Blueprint
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 10, 2017
Registration No. 333-219029
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT
NO. 1
to
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida
|
7200
|
86-0787790
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(Primary
Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
2151 LeJeune Road, Suite 150-Mezzanine
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 774-0407
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant’s principal executive offices)
William
O’Dowd, IV
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
2151
LeJeune Road, Suite 150-Mezzanine
Coral
Gables, FL 33134
(305)
774-0407
(Name,
address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area
code, of agent for service)
Copies
to:
Kara L.
MacCullough, Esq.
|
Barry I. Grossman,
Esq.
|
Laurie L. Green,
Esq.
|
Sarah Williams,
Esq.
|
Greenberg Traurig,
P.A.
|
Ellenoff Grossman
& Schole LLP
|
401 East Las Olas
Boulevard, Suite 2000
|
1345 Avenue of the
Americas
|
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33301
|
New York, NY
10105
|
(954)
765-0500
|
(212)
370-1300
|
Approximate date of
commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable
after this registration statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under
the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.
☒
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration
statement for the same offering. ☐
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule
462(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
☐
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule
462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated
filer,”“accelerated filer,” “smaller
reporting company,” and “emerging growth company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities
Act. ☐
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each
Class of Securities to be Registered
|
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering
Price(1)
|
Amount of Registration Fee(1)
|
Units(2)(3)
|
$-
|
$-
|
Shares of common
stock, par value $0.015, included in the units(4)(5)
|
-
|
-
|
Warrants to
purchase shares of common stock, included in the units(5)
|
-
|
-
|
Shares of common
stock underlying the warrants included in the units(3)(4)
|
-
|
-
|
Underwriters’
warrants(5)
|
-
|
-
|
Shares of common
stock underlying underwriters’ warrants(4)(6)
|
$
|
$-
|
Total:
|
$18,578,250
|
$2,312.99(7)
|
(1)
Estimated solely
for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Securities Act”).
(2)
Each unit consists
of one share of common stock, par value $0.015, and a warrant to
purchase share of common stock, par
value $0.015.
(3)
Includes units and
shares of common stock the underwriters have the option to purchase
to cover over-allotments, if any.
(4)
Pursuant to Rule
416 under the Securities Act, the securities being registered
hereunder include such indeterminate number of additional shares of
common stock as may be issued after the date hereof as a result of
stock splits, stock dividends or similar
transactions.
(5)
No fee required
pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities
Act.
(6)
The
underwriters’ warrants are exercisable at a per share
exercise price equal to 110% of the public offering price. As
estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act, the proposed
maximum aggregate offering price of the underwriters’
warrants is $1,328,250 (which is equal to 110% of $1,207,500 (7% of
$17,250,000)).
(7)
$2,897.50 was
previously paid upon the initial filing of this registration
statement.
The registrant hereby amends this registration
statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay
its effective date until the registrant shall file a further
amendment which specifically states that this registration
statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance
with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the
registration statement shall become effective on such
date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
|
|
|
|
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
declared effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to
sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy
these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted
|
|
|
|
|
PROSPECTUS
Subject to completion, dated October 10,
2017
$15,000,000
Units
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
________________________
We
are offering $15,000,000 of units with each unit consisting of one
share of our common stock, $0.015 par value per share and one
warrant to purchase share
of our common stock per unit at an exercise price equal to $ per share and
expiring five years after the issuance date. The units will not be
issued or certificated. Purchasers will receive only shares of
common stock and warrants. The common stock and warrants are
immediately separable and will be issued separately. The offering
also includes the shares issuable from time to time upon exercise
of the warrants.
Our shares of
common stock are currently quoted on the OTC Pink Marketplace,
operated by OTC Markets Group. The symbol for our common stock is
“DPDM”. There is currently no public market for our
warrants. We have applied to have our common stock and warrants
offered hereby listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbols
“DLPN” and “DLPNW,” respectively. On
October 4, 2017, the last reported sale price of our common stock
on the OTC Pink Marketplace was $8.00 per
share.
Our business and an investment in our common stock involve
significant risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page
5 of this prospectus to read about factors that you should consider
before making an investment decision.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
Public offering
price
|
$
|
$
|
Underwriting
discount(1)
|
$
|
$
|
Proceeds
before expenses(2)
|
$
|
$
|
|
(1)
|
In addition to the
underwriting discount, we have agreed to issue to the underwriter
warrants to purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to 7%
of the total number of shares being sold in the offering, including
the over-allotments, if any, and to reimburse the underwriter for
expenses incurred by it in an amount not to exceed $150,000. See
“Underwriting” beginning on page 80 of this prospectus
for additional information regarding total underwriter
compensation.
|
|
(2)
|
We estimate the
total expenses of this offering will be approximately
$ . See
“Underwriting” for additional
information.
|
We have granted the
underwriters the option for a period of 45 days to purchase up to
additional units at the
public offering price solely to cover over-allotments, if any. If
the underwriters exercise their right to purchase additional units
to cover over-allotments, we estimate that we will receive gross
proceeds of $ from the sale of units
being offered and net proceeds of
$ after deducting
$ for underwriting
discounts and commissions.
The underwriters
expect to deliver our shares and warrants to purchasers in the
offering on or
about ,
2017.
Joint Book-Running
Managers
Maxim
Group
LLC Ladenburg
Thalmann
The
date of this prospectus
is ,
2017.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
|
|
1
|
RISK FACTORS
|
|
5
|
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING
STATEMENTS
|
|
19
|
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
21
|
USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
|
26
|
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
|
|
27
|
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING
PRICE
|
|
28
|
CAPITALIZATION
|
|
29
|
DILUTION
|
|
30
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
|
31
|
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
|
33
|
BUSINESS
|
|
55
|
PROPERTIES
|
|
62
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
|
62
|
MANAGEMENT
|
|
63
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
|
67
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
|
|
68
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
|
|
70
|
DESCRIPTION OF
SECURITIES
|
|
73
|
UNDERWRITING
|
|
80
|
LEGAL MATTERS
|
|
83
|
EXPERTS
|
|
83
|
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION
|
|
83
|
INDEX TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
F-1
|
You
should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus
that we have authorized for use in connection with this offering.
Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized any
other person to provide you with additional or different
information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent
information, you should not rely on it. Neither we nor the
underwriters are making an offer to sell these
securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not
permitted. You should assume that the information in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of
this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this
prospectus or any sale of our securities. Our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed
since that date.
Industry and Market Data
We
obtained the industry, market and competitive position data
described or referred to in this prospectus from our own internal
estimates and research as well as from industry and general
publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third
parties. These data involve a number of assumptions and
limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such
estimates.
Information that is
based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or
similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and
actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events
and circumstances that are assumed in this information. In some
cases, we do not expressly refer to the sources from which this
data is derived. In that regard, when we refer to one or more
sources of this type of data in any paragraph, you should assume
that other data of this type appearing in the same paragraph is
derived from the same sources, unless otherwise expressly stated or
the context otherwise requires.
Information
contained in, and that can be accessed through, our web site
www.dolphinentertainment.com
shall not be deemed to be part of this prospectus or incorporated
herein by reference and should not be relied upon by any
prospective investors for the purposes of determining whether to
purchase the securities offered hereunder.
|
|
|
|
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all the
information that you should consider before investing in the
units. You should carefully read the entire
prospectus, including “Risk Factors”,
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial
statements, before making an investment decision. In this
prospectus, the terms “Dolphin,”
“company,” “we,” “us” and
“our” refer to Dolphin Entertainment,
Inc.
Our Business
We are
a leading independent entertainment marketing and premium content
development company. Through our recent acquisition of 42West,
LLC, we provide expert strategic marketing and
publicity services to all of the major film studios, and many of
the leading independent and digital content providers, as well as
for hundreds of A-list celebrity talent, including actors,
directors, producers, recording artists, athletes and authors. The
strategic acquisition of 42West brings together premium marketing
services with premium content production, creating significant
opportunities to serve our respective constituents more
strategically and to grow and diversify our business. Our
content production business is a long established, leading
independent producer, committed to distributing premium,
best-in-class film and digital entertainment. We produce original
feature films and digital programming primarily aimed at family and
young adult markets.
Our Market Opportunity
We
believe the market for premium content marketing and content
development and production is large, growing and rapidly evolving.
Drivers of growth in our markets include:
●
Global
proliferation of high speed data networks and devices among
consumers creating more frequent engagement and on demand access to
media and content
●
Increasing demand
for more, engaging and original video content
●
Success and growth
of new platforms such as Netflix, Amazon, Facebook and
more
●
Multibillion dollar
strategic initiatives by new these new platforms to develop
original video content
●
Increasing
complexity and fragmentation of the media ecosystem driving
increased emphasis on and requirements for expert marketing
capabilities
Entertainment Publicity
On March 30,
2017, we acquired 42West, one of the leading full-service marketing
and public-relations firms in the entertainment industry, offering
clients preeminent experience, contacts, and
expertise. The name 42West symbolizes the agency’s position
in the nation’s largest entertainment markets: from
Manhattan’s 42nd Street (where the firm got its start) to the
West Coast (which it serves from its offices in Los Angeles).
42West’s professional capabilities are equally broad,
encompassing talent publicity and strategic communications as well
as entertainment, digital, and targeted marketing.
42West grew
out of The Dart Group, which was launched by Leslee Dart in 2004.
Amanda Lundberg teamed up with Dart a few months later. In 2006,
after Allan Mayer joined the partnership, the company was
rechristened 42West. Over the next ten years, 42West grew to become
the largest independently-owned public-relations firm in the
entertainment industry. This past December, the New York Observer
listed 42West as one of the six most powerful PR firms of any kind
in the United States.
Content Production
In addition to
42West’s leading entertainment publicity business, we are
dedicated to the production of high-quality digital and motion
picture content. We also intend to expand into television
production in the near future. Our CEO, William O’Dowd, is an
Emmy-nominated producer and recognized leader in family
entertainment, with previous productions available in over 300
million homes in more than 100 countries around the world. Mr.
O’Dowd received 2017’s prestigious worldwide KidScreen
Award for Best New Tween/Teen Series as Executive Producer of
sitcom “Raising Expectations,” starring Molly Ringwald
and Jason Priestley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Films
rated PG or PG-13 constituted 23 of the top 25
domestic grossing films in 2016 and family films are consistently
the highest grossing category at the box office. We have developed
a production pipeline of feature films and television series aimed
at the family market. Furthermore, we have had a dedicated division
servicing the digital video market for over 6 years, during which
time we have worked with most major ad-supported online
distribution channels, including Facebook, Yahoo!, Hulu and AOL.
Our digital productions have been recognized for their quality and
creativity, earning various awards including two Streamy
Awards.
Competitive Advantages
We have a long and loyal
list of marquee clients. 42West’s list of active
clients is both long (upwards of 400 in 2016) and distinguished
(including many of the world’s most famous and acclaimed
screen and pop stars, its most honored directors and producers,
every major movie studio, and virtually every digital platform and
content distributor, along with a host of production companies and
media firms as well as consumer-product marketers). The extensive
A-list nature of 42West’s client list is a huge competitive
advantage in an industry where the first question following a
new-business pitch is invariably: “Who else is
involved?” The firm’s client roster is
also highly stable. The churn rate among
42West’s clients is low; many of them have been with the firm
for years.
A stable and experienced
work force, led by an exceptional management team. Our CEO,
Mr. O’Dowd, has a 20-year history of producing and delivering
high-quality family entertainment. In addition, 42West’s
three co-CEO’s, Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg, and Allan
Mayer, are all longtime PR practitioners, with decades of
experience, widely regarded as being among the top communications
strategists in the entertainment industry. They lead a staff of
roughly 100 PR professionals that is known for both its skill and
its longevity. Staff turnover is far below industry norms, and
every one of the firm’s six managing directors has been there
for more than nine years.
We believe that we are one
of the only entertainment companies that can offer clients a broad
array of interrelated services. We believe that the ability
to create content for our 42West clients and the ability to
internally develop and execute marketing campaigns for our digital
and film productions will allow us to expand and grow each of our
business lines. For our 42West clients, celebrities and marketers,
the ability to control the content and quality of their digital
persona is critical in today’s digital world.
Growth Opportunities
We are
focused on driving growth through the following:
Expand and grow 42West to
serve more clients with a broad array of interrelated
services. As a result of its acquisition by Dolphin,
42West now has the ability to create promotional and marketing
content for clients, a critical service for
celebrities and marketers alike in today’s digital world. We
believe that by adding content creation to
42West’s menu of capabilities, it will provide a great
opportunity to capitalize on unique synergies to drive
immediate organic growth, which will
allow us to both attract new clients and broaden our offering of
billable services to existing ones. We also believe that the skills
and experience of our 42West business in entertainment PR are
readily transferable to related business sectors such as sports or
fashion. The growing involvement in non-entertainment businesses by
many of our existing entertainment clients has allowed 42West to
establish a presence and develop expertise outside its traditional
footprint with little risk or expense. Using this as a foundation,
we are now working to expand our involvement in these new
areas.
Organically
grow through future synergies between 42West and our digital and
film productions. Adding content creation to 42West’s
menu of capabilities provides a great opportunity for immediate
growth, as it will allow us to both attract new clients and broaden
our offering of billable services to existing ones. Furthermore,
bringing marketing expertise in-house will allow us to review a
prospective digital or film project’s marketing potential
prior to making a production commitment, thus allowing our
marketing strategy to be a driver of our creative content. In
addition, for each project greenlit for production, we can
potentially create a comprehensive marketing plan before the start
of principal photography, allowing for relevant marketing assets to
be created while filming. We can also create marketing campaigns
for completed films, across all media channels, including
television, print, radio, digital and social
media.
Opportunistically grow
through more complementary acquisitions. We plan to
selectively pursue acquisitions in the future, to further enforce
our competitive advantages, scale and grow our business and
increase profitability. Our acquisition strategy is based on
identifying and acquiring companies that complement our existing
content production and entertainment
publicity services businesses. We believe that
complementary businesses, such as data analytics and digital
marketing, can create synergistic opportunities and bolster profits
and cash flow.
Build a portfolio of
premium film, television and digital content. We intend to
grow and diversify our portfolio of film and digital content by
capitalizing on demand for high quality digital media and film
content throughout the world marketplace. We plan to balance our
financial risks against the probability of commercial success for
each project. We believe that our strategic focus on content and
creation of innovative content distribution strategies will enhance
our competitive position in the industry, ensure optimal use of our
capital, build a diversified foundation for future growth and
generate long-term value for our shareholders. Finally, we
believe that marketing strategies that will be
developed by 42West will drive our creative content, thus creating
greater potential for profitability.
Our Company Background
We
were first incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 7,
1995 and were domesticated in the State of Florida on
December 4, 2014. Effective July 6, 2017, we changed our
name from Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. to Dolphin Entertainment,
Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 2151 Le
Jeune Road, Suite 150-Mezzanine, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. We
also have an office located at 10866 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800,
Los Angeles, California, 90024. 42West, LLC has offices located at
600 3rd Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York, 10016 and 1840
Century Park East, Suite 700, Los Angeles, California 90067. Our
telephone number is (305) 774-0407 and our website address is
www.dolphinentertainment.com. Neither our website nor any
information contained on our website is part of this
prospectus.
Recent
Developments
Effective September
14, 2017, we amended our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation to effectuate a 1-to-2 reverse stock split. The
reverse stock split was approved by our Board of Directors, or the
Board, on August 10, 2017 and shareholder approval was not
required. Immediately after the reverse stock split, the number of
authorized shares of common stock was reduced from 400,000,000 to
200,000,000 shares. As a result, each shareholder’s
percentage ownership interest in the Company and proportional
voting power remained unchanged. Any fractional shares resulting
from the reverse stock split were rounded up to the nearest whole
share of common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the numbers set
forth in this prospectus have been adjusted to reflect the reverse
stock split.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Offering
The following summary contains basic information about the offering
and the securities we are offering and is not intended to be
complete. It does not contain all the information that is important
to you. For a more complete understanding of the securities we are
offering, please refer to the section of this prospectus titled
“Description of Securities.”
|
|
|
Securities
being offered
|
|
$15,000,000
of units, each consisting of one share of
common stock and one warrant to purchase
share of common stock at an
exercise price of $ per share
and.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
$
per unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment
option
|
|
We have
granted the underwriters an option for a period of up
to 45 days to purchase up to
additional units to cover over-allotments, if
any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters’
warrants
|
|
The Underwriting
Agreement provides that we will issue to the underwriters warrants
covering a number of shares of common stock equal to 7% of the
total number of shares being sold in the offering, including the
over-allotments, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock outstanding before this offering
|
|
9,367,057 shares of common stock(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock outstanding after this offering
|
|
shares of common stock (or shares if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option
in full).(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock underlying the warrants
|
|
shares of common
stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of
proceeds
|
|
We
intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for (i)
growth initiatives of our entertainment publicity business,
including acquisitions of comparable businesses and groups with
public relations expertise, (ii) the budget for our content
production business and (iii) general corporate purposes,
including working capital. See “Use of Proceeds” for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
factors
|
|
Investing
in our securities involves risks. You should read
carefully the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus
for a discussion of factors that you should carefully consider
before deciding to invest in our
securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
Pink Marketplace ticker symbol
|
|
“DPDM”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The
number of shares of our common stock outstanding is based on
9,367,057 shares outstanding as of October 2, 2017, which
excludes:
●
1,612,115 shares of our
common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants
having exercise prices ranging from $6.20 to $10.00 per share. For
a discussion on the terms of the outstanding warrants, see
“Description of Securities -
Warrants.”;
● shares of our common stock issuable
upon the conversion of 50,000 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding. For a discussion of the
conditions upon which the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock become convertible, and the number of shares of common stock
into which such preferred stock would be convertible upon
satisfaction of such conditions, see “Description of
Securities - Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock”;
● shares
of our common stock issuable in connection with the 42West
acquisition as follows: (i) 980,911 shares of our common stock that
we will issue to the sellers on January 2, 2018 and (ii) up to
981,563 shares of our common stock that we may issue to the sellers
based on the achievement of specified financial performance targets
over a three-year period as set forth in the membership interest
purchase agreement;
●
78,757 shares of our common
stock issuable upon the conversion of seven convertible promissory
notes in the aggregate principal amount of $725,000
(calculated based
on the 90-trading day average price per share as of October 2,
2017). For a discussion of the terms of conversion of the
promissory notes and the number of common stock into which such
promissory notes would be convertible, see “Description of
Securities - Convertible Promissory Notes;”
and
● 940,680 shares of our common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2017 Equity Incentive
Plan.
In addition, we may
be required to purchase up to 1,070,503 shares of our common stock
from the sellers during certain specified exercise periods up until
December 2020, pursuant to certain put agreements. For a
discussion of the terms of the put agreements, see
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of
Operations.”
(2) Includes the issuance of the shares of common
stock sold as part of the units, but excludes the issuances of the
shares underlying the warrants issued as part of the units and the
underwriters' warrants.
Except as otherwise
stated herein, the information in this prospectus assumes no
exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to an
additional units to cover
over-allotments, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
Consolidated Financial Data and Pro Forma
Data
The
following tables include our summary historical
financial data. The historical financial data as of December 31,
2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
have been derived from our audited financial statements, which are
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical financial
data as of December 31, 2014 and for the year ended December 31,
2014 have been derived from our audited financial statements, which
are not included in this prospectus. The historical financial data
as of June 30, 2017 and for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 have been derived
from our unaudited financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Certain items have been reclassified
for presentation purposes. Our financial statements are prepared
and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. The results indicated below are
not necessarily indicative of our future performance.
The
following tables also include summary
unaudited pro forma financial data reflecting our acquisition of
42West that was completed on March 30, 2017. The
unaudited pro forma financial data for the year ended December 31,
2016 and the six months ended June 30,
2017 have been derived from the unaudited pro forma combined
financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
unaudited pro forma financial data for the year ended December 31,
2016 gives effect to the transaction as if it had occurred on
January 1, 2016. The unaudited pro forma financial data for the
six months ended June 30, 2017 gives
effect to the transaction as if it had occurred on January 1,
2017.
The
financial information set forth below is only a summary. You should
read this information together with our
“Capitalization”, “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations”, “Selected Financial Data”,
“Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statements of
Operations” and our consolidated financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
Pro Forma
Data:
|
|
|
|
For the year
ended
December 31,
2016
|
For the six
months
ended
June 30,
2017
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$27,959,374
|
$13,054,074
|
Operating
Loss
|
(14,989,692)
|
(131,112)
|
Net Income
(Loss)
|
$(35,769,543)
|
$4,542,982
|
Net Income (Loss)
attributable to common shareholders
|
$(41,016,770)
|
$4,542,982
|
Net loss
attributable to common shareholders for fully diluted
calculation
|
$(41,016,770)
|
$(1,746,531)
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Per
share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(6.66)
|
$0.52
|
Diluted
|
$(6.66)
|
$(0.18)
|
Weighted average
number of shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
Basic:
|
6,157,425
|
8,661,185
|
Diluted:
|
6,157,425
|
9,910,688
|
|
Consolidated
Financial
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
For the year
ended
December
31,
|
For the
six months
ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and
distribution
|
$51,192
|
$3,031,073
|
$9,367,222
|
$4,157
|
$3,226,962
|
Entertainment
publicity
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5,137,556
|
Service
|
2,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Membership
|
19,002
|
69,761
|
28,403
|
21,028
|
-
|
Total
Revenue
|
2,070,194
|
3,100,834
|
9,395,625
|
25,185
|
8,364,518
|
Loss before other
income (expense)
|
(1,252,925)
|
(5,373,132)
|
(17,702,264)
|
(2,258,553)
|
(779,092)
|
Net Income
(Loss)
|
$(1,873,505)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$(11,247,780)
|
$3,402,623
|
Net Income (Loss)
attributable to common shareholders
|
$(1,873,505)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
$(42,436,906)
|
$(16,475,027)
|
$3,402,623
|
Income (Loss) Per
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.92)
|
$(4.32)
|
$(9.67)
|
$(5.45)
|
$0.41
|
Diluted
|
$(0.92)
|
$(4.32)
|
$(9.67)
|
$(5.45)
|
$(0.30)
|
Weighted average
number of shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
2,047,309
|
2,047,309
|
4,389,097
|
3,025,448
|
8,293,343
|
Diluted
|
2,047,309
|
2,047,309
|
4,389,097
|
3,025,448
|
9,542,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
Adjusted(2)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$198,470
|
$2,392,685
|
$662,546
|
$ 1,071,813
|
|
Intangible
assets
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
8,860,667
|
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
14,336,919
|
|
Total
Assets
|
$1,493,240
|
$21,369,113
|
$14,197,241
|
$ 35,544,894
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
10,285,083
|
54,233,031
|
46,065,038
|
38,569,454
|
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
(8,791,843)
|
(32,863,918)
|
(31,867,797)
|
(3,024,560)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Financial information has been
retrospectively adjusted for the acquisition of Dolphin Films. See
Notes 1 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
(2) The as adjusted balance sheet data
give effect to our issuance and sale of units in this offering at
an offering price of $ per unit, after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You
should carefully consider the risks described below before deciding
to purchase our securities. If any of the events, contingencies,
circumstances or conditions described in the risks below actually
occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations
could be seriously harmed. The trading price of our securities
could, in turn, decline and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks Related to our Business and Financial Condition
Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern.
For
each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our
independent auditors issued an explanatory paragraph in their audit
report expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern based upon our net losses and negative cash
flows from operations for the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015 and our levels of working capital as of December 31,
2016 and 2015. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties. Management is planning to raise any necessary
additional funds to fund our operating expenses through loans and
additional sales of our common stock, securities convertible into
our common stock, debt securities or a combination of such
financing alternatives, including the proceeds from this offering;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in
raising any necessary additional capital. If we are not successful
in raising additional capital, we may not have enough financial
resources to support our business and operations and, as a result,
may not be able to continue as a going concern and could be forced
to liquidate.
We have a history of net losses and may continue to incur net
losses.
We have
a history of net losses and may be unable to generate sufficient
revenue to achieve profitability in the future. For the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016, our net loss was $37,189,679.
Although we had net income of $3,402,623 for the six months
ended June 30, 2017, it was primarily due to a change in the
fair value of the warrant liability. Our accumulated deficit was
$96,409,581 and $99,812,204 at June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Our ability to
generate net profit in the future will depend on our ability to
successfully produce and commercialize multiple web series and
films, as no single project is likely to generate sufficient
revenue to cover our operating expenses, and to realize the
financial benefits from the operations of 42West. If we are unable
to generate net profit at some point, we will not be able to meet
our debt service requirements or our working capital requirements.
As a result we may need to (i) issue additional equity, which could
dilute the value of your share holdings, (ii) sell a portion or all
of our assets, including any project rights which might have
otherwise generated revenue, or (iii) cease
operations.
We currently have substantial indebtedness which may adversely
affect our cash flow and business operations and may affect our
ability to continue to operate as a going concern.
We
currently have a substantial amount of debt. We do not
currently have sufficient assets to repay such debt in full when
due, and our available cash flow may not be adequate to maintain
our current operations if we are unable to repay, extend or
refinance such indebtedness. The table below sets forth our
total principal amount of debt and stockholders’ equity as of
December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2017.
Approximately $4 million of the total debt as of June
30, 2017 represents the fair value of the put options in
connection with the 42West acquisition, which may or may not be
exercised by the sellers. Approximately $12.9 million
of our current indebtedness ($9.7 million outstanding under the
prints and advertising loan agreement plus $3.2 million outstanding
under the production service agreement) was incurred by our
subsidiary Max Steel Holdings LLC and Max Steel Productions, a
variable interest entity (or VIE) created in connection with the
financing and production of Max Steel (the "Max Steel VIE").
Repayment of these loans was intended to be made from revenues
generated by Max Steel in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. These
loans are non-recourse to us. Max
Steel did not generate sufficient funds to repay either of
these loans prior to the maturity date. As a result, we may lose
the copyright for Max Steel
and, consequently, may no longer receive any revenues from
Max
Steel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party
debt
|
$684,326
|
$ 1,818,659
|
Max Steel
debt
|
$ 18,743,069
|
$ 12,892,544
|
Total Debt
(including related party debt)
|
$19,727,395
|
$ 20,611,203
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
$31,867,797
|
$ 3,024,560
|
Our
indebtedness could have important negative consequences,
including:
●
our
ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, future productions or other purposes may be impaired
or such financing may not be available on favorable terms or at
all;
●
we may
have to pay higher interest rates upon obtaining future financing,
thereby reducing our cash flows; and
●
we may
need a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make
principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing the
funds that would otherwise be available for operations and future
business opportunities.
Our
ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance and our
ability to obtain additional financing, which will be affected by
prevailing economic conditions, the profitability of our
content production and entertainment
publicity businesses and other factors contained in
these Risk Factors, some of
which are beyond our control.
If we
are not able to generate sufficient cash to service our current or
future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as
reducing or delaying digital or film productions, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness or seeking additional
debt or equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able
to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms or at all and
our indebtedness may affect our ability to continue to operate as a
going concern.
Litigation
or legal proceedings could expose us to significant
liabilities.
We are,
and in the future may become, party to litigation claims and legal
proceedings. For example, 42West was named as one of the
defendants in a putative class action alleging fraudulent
misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, fraud in the
inducement, breach of contract, and violation of various state
consumer protection laws. The putative class action, which
was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Florida on May 5, 2017, alleged that 42West and the other
defendants made false and misleading representations in promoting
the “Fyre Festival”, which did not live up to the
luxury experience that it was represented to be. The plaintiffs
seek to certify a nationwide class action and seek damages in
excess of $5,000,000 on behalf of themselves and the class.
A class action lawsuit would require significant
management time and attention and would result in significant legal
expenses. While we believe the claims against 42West are
without merit, regardless of the merit or ultimate results of any
litigation, such claims could divert management’s attention
and resources from our business, which could harm our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our management has determined that our disclosure controls and
procedures are not effective and we have identified material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting.
In
connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the
years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
not effective and we identified several material weaknesses. A
material weakness is a deficiency, or
a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In addition,
as of December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2017, our
management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective due to the material weaknesses in our internal
control over financial reporting. The material weaknesses result
from the following:
●
Design
deficiencies related to the entity level control environment,
including risk assessment, information and communication and
monitoring controls:
●
There
is no documented fraud risk assessment or risk management oversight
function.
●
There
are no documented procedures related to financial reporting matters
(both internal and external) to the appropriate
parties.
●
There
is no budget prepared and therefore monitoring controls are not
designed effectively as current results cannot be compared to
expectations.
●
There
is no documented process to monitor and remediate deficiencies in
internal controls.
●
Inadequate
documented review and approval of certain aspects of the accounting
process including the documented review of accounting
reconciliations and journal entries that they considered to be a
material weakness in internal control. Specifically:
●
There
is no documented period end closing procedures, specifically the
individuals that are responsible for preparation, review and
approval of period end close functions.
●
Reconciliations
are performed on all balance sheet accounts, including
noncontrolling interest on at least a quarterly basis; however
there is no documented review and approval by a member of
management that is segregated from the period end financial
reporting process.
●
There
is no review and approval for the posting of journal
entries.
●
Inadequate
segregation of duties within the accounting process, including the
following:
●
One
individual has the ability to add vendors to the master vendor
file. This individual also has access to the company checkbook that
is maintained in a secured location.
●
One
individual has sole access to our information technology system to
initiate, process and record financial information. We have not
developed any internal controls related to information technology
systems including change management, physical security, access or
program development.
In order to
remediate the other material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting, we are in the process of finalizing a
remediation plan, under the direction of our Board, and intend to
implement improvements during fiscal year 2017 as
follows:
●
Our
Board will review the COSO “Internal Control over Financial
Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies” that was
published in 2006 including the control environment, risk
assessment, control activities, information and communication and
monitoring. Based on this framework, the Board will implement
controls as needed assuming a cost benefit relationship. In
addition, our Board will also evaluate the key concepts of the
updated 2013 COSO “Internal Control – Integrated
Framework” as it provides a means to apply internal control
to any type of entity
●
Document all
significant accounting policies and ensure that the accounting
policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. and that internal controls are designed
effectively to ensure that the financial information is properly
reported. Management will engage independent accounting
specialists, if necessary, to ensure that there is an independent
verification of the accounting positions taken.
●
We
will implement a higher standard for document retention and support
for all items related to revenue recognition. All revenue
arrangements that are entered into by us will be evaluated under
the applicable revenue guidance and management should document
their position based on the facts and circumstances of each
agreement.
●
In
connection with the reported inadequately documented review and
approval of certain aspects of the accounting process, management
has plans to assess the current review and approval processes and
implement changes to ensure that all material agreements,
accounting reconciliations and journal entries are reviewed and
approved on a timely basis and that this review process is
documented by a member of management separate from the preparer. A
documented quarter end close procedure will be established whereby
management will review and approve reconciliations and journal
entries. Management will formally approve new vendors that are
added to the master vendor file.
●
In
connection with the reported inadequate segregation of duties,
management intends to hire additional personnel in the accounting
and finance area. This will allow for adequate segregation of
duties in performing the accounting processes.
Each of
the material weaknesses described above could result in a
misstatement of our accounts or disclosures that would result in a
material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. We
cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any
measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to remediate
the material weaknesses described above or avoid potential future
material weaknesses. If we are unable to report financial
information timely and accurately or to maintain effective
disclosure controls and procedures, our stock price could be
negatively impacted and we could be subject to, among other things,
regulatory or enforcement actions by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which we refer to as the SEC or the
Commission.
The operation of our
business could be adversely affected if Max Steel VIE goes bankrupt
or becomes subject to a dissolution or liquidation
proceeding.
Max Steel VIE holds
certain of our intellectual property and film distribution rights
which are security for certain of the Max Steel VIE’s debt
obligations. Max Steel VIE is currently in default on all or
a portion of those debt obligations. If Max Steel VIE is
unable to repay such debts and the debt holders foreclose on such
debts and take control of the intellectual property and film
distribution rights, we may be unable to continue some or all of
our business activities, which could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, if Max Steel VIE undergoes a voluntary or involuntary
liquidation proceeding, independent third-party creditors may claim
rights to some or all of these assets, thereby hindering our
ability to operate our business, which could materially and
adversely affect our future revenue from such
film.
Entertainment
Publicity Business
Our business could be adversely affected if we fail to retain the
principal sellers, and other key employees of 42West and the
clients they serve.
The success of our
42West business substantially depends on our ability to retain the
services of Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg and Allan Mayer, each a
former owner of 42West, who we refer to as the principal sellers.
If we lose the services of one or more of these individuals, our
ability to successfully implement our business plan with respect to
our entertainment publicity business and the value of our common
stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we entered
into three-year employment agreements with each of the principal
sellers in connection with the 42West acquisition, there can be no
assurance that they will serve the term of their employment
agreements or choose to remain with us following the expiration of
such terms. In addition, the employees of 42West, and their skills
and relationships with clients, are among our most valuable assets.
An important aspect of the business’ competitiveness is its
ability to retain these key employees. If 42West fails to hire and
retain a sufficient number of these key employees, it may have a
material adverse effect on our overall business and results of
operations.
42West’s
talent roster currently includes some of the best known and most
highly respected members of the entertainment community in addition
to major studios and networks, corporations and well-known consumer
brands. These clients often form highly loyal relationships with
certain public relations and marketing professionals rather than
with a particular firm. The employment agreements with the
principal sellers currently contain non-competition provisions that
will prevent the principal sellers from continuing to provide
services to such clients should they leave our company, however,
clients are free to engage other public relations and marketing
professionals and there can be no assurance that they will choose
to remain with our company. The success of the 42West acquisition,
therefore, depends on our ability to continue to successfully
maintain such client relationships should the principal sellers or
other key employees leave our company. If we are unable to retain
the current 42West clients or attract new clients, we may lose all
of the benefits of the acquisition which would materially adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
42West operates in a highly competitive
industry.
The entertainment
publicity business is highly competitive. Through 42West, we must
compete with other agencies, and with other providers of
entertainment publicity services, in order to maintain existing
client relationships and to win new clients. The client’s
perception of the quality of an agency’s creative work and
the agency’s reputation are critical factors in determining
its competitive position.
The success of our 42West business depends on its ability to
consistently and effectively deliver marketing and public relations
services to its clients.
42West’s
success depends on its ability to effectively and consistently
staff and execute client engagements to achieve the clients’
unique personal or professional goals. 42West works to design
customized communications or publicity campaigns tailored to the
particular needs and objectives of particular projects. In some of
its engagements, 42West relies on other third parties to provide
some of the services to its clients, and we cannot guarantee that
these third parties will effectively deliver their services or that
we will have adequate recourse against these third parties in the
event they fail to effectively deliver their services. Other
contingencies and events outside of our control may also impact
42West’s ability to provide its services. 42West’s
failure to effectively and timely staff, coordinate and execute its
client engagements may adversely impact existing client
relationships, the amount or timing of payments from clients, its
reputation in the marketplace and ability to secure additional
business and our resulting financial performance. In addition, our
contractual arrangements with our clients may not provide us with
sufficient protections against claims for lost profits or other
claims for damages.
If we are unable to adapt to changing client demands, social and
cultural trends or emerging technologies, we may not remain
competitive and our business, revenues and operating results could
suffer.
We operate in an
industry characterized by rapidly changing client expectations,
marketing technologies, and social mores and cultural trends that
impact our target audiences. The entertainment industry continues
to undergo significant developments as advances in technologies and
new methods of message delivery and consumption emerge. These
developments drive changes in our target audiences’ behavior
to which we must adapt in order to reach our target audiences. In
addition, our success depends on our ability to anticipate and
respond to changing social mores and cultural trends that impact
the entertainment industry and our target audiences. We must adapt
our business to these trends, as well as shifting patterns of
content consumption and changing behaviors and preferences of our
target audiences, through the adoption and exploitation of new
technologies. If we cannot successfully exploit emerging
technologies or if the marketing strategies we choose misinterpret
cultural or social trends and prove to be incorrect or ineffective,
any of these could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating
results, liquidity and prospects.
A significant labor dispute
in our clients’ industries could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
An industry-wide
strike or other job action by or affecting the Writers Guild,
Screen Actors Guild or other major entertainment industry union
could reduce the supply of original entertainment content, which
would in turn reduce the demand for our talent and entertainment
marketing services. An extensive work stoppage would affect feature
film production as well as television and commercial production and
could have a material adverse effect on our clients and the motion
picture production industry in general. For example, on November 5,
2007, the Writers Guild declared a strike affecting the script
writing for television shows and films. The strike, which lasted
until February 12, 2008, significantly affected the entertainment
industry which consequently, had a material adverse impact on
revenue generated by public relations and entertainment marketing
agencies. Contracts between entertainment industry unions and the
Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which we refer
to as AMPTP, expire from time to time. The failure to finalize and
ratify a new agreement with the AMPTP or the failure to enter into
new commercial contracts upon expiration of the current contracts
could lead to a strike or other job action. Any such severe or
prolonged work stoppage could have an adverse effect on the
television and/or motion picture production industries and could
severely impair our clients’ prospects. Any resulting
decrease in demand for our talent and entertainment marketing and
other public relations services would have a material adverse
effect on our cash flows and results of
operations.
Clients may terminate or reduce their relationships with us on
short notice.
42West’s
entertainment clients may choose to reduce their relationships with
us, on a relatively short time frame and for any reason and can
terminate their contracts with us with 30 days’ notice. If a
significant number of the 42West clients were to terminate their
relationships with us, this could have a material adverse effect
upon our business and results of operations.
42West’s ability to generate new business from new and
existing clients may be limited.
To increase its
revenues, 42West needs to obtain additional clients or generate
demand for additional services from existing clients.
42West’s ability to generate initial demand for its services
from new clients and additional demand from existing clients is
subject to such clients’ and potential clients’ needs,
trends in the entertainment industry, financial conditions,
strategic plans and internal resources of corporate clients, as
well as the quality of 42West’s employees, services and
reputation. To the extent 42West cannot generate new business from
new or existing clients due to these limitations, the ability of
42West to grow its business, and our ability to increase our
revenues, will be limited.
42West’s revenues are susceptible to declines as a result of
unfavorable economic conditions.
Economic downturns
often severely affect the marketing services industry. Some of our
corporate clients may respond to weak economic performance by
reducing their marketing budgets, which are generally discretionary
in nature and easier to reduce in the short-term than other
expenses related to operations. In addition, economic downturns
could lead to reduced public demand for varying forms of
entertainment for which we are engaged to provide public relations
and media strategy and promotional services. Such reduced demand
for our services could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and results of operations.
Content Production Business
Our content production business requires a substantial
investment of capital and failure to access sufficient capital
while awaiting delayed revenues will have a material adverse effect
on our results of operation.
The
production, acquisition and distribution of film or digital media
content require a significant amount of capital. The budget for the
projects we plan to produce will require between $6 and $8 million
to produce. In addition, if a distributor does not provide the
funds for the distribution and marketing of our film, we will
require additional capital to distribute and market the film. We
estimate distribution and marketing fees to be approximately
$10,000 per theatrical screen. A significant amount of time may
elapse between our expenditure of funds and the receipt of revenues
from our productions. Our content production business
does not have a traditional credit facility with a financial
institution on which to depend for our liquidity needs and a time
lapse may require us to fund a significant portion of our capital
requirements through related party transactions with our CEO or
other financing sources. There can be no assurance that any
additional financing resources will be available to us as and when
required, or on terms that will be acceptable to us. Our inability
to raise capital necessary to sustain our operations while awaiting
delayed revenues would have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity and results of operations.
Our success is highly dependent on audience acceptance of our films
and digital media productions, which is extremely difficult to
predict and, therefore, inherently risky.
We
cannot predict the economic success of any of our films because the
revenue derived from the distribution of a film (which does not
necessarily directly correlate with the production or distribution
costs incurred) depends primarily upon its acceptance by the
public, which cannot be accurately predicted. The economic success
of a film also depends upon the public’s acceptance of
competing films, the availability of alternative forms of
entertainment and leisure-time activities, general economic
conditions and other tangible and intangible factors, all of which
can change and cannot be predicted with certainty.
The
economic success of a film is largely determined by our ability to
produce content and develop stories and characters that appeal to a
broad audience and by the effective marketing of the film. The
theatrical performance of a film is a key factor in predicting
revenue from post-theatrical markets. If we are unable to
accurately judge audience acceptance of our film content or to have
the film effectively marketed, the commercial success of the film
will be in doubt, which could result in costs not being recouped or
anticipated profits not being realized. Moreover, we cannot assure
you that any particular feature film will generate enough revenue
to offset its distribution, fulfillment services and marketing
costs, in which case we would not receive any revenues for such
film from our distributors.
In
addition, changing consumer tastes affect our ability to predict
which digital media productions will be popular with web audiences.
As we invest in various digital projects, stars and directors, it
is highly likely that at least some of the digital projects in
which we invest will not appeal to our target audiences. If we are
unable to produce web content that appeals to our target audiences
the costs of such digital media productions could exceed revenues
generated and anticipated profits may not be realized. Our failure
to realize anticipated profits could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations.
We may incur significant write-offs if our feature films and other
projects do not perform well enough to recoup production,
marketing, distribution and other costs.
We are
required to amortize capitalized production costs over the expected
revenue streams as we recognize revenue from our films or other
projects. The amount of production costs that will be amortized
each quarter depends on, among other things, how much future
revenue we expect to receive from each project. Unamortized
production costs are evaluated for impairment each reporting period
on a project-by-project basis. If estimated remaining revenue is
not sufficient to recover the unamortized production costs, the
unamortized production costs will be written down to fair value. In
any given quarter, if we lower our previous forecast with respect
to total anticipated revenue from any individual feature film or
other project, we may be required to accelerate amortization or
record impairment charges with respect to the unamortized costs,
even if we have previously recorded impairment charges for such
film or other project. For example, in the year ended
December 31, 2016, we recorded a $2 million impairment of the
capitalized production costs for our feature film, Max Steel. Such impairment charges have
had and in the future could have, a material adverse impact on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
In the
past, we purchased several scripts and project ideas for our
digital media productions totaling approximately $0.6 million that
failed to generate interest among distributors or advertisers. As a
result of the write off of the costs incurred in purchasing such
scripts and project ideas, our operating results were negatively
impacted.
Our content production business is currently
substantially dependent upon the success of a limited number of
film releases and digital media productions each year and the
unexpected delay or commercial failure of any one of them could
have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
We
generally expect to release one to two feature films and one
digital production in the next year. The unexpected delay in
release or commercial failure of just one of these films or digital
media productions could have a significant adverse impact on our
results of operations and cash flows in both the year of release
and in the future. Historically, feature films that are successful
in the domestic theatrical market are generally also successful in
the international theatrical and ancillary markets, although each
film is different and there is no way to guarantee such results. If
our films fail to achieve domestic box office success, their
success in the international box office and ancillary markets and
our business, results of operations and financial condition could
be adversely affected. Further, we can make no assurances that the
historical correlation between results in the domestic box office
and results in the international box office and ancillary markets
will continue in the future. If our feature films do not perform
well in the domestic or international theatrical markets and
ancillary markets, or our digital media productions do not perform
as anticipated, the failure of any one of these could a material
adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
Delays, cost overruns, cancellation or abandonment of the
completion or release of our web series or films may have an
adverse effect on our business.
There
are substantial financial risks relating to production, completion
and release of web series and films. Actual costs may exceed their
budgets due to factors such as labor
disputes, unavailability of a star performer, equipment shortages,
disputes with production teams or adverse weather conditions, any
of which may cause cost overruns and delay or hamper film
completion. We are typically responsible for paying all production
costs in accordance with a budget and receive a fixed
producer’s fee for our services plus a portion of any project
income. However to the extent that delays or cost overruns result
in us not completing the web series or film within budget, there
may not be enough funds left to pay us our producer’s fee, to
generate any project income or complete the project at all. If this
were to occur, it would significantly and adversely affect our
revenue and results of operations.
We rely on third party distributors to distribute our films and
their failure to perform or promote our films could negatively
impact our ability to generate revenues and have a material adverse
effect on our operating results.
Our
films are primarily distributed and marketed by third party
distributors. If any of these third party distributors fails to
perform under their respective arrangements, such failure could
negatively impact the success of our films and have a material
adverse effect on our business, reputation and ability to generate
revenues.
We
generally do not control the timing and manner in which our
distributors distribute our films; their decisions regarding the
timing of release and promotional support are important in
determining success. Any decision by those distributors not to
distribute or promote one of our films or to promote our
competitors’ films or related products to a greater extent
than they promote ours could have a material adverse effect on our
business, cash flows and operating results.
We rely on third party relationships with online digital platforms
for our advertising revenue and we may be unable to secure such
relationships.
We
anticipate entering into distribution agreements containing revenue
share provisions with online digital platforms to distribute our
digital media productions. Pursuant to these revenue share
provisions, we will earn a portion of advertising revenues once our
digital media productions are distributed online. If we fail to
secure such relationships with online digital platforms, we will
not be able to earn advertising revenues from our digital projects,
which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and
results of operations. In addition, some of our distributors have
moved from an advertisement-based model to a subscription-based
model which makes it more difficult for us to use our funding and
distribution methods.
We may be unable to attract or retain advertisers, which could
negatively impact our results of operation.
Typically, online
digital platforms are responsible for securing advertisers and, as
such, our ability to earn advertising revenues would depend on
their success in doing so. However, at times we have, and may
continue to, proactively secure advertising commitments against
anticipated web series. Our ability to retain advertisers is
contingent on our ability to successfully complete and deliver
online projects which are commercially successful, which we may
fail to do. Advertising revenues could also be adversely impacted
by factors outside our control such as failure of our digital media
productions to attract our target viewer audiences, lack of future
demand for our digital media productions, the inability of third
party online digital platforms to deliver ads in an effective
manner, competition for advertising revenue from existing
competitors or new digital media companies, declines in advertising
rates, adverse legal developments relating to online advertising,
including legislative and regulatory developments and developments
in litigation. The existence of any of these factors could result
in a decrease of our anticipated advertising revenues.
Our success depends on the services of our CEO.
Our
success greatly depends on the skills, experience and efforts of
our CEO, Mr. O’Dowd. We do not have an employment agreement
with Mr. O’Dowd. If Mr. O’Dowd resigns
or becomes unable to continue in his present role and is not
adequately replaced, the loss of his services could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial
condition.
Risks Related to our Industry
The popularity and commercial success of our digital media
productions and films are subject to numerous factors, over which
we may have limited or no control.
The
popularity and commercial success of our digital media productions
and films depends on many factors including, but not limited to,
the key talent involved, the timing of release, the promotion and
marketing of the digital media production or film, the quality and
acceptance of other competing productions released into the
marketplace at or near the same time, the availability of
alternative forms of entertainment, general economic conditions,
the genre and specific subject matter of the digital media
production or film, its critical acclaim and the breadth, timing
and format of its initial release. We cannot predict the impact of
such factors on any digital media production or film, and many are
factors that are beyond our control. As a result of these factors
and many others, our digital media productions and films may not be
as successful as we anticipate, and as a result, our results of
operations may suffer.
The creation of content for the entertainment industry is highly
competitive and we will be competing with companies with much
greater resources than we have.
The
business in which we engage is highly competitive. Our primary
business operations are subject to competition from companies
which, in many instances, have greater development, production and
distribution and capital resources than us. We compete for the
services of writers, producers, directors, actors and other artists
to produce our digital media and motion picture content, as well as
for advertisement dollars. Larger companies have a broader and more
diverse selection of scripts than we do, which translates to a
greater probability that they will be able to more closely fit the
demands and interests of advertisers than we can.
As a
small independent producer, we compete with major U.S. and
international studios. Most of the major U.S. studios are part of
large diversified corporate groups with a variety of other
operations that can provide both the means of distributing their
products and stable sources of earnings that may allow them better
to offset fluctuations in the financial performance of their film
and other operations. In addition, the major studios have more
resources with which to compete for ideas, storylines and scripts
created by third parties, as well as for actors, directors and
other personnel required for production. Such competition for the
industry’s talent and resources may negatively affect our
ability to acquire, develop, produce, advertise and distribute
digital media and motion picture content.
We must successfully respond to rapid technological changes and
alternative forms of delivery or storage to remain
competitive.
The
entertainment industry continues to undergo significant
developments as advances in technologies and new methods of product
delivery and storage, and certain changes in consumer behavior
driven by these developments emerge. New technologies affect the
demand for our content, the manner in which our content is
distributed to consumers, the sources and nature of competing
content offerings and the time and manner in which consumers
acquire and view our content. We and our distributors must adapt
our businesses to shifting patterns of content consumption and
changing consumer behavior and preferences through the adoption and
exploitation of new technologies. If we cannot successfully exploit
these and other emerging technologies, it could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating
results, liquidity and prospects.
We
rely on information technology systems and could face cybersecurity
risks.
We rely on
information technologies and infrastructure to manage our business,
including digital storage of marketing strategies, client
information, films and digital programming and delivery of digital
marketing services. Data maintained in digital form is subject to
the risk of intrusion, tampering and theft. The incidence of
malicious technology-related events, such as cyberattacks, computer
hacking, computer viruses, worms or other destructive or disruptive
software, denial of service attacks or other malicious activities
is on the rise worldwide. Power outages, equipment failure, natural
disasters (including extreme weather), terrorist activities or
human error may also affect our systems and result in disruption of
our services or loss or improper disclosure of personal data,
business information or other confidential
information.
Likewise, data
privacy breaches, as well as improper use of social media, by
employees and others may pose a risk that sensitive data, such as
personally identifiable information, strategic plans and trade
secrets, could be exposed to third parties or to the general
public. We also utilize third parties, including third-party
“cloud” computing services, to store, transfer or
process data, and system failures or network disruptions or
breaches in the systems of such third parties could adversely
affect its reputation or business. Any such breaches or breakdowns
could expose us to legal liability, be expensive to remedy, result
in a loss of clients or clients’ proprietary information and
damage our reputation. Efforts to develop, implement and maintain
security measures are costly, may not be successful in preventing
these events from occurring and require ongoing monitoring and
updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome security
measures become more sophisticated.
We have and may in the future be adversely affected by union
activity.
We
retain the services of actors who are covered by collective
bargaining agreements with Screen Actors Guild – American
Federation of Television and Radio Artists, which we refer to as
SAG-AFTRA, and we may also become signatories to certain guilds
such as Directors Guild of America and Writers Guild of America in
order to allow us to hire directors and talent for our productions.
Collective bargaining agreements are industry-wide agreements, and
we lack practical control over the negotiations and terms of these
agreements. In addition, our digital projects fall within
SAG-AFTRA’s definition of “new media”, which is
an emerging category covered by its New Media and Interactive Media
Agreements for actors. As such, our ability to retain actors is
subject to uncertainties that arise from SAG-AFTRA’s
administration of this relatively new category of collective
bargaining agreements. Such uncertainties have resulted and may
continue to result in delays in production of our digital
projects.
In
addition, if negotiations to renew expiring collective bargaining
agreements are not successful or become unproductive, the union
could take actions such as strikes, work slowdowns or work
stoppages. Strikes, work slowdowns or work stoppages or the
possibility of such actions could result in delays in production of
our digital projects. We could also incur higher costs from such
actions, new collective bargaining agreements or the renewal of
collective bargaining agreements on less favorable terms. Depending
on their duration, union activity or labor disputes could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations.
Others may assert intellectual property infringement claims or
liability claims for digital media or film content against us which
may force us to incur substantial legal expenses.
There
is a possibility that others may claim that our productions and
production techniques misappropriate or infringe the intellectual
property rights of third parties with respect to their previously
developed web series, films, stories, characters, other
entertainment or intellectual property. In addition, as
distributors of digital media and film content, we may face
potential liability for such claims as defamation, invasion of
privacy, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement or other
claims based on the nature and content of the materials
distributed. If successfully asserted, our insurance may not be
adequate to cover any of the foregoing claims. Irrespective of the
validity or the successful assertion of such claims, we could incur
significant costs and diversion of resources in defending against
them, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating
results.
If we fail to protect our intellectual property and proprietary
rights adequately, our business could be adversely
affected.
Our
ability to compete depends, in part, upon successful protection of
our intellectual property. We attempt to protect proprietary and
intellectual property rights to our productions through available
copyright and trademark laws and distribution arrangements with
companies for limited durations. Unauthorized parties may attempt
to copy aspects of our intellectual property or to obtain and use
property that we regard as proprietary. We cannot assure you that
our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the United
States. Intellectual property protections may also be unavailable,
limited or difficult to enforce in some countries, which could make
it easier for competitors to steal our intellectual property. Our
failure to protect adequately our intellectual property and
proprietary rights could adversely affect our business and results
of operations.
Our online activities are subject to a variety of laws and
regulations relating to privacy and child protection, which, if
violated, could subject us to an increased risk of litigation and
regulatory actions.
In
addition to our company websites and applications, we use
third-party applications, websites, and social media platforms to
promote our digital media productions and engage consumers, as well
as monitor and collect certain information about users of our
online forums. A variety of laws and regulations have been adopted
in recent years aimed at protecting children using the internet
such as the Children’s Online Privacy and Protection Act of
1998, which we refer to as COPPA. COPPA sets forth, among other
things, a number of restrictions on what website operators can
present to children under the age of 13 and what information can be
collected from them. Many foreign countries have adopted similar
laws governing individual privacy, including safeguards which
relate to the interaction with children. If our online activities
were to violate any applicable current or future laws and
regulations, we could be subject to litigation and regulatory
actions, including fines and other penalties.
Risks
Related to Acquisitions
We are subject to risks associated with acquisitions and we may not
realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions.
We have
in the past completed acquisitions, and may in the future engage in
discussions and activities with respect to possible acquisitions,
intended to complement or expand our business, some of which may be
significant transactions for us. For example, in March 2016, we
acquired Dolphin Films, a content producer of motion pictures, and
on March 30, 2017, we acquired 42West, a full-service
entertainment marketing agency. Identifying suitable acquisition
candidates can be difficult, time-consuming and costly, and we may
not be able to identify suitable candidates or complete
acquisitions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis or at
all.
Even if
we complete an acquisition, we may not realize the anticipated
benefits of such transaction. Our recent acquisitions have
required, and any similar future transactions may also require,
significant efforts and expenditures, including with respect to
integrating the acquired business with our historical business. We
may encounter unexpected difficulties, or incur unexpected costs,
in connection with acquisition activities and integration efforts,
which include:
●
diversion of
management attention from managing our historical core
business;
●
potential
disruption of our historical core business or of the acquired
business;
●
the
strain on, and need to continue to expand, our existing
operational, technical, financial and administrative
infrastructure;
●
inability to
achieve synergies as planned;
●
challenges in
controlling additional costs and expenses in connection with and as
a result of the acquisition;
●
dilution to
existing shareholders from the issuance of equity
securities;
●
becoming subject
to adverse tax consequences or substantial
depreciation;
●
difficulties in
assimilating employees and corporate cultures or in integrating
systems and controls;
●
difficulties in
anticipating and responding to actions that may be taken by
competitors;
●
difficulties in
realizing the anticipated benefits of the transaction;
●
inability to
generate sufficient revenue from acquisitions to offset the
associated acquisition costs;
●
potential loss of
key employees, key clients or other partners of the acquired
business as a result of the change of ownership; and
●
the
assumption of and exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of
the acquired businesses.
If any
of our acquisitions do not perform as anticipated for any of the
reasons noted above or otherwise, there could be a negative impact
on our results of operations and financial condition.
Any due diligence by us in connection with potential future
acquisition may not reveal all relevant considerations or
liabilities of the target business, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
We
intend to conduct such due diligence as we deem reasonably
practicable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances
applicable to any potential acquisition. The objective of the due
diligence process will be to identify material issues which may
affect the decision to proceed with any one particular acquisition
target or the consideration payable for an acquisition. We also
intend to use information revealed during the due diligence process
to formulate our business and operational planning for, and our
valuation of, any target company or business. While conducting due
diligence and assessing a potential acquisition, we may rely on
publicly available information, if any, information provided by the
relevant target company to the extent such company is willing or
able to provide such information and, in some circumstances, third
party investigations.
There
can be no assurance that the due diligence undertaken with respect
to an acquisition, including the Dolphin Films acquisition or the
42West acquisition, will reveal all relevant facts that may be
necessary to evaluate such acquisition including the determination
of the price we may pay for an acquisition target or to formulate a
business strategy. Furthermore, the information provided during due
diligence may be incomplete, inadequate or inaccurate. As part of
the due diligence process, we will also make subjective judgments
regarding the results of operations, financial condition and
prospects of a potential target. For example, the due diligence we
conducted in connection with the Dolphin Films acquisition and the
42West acquisition may not have been complete, adequate or accurate
and may not have uncovered all material issues and liabilities to
which we are now subject. If the due diligence investigation fails
to correctly identify material issues and liabilities that may be
present in a target company or business, or if we consider such
material risks to be commercially acceptable relative to the
opportunity, and we proceed with an acquisition, we may
subsequently incur substantial impairment charges or other
losses.
In addition,
following an acquisition, including the Dolphin Films acquisition
and the 42West acquisition, we may be subject to significant,
previously undisclosed liabilities of the acquired business that
were not identified during due diligence and which could contribute
to poor operational performance, undermine any attempt to
restructure the acquired company or business in line with our
business plan and have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Claims against us relating to any acquisition may necessitate our
seeking claims against the seller for which the seller may not
indemnify us or that may exceed the seller’s indemnification
obligations.
As
discussed above, there may be liabilities assumed in any
acquisition that we did not discover or that we underestimated in
the course of performing our due diligence. Although a seller
generally will have indemnification obligations to us under an
acquisition or merger agreement, these obligations usually will be
subject to financial limitations, such as general deductibles and
maximum recovery amounts, as well as time limitations, as was the
case in the 42West acquisition. We cannot assure you that our right
to indemnification from any seller will be enforceable, collectible
or sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully offset the
amount of any undiscovered or underestimated liabilities that we
may incur. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operating results.
Risks Related to our Common Stock and Preferred Stock
We have recently issued, and may in the future issue, a significant
amount of equity securities and, as a result, your ownership
interest in our company has been, and may in the future be,
substantially diluted and your investment in our common stock could
suffer a material decline in value.
From
January 1, 2016 to October 2, 2017, the number of
shares of our common stock issued and outstanding has increased
from 2,047,309 (adjusted for a 1-to-20 reverse stock
split on May 10, 2016 and further adjusted for a 1-to-2
reverse stock split on September 14, 2017) to 9,367,057
shares. Of this amount, approximately 2,832,880 shares
of common stock have been issued in private placements as payment
to certain holders of our Company’s debt pursuant to debt
exchange agreements. Consequently, we have not received any cash
proceeds in connection with such issuances of common stock. In
addition, 762,500 shares of common stock were issued
in private placements pursuant to subscription agreements.
Generally, these subscription agreements and debt exchange
agreements provide for past or future purchases of, or exchanges of
debt for, our common stock at a price of $10.00 per
share which, upon each exercise or exchange thus far, has been
below the market price of our common stock. In addition, during
2016, we issued Warrants G, H, I, J and K. Warrants G, H and I are
exercisable for an aggregate of 1,250,000 shares of
common stock and originally had exercise prices
ranging from $10.00 to $14.00 per share. As of
June 30, 2017, Warrants G, H and I were exercisable at a
price of $9.22 per share. Warrants J and K were issued in
exchange for debt, and to purchase the remaining membership
interests in Dolphin Kids Club, and were exercised for an aggregate
of 1,170,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $0.03 per share. Furthermore, as
consideration for our 42West acquisition, we (i) issued
615,140 shares of common stock on the closing date,
172,275 shares of common stock to certain 42West employees on April
13, 2017 and 59,320 shares of common stock as employee
stock bonuses on August 21, 2017 and (ii)
will issue 980,911 shares of common stock on January
2, 2018. In addition, we may issue up to 981,563
shares of common stock based on the achievement of specified
financial performance targets over a three-year period.
Subsequent to the quarter ended June 30, 2017, we also issued
seven convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount of
$725,000 that are
convertible into 78,757 shares of our common stock
(calculated based
on the 90-trading day average price per share as of October 2,
2017). As a result of these past issuances and potential
future issuances, your ownership interest in our company has
been, and may in the future be, substantially diluted. The market
price for our common stock has been volatile in the past, and these
issuances could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate
substantially in the future. In addition, we have historically
experienced significantly low trading volumes. Once restricted
stock issued in the private placements and in the 42West
acquisition becomes freely tradable, these current or future
shareholders may decide to trade their shares of common stock and,
if our stock is thinly traded, this could have a material adverse
effect on its market price.
In the
near term, we will need to raise additional capital and may seek to
do so by conducting one or more private placements of equity
securities, securities convertible into equity securities or debt
securities, selling additional securities in a registered public
offering, or through a combination of one or more of such financing
alternatives, including the proceeds from this offering. Such
issuances of additional securities would further dilute the equity
interests of our existing shareholders, perhaps substantially, and
may further exacerbate any or all of the above risks.
The
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has anti-dilution protections
and super voting rights that may adversely affect our
shareholders.
For a
period of five years from March 7, 2016, the date of issuance, the
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which are all held by Mr.
O’Dowd, will have certain anti-dilution protections. Upon
triggers specified in the Series C Certificate of Designation, the
number of shares of common stock into which Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock held by Mr. O’Dowd (or any entity
directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. O’Dowd) can be
converted will be increased, such that the total number of shares
of common stock held by Mr. O’Dowd (or any entity
directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. O’Dowd) (based
on the number of shares of common stock held as of the date of
issuance) will be preserved at the same percentage of shares of
common stock outstanding held by such persons on such date. As a
result, your ownership interests may be further
diluted.
Except
as required by law, holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
will only have voting rights once the independent directors of the
Board determine that an optional conversion threshold (as defined
in the Series C Certificate of Designation) has occurred. Upon such
determination by the Board, a holder of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock (Mr. O’Dowd) will be entitled to super
voting rights of three votes for each share of common stock into
which such holder’s shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock could then be converted. Holders of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock will be entitled to vote together as a single class
on all matters upon which common stock holders are entitled to
vote. Your voting rights will be diluted as a result of these super
voting rights. In addition, the anti-dilution protections may
result in an increase in the number of shares of common stock into
which Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by
Mr. O’Dowd and certain eligible persons can be
converted, which could further dilute your percentage of voting
rights.
If
you purchase the securities sold in this offering, the exercise
price of certain outstanding warrants will be reduced and you will
experience immediate dilution in your
investment.
As
of September 30, 2017, we have 1,262,115 warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock which contain full ratchet
anti-dilution price protection (the “Warrants”).
This generally means that if we issue certain additional securities
while the Warrants are outstanding at a price or with an
exercise price less than the then current exercise price of the
Warrants, the exercise price of those Warrants would be
reduced to this lower sale price or exercise price. The Warrants
were initially exercisable at $10.00 to $14.00 per share. The
initial exercise price of the Warrants was reset to $9.22 per share
in connection with the acquisition of 42West described elsewhere in
this prospectus. If the price paid in this offering is below $9.22
per share, the exercise price of the Warrants will be reduced to
such price making it more likely that the Warrants will be
exercised which will result in additional dilution to our
shareholders and may make it more difficult to raise additional
capital in future periods.
Changes in the fair value of warrants to purchase shares of our
common stock may have a material impact on, and result in
significant volatility in, our reported operating
results.
We have determined
that our Series G Warrants, Series H Warrants and Series I Warrants
to purchase shares of our common stock should be accounted for as
derivatives. These warrants require us to “mark to
market” (i.e., record the derivatives at fair value) based on
the price as of the end of each reporting period as liabilities on
our balance sheet and to record the change in fair value during
each period as income or expense in our current period consolidated
statements of operations. The fair value is most sensitive to
changes, at each valuation date, in our common stock price, the
volatility rate assumption, and the exercise price, which could
change if we were to do a dilutive future financing (such as this
offering). This accounting treatment could have a material impact
on, and could significantly increase the volatility of, our
reported operating results, even though there is no related cash
flow impact to us.
Accounting for the put rights could cause variability in the
results we report.
In connection with
the 42West acquisition, we granted put rights to the sellers to
cause us to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of their
shares of common stock received as consideration for a purchase
price equal to $9.22 per share during certain specified exercise
periods set forth in the put agreements up until December 2020. As
of the date of this prospectus, we have repurchased an aggregate of
116,591 shares of common stock from the sellers pursuant to the put
rights. The put rights are an embedded equity derivative within our
common stock requiring certain fair value measurements at each
reporting period. We record the fair value of the liability in the
consolidated balance sheets and we record changes to the liability
against earnings or loss in the consolidated statements of
operations. The put rights are inherently difficult to value.
