UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Form S-1
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC.
Delaware | 6199 | 20-0723270 | ||
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(Primary Standard
Industrial Classification Code Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
3525 East Post Road, Suite 120
Kirk Sanford
Please send copies of all communications to:
Paul Chip
L. Lion III Justin L. Bastian Timothy J. Harris Morrison & Foerster LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 |
Patrick A. Pohlen Latham & Watkins LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Proposed Maximum | ||||
Title of Each Class of | Aggregate Offering | Amount of | ||
Securities to be Registered | Price | Registration Fee | ||
Common stock,
$0.001 par value
|
$471,500,000 | $55,495.55 | ||
Guarantee of 8
3/4% senior subordinated notes of Global Cash Access, Inc.
due 2012
|
(1) | (1) | ||
(1) | No separate consideration will be received for the guarantee. Pursuant to Rule 457(n) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, there is no filing fee with respect to the guarantee. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Subject to Completion.
Dated March 22, 2005.
Common Stock
This is an initial
public offering of shares of common stock of Global Cash Access
Holdings, Inc. Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. is
offering of
the shares to be sold in the offering. The selling stockholders
identified in this prospectus are offering an
additional shares.
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by the selling
stockholders.
Prior to this
offering, there has been no public market for Global Cash Access
Holdings, Inc.s common stock. It is currently estimated
that the initial public offering price will be between
$ and
$ per
share.
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. intends to list
the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
GCA.
See Risk
Factors beginning on page 8 to read about certain
factors you should consider before buying shares of the common
stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor any state securities commission or other regulatory body has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed on the
accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
The information in this
prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell
these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not
soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Underwriting | Proceeds to | |||||||||||||||
Price to | Discounts and | Proceeds | the Selling | |||||||||||||
Public | Commissions | to Us | Stockholders | |||||||||||||
Per Share
|
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | $ | $ | $ |
To the extent that the underwriters sell more than shares of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional shares of common stock from the selling stockholders at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discount.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York on , 2005.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | JPMorgan |
Banc of America Securities LLC |
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. |
Citigroup |
Deutsche Bank Securities |
SG Cowen & Co. | Wachovia Securities |
Prospectus dated , 2005.
DESCRIPTION OF GRAPHICS INSIDE THE FRONT COVER
The next page consists of three rows of pictures, logos and text.
First Row
The first row consists of five photographs of the registrants cash access products. From left to right are photographs of a Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATM, an Automated Cashier Machine and a QuikCash kiosk. To the right of the photograph of the QuikCash kiosk is a photograph of a TODD device directly above a photograph of an EDITH device.
Second Row
The second row consists of a logo and text. On the left side of the row is a Central Credit logo, which consists of a red square with rounded corners, inside of which appear the portions of two white concentric circles designed to resemble a smaller letter C inside of a larger letter C, and below which appears the name Central Credit in black letters. To the right of the logo is the following text: Central Credit, the leading gaming patron credit bureau, provides detailed patron credit histories to gaming establishments to improve their credit decisions.
Third Row
The third row consists of a photograph and a logo. On the left side of the row is a photograph of the screen display of a personal computer running QuikCash Plus Web. To the right of the photograph is a TeleCheck logo, which consists of a red rectangle with rounded corners, inside of which appears the name TeleCheck in white letters and five white lines that extend horizontally from the left margin, curl downwards at a rounded 90 degree angle at approximately one-third of the distance from the left margin to the right margin and extend upwards to the top margin at an approximately 45 degree angle. The registered trademark symbol is positioned just outside the lower right corner of the rectangle and the words A First Data Company appear beneath the red rectangle.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
36 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
68 | ||||||||
80 | ||||||||
92 | ||||||||
95 | ||||||||
100 | ||||||||
101 | ||||||||
103 | ||||||||
106 | ||||||||
110 | ||||||||
110 | ||||||||
111 | ||||||||
F-1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 3.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 4.5 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 5.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.26 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.27 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.28 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.29 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 21.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 23.1 |
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following is a summary of some of the information contained in this prospectus. It may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand this offering fully, you should read carefully the entire prospectus, including the risk factors and the financial statements. Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. is a holding company, the principal asset of which is the capital stock of Global Cash Access, Inc. Global Cash Access, Inc. directly owns certain of the assets and the equity interests of certain subsidiaries which operate our business. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms Global Cash Access, we, us, our, our company and our business refer to Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries. The information contained in this prospectus assumes (1) the merger of Casino Credit Services, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of M&C International that provides gaming patron credit bureau services to gaming establishments in Michigan, with and into Central Credit, LLC, a subsidiary of ours, concurrent with the consummation of the offering of common stock described herein, (2) the amendment of our senior secured credit facilities to permit the consummation of certain of the transactions described in this prospectus, including allowing Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. to guarantee the obligations of Global Cash Access, Inc. under its currently outstanding 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012 and allowing Global Cash Access, Inc. to acquire the patent covering our 3-in-1 rollover functionality as described below, (3) the effectiveness of that guarantee upon the consummation of the offering of common stock described herein, (4) our acquisition from USA Payments of the patent covering our 3-in-1 rollover functionality for $10 million effective upon the consummation of this offering, (5) the transfer by M & C International of shares of our capital stock and cash to Kirk Sanford in full redemption of his ownership interest in M & C International, (6) the transfer by M & C International of shares of our capital stock to Mr. Sanford, the issuance of a promissory note by M&C International to Mr. Sanford and the forgiveness of a note from Mr. Sanford to M&C International in consideration of Mr. Sanfords prior advisory services to M & C International, and (7) Mr. Sanfords execution of the employment agreement described in this prospectus.
Business
We are the leading provider of cash access products and related services to the gaming industry in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the Caribbean. Our products and services provide gaming establishment patrons access to cash through a variety of methods, including ATM cash withdrawals, credit card cash advances, point-of-sale, or POS, debit card transactions, check verification and warranty and money transfers. In addition, we provide products and services that improve credit decision-making, automate cashier operations and enhance patron marketing activities for gaming establishments.
Substantially all gambling transactions within a gaming establishment must be completed in cash. Consequently, gaming revenues are critically dependent on the amount of cash available to patrons within gaming establishments. We believe that the proliferation of card-based payment instruments has led to a general reduction in the amount of cash that consumers carry, including when they visit gaming establishments. Therefore, the ability of gaming establishments to maximize revenues depends upon the ease with which patrons can access cash. Our products and services allow patrons to easily access their cash within a gaming establishment. For example, our patented 3-in-1 rollover functionality allows a gaming patron to easily convert an unsuccessful ATM cash withdrawal into a POS debit card transaction or a credit card cash advance.
We provide cash access products and related services at approximately 960 gaming establishments worldwide, including those of seven of the top ten gaming operators in the United States based on 2004 revenues: Harrahs Entertainment, Inc., Caesars Entertainment, Inc., Mandalay Resort Group, Boyd Gaming Corporation, Foxwoods Resort Casino, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority and Penn National Gaming, Inc. In addition, we provide cash access products and related services to three of the top four gaming operators in the United Kingdom based on 2004 revenues, including Stanley Leisure plc, Gala Casinos Ltd. and London Clubs International. In general, our contracts with gaming
1
Our cash access products and services enable three different types of electronic payment transactions: ATM cash withdrawals, credit card cash advance and POS debit card transactions. Patrons can complete any of these three transactions at any one of 848 Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATM machines, 262 Automated Cashier Machines, or ACMs, or thirteen 3-in-1 QuickJack Plus devices enabled with our proprietary software, or 3-in-1 Enabled QuickJack Plus devices. In addition, patrons can obtain credit card cash advances and POS debit card transactions at any one of more than 3,000 QuikCash kiosks. We also provide check verification and warranty services to gaming establishments that cash patron checks. Our Central Credit service, the leading gaming patron credit bureau, provides detailed patron credit histories to gaming establishments to improve their credit decisions. We also maintain a separate patron transaction database that can enhance a gaming establishments patron marketing activities. In addition, we have developed, together with our strategic partners, products to facilitate an efficient means of accessing funds in a cashless gaming environment.
In 2004, we processed over 66 million transactions which resulted in approximately $13.7 billion in cash being disbursed to gaming patrons. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we generated revenues and operating income of $403.0 million and $74.0 million, respectively.
Industry Trends
We believe that demand for our cash access products and related services will be driven by the following:
| Gaming Industry Growth. Future gaming industry growth is expected to be driven by continued market expansion in the United States and from the development of European, Asian and other international markets. | |
| Importance of Access to Cash. Without cash access services, gaming revenues would be limited by the amount of cash that patrons bring to gaming establishments. Therefore, casino operators increasingly realize the importance of offering gaming patrons the ability to access different sources of funds while in the gaming establishment. Most gaming establishments outsource their cash access services to third-party providers. | |
| Migration from Cash to Electronic Forms of Payment. We believe that the proliferation of card-based payment instruments in retail environments has led to a general reduction in the amount of cash that patrons bring to gaming establishments, increasing the demand for cash access products and services within gaming establishments. | |
| Innovation of Cash Access Products and Related Services. We believe that gaming establishments will demand new or enhanced products and services that increase the amount of cash available to gaming patrons and continue to reduce transaction times and cashier labor costs. | |
| Demand for Effective Patron Marketing. Gaming establishments target profitable, repeat customers and increasingly rely on the aggregation and analysis of patron transaction data to develop, implement and refine patron marketing strategies that increase loyalty and revenues. |
Competitive Strengths
We believe our competitive strengths are as follows:
| Industry leader. We are the leading provider of cash access products and related services to the gaming industry. We have a leading market share, providing our cash access products and services at approximately 960 gaming establishments worldwide. We have contracts to provide cash access products and related services to seven of the top ten gaming operators in the United States and three of the top four gaming operators in the United Kingdom, based on 2004 |
2
revenues. We focus solely on the gaming industry and believe we have the industry leading brand. | ||
| Best-in-class products and services. We believe that we offer the most innovative, reliable, comprehensive and integrated cash access products and services. Based upon information obtained from certain of our customers that have switched from our competitors products and services to our products and services, we believe that our cash access products and services result in substantially more cash being disbursed within gaming establishments. | |
| Proprietary patron information. Our proprietary databases contain credit histories and patron transaction data generated across multiple gaming establishments over time. Central Credit is the de facto industry standard credit bureau and is used by gaming establishments to improve their credit decision-making. Our proprietary patron transaction database contains information about patron cash access activity that can enhance a gaming establishments patron marketing activities. | |
| Exclusive strategic alliances. We have partnered with gaming industry leaders on an exclusive basis to develop, market and provide innovative products to gaming establishments. We enjoy the benefit of our alliance partners existing installed bases, reputations and relationships with gaming establishments. |
Business Strategy
We intend to enhance our position as the leading provider of cash access products and related services to the gaming industry by pursuing the following strategies:
| Generate additional revenue from existing customers. We intend to generate additional revenue by maintaining and broadening our existing customer relationships. By renewing our global contracts with our existing customers we expect to benefit from our customers growth in existing and new markets. We also intend to provide them additional cash access products and services. | |
| Expand our customer base in existing markets. We seek to enter into contracts with new customers when our competitors contracts expire or when new participants enter our existing markets. We believe that the breadth and quality of our products and services provides us with a significant competitive advantage. | |
| Enter new markets. We plan to grow our business by further expanding our geographic presence in the United States and internationally. Legislation permitting or expanding gaming has been proposed or passed in a number of jurisdictions both in the United States and internationally. We believe that many of our existing customers will participate in this expansion, and our contracts typically provide that we will have the right to provide cash access services at these new establishments. We also believe that our market leadership will allow us to capitalize upon this expansion even in the absence of existing contractual relationships. | |
| Continue to innovate. We plan to enhance the features of our existing products and services as well as develop additional products and services using new technologies to provide more efficient access to cash at gaming establishments. |
Our History
We began our operations in July 1998 as a joint venture limited liability company among M&C International and entities affiliated with Bank of America and First Data Corporation. In September 2000, Bank of America sold its entire ownership interest to M&C International and First Data Corporation. In March 2004, Global Cash Access, Inc. issued $235 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012 and borrowed $260 million under senior secured credit facilities. Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. was formed to hold all of the outstanding capital stock of Global Cash Access, Inc. and to guarantee the obligations under the senior secured credit
3
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc.s principal executive offices are located at 3525 East Post Road, Suite 120, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120. Our telephone number is (800) 833-7110. Our web site address is www.globalcashaccess.com. The information on our web site is not deemed to be part of this prospectus.
This prospectus contains trademarks and service marks owned by us and our subsidiaries, such as Global Cash Access®, QuikCash®, ACM®, QuikCredit® and QuikMarketing®, and also contains trademarks and service marks owned by third parties.
4
The Offering
Common stock offered by us | shares | |
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders | shares(1) | |
Total common stock offered | shares | |
Common stock outstanding after this offering | shares | |
Use of proceeds | We intend to (i) use approximately $89.4 million of the net proceeds of the common stock offered by us to redeem $82.3 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes of Global Cash Access, Inc. due 2012, (ii) use $10.0 million to acquire the patent covering our 3-in-1 rollover functionality, and (iii) retain the remainder of the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including working capital. For more information, see Use of Proceeds on page 30 of this prospectus. | |
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our common stock by the selling stockholders in the offering. | ||
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol | GCA | |
Risk Factors | See Risk Factors beginning on page 8 of this prospectus for a discussion of factors that you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. | |
Dividend policy | We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. | |
Guarantee of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes of Global Cash Access, Inc. due 2012 | Effective upon the consummation of this offering of common stock, we will guarantee the obligations of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Cash Access, Inc., under its currently outstanding 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012. Our guarantee will be full and unconditional and will be joint and several with the existing guarantee of the same obligations by Central Credit, LLC. See Description of Guarantee. |
Except as otherwise indicated, whenever we present the number of shares of common stock outstanding, we have:
| assumed full conversion of all outstanding preferred stock into common stock; | |
| based this information on the shares outstanding as of December 31, 2004, excluding: |
| 722,215 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of an outstanding option at an exercise price of $8.046 per share; and | |
| shares of common stock available for future issuance pursuant to our stock option plan; |
| assumed no exercise of options after December 31, 2004; and | |
| assumed no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option. |
(1) | Does not include shares of common stock that may be sold by the selling stockholders upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option. |
5
Summary Consolidated Financial Data
The following summary consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary consolidated financial data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Other than insubstantial assets that are immaterial in amount and nature, the sole asset of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. is the capital stock of Global Cash Access, Inc. The formation of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. and the transfer of ownership of Global Cash Access, Inc. to Global Cash Access Holding, Inc. were treated as a reorganization of entities under common control. Accordingly, the income and expense of Global Cash Access, Inc. for all periods are included in the accompanying financial statements. Our summary historical consolidated financial data may not be indicative of our future financial condition or results of operations. See Consolidated Financial Statements. The pro forma income tax amounts below are unaudited and have been calculated to reflect the taxes that would have been reported had we been subject to federal and state income taxes as a C Corporation during the periods presented.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 2001(1) | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement
Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 170,792 | $ | 174,787 | $ | 182,754 | $ | 186,547 | $ | 209,962 | ||||||||||||
ATM
|
33,634 | 110,074 | 119,424 | 132,341 | 158,433 | |||||||||||||||||
Check services
|
26,997 | 26,614 | 29,412 | 26,326 | 23,768 | |||||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
|
10,216 | 10,152 | 10,303 | 10,500 | 10,840 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
241,639 | 321,627 | 341,893 | 355,714 | 403,003 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
147,900 | 203,274 | 216,658 | 232,463 | 270,112 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
93,739 | 118,353 | 125,235 | 123,251 | 132,891 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
(38,250 | ) | (54,270 | ) | (57,649 | ) | (45,430 | ) | (45,322 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(11,084 | ) | (16,838 | ) | (11,820 | ) | (14,061 | ) | (13,548 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating income
|
44,405 | 47,245 | 55,766 | 63,760 | 74,021 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net(2)
|
(1,177 | ) | (5,082 | ) | (4,933 | ) | (5,450 | ) | (32,025 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income before income tax
(provision) benefit and minority
ownership loss |
43,228 | 42,163 | 50,833 | 58,310 | 41,996 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax
(provision) benefit
|
(637 | ) | (442 | ) | (1,451 | ) | (321 | ) | 212,346 | |||||||||||||
Income before minority
ownership loss
|
42,591 | 41,721 | 49,382 | 57,989 | 254,342 | |||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss(3)
|
| 420 | 1,040 | 400 | 213 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 42,591 | $ | 42,141 | $ | 50,422 | $ | 58,389 | $ | 254,555 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.57 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 7.91 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 3.52 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
71,500 | 71,500 | 71,500 | 71,500 | 72,222 | |||||||||||||||||
Pro forma computation
related to conversion to corporation for tax purposes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision
for income taxes and minority ownership loss
historical
|
$ | 43,228 | $ | 42,163 | $ | 50,833 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 41,996 | ||||||||||||
Income tax
provision historical, exclusive of one-time tax
benefit(4)
|
(637 | ) | (442 | ) | (1,451 | ) | (321 | ) | (10,519 | ) | ||||||||||||
Pro forma income tax
provision unaudited(5)
|
(17,951 | ) | (16,154 | ) | (16,940 | ) | (20,741 | ) | (4,600 | ) | ||||||||||||
Minority ownership
loss historical
|
| 420 | 1,040 | 400 | 213 | |||||||||||||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 24,640 | $ | 25,987 | $ | 33,482 | $ | 37,648 | $ | 27,090 | ||||||||||||
Pro forma earnings per
share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 0.84 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
71,500 | 71,500 | 71,500 | 71,500 | 72,222 |
6
December 31, 2004 | |||||||||
Actual | As Adjusted(6) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 49,577 | $ | ||||||
Total assets
|
496,625 | ||||||||
Total borrowings
|
478,250 | ||||||||
Stockholders
deficiency and members capital
|
(56,779 | ) |
For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||||
Other Data:
|
|||||||||||||
Aggregate dollar amount
processed (in billions):
|
|||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 3.6 | $ | 3.8 | $ | 4.2 | |||||||
ATM
|
6.2 | 6.9 | 8.4 | ||||||||||
Check warranty
|
1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | ||||||||||
Number of transactions
completed (in millions):
|
|||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
8.2 | 8.1 | 8.8 | ||||||||||
ATM
|
42.5 | 45.7 | 53.2 | ||||||||||
Check warranty
|
7.0 | 5.5 | 4.8 |
(1) | The increase in revenues and operating expenses during fiscal 2001, as compared to fiscal 2000, is primarily attributable to our acquisitions of the gaming ATM portfolios of Bank of America, N.A. and InnoVentry Corporation. |
(2) | Interest expense, net, includes interest income. |
(3) | Minority ownership loss represents the portion of the loss from operations of QuikPlay, LLC that is attributable to the 40% ownership interest in QuikPlay, LLC that is not owned by us. |
(4) | In connection with our conversion to a taxable corporate entity for United States income tax purposes, we recognized a net tax asset created by a step up in the tax basis of our net assets due to the Recapitalization and the Private Equity Restructuring. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation Overview. For purposes of determining the pro forma net income, the recognition of this one-time step up in basis has been excluded from our pro forma tax computation. |
(5) | The pro forma unaudited income tax adjustments represent the tax effects that would have been reported had the Company been subject to United States federal and state income taxes as a corporation. Pro forma expenses are based upon the statutory income tax rates and adjustments to income for estimated permanent differences occurring during the period. Actual rates and expenses could have differed had the Company been subject to United States federal and state income taxes for all periods presented. Therefore, the unaudited pro forma amounts are for informational purposes only and are intended to be indicative of the results of operations had the Company been subject to United States federal and state income taxes for all periods presented. |
The following table presents the computation of the pro forma income tax expense for all the periods presented (in thousands): |
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Income before income
taxes, as reported
|
$ | 43,228 | $ | 42,163 | $ | 50,833 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 41,996 | ||||||||||
Effective pro forma income
tax rate
|
43.00 | % | 39.36 | % | 36.18 | % | 36.12 | % | 36.00 | % | ||||||||||
Pro forma income tax
expense
|
$ | 18,588 | $ | 16,596 | $ | 18,391 | $ | 21,062 | $ | 15,119 | ||||||||||
(6) | The as adjusted balance sheet data gives effect to the sale of our shares of common stock in this offering, at an assumed public offering price of $ per share, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses and the redemption of $82.3 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012. See Capitalization. |
7
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risks
and other information in this prospectus before deciding to
invest in shares of our common stock. The following risks and
uncertainties could materially adversely affect or business,
financial condition or operating results. In this event, the
trading price of our common stock could decline and you could
lose part or all of your investment.
Risk Related to Our Business
If we are unable to maintain our current
customers on terms that are favorable to us, our business,
financial condition and operating results may suffer a material
adverse effect.
We enter into contracts with our gaming
establishment customers to provide our cash access products and
related services. Most of our contracts have a term ranging from
three to five years in duration and provide that we are the only
provider of cash access products to these establishments during
the term of the contract. However, some of our contracts are
terminable upon 30 days advance notice and some of our
contracts either become nonexclusive or terminable by our gaming
establishment customers in the event that we fail to satisfy
certain covenants, including related to our ongoing product
development. We are typically required to renegotiate the terms
of our customer contracts upon their expiration, and in certain
circumstances we may be forced to modify the terms of our
contracts before they expire. When we have successfully renewed
these contracts, these negotiations have in the past resulted
in, and in the future may result in, financial and other terms
that are less favorable to us than the terms of the expired
contracts. In particular, we are often required to pay a higher
commission rate to a gaming establishment than we previously
paid in order to renew the relationship. Assuming constant
transaction volume, increases in commissions or other incentives
paid to gaming establishments would reduce our operating
results. We may not succeed in renewing these contracts when
they expire, which would result in a complete loss of revenue
from that customer, either for an extended period of time or
forever. Our contracts are often global, in that they cover all
of the gaming establishments of a particular operator wherever
they are located around the world. So, the loss of a single
contract often results in the loss of multiple gaming
establishments. If we are required to pay higher commission
rates or agree to other less favorable terms to retain our
customers or we are not able to renew our relationships with our
customers upon the expiration of our contracts, our business,
financial condition and operating results would be harmed.
Because of significant concentration among our
top customers, the loss of a top customer could have a material
adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
In 2004, our five largest customers,
Harrahs Entertainment, Inc., Caesars Entertainment, Inc.,
Mandalay Resort Group, Boyd Gaming Corporation and Station
Casinos, Inc., accounted for approximately 38.0% of our
revenues. In 2004, revenues attributable to our largest
customer, Harrahs Entertainment, Inc., were approximately
11.7% of our revenues. The loss of, or a substantial decrease in
revenues from, any one of our top customers could have a
material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Consolidation among operators of gaming
establishments may also result in the loss of a top customer to
the extent that customers of ours are acquired by our
competitors customers. For example, Mandalay Resort Group
is currently the subject of a pending acquisition by
MGM MIRAGE. We are engaged in competitive bidding for a new
contract with MGM MIRAGE. If we are unsuccessful in
securing a long-term contract with MGM MIRAGE and the
pending acquisition of the Mandalay Resort Group by
MGM MIRAGE is consummated, we may lose Mandalay Resort
Group as a customer upon the expiration of our contract with it.
8
Competition in the market for cash access
services is intense which could result in higher commissions or
loss of customers to our competitors.
The market for cash access products and related
services is intensely competitive, and we expect competition to
increase and intensify in the future. We compete with other
providers of cash access products and services such as Game
Financial Corporation, a subsidiary of Certegy Inc.,
operating as GameCash; Global Payment Systems operating as
Cash & Win; Cash Systems, Inc; and financial
institutions such as U.S. Bancorp and other regional and
local banks that operate ATM machines on the premises of gaming
establishments. We face potential competition from gaming
establishments that may choose to operate cash access systems on
their own behalf rather than outsource to us. We may in the
future also face competition from traditional transaction
processors, such as First Data Corporation, that may choose to
enter the gaming patron cash services market. In connection with
our redemption of First Data Corporations interest in us,
First Data Corporation agreed not to compete with us prior to
March 10, 2007. This agreement not to compete, however, is
limited to the United States and Canada and is subject to a
number of exceptions. Given its familiarity with our specific
industry and business and operations as a result of being our
majority owner from inception until March 10, 2004, First
Data Corporation could be a significant competitive threat upon
the expiration of this covenant not to compete. In addition, we
may in the future face potential competition from new entrants
into the market for cash access products and related services.
Some of our competitors and potential competitors have
significant advantages over us, including greater name
recognition, longer operating histories, pre-existing
relationships with current or potential customers, significantly
greater financial, marketing and other resources and more ready
access to capital which allow them to respond more quickly to
new or changing opportunities. In addition, certain providers of
cash access products and services to gaming establishments have
established cooperative relationships with financial
institutions in order to expand their service offerings.
Other providers of cash access products and
services to gaming establishments have in the past increased,
and may in the future continue to increase, the commissions or
other incentives they pay to gaming establishments in order to
win those gaming establishments as customers and to gain market
share. To the extent that competitive pressures force us to
increase commissions or other incentives to establish or
maintain relationships with gaming establishments, our business
and operating results could be adversely affected.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual
property adequately, we may lose a valuable competitive
advantage or be forced to incur costly litigation to protect our
rights.
Our success depends on developing and protecting
our intellectual property. We have entered into license
agreements with other parties for intellectual property that is
critical to our business. We rely on the terms of these license
agreements, as well as copyright, patent, trademark and trade
secret laws to protect our intellectual property. We also rely
on other confidentiality and contractual agreements and
arrangements with our employees, affiliates, business partners
and customers to establish and protect our intellectual property
and similar proprietary rights. We hold two issued patents and
we have four patent applications pending. However, we can
provide no assurance that these applications will become issued
patents. If they do not become issued patents, our competitors
would not be prevented from using these inventions.
We have also entered into license agreements with
other parties for the exclusive use of their technology and
intellectual property rights in the gaming industry, such as our
license to use certain portions of the software infrastructure
upon which our systems operate from Infonox on the Web. We rely
on these other parties to maintain and protect this technology
and the related intellectual property rights. If our licensors
fail to protect their intellectual property rights in material
that we license and we are unable to protect such intellectual
property rights, the value of our licenses may diminish
significantly and our business could be significantly harmed. It
is possible that third parties may copy or otherwise obtain and
use our information and proprietary technology without our
authorization or otherwise infringe on our intellectual property
rights or intellectual property rights that we exclusively
9
We may have to rely on litigation to enforce our
intellectual property rights and contractual rights. For
example, we are pursuing a patent infringement action against
U.S. Bancorp, Certegy Inc. and Game Financial Corporation
to discontinue what we believe to be their infringement of the
rights arising under our patent to the 3-in-1
rollover functionality. By pursuing this litigation, we
are exposed to the risk that the defendants will attempt to
invalidate the patent or otherwise limit its scope. If
litigation that we initiate is unsuccessful, including the
litigation described above, we may not be able to protect the
value of our intellectual property and our business could be
adversely affected. We may also face difficulty enforcing our
rights in the QuikCash trademark because of the timing and
sequence of certain assignment and renewal actions relating to
the trademark.
In addition, we may face claims of infringement
that could interfere with our ability to use technology or other
intellectual property rights that are material to our business
operations. In the event a claim of infringement against us is
successful, we may be required to pay royalties to use
technology or other intellectual property rights that we had
been using or we may be required to enter into a license
agreement and pay license fees, or we may be required to stop
using the technology or other intellectual property rights that
we had been using. We may be unable to obtain necessary licenses
from third parties at a reasonable cost or within a reasonable
time. Any litigation of this type, whether successful or
unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs to us and
diversions of our resources.
We are subject to extensive rules and
regulations of card associations, including MasterCard
International, Visa International and Visa U.S.A., that are
always subject to change, which may harm our business.
In 2004, a substantial portion of our revenues
were derived from transactions subject to the extensive rules
and regulations of the leading card associations, Visa
International and Visa U.S.A., or VISA, and MasterCard
International, or MasterCard. From time to time, we receive
correspondence from these card associations regarding our
compliance with their rules and regulations. In the ordinary
course of our business, we engage in discussions with the card
associations, and the bank that sponsors us into the card
associations, regarding our compliance with their rules and
regulations. The rules and regulations do not expressly address
some of the contexts and settings in which we process cash
access transactions, or do so in a manner subject to varying
interpretations. For example, one of the major card associations
has not determined that our ability to process credit card cash
advance transactions using biometric technology at an unmanned
machine and without cashier involvement through our ACM complies
with its regulations. As a result, we are currently not able to
use this feature of our ACMs to process credit card cash
advances or POS debit card transactions involving that card
association. Therefore, patrons still must complete these
transactions at the cashier, which is inconvenient to patrons
and prevents gaming establishments from realizing potential
cashier labor cost savings. As another example, in 2003, one of
the major card associations informed our sponsoring bank that
authorization requests originating from our systems needed to be
encoded to identify our transactions as gambling transactions,
even though our services do not directly involve any gambling
activity. This resulted in a large number of card issuing banks
declining all transactions initiated through our services. We
resolved this issue by encoding the authorization requests with
an alternative non-gambling indicator that the card association
agreed was applicable. These examples only illustrate some of
the ways in which the card association rules and regulations
have affected us in the past or may affect us in the future;
there are many other ways in which these rules and regulations
may adversely affect us beyond the examples provided in this
prospectus.
10
The card associations rules and regulations
are always subject to change, and the associations modify their
rules and regulations from time to time. Our inability to
anticipate changes in rules, regulations or the interpretation
or application thereof may result in substantial disruption to
our business. In the event that the card associations or our
sponsoring bank determine that the manner in which we process
certain card transactions is not in compliance with existing
rules and regulations, or if the card associations adopt new
rules or regulations that prohibit or restrict the manner in
which we process certain card transactions, we may be forced to
pay a fine, modify the manner in which we operate our business
or stop processing certain types of cash access transactions
altogether, any of which could have a material negative impact
on our business and operating results.
We also process transactions involving the use of
the Discover Card and the American Express card. The rules and
regulations of the proprietary credit card networks that service
these cards present risks to us that are similar to those posed
by the rules and regulations of VISA and MasterCard.
Changes in interchange rates and other fees
may affect our cost of revenues and net income.
We pay credit card associations fees for services
they provide in settling transactions routed through their
networks, called interchange fees. In addition, we pay fees to
participate in various ATM or POS debit card networks as well as
processing fees to process our transactions. The amounts of
these interchange fees are fixed by the card associations and
networks in their sole discretion, and are subject to increase
at any time. VISA increased certain interchange fees in February
2004 and MasterCard increased certain interchange fees in April
2004. Also in 2004, VISAs Interlink network, through which
we process a substantial portion of our POS debit card
transactions, materially increased the interchange rates for
those transactions. Many of our contracts enable us to pass
through to our customers increases in interchange or processing
fees, but competitive pressures might prevent us from passing
all or some of these fees through to our customers in the
future. To the extent that we are unable to pass through to our
customers all or any portion of any increase in interchange or
processing fees, our cost of revenues would increase and our net
income would decrease, assuming no change in transaction
volumes. Any such decrease in net income could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
We receive fees from the issuers of ATM cards
that are used in our ATM machines, called reverse interchange
fees. We rely to some extent on these reverse interchange fees
to finance the ongoing operation and maintenance of our ATM
machines. The amounts of these reverse interchange fees are
fixed by electronic funds transfer networks, and are subject to
decrease in their discretion at any time. Unlike credit card
association interchange fees, our contracts do not enable us to
pass through to our customers the amount of any decrease in
reverse interchange fees. To the extent that reverse interchange
fees are reduced, our net income would decrease, assuming no
change in transaction volumes, which may result in a material
adverse effect on our operating results.
Our substantial indebtedness could materially
adversely affect our operations and financial results and
prevent us from obtaining additional financing, if
necessary.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness. On
December 31, 2004, we had total indebtedness of
$478.3 million (of which $235 million consisted of
senior subordinated notes and $243.3 million consisted of
senior secured debt). Our substantial indebtedness could have
important consequences. For example, it:
11
makes it more difficult for us to satisfy our
obligations with respect to either our senior secured debt or
our senior subordinated notes, which, if we fail to do, could
result in the acceleration of all of our debt;
increases our vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry conditions;
requires us to dedicate a substantial portion (in
the case of our senior secured debt, up to 75% of our excess
cash flow, depending upon our total leverage ratio) of our cash
flow from operations to
In addition, our senior secured credit facilities
and the indenture for our senior subordinated notes contain
financial and other restrictive covenants that limit our ability
to engage in activities that we may believe to be in our
long-term best interests. These restrictions include, among
other things, limits on our ability to make investments, pay
dividends, incur debt, sell assets, or merge with or acquire
another entity. Our failure to comply with those covenants could
result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived,
could result in the acceleration of all of our debt.
Our senior secured debt currently bears interest
at a rate that is based on the London Interbank Offering Rate,
or LIBOR, and is adjusted periodically to reflect changes in
LIBOR. We are therefore exposed the risk of increased interest
expense in the event of any increase in LIBOR. The substantial
amount of our senior secured debt magnifies this risk.
To service our indebtedness we will require a
significant amount of cash, and our ability to generate cash
flow depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to generate cash flow from operations
depends on general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control. Due to these factors, it is possible that our business
will not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to enable
us to pay our indebtedness as it matures and to fund our other
liquidity needs. This would cause us to have to borrow money to
meet these needs and future borrowing may not be available to us
at all or in an amount sufficient to satisfy these needs. In
such events, we will need to refinance all or a portion of our
indebtedness on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. We could have to adopt
one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying planned
expenses and capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring
debt or obtaining additional equity or debt financing or joint
venture partners. There can be no assurance that any of these
financing strategies could be effected on satisfactory terms, if
at all. Our failure to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy
our debt obligations or to refinance our obligations on
commercially reasonable terms would have a material adverse
effect on our business and our ability to satisfy our
obligations with respect to our indebtedness.
The terms of our senior secured debt require us
to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from
operations to payments on our indebtedness, which will reduce
the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures, expansion efforts and other general
corporate purposes.
Because of our dependence on a few providers,
or in some cases one provider, for some of the financial
services we offer to patrons, the loss of a provider could have
a material adverse effect on our business or our financial
performance.
We depend on a few providers, or in some cases
one provider, for some of the financial services that we offer
to patrons.
12
payments on our indebtedness, which would reduce
the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures, expansion efforts and other general
corporate purposes;
limits our flexibility in planning for, or
reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which
we operate;
restricts our ability to pay dividends;
places us at a competitive disadvantage compared
to our competitors that have less debt;
prohibits us from acquiring businesses or
technologies that would benefit our business
restricts our ability to engage in transactions
with affiliates or create liens or guarantees; and
limits, along with the financial and other
restrictive covenants in our other indebtedness, among other
things, our ability to borrow additional funds.
Check warranty
services. We rely on TRS Recovery
Services, Inc. (formerly known as TeleCheck Recovery Services,
Inc.), or TeleCheck, to provide the check warranty services that
our gaming establishment customers use when cashing patron
checks. Our contract with TeleCheck expires on March 31,
2006, and unless we and TeleCheck mutually agree to renew the
contract, we will need to make alternative arrangements for
check warranty services. There can be no assurance that we will
be able to make such alternative arrangements on terms that are
as favorable to us as the terms of our contract with TeleCheck,
or on any terms at all. In addition, our Central Credit check
warranty service, as currently deployed, uses risk analytics
provided by third-party providers.
Authorizations and
Settlement. We rely on USA Payments
and USA Payment Systems to obtain authorizations for credit card
cash advances, POS debit card transactions, ATM cash withdrawal
transactions and to settle certain of these transactions.
Card association
sponsorship. We rely on Bank of
America Merchant Services for sponsorship into the Visa U.S.A.
and MasterCard card associations for domestic transactions at no
cost to us. We also rely on a foreign bank in each foreign
jurisdiction in which we operate for sponsorship into the Visa
International and MasterCard card associations for transactions
conducted in those jurisdictions.
Money order
instruments. We rely on Integrated
Payment Systems, Inc. to issue the negotiable instruments that
are used to complete credit card cash advance and POS debit card
transactions.
ATM cash supply. We
rely on Bank of America, N.A. to supply cash for substantially
all of our ATMs.
Software development and system
support. We generally rely on Infonox
on the Web, which is under common control with M&C
International, for software development and system support. In
addition, we rely on NRT Technology Corporation, or NRT, for
software development and system support related to 3-in-1
Enabled QuickJack Plus devices.
Product Development.
We rely on our joint venture partner and strategic partners for
certain aspects of our product development. For example, we are
developing cashless gaming products through QuikPlay, LLC, our
joint venture with International Game Technology, or IGT. We
have jointly developed and are marketing self-service slot
ticket and player point redemption kiosks that incorporate our
cash access services with our strategic partners NRT and Western
Money Systems. These activities have risks resulting from
unproven combinations of disparate products and services,
reduced flexibility in making design changes in response to
market changes, reduced control over product completion
schedules and the risk of disputes with our joint venture
partners and strategic partners. In addition, if our cashless
gaming products are unsuccessful, we could lose our entire
investment in QuikPlay, LLC.
Money transfers. We
rely on Western Union Financial Services, Inc. to facilitate
money transfers.
Our contracts with these providers are for
varying terms and provide early termination rights in the event
of our breach of or the occurrence of an event of default under
these contracts. Replacing any of these or other products and
services we obtain from third parties could be materially
disruptive to our operations. There can be no assurance that we
would be able to enter into contracts or arrangements with
alternate providers on terms and conditions as beneficial to us
as the contracts or arrangements with our current providers, or
at all. A change in our business relationships with any of these
third-party providers or the loss of their services or failed
execution on their part could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operation.
Certain providers upon whom we are dependent
are under common control with M&C International, the loss of
which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We depend on services provided by USA Payments,
USA Payment Systems and Infonox on the Web, each of which is
affiliated with M&C International, to provide many of the
financial services that we offer to patrons. We cannot assure
you that the interests of M&C International or its
principals will coincide with the interests of the holders of
our common stock or that such principals will not take action
13
Our business depends on our ability to
introduce new, commercially viable products and services in a
timely manner.
Our ability to maintain and grow our business
will depend upon our ability to introduce successful new
products and services in a timely manner. Our product
development efforts are based upon a number of complex
assumptions, including assumptions relating to gaming patron
habits, changes in the popularity and prevalence of certain
payment methods, anticipated transaction volumes, the costs and
time required to bring new products and services to market, and
the willingness and ability of both patrons and gaming
establishment personnel to use new products and services and
bear the economic costs of doing so. Our new products and
services may not achieve market acceptance if any of our
assumptions are wrong, or for other reasons.
Our ability to introduce new products and
services may also require regulatory approvals, which may
significantly increase the costs associated with developing a
new product or service and the time required to introduce a new
product or service into the marketplace. In order to obtain
these regulatory approvals we may need to modify our products
and services which would increase our costs of development and
may make our products or services less likely to achieve market
acceptance.
For example, the commercial success of our
ticket-out debit device, or TODD, cashless gaming product, and
our electronic debit interactive terminal housing, or EDITH,
depends upon the continued viability of the cashless gaming
market segment. A curtailment in the prevalence of cashless
gaming opportunities, as a result of legislative action,
responsible gaming pressures or other factors beyond our
control, would threaten the commercial success of our cashless
gaming products and services. TODD required extensive laboratory
testing and certification and to date has only been approved for
use in one casino, and EDITH has not yet been approved for use
in any location.
Our ability to grow our business through the
introduction of new products and services depends in part on our
joint development activities with third parties over whom we
have little or no control. We have engaged in joint development
projects with third parties in the past and we expect to
continue doing so in the future. Joint development can magnify
several risks for us, including the loss of control over
development of aspects of the jointly developed products and
disputes with our joint venture partners.
Our products and services are complex, depend
on a myriad of complex networks and technologies and may be
subject to software or hardware errors or failures that could
lead to an increase in our costs, reduce our revenues or damage
our reputation.
Our products and services, and the networks and
third-party services upon which our products and services are
based, are complex and may contain undetected errors or may
suffer unexpected failures. We are exposed to the risk of
failure of our proprietary computer systems, many of which are
deployed, operated, monitored and supported by Infonox on the
Web, whom we do not control. We rely on Infonox on the Web to
detect and respond to errors and failures in our proprietary
computer systems. We rely on NRT for software development and
system support of the 3-in-1 Enabled QuickJack Plus devices. We
are exposed to the risk of failure of the computer systems that
are owned, operated and managed by USA Payments Systems, whom we
do not control. USA Payment Systems owns the data center through
which most of our transactions are processed, and we rely on USA
Payment Systems to maintain the
14
We may not successfully enter new markets and
therefore not achieve all of our strategic growth
objectives.
We intend to enter new and developing domestic
markets. Pennsylvania enacted legislation in 2004 that
authorizes as many as 61,000 slot machines for horse tracks,
resorts and slot parlors across the state. Oklahoma approved in
2004 measures that would allow the installation of slot machines
at specified locations, subject to certain conditions. Broward
County, Florida approved in 2005 a measure requiring the State
of Florida to begin negotiations to allow slot machines to be
installed and operated at racetracks and jai lai establishments
in Broward County. California and certain Native American tribes
in the state signed agreements in 2004 to allow an unlimited
number of slot machines at tribal gaming establishments. If and
as these markets continue to develop, competition among
providers of cash access products and services will intensify
and we will have to expand our sales and marketing presence in
these markets. In competitive bidding situations, we may not
enjoy the advantage of being the incumbent provider of cash
access products and services to gaming establishments in these
new markets and developers and operators of gaming
establishments in these new markets may have pre-existing
relationships with our competitors. We may also face the
uncertainty of compliance with new or developing regulatory
regimes with which we are not currently familiar and oversight
by regulators that are not familiar with us or our business.
Each of these risks could materially impair our ability to
successfully expand our operations into these new and developing
domestic markets.
We also intend to enter new and developing
international markets, including markets in which we have not
previously operated. Our strategy of entering foreign markets
may expose us to political, economic and regulatory risks not
faced by businesses that operate only in the United States. The
legal and regulatory regimes of foreign markets and their
ramifications on our business are less certain. Our
international operations will be subject to a variety of risks,
including different regulatory requirements, trade barriers,
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, higher
rates of fraud, fluctuations in currency exchange rates,
difficulty in enforcing contracts, political and economic
instability and potentially adverse tax consequences. In these
new markets, our operations will rely on an infrastructure of
financial services and telecommunications facilities that may
not be sufficient to support our business needs, such as the
authorization and settlement services that are required to
implement electronic payment transactions and the
telecommunications facilities that would enable us to reliably
connect our networks to our products at gaming establishments in
these new markets. These risks, among others, could materially
adversely affect our business and operating results. In
connection with our expansion into new international markets, we
may forge strategic relationships with business partners to
assist us. The success of our expansion into these markets
therefore may depend in part upon the success of the business
partners with whom we forge these strategic relationships. We
have entered into an agreement with an overseas representative
to assist us in the sales and marketing of our cash access
services to gaming establishments in Eastern Europe, and we are
attempting to form relationships with foreign banks to assist us
in the processing of transactions originating from these
15
We are also subject to the risk that the domestic
or international markets that we are attempting to enter or
expand into may not develop as quickly as anticipated, or at
all. The development of new gaming markets is subject to
political, social, regulatory and economic forces beyond our
control. The expansion of gaming activities in new markets can
be very controversial and may depend heavily on the support and
sponsorship of local government. Changes in government
leadership, failure to obtain requisite voter support in
referendums, failure of legislators to enact enabling
legislation and limitations on the volume of gaming activity
that is permitted in particular markets may inhibit the
development of new markets.
Our estimates of the potential future transaction
volumes in new markets are based on a variety of assumptions
which may prove to be inaccurate. To the extent that we
overestimate the potential of a new market, incorrectly gauge
the timing of the development of a new market, or fail to
anticipate the differences between a new market and our existing
markets, we may fail in our strategy of growing our business by
expanding into new markets. Moreover, if we are unable to meet
the needs of our existing customers as they enter markets that
we do not currently serve, our relationships with these
customers could be harmed.
We may encounter difficulties managing our
growth, which could adversely affect our operating
results.
We will need to effectively manage the expansion
of our operations in order to execute our growth strategy of
entering into new markets, expanding in existing markets and
introducing new products and services. Growth will strain our
existing resources. It is possible that our management,
employees, systems and facilities currently in place may not be
adequate to accommodate future growth. In this situation, we
will have to improve our operational, financial and management
controls, reporting systems and procedures. If we are unable to
effectively manage our growth, our operations and financial
results may be adversely affected.
From inception through March 2004, we were a
majority-owned subsidiary of First Data Corporation and received
legal, accounting, tax and regulatory compliance support
services from First Data Corporation. Since our transition to an
independent company in March 2004, we have either increased our
abilities and resources to be able to perform these services
ourselves or we have arranged to obtain them from third parties.
We do not have an extensive operating history as an independent
company and any shortcomings in our existing resources,
controls, systems or procedures may hinder our ability to grow.
We depend on key personnel and they would be
difficult to replace.
We depend upon the ability and experience of a
number of our key members of senior management who have
substantial experience with our operations and the gaming patron
cash access industry. For example, we are highly dependent on
the involvement of Kirk Sanford, our President and Chief
Executive Officer, Harry Hagerty, our Chief Financial Officer,
and other members of our senior management team. Other than
Messrs. Sanford and Hagerty, none of our executive officers
have employment agreements with us. The loss of
Mr. Sanford, Mr. Hagerty or other members of our
senior management team would have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Our future success depends upon our ability to
attract, train and retain key managers involved in the
development and marketing of our products and services to gaming
establishments. We may need to increase the number of key
managers as we further develop our products and services and as
we enter new markets and expand in existing markets. Our ability
to enter into contracts with gaming establishments depends in
large part on the relationships that our key managers have
formed with management-level personnel of gaming establishments.
