tender offer for the 7.65% senior notes due 2010
was $74.7 million.
During the second quarter of 2009, we redeemed the remaining principal amount of Clear
Channels 4.25% senior notes at maturity with a draw under the $500.0 million delayed draw term
loan facility that is specifically designated for this purpose.
A-38
Dividends
We have never paid cash dividends on our Class A common stock, and we currently do not intend
to pay cash dividends on our Class A common stock in the future. Clear Channels debt financing
arrangements include restrictions on its ability to pay dividends, which in turn affects our
ability to pay dividends.
Prior to the merger, Clear Channel declared a $93.4 million dividend on December 3, 2007
payable to shareholders of record on December 31, 2007 and paid on January 15, 2008.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures were $223.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. Capital
expenditures on a combined basis for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $430.5 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Radio |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Non-revenue producing |
|
$ |
41.9 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
95.0 |
|
Revenue producing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41.9 |
|
|
$ |
84.4 |
|
|
$ |
91.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
223.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
During 2009, our Americas outdoor segment paid $5.0 million primarily for the acquisition of
land and buildings.
We acquired FCC licenses in our radio segment for $11.7 million in cash during 2008. We
acquired outdoor display faces and additional equity interests in international outdoor companies
for $96.5 million in cash during 2008. Our national representation business acquired
representation contracts for $68.9 million in cash during 2008.
Purchases of Additional Equity Interests
During 2009, our Americas outdoor segment purchased the remaining 15% interest in our
consolidated subsidiary, Paneles Napsa S.A., for $13.0 million and our International outdoor
segment acquired an additional 5% interest in our consolidated subsidiary, Clear Channel Jolly
Pubblicita SPA, for $12.1 million.
Certain Relationships with the Sponsors
We are party to a management agreement with certain affiliates of the Sponsors and certain
other parties pursuant to which such affiliates of the Sponsors will provide management and
financial advisory services until 2018. These arrangements require management fees to be paid to
such affiliates of the Sponsors for such services at a rate not greater than $15.0 million per year
plus expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized management fees of $15.0
million. For the post-merger period of 2008, we recognized Sponsors management fees of $6.3
million.
In addition, we reimbursed the Sponsors for additional expenses in the amount of $5.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In connection with the merger, we paid certain affiliates of the Sponsors $87.5 million in
fees and expenses for financial and structural advice and analysis, assistance with due diligence
investigations and debt financing negotiations and $15.9 million for reimbursement of escrow and
other out-of-pocket expenses. This amount was allocated between merger expenses, deferred loan
costs or included in the overall purchase price of the merger.
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings. Based on current assumptions, we have
accrued an estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims. Future results of
operations could be materially affected by changes in these assumptions.
A-39
Certain agreements relating to acquisitions provide for purchase price adjustments and other
future contingent payments based on the financial performance of the acquired companies generally
over a one to five-year period. The aggregate of these contingent payments, if performance targets
are met, would not significantly impact our financial position or results of operations.
In addition to our scheduled maturities on our debt, we have future cash obligations under
various types of contracts. We lease office space, certain broadcast facilities, equipment and the
majority of the land occupied by our outdoor advertising structures under long-term operating
leases. Some of our lease agreements contain renewal options and annual rental escalation clauses
(generally tied to the consumer price index), as well as provisions for our payment of utilities
and maintenance.
We have minimum franchise payments associated with non-cancelable contracts that enable us to
display advertising on such media as buses, taxis, trains, bus shelters and terminals. The
majority of these contracts contain rent provisions that are calculated as the greater of a
percentage of the relevant advertising revenue or a specified guaranteed minimum annual payment.
Also, we have non-cancelable contracts in our radio broadcasting operations related to program
rights and music license fees.
In the normal course of business, our broadcasting operations have minimum future payments
associated with employee and talent contracts. These contracts typically contain cancellation
provisions that allow us to cancel the contract with good cause.
The scheduled maturities of our senior secured credit facilities, receivables based facility,
senior cash pay and senior toggle notes, other long-term debt outstanding, future minimum rental
commitments under non-cancelable lease agreements, minimum payments under other non-cancelable
contracts, payments under employment/talent contracts, capital expenditure commitments, and other
long-term obligations as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Payments due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011-2012 |
|
|
2013-2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt |
|
$ |
13,928,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,095 |
|
|
$ |
3,315,026 |
|
|
$ |
10,586,990 |
|
Senior Cash Pay and Senior Toggle Notes (1) |
|
|
1,711,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,711,450 |
|
Clear Channel Senior Notes |
|
|
3,267,549 |
|
|
|
356,156 |
|
|
|
1,082,829 |
|
|
|
853,564 |
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
Subsidiary Senior Notes |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
Other Long-term Debt |
|
|
82,882 |
|
|
|
47,077 |
|
|
|
31,769 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt (2) |
|
|
7,270,202 |
|
|
|
1,152,658 |
|
|
|
2,033,704 |
|
|
|
2,334,780 |
|
|
|
1,749,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cancelable Operating Leases |
|
|
2,649,573 |
|
|
|
367,524 |
|
|
|
588,254 |
|
|
|
468,144 |
|
|
|
1,225,651 |
|
Non-Cancelable Contracts |
|
|
2,294,611 |
|
|
|
541,683 |
|
|
|
748,929 |
|
|
|
423,184 |
|
|
|
580,815 |
|
Employment/Talent Contracts |
|
|
458,903 |
|
|
|
168,505 |
|
|
|
179,442 |
|
|
|
55,689 |
|
|
|
55,267 |
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
136,262 |
|
|
|
67,372 |
|
|
|
45,638 |
|
|
|
19,837 |
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
Other long-term obligations (3) |
|
|
152,499 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
13,077 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
134,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (4) |
|
$ |
34,452,042 |
|
|
$ |
2,702,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,749,737 |
|
|
$ |
7,477,708 |
|
|
$ |
19,522,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On January 15, 2009, Clear Channel made a permitted election under the indenture governing
the senior toggle notes to pay PIK Interest with respect to 100% of the senior toggle notes
for the semi-annual interest period commencing February 1, 2009. For subsequent interest
periods, Clear Channel must make an election regarding whether the applicable interest payment
on the senior toggle notes will be made entirely in cash, entirely through PIK Interest or 50%
in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. In the absence of such an election for any interest period,
interest on the senior toggle notes will be payable according to the election for the
immediately preceding interest period. As a result, Clear Channel is deemed to have made the
PIK Interest election for future interest periods unless and until Clear Channel elects
otherwise. Therefore, the interest payments on the senior toggle notes assume that the PIK
Interest election remains the default election over the term of the notes. Assuming the PIK
Interest election remains in effect over the term of the Notes, we are contractually obligated
to make a payment of $486.1 million on August 1, 2013 which is included in Interest payments
on long-term debt in the table above. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on the senior secured credit facilities, other than the revolving credit
facility, assume the obligations are repaid in accordance with the amortization schedule
included in the credit agreement and the interest rate is held constant over the remaining
term based on the weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2009 on the senior secured
credit facilities. |
|
|
|
Interest payments related to the revolving credit facility assume the balance and interest rate
as of December 31, |
A-40
|
|
|
|
|
2009 is held constant over the remaining term. |
|
|
|
Interest payments on $6.0 billion of the Term Loan B facility are effectively fixed at interest
rates between 2.6% and 4.4%, plus applicable margins, per annum, as a result of an aggregate
$6.0 billion notional amount of interest rate swap agreements. $3.5 billion notional amount of
interest rate swap agreements mature in October of 2010 with the
remaining $2.5 billion maturing in September 2013. Interest expense assumes the rate is fixed
through maturity of the swaps, at which point the rate reverts back to the floating rate in
effect at December 31, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Other long-term obligations consist of $51.3 million related to asset retirement obligations
recorded pursuant to ASC 410-20, which assumes the underlying assets will be removed at some
period over the next 50 years. Also included are $36.1 million of contract payments in our
syndicated radio and media representation businesses and $65.1 million of various other
long-term obligations. |
|
(4) |
|
Excluded from the table is $672.1 million related to various obligations with no specific
contractual commitment or maturity, $308.3 million of which relates to unrecognized tax
benefits and accrued interest and penalties recorded pursuant to ASC 740-10 and $237.2 million
of which relates to the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements. |
Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
After the merger a significant amount of our long-term debt bears interest at variable rates.
Accordingly, our earnings will be affected by changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2009 we
had interest rate swap agreements with a $6.0 billion notional amount that effectively fixes
interest at rates between 2.6% and 4.4%, plus applicable margins, per annum. The fair value of
these agreements at December 31, 2009 was a liability of $237.2 million. At December 31, 2009,
approximately 36% of our aggregate principal amount of long-term debt, including taking into
consideration debt on which we have entered into pay-fixed rate receive floating rate swap
agreements, bears interest at floating rates.
Assuming the current level of borrowings and interest rate swap contracts and assuming a 30%
change in LIBOR, it is estimated that our interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009
would have changed by approximately $5.6 million.
In the event of an adverse change in interest rates, management may take actions to further
mitigate its exposure. However, due to the uncertainty of the actions that would be taken and
their possible effects, this interest rate analysis assumes no such actions. Further, the analysis
does not consider the effects of the change in the level of overall economic activity that could
exist in such an environment.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have operations in countries throughout the world. Foreign operations are measured in
their local currencies except in hyper-inflationary countries in which we operate. As a result,
our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange
rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets in which we have operations. We believe
we mitigate a small portion of our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations with a natural hedge
through borrowings in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Our foreign operations reported a net
loss of approximately $285.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. We estimate a 10%
change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies would have changed our net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 by approximately $28.6 million.
Our earnings are also affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to
foreign currencies as a result of our equity method investments in various countries. It is
estimated that the result of a 10% fluctuation in the value of the dollar relative to these foreign
currencies at December 31, 2009 would change our equity in loss of nonconsolidated affiliates by
$2.1 million and would change our net loss by approximately $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
This analysis does not consider the implications that such fluctuations could have on the
overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment in the U.S. or the foreign
countries or on the results of operations of these foreign entities.
A-41
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-02, Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiarya
Scope Clarification. The update is to ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. The ASU clarifies that the
decrease-in-ownership provisions of ASC 810-10 and related guidance apply to (1) a subsidiary or
group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity, (2) a subsidiary or group of assets that
is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint
venture, and (3) an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity
for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).
In addition, the ASU expands the information an entity is required to disclose upon deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. This standard is effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009
with retrospective application required for the first period in which the entity adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160. We adopted the amendment upon issuance with no material
impact to our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. The update is to ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation. This standard amends ASC 810-10-25 by requiring consolidation of certain special
purpose entities that were previously exempted from consolidation. The revised criteria will define
a controlling financial interest for requiring consolidation as: the power to direct the activities
that most significantly affect the entitys performance, and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of
the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This standard is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We adopted the amendment on January 1, 2010 with
no material impact to our financial position or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. The
update is to ASC Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair
value measurement of liabilities. The purpose of this update is to reduce ambiguity in financial
reporting when measuring the fair value of liabilities. The guidance provided in this update is
effective for the first reporting period beginning after the date of issuance. We adopted the
amendment on October 1, 2009 with no material impact to our financial position or results of
operations.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, codified
in ASC 105-10, was issued in June 2009. ASC 105-10 identifies the sources of accounting principles
and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States. ASC
105-10 establishes the ASC as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied
by nongovernmental entities. Following this statement, the FASB will issue new standards in the
form of ASUs. ASC 105-10 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of ASC 105-10 on July 1, 2009.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46(R) (Statement No. 167), which is not yet codified, was issued in June 2009. Statement No. 167
shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period
that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period,
and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited.
Statement No. 167 amends Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, codified in ASC 810-10-25, to replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is
expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which enterprise has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. Statement No. 167 requires an
additional reconsideration event when determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity
when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at
risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to
direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance. It also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. These requirements will provide more relevant and
timely information to users of financial statements. Statement No. 167 amends ASC 810-10-25 to
require additional disclosures about an enterprises involvement in variable interest entities,
which will enhance the information provided to users of financial statements. We adopted Statement
No. 167 on January 1, 2010 with no material impact to our financial position or results of
operations.
A-42
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events, codified in ASC
855-10, was issued in May 2009. The provisions of ASC 855-10 are effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009 and are intended to establish general standards of accounting
for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that datethat is,
whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be
issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not
evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. In
accordance with the provisions of ASC 855-10, we currently evaluate subsequent events through the
date the financial statements are issued.
FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted
in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, codified in ASC 260-10-45, was
issued in June 2008. ASC 260-10-45 clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards with a right
to receive nonforfeitable dividends are participating securities. Guidance is also provided on how
to allocate earnings to participating securities and compute basic earnings per share using the
two-class method. All prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected
financial data) to conform with the provisions of ASC 260-10-45. We retrospectively adopted the
provisions of ASC 260-10-45 on January 1, 2009. The impact of adopting ASC 260-10-45 decreased
previously reported basic earnings per share by $.01 for the pre-merger year ended December 31,
2007.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, codified in ASC 810-10-45, was issued in
December 2007. ASC 810-10-45 clarifies the classification of noncontrolling interests in
consolidated statements of financial position and the accounting for and reporting of transactions
between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under this guidance,
noncontrolling interests are considered equity and should be reported as an element of consolidated
equity, net income will encompass the total income of all consolidated subsidiaries and there will
be separate disclosure on the face of the income statement of the attribution of that income
between the controlling and noncontrolling interests, and increases and decreases in the
noncontrolling ownership interest amount will be accounted for as equity transactions. The
provisions of ASC 810-10-45 are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is prohibited. Guidance is required to be adopted
prospectively, except for reclassifying noncontrolling interests to equity, separate from the
parents shareholders equity, in the consolidated statement of financial position and recasting
consolidated net income (loss) to include net income (loss) attributable to both the controlling
and noncontrolling interests, both of which are required to be adopted retrospectively. We adopted
the provisions of ASC 810-10-45 on January 1, 2009, which resulted in a reclassification of
approximately $426.2 million of noncontrolling interests to shareholders equity.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, codified in ASC 815-10-50, was issued in March 2008. ASC 815-10-50
requires additional disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how derivative instruments
and related hedged items effect an entitys financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. We adopted the provisions of ASC 815-10-50 on January 1, 2009. Please refer to Note H in
Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for disclosure required by ASC 815-10-50.
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, codified in ASC
820-10, was issued in February 2008. ASC 820-10 delays the effective date of FASB Statement No.
157, Fair Value Measurements, for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We adopted the provisions of ASC
820-10 on January 1, 2009 with no material impact to our financial position or results of
operations.
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly, codified in ASC 820-10, was issued in April 2009. ASC 820-10-35 provides
additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset
or liability have significantly decreased. ASC 820-10 also includes guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. This guidance is effective for interim
and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early
adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. Earlier adoption for periods ending
before March 15, 2009 is not permitted. We adopted the provisions of ASC 820-10 on April 1, 2009
with no material impact to our financial position or results of operations.
A-43
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, codified in ASC 320-10-35, was issued in April 2009. It amends
the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance
more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments
on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. ASC 320-10-35 does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June
15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. Earlier adoption
for periods ending before March 15, 2009 is not permitted. We adopted the provisions of ASC
320-10-35 on April 1, 2009 with no material impact to our financial position or results of
operations.
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, codified in ASC 825-10-50, was issued in April 2009. ASC 825-10-50 amends
prior authoritative guidance to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for
interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
The provisions of ASC 825-10-50 are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We adopted the
disclosure requirements of ASC 825-10-50 on April 1, 2009.
Inflation
Inflation is a factor in the economies in which we do business and we continue to seek ways to
mitigate its effect. Inflation has affected our performance in terms of higher costs for wages,
salaries and equipment. Although the exact impact of inflation is indeterminable, we believe we
have offset these higher costs by increasing the effective advertising rates of most of our
broadcasting stations and outdoor display faces.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of expenses during the
reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates that are based on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. The result of these evaluations forms the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported amount of expenses that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Because future events and their effects cannot be determined with
certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such difference
could be material. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements, included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully
understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require managements most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The following narrative describes these critical
accounting estimates, the judgments and assumptions and the effect if actual results differ from
these assumptions.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors.
In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customers inability to meet its financial
obligations, we record a specific reserve to reduce the amounts recorded to what we believe will be
collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debt based on historical
experience of bad debts as a percent of revenue for each business unit, adjusted for relative
improvements or deteriorations in the agings and changes in current economic conditions.
If our agings were to improve or deteriorate resulting in a 10% change in our allowance, we
estimated that our bad debt expense for the year ended December 31, 2009, would have changed by
approximately $7.2 million and our net loss for the same period would have changed by approximately
$4.4 million.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangibles are
reviewed for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that depreciable and amortizable
long-lived assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. When specific assets are
determined to be unrecoverable, the cost basis of the asset is reduced to reflect the current fair
market value.
A-44
We use various assumptions in determining the current fair market value of these assets,
including future expected cash flows, industry growth rates and discount rates, as well as future
salvage values. Our impairment loss calculations require management to apply judgment in
estimating future cash flows, including forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting the
discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.
Using the impairment review described above, we recorded aggregate impairment charges of
approximately $87.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. For additional information,
please refer to the Impairment Charges section included in the beginning of this MD&A.
If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments used in estimating
future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to future impairment losses that could
be material to our results of operations. For additional information, please refer to the
Impairment Charges section included in the beginning of this MD&A.
Indefinite-lived Assets
Indefinite-lived assets are reviewed annually for possible impairment using the direct
valuation method as prescribed in ASC 805-20-S99. Under the direct valuation method, the fair
value of the indefinite-lived assets was calculated at the market level as prescribed by ASC
350-30-35. Under the direct valuation method, it is assumed that rather than acquiring
indefinite-lived intangible assets as a part of a going concern business, the buyer hypothetically
obtains indefinite-lived intangible assets and builds a new operation with similar attributes from
scratch. Thus, the buyer incurs start-up costs during the build-up phase which are normally
associated with going concern value. Initial capital costs are deducted from the discounted cash
flows model which results in value that is directly attributable to the indefinite-lived intangible
assets.
Our key assumptions using the direct valuation method are market revenue growth rates, market
share, profit margin, duration and profile of the build-up period, estimated start-up capital costs
and losses incurred during the build-up period, the risk-adjusted discount rate and terminal
values. This data is populated using industry normalized information representing an average asset
within a market.
In accordance with ASC 350-30, we performed an interim impairment test as of December 31, 2008
and again as of June 30, 2009. The estimated fair value of our FCC licenses and permits was below
their carrying values at the date of each interim impairment test. As a result, we recognized
non-cash impairment charges of $1.7 billion and $935.6 million at December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2009, respectively, related to our indefinite-lived FCC licenses and permits. For additional
information, please refer to the Impairment Charges section included in the beginning of this MD&A.
If our future results are not consistent with our estimates, we could be exposed to future
impairment losses that could be material to our results of operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net
assets acquired in business combinations. We test goodwill at interim dates if events or changes
in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. The fair value of our reporting units
is used to apply value to the net assets of each reporting unit. To the extent that the carrying
amount of net assets would exceed the fair value, an impairment charge may be required to be
recorded.
The discounted cash flow approach we use for valuing goodwill involves estimating future cash
flows expected to be generated from the related assets, discounted to their present value using a
risk-adjusted discount rate. Terminal values are also estimated and discounted to their present
value. In accordance with ASC 350-20, we performed an interim impairment test on goodwill as of
December 31, 2008 and again as of June 30, 2009.
The estimated fair value of our reporting units was below their carrying values at the date of
each interim impairment test, which required us to compare the implied fair value of each reporting
units goodwill with its carrying value. As a result, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of
$3.6 billion and $3.1 billion at December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively, to reduce our
goodwill. For additional information, please refer to the Impairment Charges section included in
the beginning of this MD&A.
If our future results are not consistent with our estimates, we could be exposed to future
impairment losses that could be material to our results of operations.
A-45
Tax Accruals
The IRS and other taxing authorities routinely examine our tax returns we file as part of the
consolidated tax returns filed by us. From time to time, the IRS challenges certain of our tax
positions. We believe our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and we would vigorously
defend these positions if challenged. The final disposition of any positions challenged by the IRS
could require us to make additional tax payments. We believe that we have adequately accrued for
any foreseeable payments resulting from tax examinations and consequently do not anticipate any
material impact upon their ultimate resolution.
Our estimates of income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred assets and
liabilities are shown in the notes to our consolidated financial statements and reflect our
assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the financial statements, giving
consideration to both timing and probability of these estimates. Actual income taxes could vary
from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law or results from the final review of
our tax returns by Federal, state or foreign tax authorities.
We have considered these potential changes in accordance with ASC 740-10, which requires
us to record reserves for estimates of probable settlements of Federal and state tax audits.
Litigation Accruals
We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings and, as required, have accrued our
estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims.
Managements estimates used have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based
upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement
strategies.
It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be
materially affected by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies related to
these proceedings. During 2009, we recorded a $23.5 million accrual related to an unfavorable
outcome of litigation concerning a breach of contract regarding internet advertising and our radio
stations.
Insurance Accruals
We are currently self-insured beyond certain retention amounts for various insurance
coverages, including general liability and property and casualty. Accruals are recorded based on
estimates of actual claims filed, historical payouts, existing insurance coverage and projected
future development of costs related to existing claims.
Our self-insured liabilities contain uncertainties because management must make assumptions
and apply judgment to estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but
not reported as of December 31, 2009.
If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we may be exposed to
gains or losses that could be material. A 10% change in our self-insurance liabilities at December
31, 2009, would have affected our net loss by approximately $2.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Asset Retirement Obligations
ASC 410-20 requires us to estimate our obligation upon the termination or nonrenewal of a
lease, to dismantle and remove our billboard structures from the leased land and to reclaim the
site to its original condition. We record the present value of obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which they are incurred. When the
liability is recorded, the cost is capitalized as part of the related long-lived assets carrying
amount. Over time, accretion of the liability is recognized as an operating expense and the
capitalized cost is depreciated over the expected useful life of the related asset.
Due to the high rate of lease renewals over a long period of time, our calculation assumes all
related assets will be removed at some period over the next 50 years. An estimate of third-party
cost information is used with respect to the dismantling of the structures and the reclamation of
the site. The interest rate used to calculate the present value of such costs over the retirement
period is based on an estimated risk-adjusted credit rate for the same period. If our assumption
of the risk-adjusted credit rate used to discount current year additions to the asset retirement
obligation decreased approximately 1%, our liability as of December 31, 2009 would increase
approximately $0.2 million. Similarly, if our assumption of the risk-adjusted credit rate
increased approximately 1%, our liability would decrease approximately $0.1 million.
A-46
Shared based Payments
Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718-10, stock based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award. For awards that vest based on service
conditions, this cost is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
For awards that will vest based on market, performance and service conditions, this cost will be
recognized when it becomes probable that the performance conditions will be satisfied. Determining
the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires assumptions and judgments about
expected volatility and forfeiture rates, among other factors. If actual results differ
significantly from these estimates, our results of operations could be materially impacted.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Required information is within Item 7.
