The information in this prospectus supplement is not complete and may be changed. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus are not an offer to sell these securities and are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Filed pursuant to Rule
497
Registration Statement No. 333-142154
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT | PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT | SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JULY 9, 2007 | ||||
(To Prospectus Dated June 29, 2007) |
1,250,000 Shares
Technology Investment Capital Corp.
Common Stock
We are offering for sale 1,250,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol TICC. The last reported sales price for our common stock on July 6, 2007 was $15.96 per share.
Please read this prospectus supplement, and the accompanying prospectus, before investing, and keep it for future reference. The prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus contain important information about us that a prospective investor should know before investing in our common stock. We have filed additional information about us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (http://www.sec.gov), which is available free of charge by contacting Technology Investment Capital Corp. at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, CT 06830 or by telephone at (203) 983-5275 or on our website (http://www.ticc.com). The information on our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus supplement.
An investment in our common stock is subject to risks and involves a heightened risk of total loss of investment. In addition, the companies in which we invest are subject to special risks. See Risk Factors beginning on page 8 of the accompanying prospectus to read about factors you should consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in our common stock.
Per Share | Total | |||||
Public offering price |
$ | $ | ||||
Underwriting discount |
$ | $ | ||||
Proceeds to Technology Investment Capital Corp.(1) |
$ | $ |
(1) | Before deducting expenses payable by us estimated to be $250,000. |
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or about July , 2007.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission, nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
We have granted the underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to 187,500 additional shares of our common stock at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions, to cover over-allotments.
Wachovia Securities
The date of this prospectus supplement is , 2007.
Prospectus Supplement | ||
Page | ||
S-1 | ||
S-2 | ||
S-4 | ||
S-6 | ||
S-6 | ||
S-7 | ||
S-8 | ||
S-10 | ||
Prospectus | ||
Prospectus Summary |
1 | |
Fees and Expenses |
4 | |
Selected Financial and Other Data |
6 | |
Selected Quarterly Financial Data |
7 | |
Risk Factors |
8 | |
Forward-Looking Statements and Projections |
20 | |
Use of Proceeds |
21 | |
Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions |
22 | |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
24 | |
Senior Securities |
44 | |
Business |
45 | |
Portfolio Companies |
55 | |
Determination of Net Asset Value |
58 | |
Management |
60 | |
Portfolio Management |
65 | |
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations |
73 | |
Regulation as a Business Development Company |
78 | |
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
83 | |
Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities |
84 | |
Certain Relationships and Transactions |
85 | |
Description of Securities |
86 | |
Plan of Distribution |
93 | |
Legal Matters |
94 | |
Custodian, Transfer and Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar |
94 | |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
94 | |
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices |
94 | |
Where You Can Find Additional Information |
95 | |
Index to Financial Statements |
F-1 |
We have not, and the underwriter has not, authorized any dealer, salesman or other person to give any information or to make any representation other than those contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. You must not rely upon any information or representation not contained in this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus as if we had authorized it. This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus do not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any security other than the registered securities to which they relate, nor do they constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. The information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is accurate as of the dates on their covers; however, this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus will be updated to reflect any material changes.
In this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, except where the context requires otherwise, the terms TICC, the Company, we, us and our refer to Technology Investment Capital Corp.; TIM and investment adviser refers to Technology Investment Management, LLC; and BDC Partners refers to BDC Partners, LLC.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus contain forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, and estimates and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
| an economic downturn could impair our customers ability to repay our loans and increase our non-performing assets, |
| an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the technology-related industry in which we concentrate causing us to suffer losses in our portfolio and experience diminished demand for capital in this industry sector, |
| a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities, |
| interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, and |
| the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in this prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus, including the Risk Factors section in the accompanying prospectus, and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC. |
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this prospectus supplement and the accompany prospectus should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in the Risk Factors section of the accompanying prospectus, and elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus, as appropriate.
S-1
THE COMPANY
Overview
We are a specialty finance company principally providing capital to primarily non-public small- and medium-sized technology-related companies. Technology-related companies are businesses that focus on the following sectors: software, Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware and technology-enabled services.
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. Our primary focus is on seeking current income by investing in non-public debt securities. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt investments, or equity investments in technology-related companies. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and/or equity securities of other technology-related companies.
Our capital is generally used by our portfolio companies to finance organic growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations and working capital. Our investment decisions are based on extensive analysis of potential portfolio companies business operations supported by an in-depth understanding of the quality of their recurring revenues and cash flow, variability of costs and the inherent value of their assets, including proprietary intangible assets and intellectual property.
We currently concentrate our investments in companies having annual revenues of less than $200 million and/or an equity capitalization of less than $300 million. Our investments typically range from $5 million to $30 million each, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates.
We also borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, Technology Investment Management, LLC (TIM), will be borne by our common stockholders.
Our investment activities are managed by TIM. TIM is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the Advisers Act). TIM is owned by BDC Partners, LLC (BDC Partners), its managing member, and Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce & Associates). Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. Under the investment advisory agreement, we have agreed to pay TIM an annual base management fee based on our gross assets as well as an incentive fee based on our performance. See Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement in the accompanying prospectus.
We were founded in July 2003 and completed an initial public offering of shares of our common stock in November 2003. We are a Maryland corporation and a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we are required to meet certain regulatory tests, including the requirement to invest at least 70% of our total assets in eligible portfolio companies. See Regulation as a Business Development Company in the accompanying prospectus. In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as the Code.
S-2
We intend to concentrate in the technology-related sector and to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology-related companies.
Our headquarters are at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255 Greenwich, Connecticut and our telephone number is (203) 983-5275.
Recent Developments
On June 27, 2007, we completed an $11 million investment in senior secured notes with warrants in Pulvermedia Inc. Pulvermedia Inc. operates and produces tradeshow and conference events, most notably VON events.
On June 27, 2007, we amended our credit facility with Royal Bank of Canada and Branch Banking & Trust Company to increase the size of the facility to $180 million and to add Commerzbank AG as an additional lender, providing a $30 million commitment.
On May 7, 2007, we amended our credit facility with Royal Bank of Canada and Branch Banking & Trust Company to reduce the interest rate on the facility by 50 basis points, to 1.75% over LIBOR, and increase the size of the facility to $150 million.
On May 7, 2007, we completed a $14.9 million transaction with Box Services, LLC, whereby we invested $13.5 million in senior secured notes with a commitment of an additional $1.4 million in senior notes, as the company achieves certain milestones. Box Services, LLC is a provider of digital imaging services to leading professional photographers, luxury fashion brands, publishers and advertisers.
On April 30, 2007, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.36 per share for the second quarter, payable on June 29, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 8, 2007.
On April 24, 2007, we completed a $15.0 million investment in senior secured notes issued by American Integration Technologies, LLC an existing portfolio company.
On April 10, 2007, we completed an $11.5 million transaction with PrePak Systems, Inc., whereby we invested $10 million in senior secured notes with a commitment of an additional $1.5 million in senior notes, as the company achieves certain milestones. PrePak Systems, Inc. is a contract packaging organization that repackages bulk pharmaceuticals into bottles, blister packs and individually packaged doses for government mail outpatient pharmacies and hospitals, commercial hospitals, nursing homes, and direct pharmacy clients.
S-3
The following table is intended to assist prospective investors in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in an offering will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary.
Stockholder Transaction Expenses
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price) |
%(1) | ||
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
% | ||
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses |
0.00 | %(2) | |
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
% | ||
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock)
Management fees |
2.42 | %(3) | |
Incentive fees payable under our investment advisory agreement |
0.02 | %(4) | |
Interest payments on borrowed funds |
1.61 | %(5) | |
Acquired fund fees and expenses |
0.00 | %(6) | |
Other expenses |
0.93 | % | |
Total annual expenses |
4.98 | %(7)(8) | |
EXAMPLE
The following example, required by the SEC, demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in us. In calculating the following expense amounts, we assumed we would have no additional leverage above our current level as of March 31, 2007 and that our operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above.
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||||||
You would have to pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5.0% annual return |
$ | $ | $ | $ |
The above example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses (including leverage and other expenses) may be greater or less than those shown. Moreover, while the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The incentive fee under the investment advisory agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have a de minimis effect, is not included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our investments to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors, would be higher.
In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan may receive shares valued at the market price in effect at that time. This price may be at, above or below net asset value. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan in the accompanying prospectus for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
(1) | Represents the underwriting discounts and commissions with respect to the shares to be sold by us in this offering. |
(2) | The expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in Other expenses. |
S-4
(3) | Our management fee is based on gross assets; estimate of management fee assumes net assets of $269.4 million and leverage of $56.5 million. See Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement in the accompanying prospectus. |
(4) | Assumes that annual incentive fees earned by our investment advisor, TIM, remain consistent with the incentive fees earned by TIM during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2007, which totaled approximately $12,000. In subsequent years, incentive fees would increase if, and to the extent that, we earn greater interest income through our investments in portfolio companies and realize additional capital gains upon the sale of warrants or other equity investments in such companies. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which is payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20.0% of the excess, if any, of pre-incentive fee net investment income over an annual hurdle rate (equal to the interest rate payable on a five-year U.S. Treasury Note plus 5%). The second part of the incentive fee equals 20.0% of our net realized capital gains for the calendar year less any unrealized capital losses for such year and will be payable at the end of each calendar year. For a more detailed discussion of the calculation of this fee, see Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement in the accompanying prospectus. |
(5) | The Interest payments on borrowed funds assumes that we maintain our level of outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2007 and incur interest on such outstanding borrowings at an interest rate of 7.69%, which was our weighted average borrowing cost at March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, we had $100 million available to us under a credit facility, of which we had borrowed approximately $56.5 million. As of May 7, 2007, the credit facility was increased to $150 million. As of June 27, 2007, the credit facility was further increased to $180 million. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources in the accompanying prospectus. Leverage allows us to increase our portfolio investments, but also increases the fees and expenses borne by our common stockholders, including the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TIM. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Business and StructureWe may borrow money, which may magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us in the accompanying prospectus. |
(6) | As of March 31, 2007, we had no investments in any acquired funds. |
(7) | Total annual expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock are higher than the total annual expenses percentage would be for a company that is not leveraged. We borrow money to leverage our net assets and increase our total assets. The SEC requires that Total annual expenses percentage be calculated as a percentage of net assets, rather than the total assets, including assets that have been funded with borrowed monies. If the Total annual expenses percentage were calculated instead as a percentage of our total assets, our Total annual expenses would be approximately 4.11% of total assets. |
(8) | The holders of shares of our common stock (and not the holders of our debt securities or preferred stock, if any) indirectly bear the cost associated with our annual expenses. |
S-5
Common stock we are offering |
1,250,000 shares |
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
21,157,086 shares |
Nasdaq Global Select Market Symbol |
TICC |
Risk factors |
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk Factors beginning on page 8 of the accompanying prospectus. |
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of the 1,250,000 shares of our common stock that we are offering, after deducting estimated expenses of this offering payable by us, will be approximately $ million (or $ million, if the over-allotment is exercised in full), assuming a public offering price of $ per share. The amount of net proceeds may be more or less than the amount described in this prospectus supplement depending on the public offering price of the common stock and the actual number of shares of common stock we sell in the offering, both of which will be determined at pricing. We may change the size of this offering based on demand and market conditions.
We intend to use the net proceeds from selling the shares of our common stock to repay indebtedness owed under our current revolving credit facility, which will create additional capacity under our credit facility to originate loans and make investments in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objective. At July 6, 2007, we had approximately $72.0 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility, with a weighted average borrowing cost of 7.16%.
S-6
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of March 31, 2007 (i) on an actual basis and (ii) as adjusted to reflect the effects of the sale of 1,250,000 shares of our common stock in this offering at the price of $ per share and our receipt of the estimated net proceeds from that sale. You should read this table together with Use of Proceeds set forth in this prospectus supplement, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our financial statements and notes thereto included in the accompanying prospectus.
As of March 31, 2007 | |||||||
Actual | As Adjusted(1) | ||||||
Borrowings: |
|||||||
Credit facility(2) |
$ | 56,500,000 | $ | ||||
Stockholders equity: |
|||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 19,810,567 and 21,060,567 issued and outstanding, respectively |
$ | 198,106 | $ | ||||
Capital in excess of par value |
271,662,365 | ||||||
Accumulated net investment income |
(92,263 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(2,501,598 | ) | |||||
Accumulated net realized gain |
176,932 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 269,443,542 | $ | ||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 325,943,542 | $ | ||||
(1) | Does not include the underwriters over-allotment option of 187,500 shares. |
(2) | As of July 6, 2007, we had approximately $72.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. |
S-7
Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, and the underwriter has agreed to purchase from us, 1,250,000 shares of common stock. The principal business address of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC is One Wachovia Center, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, NC 28288-0735.
The underwriter has agreed to purchase all of the shares referred to in the preceding paragraph if any of those shares are purchased.
The shares of common stock are offered by the underwriter, subject to prior sale, when, as and if delivered to and accepted by it, subject to approval of legal matters by counsel for the underwriter and other conditions. The underwriter reserves the right to withdraw, cancel or modify the offer and to reject orders in whole or in part.
This offering is being conducted in compliance with Rule 2810 of the Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
Commissions and Discounts
The underwriter has advised us that it proposes to offer the shares of common stock to the public at the public offering price appearing on the cover page of this prospectus supplement. After the initial offering, the public offering price may be changed.
The following table shows the underwriting discount that will be paid to the underwriter in connection with this offering. This amount is shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional shares of common stock. We estimate that our portion of the total expenses of this offering, not including the underwriting discount, will be approximately $250,000.
No Exercise | Full Exercise | |||||
Per share |
$ | $ | ||||
Total |
$ | $ |
Over-allotment Option
We have granted to the underwriter an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, to purchase up to 187,500 additional shares of common stock at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriter may exercise the option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, in connection with this offering.
Indemnity
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriter against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments that the underwriter may be required to make because of those liabilities.
Lock-Up Agreements
We, our officers and directors, TIM, certain officers of TIM, BDC Partners, and certain officers of BDC Partners, have agreed that, for a period of 60 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, we and they will not, without the prior written consent of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of (or enter into any transaction which is designed to or might reasonably be expected to result in the disposition of), directly or indirectly, any shares of our capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our capital stock, or publicly announce an intention to effect any such transaction.
S-8
Moreover, if during the last 17 days of the 60-day restricted period referred to above we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to us is announced or if prior to the expiration of the 60-day restricted period we announce that we will release earnings results during the 17-day period beginning on the last day of the 60-day period, the restrictions described in the immediately preceding sentence will continue to apply until the expiration of the 17-day period beginning on the date of the issuance of the earnings release or the announcement of the material news or material event, as the case may be, unless the underwriter waives, in writing, that extension.
Stabilization
The underwriter has advised us that it may engage in transactions, including stabilization bids, short sales, covering transactions or the imposition of penalty bids, which may have the effect of stabilizing or maintaining the market price of our shares of common stock at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market.
| A stabilizing bid is a bid for the purchase of the shares of common stock on behalf of the underwriter for the purpose of fixing or maintaining the price of such shares. |
| A short sale involves a syndicate sale of common stock in excess of the number of shares to be purchased by the underwriter in the offering, which creates a syndicate short position. The underwriter may make naked short sales of shares. The underwriter must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares of common stock in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriter is concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. |
| A covering transaction is a bid for or the purchase of the shares of common stock on behalf of the underwriter to reduce a short position incurred by the underwriter in connection with this offering. |
| A penalty bid is an arrangement permitting the underwriter to reclaim the selling concession otherwise accruing to the underwriter or selling group member, if any, in connection with this offering if the shares of common stock originally sold by that underwriter or selling group member are purchased by the underwriter in a covering transaction and therefore have not been effectively placed by that underwriter or selling group member. |
The underwriter has advised us that these transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise. Neither we nor the underwriter makes any representation that the underwriter will engage in any of the transactions described above, and these transactions, if commenced, may be discontinued without notice. Neither we nor the underwriter makes any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of the effect that the transactions described above, if commenced, may have on the market price of our shares of common stock.
Other Relationships
The underwriter and its affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide, various investment banking, commercial banking, fiduciary and advisory services for us from time to time for which they have received, and may in the future receive, customary fees and expenses. The underwriter and its affiliates may, from time to time, engage in other transactions with and perform services for us in the ordinary course of their business.
The Nasdaq Global Select Market Listing
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol TICC.
S-9
Electronic Prospectus Delivery
In connection with this offering, the underwriter may distribute prospectuses electronically. In addition, shares may be sold by the underwriter to securities dealers who resell shares to online brokerage account holders.
Certain legal matters with respect to the validity of the shares of common stock we are offering will be passed upon for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington, D.C. Certain legal matters related to the offering will be passed upon for the underwriter by Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY.
S-10
PROSPECTUS
10,000,000 Shares
![]() |
Technology Investment Capital Corp. |
Common Stock
We are a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. We are principally engaged in providing capital to primarily non-public small to mid-size technology-related companies. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies.
We may offer, from time to time, up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in one or more offerings.
The shares of our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms to be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. The offering price per share of our common stock will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time we make the offering.
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol TICC. On June 27, 2007, the last reported sales price on the Nasdaq Global Select Market for our common stock was $16.17 per share.
An investment in our common stock is subject to risks and involves a heightened risk of total loss of investment. In addition, the companies in which we invest are subject to special risks. See Risk Factors beginning on page 8 to read about factors you should consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in our common stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities, or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of shares of common stock unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
Please read this prospectus before investing and keep it for future reference. It contains important information about us that a prospective investor ought to know before investing in our common stock. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (http://www.sec.gov), which is available free of charge by contacting Technology Investment Capital Corp. at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, CT 06830 or by telephone at (203) 983-5275, or on our website (http://www.ticc.com).
June 29, 2007
We have not authorized any dealer, salesman or other person to give any information or to make any representation other than those contained in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement, if any, to this prospectus. You must not rely upon any information or representation not contained in this prospectus or any such supplements as if we had authorized it. This prospectus and any such supplements do not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any security other than the registered securities to which they relate, nor do they constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. The information contained in this prospectus and any such supplements is accurate as of the dates on their covers; however, the prospectus and any supplements will be updated to reflect any material changes.
1 | ||
4 | ||
6 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
20 | ||
21 | ||
22 | ||
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
24 | |
44 | ||
45 | ||
55 | ||
58 | ||
60 | ||
65 | ||
73 | ||
78 | ||
83 | ||
84 | ||
85 | ||
86 | ||
93 | ||
94 | ||
94 | ||
94 | ||
94 | ||
95 | ||
F-1 |
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission using the shelf registration process. Under the shelf registration process, which constitutes a delayed offering in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, we may offer, from time to time, up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock on the terms to be determined at the time of the offering. Shares of our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the shares of our common stock that we may offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer shares of our common stock, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. A prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any such supplements together with the additional information described under Where You Can Find Additional Information in the Prospectus Summary and Risk Factors sections before you make an investment decision. A prospectus supplement may also add to, update or change information contained in this prospectus.
The following summary contains basic information about this offering. It may not contain all the information that is important to an investor. For a more complete understanding of this offering, we encourage you to read this entire document and the documents to which we have referred.
Except where the context requires otherwise, the terms TICC, the Company, we, us and our refer to Technology Investment Capital Corp.; TIM and investment adviser refers to Technology Investment Management, LLC; and BDC Partners refers to BDC Partners, LLC.
BUSINESS
We are a specialty finance company principally providing capital to primarily non-public small- and medium-sized technology-related companies. Technology-related companies are businesses that focus on the following sectors: software, Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware and technology-enabled services.
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. Our primary focus is on seeking current income by investing in non-public debt securities. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt investments, or equity investments in technology-related companies. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and/or equity securities of other technology-related companies.
Our capital is generally used by our portfolio companies to finance organic growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations and working capital. Our investment decisions are based on extensive analysis of potential portfolio companies business operations supported by an in-depth understanding of the quality of their recurring revenues and cash flow, variability of costs and the inherent value of their assets, including proprietary intangible assets and intellectual property.
We currently concentrate our investments in companies having annual revenues of less than $200 million and/or an equity capitalization of less than $300 million. Our investments typically range from $5 million to $30 million each, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates.
We also borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, Technology Investment Management, LLC (TIM), will be borne by our common stockholders.
Our investment activities are managed by TIM. TIM is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the Advisers Act). TIM is owned by BDC Partners, LLC (BDC Partners), its managing member, and Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce & Associates). Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. Under the investment advisory agreement, we have agreed to pay TIM an annual base management fee based on our gross assets as well as an incentive fee based on our performance. See Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement.
1
We were founded in July 2003 and completed an initial public offering of shares of our common stock in November 2003. We are a Maryland corporation and a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we are required to meet certain regulatory tests, including the requirement to invest at least 70% of our total assets in eligible portfolio companies. See Regulation as a Business Development Company. In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as the Code.
We intend to concentrate in the technology-related sector and to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology-related companies.
Our headquarters are at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255 Greenwich, Connecticut and our telephone number is (203) 983-5275.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
We may offer, from time to time, up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, on terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
Shares of our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. The offering price per share of our common stock less any underwriting commission or discount will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time we make the offering.
Our shares of common stock may be offered directly to one or more purchasers, through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The supplement to this prospectus relating to the offering will identify any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our shares of common stock, and will set forth any applicable purchase price, fee and commission or discount arrangement or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated.
We may not sell shares of common stock pursuant to this prospectus without delivering a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of such shares.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We intend to use the net proceeds from any offerings to originate loans and make investments in technology-related companies in accordance with our investment objective, and for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of amounts outstanding under any credit facility. The supplement to this prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of the proceeds from any such offering.
We estimate that it will take up to one year for us to substantially invest the net proceeds of any offering, depending on the availability of attractive opportunities and market conditions. However, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to achieve this goal.
Pending these uses, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. The management fee payable by us to our investment adviser will not be reduced while our assets are invested in such securities.
2
DISTRIBUTIONS
We intend to make quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock. The amount of our quarterly distributions will be determined by our Board of Directors. We intend to distribute to our stockholders all of our net income and, in most cases, all of our net capital gains, although we may opt not to distribute certain net capital gains in the future. Specifically, we may in the future opt to make deemed distributions to our stockholders of any retained net capital gains.
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan. If your shares of common stock are registered in your own name, your distributions will automatically be reinvested under our dividend reinvestment plan in additional whole and fractional shares of common stock, unless you opt out of our dividend reinvestment plan by delivering a written notice to our dividend paying agent. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee, you should contact the broker or nominee for details regarding opting out of our dividend reinvestment plan.
PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the information found in Risk Factors. If we fail to qualify as a regulated investment company, we could become subject to federal income tax on all of our income, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial performance. We lend to and invest in small- and medium-sized private companies. These activities may involve a high degree of business and financial risk. We are also subject to risks associated with fluctuating interest rates, access to additional capital, fluctuating quarterly results and variation in our portfolio value. We also borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TIM, will be borne by our common stockholders.
CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS
Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and regulatory requirements, contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price for our common stock.
3
The following table is intended to assist prospective investors in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in an offering will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary.
Stockholder Transaction Expenses |
|||
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price) |
| %(1) | |
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
| %(2) | |
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses |
0.00 | %(3) | |
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
| %(2) | |
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock) |
|||
Management fees |
2.42 | %(4) | |
Incentive fees payable under our investment advisory agreement |
0.02 | %(5) | |
Interest payments on borrowed funds |
1.61 | %(6) | |
Acquired fund fees and expenses |
0.00 | %(7) | |
Other expenses |
0.93 | % | |
Total annual expenses |
4.98 | %(8)(9) | |
EXAMPLE
The following example, required by the SEC, demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in us. In calculating the following expense amounts, we assumed we would have no additional leverage above our current level as of March 31, 2007 and that our operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above. In the event that shares to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will restate this example to reflect the applicable sales load.
1 year | 3 years | 5 years | 10 years | |||||||||
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5.0% annual return |
$ | 50 | $ | 149 | $ | 248 | $ | 497 |
The above example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses (including leverage and other expenses) may be greater or less than those shown. Moreover, while the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The incentive fee under the investment advisory agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have a de minimis effect, is not included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our investments to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors, would be higher.
In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan may receive shares valued at the market price in effect at that time. This price may be at, above or below net asset value. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
(1) |
In the event that the shares of common stock to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the applicable sales load. |
(2) |
The prospectus supplement corresponding to each offering will disclose the applicable offering expenses and total stockholder transaction expenses. |
(3) |
The expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in Other expenses. |
4
(4) |
Our management fee is based on gross assets; estimate of management fee assumes net assets of $269.4 million and leverage of $56.5 million. See Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement. |
(5) |
Assumes that annual incentive fees earned by our investment advisor, TIM, remain consistent with the incentive fees earned by TIM during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2007, which totaled approximately $12,000. In subsequent years, incentive fees would increase if, and to the extent that, we earn greater interest income through our investments in portfolio companies and realize additional capital gains upon the sale of warrants or other equity investments in such companies. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which is payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20.0% of the excess, if any, of pre-incentive fee net investment income over an annual hurdle rate (equal to the interest rate payable on a five-year U.S. Treasury Note plus 5%). The second part of the incentive fee equals 20.0% of our net realized capital gains for the calendar year less any unrealized capital losses for such year and will be payable at the end of each calendar year. For a more detailed discussion of the calculation of this fee, see Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement. |
(6) |
The Interest payments on borrowed funds assumes that we maintain our level of outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2007 and incur interest on such outstanding borrowings at an interest rate of 7.69%, which was our weighted average borrowing cost at March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, we had $100 million available to us under a credit facility, of which we had borrowed approximately $56.5 million. As of May 7, 2007, the credit facility was increased to $150 million. As of June 27, 2007, the credit facility was further increased to $180 million. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources. Leverage allows us to increase our portfolio investments, but also increases the fees and expenses borne by our common stockholders, including the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TIM. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our Business and StructureWe borrow money, which would magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us. |
(7) |
As of March 31, 2007, we had no investments in any acquired funds. |
(8) |
Total annual expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock are higher than the total annual expenses percentage would be for a company that is not leveraged. We borrow money to leverage our net assets and increase our total assets. The SEC requires that Total annual expenses percentage be calculated as a percentage of net assets, rather than the total assets, including assets that have been funded with borrowed monies. If the Total annual expenses percentage were calculated instead as a percentage of our total assets, our Total annual expenses would be approximately 4.11% of total assets. |
(9) |
The holders of shares of our common stock (and not the holders of our debt securities or preferred stock, if any) indirectly bear the cost associated with our annual expenses. |
5
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The selected financial and other data below should be read in conjunction with our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto. Financial information at and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 has been derived from our financial statements that were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. Quarterly financial information is derived from unaudited financial data, but in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are necessary to present fairly the results for such interim periods. Interim results at and for the three months ended March 31, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Senior Securities below for more information.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | 2007 | 2006 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 9,897 | $ | 7,208 | $ | 35,947 | $ | 21,800 | $ | 7,388 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
3,269 | 1,893 | 10,546 | 7,415 | 4,024 | 692 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
6,628 | 5,315 | 25,401 | 14,385 | 3,364 | (578 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
3,459 | 5,263 | 26,331 | 16,304 | 3,364 | (578 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Per Common Share Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common sharebasic and diluted |
0.18 | 0.27 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 0.33 | (0.25 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared per common share |
0.36 | 0.30 | 1.38 | 1.01 | 0.43 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 328,295 | $ | 294,251 | $ | 334,820 | $ | 270,108 | $ | 140,502 | $ | 138,325 | ||||||||||||
Total net assets |
269,444 | 267,657 | 271,335 | 265,905 | 139,262 | 137,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings(2) |
56,500 | | 58,500 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of portfolio companies at period end |
24 | 21 | 28 | 19 | 9 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Principal amount of loan originations |
$ | 26,400 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 191,000 | $ | 159,500 | $ | 82,200 | | |||||||||||||
Principal amount of loan repayments |
32,795 | 4,625 | 76,595 | 29,500 | 1,480 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return(3) |
7.0 | % | (1.7 | )% | 17.0 | % | 7.5 | % | (0.7 | )% | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average yield on debt investments at period end |
12.0 | % | 11.0 | % | 12.8 | % | 10.9 | % | 10.8 | % | N/A |
(1) |
Includes period from July 21, 2003 (inception) through December 31, 2003. |
(2) |
See Senior Securities and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information regarding our level of indebtedness. |
(3) |
Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment at prices obtained under our dividend reinvestment plan. Total return from inception through December 31, 2003 has not been annualized. |
6
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain quarterly financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and for each of the quarters for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. This information was derived from our unaudited financial statements. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future quarter.
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | Qtr 1 | Qtr 4 | Qtr 3 | Qtr 2 | Qtr 1 | Qtr 4 | Qtr 3 | Qtr 2 | Qtr 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 9,897 | $ | 11,483 | $ | 8,792 | $ | 8,464 | $ | 7,208 | $ | 6,353 | $ | 6,499 | $ | 4,719 | $ | 4,230 | |||||||||
Total expenses |
3,269 | 3,814 | 2,651 | 2,188 | 1,893 | 2,544 | 2,018 | 1,428 | 1,425 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
6,628 | 7,669 | 6,141 | 6,276 | 5,315 | 3,809 | 4,481 | 3,291 | 2,805 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
3,459 | 7,444 | 6,760 | 6,865 | 5,263 | 5,489 | 4,720 | 3,291 | 2,805 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common sharebasic and diluted |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.23 |
7
An investment in our securities involves certain risks relating to our structure and investment objectives. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face, and we face other risks which we have not yet identified, which we do not currently deem material or which are not yet predictable. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE
Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company would reduce our operating flexibility.
If we do not remain a business development company, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.
We are dependent upon TIMs key management personnel for our future success, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen and Saul B. Rosenthal.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of TIM. The senior management, together with other investment professionals, will evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, monitor and service our investments. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of the senior management team, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of TIM, and Saul B. Rosenthal, the President and Chief Operating Officer of TIM. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal will devote all of their business time to our operations, and both will have other demands on their time as a result of their other activities. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal is subject to an employment contract. The departure of either of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.
Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage our future growth effectively.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to grow, which will depend, in turn, on our investment advisers ability to identify, analyze, invest in and finance companies that meet our investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment advisers structuring of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms.
We and TIM, through TIMs managing member, BDC Partners, will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make in technology-related companies. We compete with a large number of private equity and venture capital funds, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, including other business development companies, investment banks and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than us and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a
8
lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. There can be no assurance that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.
Our business model depends upon the development and maintenance of strong referral relationships with private equity and venture capital funds and investment banking firms.
If we fail to maintain our relationships with key firms, or if we fail to establish strong referral relationships with other firms or other sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to grow our portfolio of loans and achieve our investment objective. In addition, persons with whom we have informal relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and therefore there is no assurance that such relationships will lead to the origination of debt or other investments.
We may not realize gains from our equity investments.
When we invest in debt securities, we generally expect to acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.
Because our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities, there is uncertainty regarding the value of our investments, which could adversely affect the determination of our net asset value.
Our portfolio investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. As a result, the fair value of these securities is not readily determinable. We value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based upon the recommendation of the Boards Valuation Committee. In connection with that determination, members of TIMs portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. We also utilize the services of a third party valuation firm which prepares valuations for each of our portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of the third party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. However, the Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the appropriate valuation of each investment. The types of factors that the Valuation Committee takes into account in providing its fair value recommendation to the Board of Directors includes, as relevant, the nature and value of any collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to valuations of publicly traded companies, comparisons to recent sales of comparable companies, the discounted value of the cash flows of the portfolio company and other relevant factors. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would be assessed if a readily available market for these securities existed.
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
As stated above, our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded
9
securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. Also, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments.
In addition, because we generally invest in debt securities with a term of up to seven years and generally intend to hold such investments until maturity of the debt, we do not expect realization events, if any, to occur in the near-term. We expect that our holdings of equity securities may require several years to appreciate in value, and we can offer no assurance that such appreciation will occur.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the rate at which we make new investments, the interest rates payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
Even in the event the value of your investment declines, the management fee and, in certain circumstances, the incentive fee will still be payable.