Competition for individuals with such
16
The loss of our sponsorship into the Visa
U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard card associations
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We cannot provide cash access services involving
VISA cards and MasterCard cards in the United States without
sponsorship into the Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard card
associations. Bank of America Merchant Services currently
sponsors us into the card associations at no cost to us. Bank of
America Merchant Services began this sponsorship of us into the
card associations in 1998 when it held a significant ownership
interest in us. When Bank of America Merchant Services sold its
interest in us in 2000, Bank of America Merchant Services agreed
to continue its sponsorship of us at no cost to us conditioned
upon First Data Corporations continued indemnification of
Bank of America Merchant Services for any losses it may suffer
as a result of such sponsorship. When we redeemed First Data
Corporations ownership interest in us in 2004, First Data
Corporation agreed to continue to indemnify Bank of America
Merchant Services for any losses it may suffer as a result of
sponsoring us into the card associations through September 2010.
First Data Corporation will have the right to terminate its
indemnification obligations prior to September 2010 in the event
that we breach certain indemnification obligations that we owe
to First Data Corporation, in the event that we incur
chargebacks in excess of certain levels, in the event that we
are fined in excess of certain amounts for violating card
associations operating rules, or in the event that we
amend the sponsorship agreement without First Data
Corporations consent.
In the event that First Data Corporation
terminates its indemnification obligations and as a result we
lose our sponsorship by Bank of America Merchant Services into
the card associations, we would need to obtain sponsorship into
the card associations through another member of the card
associations that is capable of supporting our transaction
volume. We would not be able to obtain such alternate
sponsorship on terms as favorable to us as the terms of our
current sponsorship by Bank of America Merchant Services, which
is at no cost to us. We cannot assure you that we would be able
to obtain alternate sponsorship at all. Our inability to obtain
alternate sponsorship on favorable terms or at all would have a
material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We cannot provide cash access services involving
VISA cards and MasterCard cards outside of the United States
without sponsorship into the Visa International and MasterCard
card associations by a bank in each foreign jurisdiction in
which we conduct cash access transactions. We are currently
sponsored into these card associations by foreign banks in each
of the foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct cash access
transactions. In the event that any foreign bank that currently
sponsors us into these card associations terminates its
sponsorship of us, we would need to obtain sponsorship into the
card associations through another foreign bank that is capable
of supporting our transaction volume in the relevant
jurisdiction. For example, we were recently notified that Bank
of America is not authorized to sponsor us in certain Caribbean
markets. If we are unable to find an alternative sponsor, we may
be fined and/or required to discontinue our business operations
in the Caribbean. We may not be able to obtain alternate
sponsorship in any region on terms as favorable to us as the
terms of our current sponsorship by foreign banks, or at all.
Our inability to obtain alternate sponsorship on favorable terms
or at all could have a material adverse effect on our business
and operating results.
An unexpectedly high level of chargebacks, as
the result of fraud or otherwise, could adversely affect our
cash advance business.
When patrons use our cash access services, we
either dispense cash or produce a negotiable instrument that can
be endorsed and exchanged for cash. If a completed cash access
transaction is
17
A material increase in market interest rates
or changing regulations could adversely affect our ATM
business.
We obtain a supply of cash for our ATMs from Bank
of America, N.A. Pursuant to our contract with Bank of America,
N.A., we are obligated to pay a monthly fee that is based upon
the amount of cash used to supply our ATMs and a market interest
rate. Assuming no change in the amount of cash used to supply
our ATMs, an increase in market interest rates will result in an
increase in the monthly fee that we must pay to obtain this
supply of cash, thereby increasing our ATM operating costs. Any
increase in the amount of cash required to supply our ATMs would
magnify the impact of an increase in market interest rates. An
increase in interest rates may result in a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and operating results. In
2004, we paid approximately $5.7 million in aggregate fees
for this supply of cash, including amounts that we paid to the
suppliers of this cash other than Bank of America, N.A.
Our ATM services are subject to the applicable
state banking regulations in each jurisdiction in which we
operate ATMs. Our ATM services may also be subject to local
regulations relating to the imposition of daily limits on the
amounts that may be withdrawn from ATM machines, the location of
ATM machines and our ability to surcharge cardholders who use
our ATM machines. These regulations may impose significant
burdens on our ability to operate ATMs profitably in certain
locations, or at all. Moreover, because these regulations are
subject to change, we may be forced to modify our ATM operations
in a manner inconsistent with the assumptions upon which we
relied in entering into contracts to provide ATM services at
gaming establishments.
An unexpected increase in check warranty
expenses could adversely affect our check warranty
business.
We currently rely on TeleCheck to provide check
warranty services to our customers. When a gaming establishment
obtains an authorization from TeleCheck pursuant to its check
warranty service, TeleCheck warrants payment on the
patrons check. If the patrons check is subsequently
dishonored upon presentment for payment, TeleCheck purchases the
dishonored check from the gaming establishment for its face
amount. Pursuant to the terms of our contract with TeleCheck, we
share a portion of the loss associated with these dishonored
checks. Although this contract limits the percentage of the
dishonored checks to which we are exposed, there is no limit on
the aggregate dollar amount to which we are exposed, which is a
function of the face amount of checks warranted. TeleCheck
manages and mitigates these dishonored checks through the use of
risk analytics and collection efforts, including the additional
fees that it is entitled to collect from check writers of
dishonored checks. During the year ending December 31,
2004, the aggregate of our warranty expenses with respect to
TeleChecks check warranty service were $10.1 million.
We have no control over TeleChecks decision to warrant
payment on a particular check and we have limited visibility
into TeleChecks collection activities. As a result, we may
incur an unexpectedly high level of check warranty expenses at
any time, and if we do, we may suffer a material adverse effect
to our business or results of operation.
As an alternative to TeleChecks check
warranty service, we are currently developing our own Central
Credit check warranty service that is based upon our Central
Credit gaming patron credit bureau database, our proprietary
patron transaction database, third-party risk analytics and
certain actuarial assumptions. If these risk analytics or
actuarial assumptions are ineffective, we may incur an
18
To execute our growth strategy, we may make
acquisitions or strategic investments, which involve numerous
risks that we may not be able to address without substantial
expense, delay or other operational or financial
problems.
In order to obtain new customers in existing
markets, expand our operations into new markets, or grow our
business through the introduction of new products and services,
we may consider acquiring additional businesses, technologies,
products and intellectual property. For example, we may consider
acquiring or forming a bank or other financial services company
for the purpose of, among other things, issuing our own credit
cards and using our own vault cash to supply cash to our ATMs.
Acquisitions and strategic investments involve various risks,
such as:
Acquisitions and strategic investments could also
result in substantial cash expenditures, the dilutive issuance
of our equity securities, our incurring of additional debt and
contingent liabilities, and amortization expenses related to
other intangible assets that could adversely affect our
business, operating results and financial condition.
Acquisitions and strategic investments may also be highly
dependent upon the retention and performance of existing
management and employees of acquired businesses for the
day-to-day management and future operating results of these
businesses.
Risks Related to the Industry
Economic downturns, a decline in the
popularity of gaming or changes in the demographic profile of
gaming patrons could reduce the number of patrons that use our
services or the amounts of cash that they access using our
services.
We provide our cash access products and related
services exclusively to gaming establishments for the purpose of
enabling their patrons to access cash. As a result, our business
depends on consumer demand for gaming. Gaming is a discretionary
leisure activity, and participation in discretionary leisure
activities has in the past and may in the future decline during
economic downturns because consumers have less disposable
income. Therefore, during periods of economic contraction, our
revenues may decrease while some of our costs remain fixed,
resulting in decreased earnings. Gaming activity may also
decline based on changes in consumer confidence related to
general economic conditions or outlook, fears of war, future
acts of terrorism, or other factors. A reduction in tourism
could also result in a decline in gaming activity. A decline in
gaming activity as a result of these or any other factors would
have a material adverse effect on our business and operating
results.
Changes in consumer preferences could also harm
our business. Gaming competes with other leisure activities as a
form of consumer entertainment, and may lose popularity as new
leisure activities arise or as other leisure activities become
more popular. In addition, gaming in traditional gaming
19
difficulty integrating the technologies,
operations and personnel from the acquired business;
overestimation of potential synergies or a delay
in realizing those synergies;
disruption to our ongoing business, including the
diversion of managements attention and of resources from
our principal business;
inability to obtain the desired financial and
strategic benefits from the acquisition or investment;
loss of customers of an acquired business;
assumption of unanticipated liabilities;
loss of key employees of an acquired
business; and
entering into new markets in which we have
limited prior experience.
Aside from the general popularity of gaming, the
demographic profile of gaming patrons changes over time. The
gaming habits and use of cash access services varies with the
demographic profile of gaming patrons. For example, a local
patron may visit a gaming establishment regularly but limit his
or her play to the amount of cash that he or she brings to the
gaming establishment. In contrast, a vacationing gaming patron
that visits the gaming establishment infrequently may play much
larger amounts and have a greater need to use cash access
services. To the extent that the demographic profile of gaming
patrons in the markets we serve either narrows or migrates
towards patrons who use cash access services less frequently or
for lesser amounts of cash, the demand for our cash access
services may decline and our business may be harmed.
Changes in consumer willingness to pay a fee
to access their funds could reduce the demand for our cash
access products and services.
Our business depends upon the willingness of
patrons to pay a fee to access their own funds on the premises
of a gaming establishment. In most retail environments,
consumers typically do not pay an additional fee for using
non-cash payment methods such as credit cards, POS debit
cards or checks. In order to access cash in a gaming
establishment, however, patrons must pay service charges to
access their funds. Gaming patrons could bring more cash with
them to gaming establishments, or access cash outside of gaming
establishments without paying a fee for the convenience of not
having to leave the gaming establishment. To the extent that
gaming patrons become unwilling to pay these fees for
convenience or lower cost cash access alternatives become
available, the demand for cash access services within gaming
establishments will decline and our business could suffer.
The cash access industry is subject to change,
and we must keep pace with the changes to successfully
compete.
The demand for our products and services is
affected by new and evolving technology and industry standards.
Cash access services are based on existing financial services
and payment methods, which are also continually evolving. Our
future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to
successfully develop and introduce new cash access services
based on emerging financial services and payment methods. Stored
value cards, Internet-based payment methods and the use of
portable consumer devices such as personal digital assistants
and mobile telephones are examples of evolving payment
technologies that could impact our business. Our future success
will depend, in part, upon our ability to successfully develop
and introduce new cash access products and services and to
enhance our existing products and services to respond to changes
in technology and industry standards on a timely basis. We
cannot be sure that the products or services that we choose to
develop will achieve market acceptance or obtain any necessary
regulatory approval. In addition, alternative products, services
or technologies may replace our products and services or render
them obsolete. If we are unable to develop new products or
services or enhance existing products or services in a timely
and cost-effective manner in response to technological or market
changes, our business, financial condition and operating results
may be materially adversely affected.
The cash access industry also changes based on
changing consumer preferences. Our failure to recognize or keep
pace with changing preferences could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and operating
results. For example, we have observed a decline in the volume
of check cashing at gaming establishments over time as patron
familiarity and comfort with credit card cash advances, POS
debit card transactions and ATM cash withdrawal transactions has
increased. To the extent that we continue to rely on check
warranty services for a substantial portion of
20
Growth of the gaming industry in any market is
subject to political and regulatory developments that are
difficult to anticipate.
We expect a substantial portion of our future
growth to result from the general expansion of the gaming
industry. The expansion of gaming activities in new markets can
be very controversial and may depend heavily on the support of
national and local government. Changes in government leadership,
failure to obtain requisite voter support in referenda, failure
of legislators to enact enabling legislation and limitations on
the volume of gaming activity that is permitted in particular
markets may prevent us from expanding our operations into new
markets. A failure by the gaming industry to expand at the rate
that we expect could have a material adverse effect on our
business, growth rates, financial condition and operating
results.
We are subject to extensive governmental
gaming regulation, which may harm our business.
We are subject to a variety of regulations in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. Most of the jurisdictions in
which we operate distinguish between gaming-related suppliers
and vendors, such as manufacturers of slot machine or other
gaming devices, and non-gaming suppliers and vendors, such as
food and beverage purveyors, construction contractors and
laundry and linen suppliers. In these jurisdictions, we are
generally characterized as a non-gaming supplier or vendor and
we must obtain a non-gaming suppliers or vendors
license, qualification or approval. The obtaining of these
licenses, qualifications or approvals and the regulations
imposed on non-gaming suppliers and vendors are typically less
stringent than for gaming-related suppliers and vendors.
However, a few of the jurisdictions in which we do business do
not distinguish between gaming-related and non-gaming related
suppliers and vendors, and in those jurisdictions we currently
are subject to the same stringent licensing, qualification and
approval requirements and regulations that are imposed upon
vendors and suppliers that would be characterized as
gaming-related in other jurisdictions. Such requirements include
licensure or finding of suitability for certain officers,
directors and beneficial owners of our securities. If regulatory
authorities were to find any such officer, director or
beneficial owner unsuitable, we would be required to sever our
relationship with that person. Certain public issuances of
securities and certain other transactions by us also require the
approval of certain regulatory authorities.
If we must obtain a gaming-related
suppliers or vendors license, qualification or
approval because of the introduction of new products (such as
products related to cashless gaming) or services or because of a
change in the laws or regulations, or interpretation thereof,
our business could be materially adversely affected. This
increased regulation over our business could include, but is not
limited to: requiring the licensure or finding of suitability in
many jurisdictions of any officer, director, key employee or
beneficial owner of our securities; the termination or
disassociation with any officer, director, key employee or
beneficial owner of our securities that fails to file an
application or to obtain a license or finding of suitability;
the submission of detailed financial and operating reports;
submission of reports of material loans, leases and financing;
and, requiring regulatory approval of certain commercial
transactions such as the transfer or pledge of equity interests
in the company.
Prior changes in our ownership, management and
corporate structure, including the recapitalization of our
ownership and our conversion from a limited liability company to
a corporation in 2004, required us to notify many of the state
and tribal gaming regulators under whose jurisdiction we
operate. In many cases, those regulators have asked us for
further information and explanation of these changes. To date,
we have satisfied some of these inquiries, and are continuing to
cooperate with those that are ongoing. Given the magnitude of
the changes in our ownership that resulted from
recapitalization, we were required to reapply for new permits or
licenses in many jurisdictions but we were not required to
discontinue our operation during the period of re-application.
We cannot assure you that any new gaming license or related
approval that may be required in the future will be granted, or
that our existing licenses will not be revoked, suspended or
limited or will be renewed. In certain
21
Regulatory authorities at the federal, state,
local and tribal levels have broad powers with respect to the
licensing of gaming-related activities and may revoke, suspend,
condition or limit our licenses, impose substantial fines and
take other actions against us or the gaming establishments that
are our customers, any one of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results. We cannot assure you that any new gaming
license or related approval that may be required in the future
will be granted, or that our existing licenses will be renewed
or will not be revoked, suspended or limited. If additional
gaming regulations are adopted in a jurisdiction in which we
operate, such regulations could impose restrictions or costs
that could have a material adverse effect on our business. From
time to time, various proposals are introduced in the
legislatures of some of the jurisdictions in which we have
existing or planned operations that, if enacted, could adversely
affect the tax, regulatory, operational or other aspects of the
gaming industry or cash access in the gaming industry.
Legislation of this type may be enacted in the future.
In addition, certain new products and services
that we may develop cannot be offered in the absence of
regulatory approval of the product or service or licensing of
us, or both. For example, our TODD cashless gaming product has
to date only been approved for use at one casino and cannot be
used at any other location until we receive approval from the
appropriate authority in such additional location. These
approvals could require that we and our officers, directors or
ultimate beneficial owners obtain a license or be found suitable
and that the product or service be approved after testing and
review. We cannot assure you that we will obtain any such
approvals in the future.
When contracting with tribal owned or controlled
gaming establishments, we become subject to tribal laws and
regulations that may differ materially from the non-tribal laws
and regulations under which we generally operate. In addition to
tribal gaming regulations that may require us to provide certain
disclosures or obtain certain licenses or permits to conduct our
business on tribal lands, we may also become subject to tribal
laws that govern our contracts. These tribal governing laws may
not provide us with processes, procedures and remedies that
enable us to enforce our rights as effectively and
advantageously as the processes, procedures and remedies that
would be afforded to us under non-tribal laws, or to enforce our
rights at all. Many tribal laws permit redress to a tribal
adjudicatory body to resolve disputes; however, such redress is
largely untested in our experience. We may be precluded from
enforcing our rights against a tribal body under the legal
doctrine of sovereign immunity. A change in tribal laws and
regulations or our inability to obtain required licenses or
licenses to operate on tribal lands or enforce our contract
rights under tribal law could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
Many of the financial services that we provide
are subject to extensive rules and regulations, which may harm
our business.
Our Central Credit gaming patron credit bureau
services are subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 and similar state
laws. Our QuikCredit service and TeleChecks and our
collection practices in connection with dishonored checks with
respect to which TeleCheck or Central Credit has issued
authorizations pursuant to TeleChecks or Central
Credits check warranty service, are subject to the Fair
Debt Collections Practices Act and applicable state laws
relating to debt collection. All of our cash access services and
patron marketing services are subject to the privacy provisions
of state and federal law, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Our POS debit card transactions and ATM withdrawal
services are subject to the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.
Our ATM services are subject to the applicable state
banking regulations in each jurisdiction in which we operate
ATMs. Our ATM services may also be subject to local
regulations relating to the imposition of daily limits on the
amounts that may be withdrawn from ATM machines, the
location of ATM machines and our ability to surcharge
cardholders who use our ATM machines. The cash access
22
In the event that any regulatory authority
determines that the manner in which we provide cash access
services, patron marketing services or gaming patron credit
bureau services is not in compliance with existing rules and
regulations, or the regulatory authorities adopt new rules or
regulations that prohibit or restrict the manner in which we
provide cash access services, patron marketing services or
gaming patron credit bureau services, we may be forced to modify
the manner in which we operate, or stop processing certain types
of cash access transactions or providing patron marketing
services or gaming patron credit bureau services altogether. We
may also be required to pay substantial penalties and fines in
we fail to comply with applicable rules and regulations. For
example, if we fail to file CTRs or SARs on a timely basis or if
we are found to be noncompliant in any way with either the Bank
Secrecy Act and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, we could be
subject to substantial civil and criminal penalties. In
addition, our failure to comply with applicable rules and
regulations could subject us to private litigation. Any such
actions could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and operating results.
Following the events of September 11, 2001,
the United States and certain other governments have imposed and
are considering a variety of new regulations focused on the
detection and prevention of money laundering and money
transmitting to or from terrorists and other criminals.
Compliance with these new regulations may impact our business
operations or increase our costs.
If consumer privacy laws change, or if we are
required to change our business practices, the value of our
patron marketing services may be hampered.
Our patron marketing services depend on our
ability to collect and use certain non-public personal
information relating to patrons who use our products and
services and the transactions they consummate using our
services. We are required by applicable privacy legislation to
safeguard and protect the privacy of such information, to make
certain disclosures to patrons regarding our privacy and
information sharing policies and, in some cases, to provide
patrons an opportunity to opt out of the use of
their information for certain purposes. We cannot assure you
that regulators reviewing our policies and practices would not
require us to modify our practices in a material or immaterial
manner or impose fines or other penalties if they believe that
our policies and practices do not meet the necessary standard.
To the extent that our patron marketing services have in the
past failed or now or in the future fail to comply with
applicable law, our privacy policies or the notices that we
provide to patrons, we may become subject to actions by a
regulatory authority or patrons which cause us to pay monetary
penalties or require us to modify the manner in which we provide
patron marketing services. To the extent that patrons exercise
their right to opt out, our ability to leverage
existing and future databases of information would be curtailed.
Consumer and data privacy laws are evolving, and to the extent
that such laws are broadened in their application or narrow the
types of information that may be collected or used for marketing
or certain other purposes or require patrons to
opt-in to the use of their information for certain
purposes, the value of our patron marketing services may be
hampered.
23
Responsible gaming pressures could result in a
material adverse effect on our business and operating
results.
Responsible gaming pressures can have a similar
effect on us as governmental gaming regulation. Our ability to
expand our business and introduce new products and services,
depend in part on the support of, or lack of opposition from,
social responsibility organizations that are dedicated to
addressing problem gaming. If we are unable to garner the
support of responsible gaming organizations or if we face
substantial opposition from responsible gaming organizations, we
may face additional difficulties in sustaining our existing
customer relationships, establishing new customer relationships,
or obtaining required regulatory approvals for new products or
services, each of which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
Lawsuits could be filed against gaming
establishments and other gaming related product and service
providers on behalf of problem gamblers. We may be named in such
litigation because we provide patrons the ability to access
their cash in gaming establishments. This litigation could
develop as individual complaints or as mass tort or class action
claims. We would vigorously defend ourselves in any such
litigation, and this defense could result in substantial expense
to us and distraction of our management. The outcome of any such
litigation would be substantially uncertain, and it is possible
that our business, financial condition and operating results
could be materially affected by an unfavorable outcome against
either us or our gaming establishment customers.
Risk Related to Investing in Our
Stock
Our stock price will fluctuate after this
offering which could result in the loss of all or a significant
part of your investment.
The initial public offering price for the shares
of our common stock has been determined by negotiations between
us, the selling stockholders and the underwriters and may not be
indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market
following this offering. Once trading in our common stock
commences, the market price for our common stock will vary from
the initial public offering price. You may be unable to resell
your shares at or above the offering price and this could result
in substantial losses. The market price of our common stock may
fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including those described above
under Risks Related to Our Business,
Risks Related to the Industry and the
following:
24
our failure to maintain our current customers,
including because of consolidation in the gaming industry;
increases in commissions paid to gaming
establishments as a result of competition;
increases in interchange rates or processing or
other fees paid by us or decreases in reverse interchange rates;
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our or our
competitors revenue, operating results or growth rate;
our inability to adequately protect or enforce
our intellectual property rights;
any adverse results in litigation initiated by us
or by other against us;
our inability to make payments on our outstanding
indebtedness as they become do or our inability to undertake
actions that might otherwise benefit us based on the financial
and other restrictive covenants contained in our senior secured
credit facilities and the indenture for our senior subordinated
notes;
the loss of a significant supplier or strategic
partner, or the failure of a significant supplier or strategic
partner to provide the goods or services that we rely on them
for;
In addition, the stock market in general has
experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been
unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
particular businesses. These broad market and industry factors
may materially reduce the market price of our common stock,
regardless of our operating performance.
No market currently exists for our common
stock and we cannot assure you that an active trading market
will develop for our common stock.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public
market for our common stock. We cannot assure you that an active
trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained
following this offering. The lack of an active market may impair
your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell
them or at a price that you consider reasonable. An inactive
market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling
shares and may impair our ability to acquire other businesses,
products or technologies by using our shares as consideration.
Future sales of our common stock may cause the
market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if
our business is doing well.
The market price of our common stock could
decline as a result of sales of additional shares of our common
stock by us or our stockholders after this offering, or the
perception that these sales could occur. Upon the completion of
this offering, there will
be shares
of our common stock outstanding.
The shares
of common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradeable
without restriction or further registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, so long as held
by persons that are not affiliated with us.
Each of our officers, directors and stockholders
have entered into the lock-up agreements described in
Underwriting. Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., in their sole discretion, may
release all or some portion of the shares subject to the lock-up
agreements without notice at any time or from time to time after
the date of this prospectus, prior to the expiration of the
180 day minimum period provided for in the lock-ups.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc. have no pre-established conditions to waiving the terms of
the lock-up agreements, and any decision them it to waive those
conditions would depend on a number of factors, which may include
25
our inability to introduce successful, new
products and services in a timely manner or the introduction of
new products or services by our competitors that reduce the
demand for our products and services;
our failure to successfully enter new markets or
the failure or new markets to develop in the time and manner
that we anticipate;
announcements by our competitors of significant
new contracts or contract renewals or of new products or
services;
changes in general economic conditions, financial
markets, the gaming industry or the payments processing industry;
the trading volume of our common stock;
sales of common stock or other actions by our
current officers, directors and stockholders;
acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint
ventures involving us or our competitors;
future sales of our common stock or other
securities;
the failure of securities analysts to cover our
common stock after this offering or changes in financial
estimates or recommendations by analysts;
additions or departures of key personnel; and
terrorist acts.
Following completion of this offering, certain of
our stockholders,
holding shares
of our common stock, will have the right to require us to
register those shares of our common stock. If we propose to
register any of our securities under the Securities Act of 1933
either for our own account or for the accounts of other
stockholders after this offering, subject to certain conditions
and limitations, the holders of registration rights will be
entitled to include their shares of common stock in the
registered offering. In addition, holders of registration rights
may require us on not more than six occasions at any time
beginning approximately six months from the effective date of
this offering, to file a registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 with respect to their shares of common
stock. Further, the holders of registration rights may require
us to register their shares on Form S-3 if and when we
become eligible to use this form.
In the future, we will also issue additional
shares or options to purchase additional shares to our
employees, directors and consultants, in connection with
corporate alliances or acquisitions, and in follow-on offerings
to raise additional capital. Based on all of these factors,
sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the public market could occur at any time. These sales could
reduce the market price of our common stock. In addition, future
sales of our common stock by our stockholders could make it more
difficult for us to sell additional shares of our common stock
or other securities in the future.
M&C International and entities affiliated
with Summit Partners possess significant voting power and may
take actions that are not be in the best interests of our other
stockholders.
Upon completion of this offering M&C
International and entities affiliated with Summit Partners will
own or control shares representing, in the
aggregate, %
of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Accordingly,
M&C International and these entities affiliated with
Summit Partners will exert substantial influence over all
matters requiring approval of our stockholders, including the
election and removal of directors and the approval of mergers or
other business combinations. M&C Internationals
and these entities ownership may have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change of control of our company or
discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares,
which could prevent stockholders from receiving a premium for
their shares. These actions may be taken even if other
stockholders oppose them and even if they are not in the
interests of other stockholders.
Conflicts of interest may arise because
certain of our directors are also principals or partners of our
controlling stockholders.
Two of our directors are principals of
M&C International and two of our other directors are
partners and members of various entities affiliated with Summit
Partners. We depend on certain licenses and services provided by
entities affiliated with M&C International to provide
many of the financial services that we offer to patrons as
discussed in Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions. Summit Partners and its affiliates may
invest in entities that directly or indirectly compete with us
or companies in which they currently invest may begin competing
with us. As a result of these relationships, when conflicts
between the interests of M&C International or Summit
Partners, on the one hand, and the interests of our other
stockholders, on the other hand, arise, these directors may not
be disinterested.
26
Some provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent transactions that
many stockholders may favor.
Some provisions of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
that will become effective upon the completion of this offering
may have the effect of delaying, discouraging, or preventing a
merger or acquisition that our stockholders may consider
favorable or a change in our management or our board of
directors. These provisions:
These provisions may have the effect of
entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the
opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirors at a
premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability to
obtain a premium could reduce the price of our common stock.
Being a public company may strain our
resources, divert managements attention and affect our
ability to attract and retain qualified directors.
As a public company, we will be subject to the
reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of the
New York Stock Exchange. Our operating subsidiary, Global Cash
Access, Inc., has been subject to the Exchange Act and certain
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act since 2004 as a result of
the registration of its senior subordinated notes. The
requirements of these
27
divide our board of directors into three separate
classes serving staggered three-year terms, which will have the
effect of requiring at least two annual stockholder meetings
instead of one, to replace a majority of our directors, which
could have the effect of delaying of preventing a change in our
control or management;
provide that special meetings of stockholders can
only be called by our board of directors, chairman of the board
or chief executive officer. In addition, the business permitted
to be conducted at any special meeting of stockholders is
limited to the business specified in the notice of such meeting
to the stockholders;
provide for an advance notice procedure with
regard to business to be brought before a meeting of
stockholders which may delay or preclude stockholders from
bringing matters before a meeting of stockholders or from making
nominations for directors at a meeting of stockholders, which
could delay or deter takeover attempts or changes in management;
eliminate the right of stockholders to act by
written consent so that all stockholder actions must be effected
at a duly called meeting;
provide that directors may only be removed for
cause with the approval of stockholders holding a majority of
our outstanding voting stock;
provide that vacancies on our board of directors
may be filled by a majority of directors in office, although
less than a quorum and that our board of directors may fix the
number of directors by resolution;
allow our board of directors to issue shares of
preferred stock with rights senior to those of the common stock
and that otherwise could adversely affect the rights and powers,
including voting rights and the right to approve or not to
approve an acquisition or other change in control, of the
holders of common stock, without any further vote or action by
the stockholders; and
not provide for cumulative voting for our
directors, which may make it more difficult for stockholders
owning less than a majority of our stock to elect any directors
to our board of directors. In addition, we are also subject to
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
provides, subject to enumerated exceptions, that if a person
acquires 15% or more of our voting stock, the person is an
interested stockholder and may not engage in
business combinations with us for a period of three
years from the time the person acquired 15% or more of our
voting stock.
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and
regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, we will also be
required to establish an independent board of directors and an
independent audit committee, which we currently have not
established. Failure to establish either an independent board of
directors or an independent audit committee within the timelines
prescribed by the New York Stock Exchange may result in the
delisting of our common stock, which may result in there being
no public market for shares of our common stock. We also expect
these rules and regulations will make it more difficult and more
expensive for us to maintain director and officer liability
insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or
incur substantially higher costs to maintain coverage. If we are
unable to maintain adequate director and officer insurance, our
ability to recruit and retain qualified officers and directors,
especially those directors who may be deemed independent for
purposes of the rules and regulations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
and the New York Stock Exchange, will be significantly curtailed.
You will suffer immediate and substantial
dilution.
The assumed initial public offering price of our
common stock is substantially higher than the net tangible book
value per share of outstanding common stock immediately after
this offering. You will incur immediate and substantial dilution
of
$ per
share in the net tangible book value of our common stock as of
December 31, 2004 at an assumed initial public offering
price of
$ per
share. You will incur additional dilution if the holders of
options to purchase shares of common stock, whether currently
outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options
following this offering.
We do not intend to pay dividends in the
future.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends
on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all
available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation
and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. See Dividend
Policy. In addition, the terms of our current senior
secured credit facilities limit our ability to pay dividends,
and our future debt or credit facilities may preclude us from
paying any dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any,
of our common stock will be your sole source of potential gain
for the foreseeable future.
28
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking
statements that are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts and projections about the industry in which we
operate, managements beliefs and assumptions made by
management. Such statements include, in particular, statements
about our plans, strategies and prospects under the headings
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business. Words such as expect,
anticipate, intend, plan,
believe, seek, estimate,
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward looking statements. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially
from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking
statements. Except as required under the federal securities laws
and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we do not have any intention or obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statements after we distribute this
prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. You should read carefully the factors
described in the section entitled Risk Factors of
this prospectus, among other things, for a description of
certain risks that could cause actual results to differ from
these forward-looking statements.
29
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of
approximately
$ from
this offering of our common stock, based on the initial public
offering price of
$ per
share and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
common stock by the selling stockholders.
We intend to use approximately $89.4 million
of the net proceeds of the common stock offered by us to redeem
$82.3 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4%
senior subordinated notes due 2012 issued by Global Cash Access,
Inc. and pay the corresponding $7.1 million premium
associated with that redemption. We intend to use
$10.0 million of the net proceeds to acquire the patent
covering our 3-in-1 rollover functionality. The
remaining net proceeds that we receive will be used for general
corporate purposes, including working capital. In addition to
these uses of the net proceeds of this offering, the other
purposes of this offering are to enhance our ability to acquire
other businesses, products or technologies, to create a public
market for our common stock, to facilitate our future access to
public equity markets, to provide liquidity for our existing
stockholders, to improve the effectiveness of our stock option
plans in attracting and retaining key employees, to increase the
visibility of our company in a marketplace in which several of
our competitors are publicly-held companies, and to provide our
customers greater assurances as to our long-term viability,
which is enhanced by being subject to the financial reporting
and disclosure obligations of a public company. We may use a
portion of the net proceeds to acquire businesses that are
complementary to our own, but we currently have no commitments,
agreements nor are we in any negotiations relating to any of
these types of transactions. The amounts and timing of our
actual expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including
the status of our product development efforts, sales and
marketing activities, technological advances, amount of cash
generated or used by our operations and competition. We may find
it necessary or advisable to use the net proceeds for other
purposes, and we will have broad discretion in the application
of the balance of the net proceeds. Pending the uses described
above, we intend to invest the net proceeds in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities.
30
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends
on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any dividends
on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently
intend to retain all our earnings to finance the growth and
development of our business. Any future change in our dividend
policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend on contractual restrictions, our results of
operations, earnings, capital requirements and other factors
considered relevant by our board of directors. In addition, our
senior secured credit facilities and the indenture governing our
senior subordinated notes limit the ability of Global Cash
Access, Inc. to declare and pay cash dividends. Because we
conduct our business entirely through Global Cash Access, Inc.
and its subsidiaries, as a practical matter these restrictions
similarly limit our ability to pay dividends on our common
stock. Prior to converting into a corporation, we made
distributions to our members when we conducted our operations as
a limited liability company that was taxed as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes.
DILUTION
Your interest in our common stock will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the initial public
offering price per share of our common stock in this offering
and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock
after this offering.
Net tangible book value of our common stock
immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, was
$ million,
or
$ per
share. We determined pro forma net tangible book value per share
before this offering by dividing the net tangible book value
(total book value of tangible assets less total liabilities) by
71,500,000, or the number of shares of common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the consummation of the offering. After
giving effect to the sale of our common stock in the offering at
$ per
share, and after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in
connection with the offering, our adjusted pro forma net
tangible book value, as of December 31, 2004, would have
been
$ million,
or
$ per
share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma net
tangible book value per share of
$ to
existing stockholders and dilution in pro forma net tangible
book value per share of
$ to
new stockholders who receive shares in the offering. The
following table illustrates this per share dilution:
Initial public offering
price per share
|
$ | |||
Net tangible book value
per share as of December 31, 2004
|
||||
Increase in net tangible
book value per share attributable to the offering
|
||||
Pro forma net tangible
book value per share after giving effect to the offering
|
||||
Dilution per share to new
holders of common stock
|
The discussion and table above exclude the following:
| all of the approximately shares of our common stock that will underlie outstanding stock options granted to our employees and consultants under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan upon the consummation of this offering; and | |
| all of the approximately shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to equity-based awards to be granted to our employees under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in connection with future grants of equity-based awards. |
To the extent any of these equity-based compensation awards become exercisable at a price below the initial public offering price, there will be further dilution to new investors.
31
CAPITALIZATION
Our capitalization as of December 31, 2004
is set forth in the following table;
on an actual basis, giving effect to a 13-for-1
stock split completed on January 7, 2005;
on a pro forma basis to reflect the conversion of
all outstanding preferred stock into shares of our common stock
and the adoption of an amended and restated certificate of
incorporation immediately prior to this offering; and
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect
to the receipt of the estimated net proceeds to us from this
offering, at the initial public offering price of
$ per
share and the redemption of $82.3 million in aggregate
principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due
2012.
December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Pro Forma as | |||||||||||||||
Actual | Pro Forma | Adjusted | |||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share) | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, including
current portion:
|
|||||||||||||||
Senior secured credit
facilities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Term loan
|
243,250 | 243,250 | 243,250 | ||||||||||||
Senior subordinated notes
|
235,000 | 235,000 | 152,750 | ||||||||||||
Total long-term debt,
including current portion:
|
478,250 | 478,250 | 396,000 | ||||||||||||
Stockholders
(deficiency) equity:
|
|||||||||||||||
Convertible preferred
stock, 52,325 shares authorized,
actual; shares
authorized, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted;
39,325 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
|
40 | | | ||||||||||||
Common stock,
110,500 shares authorized,
actual; shares
authorized, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted;
32,175 shares issued and outstanding, actual;
71,500 shares issued and outstanding, pro
forma; shares issued
and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
32 | 72 | |||||||||||||
Additional paid in capital
|
| ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
1,950 | 1,950 | 1,950 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(58,801 | ) | (58,801 | ) | (58,801 | ) | |||||||||
Total stockholders
(deficiency) equity
|
(56,779 | ) | (56,779 | ) | |||||||||||
Total capitalization
|
$ | 421,471 | $ | 421,471 | $ | ||||||||||
32
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial
data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003
and 2004 have been derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements. Other than insubstantial assets that are
immaterial in amount and nature, the sole asset of Global Cash
Access Holdings, Inc. is the capital stock of Global Cash
Access, Inc. The formation of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc.
and the transfer of ownership of Global Cash Access, Inc. to
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. were treated as a
reorganization of entities under common control. Accordingly,
the income and expense of Global Cash Access, Inc. for all
periods are included in the accompanying financial statements.
Our selected consolidated financial data may not be indicative
of our future financial condition or results of operations. The
pro forma income tax amounts below are unaudited and have been
calculated to reflect the taxes that would have been reported
had we been subject to federal and state income taxes as a
corporation during the periods presented.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 2001(1) | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement
Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 170,792 | $ | 174,787 | $ | 182,754 | $ | 186,547 | $ | 209,962 | ||||||||||||
ATM
|
33,634 | 110,074 | 119,424 | 132,341 | 158,433 | |||||||||||||||||
Check services
|
26,997 | 26,614 | 29,412 | 26,326 | 23,768 | |||||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
|
10,216 | 10,152 | 10,303 | 10,500 | 10,840 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
241,639 | 321,627 | 341,893 | 355,714 | 403,003 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
147,900 | 203,274 | 216,658 | 232,463 | 270,112 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
93,739 | 118,353 | 125,235 | 123,251 | 132,891 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
(38,250 | ) | (54,270 | ) | (57,649 | ) | (45,430 | ) | (45,322 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(11,084 | ) | (16,838 | ) | (11,820 | ) | (14,061 | ) | (13,548 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating income
|
44,405 | 47,245 | 55,766 | 63,760 | 74,021 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net(2)
|
(1,177 | ) | (5,082 | ) | (4,933 | ) | (5,450 | ) | (32,025 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income before income tax
(provision) benefit and minority ownership loss
|
43,228 | 42,163 | 50,833 | 58,310 | 41,996 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax
(provision) benefit
|
(637 | ) | (442 | ) | (1,451 | ) | (321 | ) | 212,346 | |||||||||||||
Income before minority
ownership loss
|
42,591 | 41,721 | 49,382 | 57,989 | 254,342 | |||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss(3)
|
| 420 | 1,040 | 400 | 213 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 42,591 | $ | 42,141 | $ | 50,422 | $ | 58,389 | $ | 254,555 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.57 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 7.91 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 3.52 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
71,500 | 71,500 | 71,500 | 71,500 | 72,222 |
33
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 2001(1) | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pro forma computation
related to conversion to corporation for tax purposes (unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision
for income taxes and minority ownership loss
historical
|
$ | 43,228 | $ | 42,163 | $ | 50,833 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 41,996 | |||||||||||
Income tax
provision historical, exclusive of one-time tax
benefit(4)
|
(637 | ) | (442 | ) | (1,451 | ) | (321 | ) | (10,519 | ) | |||||||||||
Pro forma income tax
provision unaudited(5)
|
(17,951 | ) | (16,154 | ) | (16,940 | ) | (20,741 | ) | (4,600 | ) | |||||||||||
Minority ownership
loss historical
|
| 420 | 1,040 | 400 | 213 | ||||||||||||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 24,640 | $ | 25,987 | $ | 33,482 | $ | 37,648 | $ | 27,090 | |||||||||||
Pro forma earnings per
share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 0.84 | |||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.38 | |||||||||||
Other Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities(6)
|
$ | 14,348 | $ | 6,295 | $ | 9,750 | $ | 7,047 | $ | 4,861 |
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | Pro Forma | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(at end of period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 27,448 | $ | 37,500 | $ | 57,584 | $ | 23,423 | $ | 49,577 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
291,249 | 276,207 | 287,039 | 243,627 | 496,625 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings
|
| | | | 478,250 | 396,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders
deficiency and members capital
|
220,448 | 205,202 | 202,271 | 199,247 | (56,779 | ) |
(1) | The increase in revenues and operating expenses during fiscal 2001, as compared to fiscal 2000, is primarily attributable to our acquisitions of the gaming ATM portfolios of Bank of America, N.A. and InnoVentry Corporation. |
(2) | Interest expense, net, includes interest income. |
(3) | Minority ownership loss represents the portion of the loss from operations of QuikPlay, LLC that is attributable to the 40% ownership interest in QuikPlay, LLC that is not owned by us. |
(4) | In connection with our conversion to a taxable corporate entity for United States income tax purposes, we recognized a net tax asset created by a step up in the tax basis of our net assets due to the Recapitalization and the Private Equity Restructuring. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation Overview. For purposes of determining the pro forma net income, the recognition of this one-time step up in basis has been excluded from our pro forma tax computation. |
(5) | The pro forma unaudited income tax adjustments represent the tax effects that would have been reported had the Company been subject to United States federal and state income taxes as a corporation. Pro forma expenses are based upon the statutory income tax rates and adjustments to |
34
The following table presents the computation of
the pro forma income tax expense for all the periods presented
(in thousands):
income for estimated permanent differences
occurring during the period. Actual rates and expenses could
have differed had the Company been subject to United States
federal and state income taxes for all periods presented.
Therefore, the unaudited pro forma amounts are for informational
purposes only and are intended to be indicative of the results
of operations had the Company been subject to United States
federal and state income taxes for all periods presented.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Income before income
taxes, as reported
|
$ | 43,228 | $ | 42,163 | $ | 50,833 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 41,996 | ||||||||||
Effective pro forma income
tax rate
|
43.00 | % | 39.36 | % | 36.18 | % | 36.12 | % | 36.00 | % | ||||||||||
Pro forma income tax
expense
|
$ | 18,588 | $ | 16,596 | $ | 18,391 | $ | 21,062 | $ | 15,119 | ||||||||||
(6) | In 2004, net cash used in investing activities includes $1.0 million of non-compete payments to two former executives. |
(7) | The pro forma balance sheet data gives effect to the sale of our shares of common stock in this offering, at an assumed public offering price of $ per share, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses and the redemption of $82.3 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due in 2012. See Capitalization. |
35
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
The following Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related
notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion
contains forward-looking statements based upon current
expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, as set forth
under Forward-Looking Statements. Our actual results
and the timing of events could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of
several factors, including those set forth in the following
discussion and under Risk Factors,
Business and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are the leading provider of cash access
products and related services to the gaming industry in the
United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the Caribbean. Our
products and services provide gaming establishment patrons
access to cash through a variety of methods, including ATM cash
withdrawals, credit card cash advances, point-of-sale, or POS,
debit card transactions, check verification and warranty
services and money transfers. In addition, we also provide
products and services that improve credit decision-making,
automate cashier operations and enhance patron marketing
activities for gaming establishments. In 2004, we processed over
66 million transactions, disbursing approximately
$13.7 billion in cash to gaming patrons. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, we generated $403.0 million in
revenues, $74.0 million in operating income and
$254.6 million in net income. Our net income in the year
ended December 31, 2004 benefited from a one-time
realization of an estimated deferred tax asset that was created
by the Recapitalization and the Private Equity Restructuring
described below. Excluding the effects of the initial
realization and adjustments of this estimated deferred tax
asset, our net income for the year ended December 31, 2004
was $27.1 million.
We began our operations as a joint venture
limited liability company among M&C International and
entities affiliated with Bank of America and First Data
Corporation in July 1998. In September 2000, Bank of America
Corporation sold its entire ownership interest in us to M&C
International and First Data Corporation. In March 2004, Global
Cash Access, Inc. issued $235 million in aggregate
principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012
and borrowed $260 million under senior secured credit
facilities. Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. was formed to hold
all of the outstanding capital stock of Global Cash Access, Inc.
and to guarantee the obligations under the senior secured credit
facilities. A substantial portion of the proceeds of these
senior subordinated notes and senior secured credit facilities
were used to redeem all of First Data Corporations
interest in us and a portion of M&C Internationals
interest in us through a recapitalization (the
Recapitalization), in which Bank of America
Corporation acquired an ownership interest in us. In May 2004,
we completed a private equity restructuring (the Private
Equity Restructuring) in which M&C International sold
a portion of its ownership interest in us to a number of private
equity investors, including entities affiliated with Summit
Partners and we converted from a limited liability company to a
Delaware corporation.
Other than insubstantial assets that are
immaterial in amount and nature, the sole asset of Global Cash
Access Holdings, Inc. is the capital stock of Global Cash
Access, Inc. The consolidated financial data set forth and
discussed below reflects our financial condition as if Global
Cash Access, Inc. had been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Global
Cash Access Holdings, Inc. during each of periods and at the
dates presented.
In connection with our conversion from a limited
liability company to a corporation for United States federal
income tax purposes, we recognized deferred tax assets and
liabilities from the expected tax consequences of temporary
differences between the book basis and tax basis of our assets
and liabilities at the date of conversion into a taxable entity.