A-47
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements and notes related thereto were prepared by and are the
responsibility of management. The financial statements and related notes were prepared in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts based upon
managements best estimates and judgments.
It is managements objective to ensure the integrity and objectivity of its financial data through
systems of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are
properly recorded in our books and records, that assets are safeguarded from unauthorized use and
that financial records are reliable to serve as a basis for preparation of financial statements.
The financial statements have been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, to the extent required by auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, they have expressed their professional opinion on
the financial statements in their report included herein.
The Board of Directors meets with the independent registered public accounting firm and management
periodically to satisfy itself that they are properly discharging their responsibilities. The
independent registered public accounting firm has unrestricted access to the Board, without
management present, to discuss the results of their audit and the quality of financial reporting
and internal accounting controls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark P. Mays
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas W. Casey
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
/s/ Herbert W. Hill, Jr.
|
|
|
Senior Vice President/Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
A-48
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
CC Media Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CC Media Holdings, Inc. (Holdings)
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity (deficit), and cash flows of Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the
period from July 31, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the related consolidated statement of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (Clear
Channel) for the period from January 1, 2008 through July 30, 2008 and for the year ended December
31, 2007. Our audits also include the financial statement schedule listed in the index as Item
15(a)2. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of Holdings management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Holdings at December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
consolidated results of Holdings operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009
and for the period from July 31, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the consolidated results of Clear
Channels operations and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2008 through July 30, 2008 and
the year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Holdings internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 16, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Antonio, Texas
March 16, 2010
A-49
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,883,994 |
|
|
$ |
239,846 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $71,650 in 2009 and $97,364 in 2008 |
|
|
1,301,700 |
|
|
|
1,431,304 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
136,207 |
|
|
|
46,615 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
81,669 |
|
|
|
133,217 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
255,275 |
|
|
|
215,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
3,658,845 |
|
|
|
2,066,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings and improvements |
|
|
633,222 |
|
|
|
614,811 |
|
Structures |
|
|
2,514,602 |
|
|
|
2,355,776 |
|
Towers, transmitters and studio equipment |
|
|
381,046 |
|
|
|
353,108 |
|
Furniture and other equipment |
|
|
234,101 |
|
|
|
242,287 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
88,391 |
|
|
|
128,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,851,362 |
|
|
|
3,694,721 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
518,969 |
|
|
|
146,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,332,393 |
|
|
|
3,548,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangibles, net |
|
|
2,599,244 |
|
|
|
2,881,720 |
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles licenses |
|
|
2,429,839 |
|
|
|
3,019,803 |
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles permits |
|
|
1,132,218 |
|
|
|
1,529,068 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,125,005 |
|
|
|
7,090,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
11,633 |
|
Investments in, and advances to, nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
345,349 |
|
|
|
384,137 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
378,058 |
|
|
|
560,260 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
44,685 |
|
|
|
33,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
18,047,101 |
|
|
$ |
21,125,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
132,193 |
|
|
$ |
155,240 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
726,311 |
|
|
|
793,366 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
137,236 |
|
|
|
181,264 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
398,779 |
|
|
|
562,923 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
149,617 |
|
|
|
153,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,544,136 |
|
|
|
1,845,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
20,303,126 |
|
|
|
18,940,697 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,220,023 |
|
|
|
2,679,312 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
824,554 |
|
|
|
575,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note J) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
455,648 |
|
|
|
426,220 |
|
Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, authorized 400,000,000
shares, issued 23,428,807 and 23,605,923 shares in 2009 and 2008,
respectively |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Class B Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, authorized 150,000,000
shares, issued 555,556 shares in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Class C Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, authorized 100,000,000
shares, issued 58,967,502 shares in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,109,110 |
|
|
|
2,100,995 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(9,076,084 |
) |
|
|
(5,041,998 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(333,309 |
) |
|
|
(401,529 |
) |
Cost of shares (147,783 in 2009 and 81 in 2008) held in treasury |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Deficit |
|
|
(6,844,738 |
) |
|
|
(2,916,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Deficit |
|
$ |
18,047,101 |
|
|
$ |
21,125,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A-50
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
July 31 through |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
5,551,909 |
|
|
$ |
2,736,941 |
|
|
$ |
3,951,742 |
|
|
$ |
6,921,202 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (excludes
depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
2,583,263 |
|
|
|
1,198,345 |
|
|
|
1,706,099 |
|
|
|
2,733,004 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(excludes depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
1,466,593 |
|
|
|
806,787 |
|
|
|
1,022,459 |
|
|
|
1,761,939 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
765,474 |
|
|
|
348,041 |
|
|
|
348,789 |
|
|
|
566,627 |
|
Corporate expenses (excludes depreciation
and amortization) |
|
|
253,964 |
|
|
|
102,276 |
|
|
|
125,669 |
|
|
|
181,504 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,085 |
|
|
|
87,684 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (loss) net |
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,687,146 |
) |
|
|
(5,042,246 |
) |
|
|
675,869 |
|
|
|
1,685,479 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,500,866 |
|
|
|
715,768 |
|
|
|
213,210 |
|
|
|
451,870 |
|
Gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
(13,371 |
) |
|
|
(116,552 |
) |
|
|
34,262 |
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
(20,689 |
) |
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
94,215 |
|
|
|
35,176 |
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
679,716 |
|
|
|
131,505 |
|
|
|
(5,112 |
) |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations |
|
|
(4,542,356 |
) |
|
|
(5,737,257 |
) |
|
|
586,024 |
|
|
|
1,280,853 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
76,129 |
|
|
|
76,729 |
|
|
|
(27,280 |
) |
|
|
(252,910 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
417,191 |
|
|
|
619,894 |
|
|
|
(145,303 |
) |
|
|
(188,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
493,320 |
|
|
|
696,623 |
|
|
|
(172,583 |
) |
|
|
(441,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(5,040,634 |
) |
|
|
413,441 |
|
|
|
839,705 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
145,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(5,042,479 |
) |
|
|
1,053,677 |
|
|
|
985,538 |
|
Amount attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(14,950 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
17,152 |
|
|
|
47,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(4,034,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,041,998 |
) |
|
$ |
1,036,525 |
|
|
$ |
938,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
151,422 |
|
|
|
(382,760 |
) |
|
|
46,679 |
|
|
|
105,574 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities and
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
marketable securities |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
(95,669 |
) |
|
|
(52,460 |
) |
|
|
(8,412 |
) |
Unrealized holding loss on cash flow
derivatives |
|
|
(74,100 |
) |
|
|
(75,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for realized
(gain) loss on securities and derivatives
included in net income |
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
102,766 |
|
|
|
(29,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(3,945,078) |
|
|
|
(5,492,740 |
) |
|
|
1,000,953 |
|
|
|
1,033,981 |
|
Amount attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
20,788 |
|
|
|
(49,212 |
) |
|
|
19,210 |
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the
Company |
|
$ |
(3,965,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,443,528 |
) |
|
$ |
981,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,003,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company
before discontinued operations basic |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.04 |
) |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
Discontinued operations basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company
basic |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.06 |
) |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares basic |
|
|
81,296 |
|
|
|
81,242 |
|
|
|
495,044 |
|
|
|
494,347 |
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company
before discontinued operations diluted |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.04 |
) |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
Discontinued operations diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company
diluted |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.06 |
) |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
81,296 |
|
|
|
81,242 |
|
|
|
496,519 |
|
|
|
495,784 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A-51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Interest |
|
Pre-merger Balances at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,982,851 |
|
|
$ |
363,966 |
|
Cumulative effect of FIN 48 adoption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,031 |
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary common stock issued for a business acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,092,566 |
|
|
|
10,780 |
|
Amortization and adjustment of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,049 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
Unrealized (loss) on cash flow derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-merger Balances at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498,075,417 |
|
|
|
464,551 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,152 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and adjustment of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,813 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,367 |
|
Unrealized (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,125 |
) |
Reclassification adjustments for realized gain included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-merger Balances at July 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498,158,062 |
|
|
|
471,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of pre-merger equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498,158,062 |
) |
|
|
(471,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class C |
|
Class B |
|
Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
Post-merger Balances at July 31, 2008 |
|
|
58,967,502 |
|
|
|
555,556 |
|
|
|
21,718,569 |
|
|
|
471,867 |
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock awards and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,887,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and adjustment of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,010 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) on cash flow derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,856 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for realized loss included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-merger Balances at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
58,967,502 |
|
|
|
555,556 |
|
|
|
23,605,923 |
|
|
|
426,220 |
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,950 |
) |
Issuance (forfeiture) of restricted stock awards and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization and adjustment of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,104 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,486 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,201 |
|
Unrealized (loss) on cash flow derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustments for realized loss included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-merger Balances at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
58,967,502 |
|
|
|
555,556 |
|
|
|
23,428,807 |
|
|
$ |
455,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Deficit) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,399 |
|
|
$ |
26,745,687 |
|
|
$ |
(19,054,365 |
) |
|
$ |
290,401 |
|
|
$ |
(3,355 |
) |
|
$ |
8,391,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
74,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
84,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,808 |
|
|
|
26,858,079 |
|
|
|
(18,489,143 |
) |
|
|
355,507 |
|
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
9,233,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,677 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,838 |
|
|
|
26,920,897 |
|
|
|
(17,452,618 |
) |
|
|
334,108 |
|
|
|
(6,975 |
) |
|
|
10,317,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,838 |
) |
|
|
(26,920,897 |
) |
|
|
17,452,618 |
|
|
|
(334,108 |
) |
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
(10,317,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
2,089,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,041,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,042,479 |
) |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(382,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
2,100,995 |
|
|
|
(5,041,998 |
) |
|
|
(401,529 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2,916,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,034,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
27,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
2,109,110 |
|
|
$ |
(9,076,084 |
) |
|
$ |
(333,309 |
) |
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,844,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A-53
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
July 31 through |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,042,479 |
) |
|
$ |
1,053,677 |
|
|
$ |
985,538 |
|
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
145,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(4,049,036 |
) |
|
|
(5,040,634 |
) |
|
|
413,441 |
|
|
|
839,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
423,835 |
|
|
|
197,702 |
|
|
|
290,454 |
|
|
|
461,598 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
341,639 |
|
|
|
150,339 |
|
|
|
58,335 |
|
|
|
105,029 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(417,191 |
) |
|
|
(619,894 |
) |
|
|
145,303 |
|
|
|
188,238 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
52,498 |
|
|
|
54,603 |
|
|
|
23,216 |
|
|
|
38,615 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing charges, bond
premiums and accretion of note discounts, net |
|
|
229,464 |
|
|
|
102,859 |
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
7,739 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
39,786 |
|
|
|
15,911 |
|
|
|
62,723 |
|
|
|
44,051 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of operating and fixed assets |
|
|
50,837 |
|
|
|
(13,205 |
) |
|
|
(14,827 |
) |
|
|
(14,113 |
) |
Loss on forward exchange contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
(Gain) loss on securities |
|
|
13,371 |
|
|
|
116,552 |
|
|
|
(36,758 |
) |
|
|
(10,696 |
) |
Equity in loss (earnings) of nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
20,689 |
|
|
|
(5,804 |
) |
|
|
(94,215 |
) |
|
|
(35,176 |
) |
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(713,034 |
) |
|
|
(116,677 |
) |
|
|
13,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on other investments and assets |
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other, net |
|
|
36,571 |
|
|
|
12,089 |
|
|
|
9,133 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effects of acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable |
|
|
99,225 |
|
|
|
158,142 |
|
|
|
24,529 |
|
|
|
(111,152 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses |
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
6,538 |
|
|
|
(21,459 |
) |
|
|
5,098 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other current assets |
|
|
(21,604 |
) |
|
|
156,869 |
|
|
|
(29,329 |
) |
|
|
694 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(27,934 |
) |
|
|
(130,172 |
) |
|
|
190,834 |
|
|
|
27,027 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest |
|
|
33,047 |
|
|
|
98,909 |
|
|
|
(16,572 |
) |
|
|
(13,429 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in deferred income |
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
(54,938 |
) |
|
|
51,200 |
|
|
|
26,013 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes |
|
|
(70,780 |
) |
|
|
(112,021 |
) |
|
|
(40,260 |
) |
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
181,175 |
|
|
|
246,026 |
|
|
|
1,035,258 |
|
|
|
1,576,428 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A-54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
July 31 through |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in notes receivable, net |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(6,069 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in investments in, and
advances to nonconsolidated affiliates net |
|
|
(3,811 |
) |
|
|
3,909 |
|
|
|
25,098 |
|
|
|
20,868 |
|
Cross currency settlement of interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198,615 |
) |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(3,372 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(726 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of other investments |
|
|
41,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,467 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(223,792 |
) |
|
|
(190,253 |
) |
|
|
(240,202 |
) |
|
|
(363,309 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
48,818 |
|
|
|
16,955 |
|
|
|
72,806 |
|
|
|
26,177 |
|
Acquisition of operating assets |
|
|
(8,300 |
) |
|
|
(23,228 |
) |
|
|
(153,836 |
) |
|
|
(122,110 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other net |
|
|
6,258 |
|
|
|
(47,342 |
) |
|
|
(95,207 |
) |
|
|
(38,703 |
) |
Cash used to purchase equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,472,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(141,749 |
) |
|
|
(17,711,703 |
) |
|
|
(416,251 |
) |
|
|
(482,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Draws on credit facilities |
|
|
1,708,625 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
692,614 |
|
|
|
886,910 |
|
Payments on credit facilities |
|
|
(202,241 |
) |
|
|
(128,551 |
) |
|
|
(872,901 |
) |
|
|
(1,705,014 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
557,520 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
22,483 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary senior notes |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(472,419 |
) |
|
|
(554,664 |
) |
|
|
(1,282,348 |
) |
|
|
(343,041 |
) |
Payments on senior secured credit facilities |
|
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of long-term debt |
|
|
(343,466 |
) |
|
|
(24,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing charges |
|
|
(60,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt proceeds used to finance the merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,382,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution used to finance the merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,142,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on forward exchange contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
80,017 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,367 |
) |
|
|
(372,369 |
) |
Payments for purchase of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(25,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchase of common shares |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(3,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
1,604,722 |
|
|
|
17,554,739 |
|
|
|
(1,646,941 |
) |
|
|
(1,431,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
(67,751 |
) |
|
|
33,832 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,892 |
|
|
|
332,579 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
1,031,141 |
|
|
|
366,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,644,148 |
|
|
|
91,491 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
29,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
239,846 |
|
|
|
148,355 |
|
|
|
145,148 |
|
|
|
116,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,883,994 |
|
|
$ |
239,846 |
|
|
$ |
148,355 |
|
|
$ |
145,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1,240,322 |
|
|
$ |
527,083 |
|
|
$ |
231,163 |
|
|
$ |
462,181 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,029 |
|
|
|
138,187 |
|
|
|
299,415 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A-55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
CC Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) was formed in May 2007 by private equity funds
sponsored by Bain Capital Partners, LLC and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (together, the Sponsors)
for the purpose of acquiring the business of Clear Channel Communications, Inc., a Texas company
(Clear Channel). The acquisition was completed on July 30, 2008 pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated November 16, 2006, as amended on April 18, 2007, May 17, 2007 and May 13,
2008 (the Merger Agreement).
As a result of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of Clear Channel, other than shares
held by certain principals of the Company that were rolled over and exchanged for Class A common
stock of the Company, was either exchanged for (i) $36.00 in cash consideration or (ii) one share
of Class A common stock of the Company.
The purchase price was approximately $23 billion including $94 million in capitalized transaction
costs. The merger was funded primarily through a $3 billion equity contribution, including the
rollover of Clear Channel shares, and $20.8 billion in debt financing, including the assumption of
$5.1 billion aggregate principal amount of Clear Channel debt.
The Company accounted for its acquisition of Clear Channel as a purchase business combination in
conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, and
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 88-16, Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions. The Company
allocated a portion of the consideration paid to the assets and liabilities acquired at their
respective fair values with the remaining portion recorded at the continuing shareholders basis.
Excess consideration after this allocation was recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation
was complete as of July 30, 2009 in accordance with ASC 805-10-25, which requires that the
allocation period not exceed one year from the date of acquisition.
The merger is discussed more fully in Note B.
Liquidity
The Companys primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations, which has been
adversely affected by the global economic downturn. The risks associated with the Companys
businesses become more acute in periods of a slowing economy or recession, which may be accompanied
by a decrease in advertising. Expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall
economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns. The global economic downturn has resulted
in a decline in advertising and marketing services among the Companys customers, resulting in a
decline in advertising revenues across the Companys businesses. This reduction in advertising
revenues has had an adverse effect on the Companys revenue, profit margins, cash flow and
liquidity. The continuation of the global economic downturn may continue to adversely impact the
Companys revenue, profit margins, cash flow and liquidity.
The Company commenced a restructuring program in the fourth quarter of 2008 targeting a reduction
of fixed costs. The Company recognized approximately $164.4 million and $95.9 million of costs
related to its restructuring program during the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
On February 6, 2009 Clear Channel borrowed the approximately $1.6 billon of remaining availability
under its $2.0 billion revolving credit facility. In December of 2009, Clear Channel applied $2.0
billion of the cash proceeds it received from Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. from the issuance and
sale of the Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings Senior Notes to repay an equal amount of indebtedness
under its senior secured credit facilities, thereby strengthening the Companys capital structure
meaningfully in the short and long term.
A-56
Based on the Companys current and anticipated levels of operations and conditions in its markets,
it believes that cash on hand (including amounts drawn or available under Clear Channels senior
secured credit facilities) as well as cash flow from operations will enable the Company to meet its
working capital, capital expenditure, debt service and other funding requirements for at least the
next 12 months.
The Company expects to be in compliance with the covenants contained in Clear Channels material
financing agreements, including the subsidiary senior notes, in 2010, including the maximum
consolidated senior secured net debt to adjusted EBITDA limitation contained in Clear Channels
senior secured credit facilities. However, the Companys anticipated results are subject to
significant uncertainty and the Companys ability to comply with this limitation may be affected by
events beyond its control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. The
breach of any covenants set forth in the financing agreements would result in a default thereunder.
An event of default would permit the lenders under a defaulted financing agreement to declare all
indebtedness thereunder to be due and payable prior to maturity. Moreover, the lenders under the
revolving credit facility under the senior secured credit facilities would have the option to
terminate their commitments to make further extensions of revolving credit thereunder. If the
Company is unable to repay Clear Channels obligations under any senior secured credit facilities
or the receivables based credit facility, the lenders could proceed against any assets that were
pledged to secure such facility. In addition, a default or acceleration under any of Clear
Channels material financing agreements, including the subsidiary senior notes, could cause a
default under other obligations that are subject to cross-default and cross-acceleration
provisions. The threshold amount for a cross-default under the senior secured credit facilities is
$100 million dollars.
The Companys and Clear Channels current corporate ratings are CCC+ and Caa2 by Standard &
Poors Ratings Services and Moodys Investors Service, respectively, which are speculative grade
ratings. These ratings have been downgraded and then upgraded at various times during the two
years ended December 31, 2009. The adjustments had no impact on Clear Channels borrowing costs
under the credit agreements.
Format of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated statements of operations, statements of cash flows and
shareholders equity are presented for two periods: post-merger and pre-merger. The merger
resulted in a new basis of accounting beginning on July 31, 2008 and the financial reporting
periods are presented as follows:
|
|
|
The year ended December 31, 2009 and the period from July 31 through December 31, 2008
reflect the post-merger period of the Company, including the merger of a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company with and into Clear Channel. Subsequent to the acquisition,
Clear Channel became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the business
of the Company became that of Clear Channel and its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
The periods from January 1 through July 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007
reflect the pre-merger period of Clear Channel. Prior to its acquisition of Clear Channel,
the Company had not conducted any activities, other than activities incident to its
formation and in connection with the acquisition, and did not have any assets or
liabilities, other than as related to the acquisition. The consolidated financial
statements for all pre-merger periods were prepared using the historical basis of
accounting for Clear Channel. As a result of the merger and the associated purchase
accounting, the consolidated financial statements of the post-merger periods are not
comparable to periods preceding the merger. |
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investments in companies in which the Company owns 20 percent to 50 percent of the voting common
stock or otherwise exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies of the
company are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
The Company holds nontransferable, noncompliant station combinations pursuant to certain FCC rules
or, in a few cases, pursuant to temporary waivers. These noncompliant station combinations were
placed in a trust in order to bring the merger into compliance with the FCCs media ownership rules. The Company will have to
divest of
A-57
certain stations in these noncompliant station combinations. The trust will be
terminated, with respect to each noncompliant station combination, if at any time the stations may
be owned by the Company under the then-current FCC media ownership rules. The trust agreement
stipulates that the Company must fund any operating shortfalls of the trust activities, and any
excess cash flow generated by the trust is distributed to the Company. The Company is also the
beneficiary of proceeds from the sale of stations held in the trust. The Company consolidates the
trust in accordance with ASC 810-10, which requires an enterprise involved with variable interest
entities to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in the variable interest entity, as the trust
was determined to be a variable interest entity and the Company is its primary beneficiary.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a combination of
factors. In circumstances where it is aware of a specific customers inability to meet its
financial obligations, it records a specific reserve to reduce the amounts recorded to what it
believes will be collected. For all other customers, it recognizes reserves for bad debt based on
historical experience of bad debts as a percent of revenue for each business unit, adjusted for
relative improvements or deteriorations in the agings and changes in current economic conditions.
The Company believes its concentration of credit risk is limited due to the large number and the
geographic diversification of its customers.
Land Leases and Other Structure Licenses
Most of the Companys outdoor advertising structures are located on leased land. Americas
outdoor land rents are typically paid in advance for periods ranging from one to twelve months.
International outdoor land rents are paid both in advance and in arrears, for periods ranging from
one to twelve months. Most international street furniture display faces are operated through
contracts with the municipalities for up to 20 years. The street furniture contracts often include
a percent of revenue to be paid along with a base rent payment. Prepaid land leases are recorded
as an asset and expensed ratably over the related rental term and license and rent payments in
arrears are recorded as an accrued liability.
Purchase Accounting
The Company accounts for its business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting.
The total cost of an acquisition is allocated to the underlying identifiable net assets, based on
their respective estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair
values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed requires managements judgment and often involves the use of
significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows
and outflows, discount rates, asset lives and market multiples, among other items. Various
acquisition agreements may include contingent purchase consideration based on performance
requirements of the investee. The Company accounts for these payments in conformity with the
provisions of ASC 805-20-30, which establish the requirements related to recognition of certain
assets and liabilities arising from contingencies.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method at rates that, in the opinion of management, are adequate to allocate the cost
of such assets over their estimated useful lives, which are as follows:
Buildings and improvements 10 to 39 years
Structures 5 to 40 years
Towers, transmitters and studio equipment 7 to 20 years
Furniture and other equipment 3 to 20 years
Leasehold improvements shorter of economic life or lease term assuming renewal periods, if
appropriate
A-58
For assets associated with a lease or contract, the assets are depreciated at the shorter of the
economic life or the lease or contract term, assuming renewal periods, if appropriate.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, whereas
expenditures for renewal and betterments are capitalized.
