UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

Innodata Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Three University Plaza Drive

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 5, 2015

To the Stockholders of Innodata Inc.:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Innodata Inc. (the "Company") will be held at Innodata Inc., Three University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 at 11:00 A.M. on June 5, 2015, for the following purposes:

A Proxy Statement, form of Proxy, and the Annual Report to Stockholders of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 are enclosed herewith. Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Company at the close of business on April 17, 2015 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote will be available for inspection by any stockholder during the meeting; in addition, the list will be open for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting at the office of the Secretary of the Company, located at Three University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Meeting. If you do not expect to be present, please sign and date the enclosed form of Proxy and return it promptly using the enclosed envelope. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. Any person giving a Proxy has the power to revoke it at any time prior to its exercise and if present at the Meeting may withdraw it and vote in person.

Voting in Person at the Meeting

Registered holders can vote in person. Beneficial owners must obtain a proxy from their brokerage firm, bank, or other holder of record and present it to the inspector of elections with their ballot in order to be able to vote shares in person at the meeting. Voting in person will replace any previous votes submitted by Proxy.

Attendance at the Meeting is limited to stockholders, their proxies and invited guests of the Company. Directions to the meeting may be found at www.mapquest.com.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 5, 2015

We have elected to provide access to our Proxy materials both by sending you this full set of Proxy materials, including a Proxy card, and by notifying you of the availability of our Proxy materials on the Internet.

This Proxy Statement and the 2014 Annual Report are available on the Internet at: http://www.innodata.com/proxy

INNODATA INC.

Three University Plaza Drive

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Innodata Inc. (the "Company") of Proxies in the form enclosed. Such Proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at Innodata Inc., Three University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 at 11:00 A.M. on June 5, 2015 (the "Meeting") and at any adjournments thereof for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This Proxy Statement and accompanying Proxy are being mailed on or about May 5, 2015 to all stockholders of record on April 17, 2015 (the "Record Date").

Any stockholder giving a Proxy has the power to revoke the same at any time before it is voted. The cost of soliciting Proxies will be borne by the Company. Following the mailing of the Proxy materials, solicitation of Proxies may be made by officers and employees of the Company by mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic communication or personal interview. Properly executed Proxies will be voted in accordance with instructions given by stockholders at the places provided for such purpose in the accompanying Proxy and, as to any other matter properly coming before the Meeting (none of which is presently known to the Board of Directors), in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated as proxies. Unless contrary instructions are given by stockholders, persons named in the Proxy intend to vote the shares represented by such Proxies for the election of the six nominees for director named herein, for the selection of CohnReznick LLP as independent auditors, and for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the Company’s executive compensation as disclosed in these materials. The current members of the Board of Directors presently hold voting authority for Common Stock representing an aggregate of 1,193,985 votes, or approximately 4.7% of the total number of votes eligible to be cast at the Meeting. The members of the Board of Directors have indicated their intention to vote affirmatively on all of the proposals.

VOTING SECURITIES

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournments thereof. On the Record Date there were 25,337,267 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"). Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share held by such holder. The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Meeting. Proxies submitted which contain abstentions or broker non-votes will be deemed present at the Meeting in determining the presence of a quorum.

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

It is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of Proxy, unless such form of Proxy specifies otherwise, to nominate and to vote the shares represented by such Proxy for the election as directors of Jack S. Abuhoff, Haig S. Bagerdjian, Louise C. Forlenza, Stewart R. Massey, Anthea C. Stratigos and Andargachew S. Zelleke to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees named below currently serves as a director of the Company and was elected at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 3, 2014. The Company has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will become unavailable to serve as director for any reason before the Meeting. However, in the event that any of them shall become unavailable, each of the persons designated as proxy reserves the right to substitute another person of his or her choice when voting at the Meeting. Below is the biographical and other information about the nominees. Following each nominee’s biographical information, we have provided information concerning the particular experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills that led the Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that each nominee should serve as a director.

Jack S. Abuhoff, age 54, has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since September 15, 1997, and a director of the Company since its founding in 1988. Mr. Abuhoff has been the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since May 2001. From 1995 to 1997 he was Chief Operating Officer of Charles River Corporation, an international systems integration and outsourcing firm. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Abuhoff was employed by Chadbourne & Parke, LLP, in connection with its joint venture with Goldman Sachs to develop capital projects in China. Mr. Abuhoff is a trustee on the Board of Trustees of the Harvard Law School Association of New Jersey. He practiced international corporate law at White & Case LLP from 1986 to 1992. Mr. Abuhoff holds an A.B. degree in English from Columbia College (1983), and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School (1986).

Key Experience, Attributes and Skills

Mr. Abuhoff has knowledge of the Company, its clients and the industries the Company serves, both from an historical and a current perspective, as well as leadership and management skills, international experience, and experience in providing outsourced services.

Haig S. Bagerdjian, age 58, has served as one of the Company’s directors since June 2001. He has also been Chairman of the Board of Point.360 (OTCQX: PTSX), a provider of video and film asset management services to owners, producers and distributors of entertainment and advertising content, since September 2001, and its President and Chief Executive Officer since October 2002. Mr. Bagerdjian has also served as a director of Destiny Media Technologies Inc. (TSXV: DSY.V; OCTQX: DSNY), a provider of services that enable content owners to securely display and distribute their audio and video content digitally through the internet, since January 2015. From 1991 to 2002, Mr. Bagerdjian served in various executive management positions at Syncor International Corporation (Nasdaq: SCOR), a leading provider of radiopharmaceuticals, comprehensive nuclear pharmacy services and medical imaging services, including: Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer of Syncor Overseas, Ltd., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Syncor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chief Legal Officer, and Senior Vice President, Business Development. Mr. Bagerdjian received a B.A. degree in International Relations and Slavic Languages and Literature, and Certificates in Russian Studies, Strategic Defense and National Security, from the University of Southern California (1983), and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School (1986). He is admitted to the State Bar of California.

Key Experience, Attributes and Skills

Mr. Bagerdjian has leadership experience as a Chairman, CEO and President of a public company. He has public company board experience, as well as experience in international operations, mergers and acquisitions, compensation and governance, and provides diversity of background and viewpoint.