Additionally, derivative accounting for the put rights also affects
the accounting for other items in our financial statements,
including our exercisable warrants, and these effects are
inherently difficult to determine, require difficult estimates and
are very subjective. We could have substantial variability in the
related periodic fair value measurements, which would affect our
operating results and in turn could impact our stock
price.
Our common stock is quoted only on the OTC Pink Marketplace, which
may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and
liquidity.
Our
common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Marketplace. The OTC Pink
Marketplace is a significantly more limited market than the New
York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ system. The quotation of our shares
on the OTC Pink Marketplace may result in an illiquid market
available for existing and potential shareholders to trade shares
of our common stock and depress the trading price of our common
stock, and may have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to
raise capital in the future.
You
may experience additional dilution as a result of future equity
offerings.
In
order to raise additional capital, we have issued equity securities
in the past and may in the future offer additional shares of our
common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable
for our common stock at prices that may not be the same as the
price per unit in this offering. The price per share at which we
sell additional shares of our common stock, or securities
convertible or exchangeable into common stock, in future
transactions, may be lower than the price per share paid by
investors in this offering.
Risks Related to the Offering
We will have broad discretion as to the use of the net proceeds
from this offering, and we may not use the proceeds
effectively.
We
currently intend to use the net proceeds received from the sale of
the securities for (i) growth initiatives of our
entertainment publicity business, including acquisitions of
comparable businesses and groups with public relations expertise,
(ii) the budget for our content production business and
(iii) general corporate purposes, including working capital.
Our management has broad discretion over how these proceeds are
used and could spend the proceeds in ways with which you may not
agree. Pending the use of the proceeds in this offering, we will
invest them. However, the proceeds may not be invested in a manner
that yields a favorable or any return.
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the book
value of the shares you purchase in this offering.
The
offering price is substantially higher than the net tangible book
value per share of our outstanding common stock. As a result, based
on our capitalization as of June 30, 2017, you will
incur immediate dilution in the book value of the shares you
purchase in the offering. Based upon the issuance and sale of the
units on an assumed closing date of
, 2017 at an assumed public offering price of $
per unit, you will incur immediate dilution of
approximately $ in the net tangible
book value per share if you purchase units in this
offering. In addition to this offering, subject to market
conditions and other factors, we may pursue additional financings
in the future, as we continue to build our business, which may
result in further dilution to you.
Future sales of our common stock by our existing shareholders may
negatively impact the trading price of our common
stock.
If a
substantial number of our existing shareholders decide to sell
shares of their common stock in the public market following the
completion of this offering, the price at which our common stock
trades could decline. Additionally, the public market’s
perception that such sales might occur may also depress the price
of our common stock.
The warrants may not have any value.
The
warrants will be exercisable for
years from the date of the closing of the offering at an initial
exercise price per share equal to $ . In the
event that the price of a share does not exceed the exercise price
of the warrants during the period when the warrants are
exercisable, the warrants may not have any value.
Holders of the warrants will have no rights as a shareholder until
they acquire our common stock.
Until
you acquire shares upon exercise of your warrants, you will have no
rights with respect to our common stock. Upon exercise of your
warrants, you will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common
shareholder only as to matters for which the record date occurs
after the exercise date.
An effective registration statement may not be in place when an
investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such
investor from being able to exercise his, her or its warrants at
that time.
No
warrant held by an investor will be exercisable and we will not be
obligated to issue common stock unless at the time such holder
seeks to exercise such warrant, a prospectus relating to the common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant is current (or an
exemption from registration is available) and the common stock has
been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the
securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the
warrants. Under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed
to use our best efforts to meet these conditions and to maintain a
current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants.
However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so, and if
we do not maintain a current prospectus related to the common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants (and an exemption from
registration is not available), holders will be unable to exercise
their warrants and we will not be required to net cash settle any
such warrant exercise. If we are unable to issue the shares upon
exercise of the warrants by an investor because there is no current
prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrant (and an exemption from registration is not available)
or the common stock has not been registered or qualified or deemed
to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of
the holder of the warrants, the warrants will not expire until ten
days after the date we are first able to issue the shares.
Nevertheless, because an investor may not be able to exercise the
warrants at the most advantageous time, the warrants held by an
investor may have no value, the market for such warrants may be
limited and such warrants may expire worthless.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
prospectus may contain “forward-looking statements”
that involve certain risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our
plans, objectives, representations and intentions and are not
historical facts and typically are identified by use of terms such
as “may,” “should,” “could,”
“expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,”
“believe,” “estimate,”
“predict,” “potential,”
“continue” and similar words, although some
forward-looking statements are expressed differently. You should be
aware that the forward-looking statements included herein represent
management’s current judgment and expectations, but our
actual results, events and performance could differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements. Specifically, this
prospectus contains forward-looking statements
regarding:
●
our
expectations regarding the potential benefits and synergies we can
derive from our acquisitions;
●
our
expectations to offer clients a broad array of interrelated
services, the impact of such strategy on our future profitability
and growth and our belief regarding our resulting market
position;
●
our
expectations regarding the growth potential of the content
marketing, development and production markets;
●
our
intention to expand into television production in the near
future;
●
our
belief regarding the transferability of 42West’s skills and
experience to related business sectors and our intention to expand
our involvement in those areas;
●
our
intention to grow and diversify our portfolio of film and digital
content and our beliefs regarding our strategies to accomplish such
growth and diversification;
●
our
beliefs regarding the impact of our strategic focus on content and
creation of innovative content distribution strategies on our
competitive position in the industry, use of capital, growth and
long-term shareholder value;
●
our
plan to balance our financial risks against the probability of
commercial success for each project;
●
our
intention to selectively pursue complementary acquisitions to
enforce our competitive advantages, scale and grow and our belief
that such acquisitions will create synergistic opportunities and
increased profits and cash flows;
●
our
expectations concerning our ability to derive future cash flows and
revenues from the production, release and advertising of future web
series on online platforms, and the timing of receipt of such cash
flows and revenues;
●
our
expectations concerning the timing of production and distribution
of future feature films and digital projects;
●
our
intention to source potential distribution partners for our web
series, South Beach –
Fever, and to enter into distribution agreements for future
digital productions;
●
our
expectation that we will continue to receive revenues from our
motion picture, Max Steel
from (i) international revenues expected to be derived through
license agreements with international distributors and (ii) other
secondary distribution revenues;
●
our
intention to use our purchased scripts for future motion picture
and digital productions;
●
our
expectations to raise funds through loans, additional sales of our
common stock, securities convertible into our common stock, debt
securities or a combination of financing alternatives, including
the proceeds from this offering;
●
our
beliefs regarding the merits of claims asserted in the class action
against 42West and other defendants and our defenses against such
claims; and
●
our
intention to implement improvements to address material weaknesses
in internal control over financial reporting.
These
forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future
events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. We
wish to caution readers that certain important factors may have
affected and could in the future affect our actual results and
could cause actual results to differ significantly from those
expressed in any forward-looking statement. The most important
factors that could prevent us from achieving our goals, and cause
the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements and the
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or
implied by those forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, the following:
●
our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the 42West
acquisition, including synergies, expanded interrelated service
offerings, growth and increased revenues;
●
our
ability to accurately predict 42West’s clients’
acceptance of our differentiated business model that offers
interrelated services;
●
our
ability to profitably exploit the transferability of 42West’s
skills and experience to related business sectors;
●
our
ability to successfully identify and complete acquisitions in line
with our growth strategy, and to realize the anticipated benefits
of those acquisitions;
●
our
ability to accurately interpret trends and predict future demand in
the digital media and film industries;
●
our
ability to repay our P&A Loan in accordance with the terms of
the agreement so that we will be able to continue to receive
revenues from Max Steel
;
●
adverse trends and
changes in the entertainment or entertainment marketing industries
that could negatively impact 42West’s operations and ability
to generate revenues;
●
unpredictability
of the commercial success of our current and future web series and
motion pictures;
●
economic factors
that adversely impact the entertainment industry, as well as
advertising, production and distribution revenue in the online and
motion picture industries;
●
our
ability to identify, produce and develop online digital
entertainment and motion pictures that meet industry and customer
demand;
●
competition for
talent and other resources within the industry and our ability to
enter into agreements with talent under favorable
terms;
●
our
ability to attract and/or retain the highly specialized services of
the 42West executives and employees and our CEO;
●
availability of
financing from our CEO and other investors under favorable
terms;
●
our
ability to adequately address material weaknesses in internal
control over financial reporting;
●
uncertainties
regarding the outcome of pending litigation; and
●
the
factors included under "Risk factors" in this
prospectus.
Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as to the date on which that
statement is made. We assume no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances that
occur after the date on which the statement is made.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
The following unaudited pro forma combined statements of
operations and related notes present our historical combined
statements of operations with that of 42West, after giving effect
to our acquisition of 42West that was completed on March 30,
2017. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and assumptions that we believe are
reasonable.
The unaudited pro
forma combined statements of operations for the year ended December
31, 2016 are presented as if the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are
presented as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1,
2017. The historical statements of operations are
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma combined statements of
operations to give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly
attributable to the proposed acquisition, (2) factually supportable
and (3) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined
results.
Dolphin has not
completed the detailed valuations necessary to estimate the fair
value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed from
42West and the related allocations of purchase price, nor has
Dolphin identified all adjustments necessary to conform
42West’s accounting policies to Dolphin’s accounting
policies. Although the unaudited pro forma financial information
presented herein do not contain a pro forma balance sheet, the
preliminary estimated fair value of intangible assets was used to
prepare certain adjustments to the combined statements of
operations presented herein. Dolphin’s preliminary estimates
of the fair value of 42West’s assets and liabilities is
based on discussions with 42West’s management, due diligence
and preliminary work performed by third-party valuation
specialists. As the final valuations are being performed,
increases or decreases in fair value of relevant balance sheet
amounts will result in adjustments, some of which may affect the
statement of operations, and may result in material differences
from the information presented herein.
The unaudited pro
forma adjustments are not necessarily indicative of or intended to
represent the results that would have been achieved had the
transaction been consummated as of the dates indicated or that may
be achieved in the future. The actual results reported
by the combined company in periods following the acquisition may
differ significantly from those reflected in these unaudited pro
forma combined financial information for a number of reasons,
including cost saving synergies from operating efficiencies and the
effect of incremental costs incurred to integrate the two
companies.
The unaudited pro
forma combined financial information should be read in conjunction
with our historical consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes and the historical financial statements of
42West as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statements of
Operations
For
the year ended December 31, 2016
|
Dolphin Digital
Media, Inc. (Historical)
|
42West - Acquiree
(Historical)
|
|
Notes
|
|
Revenues
|
$9,395,625
|
$18,563,749
|
$—
|
|
$27,959,374
|
Operating expenses
exclusive of depreciation and amortization
|
27,097,889
|
15,851,177
|
—
|
|
42,949,066
|
Operating (loss)
income
|
(17,702,264)
|
2,712,572
|
—
|
|
(14,989,692)
|
Depreciation and
amortization(1)
|
(476,250)
|
(213,846)
|
(997,333)
|
(A)
|
(1,687,429)
|
Interest
expense
|
(4,241,841)
|
(21,505)
|
|
|
(4,263,346)
|
Change in fair
value of warrant liability
|
2,195,542
|
—
|
—
|
|
2,195,542
|
Warrant issuance
expense
|
(7,372,593)
|
—
|
—
|
|
(7,372,593)
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
(9,601,933)
|
—
|
—
|
|
(9,601,933)
|
Other income
(expense)
|
9,660
|
(59,752)
|
—
|
|
(50,092)
|
Net (loss)
income
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$2,417,469
|
$(997,333)
|
|
$(35,769,543)
|
Deemed dividend on
preferred stock
|
5,247,227
|
—
|
—
|
|
5,247,227
|
Net loss
attributable to common shareholders
|
$(42,436,906)
|
$2,417,469
|
$(997,333)
|
|
$(41,016,770)
|
Basic and Diluted
Loss per Share
|
$(9.67)
|
—
|
—
|
|
$(6.66)
|
Weighted average
number of shares used in share calculation
|
4,389,096
|
—
|
—
|
(E)
|
6,157,425
|
(1) Depreciation
and amortization have been reclassified from operating (loss)
income for presentation purposes.
See accompanying
notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statements of
Operations
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of
Operations
For
the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. (Historical)
|
42West - Acquiree (Historical)
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$3,226,962
|
$9,827,112
|
$-
|
|
$13,054,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Operating
expenses
|
4,687,734
|
8,497,452
|
-
|
|
13,185,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Operating
(loss) income
|
(1,460,772)
|
1,329,660
|
-
|
|
(131,112)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
-
|
-
|
(498,667)
|
(A)
|
(498,667)
|
Interest
expense
|
(838,242)
|
(14,318)
|
-
|
|
(852,560)
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(4,167)
|
-
|
-
|
|
(4,167)
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
6,289,513
|
-
|
-
|
|
6,289,513
|
Change
in fair value of put rights
|
-
|
-
|
(100,000)
|
(B)
|
(100,000)
|
Change
in fair value of contingent consideration
|
-
|
-
|
(116,000)
|
(B)
|
(116,000)
|
Acquistion
related expense
|
(537,708)
|
(207,564)
|
745,272
|
(C)
|
-
|
Loss
on disposal of furniture, office equipment and leasehold
improvements
|
(28,025)
|
-
|
-
|
|
(28,025)
|
Other
expense
|
(16,000)
|
$-
|
-
|
|
(16,000)
|
Total
other income (expenses)
|
4,865,371
|
$(221,882)
|
$30,605
|
|
4,674,094
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
(268,743)
|
268,743
|
(D)
|
-
|
Net
Income
|
$3,404,599
|
$839,035
|
$299,348
|
|
$4,542,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.41
|
|
|
|
$0.52
|
Diluted
|
$(0.30)
|
|
|
|
$(0.18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of share used in per share
calculation:
|
|
|
Basic
|
8,293,343
|
|
|
(E)
|
8,661,185
|
Diluted
|
9,542,846
|
|
|
|
9,910,688
|
See
accompanying notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial
Information
NOTES
TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
NOTE
1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE TRANSACTION
On March 30,
2017, we completed our acquisition of 42West. Pursuant
to the terms of the purchase agreement we acquired from the members
of 42West, 100% of the membership interests of 42West and 42West
became our wholly-owned subsidiary. The consideration paid by us in
connection with the 42West acquisition was approximately $18.7
million in shares of common stock, based on our 30-trading-day
average stock price prior to the closing date of $9.22 per share as
adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split (less certain working
capital and closing adjustments, transaction expenses and payments
of indebtedness), plus the potential to earn up to an additional
$9.3 million in shares of common stock based on achieving certain
financial targets. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement,
(i) 615,140 shares of common stock were issued on March 30, 2017,
172,275 shares of common stock were issued on April 13, 2017 and
59,320 shares of common stock were issued as employee stock bonuses
on August 21, 2017 and (ii) 980,911 will be issued on January 2,
2018. The Company recalculated the weighted average shares as if
the shares of common stock had been issued on January 1,
2017.
Also in connection
with the 42West acquisition, on March 30, 2017, we entered into put
agreements with each of the sellers. Pursuant to the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the put agreements, we
granted the sellers the right, but not obligation, to cause us to
purchase up to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of the shares of common
stock received as consideration for a purchase price equal to $9.22
per share as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split during
certain specified exercise periods set forth in the put agreements
up until December 2020.
NOTE
2 –BASIS OF PRO FORMA PRESENTATION
The unaudited pro
forma combined statement of operations for the year ended December
31, 2016 and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement
of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 combine our
historical statement of operations with the historical statement of
operations of 42West and (i) for the year ended December 31, 2016,
was prepared as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2016 and
(ii) for the six months ended June 30, 2017, was prepared as if the
acquisition occurred on January 1, 2017. The historical
statements of operations are adjusted in the unaudited pro forma
combined statements of operations to give effect to pro forma
events that are (1) directly attributable to the proposed
acquisition, (2) factually supportable, and (3) expected to have a
continuing impact on the combined
results.
We accounted for the acquisition in the unaudited pro forma
combined statements of operations using the acquisition method of
accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805 “Business
Combinations” or “ASC 805”. In
accordance with ASC 805, we used our best estimates and assumptions
to assign fair value to the tangible and intangible assets acquired
and liabilities assumed at the acquisition
date. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as
the excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of the net
tangible and identifiable assets
acquired.
The pro forma
adjustments described below were developed based on
management’s assumptions and estimates, including assumptions
relating to the consideration paid and the allocation thereof to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from 42West based on
preliminary estimates to fair value. The final purchase
consideration and allocation of the purchase consideration will
differ from that reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined
statements of operations after the final valuation procedures are
performed and the amounts are finalized.
The unaudited pro
forma combined statements of operations are provided for
illustrative purposes only and do not purport to represent what the
actual consolidated results of operations of the combined company
would have been had the acquisition occurred on the dates assumed,
nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results
of operations.
We expect to incur costs and realize benefits associated with
integrating our operations and those of 42West. The
unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations do not
reflect the costs of any integration activities or any benefits
that may result from operating efficiencies or revenue
synergies. The unaudited pro forma combined statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the unaudited
pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 do not reflect any non-recurring charges
directly related to the acquisition that the combined companies
incurred upon completion of the 42West
acquisition.
NOTE
3 – PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS
The following is a
description of the unaudited pro forma adjustments reflected in the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2016 and the six months ended June 30,
2017:
(A)
The
Company adjusted the amortization of the acquired intangible asset
to reflect annual amortization for the year ended December 31, 2016
and six months of amortization for the six months ended June 30,
2017. The amortization of the acquired intangible assets are
calculated as follows:
|
Acquisition Date
Opening Balance
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
relationships
|
$5,980,000
|
10
|
$598,000
|
$149,500
|
Trade
name
|
2,760,000
|
10
|
$276,000
|
$69,000
|
Non-competition
agreements
|
370,000
|
3
|
$123,833
|
$30,833
|
|
$9,110,000
|
|
$997,333
|
$249,333
|
(B)
The
Company adjusted the pro forma statement of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 to reflect changes in the fair value of
the put rights in the amount of $100,000 and contingent
consideration in the amount of $116,000.
(C)
The
Company adjusted the pro forma statement of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 to eliminate $745,272 of acquisition
related costs since they are not expected to have a continuing
impact on the operating results of the combined
entities.
(D)
The
Company adjusted the pro forma statement of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 to eliminate $268,743 of provision for
income taxes that was reflected on the historical statement of
operations of 42West because the Company expects to have sufficient
net accumulated operating tax losses to offset the net taxable
revenues.
(E)
The
Company recalculated income per share to give effect to the
acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1,
2017.
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to Dolphin
shareholders
|
$3,402,623
|
$4,542,982
|
Numerator
for basic earnings per share
|
3,402,623
|
4,542,982
|
Change
in fair value of G, H and I warrants
|
(6,289,513)
|
(6,289,513)
|
Numerator
for diluted earnings per share
|
(2,886,890)
|
(1,746,531)
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic EPS - weighted-average shares
|
8,293,343
|
8,661,185
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
Warrants
|
756,338
|
756,338
|
Shares
issuable in January 2018 as part of the Additional Consideration
for the 42West acquisition
|
493,165
|
493,165
|
Denominator
for diluted EPS - adjusted weighted-average shares assuming
exercise of warrants
|
9,542,846
|
9,910,688
|
|
|
|
Basic
income (loss) per share
|
$0.41
|
$0.52
|
Diluted
income (loss) per share
|
$(0.30)
|
$(0.18)
|
USE OF PROCEEDS
We
estimate that the net proceeds from our sale of the
units in this offering, assuming a public offering
price of $ per unit and all
securities are sold, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, will be
approximately $ million.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment
option in full, we estimate that the net proceeds from this
offering will be approximately
$ million. This amount does not
include the proceeds which we may receive in connection with the
exercise of the warrants. We cannot predict when or if the warrants
will be exercised, and it is possible that the warrants may expire
and never be exercised. The principal reason for this offering is
to raise capital for general corporate purposes, including working
capital.
We
intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for (i)
growth initiatives of our entertainment publicity business,
including acquisitions of comparable businesses and groups with
public relations expertise, (ii) the budget for our content
production business and (iii) general corporate purposes,
including working capital.
A
$0.50 increase or decrease in the assumed public
offering price of $ per unit would increase or
decrease the net proceeds from this offering by approximately
$ million, assuming that the number of
units offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, and the assumed public offering price remain the same
and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions.
We will
have broad discretion over the manner in which the net proceeds of
the offering will be applied, and we may not use these proceeds in
a manner desired by our shareholders. Although we have no present
intention of doing so, future events may require us to reallocate
the offering proceeds.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Market for our Common Stock
Our
common stock currently trades on the over-the-counter market and is
quoted on the OTC Pink Marketplace under the symbol
“DPDM”. The high and low bid information for each
quarter since January 1, 2015, as quoted on the OTC Pink
Marketplace, is as follows:
Quarter
|
|
|
2017:
|
|
|
October 1 to
4
|
$8.15
|
$8.00
|
Third
Quarter
|
$10.00
|
$6.06
|
Second
Quarter
|
$10.50
|
$6.00
|
First
Quarter
|
$12.00
|
$7.00
|
|
|
|
2016:
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$13.50
|
$4.00
|
Third
Quarter
|
$14.50
|
$8.00
|
Second
Quarter
|
$16.54
|
$10.80
|
First
Quarter
|
$15.20
|
$3.20
|
|
|
|
2015:
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$12.00
|
$1.20
|
Third
Quarter
|
$2.00
|
$1.20
|
Second
Quarter
|
$2.40
|
$1.60
|
First
Quarter
|
$3.60
|
$1.60
|
The
over-the-counter quotations above reflect inter-dealer prices,
without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions and may not reflect
actual transactions. Such quotes are not necessarily representative
of actual transactions or of the value of our securities, and are,
in all likelihood, not based upon any recognized criteria of
securities valuation as used in the investment banking
community.
The
trading volume for our common stock is relatively limited. There is
no assurance that an active trading market will continue to provide
adequate liquidity for our existing shareholders or for persons who
may acquire our common stock in the future.
The
closing price per share of our common stock on October 4,
2017 was $8.00, as
reported by the OTC Pink Marketplace.
Holders of our Common Stock
As of
October 2, 2017, an aggregate of
9,367,057 shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding and were owned by approximately 360
shareholders of record, based on information provided by our
transfer agent.
Dividends
We have
never paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate that
we will do so in the near future.
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
In
determining the offering price for the units, and the
exercise price of the warrants, we will consider a number of
factors including, but not limited to, the current market price of
our common stock, trading prices of our common stock over a period
of time, the illiquidity and volatility of our common stock,
prevailing market conditions, our historical performance, our
future prospects and the future prospects of our industry in
general, our capital structure, estimates of our business potential
and earnings prospects, the present state of our development and an
assessment of our management and the consideration of the above
factors in relation to market valuation of companies engaged in
businesses and activities similar to ours.
It is
also possible that after the offering, the shares of common stock
will not trade in the public market at or above the offering
price.
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table summarizes our capitalization and cash and cash
equivalents as of June 30, 2017:
●
on an
actual basis; and
●
on an
as adjusted basis to reflect (i) the sale by us of units in this
offering on an assumed closing date of ,
2017, based on an assumed public offering price of
$ per unit, assuming no
exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional
units, and (ii) the deduction of estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by
us.
You
should read this table together with “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation,” as well as our financial statements and related
notes and the other financial information, appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$ 1,071,813
|
$
|
Debt:
|
|
|
Current line of
credit
|
$ 750,000
|
$ 750,000
|
Current
debt(1)
|
12,892,544
|
12,892,544
|
Current loan from
related party
|
1,818,659
|
1,818,659
|
Current note
payable
|
850,000
|
850,000
|
Current put
rights(2)
|
750,343
|
750,343
|
Non-current put
rights(2)
|
3,149,657
|
3,149,657
|
|
400,000
|
400,000
|
Total
debt
|
$ 20,611,203
|
$ 20,611,203
|
Common stock,
$0.015 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
9,345,396 issued and outstanding, actual, and , issued and
outstanding, as adjusted
|
$ 140,181
|
|
Series C
Convertible Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000 shares
authorized, 50,000 issued and outstanding
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
Additional paid in
capital
|
93,243,840
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(96,409,581)
|
|
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(3,024,560)
|
|
|
$ 17,186,643
|
$
|
_________
(1)
|
Consists of debt of
our subsidiaries used to produce and pay the print and advertising
expenses of Max
Steel.
|
(2)
|
Consists of our
obligation to purchase up to 1,070,503 shares of our common stock
from the sellers of 42West during certain specified exercise
periods up until December 2020, pursuant to put agreements. For a
discussion of the terms of the put agreements, see
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
|
The
number of shares of our outstanding common stock, actual and as
adjusted, excludes:
●
1,612,115 shares
of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants having exercise prices ranging from $6.20 to $10.00 per
share;
●
shares
of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of 50,000 shares
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. For a
discussion of the conditions upon which the shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock become convertible, and the number of
shares of common stock into which such preferred stock would be
convertible upon satisfaction of such conditions, see
“Description of Securities—Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock”;
●
shares
of our common stock issuable in connection with the 42West
acquisition as follows: (i) 980,911 shares of our common stock that
we will issue to the sellers on January 2, 2018 and (ii) up to
981,563 shares of our common stock that we may issue to the sellers
based on the achievement of specified financial performance targets
over a three-year period as set forth in the membership interest
purchase agreement;
●
78,757
shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of seven
convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$725,000 (calculated based on the
90-trading day average price per share as of October 2,
2017). For a discussion of the terms of conversion of the
promissory notes and the number of common stock into which such
promissory notes would be convertible, see “Description of
Securities—Convertible Promissory Notes;”
and
●
940,680 shares of
our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2017 Equity
Incentive Plan.
DILUTION
If you
invest in the securities being offered by this prospectus, you will
suffer immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book
value per share of common stock. Our net tangible deficit as of
June 30, 2017 was approximately $(26.2)
million, or approximately $(2.81) per share. Net
tangible deficit per share represents our total tangible assets
less total tangible liabilities, divided by the number of shares of
common stock outstanding as of June 30,
2017.
Dilution in net
tangible book value per share represents the difference between the
public offering price per unit paid by purchasers in this offering,
attributing no value to the warrants offered hereby, and the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after
this offering. After giving effect to the sale by us of
units in this offering, assuming all
units are sold, at a public offering price of $
per unit and attributing no value to the
warrants, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our net
tangible book value as of June 30, 2017 would have
been approximately $ million, or approximately $
per share of common stock. This represents an
immediate increase of $ in net tangible book value per
share to our existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of $
per share to purchasers of securities in this
offering. The following table illustrates this per share
dilution:
Assumed
public offering price per unit
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net
tangible book value deficit per share as of June 30,
2017
|
|
$
|
(2.81)
|
|
Increase
in net tangible book value per share attributable to new
investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
Adjusted
net tangible book value deficit per share as of June 30,
2017, after giving effect to the offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
Dilution
per share to new investors in the offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
If the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, the adjusted net tangible book value will increase to
$ per share, representing an immediate
dilution of $ per share to new
investors, assuming that the assumed public offering price remains
the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions
and the estimated offering expenses payable by us. Investors
exercising their warrants may experience additional
dilution.
The
above discussion and tables do not include the
following:
●
shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants offered
hereby;
●
1,612,115 shares
of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants having exercise prices ranging from $6.20 to $10.00 per
share;
●
shares
of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of 50,000 shares
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. For a
discussion of the conditions upon which the shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock become convertible, and the number of
shares of common stock into which such preferred stock would be
convertible upon satisfaction of such conditions, see
“Description of Securities—Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock”;
●
Shares
of our common stock issuable in connection with the 42West
acquisition as follows: (i) 980,911 shares of our common stock that
we will issue to the sellers on January 2, 2018 and (ii) up to
981,563 shares of our common stock that we may issue to the sellers
based on the achievement of specified financial performance targets
over a three-year period as set forth in the membership interest
purchase agreement;
●
78,757
shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of seven
convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$725,000 (calculated based on the 90-trading day average
price per share as of October 2, 2017). For a discussion of
the terms of conversion of the promissory notes and the number of
common stock into which such promissory notes would be convertible,
see “Description of Securities—Convertible Promissory
Notes;” and
●
940,680 shares of
our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2017 Equity
Incentive Plan.
In
addition, we may be required to purchase up to
1,070,503 shares of our common stock from the sellers
during certain specified exercise periods up until December 2020,
pursuant to put agreements. For a discussion of the terms of
the put agreements, see “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The
following table includes our selected historical financial data.
The historical financial data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been derived
from our audited financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this prospectus. The historical financial data as of December
31, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 have been derived
from our audited financial statements, which are not included in
this prospectus. The historical financial data as of June 30,
2017 and for the six months ended June
30, 2017 and 2016 have been derived from our unaudited
financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Our financial statements are prepared and presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. The results indicated below are not necessarily
indicative of our future performance.
|
For the year ended
December 31,
|
For the six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and
distribution
|
51,192
|
3,031,073
|
9,367,222
|
4,157
|
3,226,962
|
Entertainment
publicity
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5,137,556
|
Service
|
2,000,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Membership
|
19,002
|
69,761
|
28,403
|
21,028
|
—
|
Total
Revenue
|
2,070,194
|
3,100,834
|
9,395,625
|
25,185
|
8,364,518
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
159,539
|
2,587,257
|
10,661,241
|
2,429
|
2,500,772
|
Distribution and
marketing
|
—
|
213,300
|
11,322,616
|
—
|
629,493
|
Selling, general
and administrative
|
1,533,211
|
1,845,088
|
1,245,689
|
562,576
|
1,213,400
|
Legal and
professional
|
—
|
2,392,556
|
2,405,754
|
967,531
|
997,434
|
Payroll
|
1,630,369
|
1,435,765
|
1,462,589
|
751,202
|
3,802,511
|
Loss before other
income (expense)
|
(1,252,925)
|
(5,373,132)
|
(17,702,264)
|
(2,258,553)
|
(779,092)
|
Other Income
(Expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
40,000
|
96,302
|
9,660
|
9,660
|
(16,000)
|
Amortization of
loan fees
|
—
|
—
|
(476,250)
|
—
|
—
|
Amortization of
intangible assets
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(249,333)
|
Change in fair
value of warrant liability
|
—
|
—
|
2,195,542
|
—
|
6,289,513
|
Change in fair
value of put rights
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(100,000)
|
Loss on disposal of
furniture, office equipment and leasehold improvements
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(28,025)
|
Change in fair
value of contingent consideration
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(116,000)
|
Warrant issuance
expense
|
—
|
—
|
(7,372,593)
|
—
|
—
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
—
|
(9,601,933)
|
(5,843,811)
|
(4,167)
|
Acquisition related
costs
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(745,272)
|
Interest
expense
|
(660,580)
|
(3,559,532)
|
(4,241,841)
|
(3,155,076)
|
(849,001)
|
Total Other Income
(Expenses)
|
(620,580)
|
(3,463,230)
|
(19,487,415)
|
(8,989,227)
|
4,181,715
|
Net Income
(Loss)
|
$(1,873,505)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$ (11,247,780)
|
$ 3,402,623
|
Net Income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
4,750
|
17,440
|
—
|
5,257
|
—
|
Net Loss
attributable to Dolphin Films, Inc.
|
—
|
(4,786,341)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Net Loss
attributable to Dolphin Digital Media, Inc.
|
(1,878,255)
|
(4,067,461)
|
(37,189,679)
|
(11,253,037)
|
3,402,623
|
|
$(1,873,505)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$ (11,247,780)
|
$ 3,402,623
|
Deemed dividend on
preferred stock
|
—
|
—
|
5,247,227
|
(5,227,247)
|
—
|
Net loss
attributable to common shareholders
|
$(1,873,505)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
$(42,436,906)
|
$ (16,475,027)
|
$ 3,402,623
|
Income (Loss) Per
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.92)
|
$(4.32)
|
$(9.67)
|
$ (5.45)
|
$ 0.41
|
Diluted
|
$(0.92)
|
$(4.32)
|
$(9.67)
|
$ (5.45)
|
$ (0.30)
|
Weighted average
number of shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
2,047,309
|
2,047,309
|
4,389,097
|
3,025,448
|
8,293,343
|
Diluted
|
2,047,309
|
2,047,309
|
4,389,097
|
3,025,448
|
9,542,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$198,470
|
$2,392,685
|
$662,546
|
$ 1,071,813
|
Restricted
cash
|
—
|
—
|
1,250,000
|
—
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
693,526
|
15,170,768
|
4,654,013
|
2,626,461
|
Intangible
assets
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
8,860,667
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
14,336,919
|
Total
Assets
|
$1,493,240
|
$21,369,113
|
$14,197,241
|
$ 35,544,894
|
Total
Liabilities
|
10,285,083
|
54,233,031
|
46,065,038
|
38,569,454
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
(8,791,843)
|
(32,863,918)
|
(31,867,797)
|
(3,024,560)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
(1)
|
Financial
information has been retrospectively adjusted for our acquisition
of Dolphin Films. See Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our historical
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which are
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion
includes forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in
“Risk Factors”. Our actual results may differ
materially from those discussed below. See “Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk
Factors”.
Overview
We are
a leading independent entertainment marketing and premium content
development company. Through our recent acquisition of 42West, we
provide expert strategic marketing and publicity services to all of
the major film studios, and many of the leading independent and
digital content providers, as well as for hundreds of A-list
celebrity talent, including actors, directors, producers, recording
artists, athletes and authors. The strategic acquisition of 42West
brings together premium marketing services with premium content
production, creating significant opportunities to serve our
respective constituents more strategically and to grow and
diversify our business. Our content
production business is a long established, leading independent
producer, committed to distributing premium, best-in-class film and
digital entertainment. We produce original feature films and
digital programming primarily aimed at family and young adult
markets.
On March 30,
2017, we acquired 42West, an entertainment public relations agency
offering talent publicity, strategic communications and
entertainment content marketing. As consideration for the 42West
acquisition, we paid approximately $18.7 million in shares of
common stock, par value $0.015, based on our company’s
30-trading-day average stock price prior to the closing date of
$9.22 per share, as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split,
(less certain working capital and closing adjustments, transaction
expenses and payments of indebtedness), plus the potential to earn
up to an additional $9.3 million in shares of common stock. As a
result, we (i) issued 615,140 shares of common stock on the closing
date, 172,275 shares of common stock to certain 42West employees on
April 13, 2017 and 59,320 shares of common stock as employee stock
bonuses on August 21, 2017 and (ii) will issue 980,911 shares of
common stock on January 2, 2018. In addition, we may issue up to
981,563 shares of common stock based on the achievement of
specified financial performance targets over a three-year period as
set forth in the membership interest purchase
agreement.
Prior to its
acquisition, 42West was the largest independently-owned public
relations firm in the entertainment industry. Among other benefits,
we believe that the 42West acquisition will strengthen and
complement our current content production business, while expanding
and diversifying our operations.
The principal
sellers have each entered into employment agreements with us and
will continue as employees of our company until March 2020. The
nonexecutive employees of 42West were retained as well. In
connection with the 42West acquisition, pursuant to put agreements
we granted the sellers the right, but not the obligation, to cause
us to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of their shares of
common stock received as consideration for a purchase price equal
to $9.22 per share, as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split,
during certain specified exercise periods up until December 2020.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, certain of the sellers
exercised these rights and we purchased 75,919 shares of our common
stock for an aggregate purchase price of $700,000. Subsequent to
the six months ended June 30, 2017, we purchased an additional
40,672 shares of our common stock for $375,000 from certain of the
sellers who exercised their put rights.
In connection with
the 42West acquisition, we acquired an estimated $9.1 million of
intangible assets and recorded approximately $14 million of
goodwill. The purchase price allocation and related consideration
for the intangible assets and goodwill are provisional and subject
to completion and adjustment. We amortize our intangible assets
over useful lives of between 3 and 10 years. We have recorded
amortization in the amount of approximately $0.2 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2017.
On
March 7, 2016, we acquired Dolphin Films from Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC, an entity wholly owned by our President,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. William O’Dowd, IV.
Dolphin Films is a content producer of family feature films. In
2016, we released our feature film, Max Steel, which was produced by
Dolphin Films. All financial information has been retrospectively
adjusted at the historical values of Dolphin Films, as the merger
was between entities under common control.
Effective May 10,
2016, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to effectuate a
1-to-20 reverse stock split.
Effective
July 6, 2017, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to (i)
change our name to Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.; (ii) cancel
previous designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock; (iii) reduce the number of
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (described below) outstanding
in light of our 1-to-20 reverse stock split from 1,000,000 to
50,000 shares; and (iv) clarify the voting rights of the Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock that, except as required by law,
holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will only have
voting rights once the independent directors of the Board determine
that an optional conversion threshold has
occurred.'
Effective September
14, 2017, we amended our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation to effectuate a 1-to-2 reverse stock split. Shares of
common stock have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the
reverse stock split in the following management discussion and
analysis.
As a result of the
acquisition of 42West, we have determined that as of the second
quarter of 2017, we operate in two reportable segments, the
entertainment publicity division and the content production
division. The entertainment publicity division is comprised of
42West and provides clients with diversified services, including
public relations, entertainment content marketing and strategic
marketing consulting. The content production division is comprised
of Dolphin Films and Dolphin Digital Studios and specializes in the
production and distribution of digital content and feature
films.
Going Concern
In the
audit opinion for our financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2016, our independent auditors included an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern based upon our net loss for
the year ended December 31, 2016, our accumulated deficit as
of December 31, 2016 and our level of working capital. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of these uncertainties. Management is
planning to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and
additional sales of our common stock, securities convertible into
our common stock, debt securities or a combination of such
financing alternatives, including the proceeds from this offering;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in
raising any necessary additional loans or capital. Such issuances
of additional securities would further dilute the equity interests
of our existing shareholders, perhaps substantially.
Revenues
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, we derived revenue through (1)
the online distribution rights of our web series, South Beach – Fever and
international distribution rights to our motion picture,
Believe; and (2) a portion
of fees obtained from the sale of memberships to online kids clubs.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, our primary source of
revenue was from the release of our motion picture, Max Steel. During the six months ended
June 30, 2016, we derived revenues from a portion of
fees obtained from the sale of memberships to online kids clubs
and international distribution rights of our motion picture,
Believe. During the six
months ended June 30, 2017, we derived the majority of our revenues
from our recently acquired subsidiary 42West. 42West derives its
revenues from providing talent publicity, strategic communications
and entertainment content marketing. During the six months ended
June 30, 2017, revenues from production and distribution were
derived from the release of our motion picture, Max Steel. The table below sets forth
the components of revenue for the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2016 and for the six months ended June
30, 2016 and 2017:
|
For the year ended
December
31,
|
For the six months
ended
June
30,
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
Production and
distribution
|
98.0%
|
99.7%
|
16.5%
|
38.6%
|
Entertainment
publicity
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
61.4%
|
Membership
|
2.0%
|
0.3%
|
83.5%
|
0.0%
|
Total
revenue
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Dolphin Digital Studios
In
April 2016, we entered into a co-production agreement to produce
Jack of all Tastes, a
digital project that showcases favorite restaurants of NFL players.
The show was produced during 2016 throughout several cities in the
U.S. The show was released on Destination America, a digital
cable and satellite television channel, on September 9, 2017 and we
do not expect to derive any revenues from this initial
release. We are currently sourcing distribution platforms in
which to release completed projects and those for
which we have the rights, and which we intend to produce. We earn
production and online distribution revenue solely through the
following:
●
Producer’s
Fees – We earn fees for producing each web series, as
included in the production budget for each project. We either
recognize producer’s fees on a percentage of completion or a
completed contract basis depending on the terms of the producer
agreements, which we negotiate on a project by project basis.
During 2016, we began production of our new web series but it had
not been completed as of June 30, 2017. In addition, we
concentrated our efforts in identifying potential distribution
partners.
●
Initial
Distribution/Advertising Revenue – We earn revenues from the
distribution of online content on advertiser supported
video-on-demand, or AVOD, platforms. Distribution agreements
contain revenue sharing provisions which permit the producer to
retain a percentage of all domestic and international advertising
revenue generated from the online distribution of a particular web
series. Typically, these rates range from 30% to 45% of such
revenue. We have previously distributed our productions on various
online platforms including Yahoo!, Facebook, Hulu and AOL. No
revenues from this source have been derived during the six months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
●
Secondary
Distribution Revenue – Once our contractual obligation with
the initial online distribution platform expires, we have the
ability to derive revenues from distributions of the web series in
ancillary markets such as DVD, television and subscription
video-on-demand, or SVOD. No revenues from this source have been
derived during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 or during
the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017. We intend to source
potential secondary distribution partners for our web series,
South Beach–Fever ,
that was released in 2015, once our agreement with the initial
distributor expires.
Dolphin Films
During
the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, we derived revenues
through the international distribution of the motion picture,
Believe. During the
six months ended June 30, 2017, we
derived revenues from Dolphin Films primarily through the domestic
and international distribution of our motion picture, Max Steel.
The
production of the motion picture, Max Steel, was completed during 2015
and released in the United States on October 14, 2016. The motion
picture did not perform as well as expected domestically but we
have secured approximately $8.2 million in international
distribution agreements. Unamortized film costs are to be tested
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the fair value of the film may be less than its unamortized
costs. We determined that Max
Steel’s domestic performance was an indicator that the
capitalized production costs may need to be impaired. We used a
discounted cash flow model to help determine the fair value of the
capitalized production costs and determined that the carrying value
of the capitalized production costs were below the fair value and
recorded an impairment of $2 million during 2016.
Revenues from the
motion picture, Max Steel,
were generated from the following sources:
●
Theatrical –
Theatrical revenues were derived from the domestic theatrical
release of motion pictures licensed to a U.S. theatrical
distributor that had agreements with theatrical exhibitors. The
financial terms negotiated with the U.S. theatrical distributor
provided that we receive a percentage of the box office results,
after related distribution fees.
●
International
– International revenues were derived through license
agreements with international distributors to distribute our motion
pictures in an agreed upon territory for an agreed upon time.
Several of the international distribution agreements were
contingent on a domestic wide release that occurred on October 14,
2016.
●
Other
– Dolphin Films’ U.S. theatrical distributor has
existing output arrangements for the distribution of productions to
home entertainment, video-on-demand, or VOD, pay-per-view, or PPV,
electronic-sell-through, or EST, SVOD and free and pay television
markets. The revenues expected to be derived from these channels
are based on the performance of the motion picture in the domestic
box office. We anticipate that the revenues from these channels
will be received in 2017 and thereafter.
Our ability to
receive additional revenues from Max Steel depends on the ability to
repay our loans under our production service agreement and prints
and advertising loan agreement from the profits of Max Steel.
MaxSteel did not generate sufficient funds to repay either of the
loans when they became due. As a result, we may lose our copyright
from the film and will, consequently, no longer receive revenues
related to Max Steel. The
film is not expected to generate sufficient funds to repay these
loans. For a discussion of the terms of such agreements, see
“Liquidity and Capital Resources”
below.
Project Development and Related Services
We have
a development team that dedicates a portion of its time and
resources to sourcing scripts for future developments. The scripts
can be for either digital or motion picture productions. During
2015 and 2016, we acquired the rights to certain scripts, one that
we intend to produce in the fourth quarter of 2017 and the others
in 2018. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired the
rights to a book from which we intend to develop a script and
produce in 2018. We have not yet determined if these projects would
be produced for digital or theatrical distribution.
Entertainment
Publicity
Our revenue is
directly impacted by the retention and spending levels of existing
clients and by our ability to win new clients. We have a stable
client base and continue to grow organically through referrals and
actively soliciting new business. Our revenue is directly impacted
by the retention and spending levels of existing clients and by our
ability to win new clients. We have a stable client base and
continue to grow organically through referrals and actively
soliciting new business. We earn revenues primarily from three
sources. We provide entertainment marketing services under
multiyear master service agreements in exchange for fixed
project-based fees ranging from $25,000 to $300,000 per project. We
have numerous projects per year per client for durations between
three and six months. We provide talent publicity services in
exchange for monthly fees of approximately $5,000 per client. We
provide strategic communications services in exchange for monthly
fees ranging from $10,000 to $30,000 per
client.
●
Entertainment
Content Marketing – We earn fees from providing marketing
direction, public relations counsel and media strategy for
productions (including theatrical films, DVD and VOD releases,
television programs, and online series) as well as content
producers ranging from individual filmmakers and creative artists
to production companies, film financiers, DVD distributors, and
other entities. Our capabilities include worldwide studio releases,
independent films, television programming and web productions. In
addition, we provide entertainment marketing services in connection
with film festivals, awards campaigns, event publicity and red
carpet management. As part of our services we offer marketing and
publicity services that are tailored to reach diverse audiences.
Our clients for this type of service may include major studios and
independent producers for whom they create strategic multicultural
marketing campaigns and provide strategic guidance aimed at
reaching diverse audiences.
●
Talent
Publicity – We earn fees from creating and implementing
strategic communication campaigns for performers and entertainers,
including television and film stars, recording artists, authors,
models, athletes, and theater actors. Our talent roster includes
Oscar- and Emmy-winning actors and Grammy-winning singers and
musicians and New York Times best-selling authors. Our services in
this area include ongoing strategic counsel, media relations,
studio, network, charity, corporate liaison and event and tour
support. Many of our clients have been with 42West since it was
founded in 2004. Our services may be ongoing or related to a
specific project that our talent is associated
with.
●
Strategic
Communication – We earn fees through our strategic
communications team by advising high-profile individuals and
companies faced with sensitive situations or looking to raise,
reposition, or rehabilitate their public profiles. We also help
studios and filmmakers deal with controversial
movies.
Online Kids Clubs
We
partnered with US Youth Soccer in 2012, and with United Way
Worldwide in 2013, to create online kids clubs. Our online kids
clubs derive revenue from the sale of memberships in the online
kids clubs to various individuals and organizations. We shared in a
portion of the membership fees as outlined in our agreements with
the respective entities. During 2016, we terminated, by mutual
accord, the agreement with United Way Worldwide. We have retained
the trademark to the online kids club and will continue to operate
the site. Pursuant to the terms of our agreement with US Youth
Soccer, we notified them that we did not intend to renew our
agreement that terminated on February 1, 2017. We operate our
online kids club activities through our subsidiary, Dolphin Kids
Clubs, LLC. On December 29, 2016, we entered into a purchase
agreement to acquire the remaining 25% membership interest in
Dolphin Kids Clubs and as a result, Dolphin Kids Clubs became our
wholly owned subsidiary. As consideration for the purchase of the
25% membership interest, we issued Warrant J which was exercised to
acquire 1,085,000 shares of our common stock at a
purchase price of $0.03 per share. (See Note 10 to the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus for further discussion on the warrants).
For the
years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, we did not record
significant revenues from the online kids clubs. For the
six months ended June 30, 2016, we
recorded $0.02 million of revenues from the online kids clubs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we did not derive any
revenues from the online kids clubs. Membership revenues
decreased during the six months ended June 30,
2017, as compared to the same period in the prior year
mainly due to promotional efforts made by a consultant that we
hired to promote Club Connect. That consultant is no longer
providing services to our company. During the six months
ended June 30, 2017, management decided to discontinue the online
kids clubs at the end of this year to dedicate a majority of our
time and resources to the entertainment publicity business and the
production of feature films and digital
content.
Expenses
Our
expenses consist primarily of (1) direct costs; (2) distribution
and marketing; (3) selling, general and administrative expenses;
(4) payroll expenses; and (5) legal and professional
fees.
Direct
costs include certain cost of services related to our
entertainment publicity business, amortization of deferred
production costs, impairment of deferred production costs,
residuals and other costs associated with production. Residuals
represent amounts payable to various unions or “guilds”
such as the Screen Actors Guild, Directors Guild of America, and
Writers Guild of America, based on the performance of the digital
production in certain ancillary markets. Included within direct
costs are immaterial impairments for any of our projects.
Capitalized production costs are recorded at the lower of their
cost, less accumulated amortization and tax incentives, or fair
value. If estimated remaining revenue is not sufficient to recover
the unamortized capitalized production costs for that title, the
unamortized capitalized production costs will be written down to
fair value.
Distribution and
marketing expenses were incurred during the years ended December
31, 2015 and 2016 and included the costs of theatrical, prints and
advertising, or P&A, and of DVD/Blu-ray duplication and
marketing. Theatrical P&A includes the costs of the theatrical
prints delivered to theatrical exhibitors and the advertising and
marketing cost associated with the theatrical release of the
picture. DVD/Blu-ray duplication represents the cost of the
DVD/Blu-ray product and the manufacturing costs associated with
creating the physical products. DVD/Blu-ray marketing costs
represent the cost of advertising the product at or near the time
of its release.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses include all overhead costs except for
payroll and legal and professional fees that are reported as a
separate expense item. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and
2016, selling, general and administrative expenses included the
commissions that we pay our advertising and distribution brokers,
which can range up to 25% of the distribution and advertising
revenue that we receive.
Legal
and professional fees include fees paid to our attorneys, fees for
investor relations consultants, audit
and accounting fees and fees for general business
consultants.
Payroll expenses
include wages, payroll taxes and employee
benefits.
Other Income and Expenses
During
the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, Other income and
expenses consisted primarily of (1) interest to Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC, in connection with loans made to
our company; (2) interest payments related to the Loan and Security
Agreements entered into to finance the production of certain
digital content and motion pictures; (3) loss on extinguishment of
debt; (4) amortization of loan fees; (5) warrant issuance expense;
and (6) change in fair value of derivative liability.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we entered into agreements
with certain debtholders, including Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC, to convert an aggregate of $25,164,798 principal
and interest into 2,516,480 shares of common stock at
a price of $10.00 per share. The conversions occurred
on days when the market price of the stock was between $12.00
and $13.98 per share. As a result, we recorded a loss on the
extinguishment of the debt of approximately $6.3 million. In
addition, we entered into (i) a termination agreement to
terminate an equity finance agreement, (ii) a purchase agreement
for the acquisition of 25% membership interest of Dolphin Kids
Clubs and (iii) a debt exchange agreement to convert certain notes.
As consideration for the three agreements, we issued Warrant J and
Warrant K that entitled the warrant holder to purchase
up to 1,170,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.03 per share. As a result of the issuance of the
shares, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of
approximately $3.3 million. In addition to Warrants J and K, we
entered into a warrant purchase agreement whereby we agreed to
issue Warrants G, H and I in exchange for a $50,000 payment that
was used to reduce the exercise price of Warrant E. The warrant
purchase agreement entitles the warrant holder to purchase shares
of common stock as follows: (i) up to 750,000 shares of common
stock prior to January 31, 2018, at $10.00 per
share (ii) up to 250,000 shares of common stock at
$12.00 per share prior to January, 31, 2019, and
(iii) up to 250,000 shares of common stock at $14.00 per share
prior to January 31, 2020. As of June 30, 2017 Warrants
G, H and I were exercisable at a price of $9.22 per share.
We determined that Warrants G, H, I, J, and K, which we refer to,
collectively, as the New Warrants, should be accounted for as a
derivative for which a liability is recorded in the aggregate and
measured fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and changes
in the fair value from one reporting period to the next are
reported as income or expense. As a result of the issuance of the
New Warrants, we recorded a warrant issuance expense of
approximately $7.4 million and income of approximately, $2.2
million from changes in the fair value of the New Warrants from the
dates of issuance through December 31, 2016.
During
the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2017,
other income and expenses consisted primarily of (1)
interest payments to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC in
connection with loans made to our company; (2) interest payments
related to the loan and security agreements entered into to finance
the production of certain digital content and motion pictures; (3)
loss on extinguishment of debt; (4) amortization of loan fees; (5)
changes in the fair value of warrant liabilities; (6) changes
in the fair value of put rights; (7) changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration; and (8) loss from disposal of furniture,
office equipment and leasehold improvements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to six months ended June
30, 2016
Revenues
For the
six months ended June 30, 2017, our
revenues were as follows:
|
For the six
months
ended
June
30,
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Production and
distribution
|
$3,226,962
|
$4,157
|
Entertainment
publicity
|
5,137,556
|
–
|
Membership
|
–
|
21,028
|
Total
revenues:
|
$8,364,518
|
$25,185
|
Revenues from
production and distribution increased by $3.2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to
the same period in the prior year primarily due to the
revenue generated by the domestic and international distribution of
Max Steel.
Expenses
For the
six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
our primary operating expenses were as follows:
|
For the six months
ended
June
30,
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
$ 2,500,772
|
$ 2,429
|
Distribution and
marketing
|
629,493
|
–
|
Selling, general
and administrative
|
1,213,400
|
562,576
|
Payroll
|
3,802,511
|
751,202
|
Legal and
professional
|
997,434
|
967,531
|
Total
expenses
|
$ 9,143,610
|
$ 2,238,738
|
Direct
costs increased by approximately $2.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same
period in the prior year, mainly due to (i) the
amortization of capitalized production costs related to the
revenues earned from our motion picture, Max Steel and (ii) approximately
$0.4 million of cost of services attributed to
42West.
Distribution
and marketing expenses increased by approximately
$0.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2017 as compared to the same period in the
prior year due to expenses, such as
distributor fees and residuals, related to the distribution of
Max
Steel.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $0.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the
same period in the prior year. The June 30, 2016 amounts do not
include 42West and approximately $0.9 million of selling, general
and administrative expenses incurred during the six months ended
June 30, 2017 are attributable to 42West. We had a decrease in
selling, general and administrative expense related to the content
production business of approximately $0.3 million as compared to
the same period in the prior year primarily attributable to (i) a
charitable contribution of $0.1 million made during the six months
ended June 30, 2016 and (ii) selling costs for Max Steel of $0.2
million prior to its release in 2016.
Payroll
expenses increased by approximately $3.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior
year. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, approximately $3.1
million of payroll expenses are attributable to 42West, which were
offset by a decrease of approximately $0.1 million in payroll
expenses, as compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to a reduction of headcount during the second quarter
of 2016.
Legal
and professional expenses increased by approximately $0.3 million
for the period ended June 30 2017, as
compared to the same period in the prior year
primarily due to (i) fees paid for due diligence work
related to financing that was later abandoned (ii) fees paid
for consulting related to accounting treatment of certain
transactions and (iii) increase in audit-related
fees.
Other
Income and Expenses
|
For the six
months
ended
June
30,
|
Other
(Income) Expense:
|
|
|
Other (income) and
expenses
|
$16,000
|
$(9,660)
|
Amortization of
intangible assets
|
249,333
|
–
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
4,167
|
5,843,811
|
Loss on disposal of
furniture, office equipment and leasehold
improvements
|
28,025
|
–
|
Acquisition related
costs
|
745,272
|
–
|
Change in fair
value of warrant liability
|
(6,289,513)
|
–
|
Change in fair
value of contingent consideration
|
116,000
|
–
|
Change in fair
value of put rights
|
100,000
|
–
|
Interest
expense
|
849,001
|
3,155,076
|
Other
(Income)/expense
|
$(4,181,715)
|
$8,989,227
|
Interest expense
decreased by approximately $2.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same
period in the prior year and was directly related to the
extinguishment, during 2016, of loan and security agreements
related to the First Group Film Funding, Second Group Film Funding
and the Web Series Funding, each described under “Liquidity
and Capital Resources”.
Change
in fair value of warrant liability increased by approximately $6.3
million for the six months ended June 30,
2017, as compared to the same period in the prior year due
to warrants that were issued in the fourth quarter of 2016 that
were accounted for as derivative liabilities. We recorded the
warrants at their fair value on the date of issuance and will
record any changes to fair value at each balance sheet date on our
consolidated statements of operation.
Loss on
extinguishment of debt decreased by approximately $5.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as
compared to the same period in prior year as a result of
extinguishment of certain debt of our company. On March 29, 2016,
we entered into ten individual subscription agreements with each of
ten subscribers. The subscribers were holders of outstanding
promissory notes issued pursuant to loan and security agreements.
Pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreements, we agreed to
convert $2,883,377 aggregate amount of principal and interest
outstanding under the notes into an aggregate of
288,338 shares of common stock at $10.00
per share as payment in full of each of the notes. On the date of
the conversion, our market price was $12.00 per share
and we recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the debt of
$576,676 on our condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
In
addition, on March 4, 2016, we entered into a subscription
agreement with Dolphin Entertainment, LLC. Pursuant to
the terms of the subscription agreement, we agreed to convert
$3,073,410 of principal and interest outstanding on a revolving
promissory note into 307,341 shares of common stock at
$10.00 per share. On the date of conversion, our
market price was $12.00 per share and we recorded a
loss on the extinguishment of the debt of $614,682 on our condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
On May 31, 2016 and
June 30, 2016, we entered into thirteen individual debt exchange
agreements with parties to loan and security agreements under which
we issued promissory notes to each of the parties. Pursuant to the
debt exchange agreements, we agreed to convert an aggregate
$17,551,480 in principal and accrued interest under the promissory
notes into an aggregate of 1,755,148 shares of common stock at a
price of $10.00 per share as payment in full of each of the
promissory notes. On May 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, the market
price per share of common stock was $13.98 and $12.16,
respectively. As a result, we recorded a loss on the extinguishment
of debt of $4,652,453 on our condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the six months ended June 30,
2016.
We incurred
approximately $0.7 million of legal, consulting and
auditing costs related to our acquisition of 42West during
the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income was
approximately $3.4 million or $0.41 per share based on 8,293,343
weighted average shares outstanding and $(0.30) per share on a
fully diluted basis based on 9,542,846 weighted average shares for
the six months ended June 30, 2017. Net loss for the six months
ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $11.2 million or $(5.44) per
share based on 3,025,448 weighted average shares for the six months
ended June 30, 2016. Net income and losses for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were related to the factors
discussed above.
Year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to year ended December 31,
2015
Revenues
For the
year ended December 31, 2016, our revenues were as
follows:
|
For the year
ended
December
31,
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Production and
distribution
|
$9,367,222
|
$3,031,073
|
Membership
|
28,403
|
69,761
|
Total
revenue
|
$9,395,625
|
$3,100,834
|
Revenues from
production and distribution increased by $6.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2015, primarily due to the release of our motion
picture, Max Steel, on
October 14, 2016 and the recognition of domestic box office
revenues and recognition of revenue from international licensing
agreements of the motion picture. During the same period in 2015,
we derived revenues from the online release of our web series,
South Beach–Fever, on
Hulu.
Revenues from
membership fees decreased by $0.04 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2015, as a result of one individual that
purchased memberships to the online kids club for a group of
schools in Louisiana during the second quarter of
2015.
Expenses
For the
years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our operating expenses
were as follows:
|
For the year
ended
December
31,
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
$10,661,241
|
$2,587,257
|
Distribution and
marketing
|
11,322,616
|
213,300
|
Selling, general
and administrative
|
1,245,689
|
1,845,088
|
Legal and
professional
|
2,405,754
|
2,392,556
|
Payroll
|
1,462,589
|
1,435,765
|
Total
expenses
|
$27,097,889
|
$8,473,966
|
Direct
costs increased by approximately $8.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2015, mainly due to (i) amortization of
capitalized production costs related to the release of our motion
picture, Max Steel; (ii) a
$2 million impairment of the capitalized production costs of
Max Steel; (iii)
international sales agent fees paid for the distribution of our
motion picture in international territories; and (iv) the
impairment of the cost of a script that we decided not to produce.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, direct costs
consisted primarily of (i) amortization of capitalized production
costs for our web series, South
Beach – Fever; (ii) a fee paid to our distributor in
2015 related to the release date of our motion picture; and (iii)
impairment of the costs of scripts that we do not intend to
immediately produce.
Distribution and
marketing expenses increased by approximately $11.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2015, mainly due to costs associated with
the distribution and marketing for the release of our motion
picture, Max
Steel.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $0.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2015, mainly due to a contract for
international distribution back office services that ended on
December 31, 2015 and was not renewed for 2016.
Legal
and professional fees remained relatively consistent between the
year ended December 31, 2016 and the year ended
December 31, 2015. The majority of our professional fees are
related to consulting fees and legal fees that would be considered
in the normal course of business for our industry. During the year
ended December 31, 2016, we incurred approximately $0.5
million of legal and consulting fees directly related to the
release of our motion picture. By contrast during the year ended
December 31, 2015, we incurred $0.5 million of fees for
services rendered by our advertising and distribution broker
related to our web series.
Payroll
expenses increased by approximately $0.03 million during the year
ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2015, mostly due to certain payroll costs
capitalized during the production of our web series in 2015 and
cost of living salary increases made at the beginning of
2016.
Other
Income and Expenses
|
For the year
ended
December
31,
|
Other
Income and expenses:
|
|
|
Other
income
|
$9,660
|
$96,302
|
Amortization of
loan fees
|
(476,250)
|
–
|
Change in fair
value of warrant liability
|
2,195,542
|
–
|
Warrant issuance
expense
|
(7,372,593)
|
–
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
(9,601,933)
|
–
|
Interest
expense
|
(4,241,841)
|
(3,559,532)
|
Total
|
$(19,487,415)
|
$(3,463,230)
|
Interest expense
increased by $0.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2016, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, and was
directly related to (i) interest related to the conversion of
certain notes payable to shares of our common stock and (ii)
interest related to the production and distribution loans of our
motion picture.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we amortized approximately
$0.5 million of certain loan fees related to the financing obtained
for the distribution and marketing expenses for the release of
Max Steel.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we entered into subscription
agreements, termination agreements and debt exchange agreements,
which we refer to, collectively, as the Conversion Agreements, to
convert debt into shares of our common stock or to warrants to
purchase shares of our common stock. These Conversion Agreements
resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt in the aggregate
amount of $9.6 million due to the difference in the price per share
in the Conversion Agreement and the market price per share on the
date of the conversion. The following details the various
agreements we entered into during the year ended December 31,
2016:
a)
|
We
entered into thirteen individual agreements with parties to loan
and security agreements under which we issued promissory notes to
each of the parties. Pursuant to the terms of the debt exchange
agreements, we converted an aggregate $3.75 million of principal
and approximately $0.4 million of interest under the promissory
notes into an aggregate of 420,455 shares of common stock at $10.00
per share as payment in full of each of the promissory notes. The
market price per share was between $12.00 and $12.90 per share at
the time of the conversions. As a result, we recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt related to these loan and security
agreements of $0.9 million on our consolidated statement of
operations.
|
b)
|
We
entered into three debt exchange agreements with parties to equity
finance agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the agreements, we
converted an aggregate $0.3 million of principal and interest into
an aggregate of 33,100 shares of our common stock at $10.00 per
share as payment in full for each equity finance agreement. The
market price per share was between $12.50 and $13.50 per share at
the time of the conversions. As a result, we recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt related to these equity finance agreements
of $0.1 million on our consolidated statements of operations. We
also entered into a settlement agreement with a separate party to
an equity finance agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the
settlement agreement, we agreed to pay $0.2 million and recorded a
loss on extinguishment of debt on our consolidated statement of
operations of approximately $0.1 million related to this settlement
agreement.
|
c)
|
We
entered into a debt exchange agreement with a party to a kids club
agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreements, we converted
$0.06 million on principal and interest into 6,000 shares of our
common stock at $10.00 per share as payment in full of the kids
club agreement. The market price per share was $13.50 per share at
the time of the conversion. As a result, we recorded $0.02 million
of loss on extinguishment of debt on our consolidated statements of
operations, related to this kids club agreement.
|
d)
|
We
entered into a subscription agreement with Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreement, we
converted $3.0 million of principal and interest outstanding on a
revolving promissory note into 307,341 shares of our common stock
at a price of $10.00 per share. At the time of the conversion,
market price per share of common stock was $12.00. As a result, we
recorded a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million on
its condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2016.
|
e)
|
We
entered into various individual debt exchange agreements with
parties to loan and security agreements under which we issued
promissory notes to each of the parties. Pursuant to the debt
exchange agreements, we agreed to convert an aggregate $17.9
million in principal and interest under the promissory notes into
an aggregate of 1.8 million shares of common stock at a price of
$10.00 per share as payment in full of each of the promissory
notes. On the dates of conversion the market price per share of
common stock was between $12.16 and $13.98 and as a result, we
recorded a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $4.6 million our
consolidated statements of operations.
|
f)
|
We
entered into a termination agreement and a debt exchange agreement
whereby we issued Warrants J and K that entitled the holder to
purchase shares of our common stock at a price of $0.03. In
exchange the warrant holder agreed to convert an aggregate of $6.5
million of debt. Warrant K entitled the warrant holder to purchase
up to 85,000 shares of our common stock and Warrant J entitled the
warrant holder to purchase up to 1,085,000 but also includes
consideration for the purchase of a 25% interest in Dolphin Kids
Clubs. We recorded loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.2 million
related to these agreements.
|
In
addition to Warrants J and K discussed above, as previously
described, we entered into a warrant purchase agreement whereby we
agreed to issue Warrants G, H and I. We recorded $7.4 million of
warrant issuance expense with respect to Warrants G, H and I. All
of the warrants issued during 2016 were recorded as a derivative
liability. We recorded the warrants at their fair value on the date
of issuance and will record any changes to fair value at each
balance sheet date as a change in the fair value of a derivative
liability on our consolidated statements of operation. For the year
ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $2.2 million of a change
in the fair value of the derivative liability.