The management fee is calculated as 2.0% of the value of our gross assets at a specific time. Accordingly, the management fee will be payable regardless of whether the value of our gross assets and/or your investment have decreased. Moreover, a portion of our advisers incentive fee is payable if our net investment income for a calendar quarter exceeds a designated hurdle rate. This portion of the incentive fee is payable without regard to any capital gain, capital loss or unrealized depreciation that may occur during the quarter. Accordingly, this portion of our advisers incentive fee may also be payable notwithstanding a decline in net asset value that quarter. In addition, in the event we recognize deferred loan interest income in excess of our available capital as a result of our receipt of payment-in-kind, or PIK interest, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TIM, however, is not required to reimburse us for the portion of any incentive fees attributable to deferred loan interest income in the event of a subsequent default.
We borrow money, which would magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks, insurance companies, and other lenders. Lenders of these senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock dividend payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. Our ability to service any debt that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, as the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TIM, will be payable on our gross assets, including those assets acquired through the use of leverage, TIM may have a financial incentive to incur leverage which may not be consistent with our stockholders interests. In addition, our common stockholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of leverage, including any increase in the management fee payable to TIM.
10
As of March 31, 2007, we had $100 million available to us under a credit facility, of which we had borrowed approximately $56.5 million. As of March 31, 2007, the interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the credit facility was approximately 7.69%. As of May 7, 2007, the credit facility was increased to $150 million. As of June 27, 2007, the credit facility was further increased to $180 million. Royal Bank of Canada, or RBC, serves as administrative agent under our credit facility, and RBC, Branch Banking and Trust Company, or BB&T, and Commerzbank AG, or Commerzbank, each serve as a lender under our credit facility.
Illustration. The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.
Assumed return on our portfolio (net of expenses) |
|||||||||||||||
(10)% | (5)% | 0% | 5% | 10% | |||||||||||
Corresponding return to stockholder(1) |
(13.71 | )% | (7.66 | )% | (1.61 | )% | 4.44 | % | 10.48 | % |
(1) |
Assumes $325.9 million in total assets, $56.5 million in debt outstanding, and $269.4 million in net assets and an average cost of funds of 7.69%, which was our weighted average borrowing cost at March 31, 2007. Excludes non-portfolio investment assets and non-leverage related liabilities. |
Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.
Our business will require a substantial amount of capital, which we may acquire from the following sources:
Senior Securities and Other Indebtedness
We issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% of gross assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each issuance of senior securities. As a result of the issuance of senior securities, including preferred stock and debt securities, we are exposed to typical risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss and an increase in expenses, which are ultimately borne by our common stockholders. Because we incur leverage to make investments, a decrease in the value of our investments would have a greater negative impact on the value of our common stock. When we issue debt securities or preferred stock, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. In addition, such securities may be rated by rating agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such securities, we may be required to abide by operating and investment guidelines that could further restrict our operating flexibility. As of March 31, 2007, we had $100 million available to us under a credit facility, of which we had borrowed approximately $56.5 million. As of May 7, 2007, the credit facility was increased to $150 million. As of June 27, 2007, the credit facility was further increased to $180 million. RBC serves as administrative agent under our credit facility, and RBC, BB&T and Commerzbank each serve as a lender under our credit facility.
Our ability to pay dividends or issue additional senior securities would be restricted if our asset coverage ratio was not at least 200%. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distributions to our common stockholders.
11
Common Stock
We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of TICC and its stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In certain limited circumstances, pursuant to an SEC staff interpretation, we may also issue shares at a price below net asset value in connection with a transferable rights offering so long as: (1) the offer does not discriminate among shareholders; (2) we use our best efforts to ensure an adequate trading market exists for the rights; and (3) the ratio of the offering does not exceed one new share for each three rights held. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time would decrease and they may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on favorable terms or at all.
Our Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify any unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock, which could convey special rights and privileges to its owners.
Our charter permits our Board of Directors to reclassify any authorized but unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock. We are currently authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 19,810,567 shares are currently issued and outstanding. In the event our Board of Directors opts to reclassify a portion of our unissued shares of common stock into a class of preferred stock, those preferred shares would have a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation. The cost of any such reclassification would be borne by our existing common stockholders. The class voting rights of any preferred shares we may issue could make it more difficult for us to take some actions that may, in the future, be proposed by the Board of Directors and/or the holders of our common stock, such as a merger, exchange of securities, liquidation, or alteration of the rights of a class of our securities, if these actions were perceived by the holders of preferred shares as not in their best interests. The issuance of preferred shares convertible into shares of common stock might also reduce the net income and net asset value per share of our common stock upon conversion. These effects, among others, could have an adverse effect on your investment in our common stock.
A change in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability.
A portion of our income will depend upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate on the debt securities in which we invest. We anticipate using a combination of equity and long-term and short-term borrowings to finance our investment activities. As of March 31, 2007, we had $100 million available to us under a credit facility, of which we had borrowed approximately $56.5 million. As of May 7, 2007, the credit facility was increased to $150 million. As of June 27, 2007, the credit facility was further increased to $180 million. RBC serves as administrative agent under our credit facility, and RBC, BB&T and Commerzbank each serve as a lender under our credit facility. Some of our investments in debt securities are at fixed rates and others at variable rates. Although we have not done so in the past, we may in the future choose to hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we have limited experience in entering into hedging transactions, and we will initially have to purchase or develop such expertise if we choose to employ hedging strategies in the future.
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC.
To remain entitled to the tax benefits accorded to RICs under the Code, we must meet certain income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. In order to qualify as a RIC, we must derive each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain
12
securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Because we currently maintain a credit facility, and we may use additional debt financing in the future, we may be subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the annual distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for special tax treatment as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax on all our income. To qualify as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason and remain or become subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders.
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we will include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or contracted PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. A significant portion of our interest income from debt investments since our inception has been attributable to PIK interest received from our debt investments that contain a PIK provision. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.
Because in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty satisfying the annual distribution requirement applicable to RICs. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investments to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus be subject to corporate-level income tax.
There are significant potential conflicts of interest, which could impact our investment returns.
In the course of our investing activities, we pay management and incentive fees to our investment adviser, TIM, and reimburse TIM for certain expenses it incurs. As a result, investors in our common stock invest on a gross basis and receive distributions on a net basis after expenses, resulting in, among other things, a lower rate of return than one might achieve through direct investments. As a result of this arrangement, there may be times when the management team of TIM has interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.
TIM receives a quarterly incentive fee based, in part, on our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This incentive fee is subject to a quarterly hurdle rate before providing an incentive fee return to TIM. To the extent we or TIM are able to exert influence over our portfolio companies, the quarterly pre-incentive fee may provide TIM with an incentive to induce our portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another.
In addition, our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of our investment adviser, TIM, and its managing member, BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For example, Jonathan H. Cohen,
13
the Chief Executive Officer of TIM, BDC Partners and TICC, is a principal of JHC Capital Management, LLC, a registered investment adviser. Steven P. Novak, one of our independent directors, is the President of Palladio Capital Management, LLC, the manager of an equity-oriented hedge fund. Charles M. Royce, the non-executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, is the President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates, the non-managing member of our investment adviser.
Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal also currently serve as Chief Executive Officer, and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member, and Royce & Associates is a non-managing member, of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of TIM, BDC Partners and TICC, serves as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer for both T2 Income Fund Limited and T2 Advisers, LLC. Messrs. Rosenthal and Conroy also each serve as a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited. Because of these possible conflicts of interest, these individuals may direct potential business and investment opportunities to other entities rather than to us or such individuals may undertake or otherwise engage in activities or conduct on behalf of such other entities that is not in, or which may be adverse to, our best interests.
Both we and T2 Income Fund Limited have adopted a policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities in view of these potential conflicts of interest. In accordance with this allocation policy, all U.S.-based bilateral investment opportunities are generally allocated to us, while non-U.S.-based bilateral investment opportunities are generally allocated to T2 Income Fund Limited. Bilateral investment opportunities are those negotiated directly between us or T2 Income Fund Limited and a prospective portfolio company. In addition, any syndicated investment opportunities with a proposed value in excess of $12 million are generally allocated to us, while syndicated investment opportunities with a proposed value of $12 million or less are generally allocated to T2 Income Fund Limited. Syndicated investment opportunities are those arranged through an agent investment banking firm, rather than directly with a prospective portfolio company, and typically involve multiple investors.
In order to minimize the potential conflicts of interest that might arise, we have adopted a policy that generally prohibits us from making investments in, or otherwise knowingly doing business with, any company in which any fund or other client account managed by JHC Capital Management, Royce & Associates, LLC, Palladio Capital Management or T2 Advisers, LLC holds a long or short position. However, our policy generally permits us to purchase securities of such companies in secondary market transactions. The investment focus of each of these entities tends to be different from our investment objective. Nevertheless, it is possible that new investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may come to the attention of one of these entities in connection with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available, to us. Also, our investment policy precluding the investments referenced above could cause us to miss out on some investment opportunities. However, our executive officers, directors and investment adviser intend to treat us in a fair and equitable manner over time consistent with their applicable duties under law so that we will not be disadvantaged in relation to any other particular client. In addition, we have adopted a formal Code of Ethics that governs the conduct of our officers and directors. Our officers and directors also remain subject to the fiduciary obligations imposed by both the 1940 Act and applicable state corporate law. Finally, we pay BDC Partners our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors must monitor.
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Any change in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
14
If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a business development company or be precluded from investing according to our current business strategy.
As a business development company, we may not acquire any assets other than qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. See Regulation as a Business Development Company.
We believe that most of our portfolio investments will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a business development company, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our position) or could require us to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to comply with the 1940 Act. If we need to dispose of such investments quickly, it would be difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. For example, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss.
Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and regulatory requirements, contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change of control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price for our common stock.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INVESTMENTS
Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies in the technology-related sector, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt securities that we hold or if the technology-related sector experiences a market downturn.
A consequence of our limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax asset diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few issuers. In addition, we intend to concentrate in the technology-related sector and to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology-related companies. As a result, a market downturn in the technology-related sector could materially adversely affect us.
The technology-related sector is subject to many risks, including volatility, intense competition, decreasing life cycles and periodic downturns.
We invest in companies in the technology-related sector, some of which may have relatively short operating histories. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of technology-related companies can and often do fluctuate suddenly and dramatically. Also, the technology-related market is generally characterized by abrupt business cycles and intense competition. Since mid-2000, there has been substantial excess capacity and a significant slowdown in many industries in the technology-related sector. In addition, this overcapacity, together with a cyclical economic downturn, resulted in substantial decreases in the market capitalization of many
15
technology-related companies. While such valuations have recovered to some extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market capitalizations will not recur, or that any future decreases in technology company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in nature. Therefore, our portfolio companies may face considerably more risk of loss than companies in other industry sectors.
In addition, because of rapid technological change, the average selling prices of products and some services provided by the technology-related sector have historically decreased over their productive lives. As a result, the average selling prices of products and services offered by our portfolio companies may decrease over time, which could adversely affect their operating results and their ability to meet their obligations under their debt securities, as well as the value of any equity securities, that we may hold. This could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our investments in the technology-related companies that we are targeting may be extremely risky and we could lose all or part of our investments.
Although a prospective portfolio companys assets are one component of our analysis when determining whether to provide debt capital, we generally do not base an investment decision primarily on the liquidation value of a companys balance sheet assets. Instead, given the nature of the companies that we invest in, we also review the companys historical and projected cash flows, equity capital and soft assets, including intellectual property (patented and non-patented), databases, business relationships (both contractual and non-contractual) and the like. Accordingly, considerably higher levels of overall risk will likely be associated with our portfolio compared with that of a traditional asset-based lender whose security consists primarily of receivables, inventories, equipment and other tangible assets. Interest rates payable by our portfolio companies may not compensate for these additional risks.
Specifically, investment in the technology-related companies that we are targeting involves a number of significant risks, including:
| these companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt securities that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any value from the liquidation of such collateral; |
| they typically have limited operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
| because they tend to be privately owned, there is generally little publicly available information about these businesses; therefore, although TIMs agents will perform due diligence investigations on these portfolio companies, their operations and their prospects, we may not learn all of the material information we need to know regarding these businesses; |
| they are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us; and |
| they generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position. |
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our portfolio companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes
16
bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors.
Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our portfolio.
Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as follow-on investments, in order to: (i) increase or maintain in whole or in part our equity ownership percentage; (ii) exercise warrants, options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or subsequent financing; or (iii) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our investment.
We may elect not to make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources. The failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities, or because we are inhibited by compliance with business development company requirements or the desire to maintain our tax status.
Our incentive fee may induce TIM to make speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to TIM may create an incentive for TIM to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable to TIM is determined, which is calculated as a percentage of the return on invested capital, may encourage TIM to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because TIM will receive the incentive fee based, in part, upon the capital gains realized on our investments, the investment adviser may invest more than would otherwise be appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns.
Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
We intend to invest primarily in senior debt securities, but may also invest in subordinated debt securities, issued by our portfolio companies. In some cases portfolio companies will be permitted to have other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt securities in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may provide that the holders thereof are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of the debt securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligations to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we will not be in a position to control any portfolio company by investing in its debt securities. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the
17
management of such companies, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not best serve our interests as debt investors.
Because we generally do not hold controlling equity interests in our portfolio companies, we may not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by the managements of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.
Although we have taken and may in the future take controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies from time to time, we generally do not do so. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the stockholders and management of a portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity for the debt and equity investments that we typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company, and may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments.
RISKS RELATED TO THIS OFFERING
Our common stock price may be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially. The price of the common stock that will prevail in the market after this offering may be higher or lower than the price you pay, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
| price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time; |
| significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of regulated investment companies, business development companies or other financial services companies; |
| changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines with respect to regulated investment companies or business development companies; |
| actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or changes in the expectations of securities analysts; |
| general economic conditions and trends; |
| loss of a major funding source; or |
| departures of key personnel. |
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a companys securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert managements attention and resources from our business.
Our shares may trade at discounts from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term.
Shares of business development companies may trade at a market price that is less than the net asset value that is attributable to those shares. The possibility that our shares of common stock will trade at a discount from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value will decrease. During the second and third quarters of 2006, our shares of common stock traded at a discount to the net asset value attributable to those shares. It is not possible to predict whether the shares offered hereby will trade at, above, or below net asset value.
18
There is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our dividends may not grow over time.
We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. See Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions.
We will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds of this offering, to the extent it is successful.
We will have significant flexibility in applying the proceeds of this offering. We will also pay operating expenses, and may pay other expenses such as due diligence expenses of potential new investments, from net proceeds. Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited to the extent that the net proceeds of the offering, pending full investment, are used to pay operating expenses. In addition, we can provide you no assurance that the current offering will be successful, or that by increasing the size of our available equity capital our aggregate expenses, and correspondingly, our expense ratio, will be lowered.
19
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, and estimates and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements including without limitation:
| an economic downturn could impair our customers ability to repay our loans and increase our non-performing assets, |
| an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the technology-related industry in which we currently concentrate causing us to suffer losses in our portfolio and experience diminished demand for capital in this industry sector, |
| a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities, |
| interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, and |
| the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus and in our filings with the SEC. |
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this prospectus should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus.
20
We intend to use the net proceeds from selling shares of our common stock for general corporate purposes, which may include investing in debt or equity securities in primarily privately negotiated transactions, repayment of indebtedness, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. Because our primary business is to originate loans and make investments in technology-related companies, we are continuously identifying, reviewing and, to the extent consistent with our investment objective, funding new investments. As a result, we typically raise capital as we deem appropriate to fund such new investments. The supplement to this prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of the proceeds from such offering.
We estimate that it will take up to one year for us to substantially invest the net proceeds of any offering, depending on the availability of attractive opportunities and market conditions. However, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to achieve this goal.
Pending these uses, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. The management fee payable by us to our investment adviser will not be reduced while our assets are invested in such securities.
21
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol TICC. The following table lists the high and low sales prices for our common stock, the sales price as a percentage of net asset value (NAV) and quarterly dividends per share.
Price Range | ||||||||||||||||||
NAV(1) | High | Low | Premium/ Discount of High Sales Price to NAV(2) |
Premium/ Discount of Low Sales Price to NAV(2) |
Cash Per Share(3) | |||||||||||||
Fiscal 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||
Second Quarter (through June 27, 2007) |
* | $ | 17.30 | $ | 15.68 | * | * | $ | 0.36 | |||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 13.60 | 17.50 | 15.51 | 129 | % | 114 | % | 0.36 | |||||||||
Fiscal 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
13.77 | 16.46 | 14.31 | 120 | % | 104 | % | 0.34 | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
13.84 | 14.96 | 13.61 | 108 | % | 98 | % | 0.32 | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
13.81 | 15.00 | 13.59 | 109 | % | 98 | % | 0.30 | ||||||||||
First Quarter |
13.75 | 15.63 | 14.54 | 114 | % | 106 | % | 0.30 | ||||||||||
Fiscal 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
13.77 | 15.90 | 14.50 | 115 | % | 105 | % | 0.30 | ||||||||||
Third Quarter |
13.86 | 16.37 | 14.95 | 118 | % | 108 | % | 0.25 | ||||||||||
Second Quarter |
13.74 | 15.15 | 14.45 | 110 | % | 105 | % | 0.20 | ||||||||||
First Quarter |
13.69 | 15.52 | 14.30 | 113 | % | 104 | % | 0.14 |
(1) |
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the date of the high and low sales prices. The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of each period. |
(2) |
Calculated as the respective high or low sales price divided by NAV. |
(3) |
Represents the cash distribution declared in the specified quarter. |
* |
Not determinable at the time of filing. |
On June 27, 2007, the last reported sales price of our common stock was $16.17 per share. As of June 27, 2007, we had 168 shareholders of record.
Shares of business development companies may trade at a market price that is less than the value of the net assets attributable to those shares. The possibility that our shares of common stock will trade at a discount from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value will decrease. During the second and third quarters of 2006, our shares of common stock traded at a discount to the net assets attributable to those shares. As of June 27, 2007, our shares of common stock traded at a premium of approximately 19% to the net assets attributable to those shares based upon our net asset value as of March 31, 2007. It is not possible to predict whether the shares offered hereby will trade at, above, or below net asset value.
We currently intend to distribute a minimum of 90% of our ordinary income and net short-term capital gains, if any, on a quarterly basis to our stockholders. The amount of our quarterly dividends is determined by our Board of Directors. To the extent our taxable earnings for any fiscal year fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will permit any particular level of dividend payment. Our ability to make distributions is limited by the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act. For a more detailed discussion, see Regulation as a Business Development Company.
22
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan. If your shares of common stock are registered in your own name, your distributions will automatically be reinvested under our dividend reinvestment plan in additional whole and fractional shares of common stock, unless you opt out of our dividend reinvestment plan by delivering a written notice to our dividend paying agent. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee, you should contact the broker or nominee for details regarding opting out of our dividend reinvestment plan.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial and Other Data and our Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
OVERVIEW
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. Our primary focus is seeking current income by investing in non-public debt securities. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt investments, or equity investments in technology-related companies. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and/or equity securities of other technology-related companies. We operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company, and have elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. We have elected to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC under the Code, beginning with our 2003 taxable year.
Our investment activities are managed by TIM, a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act. TIM is owned by BDC Partners, its managing member, and Royce & Associates. Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay TIM an annual base fee calculated on gross assets, and an incentive fee based upon our performance. Under an Administration Agreement, we have agreed to pay or reimburse BDC Partners, as administrator, for certain expenses incurred in operating the Company. Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TIM and BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For more information, see Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our Business and StructureThere are significant potential conflicts of interest, which could impact our investment returns.
We currently concentrate our investments in companies having annual revenues of less than $200 million and/or an equity capitalization of less than $300 million. We focus on companies that create products or provide services requiring advanced technology and companies that compete in industries characterized by such products or services, including companies in the following businesses: Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware, software and technology-enabled services.
While the structure of our investments will vary, we invest primarily in the debt and equity of established target technology-related companies. We seek to invest in entities that, as a general matter, have been operating for at least one year prior to the date of our investment and that will, at the time of our investment, have employees and revenues. Many of these companies will have financial backing provided by private equity or venture capital funds or other financial or strategic sponsors at the time we make an investment.
We expect that our investments will generally range between $5 million and $30 million each, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes, and will accrue interest at fixed and variable rates. As of December 31, 2006, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 9.63% and 15.50% and maturity dates of between 15 and 81 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 12.8%. As of March 31, 2007, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 9.61% and 15.50% and maturity dates of between 12 and 74 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 12.0%.
Our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments, which will be added to the principal amount of the loan. This form of deferred interest is referred to as payment-in-kind or PIK
24
interest and, when earned, is recorded as interest income and an increase in the principal amount of the loan. We had PIK interest of approximately $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to PIK interest of approximately $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. We had PIK interest of approximately $509,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
We also borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TIM, will be borne by our common stockholders.
In addition, as a business development company under the 1940 Act, we are required to make available significant managerial assistance, for which we may receive fees, to our portfolio companies. These fees would be generally non-recurring, however in some instances they may have a recurring component. We have received no fee income for managerial assistance to date.
Prior to making an investment, we typically enter into a non-binding term sheet with the potential portfolio company. These term sheets are generally subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigations of the companys business and legal documentation for the loan.
To the extent possible, our loans will be collateralized by a security interest in the borrowers assets or guaranteed by a principal to the transaction. Interest payments, if not deferred, are normally payable quarterly with amortization of principal being deferred for several years. When we receive a warrant to purchase stock in a portfolio company, the warrant will typically have a nominal strike price, and will entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrowers stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we closed approximately $191.5 million (which included approximately $0.5 million of closing fees received in the form of warrants) in portfolio investments, including additional investments of approximately $44.0 million in existing portfolio companies and approximately $147.5 million of investments in new portfolio companies. A total of $76.6 million of principal in debt investments was repaid by our existing portfolio companies during the year ended December 31, 2006.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we closed approximately $26.4 million in portfolio investments, including additional debt investments of approximately $1.4 million in an existing portfolio company, and approximately $25.0 million in a new portfolio company. We received a total of $32.5 million of proceeds from principal repayments in debt investments by our portfolio companies during the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
We realized net gains on five investments during the year ended December 31, 2006 in the amount of approximately $586,000.
Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, we had net unrealized appreciation on investments of approximately $344,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, which consisted of an increase in the fair value of our investments in the amount of approximately $1,821,000, which was offset by unrealized depreciation of approximately $1,477,000 attributable to a decrease in the fair value of our investments.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we had net realized losses of approximately $143,000 and net unrealized depreciation of approximately $3.0 million. The realized losses relate to the debt and warrants we held in StayOnline, Inc., the cancellation of our warrants in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. and the sale of the notes we held in Network Solutions, LLC. The unrealized depreciation is largely due to the fair value determination of our debt investments in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. and Falcon Communications, Inc., based upon a
25
review of the operating performance of these companies, as well as consideration of other factors and conditions affecting these investments. These decreases were partially offset by the net unrealized appreciation in several other investments, in particular Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
The total portfolio value of our investments was approximately $326.2 million and $211.4 million at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The increase in investments during 2006 was primarily due to newly originated debt investments, partially offset by debt repayments and sales of equity investments. The increase is also due to additional investments in existing portfolio companies, accrual of payment-in-kind interest and changes in fair value. During 2006, we originated investments in 17 portfolio companies (14 of which were new portfolio companies and 3 of which were existing portfolio companies) and made advances to existing customers under existing contractual terms. Our gross originations and advances totaled approximately $191.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. During 2005, we originated investments in 15 portfolio companies. Our gross originations totaled $159.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2005.
The total portfolio value of our investments was approximately $317.5 million at March 31, 2007. The decrease in investments during the first quarter was due to debt repayments, partially offset by newly originated debt investments, as well as net unrealized depreciation on investments. Our gross originations and advances totaled approximately $26.4 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
In certain instances, we receive payments in our loan portfolio based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our loans prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had $76.6 million and $29.5 million, respectively, of loan repayments. Portfolio activity also reflects sales of securities in the amounts of $3.5 million and $6.8 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively. During 2006, major repayments on our investments were from MortgageIT, Inc. ($30 million), Mortgagebot Acquisitions, LLC ($11 million), Klinger Advanced Aesthetics, Inc. ($10 million), and Climax Group, Inc. ($6 million). For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we had repayments of $32.5 million, largely due to payments from StayOnline, Inc. ($14.7 million), Network Solutions, LLC ($9.9 million) and Data Transmission Network Corporation ($5 million).
At December 31, 2006, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 26 portfolio companies, totaling approximately $315.8 million, and equity investments of approximately $10.4 million. The debt investments include approximately $6.2 million in accrued PIK interest which, as described in Overview above, is added to the carrying value of our investments, reduced by repayments of principal. At December 31, 2005, we had debt investment in 18 portfolio companies totaling $203.8 million (including $5.1 million in PIK interest), and equity investments of approximately $7.6 million. At March 31, 2007, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 24 private companies, totaling approximately $304.1 million, and equity investments of approximately $13.4 million.
26
A reconciliation of the investment portfolio for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 follows:
March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | ||||||||||
Beginning Investment Portfolio |
$ | 326.2 | $ | 211.4 | $ | 82.1 | ||||||
Portfolio Investments Acquired |
26.4 | 191.5 | 159.5 | |||||||||
Debt repayments |
(32.5 | ) | (76.6 | ) | (29.5 | ) | ||||||
Sales of securities |
(0.4 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (6.8 | ) | ||||||
Payment in Kind |
0.5 | 1.6 | 3.8 | |||||||||
Original Issue Discount |
0.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | |||||||||
Net Unrealized (Depreciation) Appreciation |
(3.0 | ) | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||
Net Realized (Losses) Gains |
(0.1 | ) | 0.6 | 1.7 | ||||||||
Ending Investment Portfolio |
$ | 317.5 | $ | 326.2 | $ | 211.4 | ||||||
The following table indicates the quarterly portfolio investment activity for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
New Investments | Debt Repayments | Sales of Securities | |||||||
(dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | |||||||
Quarter ended |
|||||||||
March 31, 2007 |
$ | 26.4 | $ | 32.5 | $ | 0.4 | |||
December 31, 2006 |
$ | 57.0 | $ | 25.1 | $ | 2.3 | |||
September 30, 2006 |
47.6 | 40.6 | 1.1 | ||||||
June 30, 2006 |
36.9 | 6.3 | 0.0 | ||||||
March 31, 2006 |
50.0 | 4.6 | 0.1 | ||||||
Total |
191.5 | 76.6 | 3.5 | ||||||
December 31, 2005 |
8.5 | 10.6 | 6.8 | ||||||
September 30, 2005 |
70.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | ||||||
June 30, 2005 |
37.5 | 16.9 | 0.0 | ||||||
March 31, 2005 |
43.5 | 1.4 | 0.0 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 159.5 | $ | 29.5 | $ | 6.8 | |||
27
The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of March 31, 2007, and as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) |
(dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes |
$ | 255.7 | 80.5 | % | $ | 265.7 | 81.4 | % | $ | 173.6 | 82.1 | % | ||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes |
33.3 | 10.5 | % | 34.8 | 10.7 | % | 30.2 | 14.3 | % | |||||||||
Senior Subordinated Unsecured Notes |
13.9 | 4.4 | % | 14.1 | 4.3 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Subordinated Promissory Notes |
1.2 | 0.4 | % | 1.2 | 0.4 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Preferred Stock |
3.2 | 1.0 | % | 2.9 | 0.9 | % | 3.2 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||
Common Stock |
7.0 | 2.2 | % | 4.0 | 1.2 | % | 3.0 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||
Warrants |
3.2 | 1.0 | % | 3.5 | 1.1 | % | 1.4 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 317.5 | 100.0 | % | $ | 326.2 | 100.0 | % | $ | 211.4 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
The following table shows our portfolio of investments by industry at fair value, as of March 31, 2007, and as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Fair Value |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Fair Value |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) |
(dollars in millions) |
(dollars in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
$ | 45.7 | 14.4 | % | $ | 43.1 | 13.3 | % | $ | 5.0 | 2.4 | % | ||||||
Satellite communications |
32.1 | 10.1 | % | 35.4 | 10.8 | % | 25.5 | 12.0 | % | |||||||||
IT value-added reseller |
29.2 | 9.2 | % | 29.4 | 9.0 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
IT consulting |
27.0 | 8.5 | % | 27.0 | 8.3 | % | 20.0 | 9.5 | % | |||||||||
Web hosting |
25.5 | 8.0 | % | 25.2 | 7.7 | % | 21.1 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||
Advertising |
25.0 | 7.9 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Digital imaging |
23.4 | 7.4 | % | 23.4 | 7.2 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Logistics technology |
16.9 | 5.3 | % | 17.4 | 5.3 | % | 17.1 | 8.1 | % | |||||||||
Web-based services |
15.0 | 4.7 | % | 15.0 | 4.6 | % | 26.0 | 12.3 | % | |||||||||
Digital media |
13.6 | 4.3 | % | 13.6 | 4.1 | % | 12.0 | 5.7 | % | |||||||||
Geospatial imaging |
13.0 | 4.1 | % | 13.0 | 4.0 | % | 13.0 | 6.1 | % | |||||||||
Internet business services |
12.0 | 3.8 | % | 12.0 | 3.7 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Semiconductor capital equipment |
12.0 | 3.8 | % | 12.0 | 3.7 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Interactive voice messaging service |
11.8 | 3.7 | % | 14.9 | 4.6 | % | 15.0 | 7.1 | % | |||||||||
Virtual workforce services |
10.5 | 3.3 | % | 10.5 | 3.2 | % | 13.5 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||
Enterprise software |
3.5 | 1.1 | % | 3.5 | 1.1 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Medical services |
1.3 | 0.4 | % | 1.1 | 0.4 | % | 10.0 | 4.7 | % | |||||||||
Internet service provider |
0.0 | 0.0 | % | 14.7 | 4.5 | % | 15.0 | 7.1 | % | |||||||||
Domain name registration |
0.0 | 0.0 | % | 10.0 | 3.0 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Information services |
0.0 | 0.0 | % | 5.0 | 1.5 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Financial services |
0.0 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | 15.0 | 7.1 | % | |||||||||
Internet advertising |
0.0 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | 3.2 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||
$ | 317.5 | 100 | % | $ | 326.2 | 100 | % | $ | 211.4 | 100 | % | |||||||
28
Since our inception in 2003, our portfolio has consisted primarily of senior loans to companies operating in the technology-related sector. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and/or equity securities of other technology-related companies or take controlling interests in such companies in certain limited circumstances. We intend to continue to maintain a diverse portfolio; however, we have no policy with respect to the level of our diversification and we do not intend to operate as a diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
We believe that we have a strong pipeline of potential transactions in various stages. We continue to work diligently toward the consummation of additional investments, and our management is actively involved in identifying and evaluating potential opportunities. However, there can be no assurance when or if these potential transactions will close.
PORTFOLIO GRADING
We have adopted a credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. As of March 31, 2007, and as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 our portfolio had a weighted average grade of 2.2, 2.1 and 1.9, respectively, based upon the fair value of the debt investments in the portfolio. Equity securities are not graded.
