CORRESP 1 filename1.htm Correspondence

LOGO

B. Andrew Rose

Chief Financial Officer

April 3, 2009

Mr. John Cash

Accounting Branch Chief

Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Washington, D.C. 20549-7010

 

  Re: Follow-up Letter Dated March 24, 2009 to Comment letter dated February 19, 2009, File No. 1-8399 Worthington Industries, Inc.

Dear Mr. Cash:

This letter is in response to the comment of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission “) provided in your letter dated March 24, 2009, as a follow-up to the response from Worthington Industries, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” or “our”). In responding to this comment, we acknowledge that:

 

   

The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings;

 

   

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

 

   

The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.


Mr. John Cash

April 3, 2009

Page 2

 

The following is your comment followed by our response:

Worthington Industries, Inc. Schedule 14A

Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 22

 

  1. We have considered your response to our prior comments #7 thru #9 and we are unable to concur with your argument that the use of the comparator group information in the determination of executive compensation does not constitute benchmarking. Accordingly, as previously requested, please provide the information required by Item 402(b)(2)(xiv) of Regulation S-K. Refer to Question 118.05 of the Regulation S-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, which are available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corp/guidance/regs-kinterp.htm.

Response:

Item 402(b)(2)(xiv) of Regulation S-K provides that a Registrant should discuss:

(xiv) Whether the registrant engaged in any benchmarking of total compensation, or any material element of compensation, identifying the benchmark and, if applicable, its components (including component companies); and

We believe the following material from pages 23 and 24 of our 2008 Proxy Statement addressed most of the information contemplated by this item. It provides a description of the comparator group and states that comparator group information is reviewed with respect to “base salaries, bonuses, and long-term incentive programs.”

The [Compensation] Committee annually reviews certain market compensation information with the assistance of an independent compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, who is directly engaged by the Committee to prepare the information. This information includes information regarding compensation paid to officers with similar responsibilities by a broad-based group of more than 120 manufacturing companies with revenues between $1 billion and $10 billion (the “comparator group”). For comparison purposes, due to variance in size of the companies in the comparator group, regression analysis, which is an objective analytical tool used to determine the relationship between data, is used to adjust data. The Compensation Committee believes that using this broad-based comparator group minimizes the effects of changes to the group due to changes in data-base participation or mergers/acquisitions, lessens the impact a single entity can have on the overall data, provides more consistent results and better reflects the market in which the Company competes for executive talent.

During its review process, the Compensation Committee meets directly with the compensation consultant to review and evaluate comparator group information with respect to base salaries, bonuses and long-term incentive programs. The Company and the Compensation Committee are committed to reviewing compensation for market competitiveness, and to employing incentive compensation vehicles and practices that continue to drive Company performance and that are aligned with shareholder


Mr. John Cash

April 3, 2009

Page 3

 

interests. The Compensation Committee reviews the information provided by the compensation consultant as an important factor in determining the appropriate levels and mix of executive compensation.

The following provides additional information on the comparator group and its component companies.

The comparator group comprises all manufacturing companies maintained in the executive compensation database of our compensation consultant at the time the study is conducted with revenues between $1 billion and $10 billion. Changes in that group occur as companies begin or cease participation in the database, due to the sale, merger or acquisition of companies included, due to an increase or decrease in revenues, or for other reasons.

Exhibit A sets forth the entities in the comparator group at the time of the Towers-Perrin study.

We would intend to include additional information similar to the above in future filings as it remains applicable.

We believe the above is responsive to your comments. Should you need further information, please contact Dale Brinkman, General Counsel at (614) 438-3001.

 

Sincerely,

/s/ B. Andrew Rose

B. Andrew Rose

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


EXHIBIT A

 

2007 U.S. CDB General Industry Executive Database    1

 

Manufacturing Industry Companies between $1 - $10B

 

Company Name

  

Company Name

A.O. Smith    JM Family
Advanced Medical Optics    Kaman Industrial Technologies
Advanced Micro Devices    Kennametal
Agilent Technologies    KLA-Tencor
Air Products and Chemicals    Kohler
Alliant Techsystems    La-Z-Boy
American Axle & Manufacturing    Leggett and Platt
American Standard    Lexmark International
Anchor Danly    Louisiana-Pacific
Appleton Papers    MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates
Applied Materials    Makino
Armstrong World Industries    Manitowoc
ArvinMeritor    Martin Marietta Materials
Ball    Masco
Barrick Gold of North America    MeadWestvaco
Beckman Coulter    Millipore
Brady    Mine Safety Appliances
CA    Monaco Coach
Callaway Golf    MSC Industrial Direct
Cameron International    National Semiconductor
Carpenter Technology    Navistar International
Carter Holt Harvey    NCR
Celestica    Noranda Aluminum
Ceridian    Owens-Illinois
CGI    Parker Hannifin
Chesapeake    PerkinElmer
Connell    Pitney Bowes
CONSTAR International    Plexus
Cooper Standard Automotive    Plum Creek Timber
Cooper Tire & Rubber    Polymer Group
Corning    Rockwell Automation
Crown Holdings    Rockwell Collins
Curtiss-Wright    SAIC
Dana    Scotts Miracle-Gro
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group    Seagate Technology
Donaldson    Sensata Technologies
Dresser-Rand    Smith & Nephew
EMC    Smurfit-Stone Container
FANUC Robotics America    Sonoco Products
Federal-Mogul    Steelcase
Fleetwood Enterprises    SunGard Data Systems
Flowserve    Sybron Dental Specialties
Fortune Brands    Symantec
Gates    TDK


EXHIBIT A

 

2007 U.S. CDB General Industry Executive Database    2

 

 

GATX    Tektronix
Goodrich    Temple-Inland
Greif Bros    Terex
GTECH    Textron
Harley-Davidson    Thomas & Betts
Harman International Industries    TI Automotive
Harsco    Timken
Hayes Lemmerz    Toro
Herman Miller    Tower Automotive
Hexcel    Trinity Industries
HNI    Unisys
IDEX    United Rentals
Ingersoll-Rand    USG
Invensys Controls    Valmont Industries
Invensys Process Systems    Visteon
Itochu International    Vulcan Materials
ITT—Corporate    W.W. Grainger