Prior to our conversion to a corporation, we operated our
business through a limited liability company that was treated as
a pass through entity for United States federal
income tax purposes, so that our owners were responsible for the
taxes on our
36
Principal Sources of Revenues and
Expenses
We derive our revenues as follows:
Cash Advance. Cash
advance revenues are comprised of transaction fees assessed to
gaming patrons in connection with credit card cash advances and
POS debit card transactions at the time the transactions are
authorized. Such fees are based on a combination of a fixed
amount plus a percentage of the face amount of the credit card
cash advance or POS debit card transaction amount.
ATM. ATM revenues
are comprised of transaction fees in the form of cardholder
surcharges assessed to gaming patrons in connection with ATM
cash withdrawals at the time the transactions are authorized and
reverse interchange fees paid to us by the patrons issuing
banks. Cardholder surcharges are recognized as revenue when a
transaction is initiated and reverse interchange is recognized
as revenue on a monthly basis based on the total transactions
occurring during the month. The cardholder surcharges assessed
to gaming patrons in connection with ATM cash withdrawals are
currently a fixed dollar amount and not a percentage of the
transaction amount.
Check Services.
Check services revenues are principally comprised of check
warranty revenues and are generally based upon a percentage of
the face amount of checks warranted. These fees are paid to us
by gaming establishments. In some cases, gaming establishments
pass on the fees to patrons.
Central Credit and Other
Revenues. Central Credit revenues are
based upon either a flat monthly unlimited usage fee or a
variable fee structure driven by the volume of patron credit
histories generated, while other revenues are primarily based on
a fee for specific service performed.
Our principal costs and expenses include:
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues are costs and expenses directly related to the
generation of revenue. For cash advance, ATM and, to a lesser
extent, check services, we pay a commission to the gaming
establishment at which the transaction occurs. Commissions are
the largest component of cost of revenues. We pay credit card
associations and POS debit networks interchange fees for
services they provide in routing transactions through their
networks. In addition, we pay fees to participate in various ATM
networks. The amounts of these interchange fees are determined
by the card associations and networks in their sole discretion,
and are subject to increase in their discretion from time to
time. Many of our cash advance contracts enable us to pass
through to our gaming establishment customers, who may in turn
pass through to patrons, the amount of any increase in
interchange or processing fees. We pay connectivity and
processing fees to our network services providers. We incur
warranty expense when checks that we have warranted through our
Central Credit check warranty service or that TeleCheck has
warranted through its check warranty service are dishonored upon
presentment for payment. Our contract with TeleCheck limits our
warranty expense for checks warranted by TeleCheck to a maximum
percentage of the total face amount of dishonored checks. Other
cost of revenues consists primarily of costs related to
maintaining our Central Credit database and our patron
transaction database.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits,
armored carrier expenses, telecommunications expenses, the cost
of repair and maintenance on our cash access devices and gain
(loss) on sale or disposal of assets.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense includes interest incurred on our senior
secured credit facilities and our senior subordinated notes, and
the amortization of deferred financing costs. Interest expense
also includes the cash usage fees associated with the cash used
in our ATM machines.
37
Interest Income. We
generate interest income on the amount of cash in our bank
accounts and on cash that is deposited into accounts to settle
our credit card cash advance and POS debit card transactions.
Income Tax. Our
earnings are subject to taxation under the tax laws of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. Prior to our conversion to a
Delaware corporation, our domestic earnings were not subject to
corporate taxation because we were organized as a Delaware
limited liability company. Subsequent to our conversion to a
Delaware corporation, our domestic earnings have been subject to
corporate taxation.
Minority Interest.
We operate a cashless gaming joint venture with IGT through
QuikPlay, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or
QuikPlay, of which we own 60% of the equity interests and of
which IGT owns 40% of the equity interests. The joint venture
was formed to develop and market a cash access product that
allows patrons to utilize a debit card to access cash directly
at gaming machines. The minority interest shown on the
consolidated financial statements reflects the addition to our
net income of the 40% of QuikPlay, LLCs losses that are
attributable to IGT.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the condensed
consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (in thousands
except per share):
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared
to Year Ended December 31, 2003
December 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 209,962 | 52.1 | % | $ | 186,547 | 52.4 | % | ||||||||||
ATM
|
158,433 | 39.3 | 132,341 | 37.2 | ||||||||||||||
Check services
|
23,768 | 5.9 | 26,326 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
revenues
|
10,840 | 2.7 | 10,500 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
403,003 | 100.0 | 355,714 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
270,112 | 67.0 | 232,463 | 65.4 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
132,891 | 33.0 | 123,251 | 34.6 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
(45,322 | ) | (11.2 | ) | (45,430 | ) | (12.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(13,548 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (14,061 | ) | (4.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income
|
74,021 | 18.4 | 63,760 | 17.9 | ||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense),
net
|
(32,025 | ) | (7.9 | ) | (5,450 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income tax
benefit (provision) and minority ownership loss
|
41,996 | 10.4 | 58,310 | 16.4 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit
(provision)
|
212,346 | 52.7 | (321 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income before minority
ownership loss
|
254,342 | 63.1 | 57,989 | 16.3 | ||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
213 | 0.1 | 400 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 254,555 | 63.2 | % | $ | 58,389 | 16.4 | % | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per common
share
|
$ | 7.91 | $ | 1.81 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per
common share
|
$ | 3.52 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income tax
benefit (provision) and minority ownership loss
|
$ | 41,996 | 10.4 | % | $ | 58,310 | 16.4 | % | ||||||||||
Pro forma provision for
income taxes
|
(15,119 | ) | (3.8 | ) | (21,062 | ) | (5.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
213 | 0.1 | 400 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 27,090 | 6.7 | % | $ | 37,648 | 10.6 | % | ||||||||||
38
Total revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were $403.0 million, an increase of
$47.3 million, or 13.3%, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily due to the
reasons described below.
Cash Advance. Cash
advance revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
$210.0 million, an increase of $23.4 million, or
12.6%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.
This increase was primarily due to a 51.2% increase in POS debit
card transaction revenue and a 9.4% increase in credit card cash
advance revenue. We anticipate that POS debit card transaction
revenue will continue to grow more rapidly than credit card cash
advance revenue. The total amount of cash disbursed increased
12.0% from $3.8 billion to $4.2 billion and the number
of transactions completed increased 8.6% from 8.1 million
to 8.8 million. Revenue per cash advance transaction
increased 3.6%, from $22.93 to $23.76.
ATM. ATM revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2004 was $158.4 million,
an increase of $26.1 million, or 19.7%, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily
attributable to a 16.4% increase in the number of transactions
from 45.7 million to 53.2 million. Revenue per ATM
transaction increased 2.9% from $2.90 to $2.98. There was a
21.9% increase in the total amount of cash disbursed from
$6.9 billion to $8.4 billion.
Check Services.
Check services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004
was $23.8 million, a decrease of $2.6 million, or
9.7%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. The
face amount of checks warranted declined 8.8% from
$1.2 billion to $1.1 billion. The number of checks
warranted decreased 11.9% from 5.5 million to
4.8 million, while the average face amount per check
warranted increased from $216.44 to $223.87. Check warranty
revenue as a percent of face amount warranted was 2.08% in 2004
as compared to 2.14% for the year ended December 31, 2003,
and revenue per check warranty transaction increased 0.7% from
$4.63 to $4.66. We expect check services revenue, including
check warranty revenue, to continue to decline as patrons
increasingly use ATMs, POS debit cards and credit cards to
access funds.
Central Credit and
Other. Central Credit and other
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004, were
$10.8 million, an increase of $0.3 million, or 3.2%,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. The
increase was primarily a result of our prior year price
increases being in effect for the entire year and increases in
our marketing revenue.
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues increased 16.2% from $232.5 million to
$270.1 million. The largest component of cost of revenues
is commissions, and commissions increased 17.2% in 2004 as
contracts were signed or renewed at higher commission rates than
experienced in 2003. The second-largest component of cost of
revenues is interchange; interchange expenses increased 16.0%.
Warranty expenses increased 3.3% even as check service revenue
declined. We expect that commissions and interchange will
continue to increase, and we expect that in 2005 cost of
revenues will increase at a rate faster than revenues.
Primarily as a result of the factors described
above, gross profit increased 7.8%, from $123.3 million to
$132.9 million. We expect that, even though cost of
revenues will grow more rapidly than revenues, gross profit will
increase in 2005.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004
were $45.3 million, a decrease of $0.1 million, or
0.2%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.
Operating expenses in 2004 include several expenses aggregating
$6.1 million that we consider to be unusual in nature.
These expenses consist of $2.3 million in settlement and
related expenses of a lawsuit, $1.5 million in payment of
disputed Canadian taxes, $1.8 million in expenses related
to the Private Equity Restructuring, and $0.5 million of
other unusual expenses. Excluding these unusual expenses,
operating expenses in 2004 would have been $39.2 million, a
reduction of $6.2 million, or
39
Total Revenues
Costs and Expenses
Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation expense for
the year ended December 31, 2004 was $7.9 million, an
increase of $0.3 million, or 4.3%, as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily due to
the procurement of additional ATM equipment. Amortization
expense, which relates principally to computer software and
customer contracts, decreased $0.8 million from
$6.5 million to $5.7 million, as a result of certain
capitalized software projects becoming fully amortized.
Primarily as a result of the factors described
above, operating income for the year ended December 31,
2004 was $74.0 million, an increase of $10.3 million,
or 16.1%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.
Interest Income (Expense),
Net. Interest income was
$1.3 million in 2004, essentially unchanged from
$1.3 million in 2003. Interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004, was $33.3 million, an increase of
$26.6 million, or 393.1%, as compared to December 31,
2003. The increase is primarily due to the borrowings incurred
in March 2004 in connection with the Recapitalization. Interest
expense on borrowings (including amortization of deferred
financing costs) was $27.6 million in 2004 as compared to
$0 in 2003. The cash usage fee for cash used in our ATMs is
included in interest expense. ATM cash usage fees were
$5.7 million in 2004 as compared to $6.8 million in
2003, a reduction of $1.0 million or 15.5%. The reduction
resulted primarily from a more favorable supply agreement for
ATM cash that was entered into in June 2004.
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, income
before income tax benefit (provision) and minority
ownership loss was $42.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, a decrease of $16.3 million, or
28.0%, as compared to the prior year.
Income Tax. For all
of 2003, we were a limited liability company. As a consequence,
all of our United States federal and state tax obligations were
passed through to our members and we recorded no provision for
such taxes. Income tax expense of $0.3 million in 2003 was
entirely attributable to income taxes in non-United States
jurisdictions. In 2004, we were a limited liability company up
until May 14, 2004, at which point we converted to a
Delaware corporation and elected to be taxed at the corporate
level. United States income tax obligations for the period prior
to May 14, 2004, were passed through to our members. Income
tax benefit of $212.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, represents foreign income tax expense of
$1.7 million, United States state and federal income tax
expense of $8.8 million, and the estimated realization of a
net deferred tax asset created by the Recapitalization and the
Private Equity Restructuring of $222.9 million.
The amount of the net deferred tax asset will
depend upon the ultimate gain reported by the sellers in both
the Recapitalization and the Private Equity Restructuring. The
amount included as income in 2004 is based on current estimates
of those gains. To the extent that we receive revised
information about the gain realized by the sellers, we will be
obligated to recompute the deferred tax asset, and changes in
the balance of the deferred tax asset will be recognized as
income tax benefit or expense in the period in which we receive
the revised information. We expect that the component of the net
deferred tax asset attributable to the Recapitalization and the
Private Equity Restructuring will be amortized over
15 years, with the result that our United States federal
income taxes paid (to the extent that we have taxable income)
will be approximately $15.9 million lower per year than the
amount we record as income tax expense in each of the next
15 years. We expect that in 2005 the provision for income
tax expense will be approximately 36% of income before income
tax benefit (provision) and minority ownership loss.
40
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, income
before minority ownership loss was $254.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of
$196.4 million, or 338.6%, as compared to the prior year.
Minority Ownership
Loss. Minority ownership loss
attributable to QuikPlay, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $0.2 million, a decrease of
$0.2 million as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a
full year of revenue being realized in 2004 as opposed to only a
partial year in 2003. We expect that QuikPlay, LLC will record a
loss in 2005 as well.
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, net
income was $254.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, an increase of $196.2 million, or
336.0%, as compared to the prior year.
The following table sets forth the condensed
consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 (in thousands
except per share):
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared
to Year Ended December 31, 2002
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 186,547 | 52.4 | % | $ | 182,754 | 53.5 | % | ||||||||||
ATM
|
132,341 | 37.2 | 119,424 | 34.9 | ||||||||||||||
Check services
|
26,326 | 7.4 | 29,412 | 8.6 | ||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
revenues
|
10,500 | 3.0 | 10,303 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
355,714 | 100.0 | 341,893 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
232,463 | 65.4 | 216,658 | 63.4 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
123,251 | 34.6 | 125,235 | 36.6 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
(45,430 | ) | (12.8 | ) | (57,649 | ) | (16.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(14,061 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (11,820 | ) | (3.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income
|
63,760 | 17.9 | 55,766 | 16.3 | ||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense),
net
|
(5,450 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (4,933 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income tax
provision and minority ownership loss
|
58,310 | 16.4 | 50,833 | 14.9 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision
|
(321 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (1,451 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before minority
ownership loss
|
57,989 | 16.3 | 49,382 | 14.4 | ||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
400 | 0.1 | 1,040 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 58,389 | 16.4 | % | $ | 50,422 | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per common
share
|
$ | 1.81 | $ | 1.57 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per
common share
|
$ | 0.82 | $ | 0.71 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income tax
benefit (provision) and minority ownership loss
|
$ | 58,310 | 16.4 | % | $ | 50,833 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||||
Pro forma provision for
income taxes
|
(21,062 | ) | (5.9 | ) | (18,391 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
400 | 0.1 | 1,040 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 37,648 | 10.6 | % | $ | 33,482 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||
41
Total revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2003 were $355.7 million, an increase of
$13.8 million, or 4.0%, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily due to the
reasons described below.
Cash Advance. Cash
advance revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 were
$186.5 million, an increase of $3.8 million, or 2.1%,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. This
increase was primarily due to a 20.0% increase in POS debit card
transaction revenue and a 0.8% increase in credit card cash
advance revenue. The total amount of cash disbursed increased
4.7% from $3.6 billion to $3.8 billion. The number of
transactions completed declined 0.4% from 8.2 million to
8.1 million. Revenue per cash advance transaction increased
2.5% from $22.38 to $22.93.
ATM. ATM revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2003 were
$132.3 million, an increase of $12.9 million, or
10.8%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. The
increase was driven by a 7.4% increase in the number of
transactions from 42.5 million to 45.7 million.
Revenue per ATM transaction rose from $2.81 to $2.90, and
increase of 3.1%. The total amount of cash disbursed increased
11.2% from $6.2 billion to $6.9 billion.
Check Services.
Check services revenues for the year ended December 31,
2003 were $26.3 million, a decrease of $3.1 million,
or 10.5%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
The total face amount of checks warranted declined 11.7% from
$1.3 billion to $1.2 billion. The number of checks
warranted decreased 21.0% from 7.0 million to
5.5 million, and the average face amount per check
warranted increased 11.8%, from $193.68 to $216.44. Check
warranty revenue as a percent of face amount warranted decreased
from 2.17% to 2.14% and revenue per check warranty transaction
increased from $4.21 to $4.63.
Central Credit and
Other. Central Credit and other
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, were
$10.5 million, an increase of $0.2 million, or 1.9%,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. This
increase was primarily due to our first price increase for
Central Credit services in the last five years.
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
$232.5 million, an increase of $15.8 million, or 7.3%,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
Commissions increased 5.4%, principally due to the fact that ATM
revenues, which carry the highest commission rate, grew more
rapidly than other categories of revenue. Interchange and
processing expenses increased 13.3% primarily as a result of
higher dollar volumes of cash advance and an increase in
applicable interchange rates. Warranty expense was unchanged,
but was higher as a percentage of the face amount of checks
warranted. Other costs and expenses declined modestly primarily
as a result of a change in product mix.
Primarily as a result of the factors described
above, gross profit declined 1.6% to $123.3 million in 2003
as compared to $125.2 million in 2002.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003
were $45.4 million, a decrease of $12.2 million, or
21.2%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
This decrease was primarily due to cost reduction initiatives
implemented in 2003 offset by higher operating expenses due to
increased ATM transactional volumes.
Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation expense for
the year ended December 31, 2003 was $7.6 million, an
increase of $2.2 million, or 42.3%, as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily due to
the procurement of additional ATM equipment to support new
business we gained during the year. Amortization expense related
to computer software and customer contracts for the year ended
December 31, 2003 was $6.5 million, unchanged as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
42
Total Revenues
Costs and Expenses
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, operating
income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
$63.8 million, an increase of $8.0 million, or 14.3%,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
Interest Income (Expense),
Net. Interest income was
$1.3 million in 2003, essentially unchanged from
$1.3 million in 2002. Interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2003, was $6.8 million, an increase of
$0.5 million, or 8.8%, as compared to December 31,
2002. This increase was primarily due to an increase in cash
balances necessary to support the growth in the ATM business
offset by lower interest rates.
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, income
before income tax provision and minority ownership loss
increased $7.5 million, or 14.7% in the year ended
December 31, 2003 as compared to the prior year.
Income Tax
Provision. The provision for income
taxes relates solely to foreign income taxes. The provision for
foreign income tax for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
$0.3 million, a decrease of $1.1 million as compared
to the year ended December 31, 2002. This decrease was
primarily due to unanticipated provincial taxes that were paid
in 2002.
Primarily due to the factors described above,
income before minority ownership loss increased
$8.6 million, or 17.4%, in 2003 as compared to the prior
year.
Minority Ownership
Loss. Minority ownership loss
attributable to QuikPlay, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2003 was $0.4 million, a decrease of
$0.6 million as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2002. This decrease was primarily due to the
completion of development and the first installation of the TODD
product.
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, net
income for the year ended December 31, 2003, was
$58.4 million, an increase of $8.0 million, or 15.8%,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements in
conformity with United States GAAP requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial
statements. The SEC has defined a companys critical
accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the
portrayal of the financial condition and results of operations,
and which require management to make its most difficult and
subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make
estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on
this definition, we have identified our critical accounting
policies as those addressed below. We also have other key
accounting policies that involve the use of estimates, judgments
and assumptions. You should review the notes to our consolidated
financial statements for a summary of these policies. We believe
that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, based upon
information presently available; however, actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We have approximately $156.7 million in net
unamortized goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2004 resulting from our acquisition of other
businesses. A new accounting standard adopted in 2002 requires
an annual review of goodwill and other non-amortizing intangible
assets for impairment. We completed our initial assessment for
impairment of goodwill and determined that no impairment was
necessary at that time. Our most recent annual assessment was
performed as of October 1, 2004 and it was determined that
no impairment adjustment was necessary at that time. The annual
evaluation of goodwill and other non-amortizing intangible
assets requires the use of estimates about future operating
results of each reporting unit to determine their estimated fair
value. Changes in forecasted operations can materially affect
these estimates, which could significantly affect our results of
operations.
43
Goodwill
We recognize revenue when evidence of an
arrangement exists, services have been rendered, our price fixed
or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We
evaluate our revenue streams for proper timing of revenue
recognition.
Cash advance revenue is comprised of upfront
patron transaction fees assessed at the time the transaction is
initiated and a percentage of the face amount of the cash
advance. Cash advance revenue is recognized at the point that a
negotiable money order instrument is generated by the casino
cashier.
ATM revenue is comprised of upfront patron
transaction fees or surcharges assessed at the time the
transaction is initiated and a percentage of interchange fees
paid by the patrons issuing bank. These issuing banks
share the interchange revenue, or reverse interchange, with us
to cover the costs we incur to acquire the ATM transaction.
Upfront patron transaction fees are recognized when a
transaction is authorized, and reverse interchange is recognized
on a monthly basis.
Check services revenue is generally contractually
based upon a percentage of the face amount of total checks
warranted. Check services revenue is recognized on a monthly
basis.
Central Credit revenue is based upon either a
flat monthly unlimited usage fee or a variable fee structure
driven by the volume of patron credit histories generated. This
revenue is recognized on a monthly basis. Revenue derived from
our patron marketing products and services is recognized upon
completion of services.
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, or FASB, issued FASB Interpretation No., or
FIN, 46 (and subsequently revised its interpretation
through February 2004), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, or VIEs. FIN 46 clarifies the
application of Accounting Research Bulletin 51,
Consolidated Financial Statements, and establishes
standards for determining under what circumstances VIEs should
be consolidated with their primary beneficiary, including those
to which the usual condition for consolidation does not apply.
FIN 46 also requires disclosures about unconsolidated VIEs
in which a company has a significant variable interest. The
consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to
VIEs created after December 31, 2003. The consolidation
requirements apply to older entities in the first period ending
after March 15, 2004. Certain disclosure requirements apply
to all financial statements issued after December 31, 2003.
The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which
establishes accounting standards for all transactions in which
an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and
services. SFAS No. 123(R) focuses primarily on
accounting for transactions with employees, and carries forward
without change prior guidance for share-based payments for
transactions with non-employees.
SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the
intrinsic value measurement objective in APB Opinion
No. 25 and generally requires us to measure the cost of
employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of
the grant. The standard requires grant date fair value to be
estimated using either an option-pricing model, which is
consistent with the terms of the award, or a market observed
price, if such a price exists. Such cost must be recognized over
the period during which an employee is required to provide
service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting
period. The standard also requires us to estimate the number of
instruments that will ultimately be issued, rather than
accounting for forfeitures as they occur.
We are required to apply
SFAS No. 123(R) to all awards granted, modified or
settled in our first reporting period under U.S. GAAP
beginning after June 15, 2005. We are also required
to use either the modified prospective method or the
modified retrospective method. Under the modified
44
Revenue Recognition
Under the modified retrospective method, we must
restate our previously issued financial statements to recognize
the amounts we previously calculated and reported on a pro forma
basis, as if the prior standard had been adopted.
Under both methods, we are permitted to use
either a straight line or an accelerated method to amortize the
cost as an expense for awards with graded vesting. The standard
permits and encourages early adoption. We have commenced our
analysis of the impact of SFAS 123(R), but have not yet
decided: (1) whether we will elect to adopt early,
(2) if we elect to adopt early, then at what date we would
do so, (3) whether we will use the modified prospective
method or elect to use the modified retrospective method, and
(4) whether we will elect to use straight line amortization
or an accelerated method.
In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets an
amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. This Statement amends
Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary
exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a
general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do
not have commercial substance. The Statement specifies that a
nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash
flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a
result of the exchange. This Statement is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is
permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal
periods beginning after the date this Statement is issued.
Retroactive application is not permitted. Management is
analyzing the requirements of this new Statement and believes
that its adoption will not have any significant impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes our cash flows for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively:
Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by
operating activities
|
$ | 75,212 | $ | 33,471 | $ | 81,964 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(4,861 | ) | (7,047 | ) | (9,750 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
(43,950 | ) | (63,067 | ) | (52,333 | ) | ||||||
Net effect of exchange
rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(247 | ) | 2,482 | 203 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
cash and cash equivalents
|
26,154 | (34,161 | ) | 20,084 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
23,423 | 57,584 | 37,500 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of period
|
$ | 49,577 | $ | 23,423 | $ | 57,584 | ||||||
Our principal source of liquidity is cash flows from operating activities, which were $75.2 million, $33.5 million and $82.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Our cash flows from operating activities are influenced by changes in settlement receivables and the timing of payments related to settlement liabilities. For example, in 2003, changes in settlement liabilities resulted in a $34.3 million use of cash. This compares to a $19.0 million source of cash in 2004. The variation is due to the timing of our settlement liability payments. As a result, our cash flows from operating activities have changed and may in the future change substantially based upon the timing of our settlement liability payments. We calculate our net cash position as cash and cash equivalents plus
45
December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 49,577 | $ | 23,423 | $ | 57,584 | |||||||
Settlement receivables
|
30,357 | 20,307 | 20,829 | ||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
(42,192 | ) | (22,968 | ) | (61,615 | ) | |||||||
Net cash position
|
$ | 37,742 | $ | 20,762 | $ | 16,798 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $4.9 million, $7.0 million, and $9.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Included in net cash used in investing activities were funds spent on software development in the amounts of $0.6 million, $1.0 million and $2.0 million, and funds spent on the procurement of cash access equipment, computer and other hardware in the amounts of $3.2 million, $6.0 million and $7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, we also made severance payments in the aggregate amount of $1.0 million to two departing executives in consideration of covenants not to compete with us for a period of two years. We have capitalized those non-compete agreements and are amortizing them over the term of the non-compete period. We have met our capital requirements to date through cash flows from operating activities. We expect that capital expenditures in 2005 will be higher than in 2004, but we do not expect capital expenditures in 2005 to exceed $8 million.
Net cash used in financing activities were $44.0 million, $63.1 million and $52.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. In 2004, this is the result of $464.3 million in net borrowings (which include debt repayments, and payments for debt issuance costs), $508.6 million of distributions on or redemptions of membership interests, and $0.3 million in capital contributions from IGT related to QuikPlay, LLC, our joint venture with IGT. In 2003 and 2002, these cash outflows were a result of cash distributions on membership interests offset partially by capital contributions from IGT related to QuikPlay, LLC.
Indebtedness |
On March 10, 2004 we entered into senior secured credit facilities arranged by Banc of America Securities LLC with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent in an aggregate principal amount of $280.0 million, consisting of a five-year revolving credit facility of $20.0 million and a six-year term loan facility of $260.0 million. Proceeds of the term loan under the senior secured credit facilities were used to finance in part the Recapitalization and to pay related fees and expenses. The revolving credit facility will be used to provide ongoing working capital and for other general corporate purposes. Amounts available under this revolving credit were reduced by $3.4 million of letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2004. The terms of our senior secured credit facilities require that a significant portion of our excess cash flow be devoted to reducing amounts outstanding under these facilities. As a result, we anticipate making a payment of $28.3 million in March 2005 from our excess cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2004 to reduce the amounts outstanding under these facilities. Under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities we are required to maintain certain financial covenants related to our leverage ratio, senior leverage ratio and fixed charge cover ratio. Additionally, we have a covenant related to our allowable capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2004, we believe we are in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
After giving effect to the Recapitalization, our total consolidated debt increased and, as a result, our interest expense increased compared to historic levels.
The following is a summary of our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2004, including our senior subordinated notes and our senior secured credit facilities. These amounts exclude
46
2-3 | 4-5 | After | ||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Cash Obligations | Total | 1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
$ | 478,250 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 26,000 | $ | 162,500 | $ | 276,750 | ||||||||||
Estimated interest payments
|
207,892 | 32,885 | 63,753 | 59,315 | 51,939 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases
|
2,926 | 488 | 1,001 | 962 | 475 | |||||||||||||||
Total cash obligations
|
$ | 689,068 | $ | 46,373 | $ | 90,754 | $ | 222,777 | $ | 329,164 | ||||||||||
Other Liquidity Needs and Resources |
Bank of America, N.A. supplies us with currency needed for normal operating requirements of our ATMs pursuant to a treasury services agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, we pay a monthly cash usage fee based upon the product of the average daily dollars outstanding in all ATMs multiplied by the average London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, for one-month United States dollar deposits for each day that rate is published in that month plus a margin of 25 basis points. We are therefore exposed to interest rate risk to the extent that the applicable LIBOR rate increases. As of December 31, 2004, the rate in effect, inclusive of the 25 basis points margin, was 2.67%, and the currency supplied by Bank of America, N.A. pursuant to this agreement was $371.2 million.
We need supplies of cash to support each of our foreign operations that involve the dispensing of currency. For some foreign jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom, applicable law and cross-border treaties allow us to transfer funds between our domestic and foreign operations efficiently. For other foreign jurisdictions, we must rely on the supply of cash generated by our operations in those foreign jurisdictions, and the costs of repatriation are prohibitive. For example, CashCall Systems, Inc., the subsidiary through which we operate in Canada, generates a supply of cash that is sufficient to support its operations, and all cash generated through such operations is retained by CashCall Systems, Inc. As we expand our operations into new foreign jurisdictions, we must rely on treaty-favored cross-border transfers of funds, the supply of cash generated by our operations in those foreign jurisdictions or alternate sources of working capital.
Pursuant to the terms of our agreement with IGT, we are obligated to invest up to our pro rata share of $10.0 million in capital to QuikPlay. Our obligation to invest additional capital in QuikPlay is conditioned upon capital calls, which are in our sole discretion. As of December 31 2004, we had invested a total of $3.2 million in QuikPlay.
We believe that borrowings available under our senior secured credit facilities, together with our anticipated operating cash flows will be adequate to meet our anticipated future requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and scheduled interest payments on the notes and under our senior secured credit facilities for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future. Although no additional financing other than this Offering is currently contemplated, we may seek, if necessary or otherwise advisable and to the extent permitted under the indenture governing the notes and the terms of the senior secured credit facilities, additional financing through bank borrowings or public or private debt or equity financings. We cannot assure you that additional financing, if needed, will be available to us, or that, if available, the financing will be on terms favorable to us. The terms of any additional debt or equity financing that we may obtain in the future could impose additional limitations on our operations and/or management structure. We also cannot assure you that our estimates of our reasonably anticipated liquidity needs are accurate or that new business developments or other unforeseen events will not occur, resulting in the need to raise additional funds.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We obtain currency to meet the normal operating requirements of our domestic ATMs and ACMs pursuant to a treasury services agreement with Bank of America, N.A. Under this agreement, all
47
Effects of Inflation
Our monetary assets, consisting primarily of cash
and receivables, are not significantly affected by inflation.
Our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of our deferred
tax asset, goodwill and other intangible assets, are not
affected by inflation. We believe that replacement costs of
equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements will not
materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation
affects our operating expenses, such as those for salaries and
benefits, armored carrier expenses, telecommunications expenses
and equipment repair and maintenance services, which may not be
readily recoverable in the financial terms under which we
provide our cash access products and services to gaming
establishments and their patrons.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk
In the normal course of business, we are exposed
to foreign currency exchange risk. We operate and conduct
business in foreign countries and, as a result, are exposed to
movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Our exposure to
foreign currency exchange risk related to our foreign operations
is not material to our results of operations, cash flows or
financial position. At present, we do not hedge this risk, but
continue to evaluate such foreign currency translation risk
exposure. At present, we do not hold any derivative securities
of any kind.
Bank of America, N.A. supplies us with currency
needed for normal operating requirements of our domestic ATMs
and ACMs pursuant to a treasury services agreement. Under the
terms of this agreement, we pay a monthly cash usage fee based
upon the product of the average daily dollars outstanding in all
ATMs and ACMs multiplied by the average LIBOR for one-month
United States dollar deposits for each day that rate is
published in that month plus a margin of 25 basis points.
We are therefore exposed to interest rate risk to the extent
that the applicable LIBOR rate increases. As of
December 31, 2004, the rate in effect, inclusive of the
25 basis points margin, was 2.67% and the currency supplied
by Bank of America, N.A. pursuant to this agreement was
$371.2 million. Based upon the average outstanding amount
of currency to be supplied by Bank of America, N.A. pursuant to
this agreement during 2004, which was $273.5 million, each
1% change in the applicable LIBOR rate would have had a
$2.7 million impact on income before taxes and minority
ownership loss in 2004. Currency for the normal operating
requirements of our foreign ATMs is supplied by the gaming
establishments in which those ATMs are located.
Our senior secured credit facilities bear
interest at rates that can vary over time. We have the option of
having interest on the outstanding amounts under these credit
facilities paid based on a base rate (equivalent to the prime
rate) or based on the Eurodollar rate (equivalent to LIBOR). We
have historically elected to pay interest based on one month
United States dollar LIBOR, and we expect to continue to pay
interest based on LIBOR of various maturities. Our interest
expense on these credit facilities is the applicable LIBOR rate
plus a margin on 275 basis points for the term loan portion
and LIBOR plus 300 basis points for the revolving credit
portion. The margin for the term loan portion may decrease if
our leverage ratio, as defined, decreases. At December 31,
2004, we had $0 drawn under the revolving credit portion and we
had $243.3 million outstanding under the term loan portion
at an interest rate, including the margin, of 5.17%. Based upon
the outstanding balance on the term loan of $243.3 million
on December 31, 2004, each 1% increase in the applicable
LIBOR rate would add an additional $2.4 million of interest
expense in 2005.
48
BUSINESS
Overview
We are the leading provider of cash access
products and related services to the gaming industry in the
United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the Caribbean. Our
products and services provide gaming establishment patrons
access to cash through a variety of methods, including ATM cash
withdrawals, credit card cash advances, point-of-sale, or POS,
debit card transactions, check verification and warranty
services and money transfers. In addition, we provide products
and services that improve credit decision-making, automate
cashier operations and enhance patron marketing activities for
gaming establishments.
Substantially all gambling transactions within a
gaming establishment must be completed in cash. Consequently,
gaming revenues are critically dependent on the amount of cash
available to patrons within gaming establishments. We believe
that the proliferation of card-based payment instruments has led
to a general reduction in the amount of cash that consumers
carry generally, including when they visit gaming
establishments. Therefore, the ability of gaming establishments
to maximize revenues depends upon the ease with which patrons
can access cash. Our products and services allow patrons to
easily access their cash within a gaming establishment. For
example, our patented 3-in-1 rollover functionality
allows a gaming patron to easily convert an unsuccessful ATM
cash withdrawal into a POS debit card transaction or a credit
card cash advance.
We provide cash access products and related
services at approximately 960 gaming establishments worldwide,
including those of seven of the top ten gaming operators in the
United States based on 2004 revenues: Harrahs
Entertainment, Inc., Caesars Entertainment, Inc., Mandalay
Resort Group, Boyd Gaming Corporation, Foxwoods Resort Casino,
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority and, Penn National Gaming, Inc.
In addition, we provide cash access products and related
services to three of the top four gaming operators in the United
Kingdom based on 2004 revenues, including Stanley Leisure plc,
Gala Casinos Ltd. and London Clubs International. In general,
our contracts with gaming establishments are exclusive, range in
duration from three to five years and are global in that they
govern all of an operators gaming establishments wherever
they are located around the world.
In 2004, we processed over 66 million
transactions which resulted in approximately $13.7 billion
in cash being disbursed to gaming patrons. We have an installed
base in approximately 960 gaming establishments of over
3,000 cash access kiosks, 848 Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATMs,
262 ACMs and thirteen 3-in-1 Enabled QuickJack Plus
devices. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we generated
revenues and operating income of $403.0 million and
$74.0 million, respectively.
Industry Trends
We believe that demand for cash access products
and related services will be driven by the underlying growth of
the gaming industry, the importance of access to cash within
gaming establishments, the migration from cash to electronic
forms of payment, the continued innovation in cash access
products and related services and the demand for effective
patron marketing.
The historical growth of the United States gaming
industry has resulted from the increased acceptance of gaming as
a form of entertainment, as well as an increase in the number of
jurisdictions where gaming is allowed. On a global basis, future
gaming industry growth is expected to be driven by continued
market expansion in the United States and from the development
of European, Asian and other international markets.
United
States. Since Nevada legalized
gambling in 1931, the number of jurisdictions that allow some
form of gaming has increased dramatically. Beginning with New
Jersey in 1978, several states
49
Gaming Industry Growth
In 2004, certain states proposed or passed
legislation permitting gaming in new geographies or increased
gaming in existing locations. Pennsylvania enacted legislation
that authorizes as many as 61,000 slot machines for racinos,
resorts and slot parlors across the state. Oklahoma approved
measures that would allow the installation of slot machines at
specified locations. Broward County, Florida approved a measure
requiring the State of Florida to begin negotiations to allow
slot machines to be installed at racetracks and jai lai
establishments in Broward County. California and certain Native
American tribes in the state signed agreements to allow an
unlimited number of slot machines at tribal gaming
establishments.
International.
The gaming industry is also experiencing strong growth in
selected international markets. In the United Kingdom, proposed
changes to existing regulation would allow for an increase in
the number of gaming establishments and slot machines. In
addition, the proposed changes would allow casinos to provide
additional gaming opportunities and eliminate the requirement
that patrons become members of a gaming establishment before
engaging in any gaming activities. In Macau, gaming revenues
have become a key driver of economic growth, and both the
entrance of international gaming operators as well as the
lifting of travel restrictions is expected to lead to further
gaming industry expansion. Other Asian countries, Russia and
countries in Eastern Europe are expected to experience growth in
gaming as governments consider proposals for gaming industry
liberalization. Several United States-based gaming operators
have announced their intention to participate in expected gaming
expansion.
Substantially all gambling transactions within a
gaming establishment must be completed in cash. Consequently,
gaming revenues are critically dependent on the amount of cash
available within a gaming establishment. Without cash access
services, gaming revenues would be limited by the amount of cash
that patrons bring to gaming establishments. Therefore, casino
operators increasingly realize the importance of offering gaming
patrons the ability to access different sources of funds while
in the gaming establishment. Most gaming establishments
outsource their cash access services to third-party providers
because providing these services is not a core competency of
gaming establishment operators. We believe that cash access
service providers that offer more efficient means for patrons to
access cash will result in more revenue for gaming operators.
We believe that the proliferation of card-based
payment instruments in retail environments has led to a general
reduction in the amount of cash that patrons bring to gaming
establishments. Electronic payments, including credit card and
debit card transactions, are rapidly displacing cash and checks,
the traditional forms of payment. According to the Federal
Reserve, in 2003, the number of electronic payment transactions
in the United States, which includes ATM cash withdrawals,
exceeded the number of checks paid, for the first time. If
current growth rates are sustained, the Federal Reserve projects
that credit cards and debit cards will both surpass checks in
terms of total annual transactions in 2007. We expect that this
growth in electronic payment transactions will impact the growth
in the number of transactions that we process.
Debit card transactions are expected to be the
most important growth driver in the United States for electronic
payments for the next several years. For the five years ended in
2003, total United States
50
Importance of Access to Cash
Migration from Cash to Electronic Forms of
Payment
Credit card usage has also grown at significant
rates, particularly in international markets. For example,
according to The Nilson Report, credit card purchase volume
increased 15.3% in Europe in 2003 compared to 2002, versus 7.8%
in the United States. Certain regions, such as Asia, Russia and
Eastern Europe, are experiencing rapid growth in the usage of
card-based payments. In China, according to The Nilson Report,
VISA and MasterCard purchase volume increased 34% from 2002 to
2003, from $6.8 billion to $9.1 billion.
One of the most rapidly changing parts of the
payments system is the ATM industry. Growth in ATM installations
in the United States was 9.3% per year from 1983 to 1995
but accelerated to an annual pace of 15.5% from 1996 to 2002.
Much of the acceleration is the result of the placement of ATMs
in locations other than bank premises. These off-premise ATMs
accounted for only 26% of total ATMs in the United States in
1994, while more than 62% of ATMs were located off bank premises
by 2002.
We believe that gaming establishments will demand
new or enhanced products and services that increase the amount
of cash available to gaming patrons and continue to reduce
transaction times and cashier labor costs. Aggregating diverse
financial services onto a single integrated hardware and
software platform, employing emerging technologies such as
biometric facial recognition and cashless gaming, and providing
secure remote access to patron and transaction information via
the Internet are examples of enhanced features of cash access
products.
Gaming establishments target profitable, repeat
customers and increasingly rely on the aggregation and analysis
of patron data to develop, implement and refine patron marketing
strategies that increase loyalty and revenues. The ability to
obtain and analyze patron data across several different gaming
establishments is a powerful tool in attracting and retaining
patrons. Since marketing is one of a gaming establishments
largest cost items, we believe that our customers will find our
proprietary patron transaction database increasingly valuable as
they try to attract new patrons and to retain valued patrons.
Competitive Strengths
Industry
leader. We are the leading
provider of cash access products and related services to the
gaming industry in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada
and the Caribbean. We have a leading market share, providing our
cash access products and services at approximately 960 gaming
establishments worldwide. We have exclusive, global and
long-term contracts to provide cash access products or related
services to seven of the top ten gaming operators in the United
States and three of the top four gaming operators in the United
Kingdom, based on 2004 revenues. We believe that our status as
the incumbent provider of cash access products and related
services to our current customers and the duration of our
relationships with those customers will help us sustain our
leading industry position. Our sole focus on the gaming industry
and the breadth of our relationships provide us with greater
insight into trends and developments in the marketplace and more
resources to invest in product development and sales and
marketing than other providers. We believe we have the industry
leading brand among gaming establishments for cash access
products and services and a reputation for quality, reliability,
innovation and customer service.
Best-in-class products and
services. We believe that we offer
the most innovative, reliable, comprehensive and integrated cash
access products and services. Based upon information obtained
51
Innovation of Cash Access Products and
Related Services
Demand for Effective Patron
Marketing
Innovative. We use
our knowledge of electronic payment transactions and the gaming
industry to continually improve our existing products and
services and to develop new ones. Examples of our industry
innovation include our patented 3-in-1 rollover
functionality, the QuikCash Plus (QCP) Web product, and our next
generation of cashless gaming products.
Reliable. We believe
that we offer gaming establishments superior reliability for two
principal reasons. First, our real-time device monitoring
capabilities allow us to respond to maintenance issues as soon
as they occur. Second, two fault-tolerant processing centers
support our transaction processing operations, which provided an
average monthly network uptime of 99.9% in 2004. Our
infrastructure and systems are designed to meet the unique needs
of the gaming industry, such as settlement procedures and the
timing of maintenance.
Comprehensive and
Integrated. We offer gaming
establishments a comprehensive and integrated suite of cash
access, information and cashless gaming products and services.
All of our top ten gaming establishment customers use three or
more of our products and services. Our proprietary QCP Web
transaction processing system integrates the processing of
credit card cash advances, POS debit card transactions, check
verification and warranty services, money transfer, and Central
Credit services online through a single terminal. QCP Web
reduces operating complexity in the cashier operations, reduces
transaction times and saves space by eliminating multiple pieces
of hardware.
Proprietary patron
information. Our proprietary
databases contain credit histories and patron transaction data
generated across multiple gaming establishments over time.
Central Credit is the leading credit reporting agency of the
gaming industry and is the de facto industry standard credit
bureau for gaming establishments to improve their credit
decision-making. Central Credit contains decades of gaming
patron credit history and transaction data on millions of
patrons. Our proprietary patron transaction database contains
information about patron cash access activity and allows gaming
establishments to more effectively target their marketing
efforts. The combination of these databases enable us to develop
unique products and services based on these databases.
Exclusive strategic
alliances. We have partnered with
gaming industry leaders on an exclusive basis to develop, market
and provide innovative products to our customers and expand our
customer base. We have QuikPlay, which is our joint venture with
IGT, a leading manufacturer of slot machines and other
electronic gaming devices, and strategic alliances with NRT and
Western Money Systems, leading providers of slot ticket and
player point redemption kiosks. Under our agreement with IGT,
IGT is prohibited from competing with QuikPlay in its business
of developing and marketing products allowing patrons to access
cash with a debit card directly at gaming machines. Under our
agreements with NRT and Western Money Systems, they are
prohibited from combining their cash handling services with cash
access services of other providers. We enjoy the benefit of our
alliance partners existing installed bases, reputations
and relationships with gaming establishments.
Business Strategy
Generate additional revenue from existing
customers. We intend to generate
additional revenue from our customers by taking advantage of
growth in their businesses and broadening our existing
relationships by providing additional products and services. We
provide our cash access products and services pursuant to
exclusive, global and long-term contracts and we have a strong
track record of retaining our existing customers. Our revenues
grow as the number of transactions and dollar volume per
transaction increases, which is driven by the underlying growth
of the gaming industry, the need for access to cash within
a gaming establishment and the migration from cash to electronic
forms of payment. As our customers acquire, build or assume the
management of new gaming establishments, our revenues also grow
because our contracts generally provide us with the right to
provide cash access services at those new establishments. We
also seek to provide our customers with
52
Expand our customer base in existing
markets. We seek to enter into
contracts with new customers when our competitors
contracts expire or when new participants enter our existing
markets. We currently have little or no business with a number
of national and regional gaming establishment operators, and we
believe that we are well positioned to compete for that
business. In addition, the opening of new gaming establishments
in existing markets provides meaningful opportunities for new
customer acquisition. We believe that the breadth and quality of
our products and services provides us with a significant
competitive advantage.
Enter new
markets. We plan on growing our
business by further expanding our geographic presence in the
United States and internationally. Legislation permitting or
expanding gaming has been proposed or passed in a number of
jurisdictions both in the United States and internationally. We
believe that many of our existing customers will participate in
this expansion by opening new establishments in these
jurisdictions, and our contracts typically provide that we will
have the right to provide cash access services at these new
establishments. We believe that our market leadership will allow
us to capitalize upon this expansion even in the absence of
existing contractual relationships.
Continue to
innovate. We seek to provide more
efficient access to cash at gaming establishments. Toward that
end, we will continue to enhance the features of our existing
products and services as well as develop additional products and
services using new technologies. For example, our exclusive
strategic alliance with NRT takes advantage of the emerging
demand for redemption devices driven by the proliferation of
ticket-in-ticket-out slot machines. We are currently
focused on developing patron marketing services that take
advantage of our proprietary patron transaction database, and we
are also developing cashless gaming products. We are also
exploring the possibility of launching a private label credit
card to further broaden our suite of products and services.