Louise C. Forlenza, age 65, has served as one of the Company’s directors since October 2002. From 1994 to the present, Ms. Forlenza has been providing audit consultancy, management advisory, and tax planning services to a diverse group of corporate clients. From 1987 through 1992, she was the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Intercontinental Exchange Partners, an international foreign exchange company, and served as a director and as chair of its International Audit Committee. Prior to joining Intercontinental, Ms. Forlenza was Chief Financial Officer of Bierbaum-Martin, a foreign exchange firm. Ms. Forlenza participates actively in various not-for-profit and philanthropic organizations including as a trustee of Arts Horizons. She is a Certified Public Accountant and served on the faculty of the accounting department of Iona College from 1981 to 1982. Ms. Forlenza received a B.B.A. degree in Accounting from Iona College (1971).

Key Experience, Attributes and Skills

Ms. Forlenza satisfies the financial literacy requirements of Nasdaq and has been determined to be an “audit committee financial expert” under the SEC’s rules and regulations. A Certified Public Accountant and a former CFO, she has a background in accounting, audit, tax planning and foreign exchange planning, and provides diversity of background and viewpoint.

Stewart R. Massey, age 58, has served as one of the Company’s directors since March 2009. Mr. Massey co-founded Massey, Quick and Co. LLC in 2004 after a 24-year career on Wall Street. Massey Quick currently oversees approximately $3.0 billion in investment assets for endowments, foundations and wealthy families. Mr. Massey joined Morgan Stanley’s Private Client Group in 1983 after four years with Dean Witter Reynolds.  From 1988 through 1993, he was based in Hong Kong and led Morgan Stanley’s private client businesses in Asia, Australia, and Japan. Mr. Massey was Head of Japanese Equity Sales in New York from 1993 through 1996, and returned to Tokyo as Head of Institutional Equity Sales and Global Head of Japanese Equities in 1996. Mr. Massey served as President and CEO of Robert Fleming, Inc. in 1997 and 1998.  At Fleming, he had regional responsibility for equity sales and trading, research, capital markets, investment banking, and asset management in the Americas, serving on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the parent company in London. Mr. Massey returned to Morgan Stanley in September of 1998 as a Managing Director and Head of Institutional Sales, Marketing, and Product Development for the firm’s prime brokerage business. He later served as the senior relationship manager for a number of Morgan Stanley’s most prominent institutional global clients. Mr. Massey holds a B.A. degree in History from The College of Wooster (1979), where he has served as a Trustee since 1987.  As an Emeritus Trustee he serves on the Trustee and Governance, Finance and Investment committees.  Mr. Massey also serves on the investment committees of Hobart and William Smith Colleges, The Visiting Nurse Association of Somerset Hills and St. Mary’s Abbey Delbarton. Mr. Massey was honored as one of the top 100 independent investment advisors in America by Barron’s Magazine in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.

Key Experience, Attributes and Skills

Mr. Massey has leadership experience as a CEO and a senior executive officer. He has financial management expertise, as well as compensation, mergers and acquisitions, investment advisory, board, governance and international experience, and provides diversity of background and viewpoint.

Anthea C. Stratigos, age 54, has served as one of the Company’s directors since March 2009. Ms. Stratigos is co-founder and CEO of Outsell, Inc. (founded in 1994), a leading research and advisory firm that focuses exclusively on the information and publishing industries, providing analysis and recommendations for high-level executives regarding markets, trends, benchmarks and best practices. She is Outsell’s primary spokesperson and chairs Outsell’s Leadership Council, a member-service for CEOs and senior executives of publishing and information-provider firms. Ms. Stratigos holds a B.S. degree in Communication from Stanford University (1983) and graduated from the Executive Marketing Program at Harvard University (1992).

Key Experience, Attributes and Skills

As CEO and founder of Outsell, Ms. Stratigos brings significant current knowledge about the direction and needs of the information and publishing industries, the Company’s primary market, leadership, marketing and entrepreneurial skills, and provides diversity of background and viewpoint.

Andargachew S. Zelleke, age 54, has served as one of the Company’s directors since June 2012. In July 2011 Dr. Zelleke was appointed the MBA Class of 1962 Senior Lecturer of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School, and presently serves in that role. From July 2007 through June 2011, he was a lecturer in public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, serving for two of those years as Co-Director of the Harvard Kennedy School’s Center for Public Leadership. From July 2003 through June 2007, Dr. Zelleke was a lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. While a member of the Wharton faculty, Dr. Zelleke was Project Director and a Steering Committee member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences' Corporate Responsibility initiative, and coeditor of its 2005 book Restoring Trust in American Business (MIT Press). Dr. Zelleke has written several articles on corporate governance and op-eds on topics in leadership, corporate governance and foreign affairs. He has served as a consultant to leading law firms in relation to three major business litigations and is formerly a business lawyer who practiced law for six years at two large international law firms. Dr. Zelleke received an A.B. in Government from Harvard College (1983) and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School (1986). He also received an A.M. in Sociology (2000) and a Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior (2003), both from Harvard University. Dr. Zelleke is a member of the State Bar of New York and the Council on Foreign Relations.

Key Experience, Attributes and Skills

Dr. Zelleke has expertise in corporate governance and negotiation as well as experience in corporate law, organizational strategy and leadership development, and provides diversity of background and experience.

There are no family relationships between or among any nominees for director of the Company. Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that Haig S. Bagerdjian, Louise C. Forlenza, Stewart R. Massey, Anthea C. Stratigos and Andargachew S. Zelleke are independent directors. The independent directors comprise a majority of the Board. The only director who is not independent is Jack S. Abuhoff, the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Company defines independence as meeting the requirements to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2). To assist in determining director independence, the Board of Directors also considers any business relationship with any independent director, including any business entity with which any independent director is affiliated, to determine if there is any material relationship that would impair a director’s independence. In making its determination, the Board of Directors reviewed information provided by each of the directors and information gathered by the Company.