At March 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006 and 2005, our debt investment portfolio was graded as follows:
March 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||
Grade | Summary Description |
Principal Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Portfolio at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||
(dollars in millions) |
(dollars in millions) |
|||||||||||||
1 | Trending ahead of expectations | $ | 25.0 | 7.9 | % | $ | 24.8 | 8.2 | % | |||||
2 | Full repayment of principal and interest is expected | 209.6 | 66.4 | % | 206.0 | 67.7 | % | |||||||
3 | Requires closer monitoring, but full repayment of principal and interest is expected | 64.1 | 20.3 | % | 61.5 | 20.2 | % | |||||||
4 | Some reduction of interest income is expected, but no loss of principal is expected | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
5 | Some loss of principal is expected | 16.9 | 5.4 | % | 11.8 | 3.9 | % | |||||||
$ | 315.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 304.1 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||
Grade | Summary Description |
Principal Value |
Percentage of |
Portfolio at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||
(dollars in |
(dollars in millions) |
|||||||||||||
1 | Trending ahead of expectations | $ | 34.9 | 10.9 | % | $ | 34.7 | 11.0 | % | |||||
2 | Full repayment of principal and interest is expected | 218.6 | 67.9 | % | 213.6 | 67.6 | % | |||||||
3 | Requires closer monitoring, but full repayment of principal and interest is expected | 68.3 | 21.2 | % | 67.5 | 21.4 | % | |||||||
4 | Some reduction of interest income is expected, but no loss of principal is expected | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
5 | Some loss of principal is expected | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
$ | 321.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 315.8 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
29
Grade | Summary Description |
December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||
Principal Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Portfolio at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||
(dollars in millions) |
(dollars in millions) |
|||||||||||||
1 | Trending ahead of expectations | $ | 53.0 | 25.8 | % | $ | 52.5 | 25.8 | % | |||||
2 | Full repayment of principal and interest is expected | 120.2 | 58.6 | % | 119.3 | 58.5 | % | |||||||
3 | Requires closer monitoring, but full repayment of principal and interest is expected | 32.1 | 15.6 | % | 32.0 | 15.7 | % | |||||||
4 | Some reduction of interest income is expected, but no loss of principal is expected | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
5 | Some loss of principal is expected | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
$ | 205.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | 203.8 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
We expect that a portion of our investments will be in the Grades 3, 4 or 5 categories from time to time, and, as such, we will be required to work with troubled portfolio companies to improve their business and protect our investment. The number and amount of investments included in Grades 3, 4 or 5 may fluctuate from year to year.
Effective February 27, 2007, one of our portfolio companies, GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., completed a restructuring of its capital structure, whereby $5.15 million of GenuTecs debt, including accrued interest, held by another institutional investor was converted to convertible preferred stock. As a result, we are the only remaining senior noteholder for GenuTec. In connection with this restructuring, we agreed to cancel our warrants to purchase common stock, to provide additional senior notes of up to $2.0 million, to reduce the interest rate on the senior secured notes to 10.46%, and to convert the cash interest payments to PIK for the next four quarters. As of April 23, 2007, the full amount of the additional senior notes had been fully drawn down. GenuTec also made changes in its management team and its board of directors. As of December 31, 2006, the notes were assigned a Grade 3 rating, which indicated that closer monitoring was required, but full repayment of principal and interest was expected. As of March 31, 2007, we determined that our investment in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. presented a risk of loss for some portion of the principal amount outstanding and downgraded our investment in GenuTec from a 3 to a 5 rating; a fair value reduction in the investment has been recorded, and the PIK interest on the investment is considered to be on non-accrual status.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and the period from July 21, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2003.
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2007 to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Investment Income
Investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $9.9 million compared to approximately $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase resulted primarily from our portfolio investing activities throughout 2006 and the first quarter of 2007, as the debt investment portfolio increased from $249.9 million to $304.1 million. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007 investment income consisted of approximately $8.6 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $0.1 million in cash interest from cash and cash equivalents, approximately $351,000 in PIK interest from two debt investments, and amortization of original issue discount of approximately $425,000. As of March 31, 2007, one of the debt investments which has a provision for PIK interest, GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., has been placed on non-accrual status.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, investment income consisted of approximately $5.1 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $0.4 million in cash interest from cash and cash equivalents, approximately $800,000 in PIK interest from two investments, and amortization of original issue discount of approximately $110,000.
30
As of March 31, 2007, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 9.61% and 15.50% and maturity dates of between 12 and 74 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 12.0% compared to 11.0% as of March 31, 2006. In addition to cash interest, our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments, which is added to the principal amount of the loan.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, other income of approximately $280,000 was recorded, consisting primarily of non-recurring amendment fees earned in connection with existing portfolio investments, compared to other income of approximately $826,000 for the same period in 2006. This decrease is the result of fewer loan originations during the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 were approximately $3.3 million. This amount consisted primarily of investment advisory fees, interest expense, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses. This was an increase of approximately $1.4 million from the quarter ended March 31, 2006, which was attributable primarily to an increase of approximately $1.0 million in interest expense and an increase of approximately $293,000 in investment advisory fees. Operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 were approximately $1.9 million.
The investment advisory fee for the first quarter of 2007 was approximately $1.6 million, representing the base fee for the period as provided for in the investment advisory agreement as well as income incentive fees earned of approximately $12,000. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2006 was approximately $1.3 million which consisted solely of the base fee for the period. The increase of approximately $293,000 is due to an increase in average gross assets during the first quarter of 2007. At each of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, approximately $1.6 million and $2.0 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TIM.
Interest expense was approximately $1.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to none for the same quarter in the prior year, as a result of borrowings outstanding during the first quarter of 2007. The average interest rate on the amounts borrowed was approximately 7.69% for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. Approximately $76.5 million was outstanding under the credit facility as of May 8, 2007.
Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $251,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, compared to approximately $295,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease of approximately $24,000 in legal fees for general corporate matters and lower audit fees of approximately $18,000.
Compensation expenses were approximately $200,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, compared to approximately $130,000 for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our Chief Financial Officer, our Controller, and other administrative support personnel. The increase of approximately $70,000 from 2006 reflects a greater base salary as well as an increased year-to-date accrual of estimated bonuses. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, approximately $94,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors fees, insurance, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $172,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to approximately $120,000 for the same period in 2006. This increase was primarily a result of bank fees associated with our senior secured revolving credit facility in 2007 and higher facility costs. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the administration agreement with TIM and BDC Partners.
31
Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments
For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we had realized losses of approximately $143,000. During this period we sold back to StayOnline, Inc. our debt investment in that company, which generated a realized gain of approximately $259,000; at the same time we surrendered our warrants in the company which were previously valued at zero, which created a realized loss of approximately $361,000. Previously recorded unrealized depreciation in the same amount was reversed upon consummation of this transaction. Additionally, we cancelled our warrants in our existing portfolio company, GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., which created a realized loss of approximately $91,000. Those warrants were valued at zero in a prior period; the previously recorded unrealized depreciation was reversed. We also realized a capital gain of approximately $31,000 from the sale of the notes we held in Network Solutions, LLC. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, we had realized gains on investments of approximately $158,000.
We also had net unrealized depreciation on investments of approximately $3.0 million. We recorded unrealized depreciation on our debt investments in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. ($5.0 million) and Falcon Communications, Inc. ($1.5 million) based upon a review of the operating performance of these companies, as well as consideration of other factors and conditions affecting these investments. These decreases were partially offset by unrealized appreciation of approximately $3.0 million associated with the equity investment in Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. and net unrealized appreciation on other investments in the amount of approximately $500,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, we had net unrealized depreciation of approximately $211,000.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $3.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to a net increase of approximately $5.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. This decrease was attributable primarily to improved net investment income performance offset by higher unrealized depreciation and realized losses on investments.
Based on a weighted-average of 19,732,312 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $0.18 for basic and diluted earnings, compared to $0.27 per share for the same period in 2006.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
Investment Income
As of December 31, 2006, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 9.63% and 15.50% and maturity dates of between 15 and 81 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 12.8%, compared to 10.9% as of December 31, 2005. In addition to cash interest, our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments, which is added to the principal amount of the loan.
Investment income for the year ended December 31, 2006, was approximately $35.9 million compared to approximately $21.8 million for the period ended December 31, 2005. The increase resulted primarily from our portfolio investing activities throughout 2006, as the debt investment portfolio increased from approximately $203.8 million to approximately $315.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2006, investment income consisted of approximately $29.0 million from portfolio investments, approximately $0.7 million from cash and cash equivalents, approximately $1.6 million in PIK interest from three of our debt investments, and amortization of original issue discount of approximately $0.9 million. For the year ended December 31, 2005 investment income consisted of approximately $13.4 million from portfolio investments, approximately $1.0 million from cash and cash equivalents, approximately $3.8 million in PIK interest, and amortization of original issue discount of approximately $0.4 million.
32
For the year ended December 31, 2006, other income of approximately $3.7 million was recorded, consisting primarily of non-recurring origination fees earned in connection with the initiation of new investments, compared to similar fee income of approximately $3.6 million in 2005.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006, were approximately $10.5 million. This amount consisted primarily of investment advisory fees, compensation expenses, professional fees, interest expense, directors fees and general and administrative expenses. This was an increase of approximately $3.1 million from the period ended December 31, 2005, which was attributable primarily to an increase in investment advisory fees of approximately $1.9 million resulting from the increase in gross assets and increased interest expense of approximately $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. Our operating expenses for the period ended December 31, 2005 were approximately $7.4 million.
The investment advisory fee for fiscal 2006 was approximately $6.2 million, representing primarily the base fee as provided for in the investment advisory agreement, as well as an investment income incentive fee of approximately $331,000. The investment advisory fee in 2005 was approximately $4.3 million, which consisted of the base fee as well as an income incentive fee of approximately $148,000 and a capital gain incentive fee of approximately $300,000. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, approximately $2.0 million and approximately $1.5 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TIM.
Compensation expenses were approximately $712,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to approximately $725,000 for the period ending December 31, 2005, reflecting primarily the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our Chief Financial Officer, Controller, and other administrative support personnel. The slight decrease of approximately $13,000 from 2005 reflects the impact of lower costs associated with bonuses partially offset by an increase in base salaries. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, no compensation expenses remained payable to BDC Partners.
Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Decreased legal costs were largely offset by increased fees associated with the number of quarterly independent valuation reviews by a third party valuation firm during 2006.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2006, was approximately $1.9 million, which was directly related to our drawdowns under our credit facility throughout the year. Interest expense for the year ended 2005 was approximately $547,000; the increase is attributable to the higher level of borrowing throughout the year ended December 31, 2006.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of bank fees, as well as office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $281,000 in 2006 compared to approximately $368,000 in 2005. The decrease is primarily related to lower bank fees as well as decreased printing and listing costs incurred during 2006. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement with TIM and BDC Partners.
Realized Gains on Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we had net realized gains on investments of approximately $586,000 resulting primarily from contingency payouts of approximately $723,000 relating to the sale of Innovation Interactive, LLC in 2005 and realized gains of approximately $60,000 due to the repayment of the Climax Groups notes which were partially offset by the loss of approximately $240,000 on the surrender of warrants in DirectRevenue in connection with the early repayment of its outstanding notes. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we had net realized gains on our investments of approximately $1.7 million.
33
Unrealized Appreciation on Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we had net unrealized appreciation on our investments of approximately $344,000, primarily with respect to our equity investments in AVIEL Systems, Inc. ($900,000), Network Solutions, LLC ($106,000), reversal of the previously recorded unrealized loss on the DirectRevenue warrants ($240,000) and unrealized appreciation associated with several other investments ($203,000.) These increases were partially offset by unrealized depreciation associated with our equity investments in StayOnline, Inc. ($361,000), Segovia, Inc. ($340,000), The CAPS Group ($200,000), GenuTec ($91,000), and Willow CSN Incorporated ($75,000) and unrealized depreciation associated with several broadly syndicated loan investments ($39,000). Net unrealized appreciation on our investments for the year ended December 31, 2005 was approximately $180,000.
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations
We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $26.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to a net increase in net assets of approximately $16.3 million in 2005. Based on a weighted-average of 19,491,588 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), our net increase in net assets from operations per common share for the year ended December 31, 2006, was approximately $1.35 for basic and diluted earnings, compared to $1.21 per share in 2005.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
Investment Income
As of December 31, 2005, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 5.5% and 14.0% and maturity dates of between 15 and 63 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 10.9%, compared to 10.8% as of December 31, 2004. In addition to cash interest, certain of our loans carried a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments, which was added to the principal amount of the loan.
Investment income for the year ended December 31, 2005, was approximately $21.8 million compared to approximately $7.4 million for the period ended December 31, 2004. The increase resulted primarily from our portfolio investing activities throughout 2005, as the debt investment portfolio increased from $82.1 million to $211.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2005 investment income consisted of approximately $13.4 million from portfolio investments, approximately $1.0 million from cash and cash equivalents, approximately $3.8 million in PIK interest from two of our debt investments, and amortization of original issue discount of approximately $395,000. For the year ended December 31, 2004 investment income consisted of approximately $3.1 million from portfolio investments, approximately $1.1 million from cash and cash equivalents, approximately $1.3 million in PIK interest, and amortization of original issue discount of approximately $89,000.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, other income of approximately $3.6 million was recorded, consisting primarily of non-recurring origination fees earned in connection with the initiation of new investments, compared to fee income of approximately $1.7 million in 2004.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005, were approximately $7.4 million. This amount consisted primarily of investment advisory fees, compensation expenses, professional fees, interest expense, directors fees and general and administrative expenses. This was an increase of approximately $3.4 million from the period ended December 31, 2004, which was attributable primarily to an increase in our investment advisory fees resulting from our additional investments and, to a lesser extent, increased professional fees during the year ended December 31, 2005. Our operating expenses for the period ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $4.0 million.
34
The investment advisory fee for fiscal 2005 was approximately $4.3 million, representing primarily the base fee as provided for in the investment advisory agreement, as well as an investment income incentive fee of approximately $148,000 and a capital gains incentive fee of approximately $300,000. The investment advisory fee in 2004 was approximately $2.8 million, which consisted entirely of the base incentive fee for the year. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, approximately $1.5 million and approximately $697,000 of investment advisory fees remained payable to TIM.
Compensation expenses were approximately $725,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to approximately $208,000 for the period ending December 31, 2004, reflecting primarily the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our Chief Financial Officer, Controller, and other administrative support personnel. The increase of approximately $517,000 from 2004 reflects the impact of bonuses, the addition of the Controller position during the year, and increase in base salaries. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, approximately $0 and $13,000 of compensation expenses remained payable to BDC Partners.
Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to approximately $587,000 for the period ended December 31, 2004. The increase is directly related to an increase in audit fees associated with our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as an increase in the number of quarterly independent valuation reviews by a third party valuation firm in 2005 compared to 2004.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2005, was approximately $547,000, which was directly related to our drawdowns on our credit facility commencing in the third quarter of 2005. There were no borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2004, and therefore no interest expense for that period.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of bank fees, as well as office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $368,000 in 2005 compared to approximately $145,000 in 2004. The increase is primarily related to bank fees to establish our credit facility. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, are allocated to us under the terms of the administration agreement with TIM and BDC Partners.
Realized Gains on Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2005, we had realized gains on investments of $1.7 million. We sold our warrants of Innovation Interactive, LLC in November 2005 in connection with the acquisition of Innovation Interactive, LLC by livedoor, Inc. Our basis in the warrants was $0 and a gain of approximately $966,000 was realized. In addition, we realized a gain of approximately $773,000 in connection with the sale of our warrants in Advanced Aesthetics to another equity sponsor. The warrants had a basis of $0.
Unrealized Appreciation on Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2005, we recognized unrealized appreciation on our investment in the warrants of Segovia, Inc. in the amount of $420,000; the warrants have an original fair value basis of $260,000. We also had, as of December 31, 2005, unrealized depreciation on the warrants we held in DirectRevenue; the warrants had an original basis of $240,000 and were written down to $0 in the third quarter of 2005. Our net unrealized appreciation on our investments at December 31, 2005 was $180,000.
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations
We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to an increase of approximately $3.4 million in 2004. Based on a weighted-average of 13,459,343 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), our net increase in net assets from operations per common share for the year ended December 31, 2005, was approximately $1.21 for basic and diluted earnings, compared to $0.33 per share in 2004.
35
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
On November 26, 2003, we closed our initial public offering and sold 8,695,653 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $15.00 per share, less an underwriting discount of $1.05 per share and offering expenses of approximately $954,000. On December 10, 2003, we issued an additional 1,304,347 shares of our common stock at the same price pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment. The total net proceeds to us from the initial public offering, including the exercise of the over-allotment, were approximately $138.5 million.
We raised net proceeds of approximately $41.5 million from a rights offering which closed in January 2005. Under the terms of the offering, each stockholder of record on December 29, 2004 was entitled to purchase an additional share of stock for each three shares of stock owned on that date. Pursuant to the rights offering, we issued 3,115,666 shares at a price of $14.029 per share.
In December 2005, we raised $78.8 million, net of underwriting commission and expenses, in a follow-on stock offering, in which we sold 5,750,000 shares (including the underwriters over-allotment) at $14.50 per share. Net proceeds from the follow-on offering were used to repay the credit facility drawdowns, and provide additional funds for investment purposes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, cash and cash equivalents increased from approximately $5.2 million at the beginning of the period to approximately $7.9 million at the end of the period. Cash provided by operating activities for the period, consisting primarily of the items described in Results of Operations, was approximately $6.0 million, reflecting net investment income and the net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation. Net cash provided by investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $6.4 million, reflecting new investments of approximately $26.4 million offset by principal repayments of approximately $32.8 million. During the period, a substantial outflow from financing activities of approximately $9.7 million reflected primarily the payment of dividends.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, cash and cash equivalents decreased from approximately $55.8 million at the beginning of the period to approximately $5.2 million at the end of the period. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2006, consisting primarily of the items described in Results of Operations, was approximately $21.9 million, reflecting net investment income and the increase in accrued expenses, offset by realized and unrealized gains on investments, non-cash income related to fees, PIK interest and original issue discount, as well as the increase in accrued interest receivable.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, cash and cash equivalents remained virtually unchanged, from approximately $57.3 million at the beginning of the period to approximately $55.8 million at the end of the period. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2005, consisting primarily of the items described in Results of Operations, was approximately $9.8 million, reflecting net investment income and the increase in investment advisory fees payable, offset by realized and unrealized gains on investments, non-cash income related to PIK interest and original issue discount, as well as the increase in accrued interest receivable.
As a business development company, we have an ongoing need to raise additional capital for investment purposes. As a result, we expect from time to time to access the debt and/or equity markets when we believe it is necessary and appropriate to do so.
Contractual Obligations
The following table shows our significant contractual obligations for the repayment of outstanding borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2007.
Payments Due By Year dollars in millions) | |||||||||
Total | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (1) |
$ | 56.5 | $ | | $ | 56.5 | |||
(1) |
At March 31, 2007, $43.5 million remained unused under our senior secured revolving credit facility. |
36
In addition, we have certain obligations with respect to the investment advisory and administration services we receive. See Overview. We incurred approximately $6.2 million for investment advisory services and approximately $0.3 million for administrative services for the year ended December 31, 2006. We incurred approximately $1.6 million for investment advisory services and $83,000 for administrative services for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices. However, as of March 31, 2007, we had unused commitments to extend credit to our existing portfolio companies of approximately $7.6 million, which are not reflected on our balance sheet.
Borrowings
At March 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $56.5 million and $58.5 million, respectively, under our senior secured revolving credit facility. We had no outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. We had no outstanding credit facility as of December 31, 2004. The following table shows the facility amounts and outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
March 31, 2007 (dollars in millions) |
December 31, 2006 (dollars in millions) |
December 31, 2005 (dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Facility Amount |
Amount Outstanding |
Facility Amount |
Amount Outstanding |
Facility Amount |
Amount Outstanding | |||||||||||||
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ | 100.0 | $ | 56.5 | $ | 100.0 | $ | 58.5 | $ | 100.0 | $ | | ||||||
On May 18, 2005, we entered into an uncommitted $35 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Bayerishe Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG (HVB), as administrative agent and lender. On October 13, 2005, we entered into an agreement amending the Credit Facility to increase the Credit Facility from $35 million to $100 million through February 2006, with Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) as an additional lender under the amended Credit Facility. Effective February 16, 2006, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which RBC replaced HVB as administrative agent under our Credit Facility. Concurrent with its appointment, RBC agreed to make $40 million available under the Credit Facility.
On April 11, 2006, we entered into an amended and restated Credit Facility, with RBC as an agent and a lender, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) as an additional lender. Under the amended and restated Credit Facility, the amount of our Credit Facility was increased to $100 million, with each lender providing $50 million under the facility. The Credit Facility supplements our equity capital and provides funding for additional portfolio investments, as well as general corporate matters. All amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable within one year of the date of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of April 11, 2008. On May 7, 2007, the credit facility was amended to increase the amount available to $150 million. On June 27, 2007, the credit facility was further amended to increase the credit facility to $180 million and to add Commerzbank as an additional lender. As of June 27, 2007, we had $72.0 million outstanding under the credit facility.
Under the Credit Facility agreement we must satisfy monthly several portfolio covenant requirements including minimum market value, weighted average maturity, and average weighted coupon rate on all secured transaction assets, as well as limitations on the principal amounts of eligible transaction assets. In addition, we must comply with other general covenants including indebtedness, liens and pledges, restricted payments, mergers and consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
37
Distributions
In order to qualify as a regulated investment company and to avoid corporate level tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses to our stockholders on an annual basis.
Management determined that a tax return of capital occurred with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Specifically, management determined that the dividend we distributed on December 31, 2004, resulted in a tax return of capital to our shareholders. A written statement identifying the source of the dividend (i.e., net income from operations, accumulated undistributed net profits from the sale of securities, and/or paid-in-capital surplus) accompanied our fourth quarter dividend payment to our shareholders.
The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, per share that we have declared on our common stock to date:
Date Declared |
Record Date | Payment Date | Amount | |||||
Fiscal 2007 |
||||||||
April 30, 2007 |
June 8, 2007 | June 29, 2007 | $0.36 | |||||
February 27, 2007 |
March 9, 2007 | March 30, 2007 | 0.36 | (1) | ||||
Total (2007) |
0.72 | |||||||
Fiscal 2006 |
||||||||
December 20, 2006 |
December 29, 2006 | January 17, 2007 | 0.12 | |||||
October 26, 2006 |
December 8, 2006 | December 29, 2006 | 0.34 | |||||
July 26, 2006 |
September 8, 2006 | September 29, 2006 | 0.32 | |||||
April 26, 2006 |
June 9, 2006 | June 30, 2006 | 0.30 | |||||
February 9, 2006 |
March 10, 2006 | March 31, 2006 | 0.30 | |||||
Total (2006) |
1.38 | |||||||
Fiscal 2005 |
||||||||
December 7, 2005 |
December 30, 2005 | January 18, 2006 | 0.12 | |||||
October 27, 2005 |
December 9, 2005 | December 30, 2005 | 0.30 | |||||
July 27, 2005 |
September 10, 2005 | September 30, 2005 | 0.25 | |||||
April 27, 2005 |
June 10, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | 0.20 | |||||
February 9, 2005 |
March 10, 2005 | March 31, 2005 | 0.14 | |||||
Total (2005) |
1.01 | |||||||
Fiscal 2004 |
||||||||
October 27, 2004 |
December 10, 2004 | December 31, 2004 | 0.11 | (2) | ||||
July 28, 2004 |
September 10, 2004 | September 30, 2004 | 0.11 | |||||
May 5, 2004 |
June 10, 2004 | June 30, 2004 | 0.11 | |||||
February 2, 2004 |
March 15, 2004 | April 5, 2004 | 0.10 | |||||
Total (2004) |
0.43 | (2) | ||||||
Total Distributions: |
$ | 3.54 | (2)(3) | |||||
(1) |
On March 30, 2007, the Company paid a dividend of $0.36 per share, which included approximately $0.02 per share of undistributed net investment income from 2006, and approximately $0.34 per share of investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Management monitors available net investment income to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to our stockholders. |
(2) |
Includes a return of capital of $0.10 per share for tax purposes. |
(3) |
We did not declare a dividend for the period ended December 31, 2003. |
38
Related Parties
We have a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:
| We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with TIM. TIM is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TIM is owned by Royce & Associates as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TIM, manages the business and internal affairs of TIM. In addition, BDC Partners provides us with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement. |
| Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member, and Royce & Associates is a non-managing member, of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Mr. Conroy serves as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer for both T2 Income Fund Limited and T2 Advisers, LLC. Messrs. Rosenthal and Conroy also each serve as a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited. |
| Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of TIM, BDC Partners and TICC, is a principal of JHC Capital Management, LLC, a registered investment adviser. Steven P. Novak, one of our independent directors, is the President of Palladio Capital Management, LLC, the manager of an equity-oriented hedge fund. Charles M. Royce, the non-executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, is the President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates, the non-managing member of our investment adviser. |
In order to minimize the potential conflicts of interest that might arise, we have adopted a policy that prohibits it from making investments in, or otherwise knowingly doing business with, any company in which any fund or other client account managed by JHC Capital Management, Royce & Associates, LLC, Palladio Capital Management or T2 Advisers, LLC holds a long or short position. The investment focus of each of these entities tends to be different from our investment objective. Nevertheless, it is possible that new investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may come to the attention of one of these entities in connection with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available, to us. Also, our investment policy precluding the investments referenced above could cause us to miss out on some investment opportunities. However, our executive officers, directors and investment adviser intend to treat us in a fair and equitable manner over time consistent with their applicable duties under law so that we will not be disadvantaged in relation to any other particular client.
Both we and T2 Income Fund Limited have adopted a policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities in view of these potential conflicts of interest. In accordance with this allocation policy, all U.S.-based bilateral investment opportunities are generally allocated to us, while non-U.S.-based bilateral investment opportunities are generally allocated to T2 Income Fund Limited. Bilateral investment opportunities are those negotiated directly between us or T2 Income Fund Limited and a prospective portfolio company. In addition, any syndicated investment opportunities with a proposed value in excess of $12 million are generally allocated to us, while syndicated investment opportunities with a proposed value of $12 million or less are generally allocated to T2 Income Fund Limited. Syndicated investment opportunities are those arranged through an agent investment banking firm, rather than directly with a prospective portfolio company, and typically involve multiple investors.
In addition, we have adopted a formal Code of Ethics that governs the conduct of our officers and directors. Our officers and directors also remain subject to the fiduciary obligations imposed by both the 1940 Act and applicable state corporate law. Finally, we pay BDC Partners our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a
39
portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors must monitor.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified our investment valuation policy as a critical accounting policy.
Investment Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded.
There is no single standard for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. We are required to specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly basis. We will record unrealized depreciation on investments when we believe that an investment has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful, or when the enterprise value of the portfolio company does not currently support the cost of our debt or equity investment. Enterprise value means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and our equity security has also appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Our process for determining the fair value of a private finance investment begins with determining the enterprise value of the portfolio company. The fair value of our investment is based on the enterprise value at which the portfolio company could be sold in an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of time between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The liquidity event whereby we exit a private finance investment is generally the sale, the recapitalization or, in some cases, the initial public offering of the portfolio company. There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze its historical and projected financial results, as well as the nature and value of any collateral. We also use industry valuation benchmarks and public market comparables. We also consider other events, including private mergers and acquisitions, a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent debt or equity sale or restructuring, and include these events in the enterprise valuation process. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
If there is adequate enterprise value to support the repayment of our debt, the fair value of our loan or debt security normally corresponds to cost unless the borrowers condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value at a different amount. The fair value of equity interests in portfolio companies is determined based on various factors, including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders after the repayment of the portfolio companys debt and other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio companys equity securities, or other liquidation events. The determined equity values are generally discounted when we have a minority position, restrictions on resale, specific concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a specific company at a certain time, or other factors.
40
Our Board of Directors determines the value of our investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TIMs portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, we have engaged a third-party valuation firm to independently evaluate our portfolio investments and provide their reports to the Valuation Committee, although the Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment.
As part of our valuation process, the third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of our portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, on October 26, 2006 our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of our Valuation Committee, approved a change in our valuation process whereby the frequency of those third-party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly.
OTHER ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interest Income Recognition
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected.
Payment in Kind Interest
We have investments in our portfolio which contain a PIK provision. The PIK interest is added to the principal balance of the investment and is recorded as income. To maintain our status as a RIC, this income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though we have not collected any cash. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, we had approximately $1,545,000, $3,798,000 and $1,316,000 in PIK interest. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we received PIK interest of $509,281 and $757,647, respectively, and recorded a corresponding increase in the cost of the investment. One of the debt investments which has a provision for PIK interest, GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., has been placed on non-accrual status as of March 31, 2007.
In addition, we recorded original issue discount income (OID) of approximately $914,000, $395,000 and $89,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, representing the amortization of the discounted cost attributed to certain debt securities purchased by us in connection with the issuance of warrants. We recorded OID of approximately $425,522 for the three months ended March 31, 2007, and we had approximately $109,557 in OID for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Other Income
Other income includes closing fees, or origination fees, associated with investments in portfolio companies. Such fees are normally paid at closing of our investments, are fully earned and non-refundable, and are generally non-recurring.
Managerial Assistance Fees
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company offer managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. We offer to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies in connection with our investments and may receive fees for our services. We have not received any fees for such services since inception.
41
Federal Income Taxes
We intend to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, to not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify for RIC tax treatment, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code.
Because federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statement to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
For tax purposes, the cost basis of the portfolio investments at March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was approximately $320,038,435, $325,660,997 and $211,218,202, respectively.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On April 10, 2007, we completed an $11.5 million transaction with PrePak Systems, Inc., whereby we invested $10 million in senior secured notes with a commitment of an additional $1.5 million in senior notes, as the company achieves certain milestones. PrePak Systems, Inc. is a contract packaging organization that repackages bulk pharmaceuticals into bottles, blister packs and individually packaged doses for government mail outpatient pharmacies and hospitals, commercial hospitals, nursing homes, and direct pharmacy clients.
On April 24, 2007, we completed a $15.0 million investment in senior secured notes issued by American Integration Technologies, LLC an existing portfolio company.
On April 30, 2007, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.36 per share for the second quarter, payable on June 29, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 8, 2007.
On May 7, 2007, we completed a $14.9 million transaction with Box Services, LLC, whereby we invested $13.5 million in senior secured notes with a commitment of an additional $1.4 million in senior notes, as the company achieves certain milestones. Box Services is a provider of digital imaging services to leading professional photographers, luxury fashion brands, publishers and advertisers.
On May 7, 2007, we amended our credit facility with RBC and BB&T to reduce the interest rate on the facility by 50 basis points, to 1.75% over LIBOR, and increase the size of the facility to $150 million.
On June 27, 2007, we amended our credit facility with RBC and BB&T to increase the size of the facility to $180 million and to add Commerzbank as an additional lender, providing a $30 million commitment. Approximately $72.0 million was outstanding under the credit facility as of June 27, 2007.
On June 27, 2007, we completed an $11 million investment in senior secured notes with warrants in Pulvermedia Inc. Pulvermedia Inc. operates and produces tradeshow and conference events, most notably VON events.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. As of March 31, 2007, two debt investments in our portfolio were at fixed rates, and the remaining twenty-five debt investments were at variable rates, representing approximately $15.5 million and $300.1 million in principal debt, respectively. The variable rates are based upon the five-year Treasury note or LIBOR, and generally reset each year. We expect that future debt investments will generally be made at variable rates. In addition, we have an uncommitted revolving credit agreement which carries variable rate interest charges when drawn. Because we fund a portion of our investments with borrowings, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations is affected by the spread between the rate at which we invest and the rate at which we borrow. We attempt to match-fund our liabilities and assets by financing variable rate assets with variable rate borrowings.
42
To illustrate the potential impact of a change in the underlying interest rate on our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, we have assumed a 1% increase in the underlying five-year Treasury note or LIBOR, and no other change in our portfolio as of March 31, 2007. We have also assumed a borrowing of $56.5 million under the credit facility. Under this analysis, net investment income would increase approximately $2.4 million annually. Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for changes in the credit quality, size and composition of our portfolio, and other business developments, including borrowing under the credit facility, that could affect the net increase in stockholders equity resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.
In addition, we have an uncommitted revolving credit agreement which carries variable rate interest charges when drawn.
We may in the future hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the investments in our portfolio with fixed interest rates.
43
Information about our senior securities is shown in the following tables as of December 31 for the years indicated in the table, unless otherwise noted. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the senior securities table as of December 31, 2006, is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Class and Year |
Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(1) |
Asset Coverage Per Unit(2) |
Involuntary Liquidating Preference Per Unit(3) |
Average Market Value Per Unit(4) | ||||||
Credit Facility with Royal Bank of Canada as Agent |
||||||||||
2003 |
| | | N/A | ||||||
2004 |
| | | N/A | ||||||
2005 |
| | | N/A | ||||||
2006 |
$ | 58,500,000 | $ | 5,638 | | N/A | ||||
For the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (unaudited) |
$ | 56,500,000 | $ | 5,769 | | N/A |
(1) |
Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at the end of the period presented. |
(2) |
Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of our total consolidated assets, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness. |
(3) |
The amount to which such class of senior security would be entitled upon the voluntary liquidation of the issuer in preference to any security junior to it. The in this column indicates that the Securities and Exchange Commission expressly does not require this information to be disclosed for certain types of senior securities. |
(4) |
Not applicable because senior securities are not registered for public trading. |
44
We are a specialty finance company principally providing capital to primarily non-public small- and medium-sized technology-related companies. Technology-related companies are businesses that focus on the following sectors: software, Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware and technology-enabled services.
