UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.         )

Filed by the Registrant x   

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

October 26, 2007

To Our Stockholders:

We have scheduled a Special Meeting of Stockholders of Constellation Brands, Inc. for December 6, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. (local time) to be held at the office of the company located at 370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 300, Fairport, New York.

The meeting has been called in response to a situation created by recent changes in U.S. tax rules. The application of the new rules modifies the U.S. tax treatment associated with stock options under certain circumstances. Under the new rules, certain characteristics of our Class A Common Stock introduce the possibility that material additional income taxes may be imposed on recipients of our stock options who are subject to U.S. taxation and that the date on which such stock options are taxed may be accelerated. Such changes would significantly reduce the benefit that option recipients receive from our stock options without reducing our costs associated with the option program. Stock options are an important part of our company’s compensation plan and enable the company to continue to attract and retain talented, high-caliber individuals.

In response to this situation, we are proposing to implement changes to our capital structure and our option program to preserve the tax treatment of stock options that was applicable prior to the new rules. These changes include the creation of a new class of common stock and amendments to our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, both of which require stockholder approval. The changes being proposed will not affect the underlying economics of the company’s stock option program and will not increase the aggregate number of shares available for granting awards under the company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.

The accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe in greater detail the specific matters expected to be acted upon at the meeting. Given the limited purpose of the meeting and the technical nature of the matters to be acted upon, this meeting will not include the types of management presentations or amenities typically associated with our annual meetings.

Whether or not you attend the meeting in person, we would appreciate it if you would review the enclosed materials and support the proposals by submitting a proxy.

Very truly yours,

RICHARD SANDS

Chairman of the Board

CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD DECEMBER 6, 2007

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of Stockholders of CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) will be held in the Town of Perinton at the office of the Company located at 370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 300, Fairport, New York 14450 on December 6, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. (local time) for the following purposes more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on October 15, 2007 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

A Proxy Statement and proxy card or proxy cards are enclosed.

YOU ARE WELCOME TO ATTEND THIS SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON, BUT YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT UNLIKE AN ANNUAL MEETING THERE WILL BE NO PRESENTATIONS CONCERNING THE COMPANY AND ANY DISCUSSION IS INTENDED TO BE LIMITED TO THE PROPOSALS DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT AND RELATED PROCEDURAL MATTERS. IF YOU DO NOT PLAN ON ATTENDING THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD(S). YOU MAY RETURN THE PROXY CARD(S) IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

DAVID S. SORCE, Secretary

October 26, 2007

CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.

370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 300

Fairport, New York 14450

PROXY STATEMENT

SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the holders of the common stock of CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company. The proxies are for use at a Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company and at any adjournment thereof (the “Meeting”). The Meeting will be held on December 6, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. (local time) in the Town of Perinton at the office of the Company located at 370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 300, Fairport, New York 14450. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy cards are being first mailed to stockholders on or about November 2, 2007.

PURPOSE OF THE MEETING

In April 2007 the United States Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) adopted new regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The application of the new regulations creates the possibility of a change in the tax treatment associated with stock options relating to our Class A Common Stock that are granted by the Company to individuals who are subject to U.S. taxation. The consequences of such a change could include:

These consequences would significantly reduce the benefit that option recipients receive from the Company’s stock options without reducing the Company’s costs associated with the option program. If the alternate tax treatment applied, it might be necessary for the Company to substitute additional consideration to compensate for the reduced benefit received by recipients of stock options so as to maintain a comparable level of compensation. To the extent that the change in tax treatment causes a change in behavior so that option holders exercise options before they otherwise would in order to satisfy the accelerated tax obligation, it will deprive the option holders of a fundamental benefit of the stock options that are exercised prematurely—the ability to participate in the long-term appreciation in the value of the Company. Removing this long-term incentive will reduce the retention benefit sought to be gained by granting stock options, further frustrating the achievement by the Company of its objectives.

The potential for a change in tax treatment stems from a combination of the Company’s dual-class capital structure and broad language included in the new regulations. The Company’s dual-class capital structure is made up of its Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (“Class A Stock”), and Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (“Class B Stock”). Shares of Class A Stock have dividend features that do not apply to the Class B Stock, while the Class B Stock generally has ten votes per share compared to one vote per share for the Class A Stock. The unique dividend features of the Class A Stock are the right to receive cash dividends per share that are at least ten percent (10%) greater than any cash dividends declared and paid on the Class B Stock and the ability of the Board of Directors to declare and pay cash dividends on Class A Stock without declaring and paying cash dividends on Class B Stock. It is these special features that create the concern under the new regulations, even though the Company’s current policy is to retain all of its earnings to finance the development and expansion of its business and the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock since its initial public offering in 1973.

The new regulations impose the adverse tax treatment outlined above on options where the stock subject to the options does not satisfy certain criteria. One of these criteria is that the underlying stock may not have any “preference as to distributions.” While the Company does not believe that the dividend features associated with the Class A Stock are the types of rights that the IRS intended to capture with the “preferences as to distributions” language and that such language should be interpreted to not apply to the dividend features of the Class A Stock, it is possible that the dividend features of the Class A Stock could be construed to be preferences as to distributions within the meaning of the new regulations and could cause the Class A Stock to not satisfy the applicable criteria. The Company has sought clarification from both the IRS and the Treasury Department that the Class A Stock dividend features would not constitute preferences as to distributions, but neither was able to provide any formal or informal confirmation to that effect at this time.

Because of the importance of stock options to the Company’s overall compensation program, the large number of option holders who would be affected by a change in tax treatment and the magnitude of the aggregate potential tax liability to the affected option holders, the Company has determined that in light of the potential change in tax treatment it would be inadvisable to continue to grant stock options with respect to its Class A Stock to individuals who are subject to U.S. taxation. In order to continue to use stock options in its compensation program while maintaining the U.S. tax treatment that applied to options prior to the new regulations, the Company is proposing to (i) create a new class of common stock, Class 1 Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (“Class 1 Stock”), that is designed to satisfy the criteria specified in the new regulations and (ii) amend its Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan to permit awards under the plan to be granted with respect to the new Class 1 Stock. The Meeting is necessary because both of these actions require the approval of the Company’s stockholders.