These initiatives highlight our position as a leading innovator
in the industry.
Our Business
Our cash access products and services enable
three primary types of electronic payment transactions: ATM cash
withdrawals, credit card cash advances and POS debit card
transactions. Patrons can complete any of these three
transactions at any one of 848 Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATM
machines, 262 ACMs and thirteen 3-in-1 Enabled QuickJack Plus
devices. We own nearly all of these devices. In addition,
patrons can complete credit card cash advances and POS debit
card transactions at any one of more than 3,000 QuikCash kiosks,
all of which we own. We also provide check verification and
warranty services to gaming establishments that cash patron
checks.
ATM cash withdrawal transactions represent the
largest category of electronic payment transactions that we
process, as measured by dollar and transaction volume. In an ATM
cash withdrawal, a patron directly withdraws funds from his or
her bank account by swiping an ATM card through either our
Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATM or ACM machines. Our processor then
routes the transaction request through an electronic funds
transfer, or EFT, network to the patrons bank. Depending
upon a number of factors, including the patrons account
balance and daily withdrawal limit (which is usually $300 to
$500 during a 24-hour period delineated by the patrons
bank), the bank will either decline or authorize the
transaction. If the transaction is authorized, then the ATM or
ACM machine dispenses the cash to the customer. The
patrons bank account is debited by the amount of cash
disbursed plus a surcharge that we assess the patron for the use
of our machine, which is currently a fixed dollar amount and not
a percentage of the transaction size. In most circumstances we
53
ATM Cash Withdrawals
The following hypothetical ATM cash withdrawal
transaction and diagram are intended to illustrate the manner in
which surcharges are distributed and are not intended to
represent the actual dollar amounts that we will receive or pay
in every circumstance. The actual cardholder surcharge,
commission, processing expenses and reverse interchange that we
receive or pay may vary with each transaction. Assuming a
$100.00 ATM cash withdrawal with a $2.50 cardholder surcharge,
$102.50 would be debited from the patrons bank account.
The patron would receive $100.00 in cash disbursed at the
machine. We would receive $2.50 in surcharge, and we would also
receive reverse interchange from the patrons bank, which
is assumed to be $0.50 for purposes of this illustration. Our
revenue from the transaction would be $3.00. From this amount,
we incur certain cost of revenues and expenses. Our largest cost
of revenues is commissions to the gaming establishment, which is
assumed to be 80% of the surcharge, or $2.00, for purposes of
this illustration. After payment of all other costs and
expenses, including but not limited to processing expenses,
salaries and benefits, maintenance, telecommunications, taxes,
interest expense and other costs and expenses, the remaining
amount is our profit.
ATM cash withdrawal patron
receives $100
Patrons can also obtain credit card cash advances
and POS debit card transactions using our Casino Cash Plus
3-in-1 ATMs or ACM machines as well as at our QuikCash kiosks. A
patrons credit card cash advance limit is set by the card
issuing bank based on the patrons credit profile. These
limits vary significantly and can be larger or smaller than the
POS debit limit. A credit card cash advance transaction
obligates the patron to repay the issuing bank over time on
terms that are preset by the cardholder agreement. A
patrons POS debit card allows him or her to make cash
withdrawals at the point of sale in an amount equal to the
lesser of the amount of funds in their account or a daily limit
that is generally five to ten times as large as their daily ATM
limit. A POS debit card transaction automatically reduces the
balance in the patrons account.
When a patron requests a credit card cash advance
or POS debit card transaction, our processor routes the
transaction request through one of the card association (e.g.,
VISA or MasterCard) or EFT networks (e.g., Star, Interlink or
Maestro) to the issuing bank. Depending upon several factors
such as
54
Credit Card Cash Advances and POS Debit
Card Transactions
The following hypothetical credit card cash
advance transaction and diagram are intended to illustrate the
manner in which service fees are distributed and are not
intended to represent the actual dollar amounts that we will
receive or pay in every circumstance. The actual service fee,
card association fees and interchange, commission and processing
expenses that we receive or pay may vary with each transaction.
Assuming a $100.00 credit card cash advance with a $5.50 service
fee, $105.50 would be added to the credit balance of the
patrons credit card. The patron would receive $100.00 in
cash disbursed at the cashier. We would receive the $5.50
service fee, which we record as revenue. From this amount, we
incur certain cost of revenues. Our largest cost of revenues is
card association fees and interchange, assumed to be $2.10 for
purposes of this illustration. We would also pay a commission to
the gaming establishment, which is assumed to be $2.00 for
purposes of this illustration. After payment of all other costs
and expenses, including but not limited to processing expenses,
salaries and benefits, maintenance, telecommunications, taxes,
interest expense, interchange and other costs and expenses, the
remaining amount is our profit.
Credit card cash advance patron
receives $100
55
The following hypothetical POS debit card
transaction and diagram are intended to illustrate the manner in
which service fees are distributed in a transaction and are not
intended to represent the actual dollar amounts that we will
receive or pay in every circumstance. The actual service fee,
commission, card association fees and interchange and processing
expenses that we receive or pay may vary with each transaction.
Assuming a $100.00 POS debit card transaction with a $3.50
service fee, $103.50 would be debited from the patrons
bank account. The patron would receive $100.00 in cash disbursed
at the cashier. We would receive the $3.50 service fee, which we
would record as revenue. From this amount, we incur certain cost
of revenues, including a commission to the gaming establishment,
which is assumed to be $0.60 for purposes of this illustration;
and card association fees and interchange, which are assumed to
be $0.50 for purposes of this illustration. After payment of all
other costs and expenses, including but not limited to
processing expenses, salaries and benefits, maintenance,
telecommunications, taxes, interest expense, interchange and
other costs and expenses, the remaining amount is our profit.
POS debit card transaction patron
receives $100
Although the usage of checks relative to other
forms of payment is declining, a significant number of patrons
still cash checks at gaming establishments to fund their gaming
play. When a patron presents a check at the cashier, the gaming
establishment can accept or deny the transaction based on its
own customer information and at its own risk; it can obtain
third-party verification information about the check writer and
the check to manage its risk; or it can obtain a warranty on
payment of the check which entitles the gaming establishment to
reimbursement of the full face amount of the check if it is
dishonored.
There are a number of check verification
services. Our Central Credit database, which is used primarily
by gaming establishments to make credit issuing decisions, also
has information on the check cashing history of many patrons. In
general, we do not charge separately for this service on a per
transaction basis, but rather charge a fixed monthly
subscription fee.
If a gaming establishment chooses to have a check
warranted, it sends a request to a check warranty service
provider, asking whether it will warrant the check. If the check
warranty service provider warrants payment on the check, the
gaming establishment is obligated to pay a fee. The gaming
establishment then pays the patron the face amount and deposits
the check. If the check is dishonored by the patrons bank,
the gaming establishment invokes the warranty, and the check
56
Check Verification and Warranty
Services
TeleCheck is currently our primary check warranty
service provider. Under our agreement with TeleCheck, we receive
all of TeleChecks check warranty revenue, less operating
expenses and warranty expenses. Operating expenses are fixed at
a percentage of TeleChecks check warranty revenues.
Warranty expenses are defined as any amounts paid by TeleCheck
to gaming establishments to purchase dishonored checks. Our
agreement further provides that TeleCheck will pay us the actual
collections realized within 120 days after a check is
purchased, subject to the obligation to pay us a guaranteed
minimum amount of dishonored checks. As described in more detail
below, we are currently developing our own Central Credit check
warranty service to augment or ultimately replace
TeleChecks check warranty service.
In addition to the three primary types of
electronic payment transactions described above, gaming
establishment patrons can access funds through credit extended
by gaming establishments. Central Credit is the leading gaming
patron credit bureau, which allows gaming establishments to
improve their credit-making decisions. Our Central Credit
database contains decades of gaming patron credit history and
transaction data on millions of gaming patrons. Our gaming
credit reports are comprised of information recorded from patron
experiences at hundreds of gaming establishments. We can apply a
gaming establishments credit rules or business logic to
our gaming credit reports to provide our customers with a means
of underwriting patron credit requests in advance of their
arrival or upon demand in person. At a gaming
establishments request, we can augment the information
provided in our gaming credit reports with traditional credit
reports or bank ratings through our relationships with consumer
credit bureaus and bank reporting agencies. We charge our
customers for Central Credit services on a monthly basis for
either unlimited usage or a per transaction fee.
We also market money transfer services that allow
patrons to receive money transfers at gaming establishments and
provide information services that automate cashier operations
and enhance patron marketing activities.
Our Products and Services
Our customer solutions consist of cash access
products and services, information services and cashless gaming
products.
Central Credit
Other
Cash Access | Cashless Gaming | |||
Products and Services | Information Services | Products | ||
Casino Cash
Plus 3-in-1 ATM QuikCash Automated Cashier Machine Check verification and warranty QuikCredit Money transfers |
Central
Credit QuikCash Plus Web QuikReports QuikMarketing |
TODD EDITH 3-in-1 Enabled QuickJack Plus |
Cash Access Products and Services
We provide gaming establishments the ability to enable their patrons to access cash through a variety of products and services.
Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATM is an unmanned, cash-dispensing machine that offers patrons a quick way to access cash through ATM cash withdrawals, POS debit card transactions and credit card cash advances using our patented 3-in-1 rollover functionality. Statistics show that approximately 30%
57
QuikCash is
the brand name used for our stand-alone, non-ATM cash advance
kiosks in the gaming industry. Our QuikCash kiosks are
customer-activated, touch screen terminals that provide patrons
with access to credit card cash advances and POS debit card
transactions. Available in countertop, wall-mount, free-standing
and handheld models, our QuikCash terminals can be installed or
used virtually anywhere in a gaming establishment. For
successful advances, once the transaction is authorized, the
patron is instructed to proceed to the cashier who completes the
transaction by verifying the patrons identity, completing
the money order in accordance with the rules of major card
associations, and dispensing cash to the patron. Our terminals
provide gaming patrons with fast, reliable, and easily
accessible sources of cash close to the areas within the gaming
establishment where gaming activity is conducted.
Automated Cashier Machine (ACM)
is an unmanned, cash-dispensing
virtual cashier which was designed to provide casino
patrons with credit card cash advances, POS debit card
transactions and ATM cash withdrawals as well as check cashing
services without the need to visit the cashier after the initial
registration transaction. Our ACM devices provide
gaming patrons the same seamless cash access features as our
Casino Cash Plus 3-in-1 ATMs while allowing gaming
establishments to reduce the dependency on casino personnel to
complete transactions. Our ACMs use biometric facial recognition
technology, as a surrogate for face-to-face interaction with the
cashier, to verify the patrons identity. By eliminating
the cashier interaction requirement, our ACMs have the potential
to reduce transaction times, to improve the customer experience
and to reduce a gaming establishments cashier labor costs.
ATM transactions, check cashing transactions and credit card
cash advance and POS debit card transactions involving one of
the major card associations can be completed at the ACM without
the assistance of a cashier. The use of biometric facial
recognition is not an accepted surrogate for face-to-face
interaction by other major card associations, and this
functionality is not currently in use on existing ACMs for those
credit card cash advance or POS debit card transactions. We have
been actively working with the card associations to achieve
broader acceptance of biometric facial recognition as an
approved transaction completion protocol. Some of our largest
and most sophisticated customers have migrated to the ACM as the
standard cash access platform in their gaming establishments.
Check verification and warranty services
allow gaming establishments to
manage or eliminate risk on patron checks that they cash. A
gaming establishment can query our Central Credit database to
review the check cashing history of a casino patron before
deciding whether to cash the patrons check. If the gaming
establishment wants additional protection against loss, it can
seek a warranty on payment of the check. We have an exclusive
relationship with TeleCheck to market its check warranty
services to gaming establishments. As an alternative to
TeleChecks check warranty service, we are currently
58
QuikCredit is
a service through which we provide lines of credit to patrons in
gaming establishments that choose not to offer in-house credit.
Our QuikCredit service allows a gaming establishment to increase
the amount of cash available within the gaming establishment
without incurring credit risk. To use QuikCredit, a gaming
patron deposits a check payable to us with the gaming
establishment. The patrons check is deposited under
deferred presentment terms, meaning the check will not be
presented for payment for a specified period of time. A gaming
establishment using QuikCredit then seeks an authorization from
us. We currently query both our Central Credit database and the
TeleCheck database to assess the patrons credit risk. If
the check and check writer satisfy certain risk criteria and
underwriting guidelines, we issue an authorization to the gaming
establishment to endorse the check over to the gaming
establishment and to dispense the patrons funds. If any
authorized check is subsequently dishonored, we purchase the
check from the gaming establishment for its face amount, thereby
eliminating any collection risk to the gaming establishment. The
maximum line of credit we extend is $5,000 per patron and
in 2004, the average line of credit extended was approximately
$1,400.
Money transfer
services are provided through a
contractual relationship with Western Union Financial Services,
Inc., or Western Union. We are the worldwide exclusive marketer
to the gaming industry of Western Unions electronic and
paper-based systems for receiving funds transfers at gaming
establishments. Western Union Financial Services, Inc. contracts
directly with gaming establishments and we receive a monthly
payment based upon the number of transactions completed.
Information Services
We market our information services to gaming
establishments to improve credit decision-making, to automate
cashier operations and to enhance patron marketing activities.
Central Credit
is the leading gaming patron
credit bureau, which allows gaming establishments to improve
their credit making decisions. Our Central Credit database
contains decades of gaming patron credit history and transaction
data on millions of gaming patrons. Our gaming credit reports
are comprised of information recorded from patron experiences at
hundreds of gaming establishments. We can apply a gaming
establishments credit rules or business logic to our
gaming credit reports to provide our customers with a means of
underwriting patron credit requests in advance of their arrival
or upon demand in person. At a gaming establishments
request, we can augment the information provided in our gaming
credit reports with traditional credit reports or bank ratings
through our relationships with consumer credit bureaus and bank
reporting agencies.
QuikCash Plus (QCP) Web
is a proprietary browser-based,
full service cash access transaction processing system for
casino cashier operations which runs on a gaming
establishments own computer hardware. Cashiers using QCP
Web can process credit card cash advances, POS debit card
transactions, check verification and warranty services, money
transfer, and Central Credit services online through a single
terminal. Without QCP Web, casino cage operators are required to
access multiple systems running on disparate hardware and
software platforms. QCP Web reduces cage operating complexity,
improves transaction times, saves space by eliminating multiple
pieces of hardware and reduces training requirements for cage
operators resulting in lower operating costs for
59
Improve Credit
Decision-making
Automate Cashier Operations
Using our proprietary patron transaction
database, we provide patron marketing data to gaming
establishments. Gaming establishment marketing professionals can
use our patron data to develop, implement and to refine their
customer loyalty programs. Since marketing, including providing
complimentary goods and services, is one of a gaming
establishments largest cost items, we believe that gaming
establishments will find our patron marketing services
increasingly helpful as they try to attract new patrons and to
retain valued patrons. Because we have data on patron cash
access activity across multiple gaming establishments, we are
uniquely able to help an operator understand how much of a
patrons cash access activity, in aggregate, is being done
in other gaming establishments in order to gauge the
patrons loyalty to the gaming establishment.
QuikReports
is a browser-based reporting tool
that provides marketing professionals with real-time access to,
and analysis of, information on patron cash access activity. We
provide this information through a secure Internet connection at
user-specified levels of detail ranging from aggregated summary
information to individual cash access transactions. For example,
an operator may use QuikReports to focus its marketing efforts
on target patrons by generating a report of the patrons who
accessed the greatest amounts of cash at the operators
gaming establishment during a specified period, and comparing
the amounts of cash accessed at the operators gaming
establishments with the aggregate amounts of cash accessed at
other gaming establishments that are part of our network. A
gaming establishment may also use QuikReports to monitor or
analyze the cash access activities of its patrons to determine
peak periods, the relative popularity of various cash access
methods, or the traffic volumes, at particular machines in
particular locations.
QuikMarketing.
Through our QuikMarketing service, we query our proprietary
patron transaction database of more than 14 million gaming
patrons using criteria supplied by the gaming establishment. We
then distribute gaming establishment-supplied marketing
materials to patrons in our database that match target patron
criteria supplied by the gaming establishment. In 2004, some of
our largest customers utilized our QuikMarketing services to
execute approximately 30 projects which sent out approximately
2.4 million pieces of mail. Our proprietary patron
transaction database includes information that is captured from
transactions we process in which personal information is
available; ATM transactions are not included. As the applicable
transaction volume increases, we continue to build existing
patron profiles and add new patron profiles. During 2004, we
added approximately 94,000 new patron profiles each month.
Cashless Gaming Products
A recent trend in gaming has been the movement
towards cashless gaming as a more efficient means for gaming
operators to manage their slot machine operations. Cashless
gaming, also known as ticket-in-ticket-out, reduces
the amount of cash utilized in slot machines and consequently
reduces casino labor needs by dispensing bar-coded tickets
instead of cash for jackpots and cash-outs. To capitalize on the
movement towards cashless gaming initiatives, we have developed,
together with our strategic partners, products that facilitate
an efficient means of accessing funds in a cashless gaming
environment. Our cash access services are platform independent
and our existing infrastructure has been designed to be
adaptable to new platforms or operating environments.
TODD Ticket-Out Debit Device
is a cashless gaming product
developed by QuikPlay, our joint venture with IGT, that allows
slot machine patrons to access funds without leaving the
machines they are playing. When a slot machine is equipped with
TODD technology, a slot machine patron swipes his
60
Enhance Patron Marketing
EDITH Electronic Debit Interactive
Terminal Housing is a
next-generation cashless gaming device developed by QuikPlay
that allows gaming patrons to purchase slot machine tickets from
a customer-activated kiosk. EDITH is functionally similar to
TODD, but instead of being deployed at an individual slot
machine, EDITH is a stand-alone unit that is placed at the end
of one or more banks of slot machines. EDITH has not yet been
approved for use at any gaming establishment.
3-in-1 Enabled QuickJack Plus
is a multi-function patron kiosk
which incorporates our 3-in-1 rollover functionality
for cash access into NRTs self-service kiosk for slot
ticket redemption services. When a patron presses the cash out
button on a cashless slot machine, the patron receives the value
of the winnings on a paper ticket dispensed from a printer
embedded in the slot machine. The ticket can then be inserted
into other slot machines or exchanged for cash at a QuickJack
Plus kiosk. The availability of our cash access services on
these slot ticket redemption devices provides us with additional
points of contact with gaming patrons at locations that are
closer to the slot machines than traditional cash access devices
that are typically located on the periphery of the area within
the gaming establishment where gaming activity is conducted.
These additional points of contact provide gaming patrons with
more opportunities to access their cash with less cashier
involvement, thereby creating labor cost savings for gaming
establishments. In addition, by incorporating our cash access
services into QuickJack Plus, we enjoy the benefit of NRTs
existing relationships with gaming establishments and its sales
and marketing efforts directed towards additional gaming
establishments. We have the exclusive right to provide cash
access services on NRTs self-service redemption devices.
We have a similar alliance with Western Money Systems, another
provider of slot ticket and player point redemption kiosks,
subject to completion of development and regulatory approval.
Customer Service
We operate a customer service call center from
our facility in Las Vegas, Nevada that is accessible
24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Our customer service
representatives assist cashier personnel and gaming patrons in
their use of our products and services. Through our use of
third-party translation services, our customer service
representatives can serve gaming establishment customers and
patrons in approximately 150 different languages.
Intellectual Property
We believe that the ability to introduce and
respond to technological innovation in the gaming industry will
be an increasingly important qualification for the future
success of any provider of cash access services. Our continued
competitiveness will depend on the pace of our product
development; our patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret
protection; and our relationships with customers. Our business
development personnel work with gaming establishments, our joint
venture partners, our strategic partners and the suppliers of
the financial services upon which our cash access services rely
to design and develop innovative cash access products and
services and to identify potential new solutions for the
delivery and distribution of cash in gaming establishments.
We have two issued United States patents and four
pending United States patent applications, two registered United
States trademarks related to our ACM product, one registered
United States trademark relating to our name and other
trademarks, some of which are only registered in the United
States and some of which are pending registration in the United
States and in certain other countries.
61
Our ACMs use biometric facial recognition
technology and our patented 3-in-1 rollover
functionality to provide credit card cash advances, POS debit
card transactions, ATM cash withdrawals, check cashing and money
transfer services at a single, unmanned machine. These
technologies are key differentiating technologies from our
competitors.
Certain of our systems, such as the software that
implements our QCP Web and QuikReports products and the software
that drives our ACM product, were developed by Infonox on the
Web, a corporation that is under common control with M&C
International, and are hosted and operated on an infrastructure
platform that is owned by Infonox on the Web. We own all of the
intellectual property developed by Infonox on the Web to
implement our products and services on such infrastructure
platform, and Infonox on the Web has granted us an exclusive
license in the gaming industry to use its infrastructure
platform to deliver our products and services to our customers.
Sales and Marketing
We sell and market our products and services to
gaming establishments primarily through the use of a direct
sales force. The target customers of our direct sales force are
gaming establishments in the United States, the United Kingdom,
Canada and the Caribbean as well as gaming establishments in
developing markets. These gaming establishments include
traditional land-based casinos, gaming establishments operated
on Native American lands, racinos, riverboats, cruise ships with
gaming operations, pari-mutuel wagering facilities and card
rooms. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, revenues from our operations in
the United Kingdom, Canada and the Caribbean comprised 3.1%,
3.4% and 3.2%, respectively, of our revenues.
Our sales and marketing efforts are directed by
13 experienced senior sales executives located in various
regions across the United States, each with business development
responsibility for the gaming establishments in those regions.
These senior sales executives target all levels of gaming
establishment personnel, including senior executives, finance
professionals, marketing staff and cashiers, and seek to educate
them on the benefits of our cash access products and services.
The senior sales executives are supported by
23 field account managers, who provide on site customer
service to most of our customers in the United States. These
field account managers reside in the vicinity of the specific
gaming establishments that they support to ensure that they
respond to the customer service needs of those gaming
establishments.
We also have joint sales efforts with a number of
strategic partners, including NRT, Western Money Systems and
Hibernia National Bank, which allow us to market our cash access
services to gaming establishments through channels other than
our direct sales force.
Competition
We compete with third-party providers of cash
access services, such as Game Financial Corporation, a
subsidiary of Certegy Inc. operating as GameCash; Global Payment
Systems operating as Cash & Win; and Cash Systems, Inc.
We compete with financial institutions, such as
U.S. Bancorp and other regional and local banks that
operate ATM machines on the premises of gaming establishments.
In some cases, other third-party providers of cash access
services and financial institutions have pre-existing
relationships with potential customers that we must overcome to
enter into contracts with new customers. Some of these other
third-party providers and financial institutions have also
established cooperative relationships with each other to expand
their service offerings.
We face potential competition from gaming
establishments that may choose to operate their own in-house
cash access systems rather than outsource to us. In the past,
some gaming establishments have operated their own in-house cash
access systems. Most gaming establishments, however, outsource
their cash access service to third-party providers because
providing these services is not a core
62
We may in the future also face competition from
traditional transaction processors, such as First Data
Corporation, that may choose to enter the gaming patron cash
access services market. In connection with our redemption of
First Data Corporations interest in us, First Data
Corporation agreed not to compete with us prior to
March 10, 2007. This agreement not to compete, however, is
limited to the United States and Canada and is subject to a
number of exceptions. Given its familiarity with our business,
operations and industry as a result of being our majority owner
from inception until March 10, 2004, First Data Corporation
could be a significant competitive threat upon the expiration of
this covenant not to compete. In addition, we may in the future
face potential competition from new entrants into the market for
cash access products and related services. Some of these
potential competitors may have a number of significant
advantages over us, including greater name recognition and
marketing power, longer operating histories, pre-existing
relationships with current or potential customers and
significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources
and access to capital which allow them to respond more quickly
to new or changing opportunities.
Regulation
Various aspects of our business are subject to
gaming regulation and financial services regulation. Depending
on the nature of the noncompliance, our failure to comply with
these regulations may result in the suspension or revocation of
any license or registration at issue, as well as the imposition
of civil fines and criminal penalties.
We are subject to a variety of gaming and other
regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. As a
general matter, we are regulated by gaming commissions or
similar authorities at the state or tribal level, such as the
New Jersey Casino Control Commission and New Jersey Division of
Gaming Enforcement. In some jurisdictions, such as Nevada, we
are considered a supplier of associated equipment
and could be required by the regulatory authorities, in their
discretion, to file a license application. In such event, any of
our officers, directors or beneficial owners of our securities
could be required to apply for a license or a finding of
suitability. To date, we have not been required to file such an
application. Most of the jurisdictions in which we operate
distinguish between gaming-related suppliers and vendors, such
as manufacturers of slot machine or other gaming devices, and
non-gaming suppliers and vendors, such as food and beverage
purveyors, construction contractors and laundry and linen
suppliers. In these jurisdictions, we are typically
characterized as a non-gaming supplier or vendor and we must
obtain a non-gaming suppliers or vendors license,
qualification or approval. The licensure, qualification and
approval requirements and the regulations imposed on non-gaming
suppliers and vendors are generally less stringent than for
gaming-related suppliers and vendors, and as such, we are often
subject to a lesser degree of regulation than our customers that
directly engage in gaming activities. However, some of the
jurisdictions in which we do business do not distinguish between
gaming-related and non-gaming related suppliers and vendors and
we are subject to the same stringent licensing, qualification or
approval requirements and regulations that are imposed upon
vendors and suppliers that would be characterized as
gaming-related in other jurisdictions. Most state and many
tribal gaming regulators require us to obtain and maintain a
permit or license to provide our services to gaming
establishments. The process of obtaining such permits or
licenses often involves substantial disclosure of information
about us, our officers, directors and beneficial owners of our
securities, and involves a determination by the regulators as to
our suitability as a supplier or vendor to gaming establishments.
The expansion of our business or the introduction
of new cash access products or services may result in us being
characterized as a gaming-related supplier or vendor in
jurisdictions in which we are now a non-gaming related supplier
or vendor. Our EDITH and TODD cashless gaming products, for
63
Gaming Regulation
Gaming regulatory authorities have broad
discretion and can require any beneficial holder of our
securities, regardless of the number of shares of common stock
or amount of debt securities owned, to file an application, be
investigated, and be subject to a determination of suitability.
If the beneficial holder of our securities who must be found
suitable is a corporation, partnership, or trust, such entity
must submit detailed business and financial information
including a list of its officers, directors, partners and
beneficial owners. Further disclosure by those officer,
directors, partners and beneficial owners may be required. Under
certain circumstances and in certain jurisdictions, an
institutional investor, as defined in the applicable gaming
regulations, that acquires a certain amount of our securities
may apply to the regulatory authority for a waiver of these
licensure, qualification or finding of suitability requirements,
provided the institutional investor holds the voting securities
for investment purposes only. An institutional investor will not
be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes
unless the securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary
course of its business.
The changes in our ownership, management and
corporate structure that resulted from the recapitalizations of
our ownership in 2004 and our conversion from a limited
liability company to a corporation in 2004, required us to
notify many of the state and tribal gaming regulators under
whose jurisdiction we operate. In many cases, those regulators
have asked us for further information and explanation of those
changes. To date, we have satisfied certain of these inquiries,
and are continuing to cooperate with those that are ongoing.
Given the magnitude of the changes in our ownership that
resulted from the recapitalizations, we were required to
re-apply for new permits or licenses in some jurisdictions, but
were not required to discontinue our operations during the
period of re-application. We anticipate notifying many of the
state and tribal gaming regulators under whose jurisdictions we
operate of this offering of our common stock, which we expect
may require further disclosures or re-applications for new
permits or licenses, none of which we expect will require us to
discontinue our operations in any such jurisdictions. In certain
jurisdictions we are in the process of obtaining licenses and
have yet to receive final approval of such licenses from the
applicable regulatory authority. In these jurisdictions, we
operate under temporary licenses or without a license. There is
no assurance that we will be issued a license in these
jurisdictions.
Anti-Money
Laundering. The USA PATRIOT Act of
2001 and its implementing federal regulations require us to
establish and maintain an anti-money laundering program. Our
anti-money laundering program includes: (1) internal
policies, procedures, and controls designated to identify and
report money laundering; (2) a designated compliance
officer; (3) an ongoing employee training program; and
(4) an independent audit function to test the program.
In addition, the cash access services that we
provide are subject to certain recordkeeping and reporting
obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. Our gaming establishment
customers, in situations where our cash access services are
provided through gaming establishment cashier personnel, and we,
in situations where we provide our cash access services directly
to patrons through satellite cashiers or booths that we staff
and operate, are required to file a SAR with the
U.S. Treasury Departments
64
Financial Services Regulation
Following the events of September 11, 2001,
the United States and certain other governments have imposed and
are considering a variety of new regulations focused on the
detection and prevention of money laundering and money
transmitting to or from terrorists and other criminals.
Compliance with these new regulations may impact our business
operations or increase our costs.
Fund Transfers. Our
POS debit card transactions and ATM services are subject to the
Electronic Fund Transfer Act, which provides gaming patrons
with certain rights including with respect to disputes relating
to unauthorized charges, charges that list the wrong date or
amount, charges for goods and services that are not accepted or
delivered as agreed, math errors and charges for which a
cardholder asks for an explanation or written proof of
transaction along with a claimed error or request for
clarification. We have implemented the necessary policies and
procedures in order to comply with the regulatory requirements
for fund transfers.
Credit Reporting.
Our Central Credit gaming patron credit bureau services are
subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, which provide patrons
certain rights to access their Central Credit files, dispute
information contained in their Central Credit files and add
brief statements to their Central Credit files in the event
disputes are not resolved by our investigation. We continue to
implement policies and procedures as well as adapt our business
practices in order to comply with these laws and regulations. In
addition to federal regulation, our Central Credit gaming patron
credit bureau services are subject to the state credit reporting
regulations which impose similar requirements to the Fair Credit
Reporting Act and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
of 2003.
Debt Collection.
Although we currently outsource all debt collection efforts to a
third party, we may engage in debt collection efforts for credit
extended using our QuikCredit service and we may engage in
efforts to collect on dishonored checks purchased by Central
Credit pursuant to our check warranty services and chargeback.
All such collection practices are subject to the Fair Debt
Collections Practices Act, which generally prohibits unfair,
deceptive or abusive debt collection practices, as well as
consumer-debt-collection laws and regulation adopted by the
various states.
Privacy Regulations.
Our collection of information from patrons who use our cash
access services is subject to the financial information privacy
protection provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and its
implementing federal regulations. We gather, as permitted by
law, certain non-public, personally-identifiable financial
information from patrons who use our cash access services, such
as names, addresses, telephone numbers, bank and credit card
account numbers, Social Security numbers and income, credit
histories and transaction information. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act requires us to safeguard and protect the privacy of such
non-public personal information. Also, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act requires us to make certain disclosures to patrons regarding
our privacy and information sharing policies and give patrons
the opportunity to prevent us from releasing information about
them to unaffiliated third parties in certain situations. In
this regard, we provide patrons with a privacy notice, an
65
ATM Operations. Our
ATM services are subject to applicable state banking regulations
in each jurisdiction in which we operate ATMs. These regulations
require, among other things, that we register with the state
banking regulators as an operator of ATMs, that we provide
gaming patrons with certain notices of the transaction fees
assessed upon use of our ATMs, that our transaction fees do not
exceed designated maximums, that we offer gaming patrons a means
of resolving disputes with us, and that we comply with
prescribed safety and security requirements.
Check Cashing. In
jurisdictions in which we serve as a check casher or agree to
defer deposit of gaming patrons checks under our
QuikCredit services, we are subject to the state licensing
requirements and regulations governing check cashing activities.
Generally, these regulations require us to obtain a license from
the states banking regulators to operate as a check
casher. Certain states also impose restrictions on this activity
such as restrictions on the amounts of service fees that may be
imposed on the cashing of certain types of checks, requirements
as to records that must be kept with respect to dishonored
checks, and requirements as to the contents of receipts that
must be delivered to gaming patrons at the time a check is
cashed.
Lending. In those
states in which we are deemed to operate as a short-term
consumer or payday lender as a result of our QuikCredit
services, we are subject to the various state regulations
governing the terms of the loans. Typically, the state
regulations limit the amount that a lender or service provider
may lend or provide and, in some cases, the number of loans or
transactions that a lender or service provider may make to any
customer at one time, restrict the amount of finance or service
charges or fees that the lender or service provider may assess
in connection with any loan or transaction. The lender or
service provider must also comply with various consumer
disclosure requirements, which are typically similar or
equivalent to the Federal Truth in Lending Act and corresponding
federal regulations, in connection with the loans or
transactions.
Network and Card Association
Regulation. In addition to the
governmental regulation described above, certain of our services
are also subject to rules promulgated by various payment
networks, EFT networks and card associations.
When contracting with tribal owned or controlled
gaming establishments, we become subject to tribal laws and
regulations that may differ materially from the non-tribal laws
and regulations under which we generally operate. In addition to
tribal gaming regulations that may require us to provide certain
disclosures or obtain certain licenses or permits to conduct our
business on tribal lands, we may also become subject to tribal
laws that govern our contracts. These tribal governing laws may
not provide us with processes, procedures and remedies that
enable us to enforce our rights as effectively and
advantageously as the processes, procedures and remedies that
would be afforded to us under non-tribal laws, or to enforce our
rights at all, and may expose us to an increased risk of
contract repudiation as compared to that inherent in dealing
with non-tribal customers. Many tribal laws permit redress to a
tribal adjudicatory body to resolve disputes; however, such
redress is largely untested in our experience. We may be
precluded from enforcing our rights against a tribal body under
the legal doctrine of sovereign immunity.
We are also subject to a variety of gaming and
other laws and regulations in the United Kingdom, Canada and the
Caribbean, and we expect to become subject to gaming and other
laws in the jurisdictions into which we expand our operations.
Our expansion into new markets is dependent upon the adoption of
enabling legislation in new jurisdictions and our ability to
comply with the regulatory regimes adopted by such jurisdictions.
66
Other Regulation
As we develop new services and new products, we
may become subject to additional federal and state regulations.
For example, in the event that we form or acquire a bank or
industrial loan company, we would become subject to a number of
additional banking and financial institution regulations, which
may including the Bank Holding Company Act. These additional
regulations could substantially restrict the nature of the
business in which we may engage and the nature of the businesses
in which we may invest. In addition, changes in current laws or
regulations and future laws or regulations may restrict our
ability to continue our current methods or operation or expand
our operations and may have material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Facilities
Our headquarters are located in a leased facility
in Las Vegas, Nevada and consist of approximately
40,000 square feet of office space which is under a lease
through May 2011. We operate a remote sales office in
approximately 800 square feet of office space in Atlantic
City, New Jersey under a lease through August 14, 2005. We
also lease approximately 1,262 square feet of space in
Reno, Nevada under a lease through July 31, 2005, which
houses computer systems and equipment that constitute our backup
data center. We may seek to relocate our Reno facility upon the
expiration of that lease. We believe that these facilities are
adequate for our business as presently conducted and provide
necessary redundancy for disaster recovery purposes.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had
approximately 295 employees. We are not subject to any
collective bargaining agreement and have never been subject to a
work stoppage. We believe that we have maintained good
relationships with our employees.
Legal Proceedings
On October 22, 2004, we and USA Payments, as
co-plaintiffs, filed a complaint in United States District
Court, District of Nevada against U.S. Bancorp d/b/a
U.S. Bank, Certegy Inc., Certegy Check Services, Inc., Game
Financial Corporation and GameCash, Inc. alleging the
infringement of the patented 3-in-1 rollover
functionality. In this litigation, we are seeking an injunction
against future infringement of the patent and recovery of
damages as a result of past infringement of the patent. In its
response, the defendants have denied infringement and have
asserted patent invalidity. In addition, the defendants have
asserted various antitrust and unfair competition counterclaims.
We are threatened with or named as a defendant in
various lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, such as
personal injury claims and employment-related claims.
It is not possible to determine the ultimate
disposition of these matters; however, we are of the opinion
that the final resolution of any such threatened or pending
litigation, individually or in the aggregate, is not likely to
have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow,
results of operations or financial position.
67
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth information as to
persons who are expected to serve as our directors and executive
officers upon consummation of this offering, together with their
positions and ages. Executive officers are appointed by and
serve at the pleasure of our board of directors.
Name | Age | Position | ||||
Karim Maskatiya
|
52 | Co-Founder, Co-Chairman and Director | ||||
Robert Cucinotta
|
44 | Co-Founder and Director | ||||
Kirk Sanford
|
38 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
Harry C. Hagerty
|
44 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Diran Kludjian
|
48 | Executive Vice President of North American and International Sales | ||||
Kurt Sullivan
|
53 | Executive Vice President | ||||
Thomas Sears
|
45 | Executive Vice President of Business Development | ||||
Walter G. Kortschak
|
45 | Co-Chairman and Director | ||||
Charles J. Fitzgerald
|
37 | Director | ||||
E. Miles Kilburn
|
42 | Director |
Set forth below is a brief description of the business experience of the persons who are expected to serve as our directors and executive officers upon consummation of this offering:
Karim Maskatiya is a co-founder and co-chairman of the company and has served as a member of the board of directors designated by M&C International since our incorporation pursuant to the stockholders agreement that was entered into among our stockholders prior to this offering. Mr. Maskatiya is also President and Chairman of M&C International. From 1992 to present, Mr. Maskatiya has been a principal of USA Processing, Inc., an independent sales organization in the merchant processing industry. From 2001 to present, Mr. Maskatiya has been a principal of WD International, L.L.C., formerly known as Cornerstone Payment Systems, L.L.C., an independent sales organization in the merchant processing industry. Mr. Maskatiya is also President and Chairman of USA Payments, a payment processing company whose services we use, President of USA Payment Systems, a payment processing company whose services we use, and Chairman of Infonox on the Web, a technology research and development company whose services we use. Mr. Maskatiya has also been a real estate investor and developer in Northern California since 1978.
Robert Cucinotta is a co-founder of the company and has served as a member of the board of directors designated by M&C International since our incorporation pursuant to the stockholders agreement that was entered into among our stockholders prior to this offering. Mr. Cucinotta is also Secretary of M&C International. From 1992 to present, Mr. Cucinotta has been a principal of USA Processing, Inc. From 2001 to present, Mr. Cucinotta has been a principal of WD International, L.L.C., formerly known as Cornerstone Payment Systems, L.L.C. Mr. Cucinotta is also Secretary of USA Payments, Secretary of Infonox on the Web and Secretary of USA Payment Systems. Mr. Cucinotta has been a real estate investor and developer in Northern California since 1983.
Kirk Sanford has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since 1999 and was a member of our management committee when we conducted our operations as a limited liability company from 1998 through May 2004. Mr. Sanford joined our board of directors in March 2005. Before serving as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Sanford was our Executive Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Product Development from 1998 to 1999. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Sanford was
68
Harry C. Hagerty has
served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer since July 2004. Before joining our executive team,
Mr. Hagerty was Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. from March 2002
to May 2004. Prior to that, he was the Chief Operating Officer
of Akula Software, Inc. from October 2001 to March 2002, and
Chief Financial Officer from April 2001 to October 2001. From
November 1999 to April 2001, he was President of Venator
Corporate Advisors. Mr. Hagerty has also served as Managing
Director, Investment Banking of BancBoston Robertson Stephens
Inc. from March 1998 to November 1999, and Managing Director,
Investment Banking of Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Inc. from January
1994 to March 1998.
Diran Kludjian has
served as our Executive Vice President of North American and
International Sales since 1999. Prior to that he was Senior Vice
President from November 1998 to 1999. Before joining our
executive team, Mr. Kludjian spent five years with First
Data Corporation, last serving as a vice president of the Chase
Banking Alliance for the entertainment and travel sector.
Mr. Kludjian also has 15 years of consumer product
sales and marketing experience.
Kurt Sullivan joined
us in December 2000 and currently serves as an Executive Vice
President where he directs the development and deployment of our
QCP Web and ACM products and our QuikCredit and Central Credit
check warranty service. Prior to joining us, Mr. Sullivan
had 22 years of experience in the gaming industry,
including 20 years with Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. He
served on the Board of Directors of Circus Circus Enterprises,
Inc. and held several management positions, the most recent
being senior vice president of operations and general manager.
Mr. Sullivan has also worked for the MGM Grand
Hotel & Casino and Park Place Entertainment Corporation.
Thomas Sears has
served as our Executive Vice President of Business Development
since he joined the Company in March 2002. Prior to joining the
company, Mr. Sears spent seven years at Park Place
Entertainment as vice president of operations and vice president
of interactive strategies. Prior to that, Mr. Sears spent
nine years in operations at Harrahs Entertainment, Inc.,
including positions in five different markets (Atlantic City,
NJ, Reno, NV, Laughlin, CA, Las Vegas, NV and Vicksburg, MS).
Mr. Sears began his career at Harrahs Entertainment,
Inc., which was then known as Holiday Inns, Inc., as a labor
analyst in 1984 and eventually served as director of finance
during the opening of the Vicksburg facility.
Walter G. Kortschak
has served as a member of the board of
directors since our incorporation as a designee pursuant to the
stockholders agreement that was entered into among our
stockholders prior to this offering. Mr. Kortschak is a
managing partner and managing member of various entities
affiliated with Summit Partners, a private equity and venture
capital firm, where he has been employed since June 1989. Prior
to that, he was a Vice President at Crosspoint Venture Partners,
a venture capital firm. Mr. Kortschak also serves as a
director of AlphaSmart, Inc., a provider of technology solutions
for the education market, Somera Communications, Inc., a
telecommunications equipment company, the National Venture
Capital Association and several privately held companies.
Charles J. Fitzgerald
has served as a member of the board of
directors since our incorporation as a designee pursuant to the
stockholders agreement that was entered into among our
stockholders prior to this offering. Mr. Fitzgerald has
been a partner and member of various entities affiliated with
Summit Partners, a private equity and venture capital firm,
since January 2005. Prior to that, he was a principal of Summit
Partners from 2002 to 2004 and a vice president from 2001 to
2002. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Fitzgerald was the chief
executive officer of North Systems, Inc., a software vendor.
Mr. Fitzgerald also serves as a director of WebSideStory,
Inc., a provider of on-demand web analytics and several
privately held companies.
69
E. Miles Kilburn
has served as a member of the board of
directors since March 2005. Mr. Kilburn has been a private
investor since June 2004. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice
President and Chief Strategy Officer with Concord EFS, Inc.
(which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Data
Corporation in February 2004) from 2003 to 2004, and Senior Vice
President of Business Strategy and Corporate Development from
2001 to 2003. Mr. Kilburn was Group Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer for Star Systems, Inc.
from 1999 to 2001. He has also served as Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer for Primary Payment Systems, Inc., a
majority-owned subsidiary of Star Systems, Inc., from 1997 to
1999. Mr. Kilburn also serves as a director of several
privately held companies.
Composition of Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of six
members.
Messrs. Maskatiya, Cucinotta, Kortschak,
Fitzgerald, Kilburn and Sanford were appointed to the board
pursuant to a stockholders agreement entered into among our
stockholders prior to this offering. The parties to the
stockholders agreement agreed to cause the election to the board
of, among others, two representatives designated by M&C
International (Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta), two
representatives designated by the holders of a majority of all
shares of voting capital stock other than those held by M&C
International (Messrs. Kortschak and Fitzgerald) and one
individual that is neither an officer nor an employee of ours
and that is approved by M&C International and the holders of
a majority of all shares of voting capital stock other than
those held by M&C International and Bank of America
Corporation and that is an independent director under the
relevant rules promulgated by the New York Stock Exchange
(Mr. Kilburn). The stockholders agreement further provides
for the election, in certain circumstances, of up to two
additional directors that are neither officers nor employees of
ours. The first such additional director must be approved by
M&C International and the holders of a majority of all
shares of voting capital stock other than those held by M&C
International and Bank of America Corporation. The second such
additional director must be approved by M&C International,
the holders of a majority of all shares of voting capital stock
held by entities affiliated with Tudor Investment Corporation
and the holders of a majority of all shares of voting capital
stock other than those held by M&C International and Bank of
America Corporation. The requisite stockholders have waived
compliance with the provision of the stockholders agreement
relating to the election of the first such additional director
in favor of appointing Mr. Sanford to the board. This
waiver is revocable at any time by the same vote of the
requisite stockholders that was required to effect the waiver.
The relevant provisions of this stockholders agreement will
expire upon the completion of this offering.
Upon the completion of this offering we will have
a board of directors comprised of our current six directors.
Each of Messrs. Kortschak, Fitzgerald and Kilburn will be
independent directors under the relevant rules promulgated by
the New York Stock Exchange. In accordance with the terms of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws,
the board of directors will be divided into three classes,
Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class
serving staggered three-year terms. The members of the classes
will be as follows:
Our directors may be removed only for cause by
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our voting
stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that the authorized number of directors
may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors.
This classification of the board of
70
Class I, whose term will expire at the
annual meeting of the stockholders to be held in 2006, will be
comprised of Messrs. Sanford and Kilburn;
Class II, whose term will expire at the
annual meeting of the stockholders to be held in 2007, will be
comprised of Messrs. Cucinotta and Fitzgerald; and
Class III, whose term will expire at the
annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2008, will be
comprised of Messrs. Maskatiya and Kortschak.