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. Our primary focus is on seeking current income by investing in non-public debt securities. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt investments, or equity investments in technology-related companies. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and/or equity securities of other technology-related companies.
Our capital is generally used by our portfolio companies to finance organic growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations and working capital. Our investment decisions are based on extensive analysis of potential portfolio companies business operations supported by an in-depth understanding of the quality of their recurring revenues and cash flow, variability of costs and the inherent value of their assets, including proprietary intangible assets and intellectual property.
We currently concentrate our investments in companies having annual revenues of less than $200 million and/or an equity capitalization of less than $300 million. Our investments typically range from $5 million to $30 million each, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates.
We also borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, Technology Investment Management, LLC (TIM), will be borne by our common stockholders.
Our investment activities are managed by TIM. TIM is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the Advisers Act). TIM is owned by BDC Partners, LLC (BDC Partners), its managing member, and Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce & Associates). Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. Under the investment advisory agreement, we have agreed to pay TIM an annual base management fee based on our gross assets as well as an incentive fee based on our performance. See Portfolio ManagementInvestment Advisory Agreement.
We were founded in July 2003 and completed an initial public offering of shares of our common stock in November 2003. We are a Maryland corporation and a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we are required to meet certain regulatory tests, including the requirement to invest at least 70% of our total assets in eligible portfolio companies. See Regulation as a Business Development Company. In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as the Code.
We intend to concentrate in the technology-related sector and to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology-related companies.
45
Our headquarters are at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255 Greenwich, Connecticut and our telephone number is (203) 983-5275.
MARKET OPPORTUNITY
The period since mid-2000 has seen a dramatic shift in the competitive landscape across the technology-related sector. Significant declines in corporate and consumer demand for information technology products and services have driven vigorous price competition and spurred numerous corporate reorganizations in technology- related industries. Many companies have merged with competitors, scaled back their operations or simply closed down in response to these difficult business conditions, and we expect to see further consolidation in these industries. At the same time, technology-related companies with strong balance sheets, stable revenues and efficient operating structures are benefiting from the consolidation or elimination of competitors in their markets.
Large, underserved market for product
Following the technology-related market downturn, an increasing number of well-positioned technology-related companies have been seeking to raise capital. Historically, growing technology-related companies have generally relied upon equity rather than debt financing. As a result, the market for debt financing for technology-related companies is generally less developed than the debt markets serving other industries. In spite of the large number of technology-related companies in the United States today, we believe that these companies are significantly underserved by traditional lenders such as banks, savings and loan institutions and finance companies for the following reasons:
| Non-traditional financial profileThe balance sheet of a technology-related company often includes a disproportionately large amount of intellectual property assets as compared to the balance sheets of industrial and service companies, which makes them difficult to evaluate using traditional lending criteria. Additionally, the high revenue growth rates characteristic of technology-related companies often render them difficult to evaluate from a credit perspective. Moreover, technology-related companies often incur relatively high expenditures for research and development, utilize unorthodox sales and marketing techniques and selling channels, and experience rapid shifts in technology, consumer demand and market share. These attributes can make it difficult for traditional lenders to analyze technology-related companies using conventional analytical methods. |
| Industry scale, concentration and regulationMany companies in technology-related industries lack the size, and the markets in which they operate lack the scale, necessary to service large loans by traditional lenders. In the banking industry, in particular, consolidation over the last decade has increased the size, and reduced the number, of surviving banks. The surviving institutions have sought to limit their credit exposures to, and the monitoring costs associated with loans to, smaller businesses. In addition, traditional lending institutions operate in a regulatory environment that favors lending to large, established businesses. In response to such regulation, many traditional lending institutions have developed loan approval processes which conflict with the entrepreneurial culture of smaller technology-related companies. |
For the reasons outlined above, we believe that many viable technology-related companies have either not been able, or have elected not, to obtain financing from traditional lending institutions. We believe that these factors are likely to continue, given the ongoing consolidation in the financial services industry.
Complementing private equity and venture capital funds
Our investment approach complements other sources of capital available to technology-related companies. For example, although we may compete with private equity and venture capital funds as sources of capital for such businesses, those types of investors typically invest primarily in equity-based securities. We believe that the nature of our investments in debt securities is often viewed by such entities as an attractive alternative source of
46
capital. Private equity and venture capital funds often base their investments on anticipated annual internal rates of return that are substantially higher than the annual internal rates of return that we set as our operating target. Moreover, private equity and venture capital funds generally require a significantly greater percentage of equity ownership interests than we require. However, private equity and venture capital investments typically entail considerably more risk than the debt investments that we make, as they are usually uncollateralized and rank lower in priority in the capital structure of the portfolio companies. We believe the prospect of obtaining additional capital without incurring substantial incremental dilution makes us attractive to owner-managers as a prospective source of capital.
In addition, in many cases, we expect that private equity and venture capital funds will generally welcome an investment by us in their portfolio companies. After making an initial investment, these funds often seek to stabilize or reduce their financial exposure to their portfolio companies, a goal that financing from us could accomplish by providing non-equity capital. In the current investment climate, it is possible that we will offer one of the only viable alternative sources of capital for a technology-related company other than incremental equity investments by the companys existing financial sponsors. As such, we provide technology-related companies and their financial sponsors with an opportunity to diversify the companys capital sources. In addition to enabling incremental growth, this can facilitate access to other alternative sources of capital in the future.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
We believe that we are well positioned to provide financing to technology-related companies for the following reasons:
| Focus on technology; |
| Expertise in originating, structuring and monitoring investments; |
| Flexible investment approach; and |
| Established deal sourcing network. |
Focus on technology
We currently concentrate our investments in companies in technology-related industries. We believe that this focus, together with our experience in analyzing and financing such companies, affords us a sustainable competitive advantage. In particular, we have expertise in assessing the value of intellectual property assets, and in evaluating the operating characteristics of technology-related companies. As a result, we believe that we have a competitive advantage over less specialized lenders, particularly over lenders with limited experience in lending to technology-related companies. In addition, we believe that our specialization in financing companies within the technology sector enables us to advise portfolio companies on consolidation and exit financing opportunities more rapidly and effectively than less specialized lenders.
Expertise in originating, structuring and monitoring investments
We believe that our strong combination of experience and contacts in the technology sector has attracted well-positioned prospective portfolio companies.
| Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, has more than 16 years of experience in technology-related equity research and investment. He was named to Institutional Investors All-American research team in 1996, 1997 and 1998. During his career, Mr. Cohen has managed technology research groups covering computer software and hardware companies, telecommunication companies and semiconductor companies at several firms, including Wit SoundView, Merrill Lynch & Co., UBS Securities and Salomon Smith Barney. Mr. Cohen is also the owner and a principal of JHC Capital |
47
Management, LLC, a registered investment adviser. |
| Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, has 8 years of experience in the capital markets, with a focus on small to middle-market transactions in the technology sector. Mr. Rosenthal previously served as President of Privet Financial Securities, LLC, a broker-dealer providing advisory services to technology companies, and previously led the private financing/public company effort at SoundView Technology Group, where he co-founded SoundViews Private Equity Group. He was a Vice-President and co-founder of the Private Equity Group at Wit Capital from 1998 to 2000. Prior to joining Wit Capital, Mr. Rosenthal was an attorney at the law firm of Shearman & Sterling LLP. |
We believe that our extensive experience in researching, analyzing and investing in technology companies and structuring debt investments affords us a competitive advantage in providing financing to technology-related companies.
Flexible investment approach
We have significant flexibility in selecting and structuring our investments. While we must comply with the 1940 Act, we are not subject to many of the regulatory limitations that govern traditional lending institutions such as banks. Also, we have fairly broad latitude as to the term and nature of our investments. We recognize that technology-related companies regularly make corporate development decisions that impact their financial performance, valuation and risk profile. In some cases, these decisions can favorably impact long-term enterprise value at the expense of short-term financial performance. We seek to structure our investments so as to take into account the uncertain and potentially variable financial performance of our portfolio companies. This enables our portfolio companies to retain access to committed capital at different stages in their development and eliminate some of the uncertainty surrounding their capital allocation decisions. We calculate rates of return on invested capital based on a combination of up-front commitment fees, current and deferred interest rates and exit values, which may take the form of common stock, warrants, or other equity-linked instruments. We believe that this flexible approach to structuring investments will facilitate positive, long-term relationships with our portfolio companies and their equity sponsors and enable us to become a preferred source of capital to them. We also believe our approach should enable debt financing to develop into a viable alternative capital source for funding the growth of technology-related companies that wish to avoid the dilutive effects of equity financings for existing equity holders.
We are not subject to periodic capital return requirements. Such requirements, which are standard for most private funds, typically require that such funds return to investors the initial capital investment after a pre-agreed time, together with any capital gains on such investment. These provisions often force such funds to seek the return of their investments in portfolio companies through mergers, public equity offerings or other liquidity events more quickly than they otherwise might, which can result in a lower overall return to investors and adversely affect the ultimate viability of the affected portfolio companies. We believe that our flexibility to take a longer-term view should help us to maximize returns on our invested capital while still meeting the needs of our portfolio companies.
Established deal sourcing network
Through the senior investment professionals of TIM and our directors, we have extensive contacts and sources from which to generate investment opportunities. These contacts and sources include private equity and venture capital funds, public and private companies, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and commercial bankers. We believe that senior professionals of TIM have developed strong reputations within the investment community over their years in the investment banking, investment management and equity research businesses.
48
INVESTMENT PROCESS
Identification of prospective portfolio companies
We identify and source new prospective portfolio companies through a network of venture capital and private equity funds, investment banks, accounting and law firms and direct company relationships. We have identified several criteria that we believe are important in seeking our investment objective with respect to technology-related companies. These criteria provide general guidelines for our investment decisions; however, we do not require each prospective portfolio company in which we choose to invest to meet all of these criteria.
| Experienced managementWe generally require that our portfolio companies have an experienced management team. We also require the portfolio companies to have in place proper incentives to induce management to succeed and to act in concert with our interests as investors, including having significant equity interests. |
| Significant financial or strategic sponsor and / or strategic partnerWe prefer to invest in technology-related companies in which established private equity or venture capital funds or other financial or strategic sponsors have previously invested and are willing to make an ongoing contribution to the management of the business. |
| Strong competitive position in industryWe seek to invest in technology-related companies that have developed a strong competitive position within their respective sector or niche of a technology-related industry. |
| Profitable on a cash flow basisWe focus on technology-related companies that are profitable or nearly profitable on an operating cash flow basis. Typically, we would not expect to invest in start-up companies. |
| Clearly defined exit strategyPrior to making an investment in a debt security that is accompanied by an equity-based security in a portfolio company, we analyze the potential for that company to increase the liquidity of its common equity through a future event that would enable us to realize appreciation, if any, in the value of our equity interest. Liquidity events may include an initial public offering, a merger or an acquisition of the company, a private sale of our equity interest to a third party, or a purchase of our equity position by the company or one of its stockholders. |
| Liquidation value of assetsAlthough we do not operate as an asset-based lender, the prospective liquidation value of the assets, if any, collateralizing the debt securities that we hold is an important factor in our credit analysis. We emphasize both tangible assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, and intangible assets, such as intellectual property, software code, customer lists, networks and databases. |
Due diligence
If a technology-related company meets some of the characteristics described above, we perform a preliminary due diligence review including company and technology assessments, market analysis, competitive analysis, evaluation of management, risk analysis and transaction size, pricing and structure analysis. The criteria delineated below provide general parameters for our investment decisions, although not all of such criteria will be followed in each instance. Upon successful completion of this preliminary evaluation process, we will decide whether to deliver a non-binding letter of intent, after which our administrator, BDC Partners, generally receives an upfront advance to cover our due diligence-related expenses, begin the due diligence process and move forward towards the completion of a transaction.
49
The following outlines our due diligence process:
Management team and financial sponsor
| management assessment including a review of managements track record with respect to product development, sales and marketing, mergers and acquisitions, alliances, collaborations, research and development outsourcing and other strategic activities, reference and background checks; and |
| financial sponsor reputation, track record, experience and knowledge. |
Business
| industry and competitive analysis; |
| customer and vendor interviews to assess both business prospects and standard practices of the company; |
| assessment of likely exit strategies; and |
| potential regulatory / legal issues. |
Financial condition
| detailed review of the historical financial performance and the quality of earnings; |
| development of detailed pro forma financial projections; |
| review of internal controls and accounting systems; |
| review of assets and liabilities, including contingent liabilities; and |
| customer and vendor interviews to assess both business prospects and standard practices of the company. |
Technology assessment
| evaluation of intellectual property position; |
| review of research and development milestones; |
| analysis of core technology under development; |
| assessment of collaborations and other technology validations; and |
| assessment of market and growth potential. |
Contemporaneous with our due diligence process, the investment team prepares a detailed credit memorandum for presentation to our Investment Committee, which currently consists of Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal. Our Investment Committee reviews and approves each of our portfolio investments.
Investment structuring
We seek to achieve a high level of current income by investing in debt securities, consisting primarily of senior notes, senior subordinated notes and junior subordinated notes, of technology-related companies. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make loans.
In structuring our investments, we ascertain the asset quality as well as the earnings quality of our prospective portfolio companies. Frequently, we obtain a senior secured position and thus receive a perfected,
50
first priority security interest in substantially all of our portfolio companies assets, which entitles us to a preferred position on payments in the event of liquidation, and in many cases a pledge of the equity by the equity owners. In addition, we structure loan covenants to assist in the management of risk. Our loan documents ordinarily include affirmative covenants that require the portfolio company to take specific actions such as periodic financial reporting, notification of material events and compliance with laws, restrictive covenants that prevent portfolio companies from taking a range of significant actions such as incurring additional indebtedness or making acquisitions without our consent, covenants requiring the portfolio company to maintain or achieve specified financial ratios such as debt to cash flow and interest coverage, and operating covenants requiring them to maintain certain operational benchmarks such as minimum revenue or minimum cash flow. Our loan documents also contain customary events of default such as non-payment, breach of covenant, insolvency and change of control.
Senior Debt
The senior debt in which we invest generally holds a senior position in the capital structure of a portfolio company. Such debt may include loans that hold the most senior position, loans that hold an equal ranking with other senior debt, or loans that are, in the judgment of our investment adviser, in the category of senior debt. A senior position in the borrowers capital structure generally gives the holder of the senior debt a claim on some or all of the borrowers assets that is senior to that of subordinated debt, preferred stock and common stock in the event the borrower defaults or becomes bankrupt. The senior debt in which we invest may be wholly or partially secured by collateral, or may be unsecured.
Senior Subordinated Debt
Senior subordinated debt is subordinated in its rights to receive its principal and interest payments from the borrower to the rights of the holders of senior debt. As a result, senior subordinated debt is riskier than senior debt. Although such loans are sometimes secured by significant collateral, we principally rely on the borrowers cash flow for repayment. Additionally, we often receive warrants to acquire shares of stock in borrowers in connection with these loans.
Junior Subordinated Debt
Structurally, junior subordinated debt is subordinate in priority of payment to senior debt (and is often unsecured), but is senior in priority to equity. Junior subordinated debt often has elements of both debt and equity instruments, having the fixed returns associated with senior debt while also providing the opportunity to participate in the future growth potential of a company through an equity component, typically in the form of warrants. Due to its higher risk profile and less restrictive covenants, loans associated with junior subordinated debt financing generally earn a higher return than senior debt or senior subordinated debt instruments.
ONGOING RELATIONSHIPS WITH PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
Monitoring
We monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to assess the appropriate course of action for each company and to evaluate overall portfolio quality. We closely monitor the status and performance of each individual company on at least a quarterly and, in most cases, a monthly basis.
We have several methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance of our debt and equity positions, including but not limited to the following:
| assessment of business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio companys overall adherence to its business plan; |
| periodic and regular contact with portfolio company management to discuss financial position, requirements and accomplishments; |
51
| periodic formal update interviews with portfolio company management and, if appropriate, the financial or strategic sponsor; |
| attendance at and participation in board meetings; and |
| review of monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for portfolio companies. |
In addition, we may from time to time identify investments that require closer monitoring or become workout assets. In such cases, we will develop a strategy for workout assets and periodically gauge our progress against that strategy.
Portfolio Grading
We have adopted a credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. We use an investment rating scale of 1 to 5. The following table provides a description of the conditions associated with each debt investment. Equity securities are not graded.
Grade | Summary Description | |
1 | Trending ahead of expectations | |
2 | Full return of principal and interest is expected | |
3 | Requires closer monitoring, but full repayment of principal and interest is expected | |
4 | Some reduction of interest income is expected, but no loss of principal is expected | |
5 | Some loss of principal is expected |
Managerial assistance
As a business development company, we are required to offer managerial assistance to portfolio companies. This assistance typically involves monitoring the operations of portfolio companies, participating in their board and management meetings, consulting with and advising their officers and providing other organizational and financial guidance.
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
We seek to create a portfolio that includes primarily senior secured loans, senior subordinated and junior subordinated debt investments, as well as warrants and other equity instruments we may receive in connection with such debt investments. We generally invest between $5 million and $30 million in each of our portfolio companies.
The following is a representative list of the technology-related industries in which we have invested:
Web-based services Web hosting Logistics technology Financial services Virtual workforce services Digital media Software Internet business services Semiconductor capital equipment Domain name registration Information services |
Satellite communications IT consulting IT value-added resellers Digital arts imaging Interactive voice messaging systems Internet service provider Geospatial imaging Medical services Internet advertising Enterprise software |
At December 31, 2006, our portfolio was invested 82% in senior secured notes, 15% in senior unsecured notes, and 3% in equity.
At March 31, 2007, our portfolio was invested 81% in senior secured notes, 10% in senior unsecured notes, and 9% in equity.
52
TEN LARGEST PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2007
Our ten largest portfolio company investments at March 31, 2007, based on the fair value of the debt and equity securities we hold in each portfolio company, were as follows:
Industry |
At March 31, 2007 | ||||||||||
($ in millions) | |||||||||||
Portfolio Company |
Cost | Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
||||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. |
software | $ | 22.5 | $ | 25.5 | 8.0 | % | ||||
AKQA, Inc. |
advertising | $ | 25.0 | $ | 25.0 | 7.9 | % | ||||
Endurance International Group, Inc.(1) |
web hosting | $ | 24.2 | $ | 24.5 | 7.7 | % | ||||
Group 329, LLC |
digital imaging | $ | 23.6 | $ | 23.4 | 7.4 | % | ||||
TrenStar, Inc. |
logistics technology | $ | 16.9 | $ | 16.9 | 5.3 | % | ||||
Segovia, Inc. |
satellite communications | $ | 15.4 | $ | 15.5 | 4.9 | % | ||||
AVIEL Systems, Inc. |
IT consulting | $ | 14.6 | $ | 15.5 | 4.9 | % | ||||
NetQuote, Inc. |
web-based services | $ | 15.0 | $ | 15.0 | 4.7 | % | ||||
Fusionstorm, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | $ | 14.6 | $ | 14.6 | 4.6 | % | ||||
SCS Holdings II, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | $ | 14.5 | $ | 14.6 | 4.6 | % |
(1) |
This investment was subsequently repaid in May 2007. |
Set forth below are descriptions of those investments which represent 5% or greater of the total portfolio:
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) has been providing assistive technology for more than 15 years to computer users with low vision. The Companys flagship product is ZoomText, a screen magnification and reading software application for the visually impaired.
Our investment in Ai Squared, which closed in September 2006, consisted of $22 million in senior secured notes and common stock. TICC and an individual investor each acquired 50% of the outstanding equity of Ai Squared in connection with our investment in the company.
AKQA Inc.
AKQA Inc. is an independent global marketing agency that provides ideas, insights, customer relationship marketing and e-commerce solutions to its clients. AKQA Inc. focuses on creating and delivering marketing solutions in digital media such as the Internet, mobile, digital outdoor, gaming consoles and kiosks. It provides services such as advertising, web development, customer relationship management, e-commerce and interface design.
Our investment, which closed in March 2007, consisted of $25 million in senior secured notes.
The Endurance International Group, Inc.
Endurance is a provider of shared website hosting and other online services for small and medium-sized businesses. Endurance currently manages a number of website hosting properties, each of which is a provider of web services to a targeted segment of the small business community.
Our original investment in Endurance, which closed in July 2004, consisted of $10 million in senior secured notes and warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock, of which $7 million was made available to Endurance at closing with the remaining $3 million available to be drawn down as the company met certain financial milestones. During 2005, the commitment was increased to $8 million, and Endurance subsequently borrowed a total of $6 million against that commitment. Additionally, we exercised warrants in 2005. Our commitment was increased to $30 million in April 2006 and additional warrants were issued, a portion of which were exercised. A total of $24 million has been borrowed under the facility as of March 31, 2007. TICCs warrant position represents approximately 3.8% of the fully diluted common stock of Endurance.
53
Group 329, LLC
Group 329, LLC (d/b/a/ The CAPS Group) is a provider of digital and other graphic arts services to corporations, advertising agencies and design firms. Established in 2001, The CAPS Group is an independent graphic arts services provider. Its clients include Fortune 500 corporations, mid-market companies, nationally recognized publishers and large advertising agencies.
Our original investment in The CAPS Group, which closed in March 2006, consisted of $20 million in senior secured notes with warrants to purchase common stock. Later, during 2006, TICC entered into an amended agreement with The CAPS Group whereby, we invested an additional $5 million in senior secured notes and received additional warrants. Currently, TICCs warrant position represents approximately 5.75% of the fully diluted common stock of Group 329, LCC.
TrenStar, Inc.
TrenStars supply chain technology and services heritage has evolved into a radio frequency identification (RFID)-enabled, pay-per-use model of mobile asset management designed to reduce transportation and operating costs for companies invested in containers that move raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods through the supply chain. TrenStar and its affiliates focus on the brewing, beverage, food, synthetic rubber, air cargo, and healthcare industries and other asset-intensive industries.
Our original investment in TrenStar, which closed in September 2004, consisted of $15 million in senior secured notes and warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock. Payment-in-kind, or PIK interest, received on the senior secured notes has been recorded as principal and reflected as an increase in both cost and fair value of such notes since their initial issuance. During August 2006, the notes were amended to convert PIK interest to cash interest payments.
COMPETITION
Our primary competitors to provide financing to technology-related companies include private equity and venture capital funds, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, including other business development companies, and investment banks and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of these entities have greater financial and managerial resources than we will have. For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, see Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our Business and StructureWe operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
EMPLOYEES
We have no employees. Our day-to-day investment operations are managed by our investment adviser. In addition, we reimburse BDC Partners for an allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel.
PROPERTIES
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our operation. Our headquarters are located at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut, where we occupy our office space pursuant to our Administration Agreement with BDC Partners. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
54
PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2007 regarding each portfolio company in which we have a debt or equity investment. The general terms of our loans and other investments are described in BusinessInvestment ProcessInvestment structuring. We offer to make available significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. We may receive rights to observe the meetings of our portfolio companies board of directors. Other than these investments, our only relationships with our portfolio companies are the managerial assistance we may separately provide to our portfolio companies, which services would be ancillary to our investments.
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Name and Address of Portfolio Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Percentage of Class Held |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | |||||||
Questia Media, Inc. 24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000A Houston, TX 77406 |
Digital media | Senior secured notes(3) | | $ | 13,608 | $ | 13,608 | |||||
TrueYou.com Inc. |
Medical services | Subordinated promissory notes(3) | | 1,259 | 1,259 | |||||||
The Endurance International Group, Inc. 70 Blanchard Road Burlington, MA 01803 |
Web hosting | Senior secured notes(4)(6)(7) Convertible preferred stock(5) Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(5)(10) |
3.8% 0.3% |
|
23,766 392 31 |
|
23,766 715 55 | |||||
Avue Technologies Corp. 1145 Broadway Plaza, Suite 800 Tacoma, WA 98402 |
Software | Warrants to purchase common units(5) | 1.0% | 13 | 13 | |||||||
TrenStar Inc. 5613 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, CO 80111 |
Logistics technology | Senior secured notes(3)(6) Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(5) |
1.6% |
|
16,951 0 |
|
16,951 0 | |||||
3001, Inc. |
Geospatial imaging | Senior unsecured notes(6) Preferred stock(9)(10) Common stock(5)(9)(10) |
15.2% 9.5% |
|
10,000 2,000 1,000 |
|
10,000 2,000 1,000 | |||||
Segovia, Inc. 510 Spring Street, Suite 210 Herndon, VA 20170 |
Satellite communications | Senior secured notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase common stock(5) |
3.5% |
|
14,851 600 |
|
14,851 680 | |||||
WHITTMANHART, Inc. 440 West Ontario Street Chicago, IL 60610 |
IT consulting | Senior secured notes(4)(6) Warrants to purchase common stock(10) Convertible preferred stock(5) Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(5) |
1.0% 0.1% |
|
11,000 0 476 24 |
|
11,000 0 476 24 | |||||
CrystalTech Web Hosting, Inc. |
Web hosting | Senior secured notes(6)(8) | | 1,000 | 1,000 | |||||||
Falcon Communications, Inc. |
Satellite communications | Senior unsecured notes(6) | | 10,500 | 9,000 | |||||||
Climax Group, Inc. 210 Main Street Venice, CA 90291 |
Software | Warrants to purchase common stock(5) | 3.0% | 229 | 229 |
(Continued on next page.)
55
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Name and Address of Portfolio Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Percentage of Class Held |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | |||||||
Willow CSN Incorporated 3450 Lakeside Drive, Suite 620 Miramar, FL 33027 |
Virtual workforce services |
Senior secured notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(5) |
0.7% |
|
10,370 200 |
|
10,370 125 | |||||
NetQuote, Inc. 1860 Blake Street, Suite 900 Denver, CO 80202 |
Web-based services | Senior secured notes(6) | | 15,000 | 15,000 | |||||||
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. |
Interactive voice messaging services | Senior secured notes(6)(7) |
| 16,806 | 11,806 | |||||||
Aviel Systems, Inc. 7926 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 900 McLean, VA 22102 |
IT consulting | Senior unsecured notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase common stock(5) |
4.0% |
|
14,278 300 |
|
14,278 1,200 | |||||
Group 329, LLC d/b/a The CAPS Group 329 West 18th Street, 8th Floor Chicago, IL 60616 |
Digital imaging | Senior secured term A notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase common stock(5) Senior secured term B notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase common stock(5) |
3.2% 2.6% |
|
10,684 110 12,677 90 |
|
10,684 0 12,677 0 | |||||
American Integration Technologies, LLC 481 N. Dean Avenue Chandler, AZ 85226 |
Semiconductor capital equipment | Senior secured notes(6) | | 12,000 | 12,000 | |||||||
Power Tools, Inc. 600 Unicorn Park Drive Woburn, MA 01801 |
Software | Senior secured notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase common stock(5) |
7.0% |
|
10,977 350 |
|
10,977 0 | |||||
Attachmate Corporation 1500 Dexter Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109 |
Enterprise software | Senior secured notes(6) | | 3,500 | 3,500 | |||||||
Iridium Satellite LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 500 Bethesda, MD 20817 |
Satellite communications | Senior secured first lien notes(6)(7)(8) Senior secured first lien tranche B notes(6)(7) Senior secured second lien notes(6)(7) |
|
|
2,556 2,949 1,946 |
|
2,579 3,011 2,030 | |||||
Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. d/b/a Ai Squared P.O. Box 669 Manchester Center, VT 05255 |
Software | Senior secured second lien notes(6)(7) Common stock(5) |
50.0% |
|
19,461 3,000 |
|
19,461 6,000 | |||||
NameMedia, Inc. 230 Third Avenue Waltham, MA 02451 |
Internet business services | Senior secured notes(6)(7) | | 11,956 | 12,000 | |||||||
Fusionstorm, Inc. 2 Bryant Street, Suite 150 San Francisco, CA 94105 |
IT value-added reseller | Senior subordinated unsecured notes(6)(7)(8) Warrants to purchase common stock(5) |
3.4% |
|
13,864 725 |
|
13,864 725 | |||||
Punch Software LLC 7900 NW 100th Street, Suite LL6 Kansas City, MO 64153 |
Software | Senior secured notes(6)(7) Warrants to purchase Class A-1 units(5) |
1.3% |
|
8,820 200 |
|
8,820 200 | |||||
SCS Holdings II Inc. 613 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 1000 San Antonio, TX 78216 |
IT value-added reseller | Second lien senior secured notes(6) |
| 14,519 | 14,572 | |||||||
AKQA, Inc. |
Advertising | Senior secured notes(6) |
| 25,000 | 25,031 | |||||||
$ | 320,038 | $ | 317,537 | |||||||||
(Continued on next page.)
56
(1) |
Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared), we do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
(2) |
Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) |
Investment includes payment-in-kind interest. |
(4) |
Transaction also includes a commitment for additional notes and warrants upon satisfaction of certain specified conditions. |
(5) |
Expressed as a percentage of common equity outstanding, assuming conversion of any warrants or convertible securities into the underlying common equity. |
(6) |
Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(7) |
Cost and fair value reflect accretion of original issue discount. |
(8) |
Cost and fair value reflect repayment of principal. |
(9) |
Preferred stock and common stock held by limited liability company, in which we own membership interests. We hold no voting or investment control over the securities underlying our limited liability company interests. |
(10) |
Warrants only become exercisable upon the earlier of a liquidation event involving WHITTMANHART, Inc., including the sale of or initial public offering of WHITTMANHART, Inc., and the repayment of the outstanding senior secured notes. |
57
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
We determine the net asset value per share of our common stock quarterly. The net asset value per share is equal to the value of our total assets minus liabilities and any preferred stock outstanding divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. As of the date of this prospectus, we do not have any preferred stock outstanding.
Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of 1940 Act, is (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available and (ii) for all other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors.
There is no single standard for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. We are required to specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly basis. We will record unrealized depreciation on investments when we believe that an investment has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful, or when the enterprise value of the portfolio company does not currently support the cost of our debt or equity investment. Enterprise value means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and our equity security has also appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Our process for determining the fair value of a private finance investment begins with determining the enterprise value of the portfolio company. The fair value of our investment is based on the enterprise value at which the portfolio company could be sold in an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of time between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The liquidity event whereby we exit a private finance investment is generally the sale, the recapitalization or, in some cases, the initial public offering of the portfolio company. There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze its historical and projected financial results, as well as the nature and value of any collateral. We also use industry valuation benchmarks and public market comparables. We also consider other events, including private mergers and acquisitions, a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent debt or equity sale or restructuring, and include these events in the enterprise valuation process. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
If there is adequate enterprise value to support the repayment of our debt, the fair value of our loan or debt security normally corresponds to cost unless the borrowers condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value at a different amount. The fair value of equity interests in portfolio companies is determined based on various factors, including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders after the repayment of the portfolio companys debt and other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio companys equity securities, or other liquidation events. The determined equity values are generally discounted when we have a minority position, restrictions on resale, specific concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a specific company at a certain time, or other factors.
Our Board of Directors determines the value of our investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TIMs portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, we have engaged a third-party valuation firm to independently evaluate our portfolio investments and provide their reports to the
58
Valuation Committee, although the Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment.
As part of our valuation process, the third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of our portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, on October 26, 2006 our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of our Valuation Committee, approved a change in our valuation process whereby the frequency of those third-party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly.