The actions being proposed will not affect the underlying economics of the Company’s stock option program and will not increase the aggregate number of shares available for granting awards under the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. The sole purpose of the proposed actions is to prevent the features associated with the dual-class capital structure of the Company from inadvertently subjecting recipients of options subject to U.S. taxation to significant adverse tax treatment and thereby placing the Company at a disadvantage vis-à-vis similarly situated companies who do not have a dual-class structure with similar dividend features.

The new regulations initially allowed companies until December 31, 2007 to amend non-conforming options granted on or after April 10, 2007 so that they comply with the new regulations. To permit these amendments to be made and to avoid the need for the Company to

2

suspend making stock option grants in accordance with its past practices, the Company concluded that it was necessary to call the Meeting instead of waiting until next year’s annual meeting of stockholders to address these matters. On October 22, 2007, the IRS extended the deadline for the amendment of non-conforming options until December 31, 2008. This extension created the possibility of the Company waiting until its next annual meeting to address these matters; however, the Company is proceeding with the Meeting because in its view addressing the complications that would result from such a delay would be more onerous than holding the Meeting.

PROXIES

The shares represented by your proxy, if the proxy is properly executed and returned, and not revoked, will be voted at the Meeting as therein specified. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the proxy is exercised by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the Meeting and voting in person.

Unless you indicate otherwise, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted FOR the proposal to approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s certificate of incorporation (Proposal No. 1) and FOR the proposal to approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 2).

The outstanding common stock of the Company currently consists of Class A Stock and Class B Stock. Accordingly, the Company has enclosed with the proxy materials a Class A Stock proxy card and/or a Class B Stock proxy card, depending on the holdings of the stockholder to whom proxy materials are mailed. Stockholders who receive both a Class A Stock proxy card and a Class B Stock proxy card must sign and return both proxy cards in accordance with their respective instructions to ensure the voting of the shares of each class owned.

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation by use of the mail, directors, officers or regular employees of the Company, without extra compensation, may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, facsimile, Internet or electronic mail. The Company has requested persons holding stock for others in their names or in the names of nominees to forward these materials to the beneficial owners of such shares. If requested, the Company will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in forwarding these materials.

VOTING SECURITIES

The total outstanding capital stock of the Company, as of October 15, 2007 (the “Record Date”), consisted of 191,821,187 shares of Class A Stock and 23,808,138 shares of Class B Stock. Each share of Class B Stock is convertible into one share of Class A Stock at any time at the option of the holder.

Of the 191,821,187 shares of Class A Stock outstanding on the Record Date, 2,139,715 shares were held by CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Ltd. (ACN 071 346 506) (“CDN”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ASX Limited (ACN 008 624 691), the Australian Stock Exchange (the “ASX”). CDN has issued Constellation CHESS Depositary Interests (“Constellation CDIs”) that represent beneficial interests in the Class A Stock held by CDN. Constellation CDIs are traded on the electronic transfer and settlement system operated by the ASX. As of the Record Date there were 21,397,150 Constellation CDIs outstanding that were held by approximately 700 holders of record. All references in this Proxy Statement to outstanding shares of Class A Stock include the shares of Class A Stock held by CDN and all references to holders of Class A Stock include CDN.

3

Holders of Constellation CDIs receive all the economic and other benefits of actual ownership of Class A Stock at a ratio of ten (10) Constellation CDIs to each share of Class A Stock. Constellation CDIs can be converted to Class A Stock at any time at the option of the holder of the Constellation CDIs at a ratio of one (1) share of Class A Stock for each ten (10) Constellation CDIs. Holders of Constellation CDIs have the right to attend meetings of stockholders of the Company and to direct the vote of the underlying shares of Class A Stock represented by their Constellation CDIs. CDN, as the holder of record of the underlying shares of Class A Stock represented by the Constellation CDIs, will vote such shares in accordance with the directions of the holders of the Constellation CDIs. If CDN does not receive a direction from a holder of Constellation CDIs as to how to vote the underlying shares represented by those Constellation CDIs, those shares will not be voted and will not be considered present at the Meeting for quorum purposes. A holder of Constellation CDIs will be entitled to vote at the Meeting only if such holder directs CDN to designate such holder as proxy to vote the underlying shares of Class A Stock represented by the Constellation CDIs held by such holder. A form to be used to direct CDN how to vote underlying shares of Class A Stock represented by Constellation CDIs is being delivered with this Proxy Statement to each holder of Constellation CDIs.

Only holders of record of Class A Stock and Class B Stock on the books of the Company at the close of business on October 15, 2007, the Record Date for eligibility to vote at the Meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting and at any adjournment thereof. Under arrangements established between the Company and CDN in connection with the issuance of Constellation CDIs, the holders of Constellation CDIs are entitled to notice of and to attend the Meeting but may only vote at the Meeting as proxy for CDN in the circumstances described above. At the Meeting, the holders of Class A Stock and the holders of Class B Stock will vote together as a single class on all matters. Each holder of Class A Stock is entitled to one (1) vote for each share of Class A Stock registered in such holder’s name, and each holder of Class B Stock is entitled to ten (10) votes for each share of Class B Stock registered in such holder’s name. Therefore, holders of Class A Stock are entitled to cast a total of 191,821,187 votes at the Meeting and holders of Class B Stock are entitled to cast a total of 238,081,380 votes at the Meeting.

The holders of a majority of the outstanding aggregate voting power of Class A Stock (including the underlying shares represented by Constellation CDIs) and Class B Stock present at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum. Shares represented by proxies marked as abstentions will be counted toward determining the presence of a quorum. Proxies relating to shares held in “street name” by brokers or other nominees that may be voted with respect to some, but not all, matters without instruction from the beneficial owner (“broker non-votes”) would be counted as shares present for determining a quorum. However, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers and nominees are generally not permitted to vote with respect to Proposal No. 1 and Proposal No. 2 without receiving direction from the beneficial owner of Class A Stock or Class B Stock. Because there are no proposals with respect to which brokers and nominees are generally permitted to vote without receiving direction, the Company does not expect to receive any votes from brokers or nominees except where specifically instructed by the beneficial owner and therefore does not expect to receive broker non-votes with respect to either proposal.

The adoption of the proposal to approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s certificate of incorporation (Proposal No. 1) requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the Class A Stock (including the underlying shares represented by Constellation CDIs) and Class B Stock, voting together as a single class, with the holders of the Class A Stock having one (1) vote per share and the holders of the Class B Stock having ten (10) votes per share. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if applicable, will therefore have the effect of negative votes.

