ThZeal - The Zeal

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS

				June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
				(Unaudited)

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash			$	170	$	242

		Total Current Assets			170		242

			Total Assets	$	170	$	242

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Accrued expenses			$	24,047	$	20,663

		Total Current Liabilities			24,047		20,663

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
	Preferred stock at $0.0001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized,
		none issued or outstanding			-		-
	Common stock at $0.0001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized,
		4,212,000 shares issued and outstanding			421		421
	Additional paid-in capital				92,710		83,710
	Deficit accumulated during the development stage				(117,008)		(104,552)

		Total Stockholders' Deficit			(23,877)		(20,421)

			Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	170	$	242

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.


SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							For the Period from
			For the Six Months		For the Six Months		March 25, 2008
			ended		ended		(Inception) through
			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011
			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Professional fees		$	12,383	$	13,245	$	107,332
	Officer compensation			-		-		7,500
	General and administrative expenses			72		-		2,176

		Total operating expenses		12,455		13,245		117,008

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES				(12,455)		(13,245)		(117,008)

INCOME TAX PROVISION				-		-		-

NET LOSS			$	(12,455)	$	(13,245)	$	(117,008)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE -
	BASIC AND DILUTED:		$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)

	Weighted Common Shares Outstanding -
		basic and diluted		4,212,000		4,212,000

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.


SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

			For the Three Months		For the Three Months
			ended		ended
			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Professional fees		$	4,019	$	5,700
	General and administrative expenses			36		-

		Total operating expenses		4,055		5,700

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES				(4,055)		(5,700)

INCOME TAXES				-		-

NET LOSS			$	(4,055)	$	(5,700)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE -
	BASIC AND DILUTED:		$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)

	Weighted Common Shares Outstanding -
		basic and diluted		4,212,000		4,212,000

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.


SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
For the Period from March 25, 2008 (Inception) through June 30, 2011

	Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value					Deficit accumulated
	Number of Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		During the Development Stage		Total Stockholders' Deficit
Balance, March 25, 2008 (Inception)	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.0001 per share upon formation of the Company	3,960,000		396		-		-		396
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share on May 7, 2008	4,000		1		999		-		1,000
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share between July 15, 2008 and September 25, 2008	92,000		9		22,991		-		23,000
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share between October 3, 2008 and December 15, 2008	80,000		8		19,992		-		20,000
Net loss	-		-		-		(48,563)		(48,563)
Balance, December 31, 2008	4,136,000		414		43,982		(48,563)		(4,167)
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share between January 12, 2009 and January 27, 2009	28,000		3		6,997		-		7,000
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share between May 29, 2009 and June 18, 2009	24,000		2		5,998		-		6,000
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share on July 2, 2009	24,000		2		5,998		-		6,000
Net loss	-		-		-		(28,644)		(28,644)
Balance, December 31, 2009	4,212,000		421		62,975		(77,207)		(13,811)
Contributed capital for the quarter ending June 30, 2010	-		-		7,000		-		7,000
Contributed capital for the quarter ending September 30, 2010	-		-		5,000		-		5,000
Contributed capital for the quarter ending December 31, 2010	-		-		8,735		-		8,735
Net loss	-		-		-		(27,345)		(27,345)
Balance, December 31, 2010	4,212,000		421		83,710		(104,552)		(20,421)
Contributed capital for the quarter ending March 31, 2011	-		-		9,000		-		9,000
Net loss	-		-		-		(12,455)		(12,455)
Balance, June 30, 2011	4,212,000	$	421	$	92,710	$	(117,008)	$	(23,877)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.


SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


							For the Period from
			For the Six Months		For the Six Months		March 25, 2008
			ended		ended		(Inception) through
			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011
			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss			$	(12,455)	$	(13,245)	$	(117,008)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
	operating activities
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Accrued expenses		3,384		6,245		24,047

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES				(9,071)		(7,000)		(92,961)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Sale of common stock			-		-		63,396
	Contribution to capital			9,000		7,000		29,735

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES				9,000		7,000		93,131

NET CHANGE IN CASH				(71)		-		170

Cash at beginning of period				242		280		-

Cash at end of period			$	170	$	280	$	170

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	-
	Taxes paid		$	-	$	-	$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

Silverhill Management Services, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

June 30, 2011and 2010

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS

Silverhill Management Services, Inc. (a development stage company) (the “Company”) was incorporated on March 25, 2008 under the laws of the State of Delaware. A substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved developing a business plan and establishing contacts and visibility in the marketplace. The Company plans to offer business support services to proprietors, entrepreneurs, and small business owners.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation – unaudited interim financial information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 and notes thereto contained in the information filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with SEC on March 31, 2011.

Development stage company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

The Company’s significant estimates include income taxes provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; the fair value of financial instruments; and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, and if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair value of financial instruments measured on a recurring basis

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:


Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of the instrument.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

It is not however, practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders due to their related party nature.