Net
Loss
Net
loss was approximately $37.2 million or $(9.67) per
share of common stock, including a preferred stock deemed dividend
of approximately $5.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2016 based on 4,389,097 weighted average shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and approximately $8.8
million or $(4.32) per share for the year ended
December 31, 2015 based on 2,047,309 weighted
average shares outstanding as of December 31, 2015. The
increase in net loss between the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015 was related to the factors discussed above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to Six months ended June
30, 2016
Cash
flows provided by operating activities increased by approximately
$5.0 million from approximately $(2.3) million used for operating
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to
approximately $2.7 million provided by operating activities during
the six months ended June 30, 2017. This increase was primarily due
to (i) $2.1 million of production tax incentives received (ii)
approximately $2 million received from accounts receivable related
to Max Steel and (iii) cash
flows provided by 42West.
Cash flows from
investing activities increased by approximately $1.2 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period
in the prior year primarily due to restricted cash that became
available and was used to pay a portion of our
debt.
Cash flows used for
financing activities increased by approximately $8.4 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2017 from approximately $4.8 million
provided by financing activities during the six months ended June
30, 2016 to approximately $3.5 million used for financing
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 mainly due to
(i) approximately $5.8 million used to repay the debt related to
the production, distribution and marketing loans for Max Steel, (ii) $0.7 million used to
pay the put rights exercised by the sellers of 42West pursuant to
the put agreements and (iii) $0.5 million repaid to our CEO for
advances made to the Company for working capital. In addition, we
raised a net of $1.3 million more through the sale of our common
stock during the six months ended June 30, 2016 than through
various financing activities during the six months ended June 30,
2017.
As previously discussed, in connection with the 42West acquisition,
we may be required to purchase from the sellers up to an aggregate
of 1,187,094 of their shares of common stock at a price equal to
$9.22 per share, as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split,
during certain specified exercise periods up until December 2020.
Of that amount we may be required to purchase up to 227,766 shares
in 2017, for an aggregate of up to $3.1 million. On April 14, 2017,
the sellers of 42West, exercised put options in the aggregate
amount of 43,382 shares of common stock and were paid an aggregate
total of $0.4 million. On June 1, 2017, the principal sellers
exercised put options in the aggregate amount of 32,538 shares of
common stock and were paid an aggregate of $0.3
million.
As of June 30, 2017
and 2016, we had cash available for working capital of
approximately $1.0 million and approximately $4.9 million,
respectively, and a working capital deficit of approximately $18.5
million and approximately $21.1 million,
respectively.
These factors, along with an accumulated deficit of $96.4 million
as of June 30, 2017, raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of these uncertainties. In this regard, management is
planning to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and
additional issuances of our common stock, securities convertible
into our common stock, debt securities or a combination of such
financing alternatives, including the proceeds from this offering.
There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising
additional capital. Such issuances of additional securities would
further dilute the equity interests of our existing shareholders,
perhaps substantially. We currently have the rights to several
scripts that we intend to obtain financing to produce during 2017
and 2018 and release during 2018. We will potentially earn a
producer and overhead fee for each of these productions. There can
be no assurances that such productions will be released or fees
will be realized in future periods. We expect to begin to generate
cash flows from our other sources of revenue, including the
distribution of at least one web series that, as discussed earlier
has gone into production. With the acquisition of 42West, we are
currently exploring opportunities to expand the services currently
being offered by 42West to the entertainment community. There can
be no assurance that we will be successful in selling these
services to clients.
In addition, we
have a substantial amount of debt. We do not currently have
sufficient assets to repay such debt in full when due, and our
available cash flow may not be adequate to maintain our current
operations if we are unable to repay, extend or refinance such
indebtedness. As of June 30, 2017, our total debt was $20.6 million
and our total stockholders’ deficit was approximately $2.9
million. Approximately $4 million of the total debt as of June 30,
2017 represents the fair value of put options in connection with
the 42West acquisition, which may or may not be exercised by the
sellers. Approximately $12.9 million of our current indebtedness
($9.7 million outstanding under the prints and advertising loan
agreement plus $3.2 million outstanding under the production
service agreement) was incurred by our Max Steel subsidiary and the
Max Steel VIE. Repayment of these loans was intended to be made
from revenues generated by Max Steel in the U.S. and outside of the
U.S. These loans are non-recourse to us. Max Steel did not generate
sufficient funds to repay either of these loans prior to the
maturity date. As a result, we may lose the copyright for
Max Steel and,
consequently, will no longer receive any revenues from Max Steel.
If we are not
able to generate sufficient cash to service our current or future
indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or
delaying digital or film productions, selling assets, restructuring
or refinancing our indebtedness or seeking additional debt or
equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to
effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms or at all and
our indebtedness may affect our ability to continue to operate as a
going concern.
Year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to year ended December 31,
2015
Cash
flows used in operating activities increased by approximately $7.9
million from approximately $(7.0) million used during the year
ended December 31, 2015 to approximately $(14.9) million used
during the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was
primarily due to the use of cash flows related to the release of
our motion picture, Max
Steel, as follows: (i) distribution and marketing fees of
approximately $11.3 million, (ii) $0.9 million of deposits used to
pay certain distribution fees related to the release, and (iii)
$1.4 million of accounts payable paid. These are offset by cash
received for sales of the motion picture in the amount of $4.8
million, and tax incentives in the amount of $0.7 million. We also
received $0.05 million from the sale of warrants.
Cash
flows from investing activities decreased by approximately $1.2
million. This decrease was due to a provision in the Max Steel loan and security agreement
that required us to keep as collateral, an account at the financial
institution that provided the loan.
Cash
flows from financing activities increased by approximately $5.4
million from approximately $9.1 million for year ended
December 31, 2015 to approximately $13.2 million for year
ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to
financing for the distribution and marketing costs for the release
of our motion picture and repayment of the production loan from
proceeds received from the motion picture. In addition, during the
year ended December 31, 2016, we entered into various
subscription agreements for the sale of our common stock for a
total of $7.5 million. In comparison, during the same period in
prior year, we received $3.2 million from a convertible note
payable and received $2.4 million more of advances from our
CEO.
Financing Arrangements
Prints and Advertising Loan
On August 12, 2016, Dolphin Max Steel
Holding, LLC, or Max Steel Holdings, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Dolphin Films, entered into a loan and security
agreement, or the P&A Loan, providing for a $14.5 million
non-revolving credit facility that matured on August 25,
2017. The loan is not secured by any other Dolphin entity and the
only asset held by Max Steel Holdings is the copyright for the
motion picture. The proceeds of the credit facility were
used to pay a portion of the P&A expenses of the domestic
distribution of our feature film, Max
Steel. To secure Max
Steel Holding's obligations under the P&A Loan, we granted to
the lender a security interest in bank account funds totaling
$1,250,000 pledged as collateral. During the six
months ended June 30, 2017, we agreed to allow the
lender to apply the $1,250,000 to the loan balance. The loan is
partially secured by a $4.5 million corporate guaranty from a party
associated with the motion picture, of which we have agreed
to backstop $620,000. The lender has retained a reserve of
$1.5 million for loan fees and interest. Amounts borrowed under the
credit facility accrue interest at either (i) a fluctuating per
annum rate equal to the 5.5% plus a base rate or (ii) a per annum
rate equal to 6.5% plus the LIBOR determined for the applicable
interest period. As of December 31, 2016, we recorded $12.5
million, including the reserve, related to this agreement.
Approximately $11.0 million was recorded as distribution and
marketing costs on our consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2016, related to the release of the motion
picture. As of June 30, 2017, we had an
outstanding balance of $9,688,855, including the reserve, related
to this agreement recorded on our condensed consolidated balance
sheets. On our condensed consolidated statement of operations
for the six months ended June 30, 2017,
we recorded (i) interest expense of $425,472 related
to the P&A Loan and (ii) $500,000 in direct costs from loan
proceeds that were not used by the distributor for the marketing of
the film and returned to the lender. There is no recourse to our company for
the debt other than the copyright of the film.
Production Service Agreement
During 2014, we entered into a
financing deal in the amount of $10.4 million to produce
Max
Steel. The loan is
partially secured by international distribution agreements made
prior to the commencement of principal photography and tax
incentives. The agreement contains repayment milestones to be made
during the year ended December 31, 2015, that if not met,
accrue interest at a default rate of 8.5% per annum above the
published base rate of HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited until the
maturity on January 31, 2016 or the release of the movie.
Due to delays in the release of the film, we
were unable to make some of the scheduled payments and, pursuant to
the terms of the agreement, we have accrued
$1.1 million of interest at the default rate. The film
was released October 14, 2016 and delivery to the international
distributors has begun. During the year ended December 31,
2016, an aggregate of $4.2 million was received from the
international distributors and tax incentives from the jurisdiction
in which a portion of the film was produced. As of December 31,
2016 and June 30, 2017, we had outstanding balances of
$6.2 million and $3.2 million, respectively, related to this debt
on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. One of our
subsidiaries is party to this agreement and there is no recourse to
our company for the debt other than the copyright of the
film.
42West Line of Credit
In 2008, 42West entered into a revolving line of credit with City
National Bank, which matured on August 31, 2017. City
National Bank agreed to extend the line of Credit to November 1,
2017 on substantially the same terms. The purpose of the
line of credit was to provide 42West with working capital as needed
from time to time. The maximum amount that can be drawn on the line
of credit is $1,500,000. The line of credit bears interest computed
as the greater of (a) three and one half percent per year or (b)
the prime rate of City National Bank less one quarter of one
percent, provided that the rate per annum never exceed 16%.
On April 27, 2017, we drew an additional $0.3 million from the line
of credit to be used for working capital. The balance as of
June 30, 2017 was $0.7 million.
Promissory Notes
On April 10 and
April 18, 2017, we issued three promissory notes, maturing six
months after issuance, to two separate lenders and received
$300,000. On June 14, 2017, we issued a promissory note that
matures two years after issuance, to a lender and received
$400,000. We may prepay the promissory note, with no penalty, after
the initial six months. On September 20, 2017, we issued a
promissory note, maturing one year after issuance, to one of our
directors, Allan Mayer, and received $150,000. Each of the five
notes bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum, payable in 30-day
installments. The proceeds from the notes were used for working
capital.
Kids Club Agreements
During
February 2011, we entered into two kids clubs agreements with
individual parties, for the development of a child fan club for the
promotion of a local university and its collegiate athletic
program, which we refer to as a Group Kids Club. Under each kids
club agreement, each party paid us $50,000 in return for the
participation of future revenue generated by the Group Kids Club.
Pursuant to the terms of each of the kids club agreements, the
amount invested by the individual investor was to be repaid by the
Group Kids Club, with a specified percentage of the Group Kids
Club’s net receipts, until the total investment was recouped.
Each individual party was to recoup its investment with a
percentage of net revenue based upon a fraction, the numerator of
which was the amount invested ($50,000), and the denominator of
which was $500,000, which we refer to as the investment ratio.
Thereafter, each individual party would share in a percentage of
the net revenue of the Group Kids Club, in an amount equal to one
half of the investment ratio. During 2015 and 2016, we made
aggregate payments of $45,000 to the party to one of the kids clubs
agreements. On July 18, 2016, we paid such party $15,000 in full
settlement of our remaining obligations under such kids club
agreement, and the agreement was terminated. On October 3,
2016, we entered into a debt exchange agreement and issued
6,000 shares of our common stock at an exchange price
of $10.00 per share to terminate the remaining kids
club agreement for (i) $10,000 plus (ii) the original investment of
$50,000. On the date of the exchange agreement, the market price of
our common stock was $13.50 and we recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt in the amount of $21,000 on our consolidated
statement of operations.
Equity Finance Agreements
During
the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we entered into
equity finance agreements, for the future production of web series
and the option to participate in the production of future web
series. The investors contributed a total equity investment of
$1,000,000 and had the ability to share in the future revenues of
the relevant web series, on a pro rata basis, until the total
equity investment was recouped and then would have shared at a
lower percentage of the additional revenues. The equity finance
agreements stated that prior to December 31, 2012, we could
utilize all, or any portion, of the total equity investment to fund
any chosen production. Per the equity finance agreements, we were
entitled to a producer’s fee, not to exceed $250,000, for
each web series that we produced before calculating the share of
revenues owed to the investors. We invested these funds in eleven
projects. On January 1, 2013, the production “cycle”
ceased and the investors were entitled to share in the future
revenues of any productions for which the funds invested were used.
Two of the productions were completed and there was no producer
gross revenue as defined in the equity finance agreements. The
remaining projects were impaired and there are no future projects
planned with funds from the equity finance agreements. As a result,
we were not required to pay the investors any amount in excess of
the existing liability already recorded as of December 31,
2015.
On June
23, 2016, we entered into a settlement agreement with one of the
investors that had originally contributed $0.1 million. Pursuant to
the terms of the settlement agreement, we made a payment of $0.2
million to the investor on June 24, 2016. On October 3, 2016,
October 13, 2016 and October 27, 2016 we entered into debt exchange
agreements with three investors to issue an aggregate amount of
33,100 shares of our common stock at an exchange price
of $10.00 per share to terminate each of their equity
finance agreements for a cumulative original investment amount of
$0.3 million. The market price of our common stock on the date of
the debt exchange agreement was between $12.50 and
$13.50 and, as such, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of
debt on our consolidated statement of operations in the amount of
$0.1 million.
On
December 29, 2016, we entered into a termination agreement with the
remaining investor, whereby we mutually agreed to terminate the
equity finance agreement in exchange for the issuance of Warrant K.
Warrant K entitles the holder to purchase up to 85,000
shares of our common stock at a price of $0.03 prior
to December 29, 2020. We recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt
in the amount of $0.5 million on our consolidated statement of
operations for the difference between the outstanding amount of the
equity finance agreement and the fair value of Warrant
K.
Loan and Security Agreements
First Group Film Funding
During
the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, we entered into
various loan and security agreements with individual noteholders
for an aggregate principal amount of notes of $11,945,219 to
finance future motion picture projects. During the year ended
December 31, 2015, one of the noteholders increased its
funding under its loan and security agreement for an additional
$500,000 investment and we used the proceeds to repay $405,219 to
another noteholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan and security
agreements, we issued notes that accrued interest at rates ranging
from 11.25% to 12% per annum, payable monthly through June 30,
2015. During 2015, we exercised our option under the loan and
security agreements, to extend the maturity date of these notes
until December 31, 2016. In consideration of our exercise of
the option to extend the maturity date, we were required to pay a
higher interest rate, increasing 1.25% to a range between 12.50%
and 13.25%. The noteholders, as a group, were to receive our entire
share of the proceeds from these projects, on a prorata basis,
until the principal investment was repaid. Thereafter, the
noteholders, as a group, had the right to participate in 15% of our
future profits from these projects (defined as our gross revenues
of such projects less the aggregate amount of principal and
interest paid for the financing of such projects) on a prorata
basis based on each noteholder’s loan commitment as a
percentage of the total loan commitments received to fund specific
motion picture productions.
On
May 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, we entered into various debt
exchange agreements on substantially similar terms with certain of
the noteholders to convert an aggregate of $11.3 million of
principal and $1.8 million of interest into shares of common stock.
Pursuant to the terms of such debt exchange agreements, we agreed
to convert the debt at $10.00 per share and issued
1,315,149 shares of common stock. On May 31, 2016, the
market price of a share of common stock was $13.98 and on
June 30, 2016 it was $12.16. As a result, we recorded a loss
on the extinguishment of debt on our consolidated statement of
operations of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Please
see “Warrants” below for a discussion of the
satisfaction of the last remaining note. As of June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any debt
outstanding or accrued interest related to such loan and security
agreements on our condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Web Series Funding
During
the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, we entered into
various loan and security agreements with individual noteholders
for an aggregate principal amount of notes of $4.0 million which we
used to finance production of our 2015 web series, South Beach–Fever. Under the loan
and security agreements, we issued promissory notes that accrued
interest at rates ranging from 10% to 12% per annum payable monthly
through August 31, 2015, with the exception of one note that
accrued interest through February 29, 2016. During 2015, we
exercised our option under the loan and security agreements to
extend the maturity date of these notes until August 31, 2016.
In consideration for our exercise of the option to extend the
maturity date, we were required to pay a higher interest rate,
increasing 1.25% to a range between 11.25% and 13.25%. Pursuant to
the terms of the loan and security agreements, the noteholders, as
a group, had the right to participate in 15% of our future profits
generated by the series (defined as our gross revenues of such
series less the aggregate amount of principal and interest paid for
the financing of such series) on a prorata basis based on each
noteholder’s loan commitment as a percentage of the total
loan commitments received to fund the series.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we entered into thirteen
individual debt exchange agreements on substantially similar terms
with the noteholders. Pursuant to the terms of the debt exchange
agreements, we and each noteholder agreed to convert an aggregate
of $3.8 million of principal and $0.4 million of interest into an
aggregate of 420,455 shares of common stock at
$10.00 per share as payment in full for each of the
notes. On the dates of the exchange, the market price of our common
stock was between $12.00 and $12.90 per share. As a
result, we recorded a loss on the extinguishment of debt on our
consolidated statement of operations $0.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2016, related to this
transaction.
Please
see “Warrants” below for a discussion of the
satisfaction of the last remaining note. As of June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any debt
outstanding or accrued interest related to such loan and security
agreements on our condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Second Group Film Funding
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, we entered into various loan
and security agreements with individual noteholders for an
aggregate principal amount of notes of $9.3 million to fund a new
group of film projects. Of this amount, notes with an aggregate
principal value of $8.8 million were issued in exchange for debt
that had originally been incurred by Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC, primarily related to the production and
distribution of the motion picture, Believe. The remaining $0.5 million was
issued as a note in exchange for cash. Pursuant to the loan and
security agreements, we issued notes that accrued interest at rates
ranging from 11.25% to 12% per annum, payable monthly through
December 31, 2016. We had the option to extend the maturity
date of these notes until July 31, 2018. If we chose to
exercise our option to extend the maturity date, we would have been
required to pay a higher interest rate, increasing 1.25% to a range
between 11.25% and 13.25%. The noteholders, as a group, would have
received our entire share of the proceeds from these projects, on a
prorata basis, until the principal investment was repaid.
Thereafter, the noteholders, as a group, had the right to
participate in 15% of our future profits from such projects
(defined as our gross revenues of such projects less the aggregate
amount of principal and interest paid for the financing of such
projects) on a prorata basis based on each noteholder’s loan
commitment as a percentage of the total loan commitments received
to fund specific motion picture productions.
On
May 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, we entered into various debt
exchange agreements on substantially similar terms with certain of
the noteholders to convert an aggregate of $4.0 million of
principal and $0.3 million of interest into shares of common stock.
Pursuant to such debt exchange agreements, we agreed to convert the
debt at $10.00 per share and issued
434,435 shares of common stock. On May 31, 2016,
the market price of a share of the common stock was
$13.98 and on June 30, 2016, it was
$12.16. As a result, we recorded a loss on the
extinguishment of debt on our consolidated statement of operations
of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. In
addition, during 2016, we repaid one of our noteholders its
principal investment of $0.3 million.
Please
see “Warrants” below for a discussion of the
satisfaction of the last remaining note. As of June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any debt
outstanding or accrued interest related to such loan and security
agreements on our condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Subscription Agreements
2015 Convertible Note Agreement
On
December 7, 2015 we entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor to sell up to $7 million in convertible promissory notes
of our company. Under the subscription agreement, we issued a
convertible promissory note to the investor in the amount of
$3,164,000 at a conversion price of $10.00 per share. The
convertible promissory note was to bear interest on the unpaid
balance at a rate of 10% per annum and became due and payable on
December 7, 2016. The outstanding principal amount and all accrued
interest were mandatorily and automatically convertible into common
stock, at the conversion price, upon the average market price of
the common stock being greater than or equal to the conversion
price for twenty trading days. On February 5, 2016, this triggering
event occurred pursuant to the convertible note agreement and
316,400 shares of common stock were issued in
satisfaction of the convertible note payable.
April 2016 Subscription Agreements
On
April 1, 2016, we entered into substantially identical subscription
agreements with certain private investors, pursuant to which we
issued and sold to the investors in a private placement an
aggregate of 537,500 shares of common stock at a
purchase price of $10.00 per share for aggregate gross
proceeds of $5,375,000 in the private placement. On March 31,
2016, we received $1,500,000, in advance for one of these
agreements. The amount was recorded as noncurrent debt on our
condensed consolidated balance sheet. Under the terms of the April
2016 subscription agreements, each investor had the option to
purchase additional shares of common stock at the purchase price,
not to exceed the number of such investor’s initial number of
subscribed shares, during each of the second, third and fourth
quarters of 2016. One investor delivered notice of its election to
purchase shares and (i) on June 28, 2016, we issued
50,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $0.5
million and (ii) on November 17, 2016, we issued
60,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $0.6
million.
June 2016 Subscription Agreements
On June
22, 2016 and June 30, 2016, we entered into two additional
subscription agreements with two investors. Pursuant to the terms
of the subscription agreements, we sold an aggregate of
35,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price
of $10.00 per share.
November 2016 Subscription Agreements
On
November 15 and November 22, 2016, we entered into eight additional
subscription agreements with four investors. Pursuant to the terms
of the subscription agreements, we sold an aggregate of
67,500 shares of our common stock at a purchase price
of $10.00 per share.
2017
Convertible Promissory Notes
On each of July 18,
July 26, August 1, August 4, 2017, August 31, 2017, September 6,
2017 and September 9, 2017, we entered into a subscription
agreement pursuant to which we issued a convertible promissory
note, each with substantially identical terms, for an aggregate
principal amount of $725,000. Each of the convertible promissory
notes matures one year from the date of issue and bears interest at
a rate of 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of
the each of the convertible promissory notes are convertible by the
respective holder at a price of either (i) the 90 trading day
average price per share of common stock as of the date the holder
submits a notice of conversion or (ii) if an Eligible Offering (as
defined in each of the convertible promissory notes) of common
stock is made, 95% of the Public Offering Share price (as defined
in each of the convertible promissory notes).
Warrants
On
December 29, 2016, we entered into a debt exchange agreement with
an investor that held the following promissory notes with the
following balances:
Notes:
|
|
First Group Film
Funding note
|
$1,160,000
|
Web Series Funding
note
|
340,000
|
Second Group Film
Funding note
|
4,970,990
|
|
$6,470,990
|
In
addition to the debt exchange agreement, we entered into a purchase
agreement with the same investor to acquire 25% of the membership
interest of Dolphin Kids Clubs to own 100% of the membership
interest. Pursuant to the debt exchange agreement and the purchase
agreement, we issued Warrant J that entitles the warrant holder to
purchase shares up to 1,085,000 shares of our common
stock at a price of $0.03 through December 29, 2020,
its expiration date. We recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt
$2.7 million on our consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2016. The loss on extinguishment was
calculated as the difference between the fair value of Warrant J
and the outstanding debt under the notes described
above.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, or “GAAP”. The preparation of
these consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base
our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
An
accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an
accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters
that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if
different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or
changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to
occur, could materially impact the consolidated financial
statements. We believe that the following critical accounting
policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions
used in the preparation of the consolidated financial
statements.
Capitalized Production Costs
Capitalized
production costs represent the costs incurred to develop and
produce a web series or feature films. These costs primarily
consist of salaries, equipment and overhead costs, as well as the
cost to acquire rights to scripts. Capitalized production costs are
stated at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization and tax
credits, if applicable, or fair value. These costs are capitalized
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
“FASB”, Accounting Standards Codification, or
“ASC”, Topic 926-20-50-2 “Other Assets –
Film Costs”. Unamortized capitalized production costs are
evaluated for impairment each reporting period on a title-by-title
basis. If estimated remaining revenue is not sufficient to recover
the unamortized capitalized production costs for that title, the
unamortized capitalized production costs will be written down to
fair value. Any project that is not greenlit for production within
three years is written off.
We are
responsible for certain contingent compensation, known as
participations, paid to certain creative participants such as
writers, directors and actors. Generally, these payments are
dependent on the performance of the web series and are based on
factors such as total revenue as defined per each of the
participation agreements. We are also responsible for residuals,
which are payments based on revenue generated from secondary
markets that are generally paid to third parties pursuant to a
collective bargaining, union or guild agreement. These costs are
accrued to direct operating expenses as the revenues, as defined in
the participation agreements, are achieved and as sales to the
secondary markets are made triggering the residual
payment.
Due to
the inherent uncertainties involved in making such estimates of
ultimate revenues and expenses, these estimates are likely to
differ to some extent in the future from actual results. Our
management regularly reviews and revises when necessary its
ultimate revenue and cost estimates, which may result in a change
in the rate of amortization of film costs and participations and
residuals and/or write-down of all or a portion of the unamortized
deferred production costs to its estimated fair value. Our
management estimates the ultimate revenue based on existing
contract negotiations with domestic distributors and international
buyers as well as management’s experience with similar
productions in the past.
An
increase in the estimate of ultimate revenue will generally result
in a lower amortization rate and, therefore, less amortization
expense of deferred productions costs, while a decrease in the
estimate of ultimate revenue will generally result in a higher
amortization rate and, therefore, higher amortization expense of
capitalized production costs. Our management evaluates unamortized
production costs for impairment whenever there is an event that may
signal that the fair value of the unamortized production costs are
below their carrying value. One example that may trigger this type
of analysis is the under-performance in the domestic box office of
a feature film. For digital productions this analysis may occur if
we are unable to secure sufficient advertising revenue for our web
series. We typically perform an impairment analysis using a
discounted cash flow method. Any write-down resulting from an
impairment analysis is included in direct costs within our
consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, we impaired approximately $2.1 and
$0.6 million, respectively of capitalized production
costs.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue
from web series and feature films is recognized in accordance with
guidance of FASB ASC 926-60 “Revenue Recognition –
Entertainment-Films”. Revenue is recorded when a contract
with a buyer for the web series or feature film exists, the web
series or feature film is complete in accordance with the terms of
the contract, the customer can begin exhibiting or selling the web
series or feature film, the fee is determinable and collection of
the fee is reasonable. Revenues from licensing agreements for
distribution in foreign territories typically includes a minimum
guarantee with the possibility of sharing in additional revenues
depending on the performance of the web series or feature film in
that territory. Revenue for these types of arrangements are
recorded when the web series or motion picture has been delivered
and our obligations under the contract have been
satisfied.
On occasion,
we may enter into agreements with third parties for the
co-production or distribution of a web series. We may also enter
into agreements for the sponsorship or integration of a product in
a web series productions. Revenue from these agreements will be
recognized when the web series is complete and ready to be
exploited. In addition, the advertising revenue is recognized at
the time advertisements are shown when a web series is aired. Cash
received and amounts billed in advance of meeting the criteria for
revenue recognition is classified as deferred revenue.
Revenue
from public relations consists of fees from the performance of
professional services and billings for direct costs reimbursed by
clients. Fees are generally recognized on a straight-line or
monthly basis which approximates the proportional performance on
such contracts. Direct costs reimbursed by clients are billed as
pass-through revenue with no mark-up.
Deferred
revenue represents customer advances or amounts allowed to be
billed under the contracts for work that has not yet been performed
or expenses that have not yet been incurred.
Warrant Liabilities and Related Fair Value
Measurements
When we
issue warrants, we evaluate the proper balance sheet classification
of the warrant to determine whether the warrant should be
classified as equity or as a derivative liability on the
consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with ASC 815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in the Entity’s Own Equity
(ASC 815-40), we classify a warrant as equity so long as it is
“indexed to the company’s equity” and several
specific conditions for equity classification are met. A warrant is
not considered indexed to the company’s equity, in general,
when it contains certain types of exercise contingencies or
contains certain provisions that may alter either the number of
shares issuable under the warrant or the exercise price of the
warrant, including, among other things, a provision that could
require a reduction to the then current exercise price each time we
subsequently issues equity or convertible instruments at a per
share price that is less than the current conversion price (also
known as a “full ratchet down round provision”). If a
warrant is not indexed to the company’s equity, it is
classified as a derivative liability which is carried on the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value with any changes in its
fair value recognized currently in the statements of
operations.
We classified the G, H, I, J and K warrants
issued during 2016 as derivative liabilities, because they contain
full-ratchet down round provisions and report the warrants on our
consolidated balance sheets at fair value under the caption
“warrant liability” and report changes in the fair
value of the warrant liability on the consolidated statements of
operations under the caption “change in fair value of warrant
liability”.
Fair
value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and
liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based on whether
the inputs are observable in the market and the degree that the
inputs are observable. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability,
including assumptions about risk. Observable inputs are based on
market data obtained from sources independent of our company.
Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions based on the best
information available in the circumstances. The fair value
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into
three broad levels, defined as follows:
Level
1 —
|
Inputs
are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities as of the reporting date.
|
Level
2 —
|
Inputs
other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted
prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets
that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated with observable market data.
|
Level
3 —
|
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.
This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
that reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability as of the reporting date.
|
We
measured the Series G, H, I, J and K warrants we issued in 2016 at
fair value in the consolidated financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2016, using inputs classified as
“level 3” of the fair value hierarchy. We develop unobservable
“level 3” inputs using the best information available
in the circumstances, which might include our own data, or when we
believe inputs based on external data better reflect the data that
market participants would use, we base our inputs on comparison
with similar entities.
We select a valuation technique to
measure “level 3” fair values that we believe is
appropriate in the circumstances. In the case of measuring the fair
value of the Series G, H, I, J and K warrants at December 31, 2016 and
for the year then ended, due to the existence of the full
ratchet down round provision, which creates a path-dependent nature
of the exercise prices of the warrants, we decided a Monte Carlo
Simulation model, which incorporates inputs classified as
“level 3” was appropriate.
Key
inputs used in the Monte Carlo Simulation model to determine the
fair value of the Series G, H, I, J and K warrants at
December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility(1)
|
63.6%
|
79.1%
|
70.8%
|
65.8%
|
65.8%
|
Expected term
(years)
|
1.08
|
2.08
|
3.08
|
4
|
4
|
Risk free interest
rate
|
.879%
|
1.223%
|
1.489%
|
1.699%
|
1.699%
|
Common stock
price
|
$ 12.00
|
$ 12.00
|
$ 12.00
|
$ 12.00
|
$ 12.00
|
Exercise
price
|
$ 10.00
|
$ 12.00
|
$ 14.00
|
$ .03
|
$ .03
|
_____________
(1) “Level 3” input.
The
“level 3” stock volatility assumption represents the
range of the volatility curves used in the valuation analysis that
we determined market participants would use based on comparison
with similar entities. The risk-free interest rate is interpolated
where appropriate, and is based on treasury yields. The valuation
model also included a “level 3” assumption we developed
as to dates of potential future financings by us that may cause a
reset of the exercise price of the warrants.
Since
derivative financial instruments, such as the Series G, H, I, J and
K warrants, are initially and subsequently carried at fair values,
our income or loss will reflect the volatility in changes to these
estimates and assumptions. The fair value of the warrants is most
sensitive to changes at each valuation date in our common stock
price, the volatility rate assumption, and the exercise price,
which could change if we were to do a dilutive future
financing.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are
recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases using tax rates in
effect for the years in which the differences are expected to
reverse. The effects of changes in tax laws on deferred tax
balances are recognized in the period the new legislation is
enacted. Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
In assessing the likelihood of realization, management considers
estimates of future taxable income. We calculate our current and
deferred tax position based on estimates and assumptions that could
differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns
filed in subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed returns are
recorded when identified.
Tax
benefits from an uncertain tax position are only recognized if it
is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on
examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position are measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate resolution. Interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as incurred as a
component of income tax expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a
discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
BUSINESS
Overview
We are
a leading independent entertainment marketing and premium content
development company. Through our recent acquisition of 42West, we
provide expert strategic marketing and publicity services to all of
the major film studios, and many of the leading independent and
digital content providers, as well as for hundreds of A-list
celebrity talent, including actors, directors, producers, recording
artists, athletes and authors. The strategic acquisition of 42West
brings together premium marketing services with premium content
production, creating significant opportunities to
serve our respective constituents more strategically and to grow
and diversify our business. Our content production business
is a long established, leading independent producer, committed to
distributing premium, best-in-class film and digital entertainment.
We produce original feature films and digital programming primarily
aimed at family and young adult markets.
We were first
incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 7, 1995 and were
domesticated in the State of Florida on December 4, 2014. On
March 7, 2016, we acquired Dolphin Films, a content producer of
motion pictures, from Dolphin Entertainment, Inc., an entity wholly
owned by our President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr.
O’Dowd.
On
March 30, 2017, we acquired 42West, an entertainment public
relations agency offering talent publicity, strategic
communications and entertainment content marketing. As
consideration in the 42West acquisition, we paid approximately
$18.7 million in shares of common stock based on our 30-trading-day
average stock price prior to the closing date of $9.22 per
share, as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split (less
certain working capital and closing adjustments, transaction
expenses, and payments of indebtedness) plus the
potential to earn up to an additional $9.3 million in shares of
common stock. As a result, we (i) issued 615,140
shares of common stock on the closing date, 172,275
shares of common stock to certain 42West employees on April 13,
2017 and 59,320 shares of common stock as employee
stock bonuses on August 21, 2017 and (ii)
will issue 980,911 shares of common stock on January
2, 2018. In addition, we may issue up to 981,563
shares of common stock based on the achievement of specified
financial performance targets over a three-year period as set forth
in the membership interest purchase agreement.
The
principal sellers have each entered into employment agreements with
our company and will continue as employees of our company until
March 2020. The non-executive employees of 42West have been
retained as well. In connection with the 42West acquisition, we
granted the sellers the right, but not the obligation, to cause us
to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of their
shares of common stock received as consideration for a purchase
price equal to $9.22 per share, as adjusted for
the 1-to-2 reverse stock split, during certain specified
exercise periods up until December 2020.
As
a result of the 42West acquisition, we have determined that as of
the second quarter of 2017, we operate in two reportable segments,
the entertainment publicity division and the content production
division. The entertainment publicity division is comprised of
42West and provides clients with diversified services, including
public relations, entertainment content marketing and strategic
marketing consulting. The content production division is
comprised of Dolphin Films and Dolphin Digital Studios and
specializes in the production and distribution of digital content
and feature films.
Effective May 10,
2016, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to effectuate a
1-to-20 reverse stock split. Effective July 6, 2017, we amended our
Articles of Incorporation to (i) change our name to Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc.; (ii) cancel previous designations of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock; (iii) reduce the number of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock (described below) outstanding in light of our 1-to-20 reverse
stock split from 1,000,000 to 50,000 shares; and (iv) clarify the
voting rights of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock that,
except as required by law, holders of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock will only have voting rights once the independent
directors of the Board determine that an optional conversion
threshold has occurred. Effective September 14, 2017, we amended
our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effectuate a
1-to-2 reverse stock split.
Growth Opportunities
We are
focused on driving growth through the following:
Expand and grow 42West to
serve more clients with a broad array of interrelated
services. As a result of its acquisition by Dolphin,
42West now has the ability to create promotional and marketing
content for clients—a critical service for celebrities and
marketers alike in today’s digital world. We
believe that by adding content creation to
42West’s menu of capabilities, it will provide a great
opportunity to capitalize on unique synergies to drive
immediate organic growth, which will allow us to both
attract new clients and broaden our offering of billable services
to existing ones. We also believe that the skills and experience of
our 42West business in entertainment PR are readily transferable to
related business sectors—such as sports or fashion. The
growing involvement in non-entertainment businesses by many of our
existing entertainment clients has allowed 42West to establish a
presence and develop expertise outside its traditional footprint
with little risk or expense. Using this as a foundation, we are now
working to expand our involvement in these new areas.
Organically
grow through future synergies between 42West and our digital and
film productions. Adding content creation to 42West’s
menu of capabilities provides a great opportunity for immediate
growth, as it will allow us to both attract new clients and broaden
our offering of billable services to existing ones. Furthermore,
bringing marketing expertise in-house will allow us to review a
prospective digital or film project’s marketing potential
prior to making a production commitment, thus allowing our
marketing strategy to be a driver of our creative content. In
addition, for each project greenlit for production, we can
potentially create a comprehensive marketing plan before the start
of principal photography, allowing for relevant marketing assets to
be created while filming. We can also create marketing campaigns
for completed films, across all media channels, including
television, print, radio, digital and social
media.
Opportunistically grow
through more complementary acquisitions. We plan to
selectively pursue acquisitions in the future, to further enforce
our competitive advantages, scale and grow our business and
increase profitability. Our acquisition strategy is based on
identifying and acquiring companies that complement our existing
content production and entertainment
publicity businesses. We believe that complementary
businesses, such as data analytics and digital marketing, can
create synergistic opportunities and bolster profits and cash
flow.
Build a portfolio of
premium film, television and digital content. We intend to
grow and diversify our portfolio of film and digital content by
capitalizing on demand for high quality digital media and film
content throughout the world marketplace. We plan to balance our
financial risks against the probability of commercial success for
each project. We believe that our strategic focus on
content and creation of innovative content distribution strategies
will enhance our competitive position in the industry, ensure
optimal use of our capital, build a diversified foundation for
future growth and generate long-term value for our shareholders.
Finally, we believe that marketing strategies that will be
developed by 42West will drive our creative content, thus creating
greater potential for profitability.
Entertainment Publicity
42West
Through 42West, an
entertainment public relations agency, we offer talent publicity,
strategic communications and entertainment content marketing. In
addition, we provide brand marketing and digital marketing
services. Prior to its acquisition, 42West was the largest
independently-owned public relations firm in the entertainment
industry. Among other benefits, we believe that the 42West
acquisition will strengthen and complement our current content
production business, while expanding and diversifying our
operations. We believe that having marketing expertise in-house
will allow us to review a prospective project’s marketing
potential prior to making a production commitment. Furthermore, for
each project greenlit for production, we can potentially create a
comprehensive marketing plan before the start of principal
photography, allowing for relevant marketing assets to be created
while filming. Therefore, we believe the marketing of our projects
can begin much sooner than the delivery of a finished film or
series.
Our public
relations and marketing professionals at 42West develop and execute
marketing and publicity strategies for hundreds of movies and
television shows as well as for individual actors, filmmakers,
recording artists, and authors. Through 42West, we provide services
in the following areas:
Talent
We focus on
creating and implementing strategic communication campaigns for
performers and entertainers, including television and film stars,
recording artists, authors, models, athletes, and theater actors.
Our talent roster includes Oscar- and Emmy-winning actors and
Grammy-winning singers and musicians and New York Times
best-selling authors. Our services in this area include ongoing
strategic counsel, media relations, studio, network, charity,
corporate liaison and event and tour support.
Entertainment & Targeted Marketing
We provide
marketing direction, public relations counsel and media strategy
for productions (including theatrical films, DVD and VOD releases,
television programs, and online series) as well as content
producers ranging from individual filmmakers and creative artists
to production companies, film financiers, DVD distributors, and
other entities. Our capabilities include worldwide studio releases,
independent films, television programming and web productions. We
provide entertainment marketing services in connection with film
festivals, awards campaigns, event publicity and red carpet
management. In addition, we provide targeted marketing and
publicity services that are tailored to reach diverse audiences.
Our clients include major studios and independent producers for
whom we create strategic multicultural marketing campaigns and
provide strategic guidance aimed at reaching diverse
audiences.
Strategic Communications
Our strategic
communications team advises high-profile individuals and companies
faced with sensitive situations or looking to raise, reposition, or
rehabilitate their public profiles. We also help studios and
filmmakers deal with controversial movies.
Much of the
activities of our strategic communications team involve
orchestrating high-stakes communications campaigns in response to
sensitive, complex situations. We also help companies define
objectives, develop messaging, create brand identities, and
construct long-term strategies to achieve specific goals, as well
as manage functions such as media relations or internal
communications on a day-to-day basis. The strategic communications
team focuses on strategic communications counsel, corporate
positioning, brand enhancement, media relations, reputation and
issues management, litigation support and crisis management and
communications. Our clients include major studios and production
companies, record labels, sports franchises, media conglomerates,
technology companies, philanthropic organizations, talent guilds,
and trade associations as well as a wide variety of high-profile
individuals, ranging from major movie and pop stars to top
executives and entrepreneurs.
Content Production
Dolphin Digital Studios
Through
Dolphin Digital Studios, we create original content to premiere
online, in the form of "web series". Dolphin Digital Studios is
instrumental in producing and distributing our web series and
sourcing financing for our digital media projects. Premium online
and mobile video is the largest growth sector for online and mobile
advertising, with market leaders such as YouTube, Facebook, Verizon
and AT&T investing in major initiatives around original
programming.
We
target three distinct demographics for our “web series”
activities:
●
|
Tweens
(roughly 9-14 years old);
|
|
●
|
Teens
and young adults (roughly 14-24 years old); and
|
●
|
General
market (roughly 14-49 years old).
|
|
We
expect to serve each of these demographics with different content,
and we may have different distribution partners for each
demographic.
Dolphin Films
Dolphin
Films is a content producer of motion pictures. In 2016, we
released our motion picture, Max
Steel. We also own the rights to several scripts that we
intend to produce at a future date.
Production
Our
in-house development team is continuously reviewing scripts for
digital projects that are directed at one of our target
demographics and that we believe we can produce within our normal
planned budget range of $3.0 to $5.0 million. Our budget typically
includes costs associated with purchase of the script, production
of the project and marketing of the project. Occasionally, we also
hire writers to develop a script for an idea that we have
internally. From the selection provided by our development team,
our management reviews the scripts and evaluates them based on
expected appeal to advertisers, talent we think we can attract,
available budget for the production and available financing. We
normally purchase a variety of scripts which we hold for future
use. Not all scripts purchased will be produced. Some scripts
revert back to the writer if they are not produced during a
contractually agreed upon timeframe.
Once we
have a stable of scripts, we present a variety of projects, based
on these scripts, to online platforms such as Hulu, AOL, and
Yahoo!. The online platform will typically evaluate the project
based on its estimation of potential demand, considering the genre
or demographic to which they are looking to appeal. Once a project
is selected by the online platform, we enter into a distribution
agreement with the online platform that outlines, among other
things, our revenue share percentages (typically between 30% and
45%) and the length of time that the show will air on that online
platform. Based on agreements with the online platforms and
advertisers, our management then makes the decision to
“greenlight” or to approve, a project for
production.
Our
goal is also to produce young adult and family films and our
in-house development team reviews scripts for motion pictures in
this genre that can be produced within a budget range of $6.0 to
$9.0 million. Our budget includes the cost of acquiring the script
and producing the motion picture. We finance our motion pictures
with funds from investors and the financing from international
licensing agreements for the motion picture.
The
production of digital projects and motion pictures is very similar.
Once management greenlights a project, the pre-production phase,
including the hiring of a director, talent, various crew and
securing locations to film, begins. We may become signatories to
certain guilds such as Screen Actors Guild, Directors Guild of
America and Writers Guild of America in order to allow us to hire
directors and talent for our productions. We typically hire crew
members directly, engage a production service company to provide us
with, among other things, the crew, equipment and a production
office or use a combination of the two alternatives. Directors and
talent are typically compensated a base amount for their work. In
addition, directors and talent who are members of various guilds
may receive remuneration from “residuals” that we pay
to the various guilds based on the performance of our productions
in ancillary markets. To better manage our upfront production
costs, we sometimes structure our agreements with talent to allow
them to participate in the proceeds of the digital project or
motion picture in exchange for reduced upfront fixed payments,
regardless of the project’s success.
The
decision of where to produce the project is often based on
incentive tax programs implemented by many states and foreign
countries to attract film production in their jurisdictions as a
means of economic development. These incentives normally take the
form of sales tax refunds, transferable tax credits, refundable tax
credits or cash rebates that are calculated based on a percentage
spent in the jurisdiction offering the incentive. The
pre-production phase may take several months and is critical to the
success of the project.
The
length of time needed to film varies by project but is typically
between three and six weeks. Once the filming is completed, the
project will enter the post-production phase, which includes film
and sound editing, and development of special effects, as needed.
Depending on the complexity of the work to be done, post-production
may take from two to six months to complete.
In the
last five years, we produced and distributed Cybergeddon in partnership with Anthony
Zuiker, creator of CSI, Hiding, and South Beach-Fever, and were hired to
provide production services for Aim High produced by a related party in
conjunction with Warner Brothers. These productions earned various
awards including two Streamy Awards. Dolphin Films produced the
motion picture, Max Steel,
that was released in 2016.
In
2016, we entered into a co-production agreement for a new digital
project showcasing favorite restaurants of NFL players throughout
the country. Pursuant to the agreement, we were responsible for
financing 50% of the project’s budget and are entitled to 50%
of the profits. In addition, we were responsible for (a) producing;
(b) negotiating and contracting the talent; (c) securing locations;
(d) preparing the production and delivery schedules; (e)
identifying and securing digital distribution; (f) soliciting and
negotiating advertising and sponsorships; (g) legal and business
affairs and (h) managing and maintaining the production account.
The show was produced during 2016 throughout several cities
in the U.S. The show was released on Destination America, a digital
cable and satellite television channel, on September 9, 2017 and we
do not expect to derive any revenues from this initial
release.
Our
pipeline of feature films includes:
●
Youngblood, an updated version of the
1986 hockey classic;
●
Out of Their League, a romantic comedy
pitting husband versus wife in the cut-throat world of fantasy
football; and
●
Ask Me, a teen comedy in which a
high-school student starts a business to help her classmates create
elaborate Promposals.
We have completed development of each of these feature films, which
means that we have completed the script and can begin
pre-production once financing is
obtained.
Distribution
Our
digital productions for AVOD platforms have premiered on online
platforms such as Hulu and Yahoo!. Distribution agreements with
online platforms are for a limited period, typically six months.
Once the contract expires, we have the ability to distribute our
productions in ancillary markets such as through home
entertainment, SVOD (e.g. Netflix), pay television, broadcast
television, foreign and other markets. Our ability to distribute
these productions in ancillary markets is typically based on the
popularity of the project during its initial online
distribution.
Similar
to distribution of digital productions described above, the
economic life of motion pictures is comprised of different phases.
The motion picture is initially distributed in theaters. A
successful motion picture may remain in theaters for several
months, after which we have the ability to distribute the motion
picture in ancillary markets such as home entertainment, PPV, VOD,
EST, SVOD, AVOD, digital rentals, pay television, broadcast
television, foreign and other markets. Concurrent with their
release in the U.S., motion pictures are generally released in
Canada and may also be released in one or more other foreign
markets.
Theatrical
distribution refers to the marketing and commercial or retail
exploitation of motion pictures. Typically, we enter into an
agreement with a distributor to place our films in theatres for a
distribution fee. Pursuant to the agreement, the distribution fee
varies depending on whether we provide our own P&A financing or
whether the distributor finances the P&A.
In
2016, we obtained the P&A financing necessary for the
distribution and marketing costs associated with our motion
picture, Max Steel, and the
film was released domestically on October 14, 2016. The motion
picture did not perform as well as expected domestically, however,
we secured approximately $8.2 million in international distribution
agreements. As part of our domestic distribution arrangement, we
still have the ability to derive revenues from the ancillary
markets described above, although the amount of revenue derived
from such channels is typically commensurate with the performance
of the film in the domestic box office.
Financing
We have
financed our acquisition of the rights to certain digital projects
and motion picture productions through a variety of financing
structures including equity finance agreements, subscription
agreements and loan and security agreements.
We
financed our production of Max
Steel using funds from investors and loans partially
collateralized by licensing agreements for the exploitation of the
motion picture in certain international territories. Our
distribution and marketing costs were financed through financing
obtained from a lender.
Online Kids Clubs
Through
our online kids clubs we seek to partner with various organizations
to provide an online destination for entertainment and information
for kids. Through online kids club memberships, established
“brands” in the children’s space seek to expand
their existing online audience through the promotion of original
content supplied and/or sourced by Dolphin Digital
Studios.
We have
partnered with Scholastic Books to provide to schools sponsored by
a donor, a location in the school that is transformed into a
reading room, which we refer to as a Reading Oasis. Donors may
sponsor a school for $10,000 which entitles each child in the
school to receive an annual online kids club membership and
entitles the school to receive a Reading Oasis. The Reading Oasis
provides the school with hundreds of books (K-3), colorful bean bag
chairs, a reading themed carpet, book cases, a listening library,
and a stereo listening center with four headphones.
In
September 2016, we terminated, by mutual accord, our 2013 agreement
with United Way Worldwide pursuant to which we created an online
kids club to promote the organization’s philanthropic
philosophy and encourage literacy in elementary school age
children. We have retained the trademark to the online kids club
and will continue to operate the site. In February 2017, we also
terminated our 2012 agreement with US Youth Soccer Association,
Inc. pursuant to which we created, designed and hosted the US Youth
Soccer Clubhouse website.
We
operate our online kids club activities through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Dolphin Kids Club LLC. Until December 2016, 25% of
Dolphin Kids Club was owned by KCF Investments, LLC. Our agreement
with KCF encompassed kids clubs created between January 1, 2012 and
December 31, 2016. On December 29, 2016, we purchased
KCF’s 25% membership interest in Dolphin Kids Club and
Dolphin Kids Club became our wholly-owned subsidiary. During the
six months ended June 30, 2017, management decided to discontinue
the online kids clubs at the end of this year to dedicate a
majority of our time and resources to the entertainment publicity
business and the production of feature films and digital
content.
Intellectual Property
We seek
to protect our intellectual property through trademarks and
copyrights. We currently hold two trademarks for
each of Cybergeddon and 42West, two
trademarks for our online kids clubs and two copyrights for
each of Cybergeddon,
Hiding, Max Steel and Jack of all Tastes and one for
South Beach. We also own
25% of the partnership that owns the copyright to the film
Believe.
Competition
The
businesses in which we engage are highly competitive. Our
entertainment publicity business operates in a highly competitive
industry. Through 42West, we compete against other public relations
and marketing communications companies as well as independent and
niche agencies to win new clients and maintain existing client
relationships. Our content production business faces
competition from companies within the entertainment business and
from alternative forms of leisure entertainment, such as travel,
sporting events, video games and computer-related activities. We
are subject to competition from other digital media and motion
production companies as well as from large, well established
companies within the entertainment industry that have significantly
greater development, production, distribution and capital resources
than us. We compete for the acquisition of literary properties and
for the services of producers, directors, actors and other artists
as well as creative and technical personnel and production
financing, all of which are essential to the success of our
business. In addition, our productions compete for audience
acceptance and advertising dollars.
We
believe that we compete on the basis of:
●
42West’s
long and loyal list of marquee clients—42West’s clients
(upwards of 400 in 2016), including many of the world’s most
famous and acclaimed screen and pop stars, its most honored
directors and producers, every major movie studio, and virtually
every digital platform and content distributor, along with a host
of production companies and media firms as well as consumer product
marketers, is a competitive advantage given the nature of the
entertainment marketing and public relations
industry;
●
a
stable and experienced work force, led by an exceptional management
team—our CEO, Mr. O’Dowd, has a 20-year history of
producing and delivering high-quality family entertainment. In
addition, 42West’s three co-CEOs, Leslee Dart, Amanda
Lundberg, and Allan Mayer, are all longtime PR practitioners, with
decades of experience, widely regarded as being among the top
communications strategists in the entertainment industry. They lead
a staff of PR professionals that is known for both its skill and
its longevity. Staff turnover is far below industry norms, and
every one of the firm’s six managing directors has been there
for more than nine years; and
●
our
ability to offer interrelated services—we believe that the
ability to create content for our 42West clients and the ability to
internally develop and execute marketing campaigns for our digital
and film productions will allow us to expand and grow each of our
business lines;
Employees
As of
October 2, 2017, we have 88 full-time
employees in our operations, including 83 employees from 42West. We
believe our relationship with our employees is good. We also
utilize consultants in the ordinary course of our business and hire
additional employees on a project-by-project basis in connection
with the production of digital media projects or motion
pictures.
Regulatory Matters
Our
online kids clubs programs which are aimed at elementary school age
children are subject to laws and regulations relating to privacy
and child protection. Through our online kids clubs we may monitor
and collect certain information about the child users of these
forums. A variety of laws and regulations have been adopted in
recent years aimed at protecting children using the internet such
as COPPA. COPPA sets forth, among other things, a number of
restrictions on what website operators can present to children
under the age of 13 and what information can be collected from
them.
We are
also subject to state and federal work and safety laws and
disclosure obligations, under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration and similar state
organizations.
Corporate Offices
Our
corporate headquarters is located at 2151 Le Jeune Road, Suite
150-Mezzanine, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. Our telephone number is
(305) 774-0407. 42West has offices located at 600 3rd Avenue, 23rd
Floor, New York, New York, 10016 and 1840 Century Park East, Suite
700, Los Angeles, California 90067.
PROPERTIES
As of
the date of this prospectus, we do not own any real property. We
lease 3,332 square feet of office space located at 2151 Le Jeune
Road, Suite 150-Mezzanine, Coral Gables, Florida 33134, at a
monthly rate of $7,404. In 2012, we opened an
additional office located at 10866 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800,
Los Angeles, California 90024 and currently lease 4,582 square feet
of office space at a monthly rate of $13,746 with annual increases
of 3% for years 1 to 3 and 3.5% for the remainder of the lease. On
June 1, 2017, we entered into an agreement to sublease our office
in Los Angeles. The sublease agreement is through July
31, 2019 at an initial monthly rate of $14,891.50.
Commencing on the thirteenth month of the sublease, the monthly
lease rate will increase by 3%. Pursuant to the lease agreement,
the subtenant will take ownership of the furniture in the
premises.
42West
leases 12,505 square feet of office space located at 600 Third
Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, at a monthly rate of
$67,735 with increases every three years. In addition, 42West
leases 12,139 square feet of office space at 1840 Century Park
East, Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90067 at a base rate of $36,417
(commencing on 2/1/14), with annual increases of 3% per year. We
believe our current facilities are adequate for our operations for
the foreseeable future.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A
putative class action was filed on May 5, 2017, in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Florida by
Kenneth and Emily Reel on behalf of a purported nationwide class of
individuals who attended the Fyre Music Festival, or the Fyre
Festival, in the Bahamas on April 28-30, 2017. The complaint names
several defendants, including 42West, along with the organizers of
the Fyre Festival, Fyre Media Inc. and Fyre Festival LLC,
individuals related to Fyre, and another entity called Matte
Projects LLC. The complaint alleges that the Fyre Festival was
promoted by Fyre as a luxurious experience through an extensive
marketing campaign orchestrated by Fyre and executed with the
assistance of outside marketing companies, 42West and Matte, but
that the reality of the festival did not live up to the luxury
experience that it was represented to be. The plaintiffs assert
claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation and for violation of
several states’ consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs seek
to certify a nationwide class action comprised of “All
persons or entities that purchased a Fyre Festival 2017 ticket or
package or that attended, or planned to attend, Fyre Festival
2017” and seek damages in excess of $5,000,000 on behalf of
themselves and the class. The plaintiffs sought to
consolidate this action with five other class actions also arising
out of the Fyre Festival (to which 42West is not a party) in a
Multi District Litigation, or MDL, proceeding, which request
was denied by the Judicial Panel on Multi District
Litigation. On July 28, 2017, 42West filed a
motion to dismiss the putative class action. On September 19,
2017, one of the defendants filed a cross-claim against all other
named defendants seeking indemnity and contribution. On
October 2, 2017, 42West filed a motion to dismiss the
cross-claim. We
believe the claims against 42West are without merit and that we
have strong defenses to the claims.
In
addition, we are involved in various legal proceedings relating to
claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not
believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity.
MANAGEMENT
Our
directors and our executive officers and the positions held
by each of them are as follows:
Directors and Director Nominees
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATION
|
William
O’Dowd, IV
|
|
48
|
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Michael
Espensen
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
Nelson
Famadas
|
|
44
|
|
Director
|
Allan
Mayer
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
Mirta A
Negrini
|
|
53
|
|
Director,
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
|
Justo
Pozo
|
|
60
|
|
Director
|
Nicholas
Stanham, Esq.
|
|
49
|
|
Director
|
Executive Officers
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATION
|
William
O’Dowd, IV
|
|
48
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
Mirta A
Negrini
|
|
53
|
|
Chief
Financial and Operating Officer
|
William O’Dowd,
IV. Mr. O’Dowd has served as our Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of our Board since June 2008. Mr. O’Dowd
founded Dolphin Entertainment, LLC in 1996 and has
served as its President since that date. In 2016, we acquired
Dolphin Films, Inc., a content producer of motion pictures, from
Dolphin Entertainment, LLC. Past television series
credits for Mr. O’Dowd include serving as Executive Producer
of Nickelodeon’s worldwide top-rated series Zoey101 (Primetime Emmy-Award
nominated) and Ned’s
Declassified School Survival Guide, as well as
Nickelodeon’s first ever musical, Spectacular! In addition, Mr.
O’Dowd produced the first season of Raising Expectations, a 26-episode
family sitcom. Raising
Expectations won the 2017 KidScreen Award for Best New
Tween/Teen Series, the global children’s television
industry’s highest honor.
Qualifications. The Board nominated Mr.
O’Dowd to serve as a director because of his current and
prior senior executive and management experience at our company and
his significant industry experience, including having founded
Dolphin Entertainment, LLC, a leading entertainment
company specializing in children’s and young adult’s
live-action programming.
Michael Espensen.
Mr. Espensen has served on our Board since June 2008. From 2009 to
2014, Mr. Espensen served as Chief Executive Officer of Keraplast
Technologies, LLC, a private multi-million dollar commercial-stage
biotechnology company. From 2009 to present, Mr. Espensen has also
served as Chairman of the Board of Keraplast. While serving as
Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Espensen was responsible for
overseeing and approving Keraplast’s annual budgets and
financial statements. Mr. Espensen is also a producer and
investor in family entertainment for television and feature films.
Between 2006 and 2009, Mr. Espensen was Executive or Co-Executive
Producer of twelve made-for-television movies targeting children
and family audiences. As Executive Producer, he approved production
budgets and then closely monitored actual spending to ensure that
productions were not over budget. Mr. Espensen has also been a
real estate developer and investor for over thirty
years.
Qualifications. The Board nominated Mr.
Espensen to serve as a director because of his business management
and financial oversight experience both as the current Chairman and
former Chief Executive Officer of a multi-million dollar company
and as a former Executive Producer in the made-for-television movie
industry, as well as his valuable knowledge of our
industry.
Nelson
Famadas. Mr. Famadas has served on our Board since December
2014. Since 2015, he has served as President of Cien, a marketing
firm that serves the Hispanic market. Prior to Cien, Mr. Famadas
served as Senior Vice President of National Latino Broadcasting
from July 2011 to May 2015. NLB is an independent Hispanic media
company that owns and operates two satellite radio channels on
SiriusXM. From July 2010 to March 2012, Mr. Famadas served as
our Chief Operating Officer, where he was responsible for daily
operations including public filings and investor relations.
Mr. Famadas began his career at MTV Networks, specifically MTV
Latin America, ultimately serving as New Business Development
Manager. From 1995 through 2001, he co-founded and managed
Astracanada Productions, a television production company that
catered mostly to the Hispanic audience, creating over 1,300 hours
of programming. As Executive Producer, he received a Suncoast EMMY
in 1997 for Entertainment Series for A Oscuras Pero Encendidos.
Mr. Famadas has over 20 years of experience in television and
radio production, programming, operations, sales and
marketing.
Qualifications. The Board nominated
Mr. Famadas to serve as a director because of his significant
prior management experience as a co-founder and former manager of a
television production company and senior vice president of a
broadcasting firm, as well as his current management experience
with a marketing firm.
Allan Mayer. Mr.
Mayer has served on our Board since June 2017. He has served
as a Co-Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, 42West,
since March 2017. Previously, he served as Principal
of 42West from October 2006 until its acquisition by our company in
March 2017. Previously, from 1997 until October 2006,
Mr. Mayer was managing director and head of the entertainment
practice at the crisis communications firm Sitrick and Company.
Mr. Mayer began his professional life as a journalist, working
as a staff reporter for The Wall
Street Journal; a writer, foreign correspondent and senior
editor for Newsweek, and
the founding editor (and later publisher) of Buzz magazine. He also served as
editorial director of Arbor House Publishing Co. and senior editor
of Simon & Schuster. Mr. Mayer has authored two books
Madam Prime Minister: Margaret
Thatcher and Her Rise to Power (Newsweek Books, 1980) and
Gaston's War (Presidio
Press, 1987)—and is co-author, with Michael S. Sitrick, of
Spin: How To Turn The Power of the
Press to Your Advantage (Regnery, 1998). In addition, he has
written for a wide variety of national publications, ranging from
The New York Times Magazine
to Vogue. Mr. Mayer is a
recipient of numerous professional honors, including the National
Magazine Award, the Overseas Press Club Citation of Excellence, and
six William Allen White Awards. Mr. Mayer serves on the board of
directors of Film Independent and has lectured on crisis management
and communications at UCLA’s Anderson School of Business and
USC's Annenberg School of Communication. From December 2007 to
January 2016, Mr. Mayer served as a director and member of the
compensation and nominating and governance committees of American
Apparel Inc., a public company. In connection with the 42West
acquisition, our Board agreed to nominate a director selected by
the sellers of 42West. In addition, Mr. O’Dowd entered into
an agreement with the sellers to vote his beneficially owned shares
of common stock to elect such nominee. As of April 20, 2017, the
record date of the annual meeting of shareholders, Mr. O'Dowd owned
17.3% of our outstanding common stock. The sellers selected Mr.
Mayer as their candidate for election to our
Board.
Qualifications. The Board
believes Mr. Mayer is qualified to serve as a
director based on his management experience as a founding
principal of 42West as well as his significant experience in the
entertainment marketing and public relations industry.
Mirta A Negrini. Ms.
Negrini has served on our Board since December 2014 and as our
Chief Financial and Operating Officer since October 2013. Ms.
Negrini has over thirty years of experience in both private and
public accounting. Immediately prior to joining us, she served
since 1996 as a named partner in Gilman & Negrini, P.A., an
accounting firm of which our company was a client. Ms. Negrini is a
Certified Public Accountant licensed in the State of
Florida.
Qualifications. The Board nominated Ms.
Negrini to serve as a director because of her significant
accounting experience gained as a named partner at an accounting
firm.
Justo
Pozo. Mr. Pozo
has served on our Board since June 2017. He is the
Chairman of Pozo Capital Partners, LLC, a family-owned equity
investment fund, focusing in the areas of entertainment, finance
and real estate. Previously, until May 2012, Mr. Pozo was
Co-Founder and President of Preferred Care Partners, Inc., one of
the largest privately owned Healthcare Maintenance Organizations in
Florida until it was acquired by United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Under his leadership, Preferred became one of South Florida’s
fastest growing private companies in 2003, being ranked 67 out of
500 privately held companies in South Florida by South Florida CEO magazine in 2007.
Preferred was also the recipient of South Florida’s Good to
Great Award given by the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce. During
his tenure at Preferred, he received numerous recognitions
including the induction into Florida International
University’s College of Business Entrepreneurial Hall of Fame
and the Miami Dade College Hall of Fame. He was selected by the
South Florida Business
Journal as a Heavy Hitter in the Health Care industry and
was a finalist for the same publications Excellence in Health Care
Award. In 2008, he received the prestigious Torch Award for
Distinguished Alumnus for the College of Business Administration of
Florida International University. Mr. Pozo is a Certified Public
Accountant licensed in the State of Florida. In March 2015, he was
appointed by the Florida Board of Governors, as Trustee to the
Florida International University Board of Trustees.
Qualifications. The Board nominated Mr.
Pozo to serve as a director because of his leadership experience as
a founder and President of an entity that experienced significant
growth and because of his background in accounting.
Nicholas Stanham,
Esq. Mr. Stanham has served on our Board since December
2014. Mr. Stanham is a founding partner of R&S International
Law Group, LLP in Miami, Florida, which was founded in January
2008. His practice is focused primarily in real estate and
corporate structuring. Mr. Stanham has over 20 years of experience
in real estate purchases and sales of residential and commercial
properties. Since 2004, Mr. Stanham has been a member of the
Christopher Columbus High School board of directors. In addition,
he serves as a director of ReachingU, a foundation that promotes
initiatives and supports organizations that offer educational
opportunities to Uruguayans living in poverty.
Qualifications. The Board nominated Mr.