4

The adoption of the proposal to approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 2) requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting. With respect to this proposal, holders of Class A Stock (including the underlying shares represented by Constellation CDIs) and Class B Stock are entitled to vote as a single class at the Meeting, with holders of Class A Stock having one (1) vote per share and holders of the Class B Stock having ten (10) votes per share. Therefore, abstentions will have the effect of negative votes. However, because broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote, in the event that the Company receives any broker non-votes with respect to this proposal they will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

This section presents information concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock by certain individuals, entities and groups. Determinations as to whether a particular individual, entity or group is the beneficial owner of our common stock have been made in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Rule 13d-3, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares as to which such person: (i) directly or indirectly has or shares voting power or investment power, or (ii) has the right to acquire such voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The fact that a person is the beneficial owner of shares for purposes of Rule 13d-3 does not necessarily mean that such person would be the beneficial owner of securities for other purposes. The percentages of beneficial ownership reported in this section were calculated on the basis of 191,821,187 shares of Class A Stock and 23,808,138 shares of Class B Stock outstanding as of the close of business on October 15, 2007, subject to adjustment as appropriate in each particular case in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Beneficial Security Ownership of More Than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock

The following tables present, as of October 15, 2007, information regarding the beneficial ownership of Class A Stock or Class B Stock by each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Class A Stock or Class B Stock. Except as otherwise noted below, the address of each person or entity listed in the tables is c/o Constellation Brands, Inc., 370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 300, Fairport, New York 14450.

5

Class A Stock

Class B Stock

6

7

Beneficial Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The Board has established targets for the minimum amounts of our common stock that our non-management directors and executive officers should beneficially own. These targets for stock ownership consider the length of a director’s tenure on the Board or an executive officer’s tenure as an executive officer. Individuals have five years in which to reach their targets. Ownership targets can be satisfied through the beneficial ownership of Class A Stock or Class B Stock, vested stock options, and/or Class A Stock underlying Constellation CDIs.

The target for non-management directors is the beneficial ownership of two times the annual retainer fee paid to them. The target for executive officers is based on each officer’s position in the organization and is a multiple of annual base salary. The Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer each has a stock ownership target of four (4) times his annual base salary. Each of the other executive officers has a stock ownership target of two (2) times his annual base salary. As of October 15, 2007, each of our non-management directors and each of our executive officers had either met his or her respective target or was within the five-year window for doing so.

The following table sets forth, as of October 15, 2007, the beneficial ownership of Class A Stock and Class B Stock by our directors, the named executive officers (as defined under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Tables and Related Information” below), and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The table does not include shares of Class A Stock that are issuable upon the conversion of Class B Stock, although such information is provided in footnotes where applicable. Unless otherwise noted, the individuals listed in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares attributed to them.

8

9

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Philosophy and Objectives

As a leading international producer and marketer of beverage alcohol with a broad portfolio of brands across the wine, spirits and imported beer categories, we operate in a highly competitive and complex business environment on a global basis. The ability to attract, motivate and retain employees throughout the organization is critical to our long-term success in this environment. Accordingly, the objective of our executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain key executives by providing a compensation package that is competitive with the pay practices of other companies of comparable size, status, and industry.

As discussed in detail below, our executive compensation program consists of both fixed compensation (in the form of base salary) and variable compensation (in the form of cash bonus payments and equity awards). We have designed the elements of executive compensation to operate together in a manner that seeks to reward our executives for their respective abilities and day-to-day service, assistance with the achievement of annual goals and financial targets, and contributions toward long-term stockholder value.

Our fiscal year ends on the last day of February of each calendar year. Throughout this discussion, fiscal years are referred to by the calendar year in which that fiscal year ends. Accordingly, the fiscal year ending February 28, 2007 is referred to in this discussion as “fiscal 2007.”

How Executive Compensation is Established

The Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors discharges the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of executives, including the annual review and approval of executive officer compensation. Management personnel within our Human Resources Department support the Committee in its work. Executive officers, including the Chairman of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, may make recommendations or provide information to, or answer questions from, the Human Resources Committee as the Committee fulfills its responsibilities regarding executive compensation. In addition, the Committee has engaged Mercer Human Resource Consulting, Inc. to assist the Committee in its review and analysis of executive compensation data and to advise the Committee on matters relating to executive officer compensation. In addition to those services, Mercer is one of the companies that we use as consultants for other human resource matters that arise from time to time, and a company affiliated with Mercer provides administration and recordkeeping services to our 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan and similar services for certain of our benefit arrangements outside of the United States.

In making its compensation decisions for executive officers, the Human Resources Committee compares elements of compensation against a specific peer group of high-performing companies that we believe to be comparable in terms of business type, financial metrics (such as gross sales, net income or market capitalization) and performance. We periodically review and revise the composition of the peer group with the assistance of Mercer. The peer group used in setting the fiscal

10

2007 executive officer compensation amounts described in this Proxy Statement and used subsequently in April 2007 to set new base salaries and equity grants for fiscal 2008 consisted of the following companies:

In addition to its review of peer group executive compensation levels, the Committee also considers general executive compensation survey data provided by Mercer.

As discussed in more detail below, the Human Resources Committee generally reviews, adjusts and makes awards under the executive compensation program on an annual basis at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee, usually in early April. At that time, the Committee considers Company and individual performance, executive compensation information and benchmarking materials from Mercer, and compensation and benefit recommendations from management. Starting in April 2007, as part of this annual review process, the Committee also reviews a tally sheet setting forth and comparing current and proposed base salaries, cash bonuses, equity incentives, and perquisites. Compensation decisions may be made at other times of the year in the case of promotions, changes in responsibilities or new hires, such as when the Board appointed Robert Sands to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer effective on July 26, 2007.

The Human Resources Committee generally attempts to maintain an executive officer compensation program that will result in executive officers’ cash compensation approximating the midpoint of that provided by peer group companies. In determining long-term incentive grants, the Committee considers historical awards and the value realizable by executive officers from those awards as well as peer group and general survey group data. Due to the historical performance of our stock, the Committee has generally set long-term incentive awards which are below peer group median levels and which approximate general survey median levels. Overall, the combined cash compensation and long-term components of our executive officer compensation program approximate the 25^th percentile of the peer group and the median of the general survey group. This design requires that, for our executive officers to achieve the median level of total compensation for the peer group, our common stock must perform better than that of our peer group.