The Company tests for possible impairment of property, plant, and equipment whenever events or
changes in circumstances, such as a reduction in operating cash flow or a dramatic change in the
manner for which the asset is intended to be used indicate that the carrying amount of the asset
may not be recoverable. If indicators exist, the Company compares the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows related to the asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value
is greater than the estimated undiscounted future cash flow amount, an impairment charge is
recorded in depreciation and amortization expense in the statement of operations for amounts
necessary to reduce the carrying value of the asset to fair value. The impairment loss
calculations require management to apply judgment in estimating future cash flows and the discount
rates that reflect the risk inherent in future cash flows.
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded an $8.7 million impairment to street furniture
tangible assets in its International segment. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2009, the
Company recorded a $12.3 million impairment primarily related to street furniture tangible assets
in its International segment and an $11.3 million impairment of corporate assets.
Intangible Assets
The Company classifies intangible assets as definite-lived, indefinite-lived or goodwill.
Definite-lived intangibles include primarily transit and street furniture contracts, talent and
representation contracts, customer and advertiser relationships, and site-leases, all of which are
amortized over the respective lives of the agreements, or over the period of time the assets are
expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the Companys future cash flows. The Company
periodically reviews the appropriateness of the amortization periods related to its definite-lived
assets. These assets are recorded at cost.
The Company impaired definite-lived intangible assets related to certain street furniture and
billboard contract intangible assets in its Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments by
$38.8 million as of June 30, 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $16.5
million impairment related to billboard contract intangible assets in its International segment.
The Companys indefinite-lived intangibles include broadcast FCC licenses in its radio broadcasting
segment and billboard permits in its Americas outdoor advertising segment. The excess cost over
fair value of net assets acquired is classified as goodwill. The Companys indefinite-lived
intangibles and goodwill are not subject to amortization, but are tested for impairment at least
annually. The Company tests for possible impairment of definite-lived intangible assets whenever
events or changes in circumstances, such as a reduction in operating cash flow or a dramatic change
in the manner for which the asset is intended to be used indicate that the carrying amount of the
asset may not be recoverable. If indicators exist, the Company compares the undiscounted cash
flows related to the asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value is greater
than the undiscounted cash flow amount, an impairment charge is recorded in amortization expense in
the statement of operations for amounts necessary to reduce the carrying value of the asset to fair
value.
The Company performs its annual impairment test for its FCC licenses and permits using a direct
valuation technique as prescribed in ASC 805-20-S99. The key assumptions used in the direct
valuation method include market revenue growth rates, market share, profit margin, duration and
profile of the build-up period, estimated start-up cost and losses incurred during the build-up
period, the risk adjusted discount rate and terminal values. The Company engages Mesirow Financial
Consulting LLC (Mesirow Financial), a third party valuation firm, to assist the Company in the
development of these assumptions and the Companys determination of the fair value of its FCC
licenses and permits.
The Company performed an interim impairment test as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, which
resulted in non-cash impairment charges of $1.7 billion and $935.6 million, respectively, on its
indefinite-lived FCC licenses and permits. See Note D for further discussion.
A-59
At least annually, the Company performs its impairment test for each reporting units goodwill
using a discounted cash flow model to determine if the carrying value of the reporting unit,
including goodwill, is less than the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company identified its
reporting units in accordance with ASC 350-20-55. The U.S. radio markets are aggregated into a
single reporting unit and the U.S. outdoor advertising markets are aggregated into a single
reporting unit for purposes of the goodwill impairment test. The Company also determined that
within its Americas outdoor segment, Canada, Mexico, Peru, and Brazil constitute separate reporting
units and each country in its International outdoor segment constitutes a separate reporting unit.
Each of the Companys reporting units is valued using a discounted cash flow model which requires
estimating future cash flows expected to be generated from the reporting unit, discounted to their
present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. Terminal values were also estimated and
discounted to their present value. Assessing the recoverability of goodwill requires the Company
to make estimates and assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates
based on its budgets, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and
marketplace data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and managements
judgment in applying these factors. The Company engages Mesirow Financial to assist the Company in
the development of these assumptions and the Companys determination of the fair value of its
reporting units.
The Company performed an interim impairment test as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, and
recognized non-cash impairment charges of $3.6 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to reduce
its goodwill. See Note D for further discussion.
Nonconsolidated Affiliates
In general, investments in which the Company owns 20 percent to 50 percent of the common stock
or otherwise exercises significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the equity
method. The Company does not recognize gains or losses upon the issuance of securities by any of
its equity method investees. The Company reviews the value of equity method investments and
records impairment charges in the statement of operations as a component of equity in earnings
(loss) of nonconsolidated affiliates for any decline in value that is determined to be
other-than-temporary.
Other Investments
Other investments are composed primarily of equity securities. These securities are
classified as available-for-sale or trading and are carried at fair value based on quoted market
prices. Securities are carried at historical value when quoted market prices are unavailable. The
net unrealized gains or losses on the available-for-sale securities, net of tax, are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive loss as a component of shareholders equity. The net unrealized
gains or losses on the trading securities are reported in the statement of operations. In
addition, the Company holds investments that do not have quoted market prices. The Company
periodically assesses the value of available-for-sale and non-marketable securities and records
impairment charges in the statement of operations for any decline in value that is determined to be
other-than-temporary. The average cost method is used to compute the realized gains and losses on
sales of equity securities.
The Company periodically assesses the value of its available-for-sale securities. Based on these
assessments, the Company concluded that an other-than-temporary impairment existed at December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2009, and recorded non-cash impairment charges of $116.6 million and $11.3
million, respectively, on the statement of operations in Gain (loss) on marketable securities.
The Company assessed the value of these available-for-sale securities through December 31, 2009 and
concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment existed.
Financial Instruments
Due to their short maturity, the carrying amounts of accounts and notes receivable, accounts
payable, accrued liabilities, and short-term borrowings approximated their fair values at December
31, 2009 and 2008.
A-60
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting bases
and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to
be realized or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by valuation allowances if the Company
believes it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire asset will not be realized. As
all earnings from the Companys foreign operations are permanently reinvested and not distributed,
the Companys income tax provision does not include additional U.S. taxes on foreign operations.
It is not practical to determine the amount of Federal income taxes, if any, that might become due
in the event that the earnings were distributed.
Revenue Recognition
Radio broadcasting revenue is recognized as advertisements or programs are broadcast and is
generally billed monthly. Outdoor advertising contracts typically cover periods of up to three
years and are generally billed monthly. Revenue for outdoor advertising space rental is recognized
ratably over the term of the contract. Advertising revenue is reported net of agency commissions.
Agency commissions are calculated based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing revenue for
the Companys broadcasting and outdoor operations. Payments received in advance of being earned
are recorded as deferred income.
Barter transactions represent the exchange of advertising spots or display space for merchandise or
services. These transactions are generally recorded at the fair market value of the advertising
spots or display space or the fair value of the merchandise or services received. Revenue is
recognized on barter and trade transactions when the advertisements are broadcasted or displayed.
Expenses are recorded ratably over a period that estimates when the merchandise or service received
is utilized or the event occurs. Barter and trade revenues and expenses from continuing operations
are included in consolidated revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses,
respectively. Barter and trade revenues and expenses from continuing operations were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
31 through |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Barter and trade revenues |
|
$ |
71.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
70.7 |
|
Barter and trade expenses |
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
Barter and trade expenses for 2009 include $14.9 million of trade receivables written off as it was
determined they no longer had value to the Company.
Share-Based Payments
Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718-10, stock based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. For awards that vest based on
service conditions, this cost is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period. For awards that will vest based on market, performance and service conditions, this cost
will be recognized when it becomes probable that the performance conditions will be satisfied.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires assumptions and
judgments about expected volatility and forfeiture rates, among other factors. If actual results
differ significantly from these estimates, the Companys results of operations could be materially
impacted.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The provisions of ASC 815-10 require the Company to recognize all of its derivative
instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The
accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been
designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on
the type of hedging relationship. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
hedging instruments,
A-61
the Company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure
being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged
items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge
transactions. The Company formally assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter,
whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting
changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. If a derivative ceases to be a
highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting. The Company accounts for its
derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges at fair value, with changes in fair value
recorded in earnings. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculation or
trading purposes.
Foreign Currency
Results of operations for foreign subsidiaries and foreign equity investees are translated
into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates during the year. The assets and liabilities of
those subsidiaries and investees, other than those of operations in highly inflationary countries,
are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates at the balance sheet date. The related
translation adjustments are recorded in a separate component of shareholders equity, Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, as well as
gains and losses from translation of financial statements of subsidiaries and investees in highly
inflationary countries, are included in operations.
Advertising Expense
The Company records advertising expense as it is incurred. Advertising expenses from
continuing operations were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
31 through |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Advertising expenses |
|
$ |
67.3 |
|
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
56.1 |
|
|
$ |
138.5 |
|
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates, judgments, and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes including, but not limited to, legal, tax and insurance accruals. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-02, Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiarya
Scope Clarification. The update is to ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. The ASU clarifies that the
decrease-in-ownership provisions of ASC 810-10 and related guidance apply to (1) a subsidiary or
group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity, (2) a subsidiary or group of assets that
is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint
venture, and (3) an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity
for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).
In addition, the ASU expands the information an entity is required to disclose upon deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. This standard is effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009
with retrospective application required for the first period in which the entity adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160. The Company adopted the amendment upon issuance with no
material impact to its financial position or results of operations.
A-62
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. The update is to ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation. This standard amends ASC 810-10-25 by requiring consolidation of certain special
purpose entities that were previously exempted from consolidation. The revised criteria will define
a controlling financial interest for requiring consolidation as: the power to direct the activities
that most significantly affect the entitys performance, and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of
the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This standard is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted the amendment on January 1,
2010 with no material impact to its financial position or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. The update is
to ASC Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value
measurement of liabilities. The purpose of this update is to reduce ambiguity in financial
reporting when measuring the fair value of liabilities. The guidance provided in this update is
effective for the first reporting period beginning after the date of issuance. The Company adopted
the amendment on October 1, 2009 with no material impact to its financial position or results of
operations.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, codified
in ASC 105-10, was issued in June 2009. ASC 105-10 identifies the sources of accounting principles
and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States. ASC
105-10 establishes the ASC as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied
by nongovernmental entities. Following this statement, the FASB will issue new standards in the
form of ASUs. ASC 105-10 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 105-10 on July
1, 2009.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(Statement No. 167), which is not yet codified, was issued in June 2009. Statement No. 167 shall
be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that
begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and
for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. Statement
No. 167 amends Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, codified in ASC 810-10-25, to replace the quantitative-based risks and
rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest
in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the
right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily
qualitative will be more effective for identifying which enterprise has a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. Statement No. 167 requires an additional reconsideration
event when determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts
and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose
the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the
entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. It also requires ongoing
assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.
These requirements will provide more relevant and timely information to users of financial
statements. Statement No. 167 amends ASC 810-10-25 to require additional disclosures about an
enterprises involvement in variable interest entities, which will enhance the information provided
to users of financial statements. The Company adopted Statement No. 167 on January 1, 2010 with no
material impact to its financial position or results of operations.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events, codified in ASC 855-10, was
issued in May 2009. The provisions of ASC 855-10 are effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009 and are intended to establish general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855-10 requires the disclosure of the date through which
an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that datethat is, whether that date
represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This
disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated
subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. In
accordance with the provisions of ASC 855-10, the
Company currently evaluates subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued.
A-63
FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, codified in ASC 260-10-45, was
issued in June 2008. ASC 260-10-45 clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards with a right
to receive nonforfeitable dividends are participating securities. Guidance is also provided on how
to allocate earnings to participating securities and compute basic earnings per share using the
two-class method. All prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected
financial data) to conform with the provisions of ASC 260-10-45. The Company retrospectively
adopted the provisions of ASC 260-10-45 on January 1, 2009. The impact of adopting ASC 260-10-45
decreased previously reported basic earnings per share by $.01 for the pre-merger year ended
December 31, 2007.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, codified in ASC 810-10-45, was issued in
December 2007. ASC 810-10-45 clarifies the classification of noncontrolling interests in
consolidated statements of financial position and the accounting for and reporting of transactions
between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under this guidance,
noncontrolling interests are considered equity and should be reported as an element of consolidated
equity, net income will encompass the total income of all consolidated subsidiaries and there will
be separate disclosure on the face of the income statement of the attribution of that income
between the controlling and noncontrolling interests, and increases and decreases in the
noncontrolling ownership interest amount will be accounted for as equity transactions. The
provisions of ASC 810-10-45 are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is prohibited. Guidance is required to be adopted
prospectively, except for reclassifying noncontrolling interests to equity, separate from the
parents shareholders equity, in the consolidated statement of financial position and recasting
consolidated net income (loss) to include net income (loss) attributable to both the controlling
and noncontrolling interests, both of which are required to be adopted retrospectively. The
Company adopted the provisions of ASC 810-10-45 on January 1, 2009, which resulted in a
reclassification of approximately $426.2 million of noncontrolling interests to shareholders
equity. Adoption of this standard requires retrospective application in the financial statements
of earlier periods on January 1, 2009. In connection with the offering of $500.0 million aggregate
principal amount of Series A Senior Notes and $2.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Series B
Senior Notes by the Companys subsidiary, the Company filed a Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2009
to retrospectively recast the historical financial statements and certain disclosures included in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for the adoption of ASC
810-10-45.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, codified in ASC 815-10-50, was issued in March 2008. ASC 815-10-50 requires
additional disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how derivative instruments and related
hedged items effect an entitys financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The
Company adopted the provisions of ASC 815-10-50 on January 1, 2009. Please refer to Note H for
disclosure required by ASC 815-10-50.
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, codified in ASC
820-10, was issued in February 2008. ASC 820-10 delays the effective date of FASB Statement No.
157, Fair Value Measurements, for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions
of ASC 820-10 on January 1, 2009 with no material impact to its financial position or results of
operations.
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly, codified in ASC 820-10-35, was issued in April 2009. ASC 820-10 provides additional
guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
have significantly decreased. ASC 820-10 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that
indicate a transaction is not orderly. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted
for periods ending after March 15, 2009. Earlier adoption for periods ending before March 15, 2009
is not permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 820-10 on April 1, 2009 with no
material impact to its financial position or results of operations.
A-64
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, codified in ASC 320-10-35, was issued in April 2009. It amends
the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance
more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments
on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. ASC 320-10-35 does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June
15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. Earlier adoption
for periods ending before March 15, 2009 is not permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of
ASC 320-10-35 on April 1, 2009 with no material impact to its financial position or results of
operations.
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, codified in ASC 825-10-50, was issued in April 2009. ASC 825-10-50 amends prior
authoritative guidance to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim
reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The
provisions of ASC 825-10-50 are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the
disclosure requirements of ASC 825-10-50 on April 1, 2009.
NOTE B BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
2009 Purchases of Additional Equity Interests
During 2009, the Companys Americas outdoor segment purchased the remaining 15% interest in its
consolidated subsidiary, Paneles Napsa S.A., for $13.0 million and the Companys International
outdoor segment acquired an additional 5% interest in its consolidated subsidiary, Clear Channel
Jolly Pubblicita SPA, for $12.1 million.
2008 Acquisitions
The Company completed its acquisition of Clear Channel on July 30, 2008. The transaction was
accounted for as a purchase in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 88-16, Basis in Leveraged Buyout
Transactions. The Company allocated a portion of the consideration paid to the assets and
liabilities acquired at their respective fair values with the remaining portion recorded at the
continuing shareholders basis. Excess consideration after this allocation was recorded as
goodwill. The purchase price allocation was complete as of July 30, 2009 in accordance with ASC
805-10-25, which requires that the allocation period not exceed one year from the date of
acquisition.
Following is a summary of the purchase price allocations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Final |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Allocation |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Allocation |
|
Consideration paid |
|
$ |
18,082,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,082,938 |
|
Debt assumed |
|
|
5,136,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,136,929 |
|
Historical carryover basis |
|
|
(825,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(825,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,394,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,394,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,311,777 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
2,318,052 |
|
PP&E net |
|
|
3,745,422 |
|
|
|
125,357 |
|
|
|
(2,664 |
) |
|
|
3,868,115 |
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
20,634,499 |
|
|
|
(764,472 |
) |
|
|
51,293 |
|
|
|
19,921,320 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
1,079,704 |
|
|
|
44,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124,491 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(1,219,033 |
) |
|
|
(13,204 |
) |
|
|
26,555 |
|
|
|
(1,205,682 |
) |
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
(4,158,149 |
) |
|
|
602,491 |
|
|
|
(43,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,598,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,394,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,382 |
|
|
|
22,427,602 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,382 |
) |
|
|
(33,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,394,220 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,394,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-65
2008 Adjustments
The adjustments to PP&E net primarily relate to fair value appraisals received for land and
buildings. The adjustments to intangible assets net primarily relate to an aggregate $3.6
billion adjustment to lower the estimated fair value of the Companys FCC licenses and permits
based on appraised values, partially offset by a $1.5 billion fair value adjustment to recognize
advertiser relationships and trade names in the Companys radio segment based on appraised values,
a $240.6 million fair value adjustment to advertising contracts in the Companys Americas and
International outdoor segments based on appraised values and an increase of $1.0 billion to
goodwill. The adjustment to long-term liabilities primarily relates to the deferred tax effects of
the fair value adjustments.
The purchase price allocation adjustments related to the Companys FCC licenses, permits and
goodwill were recorded prior to the Companys interim impairment test.
2009 Adjustments
During the first seven months of 2009, the Company decreased the initial fair value estimate of its
permits, contracts, site leases and other assets and liabilities primarily in its Americas outdoor
segment by $116.1 million based on additional information received, which resulted in an increase
to goodwill of $71.7 million and a decrease to deferred taxes of $44.4 million. During the third
quarter of 2009, the Company increased its deferred tax liability by $44.3 million to true-up its
tax rates in certain jurisdictions that were estimated in the initial purchase price allocation.
Additionally, the Company increased other comprehensive income by $33.4 million and decreased
accrued income taxes by $18.9 million. Other miscellaneous adjustments resulted in an additional
increase of $15.0 million to goodwill and a decrease of $8.6 million to other intangible assets.
Also, during the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $45.0 million increase to goodwill
in its International outdoor segment related to the fair value of certain noncontrolling interests
which existed at the merger date, with no related tax effect. This noncontrolling interest was
recorded pursuant to ASC 480-10-S99 which determines the classification of redeemable
noncontrolling interests. The Company subsequently determined that the increase in goodwill
related to these noncontrolling interests should have been included in the impairment charge
resulting from the December 31, 2008 interim goodwill impairment test. As a result, during the
fourth quarter of 2009, the Company impaired this entire goodwill amount, which after considering
the effects of foreign exchange movements, was $41.4 million.
The purchase price allocation was complete as of July 30, 2009 in accordance with ASC 805-10-25,
which requires that the allocation period not exceed one year from the date of acquisition.
The following unaudited supplemental pro forma information reflects the consolidated results of
operations of the Company as if the merger had occurred on January 1, 2007. The historical
financial information was adjusted to give effect to items that are (i) directly attributed to the
merger, (ii) factually supportable, and (iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the
consolidated results. Such items include depreciation and amortization expense associated with
preliminary valuations of property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets,
corporate expenses associated with new equity based awards granted to certain members of
management, expenses associated with the accelerated vesting of employee share based awards upon
closing of the merger, interest expense related to debt issued in conjunction with the merger and
the fair value adjustment to Clear Channels existing debt and the related tax effects of these
items. This unaudited pro forma information should not be relied upon as necessarily being
indicative of the historical results that would have been obtained if the merger had actually
occurred on that date, nor of the results that may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
Period from January |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
1 through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Pre-merger |
|
|
Pre-merger |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
3,951,742 |
|
|
$ |
6,921,202 |
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(64,952 |
) |
|
$ |
4,179 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
575,284 |
|
|
$ |
150,012 |
|
Earnings (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
7.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
Earnings (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
7.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
A-66
The Company also acquired assets in its operating segments in addition to the merger described
above. The Company acquired FCC licenses in its radio segment for $11.7 million in cash during
2008. The Company acquired outdoor display faces and additional equity interests in international
outdoor companies for $96.5 million in cash during 2008. The Companys national representation
business acquired representation contracts for $68.9 million in cash during 2008.
2007 Acquisitions
Clear Channel acquired domestic outdoor display faces and additional equity interests in
international outdoor companies for $69.1 million in cash during 2007. Clear Channels national
representation business acquired representation contracts for $53.0 million in cash during 2007.
The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities acquired and the consideration given for
acquisitions made during 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
28,002 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Definite lived intangibles |
|
|
55,017 |
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
|
|
15,023 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
41,696 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,191 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(13,081 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary common stock issued, net of noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: fair value of net assets exchanged in swap |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisitions |
|
$ |
122,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into certain agreements relating to acquisitions that provide for purchase
price adjustments and other future contingent payments based on the financial performance of the
acquired company. The Company will continue to accrue additional amounts related to such
contingent payments if and when it is determinable that the applicable financial performance
targets will be met. The aggregate of these contingent payments, if performance targets were met,
would not significantly impact the Companys financial position or results of operations.
NOTE C DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Sale of Non-core Radio Stations
The Company determined that each radio station market in Clear Channels previously announced
non-core radio station sales represents a disposal group consistent with the provisions of ASC
360-10. Consistent with the provisions of ASC 360-10, the Company classified these assets that are
subject to transfer under the definitive asset purchase agreements as discontinued operations for
all periods presented. Accordingly, depreciation and amortization associated with these assets was
discontinued. Additionally, the Company determined that these assets comprised operations and cash
flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from
the rest of the Company.
A-67
Sale of the Television Business
On March 14, 2008, Clear Channel completed the sale of its television business to Newport
Television, LLC for $1.0 billion, adjusted for certain items including proration of expenses and
adjustments for working capital. As a result, Clear Channel recorded a gain of $662.9 million as a
component of Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net in its consolidated statement of
operations during the first quarter of 2008. Additionally, net income and cash flows from the
television business were classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of
operations and the consolidated statements of cash flows, respectively, in 2008 through the date of
sale and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The net assets related to the television business
were classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2007.