DETERMINATIONS OF NET ASSET VALUE IN CONNECTION WITH OFFERINGS
In connection with each offering of shares of our common stock, our Board of Directors or a committee thereof is required to make the determination that we are not selling shares of our common stock at a price below the then current net asset value of our common stock at the time at which the sale is made. Our Board of Directors considers the following factors, among others, in making such determination:
| the net asset value of our common stock disclosed in the most recent periodic report we filed with the SEC; |
| our investment advisers assessment of whether any material change in the net asset value of our common stock has occurred (including through the realization of gains on the sale of our portfolio securities) from the period beginning on the date of the most recently disclosed net asset value of our common stock to the period ending two days prior to the date of the sale of our common stock; and |
| the magnitude of the difference between the net asset value of our common stock disclosed in the most recent periodic report we filed with the SEC and our investment advisers assessment of any material change in the net asset value of our common stock since the date of the most recently disclosed net asset value of our common stock, and the offering price of the shares of our common stock in the proposed offering. |
Importantly, this determination does not require that we calculate the net asset value of our common stock in connection with each offering of shares of our common stock, but instead it involves the determination by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof that we are not selling shares of our common stock at a price below the then current net asset value of our common stock at the time at which the sale is made.
Moreover, to the extent that there is even a remote possibility that we may (i) issue shares of our common stock at a price below the then current net asset value of our common stock at the time at which the sale is made or (ii) trigger the undertaking (which we provided to the SEC in our registration statements) to suspend the offering of shares of our common stock if the net asset value of our common stock fluctuates by certain amounts in certain circumstances until the prospectus is amended, our Board of Directors will elect, in the case of clause (i) above, either to postpone the offering until such time that there is no longer the possibility of the occurrence of such event or to undertake to determine the net asset value of our common stock within two days prior to any such sale to ensure that such sale will not be below our then current net asset value, and, in the case of clause (ii) above, to comply with such undertaking or to undertake to determine the net asset value of our common stock to ensure that such undertaking has not been triggered.
59
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors oversees our management. The responsibilities of each director include, among other things, the oversight of our investment activity, the quarterly valuation of our assets, and oversight of our financing arrangements. Our Board of Directors is classified into three classes with three-year terms, with the term of office of only one of the three classes expiring each year. Directors serve until their successors are elected and qualified.
Our Board of Directors maintains an Audit Committee and a Valuation Committee, and may establish additional committees in the future. Certain information with respect to each of the directors is set forth below, including their names, ages, a brief description of their recent business experience, including present occupations and employment, certain directorships that they hold, and the year in which each of them became a director of TICC. The business address of each director listed below is 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830.
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
The following directors are not interested persons as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Name and Year First Elected Director |
Term Expires |
Age | Background Information | |||
G. Peter OBrien (2003) | 2009 | 61 | Mr. OBrien was a member of the Board of Trustees of Colgate University from May 1996 to May 2005 and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Hill House, Inc., a congregate care facility for low income elderly residents, and a member of the Board of Directors of the Bridges School. Mr. OBrien retired as a Managing Director of Merrill Lynch & Co. in 1999 after working in the equity capital markets area since he joined Merrill Lynch & Co. in 1971. Mr. OBrien serves on the Board of Directors of the Legg Mason Family of Mutual Funds and The Royce Funds. | |||
Steven P. Novak (2003) | 2008 | 59 | Mr. Novak serves as President of Palladio Capital Management, LLC and as the Principal and Managing Member of the General Partner of Palladio Partners, LP, an equities hedge fund that commenced operations in July 2002. Prior to founding Palladio, Mr. Novak was a Managing Director of C.E. Unterberg, Towbin from February 1993 through December 2001. Mr. Novak serves on the Board of Directors of CyberSource Corporation, a publicly traded Internet based epayments processor company. | |||
Tonia L. Pankopf (2003) | 2007 | 39 | Tonia Pankopf is managing partner of Pareto Advisors, LLC. Previously, she was a senior analyst and managing director at Palladio Capital Management from January 2004 through April 2005. She previously served as an analyst and portfolio manager with P.A.W. Capital Partners, LP from 2001 to July 2003. Ms. Pankopf was a senior analyst and vice president at Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1999 to 2001 and at Merrill Lynch & Co. from 1998 to 1999. Ms. Pankopf currently serves on the Board of Directors of the University System of Maryland Foundation. |
60
INTERESTED DIRECTORS
Messrs. Cohen and Royce are interested persons of TICC as defined in the 1940 Act. Mr. Cohen is an interested person of TICC due to his position as Chief Executive Officer of TICC and TIM, TICCs investment adviser, and as the managing member of BDC Partners, the managing member of TIM. Mr. Royce is an interested person of TICC due to his relationship with Royce & Associates.
Name and Year First Elected Director |
Term Expires |
Age | Background Information | |||
Jonathan H. Cohen (2003) | 2009 | 42 | Mr. Cohen has served as Chief Executive Officer of both TICC and TIM, and as the managing member of BDC Partners, since 2003. In addition, Mr. Cohen has also served since 2005 as the Chief Executive Officer of T2 Advisers, LLC, which serves as the investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. Mr. Cohen is also the owner, Managing Member, and a Principal of JHC Capital Management, a registered investment adviser, and was previously a Managing Member and Principal of Privet Financial Securities, LLC, a registered broker-dealer, from 2003 to 2004. Prior to founding JHC Capital Management in 2001, Mr. Cohen managed technology research groups at Wit SoundView from 1999 to 2001. He has also managed securities research groups at Merrill Lynch & Co. from 1998 to 1999. | |||
Charles M. Royce (2003) | 2008 | 67 | Mr. Royce has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors since 2003. Mr. Royce became President and Chief Investment Officer in 1972, and a member of the Board of Managers in 2001, of Royce & Associates. He also manages or co-manages ten of Royce & Associates open- and closed-end registered funds. Mr. Royce serves on the Board of Directors of The Royce Funds. |
61
INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS
The following information pertains to our executive officers who are not directors of TICC. Certain of our executive officers may serve as directors of, or on the board of managers of, certain of our portfolio companies.
Name | Age | Background Information | ||
Saul B. Rosenthal | 38 | Mr. Rosenthal has served as Chief Operating Officer since 2003 and President since 2004 of Technology Investment Capital Corp. and its investment adviser, Technology Investment Management, and is a member of BDC Partners. Mr. Rosenthal was previously President of Privet Financial Securities, LLC, a registered broker-dealer, from 2003 to 2004. Mr. Rosenthal led the private financing/public company effort at SoundView Technology Group, an investment bank, from 2000 to 2002, where he co-founded SoundViews private equity group. In addition, Mr. Rosenthal has also served since 2005 as the President of T2 Advisers, LLC and a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally, for which T2 Advisers, LLC serves as investment adviser. | ||
Patrick F. Conroy | 50 | Mr. Conroy has served as the Chief Financial Officer since 2003, and the Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer, and Corporate Secretary since 2004 of Technology Investment Capital Corp., Technology Investment Management, and BDC Partners. He joined the Company in December 2003, and was previously a consultant on financial reporting and compliance matters, as well as an adjunct professor of accounting and finance at St. Thomas Aquinas College. Mr. Conroy has also served since 2005 as the Chief Financial Officer of T2 Advisers, LLC and the Chief Financial Officer and a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally, for which T2 Advisers, LLC serves as investment adviser. Mr. Conroy was the Chief Financial Officer of New York Mercantile Exchange from 1993 to 2003. He is a certified public accountant. |
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee and a Valuation Committee. During 2006, our Board of Directors held five Board meetings, four Audit Committee meetings, and four Valuation Committee meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and of the respective committees on which they served. We require each director to make a diligent effort to attend all Board and committee meetings, as well as each annual meeting of stockholders.
The Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter approved by our Board of Directors. The charter sets forth the responsibilities of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committees responsibilities include recommending the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with such independent registered public accounting firm the planning, scope and results of their audit of our financial statements, pre-approving the fees for services performed, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the adequacy of internal control systems, reviewing our annual financial statements and periodic filings, and receiving our audit reports and financial statements. The Audit Committee is presently composed of three persons: Messrs. Novak and OBrien and Ms. Pankopf, all of whom are considered independent under the rules promulgated by the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Novak is an audit committee financial expert as that term is defined under Item 407 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Novak meets the current independence and experience requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and, in addition, is not an interested person of the Company as that term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
62
The Nominating Committee. We do not have a nominating committee. A majority of the independent directors of the Board of Directors, in accordance with the Nasdaq Global Select Market listing standards, recommends candidates for election as directors. We do not currently have a charter or written policy with regard to the nomination process or stockholder recommendations. The absence of such a policy does not mean, however, that a stockholder recommendation would not have been considered had one been received.
Our independent directors will consider qualified director nominees recommended by stockholders when such recommendations are submitted in accordance with our bylaws and any applicable law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations. When submitting a nomination to us for consideration, a stockholder must provide certain information that would be required under applicable Commission rules, including the following minimum information for each director nominee: full name, age and address; principal occupation during the past five years; current directorships on publicly held companies and investment companies; number of shares of Company common stock owned, if any; and, a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board of Directors and to serve if elected by the stockholders.
In evaluating director nominees, the independent members of the Board of Directors consider the following factors:
| the appropriate size and composition of our Board of Directors; |
| whether or not the person is an interested person of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940; |
| the needs of the Company with respect to the particular talents and experience of its directors; |
| the knowledge, skills and experience of nominees in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of the Board of Directors; |
| familiarity with national and international business matters; |
| experience with accounting rules and practices; |
| appreciation of the relationship of our business to the changing needs of society; |
| the desire to balance the considerable benefit of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new members; and |
| all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and listing standards. |
The boards goal is to assemble a Board of Directors that brings to the Company a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.
Other than the foregoing there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the independent members of the Board of Directors may also consider such other factors as they may deem are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board of Directors also believes it appropriate for certain key members of our management to participate as members of the Board of Directors.
The independent directors of the Board of Directors identify nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board of Directors willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board of Directors with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board of Directors with that of obtaining a new perspective. If any member of the Board of Directors does not wish to continue in service or if the Board of Directors decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the independent members of the Board of Directors identify the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above. The entire Board of Directors is polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the aforementioned criteria. Research may also be performed to identify qualified individuals. To date, we have not
63
engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees although we reserve the right in the future to retain a third party search firm, if necessary.
The Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee establishes guidelines and makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the valuation of our loans and investments. The Valuation Committee is presently composed of Messrs. Novak and OBrien and Ms. Pankopf.
The Compensation Committee. We do not have a compensation committee because our executive officers do not receive any direct compensation from us.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth compensation of our directors, for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) |
All Other Compensation |
Total | |||||
Interested Directors |
||||||||
Jonathan H. Cohen |
| | | |||||
Charles M. Royce |
| | | |||||
Independent Directors |
||||||||
G. Peter OBrien |
$ | 55,000 | | $ | 55,000 | |||
Steven P. Novak |
$ | 60,000 | | $ | 60,000 | |||
Tonia L. Pankopf |
$ | 55,000 | | $ | 55,000 |
(1) |
For a discussion of the independent directors compensation, see below. |
(2) |
We do not maintain a stock or option plan, non-equity incentive plan or pension plan for our directors. |
The independent directors receive an annual fee of $35,000. In addition, the independent directors receive $2,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each Board of Directors meeting, $1,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each Valuation Committee meeting and $1,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each Audit Committee meeting. The Chairman of the Audit Committee also receives an additional annual fee of $5,000. No compensation was paid to directors who are interested persons of the Company as defined in the 1940 Act.
COMPENSATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
None of our officers receive direct compensation from the Company. Mr. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, through their ownership interest in BDC Partners, the managing member of TIM, are entitled to a portion of any profits earned by TIM, which includes any fees payable to TIM under the terms of our investment advisory agreement, less expenses incurred by TIM in performing its services under our investment advisory agreement. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal do not receive any additional compensation from TIM in connection with the management of our portfolio.
The compensation of Mr. Conroy, our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary, is paid by our administrator, BDC Partners, subject to reimbursement by us of an allocable portion of such compensation for services rendered by Mr. Conroy to TICC. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the amount of such reimbursement was approximately $425,000.
64
The management of our investment portfolio is the responsibility of our investment adviser, TIM, and our Investment Committee, which currently consists of Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer. Our Investment Committee must approve each new investment that we make. The members of our Investment Committee are not employed by us, and receive no compensation from us in connection with their portfolio management activities. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal, through their ownership of BDC Partners, the managing member of TIM, are entitled to a portion of any investment advisory fees paid by TICC to TIM.
Because our investment adviser, TIM, currently provides portfolio management services only to us, we do not believe there are any conflicts of interests with respect to TIMs management of our portfolio on the one hand, and the management of other accounts or investment vehicles by TIM on the other. However, Mr. Cohen is currently the owner and principal of JHC Capital Management, a registered investment adviser. In addition, Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer, and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member, and Royce & Associates is a non-managing member, of T2 Advisers, LLC. As a result, Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal may be subject to certain conflicts of interests with respect to their management of our portfolio on the one hand, and their respective obligations to manage JHC Capital Management and T2 Income Fund Limited through T2 Advisers, LLC on the other hand.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the additional entities that were managed by TIMs investment professionals as of March 31, 2007:
Name |
Entity |
Investment Focus |
Gross Assets(1) | ||||
Royce Technology Value Fund(2) |
Closed-end fund | Technology-related investments | $ | 20.2 million | |||
T2 Income Fund Limited(3) |
Guernsey-based fund | Global investments in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans | $ | 187.5 million |
(1) |
Amounts reflect gross assets as of March 31, 2007. |
(2) |
JHC Capital Management served as a sub-adviser to the Royce Technology Value Fund as of March 31, 2007. In May 2007, JHC Capital Management ceased serving in such capacity for the Royce Technology Value Fund. Mr. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors and our Investment Committee, is the owner and a principal of JHC Capital Management. |
(3) |
T2 Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited. Mr. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors and our Investment Committee, and Mr. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer and a member of our Investment Committee, currently serve as Chief Executive Officer, and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC. |
INVESTMENT PERSONNEL
Our investment personnel currently consists of our executive officers, Jonathan H. Cohen, Saul B. Rosenthal, who are the members of our Investment Committee, and six additional investment professionals who are employees of TIM.
The following information pertains to the senior investment personnel of TIM who are not executive officers of TICC:
Darryl M. Monasebian. Mr. Monasebian is the senior managing director and head of portfolio management of TIM. Mr. Monasebian has also served since 2005 as the senior managing director and head of
65
portfolio management of T2 Advisers, LLC, the investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. Prior to joining TIM, Mr. Monasebian was a director in the Merchant Banking Group at BNP Paribas, and prior to that was a director at Swiss Bank Corporation and a senior account officer at Citibank. He began his business career at Metropolitan Life Insurance Company as an investment analyst in the Corporate Investments Department.
Barry A. Osherow. Mr. Osherow is a principal of TIM and a principal of T2 Advisers, LLC, the investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. He has over nine years of experience in financing companies. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Osherow was vice president of Privet Financial Securities, a registered broker-dealer and financial consultant to small- to medium-sized private and public technology companies. He was previously at SoundView Technology Group from 2000 to 2002, where he was most recently employed as an associate in the Private Equity Group, which he co-founded.
Hari Srinivasan. Mr. Srinivasan is a principal and portfolio manager of TIM and a principal and portfolio manager of T2 Advisers, LLC, the investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. Previously, Mr. Srinivasan was a credit manager at Lucent Technologies from 2002 to 2005, focusing on restructuring and monetization of distressed assets in Lucents vendor finance portfolio, and credit analysis of Lucents telecom customers. Prior to that, Mr. Srinivasan was an analyst in the fixed income group at Lehman Brothers from 1998 to 2002.
The table below shows the dollar range of shares of common stock owned by each of the above-listed investment personnel and each of our officers as of June 27, 2007.
Investment Personnel of TIM |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in TICC(1) | |
Jonathan H. Cohen |
Over $1,000,000 | |
Saul B. Rosenthal |
$50,001-$100,000 | |
Darryl M. Monasebian |
$10,000-$50,000 | |
Barry A. Osherow |
$1-$10,000 | |
Hari Srinivasan |
None | |
Officers of TICC |
||
Patrick F. Conroy |
$10,000-$50,000 |
(1) |
Dollar ranges are as follows: None, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, $100,001-$500,000; $500,001-$1,000,000 or Over $1,000,000. |
COMPENSATION
None of TIMs investment personnel receive any direct compensation from us in connection with the management of our portfolio. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal, through their ownership interest in BDC Partners, the managing member of TIM, are entitled to a portion of any profits earned by TIM, which includes any fees payable to TIM under the terms of our investment advisory agreement, less expenses incurred by TIM in performing its services under our investment advisory agreement. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal do not receive any additional compensation from TIM in connection with the management of our portfolio. The compensation paid by TIM to its other investment personnel includes: (i) annual base salary; (ii) annual cash bonus; (iii) portfolio-based performance award; and (iv) individual performance award and/or individual performance bonus.
66
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Management Services
TIM serves as our investment adviser. TIM is registered as our investment adviser under the Advisers Act. Subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Directors, TIM manages our day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to us. Under the terms of our investment advisory agreement with TIM (the Investment Advisory Agreement), TIM:
| determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes; |
| identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make; |
| closes, monitors and services the investments we make; and |
| determines what securities we will purchase, retain or sell. |
TIMs services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to us are not impaired. TIM has agreed that, during the term of its Investment Advisory Agreement with us, it will not serve as investment adviser to any other public or private entity that utilizes a principal investment strategy of providing debt financing to technology-related companies similar to those we target.
Management Fee
We pay TIM a fee for its services under the Investment Advisory Agreement consisting of two componentsa base management fee and an incentive fee. The cost of both the base management fee payable to TIM, and any incentive fees earned by TIM, are ultimately be borne by our common stockholders.
The base management fee (the Base Fee) is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00% of our gross assets. For services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Base Fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and is calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any equity or debt capital raises, repurchases or redemptions during the current calendar quarter. The Base Fee for any partial quarter will be appropriately pro rated.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Fee, expenses payable under our administration agreement with BDC Partners (the Administration Agreement), and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to one-fourth of an annual hurdle rate.
For each year commencing on or after January 1, 2005, the annual hurdle rate has been determined as of the immediately preceding December 31st by adding 5.0% to the interest rate then payable on the most recently issued five-year U.S. Treasury Notes, up to a maximum annual hurdle rate of 10.0%. The annual hurdle rate for the 2006 calendar year was 9.35%. The current hurdle rate for the 2007 calendar year, calculated as of December 31, 2006, is 9.70%. Our net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also
67
included in the amount of our gross assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. In addition, in the event we realize deferred loan interest in excess of our available capital, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TIM, however, is not required to reimburse us for the portion of any fees attributable to accrued deferred loan interest in the event of a default by the obligor. The operation of the incentive fee with respect to our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
| no incentive fee is payable to TIM in any calendar quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed one fourth of the annual hurdle rate (currently 2.425% for the 2007 calendar year). |
| 20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds one-fourth of the annual hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (currently 2.425% for the 2007 calendar year) is payable to TIM (i.e., once the hurdle rate is reached, 20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income thereafter is allocated to TIM). |
The following is a graphical representation of the calculation of the income-related portion of the incentive fee:
Quarterly Incentive Fee Based on Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(expressed as a percentage of the value of net assets)
Percentage of Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
allocated to income-related portion of incentive fee
These calculations will be appropriately pro rated for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any equity or debt capital raises, repurchases or redemptions during the current calendar quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee Capital Gains, which consist of our realized capital gains for each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation for that calendar year. The amount of our Incentive Fee Capital Gains, which are calculated on a year-to-year rather than cumulative basis, may be reduced by both unrealized depreciation we record with respect to a portfolio investment in one year, as well as the realization of a loss with respect to that portfolio investment in a subsequent year. As a result, our aggregate Incentive Fee Capital Gains may be reduced in two (or more) separate years as a result of the same reduction in value of a portfolio investment (i.e., the year when that depreciation in value is recorded by us and the year when it is actually realized). In addition, our aggregate Incentive Fee Capital Gains for a particular year may be reduced by unrealized depreciation, even if the fair value of a portfolio investment remains above its initial cost as a result of unrealized appreciation in a prior year.
68
Example 1: Income Related Portion of Incentive Fee for Each Calendar Quarter (*)
Alternative 1
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%
Quarterly Hurdle rate(1) = 2.425%
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.) = 0.2%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(investment income (management fee + other expenses)) = 0.55%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed hurdle rate, therefore there is no income-related incentive fee.
Alternative 2
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 4.0%
Quarterly Hurdle rate(1) = 2.425%
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.) = 0.2%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(investment income (management fee + other expenses)) = 3.3%
Incentive fee = 20% x Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income in excess of the hurdle rate
= 20% x (3.3% 2.425%)
= 20% x 0.875%
= 0.175%
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds hurdle rate, therefore the income-related incentive fee is 0.175%
(1) | Represents 9.70% annualized hurdle rate for 2007 calendar year. |
(2) | Represents 2% annualized management fee. |
(3) | Excludes organizational and offering expenses. |
Example 2: Capital Gains Portion of Incentive Fee (*)
Capital Gains Incentive Fee = 20% x Incentive Fee Capital Gains (i.e., our realized capital gains for each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation for that calendar year)
Assumptions:
Year 1 = no realized capital gains or losses
Year 2 = 9% realized capital gains, 0% realized capital losses, 1% unrealized depreciation and 0% unrealized appreciation
Year 3 = 12% realized capital gains, 0% realized capital losses, 2% unrealized depreciation and 2% unrealized appreciation
69
Year 1 incentive fee |
Total Incentive Fee Capital Gains = 0 |
No capital gains incentive fee paid to TIM in Year 1 |
Year 2 incentive fee |
Total Incentive Fee Capital Gains = 8% |
(9% realized capital gains less 1% unrealized depreciation) |
Total capital gains incentive fee paid to TIM in Year 2 |
= 20% x 8% |
= 1.6% |
Year 3 incentive fee |
Total Incentive Fee Capital Gains = 10% |
(12% realized capital gains less 2% unrealized depreciation; unrealized appreciation has no effect) |
Total capital gains incentive fee paid to TIM in Year 3 |
= 20% x 10% |
= 2% |
(*) | The hypothetical amount of returns shown are based on a percentage of our total net assets and assumes no leverage. There is no guarantee that positive returns will be realized and actual returns may vary from those shown in this example. |
Payment of our Expenses
All personnel of our investment adviser when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services, and the compensation and expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by BDC Partners, the investment advisers managing member. We are responsible for all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including, without limitation, the cost of calculating our net asset value; the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of our common stock and other securities; investment advisory fees; fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making investments; transfer agent and custodial fees; federal and state registration fees; any exchange listing fees; federal, state and local taxes; independent directors fees and expenses; brokerage commissions; costs of proxy statements, stockholders reports and notices; fidelity bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums; direct costs such as printing, mailing, long distance telephone, staff, independent audits and outside legal costs and all other expenses incurred by either BDC Partners or us in connection with administering our business, including payments under the administration agreement that will be based upon our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel. All of these expenses are ultimately borne by our common stockholders.
Duration and Termination
Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect if approved annually by our Board of Directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our directors who are not interested persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon not more than 60 days written notice to the other. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our Business and StructureWe are dependent upon TIMs key management personnel for our future success, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen and Saul B. Rosenthal.
Indemnification
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and
70
obligations, TIM and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it, including without limitation BDC Partners, are entitled to indemnification from TICC for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of TIMs services under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of TICC.
Organization of the Investment Adviser
TIM is a Delaware limited liability company that is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act. BDC Partners, a Delaware limited liability company, is its managing member and provides the investment adviser with all personnel necessary to manage our day-to-day operations and provide the services under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The principal address of TIM and of BDC Partners is 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830.
Royce & Associates, a Delaware limited liability company, is the investment advisers non-managing member. Royce & Associates has agreed to make Mr. Royce or certain other portfolio managers available to the investment adviser to provide certain consulting services without compensation. Royce & Associates is a wholly owned subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc.
Board Consideration of the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement
Our Board of Directors determined at a meeting held on April 30, 2007, to re-approve the Investment Advisory Agreement. In its consideration of the re-approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors focused on information it had received relating to, among other things:
| the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to us by TIM; |
| comparative data with respect to advisory fees or similar expenses paid by other business development companies with similar investment objectives; |
| our historical and projected operating expenses and expense ratio compared to business development companies with similar investment objectives; |
| any existing and potential sources of indirect income to TIM or BDC Partners from their relationships with us and the profitability of those relationships, including through the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement; |
| information about the services to be performed and the personnel performing such services under the Investment Advisory Agreement; |
| the organizational capability and financial condition of TIM and its affiliates; |
| TIMs practices regarding the selection and compensation of brokers that may execute our portfolio transactions and the brokers provision of brokerage and research services to TIM; and |
| the possibility of obtaining similar services from other third party service providers or through an internally managed structure. |
Based on the information reviewed and the discussions, the Board of Directors, including a majority of the non-interested directors, concluded that fees payable to the investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement were reasonable in relation to the services to be provided. The Board of Directors did not assign relative weights to the above factors or the other factors considered by it. In addition, the Board of Directors did not reach any specific conclusion on each factor considered, but conducted an overall analysis of these factors. Individual members of the Board of Directors may have given different weights to different factors.
71
ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
Pursuant to a separate Administration Agreement, BDC Partners furnishes us with office facilities, together with equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities. Under the Administration Agreement, BDC Partners also performs, or oversees the performance of our required administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, BDC Partners assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. Payments under the Administration Agreement are based upon our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller, and other administrative support personnel. The Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the other party.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, BDC Partners and its officers, manager, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from TICC for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of BDC Partners services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for TICC.
72
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
As a business development company, we have elected to be treated, and intend to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses (the Annual Distribution Requirement).
TAXATION AS A REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANY
If we:
| qualify as a RIC; and |
| satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement; |
then we will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain (i.e., realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) we distribute to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.
We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding years (the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement). We currently intend to make sufficient distributions each taxable year to satisfy the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement.
In order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:
| at all times during each taxable year, have in effect an election to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act; |
| derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities and (2) net income derived from an interest in certain qualified publicly traded partnerships (QPTPs); and |
| diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year: |
| at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and |
| no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of (1) one issuer, (2) two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (3) one or more QPTPs. |
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued
73
with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Because any original issue discount accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount. The remainder of this discussion assumes we will qualify as a RIC for each taxable year.
TAXATION OF U.S. STOCKHOLDERS
Distributions by us generally will be taxable to U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains (for purposes of this discussion, a U.S. stockholder is any stockholder who is not a Non-U.S. Person as defined below). Distributions of our investment company taxable income (which is, generally, our ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions of our net capital gains (that is, the excess of our realized net long-term capital gains in excess of our realized net short-term capital losses) properly designated by us as capital gain dividends will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as long-term capital gains regardless of the U.S. stockholders holding period for its common stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. For taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2010, distributions of investment company taxable income that is designated by us as being derived from qualified dividend income will be taxed in the hands of non-corporate stockholders at the rates applicable to long term capital gain, provided that holding period and other requirements are met by both the stockholders and us. (However, distributions paid by us generally will not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income, since our income generally will not consist of dividends). Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits first will reduce a U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in such U.S. stockholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such U.S. stockholder. For a summary of the tax rates applicable to capital gains, including capital gain dividends, see the discussion below.
Under our dividend reinvestment plan, if a U.S. stockholder owns shares of common stock registered in its own name, the U.S. stockholder will have all cash distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of common stock unless the U.S. stockholder opts out of our dividend reinvestment plan by delivering a written notice to our dividend paying agent prior to the record date of the next dividend or distribution. (We currently intend to pay only our ordinary income distributions in cash.) See Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Any distributions reinvested under the plan will nevertheless remain taxable to the U.S. stockholder. The U.S. stockholder will have an adjusted basis in the additional common shares purchased through the plan equal to the amount of the reinvested distribution. The additional shares will have a new holding period commencing on the day following the day on which the shares are credited to the U.S. stockholders account.
We may opt to retain some or all of our capital gains, but to designate the retained amount as a deemed distribution. In that case, among other consequences, we will pay corporate-level tax on the retained amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit or refund equal to its allocable share of the corporate-level tax we pay on the retained capital gain. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the U.S. stockholders cost basis for its common stock. Since we expect to pay tax on any retained capital gains at our regular corporate capital gain tax rate, and since that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual U.S. stockholders will be treated as having paid will exceed the tax they owe on the capital gain dividend. Such excess generally may be claimed as a credit or refund against the U.S. stockholders other U.S. federal income tax obligations.
We will be subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT), but any items that are treated differently for AMT purposes must be apportioned between us and our stockholders and this may affect the stockholders AMT
74
liabilities. Although regulations explaining the precise method of apportionment have not yet been issued by the Internal Revenue Service, we intend in general to apportion these items in the same proportion that dividends paid to each stockholder bear to our taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction), unless we determine that a different method for a particular item is warranted under the circumstances.
For purposes of determining (i) whether the Annual Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and (ii) the amount of capital gains dividends paid for that year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make such an election, the U.S. stockholder generally will still be treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which the distribution is made and any capital gain dividend will be treated as a capital gain dividend to the U.S. stockholder. However, any dividend declared by us in October, November, or December of any calendar year, payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in such a month and actually paid during January of the following year, will be treated as if it had been received by our U.S. stockholders on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
You should consider the tax implications of buying common stock just prior to a distribution. Even if the price of the common stock includes the amount of the forthcoming distribution, you will be taxed upon receipt of the distribution and will not be entitled to offset the distribution against the tax basis in your common stock.
You may recognize taxable gain or loss if you sell or exchange your common stock. The amount of the gain or loss will be measured by the difference between your adjusted tax basis in your common stock and the amount of the proceeds you receive in exchange for such stock. Any gain or loss arising from or, in the case of distributions in excess of the sum of our current and accumulated earnings and profits and your tax basis in the stock, treated as arising from the sale or exchange of our common stock generally will be a capital gain or loss if the common stock is held as a capital asset. This capital gain or loss normally will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss if you have held your common stock for more than one year. Otherwise, it will be classified as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss arising from the sale or exchange of common stock held for six months or less generally will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain dividends received, or treated as deemed distributed, with respect to such stock and, for this purpose, the special rules of Section 852(b)(4)(C) of the Code generally apply in determining the holding period of such stock. The ability to deduct capital losses may be subject to other limitations under the Code.
In general, individual U.S. stockholders currently are subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15% (with lower rates applying to taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax rate brackets) for years beginning on or before December 31, 2010 on their net long-term capital gain, i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses for a taxable year, including any long-term capital gain derived from an investment in our common stock. Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are subject to U.S. federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35% rate also applied to ordinary income. Tax rates imposed by states and local jurisdictions on capital gain and ordinary income may differ.
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice detailing, on a per share and per distribution basis, the amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable income for such year as ordinary income, long-term capital gain and qualified dividend income, if any. In addition, the U.S. federal tax status of each years distributions generally will be reported to the Internal Revenue Service. Distributions may also be subject to additional state, local, and foreign taxes depending on a U.S. stockholders particular situation. Dividends distributed by us generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction.
Backup withholding may apply to taxable distributions on our common stock with respect to certain non-corporate U.S. stockholders. Such U.S. stockholders generally will be subject to backup withholding unless the U.S. stockholder provides its correct taxpayer identification number and certain other information, certified under penalties of perjury, to the dividend paying agent, or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup
75
withholding. Any amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit against the U.S. stockholders U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the proper information is provided to the Internal Revenue Service.
TAXATION OF NON-U.S. PERSONS
For purposes of the following discussion, a Non-U.S. Person is a beneficial owner of shares of stock that is not, for U.S. federal income tax purposes (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any State or the District of Columbia or otherwise treated or taxed as a United States corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source, (iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (v) a certain electing trust. If a partnership holds shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships holding shares should consult their tax advisor as to whether they are Non-U.S. Persons.
Whether an investment in our common stock is appropriate for a Non-U.S. Person will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. Non-U.S. Persons should consult their tax advisors before investing in our common stock.