Since the Committee desires to keep a significant portion of our executive officers’ compensation at risk and based on performance and also desires to significantly align our executive officers’ interests with the interests of our stockholders, a significant percentage of annual compensation is allocated to incentive compensation in the form of annual cash bonus payments and equity grants. The Committee, however, does not have a policy regarding the specific allocation of compensation between long-term and currently paid out compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or regarding the allocation of different forms of non-cash compensation. Rather, the Committee determines the allocation based on its analysis of the various individual components of the compensation program.

11

Elements of Compensation

For fiscal 2007, the elements of executive officer compensation consisted of the following:

Base Salary

We set base salary for our executive officers to provide current compensation for the day-to-day services the executive officers provide during the fiscal year, taking into account their individual roles and responsibilities as well as their respective experience and abilities. The fundamental objective in setting base salary levels for our executive officers, as with all components of executive compensation, is to pay competitive rates to attract, motivate and retain high-quality, competent executives.

We generally seek to pay our executive officers cash compensation at the 50^th percentile of similarly situated executives in the peer group, but an individual executive officer’s salary may fall above or below the median. For example, based on the Committee’s assessment of his responsibilities, prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer Robert Sands received a base salary that exceeded the median salary of similarly situated executives in the peer group.

The Committee considers base salary adjustments on an annual basis as part of its comprehensive review of executive compensation matters, usually in early April. The Human Resources Committee may approve off-cycle base salary adjustments in the event of a new hire, mid-year promotion or other significant change in responsibilities. No named executive officer received such an off-cycle salary adjustment during fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2008, Robert Sands received an off-cycle salary adjustment upon his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer in July 2007. Fiscal 2007 salaries for our named executive officers appear in the Summary Compensation Table.

Annual Cash Bonus Awards

In addition to their base salaries, our executive officers, like other eligible members of management, have the opportunity to earn annual cash bonuses. The Human Resources Committee views annual bonuses as an integral element of the entire compensation package. Our Annual Management Incentive Plan serves as the primary mechanism for granting such annual bonuses. The Human Resources Committee administers this plan for executive officers in order to accomplish the following objectives:

12

The Human Resources Committee meets annually within 90 days of the most recently-concluded fiscal year to approve a specific program for executive officers under the Annual Management Incentive Plan for the new year and to evaluate performance and certify and approve awards for the recently-concluded year. Payouts for executive officers under the Annual Management Incentive Plan depend on three variables:

Specifically, the Human Resources Committee establishes individual bonus targets (based on a percentage of each executive officer’s salary) depending on the executive’s position and responsibilities with us. The Committee establishes these target award opportunities based on the following principles:

For fiscal 2007 the Committee used peer group data to generally benchmark each named executive officer’s bonus targets between the 25^th percentile and median of the peer group based on actual peer group payouts and at median relative to the general survey group based on actual survey group payouts. The Committee established the following Annual Management Incentive Plan bonus targets for named executive officers in terms of a percentage of base salary:

The Committee also establishes the performance measures on which payouts are based. The Committee may use one or more measures from a list of objective performance measures set forth in the plan. The Committee chooses measures that it believes will provide an appropriate link between the level of Company performance for a given year and the corresponding payout under the plan. To provide continuing incentives throughout the year and to minimize the risk of unanticipated outcomes, the Committee provides for a range of performance from a threshold level to a maximum level, as well as a target level of performance. Under normal circumstances, the threshold levels should be achievable, the target levels should be challenging, and maximum levels should be reserved for exceptional performance. We have paid bonuses to our executive officers under our Annual Management Incentive Plan in each of the five years prior to fiscal 2007.

13

Consistent with its recent practice, for fiscal 2007 the Committee determined that awards under the Annual Management Incentive Plan for each executive officer were to be based exclusively on operating income. For each named executive officer other than Mr. Berk, the targets were based solely on the operating income of the Company on a consolidated basis. Since Mr. Berk’s responsibilities relate primarily to our beers and spirits businesses, his targets were based upon a combination of our consolidated operating income and the operating income for our beers and spirits businesses. The specific operating income targets the Committee established for fiscal 2007 were based upon desired growth rates in our earnings as recommended by our management and agreed upon in collaboration with the Board of Directors.

The Human Resources Committee met in April 2007 to review performance under the Annual Management Incentive Plan, including the executive officer program thereunder, and to consider payouts to participants. Our overall operating income for fiscal 2007 exceeded the established operating income targets under the fiscal 2007 executive officer program. However, as required under the terms of the program, we made downward adjustments to these operating income results prior to determining payments. Specifically, the plan requires us to automatically adjust for acquisitions and other events that occur during the year. This adjusted performance did not meet or exceed the threshold operating income targets under the executive officer program for the entire company on a consolidated basis due primarily to market conditions in Australia and the United Kingdom. Consequently, we made no payment under the Annual Management Incentive Plan for fiscal 2007 to those executive officers whose pre-established performance metrics were based solely on our performance on a consolidated basis. As operating income of our beers and spirits businesses exceeded target levels of achievement under the plan even after giving effect to the downward adjustments that were made to reflect transactions, the Committee certified an award to Mr. Berk at approximately 90% of his salary. This amount appears in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

Also in April 2007 the Committee approved amendments to the Annual Management Incentive Plan to (i) expand the list of potential performance measures from which the Committee can select under the plan, (ii) increase the maximum award that we can issue under the plan, and (iii) clarify certain other provisions and definitions used in the plan. Our stockholders approved these amendments on July 26, 2007. In addition, the Human Resources Committee established the parameters of the executive officer program under the Annual Management Incentive Plan for fiscal 2008. While the bonus opportunity percentages remain unchanged for the named executive officers, the Committee decided to base fiscal 2008 awards on the basis of free cash flow as well as earnings before interest and taxes.