Summarized Financial Information of Discontinued Operations
Summarized operating results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 from these businesses
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July 31 |
|
|
Period from January |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
through December 31, |
|
|
1 through July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
74,783 |
|
|
$ |
442,263 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(3,160 |
) |
|
$ |
702,698 |
|
|
$ |
209,882 |
|
Included in income (loss) from discontinued operations, net is an income tax benefit of $1.3
million for the period July 31 through December 31, 2008. Included for the period from January 1
through July 30, 2008 is income tax expense of $62.4 million and a gain of $695.8 million related
to the sale of Clear Channels television business and certain radio stations. The Company
estimates utilization of approximately $585.3 million of capital loss carryforwards to offset a
portion of the taxes associated with these gains. The Company had approximately $699.6 million,
before valuation allowance, in capital loss carryforwards remaining as of December 31, 2008.
Included in income (loss) from discontinued operations, net is income tax expense of $64.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Also included in income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net for the year ended December 31, 2007 are gains on the sale of certain radio stations of $144.6
million.
NOTE D INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Definite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company has definite-lived intangible assets which consist primarily of transit and street
furniture contracts, permanent easements that provide the Company access to certain of its outdoor
displays, and other contractual rights in its Americas and International outdoor segments. The
Company has talent and program right contracts in its radio segment and contracts for
non-affiliated radio and television stations in its media representation operations. These
definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the shorter of either the respective lives of
the agreements or over the period of time the assets are expected to contribute directly or
indirectly to the Companys future cash flows.
The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for each major
class of definite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008:
A-68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Transit, street furniture, and
other outdoor contractual rights |
|
$ |
803,297 |
|
|
$ |
166,803 |
|
|
$ |
883,130 |
|
|
$ |
49,818 |
|
Customer / advertiser relationships |
|
|
1,210,205 |
|
|
|
169,897 |
|
|
|
1,210,205 |
|
|
|
49,970 |
|
Talent contracts |
|
|
320,854 |
|
|
|
57,825 |
|
|
|
161,644 |
|
|
|
7,479 |
|
Representation contracts |
|
|
218,584 |
|
|
|
54,755 |
|
|
|
216,955 |
|
|
|
21,537 |
|
Other |
|
|
550,041 |
|
|
|
54,457 |
|
|
|
548,180 |
|
|
|
9,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,102,981 |
|
|
$ |
503,737 |
|
|
$ |
3,020,114 |
|
|
$ |
138,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense from continuing operations related to definite-lived intangible assets
was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
July 31 through |
|
|
January 1 through |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
July 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
341.6 |
|
|
$ |
150.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.3 |
|
|
$ |
105.0 |
|
Included in amortization expense in 2009 is $32.4 million for amounts since the date of the merger
related to a purchase accounting adjustment of $157.7 million to increase the balance of the
Companys talent contracts.
During the first seven months of 2009, the Company decreased the initial fair value estimate of its
permits, contracts, site leases, and other assets and liabilities primarily in its Americas segment
by $116.1 million based on additional information received.
As acquisitions and dispositions occur in the future and as purchase price allocations are
finalized, amortization expense may vary. The following table presents the Companys estimate of
amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years for definite-lived intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
319,967 |
|
2011 |
|
|
298,927 |
|
2012 |
|
|
289,449 |
|
2013 |
|
|
275,033 |
|
2014 |
|
|
253,626 |
|
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Companys indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of FCC broadcast licenses and billboard
permits. FCC broadcast licenses are granted to radio stations for up to eight years under the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act). The Act requires the FCC to renew a broadcast license
if the FCC finds that the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity, there
have been no serious violations of either the Communications Act of 1934 or the FCCs rules and
regulations by the licensee, and there have been no other serious violations which taken together
constitute a pattern of abuse. The licenses may be renewed indefinitely at little or no cost. The
Company does not believe that the technology of wireless broadcasting will be replaced in the
foreseeable future.
The Companys billboard permits are effectively issued in perpetuity by state and local governments
and are transferable or renewable at little or no cost. Permits typically specify the location
which allows the Company the right to operate an advertising structure at the specified location.
The Companys permits are located on owned land, leased land or land for which we have acquired
permanent easements. In cases where the Companys permits
A-69
are located on leased land, the leases
typically have initial terms of between 10 and 20 years and renew indefinitely, with rental
payments generally escalating at an inflation-based index. If the Company loses its lease, the
Company will typically obtain permission to relocate the permit or bank it with the municipality
for future use.
The indefinite-lived intangibles and goodwill are not subject to amortization, but are tested for
impairment at least annually. The Company tests for possible impairment of indefinite-lived
intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as a reduction in operating
cash flow or a dramatic change in the manner for which the asset is intended to be used, indicate
that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If indicators exist, the Company
compares the undiscounted cash flows related to the asset to the carrying value of the asset. If
the carrying value is greater than the undiscounted cash flow amount, an impairment charge is
recorded in amortization expense in the statement of operations for amounts necessary to reduce the
carrying value of the asset to fair value.
Interim Impairments to FCC Licenses
The United States and global economies have undergone an economic downturn, which caused, among
other things, a general tightening in the credit markets, limited access to the credit markets,
lower levels of liquidity and lower consumer and business spending. These disruptions in the
credit and financial markets and the impact of adverse economic, financial and industry conditions
on the demand for advertising negatively impacted the key assumptions used in the discounted cash
flow models used to value the Companys FCC licenses since the merger. Therefore, the Company
performed an interim impairment test on its FCC licenses as of December 31, 2008, which resulted in
a non-cash impairment charge of $936.2 million.
The industry cash flows forecast by BIA Financial Network, Inc. (BIA) during the first six months
of 2009 were below the BIA forecast used in the discounted cash flow model used to calculate the
impairment at December 31, 2008. As a result, the Company performed another interim impairment
test as of June 30, 2009 on its FCC licenses resulting in an additional non-cash impairment charge
of $590.3 million.
The impairment test consisted of a comparison of the fair value of the FCC licenses at the market
level with their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the FCC license exceeded its fair
value, an impairment loss was recognized equal to that excess. After an impairment loss is
recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the FCC license is its new accounting basis. The fair
value of the FCC licenses was determined using the direct valuation method as prescribed in ASC
805-20-S99. Under the direct valuation method, the fair value of the FCC licenses was calculated
at the market level as prescribed by ASC 350-30-35. The Company engaged Mesirow Financial, a
third-party valuation firm, to assist it in the development of the assumptions and the Companys
determination of the fair value of its FCC licenses.
The application of the direct valuation method attempts to isolate the income that is properly
attributable to the license alone (that is, apart from tangible and identified intangible assets
and goodwill). It is based upon modeling a hypothetical greenfield build up to a normalized
enterprise that, by design, lacks inherent goodwill and whose only other assets have essentially
been paid for (or added) as part of the build-up process. The Company forecasted revenue,
expenses, and cash flows over a ten-year period for each of its markets in its application of the
direct valuation method. The Company also calculated a normalized residual year which represents
the perpetual cash flows of each market. The residual year cash flow was capitalized to arrive at
the terminal value of the licenses in each market.
Under the direct valuation method, it is assumed that rather than acquiring indefinite-lived
intangible assets as part of a going concern business, the buyer hypothetically develops
indefinite-lived intangible assets and builds a new operation with similar attributes from scratch.
Thus, the buyer incurs start-up costs during the build-up phase which are normally associated with
going concern value. Initial capital costs are deducted from the discounted cash flow model which
results in value that is directly attributable to the indefinite-lived intangible assets.
The key assumptions using the direct valuation method are market revenue growth rates, market
share, profit margin, duration and profile of the build-up period, estimated start-up capital costs
and losses incurred during the build-up period, the risk-adjusted discount rate and terminal
values. This data is populated using industry normalized information representing an average FCC
license within a market.
A-70
Management uses publicly available information from BIA regarding the future revenue expectations
for the radio broadcasting industry.
The build-up period represents the time it takes for the hypothetical start-up operation to reach
normalized operations in terms of achieving a mature market share and profit margin. Management
believes that a three-year build-up period is required for a start-up operation to obtain the
necessary infrastructure and obtain advertisers. It is estimated that a start-up operation would
gradually obtain a mature market revenue share in three years. BIA forecasted industry revenue
growth of 1.9% and negative 1.8%, respectively, during the build-up period used in the December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The cost structure is expected to reach the normalized
level over three years due to the time required to establish operations and recognize the synergies
and cost savings associated with the ownership of the FCC licenses within the market.
The estimated operating margin in the first year of operations was assumed to be 12.5% based on
observable market data for an independent start-up radio station for both the December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The estimated operating margin in the second year of operations
was assumed to be the mid-point of the first-year operating margin and the normalized operating
margin. The normalized operating margin in the third year was assumed to be the industry average
margin of 30% and 29%, respectively, based on an analysis of comparable companies for the December
31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The first and second-year expenses include the
non-operating start-up costs necessary to build the operation (i.e. development of customers,
workforce, etc.).
In addition to cash flows during the projection period, a normalized residual cash flow was
calculated based upon industry-average growth of 2% beyond the discrete build-up projection period
for both the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment tests. The residual cash flow was then
capitalized to arrive at the terminal value.
The present value of the cash flows is calculated using an estimated required rate of return based
upon industry-average market conditions. In determining the estimated required rate of return,
management calculated a discount rate using both current and historical trends in the industry.
The Company calculated the discount rate as of the valuation date and also one-year, two-year, and
three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate was calculated by weighting the
required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their
estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based
on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the radio broadcasting industry.
The calculation of the discount rate required the rate of return on debt, which was based on a
review of the credit ratings for comparable companies (i.e. market participants). The Company
calculated the average yield on a Standard & Poors B and CCC rated corporate bond which was
used for the pre-tax rate of return on debt and tax-effected such yield based on applicable tax
rates.
The rate of return on equity capital was estimated using a modified Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM). Inputs to this model included the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, forecast
betas for comparable companies, calculation of a market risk premium based on research and
empirical evidence and calculation of a size premium derived from historical differences in returns
between small companies and large companies using data published by Ibbotson Associates.
The concluded discount rate used in the discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of
the licenses was 10% for the 13 largest markets and 10.5% for all other markets in both the
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models. Applying the discount rate, the present
value of cash flows during the discrete projection period and terminal value were added to estimate
the fair value of the hypothetical start-up operation. The initial capital investment was
subtracted to arrive at the value of the licenses. The initial capital investment represents the
fixed assets needed to operate the radio station.
A-71
The discount rate used in the December 31, 2008 impairment model increased 150 basis points
compared to the discount rate used in the preliminary purchase price allocation as of July 30, 2008
which resulted in a decline in the fair value of the Companys licenses. As a result, the Company
recognized a non-cash impairment charge in approximately one-quarter of its markets, which totaled
$936.2 million. The fair value of the Companys FCC licenses was $3.0 billion at December 31,
2008.
The BIA forecast for 2009 declined 8.7% and declined between 13.8% and 15.7% through 2013 compared
to the BIA forecasts used in the 2008 impairment test. Additionally, the industry profit margin
declined 100 basis points from the 2008 impairment test. These market driven changes were
primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the FCC licenses below their carrying value.
As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge in approximately one-quarter of
its markets, which totaled $590.3 million. The fair value of the Companys FCC licenses was $2.4
billion at June 30, 2009.
In calculating the fair value of its FCC licenses, the Company primarily relied on the discounted
cash flow models. However, the Company relied on the stick method for those markets where the
discounted cash flow model resulted in a value less than the stick method indicated.
To estimate the stick values for its markets, the Company obtained historical radio station
transaction data from BIA which involved sales of individual radio stations whereby the station
format was immediately abandoned after acquisition. These transactions are highly indicative of
stick transactions in which the buyer does not assign value to any of the other acquired assets
(i.e. tangible or intangible assets) and is only purchasing the FCC license.
In addition, the Company analyzed publicly available FCC license auction data involving radio
broadcast licenses. Periodically, the FCC will hold an auction for certain FCC licenses in various
markets and these auction prices reflect the purchase of only the FCC radio license.
Based on this analysis, the stick values were estimated to be the minimum value of a radio license
within each market. This value was considered to be the fair value of the license for those markets
where the present value of the cash flows and terminal value did not exceed the estimated stick
value. Approximately 17% and 23% of the fair value of the Companys FCC licenses at December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively, was determined using the stick method.
Annual Impairment Test to FCC Licenses
The Company performs its annual impairment test on October 1 of each year. The Company engaged
Mesirow Financial, a third-party valuation firm, to assist it in the development of the assumptions
and the Companys determination of the fair value of its FCC licenses. The aggregate fair value of
the Companys FCC licenses on October 1, 2009 increased approximately 11% from the fair value at
June 30, 2009. The increase in fair value resulted primarily from an increase of $120.4 million
related to improved revenue forecasts and an increase of $195.9 million related to a decline in the
discount rate of 50 basis points. The Company calculated the discount rate as of the valuation
date and also one-year, two-year, and three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate
was calculated by weighting the required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital
in proportion to their estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital
structure was estimated based on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the
radio broadcasting industry. These market driven changes were responsible for the decline in the
calculated discount rate.
As a result of the increase in the fair value of the Companys FCC licenses, no impairment was
recorded at October 1, 2009. The fair value of the Companys FCC licenses at October 1, 2009 was
approximately $2.7 billion.
Interim Impairments to Billboard Permits
The Companys billboard permits are effectively issued in perpetuity by state and local governments
as they are transferable or renewable at little or no cost. Permits typically include the location
which permits the Company to operate an advertising structure. Due to significant differences in
both business practices and regulations, billboards in the International segment are subject to
long-term, finite contracts unlike the Companys permits in the United States and Canada.
Accordingly, there are no indefinite-lived assets in the International segment.
A-72
The United States and global economies have undergone a period of economic uncertainty, which
caused, among other things, a general tightening in the credit markets, limited access to the
credit markets, lower levels of liquidity and lower consumer and business spending. These
disruptions in the credit and financial markets and the impact of adverse economic, financial and
industry conditions on the demand for advertising negatively impacted the key assumptions used in
the discounted cash flow models used to value the Companys billboard permits since the merger.
Therefore, the Company performed an interim impairment test on its billboard permits as of December
31, 2008, which resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of $722.6 million.
The Companys cash flows during the first six months of 2009 were below those in the discounted
cash flow model used to calculate the impairment at December 31, 2008. As a result, the Company
performed an interim impairment test as of June 30, 2009 on its billboard permits resulting in a
non-cash impairment charge of $345.4 million.
The impairment test consisted of a comparison of the fair value of the billboard permits at the
market level with their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the billboard permits exceeded
their fair value, an impairment loss was recognized equal to that excess. After an impairment loss
is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the billboard permit is its new accounting basis.
The fair value of the billboard permits was determined using the direct valuation method as
prescribed in ASC 805-20-S99. Under the direct valuation method, the fair value of the billboard
permits was calculated at the market level as prescribed by ASC 350-30-35. The Company engaged
Mesirow Financial to assist it in the development of the assumptions and the Companys
determination of the fair value of the billboard permits.
The Companys application of the direct valuation method utilized the greenfield approach as
discussed above. The key assumptions using the direct valuation method are market revenue growth
rates, market share, profit margin, duration and profile of the build-up period, estimated start-up
capital costs and losses incurred during the build-up period, the risk-adjusted discount rate and
terminal values. This data is populated using industry normalized information representing an
average billboard permit within a market.
Management uses its internal forecasts to estimate industry normalized information as it believes
these forecasts are similar to what a market participant would expect to generate. This is due to
the pricing structure and demand for outdoor signage in a market being relatively constant
regardless of the owner of the operation. Management also relied on its internal forecasts because
there is little public data available for each of its markets.
The build-up period represents the time it takes for the hypothetical start-up operation to reach
normalized operations in terms of achieving a mature market revenue share and profit margin.
Management believes that a one-year build-up period is required for a start-up operation to erect
the necessary structures and obtain advertisers in order achieve mature market revenue share. It
is estimated that a start-up operation would be able to obtain 10% of the potential revenues in the
first year of operations and 100% in the second year. Management assumed industry revenue growth
of negative 9% and negative 16%, respectively, during the build-up period used in the December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009 interim impairment tests. However, the cost structure is expected to reach
the normalized level over three years due to the time required to recognize the synergies and cost
savings associated with the ownership of the permits within the market.
For the normalized operating margin in the third year, management assumed a hypothetical business
would operate at the lower of the operating margin for the specific market or the industry average
margin of approximately 46% and 45% based on an analysis of comparable companies in the December
31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models, respectively. For the first and second-year of
operations, the operating margin was assumed to be 50% of the normalized operating margin for
both the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models. The first and second-year expenses
include the non-recurring start-up costs necessary to build the operation (i.e. development of
customers, workforce, etc.).
In addition to cash flows during the projection period, a normalized residual cash flow was
calculated based upon industry-average growth of 3% beyond the discrete build-up projection period
in both the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models. The residual cash flow was then
capitalized to arrive at the terminal value.
A-73
The present value of the cash flows is calculated using an estimated required rate of return based
upon industry-average market conditions. In determining the estimated required rate of return,
management calculated a discount rate using both current and historical trends in the industry.
The Company calculated the discount rate as of the valuation date and also one-year, two-year, and
three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate was calculated by weighting the
required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their
estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based
on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the outdoor advertising industry.
The calculation of the discount rate required the rate of return on debt, which was based on a
review of the credit ratings for comparable companies (i.e. market participants). Management used
the yield on a Standard & Poors B rated corporate bond for the pre-tax rate of return on debt
and tax-effected such yield based on applicable tax rates.
The rate of return on equity capital was estimated using a modified CAPM. Inputs to this model
included the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, forecast betas for comparable companies,
calculation of a market risk premium based on research and empirical evidence and calculation of a
size premium derived from historical differences in returns between small companies and large
companies using data published by Ibbotson Associates.
The concluded discount rate used in the discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of
the permits was 9.5% at December 31, 2008 and 10% at June 30, 2009. Applying the discount rate,
the present value of cash flows during the discrete projection period and terminal value were added
to estimate the fair value of the hypothetical start-up operation. The initial capital investment
was subtracted to arrive at the value of the permits. The initial capital investment represents
the expenditures required to erect the necessary advertising structures.
The discount rate used in the December 31, 2008 impairment model increased approximately 100 basis
points over the discount rate used to value the permits in the preliminary purchase price
allocation as of July 30, 2008. Industry revenue forecasts declined 10% through 2013 compared to
the forecasts used in the preliminary purchase price allocation as of July 30, 2008. These market
driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the billboard permits
below their carrying value. As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge which
totaled $722.6 million. The fair value of the permits was $1.5 billion at December 31, 2008.
The discount rate used in the June 30, 2009 impairment model increased approximately 50 basis
points over the discount rate used to value the permits at December 31, 2008. Industry revenue
forecasts declined 8% through 2013 compared to the forecasts used in the 2008 impairment test.
These market driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the
billboard permits below their carrying value. As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash
impairment charge in all but five of its markets in the United States and Canada, which totaled
$345.4 million. The fair value of the permits was $1.1 billion at June 30, 2009.
Annual Impairment Test to Billboard Permits
The Company performs its annual impairment test on October 1 of each year. The Company engaged
Mesirow Financial to assist it in the development of the assumptions and the Companys
determination of the fair value of the billboard permits. The aggregate fair value of the
Companys permits on October 1, 2009 increased approximately 8% from the fair value at June 30,
2009. The increase in fair value resulted primarily from an increase of $57.7 million related to
improved industry revenue forecasts. The discount rate was unchanged from the June 30, 2009
interim impairment analysis. The Company calculated the discount rate as of the valuation date and
also one-year, two-year, and three-year historical quarterly averages. The discount rate was
calculated by weighting the required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in
proportion to their estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure
was estimated based on the quarterly average of data for publicly traded companies in the outdoor
advertising industry.
The fair value of the Companys permits at October 1, 2009 was approximately $1.2 billion.
A-74
Interim Impairments to Goodwill
The Company tests goodwill at interim dates if events or changes in circumstances indicate that
goodwill might be impaired. The United States and global economies have undergone a period of
economic uncertainty, which caused, among other things, a general tightening in the credit markets,
limited access to the credit markets, lower levels of liquidity and lower consumer and business
spending. These disruptions in the credit and financial markets and the impact of adverse
economic, financial and industry conditions on the demand for advertising negatively impacted the
key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model used to value the Companys reporting units
since the merger. Therefore, the Company performed an interim impairment test resulting in a
non-cash impairment charge of $3.6 billion as of December 31, 2008.
The Companys cash flows during the first six months of 2009 were below those used in the
discounted cash flow model used to calculate the impairment at December 31, 2008. Additionally,
the fair value of the Companys debt and equity at June 30, 2009 was below the carrying amount of
its reporting units at June 30, 2009. As a result of these indicators, the Company performed an
interim goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2009 resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of
$3.1 billion.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step, used to screen for potential
impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including
goodwill. If applicable, the second step, used to measure the amount of the impairment loss,
compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill.
Each of the Companys reporting units is valued using a discounted cash flow model which requires
estimating future cash flows expected to be generated from the reporting unit, discounted to their
present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. Terminal values were also estimated and
discounted to their present value. Assessing the recoverability of goodwill requires the Company
to make estimates and assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates
based on its budgets, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and
marketplace data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and managements
judgment in applying these factors. The Company engaged Mesirow Financial to assist the Company in
the development of these assumptions and the Companys determination of the fair value of its
reporting units.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in each of the
Companys reportable segments. The provisions of ASC 350-20-50-1 require the disclosure of
cumulative impairment. As a result of the merger, a new basis in goodwill was recorded in
accordance with ASC 805-10. All impairments shown in the table below have been recorded subsequent
to the merger and, therefore, do not include any pre-merger impairment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Radio |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Pre-Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
6,045,527 |
|
|
$ |
688,336 |
|
|
$ |
474,253 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,210,116 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
7,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,392 |
|
Dispositions |
|
|
(20,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,931 |
) |
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
28,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,303 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
6,031,224 |
|
|
$ |
687,073 |
|
|
$ |
515,190 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,235,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Radio |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Post-Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Preliminary purchase price allocation |
|
|
6,335,220 |
|
|
|
2,805,780 |
|
|
|
603,712 |
|
|
|
60,115 |
|
|
|
9,804,827 |
|
Purchase price adjustments net |
|
|
356,040 |
|
|
|
438,025 |
|
|
|
(76,116 |
) |
|
|
271,175 |
|
|
|
989,124 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(1,115,033 |
) |
|
|
(2,321,602 |
) |
|
|
(173,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,610,070 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,605 |
) |
|
|
(63,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,124 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
5,579,190 |
|
|
|
892,598 |
|
|
|
287,543 |
|
|
|
331,290 |
|
|
|
7,090,621 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(2,420,897 |
) |
|
|
(390,374 |
) |
|
|
(73,764 |
) |
|
|
(211,988 |
) |
|
|
(3,097,023 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,878 |
|
Dispositions |
|
|
(62,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,276 |
) |
|
|
(64,686 |
) |
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,293 |
|
|
|
17,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,705 |
|
Purchase price adjustments net |
|
|
47,086 |
|
|
|
68,896 |
|
|
|
45,042 |
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
160,542 |
|
Other |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(4,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,146,869 |
|
|
$ |
585,249 |
|
|
$ |
276,343 |
|
|
$ |
116,544 |
|
|
$ |
4,125,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the Companys U.S. radio markets and outdoor advertising markets are components. The U.S.
radio markets are aggregated into a single reporting unit and the U.S. outdoor advertising markets
are aggregated into a single reporting unit for purposes of the goodwill impairment test using the
guidance in ASC 350-20-55. The Company also determined that within its Americas outdoor segment,
Canada, Mexico, Peru, and Brazil constitute separate reporting units and each country in its
International outdoor segment constitutes a separate reporting unit.