Distributions of our investment company taxable income to stockholders that are Non-U.S. Persons will currently be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits unless the distributions are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Person, and, if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States, in which case the distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the ordinary income rates applicable to U.S. persons. In that case, we will not have to withhold U.S. federal withholding tax if the Non-U.S. Person complies with applicable certification and disclosure requirements. Special certification requirements apply to a Non-U.S. Person that is a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, and such entities are urged to consult their own tax advisors. Dividends paid to Non-U.S. Persons that are derived from short-term capital gains and certain qualifying net interest income (including income from original issue discount and market discount), and that are properly designated by us as interest-related dividends or short-term capital gain dividends, will generally not be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax. This provision generally would apply to distributions with respect to taxable years beginning before January 1, 2008. It is not certain that any of our distributions will be designated as eligible for this exemption from withholding tax.
Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a stockholder that is a Non-U.S. Person, and gains realized by a Non-U.S. Person upon the sale or redemption of our common stock, will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless the distributions or gains, as the case may be, are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Person and, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Person in the United States, or, in the case of an individual, the Non-U.S. Person was present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions are met.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions, a stockholder that is a Non-U.S. Person will be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the stockholders allocable share of the corporate-level tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed; however, in order to obtain the refund, the Non-U.S. Person must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the Non-U.S. Person would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return.
76
For a corporate Non-U.S. Person, distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon the sale or redemption of our common stock that are effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable treaty). Accordingly, investment in our stock may not be appropriate for a Non-U.S. Person.
Under our dividend reinvestment plan, if a Non-U.S. Person owns shares of common stock registered in its own name, the Non-U.S. Person will have all cash distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of common stock unless it opts out of our dividend reinvestment plan by delivering a written notice to our dividend paying agent prior to the record date of the next dividend or distribution. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan. If the distribution is a distribution of our investment company taxable income and it is not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Person (or, if a treaty applies, it is not attributable to a permanent establishment), the amount distributed (to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits) will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) and only the net after-tax amount will be reinvested in common shares. If the distribution is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Person, generally the full amount of the distribution will be reinvested in the plan and will nevertheless be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the ordinary income rates applicable to U.S. persons. The Non-U.S. Person will have an adjusted basis in the additional common shares purchased through the plan equal to the amount reinvested. The additional shares will have a new holding period commencing on the day following the day on which the shares are credited to the Non-U.S. Persons account.
A Non-U.S. Person who is a nonresident alien individual, and who is otherwise subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax, may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax on dividends unless the Non-U.S. Person provides us or the dividend paying agent with an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a Non-U.S. Person or the Non-U.S. Person otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Non-U.S. Persons should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local, and foreign tax, consequences of an investment in our common stock.
FAILURE TO QUALIFY AS A RIC
If we were unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC, we would be subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to stockholders, nor would they be required to be made. Distributions would generally be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary distribution income eligible, under current law, for the 15% maximum rate to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the distributions received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholders tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
77
REGULATION AS A BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
GENERAL
A business development company is regulated by the 1940 Act. A business development company must be organized in the United States for the purpose of investing in or lending to primarily private companies and making managerial assistance available to them. A business development company may use capital provided by public stockholders and from other sources to invest in long-term, private investments in businesses. A business development company provides stockholders the ability to retain the liquidity of a publicly traded stock, while sharing in the possible benefits, if any, of investing in primarily privately owned companies.
We may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a business development company unless authorized by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, as required by the 1940 Act. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of such companys voting securities present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company are present or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. We do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.
As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a business development company must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of our directors must be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. Additionally, we are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect the business development company. Furthermore, as a business development company, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to the company or our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such persons office.
As a business development company, we are required to meet a coverage ratio of the value of total assets to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we may issue in the future, of at least 200%. We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.
We are not generally able to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our Business and StructureRegulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then- current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In addition, we may generally issue new shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value in rights offerings to existing stockholders, in payment of dividends and in certain other limited circumstances.
We may be examined by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act.
As a business development company, we are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our Business and Structure.
QUALIFYING ASSETS
As a business development company, we may not acquire any asset other than qualifying assets unless, at the time we make the acquisition, the value of our qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the value of our total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are:
| Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering, the issuer of which is an eligible portfolio company; |
78
| Securities received in exchange for or distributed with respect to securities described in the bullet above or pursuant to the exercise of options, warrants or rights relating to such securities; and |
| Cash, cash items, government securities or high quality debt securities (within the meaning of the 1940 Act), maturing in one year or less from the time of investment. |
An eligible portfolio company is generally a domestic company that is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by a business development company) and that:
| does not have a class of securities with respect to which a broker may extend margin credit at the time the acquisition is made; |
| is controlled by the business development company and has an affiliate of a business development company on its board of directors; |
| does not have any class of securities listed on a national securities exchange; or |
| meets such other criteria as may be established by the SEC. |
Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a business development company beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company.
In October 2006, the SEC re-proposed rules providing for an additional definition of eligible portfolio company. As re-proposed, the rule would expand the definition of eligible portfolio company to include certain public companies that list their securities on a national securities exchange. The SEC is seeking comment regarding the application of this proposed rule to companies with: (1) a public float of less than $75 million; (2) a market capitalization of less than $150 million; or (3) a market capitalization of less than $250 million. There is no assurance that such proposal will be adopted or what the final proposal will entail.
In addition, a business development company must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in eligible portfolio companies, or in other securities that are consistent with its purpose as a business development company.
SIGNIFICANT MANAGERIAL ASSISTANCE
To include certain securities described above as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, a business development company must offer to the issuer of those securities managerial assistance such as providing guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations, or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company. We offer to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies.
INVESTMENT CONCENTRATION
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. In this respect, we intend to concentrate in the technology-related sector and to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology-related companies. This 80% policy is not a fundamental policy and therefore may be changed without the approval of our stockholders. However, we may not change or modify this policy unless we provide our stockholders with at least 60 days prior notice. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to our InvestmentsOur portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies.
CODE OF ETHICS
As required by the 1940 Act, we maintain a code of ethics that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain transactions by our personnel. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our
79
Business and StructureThere are significant potential conflicts of interest. Our code of ethics generally does not permit investments by our employees in securities that may be purchased or held by us. You may read and copy our code of ethics at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-202-551-8090. In addition, our code of ethics is available on the EDGAR Database on the SECs Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain copies of our code of ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following Email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
We and our investment adviser have adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, and are required to review these compliance policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation, and designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes a wide variety of new regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. Many of these requirements affect us. For example:
| Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the 1934 Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer must certify the accuracy of the financial statements contained in our periodic reports; |
| Pursuant to Item 307 of Regulation S-K, our periodic reports must disclose our conclusions about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures; |
| Pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the 1934 Act, our management must prepare a report regarding its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, which must be audited by our independent registered public accounting firm; and |
| Pursuant to Item 308 of Regulation S-K and Rule 13a-15 of the 1934 Act, our periodic reports must disclose whether there were significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICIES
The restrictions identified as fundamental below, along with our investment objective of seeking to maximize total return, are our only fundamental policies. Fundamental policies may not be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, as defined in the 1940 Act. The percentage restrictions set forth below, apply at the time a transaction is effected, and a subsequent change in a percentage resulting from market fluctuations or any cause will not require us to dispose of portfolio securities or to take other action to satisfy the percentage restriction.
As a matter of fundamental policy, we will not: (1) act as an underwriter of securities of other issuers (except to the extent that we may be deemed an underwriter of securities we purchase that must be registered under the 1933 Act before they may be offered or sold to the public); (2) purchase or sell real estate or interests in real estate or real estate investment trusts (except that we may (A) purchase and sell real estate or interests in
80
real estate in connection with the orderly liquidation of investments, or in connection with foreclosure on collateral, (B) own the securities of companies that are in the business of buying, selling or developing real estate or (C) finance the purchase of real estate by our portfolio companies); (3) sell securities short (except with regard to managing the risks associated with publicly-traded securities issued by our portfolio companies); (4) purchase securities on margin (except to the extent that we may purchase securities with borrowed money); or (5) engage in the purchase or sale of commodities or commodity contracts, including futures contracts (except where necessary in working out distressed loan or investment situations or in hedging the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations), and, in such cases, only after all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have been obtained.
We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public resale, be deemed an underwriter as that term is defined in the 1933 Act. Our intention is to not write (sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated with the publicly-traded securities of our portfolio companies, except that we may enter into hedging transactions to manage the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations, and, in such cases, only after all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have been obtained. However, we may purchase or otherwise receive warrants to purchase the common stock or other equity securities of our portfolio companies in connection with acquisition financing or other investment. Similarly, in connection with an acquisition, we may acquire rights to require the issuers of acquired securities or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances. We also do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, unless otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act, we currently cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting securities of any registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one investment company or invest, in the aggregate, in excess of 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one or more investment companies. With regard to that portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by investment companies, it should be noted that such investments might subject our stockholders to additional expenses.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to our investment adviser, TIM. The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of TIM are set forth below. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by TIM and our non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change. For purposes of these Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures described below, we our and us refers to TIM.
Introduction
As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, we have a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of our clients. As part of this duty, we recognize that we must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of our clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for our investment advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.
Proxy Policies
We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interests of our clients shareholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a shareholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by our clients. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our clients portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there exist compelling long-term reasons to do so.
81
Our proxy voting decisions are made by the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our clients investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to our Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Proxy Voting Records
You may obtain information about how we voted proxies by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Compliance Officer, Technology Investment Management, LLC, 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, CT 06830.
PERIODIC REPORTING AND AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have registered our common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and have reporting obligations thereunder, including the requirement that we file annual and quarterly reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this annual report contains financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accounting firm. You may obtain our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K on our website at http://www.ticc.com free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports electronically with the SEC.
NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET REQUIREMENTS
We have adopted certain policies and procedures intended to comply with the Nasdaq Global Select Markets corporate governance rules. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all future listing standards that are approved by the SEC and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
82
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan, through which all dividends are paid to stockholders in the form of additional shares of our common stock, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below. In this way, a stockholder can maintain an undiluted investment in us and still allow us to pay out the required distributable income.
No action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to receive a distribution in shares of our common stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive an entire distribution in cash by notifying Computershare Trust Company, N.A., the plan administrator and our transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is received by the plan administrator no later than 10 days prior to the record date for distributions to stockholders. The plan administrator will set up an account for shares acquired through the plan for each stockholder who has not elected to receive distributions in cash and hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a participant, received in writing not less than 10 days prior to the record date, the plan administrator will, instead of crediting shares to the participants account, issue a certificate registered in the participants name for the number of whole shares of our common stock and a check for any fractional share.
Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other financial intermediary may receive distributions in cash by notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their election.
We use only newly-issued shares to implement the plan, whether our shares are trading at a premium or at a discount to net asset value. The number of shares to be issued to a stockholder is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to such stockholder by the market price per share of our common stock at the close of regular trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the valuation date for such distribution. Market price per share on that date will be the closing price for such shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or, if no sale is reported for such day, at the average of their electronically-reported bid and asked prices. The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after giving effect to payment of the distribution cannot be established until the value per share at which additional shares will be issued has been determined and elections of our stockholders have been tabulated.
There is no charge to stockholders for receiving their distributions in the form of additional shares of our common stock. The plan administrators fees for handling distributions in stock are paid by us. There are no brokerage charges with respect to shares we have issued directly as a result of distributions payable in stock. If a participant elects by written or telephonic notice to the plan administrator to have the plan administrator sell part or all of the shares held by the plan administrator in the participants account and remit the proceeds to the participant, the plan administrator is authorized to deduct a $2.50 transaction fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock are subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in cash. A stockholders basis for determining gain or loss upon the sale of stock received in a distribution from us will be equal to the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to the stockholder.
The plan may be terminated by us upon notice in writing mailed to each participant at least 30 days prior to any record date for the payment of any dividend or distribution by us. All correspondence concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator by mail at 250 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021 or by phone at 1-800-426-5523.
83
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of each of our directors and executive officers, and each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and our executive officers and directors as a group, as of June 27, 2007.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities.
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that each beneficial owner set forth in the table has sole voting and investment power and has the same address as us. Our address is 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut, 06830.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Number of Shares Owned Beneficially(1) |
Percentage of Class(2) |
|||
Interested Directors |
|||||
Jonathan H. Cohen |
150,300 | * | |||
Charles M. Royce |
111,411 | * | |||
Independent Directors |
|||||
Steven P. Novak |
2,349 | * | |||
G. Peter OBrien |
18,754 | * | |||
Tonia L. Pankopf |
4,507 | * | |||
Executive Officers |
|||||
Saul B. Rosenthal |
4,533 | * | |||
Patrick F. Conroy |
1,413 | * | |||
Executive officers and directors as a group |
293,267 | 1.5 | % |
* | Represents less than one percent. |
(1) |
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
(2) |
Based on a total of 19,810,567 shares of the Companys common stock issued and outstanding on June 27, 2007. |
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors as of June 27, 2007. We are not part of a family of investment companies, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
Name of Director |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned(1)(2) | |
Interested Directors |
||
Jonathan H. Cohen |
Over $100,000 | |
Charles M. Royce |
Over $100,000 | |
Independent Directors |
||
Steven P. Novak |
$10,001 - $50,000 | |
G. Peter OBrien |
Over $100,000 | |
Tonia L. Pankopf |
$50,001 - $100,000 |
(1) |
The dollar ranges are: None, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, or Over $100,000. |
(2) |
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned in us is based on the closing price for of common stock of $16.17 on June 27, 2007 on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
84
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with TIM. TIM is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TIM is owned by Royce & Associates as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TIM, manages the business and internal affairs of TIM. In addition, BDC Partners provides us with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement. Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, as well as a director, is the managing member of and controls BDC Partners. Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, is also the President and Chief Operating Officer of TIM and a member of BDC Partners.
Charles M. Royce, a director and the non-executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, is President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates. Royce & Associates as the non-managing member of our investment adviser, does not take part in the management or participate in the operations of TIM; however, Royce & Associates has agreed to make Mr. Royce or certain other portfolio managers available to TIM to provide certain consulting services without compensation. Royce & Associates is a wholly owned subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc. JHC Capital Management, a registered investment adviser owned by Mr. Cohen, previously served as the sub-adviser to the Royce Technology Value Fund until May 2007.
In addition, Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member, and Royce & Associates is a non-managing member, of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of TIM, BDC Partners and TICC, serves as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer for both T2 Income Fund Limited and T2 Advisers, LLC. Messrs. Rosenthal and Conroy also each serve as a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited.
In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented a policy and procedures whereby our investment advisers investment committee, pursuant to authority delegated to it by our Board of Directors, will review the facts and circumstances of each transaction for any possible affiliations, close or remote, between the portfolio company in which we intend to invest and (i) any of our officers, directors, employees or affiliates thereof; (ii) our investment adviser, TIM; (iii) our administrator, BDC Partners; or (iv) any officers, members, employees or affiliates thereof of TIM or BDC Partners. Mr. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, currently serve on the investment committee of our investment adviser.
We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that no affiliations prohibited by the 1940 Act exist or, if such affiliations exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek board review and approval or exemptive relief for such transaction. Our Board of Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.
We have also adopted a code of ethics which applies to, among others, our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as every officer, director and employee of TICC. Our code of ethics requires that all employees and directors avoid any conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, between an individuals personal interests and the interests of TICC. Pursuant to our code of ethics, each employee and director must disclose any conflicts of interest, or actions or relationships that might give rise to a conflict, to our Chief Operating Officer. Our Audit Committee is charged with monitoring and making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding policies and practices relating to our code of ethics, including approving any waivers thereof.
85
The following description is based on relevant portions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and on our charter and bylaws. This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer you to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions summarized below.
CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of stock, par value $.01 per share, all of which is initially designated as common stock. We have listed our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol TICC. There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase our stock. No stock has been authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans. Under Maryland law, our stockholders generally are not personally liable for our debts or obligations.
At June 27, 2007 there were 19,810,567 shares of common stock outstanding. The following are our outstanding classes of securities as of June 27, 2007:
(1) |
(2) Amount |
(3) Amount Held by |
(4) Amount | |||
Common Stock |
100,000,000 | | 19,810,567 |
Under our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock without obtaining stockholder approval. As permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter provides that the Board of Directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue.
Common Stock
All shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings, assets, dividends and voting privileges and, when they are issued, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if, as and when authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by us out of assets legally available therefore. Shares of our common stock have no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and are freely transferable, except where their transfer is restricted by federal and state securities laws or by contract. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of TICC, each share of our common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of our preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, the holders of our common stock will possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock will elect all of our directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares will be unable to elect any director.
Preferred Stock
Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, including preferred stock. The cost of any such reclassification would be borne by our existing common stockholders. Prior to issuance of shares of each class or series, the Board of Directors is required by Maryland law and by our charter to set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting
86
powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series. Thus, the Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. You should note, however, that any issuance of preferred stock must comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and before any dividend or other distribution is made with respect to our common stock and before any purchase of common stock is made, such preferred stock together with all other senior securities must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total assets after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2) the holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred stock are in arrears by two years or more. Certain matters under the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock. For example, holders of preferred stock would vote separately from the holders of common stock on a proposal to cease operations as a business development company. We believe that the availability for issuance of preferred stock will provide us with increased flexibility in structuring future financings and acquisitions. We do not currently have any plans to issue preferred stock, however.
DEBT SECURITIES
We borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TIM, will be borne by our common stockholders. On May 18, 2005, we entered into an uncommitted $35 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Bayerishe Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG (HVB), as administrative agent and lender. On October 13, 2005, we entered into an agreement amending the Credit Facility to increase the Credit Facility from $35 million to $100 million through February 2006, with Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) as an additional lender under the amended Credit Facility. Effective February 16, 2006, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which RBC replaced HVB as administrative agent under our Credit Facility. Concurrent with its appointment, RBC agreed to make $40 million available under the Credit Facility.
On May 7, 2007, we amended our restated Credit Facility, with RBC as an agent and a lender, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) as an additional lender. Under the amended Credit Facility, the amount of our Credit Facility was increased to $150 million, with each lender providing $75 million under the facility. On June 27, 2007, we entered into a second amendment to the Credit Facility. Under the second amendment, the amount of our Credit Facility has been increased to $180 million and Commerzbank had been added as an additional lender, providing a $30 million commitment. The Credit Facility supplements our equity capital and provides funding for additional portfolio investments, as well as general corporate matters. All amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable within one year of the date of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of April 11, 2008. Under the Credit Facility agreement we must satisfy monthly several portfolio covenant requirements including minimum market value, weighted average maturity, and average weighted coupon rate on all secured transaction assets, as well as limitations on the principal amounts of eligible transaction assets. In addition, we must comply with other general covenants including indebtedness, liens and pledges, restricted payments, mergers and consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
LIMITATION ON LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS; INDEMNIFICATION AND ADVANCE OF EXPENSES
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. Our charter contains such
87
a provision which eliminates directors and officers liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while a director and at our request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her status as a present or former director or officer and to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while a director and at our request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and who is made a party to the proceeding by reason of his service in that capacity from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her status as a present or former director or officer and to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. The charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities described above and any of our employees or agents or any employees or agents of our predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, we will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such person would be subject by reason of such persons willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our insurance policy does not currently provide coverage for claims, liabilities and expenses that may arise out of activities that our present or former directors or officers have performed for another entity at our request. There is no assurance that such entities will in fact carry such insurance. However, we note that we do not expect to request our present or former directors or officers to serve another entity as a director, officer, partner or trustee unless we can obtain insurance providing coverage for such persons for any claims, liabilities or expenses that may arise out of their activities while serving in such capacities.
88
PROVISIONS OF THE MARYLAND GENERAL CORPORATION LAW AND OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a potential acquiror to acquire us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with our Board of Directors. We believe that the benefits of these provisions outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of such proposals may improve their terms.
Classified Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. The initial terms of the first, second and third classes expire in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Beginning in 2004, upon expiration of their current terms, directors of each class will be elected to serve for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify and each year one class of directors will be elected by the stockholders. A classified board may render a change in control of us or removal of our incumbent management more difficult. We believe, however, that the longer time required to elect a majority of a classified Board of Directors will help to ensure the continuity and stability of our management and policies.
Election of Directors
Our charter and bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors will be required to elect a director. Pursuant to our charter, our Board of Directors may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect directors.
Number of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
Our charter provides that the number of directors will be set only by the Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that a majority of our entire Board of Directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, the number of directors may never be less than one nor more than twelve. Except as may be provided by the Board of Directors in setting the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, any and all vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
Under Maryland law, a director on a classified board may be removed only for cause and then only by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.
Action by Stockholders
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders or by unanimous consent in lieu of a meeting. These provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual meeting.
Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder Proposals
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors and the proposal of business to be considered by stockholders may be made
89
only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors at a special meeting may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) provided that the Board of Directors has determined that directors will be elected at the meeting, by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice of nominations and other business is to afford our Board of Directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by our Board of Directors, to inform stockholders and make recommendations about such qualifications or business, as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our Board of Directors any power to disapprove stockholder nominations for the election of directors or proposals recommending certain action, they may have the effect of precluding a contest for the election of directors or the consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling of Special Meetings of Stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called by our Board of Directors and certain of our officers. Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the satisfaction of certain procedural and informational requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a special meeting of stockholders will be called by the secretary of the corporation upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting.
Approval of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Charter and Bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Under our charter, provided that at least 75% of our directors then in office have approved and declared the action advisable and submitted such action to the stockholders, our dissolution, an amendment to our charter that requires stockholder approval, a merger, or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets or a similar transaction outside the ordinary course of business, must be approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. If an extraordinary matter submitted to stockholders by the Board of Directors is approved and advised by less than 75% of our directors, such matter will require approval by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
Our charter and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will have the exclusive power to make, alter, amend or repeal any provision of our bylaws.
No Appraisal Rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection with the Control Shares Act discussed below, as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter provides that stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
90
Control Share Acquisitions
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter (the Control Share Act). Shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
| one-tenth or more but less than one-third; |
| one-third or more but less than a majority; or |
| a majority or more of all voting power. |
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an acquiror crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition may compel the Board of Directors of the corporation to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then the corporation may repurchase for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right of the corporation to repurchase control shares is subject to certain conditions and limitations, including, as provided in our bylaws, compliance with the 1940 Act. Fair value is determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. However, we will amend our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Act only if the Board of Directors determines that it would be in our best interests and if the SEC staff does not object to our determination that our being subject to the Control Share Act does not conflict with the 1940 Act.
91
Business Combinations
Under Maryland law, business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder (the Business Combination Act). These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
| any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporations shares; or |
| an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation. |
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
| 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and |
| two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder. |
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporations common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the Board of Directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution that any business combination between us and any other person is exempted from the provisions of the Business Combination Act, provided that the business combination is first approved by the Board of Directors, including a majority of the directors who are not interested persons as defined in the 1940 Act. This resolution, however, may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If this resolution is repealed, or the Board of Directors does not otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Conflict with 1940 Act
Our bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision of the Maryland General Corporation Law, including the Control Share Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to such Act) and the Business Combination Act, or any provision of our charter or bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
92
We may offer, from time to time, up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock. We may sell the shares of our common stock through underwriters or dealers, directly to one or more purchasers, through agents or through a combination of any such methods of sale. Any underwriter or agent involved in the offer and sale of the shares of our common stock will be named in the applicable prospectus supplement.
The distribution of the shares of our common stock may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions, including sales at the market to or through a market maker or into an existing trading market, on an exchange or otherwise, for shares, at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices, provided, however, that the offering price per share of our common stock must equal or exceed the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time of the offering.
In connection with the sale of the shares of our common stock, underwriters or agents may receive compensation from us or from purchasers of the shares of our common stock, for whom they may act as agents, in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions. Underwriters may sell shares of our common stock to or through dealers and such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for whom they may act as agents. Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the distribution of shares of our common stock may be deemed to be underwriters under the Securities Act, and any discounts and commissions they receive from us and any profit realized by them on the resale of shares of our common stock may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act. Any such underwriter or agent will be identified and any such compensation received from us will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Any common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement will be quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, or another exchange on which the common stock is traded.
Under agreements into which we may enter, underwriters, dealers and agents who participate in the distribution of shares of our common stock may be entitled to indemnification by us against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Underwriters, dealers and agents may engage in transactions with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of business.
We may also enter derivative or other hedging transactions with financial institutions. These financial institutions may in turn engage in sales of our common stock to hedge their position, deliver this prospectus in connection with some or all of those sales and use the shares covered by this prospectus to close out any short position created in connection with those sales. We may also sell shares of our common stock using this prospectus and deliver common stock covered by this prospectus to close out such short positions, or loan or pledge our common stock to financial institutions that in turn may sell the shares of our common stock using this prospectus. We may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of our common stock covered by this prospectus to support a derivative or hedging position or other obligation and, if we default in the performance of our obligations, the pledges or secured parties may offer and sell our common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus.
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase shares of our common stock from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment and delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks, insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the condition that the purchase of shares of our common stock shall not at the time of delivery be prohibited under the laws of the jurisdiction to which such purchaser is subject. The underwriters and such other agents will not have any responsibility in
93
respect of the validity or performance of such contracts. Such contracts will be subject only to those conditions set forth in the prospectus supplement, and the prospectus supplement will set forth the commission payable for solicitation of such contracts.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or independent broker-dealer will not be greater than 10% for the sale of any securities being registered and 0.5% for due diligence.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, shares of our common stock offered hereby will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers.
The legality of our shares of common stock offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington, D.C. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for underwriters, if any, by the counsel named in the prospectus supplement.
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our securities are held under a custody agreement by State Street Bank and Trust Company. The address of the custodian is 225 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110. Computershare Trust Company, N.A. acts as our transfer, dividend paying and reinvestment plan agent and registrar. The principal business address of our transfer agent, dividend paying and reinvestment plan agent and registrar is 250 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, the related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2006, and the senior securities table as of December 31, 2006, have been included herein in reliance upon the reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm located at 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers in the normal course of our business. Subject to policies established by our Board of Directors, our investment adviser is primarily responsible for the execution of the publicly traded securities portion of our portfolio transactions and the allocation of brokerage commissions. The investment adviser does not execute transactions through any particular broker or dealer, but seeks to obtain the best net results for TICC, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of the firm and the firms risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities. While the investment adviser will generally seek reasonably competitive trade execution costs, TICC will not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available. Subject to applicable legal requirements, the investment adviser may select a broker based partly upon brokerage or research services provided to the investment adviser and TICC and any other clients. In return for such services, we may pay a higher commission than other brokers would charge if the investment adviser determines in good faith that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided.
94
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a registration statement on Form N-2 together with all amendments and related exhibits under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The registration statement contains additional information about us and the securities being offered by this prospectus.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You can inspect any materials we file with the SEC, without charge, at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. The information we file with the SEC is available free of charge by contacting us at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, CT 06830 or by telephone at (203) 983-5275 or on our website at http://www.ticc.com. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants, including us, that file such information electronically with the SEC. The address of the SECs web site is http://www.sec.gov. Information contained on our website or on the SECs web site about us is not incorporated into this prospectus and you should not consider information contained on our website or on the SECs website to be part of this prospectus.