Committees of the Board of
Directors
Our audit committee currently consists of
Messrs. Kortschak and Fitzgerald, neither of whom is
independent, as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange
Act. Upon the consummation of this offering, Mr. Kilburn,
who is independent, as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act, will join the audit committee and will be our
audit committee financial expert under the SEC rules
implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange. Our audit committee has the power to investigate any
matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties
and to retain counsel for this purpose where appropriate. The
audit committee has the responsibility for, among other things:
We do not currently have a compensation
committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
Kirk Sanford, our Chief Executive Officer, and Harry Hagerty,
our Chief Financial Officer, participated in deliberations of
our board of directors concerning executive officer
compensation. Upon the consummation of this offering, we will
establish a compensation committee. We anticipate our
71
Audit Committee
reviewing policies and procedures adopted by
management regarding fair and accurate presentation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC;
overseeing our accounting and financial reporting
processes, overseeing audits of our financial statements and
reviewing the companys audited financial statements with
management, including a review of major issues regarding
accounting and auditing principles and practices, and evaluating
the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls that could
significantly affect the companys financial statements, as
well as the adequacy and effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and managements reports
thereon;
reviewing and discussing reports from our
independent auditor regarding: (a) all critical accounting
policies and practices to be used by the company; (b) all
alternative treatments of financial information within GAAP that
have been discussed with management; and (c) other material
written communications between our independent auditor and
management;
reviewing major changes to the companys
auditing and accounting principles and practices as suggested by
the our independent auditor, internal auditors or management,
and reviewing the significant reports to management prepared by
the companys internal auditing department and
managements responses;
establishing procedures for: (a) the
receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the
company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or
auditing matters; and (b) the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of the company of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters;
advising the board of directors with respect to
the companys policies and procedures regarding compliance
with applicable laws and regulations; and
overseeing the work of the registered public
accounting firm engaged in audit, review or attest services for
the company, overseeing the appointment, compensation and
retention of the registered public accounting firm, and
overseeing and ensuring the independence of our independent
auditor, and reviewing and pre-approving of all audit services
and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our
independent auditor.
Compensation Committee; Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation
Decisions
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
Upon the consummation of this offering, we will
establish a nominating and corporate governance committee. We
anticipate our nominating and corporate governance committee
upon the completion of this offering to consist of
Messrs. Kortschak and Fitzgerald, each of whom is
independent under the relevant rules promulgated by the New York
Stock Exchange. The nominating and corporate governance
committee will have responsibility for, among other things:
Director Compensation
Prior to March 2005, the members of our board of
directors did not receive any compensation for serving on the
board of directors or the board of directors of any of our
subsidiaries. Commencing in
72
assisting the board of directors in discharging
its responsibilities relating to compensation of our directors
and executive officers;
reviewing and approving goals and objectives for
Chief Executive Officer compensation and recommending to the
board of directors non-Chief Executive Officer compensation and
incentive compensation plans and equity based plans that are
subject to board of directors approval;
administering our incentive compensation plans
and equity based plans, approving new equity compensation plan
or material changes to an existing plan where stockholder
approval has not been obtained, and approving awards as
determined by the board of directors; and
ensuring corporate performance measures and goals
are set and determining the extent that established goals have
been achieved and any related compensation earned.
developing and recommending to the board of
directors, and implementing a set of corporate governance
principles and procedures;
developing and recommending to the board of
directors, and implementing and monitoring compliance with, a
code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and
employees, and promptly disclosing and waivers for directors or
executive officers;
assessing the adequacy of the code of business
conduct and ethics and recommending any changes;
assisting the board of directors in assessing
board of directors composition, selecting nominees for election
to the board of directors consistent with criteria approved by
the board of directors, and advising the board of directors on
each committee of the board of directors regarding member
qualifications, committee appointments and removals, committee
structure and operations and committee reporting;
determining the compensation of members of the
board and its committees;
advising the board of directors on candidates for
executive offices, and advising the board of directors on
candidates for the position of Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer; and
establishing and monitoring a process of
assessing the board of directors effectiveness and
overseeing the evaluation of the board of directors and
management.
73
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information
regarding compensation paid by us to our Chief Executive Officer
and our four other highest-paid executive officers, as well as
two former executive officers that would have been among our
four highest-paid executive officers had they remained employed
with us through the end of 2004:
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Annual | Underlying | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Compensation ($)(2) | Options (#) | Compensation ($) | |||||||||||||||||
Kirk Sanford
|
2004 | $ | 286,532 | $ | 150,000 | $ | | | $ | 9,662 | (3)(4) | ||||||||||||
Chief Executive | 2003 | 297,500 | 150,000 | | | 6,077 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Officer(1) | 2002 | 350,000 | 350,000 | | | 6,154 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Harry Hagerty
|
2004 | 126,923 | 94,247 | | 722,215 | 234 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial | 2003 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Officer(5) | 2002 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Diran Kludjian
|
2004 | 230,058 | 186,227 | | | 39,968 | (3)(4)(7) | ||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice | 2003 | 200,000 | 123,100 | | | 6,970 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
President of North | 2002 | 150,000 | 190,781 | | | 6,277 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
American and International Sales(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas Sears
|
2004 | 171,538 | 78,000 | | | 13,178 | (3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice | 2003 | 199,750 | 37,500 | | | 8,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
President of Business Development(6) | 2002 | 185,288 | 18,750 | | | 7,371 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Kurt Sullivan
|
2004 | 174,186 | 34,000 | | | 10,934 | (3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice | 2003 | 215,954 | 12,500 | | | 8,170 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
President | 2002 | 240,000 | 12,500 | | | 8,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Robert C. Fry(8)
|
2004 | 111,756 | 37,500 | | | 515,328 | (3)(4)(9) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 212,500 | 75,000 | 26,432 | | 6,057 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||
2002 | 230,769 | 120,000 | 26,442 | | 5,615 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||
Pamela Shinkle(10)
|
2004 | 100,002 | 37,500 | | | 516,779 | (3)(4)(9) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 168,846 | 37,500 | 55,703 | | 6,127 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||
2002 | 183,077 | 50,000 | | | 5,508 | (3) |
(1) | In 2004, our Chief Executive Officer received payments in the aggregate amount of approximately $17.3 million and $0.1 million from M&C International and USA Payments, respectively. In 2003 he received payments in aggregate amounts of $1.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively from these entities, and in 2002 he received payments in aggregate amounts of $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, from these entities. A portion of these payments were attributable to Mr. Sanfords prior approximately 1% ownership interest in M&C International, and a portion of these payments were to compensate him through payments from M&C International and USA Payments for advisory services that he performed for those entities. In 2005, M&C International transferred 575,213 shares of our capital stock to Mr. Sanford, issued a note in the principal amount of $7,572,696.21 payable to Mr. Sanford upon the consummation of this offering, and forgave a note from Mr. Sanford in the principal amount of $5,741,178 in consideration of his prior advisory services to M&C International. The terms of his prior advisory services arrangements with M&C International and USA Payments were solely economic, did not provide Mr. Sanford with any voting rights or rights to participate in the management of either entity, and did not provide Mr. Sanford with any rights to proceeds upon the liquidation of M&C International or USA Payments. M&C International redeemed in full Mr. Sanfords ownership interest in M&C International in exchange for 283,239 shares of our capital stock and $437,717.82 in cash. Pursuant to his employment |
74
The following table sets forth information
regarding grants of stock options we granted during the year
ended December 31, 2004 to the executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table. We granted one option to
purchase 722,215 shares of common stock during the
year ended December 31, 2004, giving effect to a stock
split consummated in January 2005. Potential realizable values
are net of exercise price before taxes, and are based on the
assumption that our common stock appreciates at the annual rate
shown, compounded annually, from the date of grant until
expiration of the ten-year option term. These numbers are
calculated based on requirements set forth in rules promulgated
by the SEC and do not reflect our projection or estimate of
future stock price appreciation.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
agreement, which shall become effective upon the
consummation of this offering, Mr. Sanford has agreed not
to perform services for or to receive any compensation or other
remuneration from entities affiliated with
Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta, including M&C
International and USA Payments, other than payments to
Mr. Sanford upon the consummation of this offering pursuant
to the promissory note described above.
(2)
Represents payout of accrued but unused vacation
time.
(3)
Includes company-provided match payments under
our 401(k) plan.
(4)
Includes reimbursement of out-of-pocket payments
incurred by executives for health care.
(5)
Mr. Hagerty became our Chief Financial
Officer in July 2004 with a base annual salary of
$300,000 per year and eligibility for a bonus of
$200,000 per year.
(6)
In 2004, Messrs. Kludjian and Sears received
payments in the aggregate amount of $0.5 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, from M&C International for
advisory services that they performed for M&C International
pursuant to informal arrangements with Messrs. Maskatiya
and Cucinotta. Neither Mr. Kludjian nor Mr. Sears
received any payments from M&C International in 2003 or
2002. These informal arrangements are terminable at any time at
the will of Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta or M&C
International.
(7)
Includes reimbursement of relocation and moving
costs incurred by Mr. Kludjian in connection with his
relocation to the Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area.
(8)
Mr. Fry is our former Chief Financial
Officer, whose employment terminated on May 28, 2004.
(9)
Represents the payment of $500,000 upon the
termination of employment of the named executive as partial
consideration for a covenant not to compete with us.
(10)
Ms. Shinkle is our former chief operating
officer, whose employment terminated on May 28, 2004.
Percent of | Potential Realizable Value at | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Total Options | Assumed Annual Rates of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
of Common Stock | Granted to | Exercise or | Stock Price Appreciation for | |||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Employees in | Base Price | Option Term | |||||||||||||||||||||
Options Granted | Fiscal Year | per Share | Expiration | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | (#) | 2004 | ($/Sh) | Date | 5% ($) | 10% ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Kirk Sanford
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Harry Hagerty
|
722,215 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8.046 | 9/1/2014 | $ | 3,656,287 | $ | 9,265,748 | ||||||||||||||
Diran Kludjian
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas Sears
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Kurt Sullivan
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert C. Fry
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Pamela Shinkle
|
| | | | | |
75
The stock option set forth above will become
exercisable for 25% of the shares subject to the option on
July 12, 2005, which is the first anniversary of the
commencement of Mr. Hagertys employment with us, and
option will become exercisable for the remainder of the shares
subject to the option in 36 successive equal monthly
installments, subject to the continuation of
Mr. Hagertys employment with us. Notwithstanding the
foregoing schedule, the option will become exercisable on an
accelerated basis in the event that we undergo certain types of
corporate transactions or changes in control, such as an
acquisition of us by a third party, or in the event that we
terminate Mr. Hagertys employment without cause, as
defined in Mr. Hagertys employment agreement, or
Mr. Hagerty resigns for good reason, as defined in his
employment agreement.
The following table sets forth information
regarding the number and value of securities underlying options
held as of December 31, 2004, giving effect to a stock
split consummated in January 2005, by the executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table.
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal
Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Number of Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Value of Unexercised | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Unexercised Options at | In-the-Money Options at | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired | Fiscal Year-End (#) | Fiscal Year-End ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
on Exercise | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | (#) | Realized ($) | Exercisable | Unexercisable | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ||||||||||||||||||
Kirk Sanford
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Harry Hagerty
|
| | | 722,215 | | $ | 4,289,957 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
Diran Kludjian
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas Sears
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Kurt Sullivan
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert C. Fry
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Pamela Shinkle
|
| | | | | |
(1) | Assumes a fair market value of $13.99 per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2004. |
Employment Agreements
Sanford Employment Agreement |
As of March 22, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement, to become effective upon the consummation of this offering, with Kirk Sanford, our Chief Executive Officer, for a term of three years, at a base annual salary of $297,500 and eligibility for a discretionary bonus in an amount to be determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion. In addition, the employment agreement provides Mr. Sanford with a pro rated partial target bonus equal to two-thirds of his base salary for the year in which his employment is terminated and one years salary continuation and target bonus equal to two-thirds of his base salary in the event his employment is terminated without cause. Further, the employment agreement provides Mr. Sanford with severance payments in the aggregate amount of 2.99 times the sum of his most recent years base annual salary and a target bonus equal to two-thirds of such base salary in the event his employment is terminated without cause within 12 months after a change in control of us. Additionally, Mr. Sanfords agreement provides for a tax gross-up in the event that he is subject to an excise tax in the event of any benefit he receives is deemed to constitute an excess parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Sanfords severance benefits are conditioned upon him executing certain releases in favor of us. In addition, Mr. Sanford has agreed not to perform services for or to receive any compensation or other remuneration from entities affiliated with Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta, including M&C International and USA Payments, other than payments to Mr. Sanford upon the consummation of this offering pursuant to the promissory note described in Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Entities Controlled by Karim Maskatiya and Robert Cucinotta.
76
As of July 12, 2004, we entered into an
employment agreement with Harry C. Hagerty, our Chief Financial
Officer, for a term of three years, at a base annual salary of
$300,000 and eligibility for a discretionary bonus of $200,000.
In addition, the employment agreement provides Mr. Hagerty
with a pro rated partial target bonus for the year in which his
employment is terminated, one years salary continuation
and target bonus, pro rated vesting of his stock option plus one
years accelerated vesting of his stock option if his
employment is terminated without cause prior to the first
anniversary of his employment, and full accelerated vesting of
his stock option in the event his employment is terminated
without cause after the first anniversary of his employment. The
employment agreement also provides for full accelerated vesting
of his stock option upon the occurrence of certain events,
including an acquisition of us or a change in control of us.
Further, the employment agreement provides Mr. Hagerty with
severance and noncompete payments in the aggregate amount of
2.99 times the sum of his most recent years base annual
salary plus a target bonus equal to two-thirds of such base
salary in the event his employment is terminated without cause
within 12 months after a change in control of us.
Additionally, Mr. Hagertys agreement provides for a
tax gross-up in the event that he is subject to an
excise tax in the event of any benefit he receives is deemed to
constitute an excess parachute payment under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
Mr. Hagertys severance benefits are conditioned upon
him executing certain releases in favor of us.
Mr. Hagertys employment agreement also contains a
noncompetition covenant lasting for two years after termination
of his employment and a nonsolicitation covenant lasting for one
year after termination of his employment.
We do not have employment agreements with any of
our other executive officers or employees.
The agreements pursuant to which we have granted
stock options to Messrs. Sanford, Kludjian, Sears and
Sullivan provide for full acceleration of vesting of the
portions of the stock options that are neither assumed nor
replaced by a successor corporation after an acquisition of us,
and for full acceleration of vesting of the portions of the
stock options that are assumed or replaced in the event that the
respective executives employment is terminated without
cause within 18 months after an acquisition of us. The
agreements further provide for full acceleration of the vesting
of the stock options in the event that the respective
executives employment is terminated without cause within
18 months after a change in control of us. Further, Mr.
Sanfords stock option agreement provides for full
acceleration in the event of the termination of his employment
without cause at any time.
Our regular hiring practice requires each newly
hired employee to execute an agreement relating to the
confidentiality of our proprietary information and the
assignment to us of inventions conceived within the scope of
employment. In addition, we require employees and consultants to
execute agreements not to compete with us for a specified period
following their employment with or engagement by us as a
condition to being considered for the grant of an award under
our stock incentive plan.
2005 Stock Incentive Plan
In January 2005, we adopted our 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan. The following summary of the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan is qualified by reference to the full text
thereof, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
We have reserved 3,841,615 shares of common
stock for the grant of stock options and other equity incentive
awards under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. On the first
business day of each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year
commencing on January 1, 2006, annual increases will be
added to the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan equal to the lesser of:
(A) 3% of all outstanding shares of our common stock
immediately prior to such increase, (B) a lesser amount
determined by our board of directors, or
77
Hagerty Employment Agreement
Sanford, Kludjian, Sears and Sullivan Stock
Option Agreements
Other Employment-Related
Agreements
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan may be administered
by our board of directors or a committee thereof. Presently, the
2005 Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee. The administrator has the authority to select
individuals who are to receive options or other equity incentive
awards under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and to specify the
terms and conditions of options or other equity incentive awards
granted (including whether or not such options are incentive or
nonstatutory stock options), the vesting provisions, the term
and the exercise price. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan provides
that we may grant incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code to employees,
including our officers and employee directors, and we may grant
nonstatutory stock options to employees and consultants,
including non-employee directors.
The exercise price of incentive stock options
granted under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan shall equal the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant (except in
the case of grants to any person holding more than 10% of the
total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, or any
of our parents or subsidiaries stock, in which case
the exercise price shall equal 110% of the fair market value on
the date of grant). The exercise price of nonqualified stock
options shall not be less than 85% of the fair market value on
the date of grant (except in the case of grants to any person
holding more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all
classes of our stock, or any of our parents or
subsidiaries stock, in which case the exercise price shall
equal 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant).
Option holders may pay for an exercise in cash or other
consideration, including a promissory note, as approved by the
administrator.
Generally, options granted under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan (other than those granted to non-employee
directors) will vest at a rate of 25% of the shares underlying
the option after one year and the remaining shares vest in equal
portions over the following 36 months, such that all shares
are vested after four years. Unless otherwise provided by the
administrator, an option granted under the 2005 Stock Plan
generally expires 10 years from the date of grant (five
years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to any
person holding more than 10% of the total combined voting power
of all classes of our stock, or any of our parents or
subsidiarys, stock). Upon the optionees termination
of employment or service with us or any of our affiliates
without cause, the option will terminate in three months. Upon
the optionees termination of employment or service with us
or any of our affiliates for cause, the option may be terminated
immediately. Upon the optionees death or disability, the
option will terminate 12 months after the optionees
death or disability. In addition, options granted under our 2005
Stock Plan are not generally transferable by the optionee except
by will or the laws of descent and distribution and generally
are exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee only by such
optionee.
In the event we merge with or into another
corporation or dispose of all or substantially all of our
assets, or in the event of other transactions in which our
stockholders before the transaction own less than 50% of the
total combined voting power of all our outstanding securities
after the transaction, all outstanding awards under the 2005
Stock Incentive Plan will terminate unless they are assumed or
equivalent awards are substituted by the successor corporation
or any of its parents or subsidiaries, unless an individual
award agreement provides otherwise.
Report of the Board of Directors on Executive
Compensation
The following report shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor shall the following report be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any future filings under the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act.
Our entire board of directors has the
responsibility to approve the overall compensation strategy,
administer our annual and long-term compensation plans, and make
all decisions with respect to executive compensation.
78
The objectives of our executive compensation
policies are to attract, retain, motivate and reward key
personnel who possess the necessary leadership and management
skills, through competitive base salary, annual cash bonus
incentives, long-term incentive compensation in the form of
stock options, and various benefits, including medical and life
insurance plans.
Our executive compensation policies are intended
to combine competitive levels of compensation and rewards for
above average performance and to align relative compensation
with the achievements of key business objectives, optimal
satisfaction of customers and maximization of stockholder value.
The board of directors believes that stock ownership by
management is beneficial in aligning management and stockholder
interests, thereby enhancing stockholder value.
Base Salaries.
Salaries for our executive officers are determined primarily on
the basis of the executive officers responsibility,
general salary practices of peer companies and the
officers individual qualifications and experience. The
base salaries are reviewed annually and may be adjusted by the
board of directors, or a compensation committee formed in the
future, in accordance with certain criteria which include
individual performance, the functions performed by the executive
officer, the scope of the executive officers on-going
duties, general changes in the compensation peer group in which
we compete for executive talent, and our financial performance
generally. The weight given to each such factor by the board of
directors may vary from individual to individual.
Incentive Bonuses.
The board of directors believes that a cash incentive bonus plan
can serve to motivate our executive officers and management to
address annual performance goals, using more immediate measures
for performance than those reflected in the appreciation in
value of stock options. The bonus amounts are based upon
recommendations by management and a subjective consideration of
factors including such officers level of responsibility,
individual performance, contributions to our success and our
financial performance generally.
Stock Option Grants.
Stock options may be granted to executive officers and other
employees under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. Because of the
direct relationship between the value of an option and the stock
price, the board of directors believes that options motivate
executive officers to manage our business in a manner that is
consistent with stockholder interests. Stock option grants are
intended to focus the attention of the recipient on our
long-term performance which we believe results in improved
stockholder value, and to retain the services of the executive
officers in a competitive job market by providing significant
long-term earnings potential. To this end, stock options
generally vest and become fully exercisable over a four-year
period. The principal factors considered in granting stock
options to our executive officers are prior performance, level
of responsibility, other compensation and the executive
officers ability to influence our long-term growth and
profitability. However, our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan does not
provide any quantitative method for weighing these factors, and
a decision to grant an award is primarily based upon a
subjective evaluation of the past as well as future anticipated
performance.
Other Compensation
Plans. We have adopted certain general
employee benefit plans in which executive officers are permitted
to participate on parity with other employees. In addition,
certain executive officers are entitled to reimbursement of
out-of-pocket payments incurred for health care. We also provide
a 401(k) plan.
Deductibility of
Compensation. Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) disallows us to
deduct compensation exceeding $1.0 million paid to certain
executive officers, excluding, among other things, performance
based compensation. Because the compensation paid to the
executive officers has not approached the limitation, the board
of directors has not had to use any of the available exemptions
from the deduction limit. The board of directors remains aware
of the IRC Section 162(m) limitations and the available
exemptions and will address the issue of deductibility when and
if circumstances warrant the use of such exemptions.
Chief Executive Officer
Compensation. The compensation of our
Chief Executive Officer is reviewed annually on the same basis
as discussed above for all executive officers. The board of
directors established an annual base salary of $297,500 for
Mr. Sanford the time that he entered into his
79
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of
Officers and Directors
Our certificate of incorporation generally
provides that our directors will not be liable to us or to our
stockholders for monetary damages for a breach of a fiduciary
duty. Our bylaws provide for indemnification against all losses
actually incurred by directors and officers in connection with
any action, suit or proceeding relating to their position as a
director or officer. Our bylaws also provide for indemnification
or reimbursement of expenses to any of our employees. These
provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are
discussed further under the heading Description of Our
Capital Stock.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
Indemnification, Employment and Noncompetition
Agreements
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law, we have adopted provisions in our bylaws that authorize and
require us to indemnify our officers and directors to the
fullest extent permitted under Delaware law, subject to limited
exceptions. See Management Limitation of
Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors.
Pursuant to those provisions, we have entered into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
executive officers.
We have also entered into employment agreements
with Mr. Sanford, our Chief Executive Officer, and
Mr. Hagerty, our Chief Financial Officer. See
Management Employment Agreements.
In May 2004, we entered into a noncompetition
agreement with Mr. Sanford, our Chief Executive Officer.
The agreement prohibits Mr. Sanford from engaging in
certain specifically prescribed competitive activities during
the 24-month period following the termination of his employment
with us. In addition, the agreement prohibits Mr. Sanford
from soliciting our employees, customers or suppliers during
such 24-month period.
Stock Option Grants
We have granted options to purchase shares of our
common stock to certain of our executive officers. See
Management Executive Compensation.
Arrangements with Entities Controlled by
Stockholders and Members of the Board of Directors
Throughout our history, including the period
during which we conducted our operations as a limited liability
company, we have entered into arrangements with entities that
are controlled by our owners or members of our management
committee or board of directors. We believe that in doing so, we
have entered into arrangements on terms no less favorable to us
than we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
80
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Karim Maskatiya
Robert Cucinotta
Kirk Sanford
Walter G. Kortschak
Charles J. Fitzgerald
E. Miles Kilburn
Entities Controlled by Karim Maskatiya and
Robert Cucinotta
Karim Maskatiya and Robert Cucinotta, our
founders and two members of our board of directors, together
hold a 99% ownership interest in, and comprise the board of
directors of, M&C International. Kirk Sanford, our Chief
Executive Officer, previously held an approximately 1% ownership
interest in, and was previously a director of, M&C
International. M&C International held 40.01% of our
outstanding capital stock immediately prior to this offering and
will hold % of our common stock
immediately following this offering. Through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Global Cash Access, Inc., we are currently a party
to multiple agreements with three other entities in which in
which Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta have significant
ownership and management interests. Those companies are: Infonox
on the Web, in which Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta have
an approximately 80% ownership interest and are two directors on
that companys four member board of directors; USA Payments
in which Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta are the sole
owners and comprise that companys entire board of
directors; and USA Payment Systems, in which
Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta have a 50% ownership
interest and are two directors on that companys four
member board of directors. The terms of our agreements with each
of these entities are summarized below. We may, in the future,
attempt to acquire USA Payment Systems or Infonox on the Web,
although we are not currently engaged in any negotiations or
discussions for that purpose. Any such acquisition may involve
us making payments, directly or indirectly, to
Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta.
In addition to his prior approximately 1%
ownership interest in M&C International, Mr. Sanford
was compensated with payments from M&C International and USA
Payments for advisory services that he performed for those
entities. In 2004, Mr. Sanford received advisory services
payments in the aggregate amount of approximately
$17.3 million and $0.1 million from M&C
International and USA Payments, respectively. In 2003 and 2002,
he received advisory services payments of $1.0 million and
$0.6 million from M&C International and
$0.1 million and $0.1 million from USA Payments. In
2005, M&C International transferred 575,213 shares of
our capital stock to Mr. Sanford, issued a note in the
principal amount of $7,572,696.21 payable to Mr. Sanford
upon the consummation of this offering, and forgave a note from
Mr. Sanford in the principal amount of $5,741,178 in
consideration of his prior advisory services to M&C
International. The terms of his prior advisory services
arrangement were solely economic did not provide
Mr. Sanford with any voting rights or rights to participate
in the management of either entity, and did not provide
Mr. Sanford with any rights to proceeds upon the
liquidation of M&C International or USA Payments. M&C
International redeemed in full Mr. Sanfords ownership
interest in M&C International in exchange for
283,239 shares of our capital stock and $437,717.82 in
cash. Pursuant to his employment agreement with us, which will
become effective upon the consummation of this offering,
Mr. Sanford has agreed not to perform services for or to
receive any compensation or other remuneration from entities
affiliated with Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta, including
M&C International and USA Payments, other than payments to
Mr. Sanford upon the consummation of this offering pursuant
to the promissory note described above.
In 2004, Messrs. Kludjian and Sears received
payments in the aggregate amount of $0.5 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, from M&C International for
advisory services that they performed for M&C International
pursuant to informal arrangements with Messrs. Maskatiya
and Cucinotta. Neither Mr. Kludjian nor Mr. Sears
received any payments from M&C International in 2003 or
2002. These informal arrangements are terminable at any time at
the will of Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta or M&C
International.
Infonox on the Web is approximately 80% owned by
Messrs. Maskatiya and Cucinotta in equal shares. We are
party to a Professional Services Agreement and a Technology Side
Letter with Infonox on the Web pursuant to which Infonox on the
Web develops, implements, maintains, hosts, operates, monitors
and supports certain software for us on an as requested basis,
including the transaction processing infrastructure upon which
our systems operate. This transaction processing infrastructure
81
Infonox on the Web
Our engagement of Infonox on the Web pursuant to
the Professional Services Agreement is exclusive within the
gaming industry such that Infonox on the Web may not perform any
professional services with respect to machines or devices used
in the gaming industry other than for us, except where those
services are performed for non-gaming merchant operations
conducted at establishments where gaming activity occurs for the
purchase of or payment for goods or services other than money
orders or gaming goods or services, subject to certain
conditions. We, on the other hand, are free to engage third
parties to provide professional services to us, subject to
Infonox on the Webs proprietary rights in the underlying
generic transaction processing infrastructure and the
limitations on our ability to sublicense our license rights
therein to a third party during the term of the Software License
Agreement with Infonox on the Web. In the event that we require
different or additional professional services or service levels
with respect to the underlying generic transaction processing
infrastructure or the customized implementation thereof that
Infonox on the Web cannot or does not agree to provide then,
pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated May 13, 2004 between
USA Payment Systems, USA Payments, Infonox on the Web and us, we
have the right to engage third-party professional service
providers, sublicense to them rights in Infonox on the
Webs proprietary technology that are licensed to us by
Infonox on the Web under the Software License Agreement, and
cause Infonox on the Web to cooperate with such third-party
professional service providers to enable them to provide such
professional services or service levels to us.
Under the agreement, we own all work product,
including the customized portions of the implementation of the
generic transaction processing infrastructure produced by
Infonox on the Web in the course of its provision of
professional services to us, including all intellectual property
rights therein. This agreement contains a service level
guarantee by Infonox on the Web that the transaction processing
infrastructure will be available to us and our customers at
least 99% of the time during any calendar month, subject to
certain exceptions. If Infonox fails to meet this service level
guarantee during any calendar month, then we have the right, as
our sole and exclusive remedy for such a breach, to terminate
these professional services upon notice to Infonox during the
thirty day period following that breach. As of May 2004, we are
obligated to pay Infonox on the Web a fixed fee of
$100,000 per month for the remainder of the term of these
services, potentially subject to certain adjustments starting in
January 2005, and to reimburse Infonox on the Web for certain
expenses it incurs in the performance of services for us. Under
this agreement Infonox on the Webs implementation,
hosting, operation, maintenance and support of a majority of our
systems is scheduled to expire on March 10, 2014, but may
be terminated upon certain breaches by either party, such as our
failure to pay fees owing to Infonox on the Web under the
agreement or Infonox on the Webs breach of the service
level agreement. The agreement requires Infonox on the Web to
continue to provide services during a transition period not to
exceed 90 days following termination of the agreement, if
we so request and regardless of the legal basis for such
termination. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we
incurred costs and expenses of $1.6 million in connection
with these services.
Pursuant to a Software License Agreement and a
Technology Side Letter with Infonox on the Web, we enjoy a
royalty-free, worldwide right and license to use the generic
transaction processing infrastructure described above, including
its component software, hardware and related services, solely in
connection with our use of the customized implementation of the
infrastructure which is hosted and operated by Infonox on the
Web pursuant to the Professional Services Agreement. Our license
to the generic transaction processing infrastructure is
exclusive in the gaming industry such that Infonox on the Web
may not grant any other licenses to the generic transactions
processing infrastructure to any
82
USA Payments is wholly owned in equal shares by
each of Mr. Maskatiya and Mr. Cucinotta, members of
our board of directors. USA Payment Systems is owned 50% in
equal shares by each of Mr. Maskatiya and
Mr. Cucinotta, members of our board of directors. We are
party to an Amended and Restated Agreement for Electronic
Payment Processing and a Technology Side Letter with USA
Payments and USA Payment Systems pursuant to which they perform
for us electronic payment processing services relating to credit
card cash advances, POS debit card transactions and ATM
withdrawal transactions, including transmitting authorization
requests to the relevant networks or gateways, forwarding
transaction approvals or denials to us, and facilitating the
settlement of all funds in connection with approved and
consummated transactions. This agreement contains a service
level guarantee by USA Payments and USA Payment Systems that the
electronic payment processing system used to process our
transactions will be available to process authorization requests
we transmit to USA Payments and USA Payment Systems computer
switch at least 99% of the time during any calendar month and
90% of the time during any calendar day, subject to certain
exceptions. The agreement prohibits USA Payments and USA Payment
Systems from scheduling any system maintenance or unavailability
on a weekend or holiday without our prior permission, and
permits systems maintenance or unavailability only during times
that we previously approve.
Pursuant to the agreement, we engaged USA
Payments to provide services to us, and USA Payments in turn
delegated certain of its obligations and assigned certain of its
rights to USA Payment Systems. USA Payments is under common
control with M&C International and USA Payment Systems is
50% owned by the principals of M&C International.
Under the agreement, USA Payments or USA Payment
Systems is required to enter into agreements with credit card,
POS debit card or ATM networks necessary to provide services to
us, and they must obtain the right to act as a switch processor,
intercept processor and/or acquirer with respect to such
networks, and provide the service to us as a switch processor,
intercept processor and/or acquirer. The agreement obligates USA
Payments and USA Payment Systems to maintain the
83
USA Payments and USA Payment
Systems
We are required to enter and comply with
agreements required by the gateway or network through which USA
Payments or USA Payment Systems processes transactions, and must
have a financial institution sponsor us or USA Payments or USA
Payment Systems with each network or gateway with which we or
USA Payment Systems have an agreement that requires such a
sponsor. We are required to have a financial institution perform
settlement services in connection with the settlement of
transactions processed through the services provided to us.
The agreement requires us to pay certain fixed
monthly fees to USA Payments together with a per transaction fee
based on the volume of transactions that processed under the
agreement, subject to an annual minimum number of transactions.
The fee is $0.03 per transaction for up to 50 million
transactions, $0.025 per transaction for between
50 million and 100 million transactions, and
$0.001 per transaction for over 100 million
transactions. The scale of per transaction fees and annual
minimum number of transactions remain fixed for the term of the
agreement. This agreement also requires us to pay directly or
reimburse USA Payments and USA Payment Systems for gateway or
network fees, all direct telecommunication charges on a per
transaction basis as billed by the provider, and monthly fees of
$6,000 and $12,000 for Mastercard and VISA base processing,
respectively, incurred in connection with providing these
services to us. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we
incurred costs and expenses of $4.1 million in connection
with the provision of these services.
Our engagement of USA Payments and USA Payment
Systems is exclusive within the gaming industry, such that
neither USA Payments nor USA Payment Systems can, subject to
certain limited exceptions, provide these services with respect
to any third partys machines or devices used in the gaming
industry, including without limitation machines or devices that
provide cash access services to patrons of gaming
establishments, but permits us to obtain these services from
other providers. This agreement expires on March 10, 2014,
but automatically renews for 12 month terms unless either
we or USA Payments or USA Payment Systems provides 90 days
prior written notice of termination. This agreement is
terminable by us following an uncured material breach by USA
Payments or USA Payment Systems, or by USA Payments following an
uncured material breach by us, such as our failure to pay fees
that are owing under the agreement, subject to USA
Payments and USA Payment Systems obligation to
continue to provide services to us during a 180-day transition
period, if we so request.
In March 2005, we acquired ownership of the
patent covering the 3-in-1 rollover functionality
from USA Payments pursuant to a Patent Purchase and License
Agreement. Under that agreement, we will pay USA Payments
$10.0 million upon the consummation of this offering. Under
that agreement, we granted USA Payments a nonexclusive license
to use the patent other than in the gaming industry. We
previously enjoyed use of the patent pursuant to a Patent
License Agreement and a Technology Side Letter with USA Payments
pursuant to which we were granted a royalty-free,
non-transferable, non-sublicensable, exclusive license to use
the patented 3-in-1 rollover functionality in the
gaming industry.
Entities Affiliated with Bank of America
Corporation
The following are arrangements we have entered
into with entities directly or indirectly affiliated with Bank
of America Corporation, the holder of 4.99% of our capital stock
prior to this offering:
We are party to a Sponsorship Agreement, as
amended by the Amendment Number 1 to Sponsorship Agreement,
to which Bank of America Merchant Services is a party. The
Sponsorship Agreement is an agreement between Bank of America
Merchant Services, First Data Corporation and us whereby Bank of
America Merchant Services agrees to complete all necessary forms
and agreements to sponsor us as a licensee under certain VISA
and MasterCard rules. The sponsorship is necessary for our
participation in certain ATM and POS debit card networks. Under
the terms of the
84
Sponsorship Agreement
In connection with the sponsorship, we and First
Data Corporation agree to jointly and severally indemnify Bank
of America Merchant Services against all costs related to our
failure to comply with the rules of VISA, MasterCard or the ATM
and POS debit card networks. First Data Corporation may
terminate the sponsorship agreement by at least
30 days prior written notice to Bank of America
Merchant Services, but has agreed not to exercise such right
prior to September 30, 2010. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
First Data Corporation may exercise its right to terminate on
30 days written notice should certain specified
events occur. We may terminate the sponsorship agreement upon
180 days written notice to Bank of America Merchant
Services. At the sole discretion of Bank of America Merchant
Services, Bank of America Merchant Services may terminate its
sponsorship of us and our terminals with respect to any card
association or network if it is informed by a card association
or network that we are in violation of the operating rules or
terms of Bank of America Merchant Services membership or
our licensees rights in the sponsored accounts with
respect to such card association, provided that we will have
15 days after written notice to cure any violation. In
addition to the termination rights above, either we or Bank of
America Merchant Services may terminate the sponsorship
agreement immediately in the event that either party or First
Data Corporation materially breaches its obligations under the
agreement and fails to cure such breach within the specified
cure period, in the event that either party or First Data
Corporation becomes insolvent or in the event that Bank of
America Merchant Services ceases to be a member of or sponsored
into VISA or MasterCard. While we may not assign this agreement
without the prior written consent of Bank of America Merchant
Services, Bank of America Merchant Services may assign its
rights and obligations under the agreement to an affiliate
without our consent. This agreement expires on
September 30, 2010.
Bank of America Merchant Services has informed us
that, in the event that the Sponsorship Agreement is terminated
or expires, it does not currently intend to enter into a new
sponsorship agreement with us.
In March 2004 when we conducted our operations as
a limited liability company, we, M&C International and Bank
of America Corporation entered into a Membership Unit Purchase
Agreement, pursuant to which Bank of America Corporation
purchased from M&C International 4.99% of the membership
units in us. Bank of America Corporation paid for the membership
units by issuing to M&C International two non-recourse
promissory notes in the principal amount of approximately
$12.0 million and approximately $8.0 million. The
approximately $12.0 million note was applied to the
purchase of, and was initially secured by, 2.99% of the
membership units in us. The approximately $8.0 million note
was applied to the purchase of, and was initially secured by,
2.0% of the membership units in us. The approximately
$12.0 million note bears interest at 1.62% per annum,
payable at maturity of the note and will mature on the
completion of this offering. The approximately $8.0 million
note bears interest at 1.62% per annum, payable at maturity
of the note and will mature on the completion of this offering.
In connection with our conversion to a corporation, the
promissory notes and the pledge agreements pursuant to which
Bank of America Corporation pledged its membership units as
collateral were
85
Equity Investment in Global Cash Access
Holdings, Inc.
Bank of America Corporation may redeem either
note, in whole or in part, at any time, without premium or
penalty, by paying cash in the amount of the principal amount of
such note being prepaid, together will all accrued and unpaid
interest on such principal amount to the date of prepayment. In
the case of the payment at the stated maturity of either note or
certain redemptions of either note, Bank of America Corporation
will have an option, in lieu of paying cash, to tender to
M&C International shares of capital stock purchased with
that note, in full satisfaction of the amount of that note being
so paid. Moreover, if Bank of America Corporation defaults on
either note, M&C Internationals only remedy would be
to foreclose on the shares of capital stock purchased with the
defaulted note.
The Membership Unit Purchase Agreement provided,
among other things, that, if we granted piggyback registration
rights to any other person, Bank of America Corporation would
also receive piggyback registration rights no less favorable
than those granted to that other person. The Membership Unit
Purchase Agreement further provided that Bank of America
Corporation would be subject to a customary lock-up for a period
not exceeding 180 days in connection with any public
offering of securities by us.
In connection with the original issuance and sale
of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012, we entered into a
purchase agreement with Banc of America Securities LLC as the
initial purchaser of the notes. The purchase agreement obligated
us to take certain actions to ensure that the notes were
eligible for deposit with and clearance and settlement through
The Depository Trust Company and eligible for the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. PORTAL market, obligates
us to provide certain information and reports to Banc of America
Securities LLC periodically, obligated us to establish certain
disclosure controls and procedures, pay certain expenses, and
indemnify Banc of America Securities LLC in its capacity as the
initial purchaser of the notes.
In connection with the original issuance and sale
of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012, we entered into a
registration rights agreement with Banc of America Securities
LLC as the initial purchaser of the notes. The registration
rights agreement obligated us to consummate an exchange offer of
the notes for registered notes of like tenor and effect, pay
liquidated damages to the holders of the notes if the exchange
offer was not consummated according to a prescribed schedule,
pay certain expenses, and indemnify the holders of the notes in
connection with the registration of the exchange notes.
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
In March 2004, our operating subsidiary, Global
Cash Access, Inc., entered into senior secured credit facilities
arranged by Banc of America Securities LLC, with Bank of
America, N.A. as administrative agent and collateral agent, in
an aggregate principal amount of $280.0 million, consisting
of a five-year revolving credit facility of $20.0 million
(with a $10.0 million letters of credit sub-facility and a
$5.0 million swingline sub-facility) and a six-year term
loan of $260.0 million. Proceeds of the term loan portion
of the senior secured credit facilities were used to finance in
part the recapitalization of our ownership in March 2004 and to
pay related fees and expenses. Proceeds from the revolving
credit facility portion of the senior secured credit facilities
are used for letters of credit and to provide working capital
and other general corporate purposes. The senior secured credit
facilities are guaranteed by us and all of our current and
future domestic wholly-owned subsidiaries, and are secured by a
first priority lien on all of the outstanding capital stock of
Global Cash Access, Inc., substantially all of our assets and
our guarantor subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, real
property, accounts receivable, inventory, instruments,
documents, deposit accounts, investment property, intellectual
property, general intangibles and equipment, and 65% of the
ownership interests in our foreign subsidiaries.
The senior secured credit facilities contain
affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others,
covenants relating to financial and compliance reporting,
covenants restricting us and our
86
Senior Subordinated Notes
Offering
The senior secured credit facilities also contain
customary events of default including, among others, payment
defaults under the credit facilities, covenant default under the
credit facilities, cross defaults on debt, certain judgments,
certain intellectual property licenses being not in full force
and effect or are amended, a change of control and any event of
default under our notes. An event of default under the senior
secured credit facilities will allow the lenders to accelerate
or, in certain cases, will automatically cause the acceleration
of, the maturity of the debt under the senior secured credit
facilities.
Other
We have entered into an agreement with Bank of
America, N.A. for the supply of currency to satisfy the normal
operating requirements of our ATMs and our ACMs. Under the terms
of this agreement, we pay a monthly cash usage fee equal to the
average daily dollars outstanding on all ATMs multiplied by the
average LIBOR rate for one-month deposits for the month
(calculated on the basis of the number of days in the month and
a 360-day year) plus a margin of 25 basis points. This
agreement commenced in June 2004, and we incurred
$3.1 million of cash usage fees under terms of this
agreement during the year ended December 31, 2004. We also
utilize Bank of America, N.A. for our general corporate banking
services. Our total fees incurred for general corporate banking
services provided to us during the year ended December 31,
2004 were $1.0 million.
Entities Controlled by First Data
Corporation
The following are arrangements we entered into
with entities directly or indirectly controlled by First Data
Corporation at a time when First Data Corporation indirectly
held an ownership interest in us and designees of First Data
Corporation served on our management committee:
TRS Recovery
Services, Inc.
We are party to a TeleCheck Marketing Agreement
with TRS Recovery Services, Inc. pursuant to which we were
appointed as an agent to market the TeleCheck check warranty
service to gaming establishments. In exchange for marketing the
TeleCheck check warranty service, we receive 87% of all service
fees collected from gaming establishments that have entered into
TeleCheck gaming service agreements as a result of our marketing
efforts. The current term of this agreement expires
March 31, 2006. The warranty provision of the agreement
provides that TRS Recovery Services, Inc. covenants to recover
from check writers of returned checks, within 120 days of
its purchase of such returned checks, not less than 70% of the
aggregate face amount of such returned checks. During the year
ended December 31, 2004, we incurred warranty expenses of
$10.1 million pursuant to the terms of this agreement with
TRS Recovery Services, Inc.
Integrated
Payment Systems, Inc. and Integrated Payment Systems Canada
Inc.
We are party to a Money Order
Trust Agreement with Integrated Payment Systems, Inc. and
our Canadian subsidiary, CashCall Systems, Inc., is party to a
Money Order Trust Agreement with Integrated Payment Systems
Canada Inc. pursuant to which we and CashCall Systems, Inc. were
appointed as agents to sell money order instruments issued by
Integrated Payment Systems, Inc. and Integrated Payment Systems
Canada Inc. Under the agreements, we and CashCall Systems, Inc.
may charge a discretionary consumer fee for each money order we
sell. In exchange, we pay Integrated
87
Western Union
Financial Services, Inc.
We are party to a Network Agency Agreement with
Western Union Financial Services, Inc. pursuant to which we were
appointed as an agent to market Western Unions money
transfer services to gaming establishments. As a network agent,
we enable casinos to complete Western Unions regular
two-party money transfers. In exchange, Western Union pays us
fees and commissions that vary with the amount of monthly
transactions. Our appointment as an agent to market Western
Unions money transfer services to gaming establishments
ends on March 10, 2007.
We are party to a Participation Agreement with
Western Union Financial Services, Inc. pursuant to which we are
granted certain rights to access the Western Union Financial
Services, Inc. network through ATMs or other eligible services
employed to access the network. For each Western Union domestic
money transfer transaction initiated at one of our terminals, we
will receive $0.50 and for each Western Union domestic money
transfer transaction disbursed from one of our terminals, we
will receive $2.50. Western Union receives from us a monthly
support fee of $500. The term of this agreement expires on
November 28, 2006. Thereafter, the agreement will continue
in effect subject to the right of either party to terminate the
agreement upon 90 days notice.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we
recorded revenues from Western Union Financial Services, Inc. of
approximately $0.4 million pursuant to the terms of this
agreement.
Chase
Merchant Services, L.L.C.
We are party to a Joint Marketing Agreement with
Chase Merchant Services, L.L.C. pursuant to which we are to
market the merchant processing services of Chase Merchant
Services, L.L.C. to our gaming establishment customers in
exchange for referral fees. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we received minimal payment from Chase
Merchant Services, L.L.C. pursuant to the terms of this
agreement.