The discounted cash flow model indicated that the Company failed the first step of the impairment
test for certain of its reporting units as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, which required
it to compare the implied fair value of each reporting units goodwill with its carrying value.
The discounted cash flow approach the Company uses for valuing its reporting units involves
estimating future cash flows expected to be generated from the related assets, discounted to their
present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. Terminal values are also estimated and
discounted to their present value.
The Company forecasted revenue, expenses, and cash flows over a ten-year period for each of its
reporting units. In projecting future cash flows, the Company considers a variety of factors
including its historical growth rates, macroeconomic conditions, advertising sector and industry
trends as well as Company-specific information. Historically, revenues in its industries have been
highly correlated to economic cycles. Based on these considerations, the assumed 2008 and 2009
revenue growth rates used in the December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 impairment models were
negative followed by assumed revenue growth with an anticipated economic recovery in 2009 and 2010,
respectively. To arrive at the projected cash flows and resulting growth rates, the Company
evaluated its historical operating results, current management initiatives and both historical and
anticipated industry results to assess the reasonableness of the operating margin assumptions. The
Company also calculated a normalized residual year which represents the perpetual cash flows of
each reporting unit. The residual year cash flow was capitalized to arrive at the terminal value
of the reporting unit.
The Company calculated the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 and also one-year, two-year, and three-year historical quarterly averages for each of
its reporting units. WACC is an overall rate based upon the individual rates of return for
invested capital (equity and interest-bearing debt). The WACC is calculated by weighting the
required returns on interest-bearing debt and common equity capital in proportion to their
estimated percentages in an expected capital structure. The capital structure was estimated based
on the quarterly average data for publicly traded companies in the radio and outdoor advertising
industry. The calculation of the WACC considered both current industry WACCs and historical trends
in the industry.
A-76
The calculation of the WACC requires the rate of return on debt, which was based on a review of the
credit ratings for comparable companies (i.e. market participants) and the indicated yield on
similarly rated bonds.
The rate of return on equity capital was estimated using a modified CAPM. Inputs to this model
included the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, forecast betas for comparable companies,
calculation of a market risk premium based on research and empirical evidence and calculation of a
size premium derived from historical differences in returns between small companies and large
companies using data published by Ibbotson Associates.
In line with advertising industry trends, the Companys operations and expected cash flow are
subject to significant uncertainties about future developments, including timing and severity of
the recessionary trends and customers behaviors. To address these risks, the Company included
company-specific risk premiums for each of the reporting units in the estimated WACC. Based on
this analysis, as of December 31, 2008, company-specific risk premiums of 100 basis points, 300
basis points and 300 basis points were included for the Radio, Americas outdoor and International
outdoor segments, respectively, resulting in WACCs of 11%, 12.5% and 12.5% for each of the
reporting units in the Radio, Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments, respectively.
As of June 30, 2009, company-specific risk premiums of 100 basis points, 250 basis points and 350
basis points were included for the Radio, Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments,
respectively, resulting in WACCs of 11%, 12.5% and 13.5% for each of the reporting units in the
Radio, Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments, respectively. Applying these WACCs,
the present value of cash flows during the discrete projection period and terminal value were added
to estimate the fair value of the reporting units.
The discount rate utilized in the valuation of the FCC licenses and outdoor permits as of December
31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 excludes the company-specific risk premiums that were added to the
industry WACCs used in the valuation of the reporting units. Management believes the exclusion of
this premium is appropriate given the difference between the nature of the licenses and billboard
permits and reporting unit cash flow projections. The cash flow projections utilized under the
direct valuation method for the licenses and permits are derived from utilizing industry
normalized information for the existing portfolio of licenses and permits. Given that the
underlying cash flow projections are based on industry normalized information, application of an
industry average discount rate is appropriate. Conversely, the cash flow projections for the
overall reporting unit are based on internal forecasts for each business and incorporate future
growth and initiatives unrelated to the existing license and permit portfolio. Additionally, the
projections for the reporting unit include cash flows related to non-FCC license and non-permit
based assets. In the valuation of the reporting unit, the company-specific risk premiums were
added to the industry WACCs due to the risks inherent in achieving the projected cash flows of the
reporting unit.
The Company also utilized the market approach to provide a test of reasonableness to the results of
the discounted cash flow model. The market approach indicates the fair value of the invested
capital of a business based on a companys market capitalization (if publicly traded) and a
comparison of the business to comparable publicly traded companies and transactions in its
industry. This approach can be estimated through the quoted market price method, the market
comparable method, and the market transaction method.
One indication of the fair value of a business is the quoted market price in active markets for the
debt and equity of the business. The quoted market price of equity multiplied by the number of
shares outstanding yields the fair value of the equity of a business on a marketable,
noncontrolling basis. A premium for control is then applied and added to the estimated fair value
of interest-bearing debt to indicate the fair value of the invested capital of the business on a
marketable, controlling basis.
The market comparable method provides an indication of the fair value of the invested capital of a
business by comparing it to publicly traded companies in similar lines of business. The conditions
and prospects of companies in similar lines of business depend on common factors such as overall
demand for their products and services. An analysis of the market multiples of companies engaged
in similar lines of business yields insight into investor perceptions and, therefore, the value of
the subject business. These multiples are then applied to the operating results of the subject
business to estimate the fair value of the invested capital on a marketable, noncontrolling basis.
The Company then applies a premium for control to indicate the fair value of the business on a
marketable, controlling basis.
A-77
The market transaction method estimates the fair value of the invested capital of a business based
on exchange prices in actual transactions and on asking prices for controlling interests in similar
companies recently offered for sale. This process involves comparison and correlation of the
subject business with other similar companies that have recently been purchased. Considerations
such as location, time of sale, physical characteristics, and conditions of sale are analyzed for
comparable businesses.
The three variations of the market approach indicated that the fair value determined by the
Companys discounted cash flow model was within a reasonable range of outcomes as of December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009.
The revenue forecasts for 2009 declined 18%, 21% and 29% for Radio, Americas outdoor and
International outdoor, respectively, compared to the forecasts used in the July 30, 2008
preliminary purchase price allocation primarily as a result of the revenues realized for the year
ended December 31, 2008. These market driven changes were primarily responsible for the decline in
fair value of the reporting units below their carrying value. As a result, the Company recognized
a non-cash impairment charge to reduce its goodwill of $3.6 billion at December 31, 2008.
The revenue forecasts for 2009 declined 8%, 7% and 9% for Radio, Americas outdoor and International
outdoor, respectively, compared to the forecasts used in the 2008 impairment test primarily as a
result of the revenues realized during the first six months of 2009. These market driven changes
were primarily responsible for the decline in fair value of the reporting units below their
carrying value. As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge to reduce its
goodwill of $3.1 billion at June 30, 2009.
Annual Impairment Test to Goodwill
The Company performs its annual impairment test on October 1 of each year. The Company engaged
Mesirow Financial to assist the Company in the development of these assumptions and the Companys
determination of the fair value of its reporting units. The fair value of the Companys reporting
units on October 1, 2009 increased from the fair value at June 30, 2009. The increase in fair
value of the radio reporting unit was primarily the result of a 50 basis point decline in the WACC
as well as a 130 basis point increase in the long-term operating margin. The increase in fair value
of the Americas reporting unit was primarily the result of a 150 basis point decline in the WACC.
Application of the market approach described above supported lowering the company-specific risk
premium used in the discounted cash flow model to fair value the Americas reporting unit. The
increase in the aggregate fair value of the reporting units in the Companys International outdoor
segment was primarily the result of an improvement in the long-term revenue forecasts. As
discussed in Note B, a certain reporting unit in the International outdoor segment recognized a
$41.4 million impairment to goodwill related to the fair value adjustments of certain
noncontrolling interests recorded in the merger pursuant to ASC 480-10-S99.
NOTE E INVESTMENTS
The Companys most significant investments in nonconsolidated affiliates are listed below:
Australian Radio Network
The Company owns a fifty-percent (50%) interest in Australian Radio Network (ARN), an Australian
company that owns and operates radio stations in Australia and New Zealand.
Grupo ACIR Comunicaciones
Clear Channel sold a portion of its investment in Grupo ACIR for approximately $47.0 million on
July 1, 2008 and recorded a gain of $9.2 million in equity in earnings of nonconsolidated
affiliates during the pre-merger period ended July 30, 2008. Effective January 30, 2009 the
Company sold 57% of its remaining 20% interest in Grupo ACIR. The Company sold the remainder of
its interest on July 28, 2009.
A-78
Summarized Financial Information
The following table summarizes the Companys investments in nonconsolidated affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ARN |
|
|
Grupo ACIR |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Total |
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
290,808 |
|
|
$ |
41,518 |
|
|
$ |
51,811 |
|
|
$ |
384,137 |
|
Reclass to cost method investments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,469 |
) |
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
(16,186 |
) |
Acquisition (disposition) of investments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,153 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19,172 |
) |
Cash advances (repayments) |
|
|
(17,263 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,402 |
|
|
|
(12,858 |
) |
Equity in net earnings (loss) |
|
|
15,191 |
|
|
|
(4,372 |
) |
|
|
(31,508 |
) |
|
|
(20,689 |
) |
Foreign currency transaction adjustment |
|
|
(10,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,354 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
42,396 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
42,688 |
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,217 |
) |
|
|
(2,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
320,778 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
|
$ |
345,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investments in the table above are not consolidated, but are accounted for under the equity
method of accounting, whereby the Company records its investments in these entities in the balance
sheet as Investments in, and advances to, nonconsolidated affiliates. The Companys interests in
their operations are recorded in the statement of operations as Equity in earnings (loss) of
nonconsolidated affiliates. There were no undistributed earnings for the year ended December 31,
2009. Accumulated undistributed earnings included in retained deficit for these investments were
$3.6 million and $133.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Other Investments
Other investments of $44.7 million and $33.5 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
include marketable equity securities and other investments classified as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Cost |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for sale |
|
$ |
38,902 |
|
|
$ |
(12,237 |
) |
|
$ |
32,035 |
|
|
$ |
19,104 |
|
Other cost investments |
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
44,685 |
|
|
$ |
(12,237 |
) |
|
$ |
32,035 |
|
|
$ |
24,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for sale |
|
$ |
27,110 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,110 |
|
Other cost investments |
|
|
6,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,507 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys available-for-sale security, Independent News & Media PLC (INM), was in an
unrealized loss position for an extended period of time in 2008 and 2009. As a result, the Company
considered the guidance in ASC 320-10-S99 and reviewed the length of the time and the extent to
which the market value was less than cost and the financial condition and near-term prospects of
the issuer. After this assessment, the Company concluded that the impairment was other than
temporary and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $11.3 million and $59.8 million in Gain
(loss) on marketable securities for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
In addition, the fair value of the Companys available-for-sale security, Sirius XM Radio, Inc.,
was below its cost for an extended period of time in 2008. After considering ASC 320-10-S99
guidance, the Company concluded that the impairment was other than temporary and recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $56.7 million in Gain (loss) on marketable securities for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
A-79
Clear Channel sold its American Tower Corporation securities in the second quarter of 2008 and
recorded a gain of $30.4 million on the statement of operations in Gain (loss) on marketable
securities.
Other cost investments include various investments in companies for which there is no readily
determinable market value.
NOTE F ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
The Companys asset retirement obligation is reported in Other long-term liabilities and
relates to its obligation to dismantle and remove outdoor advertising displays from leased land and
to reclaim the site to its original condition upon the termination or non-renewal of a lease. When
the liability is recorded, the cost is capitalized as part of the related long-lived assets
carrying value. Due to the high rate of lease renewals over a long period of time, the calculation
assumes that all related assets will be removed at some period over the next 50 years. An estimate
of third-party cost information is used with respect to the dismantling of the structures and the
reclamation of the site. The interest rate used to calculate the present value of such costs over
the retirement period is based on an estimated risk adjusted credit rate for the same period.
The following table presents the activity related to the Companys asset retirement obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Period ended |
|
|
Period ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
July 30, 2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
55,592 |
|
|
$ |
59,278 |
|
|
$ |
70,497 |
|
Adjustment due to
change in estimate of
related costs |
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
|
|
(3,123 |
) |
|
|
1,853 |
|
Accretion of liability |
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(2,779 |
) |
|
|
(2,796 |
) |
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
51,301 |
|
|
$ |
55,592 |
|
|
$ |
72,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-80
NOTE G LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan A Facility Due 2014 (1) |
|
$ |
1,127,657 |
|
|
$ |
1,331,500 |
|
Term loan B Facility Due 2016 |
|
|
9,061,911 |
|
|
|
10,700,000 |
|
Term loan C Asset Sale Facility Due 2016 (1) |
|
|
695,879 |
|
|
|
695,879 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility Due 2014 |
|
|
1,812,500 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
Delayed Draw Facilities Due 2016 |
|
|
874,432 |
|
|
|
532,500 |
|
Receivables Based Facility Due 2014 |
|
|
355,732 |
|
|
|
445,609 |
|
Other Secured Long-term Debt |
|
|
5,225 |
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated Secured Debt |
|
|
13,933,336 |
|
|
|
13,932,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Cash Pay Notes |
|
|
796,250 |
|
|
|
980,000 |
|
Senior Toggle Notes |
|
|
915,200 |
|
|
|
1,330,000 |
|
Clear Channel Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25% Senior Notes Due 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
7.65% Senior Notes Due 2010 |
|
|
116,181 |
|
|
|
133,681 |
|
4.5% Senior Notes Due 2010 |
|
|
239,975 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
6.25% Senior Notes Due 2011 |
|
|
692,737 |
|
|
|
722,941 |
|
4.4% Senior Notes Due 2011 |
|
|
140,241 |
|
|
|
223,279 |
|
5.0% Senior Notes Due 2012 |
|
|
249,851 |
|
|
|
275,800 |
|
5.75% Senior Notes Due 2013 |
|
|
312,109 |
|
|
|
475,739 |
|
5.5% Senior Notes Due 2014 |
|
|
541,455 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
4.9% Senior Notes Due 2015 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
5.5% Senior Notes Due 2016 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
6.875% Senior Debentures Due 2018 |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
7.25% Senior Debentures Due 2027 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Subsidiary Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.25% Series A Senior Notes Due 2017 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.25% Series B Senior Notes Due 2017 |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
77,657 |
|
|
|
69,260 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments and original issue discount |
|
|
(788,087 |
) |
|
|
(1,114,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,701,905 |
|
|
|
19,503,620 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
398,779 |
|
|
|
562,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
20,303,126 |
|
|
$ |
18,940,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These facilities are subject to an amortization schedule with the final payment on the Term
Loan A and Term Loan C due 2014 and 2016, respectively. |
The Companys weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2009 was 6.3%. The aggregate market
value of the Companys debt based on quoted market prices for which quotes were available was
approximately $17.7 billion and $17.2 billion at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
A-81
The Company and its subsidiaries have from time to time repurchased certain debt obligations of
Clear Channel and may in the future, as part of various financing and investment strategies it may
elect to pursue, purchase additional outstanding indebtedness of Clear Channel or its subsidiaries
or outstanding equity securities of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., in tender offers, open
market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The Company may also sell
certain assets or properties and use the proceeds to reduce its indebtedness or the indebtedness of
its subsidiaries. These purchases or sales, if any, could have a material positive or negative
impact on the Companys liquidity available to repay outstanding debt obligations or on the
Companys consolidated results of operations. These transactions could also require or result in
amendments to the agreements governing outstanding debt obligations or changes in the Companys
leverage or other financial ratios, which could have a material positive or negative impact on the
Companys ability to comply with the covenants contained in its debt agreements. These
transactions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Companys liquidity
requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an
applicable margin plus, at Clear Channels option, either (i) a base rate determined by reference
to the higher of (A) the prime lending rate publicly announced by the administrative agent and (B)
the Federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, or (ii) a Eurocurrency rate
determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits for the interest period relevant to such
borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs.
The margin percentages applicable to the term loan facilities and revolving credit facility are the
following percentages per annum:
|
|
|
with respect to loans under the term loan A facility and the revolving credit
facility, (i) 2.40% in the case of base rate loans and (ii) 3.40% in the case of
Eurocurrency rate loans, subject to downward adjustments if Clear Channels leverage
ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as calculated in accordance with the senior secured
credit facilities) decreases below 7 to 1; and |
|
|
|
|
with respect to loans under the term loan B facility, term loan C asset sale
facility and delayed draw term loan facilities, (i) 2.65% in the case of base rate
loans and (ii) 3.65% in the case of Eurocurrency rate loans subject to downward
adjustments if the Companys leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 7
to 1. |
Clear Channel is required to pay each revolving credit lender a commitment fee in respect of any
unused commitments under the revolving credit facility, which is 0.50% per annum, subject to
downward adjustments if Clear Channels leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 4 to
1. Clear Channel is required to pay each delayed draw term facility lender a commitment fee in
respect of any undrawn commitments under the delayed draw term facilities, which initially is
1.825% per annum until the delayed draw term facilities are fully drawn or commitments thereunder
terminated.
The senior secured credit facilities include two delayed draw term loan facilities. The first is a
$589.8 million facility which may be drawn to purchase or redeem Clear Channels outstanding 7.65%
senior notes due 2010, of which $451.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2009, and a $423.4
million facility which was drawn to redeem Clear Channels outstanding 4.25% senior notes in May
2009.
The senior secured credit facilities require the Company to prepay outstanding term loans, subject
to certain exceptions, with:
|
|
|
50% (which percentage will be reduced to 25% and to 0% based upon the Companys
leverage ratio) of the Companys annual excess cash flow (as calculated in accordance
with the senior secured credit facilities), less any voluntary prepayments of term
loans and revolving credit loans (to the extent accompanied by a permanent reduction of
the commitment) and subject to customary credits; |
|
|
|
|
100% (which percentage will be reduced to 75% and 50% based upon the Companys
leverage ratio) of the net cash proceeds of sales or other dispositions by the Company
or its wholly-owned restricted
subsidiaries (including casualty and condemnation events) of assets other than specified
assets subject to reinvestment rights and certain other exceptions; and |
A-82
|
|
|
100% of the net cash proceeds of any incurrence of certain debt, other than
debt permitted under the senior secured credit facilities. |
The foregoing prepayments with the net cash proceeds of certain incurrences of debt and annual
excess cash flow will be applied (i) first to the term loans other than the term loan C asset
sale facility loans (on a pro rata basis) and (ii) second to the term loan C asset sale facility
loans, in each case to the remaining installments thereof in direct order of maturity. The
foregoing prepayments with the net cash proceeds of the sale of assets (including casualty and
condemnation events) will be applied (i) first to the term loan C asset sale facility loans and
(ii) second to the other term loans (on a pro rata basis), in each case to the remaining
installments thereof in direct order of maturity.
The Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under its senior secured credit facilities at
any time without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs with respect to
Eurocurrency rate loans.
The Company is required to repay the loans under its term loan facilities, after giving effect to
the December 2009 prepayment of $2.0 billion of term loans with proceeds from the issuance of
subsidiary senior notes discussed elsewhere in Note G, as follows:
|
|
|
the term loan A facility will amortize in quarterly installments commencing on
the third interest payment date after the fourth anniversary of the closing date of the
merger in annual amounts equal to 4.7% of the original funded principal amount of such
facility in year four, 10% thereafter, with the balance being payable on the final
maturity date (July 2014) of such term loans; and |
|
|
|
|
the term loan B facility and delayed draw facilities will be payable in full on
the final maturity date (January 2016) of such term loans; and |
|
|
|
|
the term loan C facility will amortize in quarterly installments on the first
interest payment date after the third anniversary of the closing date of the merger, in
annual amounts equal to 2.5% of the original funded principal amount of such facilities
in years four and five and 1% thereafter, with the balance being payable on the final
maturity date (January 2016) of such term loans. |
The Company is required to repay all borrowings under the receivables based facility and the
revolving credit facility at their final maturity in July 2014.
The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by each of the Companys existing and future
material wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.
All obligations under the senior secured credit facilities, and the guarantees of those
obligations, are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by:
|
|
|
a first-priority lien on the capital stock of Clear Channel; |
|
|
|
|
100% of the capital stock of any future material wholly-owned domestic license
subsidiary that is not a Restricted Subsidiary under the indenture governing the
Clear Channel senior notes; |
|
|
|
|
certain assets that do not constitute principal property (as defined in the
indenture governing the Clear Channel senior notes); |
|
|
|
|
certain assets that constitute principal property (as defined in the
indenture governing the Clear Channel senior notes) securing obligations under the
senior secured credit facilities up to the maximum amount permitted to be secured by
such assets without requiring equal and ratable security under the indenture governing
the Clear Channel senior notes; and |
|
|
|
|
a second-priority lien on the accounts receivable and related assets securing
our receivables based credit facility. |
The obligations of any foreign subsidiaries that are borrowers under the revolving credit facility
will also be guaranteed by certain of their material wholly-owned restricted subsidiaries, and
secured by substantially all assets of all such borrowers and guarantors, subject to permitted
liens and other exceptions.
The senior secured credit facilities contain a financial covenant that requires Clear Channel to
comply on a quarterly
basis with a maximum consolidated senior secured net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio (maximum of
9.5:1). This financial covenant becomes more restrictive over time. Clear Channels senior secured
debt consists of the senior
A-83
secured facilities, the receivables based credit facility and certain
other secured subsidiary debt. The Company was in compliance with this covenant as of December 31,
2009.
In addition, the senior secured credit facilities include negative covenants that, subject to
significant exceptions, limit the Companys ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries
to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on assets; |
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and distributions or repurchase its capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
make investments, loans, or advances; |
|
|
|
|
prepay certain junior indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
amend material agreements governing certain junior indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
|
change its lines of business. |
The senior secured credit facilities include certain customary representations and warranties,
affirmative covenants and events of default, including payment defaults, breach of representations
and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain indebtedness, certain events of
bankruptcy, certain events under ERISA, material judgments, the invalidity of material provisions
of the senior secured credit facilities documentation, the failure of collateral under the security
documents for the senior secured credit facilities, the failure of the senior secured credit
facilities to be senior debt under the subordination provisions of certain of the Companys
subordinated debt and a change of control. If an event of default occurs, the lenders under the
senior secured credit facilities will be entitled to take various actions, including the
acceleration of all amounts due under the senior secured credit facilities and all actions
permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.