Board Leadership Structure

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Positions

The Board of Directors believes that having a combined Chairman of the Board/Chief Executive Officer, independent directors with strong leadership and management experience, an independent director serving as the Lead Independent Director and Board of Directors committees being comprised solely of independent directors, provides an effective and efficient leadership structure that is appropriate for the Company at the present time. The Chairman/CEO has primary responsibility for managing the business. Combining the leadership role avoids duplication of efforts while strengthening the Chairman/CEO’s ability to provide insight and direction on important strategic initiatives to both management and the independent directors.

Lead Independent Director

Stewart R. Massey currently serves as the Company’s Lead Independent Director. The principal responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director are to:

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors believes that the goal of risk oversight is to identify and assess risks which may affect the Company’s ability to fulfill its business objectives and to formulate plans to mitigate potential effects. The Board of Directors administers its oversight function directly, through both its Audit and Compensation Committees, and through executive management of the Company, as follows:

The Board of Directors believes the various roles of the board committees and executive management in risk oversight described above complement the Board of Directors’ leadership structure described above, including the combination of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors meets throughout the year on a set schedule. The Board of Directors also holds special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent from time to time as appropriate. The Board of Directors held six meetings during the year ended December 31, 2014. Each director, except for Mr. Bagerdjian, attended at least 75% of all of the meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period they served as Director, and each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of all committees on which he or she served. The Company does not have a policy requiring incumbent directors and director nominees to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. Two directors attended last year’s annual meeting.

The Board of Directors meets in executive sessions without management, as needed, immediately prior or during its regularly scheduled meetings. The Board of Directors also schedules executive sessions during the year for the independent directors only.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee 

The Company has a separately designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is available on our website at www.innodata.com. Serving on the Committee are Ms. Forlenza and Messrs. Bagerdjian and Massey. The Board of Directors has determined that it has an audit committee financial expert serving on the audit committee: Ms. Forlenza. The functions of the Audit Committee are, among other things, to make recommendations concerning the selection each year of independent auditors of the Company, to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the Company's financial reports and financial reporting processes and systems of internal controls, to consider whether the Company's principal accountant’s provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence, and to determine through discussions with the independent auditors whether any instructions or limitations have been placed upon them in connection with the scope of their audit. To carry out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met four times during fiscal 2014. The Company defines independence as meeting the standards to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2), and the Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Audit Committee are "independent" as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).

Compensation Committee

The Company has a standing Compensation Committee comprised of Mr. Massey, Ms. Forlenza and Dr. Zelleke. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is available on our website at www.innodata.com. The function of the Compensation Committee is to discharge the responsibilities of the Board of Directors regarding executive and director compensation, including determining and approving the compensation packages of the Company’s executive officers, including its Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves stock option grants to non-executive officer employees. The Chief Executive Officer recommends to the Compensation Committee proposed compensation for the executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee engages the services of an independent compensation consultant on an as-needed basis to provide market data and advice regarding executive compensation and proposed compensation programs and amounts. To carry out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee met four times during fiscal 2014. The Company defines independence as meeting the standards to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2), and the Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Compensation Committee are "independent" as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2).

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr. Massey, Ms. Forlenza and Dr. Zelleke, none of whom are or were officers or employees of the Company.

Nominating Committee

The Company has a standing Nominating Committee comprised of Dr. Zelleke, Mr. Bagerdjian and Ms. Forlenza. The Company does not have a Nominating Committee charter. The primary responsibilities of the Nominating Committee include assisting the Board of Directors in identifying and evaluating qualified candidates to serve as directors; recommending to the Board of Directors candidates for election or re-election to the Board of Directors or to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors; and assisting in attracting qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors. Director nominees are selected by Board of Director resolution. All of the nominees recommended for election to the Board of Directors at the Meeting are directors standing for re-election. Although the Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to the consideration of diversity, when considering director candidates the Nominating Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of the Company’s existing directors, provide a blend of skills and experience that will further enhance the Board of Directors’ effectiveness at the time the consideration is made. When considering potential director candidates, the Nominating Committee considers the candidate's character, judgment, diversity, skills, including financial literacy, and experience in the context of the needs of the Company and the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee has not established any minimum qualifications for director candidates. To carry out its responsibilities, the Nominating Committee met one time during fiscal 2014. The Company defines independence as meeting the standards to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2), and the Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Nominating Committee are "independent" as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2). In 2014 the Company did not pay any fees to any third party to assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.

The Company's by-laws include a procedure whereby its stockholders can nominate director candidates, as more fully described below under “Stockholder Proposals for the 2016 Annual Meeting.” The Board of Directors will consider director candidates recommended by the Company's stockholders in a similar manner as those recommended by members of management or other directors, provided the stockholder submitting such nomination has complied with the procedures set forth in the Company’s by-laws. To date, the Company has not received any recommended nominees from any non-management stockholder or group of stockholders who beneficially owns five percent or more of its voting stock.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Generally, stockholders who have questions or concerns regarding the Company should contact our Investor Relations department at 201-371-8000. However, stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors by sending a letter to: Board of Directors of Innodata Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 3 University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601. Any communications must contain a clear notation indicating that it is a "Stockholder—Board Communication" or a "Stockholder—Director Communication" and must identify the author as a stockholder. The office of the Corporate Secretary will receive the correspondence and forward appropriate correspondence to the Chairman of the Board or to any individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed. The Company reserves the right not to forward to the Board of Directors any communication that is hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate to the Company or its business, or is otherwise inappropriate. The office of the Corporate Secretary has authority to discard or disregard any inappropriate communication or to take any other action that it deems to be appropriate with respect to any inappropriate communications.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee, which are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, include providing oversight to the Company’s financial reporting process through periodic meetings with the Company’s independent auditors and management to review accounting, auditing, internal controls and financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee is also responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors. The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial reporting information and related systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee, in carrying out its role, relies on the Company’s senior management, including senior financial management, and its independent auditors.

The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under the Audit Committee's charter. To carry out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met four times during fiscal 2014.

The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the Company's financial reports and financial reporting processes and systems of internal controls. Management of the Company has primary responsibility for the Company's financial statements and the overall reporting process, including maintenance of the Company's system of internal controls. The Company retains independent auditors who are responsible for conducting independent audits of the Company's financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and issuing reports thereon.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s consolidated audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), including those matters set forth in Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16 (Communications with Audit Committees). The independent auditors have provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the auditors their independence from the Company. The Audit Committee has concluded that the independent auditors are independent from the Company and its management.

