B. Andrew Rose
Chief Financial Officer
April 3, 2009
Mr. John Cash
Accounting Branch Chief
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Washington, D.C. 20549-7010
Re: | Follow-up Letter Dated March 24, 2009 to Comment letter dated February 19, 2009, File No. 1-8399 Worthington Industries, Inc. |
Dear Mr. Cash:
This letter is in response to the comment of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission ) provided in your letter dated March 24, 2009, as a follow-up to the response from Worthington Industries, Inc. (the Company, we, or our). In responding to this comment, we acknowledge that:
| The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings; |
| Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and |
| The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
Mr. John Cash
April 3, 2009
Page 2
The following is your comment followed by our response:
Worthington Industries, Inc. Schedule 14A
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 22
1. | We have considered your response to our prior comments #7 thru #9 and we are unable to concur with your argument that the use of the comparator group information in the determination of executive compensation does not constitute benchmarking. Accordingly, as previously requested, please provide the information required by Item 402(b)(2)(xiv) of Regulation S-K. Refer to Question 118.05 of the Regulation S-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, which are available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corp/guidance/regs-kinterp.htm. |
Response:
Item 402(b)(2)(xiv) of Regulation S-K provides that a Registrant should discuss:
(xiv) Whether the registrant engaged in any benchmarking of total compensation, or any material element of compensation, identifying the benchmark and, if applicable, its components (including component companies); and
We believe the following material from pages 23 and 24 of our 2008 Proxy Statement addressed most of the information contemplated by this item. It provides a description of the comparator group and states that comparator group information is reviewed with respect to base salaries, bonuses, and long-term incentive programs.
The [Compensation] Committee annually reviews certain market compensation information with the assistance of an independent compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, who is directly engaged by the Committee to prepare the information. This information includes information regarding compensation paid to officers with similar responsibilities by a broad-based group of more than 120 manufacturing companies with revenues between $1 billion and $10 billion (the comparator group). For comparison purposes, due to variance in size of the companies in the comparator group, regression analysis, which is an objective analytical tool used to determine the relationship between data, is used to adjust data. The Compensation Committee believes that using this broad-based comparator group minimizes the effects of changes to the group due to changes in data-base participation or mergers/acquisitions, lessens the impact a single entity can have on the overall data, provides more consistent results and better reflects the market in which the Company competes for executive talent.
During its review process, the Compensation Committee meets directly with the compensation consultant to review and evaluate comparator group information with respect to base salaries, bonuses and long-term incentive programs. The Company and the Compensation Committee are committed to reviewing compensation for market competitiveness, and to employing incentive compensation vehicles and practices that continue to drive Company performance and that are aligned with shareholder
Mr. John Cash
April 3, 2009
Page 3
interests. The Compensation Committee reviews the information provided by the compensation consultant as an important factor in determining the appropriate levels and mix of executive compensation.
The following provides additional information on the comparator group and its component companies.
The comparator group comprises all manufacturing companies maintained in the executive compensation database of our compensation consultant at the time the study is conducted with revenues between $1 billion and $10 billion. Changes in that group occur as companies begin or cease participation in the database, due to the sale, merger or acquisition of companies included, due to an increase or decrease in revenues, or for other reasons.
Exhibit A sets forth the entities in the comparator group at the time of the Towers-Perrin study.
We would intend to include additional information similar to the above in future filings as it remains applicable.
We believe the above is responsive to your comments. Should you need further information, please contact Dale Brinkman, General Counsel at (614) 438-3001.
Sincerely, |
/s/ B. Andrew Rose |
B. Andrew Rose |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT A
2007 U.S. CDB General Industry Executive Database | 1 |
Manufacturing Industry Companies between $1 - $10B
Company Name |
Company Name | |
A.O. Smith | JM Family | |
Advanced Medical Optics | Kaman Industrial Technologies | |
Advanced Micro Devices | Kennametal | |
Agilent Technologies | KLA-Tencor | |
Air Products and Chemicals | Kohler | |
Alliant Techsystems | La-Z-Boy | |
American Axle & Manufacturing | Leggett and Platt | |
American Standard | Lexmark International | |
Anchor Danly | Louisiana-Pacific | |
Appleton Papers | MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates | |
Applied Materials | Makino | |
Armstrong World Industries | Manitowoc | |
ArvinMeritor | Martin Marietta Materials | |
Ball | Masco | |
Barrick Gold of North America | MeadWestvaco | |
Beckman Coulter | Millipore | |
Brady | Mine Safety Appliances | |
CA | Monaco Coach | |
Callaway Golf | MSC Industrial Direct | |
Cameron International | National Semiconductor | |
Carpenter Technology | Navistar International | |
Carter Holt Harvey | NCR | |
Celestica | Noranda Aluminum | |
Ceridian | Owens-Illinois | |
CGI | Parker Hannifin | |
Chesapeake | PerkinElmer | |
Connell | Pitney Bowes | |
CONSTAR International | Plexus | |
Cooper Standard Automotive | Plum Creek Timber | |
Cooper Tire & Rubber | Polymer Group | |
Corning | Rockwell Automation | |
Crown Holdings | Rockwell Collins | |
Curtiss-Wright | SAIC | |
Dana | Scotts Miracle-Gro | |
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group | Seagate Technology | |
Donaldson | Sensata Technologies | |
Dresser-Rand | Smith & Nephew | |
EMC | Smurfit-Stone Container | |
FANUC Robotics America | Sonoco Products | |
Federal-Mogul | Steelcase | |
Fleetwood Enterprises | SunGard Data Systems | |
Flowserve | Sybron Dental Specialties | |
Fortune Brands | Symantec | |
Gates | TDK |
EXHIBIT A
2007 U.S. CDB General Industry Executive Database | 2 |
GATX | Tektronix | |
Goodrich | Temple-Inland | |
Greif Bros | Terex | |
GTECH | Textron | |
Harley-Davidson | Thomas & Betts | |
Harman International Industries | TI Automotive | |
Harsco | Timken | |
Hayes Lemmerz | Toro | |
Herman Miller | Tower Automotive | |
Hexcel | Trinity Industries | |
HNI | Unisys | |
IDEX | United Rentals | |
Ingersoll-Rand | USG | |
Invensys Controls | Valmont Industries | |
Invensys Process Systems | Visteon | |
Itochu International | Vulcan Materials | |
ITTCorporate | W.W. Grainger |