Stanham to serve as a director because of his experience as a
founding partner at a law firm as well as his business management
experience at that firm.
Significant
Employees
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATION
|
Leslee
Dart
|
|
63
|
|
Co-Chief Executive
Officer of 42West
|
Amanda
Lundberg
|
|
52
|
|
Co-Chief Executive
Officer of 42West
|
Leslee Dart. Ms.
Dart has served as a Co-Chief Executive Officer of 42West since
March 2017. Ms. Dart co-heads 42West’s Talent Division and
co-heads its Entertainment Marketing Division. Ms. Dart has
directed the publicity campaigns for more than 300 motion pictures
and television shows. Ms. Dart and her team also
represent numerous individual actors and entertainers. A recipient
of the 2009 New York Women in Communications Matrix Award for
excellence in Public Relations, Ms. Dart began her career at Rogers
& Cowan, a marketing and public relations agency. In 1981, she
joined PMK, a marketing and public relations agency, eventually
becoming its President. In 2004, she founded The Dart Group, which
later became 42West. Ms. Dart attended the University of Southern
California and received a degree in public relations from the
School of Journalism, with a minor in fine
arts.
Amanda Lundberg. Ms.
Lundberg has served as a Co-Chief Executive Officer of 42West since
March 2017. Ms. Lundberg co-heads 42West’s Entertainment
Marketing Division. Ms. Lundberg has been instrumental in
developing and overseeing hundreds of film-release campaigns,
awards campaigns, festival launches, and publicity initiatives for
studios, financing and production companies as well as for
individual filmmakers and talent. Ms. Lundberg also represents a
diverse slate of actors, directors, writers, and producers. In
addition, Ms. Lundberg has played a pioneering role in helping
filmmakers and financiers self-distribute their films. Prior to
joining 42West in 2005, Ms. Lundberg was Executive Vice President
of Worldwide Public Relations at Miramax, a global film and
television studio, developing and overseeing publicity campaigns
for major motion pictures. From 1995 to 2001, Ms. Lundberg also
served as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Publicity at
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, a leading entertainment company, where she
oversaw the studio’s international public relations
efforts.
There is no family
relationship between any of our directors, executive officers and
significant employees. None of our directors, officers or
significant employees has been involved in any material legal
proceedings in the past ten years.
Director Independence
We are
not listed on a national securities exchange; however, we have
elected to use the definition of independence under the NASDAQ
listing requirements in determining the independence of our
directors and nominees for director. In 2017, our Board undertook a
review of director independence, which included a review of each
director and director nominee’s responses to questionnaires
inquiring about any relationships with us. This review was designed
to identify and evaluate any transactions or relationships between
a director, or director nominee or any member of his or her
immediate family and us, or members of our senior management or
other members of our Board, and all relevant facts and
circumstances regarding any such transactions or relationships.
Based on its review, our Board determined that
Messrs. Espensen, Famadas, Pozo and Stanham are independent.
Messrs. O’Dowd and Mayer and Ms. Negrini are not independent
under NASDAQ’s independence standards, its compensation
committee independence standards or its nominations committee
independence standards.
In
making a determination of independence with respect to director
nominee, Mr. Pozo, our Board considered (i) Mr. Pozo’s
various past investments in our digital productions, which we refer
to as the Investments, and his receipt of interest income from such
investments, as well as the fact that Mr. Pozo is in the business
of making investments to other companies similar to ours, and has
participated in such Investments on substantially similar terms as
all other investors and has not received any preferential terms or
payment arrangements and (ii) Mr. Pozo’s beneficial ownership
of approximately 13% of our outstanding common stock as of April
17, 2017. Our Board determined that such Investments and beneficial
ownership would not impair Mr. Pozo’s independence from our
company.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation
awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers
during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
William
O’Dowd, IV (1)
|
|
2016
|
250,000
|
—
|
377,403(2)
|
627,403
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2015
|
250,000
|
—
|
574,947
|
824,947
|
Mirta A
Negrini
|
|
2016
|
200,000
|
—
|
—
|
200,000
|
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
|
|
2015
|
150,000
|
50,000
|
—
|
200,000
|
____________________________
(1)
For
2016, we accrued the full amount of Mr. O’Dowd’s salary
of $250,000 but did not make any payments on this
amount.
(2)
This
amount includes life insurance in the amount of $48,384, interest
paid on accrued and unpaid compensation in the amount of $212,066
and interest paid on the revolving promissory note in the amount of
$116,953 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. In March
2016, Dolphin exchanged $3,073,410 aggregate amount of principal
and interest outstanding under the revolving promissory note for
shares of our common stock. For additional information on the
revolving promissory note, please see “Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions.”
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
None of
the executive officers named in the table above had any outstanding
equity awards as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Director Compensation
In
2016, we did not pay compensation to any of our directors in
connection with their service on our Board.
Mirta A Negrini Employment Arrangement
On
October 21, 2013, we appointed Ms. Negrini as our Chief Financial
and Operating Officer, at an annual base salary of $150,000. In
2016, Ms. Negrini’s annual base salary was increased to
$200,000. The terms of Ms. Negrini’s employment arrangement
do not provide for any payments in connection with her resignation,
retirement or other termination, or a change in control, or a
change in her responsibilities following a change in
control.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The
table below shows the beneficial ownership as of October 2,
2017, of our common stock and our Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock held by each of our directors, named executive
officers, all current directors and executive officers as a group
and each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than
5% of our outstanding common stock and 5% of our
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. The percentages in the table
below are based on 9,367,065 shares of common stock
outstanding and 50,000 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding as of October 2, 2017.
Shares of common stock that will be issuable upon conversion of the
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are not included in such
calculation as the Board has not determined that an optional
conversion threshold (as defined below) has occurred. The Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible in accordance with the
terms set forth in our Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation as amended, described in the section
of this prospectus titled “Description of
Securities.”
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated
under the Exchange Act. Except as indicated by footnote and subject
to community property laws, where applicable, to our knowledge the
persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment
power with respect to all shares of common stock that are shown as
beneficially owned by them. In computing the number of shares owned
by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, any such
shares subject to warrants or other convertible securities held by
that person that were exercisable as of October 2,
2017 or that will become exercisable within 60 days
thereafter are deemed outstanding for purposes of that
person’s percentage ownership but not deemed outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Except as required by law, holders of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock will only have voting rights once the independent
directors of the Board determine that an optional conversion
threshold has occurred.
Common Stock
Name and Address
of Owner(1)
|
# of Shares
of
Common
Stock
|
% of
Class
(Common
Stock)
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
William
O’Dowd, IV(2)
|
1,625,843
|
17.4%
|
Michael
Espensen
|
278
|
*
|
Nelson
Famadas
|
1,993
|
*
|
Allan
Mayer(3)
|
154,867
|
1.7 %
|
Mirta A
Negrini
|
––
|
*
|
Justo
Pozo(4)
|
1,215,332
|
13.0%
|
Nicholas Stanham,
Esq.(5)
|
14,334
|
*
|
All Directors and
Executive Officers as a Group (7 persons)
|
3,012,646
|
32.2%
|
5% Holders
|
|
|
Stephen L.
Perrone(6)
|
2,050,000
|
21.5%
|
T Squared Partners
LP(7)
|
952,000
|
9.9%
|
Alvaro and Lileana
de Moya(8)
|
603,742
|
6.4%
|
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock
Name and Address
of Owner(1)
|
# of Shares of Preferred
Stock
|
% of
Class
(Preferred
Stock)
|
William
O’Dowd, IV(9)
|
50,000
|
100%
|
* Less
than 1% of outstanding shares.
(1)
|
Unless otherwise
indicated, the address of each shareholder is c/o Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc., 2151 Le Jeune Road, Suite 150, Mezzanine,
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134.
|
(2)
|
The amount shown
includes (1) 621,052 shares of common stock held by Dolphin Digital
Media Holdings LLC, which is wholly-owned by Mr. O’Dowd, (2)
527,841 shares of common stock held by Dolphin Entertainment, LLC,
which is wholly-owned by Mr. O’Dowd and (3) 476,950 shares of
common stock held by Mr. O’Dowd individually. Does not
include shares of common stock that are issuable upon conversion of
the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock upon the determination by
the independent directors of the Board that an optional conversion
threshold has occurred. In accordance with the terms of our Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, each share of
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible into one
half of a share of common stock, subject to adjustment for each
issuance of common stock (but not upon issuance of common stock
equivalents) that occurred, or occurs, from the date of issuance of
the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “issue
date”) until the fifth (5th) anniversary of the issue date
(i) upon the conversion or exercise of any instrument issued on the
issue date or thereafter issued (but not upon the conversion of the
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock), (ii) upon the exchange of
debt for shares of common stock, or (iii) in a private placement,
such that the total number of shares of common stock held by an
“Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder” (based on the
number of shares of common stock held as of the date of issuance)
will be preserved at the same percentage of shares of common stock
outstanding held by such Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder on
such date. An Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder means any of
(i) Dolphin Entertainment, LLC for so long as Mr. O’Dowd
continues to beneficially own at least 90% and serves on the board
of directors or other governing entity, (ii) any other entity in
which Mr. O’Dowd beneficially owns more than 90%, or a trust
for the benefit of others, for which Mr. O’Dowd serves as
trustee and (iii) Mr. O’Dowd individually. Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock will only be convertible by the
Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder upon our company satisfying
one of the “optional conversion thresholds”.
Specifically, a majority of the independent directors of the Board,
in its sole discretion, must have determined that our company
accomplished any of the following (i) EBITDA of more than $3.0
million in any calendar year, (ii) production of two feature films,
(iii) production and distribution of at least three web series,
(iv) theatrical distribution in the United States of one feature
film, or (v) any combination thereof that is subsequently approved
by a majority of the independent directors of the Board based on
the strategic plan approved by the Board. While certain events may
have occurred that could be deemed to have satisfied this criteria,
the independent directors of the Board have not yet determined that
an optional conversion threshold has occurred.
|
(3)
|
The amount shown is
beneficially owned by Mr. Mayer and is held by the Mayer-Vogel
Trust, for which Mr. Mayer serves as
trustee.
|
(4)
|
The amount shown
includes: (i) 508,869 shares held by Pozo Opportunity Fund I, LLC;
(ii) 342,115 shares held by Pozo Opportunity Fund II, LLC; (iii)
336,945 shares held by Pozo Capital Partners, LLC; (iv) 938 shares
held by the Zulita Pina Irrevocable Trust; (v) 875 shares held by
Justo Pozo ACF Ricardo S. Pozo U/FI/UTMA; (vi) 625 shares held by
the Carolina Pozo Roth IRA; and (vii) 24,966 shares held by Justo
Luis and Sylvia E. Pozo. Mr. Pozo is the beneficial owner of all of
the shares and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect
to all of the shares except for (i) 24,966 shares with respect to
which he shares voting and dispositive power with his spouse, (ii)
1,500 shares with respect to which he shares voting and dispositive
power with his children; and (iii) 336,945 shares held by Pozo
Capital Partners, LLC with respect to which Mr. Pozo shares voting
and dispositive power with his spouse and
children.
|
(5)
|
Mr. Stanham shares
voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares of
common stock with his spouse.
|
(6)
|
The amount shown
includes: (i) 1,235,000 shares held by KCF Investments LLC; (ii)
385,000 shares held by BBCF 2011 LLC; (iii) 225,000 shares held by
BBCD LLC; (iv) 5,000 shares held by Mr. Perrone as an individual;
and (v) 25,000 shares held by Strocar Investments LLC. The amount
shown also includes 175,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of a
common stock purchase warrant that is exercisable within 60 days
after October 2, 2017. Stephen L. Perrone (4450 US Highway #1, Vero
Beach, FL 32967) is the beneficial owner of all of the shares and
has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the
shares.
|
(7)
|
The amount shown is
based upon: (i) 12,115 shares issuable upon the exercise of a Class
E Warrant; (ii) 175,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of a
Class F Warrant; (iii) 750,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
a Class G Warrant; (iv) 250,000 shares issuable upon the exercise
of a Class H Warrant; (v) 250,000 shares issuable upon the exercise
of a Class I Warrant; and (vi) 15,089 shares held by Mark Jensen
and/or Thomas M. Suave and related entities owned by Mark Jensen
and/or Thomas M. Suave. Each of the warrants is
convertible/exercisable within 60 days after October 2, 2017, to
the extent that after giving effect to such conversion/exercise,
the holder (together with the holder’s affiliates) would not
beneficially own in excess of 9.9% of the number of shares of
common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such
conversion/exercise. Mark Jensen and Thomas M. Suave are both
principals of T Squared Partners LP (P.O. Box 606, Fishers, IN
46038) and are each deemed to have beneficial ownership of all the
shares. Mr. Jensen and Mr. Suave have shared voting and dispositive
power over all shares beneficially owned by T Squared Partners
LP.
|
(8)
|
The amount shown
includes: (i) 75,000 shares held by the Alvaro de Moya Revocable
Trust; (ii) 75,000 shares held by the Lileana de Moya Revocable
Trust; (iii) 100,000 shares held by the Lileana de Moya Lifetime
Trust; (iv) 10,000 shares held by the Alvaro de Moya Grantor
Retained Annuity Trust; and (v) 343,742 held by Alvaro and Lileana
de Moya. Alvaro and Lileana
de Moya serve as trustees for these entities and have shared voting
and dispositive power over all the shares beneficially
owned.
|
(9)
|
The Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock are held by Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
which is wholly-owned by Mr. O’Dowd.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
William O’Dowd, IV
On
December 31, 2011, we issued an unsecured revolving promissory note
to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC, an entity wholly owned
by our CEO, Mr. O’Dowd. The revolving promissory note accrued
interest at a rate of 10% per annum. Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC had the right at any time to demand that all
outstanding principal and accrued interest be repaid with a ten day
notice to us. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014,
Dolphin Entertainment, LLC advanced $2,797,000 and
$166,000 and was repaid $3,267,000 and $2,096,856, respectively in
principal. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC advanced $270,000. On March 4,
2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC, pursuant to which we and Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC agreed to convert $1,920,600 of
principal balance and $1,152,809 of accrued interest outstanding
under the revolving promissory note into 307,341
shares of common stock. The shares were converted at a price of
$10.00 per share. During the years ended December 31,
2016, 2015 and 2014, $32,008, $340,050 and $368,709, respectively,
were expensed in interest and we recorded accrued interest of
$5,788, $1,126,590 and $786,007, related to the revolving
promissory note, on our consolidated balance sheets as of December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014, the outstanding balances under the revolving
promissory note were $0, $1,982,267 and $2,451,767 respectively.
The largest aggregate balance that we owed to Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was
$3,112,658, $5,313,757 and $4,839,620
respectively.
On
April 1, 2013, we entered into an agreement with Dolphin Films,
which at the time was indirectly, wholly owned by our
CEO. We were responsible for rendering management and
production services to the related party. The terms of
the agreement were for a period between April 1, 2013 and December
31, 2014 for an annual fee of $2,000,000. The agreement
was not subsequently renewed.
Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC has previously advanced funds for
working capital to Dolphin Films, its former subsidiary which we
acquired in March 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015,
Dolphin Films agreed to enter into second loan and security
agreements with certain of Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC’s debtholders, pursuant to which the
debtholders exchanged their Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
notes for notes issued by Dolphin Films totaling $8,774,327. The
amount of debt assumed by Dolphin Films was applied against amounts
owed to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC by Dolphin Films. On October 1,
2016, Dolphin Films entered into a promissory note with Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC, in the principal amount of
$1,009,624. The note is payable on demand and bears interest at a
rate of 10% per annum. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, Dolphin
Films owed Dolphin Entertainment, LLC $434,326 and
$1,612,357, respectively, of principal and $19,652 and $1,305,166,
respectively, of accrued interest, that was recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets. Dolphin Films recorded interest
expense of $83,551 and $148,805, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015. During the six months ended June 30,
2017, we agreed to include certain script costs and other payables
totaling $594,315 that were owed to Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC in the note. During the six months
ended June 30, 2017, we received proceeds related to
the note from Dolphin Entertainment, LLC in the amount
of $1,297,000 and repaid Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC $506,981. As of June 30, 2017,
Dolphin Films owed Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
$1,818,661 that was recorded on the consolidated
balance sheets. Dolphin Films recorded interest expense of
$67,418 for the six months ended
June 30, 2017. The largest aggregate balance
Dolphin Films owed Dolphin Entertainment, LLC during 2016 and 2015
was $2,734,094 and $8,697,877, respectively.
On
September 7, 2012, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr.
O’Dowd, which was subsequently renewed for a period of two
years, effective January 1, 2015. The agreement provided for an
annual salary of $250,000 and a one-time bonus of $1,000,000.
Unpaid compensation accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As
of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we had a balance of $735,211,
$523,145 and $336,633, respectively of accrued interest and
$2,250,000, $2,000,000 and $1,750,000, respectively of accrued
compensation related to this agreement. We recorded $212,066,
$186,513 and $161,513 of interest expense for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The largest aggregate balance
we owed Mr. O’Dowd during 2016 and
2015 was $2,250,000 and $2,000,000
respectively.
During
2015, we agreed to pay Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
$250,000 for a script that it had developed for a web series that
we produced during 2015.
As
previously mentioned, on March 7, 2016, we acquired Dolphin Films
from Dolphin Entertainment, LLC. As consideration, we
issued to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC 2,300,000 shares
of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share
and 50,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock, par value $0.001 per share. On November 15, 2016, Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC converted the Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock into 1,092,500 shares of
our common stock. As Mr. O’Dowd is the sole owner of Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC, he is deemed the beneficial owner
of such shares of common stock.
Michael Espensen
On
December 31, 2011, we executed an unsecured promissory note in
favor of our director, Mr. Espensen, in the amount of $104,612
bearing interest at 10% per annum and payable on
demand. On the same day, we issued a payment in the
amount of $14,612 to reduce the principal. We completed
making payments of principal and interest in August 2014 and paid
$104,612 in principal and $16,389 of interest over the life of the
loan.
Allan
Mayer
On September 20,
2017, we executed an unsecured promissory note in favor of our
director, Mr. Mayer, in the amount of $150,000. The promissory note
accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum with a maturity date of
September 20, 2018. As of October 2, 2017, no principal or interest
has been paid on the note and the largest principal amount since
the date of issuance of the note has been
$150,000.
Justo Pozo
During
2016, we entered into three separate debt exchange agreements with
entities under the control of our director, Justo
Pozo, to exchange promissory notes with an aggregate principal and
interest balance of $8,148,145 into
814,814 shares of our common stock at
$10.00 per share. The promissory notes accrued
interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12.5% per annum. Mr. Pozo
was the holder of a convertible note that mandatorily and
automatically converted into common stock, at the conversion price
of $10.00 per share, upon the average market price per
share of common stock being greater than or equal to the conversion
price for twenty trading days. During 2016, such triggering event
occurred and the convertible note was converted into
316,400 shares of our common stock.
Nicholas Stanham
In
March 2016, we entered into a debt exchange agreement with our
director, Mr. Stanham, pursuant to which we exchanged a promissory
note in the amount of $50,000 for 5,564 shares of our
common stock, as payment in full of the promissory note. The
promissory note accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The
shares of common stock were converted at a price of
$10.00 per share.
T Squared Partners LP
In
connection with the merger whereby we acquired Dolphin Films, we
entered into a preferred stock exchange agreement with
T Squared Partners LP, pursuant to which, on March 7, 2016, we
issued 1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock to T Squared in exchange for 1,042,753 shares
of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, previously issued to
T Squared. On November 16, 2016, T Squared converted the
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 475,000
shares of our common stock.
On
November 4, 2016, we issued Class G, Class H and Class I Warrants
to T Squared that entitle T Squared to purchase up to
1,250,000 shares of our common stock. The warrants
have a maximum exercise provision that prohibit T Squared from
exercising warrants that would cause it to exceed 9.99% of our
outstanding shares of common stock, unless the restriction is
waived or amended, by the mutual consent of us and T
Squared.
In
September 2015, T Squared extended its Class E and Class F Warrants
until December 31, 2018. On April 13, 2017, T Squared
partially exercised Class E Warrants and acquired
162,885 shares of our common stock pursuant to the
cashless exercise provision in the related warrant agreement. T
Squared had previously paid down $1,675,000 for these
shares.
Stephen L. Perrone
In
December 2016, we and entities affiliated with Stephen L. Perrone
entered into: (i) a debt exchange agreement to exchange promissory
notes in the aggregate amount of $6,470,990 for shares of our
common stock and (ii) a purchase agreement to acquire a 25%
membership interest of Dolphin Kids Clubs owned by the affiliated
entity. The promissory notes accrued interest at rates ranging from
11.25% to $13.25% per annum. Pursuant to the agreements, we issued
a Class J Warrant that entitled Mr. Perrone to purchase up to
1,085,000 shares of our common stock at a price of
$0.03 per share through December 29, 2020. In
addition, we issued to an entity affiliated with Mr. Perrone a
Class K Warrant as consideration to terminate an equity finance
agreement in the amount of $564,000. The Class K Warrant entitled
Mr. Perrone to purchase up to 85,000 shares of our
common stock at a price of $0.03 per share prior to
December 29, 2020. On March 31, 2017, Mr. Perrone’s
affiliated entities exercised the Class J and Class K Warrants at
an aggregate purchase price of $35,100 and acquired
1,170,000 shares of our common stock.
Alvaro and Lileana De Moya
During
2016, we entered into two separate debt exchange agreements with
Alvaro and Lileana De Moya to convert two promissory notes entered
into in 2013 and 2015, with an aggregate balance of $3,437,414 of
principal and interest into 343,742 shares of our
common stock at a price of $10.00 per share. The
promissory notes accrued interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to
12.5% per annum. In addition, we entered into a subscription
agreement with the De Moya’s in which they purchased
260,000 shares of our common stock at
$10.00 per share.
All related person transactions must be reviewed and approved by
our audit committee. Current SEC rules define transactions with
related persons to include any transaction, arrangement or
relationship (i) in which we are a participant, (ii) in which the
amount involved exceeds $120,000, and (iii) in which any executive
officer, director, director nominee, beneficial owner of more than
5% of our common stock, or any immediate family member of such
persons has or will have a direct or indirect material
interest.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
The
following is a brief description of our capital stock. This summary
does not purport to be complete in all respects. This description
is subject to and qualified entirely by the terms of our Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as
amended, which we refer to as our Articles of Incorporation,
and our Bylaws, copies of which have been filed with the Commission
and are also available upon request from us.
Our
authorized capital stock currently consists of
200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.015
per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share, in one or more series. Of such preferred stock,
50,000 have been designated Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of October
2, 2017, we had outstanding
9,367,057 shares of our common stock
and 50,000 shares of our Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock. At that date, we had an aggregate of
1,612,115 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase common stock. Shares
of our common stock are also issuable upon the conversion of 50,000
shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. For a
discussion of the conditions upon which the shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock become convertible, and the number of
shares of common stock into which such preferred stock would be
convertible upon satisfaction of such conditions, see “Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock” below. In connection with our
42West acquisition (i) we will issue
980,911 shares of our common stock to the sellers on
January 2, 2018 and (ii) we may issue up to
981,563 shares of our common stock to the sellers
based on the achievement of specified financial performance targets
over a three-year period as set forth in the membership interest
purchase agreement. In addition, we granted the sellers the right,
but not the obligation, to cause us to purchase up to an aggregate
of 1,187,094 of their shares of common stock received
as consideration, for a purchase price of $9.22 per
share, as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split,
during certain specified exercise periods up until December 2020.
As of the date of this prospectus, we have repurchased
116,591 shares of common stock from the sellers
pursuant to the put options. In addition, 78,757
shares of our common stock are issuable upon the conversion of
seven convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal
amount of $725,000 (calculated based
on the 90-trading day average price per share as of October 2,
2017). For a discussion of the terms of conversion of the
promissory notes and the number of common stock into which such
promissory notes would be convertible, see “Convertible
Promissory Notes” below.
Effective May 10,
2016, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to effectuate a
1-to-20 reverse stock split. Effective July 6, 2017, we amended our
Articles of Incorporation to (i) change our name to Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc.; (ii) cancel previous designations of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock; (iii) reduce the number of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock (described below) outstanding in light of our 1-to-20 reverse
stock split from 1,000,000 to 50,000 shares; and (iv) clarify the
voting rights of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock that,
except as required by law, holders of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock will only have voting rights once the independent
directors of the Board determine that an optional conversion
threshold has occurred. Effective September 14, 2017, we amended
our Articles of Incorporation to effectuate a 1-to-2 reverse stock
split.
Units
Each unit consists
of one share of common stock, par value $0.015 per share, and one
warrant to purchase share of our
common stock, each as described further below. The common stock and
warrants will be immediately separable and will be issued
separately.
Common Stock
The
holders of our common stock are generally entitled to one vote for
each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of the
shareholders and do not have any cumulative voting rights. Unless
otherwise required by Florida law, once a quorum is present,
matters presented to shareholders, except for the election of
directors, will be approved by a majority of the votes cast. The
election of directors is determined by a plurality of the votes
cast.
Holders
of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends if, as and
when declared by the Board out of funds legally available for that
purpose, subject to preferences that may apply to any preferred
stock that we issue. In the event of our dissolution or
liquidation, after satisfaction of all our debts and liabilities
and distributions to the holders of any preferred stock that we
issued, or may issue in the future, of amounts to which they are
preferentially entitled, the holders of common stock will be
entitled to share ratably in the distribution of assets to the
shareholders.
There
are no cumulative, subscription or preemptive rights to subscribe
for any additional securities which we may issue, and there are no
redemption provisions, conversion provisions or sinking fund
provisions applicable to the common stock. The rights of holders of
common stock are subject to the rights, privileges, preferences and
priorities of any class or series of preferred stock.
Our
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws do not restrict the ability of
a holder of our common stock to transfer his or her shares of our
common stock.
All
shares of our common stock will, when issued, be duly authorized,
fully paid and nonassessable. The shares to be issued by us in this
offering, and the shares to be issued by us upon exercise of the
warrants to be issued in this offering in accordance with the terms
of the warrants, will be when issued and paid for, validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable.
Preferred Stock
Our
Board, without further approval of the shareholders, is authorized
to fix the designations, powers, including voting powers,
preferences and the relative, participating, optional or other
special rights, if any, of the shares of each class or series and
any qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, including
dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, sinking-fund
provisions, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences,
preemption rights, and the number of shares constituting any series
or the designation of such series. The issuance of preferred stock,
while providing flexibility in connection with possible
acquisitions and other corporate purposes could, among other
things, adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the
holders of our common stock and, under certain circumstances, make
it more difficult for a third party to gain control of us,
discourage bids for our common stock at a premium or otherwise
adversely affect the market price of the common stock.
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
On
February 23, 2016, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to
designate 1,000,000 preferred shares as Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock with a $0.001 par value per share which may be
issued only to an “Eligible Series C Preferred Stock
Holder” as described below. As previously discussed, as part
of the merger consideration in the Dolphin Films acquisition, on
March 7, 2016, we issued 1,000,000 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC, an
entity wholly owned by our President, Chairman and CEO, Mr.
O’Dowd. Effective July 6, 2017, we amended our Articles
of Incorporation to reduce the number of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding in light of our 1-to-20 reverse stock
split from 1,000,000 to 50,000 shares and to clarify the voting
rights of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as described
below.
Each
share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible
into one half of a share of common stock, subject to
adjustment for each issuance of common stock (but not upon issuance
of common stock equivalents) that occurred, or occurs, from the
date of issuance of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the
“issue date”) or March 7, 2016, until the
fifth (5th) anniversary of the issue date (i) upon the conversion
or exercise of any instrument issued on the issue date
or thereafter issued (but not upon the conversion of the Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock), (ii) upon the exchange of debt for
shares of common stock, or (iii) in a private placement, such that
the total number of shares of common stock held by an
“Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder” (based on the
number of shares of common stock held as of the date of issuance)
will be preserved at the same percentage of shares of common stock
outstanding held by such Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder
prior to such issuance. An Eligible Class C Preferred
Stock Holder means any of (i) Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC for so long as Mr. O’Dowd continues to
beneficially own at least 90% and serves on the board of directors
or other governing entity, (ii) any other entity in which Mr.
O’Dowd beneficially owns more than 90%, or a trust for the
benefit of others, for which Mr. O’Dowd serves as trustee and
(iii) Mr. O’Dowd individually. Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock will only be convertible by the Eligible Class C Preferred
Stock Holder upon our company satisfying one of the “optional
conversion thresholds”. Specifically, a majority of the
independent directors of the Board, in its sole discretion, must
have determined that we accomplished any of the following (i)
EBITDA of more than $3.0 million in any calendar year, (ii)
production of two feature films, (iii) production and distribution
of at least three web series, (iv) theatrical distribution in the
United States of one feature film, or (v) any combination thereof
that is subsequently approved by a majority of the independent
directors of the Board based on the strategic plan approved by the
Board. While certain events may have occurred that could be deemed
to have satisfied this criteria, (including the distribution
of Max Steel) the independent directors of the Board have
not yet determined that an optional conversion threshold has
occurred. Except as required by law, holders of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock will only have voting rights once the
independent directors of the Board determine that an optional
conversion threshold has occurred. Only upon such determination,
will the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock be entitled or
permitted to vote on all matters required or permitted to be voted
on by the holders of common stock and will be entitled to that
number of votes equal to three votes for the number of Conversion
Shares (as defined in the Certificate of Designation) into which
such Holder’s shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock could then be converted.
The
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will automatically convert
upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) each
outstanding share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which is
transferred to any holder other than an Eligible Class C Preferred
Stock Holder will automatically convert into that number of fully
paid and nonassessable Conversion Shares (as defined in the
Certificate of Designation) equal to the Conversion Number (as
defined in the Certificate of Designation) at the time in effect;
(ii) if the aggregate number of shares of common stock plus
Conversion Shares (issuable upon conversion of the Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock) held by the Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holders in the
aggregate constitute 10% or less of the sum of (x) the outstanding
shares of common stock plus (y) all Conversion Shares held by the
Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holders, then each outstanding
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock then outstanding will
automatically convert into that number of fully paid and
nonassessable Conversion Shares equal to the Conversion Number at
the time in effect; or (iii) at such time as a holder of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock ceases to be an Eligible Class C
Preferred Stock Holder, each share of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock held by such person or entity will immediately
convert into that number of fully paid and nonassessable Conversion
Shares equal to the Conversion Number at the time in
effect.
The
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock ranks, with respect to rights
upon liquidation, winding-up or dissolution, (a) senior to all
classes of common stock, to the Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock and to each other class of capital stock or series of
preferred stock established thereafter by the Board the terms of
which expressly provide that such class ranks junior to the Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as Junior Stock,
(b) on a parity with each other class of capital stock or series of
preferred stock established thereafter by the Board, which we refer
to as Parity Stock, and (c) junior to any future class of preferred
stock established thereafter by the Board, the terms of which
expressly provide that such class ranks senior to the Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as Senior
Stock.
Upon
any liquidation, dissolution or winding up after payment or
provision for payment of our debts and other liabilities, the
holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to be
paid out of our assets available for distribution to our
shareholders (i) prior to the holders of any class or series of
common stock and Junior Stock, (ii) pro rata with the holders of
any Parity Stock and (iii) after the holders of any Senior Stock,
an amount equal to $0.001 per share of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock.
The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
has dividend rights on parity with the common stock.
Warrants
We
currently have outstanding warrants, exercisable into
1,612,115 shares of our common stock at exercise
prices ranging from $6.20 to $10.00 per
share.
As of October 2,
2017, we had outstanding six series of common stock warrants: (i)
Series E Warrants, (ii) Series F Warrants, (iii) Series G Warrants,
(iv) Series H Warrants, (v) Series I Warrants, and (vi) the Strocar
warrants for the purchase of an aggregate of 1,612,115 shares of
common stock. The Series E Warrants represent the right to purchase
an aggregate of 12,115 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $6.20 per share and expire on December 31, 2018. The Series F
Warrants represent the right to purchase an aggregate of 175,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share and
expire on December 31, 2018. The Series G Warrants represent the
right to purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $9.22 per share and expire on January 31,
2018. The Series H Warrants represent the right to purchase an
aggregate of 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$9.22 per share and expire on January 31, 2019. The Series I
Warrants represent the right to purchase an aggregate of 250,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $9.22 and expire on
January 31, 2020. The Strocar Warrants represent the right to
purchase an aggregate of 175,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $10.00 per share and expire on December 31,
2018.
Cashless Exercise. The holders of each
of the warrants may, upon exercise, elect to receive the net number
of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set
forth in the warrants in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise
contemplated to be made to use upon such
exercise.
Certain Adjustments and Anti-Dilution.
The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock
purchasable upon the exercise of the Warrants are subject to
adjustment upon the occurrence of specific events, including stock
dividends, stock splits, and combinations and reclassifications of
our common stock. In addition, each of the Series E, G, H and I
Warrants, in the event we sell, grant or issue any shares, options,
warrants, or any instrument convertible into shares or equity in
any form below the current exercise price per share of such
warrant, provides that the current exercise price per share for the
warrants be reduced to the lower price.
Rights as a Stockholder. The holder of
a warrant does not have the rights or privileges of a holder of our
common stock, including any voting rights, until the holder
exercises the warrant.
Reduction of Exercise Price. The
Holders of most of our warrants may, over the term of the warrant,
make a payment to us for an equivalent amount of money to reduce
the exercise price of such warrant until such time as the exercise
price of this warrant is able to be exercised via the cashless
exercise provision.
Underwriters’
Warrants
Please see
“Underwriting” for a description of warrants to be
issued to the underwriters.
Warrants
Issued in this Offering
The warrants will
be issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between us
and our warrant agent. The material provisions of the warrants are
set forth herein but are only a summary and are qualified in their
entirety by the provisions of the warrant agreement that has been
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part.
Each
whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase share of our
common stock at a price equal to $ per share at any time for up to
years after the date of the closing of this offering.
The
holder of a warrant will not be deemed a holder of our underlying
common stock until the warrant is exercised. No fractional warrants
will be issued. If an investor would otherwise be entitled to
receive a fractional warrant, the number of warrants issued to the
investor will be rounded up to the nearest whole
warrant.
Subject
to certain limitations as described below the warrants are
immediately exercisable and expire on the anniversary of the date
of issuance. Subject to limited exceptions, a holder of warrants
will not have the right to exercise any portion of its warrants if
the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in
excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our common stock
outstanding immediately after giving effect to such
exercise.
The
exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of
the warrants is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of
recapitalization events, stock dividends, stock splits, stock
combinations, reclassifications, reorganizations or similar events
affecting our common stock, and also upon any distributions of
assets, including cash, stock or other property to our
shareholders. The warrant holders must pay the exercise price in
cash upon exercise of the warrants, unless such warrant holders are
utilizing the cashless exercise provision of the warrants. After
the close of business on the expiration date, unexercised warrants
will become void.
In
addition, in the event we consummate a merger or consolidation with
or into another person or other reorganization event in which
shares of our common stock are converted or exchange for
securities, cash or other property, or we sell, lease, license,
assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of our assets or we or another person acquire 50%
or more of our outstanding shares of common
stock, then following such event, the holders of the
warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the warrants
the same kind and amount of securities, cash or property which the
holders would have received had they exercised the warrants
immediately prior to such fundamental transaction. Any successor to
us or surviving entity shall assume the obligations under the
warrants. In addition, as further described in the form of warrant
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, in the event of any fundamental
transaction completed for cash, or a going private transaction
under Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act, or involving a person not
trading on a national securities exchange, the holders of the
warrants will have the right to require us to purchase the warrants
for an amount in cash that is determined in accordance with a
formula set forth in the warrants.
Upon
the holder’s exercise of a warrant, we will issue the shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant within three
business days following our receipt of notice of
exercise.
Prior
to the exercise of any warrants to purchase common stock, holders
of the warrants will not have any of the rights of holders of the
common stock purchasable upon exercise, including the right to vote
or to receive any payments of dividends on the common stock
purchasable upon exercise.
Warrant
holders may exercise warrants only if the issuance of the shares of
common stock upon exercise of the warrants is covered by an
effective registration statement, or an exemption from registration
is available under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act, and the securities laws of the state in which the
holder resides. We intend to use commercially reasonable efforts to
have the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a
part, effective when the warrants are exercised. The warrant
holders must pay the exercise price in cash upon exercise of the
warrants unless there is not an effective registration statement
or, if required, there is not an effective state law registration
or exemption covering the issuance of the shares underlying the
warrants (in which case, the warrants may only be exercised via a
“cashless” exercise provision).
Convertible
Promissory Notes
On each of July 18,
July 26, August 1, August 4, 2017, August 31, September 6, 2017 and
September 9, 2017, we entered into a subscription agreement
pursuant to which we issued a convertible promissory note, each
with substantially identical terms, for an aggregate principal
amount of $725,000. Each of the convertible promissory notes
matures one year from the date of issue and bears interest at a
rate of 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of
each of the convertible promissory notes are convertible by the
respective holder at a price equal to either (i) the 90-trading day
average price per share of common stock as of the date the holder
submits a notice of conversion or (ii) if an Eligible Offering (as
similarly defined in each of the convertible promissory notes) of
common stock is made, 95% of the Public Offering Share price (as
similarly defined in each of the convertible promissory
notes). The convertible
promissory notes are convertible into 78,757 shares of our common
stock (calculated based on the 90-trading day average price per
share as of October 2, 2017).
Registration Rights
In
connection with the 42West acquisition, on March 30, 2017, we
entered into a registration rights agreement with the sellers.
Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the sellers are
entitled to rights with respect to the registration under the
Securities Act of shares received as consideration in the
acquisition. These shares are referred to as registrable
securities.
The
registration of shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise
of the registration rights described below would enable the sellers
to trade these shares without restriction under the Securities Act
when the applicable registration statement is declared effective.
We will pay the fees, costs and expenses of underwritten
registrations under the registration rights agreement.
Generally, in an
underwritten offering, the managing underwriter, if any, has the
right to limit the number of shares the sellers may include in
accordance with the terms of the registration rights
agreement. The registrable securities will no longer be
registrable securities when (i) a registration statement covering
the registrable securities has been declared effective and such
registrable securities have been disposed of pursuant to the
effective registration statement, (ii) the registrable securities
may be sold without manner of sale, volume or other restriction
pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, or (iii) the
registrable securities are no longer outstanding.
Demand Registration Rights
At any
time after the one-year anniversary of the registration rights
agreement, we will be required, upon the request of sellers holding
at least a majority of the consideration received in the
acquisition, to file a registration statement on Form S-1 and
use our reasonable efforts to effect a registration covering up to
25% of the registrable securities. We are required to effect only
one registration on Form S-1. The right to have the registrable
securities registered on Form S-1 is subject to other specified
conditions and limitations.
Form S-3 Registration Rights
If we
become eligible to file a registration statement on Form S-3, upon
the request of the sellers holding at least a majority of the
consideration received by the sellers, we will be required to use
our reasonable efforts to effect a registration of such shares on
Form S-3 covering up to an additional 25% of the consideration
received by the sellers. We are required to effect only one
registration on Form S-3, if eligible. The right to have the
registrable securities registered on Form S-3 is subject to other
specified conditions and limitations.
Perrone Piggyback Registration Rights
Pursuant to a
debt exchange agreement, a purchase agreement and a termination
agreement, we granted Stephen Perrone, a greater than 5%
shareholder of our company, piggyback registration rights with
respect to 1,170,000 shares that he received upon
exercise of Class J and Class K warrants. For a discussion of
the agreements, see “Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.” Mr. Perrone waived
his right to include his shares of common stock in this
offering.
Anti-takeover Effects of our Articles of Incorporation
Our
Articles of Incorporation provide that our Board may provide
further issuances of preferred stock, in one or more series, to
establish the number of shares to be included in each series, to
fix the designation, rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions of the shares of each series and to increase or
decrease the number of shares of any series of preferred stock, all
without any further vote or action by our shareholders. The
existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved preferred stock
may enable our Board to issue shares to persons friendly to current
management, which could render more difficult or discourage an
attempt to obtain control of our company by means of a proxy
contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise, and thereby protect the
continuity of our management.
Indemnification
Both
our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide for
indemnification of our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by the Florida Business Corporation Act.
Listing
Our shares of
common stock are currently quoted on the OTC Pink Marketplace,
operated by OTC Market Group. The symbol for our common stock is
“DPDM”. There is currently no public market for our
warrants. We have applied to have our common stock and warrants
offered hereby listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol
“DLPN” and “DLPNW,” respectively. On
October 4, 2017, the last reported sale price of our common stock
on the OTC Pink Marketplace was $8.00 per
share.
Transfer Agent
The
transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Nevada Agency
and Transfer Company.
Warrant Agent
The warrant
agent for the warrant is
.
UNDERWRITING
Maxim Group
LLC and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., or the underwriters, are
acting as the joint book-running managers of this offering.
We have entered into an underwriting agreement
dated , 2017
with the underwriters. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to
the underwriters and each underwriter has
agreed to purchase, at the public offering price less the
underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, the following number of
units:
Underwriters
|
|
Number of
Units
|
Maxim Group
LLC
|
|
|
Ladenburg Thalmann
& Co.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
The
underwriters are committed to purchase all the
units offered by us other than those covered by the
option to purchase additional units described below,
if they purchase any units. The
obligations of the underwriters may be terminated upon
the occurrence of certain events specified in the underwriting
agreement. Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the
underwriters’ obligations are subject to
customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in
the underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the
underwriters of officers’ certificates and legal
opinions.
We have
agreed to indemnify the underwriters against specified
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to
contribute to payments the underwriters may be
required to make in respect thereof.
The
underwriters are offering the units,
subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by
them, subject to approval of legal matters by their
counsel and other conditions specified in the underwriting
agreement. The underwriters reserve the right to
withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject
orders in whole or in part.
Underwriter
Compensation
We have agreed to
pay the underwriters a cash fee equal to 7% of the aggregate gross
proceeds sold in the offering and issue to the underwriters
warrants to purchase that number of shares of our common stock
equal to 7% of the aggregate number of the shares of common stock
underlying the units sold in the offering (or
shares, assuming the over-allotment option is
fully exercised). Such underwriters’ warrants shall have an
exercise price equal to 110% of the public offering price,
terminate three years after the effective date of the offering,
will provide for cashless exercise. Such underwriters’
warrants will be subject to FINRA Rule 5110(g)(1) in that, such
warrants shall not be transferable for 180 days from the effective
date of the offering except as permitted by FINRA Rule
5110(g)(2).
The underwriters propose to offer the
units offered by us to the public at the public
offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus
supplement. In addition, the underwriters may offer
some of the units to other securities dealers at such
price less a concession of $ per
unit. After the initial offering, the public offering
price and concession to dealers may be changed.
Option to Purchase Additional Securities
We have
granted the underwriters an over-allotment option.
This option, which is exercisable for up to 45 days
after the date of this prospectus, permits the
underwriters to purchase a maximum of
additional units from us to
cover over-allotments. If the underwriters exercise all or part of
this option, they will
purchase
units covered by the option at the public offering price that
appears on the cover page of this prospectus supplement, less the
underwriting discount. If this option is exercised in full, the
total price to the public will be approximately
$ and the total proceeds to us will be
$ .
Discounts and Commissions
The
following table shows the public offering price, underwriting
discount and proceeds, before expenses, to us. The information
assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the
underwriters of their over-allotment
option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering
price
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
Underwriting
discount (7%)
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
Proceeds, before
expenses, to us
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
We have
agreed to reimburse the underwriters their actual,
out-of-pocket expenses, including the reasonable fees and
disbursements of the underwriters’ counsel
related to the offering, up to an aggregate maximum amount of
$150,000 but in any event in compliance with the
provisions of FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2). In the event of a
termination of the offering, the underwriters will be entitled to
reimbursement of their actual out-of-pocket expenses, not to exceed
$50,000. We estimate that the total expenses of the offering
including all expenses to be reimbursed to the
underwriters excluding the
underwriters’ discount, will be approximately
$ .
Right
of First Refusal
Subject to the
completion of the offering and the receipt in the offering of $5.0
million from investors contacted by Maxim Group LLC, other than any
person who is or has been, within the prior twelve months a holder
of our debt or equity securities, we have agreed to give Maxim
Group LLC a right of first refusal for twelve months from the date
of commencement of sales of this offering to act as no less than
our co-lead manager, co-book runner and/or co-lead placement agent
for any further capital raising transactions undertaken by us. In
addition, if we terminate the engagement with Maxim Group LLC, and
Maxim Group LLC was prepared to proceed with an offering, we have
agreed to pay Maxim Group LLC a twelve-month tail fee equal to the
compensation which would have been received in this offering if any
investor who was introduced to us by Maxim Group LLC, other than
any person who is or has been, within the prior twelve months a
holder of our debt or equity securities, provides us with further
capital during such twelve-month period following the
termination.
Price Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The
underwriters may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing
transactions, syndicate covering transactions, and penalty bids or
purchasers for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the
price of the common stock, in accordance with Regulation M under
the Exchange Act:
●
Over-allotment
involves sales by the underwriters of securities in excess of the
number of securities the underwriters are obligated to purchase,
which creates a syndicate short position. The short position may be
either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a
covered short position, the number of securities over-allotted by
the underwriters is not greater than the number of securities that
they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short
position, the number of securities involved is greater than the
number of securities in the over-allotment option. The underwriters
may close out any short position by either exercising their
over-allotment option (which they anticipate will occur if our
stock prices are greater than the price per security in this
offering) and/or purchasing securities in the open market (which
they anticipate will occur if our stock prices are less than the
price per security in this offering).
●
Stabilizing
transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so
long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified
maximum.
●
Syndicate covering
transactions involve purchases of securities in the open market
after the distribution has been completed in order to cover
syndicate short positions. In determining the source of securities
to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider,
among other things, the price of securities available for purchase
in the open market as compared to the price at which they may
purchase securities through the over-allotment option. If the
underwriters sell more securities than could be covered by the
over-allotment option, a naked short position, the position can
only be closed out by buying securities in the open market. A naked
short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the
securities in the open market after pricing that could adversely
affect investors who purchase in the offering.
●
Penalty bids
permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a
syndicate member when the securities originally sold by the
syndicate member is purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate
covering transaction to cover syndicate short
positions.
These
stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and
penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the
market price of our securities, or preventing or retarding a
decline in the market price of those securities. As a result, the
price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might
otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may be
effected on an exchange or in the over-the-counter market or
otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any
time.
Neither
we nor the underwriters make any representation or
prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the
transactions described above may have on the price of the
securities. In addition, neither we nor the
underwriters make any representation that the
underwriters will engage in these stabilizing
transactions or that any transaction, once commenced, will not be
discontinued without notice.
In
connection with this offering, the underwriters may
also engage in passive market making transactions in our
securities. Passive market making consists of displaying bids on a
national securities exchange limited by the prices of independent
market makers and effecting purchases limited by those prices in
response to order flow. Rule 103 of Regulation M promulgated by the
SEC limits the amount of net purchases that each passive market
maker may make and the displayed size of each bid. Passive market
making may stabilize the market price of our securities at a level
above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Electronic Offer, Sale and Distribution of Shares
The
underwriters may facilitate the marketing of this
offering online directly or through one of the
underwriters’ affiliates. In those cases,
prospective investors may view offering terms and a prospectus
online and place orders online or through their financial advisors.
Such websites and the information contained on such websites, or
connected to such sites, are not incorporated into and are not a
part of this prospectus. In
connection with this offering, the underwriters may
distribute prospectuses electronically.
Other Relationships
The
underwriters and their affiliates are
full service financial institutions engaged in various activities,
which may include securities trading, commercial and investment
banking, financial advisory, investment management, investment
research, principal investment, hedging, financing and brokerage
activities. The underwriters may in the future, engage
in investment banking and other commercial dealings in the ordinary
course of business with us or our affiliates.
The
underwriters may in the future, receive
customary fees and commissions for these transactions.
In the
ordinary course of their various business activities, the
underwriters and their affiliates may
make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt
and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and
financial instruments (including bank loans) for their own account
and for the accounts of their customers, and such investment and
securities activities may involve securities and/or instruments of
the issuer. The underwriters and their affiliates may also make
investment recommendations and/or publish or express independent
research views in respect of such securities or instruments and may
at any time hold, or recommend to clients that they acquire, long
and/or short positions in such securities and
instruments.
LEGAL MATTERS
The
validity of the securities offered by this prospectus will be
passed upon by Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriter by
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, New York, New
York.
EXPERTS
The
consolidated financial statements of Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
and for each of the years then ended included in this prospectus
and in the registration statement have been so included in reliance
on the report of BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein and in the
registration statement, given on the authority of said
firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The
financial statements of 42 West, LLC as of December 31, 2016 and
2015 and for each of the years then ended, included in this
prospectus and in the registration statement have been so included
in reliance on the report of BDO USA, LLP, independent auditors,
appearing elsewhere herein and in the registration
statement, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Our
corporate website is www.dolphinentertainment.com. We
make available, free of charge, access to our Annual Report on Form
10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K,
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A and amendments to those materials
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act, on our website under “Investor Relations
– SEC Filings,” as soon as reasonably practicable after
we file electronically such material with, or furnish it to, the
SEC.
You may
also read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the
SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business days during the
hours of 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., and you may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330. In
addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website, www.sec.gov, that
contains reports, proxy and information statements and other
information that we file electronically with the
SEC.
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc. (formerly known as Dolphin Digital
Media, Inc.)
Audited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
42
West, LLC
Audited
Financial Statements
|
F-83
|
|
F-84
|
|
F-85
|
|
F-86
|
|
F-87
|
|
F-88
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dolphin
Digital Media, Inc. and subsidiaries
Coral
Gables, Florida
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of
the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor
were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years then
ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note
2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to
these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ BDO USA,
LLP Certified
Public Accountants
Miami,
Florida
April 17,
2017
(except for the
last two paragraphs of Note 21, as to which the date is October 10,
2017)
DOLPHIN DIGITAL MEDIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$662,546
|
$2,392,685
|
Restricted
cash
|
1,250,000
|
-
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
-
|
72,518
|
Related
party receivable
|
-
|
453,529
|
Accounts
receivable
|
3,668,646
|
-
|
Other
current assets
|
2,665,781
|
2,827,131
|
Total
Current Assets
|
8,246,973
|
5,745,863
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
4,654,013
|
15,170,768
|
Property
and equipment
|
35,188
|
55,413
|
Deposits
|
1,261,067
|
397,069
|
Total
Assets
|
$14,197,241
|
$21,369,113
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$677,249
|
$2,070,545
|
Other
current liabilities
|
2,958,523
|
2,984,320
|
Warrant
liability
|
14,011,254
|
-
|
Accrued
compensation
|
2,250,000
|
2,065,000
|
Debt
|
18,743,069
|
37,331,008
|
Loan
from related party
|
684,326
|
2,917,523
|
Deferred
revenue
|
46,681
|
1,418,368
|
Note
payable
|
300,000
|
300,000
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
39,671,102
|
49,086,764
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Convertible
note
|
-
|
3,164,000
|
Warrant
liability
|
6,393,936
|
|
Loan
from related party
|
-
|
1,982,267
|
Total
Noncurrent Liabilities
|
6,639,936
|
5,146,267
|
Total
Liabilities
|
46,065,038
|
54,233,031
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.015 par value, 200,000,000
shares authorized, 7,197,761 and
2,047,309, respectively, issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2016 and 2015
|
107,968
|
30,710
|
Preferred
Stock 10,000,000 shares authorized, Preferred Stock, Series A
$0.001 par value, liquidation preference of 1,042,756, 1,043
shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December
31, 2015. None were issued and outstanding at December 31,
2016
|
-
|
1,043
|
Preferred
Stock, Series B, $0.10 par value, 4,000,000 shares
authorized, 2,300,000 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2015, none were issued and outstanding at December 31,
2016
|
-
|
230,000
|
Preferred
Stock, Series C, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and
2015
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
67,835,439
|
26,510,949
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(99,812,204)
|
(62,615,428)
|
Total
Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. Deficit
|
(31,867,797)
|
(35,841,726)
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
-
|
2,977,808
|
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
(31,867,797)
|
(32,863,918)
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
$14,197,241
|
$21,369,113
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
(1)
Financial information has been
retrospectively adjusted for the acquisition of Dolphin Films, Inc.
See Notes 1 and 4
.
|
|
DOLPHIN DIGITAL MEDIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of
Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Production
and distribution
|
$9,367,222
|
$3,031,073
|
Membership
|
28,403
|
69,761
|
Total
Revenue:
|
9,395,625
|
3,100,834
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
10,661,241
|
2,587,257
|
Distribution
and marketing
|
11,322,616
|
213,300
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,245,689
|
1,845,088
|
Legal
and professional
|
2,405,754
|
2,392,556
|
Payroll
|
1,462,589
|
1,435,765
|
Loss
before other income (expense)
|
(17,702,264)
|
(5,373,132)
|
|
|
|
Other
Income(Expense)
|
|
|
Other
income
|
9,660
|
96,302
|
Amortization
of loan fees
|
(476,250)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
2,195,542
|
-
|
Warrant
issuance expense
|
(7,372,593)
|
-
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(9,601,933)
|
-
|
Interest
expense
|
(4,241,841)
|
(3,559,532)
|
Total
Other Income(Expense)
|
(19,487,415)
|
(3,463,230)
|
Net
Loss
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
|
|
|
Net
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
-
|
17,440
|
Net
loss attributable to Dolphin Films, Inc.
|
-
|
(4,786,341)
|
Net
Loss attributable to Dolphin Digital Media, Inc.
|
(37,189,679)
|
(4,067,461)
|
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
|
|
|
Deemed dividend on preferred stock
|
5,247,227
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
$(42,436,906)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted Loss per Share
|
$(9.67)
|
$(4.32)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares used in share calculation
|
4,389,097
|
2,047,309
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
(1)
Financial information has been
retrospectively adjusted for the acquisition of Dolphin Films, Inc.
See Notes 1 and 4.
|
|
DOLPHIN DIGITAL MEDIA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(37,189,679)
|
$(8,836,362)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
20,225
|
24,826
|
Amortization
of capitalized production costs
|
7,822,549
|
1,672,120
|
Impairment
of capitalized production costs
|
2,075,000
|
861,825
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
9,601,933
|
-
|
Warrant
issuance
|
7,394,850
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
(2,195,542)
|
-
|
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(3,668,646)
|
-
|
Other
current assets
|
161,250
|
(265,616)
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
72,518
|
(7,679)
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
619,206
|
(2,736,321)
|
Deposits
|
(863,998)
|
-
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(1,371,687)
|
-
|
Accrued
compensation
|
185,000
|
315,000
|
Accounts
payable
|
(1,393,296)
|
784,829
|
Other
current liabilities
|
3,757,873
|
1,121,876
|
Warrant
liability
|
50,000
|
-
|
Net Cash Used in
Operating Activities
|
(14,922,444)
|
(7,065,502)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
(1,250,000)
|
-
|
Purchase of
furniture and equipment
|
-
|
(2,549)
|
Net Cash Used In
Investing Activities
|
(1,250,000)
|
(2,549)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Proceeds from Loan
and Security agreement
|
12,500,000
|
2,610,000
|
Repayment of Loan
and Security agreement
|
(410,000)
|
(405,219)
|
Proceeds from
production loan
|
-
|
440,130
|
Repayment of
production loan
|
(4,263,602)
|
-
|
Proceeds from
convertible note payable
|
-
|
3,164,000
|
Sale of common
stock
|
7,500,000
|
-
|
Advances from
related party
|
320,000
|
6,583,436
|
Repayment to
related party
|
(1,204,093)
|
(3,324,686)
|
Net Cash Provided
by Financing Activities
|
14,442,305
|
9,067,661
|
NET DECREASE IN
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(1,730,139)
|
1,999,610
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
2,392,685
|
393,075
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$662,546
|
$2,392,685
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$156,666
|
$1,635,814
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
Refinance
of related party debt to third party debt
|
$-
|
$8,774,337
|
Conversion of
related party debt and interest to shares of common
stock
|
$3,073,410
|
$-
|
Conversion of
convertible debt
|
$3,164,000
|
$-
|
Conversion of loan
and security agreements, including interest, into shares of common
stock
|
$22,091,388
|
$-
|
Conversion of loan
and security agreements converted to warrants to purchase shares of
common stock.
|
$7,034,990
|
$-
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
(1)
Financial information has been
retrospectively adjusted for the acquisition of Dolphin Films, Inc.
See Notes 1 and 4.
Dolphin Digital Media Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders' Deficit
For the year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December
31, 2014
|
4,343,000
|
$232,043
|
2,047,309
|
$30,710
|
$26,510,949
|
$2,995,249
|
$(53,761,626)
|
$(23,992,675)
|
Net loss for the year ended December
31, 2015
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,836,362)
|
(8,836,362)
|
Income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17,440
|
(17,440)
|
-
|
Return of capital to
noncontrolling member
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(34,881)
|
-
|
(34,881)
|
Balance December
31, 2015
|
4,343,000
|
$232,043
|
2,047,309
|
$30,710
|
$26,510,949
|
$2,977,808
|
$(62,615,428)
|
$(32,863,918)
|
Net loss for the year ended December
31, 2016
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(37,189,679)
|
(37,189,679)
|
Income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,097
|
(7,097)
|
-
|
Return of capital to
noncontrolling member
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(14,200)
|
-
|
(14,200)
|
Acquisition of 25%
interest in Dolphin Kids Clubs LLC
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(921,122)
|
(2,970,705)
|
-
|
(3,891,827)
|
Issuance of common
stock during the year ended December 31, 2016
|
-
|
-
|
187,572
|
2,814
|
1,872,189
|
-
|
-
|
1,875,003
|
Extinguishment of debt
at a price of $5.00
|
-
|
-
|
3,078,980
|
46,185
|
37,236,639
|
-
|
-
|
37,282,824
|
Issuance of common
stock for convertible debt
|
|
|
316,400
|
4,746
|
3,159,254
|
|
|
3,164,000
|
Preferred stock
dividend related to exchange of Series A for Series B Preferred
Stock
|
1,000,000
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
(5,227,247)
|
-
|
-
|
(5,127,247)
|
Issuance and conversion
of Series B Preferred
|
(3,300,000)
|
(330,000)
|
1,567,500
|
23,513
|
6,246,734
|
-
|
-
|
5,940,247
|
Retirement of Series A
Preferred
|
(1,043,000)
|
(1,043)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,041,957)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,043,000)
|
Balance December 31,
2016
|
1,000,000
|
$1,000
|
7,197,761
|
$107,968
|
$67,835,439
|
$-
|
$(99,812,204)
|
$(31,867,797)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
(1)
Financial information has been
retrospectively adjusted for the acquisition of Dolphin Films, Inc.
See Notes 1 and 4.
|
DOLPHIN
DIGITAL MEDIA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2016 AND 2015
NOTE
1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION:
Dolphin Digital
Media, Inc. (the “Company”, "Dolphin"), initially known
as Rising Fortune Incorporated, was incorporated in the State of
Nevada on March 7, 1995. The Company had no operations between
inception and 2003. On November 19, 2003, the Company amended
its Articles of Incorporation to change its name to Maximum Awards
Inc. On July 3, 2007, the Company amended its Articles of
Incorporation again to change its name to Logica Holdings Inc. On
July 29, 2008, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation
again to change its name to Dolphin Digital Media,
Inc.
The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dolphin,
and all of its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries,
including Dolphin Films, Inc., Hiding Digital Productions, LLC,
Dolphin Kids Clubs, LLC, Cybergeddon Productions, LLC, Dolphin SB
Productions LLC, Max Steel Productions, LLC, Dolphin Max Steel
Holdings LLC, Dolphin JB Believe Financing, LLC and Dolphin JOAT
Productions, LLC
Effective March 7,
2016, the Company acquired Dolphin Films, Inc.
(“Dolphin Films”) from Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.
(“Dolphin Entertainment”), a company wholly owned by
William O’Dowd, CEO, President and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company. The acquisition from Dolphin
Entertainment was a transfer between entities under common control.
As such, the Company recorded the assets, liabilities and deficit
of Dolphin Films on its consolidated balance sheets at Dolphin
Entertainment’s historical basis instead of fair value.
Transfers of businesses between entities under common control
require prior periods to be retrospectively adjusted to furnish
comparative information. Accordingly, the accompanying financial
statements and related notes of the Company have been
retrospectively adjusted to include the historical balances of
Dolphin Films prior to the effective date of the acquisition. See
Note 4 for additional information regarding the Dolphin Films
acquisition.
On May 9, 2016, the
Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with
the Secretary of State of the State of Florida to effectuate a
20-to-1 reverse stock split. The reverse stock split was approved
by the Board of Directors and a majority of the Company’s
shareholders and became effective May 10, 2016. The number of
shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.015 (the
“Common Stock”) in the consolidated financial
statements and all related footnotes has been adjusted to
retrospectively reflect the reverse stock split.
The Company enters
into relationships or investments with other entities, and in
certain instances, the entity in which the Company has a
relationship or investment may qualify as a variable interest
entity (“VIE”). A VIE is consolidated in the financial
statements if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary
of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party that has the power
to direct activities that most significantly impact the activities
of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The Company has included Max Steel Productions, LLC formed on
July 8, 2013 in the State of Florida and JB Believe, LLC formed on
December 4, 2012 in the State of Florida in its combined financial
statements as VIE’s.
NOTE
2 — GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America which contemplate the continuation of the
Company as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses of
$37,189,679 and $8,836,362, respectively for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company has generated negative cash
flows from operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015 of $14,922,444 and $7,065,502 respectively. Further, the
Company has a working capital deficit for the years ended December
31, 2016 and 2015 of $31,424,129 and $43,340,901, respectively,
that is not sufficient to maintain or develop its operations, and
it is dependent upon funds from private investors and the support
of certain stockholders.
These factors raise
substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a
going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties. In this regard, management is planning to raise any
necessary additional funds through loans and additional issuance of
its Common Stock. There is no assurance that the Company will be
successful in raising additional capital. If the Company is unable
to obtain additional funding from these sources within the next
twelve months, it could be forced to liquidate. On February 16,
2017, the Company sold 50,000 shares of its Common
Stock for $10.00 per share. During 2017, it has
also received loans from its CEO in the amount of $420,000. On
April 10, 2017, the Company signed two promissory notes with one
debtholder for an aggregate amount of $300,000. The
promissory notes bear interest at 10.00% per annum and have a
maturity date of October 10, 2017. The Company currently has
the rights to several scripts that it intends to obtain financing
to produce and release during 2017 and 2018. It expects to earn a
producer and overhead fee for each of these productions. There can
be no assurances that such productions will be released or fees
will be realized in future periods. The Company is currently
working on producing a variety of digital projects which it intends
to fund through private investors on a project basis. There can be
no assurances that income from such digital projects
will be realized in future periods.
On March 30, 2017, the Company acquired 42West
LLC, a limited liability company incorporated in the State of
Delaware. 42West is an entertainment public relations agency
offering talent publicity, strategic communications and
entertainment content marketing. The
Company expects to derive revenues from this wholly owned
subsidiary and will seek to identify additional revenue streams
from the combined companies. See Note 21 for further
discussion.
NOTE
3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of
our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. These estimates are based on
management’s past experience and best knowledge of historical
trends, actions that we may take in the future, and other
information available when the consolidated financial statements
are prepared. Changes in estimates are recognized in
accordance with the accounting rules for the estimate, which is
typically in the period when new information becomes available. The
most significant estimates made by management in the preparation of
the financial statements relate to ultimate revenue and costs for
investment in digital and feature film projects; estimates of
allowances and provisions for doubtful accounts and impairment
assessments for investment in digital and feature film projects.
Actual results could differ from such estimates.
Statement of Comprehensive
Income
In accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic
220, Comprehensive
Income , a statement of comprehensive income has not
been included as the Company has no items of other comprehensive
income. Comprehensive loss is the same as net loss for
all periods presented.
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents consist of cash deposits at financial
institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased
to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash
represents amounts held as collateral required under the
Company’s loan and security agreement. Proceeds
from this loan were used for the distribution and marketing costs
of the Company’s feature film. See Note 6 for
further discussion. As of December 31, 2016, the Company
maintained $1,250,000 in a separate bank account restricted for
this purpose. The funds were disbursed to the lender
subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2016.
Contracts in the Company’s
Equity
From time to time,
the Company issues contracts related to its own equity securities,
such as warrants and convertible notes. The Company evaluates
whether a standalone contract (such as a warrant), or an embedded
feature of a contract (such as the conversion feature of a
convertible note) should be classified in stockholder’s
deficit or as a liability in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet. The determination is made in accordance with the
requirements of ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
(ASC 480), and ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC
815).