First Data
Loan Company
CashCall Systems, Inc. is party to a Merchant
Services Agreement with First Data Loan Company, Canada
pursuant to which First Data Loan Company provides
processing and settlement services to support CashCall Systems,
Inc.s provision of cash access services to gaming
establishments in Canada. In exchange, CashCall Systems, Inc.
pays a fee to First Data Loan Company, Canada for services,
based upon assumptions associated with the anticipated annual
volume, average transaction size and customers method of
business. The Merchant Services Agreement requires CashCall
Systems, Inc., to use First Data Loan Company as its
exclusive provider of the services above in Canada. Under the
agreement, a change of control in CashCall Systems, Inc.
provides First Data Loan Company, Canada with the right to
terminate this agreement by giving not less than
10 days notice to CashCall Systems, Inc. The term of
this agreement expires on August 16, 2005, but unless any
party terminates by written notice at least 60 days
prior to term expiration, the agreement will automatically renew
for successive one-year renewal periods. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we paid First Data Loan Company,
Canada approximately $0.7 million in interchange and
88
First
Financial Bank (formerly known as Western Union
Bank)
We are party to an Automated Teller Machine
Sponsorship Agreement with First Financial Bank (formerly known
as Western Union Bank) pursuant to which First Financial Bank
sponsors us as a participant in certain ATM networks. The
sponsorship, as amended by the amended Automated Teller Machine
Sponsorship Agreement, allows us to connect our ATMs to the NYCE
network. In exchange, we pay First Financial Bank $0.005 for
each completed transaction that is transmitted through any of
the networks sponsored by First Financial Bank. We may not
assign our rights under the agreement without prior written
consent from First Financial Bank, which may not be unreasonably
withheld. The term of this agreement expires on
November 12, 2005. Thereafter, the agreement will
automatically renew for successive one-year renewal periods
unless terminated by either party according to the terms
thereof. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we made
minimal payments to First Financial Bank pursuant to the terms
of this agreement.
First Data
POS, Inc.
First Data POS, Inc. has historically deployed,
warehoused and maintained equipment for us without a written
agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we made
minimal payments to First Data POS, Inc. pursuant to this
arrangement.
First Data
Corporation
During the period in which we were majority owned
by First Data Corporation, we obtained various support services
from First Data Corporation, including tax, accounting, and
regulatory compliance services, corporate insurance coverage.
Subsequent to First Data Corporation ceasing to own an equity
interest in us, we continued to obtain certain services, such as
telecommunication services, through procurement arrangements of
First Data Corporation.
We are party to a Sponsorship Agreement, as
amended by the Amendment Number 1 to Sponsorship Agreement,
to which First Data Corporation is a party. The Sponsorship
Agreement is an agreement between Bank of America Merchant
Services, First Data Corporation and us whereby Bank of America
Merchant Services agrees to complete all necessary forms and
agreements to sponsor us as a licensee under certain VISA and
MasterCard rules. The sponsorship is necessary for our
participation in certain ATM and POS debit card networks. Under
the terms of the agreement, we may only use sponsored accounts
to process transactions on behalf of gaming establishments or
terminals located in gaming establishments. We may not process
transactions for Internet gaming enterprises or activities and
we may not assign or permit any other entity to use any of our
sponsored accounts without the prior written approval of Bank of
America Merchant Services or the necessary approvals of VISA or
MasterCard. In addition, we are responsible for complying with
all VISA and MasterCard rules. We have agreed to execute
contracts with merchant customers and process transactions
through the sponsored accounts in strict adherence to VISA and
MasterCard rules and Bank of America Merchant Services
membership and licensing agreements with VISA and MasterCard.
Should we fail to comply with these rules and agreements, Bank
of America Merchant Services, in its sole discretion, may
terminate its sponsorship of us and our terminals with respect
to any card association or network, provided that we will have
15 days after written notice to cure any violation.
In connection with the sponsorship, we and First
Data Corporation agree to jointly and severally indemnify Bank
of America Merchant Services against all costs related to our
failure to comply with the rules of VISA, MasterCard or the ATM
and POS debit card networks. First Data Corporation may
terminate the sponsorship agreement by at least
30 days prior written notice to Bank of America
Merchant Services, but has agreed not to exercise such right
prior to September 30, 2010. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
First Data Corporation may exercise its right to terminate on
30 days
89
In March 2004, we entered into a Sponsorship
Indemnification Agreement with First Data Corporation whereby we
agree to indemnify, protect and hold harmless FDFS Holdings, LLC
and its affiliates from and against any and all losses and
expenses, imposed in any manner upon, incurred by or asserted
against FDFS Holdings, LLC and/or its affiliates in connection
with or arising from its indemnification obligations pursuant to
the Sponsorship Agreement. The Sponsorship Indemnification
Agreement indemnifies First Data Corporation for its liability
under the Sponsorship Agreement until (i) the Sponsorship
Agreement between Bank of America Merchant Services, First Data
Corporation and us is terminated or (ii) an event of
default occurs and is unremedied. While First Data Corporation
has the right to terminate the Sponsorship Agreement upon
30 days written notice, First Data Corporation
covenants in the Sponsorship Indemnification Agreement that it
will not exercise its termination right under the Sponsorship
Agreement prior to September 30, 2010, unless certain
events occur.
NYCE
Corporation
We are party to a NYCE Network Terminal
Participant Agreement with NYCE Corporation pursuant to which
certain of our ATMs are permitted to participate in the NYCE
network. NYCE owns and operates an electronic funds transfer
network whereby insured depository institutions and other
approved organizations are able, among other things, to route,
process and settle transactions originated at terminals and the
agreement permits our becoming a banking terminal participant in
the NYCE network. The term of this agreement expires on
May 17, 2005, and will automatically renew for successive
three-year renewal periods, unless any party terminates by
written notice at least 180 days prior to term
expiration. In the year ended December 31, 2004, we earned
$4.2 million from NYCE Corporation pursuant to this
agreement.
Entities Affiliated with the Private Equity
Investors
We and certain of our stockholders prior to this
offering are party to a Securities Purchase and Exchange
Agreement, a Registration Agreement, a Stockholders Agreement
and an Investor Rights Agreement that were executed and
delivered in April 2004 in connection with a recapitalization of
our ownership that involved a sale by M&C International of a
substantial equity interest in us to a number of private equity
investors. Such private equity investors include entities
affiliated with Summit Partners and entities affiliated with
Tudor Investment Corporation. Mr. Kortschak and
Mr. Fitzgerald, directors of the company, are partners and
members of various entities affiliated with Summit Partners.
Entities affiliated with Summit Partners own approximately 35%
of our capital stock prior to this offering. Entities affiliated
with Tudor Investment Corporation own approximately 13% of our
capital stock prior to this offering.
90
Securities
Purchase and Exchange Agreement
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase and Exchange
Agreement, (i) we agreed to exchange with M&C
International and Bank of America Corporation their ownership
interests in us as a limited liability company for different
types of ownership interests in us as a limited liability
company, (ii) M&C International agreed to sell to the
private equity investors a portion of M&C
Internationals ownership interest in us for an aggregate
purchase price of $316,400,000, (iii) we agreed to convert
from a limited liability company to a corporation organized
under the laws of Delaware, (iv) we agreed to cause our
operating subsidiary, Global Cash Access, Inc., to be converted
from a limited liability company to a corporation organized
under the laws of Delaware, and (v) in connection with our
conversion to a corporation, all outstanding ownership interests
in us as a limited liability company were automatically
converted into shares of capital stock as a corporation.
Registration
Agreement
The Registration Agreement provides M&C
International, Bank of America Corporation and the private
equity investors with certain rights to cause us to register
their shares of capital stock on a registration statement filed
with the SEC. The Registration Agreement also obligates our
stockholders to refrain from certain selling activities
involving our equity securities following certain public
offerings of securities by us. For a further description of this
agreement, see Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights.
Stockholders
Agreement
The Stockholders Agreement includes
(i) provisions relating to the composition of the board of
directors and committees of the board of directors of us and
each of our subsidiaries, (ii) provisions relating to
certain restrictions on the transfer of shares of our capital
stock, including rights of first offer and co-sale rights with
respect to shares proposed to be sold, (iii) provisions
relating to a right of first refusal to purchase certain shares
of capital stock proposed to be sold by Global Cash Access
Holdings, Inc., (iv) provisions relating to the obligation
of certain stockholders to vote in favor of and take certain
actions in furtherance of certain transactions involving the
disposition of all or substantially all of our capital stock or
assets, and (v) provisions relating to the obligation of
M&C International to repurchase shares of capital stock from
Bank of America Corporation in certain circumstances, all of
which provisions will automatically terminate and be of no
further force or effect upon the consummation of this offering.
Pursuant to a Termination and Consent, effective upon the
consummation of this offering, provisions in the Stockholders
Agreement relating to the confidentiality of certain information
obtained by our stockholders from us prior to the consummation
of this offering will terminate and be of no further force or
effect. The Stockholders Agreement also includes provisions
relating to procedures that must be followed in connection with
the transfer of unregistered securities, which provisions will
remain in effect following this offering.
Investor
Rights Agreement
The Investor Rights Agreement provides the
private equity investors with certain rights to receive
financial statements and other information from us and to
inspect our properties, books and records. The Investor Rights
Agreement includes (i) provisions that prohibit us from
taking certain actions without the prior written consent of
certain constituencies of our stockholders, and
(ii) provisions that obligate us to take certain actions so
long as certain constituencies of our stockholders continue to
hold certain equity interests in us, all of which provisions
will automatically terminate and be of no further force or
effect upon the consummation of this offering. Pursuant to a
Termination and Consent, effective upon the consummation of this
offering, provisions in the Investor Rights Agreement
restricting our ability to enter into or modify certain
agreements with certain of our executives and key employees will
terminate and be of no further force or effect. The Investor
Rights Agreement also includes provisions relating to our
obligation to comply with the periodic reporting obligations of
the Exchange Act, which provisions will remain in effect
following this offering.
91
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
As of March 22, 2005, we had three holders
of our class A common stock, one holder of our class B
common stock, 13 holders of our Class A preferred
stock and 13 holders of our class B preferred stock.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, all of our
outstanding capital stock will be reconstituted as common stock.
We expect that we will have 16 holders of our common stock
immediately prior to the consummation of this offering.
The following table presents information
regarding the beneficial ownership of the shares of our common
stock as of March 22, 2005, assuming the reconstitution of
all of our outstanding capital stock as common stock, with
respect to:
Beneficial ownership is determined under the
rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment
power over securities. Except in cases where community property
laws apply or as indicated in the footnotes to this table, we
believe that each stockholder identified in the table possesses
sole voting and investment power over all shares of common stock
shown as beneficially owned by the stockholder. Percentage of
beneficial ownership is based on 71,500,000 shares of
common stock outstanding as of March 22, 2005 and shares of
common stock outstanding after completion of this offering.
Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 22,
2005 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the
person holding the options.
each of our directors;
each of the executive officers listed in the
Summary Compensation Table above;
our directors and the executive officers listed
in the Summary Compensation Table, as a group;
persons owning more than 5% of a class of our
common stock; and
each of the selling stockholders.
Shares Beneficially | Shares Beneficially | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned Prior to | Owned After | |||||||||||||||||||||||
the Offering | Number of | the Offering | Total Shares Offered | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | if Over-allotment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number | Percent | Offered | Number | Percent | Option is Exercised | ||||||||||||||||||
Current directors and
director nominees
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karim Maskatiya(1)
|
27,748,698 | 38.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Cucinotta(2)
|
27,748,698 | 38.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Walter G. Kortschak(3)
|
25,040,808 | 35.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Charles J. Fitzgerald(4)
|
25,040,808 | 35.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kirk Sanford(5)
|
858,452 | 1.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
E. Miles Kilburn
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Named officers who are
not directors
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harry C. Hagerty
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diran Kludjian
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas Sears
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kurt Sullivan
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert C. Fry
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pamela Shinkle
|
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors and officers as
a group (12 persons)(6)
|
53,647,958 | 75.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Persons owning more
than 5% of a class of our equity securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
M&C International(7)
|
27,748,698 | 38.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Summit Partners(8)
|
25,040,808 | 35.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Entities affiliated with
Tudor Investment Corporation(9)
|
9,315,774 | 13.03 | % |
92
Shares Beneficially | Shares Beneficially | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned Prior to | Owned After | |||||||||||||||||||||||
the Offering | Number of | the Offering | Total Shares Offered | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | if Over-allotment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number | Percent | Offered | Number | Percent | Option is Exercised | ||||||||||||||||||
Additional Selling
Stockholders
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
HarbourVest Partners
VI-Direct Fund L.P. (10)(11)
|
2,484,209 | 3.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
General Motors Investment
Management Corporation (11)(12)
|
2,484,209 | 3.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bank of America
Corporation(13)
|
3,567,850 | 4.99 | % |
(1) | Includes 27,748,698 shares of common stock held by M&C International, after giving effect to the transfer of 858,452 shares of common stock to Mr. Sanford, as described in Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Entities Controlled by Karim Maskatiya and Robert Cucinotta. Mr. Maskatiya disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by M&C International except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in M&C International. Mr. Maskatiyas address is c/o M&C International, 643 River Oaks Parkway, San Jose, California 95134. | |
(2) | Includes 27,748,698 shares of common stock held by M&C International, after giving effect to the transfer of 858,452 shares of common stock to Mr. Sanford, as described in Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Entities Controlled by Karim Maskatiya and Robert Cucinotta. Mr. Cucinotta disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by M&C International except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in M&C International. Mr. Cucinottas address is c/o M&C International, 643 River Oaks Parkway, San Jose, California 95134. | |
(3) | Consists of 25,040,808 shares of common stock held by Summit Partners. Mr. Kortschak disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Mr. Kortschaks address is c/o Summit Partners, L.P., 499 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 200, Palo Alto, California 94301. | |
(4) | Consists of 25,040,808 shares of common stock held by Summit Partners. Mr. Fitzgerald disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Mr. Fitzgeralds address is c/o Summit Partners, L.P., 499 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 200, Palo Alto, California 94301. | |
(5) | After giving effect to the transfer of 858,452 shares of common stock to Mr. Sanford, as described in Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Entities Controlled by Karim Maskatiya and Robert Cucinotta. Mr. Sanfords address is c/o Global Cash Access, Inc., 3525 East Post Road, Suite 120, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120. | |
(6) | See notes 1 through 5. | |
(7) | After giving effect to the transfer of 858,452 shares of common stock to Mr. Sanford, as described in Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Entities Controlled by Karim Maskatiya and Robert Cucinotta. M&C International is beneficially owned as to 50.0% by Karim Maskatiya and as to 50.0% by Robert Cucinotta. M&C Internationals address is 643 River Oaks Parkway, San Jose, California 95134. | |
(8) | Of these shares, 16,977,131 shares are held by Summit Ventures VI-A, L.P., 7,080,140 shares are held by Summit Ventures VI-B, L.P., 353,078 shares are held by Summit VI Advisors Fund, L.P., 542,090 shares are held by Summit VI Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. and 88,369 shares are held by Summit Investors VI, L.P. (such entities collectively referred to as Summit Partners). Summit Partners, L.P. is the managing member of Summit Partners VI (GP), LLC, which is the general partner of Summit Partners VI (GP), L.P., which is the general partner of each of Summit Ventures VI-A, L.P., Summit Ventures VI-B, L.P., Summit VI Advisors Fund, L.P., Summit VI Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. and Summit Investors VI, L.P. Summit Partners, L.P., through a three-person investment committee composed of certain members of Summit Master Company, LLC, has voting and dispositive authority over the shares held by each of these entities and therefore beneficially owns such shares. Decisions of the investment committee are made by a majority vote of its members and, as a result, no single member of the investment committee has voting or dispositive authority over the shares. Gregory M. Avis, John R. Carroll, Peter Y. Chung, Scott C. |
93
94
Collins, Bruce R. Evans, Charles J. Fitzgerald,
Walter G. Kortschak, Martin J. Mannion, Kevin P. Mohan, Thomas
S. Roberts, E. Roe Stamps, Joseph F. Trustey, Robert V.
Walsh and Stephen G. Woodsum are the members of Summit Master
Company, LLC, which is the general partner of Summit Partners,
L.P., and each disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held
by Summit Partners. The address for each of these entities is
499 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 200, Palo Alto,
California 94301.
(9)
Includes 3,105,258 shares held by Tudor
Ventures II, L.P., 547,066 shares held by Tudor
Proprietary Trading, L.L.C., 1,020,916 shares held by
Tudor BVI Global Portfolio Ltd., 50,466 shares held by
The Altar Rock Fund L.P. and 4,592,068 shares held by
The Raptor Global Portfolio Ltd. Tudor Investment Corporation
acts as investment advisor and/or general partner of Tudor
Ventures II, L.P., Tudor BVI Global
Portfolio Ltd., The Altar Rock Fund L.P. and The
Raptor Global Portfolio Ltd. and as a result may be deemed to
share voting and/or investment control over the shares held by
each such entity. As a result, Tudor Investment Corporation may
be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by each such
entity. Tudor Investment Corporation expressly disclaims such
beneficial ownership. In addition, Tudor Investment Corporation
is an affiliate of Tudor Proprietary Trading, L.L.C. and
therefor may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by
Tudor Proprietary Trading, L.L.C. Tudor Investment Corporation
expressly disclaims such beneficial ownership. The address of
Tudor Investment Corporation is 50 Rowes Wharf,
6th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.
(10)
The address of HarbourVest Partners
VI-Direct Fund L.P. is c/o HarbourVest Partners, LLC, One
Financial Center, 44th Floor, Boston,
Massachusetts 02111.
(11)
This selling stockholder is one of the private
equity investors that purchased an interest in us from
M&C International in May 2004.
(12)
Consists of shares registered in the name of and
being sold by GM Capital Partners I, L.P. and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, as trustee for First Plaza Group Trust.
GM Partners I LLC is the general partner of
GM Capital Partners I, L.P. and General Motors
Investment Management Corporation, or GMIMCo, is the managing
member of GM Capital Partners I, L.P. Voting and
investment power of our shares registered in the name of
GM Capital Partners I, L.P. is held by the investment
committee of GMIMCo. First Plaza Group Trust is a pension trust
formed pursuant to the laws of the State of New York for the
benefit of certain employee benefit plans of General Motors
Corporation, its subsidiaries and unrelated employers. Shares in
our company registered in the name of JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
trustee for First Plaza Group Trust may be deemed to be owned
beneficially by GMIMCo, a wholly-owned subsidiary of General
Motors Corporation. GMIMCo is registered as an investment
adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. GMIMCos
principal business is providing investment advice and investment
management services with respect to the assets of certain
employee benefit plans of GM, its subsidiaries and unrelated
employers, and with respect to the assets of certain direct and
indirect subsidiaries of GM and associated entities. GMIMCo is
serving as investment manager with respect to these shares and
in that capacity it has the sole power to direct the trustee as
to the voting and disposition of these shares. Because of the
trustees limited role, beneficial ownership of First Plaza
Group Trusts shares by the trustee is disclaimed. The
address of GMIMCo is 767 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10153.
(13)
The address of Bank of America Corporation is
600 Montgomery Street, San Francisco,
California 94111.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Upon completion of this offering and assuming the
filing of an amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
our authorized capital stock will consist
of shares
of common stock, $0.001 par value
and shares
of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. As of
December 31, 2004, there were 71,500,000 shares of our
common stock outstanding, as adjusted to reflect a 13-for-1
stock split completed on January 7, 2005 and the conversion
of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock into common
stock on the closing of this offering, that were held of record
by 11 stockholders, and options to
purchase 722,215 shares of common stock were
outstanding. We will have a total
of shares
of common stock outstanding following this offering.
The following description assumes the filing of
an amended and restated certificate of incorporation upon the
closing of this offering. This description is only a summary.
You should also refer to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws, both of which have been filed with the
SEC as exhibits to our registration statement, of which this
prospectus forms a part.
Common Stock
Subject to preferences that may apply to shares
of preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of
outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to receive
dividends out of assets legally available therefor at the times
and in the amounts as our board of directors may from time to
time determine. All dividends are non-cumulative. In the event
of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company,
the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all
assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to the
prior distribution rights of preferred stock, if any, then
outstanding. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each
share of common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders. Cumulative voting for the election of directors is
not provided for in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, which means that the holders of a majority of the
shares voted can elect all of the directors then standing for
election. Our board of directors is divided into three classes,
with each director serving a three-year term and one class being
elected at each years annual meeting of stockholders. See
Management Composition of Board. The
common stock is not entitled to preemptive rights and is not
subject to conversion or redemption. There are no sinking fund
provisions applicable to our common stock. Each outstanding
share of common stock is, and all shares of common stock to be
outstanding upon completion of this offering will be, fully paid
and nonassessable.
Preferred Stock
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation, our board of directors has the authority,
without further action by the stockholders, to issue up
to shares
of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the
designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative
participating, optional or special rights as well as the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the preferred
stock, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting
rights, terms of redemption, and liquidation preferences, any or
all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock.
Our board of directors, without stockholder approval, can issue
preferred stock with voting, conversion, or other rights that
could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the
holders of common stock. Preferred stock could thus be issued
quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in
control or make removal of management more difficult.
Additionally, the issuance of preferred stock may have the
effect of decreasing the market price of the common stock and
may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders
of common stock. At present, we have no plans to issue any
preferred stock following this offering.
Registration Rights
After the SEC declares this registration
statement effective, and assuming we comply with various other
requirements, the holders of
approximately shares
of common stock will hold registration
95
Demand Registration
Rights. At any time 180 days
after the closing of this offering, the holders of at least a
majority of the shares held by the private equity investors
having registration rights and at least a majority of the shares
held by M&C International, including shares transferred
by M&C International to Mr. Sanford prior to the
consummation of this offering, can each demand that we file a
registration statement for those shares. We will effect the
registration as requested, unless the underwriters decide to
limit the number of shares that may be included in the
registration due to marketing factors. We are only obligated to
satisfy three demand registrations for
M&C International, two demand registrations for the
private equity investors other than entities affiliated with
Tudor Investment Corporation, or Tudor, and one demand
registration for Tudor, and we may defer a registration by up to
90 days under specified circumstances once per 12-month
period.
Piggyback Registration
Rights. If we register any securities
for public sale, the shares of the private equity investors
having registration rights and the shares held by M&C
International, including shares transferred by
M&C International to Mr. Sanford prior to the
consummation of this offering, and Bank of America Corporation
having registration rights may include their shares in the
registration statement. The underwriters have the right to limit
the number of shares having registration rights that may be
included in the registration statement, and the shares, if any,
to be included in the registration statement are allocated
61.75% to the private equity investors, 33.25% to
M&C International, including shares transferred by
M&C International to Mr. Sanford prior to the
consummation of this offering, and 5% to Bank of America
Corporation. In this initial public
offering, shares
held by the private equity investors are
included, shares
held by M&C International are included, no shares held
by Mr. Sanford are included,
and shares
held by Bank of America Corporation are included.
Form S-3 Registration
Rights. If we are eligible to file a
registration statement on Form S-3, any holders of the
shares having registration rights can demand that we file a
registration statement on Form S-3 or any similar
short-form registration statement, so long as the aggregate
offering value of securities to be sold under the registration
statement on Form S-3 or any similar short-form
registration statement is at least $10 million. We may
defer a registration by up to 90 days under specified
circumstances once per 12-month period. We are not obligated to
include in any Form S-3 registration that is not
underwritten the shares of the private equity investors or
M&C International, including shares transferred by
M&C International to Mr. Sanford prior to the
consummation of this offering, who would be permitted to sell
all of their securities pursuant to Rule 144 during the
90 day period commencing on the effective date of any
Form S-3 registration.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Law and Charter and
Bylaw Provisions
Delaware Statute.
Upon consummation of this offering, we will be subject to the
provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. In general, this statute prohibits a
publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a
business combination with an interested
stockholder for a
96
Generally, a business combination
includes a merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in
a financial benefit to the interested stockholder, and an
interested stockholder is a person who, together
with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years
prior, did own) 15% or more of the corporations voting
stock. These provisions may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in control of us without
further action by our stockholders.
Charter Provisions.
Following the completion of this offering, our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws will contain
provisions that could have the effect of discouraging potential
acquisition proposals or making a tender offer or delaying or
preventing a change in control of our company, including changes
a stockholder might consider favorable. These could have the
effect of decreasing the market price of our common stock. In
particular, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws, as applicable, among other things,
will:
97
Prior to such date, the board of directors of the
corporation approved either the business, combination or the
transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
Upon consummation of the transaction which
resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder,
the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting
stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction
commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting
stock outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by
the interested stockholder), those shares owned (1) by
persons who are directors and also officers and (2) by
employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have
the right to determine confidentially whether shares held
subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange
offer; or
On or after such date, the business combination
is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an
annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written
consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the
outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested
stockholder.
divide our board of directors into three separate
classes serving staggered three-year terms, which will have the
effect of requiring at least two annual stockholder meetings
instead of one, to replace a majority of our directors, which
could have the effect of delaying of preventing a change in our
control or management;
provide that special meetings of stockholders can
only be called by our board of directors, chairman of the board,
chief executive officer or president (in the absence of a chief
executive officer). In addition, the business permitted to be
conducted at any special meeting of stockholders is limited to
the business specified in the notice of such meeting to the
stockholders;
provide for an advance notice procedure with
regard to business to be brought before a meeting of
stockholders which may delay or preclude stockholders from
bringing matters before a meeting of stockholders or from making
nominations for directors at a meeting of stockholders, which
could delay or deter takeover attempts or changes in management;
eliminate the right of stockholders to act by
written consent so that all stockholder actions must be effected
at a duly called meeting;
provide that directors may only be removed for
cause with the approval of stockholders holding a majority of
our outstanding voting stock;
provide that vacancies on our board of directors
may be filled by a majority of directors in office, although
less than a quorum and that our board of directors may fix the
number of directors by resolution;
These provisions may have the effect of
discouraging third party from acquiring us, even if doing so
would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions are
intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability
in the composition of our board of directors and in the policies
formulated by them, and to discourage some types of transactions
that may involve an actual or threatened change in control of
our company. These provisions are designed to reduce our
vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and to
discourage some tactics that may be used in proxy fights. We
believe that the benefits of increased protection of our
potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an
unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure our
company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such
proposals because, among other things, negotiation of such
proposals could result in an improvement of the proposed terms.
However, these provisions could have the effect of discouraging
others from making tender offers for our shares that could
result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. These
provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in our
management.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of
Officers and Directors
Our certificate of incorporation includes
provisions that limit the personal liability of our officers and
directors for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary
duties as directors, except for liability that cannot be
eliminated under the Delaware General Corporation Law. The
Delaware General Corporation Law does not permit a provision in
a corporations Certificate of Incorporation that would
eliminate such liability (i) for any breach of their duty
of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) for any
unlawful payment of a dividend or unlawful stock repurchase or
redemption, as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any transaction from
which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
While these provisions provide directors with
protection from awards for monetary damages for breaches of
their duty of care, they do not eliminate such duty.
Accordingly, these provisions will have no effect on the
availability of equitable remedies such as an injunction or
rescission based on a directors breach of his or her duty
of care. The provisions described above apply to an officer of a
corporation only if he or she is a director of such corporation
and is acting in his or her capacity as director, and do not
apply to the officers of the corporation who are not directors.
Our bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent
permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, we may
indemnify our directors, officers and employees and agents. In
addition, we have entered into an indemnification agreement with
each of our executive officers and directors pursuant to which
we have agreed to indemnify each such executive officer and
director to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law. These agreements, among other things, provide
for indemnification of our directors for expenses, judgments,
fines and settlement amounts incurred by any such person in any
action or proceeding arising out of such persons services
as an officer or director. We believe these provisions and
agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons
as executive officers and directors. At present, there is no
pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors
or executive officers in which indemnification is required or
permitted, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation or
proceeding that may result in a claim for such indemnification.
98
allow our board of directors to issue shares of
preferred stock with rights senior to those of the common stock
and that otherwise could adversely affect the rights and powers,
including voting rights and the right to approve or not to
approve an acquisition or other change in control, of the
holders of common stock, without any further vote or action by
the stockholders; and
not provide for cumulative voting for our
directors, which may make it more difficult for stockholders
owning less than a majority of our stock to elect any directors
to our board of directors.
Listing
We have applied for the listing of our common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
GCA.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common
stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
99
DESCRIPTION OF GUARANTEE
In 2004, our operating subsidiary, Global Cash
Access, Inc., issued $235 million in aggregate principal
amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012. The
senior subordinated notes were issued pursuant to an indenture
among Global Cash Access, Inc., as issuer, Central Credit, LLC,
as guarantor, and one or more trustees. You should refer to the
indenture, which was previously filed with the SEC as an exhibit
to the registration statement on Form S-4 (Registration
No. 333-117218), for a complete description of the senior
subordinated notes.
Effective upon the consummation of this offering
of common stock, we will guarantee the obligations of Global
Cash Access, Inc. under the senior subordinated notes.
Our guarantee will be full and unconditional, so
that, subject to the subordination described below, if Global
Cash Access, Inc. defaults in the payment of the principal of,
premium, if any, or interest on the senior subordinated notes
when and as the same shall become due, whether upon maturity,
acceleration, call for redemption or otherwise, without the
necessity of action by the trustee or any holder of senior
subordinated notes, we shall be required to make such payment
immediately and fully, and if we dont, any holder of
senior subordinated notes may immediately bring suit directly
against us for payment of all amounts due and payable.
Our guarantee of the senior subordinated notes
will be subordinate to our existing guarantee of the senior
secured credit facilities in the same manner as the rights of
holders of the senior subordinated notes to payment in full are
subordinate to those of the lenders under our senior secured
credit facilities.
Our guarantee will be joint and several with the
existing guarantee of the same obligations by Central Credit,
LLC.
We conduct substantially all of our business
through Global Cash Access, Inc. and its subsidiaries and do not
own any material assets other than all of the stock of Global
Cash Access, Inc. Our obligations under the guarantee are as a
secondary obligor, and such obligations are subordinated to our
obligations under our existing guarantee of the senior secured
credit facilities, as described above. We are presently
dependent on the receipt of dividends or other payments from
Global Cash Access, Inc. to make payments on both guarantees.
No stockholder, officer or director, past,
present or future of us or any successor corporation shall have
any personal liability in respect of our obligations under the
guarantee by reason of his, her or its status as such
stockholder, officer or director.
100
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no market
for our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of our
common stock in the public market could adversely affect
prevailing market prices.
Upon completion of this offering, we will have
outstanding shares
of our common stock. Of these shares,
the shares
sold by us and the selling stockholders in the offering (plus
any shares issued upon exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option) will be freely tradable without
restriction under the Securities Act, unless purchased by our
affiliates as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act (generally, our officers, directors and
10% stockholders). Shares purchased by affiliates may generally
only be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement
under the Securities Act or in compliance with limitations of
Rule 144 as described below.
The
remaining shares
outstanding are restricted securities within the
meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Restricted
securities may be sold in the public market only if registered
or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under
Rules 144, 144(k), or 701 promulgated under the Securities
Act, which are summarized below. All of these shares are subject
to lock-up agreements pursuant to which the stockholder has
agreed not to offer, sell, contract to sell, grant any option to
purchase, or otherwise dispose of our common stock or any
securities exercisable for or convertible into our common stock
owned by them for a period of 180 days after the date of
this prospectus without the prior written consent of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. As a
result of these contractual restrictions, notwithstanding
possible earlier eligibility for sale under the provisions of
Rules 144, 144(k), and 701, shares subject to lock-up
agreements may not be sold until such agreements expire or are
waived by the designated underwriters representative.
Taking into account the lock-up agreements, and assuming we and
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc. do not release stockholders from these agreements, the
following shares will be eligible for sale in the public market
at the following times:
After the completion of this offering, we intend
to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the
Securities Act to register all of the shares of common stock
issued or reserved for future issuance under (i) a
standalone stock option agreement with Harry Hagerty, our Chief
Financial Officer, and (ii) our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
Based upon the number of shares subject to outstanding options,
including Mr. Hagertys option, and currently reserved
for issuance under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, this
registration statement on Form S-8 would cover
approximately 4,563,830 shares in addition to annual
increases in the number of shares available under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan pursuant to the terms of such plan. Shares
registered under this registration statement will generally be
available for sale in the open market immediately after the
180-day lock-up agreements expire or earlier if we and Goldman,
Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
release the stockholders from the lock-up agreements.
Also beginning six months after the date of this
offering, holders
of shares
of our common stock will be entitled to rights with respect to
registration of these shares for sale in the public market. For
more information, see Description of Capital
Stock Registration Rights. Registration of
these shares under the Securities Act would result in these
shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the
Securities Act immediately upon effectiveness of the
registration.
101
beginning on the effective date of the offering,
only the shares sold in this offering will be immediately
available for sale in the public market;
an
additional shares
will become eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144
beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus.
Shares eligible to be sold by affiliates pursuant to
Rule 144 are subject to volume restrictions as described
below; and
an
additional shares
will become eligible for sale in the public market pursuant to
Rule 144 at various dates in the future.
Rule 144. In
general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, and
beginning after the expiration of the lock-up agreements, a
person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has
beneficially owned restricted shares for at least one year would
be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of
shares that does not exceed the greater of: one percent of the
number of shares of common stock then outstanding (which will
equal
approximately shares
immediately after the offering) or the average weekly trading
volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks
preceding the sale. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject
to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us. Under
Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been an
affiliate of us at any time during the three months preceding a
sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be
sold for at least two years, is entitled to sell shares without
complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.
Rule 701. In
general, beginning 90 days after the effective date, each
of our directors, officers, employees, consultants, or advisors
who purchased shares pursuant to a written compensatory plan or
contract prior to this offering may be entitled to rely on the
resale provisions of Rule 701. Rule 701 permits
affiliates to sell their Rule 701 shares under
Rule 144 without complying with the holding period
requirements of Rule 144. Rule 701 further provides
that non-affiliates may sell such shares in reliance on
Rule 144 without having to comply with the holding period,
public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of
Rule 144.
102
MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX
CONSEQUENCES
This is a general summary of material United
States Federal income and estate tax considerations with respect
to your acquisition, ownership and disposition of common stock
if you are a beneficial owner of shares other than:
This summary does not address all of the United
States Federal income and estate tax considerations that may be
relevant to you in light of your particular circumstances or if
you are a beneficial owner subject to special treatment under
United States Federal income tax laws (such as a
controlled foreign corporation, passive
foreign investment company, foreign personal holding
company, company that accumulates earnings to avoid United
States Federal income tax, foreign tax-exempt organization,
financial institution, broker or dealer in securities or former
United States citizen or resident). This summary does not
discuss any aspect of state, local or non-United States
taxation. This summary is based on current provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code),
Treasury regulations, judicial opinions, published positions of
the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and
all other applicable authorities, all of which are subject to
change, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary is not
intended as tax advice.
If a partnership holds our common stock, the tax
treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of
the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a
partner of a partnership holding our common stock, you should
consult your tax advisor.
WE URGE PROSPECTIVE NON-UNITED STATES
STOCKHOLDERS TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE UNITED
STATES FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND NON-UNITED STATES INCOME,
ESTATE AND OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS OF ACQUIRING, HOLDING AND
DISPOSING OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK.
Dividends
In general, any distributions we make to you with
respect to your shares of common stock that constitute dividends
for United States Federal income tax purposes will be subject to
United States withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the gross
amount, unless you are eligible for a reduced rate of
withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty and you
provide proper certification of your eligibility for such
reduced rate (usually on an IRS Form W-8BEN). A
distribution will constitute a dividend for United States
Federal income tax purposes to the extent of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits as determined under the Code.
Any distribution not constituting a dividend for United States
federal income tax purposes will constitute a return of capital
and be treated first as reducing your basis in your shares of
common stock, but not below zero, and, to the extent it exceeds
your basis, as gain from the disposition of your shares of
common stock.
Dividends we pay to you that are effectively
connected with your conduct of a trade or business within the
United States (and, if certain income tax treaties apply, are
attributable to a United States
103
a citizen or resident of the United States;
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a
corporation created or organized in, or under the laws of, the
United States or any political subdivision of the United States;
an estate, the income of which is subject to
United States Federal income taxation regardless of its source;
a trust, if a court within the United States is
able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of
the trust and one or more United States persons have the
authority to control all substantial decisions of the
trust; or
a trust that existed on August 20, 1996, was
treated as a United States person on August 19, 1996, and
elected to be treated as a United States person.
If you are eligible for a reduced rate of United
States withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty, you may
obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an
appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
If you hold our common stock through a foreign partnership or a
foreign intermediary, in addition to your compliance with the
certification requirements described above, applicable
certification requirements will also generally require that the
foreign partnership or foreign intermediary provide additional
certification.
Sale or Other Disposition of Common
Stock
You generally will not be subject to United
States Federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or
other disposition of your shares of common stock unless:
If you have gain that is described in the first
bullet point above, such gain generally will be subject to
United States Federal income tax, net of certain deductions, at
the same rates applicable to United States persons. If you are a
corporation, the branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty) also may apply to such effectively connected gain. If
the gain from the sale or disposition of your shares is
effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business
in the United States but under an applicable income tax treaty
is not attributable to a permanent establishment you maintain in
the United States, your gain may be exempt from United States
tax under the treaty. If you are described in the second bullet
point above, you generally will be subject to United States
Federal income tax at a rate of 30% on the gain realized,
although the gain may be offset by some United States source
capital losses realized during the same taxable year.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding
We must report annually to the IRS and to you the
amount of dividends or other distributions we pay to you on your
shares of common stock and the amount of tax we withhold on
these distributions regardless of whether withholding is
required. The IRS may make copies of the information returns
reporting those dividends and amounts withheld available to the
tax authorities in the country in which
104
the gain is effectively connected with your
conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and,
under certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a United
States permanent establishment you maintain);
you are an individual, you hold your shares of
common stock as capital assets, you are present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of
disposition and you meet other conditions, and you are not
eligible for relief under an applicable income tax
treaty; or
we are or have been a United States real
property holding corporation for United States Federal
income tax purposes (which we believe we are not and have never
been, and do not anticipate we will become) at any time within
the shorter of the five-year period preceding disposition or
your holding period for your shares of common stock, and so long
as our common stock is regularly traded on an established
securities market, you actually or constructively hold or have
held (at any time during the shorter of the five-year period
preceding disposition or your holding period for your shares of
common stock) more than 5% of our common stock.
The United States imposes a backup withholding
tax on dividends and certain other types of payments to United
States persons. You will generally not be subject to backup
withholding tax on dividends you receive on your shares of
common stock if you provide proper certification (usually on an
IRS Form W-8BEN) of your status as a non-United States
person or you are a corporation or one of several types of
entities and organizations that qualify for exemption (an
exempt recipient).
Information reporting and backup withholding
generally are not required with respect to the amount of any
proceeds from the sale of your shares of common stock outside
the United States through a foreign office of a foreign broker
that does not have certain specified connections to the United
States. However, if you sell your shares of common stock through
a United States broker or the United States office of a foreign
broker, the broker will be required to report the amount of
proceeds paid to you to the IRS and also backup withhold on that
amount unless you provide appropriate certification (usually on
an IRS Form W-8BEN) to the broker of your status as a
non-United States person or you are an exempt recipient.
Information reporting (and backup withholding if the appropriate
certification is not provided) also apply if you sell your
shares of common stock through a foreign broker deriving more
than a specified percentage of its income from United States
sources or having certain other connections to the United States.
Any amounts withheld with respect to your shares
of common stock under the backup withholding rules will be
refunded to you or credited against your United States Federal
income tax liability, if any, by the IRS if the required
information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.
If you hold our common stock through a foreign
partnership or a foreign intermediary, in addition to your
compliance with the certification requirements described above,
applicable certification requirements will also generally
require that the foreign partnership or foreign intermediary
provide additional certification.
Estate Tax
Common stock owned or treated as owned by an
individual who is not a citizen or resident (as defined for
United States Federal estate tax purposes) of the United States
at the time of his or her death will be included in the
individuals gross estate for United States Federal estate
tax purposes and therefore may be subject to United States
Federal estate tax unless an applicable estate tax treaty
provides otherwise.
105
UNDERWRITING
The company, the selling stockholders and the
underwriters named below will enter into an underwriting
agreement with respect to the shares being offered. Subject to
certain conditions, each underwriter will severally agree to
purchase the number of shares indicated in the following table.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc. are the joint book-running managers for this offering and
the representatives of the underwriters.
Underwriters | Number of Shares | ||||
Goldman, Sachs &
Co.
|
|||||
J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc.
|
|||||
Banc of America Securities
LLC
|
|||||
Bear, Stearns &
Co. Inc.
|
|||||
Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
|
|||||
Deutsche Bank Securities
Inc.
|
|||||
SG Cowen & Co.,
LLC
|
|||||
Wachovia Capital Markets,
LLC
|
|||||
Total
|
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the shares being offered, if any are taken, other than the shares covered by the option described below unless and until this option is exercised.
If the underwriters sell more shares than the total number set forth in the table above, the underwriters have an option to buy up to an additional shares from the selling stockholders to cover such sales. They may exercise that option for 30 days. If any shares are purchased pursuant to this option, the underwriters will severally purchase shares in approximately the same proportion as set forth in the table above.
The following tables show the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by the company and the selling stockholders. The amounts in the selling stockholders table are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional shares from the selling stockholders.
Paid by Us | ||||||||
No Exercise | Full Exercise | |||||||
Per Share
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Total
|
$ | $ |
Paid by the Selling Stockholders | ||||||||
No Exercise | Full Exercise | |||||||
Per Share
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Total
|
$ | $ |
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be offered at the initial public offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to $ per share from the initial public offering price. Any such securities dealers may resell any shares purchased from the underwriters to certain other brokers or dealers at a discount of up to $ per share from the initial public offering price. If all the shares are not sold at the initial public offering price, the representatives may change the offering price and the other selling terms.
The company, its officers, directors and each of its stockholders, including the selling stockholders, have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of their common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date 180 days after the date of this
106
The 180-day restricted period described in the
preceding paragraph will be automatically extended if:
(1) during the last 17 days of the period the company
issues an earnings release or announce material news or a
material event; or (2) prior to the expiration of the
period, the company announces that it will release earnings
results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of
the period, in which case the relevant restrictions described in
the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the
expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the
earnings release or the announcement of the material news or
material event.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public
market for the shares. The initial public offering price will be
negotiated among the company, the selling stockholders and the
underwriters. Among the factors to be considered in determining
the initial public offering price of the shares, in addition to
prevailing market conditions, will be the companys
historical performance, estimates of its business potential and
earnings prospects, an assessment of the companys
management and the consideration of the above factors in
relation to market valuation of companies in related businesses.
An application has been made to list the common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
GCA. In order to meet one of the requirements for
listing the common stock on the NYSE, the underwriters have
undertaken to sell lots of 100 or more shares to a minimum of
2,000 beneficial holders.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters
may purchase and sell shares of common stock in the open market.
These transactions may include short sales, stabilizing
transactions and purchases to cover positions created by short
sales. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a
greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in
the offering. Covered short sales are sales made in
an amount not greater than the underwriters option to
purchase additional shares from the selling stockholders in the
offering. The underwriters may close out any covered short
position by either exercising their option to purchase
additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In
determining the source of shares to close out the covered short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase additional
shares pursuant to the option granted to them. Naked
short sales are any sales in excess of such option. The
underwriters must close out any naked short position by
purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is
more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that
there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock
in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect
investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions
consist of various bids for or purchases of common stock made by
the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of
the offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid.
This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the
underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by
it because the representatives have repurchased shares sold by
or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short
covering transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and
stabilizing transactions may have the effect of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock, and
together with the imposition of the penalty bid, may stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the market price of our common
stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher
than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If
these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued at any
time. These transactions may be effected on the New York Stock
Exchange, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Each underwriter will represent, warrant and
agree that: (i) it has not offered or sold and, prior to
the expiry of a period of six months from the closing date, will
not offer or sell any shares to persons in the United Kingdom
except to persons whose ordinary activities involve them in
acquiring, holding,
107
The shares may not be offered or sold,
transferred or delivered, as part of their initial distribution
or at any time thereafter, directly or indirectly, to any
individual or legal entity in the Netherlands other than to
individuals or legal entities who or which trade or invest in
securities in the conduct of their profession or trade, which
includes banks, securities intermediaries, insurance companies,
pension funds, other institutional investors and commercial
enterprises which, as an ancillary activity, regularly trade or
invest in securities.
The shares may not be offered or sold by means of
any document other than to persons whose ordinary business is to
buy or sell shares or debentures, whether as principal or agent,
or in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the
public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance
(Cap. 32) of Hong Kong, and no advertisement, invitation or
document relating to the shares may be issued, whether in Hong
Kong or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of
which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong
Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of
Hong Kong) other than with respect to shares which are or are
intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or
only to professional investors within the meaning of
the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong
Kong and any rules made thereunder.
This prospectus has not been registered as a
prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material
in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation or
subscription or purchase, of the shares may not be circulated or
distributed, nor may the shares be offered or sold, or be made
the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase,
whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other
than under circumstances in which such offer, sale or invitation
does not constitute an offer or sale, or invitation for
subscription or purchase, of the shares to the public in
Singapore.