On the basis of the foregoing reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also recommended, subject to stockholder approval, the selection of the Company's independent auditors.

The Members of the Audit Committee

Louise C. Forlenza, Chair

Haig S. Bagerdjian

Stewart R. Massey

Fiscal 2014 and 2013 Accounting Firm Fee Summary

Set forth below is certain information concerning fees billed to the Company by CohnReznick LLP in respect of professional services rendered to the Company for the audit of the annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013; the reviews of the financial statements included in reports on Form 10-Q for periods within 2014 and 2013; related regulatory filings for periods within 2014 and 2013; and other services. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of all services is compatible with maintaining the independence of CohnReznick LLP.

Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the review of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other professional services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and the review of the Company’s financial statements and which are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services relate to consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and are not required by statute or regulation.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

All audit, audit-related services, tax services and other services provided by CohnReznick LLP must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate to its Chair the authority to pre-approve otherwise permissible non-audit services, provided that any decision made pursuant to such delegation must be presented to the full Audit Committee for informational purposes at its next scheduled meeting.

PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Subject to approval by the stockholders, the Board of Directors has appointed CohnReznick LLP as the independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. CohnReznick LLP has served as the Company's auditors since September 2008. A representative of CohnReznick LLP is expected to be present at the Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he desires to do so. A representative of CohnReznick LLP is also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions at the meeting.

In the event that the stockholders fail to ratify this appointment, other independent auditors will be considered upon recommendation of the Audit Committee. Even if this appointment is ratified, our Board of Directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent accounting firm at any time during the year, if the Board believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF
THE APPOINTMENT OF COHNREZNICK LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is information concerning the executive officers who are not directors.

Ashok Mishra has been the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2007. Prior to 2007 Mr. Mishra held senior level positions with the Company and its subsidiaries for more than nine years. Mr. Mishra has served as Senior Vice President since May 2004, after serving as Vice President, Project Delivery from October 2001 through April 2004. Prior thereto, Mr. Mishra served as Assistant Vice President, Project Delivery from November 2000 to September 2001, and as General Manager and Head of the Facility of the Company’s India operations from 1997 to October 2000. Mr. Mishra holds a Bachelor of Technology degree in Mechanical Engineering from Pantnagar University (1976). He also has Component Manufacturing Technical Training from Alcatel France (1985) and completed a condensed MBA course from Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (1995).

O’Neil Nalavadi has been the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Nalavadi was the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of R Systems International Ltd. from January 2000 and January 2001, respectively. R Systems is a provider of outsourced software product development and business process outsourcing services. Prior to R Systems, Mr. Nalavadi served as a Senior Vice President at UB Group, a $5 billion diversified conglomerate, from 1984 to 1997, and served as Chief Financial Officer of UB Group’s outsourced IT services company from August 1997 to January 2000. Mr. Nalavadi was awarded a Bachelor of Commerce and Economics degree from the University of Mumbai (1980) and qualified as a Chartered Accountant with National Honor Roll (1981).

The Company’s executive officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board of Directors. There are no family relationships between or among any of the Company’s Executive Officers.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This compensation discussion and analysis describes and analyzes the material elements of compensation awarded, earned by, or paid to each of our executive officers who served as named executive officers during the last completed fiscal year. This compensation discussion and analysis focuses on the information contained in the following tables and related footnotes and narrative for primarily the last completed fiscal year. However, we also describe compensation actions taken before or after the last completed fiscal year to the extent it enhances the understanding of our executive compensation disclosure for such completed fiscal year.

Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing and administering our executive compensation program and for establishing our executive compensation philosophy. The objectives of our compensation program are to:

The Committee applies these objectives in selecting the specific elements of compensation. The Committee also reviews and considers:

Executive Officer Compensation Processes

The Committee uses the following processes, procedures and resources to help it perform its responsibilities:

Competitive Benchmarking / Peer Group Analysis

The Company has no policy regarding the retention of independent consultants to conduct competitive benchmarking and/or a peer group analysis. The Company has, from time to time, engaged such consultants to assist in the review and determination of various executive compensation matters. No independent consultants were engaged by the Company or the Committee in calendar year 2014 with regard to executive compensation matters.

Components of the Executive Compensation Program

The primary elements of the Company’s Executive Compensation Program are:

The Committee does not use a pre-set formula to allocate a percentage of total compensation to each compensation component, and the percentage of total compensation allocated to each compensation component varies among the executive officers. Instead, the Committee relies on the processes and factors described in this discussion and analysis and takes into account the current and historical compensation components, and amount of each component, for each executive officer.

Base Salary

The base salaries of our executive officers are designed to attract and retain a high performing and dedicated leadership team. The Committee reviews the performance evaluations and salary recommendations provided to the Committee by the CEO for each executive officer other than himself. Increases to the CEO’s base salary are determined by the Committee without a recommendation by Company management. Adjustments to base salary are determined based on the individual’s responsibility level, performance, contribution and length of service, after considering the Company’s financial performance, as well as any requirements set forth in the executive officer’s employment agreement. No executive officer received a base salary increase in calendar year 2014.

Performance-Based Cash Incentives

Performance-based cash incentives provide the Company with a means of rewarding performance based upon the attainment of corporate financial goals, individual goals, and individual accomplishments and contributions to the Company. The Committee reviews Company financial performance, individual performance, accomplishments and contributions, as well as recommendations provided to the Committee by the CEO for each executive officer other than the CEO. Cash incentives may be paid pursuant to an incentive compensation plan or as cash bonuses. In 2014, incentive compensation awards for the executive officers were made pursuant to an incentive compensation plan.

The incentive compensation plan awards in 2014 were based on the extent to which the Company and each executive officer, as applicable, achieved performance measures set by the Committee for 2014. The performance measures for each of the executive officers for 2014 were Company revenues, Company gross margin, earnings before interest and taxes on content services (“EBIT”), and personal contributions to the Company’s strategic objectives (“Personal Contributions”). The target incentive compensation amount, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each executive officer on a per performance measure basis were:

The 2014 base salaries of the executive officers were $500,000 for Mr. Abuhoff, and $280,000 for each of Messrs. Mishra and Nalavadi.