A warrant is
classified as equity so long as it is “indexed to the
Company’s equity” and several specific conditions for
equity classification are met. A warrant is not
considered indexed to the Company’s equity, in general, when
it contains certain types of exercise contingencies or contains
certain provisions that may alter either the number of shares
issuable under the warrant or the exercise price of the warrant,
including, among other things, a provision that could require a
reduction to the then current exercise price each time the Company
subsequently issues equity, warrants, and/or conversion options at
less than the current conversion price (also known as a full
ratchet down round provision). If a warrant is not indexed to the
Company’s equity, must be classified as a derivative
liability.
A convertible debt
instrument in its entirety must be classified as a liability under
ASC 480 and carried at fair value in the financial statements if it
has a mandatory conversion feature. A conversion feature
of a convertible debt instrument or certain convertible preferred
stock, is separated from the convertible instrument and classified
as a derivative liability if the conversion feature, were it a
standalone instrument, would meet certain characteristics in the
definitions in ASC 815 of both an embedded derivative and a
derivative, generally including, among other conditions, if the
conversion feature must be settled in cash or a financial
instrument that is readily convertible to cash.
When a warrant or a
separated conversion feature is classified as a derivative
liability, the liability is initially and subsequently reported on
the balance sheet at its fair value, and subsequent increases or
decreases in the fair value are recorded through the statement of
operations.
When a conversion
feature does not meet the definition of a derivative per ASC 815,
it must be assessed further to determine whether a beneficial
conversion feature exists, which exists when the effective exercise
price is lower than the fair value of the Company’s related
equity instrument on the date of issuance. If it contains a
beneficial conversion feature, the amount of the beneficial
conversion feature reduces the balance of the convertible debt
instrument, creating a debt discount which is amortized over the
term of the debt to interest expense in the consolidated statement
of operations.
The classification
of a warrant or conversion feature must be reassessed at each
financial reporting date, as a change in circumstances may
necessitate reclassification of the warrant or conversion feature.
The Company has classified certain warrants issued during 2016 as
derivative liabilities due to the existence of full-ratchet down
round provisions in the warrants (see Note 16).
Gross versus Net
Revenue
The Company’s
motion pictures are primarily distributed and marketed by third
party distributors. The Company evaluates its arrangements with
third parties to determine whether revenue should be reported under
each individual arrangement on a gross or net basis by determining
whether the Company acts as the principal or agent under the terms
of each arrangement. To the extent that the Company acts as the
principal in an arrangement, revenues are reported on a gross
basis, resulting in revenues and expenses being classified in their
respective financial statement line items. Conversely, to the
extent that the Company acts as the agent in an arrangement,
revenues are reported on a net basis, resulting in revenues being
presented net of any related expenses. Determining whether the
Company acts as principal or agent is based on an evaluation of
which party has substantial risks and rewards of ownership under
the terms of an arrangement. The most significant factors that the
Company considers include identification of the primary obligor, as
well as which party has general and physical inventory risk, credit
risk and discretion in the supplier selection. The Company’s
primary distribution arrangements, which are those for its
theatrical release, are recorded on a gross basis as a result of
the evaluation previously described.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue from motion
pictures and web series are recognized in accordance with guidance
ASC 926-60 “Revenue
Recognition –
Entertainment-Films”. Revenue is recorded
when a distribution contract, domestic or international, exists,
the movie or web series is complete in accordance with the terms of
the contract, the customer can begin exhibiting or selling the
movie or web series, the fee is determinable and collection of the
fee is reasonable. On occasion, the Company may enter into
agreements with third parties for the co-production or distribution
of a movie or web series. Revenue from these agreements
will be recognized when the movie is complete and ready to be
exploited. Cash received and amounts billed in advance
of meeting the criteria for revenue recognition is classified as
deferred revenue.
Additionally,
because third parties are the principal distributors of the
Company’s movies, the amount of revenue that is recognized
from films in any given period is dependent on the timing, accuracy
and sufficiency of the information received from its distributors.
As is typical in the film industry, the Company's distributors may
make adjustments in future periods to information previously
provided to the Company that could have a material impact on the
Company’s operating results in later periods. Furthermore,
management may, in its judgment, make material adjustments to the
information reported by its distributors in future periods to
ensure that revenues are accurately reflected in the
Company’s financial statements. To date, the distributors
have not made, nor has the Company made, subsequent material
adjustments to information provided by the distributors and used in
the preparation of the Company’s historical financial
statements.
In general, the
Company records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, products have been delivered or services have been
rendered, the selling price is fixed and determinable, and
collectability is reasonably assured. Advertising revenue is
recognized over the period the advertisement is
displayed.
Capitalized Production
Costs
Capitalized
production costs represent the costs incurred to develop and
produce a motion picture or a web series. These costs primarily
consist of salaries, equipment and overhead costs, capitalized
interest as well as the cost to acquire rights to
scripts. Production costs are stated at the lower of
cost, less accumulated amortization and tax credits, if applicable,
or fair value. These costs are capitalized in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 926-20-50-2 “Other Assets – Film
Costs”. Unamortized capitalized production
costs are evaluated for impairment each reporting period on a
title-by-title basis. If estimated remaining revenue is
not sufficient to recover the unamortized capitalized production
costs for that title, the unamortized capitalized production costs
will be written down to fair value.
The Company is
responsible for certain contingent compensation, known as
participations, paid to certain creative participants such as
writers, directors and actors. Generally, these payments
are dependent on the performance of the motion picture or web
series and are based on factors such as total revenue as defined
per each of the participation agreements. The Company is
also responsible for residuals, which are payments based on revenue
generated from secondary markets and are generally paid to third
parties pursuant to a collective bargaining, union or guild
agreement. The Company has entered into a fifteen
year distribution agreement for its motion picture. As
prescribed in the agreement, the distributor has entered into a
distribution assumption agreement with the guilds to pay the
residuals from gross revenues. Upon expiration of the
term of the agreement, and nonrenewal, the Company will be
responsible for making the payments directly. These
costs are accrued to direct operating expenses as the revenues, as
defined in the participation agreements are achieved and as sales
to the secondary markets are made triggering the residual
payment.
Due to the inherent
uncertainties involved in making such estimates of ultimate
revenues and expenses, these estimates are likely to differ to some
extent in the future from actual results. Management
regularly reviews and revises when necessary its ultimate revenue
and cost estimates, which may result in a change in the rate of
amortization of film costs and participations and residuals and/or
write-down of all or a portion of the unamortized deferred
production costs to its estimated fair value. Management estimates
the ultimate revenue based on existing contract negotiations with
domestic distributors and international buyers as well as
management’s experience with similar productions in the past.
Amortization of film costs, participation and residuals and/or
write downs of all or a portion of the unamortized deferred
production costs to its estimated fair value is recorded in direct
costs.
An increase in the
estimate of ultimate revenue will generally result in a lower
amortization rate and, therefore, less amortization expense of
deferred productions costs, while a decrease in the estimate of
ultimate revenue will generally result in a higher amortization
rate and, therefore, higher amortization expense of deferred
production costs, and also periodically results in an impairment
requiring a write-down of the deferred production costs to fair
value. These write-downs are included in production expense within
the combined statements of operations. For the year ended December
31, 2015, the Company amortized $1,642,120 of capitalized
production costs related to South
Beach-Fever and recorded $648,525 for impairment of certain
capitalized production costs. During the year ended December 31,
2016, the Company amortized $7,822,549 of capitalized production
costs related to the revenues earned for its feature film and
impaired $2,075,000 of capitalized production costs that were below
the fair value.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the
carrying amount to the future net cash flows which the assets are
expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the
carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair value. Except for
those described above in Capitalized Production Costs, there were
no impairment charges for long lived assets during the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Property and
Equipment
Property and
equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated
useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The
Company recorded depreciation expense of $20,226 and $24,826,
respectively for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. When
items are retired or otherwise disposed of, income is charged or
credited for the difference between net book value and proceeds
realized thereon. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred, and replacements and betterments are
capitalized. The range of estimated useful lives to be used to
calculate depreciation and amortization for principal items of
property and equipment are as follows:
|
|
Depreciation/
|
|
|
Amortization
|
Asset
Category
|
|
Period
|
F Furniture and
fixtures
|
|
5
Years
|
Computer
equipment
|
|
3
Years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
5
Years
|
Warrants
When the Company
issues warrants, it evaluates the proper balance sheet
classification of the warrant to determine whether the warrant
should be classified as equity or as a derivative liability on the
consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with ASC 815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in the Entity’s Own Equity
(ASC 815-40), the Company classifies a warrant as equity so long as
it is “indexed to the Company’s equity” and
several specific conditions for equity classification are met.
A warrant is not considered indexed to the Company’s
equity, in general, when it contains certain types of exercise
contingencies or contains certain provisions that may alter either
the number of shares issuable under the warrant or the exercise
price of the warrant, including, among other things, a provision
that could require a reduction to the then current exercise price
each time the Company subsequently issues equity or convertible
instruments at a per share price that is less than the current
conversion price (also known as a “full ratchet down round
provision”). If a warrant is not indexed to the
Company’s equity, it is classified as a derivative liability
which is carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value
with any changes in its fair value recognized currently in the
statement of operations.
The Company
classified certain warrants issued during 2016 as derivative
liabilities, because they contain full-ratchet down round
provisions (see Notes 10 and 16). The Company also had equity
classified warrants outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015 (see
Note 16).
Convertible Debt and Convertible
Preferred Stock
When the Company
issues convertible debt or convertible deferred stock, it evaluates
the balance sheet classification to determine whether the
instrument should be classified either as debt or equity, and
whether the conversion feature should be accounted for separately
from the host instrument. A conversion feature of a convertible
debt instrument or certain convertible preferred stock would be
separated from the convertible instrument and classified as a
derivative liability if the conversion feature, were it a
standalone instrument, meets the definition of an “embedded
derivative” in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Generally,
characteristics that require derivative treatment include, among
others, when the conversion feature is not indexed to the
Company’s equity, as defined in ASC 815-40, or when it must
be settled either in cash or by issuing stock that is readily
convertible to cash. When a conversion feature meets the definition
of an embedded derivative, it would be separated from the host
instrument and classified as a derivative liability carried on the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in its
fair value recognized currently in the consolidated statements of
operations.
If a conversion
feature does not meet the conditions to be accounted for as a
derivative liability, the Company then determines whether the
conversion feature is “beneficial”. A conversion
feature would be considered beneficial if the conversion feature is
“in the money” when the host instrument is issued or,
under certain circumstances, later. If convertible debt contains a
beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”), the amount of
the amount of the proceeds allocated to the BCF reduces the balance
of the convertible debt, creating a discount which is amortized
over the debt’s term to interest expense in the consolidated
statements of operations. When a convertible preferred stock
contains a BCF, after allocating the proceeds to the BCF, the
resulting discount is either amortized over the period beginning
when the convertible preferred stock is issued up to the earliest
date the conversion feature may be exercised, or if the convertible
preferred stock is immediately exercisable, the discount is fully
amortized at the date of issuance. The amortization is recorded
similar to a dividend.
The Company had no
outstanding convertible debt or convertible preferred stock which
contain conversion feature that is accounted for either as a
derivative or a beneficial conversion feature at either December
31, 2016 or 2015 or during the years then ended.
Fair Value
Measurements
Fair value is
defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities
measured at fair value are categorized based on whether the inputs
are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are
observable. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including
assumptions about risk. Observable inputs are based on market data
obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable
inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions based on the
best information available in the circumstances. The fair value
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into
three broad levels, defined as follows:
Level
1 —
|
Inputs are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of
the reporting date.
|
Level
2 —
|
Inputs other than
quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated
with observable market data.
|
Level
3 —
|
Unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This
includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
that reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability as of the reporting date.
|
Certain warrants
issued in 2016 (see Note 16) are measured and carried at fair value
in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, and
for the year then ended, the Company had no assets or liabilities
measured at fair value, on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. See
Note 10 for additional fair value disclosures.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are
recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases using tax rates in
effect for the years in which the differences are expected to
reverse. The effects of changes in tax laws on deferred
tax balances are recognized in the period the new legislation in
enacted. Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to
be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realization,
management considers estimates of future taxable
income. We calculate our current and deferred tax
position based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from
the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in
subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed returns are
recorded when identified.
Tax benefits from
an uncertain tax position are only recognized if it is more likely
than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by
the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements
from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that
has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate resolution. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits are recorded as incurred as a component of income tax
expense.
Loss per share
Loss per share of
Common Stock is computed by dividing loss available to common stock
shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding during the period, including the issuable shares
related to the anti-dilution agreement. Stock warrants were not
included in the computation of loss per share for the periods
presented because their inclusion is anti-dilutive. The total
potential dilutive warrants outstanding were 5,890,000 and
1,050,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Going Concern
In accordance with
ASC Subtopic 205-40, Going Concern, management evaluates whether
relevant conditions and events that, when considered in the
aggregate, indicate that it is probable the Company will be unable
to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after
the date that the financial statements are issued. When
relevant conditions or events, considered in the aggregate,
initially indicate that it is probable that the Company
will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within
one year after the date that the financial statements are
issued (and therefore they raise substantial doubt about
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern),
management evaluates whether its plans that are intended to
mitigate those conditions and events, when implemented, will
alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. Management’s plans are
considered only to the extent that 1) it is probable that the plans
will be effectively implemented and 2) it is probable that the
plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. See Note 2 related to going
concern.
Concentration of
Risk
The Company
maintains its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions
and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits of
$250,000. Substantially all of the production revenue
during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was derived from
two productions.
Business Segments
The Company
operates the following business segments:
|
1)
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Media (USA): The Company created online kids clubs and derives
revenue from annual membership fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Studios: Dolphin Digital Studios creates original programming that
premieres online, with an initial focus on content geared toward
tweens and teens. The Company derived a majority of its revenues
from this segment during the year ended December 31,
2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Dolphin Films:
Dolphin Films produces motion pictures, with an initial focus on
family content. The motion pictures are distributed,
through third parties, in the domestic and international
markets. The Company derived a majority of its revenues
from this segment during the year ended December 31,
2016.
|
Based on an
analysis of the Company’s operating segments and the
provisions of ASC 280, Segment
Reporting, the Company believes it meets the criteria for
aggregating its operating segments into a single reporting segment
because they have similar economic characteristics, similar nature
of product sold, (content), similar production process (the Company
uses the same labor force, and content) and similar type of
customer (children, teens, tweens and family).
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In May 2014, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.
2014-09 —Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
(“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance for revenue
recognition. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition
requirements in ASC Topic 605, and most industry specific guidance,
and replace it with a new Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 606. The FASB has also issued several
subsequent ASUs which amend ASU 2014-09. The amendments do not
change the core principle of the guidance in ASC 606.
The core principle
of ASC 606 is that revenue is recognized when promised goods or
services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core
principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
Step 1: Identify
the contract(s) with a customer
Step 2: Identify
the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine
the transaction price.
Step 4: Allocate
the transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract.
Step 5: Recognize
revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance
obligation.
The guidance in ASU
2014-09 also specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or
fulfill a contract with a customer.
ASC 606 will
require the Company to make significant judgments and estimates.
ASC 606 also requires more extensive disclosures regarding the
nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
arising from contracts with customers.
Public business
entities are required to apply the guidance of ASC 606 to annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (2018 for the
Company), including interim reporting periods within that reporting
period. Accordingly, the Company will adopt ASU 606 in the first
quarter of 2018.
ASC 606 requires an
entity to apply ASC 606 using one of the following two transition
methods:
1.
Retrospective
approach: Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented
and the entity may elect certain practical
expedients.
2.
Modified
retrospective approach: Retrospectively with the cumulative effect
of initially applying ASC 606 recognized at the date of initial
application. If an entity elects this transition method it also is
required to provide the additional disclosures in reporting periods
that include the date of initial application of (a) the amount by
which each financial statement line item is affected in the current
reporting period by the application ASU 606 as compared to the
guidance that was in effect before the change, and (b) an
explanation of the reasons for significant
changes.
The Company expects
that it will adopt ASC 606 following the modified retrospective
approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the
adoption of this new guidance will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In
November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income
Taxes (Topic 740) regarding balance sheet classification of
deferred income taxes. ASU 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of
deferred taxes by requiring deferred tax assets and liabilities be
classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. ASU
2015-17 is effective for public companies for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (2017 for the
Company), and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The guidance may be adopted prospectively or
retrospectively and early adoption is permitted. The
Company does not believe that adoption of guidance in ASU 2015-17
will have a material impact on our financial position, or results
of operations or cash flows.
In February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 642) intended to improve
financial reporting about leasing transactions. The ASU
affects all companies and other organizations that lease assets
such as real estate, airplanes, and manufacturing
equipment. The ASU will require organizations that lease
assets—referred to as “lessees”—to
recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the
rights and obligations created by those leases. Under
the new guidance, a lease will be required to recognize assets and
liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12
months. Consistent with current Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP), the recognition, measurement, and
presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a
lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or
operating lease. However, unlike current
GAAP—which requires only capital leases to be recognized on
the balance sheet –the new ASU will require both types of
leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. The ASU
also will require disclosures to help investors and other financial
statement users better understand the amount, timing, and
uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These
disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements,
providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the
financial statements.
ASU 2016-02 will
take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15,
2018 (2019 for the Company). For all other organizations
the ASU on leases will take effect for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application
will be permitted for all organizations. The company is currently
reviewing the impact that implementing this ASU will
have.
In August 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which
addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented
and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU will be
effective on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (2018
for the Company), and interim periods within those years, with
early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe adoption of
this new guidance will have a material affect on our consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-17 —Consolidation (Topic 810):
Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common
Control, The update amends the consolidation guidance on how
VIE’s should treat indirect interest in the entity held
through related parties. The ASU will be effective on a
retrospective or modified retrospective basis for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (2017 for the Company),
and interim periods within those years, with early adoption
permitted. The Company does not believe adoption of this new
guidance will have a material affect on our consolidated financial
statements.
NOTE
4 — ACQUISITION OF DOLPHIN FILMS, INC.
On March 7, 2016,
the Company, DDM Merger Sub, Inc., a Florida corporation and a
direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger
Subsidiary”), Dolphin Entertainment and Dolphin Films
completed their previously announced merger contemplated by the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 14, 2015 (the
“Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the
Merger Agreement, Merger Subsidiary merged with and into Dolphin
Films (the “Merger”) with Dolphin Films surviving the
Merger. As a result of the Merger, the Company acquired Dolphin
Films. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Dolphin
Films’ common stock, par value $1.00 per share, issued and
outstanding, was converted into the right to receive the
consideration for the Merger (the “Merger
Consideration”). The Company issued 2,300,000 shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share,
and 1,000,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par
value $0.001 per share to Dolphin Entertainment as the Merger
Consideration.
William
O’Dowd is the President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company and, as of March 4, 2016, was the beneficial owner
of 52.5% of the outstanding Common Stock. In addition,
Mr. O’Dowd is the founder, president and sole shareholder of
Dolphin Entertainment, which was the sole shareholder of Dolphin
Films. The Merger Consideration was determined as a result of
negotiations between Dolphin Entertainment and a special committee
of independent directors of the Board of Directors of the Company
(the “Special Committee”), with the assistance of
separate financial and legal advisors selected and retained by the
Special Committee. The Special Committee unanimously determined
that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the Merger, were fair to and in the best
interests of the shareholders of the Company other than Mr.
O’Dowd, and that it was advisable for the Company to enter
into the Merger Agreement. The Merger was consummated following the
approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement by the
Company’s shareholders.
The Company
retrospectively adjusted the historical financial results for all
periods to include Dolphin Films as required for transactions
between entities under common control. The following table presents
the Company’s previously reported Consolidated Balance Sheet,
retrospectively adjusted for the acquisition of Dolphin
Films:
As of
December 31, 2015 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dolphin
Digital Media, Inc.*
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as currently reported
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$2,259,504
|
$133,181
|
-
|
$2,392,685
|
Related
party receivable
|
-
|
453,529
|
-
|
453,529
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
10,018
|
62,500
|
-
|
72,518
|
Receivables
and other current assets
|
560,112
|
2,267,019
|
-
|
2,827,131
|
Total
Current Assets
|
2,829,634
|
2,916,229
|
-
|
5,745,863
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
2,439
|
15,168,329
|
-
|
15,170,768
|
Property
and equipment
|
55,413
|
-
|
-
|
55,413
|
Deposits
|
41,291
|
355,778
|
-
|
397,069
|
Total
Assets
|
$2,928,777
|
$18,440,336
|
-
|
$21,369,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$479,799
|
$1,590,746
|
-
|
$2,070,545
|
Other
current liabilities
|
2,669,456
|
314,864
|
-
|
2,984,320
|
Accrued
compensation
|
2,065,000
|
-
|
-
|
2,065,000
|
Debt
|
5,145,000
|
32,186,008
|
-
|
37,331,008
|
Loan
from related party
|
-
|
2,917,523
|
-
|
2,917,523
|
Deferred
revenue
|
-
|
1,418,368
|
-
|
1,418,368
|
Notes
payable
|
300,000
|
-
|
-
|
300,000
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
10,659,255
|
38,427,509
|
-
|
49,086,764
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
note payable
|
3,164,000
|
-
|
-
|
3,164,000
|
|
1,982,267
|
-
|
-
|
1,982,267
|
Total
Noncurrent Liabilities
|
5,146,267
|
-
|
-
|
5,146,267
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
15,805,522
|
38,427,509
|
-
|
54,233,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.015 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 2,047,309 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2015.
|
30,710
|
100
|
(100)
|
30,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, Series A. $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,
1,042,753 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of
$1,042,753 at December 31, 2015.
|
1,043
|
-
|
-
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, Series B. $0.10 par value, 4,000,000 shares authorized,
3,300,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2015.
|
-
|
-
|
230,000
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, Series C. $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2015.
|
-
|
-
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
26,741,849
|
-
|
(230,900)
|
26,510,949
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(42,628,155)
|
(19,987,273)
|
-
|
(62,615,428)
|
Total
Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. Deficit
|
$(15,854,553)
|
$(19,987,173)
|
-
|
$(35,841,726)
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
2,977,808
|
-
|
-
|
2,977,808
|
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
$(12,876,745)
|
$(19,987,173)
|
-
|
$(32,863,918)
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
$2,928,777
|
$18,440,336
|
-
|
$21,369,113
|
*Previously
reported on Form 10-K filed with the SEC March 31,
2016
.
|
|
|
|
The following table
presents the Company’s previously reported Consolidated
Statement of Operations, retrospectively adjusted for the
acquisition of Dolphin Films:
For the year ended December 31,
2015
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Media, Inc.*
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Operations as currently reported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
$2,929,518
|
$101,555
|
|
$3,031,073
|
Membership
|
69,761
|
-
|
|
69,761
|
Total
Revenue:
|
2,999,279
|
101,555
|
|
$3,100,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
2,290,645
|
296,612
|
|
2,587,257
|
Impairment of
deferred production costs
|
-
|
213,300
|
|
213.300
|
Selling, general
and administrative
|
2,478,794
|
341,772
|
(975,478)
|
1,845,088
|
Legal and
professional
|
-
|
1,417,078
|
975,478
|
2,392,556
|
Payroll
|
1,435,765
|
-
|
|
1,435,765
|
Loss before other
income (expense)
|
(3,205,925)
|
(2,167,207)
|
|
(5,373,132)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
(Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income
|
96,302
|
-
|
|
96,302
|
Interest
expense
|
(940,398)
|
(2,619,134)
|
|
(3,559,532)
|
Net
Loss
|
(4,050,021)
|
(4,786,341)
|
|
(8,836,362)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
$17,440
|
$-
|
|
$17,440
|
Net loss
attributable to Dolphin Films, Inc.
|
-
|
(4,786,341)
|
|
(4,786,341)
|
Net loss
attributable to Dolphin Digital Media, Inc.
|
(4,067,461)
|
-
|
|
(4,067,461)
|
Net
loss
|
$(4,050,021)
|
$(4,786,341)
|
|
$(8,836,362)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
Loss per Share
|
$(1.98)
|
|
|
$(4.32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of shares used in share calculation
|
2,047,309
|
|
|
2,047,309
|
*Previously
reported on Form 10-K filed with the SEC March
31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
The following table
presents the Company’s previously reported Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, retrospectively adjusted for
the acquisition of Dolphin Films:
For
the year ended December 31, 2015
|
|
Dolphin
Digital Media, Inc.*
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows (as currently reported)
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
(4,050,021)
|
(4,786,341)
|
-
|
(8,836,362)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
-
|
Depreciation
|
24,826
|
-
|
-
|
24,826
|
Amortization
of capitalized production costs
|
1,642,120
|
30,000
|
-
|
1,672,120
|
Impairment
of capitalized production costs
|
648,525
|
213,300
|
-
|
861,825
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
-
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
(7,679)
|
-
|
-
|
(7,679)
|
Receivables
and other current assets
|
(115,069)
|
(150,547)
|
-
|
(265,616)
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
(1,599,558)
|
(1,136,763)
|
-
|
(2,736,321)
|
Accounts
Payable
|
239,063
|
545,766
|
-
|
784,829
|
Accrued
compensation
|
315,000
|
-
|
-
|
315,000
|
Other
current liabilities
|
1,121,876
|
-
|
-
|
1,121,876
|
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(1,780,917)
|
(5,284,585)
|
|
(7,065,502)
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(2,549)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,549)
|
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(2,549)
|
-
|
|
(2,549)
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from Loan and Security agreements
|
1,150,000
|
1,460,000
|
-
|
2,610,000
|
Repayment
of loan and security agreements
|
-
|
(405,219)
|
-
|
(405,219)
|
Proceeds
from production loan
|
-
|
440,130
|
-
|
440,130
|
Proceeds
from convertible note payable
|
3,164,000
|
-
|
-
|
3,164,000
|
Proceeds
from note payable with related party
|
2,797,500
|
3,785,936
|
-
|
6,583,436
|
Repayment
of note payable to related party
|
(3,267,000)
|
(57,686)
|
-
|
(3,324,686)
|
Net
Cash Provided By Financing Activities
|
3,844,500
|
5,223,161
|
-
|
9,067,661
|
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
2,061,034
|
(61,424)
|
-
|
1,999,610
|
CASH,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
198,470
|
194,605
|
-
|
393,075
|
CASH,
END OF PERIOD
|
2,259,504
|
133,181
|
-
|
2,392,685
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
Interest
Paid
|
234,777
|
1,401,037
|
|
1,635,814
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
Refinance
of related party debt to third party debt
|
-
|
8,774,337
|
|
8,774,337
|
*Previously
reported on Form 10-K filed with the SEC March 31,
2016.
|
|
|
|
NOTE
5 — CAPITALIZED PRODUCTION COSTS AND OTHER CURRENT
ASSETS
Capitalized
Production Costs
Capitalized
production costs include the unamortized costs of completed motion
pictures and digital projects which have been produced by the
Company, costs of scripts for projects that have not been developed
or produced and costs for projects that are in production. These
costs include direct production costs and production overhead and
are amortized using the individual-film-forecast method, whereby
these costs are amortized and participations and residuals costs
are accrued in the proportion that current year’s revenue
bears to management’s estimate of ultimate revenue at the
beginning of the current year expected to be recognized from the
exploitation, exhibition or sale of the motion picture
or web series.
Motion Pictures
For year ended
December 31, 2016, revenues earned from motion pictures were
$9,367,222 mainly attributable to Max Steel, the motion picture
released on October 14, 2016 and international sales of Believe,
the motion picture released in December 2013. Revenues from
motion pictures for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $101,555
attributable to international sales of Believe. The
Company amortized capitalized production costs (included as direct
costs) in the consolidated statements of operations using the
individual film forecast computation method in the amount of
$7,822,550 and $30,000, respectively for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, related to these two motion
pictures. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had a
balance of $4,189,930 and $14,893,329, respectively recorded as
capitalized production costs related to our motion
picture. As of December 31, 2016,the Company has amortized
all of the capitalized production costs related to Believe and 65% of the capitalized
production costs related to Max
Steel. The Company expects that approximately
85% of the capitalized production costs of Max Steel will be amortized over the
next two years.
ASC 926-20-35-12
states that “unamortized film costs shall be tested for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the fair value of the film may be less than its unamortized
costs”. Max
Steel did not perform as well as expected in the domestic
box office. Since the Company determined that
Max
Steel’s performance in the domestic box
office was an indicator that the capitalized production costs may
be impaired, it used a discounted cash flow model to help determine
the fair value of the capitalized production
costs. After careful analysis, the Company recorded an
impairment of $2,000,000 since it determined that the fair value of
the motion picture was lower than the balance of the capitalized
production costs.
The Company has
purchased scripts, including one from a related party, for other
motion picture productions and has deferred $215,000 and $275,000
in capitalized production costs as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
associated with these scripts. The Company intends to produce these
projects but they were not yet in production as of December 31,
2016.
On November 17,
2015, the Company entered into a quitclaim agreement with a
distributor for rights to a script owned by the
Company. As part of the agreement the Company will
receive $221,223 plus interest and a profit participation if the
distributor decides to produce the motion picture within 24 months
after the execution of the agreement. If the motion
picture is not produced within the 24 months, all rights revert
back to the Company. As per the terms of the agreement, the Company
is entitled to co-finance the motion picture and the distributor
will assist the Company in releasing its completed motion
picture. The Company recorded $213,300 in direct costs
and reduced the capitalized production costs by the same amount
during the year ended December 31, 2015 as there is no guarantee
the distributor will produce the motion picture.
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company
decided that it would not extend its option to produce a script
that it had purchased. As a result, the Company recorded
$75,000 in direct costs and reduced the capitalized production
costs by the same amount during the year ended December 31,
2016. The Company did not have any other development
projects abandoned during the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015.
As of December 31,
2016 and 2015, respectively, the Company has total capitalized
production costs of $4,654,013 and $15,168,329, net of accumulated
amortization, tax incentives and impairment charges, recorded on
its consolidated balance sheets related to motion
pictures.
Digital
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company began production of a new
digital project showcasing favorite restaurants of NFL players
throughout the country. The Company entered into a co-production
agreement with an unrelated party and is responsible for financing
50% of the project’s budget. Per the terms of the agreement,
the Company is entitled to 50% of the profits of the project, net
of any distribution fees. The project is still in
production, and as such, for the year ended December 31, 2016,
revenues earned from digital projects were
immaterial. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the
Company earned $2,929,518 from the release of the digital web
series, South
Beach-Fever.. The Company amortized capitalized
production costs (included as direct costs) in the consolidated
statements of operations using the individual film forecast
computation method in the amount of $2,439 and $1,642,120 for the
years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
In previous years,
the Company entered into agreements to hire writers to develop
scripts for other digital web series
productions. Management evaluated the scripts and based
on guidance in ASC 926-20-40-1 impaired $648,525 of capitalized
production costs during the year ended December 31, 2015, as the
scripts were more than three years old and the Company had not
begun production on the projects.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively, the Company has total capitalized production costs of
$249,083 and $2,439, net of accumulated amortization, tax
incentives and impairment charges, recorded on its consolidated
balance sheet related to web series.
The Company has
assessed events and changes in circumstances that would indicate
that the Company should assess whether the fair value of the
productions are less than the unamortized costs capitalized and did
not identify indicators of impairment, other than those noted
above.
Accounts Receivables
The Company entered
into various agreements with foreign distributors for the licensing
rights of its motion picture, Max
Steel, in certain international territories. The motion
picture was delivered to the distributors and other stipulations,
as required by the contracts were met, and the Company had a
balance of $3,668,646 in accounts receivable related to these
contracts.
Other Current Assets
The Company had a
balance of $2,665,781 and $2,827,131 in other current assets on its
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. As of December 31, 2016, these amounts were primarily
comprised of tax incentive receivables and prepaid loan interest.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the amount was primarily
comprised of tax incentive receivables, loan receivable, prepaid
expenses and advertising revenue.
Tax Incentives -The Company has
access to government programs that are designed to promote film
production in the jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
the Company recorded $2,060,883 and $1,854,066 from these tax
incentives. Tax incentives earned with respect to expenditures on
qualifying film productions are included as an offset to
capitalized production costs when the qualifying expenditures have
been incurred provided that there is reasonable assurance that the
credits will be realized. During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company received $131,807, net of discount and financing fees,
related to these incentives. The remaining tax incentives were
collected subsequent to December 31, 2016.
Prepaid Interest – The
Company entered into a loan and security agreement to finance the
distribution and marketing costs of a motion picture and prepaid
interest related to the agreement. As of December 31, 2016, there
was $602,697 of prepaid interest recorded.
Loan Receivable – During
the year ended December 31, 2015, Dolphin Films entered into a Loan
and Security agreement, with an existing investor, for $500,000
that was paid, net of interest, in January of 2016.
Prepaid Expenses – As of
December 31, 2015, the Company prepaid $62,500 for consulting fees
for the first quarter of 2016.
Advertising Revenue
Receivable – During the
year ended December 31, 2015, the Company released a web series on
Hulu. As of December 31, 2015, it recorded $569,772 of
advertising receivables related to this project. The
receivable was collected in 2016.
NOTE
6 — DEBT
Kids Club Agreements
During February
2011, the Company entered into two agreements with individual
parties (each a “Kids Club Agreement”) for the
development of a child fan club for the promotion of a local
university and its collegiate athletic program (the “Group
Kids Club”). Under each Kids Club Agreement, each party paid
the Company $50,000 in return for the participation of future
revenue generated by the Group Kids Club. Pursuant to the terms of
each of the Kids Club Agreements, the amount invested by the
individual investor was to be repaid by the Group Kids Club, with a
specified percentage of the Group Kids Club’s net receipts,
until the total investment was recouped. Each individual party was
to recoup its investment with a percentage of net revenue based
upon a fraction, the numerator of which was the amount invested
($50,000), and the denominator of which was $500,000 (the
“Investment Ratio”). Thereafter, each individual party
was to share in a percentage of the net revenue of the Group Kids
Club, in an amount equal to one half of the Investment Ratio. The
Company had made aggregate payments of $45,000 under one of the two
Kids Clubs Agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the
Company agreed to terminate such Kids Club Agreement with one of
the parties for (i) $10,000, plus (ii) the balance of the original
investment ($5,000). The Company paid such individual party $15,000
on July 18, 2016 in full settlement of the Company’s
obligations under such Kids Club Agreement, and the Kids Club
Agreement for such party was terminated. On October 3, 2016, the
Company entered into a debt exchange agreement with the remaining
party whereby The Company agreed to issue 6,000 shares
of Common Stock at an exchange price of $10.00 per
share to in exchange for (i) $10,000 plus (ii) the
remaining party’s original investment of $50,000 to terminate
the Kids Club Agreement.
For the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no significant
revenues generated or costs incurred related to the Group Kids
Club. The Company balance of debt related to the Kids
Club Agreements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0 and
$100,000, respectively.
Equity Finance Agreements
During the years
ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company entered into Equity
Finance Agreements (the “Equity Finance Agreements”)
for the future production of web series and the option to
participate in the production of future web series. The investors
contributed a total investment of $1,000,000 and had the ability to
share in the future revenues of the relevant web series, on a
prorata basis, until the total investment was recouped and then
would have shared at a lower percentage of the additional revenues.
The Equity Finance Agreements stated that prior to December 31,
2012, the Company could utilize all, or any portion, of the total
investment to fund any chosen production. Per the Equity Finance
Agreements, the Company was entitled to a producer’s fee, not
to exceed $250,000, for each web series that it produced before
calculating the share of revenues owed to the investors. The
Company invested these funds in eleven projects. On January 1,
2013, the “production cycle”, as defined in
the Equity Finance Agreements, ceased and the
investors were entitled to share in the future revenues of any
productions for which the funds invested were used. Based on the
producer’s gross revenues, (as defined in the Equity Finance
Agreements) for the productions to date and the amount of investor
funds used to date, the Company was not required to pay the
investors any amount in excess of the existing liability already
recorded as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. Two of the productions
were completed as of December 31, 2016 and there was no producer
gross revenue as defined in the Equity Finance Agreements for each
of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to those two
productions The costs of the other nine projects was impaired and
no future projects are planned with funds from the Equity Finance
Agreements. As a result, the investors did not recoup any of their
investment.
On June 23, 2016,
the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the
“Settlement”) with one of the Equity Finance Agreement
investors that had originally contributed $105,000. Pursuant to the
terms of the Settlement, the Company made a payment of $200,000 to
the investor on June 24, 2016 resulting in a loss on extinguishment
of debt of $95,000 recorded in the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. On October 3,
13 and 27, 2016, the Company
entered into debt exchange agreements with three Equity Finance
Agreement three investors to
issue an aggregate total of 33,100 shares of Common
Stock at an exchange price of $10.00 per share to
terminate each of their Equity Finance Agreements for a cumulative
original investment amount of $331,000. On the date of the conversions the market price of
the Common Stock was between $12.50 and
$13.50 and as a result, the Company recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $112,025, related to these three
agreements, on its consolidated statement of operations. On
December 29, 2016, the Company entered into a termination agreement
whereby the Company agreed to issue Warrant “K” to
another investor that entitles the warrant holder to purchase
85,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of
$0.03 per share in return for terminating its Equity
Finance Agreement. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $538,685 on the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 based on the
difference between the fair value of the Warrant “K”
and the carrying amount of the balance owed to the investor under
the Equity Finance Agreement on the date the Equity Finance
Agreement was terminated. The Company balance of debt related to
the Equity Finance Agreements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was
$0 and $1,000,000, respectively.
Loan and Security Agreements
First Group Film Funding
During the years
ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, the Company entered into various
loan and security agreements with individual noteholders (the
“First Loan and Security Noteholders”) for notes with
an aggregate principal amount of $11,945,219 to finance future
motion picture projects (the “First Loan and Security
Agreements”). During the year ended December 31, 2015, one of
the First Loan and Security Noteholders increased its funding under
its respective First Loan and Security Agreement for an additional
$500,000 note and the Company used the proceeds to repay $405,219
to another First Loan and Security Noteholder. Pursuant to the
terms of the First Loan and Security Agreements, the notes accrued
interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12% per annum, payable
monthly through June 30, 2015. During 2015, the Company exercised
its option under the First Loan and Security Agreements, to extend
the maturity date of these notes until December 31, 2016. In
consideration for the Company’s exercise of the option to
extend the maturity date, the Company was required to pay a higher
interest rate, increasing by 1.25% resulting in rates
ranging from 12.50% to 13.25%. The First Loan and Security
Noteholders, as a group, will receive the Company’s entire
share of the proceeds from the motion picture productions funded
under the First Loan and Security Agreements, on a prorata basis,
until the principal investment is repaid. Thereafter, the First
Loan and Security Noteholders, as a group, would have the right to
participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits from these
projects (defined as the Company’s gross revenues of such
projects less the aggregate amount of principal and interest paid
for the financing of such projects) on a prorata basis based on
each First Loan and Security Noteholder's loan commitment as a
percentage of the total loan commitments received to fund specific
motion picture productions.
On May 31, 2016 and
June 30, 2016, the Company entered into debt exchange agreements
with certain First Loan and Security Noteholders on substantially
similar terms to convert an aggregate of $11,340,000 of principal
and $1,811,490 of accrued interest into shares of Common Stock.
Pursuant to the terms of such debt exchange agreements, the Company
agreed to convert the debt owed to certain First Loan and Security
Noteholders into Common Stock at an exchange rate of
$10.00 per share and issued 1,315,149
shares of Common Stock. On May 31, 2016, the market price of a
share of Common Stock was $13.98 and on June 30, 2016
it was $12.16. As a result, the Company recorded
losses on the extinguishment of debt on its consolidated statement
of operations of $3,328,366 for the year ended December 31, 2016
based on the difference between the fair value of the Common Stock
issued and the carrying amount of outstanding balance of the
exchanged notes on the date of the exchange. On
December 29, 2016, as part of a global settlement agreement with an
investor that was the noteholder under each of the First Loan and
Security Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a Second Loan and
Security Agreement, the Company entered into a debt
exchange agreement whereby the Company issued Warrant
“J” that entitles the warrant holder to purchase shares
of Common Stock at a price of $0.03 per share in
settlement of $1,160,000 of debt from the note under the First Loan
and Security Agreement. See Note 16 for further
discussion of Warrant “J”.
During the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company expensed $518,767 and
$1,238,234, respectively in interest related to the First Loan and
Security Agreements. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company
had $0 and $9,334,303, respectively of outstanding debt related to
the First Loan and Security Agreements and $0 and $602,661,
respectively of accrued interest recorded in other current
liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets.
Web Series Funding
During the years
ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, the Company entered into various
loan and security agreements with individual noteholders (the
“Web Series Noteholders”) for an aggregate principal
amount of notes of $4,090,000 which the Company used to finance
production of its 2015 web series (the “Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements”). Under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements, the Company issued promissory notes that accrued
interest at rates ranging from 10% to 12% per annum payable monthly
through August 31, 2015, with the exception of one note that
accrued interest through February 29, 2016. During 2015, the
Company exercised its option under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements to extend the maturity date of these notes to August 31,
2016. In consideration for the Company’s exercise of the
option to extend the maturity date, the Company was required to pay
a higher interest rate, increasing 1.25% resulting in interest
rates ranging from 11.25% to 13.25%. Pursuant to the terms of the
Web Series Loan and Security Agreements, the First Loan and
Security Noteholders, as a group, would have had the right to
participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits generated
by the series (defined as the Company’s gross revenues of
such series less the aggregate amount of principal and interest
paid for the financing of such series) on a prorata basis based on
each Web Series Noteholder's loan commitment as a percentage of the
total loan commitments received to fund the series.
On March 29, 2016
and June 30, 2016, the Company entered into eleven individual debt
exchange agreements (the “Web Series Debt Exchange
Agreements”) on substantially similar terms with the Web
Series Noteholders. Pursuant to the terms of the Web Series Debt
Exchange Agreements, the Company and each Web Series Noteholder
agreed to convert an aggregate of $2,650,000 of principal and
$289,017 of accrued interest under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements into an aggregate of 293,902 shares of
Common Stock at an exchange price of $10.00 per share
as payment in full of each of the notes issued under the Web Series
Loan and Security Agreements. Mr. Nicholas Stanham, director of the
Company, was one of the Web Series Noteholders that converted his
note into shares of Common Stock. On December 15 and December 20,
2016, the Company entered into substantially identical Subscription
Agreements with two Web Series Noteholders to convert $1,265,530 of
principal and interest into an aggregate of 126,554
shares of Common Stock at an exchange price of $10.00
per share as payment in full of each of the notes issued under the
Web Series Loan and Security Agreements. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of
debt of $1,489,582 on its consolidated statement of operations
related to the Web Series Loan and Security Agreements due to the
following market prices per share on the dates of the exchanges (i)
$12.00 per share for 288,338 shares
issued, (ii) $12.16 for 5,564 shares
issued, (iii) $12.20 for 126,967 shares
issued and (iv) $12.90 for 16,137 shares
issued, which were in excess of the $10.00 per share
exchange prices. On December 29, 2016, as part of a global
settlement agreement with another investor that was the Noteholder
of a First Loan and Security Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and
a Second Loan and Security Agreement, the Company entered into a
debt exchange agreement whereby the Company issued Warrant
“J” that entitles the warrant holder to purchase shares
of Common Stock at a price of $0.03 per share in
settlement of $340,000 of debt from the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreement. See Note 16 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
During the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded expense of
$31,487 and $388,320 respectively, in interest related to the Web
Series Loan and Security Agreements. As of December 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively, the Company had outstanding balances of $0 and
$4,090,000, respectively of principal and $0 and $173,211,
respectively, of accrued interest recorded on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets.
Second Group Film Funding
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into various loan and
security agreements with individual noteholders (the “Second
Loan and Security Noteholders”) for notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $9,274,327 to fund a new group of film projects
(the “Second Loan and Security Agreements”). Of this
total aggregate amount, notes with an aggregate principal amount of
$8,774,327 were issued in exchange for debt that had originally
been incurred by Dolphin Entertainment, Inc., primarily related to
the production and distribution of the motion picture,
“Believe”. The remaining $500,000 of principal amount
was related to a note issued in exchange for cash. The
notes issued pursuant to the Second Loan and Security Agreements
accrue interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12% per annum,
payable monthly through December 31, 2016. The Company did not
exercise its option to extend the maturity date of these notes
until July 31, 2018. The Second Loan and Security Noteholders, as a
group, will receive the Company’s entire share of the
proceeds from the related group of film projects, on a prorata
basis, until the principal balance is repaid. Thereafter, the
Second Loan and Security Noteholders, as a group, would have the
right to participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits
from such projects (defined as the Company’s gross revenues
of such projects less the aggregate amount of principal and
interest paid for the financing of such projects) on a prorata
basis based on each Second Loan and Security Noteholder’s
loan principal as a percentage of the total loan proceeds received
to fund the specific motion picture productions.
On May 31, 2016 and
June 30, 2016, the Company entered into various debt exchange
agreements on substantially similar terms with certain of the
Second Loan and Security Noteholders to convert an aggregate of
$4,003,337 of principal and $341,013 of accrued interest into
shares of Common Stock. Pursuant to such debt exchange agreements,
the Company agreed to convert the debt at an exchange price of
$10.00 per share and issued 434,435
shares of Common Stock. On May 31, 2016, the market
price of a share of the Common Stock was $13.98 and on
June 30, 2016, it was $12.16. As a result, the Company
recorded a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $1,312,059 on its
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December
31, 2016, due to the difference between the exchange price and the
market price of the Common Stock on the dates of
exchange. On June 22, 2016, the Company repaid one of
the Second Loan and Security Noteholders its principal investment
of $300,000. On December 29, 2016, as part of a global settlement
agreement with an investor that was the noteholder under each of a
First Loan and Security Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a
Second Loan and Security Agreement, the Company entered
into a debt exchange agreement whereby the Company issued Warrant
“J” that entitles the warrant holder to purchase shares
of Common Stock at a price of $0.03 per share in
settlement of $4,970,990 of debt from the note under the Second
Loan and Security Agreement. See Note 16 for further
discussion of Warrant “J”.
During the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded interest
expense of $715,934 and $634,923, respectively, related
to the Second Loan and Security Agreements.
As of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had $0 and
$9,334,303, respectively, of outstanding debt related to the Second
Loan and Security Agreements and $0 and $228,040, respectively of
accrued interest recorded in other current liabilities on the
Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company
accounts for the above agreements in accordance with ASC
470-10-25-2, which requires that cash received from an investor in
exchange for the future payment of a specified percentage or amount
of future revenue shall be classified as debt. The Company does not
purport the arrangements to be a sale and the Company has
significant continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows
due to the noteholders.
Production Service Agreement
During the year
ended December 31, 2014, Dolphin Films entered into a financing
agreement for the production of one of the Company’s feature
film, Max Steel (the
“Production Service Agreement”). The Production Service
Agreement was for a total amount of $10,419,009 with the lender
taking an $892,619 producer fee. The Production Service Agreement
contained repayment milestones to be made during the year ended
December 31, 2015, that if not met, accrued interest at a default
rate of 8.5% per annum above the published base rate of HSBC
Private Bank (UK) Limited until the maturity on January 31, 2016 or
the release of the movie. Due to a delay in the release of
Max Steel, the Company did
not make the repayments as prescribed in the Production Service
Agreement. As a result, the Company recorded accrued interest of
$1,147,520 and $381,566, respectively, as of December 31, 2016 and
2015 in other current liabilities on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets. The loan was partially secured by
international distribution agreements entered into by the Company
prior to the commencement of principal photography and the receipt
of tax incentives. As a condition to the Production Service
Agreement, the Company acquired a completion guarantee from a bond
company for the production of the motion picture. The funds for the
loan were held by the bond company and disbursed as needed to
complete the production in accordance with the approved production
budget. The Company recorded debt as funds were transferred from
the bond company for the production.
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the motion picture, Max Steel, was released in the US and
delivered to the international
distributors. International distributors made payments
totaling $3,493,105 and $675,507 of Canadian tax incentives were
received for an aggregate of $4,168,612 applied to the balance of
the Production Service Agreement debt. As of December
31, 2016 and 2015 the Company had outstanding balances of
$6,243,069 and $10,411,681, respectively, related to this debt on
its consolidated statement of operations.
Loan and Security Agreement – (Prints and Advertising
Loan)
On August 12, 2016,
Dolphin Max Steel Holding, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
("Max Steel Holding") and a wholly owned subsidiary of Dolphin
Films, entered into a loan and security agreement (the "P&A
Loan") providing for $14,500,000 non-revolving credit facility that
matures on August 25, 2017. The proceeds of the credit facility
were used to pay a portion of the print and advertising expenses of
the domestic distribution of 'Max
Steel”. To secure Max Steel Holding’s
obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company has
granted to the lender a security interest in bank account funds
totaling $1,250,000 pledged as collateral and recorded as
restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2016, and rights to the assets of Max Steel Holdings, but
without recourse to the assets of the Company. The loan is also
partially secured by a $4,500,000 corporate guaranty from a party
associated with the film. The lender has retained a
reserve of $1,531,871 for loan fees and interest (the
“Reserve”). Amounts borrowed under the
credit facility will accrue interest at either (i) a fluctuating
per annum rate equal to the 5.5% plus a base rate or (ii) a per
annum rate equal to 6.5% plus the LIBOR determined for the
applicable interest period. As of December 31, 2016, the Company
had an outstanding balance of $12,500,000, including the Reserve,
related to this agreement recorded on the consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2016. The Company recorded
$10,168,129 in distribution and marketing costs related to the
release of the feature film on the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE
7 — CONVERTIBLE DEBT
On December 7,
2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor to sell up to $7,000,000 in convertible promissory notes
of the Company. The promissory note, bears interest on the unpaid
balance at a rate of 10% per annum, becomes due and payable on
December 7, 2016 and may be prepaid, without penalty, at any time.
Pursuant to the subscription agreement, the Company issued a
convertible note to the investor in the amount of $3,164,000. At
any time prior to the maturity date, the investor has the right, at
its option, to convert some or all of the convertible note into
Common Stock. The convertible note has a conversion price of
$10.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount and
all accrued interest are mandatorily and automatically converted
into Common Stock, at the conversion price, upon the average market
price per share of Common Stock being greater than or equal to the
conversion price for twenty trading days.
On February 5,
2016, a triggering event occurred pursuant to the convertible note
agreement. As such 316,400 shares of Common Stock were
issued in satisfaction of the convertible note payable. As of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $0 and $3,164,000
as convertible note and accrued $0 and $21,671 of interest in other
current liabilities in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company
expensed $31,207 of interest, incurred prior to its conversion,
during the year ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE
8 — NOTES PAYABLE
On July 5, 2012, the Company signed
an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $300,000 bearing 10%
interest per annum and payable on demand. No payments were made on
the note during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The
Company recorded accrued interest of $134,794 and $104,712 as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively related to this note. As
of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had a balance of
$300,000 on its consolidated balance sheets related to this note
payable.
The Company
expensed $30,082 and $30,000, respectively for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively for interest related to
this note.
NOTE 9 — LOANS FROM RELATED PARTY
On December 31,
2011, the Company issued an unsecured revolving promissory note
(the “DE Note”) to Dolphin Entertainment
(“DE”), an entity wholly owned by the Company's CEO
that, at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, had outstanding
balances of $0 and $1,982,267, respectively. The DE Note accrued
interest at a rate of 10% per annum. Dolphin Entertainment had the
right at any time to demand that all outstanding principal and
accrued interest be repaid with a ten day notice to the Company.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, DE loaned the Company
$2,797,000 and was repaid $3,267,000 in principal. During the year
ended December 31, 2016, DE advanced the Company $270,000. On March
4, 2016, the Company entered into a subscription agreement (the
“Subscription Agreement”) with DE. Pursuant to the
terms of the Subscription Agreement, the Company and DE agreed to
convert the $3,073,410 aggregate amount of principal and interest
outstanding under the DE Note into 307,341 shares of
Common Stock. The shares were converted at a price of
$10.00 per share. On the date of the conversion that
market price of the shares was $12.00 and as a result
the Company recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the debt of
$614,682 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016
and 2015 $32,008 and $340,050 was expensed in interest,
respectively and the Company recorded accrued interest of $5,788
and $1,126, related to the DE Note, on its consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In addition, DE has
previously advanced funds for working capital to Dolphin Films.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, Dolphin Films agreed to
enter into second Loan and Security Agreements with certain of
DE’s debtholders, pursuant to which the debtholders exchanged
their DE notes for notes issued by Dolphin Films totaling
$8,774,327. See Note 6 for more details. The amount of debt assumed
by Dolphin Films was applied against amounts owed to Dolphin
Entertainment by Dolphin Films. On October 1, 2016, Dolphin Films
entered into a promissory note with DE (the “New DE
Note”) in the principal amount of $1,009,624. The
New DE Note is payable on demand and bears interest at 10% per
annum. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
Dolphin Films owed DE $434,326 and $2,917,523, respectively, that
was recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Dolphin
Films recorded interest expense of $83,551 and $148,805,
respectively for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015.
NOTE
10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
During 2016, the
Company issued Series G, H, I, J and K Common Stock warrants (the
“Warrants”) for which the Company determined that the
Warrants should be accounted for as derivatives (see Note 16), for
which a liability is recorded in the aggregate and measured at fair
value in the consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis, and
the change in fair value from one reporting period to the next is
reported as income or expense in the consolidated statements of
operations.
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the consolidated balance sheets
under the caption “Warrant liability” and records
changes to the liability against earnings or loss under the caption
“Changes in fair value of warrant liability” in the
consolidated statements of operations. The carrying
amount at fair value of the aggregate liability for the Warrants
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 is
$20,405,190, and due to the decrease in the fair value of the
Warrant Liability for the period in which the Warrants were
outstanding during the year, the Company recorded a gain on the
warrant liability of $2,195,542 in the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. There
were no assets or liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring
basis at December 31, 2015 or for the year then ended.
The Warrants have
the following terms:
|
|
|
Initial Per
Share Exercise Price
|
|
|
Series
G Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
750,000
|
$10.00
|
1.2
|
January 31,
2018
|
Series
H Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
250,000
|
$12.00
|
2.2
|
January 31,
2019
|
Series
I Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
250,000
|
$14.00
|
3.2
|
January 31,
2020
|
Series
J Warrants
|
December 29,
2016
|
1,085,000
|
$0.03
|
4
|
December 29,
2020
|
Series
K Warrants
|
December 29,
2016
|
85,000
|
$0.03
|
4
|
December 29,
2020
|
The Warrants have
an adjustable exercise price due to a full ratchet down round
provision, which would result in a downward adjustment to the
exercise price in the event the Company completes a financing in
which the price per share of the financing is lower than the
exercise price of the Warrants in effect immediately prior to the
financing.
Due to the
existence of the full ratchet down round provision, which creates a
path-dependent nature of the exercise prices of the Warrants, the
Company concluded it is necessary to measure the fair value of the
Warrants using a Monte Carlo Simulation model, which incorporates
inputs classified as “level 3” according to the fair
value hierarchy in ASC 820, Fair
Value. In general, level 3 assumptions utilize unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity in the
subject instrument and that are significant to the fair value of
the liabilities. The unobservable inputs the Company utilizes for
measuring the fair value of the Warrant liability reflects
management’s own assumptions about the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability as
of the reporting date.
The Company’s
management determined the fair value of the warrant liability as of
December 31, 2016 by using a Monte Carlo simulation model with the
following key inputs:
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
(1)
|
63.6%
|
79.1%
|
70.8%
|
65.8%
|
65.8%
|
Expected term
(years)
|
1.08
|
2.08
|
3.08
|
4
|
4
|
Risk free interest
rate
|
.879%
|
1.223%
|
1.489%
|
1.699%
|
1.699%
|
Common stock
price
|
$12.00
|
$12.00
|
$12.00
|
$12.00
|
$12.00
|
Exercise
price
|
$10.00
|
$12.00
|
$14.00
|
$0.03
|
$0.03
|
The stock
volatility assumption represents the range of the volatility curves
used in the valuation analysis that the Company has determined
market participants would use based on comparison with similar
entities. The risk-free interest rate is interpolated
where appropriate, and is based on treasury yields. The valuation
model also included a level 3 assumption as to dates of potential
future financings by the Company that may cause a reset of the
exercise price.
Since derivative
financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at
fair values, the Company’s income or loss will reflect the
volatility in changes to these estimates and
assumptions. The fair value is most sensitive to changes
at each valuation date in the Company’s Common Stock price,
the volatility rate assumption, and the exercise price, which could
change if the Company were to do a dilutive future
financing.
Other financial
instruments such as cash, accounts receivable, debt, notes and
related party notes approximate their fair value due to their short
term nature or being due on demand.
NOTE
11 — LICENSING AGREEMENTS - RELATED PARTY
The
Company has entered into a ten year licensing agreement with
Dolphin Entertainment, a related party. Under the license, the
Company is authorized to use Dolphin Entertainment’s brand
properties in connection with the creation, promotion and operation
of subscription based Internet social networking websites for
children and young adults. The license requires that the Company
pays to Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. royalties at the rate of
fifteen percent of net sales from performance of the licensed
activities. The Company did not use any of the brand properties
related to this agreement and as such, there was no royalty expense
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
NOTE
12 — DEFERRED REVENUE
During the year
ended December 31, 2014, the Company entered into agreements with
various entities for the international distribution rights of a
motion picture that was in production. As required by the
distribution agreements, the Company received $1,418,368 of
deposits for these rights that was recorded as deferred revenue on
its consolidated balance sheet. During the
year ended December 31, 2016, the Company delivered the
motion picture to various international distributors and recorded
$1,371,687 of revenue from production from these
deposits. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company
recorded $46,681 and $1,418,368 as deferred revenue on its
consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE
13 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
VIEs are entities
that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors
that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating
to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not
have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or the right to
receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of
VIE is a special-purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are
commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate
certain assets, and distribute the cash flows from those assets to
investors. The legal documents that govern the transaction specify
how the cash earned on the assets must be allocated to the
SPE’s investors and other parties that have rights to those
cash flows. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors
from claims on the SPE’s, assets by creditors of other
entities, including the creditors of the seller of the
assets.
The primary
beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the assets and
liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party that
has both (1) the power to direct the activities of an entity that
most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and
(2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. To assess whether the
Company has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most
significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, the
Company considers all the facts and circumstances, including its
role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and
responsibilities.
To assess whether
the Company has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant
to the VIE, the Company considers all of its economic interests,
including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and
derivative or other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in
the VIE. This assessment requires that the Company apply judgment
in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are
considered potentially significant to the VIE.
The Company
performs ongoing reassessments of (1) whether entities previously
evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become
VIEs, based on certain triggering events, and therefore would be
subject to the VIE consolidation framework, and (2) whether changes
in the facts and circumstances regarding the Company’s
involvement with a VIE cause the Company’s consolidation
conclusion to change. The consolidation status of the VIEs with
which the Company is involved may change as a result of such
reassessments. Changes in consolidation status are applied
prospectively with assets and liabilities of a newly consolidated
VIE initially recorded at fair value unless the VIE is an entity
which was previously under common control, which in that case is
consolidated based historical cost. A gain or loss may be
recognized upon deconsolidation of a VIE depending on the carrying
amounts of deconsolidated assets and liabilities compared to the
fair value of retained interests and ongoing contractual
arrangements.
The Company
evaluated certain entities of which it did not have a majority
voting interest and determined that it had (1) the power to direct
the activities of the entities that most significantly impact their
economic performance and (2) had the obligation to absorb losses or
the right to receive benefits from these entities. As such the
financial statements of Max Steel Productions, LLC and JB Believe,
LLC are consolidated in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2016
and 2015, and in the statements of operations and statements of
cash flows presented herein for the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015. These entities were previously under common control and
have been accounted for at historical costs for all periods
presented.
|
Max Steel
Productions LLC
As of and for the
years ended December 31,
|
JB Believe
LLC
As of and for the
years ended December 31,
|
(in
USD)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
12,327,887
|
18,295,633
|
240,269
|
143,549
|
Liabilities
|
(15,922,552)
|
(19,113,335)
|
(7,014,098)
|
(6,655,335)
|
Revenues
|
9,233,520
|
-
|
133,331
|
101,555
|
Expenses
|
(11,627,444)
|
(677,339)
|
(395,374)
|
(398,959)
|
NOTE
14 — STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
A) Preferred
Stock
The Company’s
Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 10,000,000
shares of preferred stock. The Board of Directors has the power to
designate the rights and preferences of the preferred stock and
issue the preferred stock in one or more series.
On October 14,
2015, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to
designate 4,000,000 preferred shares, as “Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock” with a $0.10 par value. Each
share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible, at
the holders request, into 0.475 shares of Common
Stock. Holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
do not have any voting rights.
On October 16,
2015, the Company and T Squared Partners LP ("T Squared") entered
into a Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement whereby 1,042,753 shares
of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were to be exchanged for
1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon
satisfaction of certain conditions. On March 7, 2016, all
conditions were satisfied and, pursuant to the Preferred Stock
Exchange Agreement, the Company issued to T Squared Partners LP
1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The
Company retired the 1,042,753 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock it received in the exchange. The Company recorded a
preferred stock dividend in additional paid in capital of
$5,227,247 related to this exchange. On November 14, 2016, T
Squared notified the Company that it would convert 1,000,000 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock into 475,000 shares of the
Common Stock effective November 16, 2016.
On February 23,
2016, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to
designate 1,000,000 preferred shares as “Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock” with a $0.001 par value which may be issued
only to an “Eligible Series C Preferred Stock
Holder”. An Eligible Class C Preferred Stock
Holder means any of (i) Dolphin Entertainment for so long as Mr.
O’Dowd continues to beneficially own at least 90% of Dolphin
Entertainment and serves on the board of directors or other
governing body of Dolphin Entertainment, (ii) any other entity in
which Mr. O’Dowd beneficially owns more than 90%, or a trust
for the benefit of others but for which Mr. O’Dowd serves as
trustee and (iii) Mr. O’Dowd individually. The certificate of
designation of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the
“Certificate of Designation”) provides that each share
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one
share of Common Stock. Until the fifth anniversary of the date of
the issuance, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has certain
anti-dilution protections as provided in the Certificate of
Designation. Specifically, the number of shares of Common Stock
into which the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock may convert
(the “Conversion Number”) will be adjusted for each
future issuance of Common Stock (but not upon issuance of Common
Stock equivalents) (i) upon the conversion or exercise of any
instrument currently or hereafter issued (but not upon the
conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock), (ii) upon
the exchange of debt for shares of Common Stock, or (iii) in a
private placement, such that the total number of shares of Common
Stock held by an “Eligible Series C Preferred Holder”
(based on the number of shares of Common Stock held as of the date
of issuance) will be preserved at the same percentage of shares of
Common Stock outstanding at the time by the holder, which is
approximately 53% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding at
December 31, 2016. The shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock will automatically convert into the number of shares of
Common Stock equal to the Conversion Number in effect at that time
(“Conversion Shares”) upon the occurrence of any of the
following events: (i) upon transfer, by current holder, of the
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to any holder other than an
Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder, (ii) if the aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock plus Conversion Shares (issuable
upon conversion of each share of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock and the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock) held by the
Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holders in the aggregate
constitutes 10% or less of the sum of (x) the outstanding shares of
Common Stock plus (y) all Conversion Shares held by the Eligible
Class C Preferred Stock Holders and (iii) at such time as the
holder of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock ceases to be an
Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder. Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock will only be convertible by the holder upon the
Company satisfying certain “optional conversion
thresholds” as provided in the Certificate of Designation.
The Certificate of Designation also provides for a liquidation
value of $0.001 per share. The holders of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock and Common Stock will vote together as a single
class on all matters upon which the Common Stock is entitled to
vote, except as otherwise required by law. The holders of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to three votes for
each share of Common Stock into which such holders’ shares of
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock could then be converted. The
Certificate of Designation also provides for dividend rights of the
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on parity with the
Company’s Common Stock.
On March 7, 2016,
as the Merger Consideration related to the Company’s merger
with Dolphin Films (see Note 4 for further discussion), Dolphin
Entertainment was issued 2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock and 1,000,000 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock. On November 15, 2016, Mr. O’Dowd converted
2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into
1,092,500 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock.
As of December 31,
2016, the Company did not have any Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding and 1,000,000 shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. As
of December 31, 2015, the Company had 1,042,753 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
B) Common
Stock
The Company’s
Articles of Incorporation previously authorized the issuance of
200,000,000 shares of Common Stock. 5,000,000 shares
have been designated for an Employee Incentive Plan. As of December
31, 2016 and 2015, no awards have been issued in connection with
this plan. On February 23, 2016, the Company filed
Articles of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation with
the Secretary of State of the State of Florida to increase the
number of authorized shares of its Common Stock from 200,000,000 to
400,000,000.