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Related parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d.principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involvedb. description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. mounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Net income (loss) per common share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive outstanding shares of common stock during the period.

There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the interim period ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.

Cash flows reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosures as follows:

Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.

Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number).

This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows:

Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities.

Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.

This Update also includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers' disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets (Subtopic 715-20). The conforming amendments to Subtopic 715-20 change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and provide a cross reference to the guidance in Subtopic 820-10 on how to determine appropriate classes to present fair value disclosures. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

In December 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”).Under ASU 2010-28, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative, an entity must assess whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. To make that determination, an entity should consider whether there are adverse qualitative factors that could impact the amount of goodwill, including those listed in ASC 350-20-35-30. As a result of the new guidance, an entity can no longer assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative, despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate goodwill is more likely than not impaired. ASU 2010-28 is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010, with early adoption prohibited.

In December 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-29 “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations” (“ASU 2010-29”). ASU 2010-29 specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments in this Update also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $117,008 at June 30, 2011with a net loss of $12,455 and net cash used in operating activities of $9,071 for the interim period then ended, respectively, with no revenues earned since inception.

While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to implement its business plan and generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Free office space from its majority stockholder and Chief Executive Officer

The Company has been provided office space by its majority stockholder and Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Common stock

The Company was incorporated on March 25, 2008 at which time 3,960,000 shares of common stock were issued to the Company’s founders at $0.0001 per share for $396.

On May 7, 2008, the Company sold 4,000 shares of its common stock in a private placement at $0.25 per share to one (1) individual for $1,000.

For the period from July 15, 2008 through September 25, 2008, the Company sold 92,000 shares of its common stock in a private placement at $0.25 per share to sixteen (16) individuals for $23,000.

For the period from October 3, 2008 through December 15, 2008, the Company sold 80,000 shares of its common stock in a private placement at $0.25 per share to fifteen (15) individuals for $20,000.

For the period from January 12, 2009 through January 27, 2009, the Company sold 28,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share to seven (7) individuals for $7,000.

For the period from May 29, 2009 through June 18, 2009, the Company sold 24,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share to five (5) individuals for $6,000.

On July 2, 2009, the Company sold 24,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share to three (3) individuals for $6,000.

Additional paid-in capital

For the year ended December 31, 2010, the majority stockholder of the Company paid professional fees of $20,735 in aggregate on behalf of the Company.

For the interim period ended March 31, 2011, the majority stockholder of the Company paid professional fees of $9,000 in aggregate on behalf of the Company.

Such payments have been shown as a contribution to capital and included in additional paid-in capital.

NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following information should be read in conjunction with (i) the financial statements of Silverhill Management Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation and development stage company, and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q together with (ii) the more detailed business information and the December 31, 2010 audited financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as amended and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2011. Statements in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical or current fact constitute “forward-looking” statements

OVERVIEW

Silverhill Management Services, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 25, 2008 and established a fiscal year end of December 31. It is a development stage Company.

We intend to enter the business of offering business support services and outsourced business processes to proprietors, entrepreneurs and small businesses in the United States. Our services will include project management, database and information storage, the creation of legally compliant business policies, document management services, and finance and accounting services. The Company intends to initially fulfill these services by employing labor in the United States, and then increasingly by employing lower-cost labor in developing nations such as the Philippines and India. We are not presently operational, but anticipate commencing operations provided we can raise additional financing of between $500,000 and $2,500,000. To date we have not been successful raising such funds but are currently seeking a source of financing. Our primary focus will be to hire management personnel in both marketing and business support services areas.

Going Concern

To date the Company has little operations and no revenues and consequently has incurred recurring losses from operations. Our independent public accounting firm has issued an opinion for Silverhill Management Services which includes a statement raising substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. No revenues are anticipated until we are able to implement our business plan.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the understanding of our financial results:

Basis of presentation

Development stage company

Use of estimates

Due to the limited level of operations, the Company has not had to make material assumptions or estimates other than the assumption that the Company is a going concern.

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Fair value of financial instruments



Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010; no gains or losses are reported in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the interim periods ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.

Revenue recognition

Income taxes

Net income (loss) per common share

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Cash flows reporting

Subsequent events

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosures as follows:

This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows:

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-13, “ Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades” (“ASU 2010-13”). This update provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010.

In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-21, “Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies” (“ASU 2010-21”) , was issued to conform the SEC’s reporting requirements to the terminology and provisions in ASC 805, Business Combinations , and in ASC 810-10, Consolidation . ASU No. 2010-21 was issued to reflect SEC Release No. 33-9026, “Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies,” which was effective April 23, 2009. The ASU also proposes additions or modifications to the XBRL taxonomy as a result of the amendments in the update.