Based on actual performance, the incentive compensation amount for each executive officer could increase up to a maximum of 2.85 times the Total Incentive Compensation Target set forth in the table above, or could decrease or be eliminated. The target awards set under the incentive compensation plan for 2014 together with the thresholds and maximums are set forth in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table.

Based on the extent of the Company’s achievement of the first three performance measures, which were Company financial objectives, and the executive officer’s individual achievement of the fourth performance measure, which was based on the executive’s Personal Contributions, in April 2015 the Committee awarded a performance-based cash incentive to each executive officer as follows: $107,403 to Mr. Abuhoff; $50,122 to Mr. Mishra; and $40,097 to Mr. Nalavadi.

Each executive officer voluntarily declined to accept payment of the performance-based cash incentive awarded to him by the Committee. The Committee was informed that this decision was made to demonstrate the executive officers’ solidarity and alignment with the company’s stockholders given the Company’s 2014 shareholder return, and the Committee supported this decision. The Committee will consider ways to further align incentive compensation plans and stockholder interests.

Stock-Based Incentives

The Company uses stock option grants as the primary vehicle for employee stock-based incentives. The Company also uses restricted share grants as a form of stock-based incentives. The Committee believes stock-based incentives align the executive officers’ interests with those of stockholders in building shareholder value, offer executive officers an incentive for the achievement of superior performance over time, and foster the retention of key management personnel. The number of stock options or restricted shares the Committee awards each executive officer is based on his relative position, responsibilities and performance, including anticipated future performance, potential and responsibilities, and performance over the previous fiscal year, to the extent applicable. The Committee also reviews and considers prior stock-based grants to each executive officer, including the extent to which any prior stock option grants remained unexercised upon expiration due to an underwater stock price at the time of expiration. The size of stock-based grants is not directly related to the Company’s performance. The Committee also takes into consideration recommendations asserted in prior years by an independent compensation consulting firm. In 2014 the Committee awarded the following stock option grants to the executive officers: in March 2014 80,000 shares were granted to Mr. Mishra, and in April 2014 255,000 shares were granted to Mr. Abuhoff, and 113,000 shares were granted to each of Messrs. Mishra and Nalavadi. 100% of the stock options vest and become exercisable three years from the date of grant. The three year vesting period maximizes both the retention value and the executive’s incentive to achieve superior performance over time. The stock options have a term of seven years from the date of grant.

Benefits and Perquisites

The Company offers retirement, health, life, and disability benefits, as well as medical and dependent care reimbursement plans to all full-time employees. These plans do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers. In addition, in calendar year 2014, the Company (i) reimbursed Mr. Abuhoff $14,678 for the cost of life and disability insurance premiums and related taxes pursuant to his employment agreement; (ii) provided Mr. Mishra benefits totaling $52,106 consisting of apartment rental, utilities, car rental and security in connection with the Executive’s foreign assignment, health insurance, and related fringe benefit taxes; and (iii) provided Mr. Nalavadi, in connection with his relocation to New Jersey, benefits totaling $31,108 for an apartment rental, utilities, and travel.

Severance and Change-of-Control

The Company uses severance and change-of-control agreements to attract and retain qualified, talented and dedicated executives and to help it remain competitive in the marketplace.

Results of 2014 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in June 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2013 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers by a majority of the votes cast. Although the vote cast represented firm majority support for the named executive officer compensation, the percentage of the votes cast voting in favor of the Company’s executive compensation, approximately 73%, is less than what the Company and the Compensation Committee deem satisfactory. The Compensation Committee values the stockholder feedback provided through the vote as well as the feedback received through conversations with stockholders subsequent to the vote. The Compensation Committee will continue to review the Company’s executive compensation programs and consider ways to further align these programs with stockholder interests.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Members of the Compensation Committee

Stewart R. Massey, Chair

Louise C. Forlenza

Andargachew S. Zelleke

Summary Compensation Table 2014

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid or accrued to named executive officers in 2014.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS 2014

The following table summarizes the non-equity incentive plan awards granted to named executive officers in 2014.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements

Jack S. Abuhoff

On March 25, 2009 the Company and Mr. Jack S. Abuhoff, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, executed an employment Agreement with an effective date of February 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement will continue until terminated by the Company or Mr. Abuhoff.

The Agreement provides for: annual base salary compensation of $424,350 subject to cost of living adjustments and annual discretionary increases as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors; additional cash incentive or bonus compensation for each calendar year determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion and conditioned on the attainment of certain quantitative objectives to be established by the Compensation Committee with a target bonus of not less than 60% of Mr. Abuhoff’s base salary for the year; and stock options and/or other equity-based and/or non-equity-based awards and incentives as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. The Agreement also provides for indemnification, insurance and other fringe benefits, and contains confidentiality, non-compete and non-interference provisions.

In the event Mr. Abuhoff is terminated by the Company other than for cause (as defined), death or disability, or Mr. Abuhoff resigns his employment with the Company for good reason (as defined), Mr. Abuhoff is entitled to receive (i) an amount equal to 200% of his (A) base salary and (B) the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in substantially equal payments over a period of 24 months; (ii) the continuation of his (and as applicable, his dependents’) medical and dental insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 24 month period, pay to Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 24 month continuation period); (iii) the continuation of his life and long-term disability insurance for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination and (iv) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity-based and non-equity-based awards and incentives. In the event Mr. Abuhoff is terminated by the Company coincident with or following a change-of-control (as defined), Mr. Abuhoff is entitled to receive (i) an amount equal to 300% of his (A) base salary and (B) the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in a lump sum payout within 30 days of the date of his termination; (ii) the continuation of his (and as applicable, his dependents’) medical and dental insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 36 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 36 month period, pay to Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 36 month continuation period); and (iii) the continuation of his life and long-term disability insurance for the 36 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination; and (iv) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based awards and incentives.