In addition to any payments under the Annual Management Incentive Plan, we have discretion to pay bonuses to our executives outside of that plan, including to our executive officers. Such payments might be paid to executives, for example, after the closing of a significant acquisition or other transaction. In April 2007 the Committee determined it equitable and appropriate to award such a cash bonus for fiscal 2007 to each executive officer. The Committee awarded these bonus payments in recognition of the dedication and significant efforts on the part of management, including the executive officers, to fulfill our initiatives throughout the fiscal year, including business integration of the assets acquired through the acquisition of Vincor International Inc., the expansion of the Company’s premium spirits business within the United States, and the geographic expansion of the Company’s wine business in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. After review, the Committee decided to award these cash bonuses based on a percentage of each executive officer’s salary and set

14

the named executive officer awards at 42% of salary for Richard Sands and Robert Sands, 24.5% of salary for Messrs. Summer and Mullin and, given his less direct involvement in certain of these activities, 4.9% of salary for Mr. Berk. In making its decision, the Committee took into consideration the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code regarding the availability of tax deductions with respect to performance-based compensation and recognized that at least part of these bonuses paid to Richard Sands and Robert Sands would not qualify for a tax deduction by the Company. These bonuses paid to the named executive officers for fiscal 2007 appear in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

Fiscal 2007 Executive Officer Awards

The Human Resources Committee (as well as the full Board of Directors) has the flexibility to award executive officers non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and other stock-based awards under our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Until June 2007 the Committee (as well as the full Board of Directors) also had the ability to award the executive officers incentive stock options under our Incentive Stock Option Plan. The use of equity-based awards, together with the ownership guidelines described below, directly ties the executives’ interests to the value and appreciation of our Class A Stock. These awards also assist in the retention of executives as they vest over a period of employment with us, usually one-quarter per year over four years. The Committee generally considers granting stock-based awards as part of its annual review of executive compensation, usually in early April, and also in connection with significant business activities, such as acquisitions, or events, such as new hires.

At its April 2006 meeting the Human Resources Committee determined it was important to retain stock options as a significant element of annual compensation and awarded non-qualified options to all executive officers. The Committee set the awards based on a formula that took into account the executives’ positions and salaries so that more senior executives received a greater portion of their compensation through these long-term incentives. In structuring these annual awards, the Committee considered the competitiveness of grants by reviewing the financial statement expense of grants at peer group companies as a percentage of salary. Consistent with its recent practice, the Committee also took into account the historical performance of our stock and set annual long-term incentive awards below the peer group median level. Specifically, the Committee approved grants which approximated the 25^th percentile of peer group awards and fell between the 25^th percentile and median of general survey group awards.

At its April 2006 meeting the Human Resources Committee also awarded special options to each of the named executive officers and certain other executives that would not vest unless the Vincor International Inc. acquisition concluded within a specific timeframe. As the transaction did close within the required timeframe, these additional options will vest one-quarter each year from the date of grant, which is the same vesting schedule as for the other fiscal 2007 stock option grants.

In April 2007 the Committee awarded an annual stock option grant for fiscal 2008 to our executive officers in a similar manner as well as special grants in recognition of the closing of certain business transactions. In addition, the Committee approved amendments to the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. These amendments, which were approved by our stockholders in July 2007, included an increase in the total number of shares available for grant under the plan and the number of awards

15

that we may grant to an individual participant in any year. After this stockholder approval in July 2007, the Committee granted to Richard Sands and Robert Sands options so that, after aggregating this additional grant with the annual grant the Committee awarded in April 2007, each officer would receive an amount consistent with what the April 2007 grant would have been if the previous limit on annual awards to an individual participant had not applied.

Equity Award Granting Practices

The Human Resources Committee grants annual option and other equity awards to executive officers at the regularly scheduled meeting at which it considers annual compensation-related actions and awards. This usually occurs in early April. The Committee generally grants new employee awards, awards, associated with promotions, and awards associated with merger and acquisition activity at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee, which may or may not be one at which other compensation-related decisions are made. We used this practice, for example, for the grant of options to Richard Sands and Robert Sands in July 2007. Under certain circumstances, the Committee may take action by written consent or the Board of Directors may approve an award. In addition, the Human Resources Committee has delegated to our Chief Human Resources Officer limited authority to grant stock option awards provided that (i) the recipient is no higher than the level of Vice President, (ii) any such award may not be for more than 5,000 shares of our Class A Stock, and (iii) the number of shares and the terms and conditions for such grants shall be consistent with the past practices of the Human Resources Committee. The Chief Human Resources Officer granted one stock option award under this authority in fiscal 2007. All stock option awards under our Incentive Stock Option Plan or our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan are priced as of the closing price of our Class A Stock on the date of grant.

The Board of Directors approves equity grants to the directors pursuant to our director compensation policy as described more fully below under the heading “Director Compensation.” The Board generally approves these annual grants to directors at the Board meeting immediately following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As directors serve annual terms, such grants are intended to coincide with the beginning of the term of office. For example, the Board approved fiscal 2007 equity awards for directors on July 27, 2006 following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held earlier that day. Similarly, the Board approved fiscal 2008 equity awards for directors on July 26, 2007. The Board may also grant equity awards upon the appointment of a new member of the Board as was done at the time of the appointments to the Board of Barry A. Fromberg in April 2006, Peter H. Soderberg in April 2007, and Mark Zupan in October 2007.

We do not backdate equity grants and do not time grants of equity so that they are intentionally made prior to the announcement of favorable information or subsequent to the announcement of unfavorable information.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In order to further align the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders, the Board has established targets for the minimum amounts of our common stock that our executive officers should beneficially own. In establishing these targets for stock ownership, we consider the length of an executive officer’s tenure as an executive officer. Individuals have five years in which to reach their targets. Ownership targets can be satisfied by the beneficial ownership of Class A Stock or Class B Stock, vested stock options, and/or Class A Stock underlying Constellation

16

CHESS Depositary Interests as described above under the heading “Voting Securities.” The applicable targets for our executive officers are as follows:

As of October 15, 2007, each of our executive officers had either met his respective target or was within the five-year window for doing so.

Other Benefits

Savings Plans and Health and Welfare Benefits

As with all employees, we offer our executive officers the following retirement savings opportunities and health and welfare benefits in order to help provide a reasonable level of support during and after employment with us and to attract, maintain, and motivate employees with a competitive benefits package:

Severance Benefits

Neither Richard Sands nor Robert Sands has an employment or severance agreement.

17

Thomas S. Summer has an agreement with us regarding his retirement in May 2007. We entered into this agreement to maintain Mr. Summer’s services and help ensure a smooth transition of Mr. Summer’s duties to his successor.

Alexander L. Berk has an employment agreement with Barton Incorporated, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, which originally predates our acquisition of that entity and provides for certain severance benefits. We believe the current agreement with Mr. Berk to be competitive and important in retaining Mr. Berk’s services.

We entered into an employment letter with Thomas J. Mullin in connection with his agreement to join the Company. We believe this agreement is competitive and was essential to gaining the services of Mr. Mullin.