Receivables Based Credit Facility
The receivables based credit facility of $783.5 million provides revolving credit commitments in an
amount equal to the initial borrowing of $533.5 million on the closing date plus $250 million,
subject to a borrowing base. The borrowing base at any time equals 85% of the eligible accounts
receivable for certain subsidiaries of the Company. The receivables based credit facility includes
a letter of credit sub-facility and a swingline loan sub-facility.
Borrowings, excluding the initial borrowing, under the receivables based credit facility are
subject to compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0 if at any time excess
availability under the receivables based credit facility is less than $50 million, or if aggregate
excess availability under the receivables based credit facility and revolving credit facility is
less than 10% of the borrowing base.
Borrowings under the receivables based credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to an
applicable margin plus, at Clear Channels option, either (i) a base rate determined by reference
to the higher of (A) the prime lending rate publicly announced by the administrative agent and (B)
the Federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, or (ii) a Eurocurrency rate
determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits for the interest period relevant to such
borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs.
The margin percentage applicable to the receivables based credit facility which is (i) 1.40% in the
case of base rate loans and (ii) 2.40% in the case of Eurocurrency rate loans subject to downward
adjustments if the Companys leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 7 to 1.
Clear Channel is required to pay each lender a commitment fee in respect of any unused commitments
under the receivables based credit facility, which is 0.375% per annum, subject to downward
adjustments if Clear Channels leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDA decreases below 6 to 1.
If at any time the sum of the outstanding amounts under the receivables based credit facility
(including the letter of
credit outstanding amounts and swingline loans thereunder) exceeds the lesser of (i) the borrowing
base and (ii) the aggregate commitments under the receivables based credit facility, the Company
will be required to repay
A-84
outstanding loans and cash collateralize letters of credit in an
aggregate amount equal to such excess.
The Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the receivables based credit facility at
any time without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs with respect to
Eurocurrency rate loans.
The receivables based credit facility is guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, the
guarantors of the senior secured credit facilities. All obligations under the receivables based
credit facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured by a perfected first priority
security interest in all of the Companys and all of the guarantors accounts receivable and
related assets and proceeds thereof, subject to permitted liens and certain exceptions.
The receivables based credit facility includes negative covenants, representations, warranties,
events of default, conditions precedent and termination provisions substantially similar to those
governing our senior secured credit facilities.
Senior Cash Pay Notes and Senior Toggle Notes
Clear Channel has outstanding $796.3 million aggregate principal amount of 10.75% senior cash pay
notes due 2016 and $915.2 million aggregate principal amount of 11.00%/11.75% senior toggle notes
due 2016.
The senior toggle notes mature on August 1, 2016 and may require a special redemption of up to
$30.0 million on August 1, 2015. The Company may elect on each interest election date to pay all
or 50% of such interest on the senior toggle notes in cash or by increasing the principal amount of
the senior toggle notes or by issuing new senior toggle notes (such increase or issuance, PIK
Interest). Interest on the senior toggle notes payable in cash will accrue at a rate of 11.00%
per annum and PIK Interest will accrue at a rate of 11.75% per annum.
The Company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time prior to August 1, 2012, at a price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of such notes plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the
redemption date and a make-whole premium, as described in the notes. The Company may redeem some
or all of the notes at any time on or after August 1, 2012 at the redemption prices set forth in
notes. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 40% of any series of the outstanding notes at any
time on or prior to August 1, 2011 with the net cash proceeds raised in one or more equity
offerings. If the Company undergoes a change of control, sells certain of its assets, or issues
certain debt offerings, it may be required to offer to purchase notes from holders.
The notes are senior unsecured debt and rank equal in right of payment with all of the Companys
existing and future senior debt. Guarantors of obligations under the senior secured credit
facilities and the receivables based credit facility guarantee the notes with unconditional
guarantees that are unsecured and equal in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt
of such guarantors, except that the guarantees are subordinated in right of payment only to the
guarantees of obligations under the senior secured credit facilities and the receivables based
credit facility. In addition, the notes and the guarantees are structurally senior to Clear
Channels senior notes and existing and future debt to the extent that such debt is not guaranteed
by the guarantors of the notes. The notes and the guarantees are effectively subordinated to the
existing and future secured debt and that of the guarantors to the extent of the value of the
assets securing such indebtedness and are structurally subordinated to all obligations of
subsidiaries that do not guarantee the notes.
On January 15, 2009, Clear Channel made a permitted election under the indenture governing the
senior toggle notes to pay PIK Interest with respect to 100% of the senior toggle notes for the
semi-annual interest period commencing February 1, 2009. For subsequent interest periods, Clear
Channel must make an election regarding whether the applicable interest payment on the senior
toggle notes will be made entirely in cash, entirely through PIK Interest or 50% in cash and 50% in
PIK Interest. In the absence of such an election for any interest period, interest on the senior
toggle notes will be payable according to the election for the immediately preceding interest
period. As a result, Clear Channel is deemed to have made the PIK Interest election for future
interest periods unless and until it elects otherwise.
Subsidiary Senior Notes
In December 2009, Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (CCWH), an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of
A-85
the Companys publicly traded subsidiary, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCOH), issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series A Senior Notes due 2017 and
$2.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Series B Senior Notes due 2017 (collectively, the
Notes). The Notes are guaranteed by CCOH, Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (CCOI), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CCOH, and certain other existing and future domestic subsidiaries of CCOH
(collectively, the Guarantors).
The Notes are senior obligations that rank pari passu in right of payment to all unsubordinated
indebtedness of CCWH and the guarantees of the Notes will rank pari passu in right of payment to
all unsubordinated indebtedness of the Guarantors.
The indentures governing the Notes require the Company to maintain at least $100 million in cash or
other liquid assets or have cash available to be borrowed under committed credit facilities
consisting of (i) $50.0 million at the issuer and guarantor entities (principally the Americas
outdoor segment) and (ii) $50.0 million at the non-guarantor subsidiaries (principally the
International outdoor segment) (together the Liquidity Amount), in each case under the sole
control of the relevant entity. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution,
reorganization, or similar proceeding of Clear Channel Communications, Inc., for the period
thereafter that is the shorter of such proceeding and 60 days, the Liquidity Amount shall be
reduced to $50.0 million, with a $25.0 million requirement at the issuer and guarantor entities and
a $25.0 million requirement at the non-guarantor subsidiaries.
In addition, interest on the Notes accrues daily and is payable into an account established by the
trustee for the benefit of the bondholders (the Trustee Account). Failure to make daily payment
on any day does not constitute an event of default so long as (a) no payment or other transfer by
CCOH or any of its Subsidiaries shall have been made on such day under the cash management sweep
with Clear Channel Communications, Inc. and (b) on each semiannual interest payment date the
aggregate amount of funds in the Trustee Account is equal to at least the aggregate amount of
accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes.
The indenture governing the Series A Notes contains covenants that limit CCOH and its restricted
subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional debt to persons other than Clear Channel Communications
and its subsidiaries (other than CCOH) or issue certain preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on its restricted subsidiaries assets to secure such debt; |
|
|
|
|
create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to CCOH from its
restricted subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the notes; |
|
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another person, or sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of its assets; |
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets, including capital stock of its subsidiaries, to persons other than
Clear Channel Communications and its subsidiaries (other than CCOH). |
The indenture governing the Series A Notes does not include limitations on dividends,
distributions, investments or asset sales.
The indenture governing the Series B Notes contains covenants that limit CCOH and its restricted
subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
A-86
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional debt or issue certain preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
redeem, repurchase or retire CCOHs subordinated debt; |
|
|
|
|
make certain investments; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on its or its restricted subsidiaries assets to secure debt; |
|
|
|
|
create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to it from its
restricted subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the Notes; |
|
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another person, or sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of its assets; |
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets, including capital stock of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
designate its subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other restricted payments; and |
|
|
|
|
purchase or otherwise effectively cancel or retire any of the Series B Notes if after
doing so the ratio of (a) the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Series A Notes
to (b) the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes shall be greater
than 0.250. This stipulation ensures, among other things, that as long as the Series A
Notes are outstanding, the Series B Notes are outstanding. |
The Series B Notes indenture restricts CCOHs ability to incur additional indebtedness and pay
dividends based on an incurrence test. In order to incur additional indebtedness, CCOHs debt to
adjusted EBITDA ratios (as defined by the indenture) must be lower than 6.5:1 and 3.25:1 for total
debt and senior debt, respectively. Similarly in order for CCOH to pay dividends from the proceeds
of indebtedness or the proceeds from asset sales, its debt to adjusted EBITDA ratios (as defined by
the indenture) must be lower than 6.0:1 and 3.0:1 for total debt and senior debt, respectively. If
these ratios are not met, CCOH has certain exceptions that allow it to incur additional
indebtedness and pay dividends, such as a $500.0 million exception for the payment of dividends.
CCOH was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2009.
A portion of the proceeds of the Notes were used to (i) pay the fees and expenses of the Notes
offering, (ii) fund $50.0 million of the Liquidity Amount (the $50.0 million liquidity amount of
the non-guarantor subsidiaries was satisfied) and (iii) applied $2.0 billion of the cash proceeds
(which amount is equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Series B Notes) to repay an equal
amount of indebtedness under Clear Channels senior secured credit facilities. In accordance with
the senior secured credit facilities, the $2.0 billion cash proceeds were applied ratably to the
Term Loan A, Term Loan B, both delayed draw term loan facilities, and within each such class, such
prepayment was applied to remaining scheduled installments of principal. The Company recorded a
loss of $29.3 million in Other income (expense) net related to deferred loan costs associated
with the retired senior secured debt.
The balance of the proceeds is available to CCOI for general corporate purposes. In this regard,
all of the remaining proceeds could be used to pay dividends from CCOI to CCOH. In turn, CCOH
could declare a dividend to its shareholders, of which Clear Channel would receive its
proportionate share. Payment of such dividends would not be prohibited by the terms of the Notes
or any of the loan agreements or credit facilities of CCOI or CCOH.
Debt Repurchases, Tender Offers, Maturities and Other
During 2009 and 2008, CC Finco, LLC, and CC Finco II, LLC, both indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries
of the Company, repurchased certain of Clear Channels outstanding senior notes through open market
repurchases, privately negotiated transactions and tenders as shown in the table below. Notes
repurchased and held by CC Finco, LLC and CC Finco II, LLC are eliminated in consolidation.
A-87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
CC Finco, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of debt repurchased |
|
$ |
801,302 |
|
|
$ |
102,241 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments (1) |
|
|
(146,314 |
) |
|
|
(24,367 |
) |
Deferred loan costs and other |
|
|
(1,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain recorded in Other income (expense) net (2) |
|
|
(368,591 |
) |
|
|
(53,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for repurchases of long-term debt |
|
$ |
284,929 |
|
|
$ |
24,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Finco II, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of debt repurchased (3) |
|
$ |
433,125 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred loan costs and other |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain recorded in Other income (expense) net (2) |
|
|
(373,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for repurchases of long-term debt |
|
$ |
58,537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents unamortized fair value purchase accounting discounts recorded as a result of
the merger. |
|
(2) |
|
CC Finco, LLC, and CC Finco II, LLC, repurchased certain of Clear Channels legacy
notes, senior cash pay notes and senior toggle notes at a discount, resulting in a gain on
the extinguishment of debt. |
|
(3) |
|
CC Finco II, LLC immediately cancelled these notes subsequent to the purchase. |
On January 15, 2008, Clear Channel redeemed its 4.625% senior notes at their maturity for $500.0
million with proceeds from its bank credit facility. On June 15, 2008, Clear Channel redeemed its
6.625% Senior Notes at their maturity for $125.0 million with available cash on hand.
Clear Channel terminated its cross currency swaps on July 30, 2008 by paying the counterparty
$196.2 million from available cash on hand.
On August 7, 2008, Clear Channel announced that it commenced a cash tender offer and consent
solicitation for its outstanding $750.0 million principal amount of 7.65% senior notes due 2010.
The tender offer and consent payment expired on September 9, 2008. The aggregate principal amount
of 7.65% senior notes validly tendered and accepted for payment was $363.9 million. Clear
Channel recorded a $21.8 million loss in Other income (expense) net during the pre-merger
period as a result of the tender.
Clear Channel repurchased $639.2 million aggregate principal amount of the AMFM Operating Inc. 8%
senior notes pursuant to a tender offer and consent solicitation in connection with the merger.
The remaining 8% senior notes were redeemed at maturity on November 1, 2008. The aggregate loss on
the extinguishment of debt recorded in Other income (expense) net in 2008 as a result of the
tender offer for the AMFM Operating Inc. 8% notes was $8.0 million.
On November 24, 2008, Clear Channel announced that it commenced another cash tender offer to
purchase its outstanding 7.65% Senior Notes due 2010. The tender offer and consent payment expired
on December 23, 2008. The aggregate principal amount of 7.65% senior notes validly tendered and
accepted for payment was $252.4 million. The Company recorded an aggregate gain on the
extinguishment of debt of $74.7 million in Other income (expense) net during the post-merger
period as a result of the tender offer for the 7.65% senior notes due 2010.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company redeemed the remaining principal amount of Clear
Channels 4.25% senior notes at maturity with a draw under the $500.0 million delayed draw term
loan facility that is specifically designated for this purpose.
Future maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2009 are as follows:
A-88
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
403,233 |
|
2011 |
|
|
873,035 |
|
2012 |
|
|
267,658 |
|
2013 |
|
|
457,355 |
|
2014 |
|
|
3,715,271 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
15,773,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) |
|
$ |
21,489,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes a negative purchase accounting fair value adjustment of $788.1 million,
which is amortized through interest expense over the life of the underlying debt obligations. |
NOTE H FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Interest Rate Swaps
The Companys aggregate $6.0 billion notional amount interest rate swap agreements are designated
as a cash flow hedge and the effective portion of the gain or loss on the swap is reported as a
component of other comprehensive income. Ineffective portions of a cash flow hedging derivatives
change in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. No ineffectiveness was recorded in
earnings related to these interest rate swaps.
The Company entered into the swaps to effectively convert a portion of its floating-rate debt to a
fixed basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. The
Company assesses at inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether its interest rate swap agreements
are highly effective in offsetting changes in the interest expense of its floating rate debt. A
derivative that is not a highly effective hedge does not qualify for hedge accounting.
The Company continually monitors its positions with, and credit quality of, the financial
institutions which are counterparties to its interest rate swaps. The Company may be exposed to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the interest rate swaps.
However, the Company considers this risk to be low. If a derivative instrument no longer qualifies
as a cash flow hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued and the gain or loss that was recorded in
other comprehensive income is recognized currently in income.
Secured Forward Exchange Contracts
Clear Channel terminated its secured forward exchange contracts effective June 13, 2008, receiving
net proceeds of $15.2 million. A net gain of $27.0 million was recorded in the pre-merger period
in Gain (loss) on marketable securities related to terminating the contracts and selling the
underlying AMT shares.
Foreign Currency Rate Management
Clear Channel terminated its cross currency swap contracts on July 30, 2008 by paying the
counterparty $196.2 million from available cash on hand. The contracts were recorded on the
balance sheet at fair value, which was equivalent to the cash paid to terminate them. The related
fair value adjustments in other comprehensive income were deleted when the merger took place.
NOTE I FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, codified in ASC 820-10, on January 1, 2008 and began to apply its recognition and
disclosure provisions to its financial assets and financial liabilities that are remeasured at fair
value at least annually. ASC 820-10-35 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs
other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3, defined as
A-89
unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore
requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Companys marketable equity securities and interest rate swaps are measured at fair value on
each reporting date.
The marketable equity securities are measured at fair value using quoted prices in active markets.
Due to the fact that the inputs used to measure the marketable equity securities at fair value are
observable, the Company has categorized the fair value measurements of the securities as Level 1.
The fair value of these securities at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $38.9 million and $27.1
million, respectively.
The Companys aggregate $6.0 billion notional amount of interest rate swap agreements are
designated as a cash flow hedge and the effective portion of the gain or loss on the swap is
reported as a component of other comprehensive income. The Company entered into the swaps to
effectively convert a portion of its floating-rate debt to a fixed basis, thus reducing the impact
of interest-rate changes on future interest expense. Due to the fact that the inputs to the model
used to estimate fair value are either directly or indirectly observable, the Company classified
the fair value measurements of these agreements as Level 2. No ineffectiveness was recorded in
earnings related to these interest rate swaps.
Due to the fact that the inputs are either directly or indirectly observable, the Company
classified the fair value measurements of these agreements as Level 2.
The table below shows the balance sheet classification and fair value of the Companys interest
rate swaps designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Classification as of December 31, 2008
|
|
Fair Value
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
$ |
237,235 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
$ |
118,785 |
|
The following table details the beginning and ending accumulated other comprehensive loss and the
current period activity related to the interest rate swap agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
(In thousands) |
|
comprehensive loss |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
75,079 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
74,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
149,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE J COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company accounts for its rentals that include renewal options, annual rent escalation
clauses, minimum franchise payments and maintenance related to displays under the guidance in ASC
Topic 840, Leases.
The Company considers its non-cancelable contracts that enable it to display advertising on buses,
taxis, trains, bus shelters, etc. to be leases in accordance with the guidance in ASC 840-10.
These contracts may contain minimum annual franchise payments which generally escalate each year.
The Company accounts for these minimum franchise payments on a straight-line basis. If the rental
increases are not scheduled in the lease, for example an increase based on the CPI, those rents are
considered contingent rentals and are recorded as expense when accruable. Other contracts may
contain a variable rent component based on revenue. The Company accounts for these variable
components as contingent rentals and records these payments as expense when accruable.
A-90
The Company accounts for annual rent escalation clauses included in the lease term on a
straight-line basis under the guidance in ASC 840-10. The Company considers renewal periods in
determining its lease terms if at inception of the lease there is reasonable assurance the lease
will be renewed. Expenditures for maintenance are charged to operations as incurred, whereas
expenditures for renewal and betterments are capitalized.
The Company leases office space, certain broadcasting facilities, equipment and the majority
of the land occupied by its outdoor advertising structures under long-term operating leases. The
Company accounts for these leases in accordance with the policies described above.
The Companys contracts with municipal bodies or private companies relating to street furniture,
billboard, transit and malls generally require the Company to build bus stops, kiosks and other
public amenities or advertising structures during the term of the contract. The Company owns these
structures and is generally allowed to advertise on them for the remaining term of the contract.
Once the Company has built the structure, the cost is capitalized and expensed over the shorter of
the economic life of the asset or the remaining life of the contract.
Certain of the Companys contracts contain penalties for not fulfilling its commitments related to
its obligations to build bus stops, kiosks and other public amenities or advertising structures.
Historically, any such penalties have not materially impacted the Companys financial position or
results of operations.
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable
operating lease agreements with terms in excess of one year, minimum payments under non-cancelable
contracts in excess of one year, and capital expenditure commitments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cancelable |
|
|
Non-Cancelable |
|
|
Capital |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
367,524 |
|
|
$ |
541,683 |
|
|
$ |
67,372 |
|
2011 |
|
|
311,768 |
|
|
|
447,708 |
|
|
|
32,274 |
|
2012 |
|
|
276,486 |
|
|
|
301,221 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
2013 |
|
|
250,836 |
|
|
|
232,136 |
|
|
|
9,970 |
|
2014 |
|
|
217,308 |
|
|
|
191,048 |
|
|
|
9,867 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,225,651 |
|
|
|
580,815 |
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,649,573 |
|
|
$ |
2,294,611 |
|
|
$ |
136,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense charged to continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1.13
billion. Rent expense charged to continuing operations for the post-merger period from July 31,
2008 to December 31, 2008 and the pre-merger period from January 1, 2008 to July 30, 2008 was
$526.6 million and $755.4 million, respectively. Rent expense charged to continuing operations for
the pre-merger year ended December 31, 2007 was $1.2 billion.
The Company is currently involved in certain legal proceedings and, as required, has accrued its
estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims. These estimates have been
developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results,
assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that
future results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in
the Companys assumptions or the effectiveness of its strategies related to these proceedings.
In various areas in which the Company operates, outdoor advertising is the object of restrictive
and, in some cases, prohibitive zoning and other regulatory provisions, either enacted or proposed.
The impact to the Company of loss of displays due to governmental action has been somewhat
mitigated by Federal and state laws mandating compensation for such loss and constitutional
restraints.
Certain acquisition agreements include deferred consideration payments based on performance
requirements by the seller typically involving the completion of a development or obtaining
appropriate permits that enable the Company to construct additional advertising displays. At
December 31, 2009, the Company believes its maximum aggregate contingency, which is subject to
performance requirements by the seller, is approximately $35.0 million. As the contingencies have
not been met or resolved as of December 31, 2009, these amounts are not recorded. If future
payments are made, amounts will be recorded as additional purchase price.
A-91
NOTE K GUARANTEES
At December 31, 2009, the Company guaranteed $39.9 million of credit lines provided to certain
of its international subsidiaries by a major international bank. Most of these credit lines
related to intraday overdraft facilities covering participants in the Companys European cash
management pool. As of December 31, 2009, no amounts were outstanding under these agreements.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding commercial standby letters of credit and
surety bonds of $175.7 million and $95.2 million, respectively. Letters of credit in the amount of
$67.5 million are collateral in support of surety bonds and these amounts would only be drawn under
the letters of credit in the event the associated surety bonds were funded and the Company did not
honor its reimbursement obligation to the issuers.
These letters of credit and surety bonds relate to various operational matters including insurance,
bid, and performance bonds as well as other items.