On February 5,
2016, the Company issued 316,400 shares of Common
Stock, at a post-split price of $10.00 per share, in
connection with the conversion of the debt per the terms of the
convertible debt agreement entered into on December 7, 2015. See
Note 7 for further discussion.
On March 4, 2016,
the Company issued 307,341 shares of Common Stock in
connection with a subscription agreement entered into with Dolphin
Entertainment for debt and interest on its revolving promissory
note. The debt was converted at a post-split price of
$10.00 per share. See Note 9 for further
discussion.
On March 29, 2016,
the Company entered into ten debt exchange agreements to convert
$2,883,377 of aggregate principal and accrued interest under
certain loan and security agreements into 288,338
shares of Common Stock at a post-split conversion price of
$10.00 per share. See Note 6 for further
discussion.
On April 1, 2016,
the Company entered into subscription agreements under
substantially identical terms with certain private investors (the
“Quarterly Investors”), pursuant to which the Company
issued and sold to the Quarterly Investors in a private placement
(the “Quarterly Placement”) an aggregate of
537,500 shares (the “Initial Subscribed
Shares”) of Common Stock (on a post-split basis), at a
post-split purchase price of $10.00 per Share (the
“Quarterly Purchase Price”). The Quarterly Placement
initially provided $5,375,000 of aggregate gross proceeds to the
Company. Under the terms of the Agreements, each Quarterly Investor
has the option to purchase additional shares of Common Stock at the
Quarterly Purchase Price, not to exceed the number of such
Quarterly Investor’s Initial Subscribed Shares, during each
of the second, third and fourth quarters of 2016 (each, a
“Quarterly Subscription”). To exercise a Quarterly
Subscription, a Quarterly Investor must deliver notice to the
Company of such election during the first ten business days of the
applicable quarter, specifying the number of additional shares of
Common Stock such Quarterly Investor elects to purchase. If a
Quarterly Investor timely delivers such notice to the Company, then
the closing of the sale of the applicable number of additional
shares of Common Stock must occur on the last business day of the
applicable quarter. On June 28, 2016, the Company received $500,000
and issued 50,000 shares of Common Stock related to
these agreements. On October 13, 2016, the Company received
$600,000 and issued 60,000 shares of Common Stock
related to these agreements.
On May 9, 2016, the
Company filed Articles of Amendment to its Amended Articles of
Incorporation to effectuate a 1 to 20 reverse stock split, as
previously approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and a
majority of its shareholders. The reverse stock split became
effective on May 10, 2016. All shares and per share amounts in the
Consolidated Financial Statements have been retrospectively
adjusted for the reverse stock split.
On May 31, 2016,
the Company entered into debt exchange agreements under
substantially identical terms with certain investors, pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to such investors in a private
placement an aggregate of 473,255 shares of Common
Stock, in exchange for the cancellation of $4,732,545 of aggregate principal and
accrued interest under certain notes held by such investors, at an
exchange rate of $10.00 per share. See Note 6 for
further discussion.
On June 22, 2016,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an investor,
pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to such investor
25,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of
$10.00 per Share. This transaction provided $250,000
in proceeds for the Company.
On June 30, 2016,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an investor,
pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to such investor
10,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of
$10.00 per Share. This transaction provided $100,000
in proceeds for the Company.
On June 30, 2016,
the Company, entered into debt exchange agreements under
substantially identical terms with certain investors pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to such investors in a private
placement an aggregate of 1,276,330 shares of Common
Stock, in exchange for the cancellation of $12,763,295 of aggregate
principal and accrued interest under certain notes held by such
investors, at an exchange rate of $10.00 per share.
See Note 6 for further discussion.
On June 30, 2016,
the Company entered into a substantially identical debt exchange
agreement as those entered into on March 29, 2016. Pursuant to the
terms of the debt exchange agreement, the Company converted an
aggregate of $55,640 principal and interest into 5,564
shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $10.00
per share. See Note 6 for further discussion.
On October 3, 2016,
October 13, 2016 and October 27, 2016, the Company entered into
three substantially identical debt exchange agreements to issue an
aggregate of 33,100 shares of Common Stock at an
exchange price of $10.00 per share to terminate three
Equity Finance Agreements for a cumulative original investment
amount of $331,000.
On October 3, 2016,
the Company entered into a debt exchange agreement and agreed to
issue 6,000 shares of the Common Stock at an exchange
price of $10.00 per share to terminate the remaining
Kids Club Agreement for (i) $10,000 plus (ii) the original
investment of $50,000.
On October 13,
2016, the Company entered into six substantially identical
subscription agreements, pursuant to which the Company issued
12,500 shares at $10.00 per share and
received $125,000.
On November 15,
2016, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to an investor
50,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of
$10.00 per Share. This transaction provided $500,000
in proceeds for the Company.
On November 16,
2016, the Company entered into five subscription agreements
pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to three investors
12,500 shares of Common Stock at a price of
$10.00 per Share. This transaction provided $125,000
in proceeds for the Company.
On November 22,
2016, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to an investor 5,000
shares of Common Stock at a price of $10.00 per Share.
This transaction provided $50,000 in proceeds for the
Company.
On December 15 and
December 20, 2016, the Company entered into two substantially
identical subscription agreements with two noteholders to convert
an aggregate of $1,265,530 principal and interest on the notes into
126,554 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price
of $10.00 per share. See Note 6 for further
discussion.
As of December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company had 7,197,761 and
2,047,309 shares of Common Stock issued and
outstanding, respectively.
C)
Noncontrolling Interest
On May 21, 2012,
the Company entered into an agreement with a note holder to form
Dolphin Kids Clubs, LLC ("Dolphin Kids Clubs"). Under the terms of
the agreement, Dolphin converted an aggregate amount of $1,500,000
in notes payable and received an additional $1,500,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2012 for a 25% membership interest in the
newly formed entity. The Company holds the remaining 75% and thus
controlling interest in Dolphin Kids Clubs. The purpose of Dolphin
Kids Clubs is to create and operate online kids clubs for selected
charitable, educational and civic organizations. The agreement
encompasses kids clubs created between January 1, 2012 and December
31, 2016. It is a “gross revenue agreement” and the
Company will be responsible for paying all associated operating
expenses. On December 29, 2016, as part of a global agreement with
the 25% member of Dolphin Kids Clubs, the Company entered into a
Purchase Agreement and acquired the 25% noncontrolling interest of
Dolphin Kids Clubs. In exchange for the 25% interest,
the Company issued Warrant “J” that entitles the
warrant holder to purchase shares of common stock at a price of
$0.03 per share. At the time of the
agreement, the balance of the noncontrolling interest was
$2,970,708. The Company recorded to Additional Paid in
Capital $921,123 for the difference between the fair value of the
warrants and the balance of the noncontrolling interest on the
consolidated balance sheet on the date of the
agreement. See Note 16 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
In accordance with
ASC 810-20, Consolidation –
Control of Partnerships and Similar Entities Dolphin Kids
Clubs is consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.
Amounts attributable to the noncontrolling interest will follow the
provisions in the contractual arrangement. As of December 31, 2015,
noncontrolling interest of $2,977,808 is presented as a separate
component of shareholders’ equity on the consolidated balance
sheet.
NOTE
15 — LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share
is computed by dividing income available to holders of Common Stock
(the numerator) by the weighted-average number of Common Stock
outstanding (the denominator) for the period. Diluted earnings per
share assumes that any dilutive convertible securities outstanding
were converted, with related preferred stock dilution requirements
and outstanding Common Stock adjusted accordingly. In periods of
losses, diluted loss per share is computed on the same basis as
basic loss per share as the inclusion of any other potential shares
outstanding would be anti-dilutive. The Company included the
preferred stock dividend of $5,227,247 in the calculation of loss
per share for the year ended December 31, 2016, as the loss for
holders of Common Stock would be increased by that amount. Due to
the net losses reported the following were excluded from the
computation of diluted loss per share (i) dilutive common
equivalent shares as of December 31, 2015, (ii)
2,945,000 and 525,000 of warrants as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively and (iii) convertible debt
as of December 31, 2015. These were excluded from the computation
of diluted loss per share, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive for
the periods presented.
NOTE
16 — WARRANTS
A summary of
warrants outstanding at December 31, 2015 and issued, exercised and
expired during the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows
(amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock
split):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants:
|
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2015
|
525,000
|
$6.90
|
Issued
|
2,420,000
|
5.80
|
Exercised
|
—
|
—
|
Expired
|
—
|
—
|
Balance at December
31, 2016
|
2,945,000
|
$5.98
|
On March 10, 2010,
T Squared Investments, LLC (“T Squared”) was issued
Warrant “E” for 175,000 shares of Dolphin
Digital Media, Inc. at an exercise price of $10.00 per
share with an expiration date of December 31, 2012. T
Squared can continually pay the Company an amount of money to
reduce the exercise price of Warrant “E” until such
time as the exercise price of Warrant “E” is
effectively $0.004 per share. Each time a payment by T
Squared is made to Dolphin, a side letter will be executed by both
parties that states the new effective exercise price of Warrant
“E” at that time. At such time when T Squared has paid
down Warrant “E” to an exercise price of
$0.004 per share or less, T Squared shall have the
right to exercise Warrant “E” via a cashless provision
and hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). During
the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, T Squared paid down a
total of $1,625,000. During the year ended December 31,
2016, T Squared paid $50,000 for the issuance of Warrants G, H and
I as described below. Per the provisions of the Warrant
Purchase Agreement, the $50,000 was to reduce the exercise price of
Warrant “E”. As such, the current exercise
price is $0.44 per share.
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, T Squared agreed to amend a provision in a
preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Preferred Stock
Purchase Agreement”) dated May 2011 that required the Company
to obtain consent from T Squared before issuing any Common Stock
below the existing conversion price as defined in the Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement. As a result, the Company has extended the
expiration date of Warrant “E” (described above) to
September 13, 2015 and on September 13, 2012, the Company issued
175,000 warrants to T Squared (“Warrant
“F”) with an exercise price of $10.00 per
share. Under the terms of Warrant “F”, T Squared has
the option to continually pay the Company an amount of money to
reduce the exercise price of Warrant “F” until such
time as the exercise price of Warrant “F” is
effectively $0.004 per share. At such time, T Squared
will have the right to exercise Warrant “F” via a
cashless provision and hold for six months to remove the legend
under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. The Company agreed to extend
both warrants until December 31, 2018 with substantially the same
terms as herein discussed. T Squared did not make any payments
during the year ended December 31, 2016 to reduce the exercise
price of the warrants.
On September 13,
2012, the Company sold 175,000 warrants with an
exercise price of $10.00 per share and an expiration
date of September 13, 2015 for $35,000. Under the terms of these
warrants, the holder has the option to continually pay the Company
an amount of money to reduce the exercise price of the warrants
until such time as the exercise price is effectively
$0.004 per share. At such time, the holder will have
the right to exercise the warrants via a cashless provision and
hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act. The Company recorded the $35,000 as additional paid
in capital. The Company agreed to extend the warrants until
December 31, 2018 with substantially the same terms as herein
discussed. The holder of the warrants did not make any payments
during the year ended December 31, 2016 to reduce the exercise
price of the warrants.
On November 4,
2016, the Company issued a Warrant “G”, a Warrant
“H” and a Warrant “I” to T Squared
(“Warrants “G”, “H” and
“I”). A summary of Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” issued to T Squared is as
follows:
Warrants:
|
|
|
Fair Value as of
December 31, 2016
|
|
Warrant
“G”
|
750,000
|
$10.00
|
$3,300,671
|
January 31,
2018
|
Warrant
“H”
|
250,000
|
$12.00
|
$1,524,805
|
January 31,
2019
|
Warrant
“I”
|
250,000
|
$14.00
|
$1,568,460
|
January 31,
2020
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
$6,393,936
|
|
The Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” each contain
an antidilution provision which in the event the Company sells
grants or issues any shares, options, warrants, or any instrument
convertible into shares or equity in any form below the then
current exercise price per share of the Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I”, then the then current exercise
price per share for the warrants that are outstanding will be
reduced to such lower price per share. Under the terms of the
Warrants “G”, “H” and “I”, T
Squared has the option to continually pay the Company an amount of
money to reduce the exercise price of any of Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” until such
time as the exercise price of Warrant “G”,
“H” and/or “I” is effectively
$0.02 per share. The Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of Warrants “G”, “H” and
“I” are not registered and will contain a restrictive
legend as required by the Securities Act. At such time when the T
Squared has paid down the warrants to an exercise price of
$0.02 per share or less T Squared will have the right
to exercise the Warrants “G”, “H” and
“I” via a cashless provision and hold for six months to
remove the legend under Rule 144 of the Securities
Act.
Due to the
existence of the antidilution provision, the Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” are carried in
the consolidated financial statements as derivative liabilities at
fair value (see Note 10).
On December 29,
2016, in connection with the purchase by the Company of 25% of the
outstanding membership interests of Dolphin Kids Club, LLC, the
termination of an Equity Finance Agreement and the debt exchange of
First Loan and Security Notes, Web Series Notes and Second Loan and
Security Notes (See Note 6), the Company issued Warrant
“J” and Warrant “K” (Warrants
“J” and “K”) to the seller. A summary of
Warrants “J” and “K” follows:
Warrant:
|
|
|
Fair Value as of
December 31, 2016
|
|
Warrant
“J”
|
1,085,000
|
$0.03
|
$12,993,342
|
December 29,
2020
|
Warrant
“K”
|
85,0000
|
$0.03
|
$1,017,912
|
December 29,
2020
|
|
1,170,000
|
|
$14,011,254
|
|
The Warrants
“J” and “K” each contain an antidilution
provision that in the event the Company sells grants or issues any
shares, options, warrants, or any instrument convertible into
shares or equity in any form below the current exercise price per
share of Warrants “J” and “K”, then the
current exercise price per share for the Warrants “J”
and “K” that are outstanding will be reduced to such
lower price per share. The Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
Warrants “J” and “K” are not registered and
will contain a restrictive legend as required by the Securities
Act. At such time as the exercise price is $0.02 per
share or less, the holder will have the right to exercise the
Warrants “J” and “K” via a cashless
provision and hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule
144 of the Securities Act.
Due to the
existence of the antidilution provision, the Warrants
“J” and “K” are carried in the consolidated
financial statements as derivative liabilities at fair value (see
Note 10).
None
of the warrants were included in computing diluted earnings per
share because the effect was anti-dilutive.
NOTE 17— RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
On December 31,
2014, the Company and its CEO renewed his employment agreement for
a period of two years commencing January 1, 2015. The agreement
stated that the CEO was to receive annual compensation of $250,000
plus bonus. In addition, the CEO was entitled to an annual
discretionary bonus as determined by the Company’s Board of
Directors. The CEO was eligible to participate in all of the
Company’s benefit plans offered to its employees. As part of
his agreement, he received a $1,000,000 signing bonus in 2012 that
is recorded in accrued compensation on the consolidated balance
sheets. Any unpaid and accrued compensation due to the CEO under
this agreement will accrue interest on the principal amount at a
rate of 10% per annum from the date of this agreement until it is
paid. The agreement included provisions for disability, termination
for cause and without cause by the Company, voluntary termination
by executive and a non-compete clause. The Company accrued
$2,250,000 and $2,000,000 of compensation as accrued compensation
and $735,211 and $523,144 of interest in other current liabilities
on its consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively, in relation to this agreement. For the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded interest
expense of $212,066 and $186,513, respectively, on the consolidated
statements of operations.
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued Warrants G, H and I
that entitled T Squared, a related party which would own 9.99%, on
the fully diluted basis, of Common Stock to purchase up to
1,250,000 shares of Common Stock. T Squared
already held Warrants E and F that entitles them to purchase up to
350,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock. As a result, T Squared has warrants entitling
them to purchase up to an aggregate number of
1,600,000 shares of Common
Stock. Warrants E, F, G, H and I have a maximum
exercise provision that prohibit T Squared from exercising warrants
that would cause them to exceed 9.99% of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock, unless the restriction is waived or amended, which
may only be done with the consent of the Company and T
Squared. The TSquared warrants have the following
exercise prices and expiration dates (See Note 16 for further
discussion):
|
|
|
|
Warrant
E
|
175,000
|
$0.44
|
December 31,
2018
|
Warrant
F
|
175,000
|
$10.00
|
December 31,
2018
|
Warrant
G
|
750,000
|
$10.00
|
January 31,
2018
|
Warrant
H
|
250,000
|
$12.00
|
January 31,
2019
|
Warrant I
|
250,000
|
$14.00
|
January 31,
2020
|
During 2015,
the Company agreed to pay a related party, Dolphin Entertainment
$250,000 for a script that it had developed for a web series that
the Company produced during the year ended December 31, 2015. As
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded an accrual of
$250,000 in other current liabilities on its consolidated balance
sheets.
As discussed in
Note 4, on October 14, 2015, the Company and Merger Subsidiary, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a merger
agreement with Dolphin Films and Dolphin Entertainment, both
entities owned by a related party. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, Merger Subsidiary agreed to merge with and into Dolphin
Films with Dolphin Films surviving the Merger. As a result of the
Merger, the Company acquired Dolphin Films. As consideration for
the Merger, the Company issued 2,300,000 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B”), par value
$0.10 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share to Dolphin
Entertainment. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Series
B shares were converted into 1,092,500
shares of Common Stock.
In connection with
the Merger, on October 16, 2015, the Company and T Squared entered
into a Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement pursuant to which the
Company agreed to issue 1,000,000 shares of Series B to T Squared
in exchange for 1,042,753 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock, previously issued to T Squared. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, T Squared converted the Series B into
475,000 shares of Common Stock.
The Company entered
into a verbal agreement with Dolphin Entertainment for producer
services related to certain of its projects. The agreement was for
an annual amount of $500,000. The Company terminated the agreement
effective June 30, 2015. The Company recorded $250,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2015 in its consolidated statement of
operations.
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company entered into the following
transactions with entities under the control of Justo L Pozo, an
affiliate of the Company; (i) Debt exchange agreement with Pozo
Opportunity Fund I to exchange debt in the amount of $5,088,692
into 508,869 shares of Common Stock, (ii) Debt
Exchange Agreement with Pozo Capital Partners LLP to exchange debt
in the amount of $2,423,166 into 242,317 shares of
Common Stock, (iii) Debt Exchange Agreement with Pozo Capital
Partners LLP to exchange debt in the amount of $636,287 into
63,629 shares of Common Stock, (iv) Subscription
Agreement with Pozo Opportunity Fund II, LLC for the purchase of
25,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of
$10.00 per share and (v) mandatory issuance of
316,400 shares of Common Stock per the terms of a
Convertible Debt Agreement with Pozo Opportunity Fund II, LLC. As a
result of the transaction, Justo L Pozo, individually and
collectively with the above entities is the owner of approximately
16% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
NOTE
18 — INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense
(benefit) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax
expense (benefit)
|
|
|
Federal
|
$-
|
$-
|
State
|
-
|
-
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
Deferred income tax
expense (benefit)
|
|
|
Federal
|
$(10,854,954)
|
$(1,354,370)
|
State
|
(817,631)
|
(202,112)
|
|
$(11,259,911)
|
$(1,556,482)
|
Change in valuation
allowance (benefit)
|
|
|
Federal
|
$10,854,954
|
$1,354,370
|
State
|
817,631
|
202,112
|
|
11,259,911
|
1,556,482
|
Income tax
expense
|
$-
|
$-
|
At December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company had deferred tax assets and liabilities
as a result of temporary differences between financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax values at December 31, 2016
and 2015, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
assets:
|
|
|
Long
Term:
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
$177,447
|
$184,726
|
Interest
expense
|
329,942
|
726,575
|
Deferred
Rent
|
3,418
|
11,251
|
Accrued
compensation
|
829,051
|
779,967
|
Other
expenses
|
-
|
3,649
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
costs
|
$795,318
|
$829,108
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
1,019,784
|
219,657
|
Charitable
contributions
|
388,644
|
319,091
|
Net
operating losses and credits
|
16,364,744
|
5,170,093
|
Valuation
Allowance
|
(19,902,573)
|
(8,244,117)
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
$5,775
|
$14,130
|
Deferred tax
liability:
|
|
|
Long
term:
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
-
|
(3,784)
|
Fixed
assets
|
(5,775)
|
(10,346)
|
Total net deferred
tax assets
|
$-
|
$-
|
As of December 31,
2016, the Company has approximately $44,600,000 of net operating
loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes that begin
to expire in 2028. Additionally, the Company has
approximately $32,700,000 of net operating loss carryforwards for
Florida state income tax purposes that begin to expire in 2029 and
approximately $561,000 of California net operating loss
carryforwards that begin to expire in 2032. In assessing
the ability to realize the deferred tax assets, management
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent upon
the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
these temporary differences become
deductible. Management believes it is more likely than
not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized and has
recorded a net valuation allowance of $19,902,573 and $8,229,988 as
of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company did not
have any income tax expense or benefit for the years ended December
31, 2016 and 2015. A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax
rate with the effective tax rate from continuing operations
follows:
|
|
|
Federal statutory
tax rate
|
(34.0)%
|
(34.0)%
|
Permanent items
affecting tax rate
|
4.9%
|
0.8%
|
State income taxes,
net of federal income tax benefit
|
(2.2)%
|
(3.3)%
|
Change in Deferred
Rate
|
0.2%
|
(1.2)%
|
Return to Provision
Adjustment
|
(0.1)%
|
0.2%
|
Miscellaneous
items
|
(0.2)%
|
(1.0)%
|
Change in valuation
allowance
|
31.4%
|
38.5%
|
Effective tax
rate
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
As of December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company does not have any material unrecognized
tax benefits and accordingly has not recorded any interest or
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits. The
Company does not believe that unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change within the next twelve months. The
Company and its subsidiaries file federal, Florida and California
income tax returns. These returns remain subject to examination by
taxing authorities for all years after December 31,
2012.
NOTE
19— LEASES
On November 1,
2011, the Company entered into a 60 month lease agreement for
office space in Miami with an unrelated party. The lease
expired on October 31, 2016 and the Company extended the lease
until September 30, 2017 with substantially the same terms as the
original lease. On June 1, 2014, the Company
entered into a 62 month lease agreement for office space in Los
Angeles, California. The monthly rent is $13,746 with
annual increases of 3% for years 1-3 and 3.5% for the remainder of
the lease. The Company is also entitled to four half
months of free rent over the life of the agreement.
Lease
Payments
Future minimum
payments for operating leases in effect at December 31, 2016 were
as follows:
2017
|
$243,269
|
2018
|
184,820
|
2019
|
110,446
|
Total
|
$538,535
|
Rent expense for
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $220,426 and
$226,212, respectively.
NOTE
20 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
On or about January
25, 2010, an action was filed by Tom David against Winterman Group
Limited, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd., Malcolm Stockdale and
Sara Stockdale in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario (Canada)
alleging breach of a commercial lease and breach of a personal
guaranty. On or about March 18, 2010, Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale filed a Statement of Defense
and Crossclaim. In the Statement of Defense, Winterman Group
Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale deny any liability
under the lease and guaranty. In the Crossclaim filed against
Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd., Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale seek contribution or indemnity
against Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd. alleging that Dolphin
Digital Media (Canada) agreed to relieve Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale from any and all liability
with respect to the lease or the guaranty. On or about March 19,
2010, Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale
filed a Third Party Claim against the Company seeking contribution
or indemnity against the Company, formerly known as Logica
Holdings, Inc., alleging that the Company agreed to relieve
Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale from
any and all liability with respect to the lease or the guaranty.
The Third Party Claim was served on the Company on April 6, 2010.
On or about April 1, 2010, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) filed a
Statement of Defense and Crossclaim. In the Statement of Defense,
Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) denied any liability under the lease
and in the Crossclaim against Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm
Stockdale and Sara Stockdale, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) seeks
contribution or indemnity against Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm
Stockdale and Sara Stockdale alleging that the leased premises were
used by Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara
Stockdale for their own use. On or about April 1, 2010, Dolphin
Digital Media (Canada) also filed a Statement of Defense to the
Crossclaim denying any liability to indemnify Winterman Group
Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale. The ultimate results
of these proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with
certainty. On or about March 12, 2012, the Court served a Status
Notice on all the parties indicating that since more than (2) years
had passed since a defense in the action had been filed, the case
had not been set for trial and the case had not been terminated,
the case would be dismissed for delay unless action was taken
within ninety (90) days of the date of service of the
notice. The Company has not filed for a motion to
dismiss and no further action has been taken in the case. The
ultimate results of these proceedings against the Company could
result in a loss ranging from 0 to $325,000. On March
23, 2012, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd filed for bankruptcy
in Canada. The bankruptcy will not protect the Company
from the Third Party Claim filed against it. However, the Company
has not accrued for this loss because it believes that the claims
against it are without substance and it is not probable that they
will result in loss. During the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company has not received any other notifications
related to this action.
Tax Filings
For the year ended
December 31, 2011, the Company accrued $120,000 for estimated
penalties associated with not filing certain information
returns. The penalties per return are $10,000 per entity
per year. We received notification from the Internal
Revenue Service concerning information returns for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The Company
responded with a letter stating reasonable cause for the
noncompliance and requested that penalties be
abated. During 2012, we received a notice stating that
the reasonable cause had been denied. The Company
decided to pay the penalties and not appeal the decision for the
2009 Internal Revenue Service notification. There is no
associated interest expense as the tax filings are for information
purposes only and would not result in further income taxes to be
paid by the Company. The Company made payments in the
amount of $40,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 related
to these penalties and $80,000 remains accrued. The Company has not
received any other notifications related to these returns during
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. During the year ended
December 31, 2014, the Company determined that the Statute of
limitations for penalties to be assessed for not filing certain
information returns on a timely basis had expired. As
such, the Company recorded $40,000 of other income and reduced its
accrued liability related to these tax filings.
Kids Club
In February 2012,
the Company entered into a five year agreement with US Youth Soccer
Association, Inc. to create, design and host the US Youth Soccer
Clubhouse website. During 2012, the Company hired a
third party to begin building the US Soccer Clubhouse website at a
cost of $125,000. The first two installments of $25,000
each were paid during 2012 and remaining payments were made monthly
over a two year period once the website was delivered. The Company
expensed the payments since it could not reasonably estimate future
cash flows or revenues from the website development. The
Company decided not to renew the contract that expired on February
1, 2017.
In January 2013,
the Company entered into an agreement with United Way Worldwide to
create an online kids club to promote the organizations
philanthropic philosophy and encourage literacy programs. Effective
July 1, 2015, the two parties agreed to amend and restate the
agreement. The agreement was for a period of three years from the
effective date and was to be automatically renewed for successive
terms of three years unless terminated by either party with written
notice at least 180 day prior to the expiration of the initial or
any subsequent term. On July 1, 2016, the Company and United Way
Worldwide mutually agreed to terminate the
agreement. The Company intends to continue promoting the
online kids club with the remaining partners and it does not
anticipate any material change in the operations of the online kids
club. Each school sponsorship package is $10,000 with the Company
earning $1,250. The remaining funds are used for program materials
and the costs of other partners.
The Company
recorded revenues of $28,403 and $69,761 during the years ended
December 31 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to these
agreements.
Incentive Compensation
Plan
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors
approved an Incentive Compensation Plan. The plan was enacted as a
way of attracting and retaining exceptional employees and
consultants by enabling them to share in the long term growth and
financial success of the Company. The plan is administered by the
Board of Directors or a committee designated by the Board of
Directors. As part of an increase in authorized shares approved by
the Board of Directors in 2012, 10,000,000 common shares were
designated for this plan. No awards have been issued and, as such,
the Company has not recorded any liability or equity related to
this plan for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015.
Talent, Director and Producer
Participations
Per agreements with
talent, directors and producers on certain projects, the Company
will be responsible for bonus and back end payments upon release of
a motion picture and achieving certain box office performance as
determined by the individual agreements. The Company cannot
estimate the amounts that will be due as these are based on future
box office performance. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the
Company had not recorded any liability related to these
participations.
NOTE
21 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to year
end, the Company received a tax incentive payment from the State of
North Carolina in the amount of $2,060,670 for filming a motion
picture in that jurisdiction. The proceeds of the tax incentive
were used to paydown the production loan.
On February 16,
2017, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to an investor
50,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of
$10.00 per Share. This transaction provided $500,000
in proceeds for the Company.
On March 30, 2017,
the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
(the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company
and Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg, Allan Mayer and the Beatrice B.
Trust (the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, on March 30, 2017, the Company acquired from the Sellers
100% of the membership interests of 42West, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“42West”) and 42West became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “42West
Acquisition”). 42West is an entertainment public relations
agency offering talent publicity, strategic communications and
entertainment content marketing. As consideration in the 42West
Acquisition, the Company paid approximately $18.7 million in shares
of Common Stock based on the Company’s 30-trading-day average
stock price prior to the closing date of $9.22 per
share (less certain working capital and closing adjustments,
transaction expenses and payments of indebtedness), plus the
potential to earn up to an additional $9.3 million in shares of
Common Stock. As a result, the Company (i) issued
615,140 shares of Common Stock on the closing date
(the “Initial Consideration”), (ii) will issue (a)
172,275 shares of Common Stock to certain employees
within 30 days of the closing date, (b) 59,328 shares
of Common Stock as bonuses during 2017 and (c) approximately
980,911 shares of Common Stock on January 2, 2018 (the
"Post-Closing Consideration") and (iii) may issue approximately
981,563 shares of Common Stock based on the
achievement of specified financial performance targets over a
three-year period as set forth in the Purchase Agreement (the
"Earn-Out Consideration", and together with the Initial
Consideration and the Post-Closing Consideration, the
"Consideration").
Each of Leslee
Dart, Amanda Lundberg and Allan Mayer (the “Principal
Sellers”) has entered into employment agreements with the
Company and will continue as employees of the Company for a
three-year term after the closing of the 42West Acquisition. The
non-executive employees of 42West are expected to be retained as
well. The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations,
warranties and covenants. In connection with the 42West
Acquisition, on March 30, 2017, the Company entered into put
agreements (the “Put Agreements”) with each of the
Sellers. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Put Agreements, the Company has granted the Sellers
the right, but not obligation, to cause the Company to purchase up
to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of their shares of Common
Stock received as Consideration for a purchase price equal to
$9.22 per share during certain specified exercise
periods set forth in the Put Agreements up until December 2020. In
addition, in connection with the 42West Acquisition, on March 30,
2017, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with
the Sellers (the “Registration Rights Agreement”)
pursuant to which the Sellers are entitled to rights with respect
to the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the “Securities Act”). All fees, costs and expenses of
underwritten registrations under the Registration Rights Agreement
will be borne by the Company. At any time after the one-year
anniversary of the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company will
be required, upon the request of such Sellers holding at least a
majority of the Consideration received by the Sellers, to file a
registration statement on Form S-1 and use its reasonable efforts
to effect a registration covering up to 25% of the Consideration
received by the Sellers. In addition, if the Company is eligible to
file a registration statement on Form S-3, upon the request of such
Sellers holding at least a majority of the Consideration received
by the Sellers, the Company will be required to use its reasonable
efforts to effect a registration of such shares on Form S-3
covering up to an additional 25% of the Consideration received by
the Sellers. The Company is required to effect only one
registration on Form S-1 and one registration statement on Form
S-3, if eligible. The right to have the Consideration received by
the Sellers registered on Form S-1 or Form S-3 is subject to other
specified conditions and limitations.
On April 1, 2017,
pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, each of the
Principal Sellers notified the Company that they would exercise the
put option. As a result, 43,382 shares of Common Stock
were returned to the Company in exchange for an aggregate of
$400,000. The Company retired the shares from the number of
outstanding shares.
On March 31, 2017,
KCF Investments LLC and BBCF 2011 LLC notified the Company that
they would be exercising Warrants J and K to purchase
1,085,000 and 85,000, respectively of
shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.03
per share. This transaction provided $35,100 in proceeds
for the Company.
On April 10, 2017,
the Company signed two separate promissory notes (the
“Notes”) with one investor for an aggreagate amount of
$300,000. The Notes bear interest at 10% per annum, payable
monthly, and have a maturity date of October 10,
2017.
On April 14, 2017,
T Squared notified the Company that it would exercise
162,885 of Warrant E pursuant to the cashless exercise
provision in Warrant E. T Squared had previously paid
$1,675,000 for the warrants. The Company will issue a new
warrant for the remaining 12,115 shares that T Squared
can exercise at a price of $6.20 per share.
On June 29, 2017,
the shareholders approved a change in the name of the Company to
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. The Company filed the amended and
restated articles of incorporation with the State of Florida on
July 6, 2017 to reflect the name change.
On September 13,
2017, Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. filed with the Florida Department
of State Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of
Amendment”) to effectuate a reverse stock split of the
Company’s issued and outstanding common stock, par value
$0.015 per share, on a two (2) old for one (1) new basis (the
“Reverse Stock Split”), providing that the Reverse
Stock Split would become effective under Florida law on September
14, 2017. Immediately after the Reverse Stock Split the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock was reduced from 400,000,000
shares to 200,000,000. As a result, each shareholder’s
percentage ownership interest in the Company and proportional
voting power remained unchanged. Any fractional shares resulting
from the Reverse Stock Split were rounded up to the nearest whole
share of Common Stock. Shareholder approval of the Reverse Stock
Split was not required. All consolidated financial statements and
per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for the above
amendment to authorized shares and the reverse stock
split.
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
(unaudited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$1,071,813
|
$662,546
|
Restricted
cash
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
Accounts
receivable, net of $251,000 of allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
5,992,899
|
3,668,646
|
Other
current assets
|
511,920
|
2,665,781
|
Total
Current Assets
|
7,576,632
|
8,246,973
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
2,626,461
|
4,654,013
|
Intangible
assets, net of $249,333 of amortization
|
8,860,667
|
-
|
Goodwill
|
14,336,919
|
-
|
Property,
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
1,071,706
|
35,188
|
Investments
|
220,000
|
-
|
Deposits
|
852,509
|
1,261,067
|
Total
Assets
|
$35,544,894
|
$14,197,241
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$1,627,478
|
$677,249
|
Other
current liabilities
|
4,973,500
|
2,958,523
|
Line
of credit
|
750,000
|
-
|
Put
Rights
|
750,343
|
-
|
Warrant
liability
|
-
|
14,011,254
|
Accrued
compensation
|
2,375,000
|
2,250,000
|
Debt
|
12,892,544
|
18,743,069
|
Loan
from related party
|
1,818,659
|
684,326
|
Deferred
revenue
|
20,303
|
46,681
|
Note
payable
|
850,000
|
300,000
|
Total
current liabilities
|
26,057,827
|
39,671,102
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Warrant
liability
|
4,170,677
|
6,393,936
|
Put
Rights
|
3,149,657
|
-
|
Contingent
consideration
|
3,743,000
|
-
|
Note
payable
|
400,000
|
-
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
1,048,293
|
-
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
12,511,627
|
6,393,936
|
Total
Liabilities
|
38,569,454
|
46,065,038
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.015 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 9,345,396
and 7,197,761, respectively, issued and outstanding at June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016.
|
140,181
|
107,966
|
Preferred
Stock, Series C, $0.001 par value, 50,000, 50,000 at June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
93,243,840
|
67,835,441
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(96,409,581)
|
(99,812,204)
|
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
$(3,024,560)
|
$(31,867,797)
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
$35,544,894
|
$14,197,241
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
For the
three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
Production
and distribution
|
$2,694,096
|
$4,000
|
$3,226,962
|
$4,157
|
Entertainment
Publicity
|
5,137,556
|
-
|
5,137,556
|
-
|
Membership
|
-
|
3,750
|
-
|
21,028
|
Total
revenues
|
7,831,652
|
7,750
|
8,364,518
|
25,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
2,070,529
|
-
|
2,500,772
|
2,429
|
Distribution
and marketing
|
559,210
|
-
|
629,493
|
-
|
Payroll
|
3,466,157
|
363,756
|
3,802,511
|
751,202
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,020,807
|
523,014
|
1,213,400
|
562,576
|
Legal
and professional
|
621,369
|
394,358
|
997,434
|
967,531
|
Total
Expenses
|
7,738,072
|
1,281,128
|
9,143,610
|
2,283,738
|
Income
(Loss) before other expenses
|
93,580
|
(1,273,378)
|
(779,092)
|
(2,258,553)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expenses)
|
(16,000)
|
-
|
(16,000)
|
9,660
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
(249,333)
|
-
|
(249,333)
|
-
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(4,167)
|
(4,652,443)
|
(4,167)
|
(5,843,811)
|
Acquisition
costs
|
(207,564)
|
-
|
(745,272)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
(533,812)
|
-
|
6,289,513
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of put rights
|
(100,000)
|
-
|
(100,000)
|
-
|
Loss
on disposal of furniture, office equipment and leasehold
improvements
|
(28,025)
|
-
|
(28,025)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of contingent consideration
|
(116,000)
|
-
|
(116,000)
|
-
|
Interest
expense
|
(396,864)
|
(1,778,111)
|
(849,001)
|
(3,155,076)
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
(1,558,185)
|
(7,703,932)
|
3,402,623
|
(11,247,780)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
$-
|
$937
|
$-
|
$5,257
|
Net
loss attributable to Dolphin Entertainment,
Inc.
|
(1,558,185)
|
(7,704,869)
|
3,402,623
|
(11,253,037)
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$(7,703,932)
|
$3,402,623
|
$(11,247,780)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(Loss) per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.17)
|
$(2.10)
|
$0.41
|
$(5.45)
|
Diluted
|
$(0.17)
|
$(2.10)
|
$(0.30)
|
$(5.45)
|
Weighted
average number of shares used in per share
calculation
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
9,336,389
|
3,670,471
|
8,293,343
|
3,025,448
|
Diluted
|
9,336,389
|
3,670,471
|
9,542,846
|
3,025,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
For the six
months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$3,402,623
|
$(11,247,780)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
Depreciation
|
77,977
|
11,316
|
Amortization of
intangible assets
|
249,333
|
-
|
Amortization of
capitalized production costs
|
2,049,913
|
-
|
Impairment of
capitalized production costs
|
-
|
2,439
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
4,167
|
5,843,811
|
Loss on disposal of
fixed assets
|
28,024
|
-
|
Bad
debt
|
16,000
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of warrant liability
|
(6,289,513)
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of put rights
|
100,000
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of contingent consideration
|
116,000
|
-
|
Change in deferred
rent
|
434,353
|
-
|
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
-
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(633,609)
|
870,550
|
Other current
assets
|
2,153,861
|
-
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
-
|
69,766
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
(22,361)
|
(123,177)
|
Deposits
|
454,121
|
-
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(26,378)
|
-
|
Accrued
compensation
|
125,000
|
60,000
|
Accounts
payable
|
883,137
|
(1,370,875)
|
Other current
liabilities
|
(355,923)
|
3,597,441
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities
|
(41,120)
|
-
|
Net Cash Provided
by (Used in) Operating Activities
|
2,725,605
|
(2,286,509)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
1,250,000
|
-
|
Purchase of fixed
assets
|
(54,558)
|
-
|
Acquisition of
42West, net of cash acquired
|
13,626
|
-
|
Net Cash Provided
by Investing Activities
|
1,209,068
|
-
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Proceeds from loan
and security agreements
|
-
|
(405,000)
|
Repayment of loan
and security agreements
|
-
|
-
|
Sale of common
stock
|
500,000
|
6,225,000
|
Proceeds from line
of credit
|
750,000
|
-
|
Proceeds from note
payable
|
950,000
|
-
|
Repayment of
debt
|
(5,850,525)
|
-
|
Proceeds from the
exercise of warrants
|
35,100
|
-
|
Exercise of put
rights
|
(700,000)
|
-
|
Advances from
related party
|
1,297,000
|
-
|
Repayment to
related party
|
(506,981)
|
(961,324)
|
Net Cash Provided
by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
(3,525,406)
|
4,858,676
|
NET INCREASE IN
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
409,267
|
2,572,167
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
662,546
|
2,392,685
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$1,071,813
|
$4,964,852
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$3,333
|
$749,249
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
|
|
Conversion of
related party debt and interest to shares of common
stock
|
$-
|
$3,073,410
|
Conversion of debt
into shares of common stock
|
$-
|
$3,164,000
|
Conversion of loan
and security agreements, including interest, into shares of common
stock
|
$-
|
$20,434,858
|
Issuance of shares
of Common Stock related to the 42West
Acquisition
|
$15,030,767
|
$-
|
Liability for
contingent consideration for the 42West
Acquisition
|
$3,743,000
|
$-
|
Liability for put
rights to the Sellers of 42West
|
$3,900,000
|
$-
|
Liabilities assumed
in the 42West Acquisition
|
$1,011,000
|
$-
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Deficit
|
For
the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2016
|
1,000,000
|
$1,000
|
7,197,761
|
$107,966
|
$67,835,441
|
$(99,812,204)
|
$(31,867,797)
|
Net income
for the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,402,623
|
3,402,623
|
Sale
of common stock during the six months ended June 30,
2017
|
-
|
-
|
50,000
|
750
|
499,250
|
-
|
500,000
|
Issuance
of shares from partial exercise of Warrant E and exercise of all of
Warrants J and K
|
-
|
-
|
1,332,885
|
19,993
|
9,960,107
|
-
|
9,980,100
|
Issuance
of shares for payment of services
|
|
|
3,254
|
49
|
34,118
|
|
34,167
|
Issuance
of shares related to acquisition of 42West
|
-
|
-
|
837,415
|
12,562
|
15,613,785
|
-
|
15,626,347
|
Shares
retired from exercise of puts
|
|
|
(75,919)
|
(1,139)
|
(698,861)
|
|
(700,000)
|
Balance
June 30, 2017
|
1,000,000
|
$1,000
|
9,345,396
|
$140,181
|
$93,243,840
|
$(96,409,581)
|
$(3,024,560)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2017
NOTE
1 – GENERAL
Nature of Operations
Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company,”
“Dolphin,” “we,” “us” or
“our”), formerly Dolphin Digital Media, Inc., is a
producer of original high-quality digital programming for online
consumption and is committed to delivering premium, best-in-class
entertainment and securing premiere distribution partners to
maximize audience reach and commercial advertising potential. On
March 7, 2016, the Company completed its merger with Dolphin Films,
Inc., an entity under common control. Dolphin Films, Inc.
(“Dolphin Films”) is a motion picture studio focused on
storytelling on a global scale for young, always-connected
audiences. On March 30, 2017, the Company acquired 42West, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“42West”). 42West
is an entertainment public relations agency offering talent
publicity, strategic communications and entertainment content
marketing. Dolphin also currently operates online kids clubs,
however it intends to discontinue the online kids clubs at the end
of 2017 to dedicate its time and resources to the entertainment
publicity business and the production of feature films and digital
content.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Dolphin, and all of its majority-owned and controlled
subsidiaries, including Dolphin Films, Inc., Dolphin Kids Clubs,
LLC, Cybergeddon Productions, LLC, Dolphin SB Productions LLC,
Dolphin Max Steel Holdings LLC, Dolphin JB Believe Financing, LLC,
Dolphin JOAT Productions, LLC and 42West.
Effective March 7,
2016, the Company acquired Dolphin Films from Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC. (“DE LLC”), a company wholly owned
by William O’Dowd, CEO, President and Chairman of the Board
of Dolphin. At the time of the acquisition, Mr. O’Dowd was
also the majority shareholder of Dolphin. The acquisition from DE
LLC was a transfer between entities under common control. As such,
the Company recorded the assets, liabilities and deficit of Dolphin
Films on its consolidated balance sheets at DE LLC’s
historical basis instead of fair value. Transfers of businesses
between entities under common control require prior periods to be
retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information.
Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements and related
notes of the Company have been retrospectively adjusted to include
the historical balances of DE LLC’s prior to the effective
date of the acquisition.
On May 9, 2016, the
Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with
the Secretary of State of the State of Florida to effectuate a
20-to-1 reverse stock split. The reverse stock split was approved
by the Board of Directors and a majority of the Company’s
shareholders and became effective May 10, 2016. The number of
common shares in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and all related footnotes has been adjusted to
retrospectively reflect the reverse stock
split.
On March 30, 2017,
the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
(the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company
and Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg, Allan Mayer and the Beatrice B.
Trust (the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, the Company acquired from the Sellers 100% of the
membership interests of 42West and 42West became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company (the “42West Acquisition”).
The consideration paid by the Company in connection with the 42West
Acquisition was approximately $18.7 million in shares of common
stock of the Company, par value $0.015 (the “Common
Stock”), based on the Company’s 30-trading-day average
stock price prior to the closing date of $9.22 per share (less
certain working capital and closing adjustments, transaction
expenses and payments of indebtedness), plus the potential to earn
up to an additional $9.3 million in shares of Common Stock based on
achieving certain financial targets. See note 4 for additional
information regarding the acquisition.
On June 29, 2017,
the shareholders approved a change in the name of the Company to
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. The Company filed the amended and
restated articles of incorporation with the State of Florida on
July 6, 2017 to reflect the name change.
The Company enters
into relationships or investments with other entities, and in
certain instances, the entity in which the Company has a
relationship or investment may qualify as a variable interest
entity (“VIE”). A VIE is consolidated in the financial
statements if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary
of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party that has the power
to direct activities that most significantly impact the activities
of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The Company has included Max Steel Productions, LLC formed on
July 8, 2013 in the State of Florida and JB Believe, LLC formed on
December 4, 2012 in the State of Florida in its combined financial
statements as VIE’s.
The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim
financial information and the instructions to quarterly report on
Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”), as amended, and Article 8 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s
management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
reflected in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements. Operating results for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The
balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been derived from the
audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all
the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete
financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read together with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. The most significant estimates made by
management in the preparation of the financial statements relate to
ultimate revenue and costs for investment in digital and feature
film projects; estimates of sales returns and other allowances and
provisions for doubtful accounts and impairment assessments for
investment in digital and feature film projects. Actual results
could differ from such estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09
—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
(“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance for revenue
recognition. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition
requirements in ASC Topic 605, and most industry specific guidance,
and replace it with a new Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 606. The FASB has also issued several
subsequent ASUs which amend ASU 2014-09. The amendments do not
change the core principle of the guidance in ASC
606.
The core principle
of ASC 606 is that revenue is recognized when promised goods or
services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core
principle, an entity should apply the following
steps:
Step 1: Identify
the contract(s) with a customer
Step 2: Identify
the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine
the transaction price.
Step 4: Allocate
the transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract.
Step 5: Recognize
revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance
obligation.
The guidance in ASU
2014-09 also specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or
fulfill a contract with a customer. ASC 606 will require the
Company to make significant judgments and estimates. ASC 606 also
requires more extensive disclosures regarding the nature, amount,
timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from
contracts with customers.
Public business
entities are required to apply the guidance of ASC 606 to annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (2018 for the
Company), including interim reporting periods within that reporting
period. Accordingly, the Company will adopt ASU 606 in the first
quarter of 2018.
ASC 606 requires an
entity to apply ASC 606 using one of the following two transition
methods:
1.
Retrospective
approach: Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented
and the entity may elect certain practical
expedients.
2.
Modified
retrospective approach: Retrospectively with the cumulative effect
of initially applying ASC 606 recognized at the date of initial
application. If an entity elects this transition method it also is
required to provide the additional disclosures in reporting periods
that include the date of initial application of (a) the amount by
which each financial statement line item is affected in the current
reporting period by the application ASU 606 as compared to the
guidance that was in effect before the change, and (b) an
explanation of the reasons for significant
changes.
The Company expects
that it will adopt ASC 606 following the modified retrospective
approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the
adoption of this new guidance. While there may be additional areas
impacted by the new standard, the Company has identified certain
areas that may be impacted as follows:
Variable Consideration: The Company is
entitled to royalties from certain international distributors based
on the sales made by these distributors after recoupment of a
minimum guarantee. The Company is also entitled to certain bonus
payments if certain of their clients receive awards as specified in
the engagement contracts. Under the new revenue recognition rules,
revenues will be recorded based on best estimates available in the
period of sales or usage. The Company is evaluating the impact, if
any, of recognizing the variable consideration.
Principal vs. Agent: The new standard
includes new guidance as to how to determine whether the Company is
acting as a principal, in which case revenue would be recognized on
a gross basis, or whether the Company is acting as an agent, in
which case revenues would be recognized on a net basis. The Company
is currently evaluating whether the new principal versus agent
guidance will have an impact (i.e., changing from gross to net
recognition or from net to gross recognition) under certain of its
distribution arrangements.
The Company is
continuing to evaluate the impact of the new standard on its
consolidated financial statements for the above areas and other
areas of revenue recognition, particularly as it pertains to its
new subsidiary, 42West.
In November 2015,
the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) regarding
balance sheet classification of deferred income taxes. ASU 2015-17
simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring deferred
tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the
balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for public companies for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (2017
for the Company), and interim periods within those fiscal years.
The guidance may be adopted prospectively or retrospectively and
early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2015-17 did not have
an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In February 2016,
The FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 642) intended to improve
financial reporting about leasing transactions. The ASU affects all
companies and other organizations that lease assets such as real
estate, airplanes, and manufacturing equipment. The ASU will
require organizations that lease assets—referred to as
“lessees”—to recognize on the balance sheet the
assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by
those leases. Under the new guidance, a lease will be required to
recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of
more than 12 months. Consistent with current Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP), the recognition, measurement, and
presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a
lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or
operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP—which requires
only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet
–the new ASU will require both types of leases to be
recognized on the balance sheet. The ASU also will require
disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users
better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows
arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and
quantitative requirements, providing additional information about
the amounts recorded in the financial
statements.
ASU 2016-02 will
take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15,
2018 (2019 for the Company). For all other organizations, the ASU
on leases will take effect for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application will be
permitted for all organizations. The Company is currently reviewing
the impact that implementing this ASU will
have.
In August 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which
addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented
and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU will be
effective on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (2018
for the Company), and interim periods within those years, with
early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that
adoption of this new guidance will have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-17 —Consolidation (Topic 810):
Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common
Control. The update amends the consolidation guidance on how
VIE’s should treat indirect interest in the entity held
through related parties. The ASU will be effective on a
retrospective or modified retrospective basis for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (2017 for the Company),
and interim periods within those years, with early adoption
permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-17 did not have an effect on
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU
2016-18 provides guidance on the classification of restricted cash
and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. Although it
does not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash
equivalents, it states that amounts generally described as
restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included
with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the
beginning-of-period and end-of period total amounts shown on the
statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The
Company does not currently expect the adoption of this new standard
to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2017,
the FASB issued guidance to simplify the accounting for goodwill
impairment. The guidance removes the second step of the goodwill
impairment test, which requires that a hypothetical purchase price
allocation be performed to determine the amount of impairment, if
any. Under this new guidance, a goodwill impairment charge will be
based on the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value
exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of
goodwill. The guidance is effective for the Company's fiscal year
beginning April 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted for interim
or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates
after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted the new guidance
effective January 1, 2017, with no material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2017, FASB
issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings per Share (Topic 260),
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and
Hedging (Topic 815). ASU 2017-11 consists of two parts. The
amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification
analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or
embedded features) with down round features. When determining
whether certain financial instruments should be classified as
liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer
precludes equity classification when assessing whether the
instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The
amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for
equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding
equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option)
no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair
value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For
freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the
amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS)
in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down
round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a
dividend and as a reduction of income available to common
shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded
conversion options that have down round features are now subject to
the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion
features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and
Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The
amendments in Part II of this Update re-characterize the indefinite
deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented
as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those
amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business
entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for
all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity
early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments
should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that
includes that interim period. The amendments in Part II of this
Update do not require any transition guidance because those
amendments do not have an accounting effect The Company is
currently reviewing the impact that implementing this ASU will
have.
NOTE
2 — GOING CONCERN
The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. which contemplate the continuation of the
Company as a going concern. The Company has a net loss of
$1,558,185 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and net income
of $3,402,623 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Although the
Company had net income for the six months ended June 30, 2017, it
was primarily due to a change in the fair value of the warrant
liability. Furthermore, the Company has recorded accumulated
deficit of $96,409,581 as of June 30, 2017. The Company has a
working capital deficit of $ 18,481,195 and therefore does not have
adequate capital to fund its obligations as they come due or to
maintain or develop its operations. The Company is dependent upon
funds from private investors and support of certain stockholders.
If the Company is unable to obtain funding from these sources
within the next 12 months, it could be forced to
liquidate.
These factors raise
substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a
going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these uncertainties. In this regard, management is planning to
raise any necessary additional funds through loans and additional
issuance of its Common Stock, securities convertible into our
Common Stock, debt securities or a combination of such financing
alternatives. There is no assurance that the Company will be
successful in raising additional capital. Such issuances of
additional securities would further dilute the equity interests of
our existing shareholders, perhaps substantially. The Company
currently has the rights to several scripts that it intends to
obtain financing to produce during 2017 and 2018 and release
starting in 2018. It expects to earn a producer and overhead fee
for each of these productions. There can be no assurances that such
productions will be released or fees will be realized in future
periods. With the acquisition of 42West, the Company is currently
exploring opportunities to expand the services currently being
offered by 42West to the entertainment community and reducing
expenses by identifying certain costs that can be combined with the
Company’s. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in selling these services to clients or reducing
expenses.
NOTE
3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
The Company’s
trade accounts receivable are recorded at amounts billed to
customers, and presented on the balance sheet net of the allowance
for doubtful accounts. The allowance is determined by various
factors, including the age of the receivables, current economic
conditions, historical losses and other information management
obtains regarding the financial condition of customers. The policy
for determining the past due status of receivables is based on how
recently payments have been received. Receivables are charged off
when they are deemed uncollectible.
Revenue Recognition
Entertainment
Publicity revenue consists of fees from the performance of
professional services and billings for direct costs reimbursed by
clients. Fees are generally recognized on a straight-line or
monthly basis which approximates the proportional performance on
such contracts. Direct costs reimbursed by clients are billed as
pass-through revenue with no mark-up.
Revenue from motion
pictures and web series are recognized in accordance with guidance
of FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 926-60
“Revenue Recognition – Entertainment-Films”.
Revenue is recorded when a distribution contract, domestic or
international, exists, the movie or web series is complete in
accordance with the terms of the contract, the customer can begin
exhibiting or selling the movie or web series, the fee is
determinable and collection of the fee is reasonable. On occasion,
the Company may enter into agreements with third parties for the
co-production or distribution of a movie or web series. Revenue
from these agreements will be recognized when the movie is complete
and ready to be exploited. Cash received and amounts billed in
advance of meeting the criteria for revenue recognition is
classified as deferred revenue.
Additionally,
because third parties are the principal distributors of the
Company’s movies, the amount of revenue that is recognized
from films in any given period is dependent on the timing, accuracy
and sufficiency of the information received from its distributors.
As is typical in the film industry, the Company's distributors may
make adjustments in future periods to information previously
provided to the Company that could have a material impact on the
Company’s operating results in later periods. Furthermore,
management may, in its judgment, make material adjustments to the
information reported by its distributors in future periods to
ensure that revenues are accurately reflected in the
Company’s financial statements. To date, the distributors
have not made, nor has the Company made, subsequent material
adjustments to information provided by the distributors and used in
the preparation of the Company’s historical financial
statements.
Investment
Investment
represents an investment in equity securities of The Virtual
Reality Company (“VRC”). The Company’s $220,000
investment in VRC represents less than 1% noncontrolling ownership
interest in VRC. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its
investment under the cost method. Under the cost method, the
investor’s share of earnings or losses is not included in the
balance sheet or statement of operations. The net accumulated
earnings of the investee subsequent to the date of investment are
recognized by the investor only to the extent distributed by the
investee as dividends. However, impairment charges are recognized
in the statement of operations, if factors come to our attention
that indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has
occurred that is other than temporary.
Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Property and
equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated
useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The
Company recorded depreciation expense of $73,341 and $77,977,
respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
$5,658 and $11,316, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2016. When items are retired or otherwise disposed
of, income is charged or credited for the difference between net
book value and proceeds realized thereon. Ordinary maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and replacements and
betterments are capitalized. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the lesser of the term of the related lease or the estimated
useful lives of the assets. The range of estimated useful lives to
be used to calculate depreciation and amortization for principal
items of property and equipment are as follow:
|
|
|
|
Asset
Category
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
5 - 7
|
Computer
and office equipment
|
3 - 5
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
5 – 8, not to
exceed the lease terms
|
Deferred Landlord Reimbursement
Deferred landlord
reimbursement represents the landlord’s reimbursement for
tenant improvements of one of the Company’s office spaces.
Such amount is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of
the lease.
Deferred Rent
Deferred rent
consists of the excess of the rent expense recognized on the
straight-line basis over the payments required under certain office
leases.
Intangible assets
In connection with
the acquisition of 42West that occurred on March 30, 2017, the
Company acquired an estimated $9,110,000 of intangible assets with
finite useful lives initially estimated to range from 3 to 10
years. As indicated in note 4, the purchase price allocation and
related consideration are provisional and subject to completion and
adjustment. Intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value
and are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable.
Goodwill
In connection with
the acquisition of 42West that occurred on March 30, 2017 (note 4),
the Company recorded $13,996,337 of goodwill, which management has
assigned to the Entertainment Publicity reporting unit. As
indicated in note 4, the purchase price allocation and related
consideration are provisional and subject to completion and
adjustment. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the
Company adjusted goodwill in the amount of $340,582 to record the
issuance of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
related to a working capital adjustment, as provided for in the 42
West purchase agreement and adjust the fair value of certain
liabilities as of the acquisition date. The Company accounts
for goodwill in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No. 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other ("ASC
350"). ASC 350 requires goodwill to be reviewed for impairment
annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible
impairment. The Company evaluates goodwill in the fourth quarter or
more frequently if management believes indicators of impairment
exist. Such indicators could include, but are not limited to (1) a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate,
(2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or
assessment by a regulator.
The Company first
assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely
than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount, including goodwill. If management concludes that
it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than its carrying amount, management conducts a
two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of
the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the
reporting unit with its carrying value (including goodwill). The
Company estimates the fair values of its reporting units using a
combination of the income, or discounted cash flows approach and
the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’
data. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying
value, step two does not need to be performed. If the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value,
an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit,
and the Company must perform step two of the impairment test
(measurement).
Under step two, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount
of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value
of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined
by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner
similar to a purchase price allocation in acquisition accounting.
The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair
value of the reporting unit goodwill. To the extent that the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an
impairment loss would be recorded.
Warrants
When the Company
issues warrants, it evaluates the proper balance sheet
classification of the warrant to determine whether the warrant
should be classified as equity or as a derivative liability on the
consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with ASC 815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in the Entity’s Own Equity
(ASC 815-40), the Company classifies a warrant as equity so long as
it is “indexed to the Company’s equity” and
several specific conditions for equity classification are met.
A warrant is not considered indexed to the Company’s
equity, in general, when it contains certain types of exercise
contingencies or contains certain provisions that may alter either
the number of shares issuable under the warrant or the exercise
price of the warrant, including, among other things, a provision
that could require a reduction to the then current exercise price
each time the Company subsequently issues equity or convertible
instruments at a per share price that is less than the current
conversion price (also known as a “full ratchet down round
provision”). If a warrant is not indexed to the
Company’s equity, it is classified as a derivative liability
which is carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value
with any changes in its fair value recognized currently in the
statement of operations.
The Company has
outstanding warrants at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
accounted for as derivative liabilities, because they contain
full-ratchet down round provisions (see notes 12 and 18). The
Company also has equity classified warrants outstanding at June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016 (see note 18).
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is
defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities
measured at fair value are categorized based on whether the inputs
are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are
observable. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including
assumptions about risk. Observable inputs are based on market data
obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable
inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions based on the
best information available in the circumstances. The fair value
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into
three broad levels, defined as follows:
Level 1
—
|
Inputs are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of
the reporting date.
|
Level 2
—
|
Inputs other than
quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated
with observable market data.
|
Level 3
—
|
Unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This
includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
that reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability as of the reporting date.
|
To account for the
acquisition of 42West that occurred on March 30, 2017, the Company
made a number of fair value measurements related to the different
forms of consideration paid for 42West and of the identified assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition, the Company makes
fair value measurements of its Put Rights and Contingent
Consideration. See Note 4 and 12 for further discussion and
disclosures.
Certain warrants
issued in 2016 are measured and carried at fair value on a
recurring basis in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
See note 12 for disclosures regarding those fair value
measurements.
As of June 30,
2016, and for the three and six months then ended, the Company had
no assets or liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring or
nonrecurring basis.
Business Segments
Through March 30,
2017 (the date the Company acquired 42West) (see Note 4), the
Company operated the following business
segments:
|
1)
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Media (USA): The Company created online kids clubs and derives
revenue from annual membership fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Studios: Dolphin Digital Studios creates original programming that
premieres online, with an initial focus on content geared toward
tweens and teens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Dolphin Films:
Dolphin Films produces motion pictures, with an initial focus on
family content. The motion pictures are distributed, through third
parties, in the domestic and international markets. The Company
derived all of its revenues from this segment during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017.
|
Based on an
analysis of the Company’s operating segments and the
provisions of ASC 280, Segment Reporting (ASC 280), the Company
believes it meets the criteria for aggregating these operating
segments into a single reporting segment because they have similar
economic characteristics, similar nature of product sold,
(content), similar production process (the Company uses the same
labor force, and content) and similar type of customer (children,
teens, tweens and family).
With the
acquisition of 42West, the Company has identified an additional
operating segment meeting the criteria in ASC 280 for a separate
reporting segment. The new segment is Entertainment Publicity and
primarily provides talent publicity, strategic communications and
entertainment, content marketing. See Note 20 for Segment reporting
for the three and six months ended June 30,
2017.
NOTE 4 — ACQUISITION OF 42WEST
On March 30, 2017,
the “Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase
Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among the
Company and the Sellers. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on
March 30, 2017, the Company acquired from the Sellers 100% of the
membership interests of 42West and 42West became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company. 42West is an entertainment public
relations agency offering talent publicity, strategic
communications and entertainment content
marketing.
The consideration
paid by the Company in connection with the 42West Acquisition was
$18,666,666 (less, the amount of 42West’s transaction
expenses paid by the Company and payments by the Company of certain
42West indebtedness) in shares of Common Stock, determined based on
the Company’s 30-trading-day average stock price prior to the
closing date of $9.22 per share, plus the potential to earn up to
an additional $9.3 million (less payment of certain taxes) in
shares of Common Stock, determined based on $9.22 per share. As a
result, the Company (i) issued 615,140 shares of Common Stock to
the Sellers on the closing date (the “Initial
Consideration”), (ii) (a) issued 172,275 shares of Common
Stock to certain current 42West employees and a former 42West
employee on April 13, 2017, to settle change in control provisions
in their pre-existing employment and termination agreements (the
“Change in Control Provisions”), (b) may issue up to
59,328 shares of Common Stock as employee stock bonuses (the
“Employee Bonus Shares”) upon the effectiveness of a
registration statement on Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),
registering the Employee Bonus Shares, and (c) will issue
approximately 767,563 shares of Common Stock to the Sellers, and
213,348 shares of Common Stock to certain current and former 42West
employees to settle the Change in Control Provisions, on January 2,
2018 (the "Post-Closing Consideration"), and (iii) potentially may
issue up to approximately 856,414 shares of Common Stock to the
Sellers, and 125,149 shares to certain current and former 42West
employees in accordance with the Change in Control Provisions,
based on the achievement of specified 42West financial performance
targets over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2017 and
ending December 31, 2019 as set forth in the Purchase Agreement
(the "Earn-Out Consideration", and together with the Initial
Consideration and the Post-Closing Consideration, (the "Stock
Consideration"). The Purchase Agreement allows for a working
capital adjustment to be calculated within 30 days of the closing
of the transaction. On April 13, 2017, the Company agreed to issue
50,000 shares of Common Stock as a provisional working capital
adjustment until certain information is agreed to between the
Sellers and the Company. None of the Common Stock included in the
Stock Consideration have been registered under the Securities
Act.
The Company also
agreed to pay the Sellers’ transaction costs and assumed
certain tax liabilities incurred or to be incurred by the Sellers
based on the proceeds they receive.
The issuance of
59,320 Employee Bonus Shares and the potential issuance of 117,788
shares as part of the Earn-Out Consideration to current employees
(the “Employee Earn-Out Shares”) are conditioned on the
employees remaining employed by the Company up to the date the
shares become issuable. If an employee does not remain employed for
the requisite service period, the shares they forfeit will be
allocated among and issued to the Sellers. The Employee Bonus
Shares and Employee Earnout Shares are not considered part of the
accounting consideration transferred to acquire 42West. The
Employee Bonus Shares will be accounted for under ASC
718, Compensation—Stock
Compensation, which will result in compensation expense in
the Company’s consolidated statements of operations (see
Stock-Based Compensation in Note 1).