In the event Mr. Abuhoff is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code at the time of his termination of employment, the payments referenced above shall be delayed until the date that is six months and one day following his termination of employment (or, if earlier, the earliest other date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code). The amount payable on such date shall include all amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Abuhoff prior to that date but for the application of Section 409A and the remaining payments shall be made in substantially equal installments until fully paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the six month delay shall not apply to any such payments made (A) during the short term deferral period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), or (B) after said short term deferral period, payable solely on account of an involuntary separation from service (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) and in an amount less than the Section 409A Severance Exemption Amount. The Agreement also provides for potential tax gross-up payments in respect of taxes, penalties and/or interest that may be incurred by Mr. Abuhoff under Section 409A of the Code.

Ashok Mishra

On May 18, 2007, the Company and Mr. Ashok Mishra, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, entered into a three year agreement with an effective date of January 1, 2007 whereby the Company agreed to cause one or more of its wholly-owned subsidiaries to offer employment to Mr. Mishra. Mr. Mishra’s agreement automatically renews for one year periods unless the Company either provides a notice of non-renewal by June 30 of the then current term or the Company and Mr. Mishra execute a new agreement prior to the end of the then current term. The agreement provides for annual base compensation of $175,000 per annum, subject to annual reviews for discretionary annual increases; and incentive compensation pursuant to an incentive compensation plan. The agreement also provides for insurance and other fringe benefits, and contains confidentiality, non-compete and non-interference provisions. In the event the Company terminates the agreement without cause, Mr. Mishra is entitled to receive his then base salary for 12 months following the date of termination.

O’Neil Nalavadi

On October 11, 2009 the Company and Mr. O’Neil Nalavadi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, entered into a three year employment agreement (the “Agreement”) commencing on November 9, 2009. The Agreement was amended on November 8, 2012 to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional three years through October 8, 2015, and provides for Mr. Nalavadi’s continued employment by the Company post the Agreement term, for a period of time not to exceed six months, if notice of non-renewal of the Agreement is not provided to Mr. Nalavadi on or before May 8, 2015. The Agreement provides for annual base compensation of $240,000, subject to annual discretionary increases as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors; eligibility to receive a cash bonus for each calendar year in an amount to be determined pursuant to a written bonus plan which shall provide for a target bonus equal to 30% of Mr. Nalavadi’s base salary for the year; and stock options and/or other equity-based and/or non-equity- based awards and incentives as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors in its sole and absolute discretion. The Agreement also provides for indemnification, insurance and other fringe benefits and contains confidentiality, non-compete and non-interference provisions.

In the event Mr. Nalavadi’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause (as defined), death or disability, or Mr. Nalavadi resigns his employment for good reason (as defined), Mr. Nalavadi will be entitled to (i) an amount equal to his (A) Base Salary (as defined) and (B) any amount of Earned Bonus (as defined), to be paid in substantially equal payments over a period of 12 months; and (ii) the continuation of his (and as applicable, his dependents’) medical and dental insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 12 month period immediately following Mr. Nalavadi’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 12 month period, pay to Mr. Nalavadi an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 12 month continuation period); and (iii) have 25% of all Company stock options and all other Company equity and non-equity based awards and incentives and related compensation rights, or entitlements, but exclusive of any Bonus, to become vested (to the extent that 25% have not yet vested), and to the extent applicable, exercisable, regardless of the otherwise applicable vesting/exercise schedules in connection therewith, and be relieved to such extent of otherwise applicable transfer restrictions, lock-up or performance requirements and other restrictions and/or contingencies of any kind. In the event Mr. Nalavadi is terminated by the Company coincident with or within 12 months following the occurrence of a change-of-control (as defined), Mr. Nalavadi is entitled to receive (i) an amount equal to 200% of his (A) base salary and (B) Earned Bonus (as defined) to be paid in substantially equal payments for the 24 month period immediately following the date of termination; (ii) the continuation of his (and as applicable, his dependents’) medical and dental insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Nalavadi’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 24 month period, pay to Mr. Nalavadi an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 24 month continuation period); and (iii) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance requirements or other restrictions or contingencies on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based compensation awards, rights or entitlements.

In the event Mr. Nalavadi is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code at the time of his termination of employment, the payments referenced above shall be delayed until the date that is six months and one day following his termination of employment (or, if earlier, the earliest other date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code). The amount payable on such date shall include all amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Nalavadi prior to that date but for the application of Section 409A and the remaining payments shall be made in substantially equal installments until fully paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the six month delay shall not apply to any such payments made (A) during the short term deferral period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), or (B) after said short term deferral period, payable solely on account of an involuntary separation from service (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) and in an amount less than the Section 409A Severance Exemption Amount.

Outstanding Equity Awards at fiscal year-end 2014

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer at

December 31, 2014.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED 2014

The following table sets forth information regarding option awards exercised and stock awards vested during fiscal year 2014 for each of the named executive officers.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-OF-Control

Estimated Termination or Change-of-Control Benefits at Year-End 2014

The following table summarizes the estimated value of payments to each of the named executive officers assuming different termination events occurred at December 31, 2014.

Payments on Change-of-Control

Pursuant to Messrs. Abuhoff’s and Nalavadi’s employment agreements, a change-of-control shall be deemed to have occurred as of the earliest of any of the following events:

Upon the Company’s termination of Mr. Abuhoff’s employment coincident or following a change-of-control, Mr. Abuhoff will receive:

Upon the occurrence of a change-of-control without a termination of Mr. Abuhoff’s employment, Mr. Abuhoff will receive:

Upon the Company’s termination of Mr. Nalavadi’s employment coincident with or within 12 months following the occurrence of a change-of-control, Mr. Nalavadi will receive:

Upon the occurrence of a change-of-control without a termination of Mr. Nalavadi’s employment, Mr. Nalavadi will receive:

Payments on Termination (other than upon Change-of-Control)