NOTE L INCOME TAXES
Significant components of the provision for income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
July 31 through |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
through July 30, |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
31, 2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Current Federal |
|
$ |
(104,539 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,535 |
) |
|
$ |
187,700 |
|
Current foreign |
|
|
15,301 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
24,870 |
|
|
|
43,776 |
|
Current state |
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
8,094 |
|
|
|
8,945 |
|
|
|
21,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current (benefit) expense |
|
|
(76,129 |
) |
|
|
(76,729 |
) |
|
|
27,280 |
|
|
|
252,910 |
|
Deferred Federal |
|
|
(366,024 |
) |
|
|
(555,679 |
) |
|
|
145,149 |
|
|
|
175,524 |
|
Deferred foreign |
|
|
(30,399 |
) |
|
|
(17,762 |
) |
|
|
(12,662 |
) |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
Deferred state |
|
|
(20,768 |
) |
|
|
(46,453 |
) |
|
|
12,816 |
|
|
|
14,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred (benefit) expense |
|
|
(417,191 |
) |
|
|
(619,894 |
) |
|
|
145,303 |
|
|
|
188,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
$ |
(493,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(696,623 |
) |
|
$ |
172,583 |
|
|
$ |
441,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-92
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 2009
and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles and fixed assets |
|
$ |
2,074,925 |
|
|
$ |
2,332,924 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
530,519 |
|
|
|
352,057 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
62,661 |
|
|
|
87,654 |
|
Equity in earnings |
|
|
36,955 |
|
|
|
27,872 |
|
Investments |
|
|
18,067 |
|
|
|
15,268 |
|
Other |
|
|
17,310 |
|
|
|
25,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
2,740,437 |
|
|
|
2,841,611 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
117,041 |
|
|
|
129,684 |
|
Unrealized gain in marketable securities |
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
29,438 |
|
Net operating loss/Capital loss carryforwards |
|
|
365,208 |
|
|
|
319,530 |
|
Bad debt reserves |
|
|
11,055 |
|
|
|
28,248 |
|
Deferred Income |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
Other |
|
|
27,701 |
|
|
|
17,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
543,848 |
|
|
|
525,733 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
319,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
539,994 |
|
|
|
206,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
2,200,443 |
|
|
$ |
2,635,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the Companys net deferred tax liabilities are $19.6 million and $43.9 million of
current net deferred tax assets for 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company presents these assets
in Other current assets on its consolidated balance sheets. The remaining $2.2 billion and $2.7
billion of net deferred tax liabilities for 2009 and 2008, respectively, are presented in Deferred
tax liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded certain impairment charges that are not
deductible for tax purposes and resulted in a reduction of deferred tax liabilities of
approximately $379.6 million. Additional decreases in net deferred tax liabilities are as a result
of increases in deferred tax assets associated with current period net operating losses. The
Company is able to utilize those losses through either carrybacks to prior years as a result of the
November 6, 2009, tax law change and expanded loss carryback provisions provided by the Worker,
Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 (the Act) or based on our expectations as to
future taxable income from deferred tax liabilities that reverse in the relevant carryforward
period for those net operating losses that cannot be carried back. Increases in 2009 deferred tax
liabilities of approximately $338.9 million are as a result of the deferral of certain discharge of
indebtedness income, for income tax purposes, resulting from the reacquisition of business
indebtedness (see Note G). These gains are allowed to be deferred for tax purposes and recognized
in future periods beginning in 2014 through 2019, as provided by the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 signed into law on February 17, 2009.
At December 31, 2009, net deferred tax liabilities include a deferred tax asset of $23.2 million
relating to stock-based compensation expense under ASC 718-10, CompensationStock Compensation.
Full realization of this deferred tax asset requires stock options to be exercised at a price
equaling or exceeding the sum of the grant price plus the fair value of the option at the grant
date and restricted stock to vest at a price equaling or exceeding the fair market value at the
grant date. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the stock price of the Companys common
stock will rise to levels sufficient to realize the entire tax benefit currently reflected in its
balance sheet.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded approximately $2.5 billion in additional
deferred tax liabilities associated with the applied purchase accounting adjustments resulting from
the acquisition of Clear Channel. The additional deferred tax liabilities primarily relate to
differences between the purchase accounting
adjusted book basis and the historical tax basis of the Companys intangible assets. During the
post-merger period
A-93
ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge to its FCC
licenses, permits and tax deductible goodwill resulting in a decrease of approximately $648.2
million in recorded deferred tax liabilities.
The deferred tax liability related to intangibles and fixed assets primarily relates to the
difference in book and tax basis of acquired FCC licenses, permits and tax deductible goodwill
created from the Companys various stock acquisitions. In accordance with ASC 350-10,
IntangiblesGoodwill and Other, the Company no longer amortizes FCC licenses and permits. As a
result, this deferred tax liability will not reverse over time unless the Company recognizes future
impairment charges related to its FCC licenses, permits and tax deductible goodwill or sells its
FCC licenses or permits. As the Company continues to amortize its tax basis in its FCC licenses,
permits and tax deductible goodwill, the deferred tax liability will increase over time.
The reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. Federal statutory tax rates to income tax
expense (benefit) is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-merger year |
|
|
Post-merger period |
|
|
Pre-merger period |
|
|
Pre-merger year |
|
|
|
ended December 31, |
|
|
ended December 31, |
|
|
ended July 30, |
|
|
ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) at
statutory rates |
|
$ |
(1,589,825 |
) |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,008,040 |
) |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
205,108 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
448,298 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
State income taxes,
net of Federal tax
benefit |
|
|
(7,660 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(38,359 |
) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
21,760 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
35,548 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Foreign taxes |
|
|
92,648 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
95,478 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
(29,606 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Nondeductible items |
|
|
3,317 |
|
|
|
(0 |
%) |
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
(0 |
%) |
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Changes in
valuation allowance
and other estimates |
|
|
(54,579 |
) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
53,877 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
(32,256 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
(34,005 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Impairment charge |
|
|
1,050,535 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
1,194,182 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
12,244 |
|
|
|
(0 |
%) |
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
(0 |
%) |
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(6,064 |
) |
|
|
(0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(493,320 |
) |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
(696,623 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
172,583 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
$ |
441,148 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A tax benefit was recorded for the post-merger period ended December 31, 2009 of 11%. The
effective tax rate for the post-merger period was primarily impacted by the goodwill impairment
charges which are not deductible for tax purposes (see Note D). In addition, the Company was
unable to benefit tax losses in certain foreign jurisdictions due to the uncertainty of the ability
to utilize those losses in future years. These impacts were partially offset by the reversal of
valuation allowances on certain net operating losses as a result of the Companys ability to
utilize those losses through either carrybacks to prior years or based on our expectations as to
future taxable income from deferred tax liabilities that reverse in the relevant carryforward
period for those net operating losses that cannot be carried back.
A tax benefit was recorded for the post-merger period ended December 31, 2008 of 12% and reflects
the Companys ability to recover a limited amount of the Companys prior period tax liabilities
through certain net operating loss carrybacks. The effective tax rate for the 2008 post-merger
period was primarily impacted by the goodwill impairment charges which are not deductible for tax
purposes (see Note D). In addition, the Company recorded a valuation allowance on certain net
operating losses generated during the post-merger period that are not able to be carried back to
prior years. The effective tax rate for the 2008 pre-merger period was primarily impacted by the
tax effect of the disposition of certain radio broadcasting assets and investments.
During 2007, Clear Channel utilized approximately $2.2 million of net operating loss carryforwards,
the majority of which were generated by certain acquired companies prior to their acquisition by
Clear Channel. The utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards reduced current taxes
payable and current tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2007. Clear Channels effective
income tax rate for 2007 was 34.4% as compared to 41.2% for 2006. For 2007, the effective tax rate
was primarily affected by the recording of current tax benefits of approximately $45.7 million
related to the settlement of several tax positions with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for
the 1999 through 2004 tax years and deferred tax benefits of approximately $14.6 million related to
the release of valuation allowances for the use of certain capital loss carryforwards. These tax
benefits were partially offset by additional current tax expense being recorded in 2007 due to an
increase in Income (loss) before income taxes of $139.6 million.
A-94
The remaining Federal net operating loss carryforwards of $996.7 million expires in various amounts
from 2020 to 2029.
The Company continues to record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
current income tax expense. The total amount of interest accrued at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$70.7 million and $53.5 million, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits and
accrued interest and penalties at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $308.3 million and $267.8 million,
respectively, and is recorded in Other long-term liabilities on the Companys consolidated
balance sheets. Of this total, $308.3 million at December 31, 2009 represents the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits and accrued interest and penalties that, if recognized, would favorably
affect the effective income tax rate in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-merger year |
|
|
Post-merger period |
|
|
Pre-merger |
|
|
|
ended December 31, |
|
|
ended December 31, |
|
|
period ended |
|
Unrecognized Tax Benefits (In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
July 30, 2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
214,309 |
|
|
$ |
207,884 |
|
|
$ |
194,060 |
|
Increases for tax position taken in the current
year |
|
|
3,347 |
|
|
|
35,942 |
|
|
|
8,845 |
|
Increases for tax positions taken in previous
years |
|
|
33,892 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
Decreases for tax position taken in previous
years |
|
|
(4,629 |
) |
|
|
(20,564 |
) |
|
|
(1,764 |
) |
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(9,975 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
Decreases due to lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
(9,199 |
) |
|
|
(2,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
237,517 |
|
|
$ |
214,309 |
|
|
$ |
207,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States Federal jurisdiction
and various state and foreign jurisdictions. During 2009, the Company increased its unrecognized
tax benefits for issues in prior years as a result of certain ongoing examinations in both the
United States and certain foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the Company released certain
unrecognized tax benefits in certain foreign jurisdictions as a result of the lapse of the statute
of limitations for certain tax years. During 2008, the Company favorably settled certain issues in
foreign jurisdictions that resulted in the decrease in unrecognized tax benefits. In addition, as
a result of the currency fluctuations during 2008, the balance of unrecognized tax benefits
decreased approximately $12.0 million. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently auditing
the Companys 2007 and 2008 pre and post merger periods. The company is currently in appeals with
the IRS for the 2005 and 2006 tax years. The Company expects to settle certain state examinations
during the next twelve months. The Company has reclassed the estimated amount of such settlements
to Accrued expenses on the Companys consolidated balance sheets. Substantially all material
state, local, and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2000.
NOTE M SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
In connection with the merger, the Company issued approximately 23.6 million shares of Class A
common stock, approximately 0.6 million shares of Class B common stock and approximately 59.0
million shares of Class C common stock. Every holder of shares of Class A common stock is entitled
to one vote for each share of Class A common stock. Every holder of shares of Class B common stock
is entitled to a number of votes per share equal to the number obtained by dividing (a) the sum of
the total number of shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote
and the number of shares of Class C common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote by
(b) the number of shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of the record date for such vote.
Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of outstanding shares of Class C common stock are
not entitled to any votes upon any matters presented to our stockholders.
Except with respect to voting as described above, and as otherwise required by law, all shares of
Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common stock have the same powers,
privileges, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights, and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, and will be identical to each other in all
respects.
Vesting of certain Clear Channel stock options and restricted stock awards was accelerated upon
closing of the merger. As a result, except for certain executive officers and holders of certain
options that could not, by their
A-95
terms, be cancelled prior to their stated expiration date, holders
of stock options received cash or, if elected, an amount of Company stock, in each case equal to
the intrinsic value of the awards based on a market price of $36.00 per share. Holders of
restricted stock awards received $36.00 per share in cash or a share of Company stock per share of
Clear Channel restricted stock. Approximately $39.2 million of share-based compensation was
recognized in the pre-merger period as a result of the accelerated vesting of the stock options and
restricted stock awards.
Dividends
Clear Channel did not declare dividends in 2008 or 2009. The Company has never paid cash dividends
on its Class A common stock, and currently does not intend to pay cash dividends on its Class A
common stock in the future. Clear Channels debt financing arrangements include restrictions on
its ability to pay dividends thereby limiting the Companys ability to pay dividends.
Prior to the merger, Clear Channels Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $93.4
million on December 3, 2007 and paid on January 15, 2008.
Share-Based Payments
Stock Options
The Company has granted options to purchase its Class A common stock to certain key executives
under its equity incentive plan at no less than the fair value of the underlying stock on the
date of grant. These options are granted for a term not to exceed ten years and are forfeited,
except in certain circumstances, in the event the executive terminates his or her employment or
relationship with the Company or one of its affiliates. Approximately one-third of the options
granted vest based solely on continued service over a period of up to five years with the remainder
becoming eligible to vest over five years if certain predetermined performance targets are met.
The equity incentive plan contains antidilutive provisions that permit an adjustment of the number
of shares of the Companys common stock represented by each option for any change in
capitalization.
The Company accounts for its share-based payments using the fair value recognition provisions of
ASC 718-10. The fair value of the portion of options that vest based on continued service is
estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of the
remaining options which contain vesting provisions subject to service, market and performance
conditions is estimated on the grant date using a Monte Carlo model. Expected volatilities were
based on implied volatilities from traded options on peer companies, historical volatility on peer
companies stock, and other factors. The expected life of the options granted represents the
period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company used
historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model.
The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant for periods equal to the expected life of the option. The following assumptions were used to
calculate the fair value of these options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
58% |
|
|
|
58% |
|
Expected life in years |
|
|
5.5 7.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 7.5 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.30% 3.26 |
% |
|
|
3.46% 3.83 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
A-96
The following table presents a summary of the Companys stock options outstanding at and stock
option activity during the year ended December 31, 2009 (Price reflects the weighted average
exercise price per share):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
7,751 |
|
|
$ |
35.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted (1) |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
46.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 (2) |
|
|
6,160 |
|
|
|
35.15 |
|
|
8.5 years |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
29.55 |
|
|
7.3 years |
|
|
0 |
|
Expect to Vest |
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
8.7 years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended December
31, 2009 was $0.12 per share. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-cash compensation expense has not been recorded with respect to 3.4 million shares as the
vesting of these options is subject to performance conditions that have not yet been
determined probable to meet. |
A summary of the Companys unvested options and changes during the year ended December 31, 2009 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
Unvested, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
$ |
21.20 |
|
Granted |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
6.38 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
13.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
|
19.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
Prior to the merger, Clear Channel granted restricted stock awards to its employees and directors
and its affiliates under its various equity incentive plans. These common shares held a legend
which restricted their transferability for a term of up to five years and were forfeited, except in
certain circumstances, in the event the employee or director terminated his or her employment or
relationship with Clear Channel prior to the lapse of the restriction. Recipients of the
restricted stock awards were entitled to all cash dividends as of the date the award was granted.
At July 30, 2008, there were 2,692,904 outstanding Clear Channel restricted stock awards held by
Clear Channels employees and directors under Clear Channels equity incentive plans. Pursuant to
the Merger Agreement, 1,876,315 of the Clear Channel restricted stock awards became fully vested
and converted into the right to receive, with respect to each share of such restricted stock, a
cash payment or equity in the Company equal to the value of $36.00 per share. The remaining 816,589
shares of Clear Channel restricted stock were converted on a one-for-one basis into restricted
stock of the Company. These converted shares continue to vest in accordance with their original
terms. Following the merger, Clear Channel restricted stock automatically ceased to exist and is
no longer outstanding, and, following the receipt of the cash payment or equity, if any, described
above, the holders thereof no longer have any rights with respect to Clear Channel restricted
stock.
On July 30, 2008, the Company granted 555,556 shares of restricted stock to each its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under its 2008 Incentive Plan. The aggregate fair
value of these awards was $40.0 million, based on the market value of a share of the Companys
Class A common stock on the grant date, or $36.00 per
share. These Class A common shares are subject to restrictions on their transferability, which
lapse ratably over a
A-97
term of five years and will be forfeited, except in certain circumstances, in
the event the employee terminates his employment or relationship with the Company prior to the
lapse of the restriction. The following table presents a summary of the Companys restricted stock
outstanding at and restricted stock activity during the year ended December 31, 2009 (Price
reflects the weighted average share price at the date of grant):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Awards |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding January 1,2009 |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
$ |
36.00 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Vested (restriction lapsed) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
36.00 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary Share-Based Awards
Subsidiary Stock Options
The Companys subsidiary, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO), grants options to purchase
shares of its Class A common stock to its employees and directors and its affiliates under its
equity incentive plan typically at no less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on
the date of grant. These options are granted for a term not exceeding ten years and are forfeited,
except in certain circumstances, in the event the employee or director terminates his or her
employment or relationship with CCO or one of its affiliates. These options vest over a period of
up to five years. The incentive stock plan contains anti-dilutive provisions that permit an
adjustment of the number of shares of CCOs common stock represented by each option for any change
in capitalization.
Prior to CCOs IPO, CCO did not have any compensation plans under which it granted stock awards to
employees. However, Clear Channel had granted certain of CCOs officers and other key employees,
stock options to purchase shares of Clear Channels common stock under its own equity incentive
plans. Concurrent with the closing of CCOs IPO, all such outstanding options to purchase shares
of Clear Channels common stock held by CCO employees were converted using an intrinsic value
method into options to purchase shares of CCO Class A common stock.
The fair value of each option awarded on CCO common stock is estimated on the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from
traded options on CCOs stock, historical volatility on CCOs stock, and other factors. The
expected life of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to
be outstanding. CCO uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations
within the valuation model. CCO includes estimated forfeitures in its compensation cost and
updates the estimated forfeiture rate through the final vesting date of awards. The risk free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods
equal to the expected life of the option. The following assumptions were used to calculate the
fair value of CCOs options on the date of grant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31 |
|
January 1 |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
through |
|
through |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
July 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
58% |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
|
27% |
|
Expected life in years |
|
|
5.5 7.0 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
5.5 7.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 7.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.31% 3.25% |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3.24% 3.38% |
|
|
|
4.76% 4.89% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
A-98
The following table presents a summary of CCOs stock options outstanding at and stock option
activity during the year ended December 31, 2009 (Price reflects the weighted average exercise
price per share):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
$ |
22.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted (1) |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
17.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
24.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
17.58 |
|
|
6.0 years |
|
$ |
10,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
22.82 |
|
|
3.7 years |
|
|
0 |
|
Expect to vest |
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
14.66 |
|
|
7.4 years |
|
|
9,095 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of CCO options granted during the post-merger year
ended December 31, 2009 was $3.38 per share. The weighted average grant date fair value of
CCO options granted during the pre-merger prior from January 1, 2008 through July 30, 2008 was
$7.10 per share. The weighted average grant date fair value of CCO options granted during the
pre-merger year ended December 31, 2007 was $11.05 per share. |
|
(2) |
|
No CCO options exercised during the post-merger year ended December 31, 2009. Cash received
from CCO option exercises during the pre-merger period from January 1, 2008 through July 30,
2008, was $4.3 million. Cash received from CCO option exercises during the pre-merger year
ended December 31, 2007, was $10.8 million. The total intrinsic value of CCO options
exercised during the pre-merger period from January 1, 2008 through July 30, 2008, was $0.7
million. The total intrinsic value of CCO options exercised during the pre-merger year ended
December 31, 2007 was $2.0 million. |
A summary of CCOs nonvested options at and changes during the year ended December 31, 2009, is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
Vested (1) |
|
|
(1,332 |
) |
|
|
7.43 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total fair value of CCO options vested during the post-merger year ended December 31,
2009 was $9.9 million. The total fair value of CCO options vested during the pre-merger
period from January 1, 2008 through July 30, 2008 was $5.7 million. The total fair value of
CCO options vested during the post-merger period from July 31 through December 31, 2008 was
$2.3 million. The total fair value of CCO options vested during the pre-merger year ended
December 31, 2007 was $2.0 million. |
Restricted Stock Awards
CCO also grants restricted stock awards to employees and directors of CCO and its affiliates.
These common shares hold a legend which restricts their transferability for a term of up to five
years and are forfeited, except in certain circumstances, in the event the employee terminates his
or her employment or relationship with CCO prior to the lapse of the restriction. Restricted stock
awards are granted under the CCO equity incentive plan.
A-99
The following table presents a summary of CCOs restricted stock outstanding at and restricted
stock activity during the year ended December 31, 2009 (Price reflects the weighted average share
price at the date of grant):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Awards |
|
|
Price |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
351 |
|
|
$ |
24.54 |
|
Granted |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
Vested (restriction lapsed) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
24.90 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
22.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
18.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Cost
The share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the
award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The following
table presents the amount of share-based compensation recorded during the year ended December 31,
2009, five months ended December 31, 2008, the seven months ended July 30, 2008 and the year ended
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
Year Ended December |
|
|
July 31 December |
|
|
January 1 July |
|
|
Year Ended December |
|
(In thousands) |
|
31, 2009 |
|
|
31, 2008 |
|
|
30, 2008 |
|
|
31, 2007 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
11,361 |
|
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
21,162 |
|
|
$ |
16,975 |
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
21,213 |
|
|
|
14,884 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
8,593 |
|
|
|
20,348 |
|
|
|
12,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share based compensation expense |
|
$ |
39,786 |
|
|
$ |
15,911 |
|
|
$ |
62,723 |
|
|
$ |
44,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, there was $83.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements that will vest
based on service conditions. This cost is expected to be recognized over three years. In
addition, as of December 31, 2009, there was $80.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net
of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements that will vest
based on market, performance and service conditions. This cost will be recognized when it becomes
probable that the performance condition will be satisfied.
A-100
Reconciliation of Earnings (Loss) per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July 31 |
|
|
Period from January |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December |
|
|
through |
|
|
1 through July 30, |
|
|
Year ended December |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
31, 2007 |
|
NUMERATOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations attributable to the Company common shares |
|
$ |
(4,034,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,041,998 |
) |
|
$ |
1,036,525 |
|
|
$ |
938,507 |
|
Less: Participating securities dividends |
|
|
6,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
145,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Company |
|
|
(4,040,885 |
) |
|
|
(5,040,153 |
) |
|
|
396,289 |
|
|
|
792,674 |
|
Less: Income (loss) before discontinued operations attributable to the Company unvested shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before discontinued operations attributable to the Company per common share
basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(4,040,885 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,040,153 |
) |
|
$ |
393,956 |
|
|
$ |
787,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DENOMINATOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares basic |
|
|
81,296 |
|
|
|
81,242 |
|
|
|
495,044 |
|
|
|
494,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and common stock warrants (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for net income (loss) per common share diluted |
|
|
81,296 |
|
|
|
81,242 |
|
|
|
496,519 |
|
|
|
495,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company before discontinued operations basic |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.04 |
) |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
Discontinued operations basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company basic |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.06 |
) |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company before discontinued operations diluted |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.04 |
) |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
Discontinued operations diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company diluted |
|
$ |
(49.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.06 |
) |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
6.2 million, 7.6 million, 7.8 million, and 22.2 million stock options were outstanding at
December 31, 2009, July 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007 that were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been
anti-dilutive as the respective options strike price was greater than the current market
price of the shares. |
A-101
NOTE N EMPLOYEE STOCK AND SAVINGS PLANS
The Company has various 401(k) savings and other plans for the purpose of providing retirement
benefits for substantially all employees. Under these plans, an employee can make pre-tax
contributions and the Company will match a portion of such an employees contribution. Employees
vest in these Company matching contributions based upon their years of service to the Company.
Contributions from continuing operations to these plans of $23.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, $12.4 million for the post-merger period ended December 31, 2008 and $17.9
million for the pre-merger period ended July 30, 2008, were charged to expense. Contributions from
continuing operations to these plans of $39.1 million were charged to expense for the year ended
December 31, 2007. As of April 30, 2009, the Company suspended the matching contribution.
Clear Channel sponsored a non-qualified employee stock purchase plan for all eligible employees.
Under the plan, employees were provided with the opportunity to purchase shares of the Clear
Channels common stock at 95% of the market value on the day of purchase. During each calendar
year, employees were able to purchase shares having a value not exceeding 10% of their annual gross
compensation or $25,000, whichever was lower. The Company stopped accepting contributions to this
plan, effective January 1, 2007, as a condition of its Merger Agreement. Clear Channel terminated
this plan upon the closing of the merger and each share held under the plan was converted into the
right to receive a cash payment equal to the value of $36.00 per share.
Clear Channel offered a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its highly compensated
executives, under which such executives were able to make an annual election to defer up to 50% of
their annual salary and up to 80% of their bonus before taxes. Clear Channel accounted for the
plan in accordance with the provisions of ASC 710-10, CompensationGeneral. Clear Channel
terminated this plan upon the closing of the merger and the related asset and liability of
approximately $38.4 million were settled.