The Purchase
Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants
and indemnifications.
Also in connection
with the 42West Acquisition, on March 30, 2017, the Company entered
into put agreements (the “Put Agreements”) with each of
the Sellers. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Put Agreements, the Company has granted the
Sellers the right, but not obligation, to cause the Company to
purchase up to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of their shares of Common
Stock received as Stock Consideration for a purchase price equal to
$9.22 per share during certain specified exercise periods set forth
in the Put Agreements up until December 2020 (the “Put
Rights”). During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the
Sellers exercised their Put Rights, in accordance with the Put
Agreements, and caused the Company to purchase 75,919 shares of
Common Stock for an aggregate amount of
$700,000.
Each of Leslee
Dart, Amanda Lundberg and Allan Mayer (the “Principal
Sellers”) has entered into employment agreements with the
Company to continue as employees of the Company for a three-year
term after the closing of the 42West Acquisition. Each of the
employment agreements of the Principal Sellers contains lock-up
provisions pursuant to which each Principal Seller has agreed not
to transfer any shares of Common Stock in the first year, except
pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-1 or Form
S-3 promulgated under the Securities Act (an “Effective
Registration Statement”) or upon exercise of the Put Rights
pursuant to the Put Agreement, and, except pursuant to an Effective
Registration Statement, no more than 1/3 of the Initial
Consideration and Post-Closing Consideration received by such
Principal Seller in the second year and no more than an additional
1/3 of the Initial Consideration and Post-Closing Consideration
received by such Principal Seller in the third year, following the
closing date. The non-executive employees of 42West were retained
as well.
In addition, in
connection with the 42West Acquisition, on March 30, 2017, the
Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the
Sellers (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) pursuant
to which the Sellers are entitled to rights with respect to the
registration under the Securities Act. All fees, costs and expenses
of underwritten registrations under the Registration Rights
Agreement will be borne by the Company. At any time after the
one-year anniversary of the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Company will be required, upon the request of such Sellers holding
at least a majority of the Stock Consideration received by the
Sellers, to file a registration statement on Form S-1 and use its
reasonable efforts to affect a registration covering up to 25% of
the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers. In addition, if
the Company is eligible to file a registration statement on Form
S-3, upon the request of such Sellers holding at least a majority
of the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers, the Company
will be required to use its reasonable efforts to affect a
registration of such shares on Form S-3 covering up to an
additional 25% of the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers.
The Company is required to effect only one registration on Form S-1
and one registration statement on Form S-3, if eligible. The right
to have the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers registered
on Form S-1 or Form S-3 is subject to other specified conditions
and limitations.
The provisional
acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred
totaled $24,099,349, which consisted of the
following:
Common Stock issued
at closing and in April 2017 (787,415 shares)
|
$6,693,028
|
Common Stock
issuable on January 2, 2018 (980,911 shares)
|
8,337,739
|
Contingent
Consideration
|
3,627,000
|
Put
Rights
|
3,800,000
|
Sellers’
transaction costs paid at closing
|
260,000
|
Sellers’ tax
liabilities assumed
|
786,000
|
Working capital
adjustment
|
595,582
|
|
$24,099,349
|
The fair values of
the 787,415 shares of Common Stock issued at closing and in April
2017 and the 980,911 shares of Common Stock to be issued on January
2, 2018 were determined based on the closing market price of the
Company’s Common Stock on the acquisition date of $8.50 per
share.
The Earn-Out
Consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay up to 863,776 shares of
Common Stock to the Sellers and one former employee of
42West to settle a Change in Control Provision (the “Contingent
Consideration”), on achievement of adjusted EBITDA targets
based on the operations of 42West over the three-year period
beginning January 1, 2017. The provisional fair value of the
Contingent Consideration was estimated using a Monte Carlo
Simulation model, which incorporated significant inputs that are
not observable in the market, and thus represents a Level 3
measurement as defined in ASC 820. The unobservable inputs utilized
for measuring the fair value of the Contingent Consideration
reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions
that market participants would use in valuing the Contingent
Consideration as of the acquisition date. The key assumptions as of
the acquisition date used in applying the Monte Carlo Simulation
model are as follows: estimated risk-adjusted EBITDA figures
ranging between $3,750,000 and $3,900,000; discount rates ranging
between 11.75% and 12.25% applied to the risk-adjusted EBITDA
estimates to derive risk-neutral EBITDA estimates; risk-free
discount rates ranging from 1.03% to 1.55%, based on U.S.
government treasury obligations with terms similar to those of the
Contingent Consideration arrangement, applied to the risk-neutral
EBITDA estimates; and an annual asset volatility estimate of
72.5%.
The provisional
fair value of the Put Rights at the acquisition date was estimated
using Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, which incorporates
significant inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus
represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The
unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the
Put Rights reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the Put
Rights as of the acquisition date. The key assumptions in applying
the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model are as follows: a discount
rate range of 0.12% to 1.70% based on U.S Treasury obligations with
a term similar to the exercise period for each of the rights to put
shares to the Company as set forth in the Put Option agreements,
and an equity volatility estimate of 75% based on the stock price
volatility of the Company and certain publicly traded companies
operating in the advertising services industry.
The Sellers’
tax liabilities assumed relates to the New York City Unincorporated
Business Tax the Sellers will incur on the Initial Consideration,
Post-Closing Consideration and potential Earn-Out Consideration
received or to be received by them in connection with the 42West
Acquisition. The Company’s obligation to pay the
Sellers’ tax liabilities is a mutually agreed upon amount of
$786,000, which was based on the Sellers’ estimates at the
closing date of the 42West Acquisition of the amount of taxes to be
owed, based on a 4% tax rate and the Sellers’ estimated
taxable income. The estimated fair value of the Sellers’ tax
liabilities assumed may change during the measurement period,
pending receipt by the Company from the Sellers of an updated tax
liability accrual, and ultimately the Sellers’ preparation of
the related income tax returns related to the Initial
Consideration. Therefore, the estimated fair value of the
Sellers’ tax liabilities assumed is
provisional.
The following table
summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, March 30, 2017.
Amounts in the table are provisional estimates that may change, as
described below.
Cash
|
$273,625
|
Accounts
receivable
|
1,706,644
|
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvements
|
1,087,962
|
Other
assets
|
265,563
|
Indemnification
asset
|
300,000
|
Intangible
assets
|
9,110,000
|
Total identifiable
assets acquired
|
12,743,794
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
(731,475)
|
Line of credit and
note payable
|
(1,025,000)
|
Settlement
liability
|
(300,000)
|
Other
liabilities
|
(902,889)
|
Tax
liabilities
|
(22,000)
|
Total liabilities
assumed
|
(2,981,364)
|
Net identifiable
assets acquired
|
9,762,430
|
Goodwill
|
14,336,919
|
Net assets
acquired
|
$24,099,349
|
Of the provisional
fair value of the $9,110,000 of acquired identifiable intangible
assets, $5,980,000 was assigned to customer relationships (10-year
useful life), $2,760,000 was assigned to the trade name (10-year
useful life), and $370,000 was assigned to non-competition
agreements (3-year useful life), that were recognized at fair value
on the acquisition date.
The estimated fair
value of accounts receivable acquired is $1,706,644, with the gross
contractual amount being $1,941,644. The Company expects $235,000
to be uncollectible. The estimated fair value of accounts
receivable is provisional, pending the Company obtaining additional
evidence of the actual amounts which will be
collected.
The fair values of
property and equipment and leasehold improvements of $1,087,962,
and other assets of $265,563, are based on 42West’s carrying
values prior to the acquisition, which approximate their fair
values.
The estimated fair
value of the settlement liability of $300,000 relates to
42West’s contingent liability to the Motion Picture Industry
Pension Individual Account and Health Plans (collectively the
“Plans”), two multiemployer pension funds and one
multiemployer welfare fund, respectively, that are governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (the
“Guild Dispute”). The Plans intend to conduct an audit
of 42West’s books and records for the period June 7, 2011
through August 20, 2016 in connection with the alleged contribution
obligations of 42West to the Plans. Based on a recent audit for
periods prior to June 7, 2011, the Company estimates that the
probable amount the Plan may seek to collect from 42West is
approximately $300,000, as of the acquisition date, in pension plan
contributions, health and welfare plan contributions and union dues
once the audit is completed. Accordingly, the Company has recorded
a $300,000 settlement accrual liability for the probable amount of
the liability it may incur due to the Motion Picture Industry
Pension audit of the period from March 25, 2012 through August 20,
2016 (see Note 21). The Company has not recorded a liability as of
the acquisition date for any exposure for additional settlement
obligations related to the period from August 20, 2016 through
March 30, 2017, as the Company has not reached a conclusion that a
loss for that period is probable. Therefore, the ultimate amount
related to the settlement liability as of March 30, 2017 may vary
from the amount recorded, and therefore the estimated fair value of
the settlement liability is provisional.
In accordance with
the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Sellers indemnified the
Company with respect to the Guild Dispute for losses incurred
related the Company’s alleged contribution obligations to the
Plans for the period between March 25, 2012 through March 26, 2016.
The Company has recorded an indemnification asset related to the
recorded settlement liability, measured at fair value on the same
basis as the settlement liability. The indemnification asset
represents the estimated fair value of the indemnification payment
expected to be received from Sellers, related to the
indemnification by the Sellers of the estimated settlement
liability. As the estimated fair value of the settlement liability
is provisional, so too is the estimated fair value of the
indemnification asset.
The deferred tax
liability related to 42West is a provisional estimate pending the
completion of an analysis of deferred income
taxes.
Based on the
provisional fair values related to certain assets acquired and
liabilities assumed discussed above, the $14,336,919 of goodwill is
also provisional. The goodwill was assigned to the Entertainment
Publicity reporting unit, which at the same level as the
Entertainment Publicity segment (see Note 20). The goodwill
recognized is attributable primarily to expectations of continued
successful efforts to obtain new customers, buyer specific
synergies and the assembled workforce of 42West. The goodwill is
expected to be deductible for income tax
purposes.
The Company
expensed $207,564 and $745,272 of acquisition related costs in the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.
These costs are included in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations in the line item entitled “acquisition
costs.”
The revenue and net
income of 42West included in the consolidated amounts reported in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017 are as
follows:
|
For the three
months ended June 30, 2017
|
For the six months
ended June 30, 2017
|
Revenue
|
$5,137,556
|
$5,137,556
|
Net
income
|
244,764
|
244,764
|
The three- and
six-month amounts above are the same, as the amounts of
42West’s revenue and earnings for the one day between the
acquisition date (March 30, 2017) and March 31, 2017 were de
minimis.
The following
represents the pro forma consolidated operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively, as
if 42West had been acquired on January 1, 2016 and its results had
been included in the consolidated results of the Company beginning
on that date:
Pro
Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
Three months ended
June 30,
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$7,831,652
|
$4,550,913
|
$13,054,074
|
$9,476,356
|
Net income
(loss)
|
(1,381,361)
|
(7,794,338)
|
4,542,982
|
(10,582,396)
|
Earnings (Loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares - Basic
|
9,321,162
|
4,411,833
|
8,661,185
|
3,776,877
|
Weighted average
shares – Fully diluted
|
9,321,162
|
4,411,833
|
9,910,688
|
3,776,877
|
Loss per share -
Basic
|
$(0.15)
|
$(1.77)
|
$0.52
|
$(4.19)
|
Loss per share
– Fully diluted
|
$(0.15)
|
$(1.77)
|
$(0.18)
|
$(4.19)
|
The pro forma
amounts have been calculated after applying the Company’s
accounting policies to the financial statements of 42West and
adjusting the combined results of the Company and 42West to reflect
(a) the amortization that would have been charged assuming the
intangible assets had been recorded on January 1, 2006, (b) the
reversal of 42West’s income taxes as if 42West had filed a
consolidated income tax return with the Company beginning January
1, 2016, and (c) to exclude $207,564 and $795,272 of acquisition
related costs that were expensed by the Company during the three
months ended June 30, 2017 and by the Company and 42West on a
combined basis during the six months ended June 30, 2017,
respectively.
The
following table summarizes the original and revised estimated fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date of March 30, 2017 and the related measurement
period adjustments to the fair values recorded during the three
months ended June 30, 2017:
|
March
31, 2017
(As
initially reported)
|
Measurement
Period Adjustments
|
June 30,
2017 (As adjusted)
|
Cash
|
$273,625
|
$-
|
$273,625
|
Accounts
receivable
|
1,706,644
|
-
|
1,706,644
|
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvements
|
1,087,962
|
-
|
1,087,962
|
Other
assets
|
265,563
|
-
|
265,563
|
Indemnification
asset
|
-
|
300,000
|
300,000
|
Intangible
assets
|
9,110,000
|
-
|
9,110,000
|
Total identifiable
assets acquired
|
12,443,794
|
300,000
|
12,743,794
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
(731,475)
|
-
|
(731,475)
|
Line of credit and
note payable
|
(1,025,000)
|
-
|
(1,025,000)
|
Settlement
liability
|
(300,000)
|
-
|
(300,000)
|
Other
liabilities
|
(902,889)
|
-
|
(902,889)
|
Tax
liabilities
|
(22,000)
|
-
|
(22,000)
|
Total liabilities
assumed
|
(2,981,364)
|
-
|
(2,981,364)
|
Net identifiable
assets acquired
|
9,462,430
|
-
|
9,762,430
|
Goodwill
|
13,996,337
|
340,582
|
14,336,919
|
Net assets
acquired
|
$23,458,767
|
$640,582
|
$24,099,349
|
The
above estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed are based on the information that was available as of the
acquisition date to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. As of March 31, 2017, the Company recorded the
identifiable net assets acquired of $9,462,430 as shown in the
table above in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the
three months ended June 30,2017, the Company’s measurement
period adjustments of $640,532 were made and, accordingly, the
Company recognized these adjustments in its June 30, 2017 condensed
consolidated balance sheet to reflect the adjusted identifiable net
assets acquired of $9,762,430 as shown in the table above. The
changes to the provisional amounts did not result in changes to the
Company’s previously reported condensed consolidated income
statement for the three months ended March 31,
2017.
The
following is a reconciliation of the initially reported fair value
to the adjusted fair value of goodwill:
Goodwill
originally reported at March 31, 2017
|
$13,996,337
|
Changes
to estimated fair values:
|
|
Contingent
Consideration
|
86,000
|
Put
Rights
|
(200,000)
|
Sellers’
tax liabilities assumed
|
159,000
|
Working
capital adjustment
|
595,582
|
Indemnification
asset
|
(300,000)
|
|
340,582
|
Adjusted
goodwill
|
$14,336,919
|
The
provisional estimated fair value of Contingent Consideration
increased from the originally reported amount primarily due to
changes in the estimated risk-adjusted EBITDA figures expected to
be achieved during the earn-out period, changes to the risk-free
discount rates and recalibration of the asset volatility estimate,
which are inputs to the Monte Carlo simulation model used to
calculate the fair value.
The
provisional estimated fair value of the Put Rights decreased from
the originally reported amount primarily due to a decrease in the
annual asset volatility assumption.
The
provisional estimated fair values of the working capital adjustment
and indemnification asset were initially determined subsequent to
the issuance by the Company of its condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three months ended March 31,
2017.
NOTE
5 — CAPITALIZED PRODUCTION COSTS, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES AND
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Capitalized Production Costs
Capitalized
production costs include the unamortized costs of completed motion
pictures and digital projects which have been produced by the
Company, costs of scripts for projects that have not been developed
or produced and costs for projects that are in production. These
costs include direct production costs and production overhead and
are amortized using the individual-film-forecast method, whereby
these costs are amortized and participations and residuals costs
are accrued in the proportion that current year’s revenue
bears to management’s estimate of ultimate revenue at the
beginning of the current year expected to be recognized from the
exploitation, exhibition or sale of the motion picture or web
series.
Motion Pictures
For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017, revenues earned from motion
pictures were $2,694,096 and $3,226,962, respectively, mainly
attributable to Max Steel,
the motion picture released on October 14, 2016 and international
sales of Believe, the
motion picture released in December 2013. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2016, the Company earned revenues of $4,000
and $4,157, respectively from the international sales of
Believe. The Company
amortized capitalized production costs (included as direct costs)
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations using the
individual film forecast computation method in the amount of
$1,620,635 and $2,049,913, respectively during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017, related to Max Steel. All capitalized production
costs for Believe were
either amortized or impaired in prior years. Subsequent to the
release of Max Steel, the
Company used a discounted cash flow model and determined that the
fair value of the capitalized production costs should be impaired
by $2,000,000 due to a lower than expected domestic box office
performance. As of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the
Company had a balance of $2,140,017, and $4,189,930, respectively
recorded as capitalized production costs related to Max Steel.
The Company has
purchased scripts, including one from a related party, for other
motion picture productions and has capitalized $235,000 and
$215,000 in capitalized production costs as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 associated with these scripts. The Company
intends to produce these projects but they were not yet in
production as of June 30, 2017.
On November 17,
2015, the Company entered into a quitclaim agreement with a
distributor for rights to a script owned by the Company. As part of
the agreement the Company will receive $221,223 plus interest and a
profit participation if the distributor decides to produce the
motion picture within 24 months after the execution of the
agreement. If the motion picture is not produced within the 24
months, all rights revert back to the Company. As per the terms of
the agreement, the Company is entitled to co-finance the motion
picture. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had not been notified by
the distributor that it intends to produce the motion
picture.
As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company has total
capitalized production costs of $2,375,017 and $4,404,930, net of
accumulated amortization, tax incentives and impairment charges,
recorded on its condensed consolidated balance sheets related to
motion pictures.
Digital Productions
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company began production of a new
digital project showcasing favorite restaurants of NFL players
throughout the country. The Company entered into a co-production
agreement and was responsible for financing 50% of the
project’s budget. Per the terms of the agreement, the Company
is entitled to 50% of the profits of the project, net of any
distribution fees. During the three and six months ended June 30
and 2016, the Company did not earn any revenues related to digital
projects and impaired $2,439 of capitalized production costs
related to digital productions.
As of June
30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company has
total capitalized production costs of $251,444 and $249,083,
recorded on its condensed consolidated balance sheet related to the
digital project.
The Company has
assessed events and changes in circumstances that would indicate
that the Company should assess whether the fair value of the
productions are less than the unamortized costs capitalized and did
not identify indicators of impairment, other than those noted above
related to Max
Steel.
Accounts Receivables
The Company entered
into various agreements with foreign distributors for the licensing
rights of our motion picture, Max
Steel, in certain international territories. The motion
picture was delivered to the distributors and other stipulations,
as required by the contracts were met. As of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance of $4,038,871 and
$3,668,646, respectively, in accounts receivable related to the
revenues of Max
Steel.
The Company’s
trade accounts receivable related to its entertainment public
relations business are recorded at amounts billed to customers, and
presented on the balance sheet, net of the allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance is determined by various factors, including
the age of the receivables, current economic conditions, historical
losses and other information management obtains regarding the
financial condition of customers. As of June 30, 2017, the Company
had a balance of $1,951,827, net of $251,000 of allowance for
doubtful accounts of accounts receivable related to the
entertainment PR business. (note 4)
Other Current Assets
The Company had a
balance of $511,920 and $2,665,781 in other current assets on its
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, these amounts
were primarily comprised of prepaid loan interest and
indemnification asset related to the 42 West Acquisition. See note
4 for further discussion. As of December 31, 2016, these amounts
were primarily comprised of tax incentive receivables, and prepaid
loan interest.
Tax Incentives -The Company has
access to government programs that are designed to promote film
production in the jurisdiction. As of June 30, 2017, and December
31, 2016, respectively, the Company had a balance of $0 and
$2,060,883 from these tax incentives. Tax incentives earned with
respect to expenditures on qualifying film productions are included
as an offset to capitalized production costs when the qualifying
expenditures have been incurred provided that there is reasonable
assurance that the credits will be realized.
Prepaid Interest – The
Company entered into a loan and security agreement to finance the
distribution and marketing costs of a motion picture and prepaid
interest related to the agreement. As of June 30, 2017, and
December 31, 2016, there was a balance of $177,225 and $602,697 of
prepaid interest.
NOTE
6 —PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD
IMPROVEMENTS
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvement consists of:
|
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
$531,255
|
$65,311
|
Computers
and equipment
|
308,422
|
41,656
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
352,644
|
7,649
|
|
1,192,321
|
114,616
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
(120,615)
|
(79,428)
|
|
$1,071,706
|
$35,188
|
The Company
depreciates furniture and fixtures over a useful life of between
five and seven years, computer and equipment over a useful life of
between three and five years and leasehold improvements over the
remaining term of the related leases. On June 1, 2017, the Company
entered into a sublease agreement for one of its offices in Los
Angeles. As part of the sublease agreement, the Company agreed to
allow the subtenant to acquire the fixed assets in the office. As a
result, the Company wrote off $64,814 of property, equipment and
leasehold improvements and $36,789 of accumulated depreciation.
This resulted in a loss in the amount of $28,025 that was recorded
on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for each of
the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as loss on disposal of
furniture, office equipment and leasehold improvements. The
balances as of June 30, 2017 include the provisional amounts of the
Company’s newly acquired subsidiary 42West. (See note
4)
NOTE
7 — INVESTMENT
Investments, at
cost, consist of 344,980 shares of common stock of VRC. In exchange
for services rendered by 42West to VRC during 2015, 42West received
both cash consideration and a promissory note that was convertible
into shares of common stock of VRC. On April 7, 2016, VRC closed an
equity financing round resulting in common stock being issued to a
third-party investor. This transaction triggered the conversion of
all outstanding promissory notes into shares of common stock of
VRC. The Company’s investment in VRC represents less than 1%
noncontrolling ownership interest in VRC. The Company had a balance
of $220,000 on its condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June
30, 2017, related to this investment.
NOTE
8— DEBT
Loan
and Security Agreements
First Group Film Funding
During the years
ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, the Company entered into various
loan and security agreements with individual noteholders (the
“First Loan and Security Noteholders”) for notes with
an aggregate principal amount of $11,945,219 to finance future
motion picture projects (the “First Loan and Security
Agreements”). During the year ended December 31, 2015, one of
the First Loan and Security Noteholders increased its funding under
its respective First Loan and Security Agreement for an additional
$500,000 note and the Company used the proceeds to repay $405,219
to another First Loan and Security Noteholder. Pursuant to the
terms of the First Loan and Security Agreements, the notes accrued
interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12% per annum, payable
monthly through June 30, 2015. During 2015, the Company exercised
its option under the First Loan and Security Agreements, to extend
the maturity date of these notes until December 31, 2016. In
consideration for the Company’s exercise of the option to
extend the maturity date, the Company was required to pay a higher
interest rate, increasing by 1.25% resulting in rates ranging from
12.50% to 13.25%. The First Loan and Security Noteholders, as a
group, were to receive the Company’s entire share of the
proceeds from the motion picture productions funded under the First
Loan and Security Agreements, on a prorata basis, until the
principal investment was repaid. Thereafter, the First Loan and
Security Noteholders, as a group, would have the right to
participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits from these
projects (defined as the Company’s gross revenues of such
projects less the aggregate amount of principal and interest paid
for the financing of such projects) on a prorata basis based on
each First Loan and Security Noteholder's loan commitment as a
percentage of the total loan commitments received to fund specific
motion picture productions.
On May 31, 2016 and
June 30, 2016, the Company entered into debt exchange agreements
with certain First Loan and Security Noteholders on substantially
similar terms to convert an aggregate of $11,340,000 of principal
and $1,811,490 of accrued interest into shares of Common Stock.
Pursuant to the terms of such debt exchange agreements, the Company
agreed to convert the debt owed to certain First Loan and Security
Noteholders into Common Stock at an exchange rate of $10.00 per
share and issued 1,315,149 shares of Common Stock. On May 31, 2016,
the market price of a share of Common Stock was $13.98 and on June
30, 2016 it was $12.16. As a result, the Company recorded losses on
the extinguishment of debt on its consolidated statement of
operations of $3,328,366 for the three and six months ended June
30, 2016 based on the difference between the fair value of the
Common Stock issued and the carrying amount of outstanding balance
of the exchanged notes on the date of the exchange. On December 29,
2016, as part of a global settlement agreement with an investor
that was a noteholder under each of a First Loan and Security
Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a Second Loan and Security
Agreement, the Company entered into a debt exchange agreement
whereby the Company issued Warrant “J” that entitles
the warrant holder to purchase shares of Common Stock at a price of
$0.03 per share in settlement of $1,160,000 of debt from the note
under the First Loan and Security Agreement. See
Note 18 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
The Company did not
expense any interest during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017 and expensed $916,035 and $1,319,844, respectively, in
interest during the three and six months ended June 30 2016,
related to the First Loan and Security Agreements. The Company did
not have any debt outstanding or accrued interest as of June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016 related to the First Loan and Security
Agreements on its condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Web Series Funding
During the years
ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, the Company entered into various
loan and security agreements with individual noteholders (the
“Web Series Noteholders”) for an aggregate principal
amount of notes of $4,090,000 which the Company used to finance
production of its 2015 web series (the “Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements”). Under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements, the Company issued promissory notes that accrued
interest at rates ranging from 10% to 12% per annum payable monthly
through August 31, 2015, with the exception of one note that
accrued interest through February 29, 2016. During 2015, the
Company exercised its option under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements to extend the maturity date of these notes to August 31,
2016. In consideration for the Company’s exercise of the
option to extend the maturity date, the Company was required to pay
a higher interest rate, increasing 1.25% resulting in interest
rates ranging from 11.25% to 13.25%. Pursuant to the terms of the
Web Series Loan and Security Agreements, the Web Series
Noteholders, as a group, would have had the right to participate in
15% of the Company’s future profits generated by the series
(defined as the Company’s gross revenues of such series less
the aggregate amount of principal and interest paid for the
financing of such series) on a prorata basis based on each Web
Series Noteholder's loan commitment as a percentage of the total
loan commitments received to fund the series.
During the six
months ended June 30, 2016, the Company entered into thirteen
individual debt exchange agreements (the “Web Series Debt
Exchange Agreements”) on substantially similar terms with the
Web Series Noteholders. Pursuant to the terms of the Web Series
Debt Exchange Agreements, the Company and each Web Series
Noteholder agreed to convert an aggregate of $4,204,547 of
principal and accrued interest under the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements into an aggregate of 420,455 shares of Common
Stock at an exchange price of $10.00 per share as payment in full
of each of the notes issued under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements. Mr. Nicholas Stanham, director of the Company, was one
of the Web Series Noteholders that converted his note into shares
of Common Stock. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,
the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt in the amount
of $12,018 and $588,694 due to the market price of the Common Stock
being between $12.00 and $12.16 per share on the dates of the
exchange.
During 2016, the
Company also entered into (i) substantially identical Subscription
Agreements with two Web Series Noteholders to convert $1,265,530 of
principal and interest into an aggregate of 126,554 shares of
Common Stock at an exchange price of $10.00 per share as payment in
full of each of the notes issued under the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements and (ii) a global settlement agreement with
another investor that was a Noteholder of a First Loan and Security
Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a Second Loan and Security
Agreement. As part of the global settlement agreement, the Company
entered into a debt exchange agreement whereby the Company issued
Warrant “J” that entitles the warrant holder to
purchase shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.03 per share in
settlement of $340,000 of debt from the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreement. See Note 18 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
The Company did not
expense any interest during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017 and expensed $40,370 and $284,579 respectively, in interest
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, related to the
Web Series Loan and Security Agreements. The Company did not have
any debt outstanding or accrued interest as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 related to the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements on its condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Second Group Film Funding
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into various loan and
security agreements with individual noteholders (the “Second
Loan and Security Noteholders”) for notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $9,274,327 to fund a new group of film projects
(the “Second Loan and Security Agreements”). Of this
total aggregate amount, notes with an aggregate principal amount of
$8,774,327 were issued in exchange for debt that had originally
been incurred by DE LLC, primarily related to the production and
distribution of the motion picture, “Believe”. The remaining $500,000
of principal amount was related to a note issued in exchange for
cash. The notes issued pursuant to the Second Loan and Security
Agreements accrue interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12% per
annum, payable monthly through December 31, 2016. The Company did
not exercise its option to extend the maturity date of these notes
until July 31, 2018. The Second Loan and Security Noteholders, as a
group, were to receive the Company’s entire share of the
proceeds from the related group of film projects, on a prorata
basis, until the principal balance was repaid. Thereafter, the
Second Loan and Security Noteholders, as a group, would have the
right to participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits
from such projects (defined as the Company’s gross revenues
of such projects less the aggregate amount of principal and
interest paid for the financing of such projects) on a prorata
basis based on each Second Loan and Security Noteholder’s
loan principal as a percentage of the total loan proceeds received
to fund the specific motion picture
productions.
On May 31 and June
30, 2016, the Company entered into various debt exchange agreements
on substantially similar terms with certain of the Second Loan and
Security Noteholders to convert an aggregate of $4,344,350 of
principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock.
Pursuant to such debt exchange agreements, the Company agreed to
convert the debt at an exchange price of $10.00 per share and
issued 434,435 shares of Common Stock. On May 31, 2016, the market
price of a share of the Common Stock was $13.98 and on June 30,
2016, it was $12.16. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on
the extinguishment of debt of $1,312,059 on its consolidated
statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2017, due to the difference between the exchange price and the
market price of the Common Stock on the dates of exchange. During
2016, the Company repaid one of the Second Loan and Security
Noteholders its principal investment of $300,000. On December 29,
2016, as part of a global settlement agreement with an investor
that was a noteholder under each of a First Loan and Security
Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a Second Loan and Security
Agreement, the Company entered into a debt exchange agreement
whereby the Company issued Warrant “J” that entitles
the warrant holder to purchase shares of Common Stock at a price of
$0.03 per share in settlement of $4,970,990 of debt from the note
under the Second Loan and Security Agreement. See Note 18 for
further discussion of Warrant “J”.
During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company did not record any
interest expense related to the Second Loan and Security
Agreements. The Company recorded $517,218 and $780,408,
respectively during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 of
interest expense related to the Second Loan and Security
Agreements. The Company did not have any debt outstanding or
accrued interest as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 related
to the Second Loan and Security Agreements on its condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
The Company
accounts for the above agreements in accordance with ASC
470-10-25-2, which requires that cash received from an investor in
exchange for the future payment of a specified percentage or amount
of future revenue shall be classified as debt. The Company does not
purport the arrangements to be a sale and the Company has
significant continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows
due to the noteholders.
Prints and Advertising Loan
During 2016,
Dolphin Max Steel Holding, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
(“Max Steel Holding”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Dolphin Films, entered into a loan and security agreement (the
“P&A Loan”) providing for $14,500,000 non-revolving
credit facility that matures on August 25, 2017. The proceeds of
the credit facility were used to pay a portion of the print and
advertising expenses of the domestic distribution of “Max
Steel”. To secure Max Steel Holding’s obligations under
the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company granted to the lender
a security interest in bank account funds totaling $1,250,000
pledged as collateral and recorded as restricted cash in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, and
rights to the assets of Max Steel Holdings, but without recourse to
the assets of the Company. During the six months ended June 30,
2017, the Company agreed to allow the lender to apply the balance
held as Restricted Cash to the loan balance. The loan
is also partially secured by a $4,500,000 corporate guaranty from a
party associated with the film, of which Dolphin has backstopped
$620,000. The lender has retained a reserve of $1,531,871 for
loan fees and interest (the “Reserve”). Amounts
borrowed under the credit facility will accrue interest at either
(i) a fluctuating per annum rate equal to the 5.5% plus a base rate
or (ii) a per annum rate equal to 6.5% plus the LIBOR determined
for the applicable interest period. As June 30, 2017 and December
31, 2016, the Company had an outstanding balance of $9,688,855 and
$12,500,000, respectively, including the Reserve, related to this
agreement recorded on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets. On its condensed consolidated statement of operations
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company
recorded (i) interest expense of $205,317 and $425,472,
respectively, related to the P&A Loan and (ii) $500,000 in
direct costs from loan proceeds that were not used by the
distributor for the marketing of the film and returned to the
lender.
Production
Service Agreement
During the year
ended December 31, 2014, Dolphin Films entered into a financing
agreement for the production of one of the Company’s feature
film, Max Steel (the
“Production Service Agreement”). The Production Service
Agreement was for a total amount of $10,419,009 with the lender
taking an $892,619 producer fee. The Production Service Agreement
contained repayment milestones to be made during the year ended
December 31, 2015, that if not met, accrued interest at a default
rate of 8.5% per annum above the published base rate of HSBC
Private Bank (UK) Limited until the maturity on January 31, 2016 or
the release of the movie. Due to a delay in the release of Max
Steel, the Company did not make the repayments as prescribed in the
Production Service Agreement. As a result, the Company recorded
accrued interest of $1,351,882 and $1,147,520, respectively, as of
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 in other current liabilities on
the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The loan
was partially secured by international distribution agreements
entered into by the Company prior to the commencement of principal
photography and the receipt of tax incentives. As a condition to
the Production Service Agreement, the Company acquired a completion
guarantee from a bond company for the production of the motion
picture. The funds for the loan were held by the bond company and
disbursed as needed to complete the production in accordance with
the approved production budget. The Company recorded debt as funds
were transferred from the bond company for the
production.
As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016 the Company had outstanding balances of
$3,203,689 and $6,243,069, respectively, related to this debt on
its condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Line
of Credit
The Company’s
subsidiary, 42West has a $1,500,000 revolving credit line agreement
with City National Bank (“City National”), which
matures on August 31, 2017. The Company is in the process of
renewing the credit line on substantially identical terms.
Borrowings bear interest at the bank’s prime lending rate
plus 0.875% (5.125% on June 30, 2017). The debt, including letters
of credit outstanding, is collateralized by substantially all of
the assets of 42West and guaranteed by the Principal Sellers of
42West. The credit agreement requires the Company to meet certain
covenants and includes limitations on distributions to members.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company drew
$250,000 from the credit line for working capital. The outstanding
loan balance as of June 30, 2017 is $750,000.
Payable
to Former Member of 42West
During 2011, 42West
entered into an agreement to purchase the interest of one of its
members. Pursuant to the agreement, the outstanding principal shall
be payable immediately if 42West sells, assigns, transfers, or
otherwise disposes all or substantially all of its assets and/or
business prior to December 31, 2018. In connection with the
Company’s acquisition of the membership interest of 42West,
(note 4), payment of this redemption was accelerated, with $300,000
paid during April 2017, and the remaining $225,000 to be paid in
January 2018. The outstanding balance at June 30, 2017 of $225,000
has been included in other current liabilities on the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE
9 — CONVERTIBLE DEBT
On December 7,
2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor to sell up to $7,000,000 in convertible promissory notes
of the Company. The promissory note would bear interest on the
unpaid balance at a rate of 10% per annum, and became due and
payable on December 7, 2016. The promissory note could have been
prepaid at any time without a penalty. Pursuant to the subscription
agreement, the Company issued a convertible note to the investor in
the amount of $3,164,000. At any time prior to the maturity date,
the investor had the right, at its option, to convert some or all
of the convertible note into Common Stock. The convertible note had
a conversion price of $10.00 per share. The outstanding principal
amount and all accrued interest were mandatorily and automatically
converted into Common Stock, at the conversion price, upon the
average market price per share of Common Stock being greater than
or equal to the conversion price for twenty trading
days.
During the three
months ended March 31, 2016, a triggering event occurred pursuant
to the convertible note agreement. As such 316,400 shares of Common
Stock were issued in satisfaction of the convertible note payable.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company
recorded interest expense of $31,207 on its condensed consolidated
statements of operations. No interest expense was recorded for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
NOTE
10— NOTES PAYABLE
On June 14, 2017,
the Company signed a promissory note in the amount of $400,000 with
a two year term, expiring on June 14, 2019. The promissory note
bears interest of 10% per annum and can be prepaid without a
penalty after the initial six months.
On April 18, 2017,
the Company signed a promissory note in the amount of $250,000 that
expires on October 18, 2017, can be prepaid without a penalty at
any time and bears interest at 10% per annum.
On April 10, 2017,
the Company signed two promissory notes with an aggregate principal
amount of $300,000 on substantially identical terms. Both
promissory notes are held by one noteholder, expire on October 10,
2017, can be prepaid without a penalty at any time and bear
interest at 10% per annum.
On July 5, 2012,
the Company signed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of
$300,000 bearing 10% interest per annum and payable on demand. No
payments were made on the note during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded accrued interest of
$149,671 and $134,794 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively related to this note. As of each June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance of $300,000 on its
condensed consolidated balance sheets related to this note
payable.
The Company has a
balance of $850,000 in current liabilities and $400,000 in non
current liabilities related to these notes payable as of June 30,
2017 on its condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company
expensed $20,924 and $28,321, respectively for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017 and $7,479 and $14,959, respectively,
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 for interest
related to these promissory notes.
NOTE
11 — LOANS FROM RELATED PARTY
On December 31,
2011, the Company issued an unsecured revolving promissory note
(the “DE Note”) to DE LLC, an entity wholly owned by
the Company's CEO. The DE Note accrued interest at a rate of 10%
per annum. DE LLC had the right at any time to demand that all
outstanding principal and accrued interest be repaid with a ten-day
notice to the Company. On March 4, 2016, the Company entered into a
subscription agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”)
with DE LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement,
the Company and DE LLC agreed to convert the $3,073,410 aggregate
amount of principal and interest outstanding under the DE Note into
307,341 shares of Common Stock. The shares were converted at a
price of $10.00 per share. On the date of the conversion that
market price of the shares was $12.00 and as a result the Company
recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the debt of $614,682 on
the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2016. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded interest expense in the
amount of $32,008 on its condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
In addition, DE LLC
has previously advanced funds for working capital to Dolphin Films.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, Dolphin Films agreed to
enter into second Loan and Security Agreements with certain of DE
LLC’s debtholders, pursuant to which the debtholders
exchanged their DE Notes for notes issued by Dolphin Films totaling
$8,774,327. See note 8 for more details. The amount of debt assumed
by Dolphin Films was applied against amounts owed to DE LLC by
Dolphin Films. During 2016, Dolphin Films entered into a promissory
note with DE LLC (the “New DE Note”) in the principal
amount of $1,009,624. The New DE Note is payable on demand and
bears interest at 10% per annum. During the six months ended June
30, 2017, the Company agreed to include certain script costs and
other payables totaling $594,315 that were owed to DE LLC as part
of the New DE Note. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the
Company received proceeds related to the New DE Note from DE LLC in
the amount of $1,297,000 and repaid DE LLC $506,981. As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, Dolphin Films owed DE LLC $1,818,661
and $684,326, respectively, that was recorded on the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Dolphin Films recorded interest
expense of $44,131 and $67,418 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017.
NOTE
12 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Warrants
During 2016, the
Company issued Series G, H, I, J and K Common Stock warrants (the
“Warrants”) for which the Company determined that the
Warrants should be accounted for as derivatives (see Note 18), for
which a liability is recorded in the aggregate and measured at fair
value in the consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis, and
the change in fair value from one reporting period to the next is
reported as income or expense in the consolidated statements of
operations. On March 31, 2017, Warrants J and K were
exercised.
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets under the caption “Warrant liability”
and records changes to the liability against earnings or loss under
the caption “Changes in fair value of warrant
liability” in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations. The carrying amount at fair value of the aggregate
liability for the Warrants recorded on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is $4,170,677
and $20,405,190. Due to the change in the fair value of the Warrant
Liability for the period in which the Warrants were outstanding
during the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a
loss on the warrant liability of $ 533,812 and a gain of $6,289,513
for the period the Warrants were outstanding during the six months
ended June 30, 2017 in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
The Warrants
outstanding at June 30, 2017 have the following
terms:
|
Issuance
Date
|
Number of Common
Shares
|
Per Share
Exercise Price
|
Remaining Term
(Months)
|
Expiration
Date
|
Series G
Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
750,000
|
$9.22
|
7
|
January 31,
2018
|
Series H
Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
250,000
|
$9.22
|
19
|
January 31,
2019
|
Series I
Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
250,000
|
$9.22
|
31
|
January 31,
2020
|
The Warrants have
an adjustable exercise price due to a full ratchet down round
provision, which would result in a downward adjustment to the
exercise price in the event the Company completes a financing in
which the price per share of the financing is lower than the
exercise price of the Warrants in effect immediately prior to the
financing.
Due to the
existence of the full ratchet down round provision, which creates a
path-dependent nature of the exercise prices of the Warrants, the
Company concluded it is necessary to measure the fair value of the
Warrants using a Monte Carlo Simulation model, which incorporates
inputs classified as “level 3” according to the fair
value hierarchy in ASC 820, Fair Value. In general, level 3
assumptions utilize unobservable inputs that are supported by
little or no market activity in the subject instrument and that are
significant to the fair value of the liabilities. The unobservable
inputs the Company utilizes for measuring the fair value of the
Warrant liability reflects management’s own assumptions about
the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability as of the reporting date.
The Company
determined the fair values of the Warrants by using the following
key inputs to the Monte Carlo Simulation model at June 30,
2017:
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Volatility
(1)
|
63.8%
|
59.2%
|
77.2%
|
Expected term
(years)
|
0.58
|
1.58
|
2.58
|
Risk free interest
rate
|
1.157%
|
1.322%
|
1.479%
|
Common stock
price
|
$10.00
|
$10.00
|
$10.00
|
Exercise
price
|
$9.22
|
$9.22
|
$9.22
|
The stock
volatility assumption represents the range of the volatility curves
used in the valuation analysis that the Company has determined
market participants would use based on comparison with similar
entities. The risk-free interest rate is interpolated where
appropriate, and is based on treasury yields. The valuation model
also included a level 3 assumption as to dates of potential future
financings by the Company that may cause a reset of the exercise
price.
Since derivative
financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at
fair values, the Company’s income or loss will reflect the
volatility in changes to these estimates and assumptions. The fair
value is most sensitive to changes at each valuation date in the
Company’s Common Stock price, the volatility rate assumption,
and the exercise price, which could change if the Company were to
do a dilutive future financing.
For the Warrants,
which measured at fair value categorized within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy, the following is a reconciliation of the fair
values from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017:
|
Warrants
“G”,
“H” and “I”
|
|
|
Beginning fair
value balance reported in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2016
|
$6,393,936
|
$14,011,254
|
$20,405,190
|
Change in fair
value (gain) reported in the statements of
operations
|
(2,223,259)
|
(4,066,254)
|
(6,289,513)
|
Exercise of
“J” and “K” Warrants
|
-
|
(9,945,000)
|
(9,945,000)
|
Ending fair value
balance reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017
|
$4,170,677
|
$-
|
$4,170,677
|
Put Rights
In connection with
the 42West Acquisition (note 4), on March 30, 2017, the Company
entered into Put Agreements with each of the Sellers. Pursuant to
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Put
Agreements, the Company has granted the Sellers the right, but not
obligation, to cause the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of
1,187,094 of their shares of Common Stock received as Stock
Consideration for a purchase price equal to $9.22 per share during
certain specified exercise periods set forth in the Put Agreements
up until December 2020 (the “Put Rights”). During the
three months ended June 30, 2017, the Sellers exercised their Put
Rights, in accordance with the Put Agreements, and caused the
Company to purchase 75,919 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate
amount of $700,000.
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets under the caption “Put Rights” and
records changes to the liability against earnings or loss under the
caption “Changes in fair value of put rights” in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of
the Put Rights on the date of acquisition was $3,800,000. The
carrying amount at fair value of the aggregate liability for the
Put Rights recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017 is $3,900,000. Due to the change in the fair value of
the Put Rights for the period in which the Put Rights were
outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2017, the
Company recorded a loss on the put rights of $100,000 in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Company
measured the fair value of the Put Rights as of the date of the
acquisition.
The Company
utilized the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, which incorporates
significant inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus
represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The
unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the
Put Rights reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the Put
Rights as of the acquisition date and June 30,
2017.
The Company
determined the fair value by using the following key inputs to the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model:
|
|
On the date of
Acquisition
(March 30,
2017)
|
|
As
of
June 30,
2017
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Volatility
estimate
|
|
75%
|
|
92.5%
|
Discount rate based
on US Treasury obligations
|
|
0.12% -
1.70%
|
|
0.90% -
1.61%
|
For the Put Rights,
which measured at fair value categorized within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy, the following is a reconciliation of the fair
values from the date of acquisition (March 30, 2017) to June 30,
2017:
Beginning fair
value balance on the Acquisition Date (March 30,
2017)
|
$3,800,000
|
Change in fair
value (loss) reported in the statements of
operations
|
100,000
|
Ending fair value
balance reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017
|
$3,900,000
|
Contingent Consideration
In connection with
the 42 West acquisition (note 4), the Seller have the potential to
earn up to $9,333,333 (1,727,551
shares of Common Stock) on achievement of adjusted EBITDA targets
based on the operations of 42West over the three-year period
beginning January 1, 2017 (the “Contingent
Consideration”).
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets under the caption “Contingent
Consideration” and records changes to the liability against
earnings or loss under the caption “Changes in fair value of
contingent consideration” in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. The fair value of the Contingent
Consideration on the date of acquisition was $3,627,000. The
carrying amount at fair value of the aggregate liability for the
Contingent Consideration recorded on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at June 30, 2017 is $3,743,000. Due to the change in
the fair value of the Contingent Consideration for the period in
which the Contingent Consideration was outstanding during the three
months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a loss on the put
rights of $116,000 in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations. The Company measured the fair value of the Contingent
Consideration as of the date of the
acquisition.
The Company
utilized a Monte Carlo Simulation model, which incorporates
significant inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus
represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The
unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the
Contingent Consideration reflect management’s own assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing
the Contingent Consideration as of the acquisition
date.
The Company
determined the fair value by using the following key inputs to the
Monte Carlo Simulation Model:
|
|
On the date of
Acquisition
(March 30,
2017)
|
|
As
of
June 30,
2017
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Free Discount
Rate (based on US government treasury obligation with a term
similar to that of the Contingent
Consideration)
|
|
1.03%
-1.55%
|
|
1.14% -
1.47%
|
Annual Asset
Volatility Estimate
|
|
72.5%
|
|
90%
|
Estimated
EBITDA
|
|
$3,600,000 -
$3,900,000
|
|
$3,600,000 -
$3,900,000
|
For the Contingent
Consideration, which measured at fair value categorized within
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the following is a
reconciliation of the fair values from the date of acquisition
(March 30, 2017) to June 30, 2017:
Beginning fair
value balance on the Acquisition Date (March 30,
2017)
|
$3,627,000
|
Change in fair
value (loss) reported in the statements of
operations
|
116,000
|
Ending fair value
balance reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017
|
$3,743,000
|
There were no
assets or liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2016.
NOTE
13— LICENSING AGREEMENT - RELATED PARTY
The Company has
entered into a ten-year licensing agreement with DE LLC, a related
party. Under the license, the Company is authorized to use DE
LLC’s brand properties in connection with the creation,
promotion and operation of subscription based Internet social
networking websites for children and young adults. The license
requires that the Company pays to DE LLC royalties at the rate of
fifteen percent of net sales from performance of the licensed
activities. The Company did not use any of the brand properties
related to this agreement and as such, there was no royalty expense
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016.
NOTE
14 — DEFERRED REVENUE
During the year
ended December 31, 2014, the Company entered into agreements with
various entities for the international distribution rights of a
motion picture that was in production. As required by the
distribution agreements, the Company received $1,418,368 of
deposits for these rights that was recorded as deferred revenue on
its condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, the Company delivered the motion picture to
various international distributors and recorded $1,371,687 of
revenue from production from these deposits. As of June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company has a balance of
$20,303 and $46,681 as deferred revenue on its condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE
15 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
VIEs are entities
that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors
that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating
to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not
have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or the right to
receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of
VIE is a special-purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are
commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate
certain assets, and distribute the cash flows from those assets to
investors. The legal documents that govern the transaction specify
how the cash earned on the assets must be allocated to the
SPE’s investors and other parties that have rights to those
cash flows. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors
from claims on the SPE’s, assets by creditors of other
entities, including the creditors of the seller of the
assets.
The primary
beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the assets and
liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party that
has both (1) the power to direct the activities of an entity that
most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and
(2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. To assess whether the
Company has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most
significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, the
Company considers all the facts and circumstances, including its
role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and
responsibilities.
To assess whether
the Company has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant
to the VIE, the Company considers all of its economic interests,
including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and
derivative or other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in
the VIE. This assessment requires that the Company apply judgment
in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are
considered potentially significant to the VIE.
The Company
performs ongoing reassessments of (1) whether entities previously
evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become
VIEs, based on certain triggering events, and therefore would be
subject to the VIE consolidation framework, and (2) whether changes
in the facts and circumstances regarding the Company’s
involvement with a VIE cause the Company’s consolidation
conclusion to change. The consolidation status of the VIEs with
which the Company is involved may change as a result of such
reassessments. Changes in consolidation status are applied
prospectively with assets and liabilities of a newly consolidated
VIE initially recorded at fair value unless the VIE is an entity
which was previously under common control, which in that case is
consolidated based historical cost. A gain or loss may be
recognized upon deconsolidation of a VIE depending on the carrying
amounts of deconsolidated assets and liabilities compared to the
fair value of retained interests and ongoing contractual
arrangements.
The Company
evaluated certain entities of which it did not have a majority
voting interest and determined that it had (1) the power to direct
the activities of the entities that most significantly impact their
economic performance and (2) had the obligation to absorb losses or
the right to receive benefits from these entities. As such the
financial statements of Max Steel Productions, LLC and JB Believe,
LLC are consolidated in the balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, and in the statements of operations and
statements of cash flows presented herein for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. These entities were previously
under common control and have been accounted for at historical
costs for all periods presented.
Following is
summary financial information for the
VIE’s:
|
Max Steel Productions LLC
|
JB Believe LLC
|
(in
USD)
|
As of and for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
|
As of and
for the three
months
ended June
30, 2017
|
As of
December 31,
2016
|
As of and
for the six
months ended
June 30, 2016
|
As of and for
the three
months
ended June
30, 2016
|
As of and
for the six
months ended
June 30, 2017
|
As of and
for the
three
months
ended June
30, 2017
|
As of
December 31,
2016
|
As of and for
the six months
ended June 30,
2016
|
As of and for
the three
months ended
June 30, 2016
|
Assets
|
9,207,664
|
9,207,664
|
12,327,887
|
n/a
|
zn/a
|
30,843
|
30,843
|
240,269
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Liabilities
|
(13,011,741)
|
(13,011,741)
|
(15,922,552)
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
(6,755,328)
|
(6,755,328)
|
(7,014,098)
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Revenues
|
3,173,826
|
2,656,523
|
n/a
|
-
|
-
|
53,136
|
37,573
|
n/a
|
3,786
|
3,786
|
Expenses
|
(3,383,238)
|
(2,236,428)
|
n/a
|
(541,731)
|
(325,024)
|
(3,792)
|
-
|
n/a
|
(260,592)
|
(133,711)
|
NOTE
16 — STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
The Company’s
Amended Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board of Directors has
the power to designate the rights and preferences of the preferred
stock and issue the preferred stock in one or more
series.
On October 14,
2015, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to
designate 4,000,000 preferred shares, as “Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock” with a $0.10 par value. Each
share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible, at
the holders request, into 0.475 shares of Common Stock. Holders of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock do not have any voting
rights.
On October 16,
2015, the Company and T Squared Partners LP ("T Squared") entered
into a Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement whereby 1,042,753 shares
of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were to be exchanged for
1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon
satisfaction of certain conditions. On March 7, 2016, all
conditions were satisfied and, pursuant to the Preferred Stock
Exchange Agreement, the Company issued to T Squared Partners LP
1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The
Company retired the 1,042,753 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock it received in the exchange. The Company recorded a
preferred stock dividend in additional paid in capital of
$5,227,247 related to this exchange. On November 14, 2016, T
Squared notified the Company that it would convert 1,000,000 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock into 475,000 shares of the Common Stock
effective November 16, 2016.
On February 23,
2016, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to
designate 1,000,000 preferred shares as “Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock” with a $0.001 par value which may be issued
only to an “Eligible Series C Preferred Stock Holder”.
On May 9, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the
amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to
reduce the designation of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to
50,000 shares with a $0.001 par value. The amendment was approved
by the Company’s shareholders on June 29, 2017 and the
Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with
the State of Florida (‘the Second Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation”) on July 6, 2017. Pursuant to the
Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, each share
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible into
one share of common stock (one half of a share post-split), subject
to adjustment for each issuance of common stock (but not upon
issuance of common stock equivalents) that occurred, or occurs,
from the date of issuance of the Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock (the “issue date”) until the fifth (5th)
anniversary of the issue date (i) upon the conversion or exercise
of any instrument issued on the issued date or thereafter issued
(but not upon the conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock), (ii) upon the exchange of debt for shares of common stock,
or (iii) in a private placement, such that the total number of
shares of common stock held by an “Eligible Class C Preferred
Stock Holder” (based on the number of shares of common stock
held as of the date of issuance) will be preserved at the same
percentage of shares of common stock outstanding held by such
Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder on such date. An Eligible
Class C Preferred Stock Holder means any of (i) DE LLC for so long
as Mr. O’Dowd continues to beneficially own at least 90% and
serves on the board of directors or other governing entity, (ii)
any other entity in which Mr. O’Dowd beneficially owns more
than 90%, or a trust for the benefit of others, for which Mr.
O’Dowd serves as trustee and (iii) Mr. O’Dowd
individually. Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will only be
convertible by the Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder upon the
Company satisfying one of the “optional conversion
thresholds”. Specifically, a majority of the independent
directors of the Board, in its sole discretion, must have
determined that the Company accomplished any of the following (i)
EBITDA of more than $3.0 million in any calendar year, (ii)
production of two feature films, (iii) production and distribution
of at least three web series, (iv) theatrical distribution in the
United States of one feature film, or (v) any combination thereof
that is subsequently approved by a majority of the independent
directors of the Board based on the strategic plan approved by the
Board. While certain events may have occurred that could be deemed
to have satisfied this criteria, the independent directors of the
Board have not yet determined that an optional conversion threshold
has occurred. Except
as required by law, holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
will only have voting rights once the independent directors of the
Board determine that an optional conversion threshold has occurred.
Only upon such determination, will the Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock be entitled or permitted to vote on all matters
required or permitted to be voted on by the holders of common stock
and will be entitled to that number of votes equal to three votes
for the number of Conversion Shares (as defined in the Certificate
of Designation) into which such Holder’s shares of the Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock could then be
converted.
The Certificate of
Designation also provides for a liquidation value of $0.001 per
share. The Certificate of Designation also provides for dividend
rights of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on parity with
the Company’s Common Stock.
On March 7, 2016,
as the Merger Consideration related to the Company’s merger
with Dolphin Films), DE LLC was issued 2,300,000 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock and 1,000,000 shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock. On November 15, 2016, DE LLC converted
2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into
1,092,500 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock.
On May 9, 2017, the
Company’s Board of Directors determined that it was in the
best interest of the Company to retire the designations of Series A
Convertible Preferred and Series B Convertible Preferred and this
determination was included in the Second Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation filed with the State of Florida on July
6, 2017.
As of June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, the Company did not have any Series A or
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding and 50,000 shares
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding.
The Company’s
Articles of Incorporation previously authorized the issuance of
200,000,000 shares of Common Stock. 250,000 shares had been
designated for the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the
“2012 Plan”). On June 29, 2017, our shareholders of the
Company approved the 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2017
Plan”) that replaced the 2012 Plan. On August 7, 2017, the
Company registered 1,000,000 of Common Stock through the filing of
an S-8 statement to be used for the 2017 Plan. As of June 30, 2017,
and December 31, 2016, no awards have been issued in connection
with these plans. On February 23, 2016, the Company filed Articles
of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation with the
Secretary of State of the State of Florida to increase the number
of authorized shares of its Common Stock from 200,000,000 to
400,000,000.
On February 16,
2017, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to an investor 50,000 shares of
Common Stock at a price of $10.00 per Share. This transaction
provided $500,000 in proceeds for the Company.
On March 30, 2017,
the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
to acquire a 100% membership interest in 42West. The Company issued
615,140 shares of Common Stock at a price of $9.22 per share
related to this transaction. See note 4 for further details on the
acquisition.
On March 30, 2017,
KCF Investments LLC and BBCF 2011 LLC exercised Warrants J and K to
purchase 1,085,000 and 85,000, respectively, of shares of Common
Stock at a purchase price of $0.03 per share. This transaction
provided $35,100 in proceeds for the Company. See note 18 for
further discussion.
On April 13, 2017,
the Company issued the following shares of Common Stock as per the
42West Acquisition agreement; (i) 172,275 to certain designated
employees and (ii) 50,000 shares as an estimate for the Purchase
Consideration withheld on the date of closing related to the
working capital.
On April 13, 2017,
the Company issued 3,254 shares of Common Stock to a consultant for
services rendered during the month ended March 31, 2017. The shares
were issued at a purchase price of $9.22 per
share.
On April 13, 2017,
T Squared partially exercised Class E Warrants and acquired 162,885
shares of our common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise
provision in the related warrant agreement. T Squared had
previously paid down $1,675,000 for these
shares.
On April 14, 2017,
the Principal Sellers of 42West, exercised put options in the
aggregate amount of 43,382 shares of Common Stock and were paid an
aggregate total of $400,000.
On June 26, 2017,
the Principal Sellers of 42West, exercised put options in the
aggregate amount of 32,538 shares of Common Stock and were paid an
aggregate total of $300,000.
As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, the Company had 9,345,396 and
7,197,761 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding,
respectively.
C.
Noncontrolling
Interest
On May 21, 2012,
the Company entered into an agreement with a note holder to form
Dolphin Kids Clubs, LLC ("Dolphin Kids Clubs"). Under the terms of
the agreement, Dolphin converted an aggregate amount of $1,500,000
in notes payable and received an additional $1,500,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2012 for a 25% membership interest in the
newly formed entity. The Company holds the remaining 75% and thus
controlling interest in Dolphin Kids Clubs. The purpose of Dolphin
Kids Clubs is to create and operate online kids clubs for selected
charitable, educational and civic organizations. The agreement
encompasses kids clubs created between January 1, 2012 and December
31, 2016. It was a “gross revenue agreement” and the
Company was responsible for paying all associated operating
expenses. On December 29, 2016, as part of a global agreement with
the 25% member of Dolphin Kids Clubs, the Company entered into a
Purchase Agreement and acquired the 25% noncontrolling interest of
Dolphin Kids Clubs. In exchange for the 25% interest, the Company
issued Warrant “J” that entitles the warrant holder to
purchase shares of common stock at a price of $0.03 per share. See
notes 12 and 18 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
NOTE 17 —
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table
sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per
share:
|
Three months ended
June 30,
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$(7,703,932)
|
$3,402,623
|
$(11,247,780)
|
Preferred stock
deemed dividend
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,227,247)
|
Numerator for basic
income (loss) per share
|
(1,588,185)
|
(7,703,932)
|
3,402,623
|
(16,475,027)
|
Change in fair
value of Warrants “J” and “K” (note
12)
|
-
|
-
|
(6,289,513)
|
-
|
Numerator for
diluted income (loss) per share
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$(7,703,932)
|
$(2,886,890)
|
$(16,475,027)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for
basic EPS — weighted–average shares
|
9,336,389
|
3,670,471
|
8,293,343
|
3,025,448
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
-
|
-
|
756,338
|
-
|
Shares issuable in
January 2018 in connection with the 42West acquisition (Note
4)
|
-
|
-
|
493,165
|
-
|
Denominator for
diluted EPS — adjusted weighted-average shares assuming
exercise of warrants
|
9,336,389
|
3,670,471
|
9,542,846
|
3,025,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss)
per share
|
$(0.17)
|
$(2.10)
|
$0.41
|
$(5.45)
|
Diluted Income
(loss) per share
|
$(0.17)
|
$(2.10)
|
$(0.30)
|
$(5.45)
|
Basic income (loss)
per share is computed by dividing income or loss attributable to
the shareholders of Common Stock (the numerator) by the
weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding (the
denominator) for the period. Diluted earnings per share assumes
that any dilutive warrants were exercised and any dilutive
convertible securities outstanding were converted, with related
preferred stock dilution requirements and outstanding Common Stock
adjusted accordingly. For warrants that are carried as liabilities
at fair value, when exercise is assumed in the denominator for
diluted earnings per share, the related change in the fair value of
the warrants recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations for the period, is added back or subtracted from net
income during the period. In periods of losses, diluted loss per
share is computed on the same basis as basic loss per share, as the
inclusion of any other potential shares outstanding would be
anti-dilutive.
For the three
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, due to the net losses
reported, dilutive common equivalent shares such as warrants were
excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as
inclusion would be anti-dilutive for the periods
presented.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2017, dilutive warrant shares outstanding were
assumed to have been exercised and included in the denominator for
diluted loss per share, and the related gain recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations due to recording the decrease
in fair value of the warrant liabilities during the six-month
period was subtracted from net income to arrive at the numerator
for basic and diluted income (loss) per share. Also for the six
months ended June 30, 2017, the Common Stock that is issuable in
January 2018 in connection with the 42West Acquisition was assumed
to have been issued during the period in arriving at the
denominator for diluted loss per share.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2016, the Company reflected the preferred stock
deemed dividend of $5,227,247 (note 16) related to exchange of
Series A for Series B Preferred Stock in the numerator for
calculating basic and diluted loss per share, as the loss for
holders of Common Stock would be increased by that amount. Due to
the net losses reported, dilutive common equivalent shares were
excluded from the computation of diluted loss per
share.
NOTE
18 — WARRANTS
A summary of
warrants outstanding at December 31, 2016 and issued, exercised and
expired during the six months ended June 30, 2017 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants:
|
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2016
|
2,945,000
|
$5.98
|
Issued
|
—
|
—
|
Exercised
|
1,332,885
|
1.28
|
Expired
|
—
|
—
|
Balance at June 30,
2017
|
1,612,115
|
$9.28
|
On March 10, 2010,
T Squared Investments, LLC (“T Squared”) was issued
Warrant “E” for 175,000 shares of the Company at an
exercise price of $10.00 per share with an expiration date of
December 31, 2012. T Squared can continually pay the Company an
amount of money to reduce the exercise price of Warrant
“E” until such time as the exercise price of Warrant
“E” is effectively $0.004 per share. Each time a
payment by T Squared is made to Dolphin, a side letter will be
executed by both parties that states the new effective exercise
price of Warrant “E” at that time. At such time when T
Squared has paid down Warrant “E” to an exercise price
of $0.004 per share or less, T Squared shall have the right to
exercise Warrant “E” via a cashless provision and hold
for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011,
T Squared paid down a total of $1,625,000. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, T Squared paid $50,000 for the issuance of
Warrants G, H and I as described below. Per the provisions of the
Warrant Purchase Agreement, the $50,000 was to reduce the exercise
price of Warrant “E”. On April 13, 2017, T Squared
exercised 162,885 warrants using the cashless exercise provision,
in the warrant agreement and received 162,885 shares of the Common
Stock. Since T Squared applied the $1,675,000 that it had
previously paid the Company to pay down the exercise price of the
warrants, the exercise price for the remaining 12,115 warrants was
recalculated and is currently $6.20 per share of Common Stock. T
Squared did not make any payments during the six months ended June
30, 2017 to reduce the exercise price of the
warrants.
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, T Squared agreed to amend a provision in a
preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Preferred Stock
Purchase Agreement”) dated May 2011 that required the Company
to obtain consent from T Squared before issuing any Common Stock
below the existing conversion price as defined in the Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement. As a result, the Company has extended the
expiration date of Warrant “E” (described above) to
September 13, 2015 and on September 13, 2012, the Company issued
175,000 warrants to T Squared (“Warrant “F”) with
an exercise price of $10.00 per share. Under the terms of Warrant
“F”, T Squared has the option to continually pay the
Company an amount of money to reduce the exercise price of Warrant
“F” until such time as the exercise price of Warrant
“F” is effectively $0.004 per share. At such time, T
Squared will have the right to exercise Warrant “F” via
a cashless provision and hold for six months to remove the legend
under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. The Company agreed to extend
both warrants until December 31, 2018 with substantially the same
terms as herein discussed. T Squared did not make any payments
during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to reduce the exercise
price of the warrants.
On September 13,
2012, the Company sold 175,000 warrants with an exercise price of
$10.00 per share and an expiration date of September 13, 2015 for
$35,000. Under the terms of these warrants, the holder has the
option to continually pay the Company an amount of money to reduce
the exercise price of the warrants until such time as the exercise
price is effectively $0.004 per share. At such time, the holder
will have the right to exercise the warrants via a cashless
provision and hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule
144 of the Securities Act. The Company recorded the $35,000 as
additional paid in capital. The Company agreed to extend the
warrants until December 31, 2018 with substantially the same terms
as herein discussed. The holder of the warrants did not make any
payments during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to reduce the
exercise price of the warrants.