Jack S. Abuhoff 

Pursuant to Mr. Abuhoff’s employment agreement, if Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death or disability, or Mr. Abuhoff resigns his employment for good reason (including the Company’s breach of its material obligations under the Agreement, the Company, without Mr. Abuhoff’s prior consent, relocating Mr. Abuhoff’s regular office location by more than 50 miles from its present location, the Company assigning duties to Mr. Abuhoff which represent a material diminution of his authorities, duties or responsibilities, or requiring him to report to any person or entity other than the Board of Directors, and the Company does not revoke or reasonably cure any such action within 30 days of receipt of notice from Mr. Abuhoff and Mr. Abuhoff resigns his employment within 30 days thereafter) Mr. Abuhoff will be entitled to (i) 200% of his (A) base salary and (B) the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of the his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in substantially equal payments over a period of 24 months; (ii) the continuation of his (and as applicable, his dependents’) medical and dental insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 24 month period, pay Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 24 month continuation period); (iii) the continuation of his life and long-term disability insurance for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination; (iv) payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation and (v) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity-based and non-equity-based awards and incentives. If Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated for death, his estate will receive payment of his base salary through the date of termination, a pro-rated bonus based on his performance of his objectives through the date of termination, and payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated for disability he will receive payment of his base salary for a 90 day period following the date of termination, a pro-rated bonus based on active duty with the Company and conditioned on attainment of quantitative objectives, and payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated for cause, Mr. Abuhoff will receive his base salary through the date of termination, and payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. In return for the benefits described above, Mr. Abuhoff is required to sign a separation agreement and general release, and agreed, for a 12 month period following termination of his employment, not to compete or interfere with the Company, and not to employ or retain the services of an employee of the Company.

In the event Mr. Abuhoff is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code at the time of his termination of employment, the payments referenced above (for both change-of-control and other than upon change-of-control) shall be delayed until the date that is six months and one day following his termination of employment (or, if earlier, the earliest other date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code). The amount payable on such date shall include all amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Abuhoff prior to that date but for the application of Section 409A and the remaining payments shall be made in substantially equal installments until fully paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the six month delay shall not apply to any such payments made (A) during the short term deferral period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), or (B) after said short term deferral period, payable solely on account of an involuntary separation from service (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) and in an amount less than the Section 409A Severance Exemption Amount. The Agreement also provides for potential tax gross-up payments in respect of taxes, penalties and/or interest that may be incurred by Mr. Abuhoff under Section 409A of the Code.

Ashok Mishra

Pursuant to Mr. Mishra’s agreement, if the agreement is terminated without cause or by Mr. Mishra with good reason (including the Company’s material breach of its obligations, reduction of base salary below the amount set forth in the agreement without Mr. Mishra’s consent, and assignment of duties to Mr. Mishra inconsistent with his position, and the Company does not reasonably cure such event after receipt of written notice from Mr. Mishra that he intends to resign his employment), he will be entitled to his base salary for 12 months following the date of his termination or resignation with good reason, any earned but unpaid incentive compensation, and payment for up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If the agreement is terminated due to Mr. Mishra’s death, his estate will receive payment of his base salary through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid incentive compensation, and payment for up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If the agreement is terminated due to Mr. Mishra’s disability he will receive payment of his base salary for a 90 day period following the date of termination, any earned but unpaid incentive compensation, and payment for up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If this agreement is terminated for cause, Mr. Mishra will receive his base salary through the date of termination, and payment for up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. In return for the benefits described above, Mr. Mishra is required to sign a separation agreement and general release, and agreed not to compete with the Company for a 12 month period following termination of his employment, and not to solicit the customers of the Company or to solicit or employ the services of an employee of the Company for a 24 month period following termination of employment.

O’Neil Nalavadi 

Pursuant to Mr. Nalavadi’s employment agreement, if Mr. Nalavadi’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death or disability, or Mr. Nalavadi resigns his employment for good reason (including the Company’s breach of its material obligations under the Agreement, the Company assigning duties to Mr. Nalavadi which represent a material diminution of his authorities, duties or responsibilities, or requiring him to report to any person or entity other than the CEO, or the Company no longer permitting Mr. Nalavadi to work from El Dorado Hills, CA approximately one week per calendar month, and the Company does not reasonably cure any such action or event within 30 days of the date of notice from Mr. Nalavadi and Mr. Nalavadi resigns his employment within 30 days thereafter) Mr. Nalavadi will be entitled to (i) an amount equal to his (A) Base Salary (as defined) and (B) any amount of Earned Bonus (as defined), to be paid in substantially equal payments over a period of 12 months; and (ii) the continuation of his (and as applicable, his dependents’) medical and dental insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 12 month period immediately following Mr. Nalavadi’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 12 month period, pay Mr. Nalavadi an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 12 month continuation period); (iii) payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation and (iv) have 25% of all Company stock options and all other Company equity-based and non-equity based awards and incentives and related compensation rights, or entitlements, but exclusive of any Bonus, to become vested (to the extent that 25% have not yet vested), and to the extent applicable, exercisable, regardless of the otherwise applicable vesting/exercise schedules in connection therewith, and be relieved to such extent of otherwise applicable transfer restrictions, lock-up or performance requirements and other restrictions and/or contingencies of any kind. If Mr. Nalavadi’s employment is terminated for death, his estate will receive payment of his base salary, any Earned Bonus (as defined), and reimbursement of all his incurred but unreimbursed reasonable business expenses, in each case through the date of termination, and payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If Mr. Nalavadi’s employment is terminated for disability he will receive payment of his base salary for a 90 day period following the date of termination, a pro-rated bonus based on active duty with the Company and conditioned on attainment of quantitative objectives, reimbursement of all his incurred but unreimbursed reasonable business expenses and payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. If Mr. Nalavadi’s employment is terminated for cause, Mr. Nalavadi will receive his base salary through the date of termination, reimbursement of all his incurred but unreimbursed reasonable business expenses and payment of up to six weeks’ accrued but unused vacation. In return for the benefits described above, Mr. Nalavadi is required to sign a separation agreement and general release, and agreed, for a 12 month period following termination of his employment, not to compete or interfere with the Company, and not to employ or retain the services of an employee of the Company.

In the event Mr. Nalavadi is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code at the time of his termination of employment, the payments referenced above (for both change-of-control and other than upon change-of-control) shall be delayed until the date that is six months and one day following his termination of employment (or, if earlier, the earliest other date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code). The amount payable on such date shall include all amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Nalavadi prior to that date but for the application of Section 409A and the remaining payments shall be made in substantially equal installments until fully paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the six month delay shall not apply to any such payments made (A) during the short term deferral period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), or (B) after said short term deferral period, payable solely on account of an involuntary separation from service (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) and in an amount less than the Section 409A Severance Exemption Amount.