95
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Technology Investment Capital Corp.:
We have completed integrated audits of Technology Investment Capital Corp.s financial statements and of its internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Financial statements
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, and the related statements of operations, of changes in net assets and of cash flows and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Technology Investment Capital Corp. (the Company) at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2006, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting
F-2
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 13, 2007
F-3
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||
Investments, at fair value (cost: $325,660,997 @ 12/31/06; $211,218,202 @ 12/31/05) |
|||||||
Non-affiliated investments |
$ | 303,933,738 | $ | 211,398,202 | |||
Affiliated investments |
22,251,122 | 0 | |||||
Total investments at fair value |
326,184,860 | 211,398,202 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5,181,512 | 55,811,584 | |||||
Interest receivable - debt investments |
3,203,947 | 2,022,660 | |||||
Interest receivable - cash and cash equivalents |
12,358 | 3,271 | |||||
Securities sold not settled |
0 | 773,486 | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
230,975 | 72,740 | |||||
Other assets |
6,094 | 25,875 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 334,819,746 | $ | 270,107,818 | |||
LIABILITIES |
|||||||
Investment advisory fee payable to affiliate |
$ | 1,995,517 | $ | 1,498,813 | |||
Dividends payable |
2,364,699 | 2,316,528 | |||||
Accrued interest payable |
458,507 | 0 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
165,678 | 187,001 | |||||
Accrued offering expenses |
0 | 200,000 | |||||
Loans payable |
58,500,000 | 0 | |||||
Total liabilities |
63,484,401 | 4,202,342 | |||||
NET ASSETS |
|||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, and 19,705,824 and 19,304,401 issued and outstanding, respectively |
197,058 | 193,044 | |||||
Capital in excess of par value |
269,909,732 | 263,885,376 | |||||
Unrealized net appreciation on investments |
523,863 | 180,000 | |||||
Accumulated net realized gains on investments |
320,139 | 1,739,015 | |||||
Distributions less than (in excess of) investment income |
384,553 | (91,959 | ) | ||||
Total net assets |
271,335,345 | 265,905,476 | |||||
Total liabilities and net assets |
$ | 334,819,746 | $ | 270,107,818 | |||
Net asset value per common share |
$ | 13.77 | $ | 13.77 |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-4
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | ||||||||
Questia Media, Inc. |
digital media | senior secured notes(3)(12) (11.00%, due Jan. 28, 2009) |
$ | 13,608,127 | $ | 13,608,127 | $ | 13,608,127 | |||||
TrueYou.com Inc. |
medical services | subordinated promissory notes(3)(5) (12.00%, due July 1, 2010) |
1,849,535 | 1,168,695 | 1,168,695 | ||||||||
The Endurance International Group, Inc. |
Web hosting | senior secured notes (4)(6)(7)(12) | 24,000,000 | 23,741,320 | 23,741,320 | ||||||||
(10.99%, due July 23, 2009) | |||||||||||||
convertible preferred stock(10) | 392,450 | 392,450 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible | |||||||||||||
preferred stock(10) | 31,000 | 31,000 | |||||||||||
Avue Technologies Corp. |
software | warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 13,000 | 13,000 | |||||||||
TrenStar Inc. |
logistics | senior secured notes(3)(6)(12) | 17,451,267 | 17,451,267 | 17,451,267 | ||||||||
technology | (10.72%, due Sept. 1, 2009) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible | |||||||||||||
preferred stock(10) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
3001, Inc. |
geospatial | senior unsecured notes(6)(12) | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||
imaging | (11.00%, due Oct. 1, 2010) | ||||||||||||
preferred stock(9)(10) | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||
common stock(9)(10) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Segovia, Inc. |
satellite communications | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) | 16,750,000 | 16,588,018 | 16,588,018 | ||||||||
(12.96%, due Feb. 8, 2010) | |||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 600,000 | 680,000 | |||||||||||
WHITTMANHART, Inc. |
IT consulting | senior secured notes(4)(6)(12) | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | ||||||||
(11.58%, due March 23, 2010) | |||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
convertible preferred stock(10) | 476,000 | 476,000 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible | |||||||||||||
preferred stock(10) | 24,000 | 24,000 | |||||||||||
CrystalTech Web Hosting, Inc. |
Web hosting | senior secured notes(6)(8)(12) (13.00%, due March 28, 2008) |
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||
Falcon Communications, Inc. |
satellite communications | senior unsecured notes(6)(12) (10.00%, due March 31, 2011) |
10,500,000 | 10,500,000 | 10,500,000 | ||||||||
Climax Group, Inc. |
software | warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 229,000 | 229,000 | |||||||||
Willow CSN Incorporated |
virtual | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) | 10,500,000 | 10,360,263 | 10,360,263 | ||||||||
workforce | (11.92%, due June 30, 2010) | ||||||||||||
services | warrants to purchase | ||||||||||||
convertible preferred stock (10) | 200,000 | 125,000 | |||||||||||
NetQuote, Inc. |
web-based services | senior secured notes(6)(12) (14.50%, due August 16, 2010) |
15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | ||||||||
StayOnline, Inc. |
Internet service | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) | 15,000,000 | 14,734,329 | 14,734,329 | ||||||||
provider | (11.50%, due September 2, 2010) | ||||||||||||
convertible preferred stock(10) | 360,588 | 0 | |||||||||||
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. |
interactive | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) | 15,000,000 | 14,944,206 | 14,944,206 | ||||||||
voice | (12.20%, due September 16, 2010) | ||||||||||||
messaging services | warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 91,337 | 0 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-5
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2006
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | |||||||
Aviel Services, Inc. (f/k/a OPTIMUS GROUP) |
IT consulting | senior unsecured notes(6)(7)(12) (14.57%, due September 23, 2010) |
14,500,000 | 14,262,281 | 14,262,281 | |||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | ||||||||||
Network Solutions, LLC |
domain name registration | senior secured notes(6)(8)(12) (10.36%, due January 9, 2012) |
9,900,000 | 9,867,938 | 9,974,250 | |||||||
Group 329, LLC (d/b/a The CAPS Group) |
digital imaging | senior secured term A notes(6)(7)(12) (11.64%, due February 28, 2011) |
10,750,000 | 10,677,574 | 10,677,574 | |||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 110,000 | 0 | ||||||||||
senior secured term B notes(6)(7)(12) | 12,750,000 | 12,672,976 | 12,672,976 | |||||||||
(12.14%, due February 28, 2012) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 90,000 | 0 | ||||||||||
Data Transmission Network Corporation |
information services | senior secured notes(6)(12) (13.36%, due September 10, 2013) |
5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | |||||||
American Integration Technologies, LLC. |
semiconductor capital equipment | senior secured notes(6)(12) (10.75%, due April 29, 2011) |
12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | |||||||
Power Tools, Inc. |
software | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) | 11,500,000 | 11,205,335 | 11,205,335 | |||||||
(12.00%, due May 16, 2011) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 350,000 | 350,000 | ||||||||||
Attachmate Corporation |
enterprise software | senior secured notes(6)(12) (12.11%, due December 30, 2012) |
3,500,000 | 3,500,000 | 3,526,250 | |||||||
Iridium Satellite LLC |
satellite | senior secured first lien notes (6)(7)(8) | 2,724,488 | 2,699,025 | 2,717,680 | |||||||
communications | (9.63%, due June 30, 2010) | |||||||||||
senior secured first lien tranche B notes(6)(7) | 3,000,000 | 2,945,134 | 2,925,000 | |||||||||
(9.63%, due July 27, 2011) | ||||||||||||
senior secured second lien notes (6)(7) (13.63%, due July 27, 2012) |
2,000,000 | 1,943,883 | 1,980,000 | |||||||||
Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) |
software | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) (11.40%, due September 11, 2010) |
22,000,000 | 19,251,122 | 19,251,122 | |||||||
common stock | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||
NameMedia, Inc. |
Internet business services | senior secured notes(6)(7)(12) (11.37%, due September 7, 2008) |
12,000,000 | 11,949,106 | 12,000,000 | |||||||
Fusionstorm, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | senior subordinated unsecured notes(6)(7)(8) | 14,750,000 | 14,069,870 | 14,069,870 | |||||||
(15.50%, due October 2, 2011) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(10) | 725,000 | 725,000 | ||||||||||
Punch Software LLC |
software | senior secured notes(6)(7) | 9,000,000 | 8,808,347 | 8,808,347 | |||||||
(11.37%, due October 30, 2011) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase Class A-1 units | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||
SCS Holdings II Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | second lien senior secured notes(6) (11.36%, due May 30, 2013) |
14,500,000 | 14,519,806 | 14,572,500 | |||||||
Total Investments |
$ | 325,660,997 | $ | 326,184,860 | ||||||||
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-6
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(1) |
Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared), we do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
(2) |
Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) |
Investment includes payment-in-kind interest. |
(4) |
Transaction also includes a commitment for additional notes and warrants upon satisfaction of certain specified conditions. |
(5) |
In December 2005, Klinger Advanced Aesthetics, Inc. became a subsidiary of TrueYou.com, Inc. In July 2006, Klinger repaid its senior secured notes held by the Company and, in connection therewith, TrueYou.com issued a subordinated promissory note in which the Company invested $1,750,000 in principal value. The note includes payment-in-kind interest. |
(6) |
Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(7) |
Cost and fair value reflect accretion of original issue discount. |
(8) |
Cost and fair value reflect repayment of principal. |
(9) |
Preferred stock and common stock held by limited liability company, in which we own membership interests. |
(10) |
Non-income producing at the relevant period end. |
(11) |
As a percentage of net assets at December 31, 2006, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (97.9%), senior unsecured notes (12.8%), senior subordinated unsecured notes (5.2%), subordinated promissory notes (0.4%), preferred stock (1.1%), common stock (1.5%) and warrants to purchase equity securities (1.3%). |
(12) |
Debt investment pledged as collateral under the Companys revolving credit agreement, with the following collateral limits noted: Questia Media, Inc. ($10 million), Ai Squared ($20 million), TrenStar Inc. ($15 million) and Endurance International Group, Inc. ($20 million). |
(13) |
Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $1,270,921; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $747,058. Net unrealized appreciation is $523,863 based upon a tax cost basis of $325,660,997. |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-7
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2005
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | ||||||||
Questia Media, Inc |
digital media | senior secured notes(3)(4)(11) (11%, due Jan. 28, 2009) |
$ | 12,039,331 | $ | 12,039,331 | $ | 12,039,331 | |||||
MortgageIT, Inc. |
financial services | senior secured notes(11) (5.5%, due March 29, 2007) |
15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | ||||||||
Klinger Advanced Aesthetics, Inc. |
medical services | senior secured notes(5)(11) (12%, due March 31, 2009) |
10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||
The Endurance International Group, Inc. |
Web hosting | senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)(11) (10.04%, due July 23, 2009) |
13,000,000 | 12,729,661 | 12,729,661 | ||||||||
convertible preferred stock(9) | 345,000 | 345,000 | |||||||||||
DirectRevenue, LLC |
Internet advertising | senior secured notes(6)(7)(11) (12%, due Aug. 19, 2007) |
3,220,000 | 3,158,305 | 3,158,305 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase common units(9) | 240,000 | 0 | |||||||||||
Avue Technologies Corp. |
software | warrants to purchase common stock(9) | 13,000 | 13,000 | |||||||||
TrenStar Inc. |
logistics technology | senior secured notes(3)(5)(11) (10.03%, due Sept. 1, 2009) |
17,074,493 | 17,074,493 | 17,074,493 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(9) | | | |||||||||||
3001, Inc. |
geospatial imaging | senior unsecured notes(5)(11) (10.0%, due Oct. 1, 2010) |
10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||
preferred stock(8)(9) | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||
common stock(8)(9) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Segovia, Inc. |
satellite communications | senior secured notes(5)(6)(11) (10.0%, due Feb. 8, 2010) |
17,000,000 | 16,786,198 | 16,786,198 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(9) | 260,000 | 680,000 | |||||||||||
WHITTMANHART, Inc. |
IT consulting | senior secured notes(4)(5)(11) (10.25%, due March 23, 2010) |
5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(9) | | | |||||||||||
convertible preferred stock(9) | 476,000 | 476,000 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(9) | 24,000 | 24,000 | |||||||||||
CrystalTech WebHosting, Inc. |
Web hosting | senior secured notes(5)(11) (12.0%, due March 28, 2010) |
8,000,000 | 8,000,000 | 8,000,000 | ||||||||
Falcon Communications, Inc. |
satellite communications | senior unsecured notes(5)(11) (10.0%, due March 31, 2011) |
6,000,000 | 6,000,000 | 6,000,000 | ||||||||
common stock(9) | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||
Climax Group, Inc. |
software | senior secured notes(5)(6) (14.0%, due April 30, 2008) |
5,000,000 | 4,924,350 | 4,924,350 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(9) | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||
Willow CSN Incorporated |
virtual workforce services | senior secured notes(5)(6)(11) (10.5%, due June 30, 2010) |
13,500,000 | 13,320,068 | 13,320,068 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock(9) | 200,000 | 200,000 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-8
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2005
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | ||||||||
NetQuote, Inc. |
web-based services | senior secured notes(5) (11) (12.5%, due August 16, 2010) |
$ | 15,000,000 | $ | 15,000,000 | $ | 15,000,000 | |||||
StayOnline, Inc. |
Internet service provider | senior secured notes(5) (11) (10.5%, due September 2, 2010) |
15,000,000 | 14,662,937 | 14,662,937 | ||||||||
convertible preferred stock(9) | 360,588 | 360,588 | |||||||||||
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. |
interactive voice messaging services | senior secured notes(5)(6)(11) (9.0%, due September 16, 2010) |
15,000,000 | 14,929,271 | 14,929,271 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(9) | 75,000 | 75,000 | |||||||||||
Mortgagebot Acquisitions, LLC |
web-based services | senior secured notes(5) (11) (10.0%, due October 29, 2010) |
11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | ||||||||
OPTIMUS Corporation |
IT consulting | senior unsecured notes(5)(11) (14.0%, due September 23, 2010) |
14,500,000 | 14,200,000 | 14,200,000 | ||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(9) | 300,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||||
Total investments |
$ | 211,218,202 | $ | 211,398,202 | |||||||||
(1) |
We do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
(2) |
Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) |
Investment includes payment-in-kind interest. |
(4) |
Transaction also includes a commitment for additional notes and warrants upon satisfaction of certain specified conditions. |
(5) |
Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(6) |
Cost and fair value reflect accretion of original issue discount. |
(7) |
Cost and fair value reflect repayment of principal. |
(8) |
Preferred stock and common stock held by limited liability company, in which we own membership interests. |
(9) |
Non-income producing at the relevant period end. |
(10) |
As a percentage of net assets at December 31, 2005, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (65.3%), senior unsecured notes (11.4%), preferred stock (1.2%), common stock (1.1%) and warrants to purchase equity securities (0.5%). |
(11) |
Debt investment pledged as collateral under the Companys revolving credit agreement, with the following collateral limits noted: Questia Media, Inc. ($9 million), TrenStar Inc. ($15 million) and Segovia, Inc. ($15 million). |
(12) |
Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $420,000; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $240,000. Net unrealized appreciation is $180,000 based upon a tax cost basis of $211,218,202. |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-9
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|||||||||
From non-affiliated investments: |
|||||||||
Interest Income - debt investments |
$ | 30,490,365 | $ | 17,162,052 | $ | 4,550,566 | |||
Interest Income - cash and cash equivalents |
682,760 | 1,022,852 | 1,092,274 | ||||||
Other Income |
3,342,713 | 3,615,633 | 1,745,318 | ||||||
Total Investment Income from non-affiliated investments |
34,515,838 | 21,800,537 | 7,388,158 | ||||||
From affiliated investments: |
|||||||||
Interest Income - debt investments |
1,031,389 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Other Income |
400,000 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total investment income from affiliated investments |
1,431,389 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total investment income |
35,947,227 | 21,800,537 | 7,388,158 | ||||||
EXPENSES |
|||||||||
Compensation expenses |
712,301 | 724,784 | 207,698 | ||||||
Investment advisory fees |
6,240,055 | 4,345,637 | 2,773,849 | ||||||
Professional fees |
1,059,918 | 1,102,255 | 587,216 | ||||||
Interest expense |
1,896,903 | 546,516 | 0 | ||||||
Insurance |
82,155 | 98,860 | 83,450 | ||||||
Directors fees |
168,750 | 135,000 | 141,000 | ||||||
Transfer agent and custodian fees |
105,776 | 93,906 | 86,087 | ||||||
General and administrative |
280,551 | 368,457 | 145,341 | ||||||
Total Expenses |
10,546,409 | 7,415,415 | 4,024,641 | ||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
25,400,818 | 14,385,122 | 3,363,517 | ||||||
NET CHANGE IN UNREALIZED APPRECIATION ON INVESTMENTS |
343,863 | 180,000 | 0 | ||||||
NET REALIZED GAINS ON INVESTMENTS |
586,491 | 1,739,015 | 0 | ||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 26,331,172 | $ | 16,304,137 | $ | 3,363,517 | |||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share: |
|||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
$ | 1.35 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 0.33 | |||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
|||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
19,491,588 | 13,459,343 | 10,093,660 |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-10
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||
Increase in net assets from operations: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 25,400,818 | $ | 14,385,122 | $ | 3,363,517 | ||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
586,491 | 1,739,015 | 0 | |||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments |
343,863 | 180,000 | 0 | |||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
26,331,172 | 16,304,137 | 3,363,517 | |||||||||
Dividends from net investment income |
(24,924,306 | ) | (14,226,738 | ) | (3,293,654 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from net realized capital gains |
(2,005,367 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Tax return of capital distributions |
0 | 0 | (1,035,405 | ) | ||||||||
Total dividends and distributions to shareholders |
(26,929,673 | ) | (14,226,738 | ) | (4,329,059 | ) | ||||||
Capital share transactions: |
||||||||||||
Net proceeds from shares sold |
0 | 127,084,678 | 0 | |||||||||
Less offering costs of public share offerings |
0 | (6,780,721 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends |
6,028,370 | 4,262,583 | 2,257,452 | |||||||||
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
6,028,370 | 124,566,540 | 2,257,452 | |||||||||
Total increase in net assets: |
5,429,869 | 126,643,939 | 1,291,910 | |||||||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
265,905,476 | 139,261,537 | 137,969,627 | |||||||||
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $384,553, ($91,959) and ($250,343), respectively) |
$ | 271,335,345 | $ | 265,905,476 | $ | 139,261,537 | ||||||
Capital share activity: |
||||||||||||
Shares sold |
0 | 8,865,666 | 0 | |||||||||
Shares issued from reinvestment of dividends |
401,423 | 280,887 | 157,748 | |||||||||
Net increase in capital share activity |
401,423 | 9,146,553 | 157,748 | |||||||||
See Accompanying Notes.
F-11
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 26,331,172 | $ | 16,304,137 | $ | 3,363,517 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Increase in investments due to PIK |
(1,545,104 | ) | (3,797,778 | ) | (1,316,046 | ) | ||||||
Increase in non-cash fee income |
(470,838 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
(586,491 | ) | (1,739,015 | ) | 0 | |||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments |
(343,863 | ) | (180,000 | ) | 0 | |||||||
Increase in interest receivable |
(1,190,374 | ) | (1,528,962 | ) | (473,302 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses |
(158,235 | ) | 29,956 | (30,250 | ) | |||||||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
19,781 | 434,791 | (460,666 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of discounts |
(914,088 | ) | (395,009 | ) | (88,684 | ) | ||||||
Increase in investment advisory fee payable |
496,704 | 801,791 | 470,829 | |||||||||
Increase in accrued interest payable |
458,507 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
(Decrease) Increase in accrued expenses and accrued offering expenses |
(221,323 | ) | (156,899 | ) | 414,842 | |||||||
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
21,875,848 | 9,773,012 | 1,880,240 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(191,020,300 | ) | (159,503,358 | ) | (82,200,000 | ) | ||||||
Repayments of principal |
76,595,512 | 29,500,000 | 1,480,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of investments |
4,272,000 | 6,068,202 | 0 | |||||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
(110,152,788 | ) | (123,935,156 | ) | (80,720,000 | ) | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
0 | 122,915,928 | 0 | |||||||||
Offering expenses from the issuance of common stock |
0 | (2,611,971 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
Amounts borrowed under revolving credit facility |
83,500,000 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Amounts paid back under revolving credit facility |
(25,000,000 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Dividends paid |
(20,853,132 | ) | (7,647,627 | ) | (2,071,607 | ) | ||||||
Net Cash Provided By (Used in) Financing Activities |
37,646,868 | 112,656,330 | (2,071,607 | ) | ||||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(50,630,072 | ) | (1,505,814 | ) | (80,911,367 | ) | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
55,811,584 | 57,317,398 | 138,228,765 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 5,181,512 | $ | 55,811,584 | $ | 57,317,398 | ||||||
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan |
$ | 6,028,370 | $ | 4,262,583 | $ | 2,257,452 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 1,419,559 | $ | 546,516 | $ | 0 |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-12
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION
Technology Investment Capital Corp. (TICC or the Company) was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on July 21, 2003 and is a non-diversified, closed-end investment company. The Company has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). In addition, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Companys investment objective is to maximize its total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies.
TICCs investment activities are managed by Technology Investment Management, LLC, (TIM), a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. BDC Partners, LLC (BDC Partners) is the managing member of TIM and serves as the administrator of TICC.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the Company. There are no related companies and no intercompany accounts to be eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations and provide indemnifications. The Companys maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. However, based upon experience, the Company expects the risk of loss to be remote.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost or amortized cost which approximates fair value.
INVESTMENT VALUATION
The Company carries its investments at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. Securities that are publicly traded are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. In connection with that determination, members of TIMs portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, the Company has engaged a third-party valuation firm to perform independent valuations of its investments.
On October 26, 2006 the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, approved a change in our valuation process whereby the third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of our portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of the Companys total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of the
F-13
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Companys total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of the third-party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly.
An affiliate of the third-party valuation firm (the Valuation Firm Affiliate) owns a controlling interest in one of our portfolio companies, American Integration Technologies, LLC. Certain valuation firm personnel who perform the valuation services for the Company hold investments (directly and/or indirectly) in the Valuation Firm Affiliate. TICCs Board has considered the relative amount of the investment and believes that it does not affect the valuation firms ability to perform its valuation services.
The Board of Directors uses the recommended valuations as prepared by TIM and the valuation firm, respectively, as a component of the foundation for the final fair value determination. In making such determination, the Board of Directors values non-convertible debt securities at cost plus amortized original issue discount plus payment-in-kind (PIK) interest, if any, unless adverse factors lead to a determination of a lesser valuation. Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have resulted had a readily available market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuation currently assigned to such investments. We will record unrealized depreciation on investments when we believe that an investment has become impaired, including when the enterprise value of the portfolio company does not currently support the carrying value of our debt or equity investment. We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and our equity security has also appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statements of operations as the net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets include amounts receivable from the administrator for deal cost reimbursements as of December 31, 2006 and deferred charges associated with the Companys stock offering as well as an amounts receivable for deal costs as of December 31, 2005.
INTEREST INCOME RECOGNITION
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected.
PAYMENT-IN-KIND INTEREST
The Company has investments in its portfolio which contain a payment-in-kind (PIK) provision. The PIK interest is added to the principal balance of the investment and is recorded as interest income. To maintain its status as a RIC, this income must be included in the determination of amounts payable to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though the Company has not collected any cash. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, the Company had approximately $1,545,000, $3,798,000 and $1,316,000 in PIK interest.
In addition, the Company recorded original issue discount income of approximately $914,000, $395,000 and $89,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, representing the amortization of the discounted cost attributed to certain debt securities purchased by the Company in connection with the issuance of warrants.
F-14
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
OTHER INCOME
Other income includes primarily closing fees, or origination fees, associated with investments in portfolio companies. Such fees are normally paid at closing of the Companys investments, are fully earned and non-refundable, and are generally non-recurring.
MANAGERIAL ASSISTANCE FEES
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company offer to make available managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company offers to provide managerial assistance to its portfolio companies in connection with its investments and may receive fees for its services. The Company has not received any fees for such services since inception.
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
The Company intends to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Internal Revenue Code and, as such, would not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code.
Because federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statement to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
For tax purposes, the cost basis of the portfolio investments at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was approximately $325,660,997 and $211,218,202, respectively.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held in checking accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit. In addition, the Companys portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies in the technology-related sector, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt securities that the Company holds or if the technology-related sector experiences a market downturn.
NOTE 3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, cash and cash equivalents consisted of:
December 31, 2006 |
December 31, 2005 | |||||
Eurodollar Time Deposit (due 1/2/07 and 1/3/06) |
$ | 5,181,512 | $ | 15,700,000 | ||
U.S. Treasury Bill (1/12/06) |
| 39,954,167 | ||||
Total Cash Equivalents |
5,181,512 | 55,654,167 | ||||
Cash |
| 157,417 | ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$ | 5,181,512 | $ | 55,811,584 | ||
F-15
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Year ended December 31, 2004 | |||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted per share computation |
$ | 26,331,172 | $ | 16,304,137 | $ | 3,363,517 | |||
Denominator for basic and diluted weighted average shares |
19,491,588 | 13,459,343 | 10,093,660 | ||||||
Basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share |
$ | 1.35 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 0.33 |
NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
TICC has entered into an investment advisory agreement with TIM (the Investment Advisory Agreement) under which TIM, subject to the overall supervision of TICCs Board of Directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, TICC. For providing these services TIM receives a fee from TICC, consisting of two components: a base management fee (the Base Fee) and an incentive fee. The Base Fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00%. For services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement during the period commencing from the closing of the Companys initial public share offering through and including March 31, 2004, the Base Fee was payable monthly in arrears, and was calculated based on the initial value of TICCs net assets upon closing of the stock offering. For services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement after March 31, 2004, the Base Fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and is calculated based on the average value of TICCs gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any equity or debt capital raises, repurchases or redemptions during the current calendar quarter.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Companys operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Fee, expenses payable under the Companys administration agreement with BDC Partners (the Administration Agreement), and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Companys net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to one- fourth of an annual hurdle rate.
For the period from inception through December 31, 2004, the annual hurdle rate was 8.27%, which was equal to the interest rate payable, at the closing of the Companys initial public offering, on the most recently issued five-year U.S. Treasury Notes, plus 5.0%. For each year commencing on or after January 1, 2005, the annual hurdle rate has been determined as of the immediately preceding December 31st by adding 5.0% to the interest rate then payable on the most recently issued five-year U.S. Treasury Notes, up to a maximum annual hurdle rate of 10.0%. The annual hurdle rate for the 2006 calendar year and 2005 calendar year was 9.35% and 8.63%, respectively. The current hurdle rate for the 2007 calendar year, calculated as of December 31, 2006, is 9.70%.
F-16
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement , as of the termination date), and equals 20% of the Companys Incentive Fee Capital Gains, which consist of the Companys realized capital gains for each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation for that calendar year; provided, that the capital gains portion of the incentive fee determined as of December 31, 2004 was calculated for a period of longer than twelve months to take into account any Incentive Fee Capital Gains for the period from inception through December 31, 2003.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 there were no incentive fees earned by the Adviser. For the year ended December 31, 2005 incentive fees of approximately $148,000 and capital gains incentive fees of approximately $300,000 were earned. For the year ended December 31, 2006 incentive fees of approximately $331,000 were earned; there were no capital gains incentive fees earned for 2006.
TICC has also entered into an Administration Agreement with BDC Partners under which BDC Partners provides administrative services for TICC. For providing these services, facilities and personnel, TICC reimburses BDC Partners for TICCs allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent.
The Companys investment activities are managed by its investment adviser, TIM, pursuant to the investment advisory agreement described above. TIM is owned by BDC Partners, its managing member, and Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce & Associates). Jonathan Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles Royce, our non-executive chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. For the periods ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, TICC incurred investment advisory fees of $6,240,055, $4,345,637, and $2,773,849 in accordance with the terms of the investment advisory agreement, and incurred $712,301, $724,784, and $207,698 in compensation expenses for the services of employees allocated to the administrative activities of TICC, pursuant to the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners. In addition, TICC incurred $61,382, $53,840 and $28,879 for facility costs allocated under the agreement for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $1,995,517, $1,498,813 and $697,022 of investment advisory fees remained payable to TIM, and $0, $0 and $12,894 of compensation expenses remained payable to BDC Partners.
NOTE 6. OTHER INCOME
Other income includes primarily closing fees, or origination fees, associated with investments in portfolio companies as well as dividends. Fees are normally paid at closing of the Companys investments, are fully earned and non-refundable, and are generally non-recurring. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, TICC earned approximately $3.7 million, $3.6 million, and $1.7 million in other income.
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company offer managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company may receive fee income for managerial assistance it renders to portfolio companies in connection with its investments. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company received no fee income for managerial assistance.
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had issued commitments to purchase additional debt investments and/or warrants from certain portfolio companies, contingent upon their meeting agreed-upon financial milestones. Total commitments of $7 million are outstanding to Endurance International Group, Inc. ($6 million) and WHITTMANHART, Inc. ($1 million).
F-17
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 8. REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
On May 18, 2005, the Company entered into an uncommitted $35 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG (HVB), as administrative agent and lender. On October 13, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement amending the Credit Facility to increase the Credit Facility from $35 million to $100 million through February 2006, with Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) as an additional lender under the amended Credit Facility. Effective February 16, 2006 the Company entered into an agreement pursuant to which RBC replaced HVB as administrative agent under the Companys uncommitted revolving credit agreement. Concurrent with its appointment, RBC agreed to make $40 million available under the facility.
On April 11, 2006 the Company entered into an amended and restated Credit Facility, with RBC as an agent and a lender, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) as an additional lender. Under the amended and restated Credit Facility, the amount of our Credit Facility has been increased to $100 million, with each lender providing $50 million under the facility. The Credit Facility supplements the Companys equity capital and provides funding for additional portfolio investments, as well as general corporate matters. All amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable within one year of the date of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of April 11, 2008.
Under the Credit Facility agreement the Company must satisfy monthly several portfolio covenant requirements including minimum market value, weighted average maturity, and average weighted coupon rate on all secured transaction assets, as well as limitations on the principal amounts of eligible transaction assets. In addition, the Company must comply with other general covenants including indebtedness, liens and pledges, restricted payments, mergers and consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
The Company had outstanding borrowings of $58.5 million under the facility as of December 31, 2006 and related accrued interest payable of approximately $0.5 million; the Company had no outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2005.
NOTE 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 27, 2007, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.36 per share payable March 30, 2007 to holders of record on March 9, 2007.
Effective February 27, 2007, one of the Companys portfolio companies, GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., completed a restructuring of its capital structure, whereby $5.15 million of GenuTecs debt, including accrued interest, held by another institutional investor was converted to convertible preferred stock. As a result, the Company is the only remaining senior noteholder for GenuTec. In connection with this restructuring, the Company agreed to cancel its warrants to purchase common stock, to provide additional senior notes of up to $2.0 million, to reduce the interest rate on its senior secured notes to 10.46%, and to convert the cash interest payments to PIK for the next four quarters. As of March 13, 2007, $900,000 of the additional senior notes had been drawn down. GenuTec also made changes in its management team and its board of directors.
F-18
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 10. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
July 21, 2003 through December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||
Per Share Data |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period |
$ | 13.77 | $ | 13.71 | $ | 13.80 | $ | 15.00 | ||||||||
Net income investment (loss)(1) |
1.30 | 1.07 | 0.33 | (0.06 | ) | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized capital gains(2) |
0.05 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
Effect of shares issued, net of offering expenses |
0.03 | (0.14 | ) | 0.00 | (1.14 | ) | ||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
1.38 | 1.07 | 0.34 | (1.20 | ) | |||||||||||
Dividends from net investment income |
(1.28 | ) | (1.01 | ) | (0.33 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions from net realized capital gains |
(0.10 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||
Tax return of capital distributions |
(0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||
Total distributions |
(1.38 | ) | (1.01 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||
Net asset value at end of period |
$ | 13.77 | $ | 13.77 | $ | 13.71 | $ | 13.80 | ||||||||
Per share market value at beginning of period |
$ | 15.10 | $ | 15.01 | $ | 15.55 | $ | 15.00 | ||||||||
Per share market value at end of period |
$ | 16.14 | $ | 15.10 | $ | 15.01 | $ | 15.55 | ||||||||
Total return(3) |
17.02 | % | 7.47 | % | (0.71 | %) | 3.67 | % | ||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period |
19,705,824 | 19,304,401 | 10,157,848 | 10,000,100 | ||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period (000s) |
$ | 271,335 | $ | 265,905 | $ | 139,262 | $ | 137,970 | ||||||||
Average net assets (000s) |
270,309 | 184,715 | 137,568 | 28,703 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets |
3.90 | % | 4.00 | % | 2.90 | % | 2.40 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets |
3.20 | % | 3.72 | % | 2.90 | % | 2.40 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
9.40 | % | 7.80 | % | 2.40 | % | (2.00 | %) |
(1) Represents per share net investment income (loss) for the period, based upon average shares outstanding.
(2) Includes rounding adjustment to reconcile change in net asset value per share.
(3) Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment at prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. Total return from inception through December 31, 2003 has not been annualized.
F-19
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 11. DIVIDENDS
The following table represents the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, declared per share:
Record Date |
Payment Date | Dividend per Share | |||
Fiscal year ended 2007 |
|||||
March 9, 2007 |
March 30, 2007 | $ | 0.36 | ||
Fiscal year ended 2006 |
|||||
December 29, 2006 |
January 17, 2007 | $ | 0.12 | ||
December 8, 2006 |
December 29, 2006 | 0.34 | |||
September 8, 2006 |
September 29, 2006 | 0.32 | |||
June 9, 2006 |
June 30, 2006 | 0.30 | |||
March 10, 2006 |
March 31, 2006 | 0.30 | |||
Fiscal year ended 2005 |
|||||
December 30, 2005 |
January 18, 2006 | $ | 0.12 | ||
December 9, 2005 |
December 30, 2005 | 0.30 | |||
September 10, 2005 |
September 30, 2005 | 0.25 | |||
June 10, 2005 |
June 30, 2005 | 0.20 | |||
March 10, 2005 |
March 31, 2005 | 0.14 | |||
Fiscal year ended 2004 |
|||||
December 10, 2004 |
December 31, 2004 | $ | 0.11 | ||
September 10, 2004 |
September 30, 2004 | 0.11 | |||
June 10, 2004 |
June 30, 2004 | 0.11 | |||
March 15, 2004 |
April 5, 2004 | 0.10 |
The tax character of distributions declared and paid in 2006 represented $25,909,613 from ordinary income, including $669,769 of qualified dividend income (unaudited), $1,020,060 from long-term capital gains, and $0 from tax return of capital.
As of December 31, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Distributable ordinary income |
$ | 513,338 | |
Distributable long-term capital gains |
301,972 | ||
Unrealized appreciation on investments |
523,863 |
The tax character of distributions declared and paid in 2005 represented $14,226,738 from ordinary income, including $98,585 of qualified dividend income (unaudited), $0 from long-term capital gains, and $0 from tax return of capital.
As of December 31, 2005, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Distributable ordinary income |
$ | 1,054,048 | |
Distributable long-term capital gains |
773,486 | ||
Unrealized appreciation on investments |
180,000 |
The tax character of distributions declared and paid in 2004 represented approximately $3,293,654 from ordinary income, approximately $0 from long-term capital gains, and approximately $1,035,405 in a tax return of capital.
F-20
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 12. SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Quarter Ended December 31, |
Quarter Ended September 30, |
Quarter Ended June 30, |
Quarter Ended March 31, | |||||||||
Total Investment Income |
$ | 11,482,632 | $ | 8,792,004 | $ | 8,464,101 | $ | 7,208,490 | ||||
Net Investment Income |
7,668,602 | 6,141,483 | 6,275,648 | 5,315,085 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets resulting from Operations |
7,444,050 | 6,759,589 | 6,864,696 | 5,262,837 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.27 |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||
Quarter Ended December 31, |
Quarter Ended September 30, |
Quarter Ended June 30, |
Quarter Ended March 31, | |||||||||
Total Investment Income |
$ | 6,352,666 | $ | 6,499,053 | $ | 4,718,989 | $ | 4,229,829 | ||||
Net Investment Income |
3,808,654 | 4,480,506 | 3,290,552 | 2,805,410 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets resulting from Operations |
5,488,669 | 4,719,506 | 3,290,552 | 2,805,410 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.23 |
(1) |
Aggregation of quarterly earnings per share differs from calculation of annual earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005 due to rounding. |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||
Quarter Ended December 31, |
Quarter Ended September 30, |
Quarter Ended June 30, |
Quarter Ended March 31, |
||||||||||
Total Investment Income |
$ | 2,886,977 | $ | 2,344,537 | $ | 1,243,458 | $ | 913,186 | |||||
Net Investment Income |
1,786,901 | 1,347,156 | 275,059 | (45,599 | ) | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets resulting from Operations |
1,786,901 | 1,347,156 | 275,059 | (45,599 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.00 |
(1) |
Aggregation of quarterly earnings per share differs from calculation of annual earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2004 due to rounding. |
NOTE 13. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (the Interpretation). The Interpretation establishes for all entities, including pass-through entities such as the Company, a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of positions taken in filing tax returns (including whether an entity is taxable in a particular jurisdiction), and requires certain expanded tax disclosure. The Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the date of effectiveness. Management is in the process of evaluating the application of the Interpretation to the Company, and is assessing the impact, if any, on the Companys financial statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 157, Fair Value Measurements, which clarifies the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. Adoption of SFAS 157 requires the use of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. At this time, the Company is in the process of reviewing the Standard against its current valuation policies to determine its impact on the financial statements, if any.