More specific information concerning benefits and amounts payable to named executive officers in the event of a severance or change in control event are described below under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

Perquisites

We provide executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe to be fair, reasonable and competitive with those offered by comparable companies to their officers. The Human Resources Committee believes these benefits further its objective of attracting, motivating and retaining key executive talent and assist executive officers in dedicating the appropriate amount of time and attention to business initiatives.

We provide the following benefits to our named executive officers, which are quantified in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2007 (except as noted below or in the table):

18

Accounting Considerations

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

Effective March 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) requiring that we recognize in our financial statements the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions such as stock options. As with any significant change in accounting requirements, we and our Board of Directors have considered and continue to monitor the impact of this new standard. At this time, we continue to believe that equity-based executive compensation, including stock options, serves an important role in our executive compensation program design, and we have not significantly altered our compensation philosophy or award mix in light of this new accounting standard.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code provides that certain compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid to a company’s chief executive officer and four other most highly paid executive officers may not be deductible by that company unless it qualifies as performance-based compensation. The Human Resources Committee recognizes the benefits of structuring executive compensation so that Section 162(m) does not limit our tax deductions for such compensation, and our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, Incentive Stock Option Plan and Annual Management Incentive Plan have been designed so that the Human Resources Committee may award performance-based compensation that is not subject to the limits imposed by Section 162(m). Under certain circumstances, including those discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Annual Cash Bonus Awards” regarding cash bonus awards for fiscal 2007, the Human Resources Committee may decide to award executive compensation in an amount and form that is not deductible under Section 162(m).

19

Compensation Tables and Related Information

The following table sets forth the compensation paid or accrued by the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 (“fiscal 2007”) for services rendered in all capacities, by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers during fiscal 2007 (the “named executive officers”).

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2007

20

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits include an automobile allowance, personal use of corporate aircraft, complimentary product allowance, an expanded annual physical, and a club membership. The amount of these benefits provided to Richard Sands included $247,812 for the personal use of corporate aircraft, $2,745 for his automobile allowance and $6,386 for his product allowance. The amount of these benefits provided to Robert Sands included $217,041 for the personal use of corporate aircraft as well as $2,745 for his automobile allowance. The amount of benefits to Mr. Berk consisted of $5,640 for his automobile allowance, $4,200 for a club membership, and $3,309 for his product allowance. The aggregate amount of these benefits provided to Messrs. Summer and Mullin was less than $10,000 each.

Values noted above for the personal use of corporate aircraft represent the aggregate incremental cost to the Company for such use. The aggregate incremental cost of personal use of the corporate aircraft includes (i) the cost of fuel (using aircraft-specific average consumption rates per hour and aircraft-specific average fuel costs), (ii) ordinary aircraft maintenance (using aircraft-specific average maintenance costs per hour) and (iii) specific trip-related expenses including crew hotel and meals, on-board catering, trip-related landing fees, hangar and parking costs, and similar costs. Since Company aircraft are used primarily for business travel, the methodology excludes fixed, capital and similar costs. In instances where family members or guests fly on Company aircraft as additional passengers on business flights with an executive, the aggregate incremental cost to the Company is de minimis in amount, and no amount is reflected in the table for these additional passengers.

21

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007

22

Outstanding Equity Awards at February 28, 2007

None of the named executive officers had any stock awards outstanding as of February 28, 2007. The following table presents information concerning outstanding stock option awards to each of the named executive officers.

23

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2007

None of the named executive officers had any stock awards vest in fiscal 2007. The following table presents information concerning stock option exercises by each of the named executive officers in fiscal 2007.

24

Retirement Benefits

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, the Constellation Brands, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, to make available tax-favored retirement savings to all eligible U.S. employees, including the named executive officers. Additional detail regarding this plan is included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Savings Plans and Health and Welfare Benefits.”

Participants direct the investment of their accounts under the plan from an array of third-party managed investment options as selected by plan fiduciaries from time to time. All participants are 100% vested in their contributions, the 3% annual contributions and any earnings on these contributions. The Company’s matching contributions and supplemental profit sharing contributions, together with the earnings on those amounts, vest at the rate of 20% a year commencing on the first anniversary of the participant’s date of hire.

Based on its analysis of fiscal 2007 Company performance and, for employees of specific businesses within the Company, the performance of those specific businesses, the Human Resources Committee recommended and the Board of Directors awarded supplemental profit sharing contributions for fiscal 2007. Employees of the Company’s corporate group, including Richard Sands, Robert Sands, Thomas S. Summer, and Thomas J. Mullin, received a 4% supplemental profit sharing contribution. Employees of the Company’s beers and spirits businesses, including Alexander L. Berk, received a 4.17% supplemental profit sharing contribution. See footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table for additional information about Company contributions to the named executive officers.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

In addition to the Company’s 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, certain employees who reside in the United States, including each of the named executive officers, also are eligible to participate in the Company’s 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which is a non-qualified retirement savings plan designed to satisfy Section 409A of the Code. The 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and its predecessor plan, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (in which each named executive officer currently has a balance but to which no further contributions will be made), are designed to provide participants with the benefit of the Company’s 3% annual contributions and supplemental profit sharing contributions that could not be made to the 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan due to limitations prescribed by the IRS.

Once a year participants may direct the investment of their accounts under the plans from an array of third-party managed investment options that is similar to those offered under the Company’s 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, as selected by the plan fiduciaries from time to time. Contributions to the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan currently vest consistently with the vesting of the Company’s matching contributions and supplemental profit sharing contributions under the 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan.

For each of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, the Company contributed to the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan on behalf of each participant, including the named executive officers, a sum equal to the amount of his respective 3% annual contribution and supplemental profit sharing contribution that he would have received on the portion of his salary that exceeded the applicable IRS

25

limits. The Company pays these amounts shortly after approval by the Human Resources Committee at its April meeting. See footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table information about Company contributions to the accounts for named executive officers during fiscal 2007 and see the table below for additional information.

Named executive officers do not make contributions under the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, and there were no withdrawals by or distributions to any named executive officer during fiscal 2007 under that plan or its predecessor plan.

Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Employment Agreements

Neither Richard Sands nor Robert Sands has an employment agreement or similar arrangement. The other three named executive officers during fiscal 2007 have employment arrangements as summarized below.