The securities have not been and will not be
registered under the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan (the
Securities and Exchange Law) and each underwriter has agreed
that it will not offer or sell any securities, directly or
indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident
of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in
Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under
the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale,
directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan,
except pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the
Securities and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws,
regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
The underwriters do not expect sales to
discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total
number of shares offered.
The company estimates that its share of the total
expenses of the offering, excluding underwriting discounts and
commissions, will be approximately
$ .
The company and the selling stockholders have
agreed to indemnify the several underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective
affiliates have, from time to time, performed, and may in the
future perform, various financial advisory and investment
banking services for the company and its affiliates, for which
they received or will receive customary fees and expenses. The
company
108
109
LEGAL MATTERS
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto,
California, will pass for us on the validity of the common stock
offered hereby. Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park,
California, is acting as counsel for the underwriters in
connection with selected legal matters relating to the shares of
common stock offered by this prospectus.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2004 included in this
prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing herein, and are included in reliance upon
the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
110
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Our operating subsidiary, Global Cash Access,
Inc., has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 under
the Securities Act with the SEC to register 8 3/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2012. Thereafter, Global Cash Access,
Inc. has been subject to the reporting requirements of the
Exchange Act and has filed various periodic and other reports
with the SEC. These periodic reports and other information is
available for inspection and copying at the SECs public
reference facilities referred to below and the web site of the
SEC referred to below.
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. has not
previously been subject to the reporting requirements of the
Exchange Act. Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. filed with the
SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the
Securities Act with respect to the offer and sale of common
stock pursuant to this prospectus. This prospectus, filed as a
part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the
information set forth in the registration statement or the
exhibits and schedules thereto in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC and no reference is hereby made to such
omitted information. Statements made in this prospectus
concerning the contents of any contract, agreement or other
document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are
summaries of the terms of such contracts, agreements or
documents and are not necessarily complete. Reference is made to
each such exhibit for a more complete description of the matters
involved and such statements shall be deemed qualified in their
entirety by such reference. The registration statement and the
exhibits and schedules thereto filed with the SEC may be
inspected, without charge, and copies may be obtained at
prescribed rates, at the public reference facility maintained by
the Commission at its principal office at Judiciary Plaza,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 and at
the regional offices of the Commission located at 5670 Wilshire
Boulevard, 11th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90036-3648. Please call
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the
operation of the public reference facilities. The Commission
also maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. For
further information pertaining to the common stock offered by
this prospectus and Global Cash Access, Inc. reference is made
to the registration statement.
Upon completion of this offering, we will become
subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will
file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. These
periodic reports and other information will be available for
inspection and copying at the SECs public reference
facilities and the web site of the SEC referred to above.
111
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income
and comprehensive income, stockholders
(deficiency) equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audit included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
F-2
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 49,577 | $ | 23,423 | |||||
Settlement receivables
|
30,357 | 20,307 | |||||||
Receivables, other
|
4,641 | 6,510 | |||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
13,725 | 954 | |||||||
Property, equipment and
leasehold improvements, net
|
10,341 | 15,129 | |||||||
Goodwill
|
156,733 | 156,685 | |||||||
Other intangibles, net
|
16,546 | 20,619 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes, net
|
214,705 | | |||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 496,625 | $ | 243,627 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY AND MEMBERS CAPITAL | |||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
$ | 42,192 | $ | 22,968 | |||||
Accounts payable
|
20,617 | 18,016 | |||||||
Accrued expenses
|
12,258 | 3,396 | |||||||
Borrowings
|
478,250 | | |||||||
Total liabilities
|
553,317 | 44,380 | |||||||
Commitments and
contingencies
|
|||||||||
Minority interest
|
87 | | |||||||
Stockholders
deficiency and members capital
|
|||||||||
Common stock
series A, $0.001 par value, 97,500 shares
authorized and 31,775 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2004
|
32 | | |||||||
Common stock
series B, $0.001 par value, 13,000 shares
authorized and 400 shares outstanding at December 31,
2004
|
| | |||||||
Convertible preferred
stock series A, $0.001 par value,
39,325 shares authorized and 31,720 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2004
|
32 | | |||||||
Convertible preferred
stock series B, $0.001 par value,
13,000 shares authorized and 7,605 shares outstanding
at December 31, 2004
|
8 | | |||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(58,801 | ) | | ||||||
Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
1,950 | 1,741 | |||||||
Members capital
|
| 197,506 | |||||||
Total stockholders
deficiency and members capital
|
(56,779 | ) | 199,247 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders deficiency and members capital
|
$ | 496,625 | $ | 243,627 | |||||
F-3
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands except | ||||||||||||||
per share) | ||||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 209,962 | $ | 186,547 | $ | 182,754 | ||||||||
ATM
|
158,433 | 132,341 | 119,424 | |||||||||||
Check services
|
23,768 | 26,326 | 29,412 | |||||||||||
Central Credit and other
revenues
|
10,840 | 10,500 | 10,303 | |||||||||||
Total revenues
|
403,003 | 355,714 | 341,893 | |||||||||||
Cost of Revenues
|
270,112 | 232,463 | 216,658 | |||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT
|
132,891 | 123,251 | 125,235 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
(45,322 | ) | (45,430 | ) | (57,649 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
|
(5,672 | ) | (6,508 | ) | (6,512 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation
|
(7,876 | ) | (7,553 | ) | (5,308 | ) | ||||||||
Operating Income
|
74,021 | 63,760 | 55,766 | |||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE),
NET
|
||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
1,318 | 1,312 | 1,283 | |||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(33,343 | ) | (6,762 | ) | (6,216 | ) | ||||||||
Total interest income
(expense), net
|
(32,025 | ) | (5,450 | ) | (4,933 | ) | ||||||||
Income Before Income Tax
Benefit
|
||||||||||||||
(Provision) and Minority
Ownership Loss
|
41,996 | 58,310 | 50,833 | |||||||||||
Income Tax Benefit
(Provision)
|
212,346 | (321 | ) | (1,451 | ) | |||||||||
Income Before Minority
Ownership Loss
|
254,342 | 57,989 | 49,382 | |||||||||||
Minority Ownership Loss
|
213 | 400 | 1,040 | |||||||||||
NET INCOME
|
254,555 | 58,389 | 50,422 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
209 | 2,054 | 20 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive Income
|
$ | 254,764 | $ | 60,443 | $ | 50,442 | ||||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 7.91 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.57 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 3.52 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.71 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | |||||||||||
Diluted
|
72,222 | 71,500 | 71,500 | |||||||||||
Pro Forma Computation
Related to Conversion to Corporation For Income Tax
Purposes
|
||||||||||||||
Income before income tax
benefit (provision) and minority ownership loss
historical
|
$ | 41,996 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 50,833 | ||||||||
Income tax
provision historical, exclusive of tax benefit, net
|
(10,519 | ) | (321 | ) | (1,451 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma income tax
provision (unaudited)
|
(4,600 | ) | (20,741 | ) | (16,940 | ) | ||||||||
Minority ownership
loss historical
|
213 | 400 | 1,040 | |||||||||||
Pro Forma Net Income
(Unaudited)
|
$ | 27,090 | $ | 37,648 | $ | 33,482 | ||||||||
Pro forma earnings per
share:
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.84 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Pro forma weighted average
number of common shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | |||||||||||
Diluted
|
72,222 | 71,500 | 71,500 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Common Stock | Common Stock | Preferred Stock | Preferred Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A | Series B | Series A | Series B | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Members | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Deficit | Income | Capital | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except shares) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
January 1, 2002
|
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | $ | | $ | (333 | ) | $ | 205,535 | $ | 205,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
50,422 | 50,422 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
20 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to members
|
(53,373 | ) | (53,373 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
December 31, 2002
|
| | | | | | | | | (313 | ) | 202,584 | 202,271 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
58,389 | 58,389 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
2,054 | 2,054 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to members
|
(63,467 | ) | (63,467 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
December 31, 2003
|
| | | | | | | | | 1,741 | 197,506 | 199,247 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income before change
in tax status
|
227,121 | 227,121 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
209 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to members
|
(73,028 | ) | (73,028 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed distributions to
members
|
(3,166 | ) | (3,166 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed contributions from
members
|
964 | 964 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of membership
units
|
(435,560 | ) | (435,560 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in tax status from
a limited liability company to a corporation on May 14, 2004
|
31,775,250 | 32 | 399,750 | | 31,720,000 | 32 | 7,605,000 | 8 | (86,235 | ) | 86,163 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income after change in
tax status
|
27,434 | 27,434 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
December 31, 2004
|
31,775,250 | $ | 32 | 399,750 | $ | | 31,720,000 | $ | 32 | 7,605,000 | $ | 8 | $ | (58,801 | ) | $ | 1,950 | $ | | $ | (56,779 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Cash Flows from
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 254,555 | $ | 58,389 | $ | 50,422 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile
net income to cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Amortization of financing
costs
|
1,618 | | | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
5,672 | 6,508 | 6,512 | |||||||||||
Depreciation
|
7,876 | 7,553 | 5,308 | |||||||||||
Loss(gain) on sale or
disposal of assets
|
179 | 458 | (151 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
(214,665 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
(213 | ) | (400 | ) | (1,040 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||
Settlement receivables
|
(9,815 | ) | 795 | 12,643 | ||||||||||
Receivables, other
|
(659 | ) | (2,710 | ) | (5,693 | ) | ||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
(475 | ) | 44 | 360 | ||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
18,995 | (34,289 | ) | 13,645 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
2,588 | 1,031 | 538 | |||||||||||
Accrued expenses
|
9,556 | (3,908 | ) | (580 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by
operating activities
|
75,212 | 33,471 | 81,964 | |||||||||||
Cash Flows from
Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Purchase of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
(3,261 | ) | (6,012 | ) | (7,785 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of other
intangibles
|
(1,600 | ) | (1,035 | ) | (1,965 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(4,861 | ) | (7,047 | ) | (9,750 | ) | ||||||||
Cash Flows from
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Borrowings under credit
facility
|
484,087 | | | |||||||||||
Repayments under credit
facility
|
(16,750 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Debt issuance costs
|
(3,000 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Minority capital
contributions
|
300 | 400 | 1,040 | |||||||||||
Redemption of membership
interests and distributions to partners
|
(508,587 | ) | (63,467 | ) | (53,373 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
(43,950 | ) | (63,067 | ) | (52,333 | ) | ||||||||
Net effect of exchange
rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | (247 | ) | $ | 2,482 | $ | 203 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
cash and cash equivalents
|
26,154 | (34,161 | ) | 20,084 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
23,423 | 57,584 | 37,500 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
$ | 49,577 | $ | 23,423 | $ | 57,584 | ||||||||
Supplemental Disclosure
of Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||||||||
Cash paid during year for:
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 25,689 | $ | 6,839 | $ | 6,082 | ||||||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 407 | $ | 1,636 | $ | 1,740 | ||||||||
Supplemental schedule
of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Contribution related to
forgiveness of related party payable
|
$ | 964 | ||||||||||||
Distribution related to
forgiveness of related party receivable
|
$ | 3,166 | ||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs
treated as a reduction of credit facility proceeds
|
$ | 10,913 | ||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. is a holding
company, the principal asset of which is the capital stock of
Global Cash Access, Inc. (GCA). Unless otherwise
indicated, the terms the Company, we,
us and our refer to Global Cash Access
Holdings, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries
(Holdings). Holdings was formed on February 4,
2004, to hold all of the outstanding capital stock of GCA and to
guarantee the obligations under our senior secured credit
facilities (see further discussion at Note 7). On
May 14, 2004, the Company was incorporated under the laws
of Delaware and became known as GCA Holdings, Inc. Prior to
May 14, 2004, the Company operated as a limited liability
company and was known as GCA Holdings, L.L.C. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements present the operations of the
Company as-if Holdings had been in existence for all periods
presented.
GCA is a financial services company that provides
cash access products and services to the gaming industry. The
Companys cash access products and services allow gaming
patrons to access funds through a variety of methods, including
credit card cash advances, point-of-sale debit card cash
advances, automated teller machine (ATM)
withdrawals, check cashing transactions and money transfers.
These services are provided to patrons at gaming establishments
directly by the Company or through one of its consolidated
subsidiaries: CashCall Systems, Inc. (CashCall),
Global Cash Access (BVI), Inc. (BVI) or QuikPlay,
LLC (QuikPlay).
The Company also owns and operates one of the
leading credit reporting agencies in the gaming industry,
Central Credit, LLC (Central), and provides
credit-information services to gaming establishments and
credit-reporting history on gaming patrons to the various gaming
establishments. Central operates in both international and
domestic gaming markets.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Holdings and its consolidated
subsidiaries: GCA, CashCall, Central, BVI and QuikPlay.
CashCall is a Canadian corporation directly owned
by GCA that provides consumer cash access to gaming
establishments in Canada through card cash advance transactions.
On August 30, 2001, GCA established a United Kingdom branch
to provide credit and debit card cash advance and ATM withdrawal
transactions to gaming patrons in the United Kingdom. The branch
did not initiate these transactions until early 2002 when the
regulatory approval to perform these types of transactions in
gaming establishments was granted by Parliament.
BVI is a British Virgin Islands corporation that
we established as a holding company for future international
operations growth. BVI was established on December 16,
2004, and has no operations or assets as of December 31,
2004.
QuikPlay is a joint venture formed on
December 6, 2000, owned 60% by GCA and 40% by International
Game Technology (IGT). IGT is one of the largest
manufacturers of gaming equipment in the United States. QuikPlay
was formed to develop cash advance capabilities to gaming
patrons at or near the point of play. This product was in the
initial development stages until August 28, 2003, at which
time it received a Phase II approval letter issued by
Gaming Laboratories International, Inc. providing regulatory
approval to commence operations on a pilot tribal gaming
location. Additional regulatory approval must still be obtained
for all future tribal locations and non-tribal locations, but
management has determined that the QuikPlay product is no longer
in the development stage. As GCA is the managing member of this
entity, it has been consolidated in the Companys
consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
The Company provides certain services in
conjunction with companies wholly owned by First Data
Corporation (First Data), including TRS Recovery
Services, Inc., and TeleCheck Services, Inc.,
F-7
1.
Business and Basis of Presentation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(collectively TeleCheck), and Western
Union Financial Services, Inc. (Western Union).
Prior to March 10, 2004, First Data owned 67% of the
Company (see further discussion at Restructuring of Ownership
below). GCA is a money transfer agent for Western Union, a
wholly owned subsidiary of First Data. Western Union contracts
directly with the casinos and provides GCA commissions on the
transactions processed by the casino. These commissions are
included as part of other revenues in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income.
The Company markets check authorization services
to gaming establishments pursuant to the TeleCheck Marketing
Agreement dated July 9, 1998, as amended March 10,
2004. GCA, through TeleCheck, provides gaming establishments who
are merchant subscribers check warranty services. GCA provides
marketing and customer service to the gaming establishment on
behalf of TeleCheck. Because GCA controls the primary customer
relationship and GCA can choose to offer check warranty products
other than those of TeleCheck (including our own), we view
TeleCheck as our agent with respect to these services. Under the
TeleCheck Marketing Agreement, as amended, GCA receives the
monthly fee charged to gaming establishments, net of actual
warranty losses and operating expenses reported by TeleCheck.
GCA records the gross monthly fee charged to the gaming
establishments in check services revenue. The actual warranty
losses billed by TeleCheck are recorded as part of cost of
revenues. At month end, GCA estimates a liability for
unpresented warranty claims and adjusts the month end accrual
and warranty expense as necessary. The operating expenses
invoiced by TeleCheck are recorded as part of operating expenses.
On December 10, 2003, the principal owners
of GCA, First Data Financial Services, LLC (FDFS)
and FDFS Holdings, LLC (both of which are subsidiaries of First
Data) and M&C International (M&C), entered
into a restructuring agreement with the principals of M&C.
This restructuring agreement and the subsequent amendments
provided for the recapitalization of GCAs membership so
that all of the membership units in GCA were contributed to
Holdings. GCA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings.
Pursuant to the Restructuring of Ownership, all
of the membership units in Holdings owned by FDFS Holdings, LLC
were redeemed for an aggregate amount of $435.6 million.
Additionally, certain of M&Cs membership units in
Holdings were redeemed for $38.0 million.
Immediately prior to the redemption of First
Datas and M&Cs membership units in Holdings,
M&C sold to Bank of America Corporation a portion of
M&Cs membership units in Holdings for an aggregate
purchase price of $20.2 million. Additionally as part of
the Restructuring of Ownership, a $12.1 million
distribution was made to M&C that was paid directly to Bank
of America for settlement of a loan between Bank of America and
M&C.
Upon the consummation of the restructuring
transaction, which was completed on March 10, 2004,
Holdings was approximately 95% owned by M&C and
approximately 5% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of
America Corporation.
On April 21, 2004, and as amended on
May 13, 2004, Holdings and the owners of Holdings entered
into a Securities Purchase and Exchange Agreement
(Securities Purchase Agreement) whereby equity
interests in Holdings were sold to certain private equity
investors for an aggregate purchase price of
$316.4 million. Under the terms of the Securities Purchase
Agreement, approximately 55% of the equity interests in Holdings
held by M&C were sold to the investors. The Company did not
receive any proceeds under the private equity restructuring.
F-8
Restructuring of Ownership
Securities Purchase and Exchange
Agreement
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additionally, Holdings and each of their wholly
owned subsidiaries that were not corporations agreed, among
other things, to convert from limited liability companies to
corporations organized under the laws of Delaware (the
Conversion), and to exchange membership units in
Holdings for various classes of common and preferred stock. Upon
the consummation of the security purchase transaction, Holdings
was approximately 55% owned by the private equity investors, 40%
owned by M&C and 5% owned by Bank of America.
On May 14, 2004, the Company changed its tax
status from a limited liability company to a taxable corporation
organized under the laws of Delaware. In accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, upon conversion to a
taxable entity the Company recorded an income tax benefit to
establish a net deferred tax asset attributed to differences
between the financial reporting and the income tax basis of
assets and liabilities (see further discussion in Note 10).
The consolidated statements of income have been expanded to
reflect the unaudited pro forma impact had the Company been a
taxable entity for all periods presented.
The consolidated financial statements presented
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003 include the accounts of
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. As part
of the Restructuring of Ownership on March 10, 2004, an
affiliated company, CashCall, was contributed to GCA by the
former owners. The financial statements also include CashCall as
a combined entity for the period prior to its contribution on
March 10, 2004.
All significant intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and all
balances on deposit in banks and financial institutions. The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities
of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash and
cash equivalents. Such balances may at times exceed the federal
insurance limits. However, the Company periodically evaluates
the creditworthiness of these institutions to minimize risk.
The Company obtains all of the cash required to
operate its ATMs through various ATM Funding Agreements more
fully described in Note 3. Under the terms of these
arrangements, the cash utilized within the ATMs is not the
property of the Company. Accordingly, these funds are not
included within the consolidated balance sheets.
Certain gaming establishments provide the cash
utilized within the ATM (Site-Funded). The
receivables generated for the amount of cash dispensed from
transactions performed at our ATMs are owned by GCA and GCA is
liable to the gaming establishment for the face amount of the
cash dispensed. In the consolidated balance sheets, the amount
receivable for transactions processed on these ATM transactions
is included within settlement receivables and the amount due to
the location for the face amount of dispensing transactions is
included within settlement liabilities. As of December 31,
2004 and 2003, the Company operated 122 and 69 ATMs,
respectively, that were Site-Funded.
For our non-Site Funded locations, GCA obtains
the necessary cash to service these machines through an Amended
Treasury Services Agreement with Bank of America. Under the
terms of this agreement, neither the cash utilized within the
ATMs nor the receivables generated for the amount of
F-9
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Principles of Consolidation
Cash and Cash Equivalents
ATM Funding Agreements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cash dispensed through transactions on the ATMs
are owned nor controlled by GCA. Therefore, these amounts have
been excluded from the consolidated balance sheets.
In the credit and debit card cash advance
transactions provided by GCA and CashCall, the gaming
establishment is reimbursed for the cash disbursed to gaming
patrons through a check issued by either Integrated Payment
Systems, Inc. or IPS Canada Inc. (IPS). GCA is an
agent of IPS, a licensed issuer of payment instruments that is
wholly owned by First Data. Pursuant to these agency
relationships, GCA indemnifies IPS for any losses incurred in
conjunction with credit and debit card cash advance
transactions, and thus, assumes all of the risks and rewards.
GCA receives reimbursement from the patrons credit or
debit card issuer for the transaction in an amount equal to the
check issued to the casino plus the cash advance fee charged to
the patron. This reimbursement is included within the settlement
receivables on the consolidated balance sheets. GCA then remits
to IPS the amount of the check issued to the casino. The amount
of unpaid checks is included with settlement liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Debt issuances costs incurred in connection with
the issuance of the senior secured credit facility and the
senior subordinated notes are capitalized and amortized to
interest expense based upon the related debt agreements using
the straight-line method which approximates the effective
interest method. Unamortized debt issuance costs are included in
prepaid and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements
are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, computed
using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated
life of the related assets, generally three to five years, or
the related lease term. Amounts charged to expense for
depreciation of property, equipment and leasehold improvements
were approximately $7.9 million, $7.6 million, and
$5.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003, and 2002, respectively. Accumulated depreciation was
$25.1 million and $17.2 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Upon sale or retirement, the costs and related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and
any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated
statements of income.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. As
of December 31, 2004, the Company does not believe any of
its property, equipment and leasehold improvements are impaired.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase
price over the identifiable tangible and intangible assets
acquired plus liabilities assumed arising from business
combinations. There was no goodwill amortization expense for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which addresses the
financial accounting and reporting for intangible assets upon
acquisition and subsequent to acquisition.
F-10
Settlement Receivables and Settlement
Liabilities
Unamortized Debt Issuance
Costs
Property, Equipment and Leasehold
Improvements
Goodwill
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In January 2002 in connection with its initial
application, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill, and
tested the goodwill balances for impairment. As of the adoption
date, the Company determined that its goodwill balances were not
impaired. The Company further does not believe that any of its
goodwill is impaired as of December 31, 2004 based upon the
results of our annual impairment testing.
Goodwill, net, attributable to our principal
business lines consists of the following at December 31,
(in thousands):
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Cash Advance
|
$ | 93,230 | $ | 93,167 | $ | 93,054 | ||||||
Credit Reporting
|
39,470 | 39,470 | 39,470 | |||||||||
ATM
|
24,033 | 24,048 | 24,048 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 156,733 | $ | 156,685 | $ | 156,572 | ||||||
Other Intangible Assets |
Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer contracts (rights to provide processing services to clients) acquired through business combinations and acquisitions and capitalized software development costs. Other intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years. Amortization expense related to these intangibles totaled approximately $5.7 million, $6.5 million and $6.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Accumulated amortization of other intangible assets was $30.4 million and $25.1 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
At December 31, 2004 the anticipated amortization expense related to other intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
2005
|
$ | 4,791 | ||
2006
|
4,135 | |||
2007
|
3,819 | |||
2008
|
1,788 | |||
2009
|
1,151 | |||
Thereafter
|
862 | |||
Total
|
$ | 16,546 | ||
The Company accounts for the costs related to computer software developed or obtained for internal use in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1 (SOP 98-1), Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. SOP 98-1 establishes that computer software costs that are incurred in the preliminary project stage should be expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the application development phase are capitalized and amortized over their useful lives, generally not to exceed three years. The Company capitalized $0.6 million, $1.0 million, and $2.0 million of development costs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
Chargebacks |
The Company has established an allowance for chargebacks on credit and debit card cash advance transactions based upon past experience with losses arising from disputed charges by customers. Management periodically reviews the recorded balance to ensure the recorded amount adequately covers the expected losses to be incurred from disputed charges. The recorded allowance
F-11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for chargebacks is included within accrued
expenses on the consolidated balance sheets and had a balance of
$0.1 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The net warranty liability represents the cost to
cover the estimated unreceived and uncollectible returned checks
that TeleCheck has warranted as of December 31, 2004 and
2003. GCA is obligated to reimburse TeleCheck for all warranted
items paid on the Companys behalf. The Company has
$0.5 million accrued for net warranty liability as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
To determine the net warranty liability, the
Company determines the estimated gross warranty liability by
applying the historical reimbursement percentage to the actual
warranted checks for the month. The historical loss rate on
reimbursed items is then applied to the difference between the
estimated gross warranty liability and the actual warranty
reimbursements processed within the month to arrive at the net
warranty liability.
The Company evaluates the recorded balance of the
net warranty liability on a monthly basis to ensure that the
recorded amount adequately covers the expected expense that will
arise in future periods from losses on warranty presentments.
The Company evaluates this accrual for adequacy based upon the
expected warranty presentments compared to the revenue recorded
for the comparable periods.
The fair value of a financial instrument
represents the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged
in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in
a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a
specific point in time, based upon relevant market information
about the financial instrument.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents,
receivables, other, settlement receivables and settlement
liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these instruments. The fair value of the
Companys senior secured credit facility and senior
subordinated notes as of December 31, 2004 was
$246.6 million and $252.3 million, respectively, with
a $243.3 million and $235.0 million carrying value at
December 31, 2004, respectively. The fair value of
GCAs debt is estimated based on quoted market prices for
the same issue. The fair values of all other financial
instruments, including amounts outstanding under the ATM funding
agreements, approximate their book values as the instruments are
short-term in nature or contain market rates of interest.
The Company recognizes revenue when evidence of
an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the price is
fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company evaluates its revenue streams for proper timing of
revenue recognition.
Cash advance revenue is comprised of the fee
charged to patrons for credit and debit card cash advances and
is recognized at the point an IPS check is generated by the
casino cashier for the patrons transaction or cash is
dispensed from an ATM.
ATM revenue is comprised of upfront patron
transaction fees or surcharges assessed at the time the
transaction is initiated and a percentage of interchange fees
paid by the patrons issuing bank. These issuing banks
share the interchange revenue (reverse interchange) with GCA to
cover the cost incurred by GCA to acquire the ATM transaction.
Upfront patron transaction fees are recognized when a
F-12
Net Warranty Liability
Fair Values of Financial
Instruments
Revenue Recognition
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transaction is initiated, and reverse interchange
is recognized on a monthly basis based on the total transactions
occurring during the month.
In general, check service revenue is comprised of
a fee based upon a percentage of the face amount of total checks
warranted, and is recognized on a monthly basis.
Credit reporting revenue is based upon either a
flat monthly unlimited usage fee or a variable fee structure
driven by the volume of patron credit histories generated. This
revenue is recognized on a monthly basis based on the total
transactions occurring during the month.
The cost of revenues represents the direct costs
required to perform revenue generating transactions. The
principal costs included within cost of revenues are commissions
paid to gaming establishments, interchange paid to credit and
debit card networks, transaction processing fees to our
transaction processor and check cashing warranties.
The Company expenses advertising costs as
incurred. Total advertising expense, included in operating
expenses in the consolidated statements of income, was
$0.7 million, $0.6 million, and $1.3 million for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively.
Certain costs of start-up activities are expensed
as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003, and 2002, the Company expensed $0, $0.7 million, and
$2.6 million, respectively, in project development costs,
which related primarily to activities associated with software
and hardware development for QuikPlay. As the Company had not
received regulatory approval to commence operations until August
2003, all costs incurred for capitalizable development
activities were expensed. Such expenses were $0.5 million,
and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively, and are included within operating
expenses on the consolidated statements of income.
As a result of the change in tax status resulting
from the change in the Companys organization as a limited
liability company to a corporation, the Company is no longer a
pass-through entity for U.S. income tax purposes. Income
tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes, plus
the provision for U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of
international subsidiaries not deemed to be permanently
invested. Since it is managements practice and intent to
reinvest the earnings in the operations of CashCall,
U.S. federal income taxes have not been provided on the
undistributed earnings of this subsidiary. Certain items of
income and expense are not reported in tax returns and financial
statements in the same year. The tax effect of such temporary
differences is reported as deferred income taxes.
Foreign currency denominated assets and
liabilities for those foreign entities for which the local
currency is the functional currency are translated into
U.S. dollars based on exchange rates prevailing at the end
of each year. Revenues and expenses are translated at average
exchange rates during the year. The effects of foreign exchange
gains and losses arising from these translations are included as
a component of other comprehensive income. Translation gains and
losses on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature
are also recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.
F-13
Cost of Revenues
Advertising Costs
Project Development Costs
Income Taxes
Foreign Currency Translation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company accounts for the costs related to
computer software developed or obtained for internal use in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Statement of Position 98-1
(SOP 98-1), Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.
SOP 98-1 establishes that computer software costs that are
incurred in the preliminary project stage should be expensed as
incurred. Costs incurred in the application development phase
and any upgrades and enhancements that modify the existing
software and result in additional functionality are capitalized
and amortized over their useful lives, generally not to exceed
three years. These costs consist of outside professional fees
related to the development of our systems. As of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, costs capitalized for
internally developed software were $11.8 million and
$11.2 million, respectively.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant
estimates incorporated in the consolidated financial statements
include the estimated useful lives for depreciable and
amortizable assets, estimated cash flows in assessing the
recoverability of long-lived assets, and estimated liabilities
for chargebacks, litigation, claims and assessments. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128,
Earnings per Share, basic EPS is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
effect of potential common stock, which consists of convertible
preferred stock and assumed stock option exercises. The
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used in the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as
follows at December 31,(in thousands):
Internally Developed Software
Use of Estimates
Earnings Applicable to Common
Stock
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Weighted average common
shares outstanding basic
|
32,175 | 32,175 | 32,175 | |||||||||
Potential dilution from
conversion of preferred shares
|
39,325 | 39,325 | 39,325 | |||||||||
Potential dilution from
equity grants
|
722 | | | |||||||||
Weighted average common
shares outstanding diluted
|
72,222 | 71,500 | 71,500 | |||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation |
As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, the Company continues to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock-based compensation. Accordingly, the intrinsic value method is used to determine the compensation expense that is to be recognized.
In July 2004, an option to acquire 1% of the then outstanding stock (or 722,215 shares of common stock) was granted to the Companys Chief Financial Officer. This option represents the only outstanding stock option grant for the Company as of December 31, 2004. As all options granted had an exercise price equal to the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant (or $8.046 per common share), no compensation expense has been recorded related to these grants.
F-14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on the
net income if the Company had applied the fair-value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to the options granted to
our Chief Financial Officer for the years ended
December 31, (in thousands except per share):
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Net income, as reported
|
$ | 254,555 | $ | 58,389 | $ | 50,422 | |||||||
Less: total stock-based
compensation determined under fair-value based method for all
awards, net of tax
|
206 | | | ||||||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 254,349 | $ | 58,389 | $ | 50,422 | |||||||
Earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 7.91 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.57 | |||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 3.52 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.71 | |||||||
The fair value of the option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used: dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 50 percent; risk-free interest rate of 4.45 percent and an expected life of six years for the option granted. The fair value per share of the option granted was $4.27.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46 (and subsequently revised their interpretation through February 2004), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). FIN 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, and establishes standards for determining under what circumstances VIEs should be consolidated with their primary beneficiary, including those to which the usual condition for consolidation does not apply. FIN 46 also requires disclosures about unconsolidated VIEs in which a company has a significant variable interest. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to VIEs created after December 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements applied to older entities in the first period ending after March 15, 2004. Certain disclosure requirements apply to all financial statements issued after December 31, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which establishes accounting standards for all transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. SFAS No. 123(R) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions with employees, and carries forward without change prior guidance for share-based payments for transactions with non-employees.
SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the intrinsic value measurement objective in APB Opinion No. 25 and generally will require us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grant. The standard requires grant date fair value to be estimated using either an option-pricing model, which is consistent with the terms of the award, or a market observed price, if such a price exists. Such cost must be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. The standard also requires us to estimate the number of instruments that will ultimately be issued, rather than accounting for forfeitures as they occur.
We are required to apply SFAS No. 123(R) to all awards granted, modified or settled in our first reporting period under U.S. GAAP beginning after June 15, 2005. We are also required to use either the modified prospective method or the modified retrospective method. Under the modified prospective
F-15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
method, we must recognize compensation cost for
all awards granted after we adopt the standard and for the
unvested portion of previously granted awards that are
outstanding on that date.
Under the modified retrospective method, we must
restate our previously issued financial statements to recognize
the amounts we previously calculated and reported on a pro forma
basis, as if the prior standard had been adopted
Under both methods, we are permitted to use
either a straight line or an accelerated method to amortize the
cost as an expense for awards with graded vesting. The standard
permits and encourages early adoption. We have commenced our
analysis of the impact of SFAS 123(R), but have not yet
decided: (1) whether we will elect to adopt early,
(2) if we elect to adopt early, then at what date we would
do so, (3) whether we will use the modified prospective
method or elect to use the modified retrospective method, and
(4) whether we will elect to use straight line amortization
or an accelerated method.
In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets an
amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. This Statement amends
Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. The Statement specifies that a nonmonetary
exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of
the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of
the exchange. This Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after the date this Statement is issued. Retroactive
application is not permitted. Management is analyzing the
requirements of this new Statement and believes that its
adoption will not have any significant impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
On November 17, 2003, GCA entered into a
Vault Cash Custody Agreement (the Agreement) with
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) to provide the
currency needed for normal operating requirements for all of
GCAs ATMs. This agreement provided up to $300 million
for GCAs ATMs, and replaced the existing Bailment
Agreement between GCA and First Data. As part of this agreement,
GCA agreed that Wells Fargo shall have absolute control over all
of the cash and the settlement receivables resulting from ATM
transactions at all times. Under the agreement with Wells Fargo,
GCA was to pay a monthly funding fee to Wells Fargo equal to
average daily dollars outstanding in all ATMs multiplied by the
average Federal Funds rate published by the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco for the month plus a margin of
30 basis points multiplied by the number of days in the
calendar month.
On March 4, 2004, the Agreement with Wells
Fargo was amended to provide the currency needed for normal
operating requirements for all the ATMs. Under terms of this
amendment, Wells Fargo agreed to not exercise their right to
terminate the Agreement for a period of 120 days and the
margin utilized in the monthly funding fee computation was
changed from 30 basis points to 300 basis points.
Until the services were terminated, GCA was also required to
maintain a $5.0 million letter of credit as security for
the performance of GCAs obligations under the Agreement.
Services under terms of this agreement and the letter of credit
securing GCAs obligations terminated in June 2004.
On March 8, 2004, GCA entered into an
Amendment of the Treasury Services Agreement with Bank of
America, N.A. that allowed for the Company to utilize up to
$300 million in funds owned by Bank
F-16
3.
ATM Funding Agreements
Wells Fargo Vault Cash Custody
Agreement
Bank of America Amended Treasury Services
Agreement
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of America to provide the currency needed for the
Companys ATMs. The transition of the ATM funding from
Wells Fargo to Bank of America was completed June 8, 2004.
For use of these funds, the Company pays Bank of America a cash
usage fee equal to the average daily balance of funds utilized
multiplied by the one-month LIBOR rate plus 25 basis
points. The cash usage fee is included within interest expense
on the consolidated statements of income. The cash usage fee in
effect at December 31, 2004 was 2.67%.
The Company operates ATMs at certain customer
gaming establishments where the gaming establishment provides
the cash required for ATM operational needs. The Company is
required to reimburse the customer for the amount of cash
dispensed from these Site-Funded ATMs. As of December 31,
2004 and 2003, the Company operated 122 and 69 ATMs,
respectively, that were site funded.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements
consist of the following as of December 31, (in thousands):
Site Funded ATMs
4.
Property, Equipment and Leasehold
Improvements
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
ATM equipment
|
$ | 26,764 | $ | 24,218 | |||||
Cash advance equipment
|
4,760 | 4,306 | |||||||
Office and computer
equipment
|
1,769 | 1,660 | |||||||
Leasehold and building
improvements
|
2,115 | 2,115 | |||||||
35,408 | 32,299 | ||||||||
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
(25,067 | ) | (17,170 | ) | |||||
Total
|
$ | 10,341 | $ | 15,129 | |||||
5. | Benefit Plans |
Defined Contribution Plan |
The Company has a retirement savings plan (the 401(k) Plan) under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering its employees. The 401(k) Plan allows employees to defer up to the lesser of the Internal Revenue Code prescribed maximum amount or 100% of their income on a pre-tax basis through contributions to the plan. As a benefit to employees, the Company matches a percentage of these employee contributions. Expenses related to the matching portion of the contributions to the 401(k) plan were $0.3 million, $0.3 million, and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
6. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Lease Obligations |
The Company leases certain office facilities and operating equipment under cancelable and noncancelable agreements. Total rent expense was approximately $0.6 million, $1.3 million, and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
F-17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2004, the minimum aggregate
rental commitment under all non-cancelable operating leases for
the years then ending was (in thousands):
2005
|
$ | 488 | ||
2006
|
505 | |||
2007
|
496 | |||
2008
|
487 | |||
2009
|
475 | |||
Thereafter
|
475 | |||
Total
|
$ | 2,926 | ||
Litigation Claims and Assessments |
Canadian Goods and Services Tax (GST) |
In April 2004, CashCall was notified through one of its customers that the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) Appeals Division had taken a position that the customer was liable for GST tax on commissions it received in connection with the cash advance services provided by CashCall. The CRAs position is disputed by CashCall and the customer based upon their interpretation of the Canadian Excise Tax Act (ETA). Under the ETA, a supply of goods or services is taxable unless it is identified as exempt specifically in the ETA. Included within this listing of exempt transactions are financial services transactions. The preliminary position taken by CRA is that the advancement of funds by the gaming establishment to gaming patrons in consideration for receipt of a negotiable instrument issued by CashCall is not an exempt financial services transaction.
CRAs position is that the customer should have collected GST tax from CashCall on the commissions it was paid, and remitted these taxes to CRA. CRA requested that our customer remit to them, on our behalf, approximately $0.6 million in GST owed related to the period under audit. Our customer has made the payments to CRA for the location under audit plus another $1.1 million related to another gaming establishment that is under their management. Since they have made these payments for tax on our behalf they have requested reimbursement of these amounts from the Company.
In December 2004, the Company paid the amount requested related to this specific customer. In February 2005, the Company filed an application for rebate of GST for taxes paid in error with CRA. If this claim is denied, which is expected, the Company intends to defend the rebate claim through the assessment process, the appeals process and then through court, if necessary.
The Company believes the transactions performed in Canada are financial services transactions that are exempt from GST and are therefore not taxable. As the Company has paid these obligations and as there is uncertainty related to the ability to recover these amounts through the refund claim and appeals process, the Company has deemed it appropriate to expense this payment and accrue for a liability related to future payments for this customer. Accordingly, in the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company has recorded $1.7 million in operating expenses related to this tax exposure in the accompanying consolidated income statements.
Compliance Letters from MasterCard International, Inc. and Visa USA |
In the normal course of business, the Company routinely receives letters from MasterCard International, Inc. and Visa USA (the Associations) regarding non-compliance with various aspects of the respective Associations bylaws and regulations as they relate to transaction processing. The
F-18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company is periodically involved in discussions
with its sponsoring bank and the Associations to resolve these
issues. It is the opinion of management that all of the issues
raised by the Associations will be resolved in the normal course
of business and related changes to the bankcard transaction
processing, if any, will not result in material adverse impact
to the financial results of the Company.
The Company is threatened with or named as a
defendant in various lawsuits in the ordinary course of
business, including the one noted above. It is not possible to
determine the ultimate disposition of these matters; however,
management is of the opinion that the final resolution of any
threatened or pending litigation is not likely to have a
material adverse effect on the financial position or results of
operations of the Company.
In connection with the Restructuring of
Ownership, GCA entered into a new senior secured credit facility
(the Credit Facility) in an aggregate principal
amount of $280 million, consisting of a five-year revolving
credit facility of $20.0 million and a six-year term loan
of $260 million. Included within the revolving credit
facility are a sub-facility that provides for up to
$10.0 million in letters of credit and a sub-facility that
provides for up to $5.0 million in swingline borrowings.
The Credit Facility is secured by all of GCAs assets,
including stock of its principal subsidiaries. In addition, the
Credit Facility is secured by a pledge of the stock of GCA held
by the Company. The Credit Facility resulted in proceeds to the
Company of $255.7 million net of issuance costs and
offering expenses. Proceeds from the term loan portion of the
Credit Facility were utilized to finance, in part, the
Restructuring of Ownership and pay related fees and expenses.
The term loan portion of the Credit Facility
amortizes at a rate of $3.25 million per quarter for the
first five years with the remaining balance to be repaid in
equal quarterly installments in the sixth year. In addition,
within 100 days after the end of each fiscal year, the
Company is required to pay down the term loan in an amount equal
to a certain percentage of excess cash flow, as defined within
the agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2004, such
percentage was 75% or $28.3 million. Borrowings under the
Credit Facility bear interest at either i) a base rate
(defined as the higher of the Bank of America prime rate or the
Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) plus an applicable margin or ii)
LIBOR plus an applicable margin. For the term loan portion of
the Credit Facility the applicable margin for LIBOR loans is
2.75% while base rate loans have an applicable margin of 1.75%.
As of December 31, 2004, the interest rate applicable to
the term loan including margin was 5.17%. Initially, for the
revolving portion of the Credit Facility the applicable margin
for LIBOR loans was 3.00% while base rate loans had an
applicable margin of 1.75%. The applicable margin for the
revolving portion of the Credit Facility is adjusted from
time-to-time based upon GCAs leverage ratio.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had
$243.3 million in borrowings under the term loan and
$3.4 million in letters of credits issued and outstanding,
which reduce amounts available under the revolving portion of
the Credit Facility. No borrowings were outstanding under the
revolving credit portion of the Credit Facility.
On March 10, 2004, the Company completed a
private placement offering of $235 million
8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 15, 2012
(the Notes Offering). The Notes Offering
resulted in proceeds to the Company of $228.3 million net
of issuance costs and offering expenses. Interest on the notes
accrues based upon a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day
months and is
F-19
7.
Borrowings
Senior Secured Credit
Facility
Senior Subordinated Notes
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
payable semiannually on March 15th and
September 15th. Proceeds of the Notes Offering were
utilized to finance in part the Restructuring of Ownership and
pay related fees and expenses.
All of the Companys existing and future
domestic wholly owned subsidiaries are guarantors of the notes
on a senior subordinated basis. Up to 35% of these notes may be
redeemed before March 15, 2007, at a price of 108.75% of
face, out of the net proceeds from an equity offering. On or
after March 15, 2008, the Company may redeem all or a
portion of the notes at redemption prices of 104.375% on or
after March 15, 2008, 102.188% on or after March 15,
2009 or 100.000% on or after March 15, 2010.
At December 31, 2004, the minimum aggregate
repayment (excluding excess cash flow payments) for all
borrowings for the years then ending was (in thousands):
2005
|
$ | 13,000 | ||
2006
|
13,000 | |||
2007
|
13,000 | |||
2008
|
13,000 | |||
2009
|
149,500 | |||
Thereafter
|
276,750 | |||
Total
|
$ | 478,250 | ||
8. | Capital Stock |
Common Stock |
We are authorized to issue 97,500,000 and 13,000,000 shares of series A and B common stock, respectively. Our par value per share, on each series of common stock is $0.001 and as of December 31, 2004, we have 31,775,250 and 399,750 shares outstanding of series A and B common stock, respectively.
Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock, each share of series A common stock is entitled to: (i) one vote on all matters presented to the stockholders,; (ii) receive such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore; and (iii) in the event of our liquidation or dissolution, share ratably in any distribution of our assets.
Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock, each share of series B common stock is entitled to: (i) receive such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore; and (ii) in the event of our liquidation or dissolution, share ratably in any distribution of our assets. Series B common stock is not entitled to vote on any corporate matters other than limited specifically defined matters such as, mergers and significant sales of assets of the Company.
Convertible Preferred Stock |
Our Charter authorizes us to issue 39,325,000 and 13,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value series A and B convertible preferred stock, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, we have 31,720,000 and 7,605,000 shares outstanding of series A and B convertible preferred stock, respectively.
The series A and B convertible preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to payment of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. There are no dividend preferences to our common shares or between the series of convertible preferred shares. These shares are convertible
F-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
into common shares at the option of the holder or
automatically in connection with a qualified offering, as
defined within the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation. Each share of series A convertible preferred
stock is entitled to one vote for all matters presented to the
stockholders. Series B convertible preferred stock is not
entitled to vote on any corporate matters other than limited
specifically defined matters such as mergers and significant
sales of assets of the Company.
The Series A and B convertible preferred
stockholders are entitled to receive, in the event that we are
liquidated, dissolved or wound up, whether voluntary or
involuntary, the greater of (i) $8.046 per share of
series A or B convertible preferred stock plus an amount
per share equal to all dividends undeclared and unpaid thereon
to the date of final distribution to such holders or
(ii) the amount such holder would be entitled to receive if
the stock were converted immediately prior to such liquidation,
dissolution or winding up (the Liquidation
Preference). Until the series A and B convertible
preferred stockholders have been paid the Liquidation Preference
in full, no payment will be made to any holder of Junior Stock
upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The term
Junior Stock means our common stock and any other
class of our capital stock issued and outstanding that ranks
junior as to the payment of dividends or amounts payable upon
liquidation, dissolution and winding up to the series A or
B preferred stock. As of December 31, 2004, our preferred
stock had a liquidation preference of $8.046 per share or
$316.4 million.