QUALIFICATION BY REFERENCE

The matters described in the sections titled "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table" and "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-of-Control" are qualified in their entirety by reference to agreements previously filed by the Company in reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2014

Summary Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid or accrued to directors in fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 for service as a Director.

Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table

Each non-employee director is compensated at the rate of $2,500 per month, plus out-of-pocket expenses for each Board of Directors meeting they attend. Employees who are directors receive no compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional $833.34 per month, the Chair of the Compensation Committee receives an additional $500 per month and the Lead Independent Director receives an additional $500 per month. Directors do not receive any compensation for serving as a member of a Committee of the Board of Directors.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

The Company maintains a written policy and procedures for the review, approval, or ratification of any related party transactions that the Company is required to report under this section of the Proxy Statement. A related party, for purposes of the Company’s policy, means any (1) person who is or was (since the beginning of the last fiscal year for which the Company has filed a Form 10-K and Proxy Statement, even if they do not presently serve in that role) an executive officer, director or nominee for election as a director; (2) greater than five percent beneficial owner of the Company’s common stock; or (3) immediate family member of any of the foregoing. Immediate family member includes a person’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, and brothers- and sisters-in-law and anyone residing in such person’s home (other than a tenant or employee).

Under the related party transaction policy, any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of transactions, arrangements or relationships in which the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year between the Company and a related party must be approved by the Audit Committee, unless the transaction, arrangement or relationship is pre-approved under the policy.

As set forth in the policy, in the course of its review, approval or ratification of a related party transaction the Audit Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable to the Company than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

No director shall participate in any discussion or approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related party, except that the director shall provide all material information concerning the transaction to the Audit Committee and, if a member of the Audit Committee, may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at any meeting at which the transaction is discussed and/or approved.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2015, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of the Company's Common Stock based upon the most recent information available to the Company for (i) each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than five (5%) percent of the Company's outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (iii) each of the Company’s named executive officers, and (iv) all named executive officers and directors of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each stockholder's address is c/o the Company, Three University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

* Less than 1%.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors, certain of its officers, and any person owning more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s securities to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has procedures in place to assist its directors and officers in preparing and filing these reports on a timely basis. Based solely on a review of the forms filed, upon our records, and upon representations furnished by the Company’s officers and directors that no Form 5s were required, the Company believes that during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 all officers and directors complied with Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that one Form 4 for Mr. Jack Abuhoff for the exercise of stock options was filed late.

PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ON AN ADVISORY BASIS

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") enables stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Accordingly, you may vote on the following resolution at the 2015 annual meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby approved.”

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain individuals with the skills required to formulate and drive the Company’s strategic direction and achieve annual and long-term performance goals necessary to create shareholder value. Consistent with this philosophy, a significant percentage of the total compensation opportunity for each executive officer is based on measurable financial performance of the Company on an annual basis, and on the performance of the Company’s stock on a long-term basis.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement as well as the compensation tables and related narrative that follows it provides detailed information on the Company’s executive compensation programs and the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

Although this vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinion of the stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

VOTE REQUIRED

Election of Directors. Directors will be elected at the meeting by a plurality of the votes cast (i.e., the six nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected as directors).

Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors. The appointment of CohnReznick LLP as independent auditors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.

Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis. The compensation of the named executive officers will be approved, on an advisory basis, if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against such approval, whereas broker non-votes and shares not represented at the meeting will not be counted for purposes of determining whether such approval has been received.

EXPENSE OF SOLICITATION

The cost of soliciting Proxies, which also includes the preparation, printing and mailing of the Proxy Statement, will be borne by the Company. Solicitation will be made by the Company primarily through the mail, but regular employees of the Company may solicit Proxies personally, by telephone, facsimile or electronic communication. The Company will request brokers and nominees to obtain voting instructions of beneficial owners of the stock registered in their names and will reimburse them for any expenses incurred in connection therewith.

HOUSEHOLDING

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple shareowners who share the same last name and address and do not participate in electronic delivery will receive only one copy of the annual Proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of Proxy materials. If the household received a printed set of Proxy materials by mail, each shareowner will receive his or her own Proxy card by mail. We have undertaken householding to reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

If you wish to opt out of householding and continue to receive multiple copies of the Proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of Proxy materials at the same address, you may do so at any time prior to thirty days before the mailing of Proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of Proxy materials, which typically are mailed in May of each year, by notifying us in writing or by telephone at: Innodata Inc. Investor Relations, 3 University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, (201) 371-8000. You also may request additional copies of the Proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of Proxy materials by notifying us in writing or by telephone at the same address or telephone number.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING

Notice Required to Include Proposals in Our Proxy Statement

We will review for inclusion in next year's proxy statement shareholder proposals received by January 5, 2016. All proposals must meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement. Proposals should be sent to Innodata Inc., Three University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Notice Required to Bring Business Before an Annual Meeting

Our by-laws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders to make nominations of candidates for election as director or to bring other business before an annual meeting. Under these procedures, a stockholder who proposes to nominate a candidate for director or propose other business at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, must give us written notice of such nomination or proposal not less than 60 days and not more than 90 days prior to the scheduled date of the meeting (or, if less than 70 days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given, then not later than the 15th day following the earlier of (i) the date such notice was mailed; or (ii) the day such public disclosure was made). Such notice must provide certain information as specified in our by-laws and must be received at our principal executive offices by the deadline specified above.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC, excluding exhibits, is being mailed to you concurrently herewith. The exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K are available upon payment of charges that approximate our cost of reproduction by written request addressed to Investor Relations, Innodata Inc., 3 University Plaza Drive, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

OTHER MATTERS

The Company knows of no items of business that are expected to be presented for consideration at the Meeting which are not enumerated herein. However, if other matters properly come before the Meeting, it is intended that the person named in the accompanying Proxy will vote thereon in accordance with his best judgment.

PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. A PROMPT RETURN OF YOUR PROXY CARD WILL BE APPRECIATED AS IT WILL SAVE THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER MAILINGS.