Alexander L. Berk

Mr. Berk and Barton Incorporated (“Barton”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, are parties to an employment agreement that provides for Mr. Berk’s compensation and sets forth the terms and conditions of Mr. Berk’s employment with Barton. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Berk serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Barton. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer, Constellation Beers and Spirits.

The term of the agreement automatically extends for one-year periods expiring on the last day of February unless either Mr. Berk or Barton notifies the other that such party does not wish to extend it. The agreement will terminate prior to the expiration of the current term (i) upon Mr. Berk’s death or retirement, (ii) at Barton’s election, for cause or upon Mr. Berk’s complete disability, or (iii) at Mr. Berk’s election for good reason (all as set forth in the agreement). If Barton decides not to extend the term of the agreement, or if the agreement terminates by reason of Mr. Berk’s death, complete disability, or retirement, or at Mr. Berk’s election for good reason, Barton is obligated to pay to Mr. Berk a post-termination benefit equal to 100% of his then current base salary plus the amount paid to him under the Annual Management Incentive Plan for the immediately preceding fiscal year. If

26

Mr. Berk decides not to extend the term of the agreement, then Barton is obligated to pay to Mr. Berk a post-termination benefit equal to one-half of the foregoing amount.

In the event that Mr. Berk elects to terminate his employment for good reason, or Barton elects to terminate Mr. Berk’s employment for reasons other than death, complete disability, cause, or if Barton decides not to extend the term of the agreement, then Mr. Berk is entitled to be paid (i) a supplementary post-termination benefit equal to what he otherwise would have been entitled to receive as his share under what is now the 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan for the fiscal year in which such termination occurs if the plan is in existence and he would not be paid such amount under the terms of the plan itself and (ii) a prorated portion of his then current base salary based on the time remaining in the then current term of the agreement.

Post-termination benefits are payable to Mr. Berk in a lump sum as soon as practicable after his employment terminates, except that any supplementary post-termination benefit relating to the 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan is payable promptly after the Company makes its profit-sharing contributions under the plan for that fiscal year.

The agreement requires Mr. Berk to keep certain information with respect to the Company confidential during and after his employment with the Company.

Thomas S. Summer

On October 24, 2006 the Company entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Summer regarding his retirement. Pursuant to that letter agreement, which superseded Mr. Summer’s employment letter dated March 10, 1997, Mr. Summer agreed to continue to perform on a full time basis his duties as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until May 15, 2007 (the “Transition Date”) or the earlier appointment by the Company of a new Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Summer also agreed to assist in identifying a successor to his position. The agreement provided that, from the date of the letter agreement until the Transition Date, Mr. Summer would continue to receive his current compensation and benefits in accordance with the Company’s benefit plans. Mr. Summer retired from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on May 15, 2007. Robert P. Ryder assumed this position on the same day.

Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Summer will continue as an employee of the Company from the Transition Date through May 14, 2008 (the “Separation Date”) providing transitional assistance in person or by telephone or other electronic means as reasonably requested by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. During the period between the Transition Date and the Separation Date (the “Transition Period”), Mr. Summer will receive the base compensation that he was receiving on the Transition Date and will be entitled to the retirement and welfare benefits that are generally provided to employees consistent with the terms of such plans. He will not be entitled to bonuses, stock options or other incentive compensation during the Transition Period or for the fiscal years ending after the Transition Date, except that he had the right to and did participate in the annual option grants awarded in April 2007 and was paid a lump sum amount of $88,800 on the Transition Date. The Company agreed to consider increasing Mr. Summer’s compensation during the Transition Period if the demands placed on him become excessive.

After the Separation Date, Mr. Summer will not be entitled to receive compensation, severance or other benefits except as follows. He will be entitled to receive vested benefits under the Company’s retirement plans and stock incentive plans, reimbursement for business expenses properly incurred

27

before the Separation Date and rights as provided by law. All outstanding, unvested options will immediately vest on the Separation Date, and he will have thirty (30) days from the Separation Date to exercise vested stock options.

The parties may agree to accelerate the Separation Date from May 14, 2008 by mutual consent.

In consideration of the benefits provided under the letter agreement, Mr. Summer covenanted not to compete with the Company or solicit customers of the Company through the Separation Date unless the Company believes the competitive impact of his activities to be minimal or otherwise manageable.

Thomas J. Mullin

Mr. Mullin and the Company entered into an employment letter dated February 18, 2000. While the employment letter indicates that Mr. Mullin is an at-will employee of the Company, it provides that he will receive no less than 12 months of base compensation as severance arising out of a termination by the Company without cause, as determined in the sole discretion of the Company. Mr. Mullin’s right to the severance payment is conditioned upon his execution of the Company’s standard release and exit documentation.

Termination or Change-in-Control

Other than described above, the named executive officers during fiscal 2007 do not have employment, severance or change-in control agreements with the Company. The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would become payable under existing agreements, plans and arrangements if a named executive officer’s employment had terminated on February 28, 2007, based on the terms and conditions of the Company’s plans and arrangements, that named executive officer’s compensation, and the closing price of a share of Class A Stock, all as of that date. These benefits are in addition to the benefits generally available to salaried employees in the U.S., such as the Company’s 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, life insurance program, medical, dental and vision benefits, and disability benefits. As of February 28, 2007, none of the named executive officers was eligible to receive retirement benefits under the Company’s plans and arrangements.

Many factors can affect the nature and amount of the compensation and benefits that a named executive officer may receive upon a termination of employment. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, whether and when a named executive officer decides to exercise stock options and the Company’s stock price on that date, that named executive officer’s age and years of service, and the exercise of discretion by the Company’s Board of Directors or Human Resources Committee regarding the payment of compensation and benefits.