Each share of the series A and B preferred
stock is convertible, in whole or in part at the option of the
holders thereof, into shares of common stock at a conversion
price of $8.046 per share of common stock (equivalent to a
conversion rate of one share of common stock for each share of
series of convertible preferred stock.
Our authorized and outstanding shares of common
and preferred stock reflect a stock split that was completed on
January 7, 2004 and retroactively applied for all periods
presented.
Prior to March 10, 2004, First Data held a
67% ownership interest in GCA (see Restructuring of Ownership
section in Note 1). In the normal course of business, First
Data and its subsidiaries provided certain services to the
Company. The Company was charged a fee by FDFS for all material
services provided on its behalf based on the estimated fair
value of the services provided. As part of the Restructuring of
Ownership, the Company and First Data agreed to transition
certain corporate support functions to the Company. These
services include tax, accounting, and licensing departments,
corporate insurance coverage, and credit card rewards
processing. These functions and responsibilities were
transitioned in April 2004.
As part of the Restructuring of Ownership, the
Company and First Data agreed for First Data to continue to
provide certain services for a period of one year after closing.
In connection with the credit and debit card cash advance
transactions and the ACH check cashing transactions, the Company
incurs a settlement liability to IPS for checks written to
gaming properties on cash accounts of IPS. GCA generally funds
IPS for the checks on the third business day after the check is
issued. The Company pays a check clearing and imaging fee to
IPS. IPS pays the Company interest on the outstanding checks
from the time they are funded until the check has cleared the
IPS bank account. The balance of outstanding checks includes
short-term balances as well as checks pending escheatment.
Interest is calculated daily on the total outstanding balance
and the short-term cash deposits at the lesser of 7% or prime
rate per annum.
In connection with the ATM business, FDFS
Holdings, LLC provided ATM funding for which it charged the
Company interest. Interest was calculated daily on the total
outstanding balance at the lesser of 7% or prime rate per annum.
This arrangement was terminated on December 16, 2003.
F-21
9.
Related Party Transactions
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
GCA markets TeleCheck check authorization and
warranty services and is an agent of Western Union in gaming
establishments. Under the TeleCheck Marketing Agreement and
subsequent amendments, the Company receives the monthly fee
revenue from all gaming establishments, less the net warranty
expense for the month and an amount equal to the operating
expenses. These amounts are included within check services
revenue, cost of revenues, and operating expenses, respectively.
As an agent under the Western Union agreement, the Company
receives a monthly commission based on the total number of
merchant outlets and the volume of transactions processed. This
amount is included with Central Credit and other revenues in the
consolidated statements of income.
The Company made payments for software
development costs to Infonox on the Web, a company owned by
M&C during each of the periods presented. A portion of the
software development costs are capitalized and reflected in
intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheets and the
remainder are classified in operating or other expenses in the
consolidated statements of income.
GCA made processing payments based on authorized
transactions to USA Payments, a company owned by M&C. The
processing payments have been reflected as cost of revenues and
other expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
Additionally, USA Payments provides pass through invoices
related mainly to gateway fees and other processing charges
incurred on behalf of the Company from unrelated third parties
and subleases a portion of GCAs corporate facility from
GCA.
As part of the Restructuring of Ownership, Bank
of America Corporation became a minority owner of Holdings, the
parent company of GCA. The Company uses Bank of America, N.A.
for general corporate banking purposes and is charged monthly
servicing fees for these services, which are included in
operating expenses. In connection with the ATM Funding
agreement, GCA obtains cash for our ATMs from Bank of America,
N.A. The fees paid to Bank of America for the preparation of the
cash is included within operating expenses, while the cash usage
fee is included as part of interest expense.
F-22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table represents the transactions
with related parties for the years ended December 31, (in
thousands):
Related Party | Description of Transaction | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
First Data and Subsidiaries: | ||||||||||||||||
IPS | Invoices paid by IPS passed through as capitalized items to GCA | $ | 284 | $ | 215 | $ | 305 | |||||||||
IPS | Invoices paid by IPS passed through and expensed in operating expenses by GCA | 196 | 732 | 493 | ||||||||||||
IPS | Check clearing & imaging charges operated by IPS | 583 | 526 | 569 | ||||||||||||
First Data | Other support services including tax, accounting and licensing departments, corporate insurance coverage and credit card rewards processing | 35 | 208 | 208 | ||||||||||||
IPS | Interest income earned by GCA on outstanding checks and short-term cash deposits | (1,128 | ) | (983 | ) | (1,017 | ) | |||||||||
FDFS Holdings, LLC | Interest expense recorded by GCA on bailment of ATM cash | | 6,213 | 4,335 | ||||||||||||
TeleCheck | Check guarantee revenue included in check services revenue | (22,591 | ) | (25,449 | ) | (29,287 | ) | |||||||||
TeleCheck | Check cashing warranties | 10,144 | 9,848 | 9,827 | ||||||||||||
TeleCheck | Operating expenses | 2,959 | 6,212 | 11,626 | ||||||||||||
Western Union | Money transfer commissions earned | (355 | ) | (371 | ) | (477 | ) | |||||||||
M&C Subsidiaries: | ||||||||||||||||
Infonox on the Web | Software development costs and maintenance expense | 1,624 | 3,643 | 5,993 | ||||||||||||
USA Payments | Transaction processing charges | 2,513 | 3,016 | 2,117 | ||||||||||||
USA Payments | Pass through billing related to gateway fees, telecom and other items | 1,533 | 1,986 | 1,519 | ||||||||||||
USA Payments | Sublease income earned for leasing out corporate office space for backup servers | (18 | ) | (51 | ) | | ||||||||||
Bank of America and Subsidiaries: | ||||||||||||||||
Bank of America, N.A. | Bank fees and cash preparation fees for cash accounts maintained | 982 | 311 | 295 | ||||||||||||
Bank of America, N.A. | Cash usage fee | $ | 3,145 | $ | | $ | |
F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table details the amounts due
from(to) these related parties that are recorded as part of
receivables, other, accounts payable and accrued expenses in the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, (in
thousands):
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
First Data and Subsidiaries
|
$ | 2,454 | $ | 2,058 | |||||
M&C and related
companies
|
45 | 3,166 | |||||||
Bank of America
|
6 | 1 | |||||||
Total included within
receivables, other
|
$ | 2,505 | $ | 5,225 | |||||
First Data and Subsidiaries
|
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (245 | ) | |||
USA Payment Systems
|
(325 | ) | (427 | ) | |||||
Infonox on the Web
|
(52 | ) | | ||||||
Bank of America
|
(137 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||
Total included within
accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | (517 | ) | $ | (690 | ) | |||
Included within settlement liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets are $32.0 million and $17.6 million of amounts due to IPS for unpaid checks as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Banc of America Securities LLC was the Initial Purchaser on GCAs Notes Offering. In connection with this offering, GCA incurred arrangement fees and related expenses of $6.7 million. These amounts were deducted by Banc of America Securities LLC from the net proceeds of the Notes Offering, and are being amortized over the term of the notes. The remaining unamortized balance of the fees has been included within prepaid expenses on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004.
Bank of America, N.A. was the lead arranger for the Credit Facility. In connection with the closing of the Credit Facility, GCA incurred arrangement fees and related expenses of $4.1 million. These amounts were deducted by Bank of America from the net proceeds of the Credit Facility, and are being amortized over the term of the Credit Facility. The remaining unamortized balance of the fees has been included within prepaid expenses on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004.
Additionally, the Company pays an administrative agency fee to Bank of America, N.A. for managing the Credit Facility. The $0.2 million charge for the first year was deducted from the proceeds of the Credit Facility. The remaining unamortized balance of the fees has been included within prepaid expenses on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004.
10. | Income Taxes |
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase and Exchange Agreement, the Company and its non-corporate subsidiaries were required to convert from a limited liability companies, which are pass-through entities for U.S. income tax purposes, to corporations. The conversion of the Company was completed on May 14, 2004.
The result of this conversion was to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities from the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of the Companys assets and liabilities at the date of conversion into a taxable entity. The net tax asset recorded was principally generated from the step up in tax basis created from the implied value of the Restructuring of Ownership and the Securities Purchase and Exchange Agreement.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a net tax benefit of $212.3 million from establishing a net deferred tax asset and recording income tax expense on operations since we
F-24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
became a taxable entity. The recorded net
deferred tax asset is subject to change in future periods as the
Company obtains final tax return information from the former
partners related to the final tax basis of their interests in
GCA.
The following table presents the domestic and
foreign components of pretax income and recorded income tax
expense for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
Components of pretax
income:
|
||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 37,690 | $ | 53,123 | $ | 48,560 | ||||||||
Foreign
|
4,306 | 5,187 | 2,273 | |||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 41,996 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 50,833 | ||||||||
Benefit
(provision) for income taxes:
|
||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 214,084 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Foreign
|
(1,738 | ) | (321 | ) | (1,451 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 212,346 | $ | (321 | ) | $ | (1,451 | ) | ||||||
Substantially all of the difference between our statutory tax rate of 35% and our effective tax rate of (505.6)% resulted from the recognition of the net deferred tax asset recorded in connection with our change in tax status from a pass through entity to a corporation in 2004.
We expect that our effective tax rate will approximate our statutory rate in future periods.
The following table outlines the principal components of deferred tax items (in thousands):
December 31, | |||||||
2004 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets
related to:
|
|||||||
Accrued expenses
|
$ | 494 | |||||
Sales allowances
|
609 | ||||||
Foreign tax credit
|
1,976 | ||||||
Net operating losses
|
4,228 | ||||||
Intangibles
|
208,979 | ||||||
Total deferred income tax
assets
|
216,286 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities
related to:
|
|||||||
Property, equipment and
leasehold improvements
|
(815 | ) | |||||
Other
|
(766 | ) | |||||
Total deferred income tax
liabilities
|
(1,581 | ) | |||||
Net deferred income taxes
|
$ | 214,705 | |||||
At December 31, 2004, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $214.7 million. This deferred tax asset was evaluated under the guidelines of SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes, and a determination on the basis of objective factors was made that the asset will be realized through future years taxable earnings.
The Company has net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of approximately $11.7 million as of December 31, 2004. These NOL carryforwards begin to expire December 31, 2024.
F-25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries are
considered to be permanently invested and, accordingly, United
States income taxes have not been provided on these earnings. At
December 31, 2004, the estimated amount of unremitted
earnings of foreign subsidiaries totaled $8.5 million.
The pro forma unaudited income tax adjustments
represent the tax effects that would have been reported had the
Company been subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes
as a corporation. Pro forma expenses are based upon the
statutory income tax rates and adjustments to income for
estimated permanent differences occurring during the period.
Actual rates and expenses could have differed had the Company
been subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes for all
periods presented. Therefore, the unaudited pro forma amounts
are for informational purposes only and are intended to be
indicative of the results of operations had the Company been
subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes for all
periods presented.
The following table presents the computation of
the unaudited pro forma income tax expense for the years ended
December 31, (in thousands):
11.
Pro Forma Income Tax Information
(Unaudited)
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Income before income
taxes, as reported
|
$ | 41,996 | $ | 58,310 | $ | 50,833 | ||||||
Effective pro forma income
tax rate
|
36.00 | % | 36.12 | % | 36.18 | % | ||||||
Pro forma income tax
expense
|
$ | 15,119 | $ | 21,062 | $ | 18,391 | ||||||
12. | Segment Information |
Operating segments as defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief operating decision-making group consists of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The operating segments are reviewed separately because each represents products that can be, and often are, sold separately to our customers.
The Company operates in four distinct business segments: cash advance, ATM, check services and credit reporting services. These segments are monitored separately by management for performance against our internal forecast. The Companys internal management reporting does not allocate overhead depreciation and amortization expenses to the respective business segments. For the segment information presented below, these amounts have been allocated to the respective segments based upon relation to the business segment (where identifiable) or on respective revenue contribution.
Other lines of business, none of which exceed the established materiality for segment reporting, include Western Union, direct marketing and QuikPlay, among others.
The Companys business is predominantly domestic, with no specific regional concentrations.
Major customers |
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, GCA had one major customer, Harrahs Entertainment, Inc., that generated total revenues of approximately $47.2 million, $47.9 million, and $45.6 million from all segments, representing 11.7%, 13.4%, and 13.3% of the Companys total revenues, respectively. The Companys contract with that customer expired on October 1, 2004, but continues on a month-to-month.
F-26
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The accounting policies of the operating segments
are the same as those described in the summary of significant
accounting policies. The tables below present the results of
operations and total assets by operating segment as of, and for
the years ended (in thousands):
Cash | Check | Credit | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advance | ATM | Services | Reporting | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 209,962 | $ | 158,433 | $ | 23,768 | $ | 9,368 | $ | 1,472 | $ | 403,003 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(4,803 | ) | (7,869 | ) | (17 | ) | (364 | ) | (495 | ) | (13,548 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating income
|
39,981 | 20,256 | 9,681 | 4,100 | 3 | 74,021 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
1,318 | | | | | 1,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(14,394 | ) | (16,576 | ) | (1,630 | ) | (642 | ) | (101 | ) | (33,343 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
129,020 | 87,434 | (2,899 | ) | (1,245 | ) | 36 | 212,346 | ||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
| | | | 213 | 213 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 155,925 | $ | 91,114 | $ | 5,152 | $ | 2,213 | $ | 151 | $ | 254,555 | ||||||||||||
December 31,
2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 186,547 | $ | 132,341 | $ | 26,326 | $ | 9,289 | $ | 1,211 | $ | 355,714 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(5,872 | ) | (7,290 | ) | | (364 | ) | (535 | ) | (14,061 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
37,611 | 15,186 | 9,208 | 3,557 | (1,802 | ) | 63,760 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
1,312 | | | | | 1,312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
| (6,673 | ) | | | (89 | ) | (6,762 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(321 | ) | | | | | (321 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
| | | | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 38,602 | $ | 8,513 | $ | 9,208 | $ | 3,557 | $ | (1,491 | ) | $ | 58,389 | |||||||||||
December 31,
2002
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 182,754 | $ | 119,424 | $ | 29,412 | $ | 8,997 | $ | 1,306 | $ | 341,893 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(5,953 | ) | (4,704 | ) | | (623 | ) | (540 | ) | (11,820 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
36,398 | 15,313 | 7,316 | 1,583 | (4,844 | ) | 55,766 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
1,283 | | | | | 1,283 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
| (6,110 | ) | | | (106 | ) | (6,216 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(1,451 | ) | | | | | (1,451 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
| | | | 1,040 | 1,040 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 36,230 | $ | 9,203 | $ | 7,316 | $ | 1,583 | $ | (3,910 | ) | $ | 50,422 |
F-27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
Total Assets | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | 317,604 | $ | 154,497 | ||||
ATM
|
133,005 | 44,991 | ||||||
Check services
|
4,223 | 2,944 | ||||||
Credit reporting
|
41,263 | 40,764 | ||||||
Other
|
530 | 431 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 496,625 | $ | 243,627 | ||||
13. | Subsequent Events |
In January 2005, the Company completed a 13-for-1 stock split for all classes of stock that increased the total authorized shares of Holdings from 5,555,555 shares to 72,222,215 shares. Additionally, the Company adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (Stock Incentive Plan). Under the Stock Incentive Plan, the Company has reserved 3,841,615 shares of Class A Common Stock for the grant of stock options and other equity incentive awards. In the first quarter of 2005, options to purchase an aggregate of 3,046,930 shares of common stock were granted under the Stock Incentive Plan. Of this amount, options to purchase 2,846,930 shares were granted to employees of the Company and options to purchase 200,000 shares were granted to consultants and directors of the Company.
14. | Guarantor Information |
As part of the Restructuring of Ownership discussed in Note 1 to these consolidated financial statements, GCA issued $235 million in senior subordinated notes due 2012 (the Notes). The Notes are guaranteed by the Company and all of its domestic wholly-owned subsidiaries. These guaranties are full, unconditional, joint and several. CashCall, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary and QuikPlay, which is a consolidated joint venture, do not guarantee the Notes. As such, the following consolidating schedules present separate financial statement information on a combined basis for the parent only, GCA as issuer, as well as the Companys guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries and affiliate, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
F-28
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
Combined | Combined Non- | Elimination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Entries* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 700 | $ | 45,037 | $ | 662 | $ | 3,178 | $ | | $ | 49,577 | ||||||||||||||
Settlement receivables
|
| 29,787 | | 570 | | 30,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables, other
|
| 6,915 | 16,952 | 19 | (19,245 | ) | 4,641 | |||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
| 13,713 | | 12 | | 13,725 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
(57,479 | ) | 59,719 | | | (2,240 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, equipment and
leasehold improvements, net
|
| 10,341 | | | | 10,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net
|
| 116,575 | 39,470 | 688 | | 156,733 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other intangibles, net
|
| 16,512 | 34 | | | 16,546 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net
|
| 214,121 | | 584 | | 214,705 | ||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
$ | (56,779 | ) | $ | 512,720 | $ | 57,118 | $ | 5,051 | $ | (21,485 | ) | $ | 496,625 | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIENCY) EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
$ | | $ | 41,583 | $ | | $ | 609 | $ | | $ | 42,192 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
| 19,929 | 375 | 313 | | 20,617 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses
|
| 30,350 | | 1,153 | (19,245 | ) | 12,258 | |||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
| 478,250 | | | | 478,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
| 570,112 | 375 | 2,075 | (19,245 | ) | 553,317 | |||||||||||||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST
|
| 87 | | | | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS
(DEFICIENCY) EQUITY
|
(56,779 | ) | (57,479 | ) | 56,743 | 2,976 | (2,240 | ) | (56,779 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
$ | (56,779 | ) | $ | 512,720 | $ | 57,118 | $ | 5,051 | $ | (21,485 | ) | $ | 496,625 | ||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include intercompany investments and management fees |
F-29
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
Combined | Combined Non- | Elimination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Entries* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | | $ | 14,665 | $ | 195 | $ | 8,563 | $ | | $ | 23,423 | ||||||||||||||
Settlement receivables
|
| 19,946 | | 361 | | 20,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables, other
|
| (1,201 | ) | 10,830 | 3,151 | (6,270 | ) | 6,510 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
| 954 | | | | 954 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
199,247 | 56,768 | | | (256,015 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Property, equipment and
leasehold improvements, net
|
| 15,108 | 21 | | | 15,129 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net
|
| 116,575 | 39,470 | 640 | | 156,685 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other intangibles, net
|
| 20,250 | 369 | | | 20,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
$ | 199,247 | $ | 243,065 | $ | 50,885 | $ | 12,715 | $ | (262,285 | ) | $ | 243,627 | |||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS CAPITAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
$ | | $ | 22,709 | $ | | $ | 259 | $ | | $ | 22,968 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
| 17,489 | 371 | 156 | | 18,016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses
|
| 3,620 | | 6,046 | (6,270 | ) | 3,396 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
| 43,818 | 371 | 6,461 | (6,270 | ) | 44,380 | |||||||||||||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS CAPITAL
|
199,247 | 199,247 | 50,514 | 6,254 | (256,015 | ) | 199,247 | |||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
$ | 199,247 | $ | 243,065 | $ | 50,885 | $ | 12,715 | $ | (262,285 | ) | $ | 243,627 | |||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include intercompany investments and management fees |
F-30
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
STATEMENT OF INCOME INFORMATION
Combined | Combined Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | | $ | 205,677 | $ | | $ | 4,285 | $ | | $ | 209,962 | ||||||||||||||
ATM
|
| 158,433 | | | | 158,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Check services
|
| 23,768 | | | | 23,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
revenues
|
254,555 | 6,081 | 10,519 | 72 | (260,387 | ) | 10,840 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
254,555 | 393,959 | 10,519 | 4,357 | (260,387 | ) | 403,003 | |||||||||||||||||||
COST OF REVENUES
|
| 267,150 | 276 | 2,686 | | 270,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT
|
254,555 | 126,809 | 10,243 | 1,671 | (260,387 | ) | 132,891 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| (39,249 | ) | (3,657 | ) | (2,971 | ) | 555 | (45,322 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization
|
| (5,337 | ) | (335 | ) | | | (5,672 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
| (7,855 | ) | (21 | ) | | | (7,876 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
254,555 | 74,368 | 6,230 | (1,300 | ) | (259,832 | ) | 74,021 | ||||||||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE),
NET
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
| 1,210 | | 108 | | 1,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
| (33,343 | ) | | | | (33,343 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income
(expense), net
|
| (32,133 | ) | | 108 | | (32,025 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE
INCOME TAX BENEFIT AND MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
254,555 | 42,235 | 6,230 | (1,192 | ) | (259,832 | ) | 41,996 | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
|
| 212,107 | | 239 | | 212,346 | ||||||||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE
MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
254,555 | 254,342 | 6,230 | (953 | ) | (259,832 | ) | 254,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
| 213 | | | | 213 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
$ | 254,555 | $ | 254,555 | $ | 6,230 | $ | (953 | ) | $ | (259,832 | ) | $ | 254,555 | ||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include earnings on subsidiaries and management fees |
F-31
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
STATEMENT OF INCOME INFORMATION
Combined | Combined Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | | $ | 181,982 | $ | | $ | 4,565 | $ | | $ | 186,547 | ||||||||||||||
ATM
|
| 132,341 | | | | 132,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Check services
|
| 26,326 | | | | 26,326 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
revenues
|
58,390 | 5,016 | 9,965 | 23 | (62,894 | ) | 10,500 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
58,390 | 345,665 | 9,965 | 4,588 | (62,894 | ) | 355,714 | |||||||||||||||||||
COSTS OF REVENUES
|
| 229,022 | 304 | 3,137 | | 232,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT
|
58,390 | 116,643 | 9,661 | 1,451 | (62,894 | ) | 123,251 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| (39,211 | ) | (4,787 | ) | (1,432 | ) | | (45,430 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization
|
| (6,173 | ) | (335 | ) | | | (6,508 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
| (7,524 | ) | (29 | ) | | | (7,553 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
58,390 | 63,735 | 4,510 | 19 | (62,894 | ) | 63,760 | |||||||||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE),
NET
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
| 1,017 | | 295 | | 1,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
| (6,762 | ) | | | | (6,762 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income
(expense), net
|
| (5,745 | ) | | 295 | | (5,450 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX
PROVISION AND MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
58,390 | 57,990 | 4,510 | 314 | (62,894 | ) | 58,310 | |||||||||||||||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
| | | (321 | ) | | (321 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY
OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
58,390 | 57,990 | 4,510 | (7 | ) | (62,894 | ) | 57,989 | ||||||||||||||||||
MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
| 400 | | | | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME
|
$ | 58,390 | $ | 58,390 | $ | 4,510 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (62,894 | ) | $ | 58,389 | ||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include earnings on subsidiaries and management fees |
F-32
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
STATEMENT OF INCOME INFORMATION
Combined | Combined Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash advance
|
$ | | $ | 176,599 | $ | | $ | 6,155 | $ | | $ | 182,754 | ||||||||||||||
ATM
|
| 119,424 | | | | 119,424 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Check services
|
| 29,412 | | | | 29,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Central Credit and other
revenues
|
50,422 | 88 | 9,519 | | (49,726 | ) | 10,303 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
50,422 | 325,523 | 9,519 | 6,155 | (49,726 | ) | 341,893 | |||||||||||||||||||
COST OF REVENUES
|
| 212,348 | 330 | 3,980 | | 216,658 | ||||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT
|
50,422 | 113,175 | 9,189 | 2,175 | (49,726 | ) | 125,235 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| (47,529 | ) | (6,462 | ) | (3,658 | ) | | (57,649 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization
|
| (6,177 | ) | (335 | ) | | | (6,512 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
| (5,020 | ) | (288 | ) | | | (5,308 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
50,422 | 54,449 | 2,104 | (1,483 | ) | (49,726 | ) | 55,766 | ||||||||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE),
NET
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
| 1,149 | | 134 | | 1,283 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
| (6,216 | ) | | | | (6,216 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income
(expense), net
|
| (5,067 | ) | | 134 | | (4,933 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE
INCOME TAX PROVISION AND MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
50,422 | 49,382 | 2,104 | (1,349 | ) | (49,726 | ) | 50,833 | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
| | | (1,451 | ) | | (1,451 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE
MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
50,422 | 49,382 | 2,104 | (2,800 | ) | (49,726 | ) | 49,382 | ||||||||||||||||||
MINORITY OWNERSHIP LOSS
|
| 1,040 | | | | 1,040 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
$ | 50,422 | $ | 50,422 | $ | 2,104 | $ | (2,800 | ) | $ | (49,726 | ) | $ | 50,422 | ||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include earnings on subsidiaries and management fees |
F-33
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Combined | Combined Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 254,555 | $ | 254,555 | $ | 6,230 | $ | (953 | ) | $ | 259,832 | $ | 254,555 | |||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile
net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of financing
costs
|
| 1,618 | | | | 1,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
| 5,337 | 335 | | | 5,672 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
| 7,855 | 21 | | | 7,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity income
|
(254,555 | ) | (5,277 | ) | | | (259,832 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale or disposal
of assets
|
| 179 | | | | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| (214,121 | ) | | (544 | ) | | (214,665 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
| (213 | ) | | | | (213 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement receivables
|
| (9,683 | ) | | (132 | ) | | (9,815 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Receivables, other
|
| 7,959 | (6,123 | ) | (2,337 | ) | (158 | ) | (659 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
| (464 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (475 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
| 18,699 | | 296 | | 18,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
| 1,887 | 4 | 142 | 555 | 2,588 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses
|
| 8,571 | | 985 | | 9,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities
|
| 76,902 | 467 | (2,554 | ) | 397 | 75,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
| (3,261 | ) | | | | (3,261 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of other
intangibles
|
| (1,600 | ) | | | | (1,600 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
| (750 | ) | | | 750 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in)
provided by investing activities
|
| (5,611 | ) | | | 750 | (4,861 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under credit
facility
|
| 484,087 | | | | 484,087 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments under credit
facility
|
| (16,750 | ) | | | | (16,750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs
|
| (3,000 | ) | | | | (3,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minority capital
contributions
|
| 300 | | | | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital investments in
subsidiaries
|
700 | | | 750 | (1,450 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of membership
interests and distributions to partners
|
| (505,157 | ) | | (4,130 | ) | 700 | (508,587 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
700 | (40,520 | ) | | (3,380 | ) | (750 | ) | (43,950 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
NET EFFECT OF EXCHANGE
RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
| $ | (399 | ) | $ | | $ | 549 | $ | (397 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
700 | 30,372 | 467 | (5,385 | ) | | 26,154 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period
|
| 14,665 | 195 | 8,563 | | 23,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of period
|
$ | 700 | $ | 45,037 | $ | 662 | $ | 3,178 | $ | | $ | 49,577 | ||||||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include intercompany investments and management fees |
F-34
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Combined | Combined Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 58,391 | $ | 58,391 | $ | 4,509 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (62,895 | ) | $ | 58,389 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile
net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
| 6,173 | 335 | | | 6,508 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
| 7,524 | 29 | | | 7,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale or disposal
of assets
|
| 458 | | | | 458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity income (loss)
|
(58,391 | ) | (4,504 | ) | | | 62,895 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
| (400 | ) | | | | (400 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement receivables
|
| 674 | | 121 | | 795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables, other
|
| 7,416 | (4,596 | ) | (2,895 | ) | (2,635 | ) | (2,710 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
| 44 | | | | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
| (34,219 | ) | | (70 | ) | | (34,289 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
| 1,623 | (203 | ) | (389 | ) | | 1,031 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses
|
| (3,974 | ) | | (3,353 | ) | 3,419 | (3,908 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities
|
| 39,206 | 74 | (6,593 | ) | 784 | 33,471 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
| (6,010 | ) | (2 | ) | | | (6,012 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of other
intangibles
|
| (1,035 | ) | (1,035 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
| (1,000 | ) | | | 1,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in)
provided by investing activities
|
| (8,045 | ) | (2 | ) | | 1,000 | (7,047 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minority capital
contributions
|
| 400 | | | | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital contributions
|
| | | 1,000 | (1,000 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to partners
|
| (63,467 | ) | | | | (63,467 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in)
provided by financing activities
|
| (63,067 | ) | | 1,000 | (1,000 | ) | (63,067 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
NET EFFECT OF EXCHANGE
RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
| 1,206 | | 2,060 | (784 | ) | 2,482 | |||||||||||||||||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
| (30,700 | ) | 72 | (3,533 | ) | | (34,161 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
| 45,365 | 123 | 12,096 | | 57,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
$ | | $ | 14,665 | $ | 195 | $ | 8,563 | $ | | $ | 23,423 | ||||||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include intercompany investments and management fees |
F-35
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING SCHEDULE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Combined | Combined Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations* | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 50,422 | $ | 50,422 | $ | 2,104 | $ | (2,800 | ) | $ | (49,726 | ) | $ | 50,422 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile
net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
| 6,177 | 335 | | | 6,512 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
| 5,020 | 288 | | | 5,308 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale or disposal
of assets
|
| (151 | ) | | | | (151 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity income (loss)
|
(50,422 | ) | 696 | | | 49,726 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minority ownership loss
|
| (1,040 | ) | | | | (1,040 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement receivables
|
| 12,549 | | 94 | | 12,643 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables, other
|
| (2,902 | ) | (2,936 | ) | (8,149 | ) | 8,294 | (5,693 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
| 360 | | | | 360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement liabilities
|
| 13,825 | | (180 | ) | | 13,645 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
| 431 | 12 | 95 | | 538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses
|
| 426 | (186 | ) | 7,464 | (8,284 | ) | (580 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities
|
| 85,813 | (383 | ) | (3,476 | ) | 10 | 81,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
| (7,785 | ) | | | | (7,785 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of other
intangibles
|
| (1,965 | ) | | | (1,965 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
| (2,600 | ) | | | 2,600 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in)
provided by investing activities
|
| (12,350 | ) | | | 2,600 | (9,750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minority capital
contributions
|
| 1,040 | | | | 1,040 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital contributions
|
| | | 2,600 | (2,600 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to partners
|
| (53,373 | ) | | | | (53,373 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in)
provided by financing activities
|
| (52,333 | ) | | 2,600 | (2,600 | ) | (52,333 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
NET EFFECT OF EXCHANGE
RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
| 145 | | 68 | (10 | ) | 203 | |||||||||||||||||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
| 21,275 | (383 | ) | (808 | ) | | 20,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
| 24,090 | 506 | 12,904 | | 37,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
$ | | $ | 45,365 | $ | 123 | $ | 12,096 | $ | | $ | 57,584 | ||||||||||||||||
* | Eliminations include intercompany investments and management fees |
F-36
DESCRIPTION OF GRAPHIC INSIDE THE BACK COVER
This page consists of a photograph of the screen display of a personal computer running QuikReports. The photograph is oriented on the page in landscape mode with the top portion of the screen display appearing along the left margin of the page. The screen display shows a sample report, consisting of rows of data containing fictitious patron names, addresses and transaction totals.
Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
,
2005
You should rely only on the information contained
in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you
with information different from that contained in this
prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy,
common shares only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is
accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of
the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our
common shares.
No action is being taken in any jurisdiction
outside the United States to permit a public offering of the
common shares or possession or distribution of this prospectus
in that jurisdiction. Persons who come into possession of this
prospectus in jurisdictions outside the United States are
required to inform themselves about and to observe any
restrictions as to this offering and the distribution of this
prospectus applicable to that jurisdiction.
Through and
including ,
2005 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to a dealers obligation to
deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
JPMorgan
Banc of America Securities LLC
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
Citigroup
Deutsche Bank Securities
SG Cowen & Co.
Wachovia Securities
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN
PROSPECTUS
The following table sets forth all expenses to be
paid by the registrant, other than estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions, in connection with this offering. All
amounts shown are estimates except for the registration fee and
the New York Stock Exchange listing fee.
Item 13.
Other Expenses of Issuance and
Distribution.
SEC registration fee
|
$ | ||||
New York Stock Exchange
listing fee
|
|||||
Printing and engraving
|
|||||
Legal fees and expenses
|
|||||
Accounting fees and
expenses
|
|||||
Blue sky fees and expenses
(including legal fees)
|
|||||
Transfer agent and
registrar fees
|
|||||
Miscellaneous
|
|||||
Total
|
$ | ||||
Item 14. | Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify directors and officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement in connection with specified actions, suits and proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than action by or in the right of the corporation, or a derivative action), if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. A similar standard is applicable in the case of derivative actions, except that indemnification only extends to expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of such action, and the statute requires court approval before there can be any indemnification where the person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the corporation. The statute provides that it is not exclusive of other indemnification that may be granted by a corporations certificate of incorporation, bylaws, disinterested director vote, stockholder vote, agreement, or otherwise.
The DGCL further authorizes a Delaware corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity, arising out of his status as such, whether or not the corporation would otherwise have the power to indemnify him under Section 145.
The bylaws of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. provide for the indemnification of its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. The bylaws of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. also permit us to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person against any liability that may be asserted against, or expenses that may be incurred by, any such person in connection with our activities, regardless of whether we would have the power to indemnify such persons against such liability under the provisions of our bylaws. We have purchased liability insurance for the benefit of the members of our officers and directors.
Item 15. | Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities |
The registrant (formerly known as GCA Holdings, Inc.) resulted from the conversion of GCA Holdings, L.L.C., a limited liability company. GCA Holdings, L.L.C. was formed on February 4, 2004, converted to a
II-1
In connection with the formation of GCA Holdings,
L.L.C., on March 10, 2004, GCA Holdings, L.L.C. issued
(i) to FDFS Holdings, LLC 958 Common Units of membership
interest in exchange for 958 Common Units of membership interest
in Global Cash Access, L.L.C. (a limited liability company that
was converted to a corporation named Global Cash Access, Inc.),
and (ii) to M&C International 472 Common Units of
membership interest in exchange for 472 Common Units of
membership interest in Global Cash Access, L.L.C. These
issuances were exempt from registration under Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act.
In connection with a recapitalization of the
ownership of GCA Holdings, L.L.C., on May 13, 2004, GCA
Holdings, L.L.C. issued (i) to M&C International
220.055 Class A Common Units of membership interest,
244.000 Class A Preferred Units of membership interests and
58.500 Class B Preferred Units of membership interest, all
in exchange for 522.555 Common Units of membership interest, and
(ii) to Bank of America Corporation 24.370 Class A
Common Units and 3.075 Class B Common Units, all in
exchange for 27.445 Common Units of membership interest. These
issuances were exempt from registration under Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act.
In connection with the conversion of GCA
Holdings, L.L.C. to a corporation, on May 14, 2004, Global
Cash Access Holdings, Inc. issued (i) to M&C
International 2,200,550 shares of Class A Common stock
in exchange for 220.055 Class A Common Units of membership
interest, (ii) to Bank of America Corporation
243,700 shares of Class A Common Stock in exchange for
24.370 Class A Common Units of membership interest and
30,750 shares of Class B Common Stock in exchange for
3.075 Class B Common Units of membership interest,
(iii) to Summit/ GCA Holdings LLC 1,553,708 shares of
Class A Preferred Stock in exchange for 155.3708
Class A Preferred Units of membership interest and
372,508 shares of Class B Preferred Stock in exchange
for 37.2508 Class B Preferred Units of membership interest,
(iv) to Tudor Ventures GCA Investment Ltd.
192,672 shares of Class A Preferred Stock in exchange
for 19.2672 Class A Preferred Units of membership interest
and 46,194 shares of Class B Preferred Stock in
exchange for 4.6194 Class B Preferred Units of membership
interest, (v) to TPT GCA Investment Ltd. 33,944 shares
of Class A Preferred Stock in exchange for 3.3944
Class A Preferred Units of membership interest and
8,138 shares of Class B Preferred Stock in exchange
for 0.8138 Class B Preferred Units of membership interest,
(vi) to Tudor Funds GCA Investment Ltd. 351,400 shares
of Class A Preferred Stock in exchange for 35.1400
Class A Preferred Units of membership interest and
84,250 shares of Class B Preferred Stock in exchange
for 8.4250 Class B Preferred Units of membership interest,
(vii) to HarbourVest VI-GCA LLC 154,138 shares of
Class A Preferred Stock in exchange for 15.4138
Class A Preferred Units of membership interest and
36,955 shares of Class B Preferred Stock in exchange
for 3.6955 Class B Preferred Units of membership interest,
(viii) to Casino Cash Access Corp. 88,374 shares of
Class A Preferred Stock in exchange for 8.8374 Class A
Preferred Units of membership interest and 21,188 shares of
Class B Preferred Stock in exchange for 2.1188 Class B
Preferred Units of membership interest, and (ix) to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee for First Plaza Group
Trust 65,764 shares of Class A Preferred Stock in
exchange for 6.5764 Class A Preferred Units of membership
interest and 15,767 shares of Class B Preferred Stock
in exchange for 1.5767 Class B Preferred Units of
membership interest. These issuances were exempt from
registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
On September 1, 2004, the registrant granted
an option to purchase 55,555 shares of Class A
Common Stock for an exercise price of $104.60 per share to Harry
Hagerty in connection with the commencement of his employment
with the registrant as its Chief Financial Officer. This
issuance was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act, as well as pursuant to Rule 701
thereunder.
On January 7, 2005, the registrant effected
a 13-for-1 stock split of all of its outstanding capital stock.
On January 8, 2005, the registrant granted
options to purchase an aggregate of 2,794,430 shares of
Class A Common Stock to certain of its employees and
consultants for an exercise price of $13.99 per share
pursuant to its 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. On March 1,
2005, the registrant granted options to purchase an aggregate of
252,500 shares of Class A Common Stock to certain of
its employees for an exercise price of $13.99 per share
pursuant to its 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. These issuances were
exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act, as well as pursuant to Rule 701 thereunder.
II-2
With respect to the issuances described above as
being exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act, we claimed exemption by virtue of
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act in that such issuances
did not involve a public offering, were made without general
solicitation or advertising, each purchaser was a sophisticated
investor with access to all relevant information necessary to
evaluate the investment, and each purchaser represented to us
that the securities were being acquired for investment.
With respect to the issuances described above as
being exempt from registration under Rule 701 under the
Securities Act, we claimed exemption by virtue of Rule 701
of the Securities Act in that such issuances were either
pursuant to written compensatory benefit plans or contracts
relating to compensation, as provided in Rule 701.
(a) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index on page II-7.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
We hereby undertake to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our
directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the
Delaware General Corporation Law, our restated certificate of
incorporation or our bylaws, indemnification agreements entered
into between the company and our executive officers and
directors, the underwriting agreement, or otherwise, we have
been advised that in the opinion of the commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. If a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by us of expenses incurred or paid by any of our directors,
officers or controlling persons in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities
being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel
the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to
a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such
indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
II-3
Item 16.
Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedules
Item 17.
Undertakings
(1) For purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from
the form of Prospectus filed as part of this registration
statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a
form of Prospectus filed by us pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be
part of this registration statement as of the time it was
declared effective;
(2) For the purpose of determining any
liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective
amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that
time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant certifies that it has
reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all the requirements
for filing on Form S-1 and has duly caused this
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of
Las Vegas, Nevada on this 22nd day of March, 2005.
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE
PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints, jointly and
severally, Kirk Sanford and Harry C. Hagerty, and each one of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this
registration statement, and to sign any registration statement
for the same offering covered by this registration statement
that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b)
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
all post-effective amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that each of
said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his or
their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
each of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney as
of the date indicated.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been
signed by the persons whose signatures appear below, which
persons have signed such registration statement in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC.
By:
/s/ KIRK SANFORD
Kirk Sanford
President and Chief Executive Officer
Title | Date | |||||
Signature | ||||||
/s/ KIRK SANFORD Kirk Sanford |
President, Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
March 22, 2005 | ||||
/s/ KARIM MASKATIYA Karim Maskatiya |
Director | March 22, 2005 | ||||
/s/ ROBERT CUCINOTTA Robert Cucinotta |
Director | March 22, 2005 | ||||
/s/ WALTER G. KORTSCHAK Walter G. Kortschak |
Director | March 22, 2005 | ||||
/s/ CHARLES J.
FITZGERALD Charles J. Fitzgerald |
Director | March 22, 2005 |
II-4
Title | Date | |||||
Signature | ||||||
/s/ E. MILES KILBURN E. Miles Kilburn |
Director | March 22, 2005 | ||||
/s/ HARRY C. HAGERTY Harry C. Hagerty |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | March 22, 2005 |
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
1 | .1 | Underwriting Agreement, dated as of , 2005, by and among Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc., as Attorney-in-Fact acting on behalf of each of the Selling Stockholders named therein, and Goldman Sachs & Co., Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. on behalf of each of the Underwriters named therein | ||
3 | .1 | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. to become effective as of the closing of the offering | ||
3 | .2 | Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. to become effective as of the closing of the offering | ||
4 | .1 | Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 | ||
4 | .2 | Indenture relating to $235,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 | ||
4 | .3 | Form of 8 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 | ||
4 | .4 | Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2004, by Global Cash Access, Inc. and the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein | ||
4 | .5 | Form of Supplemental Indenture by and among Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc., Global Cash Access, Inc., Central Credit, LLC and The Bank of New York and form of notation of Guarantee by Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. | ||
5 | .1 | Form of opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP | ||
10 | .1 | Lease Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2000, by and between Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and American Pacific Capital Gateway Bldg D Co., L.L.C. | ||
10 | .2 | Credit Agreement dated as of March 10, 2004 among GCA Holdings, L.L.C., Global Cash Access, L.L.C., the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, L/C Issuer and Swingline Lender and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager | ||
10 | .3 | Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2004, among GCA Holdings, L.L.C., Global Cash Access, L.L.C., the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, L/C Issuer and Swingline Lender | ||
10 | .4 | Guaranty, dated as of March 10, 2004, among GCA Holdings, L.L.C., the guarantors from time to time party hereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. | ||
10 | .5 | Security Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, among the loan parties from time to time party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent. | ||
10 | .6 | Pledge Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, among the loan parties from time to time party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent. | ||
10 | .7 | Membership Unit Redemption Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between FDFS Holdings, LLC and GCA Holdings, L.L.C. | ||
10 | .8 | Sponsorship Agreement, dated as of November 1999, by and between BA Merchant Services, Inc. and Global Cash Access, L.L.C., as amended by Amendment Number 1 to the Sponsorship Agreement, dated as of September 2000, among BA Merchant Services, Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and First Data Corporation. | ||
10 | .9 | Sponsorship Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, by and between Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and First Data Corporation. | ||
10 | .10 | Amended and Restated Software License Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between Infonox on the Web and Global Cash Access, L.L.C. | ||
10 | .11 | Professional Services Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between Infonox on the Web and Global Cash Access, L.L.C. |
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10 | .12 | Patent License Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between USA Payments and Global Cash Access, L.L.C. | ||
10 | .13 | Amended and Restated Electronic Payment Processing Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between Global Cash Access, L.L.C., USA Payments Inc. and USA Payment Systems, Inc. | ||
10 | .14 | Letter Agreement Relating to Technology, dated May 13, 2004, among Global Cash Access, L.L.C., USA Payments, USA Payment Systems and Infonox on the web. | ||
10 | .15 | Automated Teller Machine Sponsorship Agreement by and between Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and Western Union Bank, dated as of November 12, 2002, and First Amendment to Automated Teller Machine Sponsorship Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and First Financial Bank. | ||
10 | .16 | Membership Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, by and among Bank of America Corporation, M&C International and GCA Holdings, L.L.C. | ||
10 | .17 | Amendment to Treasury Services Terms and Conditions Booklet ATM Cash Services, dated as of March 8, 2004, by and between Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and Bank of America, N.A. | ||
10 | .18 | Limited Liability Company Agreement of QuikPlay, LLC, dated as of December 6, 2000, between Global Cash Access, L.L.C. and IGT. | ||
10 | .19 | Registration Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2004, by and among GCA Holdings, L.L.C., the Investors named therein, M&C International and Bank of America Corporation | ||
10 | .20 | Stockholders Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2004, by and among GCA Holdings, L.L.C., the Investors named therein, M&C International and Bank of America Corporation | ||
10 | .21 | Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2004, by and among GCA Holdings, L.L.C., the Investors named therein and M&C International | ||
10 | .22 | Noncompete Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2004, by and between GCA Holdings, Inc. and Kirk Sanford | ||
10 | .23 | Employment Agreement, dated as of July 12, 2004, by and between Global Cash Access, Inc. and Harry C. Hagerty | ||
10 | .24 | Notice of Stock Option Award and Stock Option Award Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2004, by and between GCA Holdings, Inc. and Harry C. Hagerty | ||
10 | .25 | Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan | ||
10 | .26 | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2005, by and between Global Cash Access, Inc. and Kirk Sanford | ||
10 | .27 | Form of Indemnification Agreement between Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. and each of its executive officers and directors | ||
10 | .28 | Patent Purchase and License Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2005, by and between Global Cash Access, Inc. and USA Payments | ||
10 | .29 | Termination and Consent, dated as of March 16, 2005, by and among Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. and the other parties thereto | ||
21 | .1 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | ||
23 | .1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP | ||
23 | .2 | Consent of Morrison & Foerster LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1) | ||
24 | .1 | Power of Attorney (included in Part II to this Registration Statement) |
| Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registration Statement of Global Cash Access, Inc. on Form S-4 (File No. 333-117218) previously filed with the SEC. |
| Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Annual Report of Global Cash Access, Inc. on Form 10-K (File No. 333-117218) previously filed with the SEC. |
| To be filed by amendment. |