On November 4,
2016, the Company issued a Warrant “G”, a Warrant
“H” and a Warrant “I” to T Squared
(“Warrants “G”, “H” and
“I”). A summary of Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” issued to T Squared is as
follows:
Warrants:
|
|
Exercise price
at June 30, 2017
|
|
Fair Value as of
June 30, 2017
|
Fair Value as of
December 31, 2016
|
Expiration
Date
|
Warrant
“G”
|
750,000
|
$9.22
|
$10.00
|
$1,938,202
|
$3,300,671
|
January 31,
2018
|
Warrant
“H”
|
250,000
|
$9.22
|
$12.00
|
902,391
|
1,524,805
|
January 31,
2019
|
Warrant
“I”
|
250,000
|
$9.22
|
$14.00
|
1,330,084
|
1,568,460
|
January 31,
2020
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
$4,170,677
|
$6,393,936
|
|
The Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” each contain
an antidilution provision which in the event the Company sells
grants or issues any shares, options, warrants, or any instrument
convertible into shares or equity in any form below the then
current exercise price per share of the Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I”, then the then current exercise
price per share for the warrants that are outstanding will be
reduced to such lower price per share. Under the terms of the
Warrants “G”, “H” and “I”, T
Squared has the option to continually pay the Company an amount of
money to reduce the exercise price of any of Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” until such
time as the exercise price of Warrant “G”,
“H” and/or “I” is effectively $0.02 per
share. The Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” are not
registered and will contain a restrictive legend as required by the
Securities Act. At such time when the T Squared has paid down the
warrants to an exercise price of $0.02 per share or less T Squared
will have the right to exercise the Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” via a cashless provision and
hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act.
On March 30, 2016,
the Company issued shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of
$9.22 per share related to the acquisition of 42West (note 4). As a
result, the exercise price of each of Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” were reduced to
$9.22.
Due to the
existence of the antidilution provision, the Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” are carried in
the condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016 as derivative liabilities at fair value (see
note 12)
On December 29,
2016, in connection with the purchase by the Company of 25% of the
outstanding membership interests of Dolphin Kids Club, LLC, the
termination of an Equity Finance Agreement and the debt exchange of
First Loan and Security Notes, Web Series Notes and Second Loan and
Security Notes (See note 8), the Company issued Warrant
“J” and Warrant “K” (Warrants
“J” and “K”) to the seller. Each of the
Warrants “J” and “K” had an exercise price
of $0.03 per share and an expiration date of December 29,
2020.
The Warrants
“J” and “K” each contained an antidilution
provision that in the event the Company sells grants or issues any
shares, options, warrants, or any instrument convertible into
shares or equity in any form below the current exercise price per
share of Warrants “J” and “K”, then the
current exercise price per share for the Warrants “J”
and “K” that are outstanding will be reduced to such
lower price per share. The Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
Warrants “J” and “K” are not registered and
will contain a restrictive legend as required by the Securities
Act. At such time as the exercise price is $0.01 per share or less,
the holder will have the right to exercise the Warrants
“J” and “K” via a cashless provision and
hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act.
Due to the
existence of the antidilution provision, the Warrants
“J” and “K” were carried in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 as derivative
liabilities at a fair value of $12,993,342 for Warrant
“J” and $1,017,912 for Warrant “K” (see
note 12). On March 30, 2017, the holders of Warrants J and K
exercised their warrants and were issued 1,170,000 shares of Common
Stock. The Company received $35,100 of proceeds from the
transaction.
NOTE
19— RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On December 31,
2014, the Company and its CEO renewed his employment agreement for
a period of two years commencing January 1, 2015. The agreement
stated that the CEO was to receive annual compensation of $250,000
plus bonus. In addition, the CEO was entitled to an annual
discretionary bonus as determined by the Company’s Board of
Directors. The CEO was eligible to participate in all of the
Company’s benefit plans offered to its employees. As part of
his agreement, he received a $1,000,000 signing bonus in 2012 that
is recorded in accrued compensation on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Any unpaid and accrued compensation due to the CEO
under this agreement will accrue interest on the principal amount
at a rate of 10% per annum from the date of this agreement until it
is paid. The agreement included provisions for disability,
termination for cause and without cause by the Company, voluntary
termination by executive and a non-compete clause. The Company
accrued $2,375,000 and $2,250,000 of compensation as accrued
compensation and $849,446 and $735,211 of interest in other current
liabilities on its condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, in relation to Mr.
O’Dowd’s employment. The Company recorded interest
expense related to accrued compensation of $58,236 and $114,235,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
$51,941 and $102,323, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2016, on the condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
On October 14,
2015, the Company and Merger Subsidiary, a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company, entered into a merger agreement with Dolphin Films
and DE LLC, both entities owned by a related party. Pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, Merger Subsidiary agreed to merge with and into
Dolphin Films with Dolphin Films surviving the Merger. As a result,
during the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired
Dolphin Films. As consideration for the Merger, the Company issued
2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(“Series B”), par value $0.10 per share, and 50,000
shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001
per share to DE LLC.
On March 30, 2017,
in connection with the 42West Acquisition, the Company and Mr.
O’Dowd, as personal guarantor, entered into four separate Put
Agreements with each of the Sellers of 42West, pursuant to which
the Company has granted each of the Sellers the right to cause the
Company to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,187,094 of their shares
of Common Stock received as Consideration for a purchase price
equal to $9.22 per share during certain specified exercise periods
up until December 2020. Pursuant to the terms of one such Put
Agreement between Mr. Allan Mayer, a member of the board of
directors of the Company, and the Company, Mr. Mayer exercised Put
Rights and caused the Company to purchase 43,382 shares of Common
Stock at a purchase price of $9.22 for an aggregate amount of
$200,000, during the six months ended June 30,
2017.
On March 30, 2017,
KCF Investments LLC and BBCF 2011 LLC, entities under the common
control of Mr. Stephen L Perrone, an affiliate of the Company,
exercised Warrants “J” and “K” and were
issued an aggregate of 1,170,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.03 per
share.
NOTE
20 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
As a result of the
42West Acquisition (note 4), the Company has determined that as of
the second quarter of 2017, it operates two reportable segments,
the Entertainment Publicity Division (“EPD”) and the
Content Production Division (“CPD”). The EPD segment is
comprised of 42West and provides clients with diversified services,
including public relations, entertainment content marketing and
strategic marketing consulting. CPD is comprised of Dolphin
Entertainment, Dolphin Films, and Dolphin Digital Studios and
specializes in the production and distribution of digital content
and feature films.
The profitability
measure employed by our chief operating decision maker for
allocating resources to operating divisions and assessing operating
division performance is operating income (loss). All segments
follow the same accounting policies as those described in Note
3.
Salaries and
related expenses include salaries, bonus, commission and other
incentive related expenses. Legal and professional expenses
primarily include professional fees related to financial statement
audits, legal, investor relations and other consulting services,
which are engaged and managed by each of the segments. In addition,
general and administrative expenses include rental expense and
depreciation of property, equipment and leasehold improvements for
properties occupied by corporate office
employees.
In connection with
the 42West Acquisition, the Company assigned $9,110,000 of
intangible assets, less the amortization during the three months
ended June 30, 2017 of $249,333, and Goodwill of $14,336,919 to the
EPD segment.
|
Three
months ended June 30,
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
EPD
|
$5,137,556
|
$5,137,556
|
CPD
|
2,694,096
|
3,226,962
|
Total
|
$7,831,652
|
$8,364,518
|
Segment operating income (loss):
|
|
|
EPD
|
$697,679
|
$697,679
|
CPD
|
(604,099)
|
(1,476,772)
|
Total
|
93,580
|
(779,093)
|
Interest
expense
|
(396,864)
|
(849,001)
|
Other
(expense) income, net
|
(1,254,901)
|
5,030,717
|
Income before income taxes
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$3,402,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
EPD
|
$27,301,487
|
|
CPD
|
8,243,407
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$35,544,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
EPD
|
$27,435,905
|
CPD
|
7,943,407
|
|
|
Total
|
$35,379,312
|
|
|
NOTE
21 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
On or about January
25, 2010, an action was filed by Tom David against Winterman Group
Limited, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd., Malcolm Stockdale and
Sara Stockdale in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario (Canada)
alleging breach of a commercial lease and breach of a personal
guaranty. On or about March 18, 2010, Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale filed a Statement of Defense
and Crossclaim. In the Statement of Defense, Winterman Group
Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale denied any liability
under the lease and guaranty. In the Crossclaim filed against
Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd., Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale seek contribution or indemnity
against Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd. alleging that Dolphin
Digital Media (Canada) agreed to relieve Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale from any and all liability
with respect to the lease or the guaranty. On or about March 19,
2010, Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale
filed a Third-Party Claim against the Company seeking contribution
or indemnity against the Company, formerly known as Logica
Holdings, Inc., alleging that the Company agreed to relieve
Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale from
any and all liability with respect to the lease or the guaranty.
The Third-Party Claim was served on the Company on April 6, 2010.
On or about April 1, 2010, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) filed a
Statement of Defense and Crossclaim. In the Statement of Defense,
Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) denied any liability under the lease
and in the Crossclaim against Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm
Stockdale and Sara Stockdale, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) seeks
contribution or indemnity against Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm
Stockdale and Sara Stockdale alleging that the leased premises were
used by Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara
Stockdale for their own use. On or about April 1, 2010, Dolphin
Digital Media (Canada) also filed a Statement of Defense to the
Crossclaim denying any liability to indemnify Winterman Group
Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale. The ultimate results
of these proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with
certainty. On or about March 12, 2012, the Court served a Status
Notice on all the parties indicating that since more than (2) years
had passed since a defense in the action had been filed, the case
had not been set for trial and the case had not been terminated,
the case would be dismissed for delay unless action was taken
within ninety (90) days of the date of service of the notice. The
Company has not filed for a motion to dismiss and no further action
has been taken in the case. The ultimate results of these
proceedings against the Company could result in a loss ranging from
0 to $325,000. On March 23, 2012, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada)
Ltd filed for bankruptcy in Canada. The bankruptcy will not protect
the Company from the Third-Party Claim filed against it. However,
the Company has not accrued for this loss because it believes that
the claims against it are without substance and it is not probable
that they will result in loss. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has
not received any other notifications related to this
action.
A putative class
action was filed on May 5, 2017, in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida by Kenneth and Emily
Reel on behalf of a purported nationwide class of individuals who
attended the Fyre Music Festival, or the Fyre Festival, in the
Bahamas on April 28-30, 2017. The complaint names several
defendants, including 42West, along with the organizers of the Fyre
Festival, Fyre Media Inc. and Fyre Festival LLC, individuals
related to Fyre, and another entity called Matte Projects LLC. The
complaint alleges that the Fyre Festival was promoted by Fyre as a
luxurious experience through an extensive marketing campaign
orchestrated by Fyre and executed with the assistance of outside
marketing companies, 42West and Matte, but that the reality of the
festival did not live up to the luxury experience that it was
represented to be. The plaintiffs assert claims for fraud,
negligent misrepresentation and for violation of several
states’ consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs seek to
certify a nationwide class action comprised of “All persons
or entities that purchased a Fyre Festival 2017 ticket or package
or that attended, or planned to attend, Fyre Festival 2017”
and seek damages in excess of $5,000,000 on behalf of themselves
and the class. The plaintiffs sought to consolidate this
action with five other class actions also arising out of the Fyre
Festival (to which 42West is not a party) in a Multi District
Litigation proceeding, which request was denied by the panel. We
believe the claims against 42West are without merit and that we
have strong defenses to the claims.
Tax Filings
For the year ended
December 31, 2011, the Company accrued $120,000 for estimated
penalties associated with not filing certain information returns.
The penalties per return are $10,000 per entity per year. The
Company received notification from the Internal Revenue Service
concerning information returns for the year ended December 31,
2009. The Company responded with a letter stating reasonable cause
for the noncompliance and requested that penalties be abated.
During 2012, the Company received a notice stating that the
reasonable cause had been denied. The Company decided to pay the
penalties and not appeal the decision for the 2009 Internal Revenue
Service notification. There is no associated interest expense as
the tax filings are for information purposes only and would not
result in further income taxes to be paid by the Company. The
Company made payments in the amount of $40,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2012 related to these penalties. At each of
March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had a remainder
of $40,000 in accruals related to these late filing penalties which
is presented as a component of other current
liabilities.
Kids Club
Effective February
1, 2017, the Company notified US Youth Soccer Association, Inc.,
with whom it had entered into an agreement to create, design and
host the US Youth Soccer Clubhouse website, that it would not renew
the agreement. The Company did not record any revenues or expenses
related to this website for the three months ended March 31, 2017
and 2016.
On July 1, 2016,
the Company and United Way Worldwide mutually agreed to terminate
the agreement and agreement create and host an online kids club to
promote United Way’s philanthropic philosophy and encourage
literacy programs. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the
Company was responsible for the creation and marketing of the
website, developing and managing the sponsorship package, and
hiring of certain employees to administer the program. Each school
sponsorship package was $10,000 with the Company earning $1,250.
The remaining funds were used for program materials and the costs
of other partners. During the six months ended June 30, 2017,
management decided to discontinue the online kids clubs at the end
of 2017.
The Company recorded revenues of $3,750 and
$21,028 related to the online kids clubs during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2016. There were no revenues generated by the
online kids clubs during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017.
Incentive Compensation Plan
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, the Company’s Board and a majority
of its shareholders approved the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan was
enacted as a way of attracting and retaining exceptional employees
and consultants by enabling them to share in the long term growth
and financial success of the Company. The 2012 Plan will be
administered by the Board or a committee designated by the Board.
As part of an increase in authorized shares approved by the Board
in 2012, 250,000 shares of Common Stock were designated for the
2012 Plan. No awards have been issued and, as such, the Company had
not recorded any liability or equity related to the 2012 Plan as of
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
On June 29,
2017, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2017 Plan. The
2017 Plan was adopted as a flexible incentive compensation plan
that would allow us to use different forms of compensation awards
to attract new employees, executives and directors, to further the
goal of retaining and motivating existing personnel and directors
and to further align such individuals’ interests with those
of the Company’s shareholders. Under the 2017 Plan, the total
number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for
delivery under the 2017 Plan (the “Awards”), at any
time during the term of the 2017 Plan, will be 1,000,000 shares of
Common Stock. The 2017 Plan imposes individual limitations on the
amount of certain Awards, in part with the intention to comply with
Section 162(m) of the Code. Under these limitations, in any fiscal
year of the Company during any part of which the 2017 Plan is in
effect, no participant may be granted (i) stock options or stock
appreciation rights with respect to more than 300,000 Shares, or
(ii) performance shares (including shares of restricted stock,
restricted stock units, and other stock based-awards that are
subject to satisfaction of performance goals) that the Committee
intends to be exempt from the deduction limitations under Section
162(m) of the Code, with respect to more than 300,000 Shares, in
each case, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The
maximum amount that may be paid out to any one participant as
performance units that the Committee intends to be exempt from the
deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code, with
respect to any 12-month performance period is $1,000,000 (pro-rated
for any performance period that is less than 12 months), and with
respect to any performance period that is more than 12 months,
$2,000,000. No Awards were issued during the six months ended June
30, 2017, and, as such, the Company has not recorded any liability
or equity related to the 2017 Plan as of June 30,
2017.
Employee Benefit Plan
The Company’s
wholly owned subsidiary, 42West, has a 401(K) profit sharing plan
that covers substantially all employees of 42West.
Contributions to the plan are at discretion of management. The
Company’s contributions were approximately $148,068 and
$74,954 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,
respectively.
Employment Contracts
During 2015, 42West
entered into seven separate three-year employment contracts with
senior level management employees. The contracts define each
individual’s compensation, along with specific salary
increases mid-way through the term of each contract. Each
individual was also guaranteed a percentage of proceeds if 42West
was sold during the term of their contract. The percentages vary by
executive. Termination for cause, death or by the employee would
terminate the Company’s commitment on each of the
contracts.
As a condition to
the closing of the 42West Acquisition described in note 4, each of
the three Principal Sellers has entered into employment agreements
(the “Employment Agreements”) with the Company and will
continue as employees of the Company for a three-year term. Each of
the Employment Agreements provides for a base salary with annual
increases and bonuses if certain performance targets are met. In
addition, the Employment Agreements grant each Principal Seller an
annual stock bonus of $200,000 to be calculated using the 30-day
trading average of the Company’s Common Stock. The Employment
Agreements also contain provisions for termination and as a result
of death or disability. During the term of the Employment
Agreement, the Principal Sellers shall be entitled to participate
in all employee benefit plans, practices and programs maintained by
the Company as well as be entitled to paid vacation in accordance
with the Company’s policy. Each of the Employment Agreements
contains lock-up provisions pursuant to which each Principal Seller
has agreed not to transfer any shares of Common Stock in the first
year, no more than 1/3 of the Initial Consideration and
Post-Closing Consideration received by such Seller in the second
year and no more than an additional 1/3 of the Initial
Consideration and Post-Closing Consideration received by such
Seller in the third year, following the closing date of the 42West
Acquisition.
Talent, Director and Producer Participations
Per agreements with
talent, directors and producers on certain projects, the Company
will be responsible for bonus and back end payments upon release of
a motion picture and achieving certain box office performance as
determined by the individual agreements. The Company cannot
estimate the amounts that will be due as these are based on future
box office performance. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
the Company had not recorded any liability related to these
participations.
Leases
42West is obligated
under an operating lease agreement for office space in New York,
expiring in December 2026. The lease is secured by a standby
letter of credit amounting to $677,354, and provides for increases
in rent for real estate taxes and building operating costs. The
lease also contains a renewal option for an additional five
years.
42West is obligated
under an operating lease agreement for office space in California,
expiring in December 2021. The lease is secured by a cash security
deposit of $44,788 and a standby letter of credit amounting to
$100,000 at March 31, 2017. The lease also provides for increases
in rent for real estate taxes and operating expenses, and contains
a renewal option for an additional five years, as well as an early
termination option effective as of February 1, 2019. Should
the early termination option be executed, the Company will be
subject to a termination fee in the amount of approximately
$637,000. The Company does not expect to execute such
option.
On November 1,
2011, the Company entered into a 60 month lease agreement for
office space in Miami with an unrelated party. The lease expired on
October 31, 2016 and the Company extended the lease until September
30, 2017 with substantially the same terms as the original lease.
The Company is negotiating to extend the term of the lease until
December 31, 2017.
On June 1, 2014,
the Company entered into a 62 month lease agreement for office
space in Los Angeles, California. The monthly rent is $13,746 with
annual increases of 3% for years 1-3 and 3.5% for the remainder of
the lease. The Company is also entitled to four half months of free
rent over the life of the agreement. On June 1, 2017, the Company
entered into an agreement to sublease the office space in Los
Angeles, California. The sublease is effective June 1, 2017 through
July 31, 2019 and the Company will receive (i) $14,891.50 per month
for the first twelve months, with the first two months of rent
abated and (ii) $15,338.25 per month for the remainder of the
sublease.
Future minimum
annual rent payments are as follows:
Period ended June
30, 2017
|
|
July 1, 2017
– December 31, 2017
|
$550,090
|
2018
|
1,308,209
|
2019
|
1,327,992
|
2020
|
1,433,403
|
2021
|
1,449,019
|
Thereafter
|
4,675,844
|
|
$10,744,558
|
Rent expense,
including escalation charges, amounted to approximately $576,197
and $631,975, respectively, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2017.
Motion Picture Industry Pension Accrual
42West is a
contributing employer to the Motion Picture Industry Pension
Individual Account and Health Plans (collectively the
“Plans”), two multiemployer pension funds and one
multiemployer welfare fund, respectively, that are governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The
Plans intend to conduct an audit of 42West’s books and
records for the period June 7, 2011 through August 20, 2016 in
connection with the alleged contribution obligations to the Plans.
Based on a recent audit for periods prior to June 7, 2011, 42West
expects that the Plan may seek to collect approximately $300,000 in
pension plan contributions, health and welfare plan contributions
and union once the audit is completed. The Company believes the
exposure to be probable and has recognized this liability in other
current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as
of June 30, 2017.
NOTE
22 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 1, 2017,
the Company notified nine employees that they would be taken off
the Company’s payroll until the Company green lights a
project for production.
On July 10, 2017,
one of the Principal Sellers of 42 West exercised a Put Right and
caused the Company to purchase 8,134 shares of Common Stock for
$75,000.
On July 18, 2017,
the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement
with an unrelated third party and received $250,000. The note bears
interest at 10% per annum and matures on July 19, 2018. The holder
of the convertible note has the right to convert all or a portion
of the Principal and any accrued interest into shares of common
stock of the Company at price which is (i) the 90 trading-day
average price per share as of the date of the Notice of Conversion
or (ii) if an Eligible Offering, as defined in the agreement has
occurred, 95% of the public offering share
price.
On July 26, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $250,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) is for a period of one year and bears interest
at 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of the
Note are convertible by the holder at a price of either (i) 90 day
average trailing trading price of the stock or (ii) if an Eligible
Offering of the Company’s stock (as defined in the Note) is
made, 95% of the Public Offering Share price as defined in the
Note.
On August 1, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $25,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) is for a period of one year and bears interest
at 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of the
Note are convertible by the holder at a price of either (i) 90 day
trailing trading price of the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering
of the Company’s stock (as defined in the Note) is made, 95%
of the Public Offering Share price as defined in the
Note.
On August 2, 2017,
the Company agreed to pay an invoice in the amount of $28,856 using
2,886 shares of Common Stock at a price of $10.00 per share. On
August 2, 2017, the price of our stock was $9.50. The Company
recorded other income of $1,443 on its consolidated statement of
operations.
On August 4, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $50,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) is for a period of one year and bears interest
at 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of the
Note are convertible by the holder at a price of either (i) 90 day
trailing trading price of the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering
of the Company’s stock (as defined in the Note) is made, 95%
of the Public Offering Share price as defined in the
Note.
On August 21, 2017,
the Company issued 59,320 shares of Common Stock to certain
employees, pursuant to the 42 West Acquisition and as part of the
2017 Plan.
On September 13,
2017, Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. filed with the Florida Department
of State Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of
Amendment”) to effectuate a reverse stock split of the
Company’s issued and outstanding common stock, par value
$0.015 per share, on a two (2) old for one (1) new basis (the
“Reverse Stock Split”), providing that the Reverse
Stock Split would become effective under Florida law on September
14, 2017. Immediately after the Reverse Stock Split the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock was reduced from 400,000,000
shares to 200,000,000. As a result, each shareholder’s
percentage ownership interest in the Company and proportional
voting power remained unchanged. Any fractional shares resulting
from the Reverse Stock Split were rounded up to the nearest whole
share of Common Stock. Shareholder approval of the Reverse Stock
Split was not required. All consolidated financial statements and
per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for the above
amendment to authorized shares and the reverse stock
split.
Financial
Statements
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015
42
West, LLC
Independent
Auditor’s Report
Chief Operating
Officer
42West,
LLC
220 West 42nd
Street
12th
Floor
New York, NY
10036
We have audited the
accompanying financial statements of 42 West, LLC, which comprise
the balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the
related statements of operations, changes in members’ equity,
and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to
the financial statements.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial
Statements
Management is
responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes
the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control
relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free from material misstatement.
An audit involves
performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the
entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial
statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used
and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
We believe that the
audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of 42 West, LLC as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ BDO USA,
LLP
June 7,
2017
42 West, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$1,279,056
|
$2,161,073
|
Accounts receivable
(net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $184,000 and $165,000,
respectively)
|
1,337,806
|
1,168,921
|
Shares
receivable
|
-
|
220,000
|
Prepaid income
taxes
|
26,150
|
-
|
Total
Current Assets
|
2,643,012
|
3,549,994
|
Property,
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net
|
1,115,515
|
785,733
|
Investments
|
220,000
|
-
|
Security
Deposits
|
45,563
|
45,563
|
Total
Assets
|
$4,024,090
|
$4,381,290
|
Liabilities
and Members’ Equity
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Bank loans
payable
|
$350,000
|
$-
|
Current portion of
note payable to a former member
|
300,000
|
300,000
|
Accounts
payable
|
435,110
|
350,441
|
Accrued
expenses
|
261,053
|
712,792
|
Settlement accrual,
current portion
|
300,000
|
340,000
|
Income taxes
payable
|
-
|
94,817
|
Deferred rent,
current portion
|
47,774
|
112,477
|
Deferred landlord
reimbursement, current portion
|
98,501
|
98,501
|
Deferred tax
liability
|
1,000
|
13,000
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
1,793,438
|
2,022,028
|
Long-Term
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Note payable to a
former member, net of current portion
|
225,000
|
525,000
|
Settlement accrual,
noncurrent portion
|
-
|
260,000
|
Deferred rent,
noncurrent portion
|
383,502
|
356,080
|
Deferred landlord
reimbursement, noncurrent portion
|
385,794
|
484,295
|
Total
Long-Term Liabilities
|
994,296
|
1,625,375
|
Total
Liabilities
|
2,787,734
|
3,647,403
|
Members’
Equity
|
1,236,356
|
733,887
|
Total
Liabilities and Members’ Equity
|
$4,024,090
|
$4,381,290
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
42 West, LLC
Statements
of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$18,563,749
|
$19,769,891
|
Operating
Expenses
|
13,593,299
|
13,413,057
|
Operating
Income Before Guaranteed Payments, Expenses Billed to Clients and
Settlement Expense
|
4,970,450
|
6,356,834
|
Guaranteed
Payments
|
1,197,660
|
1,197,660
|
Expenses
Billed to Clients
|
1,234,064
|
1,633,701
|
Settlement
Expense
|
40,000
|
60,000
|
Operating
Income
|
2,498,726
|
3,465,473
|
Other
Expenses:
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of
equipment
|
-
|
43,138
|
Interest
expense
|
21,505
|
14,825
|
Total
Other Expenses
|
21,505
|
57,963
|
Income
before Provision for Income Taxes
|
2,477,221
|
3,407,510
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
59,752
|
225,140
|
Net
Income
|
$2,417,469
|
$3,182,370
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
42 West, LLC
Statements
of Changes in Members’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Members’
Equity, Beginning of Period
|
$733,887
|
$17,517
|
Net
income
|
2,417,469
|
3,182,370
|
Less:
Members’ distributions
|
(1,915,000)
|
(2,466,000)
|
Members’
Equity, End of Period
|
$1,236,356
|
$733,887
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
42 West, LLC
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$2,417,469
|
$3,182,370
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
213,846
|
211,794
|
Deferred
rent
|
(37,280)
|
(51,901)
|
Amortization of
landlord reimbursement
|
(98,501)
|
(98,501)
|
Loss on disposal of
equipment
|
-
|
43,138
|
Shares
receivable
|
-
|
(220,000)
|
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(168,885)
|
189,310
|
Accounts
payable
|
84,668
|
132,373
|
Accrued
expenses
|
(451,739)
|
(118,642)
|
Settlement
accrual
|
(300,000)
|
60,000
|
Deferred
taxes
|
(12,000)
|
22,000
|
Income taxes
payable/receivable
|
(120,967)
|
55,699
|
Net
Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
1,526,611
|
3,407,640
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Purchase of
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
(543,628)
|
(78,495)
|
Net
Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
(543,628)
|
(78,495)
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Repayment of note
payable to a former member
|
(300,000)
|
(300,000)
|
Proceeds from
revolving credit facility
|
350,000
|
-
|
Distributions
|
(1,915,000)
|
(2,466,000)
|
Net
Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
(1,865,000)
|
(2,766,000)
|
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
(882,017)
|
563,145
|
Cash,
Beginning of Period
|
2,161,073
|
1,597,928
|
Cash,
End of Period
|
$1,279,056
|
$2,161,073
|
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$21,505
|
$14,825
|
Income
taxes
|
123,950
|
147,441
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Noncash Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Conversion of
shares receivable
|
$220,000
|
$-
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
42
West, LLC
Notes
to Financial Statements
1.
Principal Business Activities
Organization and Business Activities
42 West, LLC (the
“Company”) was organized, pursuant to the laws of the
State of Delaware in March 2005, as a public relations firm
specializing in “A” list entertainment industry
clientele with offices in New York and California. The Company will
continue in operation as provided for in the operating
agreement.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015 are stated in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. The operating results for the periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any
other period or for the full year. In the opinion of management,
the accompanying financial statements contain all necessary
adjustments, consisting only of those of a recurring nature, and
disclosures to present fairly the Company’s financial
position and the results of its operations and cash flows for the
periods presented.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates in Financial Statements
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Cash
The Company
maintains an account in a bank located in the New York metropolitan
area. The excess of deposit balances reported by the bank over
amounts that would have been covered by federal insurance was
approximately $355,000 and $1,404,000 at December 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
The Company’s
trade accounts receivable are recorded at amounts billed to
customers, and presented on the balance sheet net of the allowance
for doubtful accounts. The allowance is determined by various
factors, including the age of the receivables, current economic
conditions, historical losses and other information management
obtains regarding the financial condition of customers. The policy
for determining the past due status of receivables is based on how
recently payments have been received. Receivables are charged off
when they are deemed uncollectible.
Depreciation and Amortization
Property,
equipment, and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation is
computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the lesser of the term of the related lease or the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue consists of
fees from the performance of professional services and billings for
direct costs reimbursed by clients. Fees are generally recognized
on a straight-line or monthly basis which approximates the
proportional performance on such contracts. Direct costs reimbursed
by clients are billed as pass-through revenue with no
mark-up.
Deferred revenue
represents customer advances or amounts allowed to be billed under
the contracts for work that has not yet been performed or expenses
that have not yet been incurred.
Income
Taxes
The Company is
taxed as a partnership for federal, New York State, and California
state tax purposes, whereby the Company’s income is reported
by the members. Accordingly, no provision has been made for
federal, New York State, and California State income taxes. The
Company remains liable for New York City Unincorporated Business
tax.
The Company
accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method,
which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been included in the financial statements. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of
the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect
of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
The Company
recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes these
assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a
determination, the Company considers all available positive and
negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences, projected future taxable income,
tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If the
Company determines that it would be able to realize deferred tax
assets in the future in excess of their recorded amount, it would
make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance,
which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
Guaranteed
Payments
Guaranteed payments
to members that are intended as compensation for services rendered
are accounted for as Company expenses rather than as allocations of
the Company’s net income.
Deferred Landlord Reimbursement
Deferred landlord
reimbursement represents the landlord’s reimbursement for
tenant improvements of the Company’s office space. Such
amount is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
lease.
Deferred
Rent
Deferred rent
consists of the excess of the rent expense recognized on the
straight-line basis over the payments required under certain office
leases.
Investments
Investments in
equity securities are recorded at cost. Under this method, the
Company’s share of earnings or losses of such investee
companies is not included in the balance sheet or statement of
operations. However, impairment changes are recognized in the
statement of operations. If circumstances suggest that the value of
the investee company has subsequently been recovered, such recovery
is not recorded.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs,
which are included in operating expenses, are charged to expense as
incurred. Advertising expense amounted to approximately $32,000 and
$72,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
3.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts
with Customers.” ASU 2014-09 represents a comprehensive new
revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize
revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those
goods or services. This ASU sets forth a new five-step revenue
recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition
guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous
industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have
historically existed. In August 2015, the FASB issued
ASU 2015-14, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” which deferred
the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, but permits entities
to adopt one year earlier if they choose (i.e., the original
effective date). As such, ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual
and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2018. In addition, during March 2016, April 2016, May 2016 and
December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue
from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent
Consideration (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net,” ASU
No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and
Licensing,” ASU 2016-12 “Revenue from Contracts
with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical
Expedients” and ASU 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and
Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606),” respectively. These additional amendments
clarified the revenue recognition guidance on reporting revenue as
a principal versus agent, identifying performance obligations,
accounting for intellectual property licenses and on transition,
collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales
and other similar taxes. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of this standard on the Company’s results of
operations and financial position including possible transition
alternatives.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases
(Topic 842).” The new standard establishes a right-of-use
(“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU
asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases
with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as
either finance or operating, with classification affecting the
pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016-02
is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,
2018, including interim periods within those annual periods, with
early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition
approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases
existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest
comparative period presented in the financial statements, with
certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this
standard.
4.
Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvements consist of:
|
|
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
$611,893
|
$234,195
|
Computers and
equipment
|
626,611
|
460,680
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
804,770
|
804,770
|
|
2,043,274
|
1,499,645
|
Less: Accumulated
depreciation
|
(927,759)
|
(713,912)
|
|
$1,115,515
|
$785,733
|
The Company
depreciates furniture and fixtures over a useful life of seven
years, computer and equipment over a useful life of five years, and
leasehold improvements over the remaining term of the related lease
(Note 12).
5.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses
consist of:
|
|
|
Bonuses
|
$61,357
|
$583,437
|
Commissions
|
151,000
|
73,316
|
Credit card
liabilities
|
-
|
30,318
|
Other accrued
expenses
|
48,696
|
25,721
|
|
$261,053
|
$712,792
|
6.
Line of Credit
The Company has a
$1,500,000 revolving credit line agreement with City National Bank,
which matures on April 1, 2017. Borrowings bear interest at
the bank’s prime lending rate plus 0.875% (4.625% at
December 31, 2016). The debt, including letters of credit
outstanding, is collateralized by substantially all of the
Company’s assets, and guaranteed by certain members of the
Company. The credit agreement requires the Company to meet certain
covenants and includes limitations on distributions to members. The
Company is in compliance with covenants. At December 31, 2016,
the outstanding loan balance was $350,000 and there was no
outstanding loan balance at December 31, 2015. The Company incurred
interest expense of $21,505 and $14,825 for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
7.
Note Payable to a Former Member
Effective
August 31, 2011, the Company redeemed the interest of a member
for $2,625,000. The redemption agreement includes certain terms
relating to the adjustment of purchase price for failure to collect
certain account receivables and provisions for acceleration of
scheduled payments under conditions described in the agreement. As
of December 31, 2012, all stated accounts receivable were
collected. The note is payable in quarterly installments, as
defined in the agreement, through September 30, 2018. In the
event the Company defaults under the obligation, the former member
will be entitled to receive a membership interest in proportion to
the unpaid balance. The outstanding principal, along with any
accrued interest, shall be payable in full if any of the
following transactions occur prior to December 31, 2018: (i) four
or more of the current members sell at least 50% of their
membership interest in the Company to any party other than a trust,
current members, or employees; (ii) one or more third parties
acquire more than 50% of membership interest in the Company, (iii)
the Company sells, assigns, transfers, or otherwise disposes all or
substantially all of its assets and/or business, or (iv) the
Company is merged into another party whereby the Company ceases to
exist, or the members no longer own a controlling interest in the
Company.
Future payments on
this redemption are as follows:
Period ended December 31,
|
|
2017
|
$300,000
|
2018
|
225,000
|
|
$525,000
|
8.
Investments
Investments, at
cost, consist of the following:
|
|
|
The Virtual Reality
Company (“VRC”)
|
$220,000
|
$-
|
In exchange for
services rendered to VRC throughout the year ended
December 31, 2015, the Company received both cash
consideration and a promissory note that was convertible into
common stock of VRC. On April 7, 2016, VRC closed an equity
financing round for approximately $22,700,000 of common stock
issued to a third party investor, which triggered the conversion of
all outstanding promissory notes into common stock of VRC. The
Company’s $220,000 investment in VRC represents 344,890
shares of common stock, a less than 1% ownership interest in
VRC. Investment in VRC is recorded at cost.
9.
Income Taxes
The components of
income tax expense are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
$71,252
|
$203,140
|
Deferred
|
(12,000)
|
22,000
|
|
$59,752
|
$225,140
|
|
|
|
The Company is a
partnership and is not subject to federal or state income tax in
general. It is only subject to tax in New York City
which has a statutory rate of 4%. Net deferred assets
and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
Deferred tax
assets:
|
|
|
Effect of cash
basis accounting adjustments
|
$54,000
|
$34,000
|
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
Effect of cash
basis accounting adjustments
|
(55,000)
|
(47,000)
|
Net deferred tax
liability
|
$(1,000)
|
$(13,000)
|
The Company may be
subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) as well as states for calendar years 2013
through 2016. The Company has not been notified of any
federal or state income tax examinations.
10.
Employee Benefits Plan
The Company has a
401(k) profit sharing plan that covers substantially all employees.
Contributions to the plan are at the discretion of the
Company’s management. The Company’s contributions were
approximately $228,000 and $221,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
11.
Members’ Agreement
In the event of
death, disability or withdrawal of a member, the Company is
obligated to purchase the entire membership interest owned by such
member, according to the terms as defined by the operating
agreement.
In addition, the
Company maintains key man life insurance and disability insurance
for each member.
12.
Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Company is
obligated under a sublease operating agreement for office space in
New York expiring in December 2016. The lease provides for
increases in rent for real estate taxes and building operating
costs, all of which is personally guaranteed by certain members of
the Company so long as the Company remains in possession of the
subleased premises. On July 19, 2016, the Company entered into
an operating lease agreement for new office space in New York
commencing December 1, 2016. The lease is secured by a standby
letter of credit amounting to $677,354, and provides for increases
in rent for real estate taxes and building operating costs. The
lease also contains a renewal option for an additional five
years.
The Company is
obligated under an operating lease agreement for office space in
California, expiring in December 2021. The lease is secured by a
cash security deposit of $44,788 and a standby letter of credit
amounting to $100,000 at September 30, 2016. The lease also
provides for increases in rent for real estate taxes and operating
expenses, and contains a renewal option for an additional five
years, as well as an early termination option effective as of
February 1, 2019. Should the early termination option be
executed, the Company will be subject to a termination fee in the
amount of approximately $637,000. The Company does not expect to
execute such option.
Future minimum
annual rent payments are as follows:
Period ended December 31,
|
|
2017
|
$1,289,187
|
2018
|
1,303,478
|
2019
|
1,326,535
|
2020
|
1,433,403
|
2021
|
1,449,019
|
Thereafter
|
4,675,845
|
|
$11,477,467
|
Rent expense,
including escalation charges, amounted to approximately $1,115,000
and $941,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
Employment Contract
The Company entered
into seven new three-year employment contracts with senior level
management employees during 2015, none of which are equity
partners. The contracts defined each individual’s
compensation, along with specific salary increases mid-way through
the term of each contract. Each individual was also guaranteed a
percentage of proceeds if the Company was sold during the term of
their contract. The percentages vary by executive. Termination by
cause, death, or by the employee would terminate the
Company’s commitment on each contract. Each employee is
entitled to severance compensation if terminated without
cause.
13.
Settlement Expense
The Company is a
contributing employer to the Motion Picture Industry Pension,
Individual Account, and Health Plans (collectively, the
“Plans”), two multiemployer pension funds and one
multiemployer welfare fund, respectively, that are governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. In the
past, the Company had disputed that certain employees were not
union members and, as such, were not eligible to participate in the
Plans. Pursuant to audit results that were settled during the year
ended December 31, 2016 between the Plans and the Company, the
employees were determined to be union members. Based on the
Plans’ audit results for the period from June 6, 2007
through June 6, 2011, the Company was liable to the Plans for
delinquent pension plan contributions, health and welfare plan
contributions, and union dues in the amount of $340,000, which was
expensed prior to January 1, 2014 and paid in August
2016.
The Plans intend to
conduct a second audit of the Company’s books and records for
the period from June 7, 2011 through August 20, 2016 in
connection with the Company’s alleged contribution
obligations to the Plans. Based on the settled audit by the Plans
for the period from June 6, 2007 through June 6, 2011,
the Company expects that the Plans may seek to collect
approximately $300,000 in delinquent pension plan contributions,
health and welfare plan contributions, and union dues from the
Company after the audit is completed. The Company believes this
exposure to be probable and, therefore, has recorded this liability
and recognized the expenses ratably throughout the period under
audit.
14.
Subsequent Events
On March 30, 2017
the Company and its members (the “Sellers”) entered
into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”) with Dolphin Digital Media, Inc.
(“Dolphin”), a Florida corporation, whereby Dolphin
agreed to purchase 100% of the membership interests of the Sellers
in exchange for shares of common stock in Dolphin. As of
March 30, 2017, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Dolphin.
Simultaneous with
the execution of the Agreement, the Sellers transferred their
membership interests in exchange for shares of Dolphin common
stock, based on purchase price of (i) $18,666,667 (based on the
Dolphin’s 30-trading-day average stock price prior to the
closing date of $4.61 per share); (ii) minus the Company’s
indebtedness at the time of closing; (iii) minus the
Company’s transaction expenses; and (iv) plus the
Company’s working capital at the time of closing in excess of
$500,000, or minus the excess of $500,000 over the Company’s
working capital at the time of closing. Pursuant to the Agreement,
Dolphin issued 1,230,280 shares of common stock on the closing date
to the Sellers, and will issue an additional 1,961,821 shares of
common stock to the Sellers and certain employees on January 2,
2018. Dolphin also issued 344,550 shares of common stock to certain
employees on April 13, 2017, and may issue up to 118,655 shares of
common stock as bonuses to certain employees during
2017.
The Agreement
provides for additional shares of Dolphin common stock to be
calculated and issued to the selling members based on EBITDA of the
Company’s business segment for each of the calendar years
2017, 2018, and 2019, subject to certain thresholds as defined in
the Agreement. Pursuant to a promissory note agreement with a
former member (Note 8), upon closing of this transaction the
Company paid $300,000 in cash to the former member with the
remaining $225,000 is to be paid in January 2018 as repayment of
the promissory note, the total of which decreased the amount of
common stock issued to the selling members.
Upon closing, three
of the Sellers entered into employment agreements with Dolphin, and
all of the Sellers entered into put agreements with
Dolphin. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the put agreements, Dolphin has granted the
Sellers the right, but not obligation, to cause Dolphin to purchase
up to an aggregate of 2,374,187 of their shares of common stock
received as consideration for a purchase price equal to $4.61 per
share during certain specified exercise periods set forth in the
put agreements through December 2020.
In addition, in
connection with the transaction, on March 30, 2017, Dolphin entered
into a registration rights agreement with the Sellers (the
“Registration Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which the
Sellers are entitled to rights with respect to the registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”). All fees, costs and expenses of underwritten
registrations under the Registration Rights Agreement will be borne
by Dolphin. At any time after the one-year anniversary of the
Registration Rights Agreement, Dolphin will be required, upon the
request of such Sellers holding at least a majority of the
consideration received by the Sellers, to file a registration
statement on Form S-1 and use its reasonable efforts to effect a
registration covering up to 25% of the consideration received by
the Sellers. In addition, if Dolphin is eligible to file a
registration statement on Form S-3, upon the request of such
Sellers holding at least a majority of the consideration received
by the Sellers, Dolphin will be required to use its reasonable
efforts to effect a registration of such shares on Form S-3
covering up to an additional 25% of the consideration received by
the Sellers. Dolphin is required to effect only one registration on
Form S-1 and one registration statement on Form S-3, if eligible.
The right to have the consideration received by the Sellers
registered on Form S-1 or Form S-3 is subject to other specified
conditions and limitations.
On April 27, 2017,
the Company drew $250,000 from the Line of Credit to be used for
working capital. In addition, the maturity date of the
Line of Credit was extended to August 1, 2017. All other terms of
the Line of Credit remain the same.
Subsequent events
have been evaluated through June 7, 2017, which is the date the
financial statements were available to be issued.
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Units
PROSPECTUS
, 2017
Maxim Group LLC
|
Ladenburg
Thalmann
|
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The
following table lists the costs and expenses payable by us in
connection with the offering of securities covered by this
prospectus, other than any sales commissions or discounts. All
amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC registration fee and
the FINRA filing fee, and all of the fees and expenses will be
borne by us.
Securities and
Exchange Commission Registration Fee
|
$2,312.99
|
FINRA Filing
Fee
|
$*
|
Accounting Fees and
Expenses
|
$*
|
Legal Fees and
Expense
|
$*
|
Transfer Agent and
Registrar Fee
|
$*
|
Printing and
Engraving Expenses
|
$*
|
Blue Sky Fees and
Expenses
|
$*
|
Miscellaneous
|
$*
|
Total
|
$*
|
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
The
Florida Business Corporation Act (the “Florida Act”)
authorizes the indemnification of officers, directors, employees
and agents under specified circumstances. Under Section 607.0831 of
the Florida Act, a director is not personally liable for monetary
damages to the corporation or any other person for any statement,
vote, decision, or failure to act regarding corporate management or
policy unless (1) the director breached or failed to perform his or
her duties as a director and (2) the director’s breach of, or
failure to perform, those duties constitutes: (a) a violation of
the criminal law, unless the director had reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was lawful or had no reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful, (b) a transaction from
which the director derived an improper personal benefit, either
directly or indirectly, (c) a circumstance under which the
liability provisions of Section 607.0834 of the Florida Act are
applicable, (d) in a proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation to procure a judgment in its favor or by or in the
right of a shareholder, conscious disregard for the best interest
of the corporation, or willful misconduct, or (e) in a proceeding
by or in the right of someone other than the corporation or a
shareholder, recklessness or an act or omission which was committed
in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting
wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.
A judgment or other final adjudication against a director in any
criminal proceeding for a violation of the criminal law estops that
director from contesting the fact that his or her breach, or
failure to perform, constitutes a violation of the criminal law;
but does not estop the director from establishing that he or she
had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was lawful
or had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was
unlawful.
Under
Section 607.0850 of the Florida Act, a corporation has power to
indemnify any person who was or is a party to any proceeding (other
than an action by, or in the right of the corporation), by reason
of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee
or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of
the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise against liability incurred in connection with such
proceeding, including any appeal thereof, if he or she acted in
good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in,
or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The termination
of any proceeding by judgment, order, settlement or conviction or
upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not, of
itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good
faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in,
or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation or, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, has reasonable cause
to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.
In
addition, under Section 607.0850 of the Florida Act, a corporation
has the power to indemnify any person, who was or is a party to any
proceeding by or in the right of the corporation to procure a
judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that the person is or
was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation or
is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against expenses and
amounts paid in settlement not exceeding, in the judgment of the
board of directors, the estimated expense of litigating the
proceeding to conclusion, actually and reasonably incurred in
connection with the defense or settlement of such proceeding,
including any appeal thereof. Such indemnification shall be
authorized if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he or
she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best
interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall
be made under this subsection in respect of any claim, issue, or
matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable unless, and only to the extent that, the court in which such
proceeding was brought, or any other court of competent
jurisdiction, shall determine upon application that, despite the
adjudication of liability but in view of all circumstances of the
case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity
for such expenses which such court shall deem proper.
Under Section
607.0850 of the Florida Act, the indemnification and advancement of
expenses provided pursuant to Section 607.0850 of the Florida Act
are not exclusive, and a corporation may make any other or further
indemnification or advancement of expenses of any of its directors,
officers, employees, or agents, under any bylaw, agreement, vote of
shareholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to
action in his or her official capacity and as to action in another
capacity while holding such office. However, indemnification or
advancement of expenses shall not be made to or on behalf of any
director, officer, employee or agent if a judgment or other final
adjudication establishes that his or her actions, or omissions to
act, were material to the cause of action so adjudicated and
constitute: (a) a violation of the criminal law, unless the
director, officer, employee or agent had reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was lawful or had no reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful; (b) a transaction from
which the director, officer, employee or agent derived an improper
personal benefit; (c) in the case of a director, a circumstance
under which the above liability provisions of Section 607.0834 of
the Florida Act are applicable; or (d) willful misconduct or a
conscious disregard for the best interests of the corporation in a
proceeding by or in the right of the corporation to procure a
judgment in its favor or in a proceeding by or in the right of a
stockholder.
Section
607.0850 of the Florida Act also provides that a corporation shall
have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any
person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation against any liability asserted against the person and
incurred by him or her in any such capacity or arising out of his
status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power
to indemnify him against such liability under the provisions of
Section 607.0850 of the Florida Act.
Our
Articles of Incorporation provide that we shall, to the fullest
extent provided, authorized, permitted or not prohibited by the
Florida Act and our Bylaws, indemnify our directors and officers,
from and against any and all of the expenses or liabilities
incurred in defending a civil or criminal proceeding or other
specified matters in the manner provided in our Articles of
Incorporation. Our Bylaws also provide for indemnification of our
directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law. We
maintain directors' and officers' liability insurance for the
benefit of our officers and directors.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The
following list sets forth information regarding all securities sold
by us within the past three years that were not registered under
the Securities Act:
(1)
|
On
October 14, 2015, we entered into a merger agreement pursuant to
which we acquired Dolphin Films from Dolphin Entertainment,
LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement, upon consummation of the Dolphin Films acquisition on
March 7, 2016, we issued to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and
1,000,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as
consideration. Our issuance of Series B and Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock was made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration requirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
On November 15, 2016, Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
converted all of the shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
into 1,092,500 shares of our common stock. Our
issuance of common stock to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was
made, and any future issuances of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock will be made, in reliance upon the exemption from
registration requirements in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities
Act.
|
(2)
|
In
connection with the Dolphin Films acquisition, on October 16, 2015,
we entered into a preferred stock exchange agreement with T
Squared. Pursuant to the agreement, on March 7, 2016, we exchanged
1,042,753 previously issued shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock for 1,000,000 newly issued shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock. Our issuance of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock was made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration requirements in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
On November 16, 2016, T Squared converted all of the shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 475,000
shares of our common stock.
|
(3)
|
On
December 7, 2015, we entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor pursuant to which we issued to the investor a convertible
note in the amount of $3,164,000. At any time prior to the maturity
date, the investor had the right, at its option, to convert some or
all of its convertible note into the number of shares of common
stock determined by dividing (a) the aggregate sum of the (i)
principal amount of the convertible note to be converted, and (ii)
amount of any accrued but unpaid interest with respect to such
portion of the convertible note to be converted; and (b) the
conversion price then in effect. The initial conversion price was
$10.00 per share, subject to adjustment. The
outstanding principal amount and all accrued interest of the
convertible note were to mandatorily and automatically convert into
common stock upon occurrence of a specified triggering
event. On February 5, 2016, a triggering event occurred and
the entire principal amount of the convertible note mandatorily and
automatically converted into 316,400 shares of common
stock.
|
(4)
|
On
March 4, 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with
Dolphin Entertainment, LLC, holder of an outstanding
promissory note dated December 31, 2011. Pursuant to the
subscription agreement, Dolphin Entertainment, LLC
converted an aggregate amount of principal and interest outstanding
under the note of $3,073,410 into 307,341 shares of
common stock as payment in full of the note. Our issuance of
common stock to Dolphin Entertainment, LLC to satisfy
the note was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration
requirements in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
|
(5)
|
On
March 29, 2016, we entered into ten individual subscription
agreements with each of ten subscribers. The subscribers were
holders of outstanding promissory notes issued pursuant to certain
loan and security agreements in 2014 and 2015. Pursuant to the
terms of the subscription agreements we converted the $2,883,377
aggregate amount of principal and interest outstanding under the
notes into an aggregate of 288,338 shares of common
stock at $10.00 per share as payment in
full of each of the notes. Our issuance of common stock to each of
the subscribers was made in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) of the
Securities Act.
|
(6)
|
On
April 1, 2016, we entered into substantially identical subscription
agreements with certain investors. Pursuant to the agreements, we
issued and sold to the investors in a private placement an
aggregate of 537,500 shares of common stock, at a
purchase price of $10.00 per share, which provided
$5,375,000 of aggregate gross proceeds to us. Under the
terms of the subscription agreements, each investor had the option
to purchase additional shares of common stock at the purchase
price, not to exceed the number of such investor’s initial
number of subscribed shares, during each of the second, third and
fourth quarters of 2016. We refer to such investors as quarterly
investors.
|
(7)
|
On May
31, 2016, we entered into substantially identical debt exchange
agreements with certain investors. Pursuant to the agreements, we
issued and sold to the investors in a private placement an
aggregate of 473,255 shares of our common stock in
exchange for the cancellation of an aggregate amount of
$4,732,545 in outstanding debt and interest under
certain notes held by the investors, at an exchange rate of
$10.00 per share.
|
(8)
|
On June
22, 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with an investor
whereby we issued and sold to the investor in a private placement
an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our common stock at a
purchase price of $10.00 per share. The
private placement provided $250,000 of gross proceeds to
us.
|
(9)
|
On June
28, 2016, we received notice from a quarterly investor and $500,000
to exercise the option of purchasing shares of our common stock at
$10.00 per share. We issued 50,000 shares
of common stock related to this exercise.
|
(10)
|
On June
30, 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor, pursuant to which we issued and sold to the investor in a
private placement an aggregate of 10,000 shares of
common stock at a price of $10.00 per share. The
private placement provided $100,000 of aggregate proceeds for
us.
|
(11)
|
On June
30, 2016, we entered into a web series debt exchange agreement with
a promissory noteholder with a principal amount of $50,000.
Pursuant to the agreement, we converted an aggregate of $55,640 of
principal and interest into 5,564 shares of common
stock at a price of $10.00 per share.
|
(12)
|
On June
30, 2016, we entered into substantially identical debt exchange
agreements with certain investors. Pursuant to the agreements, we
issued and sold to the investors in a private placement an
aggregate of 1,276,330 shares of our common stock in
exchange for the cancellation of an aggregate amount of
$12,763,295 in outstanding debt and interest under
certain notes held by the investors, at an exchange rate of
$10.00 per share.
|
(13)
|
On
October 3, 2016, we entered into a debt exchange agreement pursuant
to which we agreed to issue 6,000 shares of common
stock at an exchange price of $10.00 per share to
terminate the remaining kids club agreement for (i) $10,000 plus
(ii) the original investment of $50,000.
|
(14)
|
On
October 13, 2016, we received notice from a quarterly investor and
$600,000 to exercise the option of purchasing shares of our common
stock at $10.00 per share. We issued
60,000 shares of common stock related to this
exercise.
|
(15)
|
On
October 3, 2016, October 13, 2016 and October 27, 2016, we entered
into three substantially identical debt exchange agreements to
issue 33,100 shares of common stock at an exchange
price of $10.00 per share to terminate three equity
finance agreements for a cumulative original investment amount of
$331,000.
|
(16)
|
On
October 13, 2016, we entered into six substantially identical
subscription agreements, pursuant to which we issued
12,500 shares of common stock at $10.00
per share and received $125,000.
|
(17)
|
On
November 4, 2016, we entered into a warrant purchase agreement with
T Squared pursuant to which we issued the (i) Series G
Warrant to purchase up to 750,000 shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $10.00 per share of our
common stock, and an expiration date of January 31, 2018, (ii)
Series H Warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $12.00 per share
of common stock and an expiration date of January 31, 2019, and
(iii) Series I Warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $14.00 per
share of common stock and an expiration date of January 31, 2020.
As consideration for the Warrants, T Squared agreed to make a
$50,000 cash payment to us to reduce the aggregate exercise price
of the Series E Warrant to purchase up to 175,000 shares of
common stock that were issued to it on March
10, 2010 and amended on September 10, 2015 to extend their
expiration date until December 31, 2018.
|
(18)
|
On
November 15, 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor, pursuant to which we issued and sold to such investor
50,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$10.00 per Share. This transaction provided $500,000
in proceeds for us.
|
(19)
|
On
November 17, 2016, we received notice from a quarterly investor and
$600,000 to exercise the option of purchasing shares of our common
stock at $10.00 per share. We issued
60,000 shares of common stock related to this
exercise.
|
(20)
|
On
November 22, 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor pursuant to which we issued 5,000 shares of
common stock at $10.00 per share and received gross
proceeds in the amount of $50,000.
|
(21)
|
On
December 15, 2016 and December 20, 2016, we entered into two
separate subscription agreements with two individual subscribers.
The subscribers each held outstanding promissory notes of our
company, issued pursuant to certain loan and security agreements
dated January 15, 2015 and May 4, 2015, respectively. Pursuant to
the subscription agreements, we and each of the subscribers agreed
to convert their respective aggregate amounts of principal and
interest outstanding under the notes into shares of common stock.
On December 15, 2016, one of the subscribers converted the
principal balance of such subscriber’s notes together with
accrued interest, in the aggregate amount of
$1,154,245, into 115,425 shares of common
stock at $10.00 per share as payment in full of the
notes. On December 20, 2016, the other subscriber converted the
principal balance of such subscriber’s notes together with
accrued interest, in the aggregate amount of $111,285
into 11,129 shares of common stock at
$10.00 per share as payment in full of the
notes.
|
(22)
|
On
December 29, 2016, we and KCF Investments, LLC entered into (i) a
purchase agreement pursuant to which we purchased from KCF the
remaining 25% outstanding membership interests of Dolphin Kids Club
in exchange for the issuance of a common stock purchase warrant
exercisable for 300,000 shares of common stock and
(ii) a debt exchange agreement pursuant to which we exchanged an
aggregate principal amount of $6,470,990 owing under certain loan
and security agreements for a common stock purchase warrant
exercisable for 785,000 shares of common stock. In
connection with the agreements, we and KCF entered into a Common
Stock Purchase Warrant “J” Agreement pursuant to which
we agreed to issue to KCF an aggregate of up to
1,085,000 shares of common stock (as adjusted
from time to time as provided in the Warrant “J”
Agreement) with an initial exercise price of $0.03 per
share of common stock, and an expiration date of December 29,
2020.
In
addition, on December 29, 2016, we and BBCF 2011, LLC, an affiliate
of KCF, entered into a termination agreement pursuant to which we
agreed to terminate all of BBCF’s rights to profit
distributions from Dolphin Digital Studios arising under equity
finance agreements dated March 14, 2011 and June 29, 2011, in
exchange for the issuance of a common stock purchase warrant
exercisable for 85,000 shares of common stock. In connection with
the termination agreement, we and BBCF entered into a Common Stock
Purchase Warrant “K” Agreement pursuant to which the
Company agreed to issue to BBCF up to 85,000 shares of common
stock (as adjusted from time to time as provided in the Warrant
“K” Agreement) with an initial exercise price of $0.03
per share of common stock and an expiration date of December 29,
2020.
|
(23)
|
On
February 16, 2017, we entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor, pursuant to which we issued and sold to the investor
50,000 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of
$10.00 per share. We received $500,000 of
gross proceeds as a result of the sale of shares.
|
(24)
|
On
March 30, 2017, as consideration for our acquisition of
42West, we paid to the sellers approximately $18.7 million in
shares of common stock, par value $0.015, based on our
company’s 30-trading-day average stock price prior to the
closing date of $9.22 per share, as adjusted for
the 1-to-2 reverse stock split, (less certain working
capital and closing adjustments, transaction expenses and payments
of indebtedness), plus the potential to earn up to an additional
$9.3 million in shares of common stock. As a result, we (i) issued
615,140 shares of common stock on the closing date,
172,275 shares of common stock to certain 42West
employees on April 13, 2017 and 59,320
shares of common stock as employee stock bonuses on August
21, 2017 and (ii) will issue
980,911 shares of common stock on January 2, 2018. In
addition, we may issue up to 981,563 shares of common
stock based on the achievement of specified financial performance
targets over a three-year period as set forth in the Membership
Interest Purchase Agreement.
|
(25)
|
On
April 13, 2017, we issued 3,254 shares of common stock
to a consultant as consideration for services rendered during the
month of March 2017, valued at $30,000. The shares were
issued at a purchase price of $9.22 per share,
as adjusted for the 1-to-2 reverse stock split, based
on the 30-trading-day average stock price prior to March 30,
2017.
|
(26)
|
On July 18, 2017,
we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $250,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum, which is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription
agreement.
|
(27)
|
On July 26, 2017,
we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $250,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum, which is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription
agreement.
|
(28)
|
On August 1, 2017,
we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $25,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum, that is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription
agreement.
|
(29)
|
On August 2, 2017,
we issued 2,886 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per
share to a third party in settlement of an outstanding account
receivable.
|
(30)
|
On August 4, 2017,
we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $50,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum, that is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription
agreement.
|
(31) |
On August 31, 2017,
we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $50,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum that is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription agreement.
|
(32) |
On September 6,
2017, we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $50,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum that is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription agreement.
|
(33) |
On September 9,
2017, we entered into a subscription agreement with a subscriber,
pursuant to which we sold a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $50,000, at an interest rate of 10% per annum that is
convertible into shares of common stock in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the subscription agreement.
|
All of
the foregoing issuances were, or will be, made in reliance upon the
exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities
Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, except
(i) as noted in numbers (1), (2), (4), and (5) where issuances were
made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Section
3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and (ii) with respect to the
59,320 shares of common stock noted in number (24),
which were issued pursuant to a registration statement
on Form S-8. Except with respect to the 59,320 shares,
each of the investors represented to us that such investor was an
accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities
Act and that such investor’s shares were being acquired for
investment purposes.
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The
exhibits filed with this registration statement are set forth on
the “Exhibit Index” set forth elsewhere
herein.
Item 17. Undertakings
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To
file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(i) To
include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To
reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set
forth in theregistration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that
which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of
theestimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in
the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more
than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set
forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in
the effective registration statement; and
(iii) To
include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement
or any material change to such information in the registration
statement.
(2) That,
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
(3) To
remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any
of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
(4) That,
for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act
of 1933 in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned
registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of
the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the
purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser
by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned
registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered
to offer or sell such securities to such
purchaser:
(i) Any
preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant
relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule
424;
(ii) Any
free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the
undersigned registrant;
(iii) The
portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the
offering containing material information about the undersigned
registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the
undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any
other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the
undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(5) For
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of
1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as
part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and
contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant
to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall
be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time
it was declared effective.
(6) For
the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of
prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant
of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or
controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its
counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly
caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Coral
Gables, State of Florida, on this 10th day of
October, 2017.
|
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
O’Dowd, IV
|
|
|
Name:
|
William
O’Dowd, IV
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/s/
William O’Dowd, IV
|
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
October 10,
2017
|
William
O’Dowd, IV
|
|
|
/s/
Mirta A Negrini
|
|
Chief
Financial and Operating Officer and Director
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
October 10,
2017
|
Mirta A
Negrini
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
October 10,
2017
|
Michael
Espensen
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
October 10,
2017
|
Nelson
Famadas
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Allan
Mayer
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Justo
Pozo
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
October 10,
2017
|
Nicholas
Stanham
|
|
|
*
|
By: /s/ Mirta A
Negrini
|
|
Name: Mirta A
Negrini
Title:
Attorney-in-fact
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
The
following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by
reference into, this registration statement.
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Underwriting
Agreement.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated as of October
14, 2015, by and among the
Company, DDM Merger Sub, Inc., Dolphin Films, Inc. and Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2017, by and
among the Company and Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg, Allan Mayer and
The Beatrice B. Trust.*
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Dolphin
Digital Media, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1(a) to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(b) |
|
Articles of
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. |
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1(b) to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 19, 2017. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bylaws
of Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. dated as of December 3,
2014.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2017; by and
among the Company and Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg, Allan Mayer and
the Beatrice B. Trust.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2016,
between the Company and T Squared Partners LP.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 10, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Common
Stock Purchase Warrant G.
|
|
Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed on November 10,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Common
Stock Purchase Warrant H.
|
|
Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed on November 10,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Common
Stock Purchase Warrant I.
|
|
Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed on November 10,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Common
Stock Purchase Warrant
F.
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Common
Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 5, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of
Warrant.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Form of Warrant
Agreement ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Form of
Underwriter's Warrants.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion
of Greenberg Traurig, P.A.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment
to Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of
December 30, 2010, between the Company and T Squared Investment
LLC.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 5, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock Exchange Agreement, dated as of October 16,
2015, between the Company and T Squared Partners LP.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2012,
between the Company and William O’Dowd.†
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 19, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement Letter of Extension, dated as of
December 31, 2014.†
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Promissory Note, dated as of December 31, 2011, in
favor of William O’Dowd.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Loan and Security Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Equity Purchase Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 15, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Convertible Note.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 15, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription
Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2016, between
the Company and Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 11, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 7, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Debt Exchange Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 3, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dolphin
Entertainment Inc., 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.†
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on August 08,
2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2017, by and between
the Company and Allan Mayer.†
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List of
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent
of BDO USA, LLP (Dolphin Digital Media, Inc. Consolidated Financial
Statements).
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent
of BDO USA, LLP (42West, LLC Financial Statements).
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Consent
of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. (contained in Exhibit 5.1
hereto).**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power
of Attorney.
|
|
Previously
filed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document.
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
† Management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement.
*
Schedules (and similar attachments) have been omitted pursuant to
Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish
supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
**To be
filed by pre-effective amendment.