Severance Pay. The severance benefits contained in the employment agreements for Messrs. Berk, Summer and Mullin are described above under the “Employment Agreements.” Neither Richard Sands nor Robert Sands has an employment, severance or change-in-control agreement with the Company, and any severance benefits payable to them would be determined by the Human Resources Committee in its discretion. The following chart provides the severance payments named executive officers would have received under their employment agreements in the event of certain termination events as of February 28, 2007:

28

Equity Awards. The unvested equity grants to each of the named executive officers are described above under the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards at February 28, 2007.” The Company made each of these grants pursuant to the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Pursuant to that plan, no accelerated vesting would have occurred in the event of a termination as of February 28, 2007 in the event of a voluntary termination by a named executive officer, or an involuntary termination by the Company, whether with or without cause. In each of these instances, a participant, including any named executive officer, would have 30 days from termination in which to exercise vested awards (or, if earlier, until the option’s expiration date). In the event of death, disability or retirement, however, the unvested options of a plan participant, including any named executive officer, would vest and would remain exercisable for one year from such event (or, if earlier, until the option’s expiration date). Generally, unvested options will also vest under the plan in the event of a change-in-control. As of February 28, 2007, the named executive officers had unvested options with a value, based on the aggregate difference between the closing price of a share of Class A Stock on that day and the exercise prices of any in-the-money option grants, as follows:

Annual Management Incentive Plan Payments. The Company’s Annual Management Incentive Plan is described above under the heading “Annual Cash Bonus Awards” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The plan provides that, in the event of death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination without cause, the Company will provide to the participant a ratable portion of any payment approved for that fiscal year based on the performance and bonus targets established under the plan. In the event of a change-in-control, the performance period would end on the date of the change-in-control and performance targets would be adjusted to reflect the early termination of the performance period. Since February 28, 2007 was the end of the Company’s fiscal year, a named executive officer whose employment with the Company terminated as of that date for any reason would have received the appropriate annual payment for fiscal 2007 as determined in accordance with the plan. Actual payouts under the plan to the named executive officers for fiscal 2007 are set forth above in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans. The Company’s supplemental executive retirement plans are described above under the heading “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” In the event of

29

any termination of employment as of February 28, 2007, each named executive officer (or, in the case of death, the officer’s beneficiary) would be entitled to receive the value of his respective supplemental executive retirement plan account balances set forth above in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. In addition, because February 28, 2007 was the end of the Company’s fiscal year, each named executive officer would also have received the final Company contribution to the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which was approved by the Human Resources Committee in April 2007. These final contribution amounts were as follows:

The plans call for distributions of vested benefits to the named executive officers to be made by lump sum. Payments under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan would be made after the termination event, while payments to the named executive officers under the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan would be made six months after termination in compliance with Section 409A of the Code. The plans would automatically terminate, all participant accounts would vest, and the Company would make similar lump sum payments of account balances to participants in the event of a change-in-control as defined by the plans.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Company’s compensation program for members of the Board of Directors currently runs on an annual cycle commencing upon the first Board meeting following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and includes cash, restricted stock, and stock option components.

The cash component currently consists of (i) an annual retainer of $60,000, payable in quarterly installments of $15,000 at the beginning of each fiscal quarter; (ii) a Board meeting fee of $2,500 for each Board meeting attended (which includes regular, special and annual Board meetings and attendance in person or by conference telephone); (iii) a committee meeting fee of $1,500 per meeting attended (including by conference telephone); and (iv) an annual fee of $12,000 (payable in quarterly installments of $3,000) to the Chair of the Audit Committee and an annual fee of $9,000 (payable in quarterly installments of $2,250) to the Chairs of each of the Human Resources Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee.

Long-term incentive awards are another element of non-management director compensation. Long-term incentive awards in the form of, among others, stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock are available for grant under the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Each non-management director currently receives annually, if and as approved by the Board of Directors, a stock option grant and a restricted stock award. During fiscal 2007, the number of shares that could be subject to an annual option grant was not to exceed the number obtained by dividing $70,000 by the closing price of a share of Class A Stock on the date of the grant. This amount was increased to $140,000 in July 2007. The number of shares of restricted stock that may be awarded is currently calculated by dividing the sum of $40,000 by the closing price of a share of Class A Stock on the date of grant. While the Board has the flexibility to determine at the time of each grant or award the vesting provisions for that grant or award, historically stock option grants vest six (6) months following the date of grant and awards of restricted stock vest one (1) year from the date of grant.

30

Consistent with this compensation program, on July 27, 2006 the Company awarded a stock option to purchase up to 2,836 shares of Class A Stock to each of the non-management directors who then served on the Board, at an exercise price of $24.68 per share and with an exercise period of January 27, 2007 through July 27, 2016. On that same date each non-management director who then served on the Board also received 1,620 restricted shares of Class A Stock. On the date of these grants, the closing price of Class A Stock was $24.68 per share. Subject to applicable provisions in the award document, the restricted stock will vest on July 27, 2007, or earlier in the event a director resigns on account of disability. On July 28, 2007, the Company awarded its non-management directors stock options and restricted stock with respect to fiscal 2008 in accordance with its compensation program.

As Barry A. Fromberg joined the Board in April 2006 to fill a vacancy, in addition to his annual retainer, option grant and restricted stock award for the annual period commencing in July 27, 2006, Mr. Fromberg also received a prorated portion of the July 28, 2005 annual retainer, option grant and restricted stock award for the period from his appointment to the Board through July 26, 2006. Specifically, in addition to a prorated annual cash retainer, on April 4, 2006, Mr. Fromberg received a stock option to purchase up to 901 shares of Class A Stock at an exercise price of $25.89 per share and with an exercise period of October 4, 2006 through April 4, 2016 together with 514 restricted shares of Class A Stock which vested on April 4, 2007. On the date of these grants, the closing price of Class A Stock was $25.89 per share. Similarly, Peter H. Soderberg received a prorated portion of the July 2006 annual retainer, option grant and restricted stock award upon his appointment to the Board on April 4, 2007 and Mark Zupan received a prorated portion of the July 2007 annual retainer, option grant and restricted stock award upon his appointment to the Board on October 2, 2007.

The Company also reimburses its directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors. They also receive complimentary Company products having a value of up to $5,000 and are eligible to participate in a matching contribution program of the Company whereby they can direct a portion of the Company’s charitable contributions (not in excess of $5,000) in connection with their voluntary contributions to the Constellation Brands, Inc. Political Action Committee. As these donations are made in the name of the Company in an amount equal to the donations made by directors to the political action committee, this benefit does not represent compensation and is not reflected in the Director Compensation in Fiscal 2007 table set forth below.

The Company’s current non-management directors are Barry A. Fromberg, Jeananne K. Hauswald, James A. Locke III, Thomas C. McDermott, Paul L. Smith, Peter H. Soderberg, and Mark Zupan. The remaining two directors, Richard Sands and Robert Sands, who are also employees of the Company, receive no additional compensation for serving as directors. The Board of Directors is expected to consider director compensation at a future Board meeting, at which time the compensation paid to directors may be modified.

31

Director Compensation in Fiscal 2007