In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-22, “Accounting for Various Topics: Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs” (“ASU 2010-22”) , which amends various SEC paragraphs based on external comments received and the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The topics affected include reporting of inventories in financial statements for Form 10-Q, debt issue costs in conjunction with a business combination, sales of stock by subsidiary, gain recognition on sales of business, business combinations prior to an initial public offering, loss contingent and liability assumed in business combination, divestitures, and oil and gas exchange offers.

In December 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”). Under ASU 2010-28, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative, an entity must assess whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. To make that determination, an entity should consider whether there are adverse qualitative factors that could impact the amount of goodwill, including those listed in ASC 350-20-35-30. As a result of the new guidance, an entity can no longer assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative, despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate goodwill is more likely than not impaired. ASU 2010-28 is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010, with early adoption prohibited.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

PLAN OF OPERATION

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

We anticipate that our current cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations, if any, will be insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months. We will require additional funds prior to such time and the Company will seek to sell additional capital through private equity placements, debt or other sources of financing. If we are unable to obtain sufficient additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of our business plan, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Additional funding to meet our requirements may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

Implementing our planned business operation is dependent on our ability to raise between $500,000 and $2,500,000 of additional capital after all offering expenses paid to a placement agent, attorneys, accountants and the like.

Our plan is to utilize such capital we raise in the next 12 months as follows:


		If a Net of $500,000 is Raised		If a Net of $2,500,000 is Raised

Renting and Furnishing Offices	$	100,000	$	250,000

Equipment	$	80,000	$	300,000

Officer Salaries	$	100,000	$	350,000

Marketing Expense	$	120,000	$	850,000

Working Capital	$	100,000	$	750,000

The foregoing are estimates only and any funds may be reallocated based upon management’s evaluation of then existing conditions. We have no current plans on how to raise the additional funding. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to proceed with the foregoing plans.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010

We recorded no revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. For the period from March 25, 2008 (inception) through June 30, 2011, we recorded no revenues.

Operating expenses, consisting solely of professional fees and general and administrative expenses in the interim period ended June 30, 2011 consist of $36 in general and administrative expenses, as compared to $0 in general and administrative expenses for the period ended June 30, 2010; $1,500 in accounting and auditing fees, as compared to $0 in accounting and auditing fees for the period ended June 30, 2010; and $783.75 in legal fees, as compared to $5,700 in legal fees for the period ended June 30, 2010. For the period from March 25, 2008 (inception) through June 30, 2011, we incurred operating expenses of $117,008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2011, we had a cash balance of $170. We do not have sufficient cash on hand to commence our plan of operation for the next 12 months or to fund our ongoing operational expenses beyond 12 months. We will need to raise funds to commence our plan of operation and fund our ongoing operational expenses. Additional funding will likely come from equity financing from the sale of our common or preferred stock. If we are successful in completing an equity financing, existing shareholders will experience dilution of their interest in our Company. We do not have any financing arranged and we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund our plan of operation and ongoing operational expenses. In the absence of such financing, our business will likely fail. There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to complete our plan of operation and our business will fail.

Subsequent Events

None through date of this filing.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer are responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures means that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, including any consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30, 2011. Our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective at the reasonable assurance level due to the two material weaknesses described below:

(i) We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the interim period ended June 30, 2011. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

(ii) We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is not currently subject to any legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company may become subject to litigation or proceedings in connection with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant. There are no such pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 1A.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation SK.


Number		Description

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation*
3.2		Bylaws*
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-1 (file no. 333-161052), filed with the Commission on August 5, 2009.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
	(Name of Registrant)

Date: August 10, 2011	By:	/s/ Emily Lussier
		Name: Emily Lussier
		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Number		Description

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation*
3.2		Bylaws*
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-1 (file no. 333-161052), filed with the Commission on August 5, 2009.


Delaware	26-2274999
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)


Large accelerated filer	.	Accelerated filer	.
Non-accelerated filer	. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	X .


Index			Page

Part I.	Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and June 30, 2010.	6

		Statements of Operations for the Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and the period from March 25, 2008 (Inception) to June 30, 2011 (unaudited).	7

		Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) from Inception (March 25, 2008) to June 30, 2011 (unaudited).	9

		Statements of Cash Flow for the Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and for the period from March 25, 2008 (Inception) through June 30, 2011 (unaudited).	10

		Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited).	11

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	17

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	22

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	22

Part II.	Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	23

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	23

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	23

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	23

	Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved).	23

	Item 5.	Other Information.	23

	Item 6.	Exhibits.	23

Signatures			23


Contents	Page(s)


Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010	6

Statements of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011and 2010 and for the Period from March 25, 2008 (Inception) through June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)	7

Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011and 2010 (Unaudited)	8

Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Period from March 25, 2008 (Inception) through June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)	9

Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011and 2010 and for the Period from March 25, 2008 (Inception) through June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)	10

Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)	11