The Company offers a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its highly compensated
executives, under which such executives are able to make an annual election to defer up to 50% of
their annual salary and up to 80% of their bonus before taxes. The Company accounts for the plan
in accordance with the provisions of ASC 710-10. Matching credits on amounts deferred may be made
in the Companys sole discretion and the Company retains ownership of all assets until distributed.
Participants in the plan have the opportunity to allocate their deferrals and any Company matching
credits among different investment options, the performance of which is used to determine the
amounts to be paid to participants under the plan. In accordance with the provisions of ASC
710-10, the assets and liabilities of the non-qualified deferred compensation plan are presented in
Other assets and Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets,
respectively. The asset and liability under the deferred compensation plan at December 31, 2009
was approximately $9.9 million recorded in Other assets and $9.9 million recorded in Other
long-term liabilities, respectively. The asset and liability under the deferred compensation plan
at December 31, 2008 were approximately $2.5 million recorded in Other assets and $2.5 million
recorded in Other long-term liabilities, respectively.
NOTE O OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July 31 |
|
|
Period from January |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
through December |
|
|
1 through July 30, |
|
|
Year ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
31, 2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
The following details the components of Other income (expense) net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
$ |
(15,298 |
) |
|
$ |
21,323 |
|
|
$ |
7,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,743 |
|
Gain (loss) on early redemption of debt, net |
|
|
713,034 |
|
|
|
108,174 |
|
|
|
(13,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(18,020 |
) |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) net |
|
$ |
679,716 |
|
|
$ |
131,505 |
|
|
$ |
(5,112 |
) |
|
$ |
5,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July 31 |
|
|
Period from January |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
through December |
|
|
1 through July 30, |
|
|
Year ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
31, 2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
The following details the deferred income tax (asset)
liability on items of other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
16,569 |
|
|
$ |
(20,946 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,894 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,233 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities and derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) |
|
$ |
6,743 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(27,047 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,155 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow derivatives |
|
$ |
(44,350 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,706 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
The following details the components of Other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
25,838 |
|
|
$ |
28,012 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
43,903 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
20,064 |
|
|
|
7,162 |
|
Other prepayments |
|
|
51,700 |
|
|
|
53,280 |
|
Deferred loan costs |
|
|
55,479 |
|
|
|
29,877 |
|
Other |
|
|
82,613 |
|
|
|
53,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets |
|
$ |
255,275 |
|
|
$ |
215,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
The following details the components of Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
125,768 |
|
Deferred loan costs |
|
|
251,938 |
|
|
|
295,143 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
11,225 |
|
|
|
27,943 |
|
Prepaid rent |
|
|
87,960 |
|
|
|
92,171 |
|
Other prepayments |
|
|
16,028 |
|
|
|
16,685 |
|
Non-qualified plan assets |
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
378,058 |
|
|
$ |
560,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
The following details the
components of Other long-term
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits |
|
$ |
301,496 |
|
|
$ |
266,852 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
51,301 |
|
|
|
55,592 |
|
Non-qualified plan liabilities |
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
|
237,235 |
|
|
|
118,785 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
17,105 |
|
|
|
9,346 |
|
Other |
|
|
207,498 |
|
|
|
122,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
824,554 |
|
|
$ |
575,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
The following details the components of Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
(202,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(332,750 |
) |
Cumulative unrealized gain (losses) on securities |
|
|
(85,995 |
) |
|
|
(88,813 |
) |
Reclassification adjustments |
|
|
104,394 |
|
|
|
95,113 |
|
Cumulative unrealized gain (losses) on cash flow derivatives |
|
|
(149,179 |
) |
|
|
(75,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(333,309 |
) |
|
$ |
(401,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE P SEGMENT DATA
The Companys reportable operating segments, which it believes best reflects how the Company
is currently managed, are radio broadcasting, Americas outdoor advertising and international
outdoor advertising. Revenue and expenses earned and charged between segments are recorded at fair
value and eliminated in consolidation. The radio broadcasting segment also operates various radio
networks. The Americas outdoor advertising segment consists of our operations primarily in the
United States, Canada and Latin America, with approximately 91% of its 2009 revenue in this segment
derived from the United States. The international outdoor segment includes operations in Europe,
the U.K., Asia and Australia. The Americas and international display inventory consists primarily
of billboards, street furniture displays and transit displays. The other category includes our
media representation firm as well as other general support services and initiatives which are
ancillary to our other businesses. Share-based payments are recorded by each segment in direct
operating and selling, general and administrative expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radio |
|
|
Americas Outdoor |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Other |
|
|
reconciling items |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Post-Merger Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,736,404 |
|
|
$ |
1,238,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,459,853 |
|
|
$ |
200,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(82,986 |
) |
|
$ |
5,551,909 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
901,799 |
|
|
|
608,078 |
|
|
|
1,017,005 |
|
|
|
98,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,448 |
) |
|
|
2,583,263 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
933,505 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
|
|
282,208 |
|
|
|
89,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,538 |
) |
|
|
1,466,593 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
261,246 |
|
|
|
210,280 |
|
|
|
229,367 |
|
|
|
56,379 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765,474 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,964 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,118,924 |
|
Other operating expense net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
639,854 |
|
|
$ |
217,617 |
|
|
$ |
(68,727 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,963 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,431,927 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,687,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
$ |
31,974 |
|
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,245 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,986 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
8,601,490 |
|
|
$ |
4,722,975 |
|
|
$ |
2,216,691 |
|
|
$ |
771,346 |
|
|
$ |
1,734,599 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,047,101 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
41,880 |
|
|
$ |
84,440 |
|
|
$ |
91,513 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
223,792 |
|
Share-based payments |
|
$ |
8,276 |
|
|
$ |
7,977 |
|
|
$ |
2,412 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,121 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,786 |
|
A-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radio |
|
|
Americas Outdoor |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Other |
|
|
reconciling items |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Post-Merger Period from July 31, 2008 through December 31, 2008 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,355,894 |
|
|
$ |
587,427 |
|
|
$ |
739,797 |
|
|
$ |
97,975 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
(44,152 |
) |
|
$ |
2,736,941 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
409,090 |
|
|
|
276,602 |
|
|
|
486,102 |
|
|
|
46,193 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(19,642 |
) |
|
|
1,198,345 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
530,445 |
|
|
|
114,260 |
|
|
|
147,264 |
|
|
|
39,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,510 |
) |
|
|
806,787 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
90,166 |
|
|
|
90,624 |
|
|
|
134,089 |
|
|
|
24,722 |
|
|
|
8,440 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
348,041 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,276 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,085 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
Other operating income net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
326,193 |
|
|
$ |
105,941 |
|
|
$ |
(27,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,268 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,434,454 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,042,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
$ |
15,926 |
|
|
$ |
3,985 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,241 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
44,152 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
11,905,689 |
|
|
$ |
5,187,838 |
|
|
$ |
2,409,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,073 |
|
|
$ |
606,211 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
21,125,463 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
24,462 |
|
|
$ |
93,146 |
|
|
$ |
66,067 |
|
|
$ |
2,567 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
190,253 |
|
Share-based payments |
|
$ |
3,399 |
|
|
$ |
3,012 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
8,593 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
15,911 |
|
|
Pre-Merger Period from January 1, 2008 through July 30, 2008 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,937,980 |
|
|
$ |
842,831 |
|
|
$ |
1,119,232 |
|
|
$ |
111,990 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
(60,291 |
) |
|
$ |
3,951,742 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
570,234 |
|
|
|
370,924 |
|
|
|
748,508 |
|
|
|
46,490 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(30,057 |
) |
|
|
1,706,099 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
652,162 |
|
|
|
138,629 |
|
|
|
206,217 |
|
|
|
55,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,234 |
) |
|
|
1,022,459 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
62,656 |
|
|
|
117,009 |
|
|
|
130,628 |
|
|
|
28,966 |
|
|
|
9,530 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
348,789 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,669 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,684 |
|
Other operating income net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
652,928 |
|
|
$ |
216,269 |
|
|
$ |
33,879 |
|
|
$ |
(19,151 |
) |
|
$ |
(208,056 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
675,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
$ |
23,551 |
|
|
$ |
4,561 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,179 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
60,291 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
11,667,570 |
|
|
$ |
2,876,051 |
|
|
$ |
2,704,889 |
|
|
$ |
558,638 |
|
|
$ |
656,616 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
18,463,764 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
37,004 |
|
|
$ |
82,672 |
|
|
$ |
116,450 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
240,202 |
|
Share-based payments |
|
$ |
34,386 |
|
|
$ |
5,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,370 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
20,348 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
62,723 |
|
A-105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radio |
|
|
Americas Outdoor |
|
|
Outdoor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Broadcasting |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
Other |
|
|
reconciling items |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Pre-Merger Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
3,558,534 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,796,778 |
|
|
$ |
207,704 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
(126,872 |
) |
|
$ |
6,921,202 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
982,966 |
|
|
|
590,563 |
|
|
|
1,144,282 |
|
|
|
78,513 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
(63,320 |
) |
|
|
2,733,004 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
1,190,083 |
|
|
|
226,448 |
|
|
|
311,546 |
|
|
|
97,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,552 |
) |
|
|
1,761,939 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
107,466 |
|
|
|
189,853 |
|
|
|
209,630 |
|
|
|
43,436 |
|
|
|
16,242 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
566,627 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,504 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
Other operating income net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,278,019 |
|
|
$ |
478,194 |
|
|
$ |
131,320 |
|
|
$ |
(11,659 |
) |
|
$ |
(190,395 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,685,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
$ |
44,666 |
|
|
$ |
13,733 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,473 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
126,872 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
11,732,311 |
|
|
$ |
2,878,753 |
|
|
$ |
2,606,130 |
|
|
$ |
736,037 |
|
|
$ |
345,404 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
18,298,635 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
78,523 |
|
|
$ |
142,826 |
|
|
$ |
132,864 |
|
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
6,678 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
363,309 |
|
Share-based payments |
|
$ |
22,226 |
|
|
$ |
7,932 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
12,192 |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
44,051 |
|
Revenue of $1.6 billion, $799.8 million, $1.2 billion, and $1.9 billion derived from the
Companys foreign operations are included in the data above for the year ended December 31, 2009,
the post-merger period from July 31, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the pre-merger period January
1, 2008 through July 30, 2008, and the pre-merger year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
Identifiable assets of $2.5 billion, $2.6 billion, $2.9 billion, and $2.9 billion derived from
foreign operations are included in the data above for the year ended December 31, 2009, the
post-merger five months ended December 31, 2008, the pre-merger seven months ended July 30, 2008,
and the pre-merger year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
A-106
NOTE Q QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Post-Merger |
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Post-Merger |
|
Combined(3) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,207,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,564,207 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,865 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,078 |
|
|
$ |
1,393,973 |
|
|
$ |
1,684,593 |
|
|
$ |
1,512,084 |
|
|
$ |
1,608,805 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
618,349 |
|
|
|
705,947 |
|
|
|
637,076 |
|
|
|
743,485 |
|
|
|
632,778 |
|
|
|
730,405 |
|
|
|
695,060 |
|
|
|
724,607 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
377,536 |
|
|
|
426,381 |
|
|
|
360,558 |
|
|
|
445,734 |
|
|
|
337,055 |
|
|
|
441,813 |
|
|
|
391,444 |
|
|
|
515,318 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
175,559 |
|
|
|
152,278 |
|
|
|
208,246 |
|
|
|
142,188 |
|
|
|
190,189 |
|
|
|
162,463 |
|
|
|
191,480 |
|
|
|
239,901 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
47,635 |
|
|
|
46,303 |
|
|
|
50,087 |
|
|
|
47,974 |
|
|
|
79,723 |
|
|
|
64,787 |
|
|
|
76,519 |
|
|
|
68,881 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,085 |
|
Impairment charges (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,041,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,672 |
|
|
|
5,268,858 |
|
Other operating income (expense) net |
|
|
(2,894 |
) |
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
(31,516 |
) |
|
|
17,354 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
(3,782 |
) |
|
|
(17,830 |
) |
|
|
12,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(13,986 |
) |
|
|
235,006 |
|
|
|
(3,890,870 |
) |
|
|
461,595 |
|
|
|
155,631 |
|
|
|
201,504 |
|
|
|
62,079 |
|
|
|
(5,264,482 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
387,053 |
|
|
|
100,003 |
|
|
|
384,625 |
|
|
|
82,175 |
|
|
|
369,314 |
|
|
|
312,511 |
|
|
|
359,874 |
|
|
|
434,289 |
|
Gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,736 |
|
|
|
(13,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(116,552 |
) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of
nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(4,188 |
) |
|
|
83,045 |
|
|
|
(17,719 |
) |
|
|
8,990 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
3,707 |
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
(3,180 |
) |
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
430,629 |
|
|
|
(6,086 |
) |
|
|
222,282 |
|
|
|
(21,727 |
) |
|
|
29,985 |
|
|
|
142,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations |
|
|
(408,407 |
) |
|
|
236,361 |
|
|
|
(3,862,585 |
) |
|
|
410,060 |
|
|
|
(3,553 |
) |
|
|
(128,457 |
) |
|
|
(267,811 |
) |
|
|
(5,669,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (2) |
|
|
(19,592 |
) |
|
|
(66,581 |
) |
|
|
184,552 |
|
|
|
(125,137 |
) |
|
|
(89,118 |
) |
|
|
52,344 |
|
|
|
417,478 |
|
|
|
663,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued
operations |
|
|
(427,999 |
) |
|
|
169,780 |
|
|
|
(3,678,033 |
) |
|
|
284,923 |
|
|
|
(92,671 |
) |
|
|
(76,113 |
) |
|
|
149,667 |
|
|
|
(5,005,783 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
638,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
|
(427,999 |
) |
|
|
808,042 |
|
|
|
(3,678,033 |
) |
|
|
289,955 |
|
|
|
(92,671 |
) |
|
|
(80,184 |
) |
|
|
149,667 |
|
|
|
(5,006,615 |
) |
Amount attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
(9,782 |
) |
|
|
8,389 |
|
|
|
(4,629 |
) |
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
|
(2,816 |
) |
|
|
10,003 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
(9,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the
Company |
|
$ |
(418,217 |
) |
|
$ |
799,653 |
|
|
$ |
(3,673,404 |
) |
|
$ |
282,327 |
|
|
$ |
(89,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,187 |
) |
|
$ |
147,390 |
|
|
$ |
(4,997,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Combined(3) |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Post-Merger |
|
Net income per common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company
before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(5.15 |
) |
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
$ |
(45.23 |
) |
|
$ |
.56 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
(61.50 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(5.15 |
) |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
(45.23 |
) |
|
$ |
.57 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
(61.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(5.15 |
) |
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
$ |
(45.23 |
) |
|
$ |
.56 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
(61.50 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(5.15 |
) |
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
(45.23 |
) |
|
$ |
.57 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
(61.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Companys Class A common shares are quoted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the
symbol CCMO.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As discussed in Note B, the fourth quarter of 2009 includes a $41.4 million adjustment
related to previously recorded impairment charges. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note L for further discussion of the tax benefits recorded in the fourth quarters of 2009
and 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
The third quarter results of operations contain two months of post-merger and one month of
pre-merger results, which relate to the period succeeding the merger and the periods preceding
the merger, respectively. The Company believes that the presentation on a combined basis is
more meaningful as it allows the results of operations to be analyzed to comparable periods in
2009. The following table separates the combined results into the post-merger and pre-merger
periods: |
A-108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from July 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
Period from July |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
1 through July 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Post-Merger |
|
|
Pre-Merger |
|
|
Combined |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,128,136 |
|
|
$ |
556,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,684,593 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (excludes depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
473,738 |
|
|
|
256,667 |
|
|
|
730,405 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excludes
depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
291,469 |
|
|
|
150,344 |
|
|
|
441,813 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
108,140 |
|
|
|
54,323 |
|
|
|
162,463 |
|
Corporate expenses (excludes depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
33,395 |
|
|
|
31,392 |
|
|
|
64,787 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,839 |
|
|
|
79,839 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets net |
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
(4,624 |
) |
|
|
(3,782 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
222,236 |
|
|
|
(20,732 |
) |
|
|
201,504 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
281,479 |
|
|
|
31,032 |
|
|
|
312,511 |
|
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
4,277 |
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
(10,914 |
) |
|
|
(10,813 |
) |
|
|
(21,727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations |
|
|
(68,060 |
) |
|
|
(60,397 |
) |
|
|
(128,457 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
33,209 |
|
|
|
19,135 |
|
|
|
52,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
(34,851 |
) |
|
|
(41,262 |
) |
|
|
(76,113 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
(3,058 |
) |
|
|
(4,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
|
(35,864 |
) |
|
|
(44,320 |
) |
|
|
(80,184 |
) |
Amount attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
8,868 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
10,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(44,732 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,455 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company before discontinued
operations Basic |
|
$ |
(.54 |
) |
|
$ |
(.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations Basic |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company Basic |
|
$ |
(.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares Basic |
|
|
81,242 |
|
|
|
495,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to the Company before discontinued
operations Diluted |
|
$ |
(.54 |
) |
|
$ |
(.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations Diluted |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company Diluted |
|
$ |
(.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares Diluted |
|
|
81,242 |
|
|
|
495,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-109
NOTE R CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In connection with the merger, the Company paid certain affiliates of the Sponsors $87.5
million in fees and expenses for financial and structural advice and analysis, assistance with due
diligence investigations and debt financing negotiations and $15.9 million for reimbursement of
escrow and other out-of-pocket expenses. This amount was preliminarily allocated between merger
expenses, debt issuance costs or included in the overall purchase price of the merger.
The Company is party to a management agreement with certain affiliates of the Sponsors and certain
other parties pursuant to which such affiliates of the Sponsors will provide management and
financial advisory services until 2018. These agreements require management fees to be paid to
such affiliates of the Sponsors for such services at a rate not greater than $15.0 million per
year. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized management fees of $15.0. For
the post-merger period ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized management fees of $6.3
million.
In addition, the Company reimbursed the Sponsors for additional expenses in the amount of $5.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
NOTE S SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 15, 2010, Clear Channel redeemed its 4.50% senior notes at their maturity for
$250.0 million with available cash on hand.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not Applicable
A-110
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, who joined us effective January 4, 2010, we have carried
out an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2009 to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that are filed or submitted
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified by the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. The Companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed under the supervision of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
preparation of the Companys financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
As of December 31, 2009, management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial
reporting established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment, management
determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on those criteria.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated
financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an
attestation report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009. The report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, is included in
this Item under the heading Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
A-111
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
CC Media Holdings, Inc.
We have audited CC Media Holdings, Inc.s (Holdings) internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Holdings management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on Holdings internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Holdings maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Holdings as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity (deficit), and cash
flows of Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from July 31, 2008
through December 31, 2008, the related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders equity,
and cash flows of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. for the period from January 1, 2008 through
July 30, 2008, and for the year ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated March 16, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
San Antonio, Texas
March 16, 2010
ITEM 9B. Other Information
Not Applicable
A-112
OTHER DATA
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following information with respect to our executive officers is presented as of April 1,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Mark P. Mays
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Thomas W. Casey
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Robert H. Walls, Jr.
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
John E. Hogan
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Senior Vice President CC Media Holdings, Inc. |
The officers named above serve until the next Board of Directors meeting immediately following
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We expect to retain the individuals named above as our
executive officers at such Board of Directors meeting.
Mr. M. Mays was appointed Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company on July 30,
2008. Mr. M. Mays was Clear Channels President and Chief Operating Officer from February 1997
until his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2004. He relinquished
his duties as President in February 2006 until he was reappointed President in January 2010. He
has been one of Clear Channels directors since May 1998. Mr. M. Mays is the son of L. Lowry Mays,
our Chairman Emeritus and the brother of Randall T. Mays, our Vice Chairman.
Mr. Casey was appointed Chief Financial Officer effective as of January 4, 2010. Previously,
Mr. Casey served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Washington Mutual, Inc.
from 2002 until October 2008. Prior thereto, Mr. Casey served as Vice President of General Electric
Company and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GE Financial Assurance from
1999-2002 and in several other capacities at General Electric Company businesses since 1992.
Mr. Walls was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary on January 1,
2010. Previously, Mr. Walls served as Managing Director and was a founding partner of Post Oak
Energy Capital LP through December 31, 2009. Prior thereto, Mr. Walls was Executive Vice President
and General Counsel at Enron Corp., and a member of its Chief Executive Office since 2002. Prior
thereto, he was Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Enron Global Assets and Services,
Inc. and Deputy General Counsel at Enron Corp.
Mr. Hogan was appointed a Senior Vice President of the Company on July 30, 2008. He was
appointed President/Chief Executive Officer Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc., our indirect
subsidiary, in August 2002. Prior thereto Mr. Hogan served as Chief Operating Officer of Clear
Channel Broadcasting, Inc. from June 2002 and Senior Vice President of Clear Channel Broadcasting,
Inc. for the balance of the relevant period.
A-113
|
|
|
CC Media Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
May 26, 2010 |
|
|
9:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
CC Media Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
200 East Basse Road |
|
|
San Antonio, Texas 78209
|
|
ADMIT ONE |
|
|
|
CC Media Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
May 26, 2010 |
|
|
9:00 a.m. |
CC Media Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
200 East Basse Road |
|
|
San Antonio, Texas 78209
|
|
ADMIT ONE |
CC MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held May 26, 2010
The undersigned hereby appoints Mark P. Mays, Thomas W. Casey and Robert H. Walls, Jr., and
each of them, proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution for and in the name, place
and stead of the undersigned to appear and act for and to vote all shares of CC MEDIA HOLDINGS,
INC. standing in the name of the undersigned or with respect to which the undersigned is entitled
to vote and act at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of said company to be held in San Antonio,
Texas on May 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. local time, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof,
with all powers the undersigned would possess if then personally present, as indicated on the
reverse side.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of notice of said meeting and accompanying Proxy
Statement and of the accompanying materials and ratifies and confirms all acts that any of the said
proxy holders or their substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
David C. Abrams
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven W. Barnes
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Bressler
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Brizius
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
John P. Connaughton
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blair E. Hendrix
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathon S. Jacobson
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian K. Loring
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark P. Mays
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall T. Mays
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott M. Sperling
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent R. Weldon
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
|
ABSTAIN [ ] |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
2. |
|
Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN [ ] |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010.
(Continued and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)
Change of Address and/or Comments: [ ]
Please sign your name, exactly as it appears hereon. Joint owners should sign personally.
Attorney, Executor, Administrator, Trustee, or Guardian should indicate full title.
Dated: , 2010
Stockholders signature
Stockholders signature if stock held jointly
Sign, Date and Return the Proxy Card Promptly Using the Enclosed Envelope.
Votes MUST be indicated (X) in Black or Blue Ink.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to
be Held on May 26, 2010.
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at:
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/ccmo