F-21
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) |
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
March 31, 2007 (unaudited) |
December 31, 2006 | ||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||
Investments, at fair value (cost: $320,038,435 @ 3/31/07; $325,660,997 @ 12/31/06) |
|||||||
Non-affiliated investments |
$ | 292,076,024 | $ | 303,933,738 | |||
Affiliated investments |
25,460,813 | 22,251,122 | |||||
Total investments at fair value |
317,536,837 | 326,184,860 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
7,916,833 | 5,181,512 | |||||
Interest receivable |
2,594,904 | 3,216,305 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
246,238 | 237,069 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 328,294,812 | $ | 334,819,746 | |||
LIABILITIES |
|||||||
Investment advisory fee payable to affiliate |
$ | 1,641,555 | $ | 1,995,517 | |||
Dividends payable |
0 | 2,364,699 | |||||
Accrued interest payable |
405,001 | 458,507 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
304,714 | 165,678 | |||||
Loans payable |
56,500,000 | 58,500,000 | |||||
Total liabilities |
58,851,270 | 63,484,401 | |||||
NET ASSETS |
|||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, and 19,810,567 and 19,705,824 issued and outstanding, respectively |
198,106 | 197,058 | |||||
Capital in excess of par value |
271,662,365 | 269,909,732 | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(2,501,598 | ) | 523,863 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains on investments |
176,932 | 320,139 | |||||
Distributions less than (in excess of) investment income |
(92,263 | ) | 384,553 | ||||
Total net assets |
269,443,542 | 271,335,345 | |||||
Total liabilities and net assets |
$ | 328,294,812 | $ | 334,819,746 | |||
Net asset value per common share |
$13.60 | $13.77 |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-22
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
MARCH 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Company (1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value (2) | ||||||||
Questia Media, Inc. |
digital media |
senior secured notes (3)(11) |
$ | 13,608,127 | $ | 13,608,127 | $ | 13,608,127 | |||||
11.00%, due Jan. 28, 2009) |
|||||||||||||
TrueYou.com Inc. |
medical services |
subordinated promissory notes (3)(6) |
1,901,315 | 1,258,745 | 1,258,745 | ||||||||
(12.00%, due July 1, 2010) |
|||||||||||||
The Endurance International Group, Inc. |
Web hosting |
senior secured notes (4)(5)(6)(11) (10.99%, due July 23, 2009) |
24,000,000 | 23,765,456 | 23,765,456 | ||||||||
convertible preferred stock (9) |
392,450 | 715,000 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock (9) |
31,000 | 55,000 | |||||||||||
Avue Technologies Corp. |
software |
warrants to purchase common units (9) |
13,000 | 13,000 | |||||||||
TrenStar Inc. |
logistics technology |
senior secured notes (3)(5)(11) |
16,951,267 | 16,951,267 | 16,951,267 | ||||||||
(10.72%, due Sept. 1, 2009) |
|||||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock (9) |
0 | 0 | |||||||||||
3001, Inc. |
geospatial imaging |
senior unsecured notes (5)(11) |
10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||
(11.00%, due Oct. 1, 2010) |
|||||||||||||
preferred stock (8)(9) |
2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||
common stock (8)(9) |
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Segovia, Inc. |
satellite communications |
senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) |
15,000,000 | 14,851,001 | 14,851,001 | ||||||||
(12.96%, due Feb. 8, 2010) |
|||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
600,000 | 680,000 | |||||||||||
WHITTMANHART, Inc. |
IT consulting |
senior secured notes (4)(5)(11) |
11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | ||||||||
(11.58%, due March 23, 2010) |
|||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
0 | 0 | |||||||||||
convertible preferred stock (9) |
476,000 | 476,000 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock (9) |
24,000 | 24,000 | |||||||||||
CrystalTech Web Hosting, Inc. |
Web hosting |
senior secured notes (5)(7)(11) |
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||
(12.85%, due March 28, 2008) |
|||||||||||||
Falcon Communications, Inc. |
satellite communications |
senior unsecured notes (5)(11) |
10,500,000 | 10,500,000 | 9,000,000 | ||||||||
(10.00%, due March 31, 2011) |
|||||||||||||
Climax Group, Inc. |
software |
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
229,000 | 229,000 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-23
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
MARCH 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Company (1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value (2) | |||||
Willow CSN Incorporated |
virtual workforce services | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) |
10,500,000 | 10,370,252 | 10,370,252 | |||||
warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock (9) |
200,000 | 125,000 | ||||||||
NetQuote, Inc. |
web-based services | senior secured notes (5)(11) |
15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | |||||
(14.50%, due August 16, 2010) |
||||||||||
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. |
interactive voice messaging services |
senior secured notes (3)(4)(5)(6)(9) (10.46%, due September 16, 2010) |
16,857,500 | 16,805,442 | 11,805,442 | |||||
Aviel Services, Inc. |
IT consulting | senior unsecured notes (5)(6)(11) (14.57%, due September 23, 2010) |
14,500,000 | 14,277,892 | 14,277,892 | |||||
warrants to purchase common stock |
300,000 | 1,200,000 | ||||||||
Group 329, LLC |
digital imaging | senior secured term A notes (5)(6)(11) |
10,750,000 | 10,684,350 | 10,684,350 | |||||
(d/b/a The CAPS Group) |
(11.89%, due February 28, 2011) |
|||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
110,000 | 0 | ||||||||
senior secured term B notes (5)(6)(11) |
12,750,000 | 12,676,899 | 12,676,899 | |||||||
(12.39%, due February 28, 2012) |
||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
90,000 | 0 | ||||||||
American Integration Technologies, LLC. |
semiconductor capital equipment |
senior secured notes (5)(11) (10.75%, due April 29, 2011) |
12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | |||||
Power Tools, Inc. |
software | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) (12.00%, due May 16, 2011) |
11,250,000 | 10,976,706 | 10,976,706 | |||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
350,000 | 0 | ||||||||
Attachmate Corporation |
enterprise software | senior secured notes (5)(11) (12.07%, due December 30, 2012) |
3,500,000 | 3,500,000 | 3,500,000 | |||||
Iridium Satellite LLC |
satellite communications |
senior secured first lien notes (5)(6)(7)(11) (9.61%, due June 30, 2010) |
2,579,080 | 2,556,280 | 2,579,080 | |||||
senior secured first lien tranche B notes (5)(6)(11) |
3,000,000 | 2,948,416 | 3,011,250 | |||||||
(9.61%, due July 27, 2011) |
||||||||||
senior secured second lien notes (5)(6)(11) (13.61%, due July 27, 2012) |
2,000,000 | 1,946,365 | 2,030,000 | |||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. |
software | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) (11.40%, due September 11, 2010) |
22,000,000 | 19,460,813 | 19,460,813 | |||||
(d/b/a Ai Squared) |
common stock (9) |
3,000,000 | 6,000,000 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-24
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
MARCH 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Company (1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value (2) | |||||||
NameMedia, Inc. |
Internet business | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) |
12,000,000 | 11,956,363 | 12,000,000 | |||||||
services | (11.37%, due September 7, 2008) | |||||||||||
Fusionstorm, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | senior subordinated unsecured notes (5)(6)(7) |
14,500,000 | 13,864,094 | 13,864,094 | |||||||
(15.50%, due October 2, 2011) |
||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 725,000 | 725,000 | ||||||||||
Punch Software LLC |
software | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) |
9,000,000 | 8,820,474 | 8,820,474 | |||||||
(11.37%, due October 30, 2011) |
||||||||||||
warrants to purchase Class A-1 units | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||
SCS Holdings II, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | second lien senior secured notes (5)(11) |
14,500,000 | 14,519,043 | 14,571,739 | |||||||
(11.35%, due May 30, 2013) | ||||||||||||
AKQA, Inc. |
advertising | senior secured notes (5)(11) |
25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | 25,031,250 | |||||||
(9.82%, due March 20, 2013) | ||||||||||||
Total Investments |
$ | 320,038,435 | $ | 317,536,837 | ||||||||
(1) |
Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a AiSquared), which we may be deemed to control, we do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
(2) |
Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) |
Investment includes payment-in-kind interest. |
(4) |
Transaction also includes a commitment for additional notes and warrants upon satisfaction of certain specific conditions. |
(5) |
Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(6) |
Cost reflects accretion of original issue discount. |
(7) |
Cost reflects repayment of principal. |
(8) |
Preferred stock and common stock indirectly held by limited liability company, in which we own membership interests. |
(9) |
Non-income producing at the relevant period end. |
(10) |
As a percentage of net assets at March 31, 2007, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (94.9%), senior unsecured notes (12.3%), senior subordinated unsecured notes (5.1%), subordinated promissory notes (0.5%), preferred stock (1.2%), common stock (2.6%), and warrants to purchase equity securities (1.2%). |
(11) |
Debt investment pledged as collateral under the Companys revolving credit agreement, with the following credit limits noted: Questia Media, Inc. ($10 million), Ai Squared ($20 million), TrenStar, Inc. ($15 million), AKQA, Inc. ($20 million) and Endurance International Group, Inc. ($20 million). |
(12) |
Aggregate gross unrealized capital appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $4,623,402; aggregate gross unrealized capital depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $7,125,000. Net unrealized capital depreciation is $2,501,598 based upon a tax cost basis of $320,038,435. |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-25
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
DECEMBER 31, 2006
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | ||||||||
Questia Media, Inc. |
digital media | senior secured notes (3)(11) | $ | 13,608,127 | $ | 13,608,127 | $ | 13,608,127 | |||||
(11.00%, due Jan. 28, 2009) | |||||||||||||
TrueYou.com Inc. |
medical services | subordinated promissory notes (3)(6) | 1,849,535 | 1,168,695 | 1,168,695 | ||||||||
(12.00%, due July 1, 2010) | |||||||||||||
The Endurance International Group, Inc. |
Web hosting | senior secured notes (4)(5)(6)(11) | 24,000,000 | 23,741,320 | 23,741,320 | ||||||||
(10.99%, due July 23, 2009) | |||||||||||||
convertible preferred stock (9) | 392,450 | 392,450 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible | |||||||||||||
preferred stock (9) | 31,000 | 31,000 | |||||||||||
Avue Technologies Corp. |
software | warrants to purchase common units (9) | 13,000 | 13,000 | |||||||||
TrenStar Inc. |
logistics | senior secured notes (3)(5)(11) | 17,451,267 | 17,451,267 | 17,451,267 | ||||||||
technology |
(10.72%, due Sept. 1, 2009) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible | |||||||||||||
preferred stock (9) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
3001, Inc. |
geospatial | senior unsecured notes (5)(11) | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||
imaging |
(11.00%, due Oct. 1, 2010) | ||||||||||||
preferred stock (8)(9) | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||
common stock (8)(9) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Segovia, Inc. |
satellite | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 16,750,000 | 16,588,018 | 16,588,018 | ||||||||
communications | (12.96%, due Feb. 8, 2010) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 600,000 | 680,000 | |||||||||||
WHITTMANHART, Inc. |
IT consulting | senior secured notes (4)(5)(11) | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 | ||||||||
(11.58%, due March 23, 2010) | |||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
convertible preferred stock (9) | 476,000 | 476,000 | |||||||||||
warrants to purchase convertible | |||||||||||||
preferred stock (9) | 24,000 | 24,000 | |||||||||||
CrystalTech Web Hosting, Inc. |
Web hosting | senior secured notes (5)(7)(11) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||
(13.00%, due March 28, 2008) | |||||||||||||
Falcon Communications, Inc. |
satellite | senior unsecured notes (5)(11) | 10,500,000 | 10,500,000 | 10,500,000 | ||||||||
communications | (10.00%, due March 31, 2011) | ||||||||||||
Climax Group, Inc. |
software | warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 229,000 | 229,000 | |||||||||
Willow CSN Incorporated |
virtual | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 10,500,000 | 10,360,263 | 10,360,263 | ||||||||
workforce |
(11.92%, due June 30, 2010) | ||||||||||||
services |
warrants to purchase | ||||||||||||
convertible preferred stock (9) | 200,000 | 125,000 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-26
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | |||||
NetQuote, Inc. |
web-based services | senior secured notes (5)(11) | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | |||||
(14.50%, due August 16, 2010) | ||||||||||
StayOnline, Inc. |
Internet | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 15,000,000 | 14,734,329 | 14,734,329 | |||||
service provider |
(11.50%, due September 2, 2010) | |||||||||
convertible preferred stock (9) | 360,588 | 0 | ||||||||
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. |
interactive | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 15,000,000 | 14,944,206 | 14,944,206 | |||||
voice |
(12.20%, due September 16, 2010) | |||||||||
messaging services |
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 91,337 | 0 | |||||||
Aviel Services, Inc. |
IT consulting | senior unsecured notes (5)(6)(11) | 14,500,000 | 14,262,281 | 14,262,281 | |||||
(14.57%, due September 23, 2010) | ||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | ||||||||
Network Solutions, LLC |
domain name registration | senior secured notes (5)(7)(11) | 9,900,000 | 9,867,938 | 9,974,250 | |||||
(10.36%, due January 9, 2012) | ||||||||||
Group 329, LLC |
digital imaging | senior secured term A notes (5)(6)(11) | 10,750,000 | 10,677,574 | 10,677,574 | |||||
(d/b/a The CAPS Group) |
(11.64%, due February 28, 2011) | |||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 110,000 | 0 | ||||||||
senior secured term B notes (5)(6)(11) | 12,750,000 | 12,672,976 | 12,672,976 | |||||||
(12.14%, due February 28, 2012) | ||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 90,000 | 0 | ||||||||
Data Transmission Network Corporation |
information services | senior secured notes (5)(11) | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | |||||
(13.36%, due September 10, 2013) | ||||||||||
American Integration Technologies, LLC. |
semiconductor capital | senior secured notes (5)(11) | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | |||||
equipment |
(10.75%, due April 29, 2011) | |||||||||
Power Tools, Inc. |
software | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 11,500,000 | 11,205,335 | 11,205,335 | |||||
(12.00%, due May 16, 2011) | ||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) | 350,000 | 350,000 | ||||||||
Attachmate Corporation |
enterprise software | senior secured notes (5)(11) | 3,500,000 | 3,500,000 | 3,526,250 | |||||
(12.11%, due December 30, 2012) | ||||||||||
Iridium Satellite LLC |
satellite | senior secured first lien notes (5)(6)(7)(11) | 2,724,488 | 2,699,025 | 2,717,680 | |||||
communications |
(9.63%, due June 30, 2010) | |||||||||
senior secured first lien tranche B notes (5)(6)(11) |
3,000,000 | 2,945,134 | 2,925,000 | |||||||
(9.63%, due July 27, 2011) | ||||||||||
senior secured second lien notes (5)(6)(11) |
2,000,000 | 1,943,883 | 1,980,000 | |||||||
(13.63%, due July 27, 2012) |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
F-27
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
Company(1) |
Industry |
Investment |
Principal Amount |
Cost | Fair Value(2) | |||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. |
software | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 22,000,000 | 19,251,122 | 19,251,122 | |||||||
(d/b/a Ai Squared) |
(11.40%, due September 11, 2010) | |||||||||||
common stock (9) | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||
NameMedia, Inc. |
Internet business services | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) (11.37%, due September 7, 2008) |
12,000,000 | 11,949,106 | 12,000,000 | |||||||
Fusionstorm, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | senior subordinated unsecured notes (5)(6)(7) |
14,750,000 | 14,069,870 | 14,069,870 | |||||||
(15.50%, due October 2, 2011) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock (9) |
725,000 | 725,000 | ||||||||||
Punch Software LLC |
software | senior secured notes (5)(6)(11) | 9,000,000 | 8,808,347 | 8,808,347 | |||||||
(11.37%, due October 30, 2011) | ||||||||||||
warrants to purchase Class A-1 units | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||
SCS Holdings II, Inc. |
IT value-added reseller | second lien senior secured notes (5)(11) |
14,500,000 | 14,519,806 | 14,572,500 | |||||||
(11.36%, due May 30, 2013) | ||||||||||||
Total Investments |
$ | 325,660,997 | $ | 326,184,860 | ||||||||
(1) | Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a AiSquared), which we may be deemed to control, we do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
(2) | Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) | Investment includes payment-in-kind interest. |
(4) | Transaction also includes a commitment for additional notes and warrants upon satisfaction of certain specific conditions. |
(5) | Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(6) | Cost and fair value reflect accretion of original issue discount. |
(7) | Cost and fair value reflect repayment of principal. |
(8) | Preferred stock and common stock indirectly held by limited liability company, in which we own membership interests. |
(9) | Non-income producing at the relevant period end. |
(10) | As a percentage of net assets at December 31, 2006, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (97.9%), senior unsecured notes (12.8%), senior subordinated unsecured notes (5.2%), subordinated promissory notes (0.4%), preferred stock (1.1%), common stock (1.5%), and warrants to purchase equity securities (1.3%). |
(11) | Debt investment pledged as collateral under the Companys revolving credit agreement, with the following credit limits noted: Questia Media, Inc. ($10 million), Ai Squared ($20 million),TrenStar, Inc. ($15 million) and Endurance International Group, Inc. ($20 million). |
(13) | Aggregate gross unrealized capital appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $1,270,921; aggregate gross unrealized capital depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $747,058. Net unrealized capital appreciation is $523,863 based upon a tax cost basis of $325,660,997. |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-28
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||
From non-affiliated investments: |
||||||||
Interest incomedebt investments |
$ | 8,658,400 | $ | 6,028,432 | ||||
Interest incomecash and cash equivalents |
121,519 | 353,981 | ||||||
Other income |
280,250 | 826,077 | ||||||
Total investment income from non-affiliated investments |
9,060,169 | 7,208,490 | ||||||
From affiliated investments: |
||||||||
Interest incomedebt investments |
836,691 | 0 | ||||||
Other income |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Total investment income from affiliated investments |
836,691 | 0 | ||||||
Total investment income |
9,896,860 | 7,208,490 | ||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||
Compensation expense |
200,000 | 130,182 | ||||||
Investment advisory fees |
1,641,555 | 1,348,793 | ||||||
Professional fees |
251,185 | 294,575 | ||||||
Interest expense |
1,004,226 | 0 | ||||||
General and administrative |
171,741 | 119,855 | ||||||
Total expenses |
3,268,707 | 1,893,405 | ||||||
Net investment income |
6,628,153 | 5,315,085 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments |
(3,025,461 | ) | (210,588 | ) | ||||
Net realized (losses) gains on investments |
(143,207 | ) | 158,340 | |||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 3,459,485 | $ | 5,262,837 | ||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share: |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
19,732,312 | 19,345,133 |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-29
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Three Months March 31, 2007 |
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|||||||
Increase in net assets from operations: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 6,628,153 | $ | 25,400,818 | ||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments |
(143,207 | ) | 586,491 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments |
(3,025,461 | ) | 343,863 | |||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
3,459,485 | 26,331,172 | ||||||
Dividends from net investment income: |
(7,104,969 | ) | (24,924,306 | ) | ||||
Distributions from net realized capital gains: |
0 | (2,005,367 | ) | |||||
Total dividends and distributions to shareholders |
(7,104,969 | ) | (26,929,673 | ) | ||||
Capital share transactions: |
||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends |
1,753,681 | 6,028,370 | ||||||
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
1,753,681 | 6,028,370 | ||||||
Total (decrease) increase in net assets: |
(1,891,803 | ) | 5,429,869 | |||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
271,335,345 | 265,905,476 | ||||||
Net assets at end of period (including over distributed and undistributed net investment income of $92,263 and $384,553, respectively) |
$ | 269,443,542 | $ | 271,335,345 | ||||
Capital share activity: |
||||||||
Shares sold |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Shares issued from reinvestment of dividends |
104,743 | 401,423 | ||||||
Net increase in capital share activity |
104,743 | 401,423 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes.
F-30
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 3,459,485 | $ | 5,262,837 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Increase in investments due to PIK. |
(509,281 | ) | (757,647 | ) | ||||
Net realized losses (gains) on investments |
143,207 | (158,340 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments |
3,025,461 | 210,588 | ||||||
Decrease in interest receivable |
621,401 | 14,539 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
(9,169 | ) | 46,132 | |||||
Amortization of discounts |
(425,522 | ) | (109,557 | ) | ||||
Decrease in investment advisory fee payable |
(353,962 | ) | (239,609 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
(53,506 | ) | 0 | |||||
Increase in accrued expenses and accrued offering expenses |
139,036 | 35,004 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
6,037,150 | 4,303,947 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(26,400,000 | ) | (50,030,000 | ) | ||||
Repayments of principal |
32,795,408 | 4,625,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of investments |
18,750 | 931,826 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
6,414,158 | (44,473,174 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Amounts borrowed under repurchase agreement |
0 | 24,912,500 | ||||||
Amounts borrowed under revolving credit facility |
25,000,000 | 0 | ||||||
Amounts paid back under revolving credit facility |
(27,000,000 | ) | 0 | |||||
Dividends paid |
(7,715,987 | ) | (5,827,764 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(9,715,987 | ) | 19,084,736 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,735,321 | (21,084,491 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
5,181,512 | 55,811,584 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 7,916,833 | $ | 34,727,093 | ||||
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan |
$ | 1,753,681 | $ | 2,294,711 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 1,057,732 | $ | |
See Accompanying Notes.
F-31
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP.
MARCH 31, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Interim financial statements of Technology Investment Capital Corp. (TICC or Company) are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods have been included. The current periods results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved for the year. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
NOTE 2. ORGANIZATION
TICC was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on July 21, 2003 as a closed-end management investment company. The Company has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). In addition, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Companys investment objective is to maximize its total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies.
TICCs investment activities are managed by Technology Investment Management, LLC (TIM), a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the Advisers Act). BDC Partners, LLC (BDC Partners) is the managing member of TIM and serves as the administrator of TICC.
NOTE 3. INVESTMENT VALUATION
The Company carries its investments at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. Securities that are publicly traded are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. In connection with that determination, members of TIMs portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, the Company has engaged a third-party valuation firm to perform independent valuations of its investments.
Under the valuation policy approved by the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, the third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of our portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of the Companys total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of the Companys total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of the third-party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly.
F-32
The Board of Directors considers the valuation analyses as prepared by TIM and the third-party valuation firm, respectively, as a component of the foundation for the final fair value determination. In making such determination, the Board of Directors values non-convertible debt securities at cost plus amortized original issue discount plus payment-in-kind (PIK) interest, if any, unless adverse factors lead to a determination of a lesser valuation. Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have resulted had a readily available market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuation currently assigned to such investments. The Company will record unrealized depreciation on investments when it believes that an investment has become impaired, including when collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful; if there is adequate enterprise value to support the repayment of our debt then the fair value typically corresponds to cost unless the borrowers condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value at a different amount. The Company will record unrealized appreciation if it believes that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and its equity security has also appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statements of operations as the net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments.
NOTE 4. NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | |||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||
Numerator for basic and diluted income per share - net investment income |
$ | 6,628,153 | $ | 5,315,085 | ||
Numerator for basic and diluted income per share - net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 3,459,485 | $ | 5,262,837 | ||
Denominator for basic and diluted income per share - weighted average shares |
19,732,312 | 19,345,133 | ||||
Basic and diluted net investment income per common share |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.27 | ||
Basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.27 |
NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with TIM. TIM is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TIM is owned by Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce & Associates) as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TIM, manages the business and internal affairs of TIM. In addition, BDC Partners provides TICC with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement. Jonathan H. Cohen, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, as well as a Director, is the managing member of BDC Partners. Saul B. Rosenthal, the Companys President and Chief Operating Officer, is also the President and Chief Operating Officer of TIM and a member of BDC Partners. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal have an equal equity interest in BDC Partners. Mr. Royce is also President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates. Royce & Associates, as the non-managing member of TIM, does not take part in the management or participate in the operations of TIM; however, Royce & Associates has agreed to make Mr. Royce or certain other portfolio managers available to TIM to provide certain consulting services without compensation. Royce & Associates is a wholly owned subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc.
F-33
The Company has also entered into an Administration Agreement with BDC Partners under which BDC Partners provides administrative services for TICC. The Company pays BDC Partners our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors must monitor.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, TICC incurred investment advisory fees of $1,641,555 and $1,348,793, of which $1,641,555 and $1,259,204 remained payable to TIM at the end of each respective quarter. Pursuant to the terms of its administration agreement with BDC Partners, for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, TICC incurred $200,000 and $130,182 in compensation expenses for employees allocated to the administrative activities of TICC, of which $94,274 and $30,018 remained payable at the end of the respective quarter. TICC also incurred $18,000 and $10,869 for reimbursement of facility costs for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, of which amounts $6,089 and $8,094, respectively, remained payable at the end of each period.
NOTE 6. DIVIDENDS
The Company intends to continue to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Code and, as such, the Company would not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required, among other requirements, to distribute at least 90% of its annual investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based upon the annual earnings estimated by the management of the Company. To the extent that the Companys earnings fall below the amount of dividends declared, however, a portion of the total amount of the Companys dividends for the fiscal year may be deemed a return of capital for tax purposes to the Companys stockholders.
On March 30, 2007, the Company paid a dividend of $0.36 per share, which included approximately $0.02 per share of undistributed net investment income from 2006, and approximately $0.34 per share of investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Management monitors available net investment income to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent the Companys taxable earnings fall below the total amount of the Companys distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to the Companys stockholders.
The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan under which all distributions are paid to stockholders in the form of additional shares, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash.
NOTE 7. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
The Companys net asset value per share at March 31, 2007 was $13.60, and at December 31, 2006 was $13.77. In determining the Companys net asset value per share, the Board of Directors determined in good faith the fair value of the Companys portfolio investments for which reliable market quotations are not readily available.
NOTE 8. PAYMENT-IN-KIND INTEREST
The Company has investments in its portfolio which contain a PIK provision. The PIK interest is added to the cost basis of the investment and recorded as income. To maintain the Companys status as a RIC (as discussed in Note 6 above), this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends
F-34
may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company received PIK interest of $509,281 and $757,647, respectively, and recorded a corresponding increase in the cost of the investment. One of the debt investments which has a provision for PIK interest, GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., has been placed on non-accrual status as of March 31, 2007.
In addition, the Company recorded original issue discount income (OID) of approximately $425,522 for the three months ended March 31, 2007, representing the amortization of the discounted cost attributed to certain debt securities purchased by the Company in connection with the issuance of warrants or stock. The Company had approximately $109,557 in OID income for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
NOTE 9. OTHER INCOME
Other income includes primarily closing fees, or origination fees, associated with investments in portfolio companies. Such fees are normally paid at closing of the Companys investments, are fully earned and non-refundable, and are generally non-recurring.
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company make available managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company may receive fee income for managerial assistance it renders to portfolio companies in connection with its investments. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, the Company received no fee income for managerial assistance.
NOTE 10. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Financial highlights for the three months ending March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Per Share Data |
||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period |
$ | 13.77 | $ | 13.77 | ||||
Net investment income (1) |
0.34 | 0.27 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized capital gains (2) |
(0.17 | ) | 0.01 | |||||
Effect of shares issued, net of offering expenses |
0.02 | 0.00 | ||||||
Total from investment operations |
0.19 | 0.28 | ||||||
Dividends from net investment income (3) |
(0.36 | ) | (0.30 | ) | ||||
Net asset value at end of period |
$ | 13.60 | $ | 13.75 | ||||
Per share market value at beginning of period |
$ | 16.14 | $ | 15.10 | ||||
Per share market value at end of period |
$ | 16.91 | $ | 14.54 | ||||
Total return (4) |
7.00 | % | (1.7 | %) | ||||
Shares outstanding at end of period |
19,810,567 | 19,459,976 | ||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
||||||||
Net assets at end of period (000s) |
$ | 269,444 | $ | 267,657 | ||||
Average net assets (000s) |
$ | 273,558 | $ | 267,415 | ||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets |
4.78 | % | 2.83 | % | ||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets |
3.31 | % | 2.83 | % | ||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
9.69 | % | 7.95 | % |
(1) |
Represents per share net investment income for the period, based upon average shares outstanding. |
(2) |
Includes rounding adjustment to reconcile change in net asset value per share. |
F-35
(3) |
Dividends for the first quarter of 2007 were funded from undistributed net investment income from 2006, as well as net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Management monitors available net investment income to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent the Companys taxable earnings fall below the total amount of the Companys distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to the Companys stockholders. |
(4) |
Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. Total return is not annualized. |
NOTE 11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, cash and cash equivalents consisted of:
March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||
Eurodollar Time Deposit (due 4/2/07 and 1/2/07) |
$ | 7,916,833 | $ | 5,181,512 | ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$ | 7,916,833 | $ | 5,181,512 | ||
NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had issued commitments to purchase additional debt investments and/or warrants from certain portfolio companies, contingent upon their meeting agreed-upon financial milestones. Total commitments of $7.6 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2007 to The Endurance International Group ($6 million), WHITTMANHART, Inc. ($1 million) and GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. ($600,000).
NOTE 13. REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
The Company has a Credit Facility, with Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) as an agent and a lender, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) as an additional lender. The amount of the Credit Facility is $100 million, with each lender providing $50 million under the facility. The Credit Facility supplements the Companys equity capital and provides funding for additional portfolio investments, as well as general corporate matters. All amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable within one year of the date of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of April 11, 2008.
Under the Credit Facility agreement the Company must satisfy monthly several portfolio covenant requirements including minimum market value, weighted average maturity, and average weighted coupon rate on all secured transaction assets, as well as limitations on the principal amounts of eligible transaction assets. In addition, the Company must comply with other general covenants including indebtedness, liens and pledges, restricted payments, mergers and consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
The Company had outstanding borrowings of $56.5 million under the facility as of March 31, 2007 and related accrued interest payable of approximately $0.4 million; the Company had borrowings of approximately $58.5 million as of December 31, 2006 and related interest payable of approximately $0.5 million.
NOTE 14. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (the Interpretation). The Interpretation establishes for all entities, including pass-through entities such as the Company, a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of positions taken in filing tax returns (including whether an entity is taxable in a particular jurisdiction), and requires certain expanded tax disclosure. The
F-36
Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the date of effectiveness. Management has evaluated the application of the Interpretation to the Company, and has determined that it does not have any effect on the Companys financial statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 157, Fair Value Measurements, which clarifies the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. Adoption of SFAS 157 requires the use of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. At this time, the Company is in the process of reviewing SFAS 157 against the Companys current valuation policies to determine its impact on the financial statements, if any.
NOTE 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April 10, 2007, the Company completed an $11.5 million transaction with PrePak Systems, Inc., whereby the Company invested $10 million in senior secured notes with a commitment of an additional $1.5 million in senior notes, as the company achieves certain milestones. PrePak Systems, Inc. is a contract packaging organization that repackages bulk pharmaceuticals into bottles, blister packs and individually packaged doses for government mail outpatient pharmacies and hospitals, commercial hospitals, nursing homes, and direct pharmacy clients.
On April 24, 2007, the Company completed a $15.0 million investment in senior secured notes issued by American Integration Technologies, LLC an existing portfolio company.
On April 30, 2007, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.36 per share for the second quarter, payable on June 29, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 8, 2007.
On May 7, 2007, the Company completed a $14.9 million transaction with Box Services, LLC, whereby the Company invested $13.5 million in senior secured notes with a commitment of an additional $1.4 million in senior notes, as the company achieves certain milestones. Box Services is a provider of digital imaging services to leading professional photographers, luxury fashion brands, publishers and advertisers.
On May 7, 2007, the Company amended its credit facility with the Royal Bank of Canada and Branch Banking & Trust Company, reducing the interest rate on the facility by 50 basis points, to 1.75% over LIBOR, and increasing the size of the facility to $150 million.
F-37
1,250,000 Shares
Technology Investment Capital Corp.
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
, 2007
Wachovia Securities